{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":556,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":556,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"376c58a9ce66","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel"}},"results":[{"id":"W78933614","doi":"10.21991/c9565g","title":"FEDERALISM AND DEMOCRACY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04544426037578415,"gpt":0.2855656519542238,"spread":0.2401213915784397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005682734,0.0003168103,0.0003093222,0.0002315083,0.004783562,0.0001737433,0.0004262195,0.0002615123,0.0008660489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004956163,0.0003156502,0.0001477014,0.0003311335,0.009923032,0.001279258,0.0002040116,0.0002748652,0.0003328558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002816652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001499341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002055207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001688395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971864,0.0001399257,0.0005038877,0.0005749066,0.0006033553,0.0009915387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986454,0.0001184476,0.000183089,0.0003025904,0.0002665759,0.0004839155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002821038,0.00009783578,0.0460134,0.000006869316,0.00005603167,0.0000363297,0.0009849248,0.000004456547,0.00005385599,0.9472008,0.004515535,0.001001794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016874,0.00007049047,0.008235619,0.0001746955,0.0000979867,0.0001464953,0.006163044,0.00008561387,0.0004003266,0.4915031,0.4901027,0.001003132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07296707,0.0012194,0.05776847,0.01539947,0.005398375,0.001438515,0.0002393331,0.0008538484,0.8447155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923202,0.0001471965,0.003270687,0.002387903,0.0001986395,0.00005012814,0.00004054084,0.00001177029,0.001572955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528129522","doi":"10.21991/c9w37q","title":"CANADIAN MULTICULTURALISM IN HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: IS CANADA UNIQUE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Perspective (graphical); Cultural diversity; Ethnic group; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.052979621379145,"gpt":0.2848957647658698,"spread":0.2319161433867248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002354396,0.0002899294,0.0003715493,0.0002461724,0.001861548,0.00005310967,0.0002902042,0.0001922248,0.0005178096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003065248,0.0002969881,0.00008478068,0.0004376642,0.00658946,0.0004964483,0.00006447278,0.0003492017,0.00002960079],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008587449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03351597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975336,0.0001449069,0.0004264133,0.0004780583,0.0004674961,0.0009495736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981694,0.0001681523,0.0001148665,0.0001784501,0.0005485773,0.0008205474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839427,0.00004328483,0.02566307,0.000003331518,0.00003293654,0.00007452747,0.002354034,0.00001379764,0.000004788656,0.9593579,0.01239651,0.00003748229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006142519,0.00002575042,0.003249819,0.00005955247,0.00003003763,0.00009499403,0.03101469,0.00003890739,0.0000375002,0.008533566,0.9557516,0.000549308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01762048,0.001702831,0.0009632187,0.03310125,0.00182357,0.0007882655,0.0006718108,0.00009589441,0.9432327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933272,0.00008176294,0.0008946293,0.003315665,0.000101891,0.00004382284,0.000029758,0.000004508106,0.002200739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152526808","doi":"10.21991/c92d47","title":"A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05232865365993809,"gpt":0.2744731308110175,"spread":0.2221444771510794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008437209,0.0005375253,0.0005634215,0.000271832,0.005030673,0.0001385789,0.0007094906,0.0003967807,0.0009651094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009247022,0.0005568543,0.0004422357,0.0007954946,0.0367718,0.001463686,0.0002941349,0.0004681431,0.002048806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005844877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003400291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00405169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953874,0.0002300458,0.0008626021,0.000882208,0.001093322,0.001544382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974955,0.0001975528,0.0003074073,0.000506375,0.0008504805,0.0006426742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000785439,0.0002338783,0.09693106,0.00001564462,0.000145538,0.00006712808,0.0004069603,0.00001258963,0.00002502265,0.8941786,0.005074716,0.002830283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002265783,0.000108885,0.002758517,0.0002871802,0.0001676486,0.000361338,0.01853201,0.00004040491,0.000120269,0.1057036,0.8684527,0.001201653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003527401,0.00656631,0.09538502,0.004238704,0.00560647,0.001103414,0.0004560869,0.0007070482,0.8824096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914773,0.0003059476,0.002700722,0.002068244,0.0006711167,0.0001948283,0.0001066483,0.00001241792,0.002462783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499700966","doi":"10.21991/c9f66b","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02025229998304848,"gpt":0.2229640320825438,"spread":0.2027117320994953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035477,0.0002244108,0.0006242397,0.00003417467,0.00118241,0.00004374384,0.0009151815,0.0001694763,0.0000693489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001421832,0.0001295024,0.0005077993,0.0001654856,0.01804205,0.0002936486,0.0005543577,0.0002265602,0.000005995083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001126229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002798543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01007365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001819141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976341,0.0001198121,0.001389548,0.00034143,0.0001630455,0.0003521197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997501,0.0001554576,0.001272283,0.0008422913,0.0001704096,0.00005853112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007819063,0.0001186497,0.02507803,0.00004573264,0.0001339514,1.288036e-7,0.0003763631,0.0001331911,0.0001811646,0.9730275,0.0008169152,0.00001014672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005285567,0.0001419341,0.0121829,0.0004842862,0.0001332804,0.00009472503,0.001163745,0.001188571,0.02175162,0.7947824,0.1622058,0.0005851713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3786173,0.005362793,0.003065662,0.01155362,0.005005869,0.00317391,0.004680169,0.00002862123,0.5885121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974226,0.0001174597,0.00006586592,0.002112762,0.00006904222,0.00005630812,0.000008581205,0.00001058256,0.0001367642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300180147","doi":"10.21991/c92946","title":"ISRAEL USHERS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE, THE CANADIAN IMPACT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05640675291215899,"gpt":0.2998821573680748,"spread":0.2434754044559158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224782,0.0004315076,0.0003675421,0.0003566245,0.008510145,0.0002372153,0.001056495,0.0002949265,0.0004469517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001080484,0.0002886439,0.0003610667,0.001168014,0.04508217,0.001008072,0.0001907053,0.0006160651,0.0006417377],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001544988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01031304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2866036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7753307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995886,0.000309866,0.0007003862,0.0005937607,0.0009037997,0.001606161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978798,0.0003352322,0.0002096746,0.0005345145,0.0005061841,0.0005346109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003130505,0.0000545562,0.2722219,0.00000254319,0.00006169125,0.00003233523,0.001776565,0.00006665726,0.000002941081,0.7226748,0.002511797,0.000562978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001820511,0.00008295388,0.05651119,0.0002389947,0.00009746885,0.0004162433,0.1036289,0.0001844753,0.0000203426,0.04916561,0.7867594,0.001073939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0296204,0.007519318,0.008225753,0.01770385,0.006488371,0.002290335,0.0005365334,0.0002447221,0.9273707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958082,0.0001537913,0.0001770856,0.002565992,0.0003295499,0.0003031406,0.00003910217,0.000008848249,0.0006142321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108103023","doi":"10.21991/c9166m","title":"THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE CANADIAN IMPACT IN THE MIDST OF A FORMATIVE PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Period (music); Political science; Economic history; Law; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0424974356862031,"gpt":0.2877173947549372,"spread":0.2452199590687341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154191,0.0003229177,0.0003197073,0.0002110484,0.009800173,0.0001880698,0.001129454,0.0001995217,0.0001170691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126269,0.0001775651,0.0003480437,0.000874667,0.04492684,0.0007258792,0.0001369111,0.0005079294,0.0001392881],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007929697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009034779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09056893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964551,0.0004207862,0.0007265448,0.000330408,0.0009083328,0.001158881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978181,0.0005138053,0.0002966056,0.0004644553,0.0006586731,0.0002483777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004829386,0.00006351768,0.08429789,0.000005100476,0.00009554432,0.00001515308,0.004409393,0.00003688262,0.000002078592,0.9068751,0.003276648,0.0008744125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002135021,0.0001980538,0.05901146,0.0003412419,0.0001640485,0.0006144644,0.2326178,0.0001802535,0.00002544161,0.1579734,0.5458566,0.0008821918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01614607,0.01659716,0.00818624,0.03843676,0.003899172,0.002993808,0.001086622,0.0001112412,0.9125429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979799,0.0002216041,0.00010701,0.001063886,0.0001836844,0.0001885867,0.00003384206,0.000004926302,0.0002165239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03309826142050176,"gpt":0.3159430235126354,"spread":0.2828447620921337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001474055,0.0001886312,0.0004120966,0.0001610776,0.001772054,0.0001008263,0.0003737702,0.0001534062,0.0001054235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001556422,0.0001521782,0.0001196611,0.0006257662,0.008913334,0.0006322287,0.0001234611,0.0002723474,0.00002442024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001916733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002689807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004367332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00625573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973848,0.0003717128,0.0007967973,0.0002934748,0.0006623683,0.0004907817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977965,0.0005620237,0.0003161957,0.0002298522,0.0009747045,0.0001207399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004048413,0.00008163574,0.02215163,0.00005406523,0.00003223014,0.000001632717,0.002198815,0.00302253,0.0002373732,0.971685,0.0002531412,0.0002414583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008782323,0.0005547586,0.01866266,0.002914364,0.0001647264,0.0001552752,0.1006757,0.009671791,0.01743502,0.1248901,0.7137905,0.002302847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4015867,0.001512927,0.15216,0.02797694,0.002711106,0.003514117,0.0003715137,0.0001842896,0.4099824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989593,0.0000368414,0.0003098247,0.0003140638,0.0001287298,0.00005874303,0.00002004553,0.000005247128,0.0001672106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.846795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07820777877036614,"gpt":0.2358387415988572,"spread":0.1576309628284911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002263685,0.0004361791,0.0006497132,0.0002743119,0.002160375,0.0001270824,0.0003615935,0.0002583289,0.001282319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007461787,0.0004615322,0.0002829299,0.00018151,0.005864208,0.0008002037,0.0003070237,0.0003039504,0.002287518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002783728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003248551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001562659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002942642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973427,0.00002261259,0.0008796009,0.0009080726,0.0001058214,0.0007411672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989508,0.00007476715,0.0003734839,0.0002838932,0.00008166734,0.0002353467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005654575,0.00009193016,0.04634273,0.000006401558,0.0002423332,0.00001789589,0.0006702617,0.00001336871,0.000006623278,0.948939,0.00348429,0.0001286856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00143818,0.00004166556,0.009271244,0.00003235156,0.00005017627,0.00004935773,0.0006043887,0.0002582704,0.00006616716,0.6555934,0.3318416,0.0007531729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03110122,0.01039195,0.06605152,0.009798464,0.003265106,0.0007625961,0.007449193,0.0004181716,0.8707618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973561,0.00006129742,0.001011956,0.0004446396,0.0002667619,0.0001041095,0.0001100897,0.00001273924,0.0006323736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04371893510183338,"gpt":0.26364144151413,"spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009010756,0.0003626745,0.0004083019,0.00007617256,0.00922015,0.0001629553,0.0006752914,0.0002702719,0.0005566534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001579854,0.0003649729,0.0002382513,0.0004894538,0.00541215,0.001028796,0.0002548767,0.0005853421,0.00007027644],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008255287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9490386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968998,0.0003367059,0.0006377875,0.0003950975,0.0007325535,0.0009980808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979702,0.0001979378,0.0002885811,0.0004251233,0.0006008998,0.0005172521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002161892,0.000160619,0.01392275,0.00006751518,0.0001188059,0.0002542647,0.003256801,0.00003483712,0.00001728811,0.9582093,0.02364597,0.0002902301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009676568,0.00004405176,0.0002334911,0.0001636078,0.00008663787,0.0008641987,0.05265709,0.0001441355,0.0001800278,0.01371631,0.9302342,0.0007085961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1093069,0.001867131,0.01171773,0.0132351,0.007136274,0.001693056,0.001364158,0.0006377604,0.8530419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904121,0.00007263736,0.0006144912,0.007877312,0.0003741453,0.00007414546,0.0001055137,0.00001271108,0.0004569645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167291807","doi":"10.21991/c9s953","title":"UNDERSTANDING GROOTBOOM — A RESPONSE TO CASS R. SUNSTEIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Human rights; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1753670521200912,"gpt":0.3212689662745666,"spread":0.1459019141544755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001679655,0.0004017558,0.0004094856,0.0005269047,0.003665604,0.0002021279,0.0008257457,0.000347305,0.001463684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002434709,0.0004287503,0.0002590103,0.001128347,0.009150009,0.001011571,0.0003065663,0.000388396,0.001739911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00249891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00327953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001605198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002431872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956781,0.0004238278,0.0006591784,0.0007521142,0.001041378,0.00144536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975587,0.0004532138,0.0001820489,0.0005483924,0.0003762553,0.0008813511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005879803,0.0001081812,0.008752104,0.000006261179,0.0000586718,0.0001280849,0.009325098,0.00004832996,0.0001699952,0.9738839,0.006848576,0.00008283732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001280842,0.0001606959,0.0003596342,0.0001779077,0.00006862947,0.00007732802,0.04142237,0.00004769224,0.0003400557,0.06246512,0.8926616,0.0009381057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006815494,0.0004367022,0.2877141,0.009835881,0.003827361,0.001275193,0.0002451018,0.000656878,0.6891933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990714,0.00001333511,0.004973273,0.001631347,0.000238595,0.0001192924,0.00001890916,0.00002005288,0.00227119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485315654","doi":"10.21991/c9908s","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE PATRIARCHY: ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND ABORIGINAL GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Government (linguistics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02814757132014619,"gpt":0.3002645235946371,"spread":0.272116952274491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001187883,0.000442901,0.0004178399,0.00007568471,0.007269979,0.0002231451,0.0005746153,0.0002268741,0.000814794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005057835,0.0003326283,0.000191937,0.0004447707,0.02479227,0.001007658,0.000160691,0.0004810303,0.0001839593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001434424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00244368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002877652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001505909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957633,0.0002490979,0.000612044,0.000644117,0.001394902,0.001336562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981345,0.0003888736,0.0002697669,0.0003036032,0.0004107358,0.0004925141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009807537,0.00009755418,0.04790859,0.00001257765,0.0001609882,0.00002956987,0.006585787,0.00001768964,0.00003931815,0.9418256,0.002321969,0.0009023311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001220103,0.00006383032,0.005707677,0.00008185617,0.00007513392,0.0001058404,0.03375897,0.0000346309,0.00005925896,0.03231275,0.9259837,0.0005962445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2042284,0.00589546,0.02704768,0.02788716,0.00647592,0.003320278,0.001006548,0.0007873647,0.7233511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945722,0.0009450476,0.001556973,0.00128837,0.000422451,0.000314267,0.00001806144,0.00001018457,0.0008724635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9236617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162755870","doi":"10.21991/c91q1w","title":"Jane Austen and the Council of the Federation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Pride; Possession (linguistics); Law; Wife; Battle; Sentence; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0513180478118468,"gpt":0.2536156607948182,"spread":0.2022976129829714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001138502,0.0002057894,0.0002814534,0.00004802315,0.003804313,0.00007217249,0.0004518496,0.0001489602,0.0002759529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001392564,0.0001307617,0.0002011214,0.000320184,0.04840324,0.0004031539,0.0001695634,0.0002414215,0.0000319969],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005071954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02051242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004204288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002304457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975576,0.0002664611,0.0004875142,0.0002764192,0.0009173441,0.0004945918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980499,0.0004053244,0.0002769601,0.0003215854,0.0007905257,0.0001557318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000870258,0.00004588428,0.008575842,0.000007118518,0.00005644775,0.000002031612,0.001353753,0.0000330691,0.00001413946,0.9884119,0.00118498,0.0002278007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002425959,0.00003821885,0.001927501,0.0001169896,0.0001722148,0.0001512494,0.008960912,0.0001175643,0.0001523137,0.09268662,0.8928545,0.0003959344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005819504,0.001169577,0.01630161,0.01454357,0.001923983,0.0009559675,0.0001893941,0.00008193438,0.9590145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945521,0.00009052645,0.0004775838,0.001863557,0.0001506319,0.00005171416,0.00000848463,0.000004844109,0.002800521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113985439","doi":"10.21991/c9j37m","title":"THE TRICKSTER: INTEGRAL TO A DISTINCTIVE CULTURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04329065382207777,"gpt":0.2276254231445048,"spread":0.1843347693224271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001807357,0.0003641015,0.0002680961,0.00009124154,0.003764376,0.0003342646,0.0005091971,0.0001002275,0.0023934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001568345,0.0002189223,0.0002730223,0.0001416618,0.005523806,0.0006157968,0.0001859816,0.0003159803,0.001414992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003135007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002415299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002134982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997952,0.00004772363,0.0004878717,0.000435485,0.0003569374,0.0007199195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987171,0.00007391728,0.0001296925,0.0003437579,0.0004576612,0.0002778944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001313039,0.00008511813,0.0005221072,0.000006264533,0.00007885163,0.00001585345,0.004604266,0.000002856257,0.00002802574,0.9652567,0.02731613,0.001952537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052184,0.0001502835,0.0001906763,0.00007624848,0.00004335507,0.00007964579,0.02254327,0.0000327228,0.00008917095,0.03677481,0.9390855,0.0004124842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005752409,0.0008237906,0.01039478,0.00392433,0.004890344,0.001022759,0.0005907606,0.0002761967,0.9723246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840654,0.00002625022,0.0003872204,0.001816612,0.0004203397,0.0002053254,0.00005483055,0.00001121781,0.01301283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489398868","doi":"10.21991/c94t1v","title":"“Irreconcilable? The Duty to Consult and Administrative Decision Makers”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Duty; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Formative assessment; Relation (database); Sociology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03535903856437894,"gpt":0.3217228268904296,"spread":0.2863637883260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000524917,0.0002450235,0.0002312505,0.0001009399,0.004293841,0.0004405712,0.0004438537,0.0001633107,0.001042784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001068734,0.0001889202,0.0001086964,0.000504639,0.007411598,0.0007177734,0.0002215865,0.0002679408,0.001450335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002191034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001948992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001559037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002822204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977485,0.00009395793,0.000451257,0.0004944152,0.0005238605,0.0006880355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977703,0.0007072193,0.0001263129,0.0003453684,0.0005604014,0.0004903807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001731263,0.00004367051,0.004518377,0.000002762508,0.00002633768,0.000002543065,0.0004068983,0.00006656958,0.0000841021,0.9631394,0.02692809,0.004763948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006076022,0.00004044278,0.00274109,0.00006077815,0.00002816924,0.0000555191,0.0102725,0.000184666,0.00008421427,0.05514674,0.9304299,0.0003483147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0895129,0.001004019,0.1235763,0.2110765,0.002258138,0.005374899,0.000656943,0.0004141132,0.5661262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906352,0.00008747822,0.002654356,0.004341335,0.0001698451,0.0004630497,0.00002401437,0.000006901026,0.001617805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9079927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958328","doi":"10.21991/c90109","title":"Envisaging Canada in a Disenchanted World: Reflections on Federalism, Nationalism, and Distinctive Indigenous Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Federalism; Indigenous; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023293116235262,"gpt":0.2829396780795774,"spread":0.2627067469172247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000370817,0.0002003465,0.0002357985,0.001048132,0.004709489,0.0003168317,0.0002280984,0.0001098972,0.000388519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007552543,0.0002121208,0.00007975164,0.0008002436,0.00595804,0.001047288,0.00007331105,0.0002174277,0.00004859966],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004339136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01066962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8679776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976397,0.0001368158,0.0003886487,0.0004852253,0.0006852832,0.0006643409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987881,0.0003577232,0.0001394565,0.0001726982,0.0002008855,0.0003411184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003066036,0.00005636997,0.01539492,0.000005950575,0.00002729144,0.00005407853,0.0006062262,0.00003524568,0.00003592945,0.9787846,0.004070151,0.0008986108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001192484,0.00002267676,0.01527665,0.0002974186,0.00002632475,0.00004441446,0.002981446,0.00001074561,0.00001347671,0.04186098,0.937758,0.0005153457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1953811,0.002495122,0.04060861,0.1257272,0.01189396,0.003366,0.0048371,0.0005788601,0.615112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934709,0.0001281189,0.00007057533,0.001446392,0.0001598965,0.0000776513,0.00003988453,0.000007566411,0.004598998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234917865","doi":"10.21991/cf29370","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Law; Commission; Action (physics); Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03714303502622718,"gpt":0.318395759727178,"spread":0.2812527247009508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005682594,0.000281052,0.0003641844,0.0002059635,0.001605154,0.0001230707,0.0003523653,0.0002811687,0.001203966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006142089,0.000268353,0.0002042609,0.0006234008,0.004428468,0.001216404,0.0001413167,0.0003828979,0.001838009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001086144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003061663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006773311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971631,0.0001574142,0.0004958899,0.0005249102,0.0007233517,0.0009353434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989129,0.0002342623,0.0001474288,0.0002291875,0.0002671893,0.0002090294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000324799,0.0000788189,0.1266812,0.00001186684,0.00003148288,0.000009386367,0.000609548,0.000493293,0.0002314589,0.8685265,0.002240431,0.00105351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002222189,0.0000495431,0.01745468,0.0002076622,0.00002985067,0.0000275326,0.02750108,0.0002775218,0.0001889031,0.01460575,0.9366536,0.0007817438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3770074,0.001282466,0.00441433,0.03298397,0.007635642,0.002486265,0.000122817,0.0005620377,0.573505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948071,0.0001877471,0.0004596083,0.0007995963,0.0002087067,0.00008962616,0.00004553535,0.000007605344,0.003394458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9344131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948261530","doi":"10.21991/cf29383","title":"Constitutionalizing (In)justice: Treaty Interpretation and the Containment of Indigenous Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01187790138914615,"gpt":0.2829965478282339,"spread":0.2711186464390877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129313,0.000220645,0.0004093283,0.0001084065,0.001051456,0.00008345427,0.0003309945,0.0001490624,0.0002032884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007682382,0.0001807934,0.0001471027,0.0003273341,0.01268688,0.0007267175,0.0001179292,0.0002423799,0.00007003212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004168574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001800962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002827649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003091994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975975,0.0002012,0.000622001,0.0003928153,0.0006535241,0.0005330205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982298,0.0008495218,0.0003053217,0.0002423985,0.0002486515,0.0001242805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004018139,0.00006344539,0.0414154,0.00005512082,0.00003590256,0.000008825461,0.001841004,0.000785501,0.00006528411,0.9540058,0.0001930889,0.001128854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03260228,0.0005208756,0.0492562,0.004940132,0.001085188,0.00072364,0.1263203,0.006608494,0.0006622836,0.2907897,0.4835936,0.002897365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4679902,0.01459308,0.04022637,0.03457916,0.005284391,0.005444039,0.000410179,0.0001964892,0.4312761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997919,0.000662378,0.0002630473,0.0006604558,0.00006433288,0.00007043216,0.00001613232,0.000004742724,0.0003395329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6632161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503359472","doi":"10.21991/c98q12","title":"HUNTING FOR ANSWERS IN A STRANGE KETTLE OF FISH: UNILATERALISM, PATERNALISM AND FIDUCIARY RHETORIC IN BADGER AND VAN DER PEET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kettle (birds); Paternalism; Badger; Rhetoric; Fiduciary; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04282530135862936,"gpt":0.2262477848248694,"spread":0.1834224834662401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000185219,0.0002129553,0.000332622,0.0002063619,0.0004608639,0.00003892354,0.00009561951,0.00008603991,0.0001837373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007556682,0.0001865139,0.00007762832,0.00007871577,0.002736937,0.0004837347,0.00006955893,0.000138522,0.000003909437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006952276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001072292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006549099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006470227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986989,0.00002608231,0.0004506104,0.0003060184,0.0001421157,0.000376264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994956,0.00007422962,0.000105462,0.00009735702,0.0001522617,0.00007505515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006737277,0.00008901143,0.03736633,0.00007022516,0.00003903334,0.00001120176,0.008704517,0.000006021625,0.0000610073,0.9521099,0.001080272,0.0003951507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006625441,0.0003416886,0.0215653,0.0009677978,0.0001844782,0.0001061212,0.01943717,0.0003035247,0.0004097244,0.1590157,0.7895901,0.001452955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7829431,0.00434627,0.002253922,0.004392238,0.003080667,0.00172836,0.001140403,0.0001289604,0.1999861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985992,0.00006798212,0.000238032,0.0004320228,0.00009558596,0.00006590796,0.0000414715,0.0000070335,0.0004527622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798857825","doi":"10.21991/c9995r","title":"THE CHARTER REVOLUTION: IS IT UNDEMOCRATIC?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06208294036300185,"gpt":0.2909810495467232,"spread":0.2288981091837214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008827928,0.0003800138,0.0003428588,0.0001354729,0.01329533,0.0001884305,0.0007566315,0.0002556126,0.001656315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006926485,0.0003023333,0.0003468234,0.0006368866,0.02455112,0.0008465523,0.000231869,0.0003748105,0.001799071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004328696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003036398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002243326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004912619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962758,0.0001786599,0.0007288583,0.0005809493,0.001007138,0.001228534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979116,0.0003246076,0.0002428019,0.0004365129,0.0007216923,0.0003628141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000550948,0.00008595133,0.008063775,0.000003190172,0.0001253587,0.00001516748,0.001093842,0.000003922806,0.000008712517,0.8917828,0.09771571,0.001046443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004573496,0.00003734827,0.0009059829,0.00007389601,0.000061875,0.00004838253,0.01171491,0.00002842372,0.00004606872,0.2479055,0.7383287,0.0003915695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005797438,0.003088603,0.02749336,0.07024162,0.004467567,0.0008656385,0.0001586882,0.0002769647,0.8928278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870468,0.001125434,0.0005482761,0.006393376,0.0005958169,0.0001801156,0.00002197759,0.000009671293,0.004078528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551668827","doi":"10.21991/c9kd4w","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter, and Canada's Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Establishment Clause; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02493831321886555,"gpt":0.2755818411728401,"spread":0.2506435279539746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001414015,0.0004421615,0.0003884917,0.00006119935,0.01963791,0.000890822,0.0005511962,0.0002348559,0.0001023649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008987595,0.0002698449,0.0001781125,0.0004190317,0.01564313,0.002295393,0.0003031021,0.0005601795,0.00005368571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001353728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002973736,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09444927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958671,0.0003578856,0.0006525222,0.000444841,0.001091206,0.001586428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971251,0.001313875,0.0003199695,0.0003439344,0.0004294159,0.0004676769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003458444,0.00002848834,0.02121732,0.0000105694,0.0001446776,0.000007264188,0.001405365,0.00004059882,0.00002390779,0.9628155,0.0116837,0.002588039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000712622,0.00001293625,0.001072261,0.000211379,0.00009246625,0.00008737685,0.07041894,0.00003657242,0.00004705081,0.001250323,0.9256184,0.0004397495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04673191,0.160399,0.01770469,0.5319672,0.04344595,0.00666445,0.0007473606,0.001002314,0.1913371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892348,0.007307472,0.0002122726,0.001448865,0.000896246,0.0001207368,0.00002905601,0.000009331416,0.0007412434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123210615","doi":"10.21991/c9sd4r","title":"Autonomy, Subsidiarity, Solidarity: Foundations of Cooperative Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Constitution; Political science; Solidarity; Law and economics; Autonomy; Law; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Guardian; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Politics; Economics; European union","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02673319842238489,"gpt":0.3017333562858499,"spread":0.275000157863465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006347531,0.0002492103,0.0004379553,0.0001248049,0.002782081,0.000185728,0.0004068857,0.0002478246,0.0003666136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001816634,0.0002519001,0.0002241955,0.0003809411,0.01046451,0.0007996621,0.000134437,0.0002515801,0.0002095902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004722167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004561609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007882386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007270592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971828,0.0002528714,0.0006614517,0.0004196874,0.000671587,0.0008116164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979504,0.0004445077,0.0002713611,0.0003061144,0.0006639013,0.0003637659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212317,0.0001084453,0.009719481,0.00001446614,0.00004633001,0.000002282536,0.000299597,0.0001627103,0.0001085298,0.9865487,0.002470529,0.0005067918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008710562,0.00004955288,0.001330247,0.0001330349,0.00003727043,0.00002315165,0.00088393,0.0006280311,0.00029128,0.1067746,0.8885719,0.0004059918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01189451,0.0003076563,0.2719839,0.02139681,0.00266379,0.0008343718,0.0004918707,0.0002280162,0.6901991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958389,0.00003349734,0.0006989852,0.001137719,0.0003372215,0.00006541333,0.00006389115,0.000007410501,0.001816928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22851507","doi":"10.21991/c96x04","title":"Canadian Federalism in the Context of Combating Climate Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; Diversity (politics); Climate change; Public administration; Population; Cooperative federalism; Environmental planning; Geography; Law; Sociology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06104873466404512,"gpt":0.2811990999720207,"spread":0.2201503653079756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007747418,0.0001700477,0.0002266173,0.0002332228,0.001703548,0.00005748267,0.0005028956,0.00016086,0.0002299099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004150812,0.0001550388,0.0001238524,0.0004847547,0.004570534,0.000555208,0.00004274266,0.0002278806,0.00006631837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000456352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002901124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8782298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979059,0.0001487827,0.0004187966,0.0002448077,0.0003786249,0.0009031633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990093,0.0001515704,0.0001812987,0.0002285806,0.0001563439,0.0002729619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001275306,0.00003410045,0.04605877,0.000007723273,0.000009839384,0.0000309471,0.007032565,0.000002173944,0.000002512623,0.9416423,0.004106393,0.001059855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001556381,0.00006837563,0.03035856,0.0004190019,0.00003954083,0.0001121215,0.05074064,0.00008783861,0.00006670737,0.04988622,0.8659782,0.0006863522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04394438,0.001416414,0.0006364276,0.0901157,0.002244061,0.002124085,0.003481845,0.00008657542,0.8559505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869484,0.0001316644,0.0001155839,0.01245201,0.0001356839,0.00009148869,0.00002504747,0.000004682767,0.00009539662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109278735","doi":"10.21991/c9z079","title":"COULD THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AFFECT THE PROTECTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CANADA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender equality; Environmental protection; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05604926180659735,"gpt":0.2850467432627833,"spread":0.228997481456186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085351,0.0002047565,0.0002947703,0.00004908593,0.003083821,0.00004696309,0.0003344098,0.0001173072,0.00007945632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006589302,0.0001231862,0.00009294668,0.0002701455,0.007606923,0.0003604861,0.00011325,0.0002220699,0.00000273556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008102708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002351598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6902221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979683,0.000216944,0.0004333184,0.0002821274,0.0004710452,0.0006282304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986981,0.0004961463,0.0002105476,0.0001746237,0.0003203709,0.0001002071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008725301,0.00003646681,0.03316018,0.00003101284,0.00006518021,0.000001381656,0.004846591,0.00002082343,0.00002066359,0.9603574,0.0007561984,0.0006169035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003087987,0.0001999168,0.09061179,0.0002626236,0.0001151174,0.00004019195,0.184761,0.0002983668,0.0007425501,0.1887412,0.5301179,0.001021273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.86657,0.002044169,0.007471023,0.0257945,0.003540964,0.007898439,0.001106367,0.0001396723,0.08543489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998463,0.00004618233,0.0001343452,0.0002657484,0.00008795926,0.0006886428,0.000008614254,0.000003399921,0.0003021623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7716161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509468823","doi":"10.21991/c9hm2k","title":"The Governor General’s Decision to Prorogue Parliament: A Chronology & Assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Parallels; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional crisis; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); History; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03866494258941048,"gpt":0.3167969669847738,"spread":0.2781320243953633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007476138,0.0002808225,0.0002629911,0.0001317558,0.004570774,0.0001830174,0.0007670739,0.000216724,0.0005401179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001034839,0.0002382888,0.0001768018,0.0005437035,0.006252348,0.0004927529,0.0002100716,0.0002868628,0.0008451486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001216975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005463095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02238023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2010487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968657,0.0001349187,0.0005326155,0.000542406,0.0007275274,0.001196773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980733,0.0002919428,0.0002116115,0.0005172501,0.0003299832,0.0005759561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005277883,0.00006388665,0.005335079,0.000002502886,0.00004294642,0.0000111776,0.0003906076,0.00004888008,0.00002699192,0.8596983,0.1296993,0.00462751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005397246,0.0000477906,0.003380384,0.00006048362,0.0000226619,0.00003946489,0.0007067701,0.00003292302,0.00003629222,0.04219939,0.9526071,0.0003269924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02759555,0.001702043,0.2223495,0.1444624,0.00849894,0.003608941,0.001987979,0.0004028625,0.5893918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764844,0.0002811723,0.006760127,0.00704645,0.0004584623,0.0003681773,0.00003395676,0.00001320147,0.008554066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253764572","doi":"10.21991/c9dd3z","title":"HOW CAN INFRINGEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES BE JUSTIFIED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fishing; History; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03978346633299538,"gpt":0.2880866761370601,"spread":0.2483032098040647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000470611,0.0003812932,0.0005309743,0.0001599652,0.003382366,0.0000683738,0.0008592427,0.0002551229,0.0003331943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009171734,0.000282754,0.0004146682,0.0006520495,0.04133687,0.0007360562,0.0002442548,0.0003135156,0.00001369558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004246561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003363442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005426072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01053462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996537,0.0001869356,0.0007271467,0.0004718309,0.001274406,0.000802715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997366,0.0002730221,0.0006142011,0.0003856484,0.001122923,0.000238175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004878612,0.0001791552,0.06230673,0.000043839,0.0001982532,0.000005061192,0.002589833,0.00005489916,0.0003438279,0.9320113,0.00213645,0.0000818412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003898583,0.0001566687,0.02946848,0.0009391786,0.0006535459,0.00008756812,0.04640145,0.00004720988,0.008420222,0.06115653,0.8472285,0.001542091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2977123,0.002614379,0.02335575,0.0391472,0.01332583,0.004726763,0.0047144,0.0004823853,0.613921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968599,0.000123287,0.00155271,0.0002664418,0.0001585982,0.00007573741,0.00004360736,0.00000577221,0.000913955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516154490","doi":"10.21991/c9jw99","title":"Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 — Expanding the Constitution of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Court of equity; Precedent; Concurring opinion","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0322041707836593,"gpt":0.2834642513646748,"spread":0.2512600805810155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000976353,0.0003034469,0.0004107427,0.00007103012,0.005280776,0.0001122013,0.000433418,0.00019138,0.0001601212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00221584,0.0002282173,0.0001052989,0.0003280251,0.0148583,0.0005698425,0.0002109248,0.0003377541,0.00001364739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005932081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003322865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1608016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4617076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970338,0.0002478334,0.0005709598,0.0004401846,0.0009099318,0.0007972992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978217,0.0007422967,0.0003066295,0.0002762478,0.0005869298,0.0002661397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748342,0.00002523619,0.0222577,0.00002030226,0.00006483485,0.000003002715,0.0005649257,0.0002022561,0.0001754827,0.965337,0.01083801,0.0004837158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001310332,0.00005444499,0.006534383,0.0002970659,0.0001156897,0.00005020456,0.0254955,0.0003176154,0.0005412377,0.01195029,0.9526536,0.0006795644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1079953,0.003028192,0.0202424,0.08674172,0.007092719,0.002479816,0.000615598,0.0003647926,0.7714394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978124,0.0002038099,0.0003267546,0.0007678366,0.000183204,0.00005462221,0.00003625785,0.000005021664,0.0006100415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02057622548626431,"gpt":0.2752041373246879,"spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121789,0.0004030288,0.000433819,0.0002415259,0.00551218,0.0004240726,0.0008909819,0.0003240445,0.001617132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000546345,0.0003011374,0.0003462006,0.0007791452,0.05928488,0.00133519,0.0002070476,0.0005203826,0.001461385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007610755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003357789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002688165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005059341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959124,0.0002017651,0.0006532274,0.0006847157,0.001202813,0.001345115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977356,0.0005928458,0.0002796122,0.0006174498,0.000395195,0.0003792685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260921,0.0000636292,0.03596553,0.00001261048,0.00008209502,0.0000186034,0.001343841,0.0002610521,0.000124198,0.9561523,0.005562293,0.0003513086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001916792,0.0000645707,0.0002029615,0.0002252553,0.0000877757,0.00009657494,0.01694219,0.0003950681,0.0001480287,0.101124,0.8780577,0.0007391192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02037358,0.001332615,0.4799792,0.01892598,0.0116645,0.002374855,0.0002114903,0.0006643458,0.4644734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916122,0.0001850291,0.0004453526,0.00166635,0.0006206725,0.00004806386,0.00004797728,0.00001825301,0.005356085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0139573574144865,"gpt":0.2291164190205911,"spread":0.2151590616061046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005532933,0.0001713972,0.0002692002,0.00006256923,0.002400557,0.00008615841,0.0006014713,0.00008744336,0.00004342837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014084,0.0001076025,0.00007877106,0.0005488681,0.08430067,0.0002037906,0.0001724971,0.0002499774,0.000005795954],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003526074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00714824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6938927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8806365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978584,0.0001998148,0.0004956384,0.0002412308,0.0005934323,0.0006114564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980191,0.001043591,0.0001707848,0.0002511356,0.0002777851,0.0002376234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005639967,0.00001271336,0.01882853,0.000008280284,0.0000373566,0.00001465919,0.0008049266,0.0005187013,0.000002138381,0.9731854,0.006347716,0.0001831822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00372426,0.00002871211,0.0003324641,0.0000660657,0.00005305235,0.00003514266,0.03121302,0.002901639,0.00007017764,0.3467897,0.6144493,0.0003363962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2001229,0.009936154,0.1100144,0.5711628,0.006808818,0.004243264,0.002767392,0.0002601905,0.09468405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958817,0.000624987,0.0001047925,0.0029969,0.0001388674,0.00002084262,0.00004404656,0.000004440109,0.0001834005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7957588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595793275","doi":"10.21991/c98w9t","title":"Jurisdictional Justice, Democracy and the Story of Insite","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Public administration; Law; Downtown; Grassroots; Politics; Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisdiction; Business; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02760026368054896,"gpt":0.3051762843586244,"spread":0.2775760206780755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059006,0.0003518315,0.0005853571,0.0002968204,0.001700682,0.00002715019,0.0001871129,0.0002216015,0.0001882967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001140847,0.0002599322,0.0002352043,0.0003905342,0.01245544,0.0006881664,0.0002087845,0.000694819,0.0001893493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001746847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001280902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002125164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001157142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973464,0.0001751748,0.0006679062,0.0003683945,0.0007091807,0.0007329299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975882,0.000812284,0.0002762061,0.0004533358,0.0004358816,0.0004341437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005723447,0.0002495786,0.0588063,0.0001046557,0.0002160424,0.000009250656,0.0004958747,0.00008537748,0.0004815223,0.9298124,0.007456742,0.001709956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04842157,0.0006400028,0.1149882,0.001523512,0.006156623,0.01344522,0.05261936,0.004450582,0.002965693,0.06013164,0.6921989,0.002458723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.445865,0.02613107,0.1472036,0.07596337,0.009927913,0.004701337,0.001299274,0.0006908652,0.2882176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946677,0.0002607839,0.001659237,0.002068521,0.0004709089,0.00006497702,0.000125388,0.00001641154,0.0006660477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03216580779953247,"gpt":0.2678625653255279,"spread":0.2356967575259954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005300136,0.0004724622,0.0005604799,0.0001906205,0.003807941,0.0002855598,0.001176579,0.0003972681,0.001023749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00130797,0.0004541794,0.0004006808,0.0007319641,0.06685951,0.0008207069,0.0002284041,0.0005808736,0.001629573],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003626934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002356718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002781547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005145117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956628,0.0001869263,0.0007373812,0.0008821668,0.001275762,0.001254973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974834,0.0004203301,0.0002659867,0.0005660158,0.0003908013,0.0008734472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001088526,0.0001477329,0.003512343,0.00001564039,0.0000872357,0.0001058562,0.0008476059,0.001636871,0.00006553265,0.9585981,0.0341926,0.0006816521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002824036,0.0001768329,0.00003375261,0.0001745101,0.0000870843,0.00006585904,0.005861257,0.001704339,0.0002367025,0.1333311,0.854574,0.0009305091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002698894,0.001055118,0.6206998,0.05989508,0.005348041,0.001418179,0.0007608742,0.0009335688,0.3071905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879135,0.0001770974,0.00293045,0.0065902,0.001607412,0.00003515182,0.0001239932,0.0000202852,0.0006019342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22466156","doi":"10.21991/c91h3k","title":"Intergovernmental Relations, Legitimacy, and the Atlantic Accords","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02218111281435921,"gpt":0.2554672496357756,"spread":0.2332861368214164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006301775,0.0001924755,0.0002440104,0.0000516502,0.002297885,0.0001175547,0.000327676,0.000134599,0.0005369323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007528314,0.0001439167,0.0001480916,0.0001913129,0.01604536,0.0006949245,0.0001703392,0.000225387,0.0002423539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002921313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008724854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02024275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004722099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979719,0.0001574549,0.0004109276,0.0003166366,0.0005387746,0.0006043242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989802,0.00029538,0.000163822,0.0002148221,0.0001143631,0.0002314033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007501575,0.00004101738,0.06585179,0.000004305947,0.00003943532,0.000008838795,0.0006098719,0.000001963955,0.000003588012,0.9291236,0.003961753,0.0002788156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003168695,0.00003817419,0.01190671,0.0001857298,0.00008663557,0.0001967501,0.005804311,0.0002092794,0.00002949942,0.1627042,0.8151762,0.0004938717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04677738,0.001433929,0.04219242,0.01670217,0.002709888,0.001225447,0.0002188431,0.0002159332,0.888524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996244,0.0001172709,0.0003384378,0.001262011,0.0001929305,0.00007851554,0.00001212342,0.000005543623,0.001749169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9494666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480693685","doi":"10.21991/cf29363","title":"McIvor v. Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Remedy to Historical Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Indigenous; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02256163048263982,"gpt":0.2761986025802654,"spread":0.2536369720976256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000900834,0.000305071,0.0003496991,0.00008497132,0.008354022,0.0002070301,0.0006256734,0.0001449248,0.0001663161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003444642,0.0001893128,0.000105425,0.0006927472,0.00841614,0.0003270358,0.0003967794,0.000349627,0.0002374069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002358942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00284478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6907783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9345031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967818,0.0002433951,0.000466488,0.0005101523,0.00102924,0.0009689191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977871,0.000548999,0.0001398181,0.0003319535,0.0006269788,0.0005651424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001462214,0.00003397083,0.003771357,0.000005571335,0.00008897047,0.000009619699,0.005957392,0.00004030974,0.00003620761,0.7905126,0.198568,0.0008298187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009760814,0.00005345366,0.002477281,0.00005920486,0.00007239875,0.00002762351,0.01347294,0.00002952671,0.00002570819,0.001130913,0.9813364,0.0003384345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07351825,0.001198141,0.0086735,0.8527468,0.01461392,0.004882788,0.0003300754,0.0002513717,0.04378516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837052,0.00004624451,0.0004965292,0.01226796,0.0007541599,0.0002343881,0.00001190588,0.00000744779,0.002476117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.910187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603399318","doi":"10.21991/c9637h","title":"Conacher Missed the Mark on Constitutional Conventions and Fixed Election Dates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Statute; Convention; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0370479173186611,"gpt":0.2910663429502154,"spread":0.2540184256315544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230148,0.0004761957,0.0004236497,0.0002429923,0.009373801,0.0002252308,0.0004035182,0.0003073598,0.0007490197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001346475,0.0003874167,0.0002781277,0.0006725509,0.03586932,0.001090295,0.0001884783,0.00054279,0.0005999714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004504931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008450248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005400803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961085,0.0003314353,0.000653178,0.0005743455,0.001007992,0.001324532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975278,0.0008885491,0.0002547419,0.0003208922,0.0004977426,0.0005103235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009339224,0.0002536155,0.03506306,0.000007164202,0.0001877637,0.000005520955,0.0002728864,0.00005753114,0.0001221919,0.9447552,0.01832354,0.0008581658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001313231,0.00006746112,0.006073559,0.0001461156,0.0001734733,0.0001850089,0.006095595,0.00005728297,0.0001852158,0.05639707,0.9286094,0.0006965988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02367347,0.01095143,0.04708931,0.1023855,0.01078697,0.003053879,0.0008985454,0.0008430327,0.8003178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922869,0.0004736927,0.0002881247,0.00468734,0.0009657991,0.0002444661,0.0001444526,0.00001068836,0.0008985901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991077786","doi":"10.21991/cf29391","title":"Shouting into the Constitutional Void: Section 28 and Bill 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Law; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Blocking (statistics); Sociology; Public administration; Constitution; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Advertising; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02044038172835786,"gpt":0.2811343804242424,"spread":0.2606939986958846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001118235,0.0004356023,0.0004410167,0.0001557413,0.00798954,0.0003459102,0.0004605138,0.0003483556,0.0005617944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001286176,0.0002957922,0.0002561215,0.0005905405,0.02607291,0.001194496,0.0003605986,0.0005982764,0.0005035949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007711519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001659527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005768777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002845166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963182,0.0002575979,0.0006445725,0.000746825,0.001022052,0.001010797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977977,0.0006981999,0.0002720701,0.0003206589,0.0006039381,0.0003074613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003680838,0.00005005544,0.07188337,0.0000171913,0.0001161913,0.000005875646,0.001982565,0.0004259877,0.000249199,0.9195688,0.004115418,0.00154857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001411578,0.00005665476,0.004298555,0.0001808032,0.00009819694,0.0001138912,0.0385166,0.0004292729,0.00009569317,0.01975173,0.9342981,0.0007489324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3205597,0.009259636,0.03443309,0.1858254,0.02118982,0.006206747,0.0003910575,0.001425448,0.4207091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943331,0.0003493372,0.0007649302,0.001962475,0.000685091,0.000116644,0.00006420388,0.000009809481,0.001714385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999494,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489450614","doi":"10.21991/c9nd5w","title":"The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Judicial review; Deference; Parliament; Economic Justice; Judicial deference; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03814931375419438,"gpt":0.2667368051314889,"spread":0.2285874913772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008572761,0.0003802585,0.0003425303,0.0002511182,0.01661767,0.0002207392,0.0008167222,0.0002902173,0.0006317746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001782612,0.0003145777,0.0003066743,0.0006812212,0.02437252,0.0007595141,0.0001554167,0.0004431516,0.0008408171],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008026328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00975091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.206006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4611138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961641,0.0001783207,0.0005904632,0.0005557794,0.0008615167,0.001649762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975502,0.0005430094,0.0001980976,0.0003492954,0.0006049052,0.0007544291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005844827,0.00005882724,0.01062028,0.000001702339,0.0001224992,0.0000370343,0.0005564699,0.000009386609,0.000005680255,0.9777192,0.007229123,0.003581294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005076425,0.00003459741,0.004924351,0.00006249889,0.00006189468,0.00004572827,0.007093938,0.0000143169,0.00004310246,0.231567,0.7551645,0.0004804799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002829541,0.002505394,0.006357361,0.01256174,0.009163173,0.0007478097,0.0002517134,0.0002912949,0.965292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963424,0.0006297141,0.0002398435,0.001391425,0.0007218156,0.0001564925,0.00003148157,0.00001112656,0.0004757659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967104841624022,"gpt":0.2430327299145546,"spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037484,0.0002737365,0.0002902685,0.00008524668,0.004469809,0.0002304618,0.0009816285,0.0002168035,0.0004544999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003877233,0.0002182826,0.0001730287,0.0004139128,0.07592946,0.000893564,0.0004094974,0.0003204819,0.0001634486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002448736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002390514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004303839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009086845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976404,0.0001222895,0.0003454383,0.0004895578,0.0006411064,0.0007611778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984701,0.0002377692,0.0001454347,0.0004463527,0.0002438872,0.0004564956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275811,0.00003087522,0.002720557,0.00001130959,0.00006266194,0.00004316079,0.001406682,0.00003191564,0.00002411305,0.9568542,0.03811968,0.0006520285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001522344,0.00005533214,0.00005759777,0.00003965401,0.00007112556,0.00008540307,0.02115997,0.0002515681,0.00004772799,0.09260094,0.8837236,0.0003847722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100581,0.003731209,0.353664,0.3064579,0.005108201,0.001916377,0.001167367,0.00073275,0.3171641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912965,0.0002691171,0.0006858996,0.005251565,0.0007317079,0.00002259489,0.00005882592,0.000008999671,0.001674771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19611839","doi":"10.21991/c98m2d","title":"Theory and Practice in the Government of Alberta’s Consultation Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Obligation; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Treaty; Process (computing); Subject matter; Natural resource; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01125353448632626,"gpt":0.2981553040719349,"spread":0.2869017695856086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002044959,0.0001535752,0.0001795893,0.0001283285,0.003765743,0.00008546944,0.0002465833,0.000146742,0.0001556924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001562417,0.0001138363,0.00005657291,0.000430006,0.00619072,0.0009681663,0.000006104465,0.0001747687,0.00005318531],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003421639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01640193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08512461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1511012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972988,0.0007590078,0.0004604193,0.0002476375,0.000730156,0.0005039176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995048,0.003994669,0.0002516145,0.0001946174,0.0003806967,0.0001304137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004250755,0.0001647456,0.001649324,0.0000139443,0.00001772713,0.000001350918,0.05340509,0.00002457967,0.000008046249,0.9436728,0.0003332786,0.0006666015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007472779,0.00004167137,0.001853371,0.00008067013,0.00003161182,0.00008736569,0.119831,0.00001923736,0.000031974,0.122566,0.754501,0.0002087882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0433869,0.0007417999,0.004607667,0.0288162,0.0006802725,0.001869936,0.00004572169,0.00002836327,0.9198232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945642,0.001892915,0.0005324116,0.001201913,0.0001583889,0.00004268683,0.00001816624,0.000003958313,0.001585332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492773","doi":"10.21991/c97m23","title":"On The Trinity Western University Controversy: An Argument for a Christian Law School in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03037837301731852,"gpt":0.2897247159256101,"spread":0.2593463429082916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000559869,0.0001755388,0.0001832416,0.0001158645,0.002672514,0.0002329638,0.0004013078,0.00009941064,0.001255959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001422791,0.0001576331,0.00007528242,0.0004251625,0.002216282,0.001496261,0.00004011814,0.0003936381,0.0001532272],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01997655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8927444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981681,0.0002175368,0.0003271215,0.0003185078,0.000422713,0.000546076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977278,0.001052307,0.0001720194,0.0002723229,0.0004762104,0.0002993701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005086484,0.0001174935,0.009373032,0.000003120576,0.00002396135,0.000003138173,0.0001896448,0.0002287851,0.000008376573,0.9697208,0.02013679,0.0001439902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001549826,0.00004996592,0.003578685,0.00004940817,0.00002401328,0.000006930446,0.03342953,0.000258683,0.0000210956,0.03394923,0.9267537,0.0003289004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1505838,0.00009239277,0.01776034,0.5222402,0.004421369,0.005249578,0.0009506306,0.0001713229,0.2985304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868541,0.00001060579,0.0001617077,0.01200315,0.0001113625,0.0001177208,0.00008023222,0.000004529597,0.0006566067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278371041","doi":"10.21991/c9g66n","title":"R.D.S. V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN: A CASE ABOUT HOME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Genealogy; Ancient history; Art history; History; Archaeology; Zoology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04734872666542914,"gpt":0.2430024200591255,"spread":0.1956536933936963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003730073,0.000435813,0.0003796166,0.0001449465,0.005234115,0.000347211,0.0004333299,0.0001277662,0.003234482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001837453,0.0002952264,0.0003308818,0.0001225523,0.0117749,0.0009879007,0.0002733278,0.0004549526,0.001208896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001090478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000471577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003597975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003901368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974724,0.00009048366,0.0006578895,0.0005176213,0.0004167547,0.0008448565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998322,0.0002234772,0.0002768262,0.0005289422,0.0004543605,0.0001943566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679445,0.0001590178,0.002145197,0.00001781777,0.0002065254,0.0006602867,0.002642925,0.00001822914,0.000002077595,0.9465423,0.04672919,0.0008084876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008426204,0.000119467,0.0001836306,0.00007692732,0.0001498862,0.003436013,0.02100153,0.0000894842,0.00001496032,0.04459103,0.9289155,0.0005789515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01371046,0.003487619,0.004792754,0.01268472,0.00571349,0.0009894207,0.0004725285,0.0004132418,0.9577358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917597,0.0002707974,0.0002499998,0.003499722,0.0005720182,0.0001591568,0.00003075692,0.00001816327,0.003439725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95515725","doi":"10.21991/c9sh4s","title":"THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE: THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Obligation; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04053616749368175,"gpt":0.2969032487083726,"spread":0.2563670812146909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001378536,0.0003189628,0.0002163937,0.000171486,0.01007075,0.0003900287,0.000976678,0.0002445301,0.0006379778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001109289,0.0002132831,0.0001981883,0.0006425501,0.01443217,0.00107752,0.0002058353,0.0004229753,0.001085864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006450904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004042458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009668587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04040901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963639,0.0003055337,0.0006987136,0.0005108942,0.001246319,0.0008746408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974059,0.0005065245,0.0003022825,0.0004102594,0.001054173,0.0003208476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000127655,0.00006746823,0.004295588,0.000002941913,0.00005215903,0.000005530519,0.0006990297,0.0001839743,0.0000880371,0.9828742,0.00991281,0.001690643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007459733,0.00004033824,0.00349748,0.0001131199,0.00004368695,0.00003930803,0.005248713,0.0001317162,0.0003856987,0.1061896,0.8831494,0.0004148659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0160209,0.0005502953,0.1418658,0.05573257,0.007826313,0.002169553,0.0003429348,0.0004430187,0.7750486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912361,0.0001161443,0.0005146815,0.002733711,0.000454171,0.0002241749,0.0001434246,0.000008280455,0.004569326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229666626","doi":"10.21991/cf29371","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Legitimation; De facto; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01423789150904763,"gpt":0.2509128879879251,"spread":0.2366749964788775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005398061,0.0001354402,0.0001649375,0.00004336091,0.001654105,0.0000876207,0.000160232,0.0001212058,0.0003499427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002746482,0.0001181666,0.00004929166,0.0001434164,0.002496521,0.0003773685,0.0001040813,0.000143344,0.00001093943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006756943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004913554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06452789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2485694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986246,0.00007311683,0.000281787,0.0002472873,0.0003526644,0.0004205647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990259,0.0002569218,0.0001676419,0.000179155,0.0002014432,0.0001688979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001975111,0.00001359296,0.05664724,0.00001596745,0.00001985731,7.67332e-7,0.0003090797,0.000495725,0.0003845057,0.9384291,0.003246608,0.0004177959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001652084,0.00005440786,0.04153323,0.0001643411,0.0001000408,0.000144576,0.01137343,0.004830068,0.001290103,0.08031553,0.8579206,0.0006216224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7493054,0.0007187653,0.01411107,0.03249913,0.0005357694,0.001366002,0.0008170491,0.00007251416,0.2005743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974179,0.00008341097,0.0002742633,0.000841152,0.00005607626,0.0000387492,0.00004882506,0.000004271866,0.001235304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555579280","doi":"10.21991/c9x09r","title":"Accessing with Dinosaurs: Protecting Access to Government Information in the Cretaceous Period of Canadian Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Period (music); Legitimacy; Status quo; Accountability; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01890384342914863,"gpt":0.2478984333810817,"spread":0.2289945899519331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007365658,0.0001453797,0.0001805844,0.0009736954,0.00340791,0.0006806648,0.0006105325,0.0001091647,0.0002098158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009730592,0.000112802,0.00007033961,0.001150006,0.003711855,0.002775425,0.00006608446,0.0001775303,0.00005923427],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002298838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007251855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.369337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978864,0.0001086223,0.0004030694,0.0002145696,0.0007832201,0.0006041622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989573,0.0001351801,0.0001877236,0.0002207889,0.0002104004,0.0002885866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004935508,0.00002601372,0.01367792,0.00001534331,0.00001835296,0.00002108844,0.003041413,0.0002356876,0.00007223408,0.9697507,0.003205018,0.009886859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006220014,0.00003517602,0.004379048,0.0003726602,0.00001989355,0.00004875944,0.01381275,0.0000135249,0.00004567346,0.001601574,0.9787821,0.0002668693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1459476,0.0004015462,0.05616974,0.2263168,0.001978037,0.004737449,0.00135004,0.0001474373,0.5629513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977812,0.0000320803,0.0003834614,0.001450254,0.00006543531,0.000108774,0.000008243132,0.000003718884,0.0001668931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271257012","doi":"10.21991/c9qh3s","title":"MARSHALLING THE RULE OF LAW IN CANADA: OF EELS AND HONOUR","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Honour; Law; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03069806144180974,"gpt":0.2435154940380979,"spread":0.2128174325962882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004396872,0.0001253897,0.0002297153,0.00001667048,0.0007804388,0.000012946,0.0002871203,0.0001192006,0.0001710456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001393053,0.00009864978,0.00008594161,0.000223565,0.00833403,0.0002809992,0.00008181088,0.0001771446,0.000002842525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002185514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004073831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6014075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.786193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.00007449432,0.000394658,0.0001887045,0.0003721406,0.0003629483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.0001433577,0.0001725666,0.0001497993,0.0002000696,0.00009237269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001374109,0.00003655541,0.04606339,0.00001515286,0.00002895951,0.000004093556,0.002673819,0.00006364667,0.00005936216,0.9505556,0.0003414476,0.0001441924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003363433,0.00008074997,0.02703545,0.0008772622,0.000184936,0.0001044893,0.1800312,0.0002644016,0.003877943,0.3996325,0.3833887,0.001158956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2839621,0.005380743,0.002841504,0.00967689,0.001905267,0.001108965,0.0005058376,0.00005573298,0.694563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985059,0.0002325379,0.0005194453,0.0005858307,0.0000350227,0.00001715109,0.000007602855,0.000002718365,0.00009377394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7145438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519800358","doi":"10.21991/c9k37x","title":"CUSTOMS CENSORSHIP AND THE CHARTER: THE LITTLE SISTERS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Political science; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04244499575329223,"gpt":0.2150635908340262,"spread":0.172618595080734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009134432,0.0003427533,0.0002954214,0.000146351,0.002988796,0.0003867643,0.0004172645,0.0001771453,0.0003134369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004098633,0.0002018644,0.0001981297,0.0004306743,0.01303677,0.001353078,0.0002927522,0.0004384067,0.0004525601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004139556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002113686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005316724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981129,0.000044249,0.0004602271,0.0004183511,0.0003518506,0.0006123989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986262,0.000251812,0.0002411068,0.0004814633,0.0003558468,0.00004351025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000161851,0.00004870871,0.004906003,0.00004760333,0.00006512745,0.0001569382,0.0001114291,0.00003070106,0.000007091638,0.9902265,0.003456964,0.0007810577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006027129,0.00001797105,0.001904209,0.000229534,0.000539787,0.006787516,0.006276295,0.00388835,0.00005166504,0.1883773,0.7848386,0.001061651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06999905,0.003533386,0.04459336,0.1263103,0.009839894,0.00319627,0.000172618,0.0008865499,0.7414685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867359,0.00003598503,0.0001016537,0.01216208,0.0005619674,0.0001042991,0.00003237421,0.00001420965,0.000251492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9167369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543043721","doi":"10.21991/c98s9s","title":"NOVEL CONCEPTS: A COMMENT ON EGAN AND NESBIT V. THE QUEEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Art; Biology; Zoology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04111659868266362,"gpt":0.2977348988346435,"spread":0.2566183001519798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005902668,0.0003538551,0.0003231316,0.0001384151,0.004383444,0.0001314895,0.0005253176,0.0002012205,0.000559867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005349249,0.0002822745,0.000180955,0.0003464073,0.02949534,0.0004765141,0.0001750016,0.0004026741,0.0001905918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003099842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00393149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005406283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007338221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997227,0.0001681425,0.0004969303,0.0004982143,0.0006892596,0.0009205115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981157,0.0005328002,0.0002063655,0.0003873279,0.0003213235,0.0004364841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005856739,0.0001709521,0.005063674,0.00000524493,0.00007508207,0.00001252733,0.0006439894,0.00003119004,0.00001849777,0.9825001,0.01094082,0.0004793941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008638141,0.00009483236,0.0007487939,0.0000894069,0.00006292287,0.00009512639,0.007986043,0.00002240193,0.00005376519,0.01721564,0.9723402,0.0004270501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001722733,0.0004505724,0.04988936,0.07325181,0.002020693,0.001070241,0.000565832,0.0002699543,0.8707588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722086,0.0001098198,0.001259378,0.02482088,0.0002917695,0.0001059234,0.00004350022,0.00001024281,0.001149955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04711717255424792,"gpt":0.2850996094726049,"spread":0.237982436918357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008937349,0.0002483565,0.0002048024,0.0001683901,0.004307307,0.0001982021,0.0005542588,0.0002352041,0.0006823946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008133965,0.0002012739,0.0002027661,0.0004699711,0.007776425,0.001012841,0.0001011013,0.0002751907,0.0004298301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002456353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001732095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004328762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.0001715209,0.0004993498,0.0004238566,0.0006737836,0.0007264911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986072,0.0001881853,0.0002149149,0.000361302,0.000412025,0.0002163286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003502,0.00007702124,0.005961847,0.000006059779,0.00003472312,0.00001254938,0.002060354,0.00005635266,0.00006810284,0.9820347,0.00867994,0.0009732982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001590546,0.00009132111,0.003127992,0.0001780538,0.000185019,0.00008053462,0.0428571,0.0008439582,0.0007648424,0.7470372,0.2023226,0.000920826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002597897,0.0006924177,0.1071026,0.007479957,0.002651039,0.0007568802,0.00004827305,0.0002918669,0.878379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953935,0.0001650408,0.001106313,0.002150892,0.000305896,0.00011013,0.00006420053,0.000008923374,0.0006951498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211786802","doi":"10.21991/cf29431","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.2","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02915598466457876,"gpt":0.287842262644756,"spread":0.2586862779801773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001106375,0.0008936682,0.0009473659,0.0003953253,0.009955866,0.0007050501,0.0009230415,0.0007493385,0.01114322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001692443,0.0009040108,0.0006857952,0.001203678,0.04017388,0.001820488,0.0004992712,0.0008573973,0.003043969],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02054932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003930468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002046847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917793,0.0004169046,0.001597715,0.001605727,0.002148452,0.002451858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948433,0.0005459508,0.0004596026,0.0008687435,0.002071692,0.001210695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005312554,0.0004378972,0.009231858,0.00002872886,0.0002526671,0.0004727887,0.0003385542,0.0005443483,0.0001645677,0.9512643,0.0357272,0.00148398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00251417,0.00004119636,0.0003247362,0.0003047346,0.0001150684,0.0006647225,0.008403833,0.0001471475,0.0005702082,0.08929006,0.8963195,0.001304604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003848664,0.003332641,0.2445498,0.03156452,0.01012906,0.001560956,0.001334279,0.001083244,0.7025968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813242,0.0004701802,0.005289076,0.005879565,0.0008323414,0.0002445374,0.000750301,0.00002368313,0.005186102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256842593","doi":"10.21991/c9mm3w","title":"GOVERNING THE CANADIAN STATE: THE CONSTITUTION IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION, NEO-LIBERALISM, POPULISM, DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Peasant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Charter; Limited government; Liberalism; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03275263109901524,"gpt":0.2720643479479774,"spread":0.2393117168489622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009918971,0.0003144232,0.0003419234,0.0001782437,0.006220975,0.0001739459,0.0005149883,0.0002246761,0.0001479075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006844507,0.0002400869,0.0001109674,0.0009470995,0.01802947,0.001231856,0.0001225263,0.0004237491,0.00002348794],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006548238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00607634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4096511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8140559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968518,0.0003643797,0.0007035441,0.000464764,0.0007625586,0.0008529644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982823,0.0001734919,0.0003191721,0.0002776432,0.0006282135,0.0003192195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005870492,0.00006977336,0.1490947,0.000004488466,0.00004281323,0.000010542,0.002764082,0.0004463021,0.00001235862,0.8458664,0.0004913987,0.001138427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002990376,0.0001798761,0.2432565,0.0005559401,0.0002824876,0.000184325,0.02745797,0.0009883121,0.000210538,0.483459,0.2389376,0.001497015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4194772,0.008303882,0.06138984,0.05720876,0.008679138,0.006450587,0.001912363,0.000517198,0.4360611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.0004023884,0.0002019215,0.00167836,0.0001539871,0.000071599,0.00009770305,0.00000735953,0.0000296465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5778798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174120049","doi":"10.21991/c95m2g","title":"INVERTING IMAGE AND REALITY: R. V. SHARPE AND THE MORAL PANIC AROUND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child pornography; Supreme court; Moral panic; Pornography; Fantasy; Meaning (existential); Law; Dissent; Psychology; Politics; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Art; The Internet; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05404433395630701,"gpt":0.2946135925161257,"spread":0.2405692585598187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000760056,0.0004323243,0.0005103635,0.0003318945,0.001672147,0.0001051725,0.0003976976,0.0003841606,0.0003875966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002485663,0.0003434883,0.0001875007,0.0004303633,0.0221464,0.0004769563,0.000373536,0.0006193789,0.00009176561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005296013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000192215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001042324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002905632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971349,0.0001866765,0.0007263634,0.0008183826,0.0002800247,0.0008536215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984415,0.0001999879,0.000278275,0.0006864841,0.0001703136,0.0002234114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002905595,0.0001517076,0.118996,0.00001245698,0.0001700767,0.0000630229,0.0004512123,3.19579e-7,0.00004511993,0.8768238,0.00121762,0.001778119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02127929,0.000557649,0.1476536,0.000336203,0.001043517,0.0133869,0.03234457,0.0004639001,0.0003166103,0.6711621,0.1090021,0.002453609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3573583,0.01058611,0.02636163,0.01974731,0.005011803,0.002777472,0.0007704314,0.001190488,0.5761964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965804,0.0001065311,0.0006697754,0.002007548,0.0001177423,0.0001924,0.0000796557,0.0000173948,0.0002285589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6392221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598691393","doi":"10.21991/c9p07t","title":"THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE HEALTH CARE UNDER THE CANADA HEALTH ACT AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Health care; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Health policy; Politics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03051911058648152,"gpt":0.2754743430732622,"spread":0.2449552324867807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116042,0.0001960523,0.0002727628,0.00003686196,0.01587764,0.0001044556,0.0004147918,0.0000840767,0.00004678103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003035609,0.0001005244,0.0001010754,0.0002526797,0.01578341,0.0002323306,0.00009831568,0.000254596,0.000006178555],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001731324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0143307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974941,0.0003823658,0.0004797569,0.0002495289,0.000611082,0.0007831782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983947,0.0003530525,0.0003331367,0.0002616296,0.0003673985,0.0002901051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002752115,0.000005811286,0.006892551,0.000008894463,0.00006488323,3.98766e-7,0.007010031,0.0000343218,4.800474e-7,0.9782497,0.006636359,0.001069004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001439238,0.00004348346,0.09765472,0.000116614,0.00004038541,0.00002196796,0.1024268,0.00007034325,0.00001294488,0.01795687,0.7798841,0.0003325154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01735003,0.02037311,0.001570085,0.8598835,0.004079401,0.004607621,0.0004999144,0.0001069311,0.09152934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939297,0.0004170486,0.00009743108,0.005183639,0.00009892042,0.00006667204,0.00002533266,0.000004536686,0.000176718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9765797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}