{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":10,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"d345a2a077ea","filters":{"venue":"Computer law & security review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1992489658","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2012.07.009","title":"Trust in digital records: An increasingly cloudy legal area","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Digital and Cyber Forensics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Realm; Cloud computing; Competence (human resources); Digital forensics; Computer science; Public trust; Internet privacy; Computer security; Data science; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01859536251421178,"gpt":0.2446484716850637,"spread":0.2260531091708519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053722,0.0003230936,0.0005692395,0.00004631741,0.00008289677,0.0007149341,0.001250395,0.00007489765,0.00001603861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002267461,0.0002819683,0.0001800698,0.0005492537,0.0001117176,0.005528495,0.0007135281,0.0002793668,0.0001976064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006512907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005149119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001148852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006952083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997839,0.00009903526,0.0005589207,0.0005172744,0.0003408898,0.0006449279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983566,0.00006104793,0.0001388119,0.0009626692,0.00009545195,0.0003854492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004559161,0.0006926688,0.002637089,0.0004542179,0.00001677376,0.00004625368,0.0003987825,0.000001035377,3.825594e-7,0.6294221,0.003913272,0.3624128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004695532,0.0002757953,0.001682307,0.002509407,0.00002425627,0.0004371034,0.000006326921,0.004857947,0.00001517154,0.02588223,0.9629379,0.0009020282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3869832,0.2049296,0.09098532,0.003835771,0.009880682,0.003801342,0.0001467571,0.002535568,0.2969017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831362,0.001909341,0.007149532,0.006985276,0.0006264301,0.00002491705,0.00006289743,0.00002959616,0.00007578267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889893970","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2018.08.005","title":"The contemporary cybercrime ecosystem: A multi-disciplinary overview of the state of affairs and developments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Council on Graduate Studies, Council of Ontario Universities","keywords":"Cybercrime; Terminology; Malware; Cryptocurrency; Computer security; Discipline; Computer science; Political science; Law; The Internet; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05982285409282866,"gpt":0.3090919492510961,"spread":0.2492690951582675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009797491,0.0002316437,0.0005793736,0.00001810111,0.0004134981,0.00005400387,0.001258446,0.00002895695,0.000003469704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001600883,0.0001278406,0.0001700455,0.0003396569,0.0003841655,0.0002670406,0.002388284,0.0001198821,0.00001228786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002301474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009813744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001568565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007707996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979429,0.0003032213,0.0008064908,0.0003553454,0.0003375982,0.0002544329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982544,0.0001650899,0.0003565271,0.0009018666,0.0002562152,0.00006592103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005350884,0.0008487466,0.002166756,0.0336266,0.001448335,0.00002236839,0.02289432,0.000003158417,0.0001197403,0.6488369,0.05576402,0.2342156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001798817,0.0005835522,0.01382508,0.0303604,0.0001783476,0.00007748516,0.00007499984,0.003581626,0.00201634,0.00909401,0.9373948,0.001014548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0200096,0.9352862,0.01455356,0.003353706,0.00226229,0.004163259,0.00005890131,0.0001728086,0.02013964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958492,0.03720348,0.002937764,0.00115701,0.00005854167,0.00003468421,0.000002316659,0.00001343395,0.0001007383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.521319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403854526","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106067","title":"Addressing the risks of generative AI for the judiciary: The accountability framework(s) under the EU AI Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"Horizon 2020","keywords":"Accountability; Generative grammar; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2134091632221657,"gpt":0.410200612614637,"spread":0.1967914493924713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003215917,0.0003339487,0.0005025013,0.00001445172,0.001163371,0.001044963,0.003503109,0.0001104775,0.00009040628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001403995,0.0001143286,0.0005201263,0.000664296,0.001033543,0.0005440682,0.001045231,0.001035978,0.00004244532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006415862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002260356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000320271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001311547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968272,0.00100598,0.0006168826,0.000627973,0.0005011612,0.0004207897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932439,0.004159651,0.0001719749,0.002019072,0.0003475695,0.00005786507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007640122,0.0000722839,0.000003425669,0.0008223983,0.0002375952,0.000001197617,0.005157051,0.0001053394,0.000005615151,0.761896,0.14079,0.09090143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006619364,0.00007636034,0.00003587844,0.002067934,0.0001557604,0.00002028157,0.00003025561,0.2409647,0.0001347937,0.1311878,0.6250611,0.000198959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006918512,0.2185307,0.6540377,0.1232443,0.001493916,0.001784788,0.00001648621,0.0001072173,0.0007156904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7696906,0.02890032,0.00211698,0.1975486,0.001417652,0.0002580999,0.000005198891,0.00003737186,0.00002524983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7696214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645362015","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2015.05.010","title":"Two concepts of privacy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Privacy by Design; Information privacy; Privacy law; Damages; The Right to Privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Statute; Information privacy law; Law; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07035984786143314,"gpt":0.3788272074990175,"spread":0.3084673596375844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001750358,0.0001461844,0.0004489334,0.00002329661,0.0001870944,0.00005980878,0.0009279634,0.00007292371,0.0001074247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000323599,0.0001383601,0.0001352742,0.000336739,0.0003925127,0.0004770498,0.0005493579,0.0001886484,0.0001363234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007554168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002066517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002774862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006002373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978859,0.0006324576,0.0004113868,0.0002990617,0.0004810608,0.000290093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985056,0.00007629712,0.0002161766,0.0006270219,0.0003091868,0.0002657148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001238339,0.000255628,0.000265043,0.00182482,0.00003960194,0.00001069889,0.01146492,7.572052e-7,0.000005417384,0.843415,0.09206633,0.05063938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003619118,0.00006367959,0.00001996879,0.0009944753,0.00003414085,0.000004454895,0.00005341567,0.00005564509,0.00003546905,0.03852057,0.9596854,0.0001708177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01433774,0.7385742,0.01493937,0.02182023,0.006601756,0.006173024,0.0001333325,0.001005877,0.1964145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070348,0.07499852,0.008041919,0.007403253,0.002269891,0.00006324056,0.00007833554,0.0000315953,0.00007845268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.892697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5642161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076809214","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2010.09.005","title":"From music tracks to Google maps: Who owns computer-generated works?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Intervention (counseling); Digital content; Computer science; Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Advertising; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02585605246933102,"gpt":0.2324145259575395,"spread":0.2065584734882085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004091024,0.0004521895,0.0007967895,0.00008541391,0.0002852538,0.001100772,0.0009076173,0.0001489642,0.007542551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003741558,0.0003469517,0.0002745704,0.0007507432,0.00008967959,0.001232139,0.0007041293,0.0006168188,0.004446111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002291635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002370912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001189504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00123076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977326,0.00004537457,0.0006418316,0.0007689844,0.0003117087,0.0004995235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984669,0.00007391259,0.0001961052,0.0008207472,0.0003581099,0.00008421204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001276107,0.0001498002,0.00001685601,0.0007806927,0.00004537226,0.00001610717,0.0001698393,0.00000280349,0.0001027825,0.004225925,0.8284974,0.1659797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000287297,0.00002803476,0.00006373318,0.002810516,0.00009237556,0.000004032676,0.000002743219,0.03300042,0.00005047194,0.00233264,0.9607974,0.0005303993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3451513,0.1558425,0.07426726,0.04735434,0.0520598,0.0151115,0.000209926,0.005783313,0.3042201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6608496,0.004886055,0.01128261,0.273915,0.04694975,0.0001679775,0.001057586,0.0002580175,0.0006334448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3156983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412749698","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106165","title":"LLMs for legal reasoning: A unified framework and future perspectives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Science and Technology Corporation; University of Alberta","keywords":"Computer science; Cognitive science; Political science; Management science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Economics; Engineering; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02262538499452199,"gpt":0.3718845777185107,"spread":0.3492591927239887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008630437,0.0001623595,0.0003904511,0.00002447076,0.0007240577,0.0002122717,0.0003808924,0.0001565539,0.00008899932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002036902,0.0001520899,0.0001530272,0.0003878354,0.0005676211,0.0002386789,0.0001171945,0.0002633227,0.00001318339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007436112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001377011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000510917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008519766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985272,0.0002594038,0.0002887751,0.0004162796,0.0001840335,0.0003242632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998879,0.000379128,0.00009179092,0.0002950205,0.0002431484,0.0001119151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005778556,0.00003762925,0.00002029724,0.0004632249,0.0000230073,0.000001746335,0.005340641,2.345414e-7,2.888189e-7,0.9618584,0.005220247,0.02702853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003316689,0.00002915465,0.00001267867,0.001943393,0.00004776901,0.000001035648,0.001067298,0.0001145355,0.000007325277,0.1109475,0.8856497,0.0001464119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001885559,0.6706626,0.06510896,0.1054652,0.003601358,0.004443001,0.00002745799,0.0005466618,0.1482591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4266878,0.4466436,0.07691643,0.03782432,0.009879689,0.0004102463,0.00002360308,0.00007405961,0.00154024],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8804294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6202045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121471626","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105524","title":"South Africa's PNR regime: Privacy and data protection","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Data Protection Act 1998; International trade; Business; Geography; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09049200405618141,"gpt":0.3492199966627759,"spread":0.2587279926065945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001166537,0.0001636089,0.0003969186,0.00001434683,0.0004522914,0.0002600735,0.0008345182,0.0000982778,0.0001465383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003311662,0.0001557361,0.00006910834,0.0005025936,0.000312887,0.0004853964,0.001213145,0.0002935283,0.0001335158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004983519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001517244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001370377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975744,0.0006869641,0.0003134649,0.0006661072,0.0004166028,0.0003424512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981816,0.00007491033,0.0001410329,0.001220788,0.000186648,0.0001950218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001235879,0.0003791066,0.0002446399,0.007929898,0.0001760593,0.000242339,0.3049047,5.825775e-7,0.000009927885,0.4397659,0.07309999,0.1732345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001084861,0.00001621484,0.00001205327,0.001140459,0.00006086525,0.000006908823,0.0000843462,0.0001134168,0.000004466965,0.003179228,0.9950824,0.0001911255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005941399,0.8913192,0.005954158,0.01749419,0.001504159,0.002397873,0.00008510839,0.0005474843,0.08010375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8701183,0.09019689,0.02617249,0.007192187,0.003803282,0.0001275544,0.0001594398,0.00008100824,0.002148799],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9219825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6350733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404125522","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106075","title":"Digital transformation in Russia: Turning from a service model to ensuring technological sovereignty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Economic and Technological Developments in Russia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Digital transformation; Transformation (genetics); Service (business); Computer security; Business; Computer science; Process management; Political science; Law; Marketing; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03372775000532822,"gpt":0.2930001628103031,"spread":0.2592724128049749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005057271,0.000155753,0.0003308543,0.00005171999,0.0001451395,0.0002513221,0.0004611464,0.000191348,0.0001178099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003265046,0.0001306549,0.00008130438,0.0004995496,0.00009308965,0.0005157564,0.0001831109,0.0003776347,0.0002482093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001719298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006087926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009737539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002274461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998683,0.00005382621,0.0004147412,0.0003779734,0.0001686184,0.0003018449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995855,0.00009669153,0.00003764733,0.000168354,0.00002114338,0.00009062986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001357508,0.00002638457,0.0000376952,0.0003146241,0.00001124198,0.0000126832,0.001512559,0.00004217834,9.452713e-7,0.8172036,0.0001810762,0.1806556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001629079,0.00002093532,0.0001397363,0.007780038,0.00002118873,0.00000411593,0.0001315384,0.0320669,0.00001934911,0.4134622,0.5456929,0.0004982392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1799629,0.0815519,0.08677322,0.05774128,0.001067545,0.004061726,0.0001950801,0.004572695,0.5840736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862787,0.006361832,0.004150909,0.003046773,0.00006294325,0.00004702982,0.00002006127,0.000009128207,0.00002261317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5327953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149840872","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105536","title":"Government procurement law and hacking technology: The role of public contracting in regulating an invisible market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Procurement; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Public sector; Purchasing; Private sector; Government (linguistics); Business; Government procurement; Law and economics; Economics; Computer security; Marketing; Law; Political science; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01975109647248252,"gpt":0.2444721766482312,"spread":0.2247210801757487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805339,0.0002064035,0.0004256996,0.00005004185,0.000207883,0.0003786712,0.0003803853,0.00007120612,0.00007715496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010457,0.0001657605,0.00006743558,0.0006773153,0.0001151461,0.001256162,0.0007051444,0.0002627026,0.000003893416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005171888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003376004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002735395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000961541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982432,0.00008009734,0.0005580477,0.0003673867,0.0003855105,0.0003657856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988779,0.00005846852,0.0004184322,0.0004292997,0.0001936182,0.00002229362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003207211,0.0001541577,0.0110839,0.002443325,0.00003792717,0.000005004355,0.00007932106,6.95865e-7,0.00009674124,0.8843933,0.0006147234,0.1010877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325759,0.00001422098,0.0008916883,0.003030928,0.00006428424,0.00001219896,0.0001336253,0.005212363,0.0002180726,0.03086443,0.95886,0.0002655639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1242302,0.3992358,0.0005705311,0.07981855,0.0007044757,0.005064355,0.00001962196,0.0006281894,0.3897283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829557,0.001728485,0.000671118,0.01408737,0.0004550187,0.00005437999,0.00001500748,0.00002122795,0.00001167823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6759516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403996806","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106068","title":"Techno-authoritarianism &amp; copyright issues of user-generated content on social- media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer law & security review","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Social media; Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer science; User-generated content; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Law; Democracy; Mathematics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0955047920423915,"gpt":0.3025517772730972,"spread":0.2070469852307057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007598096,0.0003748157,0.0008647348,0.00007823392,0.000199387,0.000316927,0.001516735,0.0001688515,0.000245234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006149286,0.0002675334,0.0003409651,0.0007754313,0.0002958029,0.0004523366,0.0005069007,0.0004229692,0.000641643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000751273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001014421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001087477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007034114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971766,0.0002994296,0.0007699458,0.0007900727,0.0005514307,0.0004124515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983121,0.0002360884,0.0001266883,0.0008474994,0.0003342774,0.0001433429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003392368,0.0001317818,4.108965e-7,0.001659413,0.00007782213,0.00002414343,0.001517061,6.05248e-7,0.0002443019,0.7172349,0.241052,0.03805414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001433952,0.0001380147,0.000004184853,0.003862993,0.00005142828,0.00002618358,0.000002559057,0.006211697,0.00257723,0.01140597,0.9751908,0.0003855789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001673892,0.6920184,0.2442065,0.03195595,0.01017577,0.002817933,0.0001185805,0.003021504,0.01401149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5805618,0.2850599,0.08579697,0.03734694,0.005946158,0.0003133528,0.0003652391,0.0003125164,0.004297147],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7341387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}