{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":246,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":246,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"94ddb7ec7fc7","filters":{"venue":"Conservation Genetics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2129355519","doi":"10.1007/s10592-009-0044-5","title":"Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":477,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Social Fund","keywords":"Biology; Conservation genetics; Conservation biology; Population genetics; Inference; Approximate Bayesian computation; Pairwise comparison; Ecology; Biodiversity; Landscape connectivity; Evolutionary biology; Population; Genetics; Computer science; Biological dispersal; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02108401851851736,"gpt":0.2764633461630773,"spread":0.2553793276445599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001725996,0.0001333401,0.0001460977,0.00006611633,0.00004126817,0.000008894312,0.0001592866,0.0002448164,0.0000181622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006430272,0.0001436987,0.00002740935,0.0001051616,0.000264125,0.000002761992,0.00007323615,0.0001105343,0.000002153856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000227387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009777326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001306668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003370766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991143,0.0000511141,0.000312415,0.0002968391,0.00007237836,0.0001529969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992439,0.00005021325,0.0001346277,0.0003451864,0.0001667041,0.00005941488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997114,0.0001200391,0.6769808,0.00009877282,0.00003421313,1.190995e-7,0.0003070971,0.0001028271,0.2424236,0.02772628,0.0003732716,0.05179295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081567,0.0002454673,0.8666801,0.00001001896,0.00002037909,0.000007254583,0.0001960546,0.0003511604,0.02348391,0.006606958,0.1013557,0.0002272878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838841,0.008023567,0.006019711,0.000800498,0.0001285683,0.0003523837,0.00003002883,0.000009318118,0.0007518443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967518,0.002972399,0.02878398,0.0003253385,0.0001274552,0.0000664313,0.0001162421,0.00001652891,0.00007367726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2189397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5859862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075010183","doi":"10.1007/s10592-012-0425-z","title":"Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":470,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council; Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia; National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility","keywords":"Revegetation; Biodiversity; Climate change; Ecosystem services; Biodiversity hotspot; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Population; Habitat; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Biology; Environmental science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02791194584345695,"gpt":0.2423855177223797,"spread":0.2144735718789228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002185418,0.00007328162,0.00006535244,0.00003149785,0.00007804454,0.00003058846,0.00004025921,0.00004196896,0.0004809455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001996021,0.0000777222,0.00001133476,0.0001653719,0.00003954828,0.0001815481,0.00004366202,0.00003289945,0.0000360083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001513816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006209435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002267233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002917986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994009,0.00001861671,0.0001357617,0.0001264631,0.00009524902,0.0002230473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997752,0.00002882416,0.00006417516,0.00008164953,0.00000764984,0.00004249291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001109623,0.00005113078,0.970558,0.00004626826,0.000002849402,8.697517e-8,0.002744583,0.0004869219,0.02157892,0.002831852,0.0003585251,0.001329777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003333992,0.00002314024,0.9702761,0.00001459866,0.000006705734,0.00000139295,0.004177751,0.005743313,0.001157444,0.0003107146,0.01783528,0.0001201652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990931,0.0004044407,0.006047041,0.0008739823,0.00005241068,0.0003217479,0.000009497665,0.00001351825,0.001346322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980201,0.0001916508,0.001222641,0.0002488677,0.00002316644,0.00008325063,0.00002734702,0.000007646162,0.000175353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02042148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061113965","doi":"10.1007/s10592-010-0096-6","title":"Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Antarctic Division; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Feces; Pyrosequencing; Zoology; Captivity; DNA barcoding; Predation; Mitochondrial DNA; Perciformes; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Fishery; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04087822446826768,"gpt":0.3009325015537527,"spread":0.260054277085485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002397521,0.0001277783,0.000142357,0.0001012917,0.00005210104,0.0001612029,0.0002476625,0.0001576925,0.00009442111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002250739,0.0001393532,0.00005696982,0.0001618212,0.0001036636,0.00002968462,0.00007775973,0.00009132943,0.00003877384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001027825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009034452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001156453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004090604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988903,0.00004220772,0.0004402184,0.0003157033,0.0001517279,0.0001598403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998863,0.00002822806,0.0001521678,0.0005524103,0.0003291034,0.00007503885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003278342,0.00004937457,0.01260359,0.00002641955,0.00001124539,3.547832e-7,0.0008129648,0.00001739274,0.9790779,0.0002294557,0.00123595,0.0059026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003128774,0.000117528,0.05611441,0.00004304049,0.000009208349,0.000002137682,0.0009953791,0.0004155042,0.9033886,0.00008331362,0.03833763,0.0001803371],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952581,0.0005390997,0.0005061208,0.002385539,0.0009454048,0.0002519352,0.00001601006,0.00001033635,0.00008745624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947555,0.0007840066,0.001705195,0.001792699,0.00009443959,0.00003462508,0.0001309106,0.00001940802,0.0006832216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07568924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5682657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125972667","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9202-1","title":"Impact of urban fragmentation on the genetic structure of the eastern red-backed salamander","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Genetic structure; Biology; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Species richness; Biodiversity; Population fragmentation; Biological dispersal; Geography; Population; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.012708050028158,"gpt":0.2358480966968461,"spread":0.2231400466686881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000370628,0.0001232951,0.00009874842,0.00002748911,0.00008151467,0.00001260834,0.0002292945,0.000122581,0.00007032852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028194,0.00007897192,0.0001249152,0.000139068,0.0001234166,0.000001995881,0.00005953519,0.00006117313,0.000001244933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006821499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006775124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005729872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999179,0.00009467759,0.0002560951,0.000158678,0.0002064256,0.0001051102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990867,0.0000196589,0.0002669645,0.0004176235,0.0001891834,0.00001985792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003832489,0.00001773096,0.731523,0.000008609626,0.00003532193,7.579866e-8,0.00006268568,0.01064028,0.252665,0.0001667821,0.004688457,0.0001536683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003378362,0.0001203414,0.9043855,0.000009866176,0.00003147197,0.000002098834,0.00003153518,0.000431573,0.09326811,0.0005958512,0.000707379,0.00007842128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985856,0.0001494705,0.0003392175,0.0002549565,0.0001311907,0.0002486313,0.0000762185,0.000003138601,0.000211608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998896,0.0000143954,0.0003414429,0.0002356632,0.00009683418,0.00000162219,0.0001069465,0.00001050551,0.0002966081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1728625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3220381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987356373","doi":"10.1007/s10592-007-9317-z","title":"Patterns of genetic variation in anthropogenically impacted populations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Genetic variation; Habitat; Genetic variability; Context (archaeology); Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02594087010938507,"gpt":0.2825720403307636,"spread":0.2566311702213785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001990837,0.0001121883,0.000118335,0.0001186958,0.0000485961,0.00001082442,0.0001324713,0.0001846427,0.0000677764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009399009,0.0001286575,0.00005628563,0.0002102607,0.00003606913,0.000004039549,0.00005366818,0.00005997405,0.000003078709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001555276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006790066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001470988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00102285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989562,0.00004820372,0.000441094,0.0002122568,0.0001641258,0.0001780907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992649,0.00001628026,0.0001799006,0.0002769983,0.0001983304,0.00006358458],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004170048,0.00003482581,0.85234,0.00001133582,0.00001259932,0.000001141959,0.0001160421,0.001960539,0.1438567,0.000167674,0.00009268429,0.001364781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005216479,0.00008905095,0.9858286,0.000008649275,0.00001725421,0.000005014533,0.00006369156,0.0004159353,0.01079764,0.0002451376,0.001877069,0.0001303545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9332556,0.0001600661,0.06594718,0.000114495,0.0001872942,0.0001781321,0.00004633173,0.000007449587,0.0001034222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881394,0.00007266618,0.01112922,0.0002286387,0.0000775532,0.000001731867,0.000248219,0.00001196494,0.00009064199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5246501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100167868","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9197-7","title":"Quantitative analysis of prey DNA in pinniped faeces: potential to estimate diet composition?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Australian Antarctic Division","keywords":"Biology; Feces; Predation; Mitochondrial DNA; Composition (language); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Zoology; Digestion (alchemy); Animal science; Food science; Ecology; Fishery; Genetics; Gene; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0172757311325383,"gpt":0.2645454367420292,"spread":0.2472697056094909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000925553,0.0001008077,0.0001769121,0.0001149821,0.00007784249,0.00001168647,0.0001366329,0.00003805596,0.0001974104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001206867,0.0001123772,0.00005452902,0.0007112198,0.000192793,0.00006510497,0.0001705137,0.00003521819,0.00008240317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001130279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002190155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006886493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001340499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990817,0.00004589551,0.0002642021,0.0002280544,0.0002414001,0.0001387565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996519,0.00004442064,0.0001053448,0.0001539003,0.00001233925,0.00003210169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003875699,0.00008872574,0.81659,0.000003612735,0.00004617007,0.000001680941,0.0002370011,0.1489463,0.03342374,0.00003346362,0.0005557456,0.00003491657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001896173,0.0001209288,0.9730061,0.000005526706,0.0001516295,1.350878e-7,0.000117316,0.02159583,0.004476071,0.0000994907,0.0001224111,0.0001149249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956033,0.00003402454,0.003213114,0.0003904927,0.00003352235,0.0002104776,0.00006976553,0.00001268328,0.0004325799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682699,0.00001458338,0.03132579,0.0002045238,0.000003460845,0.000008443571,0.00008999518,0.00000450182,0.00007873878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1564162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4582609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503264286","doi":"10.1023/a:1012247213644","title":"Stability in the historical pattern of genetic structure of Newfoundland cod (Gadus morhua) despite the catastrophic decline in population size from 1964 to 1994","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Eye Institute","keywords":"Gadus; Biology; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Fishery; Population; Microsatellite; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02050546829222051,"gpt":0.2395910089233825,"spread":0.219085540631162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001416217,0.0001382446,0.0001839477,0.00004726232,0.00004579353,0.00001433017,0.0003397081,0.0001526248,0.0000373195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000141263,0.0001074685,0.00005220119,0.0003034696,0.00005702164,0.000003038197,0.0001010669,0.0001106252,6.660021e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005257886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005549439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005252696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02433499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986494,0.0002047261,0.0004844305,0.0002545999,0.0002568774,0.0001500053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990748,0.00009254635,0.0001986572,0.0004914432,0.0001032699,0.00003931063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001136194,0.00003589599,0.9343647,0.0000111788,0.000009975366,0.000001086472,0.0004899822,0.004610909,0.0587596,0.000004474293,0.0001143291,0.001484235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000558813,0.0001154352,0.9927284,0.000009925278,0.00002274268,0.000003694578,0.0001068137,0.0003758368,0.001826785,0.0003872446,0.003759471,0.0001048233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966155,0.0004181307,0.001320871,0.0009991039,0.0001386168,0.0003576344,0.0001425127,0.000001958429,0.000005701425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973766,0.00007445738,0.001394581,0.0007768688,0.00008316999,0.000004629809,0.0002687608,0.000008868017,0.00001210132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0583637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995624155","doi":"10.1007/s10592-012-0391-5","title":"A conceptual framework for the spatial analysis of landscape genetic data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Metapopulation; Spatial analysis; Population; Landscape connectivity; Landscape ecology; Local adaptation; Ecology; Population genetics; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06789191807096329,"gpt":0.2968211141197939,"spread":0.2289291960488306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002165042,0.00009188733,0.0001371138,0.00004144351,0.0001006438,0.00001544609,0.0003676723,0.0001046844,0.00006087267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001989418,0.00007285347,0.00008205646,0.0001550537,0.0001054869,0.000002375211,0.0001634158,0.00003617675,0.000002152319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001682719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004441665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003326848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003823424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.00003302248,0.0001931281,0.0001831004,0.0001138667,0.0001782859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989805,0.0001350068,0.0001247947,0.0005893243,0.0001168828,0.00005352003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000926451,0.00009582998,0.9617668,0.00001871401,0.001317743,1.410614e-7,0.0003958689,0.001629528,0.01233039,0.001602944,0.01596762,0.004781761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033359,0.0001513491,0.7930392,0.000007513831,0.001556042,0.000001938058,0.000752974,0.0200167,0.00445684,0.00009178743,0.1793099,0.0002123622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7398846,0.0034991,0.2554631,0.0002280753,0.0002027857,0.0001683473,0.0004774045,0.000004741765,0.00007183002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848154,0.0004474213,0.01302389,0.0005538806,0.0003060464,0.000007866825,0.0007304177,0.000006989377,0.0001081144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2449308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2970878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804919189","doi":"10.1007/s10592-018-1072-9","title":"The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC): a functional catalogue of the mammalian genome that informs conservation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea; National Research Foundation of Korea; National Human Genome Research Institute; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; National Institutes of Health; Government of Canada; National Research Foundation; INFRAFRONTIER; Genome Canada; Ontario Genomics; Ontario Genomics Institute","keywords":"Biology; Gene; Genetics; Phenotype; Gene knockout; Genome; Candidate gene; Computational biology; Loss function; Genotyping; Function (biology); Model organism; Bioinformatics; Genotype","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01947794909163687,"gpt":0.2198337099786287,"spread":0.2003557608869919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003446102,0.0001422946,0.00009570649,0.00002874311,0.0003381957,0.0000747939,0.0004625002,0.0001416379,0.0000271336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001034183,0.00009847676,0.00008832043,0.0001130919,0.0004640953,0.0000114002,0.0002484492,0.00009985496,0.000013677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002736449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002269233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000386561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005604099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989367,0.00003194297,0.0004265737,0.0001667337,0.0002354376,0.0002026635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986115,0.00003879434,0.0003665549,0.0004983456,0.0004383936,0.00004648874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009061879,0.0001607212,0.3518598,0.0001102353,0.0008314067,7.213967e-7,0.001303459,0.002181148,0.4761252,0.0132893,0.1337432,0.01948854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001175783,0.0001639312,0.2499496,0.00002297955,0.00004996162,0.00002593841,0.0005496367,0.01854502,0.1183917,0.001207527,0.6095273,0.0003906738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820085,0.0002742576,0.01210729,0.00298178,0.001090045,0.0003417599,0.0001022237,0.00001163903,0.001082518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926724,0.0001569985,0.0006090829,0.003734564,0.0004273253,0.00002212729,0.000518782,0.00001705889,0.00184168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.475784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4015766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031885989","doi":"10.1023/b:coge.0000031141.47148.8b","title":"Hybridization Between Canada Lynx and Bobcats: Genetic Results and Management Implications","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station","keywords":"Endangered species; Biology; Threatened species; Hybrid; Mitochondrial DNA; Microsatellite; Limiting; Ecology; Genetic monitoring; Biodiversity; Zoology; Population; Habitat; Allele; Genetics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01282985242822617,"gpt":0.2235369611582604,"spread":0.2107071087300342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006052402,0.0001336642,0.00009082874,0.00002841088,0.0001328489,0.00002838682,0.0001031502,0.00007150353,0.00000135067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002881157,0.0001491766,0.00001321048,0.00008418514,0.00008686667,0.00000266156,0.00009161186,0.00004059281,0.000001002822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000225332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001846087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002909003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01276271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991176,0.00002314436,0.0002584509,0.0003397514,0.0000991802,0.0001618797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994148,0.00001348509,0.00008516483,0.0002954743,0.00008589811,0.0001051474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001832535,0.0001863348,0.7839127,0.0004103381,0.0005603821,0.00000509793,0.0005841841,0.01646806,0.04567089,0.02797318,0.0222728,0.1017728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007844847,0.00008830296,0.9620798,0.00001121701,0.00004557585,0.000008794022,0.00004012812,0.00001279279,0.003477333,0.002271797,0.03100362,0.0001761888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729782,0.001203589,0.02281947,0.002070591,0.00007019431,0.0003108513,0.00009325113,0.00001094042,0.0004428867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492249,0.0008487203,0.04848305,0.0008143096,0.0001153042,0.00002575335,0.0002647897,0.00001744697,0.0002056711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1781671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7121889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056740592","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9193-y","title":"Characterization of target nuclear DNA from faeces reduces technical issues associated with the assumptions of low-quality and quantity template","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Parks Canada; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Manitoba Hydro","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Biology; DNA; Nuclear DNA; Population; Feces; Ecology; Genetics; Habitat; Mitochondrial DNA","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02391671305036182,"gpt":0.2367211629419186,"spread":0.2128044498915568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001495158,0.00008071178,0.0001298664,0.00001246974,0.0001445782,0.00001194604,0.0001134631,0.00005631495,0.0001271362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003205154,0.00006384974,0.00001982647,0.0001134119,0.0006927046,0.00008525921,0.0001235436,0.00004575145,0.000007882218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000340359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002231236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006099073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002744086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992552,0.0000775748,0.0002120679,0.0001517976,0.0002260164,0.00007728927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994912,0.00008041702,0.0002657505,0.0001310974,0.00001626592,0.00001526319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006792885,0.00004760737,0.5856049,0.000002946847,0.00001016002,8.677059e-8,0.00009358838,0.00004065346,0.4138761,0.00001660641,0.0002755817,0.00002504891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001277319,0.00003767799,0.9330005,0.00001359624,0.00002389633,1.279079e-7,0.00009731676,0.00009761962,0.06601716,0.00009702695,0.0004136407,0.00007370025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983838,0.00004911776,0.0000904542,0.001005295,0.00001660872,0.0001512096,0.000198232,0.00001647412,0.00008878401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970704,0.000125307,0.002547614,0.00009021506,0.000007646953,0.000002375952,0.0001000296,0.000005167868,0.00005120552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3478589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2603717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131019592","doi":"10.1023/a:1010133721121","title":"Questioning species realities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Agriculture and Biological Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Biodiversity; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03769467567216694,"gpt":0.2090281229984968,"spread":0.1713334473263298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006390768,0.00008147065,0.00008530261,0.00000212075,0.0002312517,0.00004283528,0.00009359233,0.00006029129,0.002292748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002192404,0.00002545253,0.0000387237,0.0001457556,0.0000646476,0.00003407149,0.00001892666,0.00004440315,0.00009900047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009121855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002096021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007858812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003782426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994612,0.00003564183,0.0001352615,0.0001364666,0.00009466333,0.00013676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997556,0.00009075947,0.0000301677,0.00002506777,0.00006400231,0.00003437942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003105888,0.00007554677,0.4405537,0.000005334024,0.00002597404,0.000003375251,0.0001934897,0.00002999279,0.06963352,0.003392415,0.04028724,0.4457684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002003488,0.00005190337,0.5989978,0.000003842189,0.00000323583,0.000001346452,0.0001086307,0.00001301785,0.0007221912,0.0005651799,0.3994476,0.00006525625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812185,0.0005297631,0.000003093358,0.005054255,0.00004033413,0.00007289113,0.00001295612,0.00008156239,0.01298669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830586,0.001366193,0.0001572711,0.001878562,0.0003791164,0.00001079462,0.000106558,3.302442e-7,0.01304263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4457031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137717200","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9204-z","title":"Genetic quality and offspring performance in Chinook salmon: implications for supportive breeding","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Offspring; Maternal effect; Sire; Genetic variation; Survivorship curve; Additive genetic effects; Population; Oncorhynchus; Zoology; Demography; Ecology; Heritability; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Pregnancy; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Gene; Animal science; Fishery; Cancer","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03393028914408189,"gpt":0.2693777040093181,"spread":0.2354474148652362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001642767,0.00006573762,0.00007829139,0.00002514871,0.0001507174,0.00001065746,0.00006317395,0.00003333573,0.00002793809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002459693,0.00007267981,0.00001196065,0.00009505377,0.0001075708,0.00006508968,0.00009300645,0.00003225133,0.000007178958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004234917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005021067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000846346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001958033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999414,0.00001449932,0.0002117634,0.0001760895,0.00004318846,0.0001404663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997429,0.00006243084,0.00007520295,0.00009327578,0.00001071662,0.00001553583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003939458,0.00001796717,0.9951563,0.00001481063,0.000002805205,8.653327e-8,0.00005511035,0.0007578253,0.0005893937,0.0004393331,0.001676143,0.001286277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002230509,0.00002888995,0.9919736,0.000003035005,0.000007748612,6.019664e-7,0.00002596695,0.002677514,0.000118025,0.001979507,0.002877577,0.00008449077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920039,0.00003516892,0.002293126,0.002449873,0.00003431269,0.0003158896,0.000004167908,0.00001607333,0.002847449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994584,0.00009433739,0.004228943,0.0007084605,0.00001862973,0.00008727231,0.000007214621,0.000005042175,0.0002661073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003182716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2963797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154688879","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9130-0","title":"Genetic nature of eastern wolves: Past, present and future","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Gray wolf; Subspecies; Canis; Biology; Zoology; Gray (unit); Range (aeronautics); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005961766035186084,"gpt":0.2012674349929128,"spread":0.1953056689577267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007228178,0.00009427038,0.00009275361,0.00002355857,0.00006677077,0.00001194524,0.0001017438,0.0001742191,0.0002442056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004222425,0.00009353238,0.00002234069,0.0001397323,0.0001601276,0.00006101439,0.0000724968,0.00009866767,0.00002682988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001762303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008539921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009767322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992768,0.00004239611,0.0002209404,0.0001883741,0.0001476749,0.000123823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996057,0.00004111394,0.000117655,0.0001777018,0.0000242997,0.00003355393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008507611,0.0000300347,0.9786515,0.000008512005,0.000004739898,0.000001089743,0.00005279939,0.0003417835,0.0005519069,0.0001227121,0.01658317,0.003643271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002046768,0.00003379523,0.9186751,0.000003686067,0.00001403149,0.000004396697,0.00003774171,0.003030382,0.0002673974,0.001121592,0.07652061,0.00008663776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918012,0.0005349083,0.0003563073,0.005537374,0.0001505747,0.0001632261,0.000004309789,0.00001707905,0.001435006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932175,0.00007246611,0.004090821,0.001234117,0.0005418037,0.0000133202,0.00001501604,0.000009873912,0.0008050952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05997642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.381414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316369336","doi":"10.1007/s10592-022-01492-0","title":"Genetic diversity goals and targets have improved, but remain insufficient for clear implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); McGill University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Stockholms Universitet; European Commission","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Genetic diversity; Biodiversity; Diversity (politics); Biology; Perspective (graphical); Environmental resource management; Convention; Process (computing); Environmental planning; Ecology; Political science; Computer science; Population; Geography; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0133822082100184,"gpt":0.2557645117410793,"spread":0.2423823035310609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001620437,0.00008766186,0.00008344828,0.00001481153,0.0003003473,0.00002207569,0.0002317825,0.0000646277,0.0002214085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001074242,0.00008291112,0.00004779081,0.0001853763,0.0001809887,0.00005258161,0.0008145389,0.0000439267,0.00003817412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001827391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001498089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008624417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991494,0.00003937387,0.0001825016,0.0002162774,0.0002588789,0.0001535825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994973,0.00008526687,0.0001359037,0.0001613209,0.00007819926,0.00004203783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002768518,0.00001806498,0.9925895,0.00001304834,0.00001378823,5.907777e-7,0.0004494342,0.0002788129,0.002865539,0.0001640658,0.001906867,0.001672623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002760282,0.0001232953,0.9879023,0.000005318245,0.00002587776,0.000001101483,0.0005986633,0.003867875,0.003627284,0.002130921,0.001350989,0.00009036952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958602,0.00002719467,0.0005788649,0.002231988,0.0001515494,0.0004967559,0.0005716381,0.00002213527,0.00005972851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948173,0.00003776184,0.004100464,0.000920885,0.00001771012,0.000007206976,0.00004189911,0.000003401873,0.0000533926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004687204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3381017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031259055","doi":"10.1007/s10592-005-9026-4","title":"Does time since colonization influence isolation by distance? A meta-analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Colonization; Biology; Gene flow; Divergence (linguistics); Isolation by distance; Ecology; Genetic divergence; Evolutionary biology; Geographical distance; Genetic variation; Genetics; Demography; Gene; Population; Genetic diversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01411213480382081,"gpt":0.2383949917383941,"spread":0.2242828569345733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001092256,0.0001484841,0.0002145156,0.00005911977,0.0001372072,0.00005709354,0.0001581917,0.0001538778,0.0002486104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005198906,0.0001184382,0.00019556,0.0003485984,0.00006299609,0.00001254829,0.00005050383,0.0000466363,0.00003515094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001577343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004024248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001304526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001404179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.00007599251,0.0002632552,0.0003190438,0.0001886734,0.0001405225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999121,0.00001600174,0.0001806927,0.0003277665,0.0002919692,0.00006259971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001502204,0.0001492315,0.3099714,0.00003377443,0.02383845,9.303062e-7,0.000472583,0.2119197,0.4174719,0.0004764164,0.03398412,0.001531252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007132793,0.0001357923,0.1308378,0.000002069393,0.029665,0.000002488485,0.0000452224,0.03288248,0.08088307,0.0002660858,0.7238215,0.0007452723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305432,0.0009837275,0.0651297,0.002692951,0.00005250784,0.0002191804,0.0002041398,0.00002462457,0.0001499895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858128,0.00009151841,0.006042273,0.002002635,0.00006948656,0.00001090611,0.001282505,0.00001106368,0.004676843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6898373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4829772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129969156","doi":"10.1007/s10592-005-9094-5","title":"Increased genetic differentiation in a specialist versus a generalist bee: implications for conservation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Biology; Population; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Pollination; Zoology; Pollen; Habitat; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07915965001588388,"gpt":0.2469622151663756,"spread":0.1678025651504917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008330691,0.0001260111,0.0001381627,0.00002215833,0.0002273999,0.00006913058,0.0001177334,0.00007838484,0.000024729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006302668,0.00007161366,0.00005640136,0.0002909979,0.00005725984,0.00005057026,0.00002649932,0.00003904333,0.000005170931],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000495272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001627601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001602408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05645515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991148,0.00004022496,0.0003178799,0.0002337863,0.00009399117,0.0001992903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993767,0.0002767171,0.0001302522,0.00002942364,0.000153677,0.00003318784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009479657,0.00008032889,0.7507149,0.000007464106,0.000006603885,3.24671e-7,0.00001282606,0.00002489768,0.2373446,0.00289128,0.006258726,0.00256323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005960464,0.00008494449,0.9770873,0.000006157565,0.00002000584,8.092121e-7,0.00002002089,0.001415405,0.0008864084,0.002518714,0.01720738,0.0001568529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938096,0.0002638235,0.0002236647,0.004710104,0.00009164745,0.0004287219,0.0002607746,0.00004416742,0.0001675394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969258,0.00007520193,0.0009283745,0.0004610319,0.0005514258,0.0001374856,0.0008214989,0.000001785511,0.00009737496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2364582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9607621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004301498","doi":"10.1007/s10592-007-9311-5","title":"Maintenance of high pollen dispersal in Eucalyptus wandoo, a dominant tree of the fragmented agricultural region in Western Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bentley (Canada)","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; James Cook University","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Pollen; Biology; Gene flow; Outcrossing; Eucalyptus; Pollen source; Ecology; Temperate climate; Pollination; Pollinator; Genetic variation; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0183978331095482,"gpt":0.2444351580167352,"spread":0.226037324907187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001311407,0.00009680488,0.0001431108,0.00005035761,0.00002051599,0.000003402182,0.0001716916,0.0001323344,0.000007063539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004996257,0.00007015323,0.00005020731,0.0002203513,0.0001240058,0.000002969361,0.00006762375,0.00006260214,4.600553e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001684423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002599787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006049848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005573938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991782,0.00005352832,0.0003440603,0.0001568769,0.0001246427,0.0001427234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.00001388218,0.0001941493,0.0002060852,0.0001063645,0.00002591022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001356497,0.00002980601,0.8571936,0.00001981745,0.00001091765,0.000001373434,0.000344181,0.0004998709,0.1407577,0.0002107181,0.0003979483,0.0003983956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001119855,0.00006379916,0.915157,0.00004550153,0.0000104737,0.000004397918,0.0003488838,0.00002912757,0.08210083,0.00007681202,0.0009658334,0.00007743665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983675,0.0001007598,0.00064783,0.0004432788,0.000146512,0.000193337,0.00001207875,0.000001245353,0.0000874786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988094,0.0000484871,0.0002896634,0.00009880473,0.00002952368,0.000001595942,0.0000367434,0.00000425246,0.0006815387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05865682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3110388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147649926","doi":"10.1007/s10592-012-0415-1","title":"Sample design effects in landscape genetics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sampling (signal processing); Sampling design; Population; Locus (genetics); Sample size determination; Biology; Cluster sampling; Gene flow; A priori and a posteriori; Statistics; Population genetics; Sample (material); Ecology; Genetics; Computer science; Mathematics; Genetic variation; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02753584523322633,"gpt":0.248497736639983,"spread":0.2209618914067566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002216797,0.0001417281,0.0001127885,0.00006564811,0.00006435649,0.00002167813,0.0001450961,0.0001875016,0.00004847092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001533624,0.0001558551,0.00004271778,0.0001540125,0.0000387901,0.000004837487,0.00007954416,0.00006769304,0.00002271323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001134038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006229181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003420319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004896052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990301,0.0001180464,0.0001902267,0.0001934577,0.0001352529,0.000332968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993972,0.00005913316,0.00007119478,0.0002745497,0.00007276195,0.000125135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003053988,0.00003697247,0.9717966,0.00001996371,0.00001618112,5.474459e-7,0.0001500413,0.002759585,0.01933681,0.0001903895,0.003480894,0.002181439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007368928,0.0001126865,0.8698972,0.000008171906,0.00002448038,0.000006556942,0.00005001579,0.002331442,0.04124283,0.0003302304,0.08499945,0.0002599856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280748,0.002620967,0.06834221,0.000109651,0.0003589543,0.0002622321,0.00001426824,0.00001202006,0.0002048339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693204,0.0002256267,0.02894812,0.0009022866,0.0002258717,0.00001196646,0.0001830665,0.00001697206,0.0001656551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1018994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6355588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332261804","doi":"10.1023/a:1021860910719","title":"Reticulate evolution and phenotypic diversity in North American ciscoes, Coregonus ssp. (Teleostei: Salmonidae): implications for the conservation of an evolutionary legacy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Cisco Systems","keywords":"Biology; Sympatric speciation; Genetic divergence; Taxon; Endangered species; Species complex; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Threatened species; Polyphyly; Zoology; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetic tree; Habitat; Clade; Population; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02394907930903883,"gpt":0.2482544701035947,"spread":0.2243053907945559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001737722,0.0001343233,0.0001381521,0.00006516663,0.0003254719,0.00002260603,0.0001631604,0.00008858333,0.00000431786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001546641,0.0001320803,0.00004681472,0.0003180354,0.0002716163,0.00001869555,0.0000952374,0.00006524631,5.377456e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002851607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001212441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002577055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001701689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990473,0.0001096117,0.0002718555,0.0002925664,0.000112448,0.00016621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989666,0.0000618724,0.0002293093,0.0003570903,0.0003251703,0.00005997239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000933827,0.00004100158,0.9874057,0.00001864137,0.00002894991,1.397125e-7,0.0001394865,0.002970449,0.004257112,0.002439093,0.0003524231,0.00225361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006219199,0.0001763468,0.9905065,0.000003894229,0.00005512287,0.00000762564,0.0002770364,0.001947553,0.001108607,0.001084501,0.004062665,0.0001482321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867575,0.0007261384,0.01097487,0.000785675,0.00009044952,0.0005260644,0.00009464529,0.000008385101,0.00003632378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926438,0.0001857238,0.006307793,0.0004018897,0.00003388804,0.00001981777,0.0003525561,0.00001045206,0.0000440213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005886411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5386077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148995183","doi":"10.1023/b:coge.0000031140.41379.73","title":"DNA in Action: Rapid Application of DNA Variation to Sockeye Salmon Fisheries Management","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Pacific Salmon Commission; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Stock (firearms); Fisheries management; Biology; Fish stock; Biodiversity; Population; Adaptive management; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geography; Fishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02894991419822823,"gpt":0.2734303416903975,"spread":0.2444804274921692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001973877,0.000107016,0.00009756469,0.0001242305,0.00006051904,0.0000252813,0.0001594161,0.0001078254,0.00001805908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004040965,0.0001306139,0.00003980817,0.0003381759,0.00004277135,0.000008629891,0.0000439921,0.00003856964,0.000033784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004079354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005440826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002616429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000128343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989725,0.00004053966,0.0004054405,0.0003022836,0.0001598542,0.0001193935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991323,0.000007601834,0.0001764691,0.000429702,0.0002101102,0.00004379727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007792081,0.0001848813,0.008097646,0.00007980395,0.00003648354,2.450447e-7,0.0003551468,0.002022156,0.970735,0.006736402,0.001282313,0.01039206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006477651,0.00009422629,0.3831617,0.00001521469,0.00001717014,0.000001580798,0.0001968453,0.0002368626,0.5585437,0.0005087379,0.05640346,0.0001726653],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9088149,0.00006703057,0.08762555,0.002170159,0.0002012507,0.0004975481,0.00001102513,0.00001775918,0.0005947863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992726,0.0001883345,0.005571198,0.0005485585,0.00006553797,0.0001432796,0.0002985892,0.00001616061,0.0004423269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4121912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5326281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188751369","doi":"10.1023/a:1023386506067","title":"Molecular and other biological evidence supports the recognition of at least three species of brown kiwi","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kiwi; Biology; Threatened species; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Population; IUCN Red List; Phylogenomics; Zoology; Clade","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07202473179977162,"gpt":0.2520413722027635,"spread":0.1800166404029919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000141253,0.00008113014,0.00009159022,0.00001919215,0.00005166282,0.000006673519,0.00007559646,0.0001079017,0.0001299931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001589837,0.00006421751,0.00004293432,0.0000691731,0.0002210376,0.000002128301,0.00005803788,0.00003113089,0.000001930384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003402286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003095643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009165042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003938977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993995,0.00007901373,0.0001848665,0.0001530113,0.0001025552,0.00008100771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994546,0.00002763875,0.0001426036,0.0001994144,0.0001482886,0.0000275235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003435505,0.00001076816,0.527257,0.00001850841,0.00002290616,3.387111e-7,0.00006264645,0.00009701271,0.4710147,0.0003676996,0.0004156718,0.0006983022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002384253,0.0001570104,0.3635271,0.00002020414,0.00003232457,0.00001403202,0.00009858109,0.00002937938,0.6120337,0.0008948412,0.02284457,0.0001098178],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963008,0.001408092,0.001447889,0.0001667594,0.00006037299,0.000141439,0.00003392013,0.000002420961,0.0004383368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997964,0.0002476948,0.00119859,0.0004028165,0.00001628201,0.000002308067,0.00003344909,0.000005051591,0.0001297592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.16373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965036919","doi":"10.1007/s10592-014-0678-9","title":"Rare biosphere exploration using high-throughput sequencing: research progress and perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Chinese Academy of Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biosphere; Biodiversity; Biology; Identification (biology); Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1528229869077597,"gpt":0.3042354290677864,"spread":0.1514124421600267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003108005,0.0001060237,0.0000911787,0.00002549262,0.000472887,0.00005424413,0.0001194306,0.00006469297,0.0001492688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006970578,0.0001101285,0.00001510504,0.0002071691,0.000931807,0.0002472464,0.0003431433,0.00009919538,0.00009675734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003271994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006378207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002002297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005315821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988819,0.0001440632,0.0001257448,0.0002915914,0.0003532019,0.0002035468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995896,0.00006470875,0.00005851697,0.0002001934,0.00003018391,0.00005685069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007791889,0.00002872774,0.9787012,0.00001232522,0.000009058958,0.000001161087,0.004327924,0.0008017007,0.01229099,0.0003352455,0.001205434,0.002278473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003856909,0.0001856071,0.959151,0.00002374648,0.000021365,0.000004221468,0.01335051,0.01041889,0.009773419,0.002179218,0.004236115,0.0002702164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964831,0.0003721035,0.0009653624,0.001478492,0.00005250984,0.0002479141,0.000005240679,0.0000292978,0.0003659069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640589,0.0002194781,0.03538901,0.000138899,0.00003783041,0.000009430384,0.000006466337,0.000009968478,0.0001299857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03442365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4490911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118041961","doi":"10.1007/s10592-010-0136-2","title":"Genetic structure and gene flow in an endangered native tilapia fish (Oreochromis esculentus) compared to invasive Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Yala swamp, East Africa","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Oreochromis; Nile tilapia; Biology; Genetic diversity; Population; Endangered species; Microsatellite; Ecology; Fishery; Allele","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01717441515844738,"gpt":0.2083976107002921,"spread":0.1912231955418447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002043866,0.0002828788,0.000334598,0.000128756,0.0001411474,0.00008718124,0.0003611624,0.0002024744,0.001301376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001396762,0.0002888005,0.00003828193,0.0004746367,0.0002080045,0.0001771357,0.0002968227,0.0002174894,0.00007001083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001969367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006949969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008636152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06627865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980131,0.0001386586,0.0004427549,0.0006256676,0.0003670556,0.0004127761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989773,0.00009331415,0.0001643713,0.0004171901,0.00006177353,0.0002860554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004847673,0.0001095083,0.8571725,0.00002574618,0.0000118638,0.00002553276,0.007317056,0.00163021,0.1307521,0.000005669867,0.001884852,0.001016478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000980565,0.000115576,0.9607908,0.00002793446,0.00001627901,0.00001111152,0.0005411633,0.02600961,0.009760402,0.000154715,0.0012284,0.0003634821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978839,0.00003144256,0.0001296003,0.0004424364,0.0001931513,0.0007708429,0.0002886617,0.00002547929,0.0002344594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855962,0.00001997729,0.01364434,0.0004815389,0.00005386077,0.0000228975,0.000078155,0.00001910454,0.000083917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1209917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987105277","doi":"10.1007/s10592-009-9974-1","title":"The genetic legacy of extirpation and re-colonization in Vancouver Island wolves","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Raincoast Conservation Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Colonization; Population; mtDNA control region; Biology; Mainland; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Mitochondrial DNA; Zoology; Ecology; Haplotype; Founder effect; Geography; Demography; Genetics; Genotype","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008956516453032765,"gpt":0.2132484606413816,"spread":0.2042919441883488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001796849,0.00006658631,0.00006997469,0.00002649559,0.00009206227,0.00001990677,0.00008136821,0.00006745003,0.0001252356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001009536,0.00005799436,0.00001122075,0.0002274804,0.0001125689,0.0001370658,0.00002431957,0.00005178875,0.000006113988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003276202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001826142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000586343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006944604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999335,0.00006322895,0.000250051,0.0001351588,0.0001108194,0.0001057382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995772,0.0001129852,0.0001290397,0.0001372419,0.00002362128,0.00001986992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790512,0.00002199105,0.978685,0.000001985969,0.000001701541,4.013952e-7,0.0002765008,0.001855821,0.000543445,0.00009576351,0.004262323,0.01423716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002556547,0.00007108247,0.9786018,0.000005429516,0.000006169277,6.708303e-7,0.00006739607,0.01462792,0.0002261123,0.003326216,0.002749295,0.00006231117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995651,0.0001635243,0.001373485,0.00163514,0.0001045118,0.0001963396,5.405653e-7,0.000008523629,0.0008669439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739,0.0002637298,0.001123649,0.0009452914,0.00001551381,0.00000871826,0.000004022108,0.000003706663,0.0002454013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01417485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3875252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130175067","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9188-8","title":"Loss of historical immigration and the unsuccessful rehabilitation of extirpated salmon populations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Biology; Genetic diversity; Population; Inbreeding; Salmo; Effective population size; Immigration; Linkage disequilibrium; Ecology; Population bottleneck; Microsatellite; Evolutionary biology; Demography; Allele; Genetics; Geography; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Haplotype","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01140931817518967,"gpt":0.2180468226541375,"spread":0.2066375044789478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000179315,0.00004350959,0.00008519247,0.00002217249,0.00007950547,0.000002566411,0.00004692979,0.00003088862,0.00003974663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007781084,0.00003462269,0.00001756563,0.0001590022,0.0002854553,0.00004947244,0.00004242871,0.00002239514,0.000001933542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004639702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003149418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001023591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003542774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994761,0.00005931701,0.0002367885,0.00008513752,0.00009419803,0.00004844355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995718,0.000140798,0.0001566014,0.00009547575,0.00002907506,0.000006231585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000222576,0.00003373404,0.9856734,0.00001152925,0.000003118785,5.569095e-8,0.0002059612,0.001291621,0.0002800984,0.003712192,0.008547333,0.0002187287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003305356,0.00003773152,0.9856842,0.000002603006,0.00002415183,1.751158e-7,0.00005787346,0.003862751,0.0001078309,0.008155659,0.001703187,0.00003336637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914935,0.00008902355,0.002431649,0.004881244,0.00006202893,0.0001948536,0.000001618031,0.000007165768,0.0008389573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976802,0.00004699352,0.0018692,0.00009060733,0.000007223685,0.00001459075,0.00001014425,0.000002464084,0.000278551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006844146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1976951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535080421","doi":"10.1007/s10592-016-0893-7","title":"Bee conservation in the age of genomics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Genomics; Genetic diversity; Conservation genetics; Conservation biology; Biodiversity; Population; Pollinator; Identification (biology); Population genetics; Evolutionary biology; Population genomics; Ecology; Pollination; Genome; Genetics; Microsatellite; Allele; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08449252728251351,"gpt":0.2196383998560933,"spread":0.1351458725735797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001554797,0.00004812406,0.00006874699,0.000005274662,0.00004885373,0.000009773888,0.0001272179,0.00003179395,0.0000222886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000513686,0.00001332327,0.00002233801,0.0001276468,0.00005809964,0.00002474429,0.0000218566,0.00002044226,0.000007408784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007791286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005211095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004465456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995676,0.00003865479,0.0001517002,0.00007688925,0.00008292598,0.00008217555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.0002972417,0.00005885709,0.0000150659,0.00004468161,0.000008128995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008228327,0.00001395046,0.380185,0.000001600718,0.000002190774,9.287886e-7,0.00007709547,3.107768e-7,0.609859,0.0004630066,0.001111685,0.00827702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007996849,0.00004991553,0.9400164,0.000009848998,0.000002966233,9.156549e-7,0.0001134351,0.00001752494,0.003671446,0.0009304798,0.05506307,0.00004398548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908219,0.000152505,0.00001166512,0.008565511,0.00001580256,0.00009443821,0.00002656289,0.000007168583,0.0003044275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982284,0.0003210436,0.0000736798,0.00122271,0.0000474036,0.000005611653,0.00001116607,2.783128e-7,0.00008965174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6061876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2491829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123803162","doi":"10.1007/s10592-005-4972-4","title":"An analysis of spatial and environmental factors influencing hybridization between native westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) and introduced rainbow trout (O. mykiss) in the upper Kootenay River drainage, British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rainbow trout; Trout; Introgression; Oncorhynchus; Biology; Ecology; Hybrid; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Zoology; Fishery; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008221320720631402,"gpt":0.2148601802928422,"spread":0.2066388595722108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000355156,0.0001319075,0.0002619943,0.0000989843,0.0002670252,0.00008554039,0.0001561806,0.00008241731,0.0001617268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006858791,0.0001539381,0.00003738361,0.0003447934,0.0005622623,0.0002788082,0.0001447003,0.0001119594,0.000001807237],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001166967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007584155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005932829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1082762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986503,0.0002050751,0.0003439573,0.0003750608,0.0002280147,0.0001975728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994193,0.000146548,0.0001837184,0.0001930029,0.00001237565,0.00004510855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005582055,0.00005594863,0.9896121,0.000004675037,0.0001099205,0.000001456824,0.003952271,0.001506337,0.0004099202,0.000003807897,0.0004033291,0.003934674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004669837,0.00009745922,0.9869159,0.000004961801,0.00032106,8.1946e-7,0.001662874,0.009277236,0.0001395355,0.00008953641,0.0008645235,0.0001590435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982272,0.00004459192,0.0005921233,0.0005342288,0.00001742594,0.0003834915,0.00005336538,0.00001182825,0.000135762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981288,0.0001857778,0.0004441139,0.0008733924,0.00003341094,0.0000163261,0.0002161516,0.000009599087,0.00009240097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1023433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136780622","doi":"10.1023/b:coge.0000014053.97782.79","title":"Dispersal in a stream dwelling salmonid: Inferences from tagging and microsatellite studies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Biology; Salvelinus; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Microsatellite; Context (archaeology); Population; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography; Trout","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02584208126003116,"gpt":0.2551329993839001,"spread":0.229290918123869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008701354,0.00008524438,0.000103649,0.00002533984,0.0001131973,0.00001806898,0.00006342233,0.00003453045,0.00005855585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003942366,0.00008267745,0.000009601683,0.000102163,0.0002337306,0.00008136392,0.000159024,0.00005168952,0.00002927619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005233446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005329613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006147081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01487432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994393,0.00001843977,0.0001492186,0.000194838,0.00006651518,0.0001316792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997723,0.00007863675,0.00004745818,0.00007605959,0.00000621462,0.00001940619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451801,0.0000207912,0.9937862,0.000005795751,0.00001887329,0.00000383265,0.001994539,0.001998357,0.0003970857,0.000108125,0.0002663237,0.001395684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003116824,0.0000259567,0.9902225,0.00002313909,0.0000149642,2.92969e-7,0.001369085,0.0007411959,0.0005374703,0.004300353,0.002349056,0.0001043679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959032,0.0007603868,0.0002825142,0.002359928,0.0000748928,0.0001128595,0.000003650419,0.00001713605,0.0004854281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924897,0.002910175,0.003038158,0.001432611,0.0000124092,0.00001164142,0.000006291778,0.000004273217,0.00009473042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01425961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8300219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107641173","doi":"10.1007/s10592-009-9892-2","title":"Reduced anti-predator responses in multi-generational hybrids of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Biology; Predator; Salmo; Hybrid; Backcrossing; Predation; Zoology; Aquaculture; Salmonidae; Population; Fish farming; Ecology; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Botany; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02566190595875544,"gpt":0.2556941235114511,"spread":0.2300322175526957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000201253,0.00009327437,0.0001328689,0.00005766997,0.00008179688,0.000009491525,0.0000877234,0.00005143852,0.00007631837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001357912,0.00009800343,0.00001585336,0.0001551539,0.0001618422,0.00007652723,0.00007660517,0.00005179675,0.00001083933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002826337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001351063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003999275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004741008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992223,0.00007225425,0.0002443136,0.0002075457,0.0001180222,0.0001355277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996749,0.00006694784,0.00008420136,0.000131338,0.00001464391,0.00002794138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003196637,0.00008431508,0.9675326,0.000006936235,0.000008332202,0.000003764232,0.0001326895,0.0004944824,0.02748799,0.00009450773,0.003709002,0.0004133859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000492223,0.00007905333,0.989781,0.000008965214,0.00001351234,0.000002044125,0.00003967187,0.004885423,0.0034568,0.0001511009,0.0009914279,0.00009875296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962106,0.00007509113,0.0003026779,0.002862578,0.00005900647,0.0002198068,0.000005139184,0.00001571338,0.0002493409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992996,0.0002833693,0.004952988,0.001474838,0.000009947976,0.000008403284,0.00001780402,0.00000477973,0.0002518697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02403119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3996464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060873220","doi":"10.1007/s10592-010-0099-3","title":"Integrating multiple analytical approaches to spatially delineate and characterize genetic population structure: an application to boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in central Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Parks Canada; Trent University; Government of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Genetic diversity; Woodland caribou; Biology; Population; Genetic structure; Ecology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02447965178321567,"gpt":0.2220882367475907,"spread":0.197608584964375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009304888,0.0002110598,0.0001806489,0.00008429356,0.0001119611,0.00006722133,0.0001770606,0.0002229122,0.00001027124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001321783,0.0002279005,0.00002732061,0.0001990634,0.00003245727,0.000009577672,0.00008633668,0.0001613265,4.796419e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003797144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1509969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8557165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986045,0.00006504595,0.0003569878,0.0004816086,0.0002035817,0.0002882853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991361,0.00001545597,0.00009061845,0.0003434291,0.0001344986,0.000279899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008939661,0.00001552789,0.8991092,0.00001212526,0.00001423125,0.000001270144,0.0002357147,0.009095459,0.07525867,0.00008036124,0.00009297993,0.01599499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004167654,0.00007643852,0.9403384,0.000004472624,0.00002231813,0.000007403785,0.00006159166,0.05024059,0.00543086,0.00003908322,0.003108991,0.0002531222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853701,0.00002484634,0.01284837,0.0006258925,0.0002203266,0.0005545047,0.0003373554,0.000009832977,0.000008802154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781356,0.000005073067,0.0174014,0.001077105,0.0002279522,0.00001854303,0.00310109,0.00002034654,0.00001287722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7047195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9293513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608595414","doi":"10.1023/a:1025680002296","title":"Genetic changes in Atlantic salmon stocks since historical times and the effective population size of a long-term captive breeding programme","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Broodstock; Biology; Salmo; Hatchery; Population; Microsatellite; Zoology; Allele; Fishery; Animal science; Aquaculture; Genetics; Gene; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01340867482755515,"gpt":0.216901949429878,"spread":0.2034932746023228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002511661,0.00008571803,0.0001393341,0.00002421962,0.00008978388,0.000007718545,0.00005901797,0.00004769798,0.00003914913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000232494,0.0000694021,0.00001558747,0.000141472,0.0002055364,0.00003240899,0.00007052626,0.00005543781,0.000003287273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001575726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003627143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004842759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006699234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993103,0.0001313239,0.0001499723,0.0001675025,0.0001028112,0.0001380791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.0003125236,0.0001094011,0.00008698419,0.00001235294,0.00001843109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002864581,0.0000313549,0.9970539,0.00001934398,0.00001293795,0.000001870811,0.0005019953,0.0001359093,0.00009300669,0.0002440446,0.0001738901,0.001703072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006277675,0.0001059113,0.997484,0.00001263769,0.00003491327,0.000002406532,0.00005709142,0.0007512793,0.00005600189,0.0006542613,0.0001404666,0.00007322225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970744,0.0001930366,0.0002500445,0.00121125,0.00006625062,0.0007424545,3.94835e-7,0.000009515192,0.0004526871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986886,0.0001542161,0.0006652345,0.0002294227,0.000008305677,0.00008915901,0.000001531279,0.000005339881,0.0001581522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006214958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.373833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W781985426","doi":"10.1007/s10592-015-0750-0","title":"Population structure and connectivity in Indo-Pacific deep-sea mussels of the Bathymodiolus septemdierum complex","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology; GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel; David and Lucile Packard Foundation; NOAA Ocean Exploration; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Indo-Pacific; Biodiversity; Population; Ecology; Bivalvia; Deep sea; Oceanography; Fishery; Mollusca; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0493285711081347,"gpt":0.2532345015867716,"spread":0.2039059304786369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003265132,0.00006252593,0.0001168924,0.00004904627,0.00007192788,0.00001025112,0.0001059342,0.000107841,0.0001759311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001796248,0.00004627307,0.0000134375,0.0001720844,0.0001481424,0.00004583222,0.00002712139,0.0001118312,0.00000344118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005499222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000592324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001304209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03821237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992627,0.0002241676,0.0001556258,0.0001293079,0.00009693192,0.0001312913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995353,0.0001493533,0.00006908427,0.0001287893,0.00006838035,0.00004904214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002808849,0.000004517793,0.9950661,0.000008642591,0.000004552996,4.502334e-7,0.0001333413,0.0008627146,0.0000375149,0.00003152194,0.0001537869,0.003668785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002776006,0.00005259759,0.9572094,0.00000217596,0.000003436954,0.000005517085,0.0001191241,0.03962731,0.00005343288,0.002227955,0.000371172,0.00005024726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984094,0.0001888857,0.00001353542,0.0005840965,0.0001480128,0.000178698,0.00002938046,0.000005382028,0.0004426437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994867,0.00001709112,0.0001652467,0.0001659265,0.00002041707,6.634409e-7,0.0001081706,0.000001307882,0.00003445753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0387646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9793378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136474734","doi":"10.1007/s10592-015-0705-5","title":"Comparative analysis of riverscape genetic structure in rare, threatened and common freshwater mussels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Endangered species; Threatened species; Biology; Ecology; Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; Population; Biodiversity; Conservation genetics; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Microsatellite","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03795387720877599,"gpt":0.2677450653883452,"spread":0.2297911881795693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007488246,0.00009051799,0.0002380652,0.0000832256,0.00003194324,0.000007491071,0.00009790133,0.00008763184,0.001353367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001109666,0.00008121107,0.00002236292,0.0004280402,0.000239651,0.00005622638,0.00007451049,0.00005810767,0.00002712468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004196101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001655969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003890985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02054005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992732,0.00008989245,0.0002306887,0.0001674243,0.0001263555,0.0001124508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999621,0.00005001313,0.00009757394,0.0001510299,0.0000237351,0.00005662787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001500815,0.00002849733,0.9870091,0.000001786539,0.00004050876,0.000003474596,0.001599973,0.006866011,0.003577899,0.00001169195,0.0006243486,0.0002217142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003663582,0.00005746756,0.941124,0.000001901383,0.0002033256,0.000001147726,0.0002416275,0.05364353,0.003621399,0.0004836451,0.0001691911,0.00008636097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993,0.00005530508,0.000119037,0.00008767388,0.00004603577,0.0001388143,0.00002715289,0.000005711058,0.0002202592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963092,0.00001176144,0.003331562,0.0002194562,0.000003814228,0.000004290067,0.00004463653,0.000003098538,0.00007222932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04677752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565631463","doi":"10.1023/a:1024033500799","title":"Significance of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) ecotypes from a molecular genetics viewpoint","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotype; Biodiversity; Species richness; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Biology; Gene flow; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01570779912459651,"gpt":0.2296293491286673,"spread":0.2139215500040708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001134727,0.0001810353,0.0001916603,0.00004411899,0.0000641267,0.00001944892,0.0001923951,0.0002240181,0.0001547259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009150527,0.0002003459,0.0001070535,0.0001419671,0.0001074789,0.000002953029,0.00005119344,0.00007524951,0.00001080302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000970497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001397777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007063921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000742583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988196,0.0001283929,0.0003289897,0.0003334365,0.0002055801,0.0001839724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999034,0.00001991797,0.0001281245,0.0004592176,0.0002717241,0.00008700579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076271,0.00006396594,0.1193174,0.00003557852,0.0001722303,0.000003678779,0.0002127572,0.006015894,0.8681929,0.001905663,0.00233162,0.001672023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009055908,0.0001471505,0.08500468,0.00001390733,0.0001008906,0.000004194696,0.0001084091,0.0003359444,0.7827259,0.001597077,0.1287172,0.0003390262],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753011,0.003862002,0.01944028,0.0001591112,0.000246013,0.0002520017,0.0001587445,0.000009464613,0.0005712592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897027,0.0003904928,0.008246283,0.001072848,0.00005699664,0.000008729733,0.0003427219,0.00002100313,0.0001582226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.816987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979480657","doi":"10.1007/s10592-007-9367-2","title":"Population structure and genetic diversity of black redhorse (Moxostoma duquesnei) in a highly fragmented watershed","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Genetic diversity; Population; Ecology; Effective population size; Gene flow; Genetic structure; Genetic drift; Biodiversity; Threatened species; Zoology; Demography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01155919777755879,"gpt":0.2260503707857967,"spread":0.2144911730082379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012937,0.0001488857,0.000159676,0.0001277837,0.00008937494,0.00001284373,0.0001316872,0.0002390507,0.00002349436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004305193,0.0001631388,0.00003880619,0.000178413,0.0001076406,0.00000638705,0.0002254058,0.00007577625,0.000001058955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001840518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002254801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000738056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998955,0.00005700655,0.0003292838,0.0002864602,0.0001841104,0.0001881828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993688,0.00001325802,0.0001594014,0.0002415927,0.0001409956,0.00007597596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001250449,0.00001891511,0.8945572,0.00003200192,0.00002061923,0.000003845836,0.000343019,0.0007729029,0.1027524,0.00004176325,0.0001856455,0.001146692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007882658,0.0001060021,0.9530185,0.00001064611,0.00002570741,0.000007274971,0.0001185819,0.0003950543,0.0441301,0.0003614989,0.0008766848,0.0001616122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978882,0.0002094696,0.001346384,0.0001161257,0.0001088604,0.0002338588,0.00004177936,0.000009019533,0.00004630222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952036,0.0000935155,0.003945874,0.0002748945,0.00005155483,6.013203e-7,0.0003306318,0.00001096342,0.00008841613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05862229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6652607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028216819","doi":"10.1007/s10592-010-0159-8","title":"Population structure and genetic diversity of greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in fragmented landscapes at the northern edge of their range","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Genetic diversity; Habitat fragmentation; Biodiversity; Population; Biology; Habitat; Fragmentation (computing); Wildlife; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007642478809701852,"gpt":0.1817820224830205,"spread":0.1741395436733187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005797432,0.00007963229,0.00009627773,0.0000236137,0.00008036297,0.000006782783,0.0001104032,0.00004392923,0.0002504733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007829389,0.00005319902,0.00002059753,0.00009703761,0.00008188299,0.00003059869,0.0002314411,0.00005345743,0.000002507991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001759321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002159019,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005987887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01155427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994642,0.00003420083,0.0001544666,0.0001272759,0.000132852,0.00008698596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996842,0.00002104449,0.0000972874,0.000164377,0.000009596462,0.00002346828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001869498,0.00001512431,0.9877214,0.00001441345,0.000006739449,8.698764e-7,0.000675484,0.0006738338,0.005222987,0.000001046434,0.00007352478,0.005575852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004417142,0.0000200165,0.9952515,0.00000543672,0.00001641781,0.00000150822,0.00004344839,0.00236661,0.001186811,0.00008703765,0.0005226396,0.00005687736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992087,0.00009946222,0.00006708065,0.0002849551,0.0000554602,0.0001968204,0.00002740345,0.000004791753,0.00005527106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995829,0.00006083175,0.0001364614,0.0001268339,0.00001341214,0.000001583439,0.00001345211,0.000005338579,0.00005920569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01095548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6447551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460504329","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9170-5","title":"Genetic variation in island populations of tuatara (Sphenodon spp) inferred from microsatellite markers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University of Wellington; University of Victoria","keywords":"Biology; Microsatellite; Genetic variation; Genetic diversity; Population; Allele; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Disjunct; Zoology; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01574277441033511,"gpt":0.2262306673891622,"spread":0.2104878929788271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008432748,0.0001482852,0.0001508277,0.00009151906,0.00005597394,0.00002642696,0.0001465731,0.0002023959,0.0001246181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003758718,0.0001761021,0.00005908303,0.0001996097,0.00006107584,0.00000649324,0.00006047299,0.00006056589,0.000009380798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001671106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006674644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001484278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003036813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998871,0.00008243928,0.0004418071,0.0002894641,0.0001570054,0.0001582794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992707,0.00001818462,0.0002064572,0.0003229777,0.0001454963,0.00003618182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006785095,0.0000382887,0.7774817,0.00001186811,0.00001743964,8.754153e-7,0.00008838623,0.01070372,0.2091022,0.00006962517,0.00140096,0.001017102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007359526,0.00004698999,0.9754279,0.00001153956,0.00003109492,0.000001621912,0.0000292043,0.001640573,0.0131856,0.002112081,0.006600983,0.0001764725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882975,0.0007338442,0.009851001,0.0001210677,0.0002113944,0.0002220929,0.0001959734,0.000008390863,0.0003587351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815817,0.00009074356,0.01637031,0.0001806326,0.0001228005,0.000004546062,0.001362988,0.00001561905,0.0002706492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1979462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7181236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039867645","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9163-4","title":"Conservation genetics of Blanding’s turtle and its application in the identification of evolutionarily significant units","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Acadia University","keywords":"Disjunct; Biology; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Threatened species; Turtle (robot); Ecology; Biodiversity; Gene flow; Population; Genetic variation; Demography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01787864300957229,"gpt":0.2215043022877697,"spread":0.2036256592781974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000552858,0.0001017854,0.0001182316,0.00006185739,0.00007670758,0.00001199396,0.0001810001,0.0001177378,0.00001992912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009389103,0.00009161668,0.00001857268,0.0005701588,0.0002144499,0.000104109,0.0000403001,0.00006940864,0.000009580079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004123162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004054335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004452644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004827193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.0001403466,0.0006063321,0.000210214,0.0002196168,0.0001160538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990458,0.0001613164,0.00043082,0.0002269189,0.0001184245,0.0000166922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001967131,0.00005842596,0.7776343,0.0000192859,0.000003786785,1.695162e-7,0.0002322618,0.00167728,0.2147974,0.004129029,0.0005272317,0.0009012353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002568142,0.00003812194,0.9315124,0.000007877775,0.00002066265,0.000002256438,0.0001397896,0.03777611,0.02473078,0.003588291,0.001837544,0.00008939439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946516,0.00038828,0.003005426,0.001154845,0.00005005295,0.0004662801,0.00002255811,0.00001062663,0.0002503587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990062,0.0001082297,0.0003301481,0.0002479055,0.00002165197,0.00004427359,0.0001308381,0.000006737898,0.0001040406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1900666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3736019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056235693","doi":"10.1007/s10592-004-7831-9","title":"Population genetic structure and dispersal across a fragmented landscape in cerulean warblers (Dendroica cerulea)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Rheumatology Association; Queen's University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Biology; Ecology; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat fragmentation; Genetic monitoring; Disjunct; Genetic structure; Habitat; Microsatellite; Genetic variation; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009390154372877574,"gpt":0.2424516184748942,"spread":0.2330614641020166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005614694,0.0001195188,0.0001110874,0.00002792956,0.0001154343,0.00002420574,0.00009899963,0.000135937,0.0009493245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001734409,0.0001221523,0.0000185728,0.000157083,0.0001160186,0.0001048109,0.00008486743,0.0001165027,0.00005072297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008352759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007089603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009859843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007034953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991023,0.00004300261,0.0002199341,0.000263754,0.0001342823,0.0002367282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996757,0.00002360922,0.00007112687,0.0001534375,0.000007080323,0.00006905934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001270376,0.00002805242,0.9803693,0.000003164996,0.000002570065,0.000003048885,0.0004790816,0.002195113,0.001439127,0.000003031602,0.0002266057,0.01523814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005096924,0.0000317939,0.9815786,0.000004607494,0.00001170551,0.0000104425,0.00008526021,0.01622988,0.0002796307,0.00005941734,0.001058588,0.0001403892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985889,0.00009356842,0.0001151523,0.0008271909,0.0000700814,0.0001917529,0.00001898333,0.00002373682,0.00007063404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958832,0.00003657055,0.00316028,0.0006296,0.00003776539,0.00000768758,0.00004486892,0.00001252557,0.0001874602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01509775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078574076","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9126-9","title":"Genetic diversity and population structure of wolverine (Gulo gulo) populations at the southern edge of their current distribution in North America with implications for genetic viability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gene flow; Biology; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Genetic structure; Population; Ecology; Mitochondrial DNA; Biodiversity; Effective population size; Evolutionary biology; Demography; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01534803302179244,"gpt":0.216943492861791,"spread":0.2015954598399985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006690893,0.0001155421,0.0001413383,0.000025807,0.0003630401,0.000005324826,0.0001220849,0.00005799942,0.00003959448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000290011,0.00009235265,0.00003225412,0.0003143124,0.0002988116,0.00005177731,0.0001858187,0.00005618997,8.515181e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001099366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001912748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001598098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03518274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991119,0.00006895485,0.0003524377,0.0002275299,0.0001076684,0.0001315447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992334,0.00009946938,0.0003040526,0.0002710902,0.00006630302,0.00002571113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003436278,0.00005389057,0.9787584,0.00001829542,0.000004732577,2.216404e-8,0.0002405117,0.01703794,0.0004876046,0.00004269536,0.00009668124,0.003224869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003192333,0.00005568216,0.9918955,0.000004775342,0.0000383685,0.000001168333,0.00004151437,0.004750607,0.00007906357,0.002468059,0.0002513893,0.00009463428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899774,0.000110359,0.008091656,0.0004673687,0.00003823041,0.0006839142,0.0006186597,0.000009208877,0.000003168211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974843,0.0000183853,0.001751964,0.00005276591,0.00001665656,0.00002757881,0.0006294326,0.000006833769,0.00001208745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03358464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595065543","doi":"10.1023/a:1014255005544","title":"An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Inbreeding; Captivity; Metapopulation; Captive breeding; Population; Effective population size; Selective breeding; Zoology; Demography; Ecology; Genetic diversity; Habitat; Endangered species","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06766575115612453,"gpt":0.277289986188,"spread":0.2096242350318755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000158245,0.00009184754,0.0001083587,0.00005017837,0.00003531841,0.000007172956,0.0001729241,0.0001251852,0.00001550332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001003754,0.00008437019,0.00004115005,0.0001990153,0.0001754268,0.00000587044,0.00004274308,0.00006491162,4.380763e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000159974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004761602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002522203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991307,0.00007589158,0.0003739732,0.0001798151,0.0001321439,0.0001075052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999328,0.00001392761,0.000191817,0.0002526589,0.0001750463,0.00003855017],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008690776,0.0000683979,0.6827098,0.00002049112,0.00001499141,5.011097e-8,0.0004820394,0.007129266,0.3043717,0.003609935,0.0001796081,0.001405066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003601907,0.0002197652,0.6527632,0.00001603583,0.00001849808,0.000001632278,0.0001708197,0.2621879,0.08389766,0.0002391255,0.00003178204,0.00009329036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980521,0.0001135888,0.01871393,0.000235233,0.000120239,0.0001668174,0.00001822174,0.000002998029,0.0001080224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985287,0.00002282918,0.01429307,0.0001312581,0.00005812545,0.000005654141,0.00007149308,0.00001044624,0.0001201873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2550587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3440517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007943598","doi":"10.1007/s10592-014-0566-3","title":"Phylogeography and population history of Leopardus guigna, the smallest American felid","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Phylogeography; Biology; Threatened species; Gene flow; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Population; Biodiversity; Genetic diversity; Habitat; Demography; Phylogenetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01024396961160496,"gpt":0.1907028033656742,"spread":0.1804588337540692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002527032,0.00007452696,0.00009471614,0.00002604173,0.00007678389,0.000005543127,0.0001086753,0.00004082205,0.0001137535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007460643,0.00006404692,0.00002550205,0.0001342101,0.0004722892,0.00003554895,0.00005322227,0.00005470245,0.00001372259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005036969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001397718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000910741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009907047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999343,0.000104871,0.0001918306,0.0001483659,0.0001149312,0.00009693389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994352,0.0001214048,0.000192109,0.0002014039,0.0000197944,0.00003007077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007016357,0.00001136992,0.9866974,0.00000255975,0.000004720243,5.833262e-8,0.0001359647,0.0002308,0.0005195008,0.0002806682,0.004351652,0.007758286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001166234,0.00006520301,0.9717746,0.000002415615,0.00001628626,0.000001231085,0.00003201679,0.005035418,0.00003246102,0.0007365579,0.02211601,0.0000712106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959244,0.000111826,0.0006756941,0.00158749,0.0001390893,0.000118627,0.000001269172,0.00001351676,0.001428064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956077,0.00004630163,0.001293727,0.002742892,0.00002698393,0.00001207014,0.00001262727,0.00000566778,0.0002520472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01776436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995029814","doi":"10.1007/s10592-006-9243-5","title":"Low MHC DRB class II diversity in the mountain goat: past bottlenecks and possible role of pathogens and parasites","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"T-cell and B-cell Immunology","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Major histocompatibility complex; Population; Genetic diversity; Ecology; MHC class I; Zoology; Genetics; Immune system; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01007940122436487,"gpt":0.2029277503858198,"spread":0.1928483491614549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002057467,0.0001151965,0.0001665121,0.0000677658,0.0002939439,0.00001165831,0.0001391462,0.0001988642,0.00002494827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001996668,0.0000953938,0.00002514893,0.0001152522,0.0003578064,0.00003532963,0.0002067638,0.0001374678,0.000007647061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001104566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002503561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004470696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992204,0.0001545588,0.0002211165,0.0001826103,0.00003479439,0.0001864965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994828,0.000143725,0.0001068557,0.0001792348,0.00007929135,0.000008134871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000254954,0.00007666453,0.4557561,0.000007704727,0.0000133243,0.000001142728,0.0005225628,0.000007881747,0.541786,0.000557285,0.0005663207,0.0006794939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001101606,0.0001993193,0.80825,0.00001392234,0.00004139734,0.00003116652,0.001017111,0.0000749042,0.1753732,0.00191302,0.01184169,0.0001427346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929834,0.005509011,0.00002695393,0.0008592123,0.00006847366,0.0001564654,0.00004065811,0.00001236355,0.0003434767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984811,0.0003190212,0.00008177036,0.0002909298,0.00001438199,0.000005462813,0.00009026007,0.000005542569,0.0007115477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3664128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006075323","doi":"10.1007/s10592-015-0709-1","title":"Valid estimates of individual inbreeding coefficients from marker-based pedigrees are not feasible in wild populations with low allelic diversity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University of Wellington; University of Victoria; Allan Wilson Centre","keywords":"Pedigree chart; Inbreeding; Biology; Genetic diversity; Genetics; Locus (genetics); Microsatellite; Population; Allele; Evolutionary biology; Effective population size; Statistics; Genetic variation; Demography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0798231121429596,"gpt":0.2779013441702554,"spread":0.1980782320272957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001499745,0.0001508777,0.0001609549,0.00007053553,0.00008189973,0.00002094714,0.0002582844,0.0001314417,0.00001002824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001059402,0.0001532074,0.00003287794,0.0001637003,0.0001248151,0.000005367643,0.000190135,0.00006999013,0.000001871207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001605996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001677724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001605365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000436473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989648,0.00005174331,0.0002450467,0.0002713728,0.0002981758,0.0001688964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991989,0.00003579455,0.000182374,0.0002611104,0.0002275553,0.00009422422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001500977,0.0001389515,0.961464,0.00001776057,0.00002803915,5.806664e-7,0.0002744617,0.03485508,0.001987685,0.00005838626,0.0006051203,0.0004198818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001420802,0.0002676902,0.9835377,0.0000563409,0.00005033358,0.000001236202,0.0003014009,0.001939323,0.01160004,0.0004946854,0.000143458,0.0001870079],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.975774,0.0002181417,0.02325713,0.0001776854,0.0001234759,0.0002150157,0.0001474038,0.00001114639,0.00007595089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439083,0.000005477293,0.0553027,0.0002574176,0.00005363987,0.000008054781,0.0004187262,0.00001475207,0.00003088289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03291576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6247618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897744634","doi":"10.1007/s10592-018-1115-2","title":"Characterizing range-wide divergence in an alpine-endemic bird: a comparison of genetic and genomic approaches","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Park Service; Colorado Parks and Wildlife; U.S. Geological Survey; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Biology; Subspecies; Evolutionary biology; Microsatellite; Intraspecific competition; Range (aeronautics); Genetic variation; Ecology; Genetics; Allele","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06167459215947878,"gpt":0.272688079388603,"spread":0.2110134872291242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001115824,0.0001356167,0.0001709762,0.00008068815,0.00007618503,0.00002030083,0.0001760063,0.0001560687,0.0000243721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003899669,0.000153387,0.00002914733,0.0001217966,0.0001919326,0.00000682863,0.0001243159,0.0000631775,0.000004387357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008021211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005100069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003350984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003086208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990134,0.00007842154,0.0003273336,0.0003088642,0.0001095514,0.0001624189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999364,0.00001276904,0.0001688288,0.000273343,0.0001116427,0.0000694636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004564501,0.00002261924,0.8253166,0.00001954782,0.00001093861,2.706718e-7,0.0005925513,0.0001726791,0.1710259,0.00001567233,0.00007558359,0.00270192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004256822,0.0002179445,0.9666256,0.0000104706,0.00001895629,0.000003288857,0.0002777044,0.004015438,0.02594235,0.00006690243,0.00223257,0.0001630659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966722,0.000872617,0.001947001,0.0001169309,0.0001275314,0.000186622,0.00001700225,0.0000106791,0.00004948725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932109,0.0001611222,0.006078101,0.0003296634,0.0001067676,0.000004829044,0.00005937683,0.0000168688,0.00003244213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1450836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083248912","doi":"10.1007/s10592-005-8704-6","title":"Population Genetic Structure and Conservation of the Galápagos Petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"Biology; Population; Archipelago; Ecology; Zoology; Genetic structure; Endangered species; Genetic variation; Habitat; Genetics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00820002768869142,"gpt":0.206856206686485,"spread":0.1986561789977936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005216116,0.0001539273,0.0001324428,0.00004545976,0.0001489765,0.00002793151,0.0001628112,0.0001865125,0.00002659226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000442022,0.0001386457,0.00005916935,0.0001586694,0.0001310202,0.000006050176,0.0001038395,0.00006765789,0.000001060772],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009756167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004711265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002682385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003963171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989862,0.00008714257,0.000317031,0.0002606984,0.0002106563,0.0001382334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991618,0.00001479608,0.000246246,0.000351598,0.0001898565,0.00003571474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002035757,0.00001151335,0.8548096,0.0000274571,0.00001608481,2.415891e-7,0.00003200598,0.001172721,0.1405282,0.0002810348,0.002337773,0.0007630356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004434334,0.00004619601,0.9538932,0.00001024497,0.00004207319,0.00001690396,0.0000209802,0.0008326905,0.03666304,0.00132555,0.006560737,0.0001449337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973484,0.0005185699,0.0008360909,0.0006232425,0.0002368537,0.0002557403,0.0000790987,0.000009801859,0.00009216124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954202,0.00004319275,0.003047684,0.0005590162,0.0001290917,0.000002939761,0.0003032611,0.00001495745,0.0004796494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1038652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5653806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040715987","doi":"10.1007/s10592-008-9612-3","title":"The contribution of island populations to in situ genetic conservation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Biology; Genetic variation; Ecology; Genetic diversity; Biodiversity; Insular biogeography; Sparrow; Variation (astronomy); Isolation by distance; Evolutionary biology; Genetic structure; Population; Demography; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02569270804995292,"gpt":0.2524494036504158,"spread":0.2267566956004629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001350649,0.0001099505,0.0001137161,0.00006726891,0.0002357453,0.00001427645,0.0001631456,0.0001241181,0.000008970922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002142925,0.0001037557,0.00004755012,0.0002685931,0.0001021513,0.000004145467,0.00006468522,0.0000557102,0.000007529979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001575551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009754689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008243435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003779461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990137,0.00008472461,0.0003604141,0.0001981428,0.0001756371,0.0001673472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991308,0.00003064472,0.0001374881,0.0003002462,0.000343608,0.00005715066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007644886,0.00002095179,0.8793412,0.000004078775,0.00001307011,0.000001078883,0.0001484502,0.00350289,0.1101154,0.000585951,0.005576117,0.0006143603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005177655,0.00009326009,0.9276063,0.000006931612,0.00001062438,0.0000111839,0.00004812407,0.0003973883,0.03339045,0.0004087758,0.03739006,0.0001190969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877236,0.0004258446,0.009804022,0.001305018,0.0002034753,0.000348905,0.00001926334,0.000006405219,0.0001634805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954966,0.0002295492,0.002961062,0.000758315,0.00006305874,0.00001356901,0.0001970397,0.000008944605,0.0002718734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07672497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4231036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135319653","doi":"10.1007/s10592-007-9453-5","title":"Mitochondrial DNA diversity of the Southwestern Atlantic humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) breeding area off Brazil, and the potential connections to Antarctic feeding areas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Humpback whale; Peninsula; Southern Hemisphere; Population; Biology; Fishery; Genetic diversity; mtDNA control region; Ecology; Whale; Geography; Haplotype","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02091270985930106,"gpt":0.2254647976825187,"spread":0.2045520878232177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000333481,0.0001365527,0.0001734461,0.00002634348,0.0006480546,0.00004656797,0.0002987967,0.00004896651,0.0001694491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001475164,0.00009771279,0.00007787513,0.0003120363,0.0003737653,0.00008678346,0.001474202,0.0001060485,0.00001929288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006430151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009192071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99886,0.00004676631,0.0002854181,0.0002435102,0.0003423349,0.0002219494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.000181273,0.0001639444,0.0002347619,0.00005300036,0.00006956021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001263499,0.00002585399,0.9890385,0.00001608336,0.00003729952,0.000001827306,0.00140783,0.000165316,0.006520061,0.00009729578,0.001151971,0.001411572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000854139,0.00006453704,0.9934281,0.00003114437,0.0001110167,0.00001468729,0.0005733006,0.0009059436,0.0007234106,0.0001393392,0.003024184,0.0001301888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951252,0.00007929206,0.001056455,0.00210065,0.000410632,0.0004579833,0.000007511509,0.00001596254,0.0007463137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977097,0.0000751064,0.0003850534,0.001577928,0.0001094365,0.000003696756,0.000002374045,0.000009244965,0.0001274809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007151378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6005954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009824797","doi":"10.1007/s10592-008-9647-5","title":"Comparative survey of within-river genetic structure in Atlantic salmon; relevance for management and conservation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Genetics","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tributary; Genetic structure; Panmixia; Biology; Biodiversity; Genetic diversity; Conservation genetics; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Fishery; Geography; Genetic variation; Population; Cartography; Microsatellite","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03875604198357749,"gpt":0.2490503095816274,"spread":0.2102942675980499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001175527,0.0001003316,0.0001715921,0.00004005358,0.0001069144,0.00000377011,0.00008733764,0.0000469611,0.00002979984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004917469,0.0001033058,0.00001129459,0.0002026075,0.0003795185,0.00005707868,0.0000998,0.00004188656,0.000004848372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003159663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007556306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004095477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01319848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00006474351,0.0002693142,0.0002166753,0.0001060016,0.0001233346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995025,0.0001713093,0.0001460195,0.0001256347,0.00003483191,0.00001972668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004355389,0.00002560721,0.9839001,0.00002996304,0.00002306449,0.000002078794,0.0007158452,0.002341404,0.0001531747,0.0001076212,0.01260011,0.0000575228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005629006,0.00005743059,0.9878543,0.000007905235,0.00001792137,0.000001867776,0.00006152254,0.009164147,0.0002049437,0.0006833309,0.001279414,0.0001042983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974617,0.0001078145,0.001217566,0.0003515552,0.00006659804,0.0005888637,0.0000148469,0.000008754229,0.0001822866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985554,0.0004227043,0.01297917,0.0007183194,0.000003751881,0.00002810535,0.00003315733,0.000005743722,0.0002550171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01278893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7365062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}