{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":556,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":556,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"376c58a9ce66","filters":{"venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel"}},"results":[{"id":"W78933614","doi":"10.21991/c9565g","title":"FEDERALISM AND DEMOCRACY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Allan Blakeney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04544426037578415,"gpt":0.2855656519542238,"spread":0.2401213915784397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304153,0.0004416746,0.0006198715,0.001100124,0.004576086,0.00578618,0.000614694,0.005419605,0.008172616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004889664,0.0002903839,0.0004562905,0.001604644,0.01691059,0.006145627,0.001759341,0.006271772,0.0008856636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004681862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003080996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01067594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009302162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978776,0.001186037,0.00006198444,0.0003110679,0.0002445435,0.0003187688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982333,0.001261979,0.0001299818,0.0001605388,0.0001424741,0.0000717889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000333011,0.000003774257,0.00005256206,0.00000679905,0.000001963158,0.000005839048,0.0001359832,0.00006330432,0.00001160969,0.9976451,0.001350638,0.0007191498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009861818,0.000004555505,0.0001516449,0.00001959531,0.000002804551,0.00001413694,0.0001002347,0.00008571248,0.00003725409,0.9728229,0.02674784,0.000003486029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02529787,0.0507388,0.01620916,0.118829,0.001998727,0.00004793818,0.000205284,0.00005231081,0.7866209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8943967,0.01044589,0.003715543,0.01601665,0.003949276,0.0001519355,0.0001059458,0.00004805721,0.07116994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01067594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0339694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528129522","doi":"10.21991/c9w37q","title":"CANADIAN MULTICULTURALISM IN HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: IS CANADA UNIQUE?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Perspective (graphical); Cultural diversity; Ethnic group; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Will Kymlicka","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.052979621379145,"gpt":0.2848957647658698,"spread":0.2319161433867248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003232408,0.0003722769,0.0005593027,0.00556715,0.04770644,0.01313473,0.002311901,0.003098916,0.007650764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005609393,0.0002709399,0.0003126572,0.01370498,0.01694821,0.003814719,0.002924125,0.004045043,0.000226258],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2329605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.213747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965891,0.00057108,0.00005905247,0.0002807379,0.0008206317,0.001679349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956821,0.001010797,0.0002000387,0.0001273232,0.001845168,0.001134471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003880139,0.00002498661,0.005997305,0.0002769261,0.00002205828,0.0005186995,0.07466744,0.0002556136,0.0001348983,0.755043,0.1258041,0.03721613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008346041,0.00001004555,0.01806042,0.0007886662,0.00002817579,0.0001954993,0.1104671,0.0002693805,0.0001439591,0.02105655,0.8488902,0.00008176427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08332636,0.1057858,0.0007610908,0.3254216,0.002826995,0.00004641019,0.001027512,0.00005516726,0.4807491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903275,0.04130789,0.001209518,0.01593718,0.0004473204,0.00004187954,0.0003136834,0.00007110232,0.03739635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2329605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8896571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152526808","doi":"10.21991/c92d47","title":"A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: ISRAEL'S BASIC LAWS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","authors":[{"name":"J Barak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05232865365993809,"gpt":0.2744731308110175,"spread":0.2221444771510794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004227445,0.0002755283,0.0003637678,0.0008977567,0.004569197,0.006216825,0.0008379223,0.004228025,0.006932674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003798369,0.0001905866,0.000244677,0.0008248919,0.01457865,0.004647732,0.001811206,0.005599788,0.0005237969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008542828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006244191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01364509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01395189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998752,0.0003788928,0.00002986935,0.0001092783,0.0002883913,0.0004415622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987803,0.000694032,0.00009188733,0.0001263286,0.0001726885,0.0001347391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009718931,0.00002863768,0.0001170722,0.000008511026,0.00000144444,0.00002141131,0.0007150655,0.00006205201,0.00009564382,0.9890828,0.005697442,0.004160111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008896652,0.00003031932,0.003206881,0.0000922804,0.000007829132,0.00006839904,0.001543359,0.0003928735,0.0004544152,0.7721325,0.2219643,0.00001796823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1060681,0.008019431,0.002492477,0.1275791,0.0008288436,0.00006065219,0.0002210539,0.00004980509,0.7546806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362056,0.001517197,0.0009452838,0.0148403,0.000821079,0.00006623071,0.0001035548,0.00002139164,0.04547935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01364509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06198281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499700966","doi":"10.21991/c9f66b","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jean Marie Leclair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02025229998304848,"gpt":0.2229640320825438,"spread":0.2027117320994953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04211009,0.0008141642,0.003449148,0.003994651,0.01308194,0.01867279,0.00634931,0.04797336,0.002972697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07425591,0.001508901,0.002395254,0.003488541,0.08594818,0.01684957,0.006659096,0.05497256,0.0007555586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02089606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02528073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03936649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02815895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9550655,0.02189285,0.002455303,0.005590616,0.01185876,0.003136838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9213671,0.063743,0.002981235,0.003795513,0.006391518,0.001721559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010734,0.00001470054,0.00007862884,0.0000197897,0.000008518503,0.00002908898,0.001136619,0.0001671105,0.00001806543,0.9900556,0.006884751,0.001576502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003036202,0.0000107249,0.0002174944,0.0001204545,0.00001167678,0.00003438791,0.0003632931,0.0003680129,0.00005728982,0.968944,0.02981869,0.00002353932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01184306,0.0159607,0.01631225,0.8524187,0.002909902,0.00004798088,0.00009836291,0.00005644387,0.1003527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6575856,0.008235167,0.009000408,0.2896461,0.01585123,0.0003916938,0.00007566525,0.0002827225,0.01893132],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04797336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2227021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300180147","doi":"10.21991/c92946","title":"ISRAEL USHERS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE, THE CANADIAN IMPACT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Zeev Segel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05640675291215899,"gpt":0.2998821573680748,"spread":0.2434754044559158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005406241,0.0003683855,0.0008905394,0.002092783,0.07457951,0.01960388,0.002491398,0.007969419,0.01668887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008320325,0.0004816871,0.0004384057,0.00689777,0.03288718,0.005442443,0.005929015,0.01392625,0.0006174451],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1849184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2013959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992288,0.001019177,0.00009581842,0.0002988117,0.001641564,0.004656702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936591,0.001708246,0.0003485738,0.0001619761,0.001770109,0.002351968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001913913,0.0001736999,0.008007332,0.0001610517,0.00003685019,0.0009008696,0.2875937,0.0003349308,0.0004488094,0.52947,0.1386508,0.03403052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006402807,0.00002708736,0.01425863,0.0002746638,0.00003218996,0.0001829399,0.2889808,0.0001282721,0.0002386705,0.009372438,0.6863304,0.0001097643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2560321,0.01997909,0.0002358025,0.2611965,0.0009443786,0.00005620061,0.0004301392,0.00003970505,0.461086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001837,0.010197,0.0001798075,0.02043044,0.0002374782,0.00003301102,0.0001318022,0.00007224367,0.06853453],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1849184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108103023","doi":"10.21991/c9166m","title":"THE ISRAELI CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION: THE CANADIAN IMPACT IN THE MIDST OF A FORMATIVE PERIOD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Period (music); Political science; Economic history; Law; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Zeev Segel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0424974356862031,"gpt":0.2877173947549372,"spread":0.2452199590687341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464642,0.0004604197,0.0008381164,0.004077714,0.03686222,0.02079305,0.002090133,0.004856074,0.0131201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01584074,0.0004456271,0.0005357108,0.007871964,0.01851785,0.00458223,0.004569874,0.009252054,0.0004139478],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3694105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3367891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992492,0.0006831534,0.00009717733,0.0003916467,0.002850909,0.003485184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910766,0.001640048,0.0003740153,0.0002406051,0.004288784,0.002379888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002340441,0.00006312177,0.00507343,0.0001493638,0.00003283771,0.0002813019,0.01803901,0.0005168538,0.0003481917,0.843042,0.09694383,0.03527603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001020375,0.00003242852,0.0433299,0.0004047574,0.00005116496,0.0000902328,0.02917926,0.0005098277,0.0004914313,0.02502005,0.900637,0.0001519099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1181594,0.0275176,0.0004840979,0.2962653,0.001850644,0.00009991197,0.001422812,0.00009039768,0.5541099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969316,0.01455413,0.0008406039,0.02487703,0.0005145607,0.00005558376,0.0004089719,0.0001093865,0.06170817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3694105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7313945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605094561","doi":"10.21991/c9x68f","title":"Cooperative Federalism in Search of a Normative Justification: Considering the Principle of Federal Loyalty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Loyalty; Normative; Political science; Federal law; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legislation; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03309826142050176,"gpt":0.3159430235126354,"spread":0.2828447620921337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126507,0.0002648874,0.0006676383,0.001534899,0.01263741,0.00843551,0.002284664,0.007331241,0.003015273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599785,0.0002678789,0.0006412932,0.001595956,0.03938922,0.00720067,0.003760803,0.007217119,0.0002612003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02760485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03991754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4149426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.485729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903296,0.003198163,0.0002243271,0.001284383,0.002626699,0.00233672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941603,0.002655229,0.0003314322,0.0006607986,0.001601014,0.0005912657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001095516,0.000001111286,0.00005157656,0.000001588641,6.772457e-7,0.000007152174,0.0003938169,0.00005720761,0.00001473308,0.9986476,0.0003959314,0.0004275241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001386905,0.000006251356,0.0004626701,0.0000387337,0.00000615729,0.00002279409,0.001234287,0.001058737,0.0001198717,0.974358,0.02266151,0.00001712317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1084676,0.002091925,0.0697207,0.1981876,0.0004357061,0.0001291529,0.0001391487,0.0001027506,0.6207255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751736,0.0003494952,0.006317027,0.00664975,0.0001603538,0.00007038502,0.00002696753,0.00002375817,0.01122868],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4149426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8250548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021206","doi":"10.21991/c9f37p","title":"SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS? LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social rights; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Human rights; Economics; Law","authors":[{"name":"Cass R. Sunstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07820777877036614,"gpt":0.2358387415988572,"spread":0.1576309628284911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003302204,0.0006390269,0.000841497,0.001588173,0.004230684,0.005294738,0.0007438383,0.002732683,0.01018906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006894296,0.0002936261,0.0003762207,0.002656178,0.009323035,0.009984738,0.004994518,0.005018897,0.0003673053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00818198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009239641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06405371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08237856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988965,0.000431828,0.00004930326,0.00007206632,0.0001057063,0.0004446062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995128,0.003770664,0.0002494775,0.0001539284,0.000370363,0.0003274776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001312324,0.00008653415,0.00256178,0.001160612,0.00004720245,0.003784291,0.06124995,0.001013412,0.0005487522,0.8155044,0.01598186,0.09792993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009200482,0.00006279703,0.008449169,0.006085052,0.00008971066,0.001107422,0.1100189,0.0004864155,0.0007005699,0.559375,0.313473,0.00005997623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1325432,0.1229715,0.002474607,0.395559,0.001055208,0.00009214596,0.0002027967,0.00002070434,0.3450809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903722,0.06942596,0.001044823,0.01313483,0.0004441818,0.00006581158,0.00005450127,0.0000302305,0.01207767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1273618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493551315","doi":"10.21991/c9pt0f","title":"Case Comment: Canada (Attorney General) v PHS Community Services Society","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legal guardian; Constitutional court; Public administration; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Rahool Parkash Agarwal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04371893510183338,"gpt":0.26364144151413,"spread":0.2199225064122966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838013,0.0006901576,0.0006892568,0.001519616,0.02571766,0.007085541,0.004145992,0.03474118,0.01321872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009727874,0.0008359127,0.001225603,0.002954354,0.006681468,0.002436894,0.002009722,0.02266088,0.001829166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04725691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06291811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9149827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9472689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929914,0.0005696135,0.0001624352,0.0008288761,0.002693659,0.002753966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969037,0.0015052,0.000119511,0.00007759096,0.001031182,0.0003627628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000727275,0.00005616517,0.002214349,0.00007721025,0.0000255843,0.003334387,0.004572781,0.0003464001,0.0004705108,0.2193414,0.764557,0.004931426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001319581,0.00004780499,0.005924284,0.0003714207,0.0001139535,0.001306984,0.01091578,0.00102639,0.001211178,0.02632707,0.9524039,0.0002193122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02041417,0.003788878,0.0009766703,0.6999283,0.00367806,0.0002754018,0.00112292,0.0001190762,0.2696966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1333192,0.001886728,0.0006595887,0.7342112,0.001450713,0.0001487696,0.0003164056,0.0000711672,0.1279363],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08501732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167291807","doi":"10.21991/c9s953","title":"UNDERSTANDING GROOTBOOM — A RESPONSE TO CASS R. SUNSTEIN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Human rights; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Theunis Roux","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1753670521200912,"gpt":0.3212689662745666,"spread":0.1459019141544755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01155746,0.0006516144,0.001072936,0.001177305,0.01454345,0.009500312,0.003043183,0.03278713,0.004632485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02166013,0.0005578992,0.0006957779,0.001848226,0.03595099,0.02015496,0.005427657,0.03884229,0.0007238032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01033791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01238324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04637127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06817962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932283,0.002857961,0.0001904049,0.001271174,0.001334025,0.001118259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909595,0.007182865,0.0002979115,0.0002157196,0.0006900849,0.0006538978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002897839,0.00001726729,0.0001711924,0.0000605543,0.000004795736,0.0002811751,0.00971623,0.0001339942,0.0001120141,0.6146861,0.3688565,0.005931133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002425082,0.00002101597,0.0003887322,0.0006429607,0.000005719098,0.0001765775,0.00897113,0.0002959794,0.0001932718,0.2989363,0.6902897,0.00005420295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00102685,0.005645226,0.0003400352,0.9834748,0.002410737,0.000005256843,0.00001167446,0.000006223349,0.007079262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04310661,0.004454121,0.0006646166,0.9364704,0.005153412,0.00003811147,0.00001510643,0.00004841873,0.01004921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04637127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09220272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485315654","doi":"10.21991/c9908s","title":"CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE PATRIARCHY: ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND ABORIGINAL GOVERNMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Government (linguistics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Joyce Green","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02814757132014619,"gpt":0.3002645235946371,"spread":0.272116952274491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01719998,0.000454575,0.0007475427,0.001300112,0.02689788,0.01921595,0.002277856,0.0113283,0.005649291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01872692,0.0005441803,0.0005887782,0.002378272,0.1036287,0.009902027,0.00998315,0.0149586,0.0002409415],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01676974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04107713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1885652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1919559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878246,0.007999218,0.0002150856,0.0005196577,0.0007625268,0.002678955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991403,0.006346179,0.0006171428,0.0004111365,0.0004704437,0.0007520436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009846603,0.00001407757,0.0002066288,0.00002354103,0.000002708749,0.0001079079,0.1000119,0.00004346548,0.00005784004,0.8970025,0.001159451,0.001360099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006196291,0.00006034265,0.002764657,0.0004624479,0.00003384425,0.000203212,0.2963641,0.0002219771,0.000300304,0.5868457,0.1126209,0.0000604725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2148553,0.01891445,0.003127865,0.2945902,0.00129239,0.000110625,0.00005405372,0.00003063937,0.4670245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771962,0.001895384,0.0004198375,0.005436185,0.000295381,0.00005808676,0.000009006238,0.0000154742,0.01467443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3749354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162755870","doi":"10.21991/c91q1w","title":"Jane Austen and the Council of the Federation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Pride; Possession (linguistics); Law; Wife; Battle; Sentence; Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jean Marie Leclair","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0513180478118468,"gpt":0.2536156607948182,"spread":0.2022976129829714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003959285,0.0003411046,0.0003338505,0.0007754475,0.02654415,0.009510709,0.001394469,0.007084132,0.01379016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01184067,0.0004376163,0.0002328704,0.0008542344,0.008079655,0.007528271,0.004646314,0.01340177,0.002454769],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01219181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01091664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05434321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1249565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938611,0.002729708,0.0001164594,0.000612241,0.001458617,0.001221982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965043,0.0007730573,0.0002696876,0.0001552312,0.0007558592,0.001541826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001932233,0.00001984794,0.000289309,0.00003372703,0.000002139728,0.0001769924,0.0111077,0.00002881422,0.00006777761,0.1684385,0.8132756,0.006540376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001935731,0.000005642618,0.0003291718,0.0000663359,8.442165e-7,0.00006984133,0.00586126,0.00001836836,0.00003117658,0.004361023,0.9892473,0.000007216991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006630365,0.00940925,0.0005239439,0.772984,0.01198093,0.00002158775,0.00004964598,0.00003616157,0.1983642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2937238,0.007532535,0.001261389,0.2447494,0.006290494,0.0001391734,0.0001231626,0.0001728579,0.4460072],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1080538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113985439","doi":"10.21991/c9j37m","title":"THE TRICKSTER: INTEGRAL TO A DISTINCTIVE CULTURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"John Borrows","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04329065382207777,"gpt":0.2276254231445048,"spread":0.1843347693224271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00644046,0.0003645874,0.0006454434,0.001378682,0.02837178,0.02432068,0.001833439,0.009161706,0.008769209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009290558,0.0005572572,0.0004272965,0.001196874,0.1191706,0.0173981,0.01695575,0.01561479,0.0009631948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006136891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01249778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01049146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01464698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906837,0.004237117,0.0002847959,0.001181812,0.001377834,0.002234677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992486,0.002440798,0.0005511158,0.001154427,0.0008997066,0.002468048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007298011,0.00001088212,0.0001807498,0.000007687811,0.000002553973,0.00008557848,0.02408053,0.00001789145,0.00008334388,0.9686795,0.004072903,0.002771137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002384339,0.00002646418,0.0009375852,0.0001209,0.00001490497,0.0003925901,0.05278285,0.0001330115,0.0003606683,0.7063574,0.2387884,0.00006139959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07566781,0.002094441,0.008877919,0.08440901,0.001197316,0.00005428099,0.00004504071,0.0001043969,0.8275499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949176,0.0002737718,0.001480196,0.008056173,0.0002788689,0.00006580853,0.00001457957,0.0001068142,0.04054769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02837178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04452652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489398868","doi":"10.21991/c94t1v","title":"“Irreconcilable? The Duty to Consult and Administrative Decision Makers”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Duty; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Formative assessment; Relation (database); Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Janna Promislow","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03535903856437894,"gpt":0.3217228268904296,"spread":0.2863637883260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03099331,0.0003960159,0.0005403002,0.001133188,0.02517313,0.02475037,0.003306052,0.01823155,0.004910865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03392135,0.0006585076,0.0005206954,0.001079985,0.08478133,0.01051388,0.006296692,0.01811523,0.0008784767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02713093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0690091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2416662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2518058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9655604,0.0176817,0.001105046,0.003323103,0.007025176,0.005304738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831165,0.009984239,0.0008724082,0.001669329,0.002764665,0.001592853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003979086,0.000009173957,0.0001445545,0.00001550151,0.0000021969,0.00009141508,0.008480895,0.00005612061,0.00006880468,0.9716935,0.01610274,0.003331144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002791231,0.00001334493,0.0006388646,0.000315679,0.00001245078,0.0001587117,0.01310684,0.0004321876,0.0004025969,0.6786779,0.3061574,0.0000560216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02058903,0.00558515,0.009902445,0.5794015,0.001148343,0.00009637098,0.000061868,0.0001289532,0.3830864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521973,0.001309191,0.005784049,0.07428489,0.0007159765,0.0001540727,0.00003976449,0.00007136417,0.06544336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2416662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.480519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344958328","doi":"10.21991/c90109","title":"Envisaging Canada in a Disenchanted World: Reflections on Federalism, Nationalism, and Distinctive Indigenous Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Federalism; Indigenous; Identity (music); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Jean Marie Leclair","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02023293116235262,"gpt":0.2829396780795774,"spread":0.2627067469172247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002202712,0.0002952179,0.0003052075,0.001425723,0.04192194,0.01257231,0.001845966,0.00428847,0.005499658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002932595,0.0002292596,0.0003934129,0.002329263,0.03541689,0.00454158,0.005389588,0.006261556,0.0001930301],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1518854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1965282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970163,0.0006389065,0.00004202827,0.0002006136,0.0006115186,0.001490656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986508,0.0004077898,0.00007182345,0.00004958349,0.0003572723,0.0004627505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115494,0.00001126775,0.0009330658,0.00002470609,0.000003891686,0.0003557659,0.08492798,0.0002322713,0.0001093373,0.9001196,0.009500649,0.003769886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002756039,0.0000169112,0.005160369,0.0002559871,0.00002783152,0.0002130658,0.349153,0.001075567,0.0003620371,0.1611542,0.4824355,0.0001180472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2143904,0.008070015,0.002900221,0.259972,0.00079205,0.00007058363,0.0001824151,0.00005269723,0.5135697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632426,0.001671195,0.0007441916,0.006052558,0.00004795265,0.00001794414,0.00002556314,0.00002342394,0.02817448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1518854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9836928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234917865","doi":"10.21991/cf29370","title":"Wahkohtowin in Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Law; Commission; Action (physics); Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Matthew Wildcat","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03714303502622718,"gpt":0.318395759727178,"spread":0.2812527247009508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001990983,0.0003485767,0.0002043605,0.0006211883,0.01077842,0.004647081,0.0009370807,0.002004573,0.02364804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002172743,0.0002142325,0.000216421,0.0005485088,0.006146552,0.002700361,0.005542992,0.0024556,0.001930418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00843366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02542012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3023905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.555779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984142,0.0003126366,0.00004183928,0.0003125805,0.0003686672,0.0005500072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992537,0.0001187563,0.00003965979,0.00009204211,0.0001667095,0.0003291139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172793,0.0001102657,0.003646544,0.0001606921,0.000009930985,0.000834649,0.06312163,0.0002275083,0.001907798,0.7486032,0.08120033,0.1001156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009319668,0.00001789195,0.002712727,0.0001675637,0.00001005828,0.0001245319,0.03126185,0.0002494623,0.0007347333,0.02609139,0.9385929,0.00002752828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05808132,0.001089894,0.006211628,0.02886473,0.001022966,0.0003419511,0.0001774734,0.0002181045,0.9039919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4763479,0.0005853369,0.008787149,0.00581791,0.00003325349,0.0002645087,0.0001078954,0.00007829696,0.5079778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3023905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6012607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948261530","doi":"10.21991/cf29383","title":"Constitutionalizing (In)justice: Treaty Interpretation and the Containment of Indigenous Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Gina Starblanket","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01187790138914615,"gpt":0.2829965478282339,"spread":0.2711186464390877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01397558,0.0003478873,0.0005303947,0.002197808,0.01445288,0.01584726,0.002734026,0.00485535,0.005834758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02112247,0.0002600357,0.0004043832,0.002747064,0.05159673,0.005039135,0.004618922,0.006829558,0.0002691833],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05014605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07555148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8469023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988857,0.003566123,0.0003338697,0.001047794,0.003381408,0.002813833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937592,0.002988456,0.000407276,0.0005959574,0.001880295,0.0003689348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003155146,0.000002192341,0.000119232,0.00001427396,0.000002255742,0.00003156716,0.003908274,0.00008237115,0.00004766945,0.9897473,0.003625757,0.002415853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002706479,0.00001484351,0.002864692,0.0004329574,0.0000421672,0.00006026433,0.01215651,0.0007324924,0.0005429327,0.6484637,0.3345927,0.00006970506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04310621,0.00861306,0.01562083,0.1213575,0.001491952,0.0001174311,0.0002901584,0.0001269869,0.8092758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338207,0.00217893,0.003800882,0.01105651,0.0005851356,0.00008451246,0.00009902015,0.00008756024,0.04828693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3638367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503359472","doi":"10.21991/c98q12","title":"HUNTING FOR ANSWERS IN A STRANGE KETTLE OF FISH: UNILATERALISM, PATERNALISM AND FIDUCIARY RHETORIC IN BADGER AND VAN DER PEET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kettle (birds); Paternalism; Badger; Rhetoric; Fiduciary; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Leonard I. Rotman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04282530135862936,"gpt":0.2262477848248694,"spread":0.1834224834662401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0148036,0.0005563985,0.0007350045,0.002640043,0.0186053,0.01865493,0.002355766,0.0125014,0.005288125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02724349,0.0008800954,0.0004754055,0.003198896,0.0737002,0.02227334,0.007934825,0.01402018,0.0003556708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01084253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005915944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01813951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03031673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847664,0.01193543,0.0002890072,0.00081922,0.001145064,0.001044945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695613,0.02750931,0.0008931134,0.0007267341,0.0008156939,0.0004938675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001276578,0.00001234326,0.0001276953,0.00001730285,0.000002860041,0.00004685459,0.05612485,0.00004959774,0.00003739242,0.9395659,0.002671831,0.001330658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006128925,0.0000205315,0.0007321941,0.0002280221,0.00002217814,0.0001393522,0.09854618,0.0004019419,0.0005002989,0.7681387,0.1311392,0.00007019005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2007971,0.01375549,0.01707581,0.255489,0.001760088,0.0000671384,0.00008590286,0.00005723941,0.5109122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810822,0.000556669,0.001326269,0.00492696,0.0002228766,0.00005536578,0.00001234315,0.00004484376,0.01177237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01865493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07866842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798857825","doi":"10.21991/c9995r","title":"THE CHARTER REVOLUTION: IS IT UNDEMOCRATIC?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Peter W. Hogg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06208294036300185,"gpt":0.2909810495467232,"spread":0.2288981091837214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00559694,0.0003429073,0.0006090463,0.001010516,0.01550844,0.01484312,0.001575946,0.004663537,0.004703062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01166809,0.0002366021,0.0002180767,0.001834694,0.04077997,0.009264503,0.002720375,0.00886,0.0005763922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02638651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03479464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4059362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4856161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930987,0.00176064,0.00006854853,0.0005385718,0.002868316,0.001665278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967989,0.001483948,0.0002676176,0.0002859036,0.0006586619,0.0005050073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006973039,0.00000831153,0.0001103255,0.00001747277,0.000001865177,0.00001874258,0.002552852,0.00004558421,0.00004022278,0.9471437,0.04027373,0.009780193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002249179,0.00001813641,0.001796312,0.0001948008,0.000006657597,0.00002756819,0.007033551,0.0001830357,0.0002095849,0.3497532,0.6407256,0.00002890936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02007196,0.04185189,0.002995229,0.5993108,0.004110804,0.00002640872,0.0001002299,0.00007369102,0.331459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7518629,0.02142616,0.001707153,0.1023616,0.003953833,0.00006069875,0.0001425811,0.0001409499,0.1183442],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4059362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8071467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551668827","doi":"10.21991/c9kd4w","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause, the Charter, and Canada's Patriated Constitution: What I Thought We Were Doing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Establishment Clause; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Hon. Allan E. Blakeney","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02493831321886555,"gpt":0.2755818411728401,"spread":0.2506435279539746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008698131,0.000461612,0.000703623,0.002391945,0.02078594,0.02003801,0.00237454,0.01026309,0.003223497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01400237,0.0004860617,0.0005395598,0.003576098,0.06526093,0.01141166,0.002901765,0.0153714,0.0003077633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09883508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1134542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9508634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933968,0.001293786,0.000131243,0.0007800807,0.002405964,0.001992146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929982,0.003356674,0.0003221136,0.0002542368,0.002185219,0.0008835855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000958875,0.000005818861,0.000386457,0.00005748593,0.000004579659,0.0001086609,0.007906699,0.0001521994,0.00006236291,0.9618761,0.02320187,0.006228158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000239722,0.00001433278,0.001959971,0.0007356281,0.0000202404,0.0001118175,0.01406098,0.0005476262,0.0003826828,0.2321145,0.7499036,0.0001246081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02642168,0.04974108,0.007091093,0.71379,0.003561213,0.00007184502,0.0002570686,0.00008420066,0.1989817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7316037,0.03045119,0.006993945,0.1606474,0.001638478,0.0001023597,0.0002061507,0.000174165,0.06818251],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09883508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7171021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123210615","doi":"10.21991/c9sd4r","title":"Autonomy, Subsidiarity, Solidarity: Foundations of Cooperative Federalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Constitution; Political science; Solidarity; Law and economics; Autonomy; Law; Cooperative federalism; Dual federalism; Guardian; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Politics; Economics; European union","authors":[{"name":"Hugo Cyr","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02673319842238489,"gpt":0.3017333562858499,"spread":0.275000157863465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004867193,0.0001997663,0.0003975417,0.001154145,0.004800597,0.008671283,0.000936128,0.003511325,0.003836104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007905018,0.0002373016,0.0004603188,0.001544879,0.02589577,0.006213673,0.003155656,0.003629833,0.0004476034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01223544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01145558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0418233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02824699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969575,0.001344362,0.00007806499,0.0003193426,0.0007146222,0.0005860438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606,0.002286548,0.0003318331,0.000399907,0.0005332309,0.0003883883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[6.081497e-7,0.000001589349,0.00002413053,0.00000237394,3.318293e-7,0.000004721836,0.0001252468,0.00009424114,0.000006931495,0.9988016,0.0003110466,0.0006272368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036261,0.000001566593,0.0001045029,0.00001709548,0.00000124656,0.000008539108,0.000113936,0.0004205357,0.00002300194,0.9911951,0.00810869,0.000002243008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04542861,0.005602139,0.1317327,0.08728586,0.0005253267,0.00008356488,0.0001276701,0.0001319356,0.7290822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754694,0.001489565,0.01065416,0.001656859,0.000271684,0.00007688536,0.00004606463,0.00002306279,0.01031246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0887748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22851507","doi":"10.21991/c96x04","title":"Canadian Federalism in the Context of Combating Climate Change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Political science; Diversity (politics); Climate change; Public administration; Population; Cooperative federalism; Environmental planning; Geography; Law; Sociology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Alexis Bélanger","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06104873466404512,"gpt":0.2811990999720207,"spread":0.2201503653079756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004513249,0.0003317679,0.0004560465,0.0022321,0.0254472,0.009638744,0.002075011,0.003945727,0.007938982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01112027,0.0003719589,0.0005389205,0.004013134,0.009428778,0.001918542,0.003403276,0.004937922,0.0003197253],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2126055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3617691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923167,0.001021215,0.0001268354,0.0005176712,0.002353701,0.00366395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958954,0.0006638851,0.000152727,0.0001752965,0.001786387,0.001326436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002246136,0.00001230596,0.002199395,0.00007498646,0.00001758898,0.0002532505,0.004572751,0.001000342,0.0001821553,0.8883286,0.08917921,0.01415699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003774545,0.00001583167,0.0166222,0.0002851736,0.00005830056,0.00009504547,0.006116349,0.001306658,0.0002019728,0.06529229,0.9098629,0.0001055075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04132133,0.01554229,0.002173035,0.2768633,0.002263658,0.0001409315,0.001099247,0.0001421802,0.660454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634883,0.009255962,0.003876536,0.02360787,0.0004664588,0.00008343457,0.0004244757,0.0000692337,0.09872777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9132659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109278735","doi":"10.21991/c9z079","title":"COULD THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AFFECT THE PROTECTION OF EQUALITY RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN CANADA?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender equality; Environmental protection; Public administration; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Lynn Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05604926180659735,"gpt":0.2850467432627833,"spread":0.228997481456186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01081312,0.0006291667,0.001056293,0.002035166,0.03656308,0.01555236,0.004178436,0.02169121,0.01210588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02882549,0.001176424,0.001591977,0.002260567,0.01353242,0.004947641,0.006391672,0.0163177,0.0006399223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1133634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2995573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9791901,0.002203736,0.0004284368,0.001170712,0.005483523,0.01152355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882783,0.003369898,0.0006356882,0.0004768823,0.003707963,0.003531171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001756937,0.0001456325,0.008306428,0.0001095262,0.00009200499,0.0006875938,0.01014928,0.001330046,0.001228433,0.9029133,0.0594492,0.01541291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000882616,0.0002190008,0.08886681,0.0009397603,0.0004393059,0.0002797823,0.0293153,0.004449767,0.003574682,0.1646316,0.7052628,0.001138564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1769106,0.00362125,0.002000474,0.4401201,0.002277386,0.0003459497,0.0009225659,0.00009247292,0.3737092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6946717,0.001748585,0.002397758,0.1577187,0.0004766658,0.0002817292,0.0001582126,0.00006314828,0.1424835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1133634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8225126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509468823","doi":"10.21991/c9hm2k","title":"The Governor General’s Decision to Prorogue Parliament: A Chronology & Assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Constitution; Parallels; Politics; Political science; Law; Constitutional crisis; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Action (physics); Government (linguistics); History; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Heard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03866494258941048,"gpt":0.3167969669847738,"spread":0.2781320243953633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007731894,0.0005021392,0.0003348042,0.009484041,0.008572985,0.01303488,0.001725339,0.004239658,0.01439943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01913958,0.0008462862,0.0003483011,0.01453419,0.003999311,0.005842539,0.002918234,0.004808431,0.002939696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05125832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06163316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.711969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8467456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905547,0.001333126,0.0005810802,0.0005097574,0.00518702,0.001834288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858398,0.001869048,0.001411397,0.0002200548,0.00782753,0.002832128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001772806,0.0001495657,0.03353316,0.001696178,0.00002847733,0.001847954,0.01911091,0.0006694982,0.0006219229,0.1183521,0.695942,0.1278708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001141595,0.00002874737,0.0348338,0.0007181086,0.000005912914,0.0001706511,0.01443861,0.0001253976,0.000158029,0.001195088,0.9482742,0.00004010621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.103456,0.07219698,0.002311623,0.1597857,0.009822752,0.00119146,0.01315674,0.0001927983,0.637886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6422761,0.08880424,0.005986867,0.03482116,0.00335187,0.001100015,0.01088066,0.0003325059,0.2124466],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.288031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5794546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253764572","doi":"10.21991/c9dd3z","title":"HOW CAN INFRINGEMENTS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES BE JUSTIFIED?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Government (linguistics); Fishing; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Kent McNeil","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03978346633299538,"gpt":0.2880866761370601,"spread":0.2483032098040647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04233555,0.000620997,0.001532883,0.002005104,0.01140855,0.01240445,0.00338538,0.02346358,0.01058323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08419899,0.0007554362,0.0009722215,0.001214158,0.04922461,0.01068939,0.008509279,0.01372828,0.001484155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008874014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02427408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05395831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04316544,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9605836,0.01700916,0.00130635,0.002913834,0.00914962,0.009037343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619539,0.02164266,0.003163875,0.004198315,0.006948173,0.002093167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017124,0.00003563632,0.0006137784,0.00006765532,0.0000374127,0.0002036167,0.005390389,0.000202622,0.0002865181,0.9852585,0.002869627,0.005017177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006907184,0.0000531991,0.00181048,0.0004345176,0.00008591326,0.0002385376,0.008691746,0.0006402504,0.0009576529,0.8864418,0.1004977,0.00007917857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07168607,0.004023043,0.01523127,0.2423281,0.00131124,0.0001822189,0.0000975861,0.00006634471,0.6650741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217296,0.00186491,0.006279008,0.02787444,0.0006845672,0.0002241214,0.00006019921,0.00006184541,0.04122129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05395831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2238945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516154490","doi":"10.21991/c9jw99","title":"Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 — Expanding the Constitution of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Economic Justice; Certiorari; Court of equity; Precedent; Concurring opinion","authors":[{"name":"Ian Peach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0322041707836593,"gpt":0.2834642513646748,"spread":0.2512600805810155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004440757,0.0006423714,0.0006357224,0.002799619,0.02353688,0.01152785,0.00334362,0.0113077,0.01255579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01211258,0.0009809415,0.0009764759,0.002905237,0.004701571,0.001980208,0.002581031,0.01052043,0.001977455],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1166627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2678153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893217,0.0005065485,0.0002887555,0.0007030507,0.005527349,0.003652668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933841,0.0009930783,0.0001358105,0.0003218825,0.00383169,0.001333361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004755189,0.00004782066,0.001841198,0.00005805292,0.00001424302,0.0002793012,0.002033873,0.0005164001,0.0006901853,0.3384575,0.645851,0.01016301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000331056,0.00001203277,0.008539531,0.0001792829,0.00002561506,0.00003429066,0.00121507,0.0002977488,0.0003559466,0.00757152,0.9816487,0.00008721176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0215546,0.009061405,0.00175726,0.142871,0.005326775,0.0005806924,0.01165667,0.0003679118,0.8068236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1980153,0.004716863,0.005251729,0.1470979,0.001162275,0.0004552938,0.003061939,0.0002038889,0.6400348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8464509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Leckey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02057622548626431,"gpt":0.2752041373246879,"spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576072,0.0004020433,0.0007645812,0.0009859133,0.007418836,0.008512023,0.001834276,0.01476287,0.00870814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04961096,0.000304278,0.0008209473,0.0006292735,0.02002752,0.01194796,0.006958762,0.01572581,0.001327968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00655881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002554666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002646547,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838852,0.007552336,0.0005341129,0.002100451,0.004220227,0.001707595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975833,0.01718738,0.001771083,0.002197952,0.002078572,0.0009320253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005525885,0.000008104024,0.0001356763,0.00001600546,0.000003553891,0.00004502144,0.0006951289,0.000043721,0.00007980968,0.989082,0.007052226,0.00283326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763789,0.00002616216,0.0002429602,0.000213765,0.00001859026,0.0001228696,0.001004714,0.0004355964,0.0003675004,0.7769439,0.2205797,0.00001670515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01769317,0.002713277,0.02579773,0.5592756,0.004426683,0.0001096076,0.00006530715,0.00006845599,0.3898501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7086132,0.002057862,0.01229511,0.222185,0.005611107,0.0004167197,0.00007293589,0.00013298,0.04861507],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1362373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Stephen L. Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0139573574144865,"gpt":0.2291164190205911,"spread":0.2151590616061046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00349004,0.0004468822,0.0006024859,0.002853966,0.05387489,0.02109277,0.002209438,0.005974343,0.01668195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01083077,0.0005618811,0.0004823648,0.005500339,0.01748738,0.003780004,0.007025354,0.008088349,0.001197139],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2811549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3497902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892877,0.0006815305,0.0001474311,0.0005815397,0.003324148,0.005977601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866383,0.001734887,0.0003989274,0.0002247938,0.003796818,0.007206235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001996673,0.00007853969,0.01064421,0.0001630142,0.00004462625,0.000831053,0.02851811,0.0005629496,0.0003354907,0.507524,0.3939039,0.05719452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006484421,0.00002911269,0.0318194,0.0005692733,0.00004599367,0.0001103242,0.05638567,0.0005605464,0.0002863785,0.01796156,0.8919178,0.0002490279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1127693,0.02884223,0.0006923925,0.2861846,0.002706283,0.0001174169,0.001229255,0.0001395324,0.5673189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7770939,0.01078235,0.0005331531,0.05752356,0.0004737238,0.00008257011,0.0004765973,0.0001605844,0.1528735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2811549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8337584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595793275","doi":"10.21991/c98w9t","title":"Jurisdictional Justice, Democracy and the Story of Insite","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Public administration; Law; Downtown; Grassroots; Politics; Charter; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisdiction; Business; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Hester Lessard","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02760026368054896,"gpt":0.3051762843586244,"spread":0.2775760206780755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006278667,0.0002917259,0.000569034,0.0009505018,0.03415611,0.01505413,0.001472115,0.01171557,0.005432065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009288092,0.0004355593,0.0003205228,0.001245476,0.08132557,0.01335179,0.01049564,0.02483945,0.0005650303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01166226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00756709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0306547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04591115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993161,0.003334951,0.0000885059,0.0005527126,0.0008034715,0.002059364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956185,0.002826234,0.0002527846,0.0003079513,0.0002756188,0.0007189018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007881555,0.0000101985,0.0001360063,0.00001160784,0.000002427688,0.0001474887,0.02133152,0.00004784995,0.00002089596,0.9567606,0.01910765,0.002415972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002627333,0.00001568185,0.0003941561,0.000154601,0.000004870452,0.0002181179,0.02275002,0.0001241304,0.00009568116,0.4572442,0.518948,0.00002432598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03947547,0.0112074,0.002258583,0.5593619,0.002000891,0.00002508329,0.00009320337,0.00004368562,0.3855338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896803,0.003317132,0.0003511777,0.06563889,0.001733182,0.00005394747,0.00004999199,0.00007131675,0.03910399],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03415611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08461601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jamie Cameron","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03216580779953247,"gpt":0.2678625653255279,"spread":0.2356967575259954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007674193,0.000442771,0.0006939592,0.001334536,0.01577807,0.0141811,0.002515393,0.01379378,0.02408562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01944098,0.0004437082,0.0006066623,0.001568754,0.01961774,0.01202445,0.008266428,0.01563117,0.003137767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01010501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007112106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02639388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02756968,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992985,0.002716884,0.0002170144,0.0009059444,0.001917076,0.001258194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875238,0.009481271,0.0004810055,0.0007361441,0.0007408928,0.001036862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001415722,0.00002323569,0.0001199806,0.00001340481,0.000003431149,0.0001305107,0.002389521,0.0001715775,0.00007526245,0.9789488,0.01442228,0.003687901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006054538,0.00001427123,0.0004301308,0.00009499017,0.00001126141,0.00008076071,0.003003204,0.0008696076,0.0002800204,0.8572062,0.1379045,0.00004451684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06976943,0.002839379,0.007767022,0.1796255,0.0008792972,0.00005926194,0.0003582576,0.000165579,0.7385363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061123,0.001234022,0.0008523365,0.03772921,0.001785812,0.0001060684,0.0001220629,0.0001493986,0.05190874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02639388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W22466156","doi":"10.21991/c91h3k","title":"Intergovernmental Relations, Legitimacy, and the Atlantic Accords","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02218111281435921,"gpt":0.2554672496357756,"spread":0.2332861368214164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006223401,0.0002105772,0.0004377976,0.002663705,0.01718289,0.01739946,0.001183643,0.002968908,0.00688161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01781118,0.0002252696,0.0002924934,0.00512266,0.02993477,0.003717612,0.003345315,0.00445307,0.0003094005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0692492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08276784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.917052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9398834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912308,0.001574275,0.000166445,0.000549271,0.00321726,0.003261878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891675,0.003283602,0.0014322,0.0006763462,0.003655318,0.001785069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005590765,0.00001039128,0.00196189,0.00001142115,0.000004091376,0.00002759037,0.001682585,0.0001485246,0.00002406071,0.9889449,0.003151797,0.004027063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007995234,0.00002069291,0.03999719,0.0004470327,0.00005470459,0.00007085472,0.01412113,0.001717743,0.0002993001,0.6809266,0.2621838,0.00008095167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1173227,0.005659249,0.003413986,0.08321612,0.0005155599,0.00004930834,0.0002367066,0.00009324874,0.7894931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871699,0.0009397418,0.000390733,0.00133621,0.0000847624,0.00001008154,0.0000389747,0.00001826707,0.01001152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08294803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5024405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480693685","doi":"10.21991/cf29363","title":"McIvor v. Canada and the 2010 Amendments to the Indian Act: A Half-Hearted Remedy to Historical Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Injustice; Indigenous; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","authors":[{"name":"Sarah E. Hamill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02256163048263982,"gpt":0.2761986025802654,"spread":0.2536369720976256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002931548,0.0004039447,0.0003099544,0.001163165,0.02546261,0.007864431,0.002035999,0.008927705,0.0061426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007390649,0.0004501664,0.0005436484,0.001557701,0.01257271,0.002103955,0.002739334,0.00958275,0.0005216303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06677981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1555313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939957,0.0006291838,0.0001234224,0.0004843105,0.002481814,0.002285491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970978,0.0007754319,0.0001653761,0.0001770498,0.001116305,0.0006679931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003607612,0.00001543924,0.00107847,0.00004759129,0.000008972711,0.0003705533,0.008917267,0.0001759143,0.0003514006,0.8004785,0.1775738,0.01094608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002664686,0.00001490463,0.004890589,0.0001992047,0.00002913642,0.0001202059,0.004859321,0.0002024844,0.000690917,0.0198401,0.9690464,0.00008011839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03924728,0.01024487,0.001606573,0.1902734,0.001931288,0.0001002181,0.0006003208,0.0001457027,0.7558503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44953,0.003776115,0.001847091,0.1213225,0.0003718221,0.00008209866,0.0002315547,0.0001270173,0.4227118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06677981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4845237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603399318","doi":"10.21991/c9637h","title":"Conacher Missed the Mark on Constitutional Conventions and Fixed Election Dates","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Statute; Convention; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Heard","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0370479173186611,"gpt":0.2910663429502154,"spread":0.2540184256315544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014625,0.0005943425,0.0008142196,0.002191766,0.02064508,0.01330806,0.003105152,0.01362925,0.00609857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03997867,0.0007261736,0.0005404173,0.001993874,0.04410613,0.01632464,0.006039219,0.03393024,0.001026768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02981687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4161363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4929829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824471,0.005568757,0.0007653611,0.003238046,0.005653956,0.002326823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719914,0.02076769,0.0006297028,0.00131765,0.004164476,0.001129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007181326,0.000004457303,0.0001034145,0.00001739958,0.000001618137,0.00002952261,0.002005651,0.00004893646,0.00005256744,0.9664366,0.02612079,0.005171815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002345381,0.00002659873,0.0007356371,0.0003792867,0.00001252635,0.0001124526,0.004501979,0.0005101376,0.0007198369,0.2971224,0.6957664,0.00008921308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02105521,0.009591213,0.01861421,0.7070668,0.007059553,0.0001081357,0.0003807506,0.0001658332,0.2359582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6035727,0.005327073,0.01077867,0.2685172,0.004126858,0.0002067769,0.0001307299,0.0003145148,0.1070255],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4161363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8274282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991077786","doi":"10.21991/cf29391","title":"Shouting into the Constitutional Void: Section 28 and Bill 21","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Charter; Law; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Blocking (statistics); Sociology; Public administration; Constitution; Business; Philosophy; Computer science; Advertising; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Kerri Froc","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02044038172835786,"gpt":0.2811343804242424,"spread":0.2606939986958846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02534421,0.0006974593,0.0009147557,0.001409266,0.01867767,0.01314255,0.003905556,0.02086895,0.009705625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04748239,0.000830659,0.0008503108,0.001492754,0.02432745,0.004362357,0.005180296,0.01987804,0.001922705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03738941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1289709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7023361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8048353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9643732,0.005852036,0.001178476,0.002865618,0.01514726,0.01058335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844618,0.006313561,0.0006435421,0.001509316,0.004937247,0.002134496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001286138,0.00001360943,0.000284834,0.00001582819,0.000002497862,0.0001084964,0.002982186,0.00007846123,0.0001908048,0.9286286,0.06423803,0.003443723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003615432,0.0000327285,0.002626762,0.0002885848,0.00001822846,0.0001277893,0.002897059,0.0002555657,0.0006382537,0.1014593,0.8914893,0.0001302934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01765454,0.003719073,0.007306491,0.1917986,0.005849299,0.0004604777,0.000566009,0.000294751,0.7723507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3337654,0.001810024,0.008642458,0.2823112,0.002151076,0.0007989133,0.0005894062,0.000485022,0.3694464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2976639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5988338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489450614","doi":"10.21991/c9nd5w","title":"The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Scrutiny; Legislature; Judicial review; Deference; Parliament; Economic Justice; Judicial deference; Judicial independence; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Sanjeev Anand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03814931375419438,"gpt":0.2667368051314889,"spread":0.2285874913772945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006866997,0.0005462288,0.0008633109,0.004873641,0.02485512,0.01855758,0.003120446,0.008183648,0.01885085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02498053,0.0004355963,0.0005403648,0.007574894,0.01844399,0.005227497,0.003216444,0.01200159,0.001127924],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1445353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1356221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881182,0.001198804,0.000271537,0.001676744,0.005677013,0.003057648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982583,0.005728071,0.0007220655,0.0007197665,0.008015723,0.002231382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005401881,0.00001650456,0.002001699,0.0002611864,0.00002621978,0.0001365896,0.006961959,0.0001252252,0.0001299288,0.5783382,0.3714014,0.04054724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027456,0.00000878523,0.007319294,0.0008931372,0.00003774909,0.00006817431,0.007646431,0.0001610793,0.000184237,0.03646715,0.9471171,0.00006942087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009173083,0.0349803,0.0004061827,0.7102221,0.003343513,0.00001706315,0.000835855,0.00005268779,0.2409693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6116655,0.05661481,0.001342527,0.2665968,0.004672507,0.00006935818,0.0009603911,0.0002111996,0.05786687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8554647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"James L. Turk","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967104841624022,"gpt":0.2430327299145546,"spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00394768,0.0004366681,0.0003467122,0.001201253,0.02385075,0.01558896,0.001319262,0.006930504,0.04791499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01282363,0.000480734,0.000266651,0.002405942,0.01020917,0.008444972,0.00402196,0.006958103,0.008653373],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05946197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05819627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9204504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930034,0.0009844702,0.0001609456,0.0006312921,0.003111388,0.002108434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916418,0.001801661,0.0004350438,0.0004138398,0.00227741,0.00343035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001487381,0.000004967168,0.0002137508,0.00002588345,7.477834e-7,0.00004058852,0.001948023,0.00002250012,0.00002406123,0.07076105,0.9181008,0.008842653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003842843,0.000002528974,0.0006337225,0.00005020511,0.000001087708,0.00001335331,0.002648743,0.00001735008,0.0000330967,0.001743144,0.994841,0.00001187821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.006443878,0.02190881,0.0006383797,0.520974,0.01037465,0.00004839617,0.0007331613,0.0001888201,0.4386899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110822,0.009415097,0.0005774121,0.06358073,0.002609893,0.00007017291,0.0004320003,0.0002327981,0.8122598],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.940538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4314288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19611839","doi":"10.21991/c98m2d","title":"Theory and Practice in the Government of Alberta’s Consultation Policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Obligation; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Treaty; Process (computing); Subject matter; Natural resource; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Neil Reddekopp","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01125353448632626,"gpt":0.2981553040719349,"spread":0.2869017695856086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02711934,0.0004991676,0.000584826,0.003232292,0.03197606,0.02598242,0.004826184,0.01577028,0.008147974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02578048,0.0006891586,0.0007336448,0.005837212,0.07336078,0.005967322,0.007538395,0.007876566,0.0004769251],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1488295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2518523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8477166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8512885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9692104,0.01545572,0.0006432532,0.002102043,0.005435594,0.007153013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725325,0.01940086,0.000886784,0.001518912,0.003057695,0.002603305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004388596,0.000009131933,0.000303574,0.00002674315,0.000002866803,0.0000838527,0.004694615,0.0004884319,0.00002388391,0.9862791,0.005363988,0.002719399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004162878,0.00002325739,0.002140345,0.0008822925,0.00002052873,0.0001406173,0.0327842,0.002521196,0.0002066221,0.5830506,0.3781082,0.0000805501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02544307,0.007196768,0.01333983,0.2105522,0.0007556381,0.0001587899,0.00009275824,0.0001422089,0.7423187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064196,0.002759416,0.01032346,0.02256505,0.0002602217,0.0001847136,0.00006331993,0.00007589338,0.05734842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8511705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121492773","doi":"10.21991/c97m23","title":"On The Trinity Western University Controversy: An Argument for a Christian Law School in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03037837301731852,"gpt":0.2897247159256101,"spread":0.2593463429082916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007807629,0.000380862,0.0006473273,0.002262023,0.06830553,0.01559739,0.003441054,0.01567985,0.0135107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02532827,0.00069645,0.0007165768,0.003091684,0.03179121,0.004419576,0.008250131,0.01790095,0.0006655542],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1498236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3014786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880576,0.001900417,0.0001724043,0.0009396079,0.003125118,0.005804877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803656,0.004913223,0.0006607912,0.0005814248,0.004620981,0.008857979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006982328,0.00005524846,0.003503057,0.00005530423,0.00001742757,0.0004770035,0.01749966,0.0002829173,0.000207478,0.8644865,0.1031862,0.01015936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002132837,0.00005696466,0.01899293,0.0006135852,0.000105314,0.0002122809,0.05520438,0.001622942,0.0007490488,0.1014247,0.8205103,0.0002943801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.09907925,0.003733254,0.001228419,0.5438058,0.001678156,0.0001164621,0.0001306327,0.00006791856,0.35016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7676358,0.001422259,0.0009020773,0.1432163,0.0004371081,0.00007180306,0.00006104654,0.0001111626,0.0861424],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1498236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278371041","doi":"10.21991/c9g66n","title":"R.D.S. V. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN: A CASE ABOUT HOME","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Genealogy; Ancient history; Art history; History; Archaeology; Zoology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Sherene H. Razack","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04734872666542914,"gpt":0.2430024200591255,"spread":0.1956536933936963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154261,0.0003721274,0.0004325707,0.0003754697,0.01820739,0.003456331,0.00149782,0.02075965,0.007318907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003696494,0.0007731263,0.0005513765,0.0004656527,0.004641002,0.001931192,0.003348534,0.01629762,0.001337759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005600657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009100547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1514487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982219,0.0005280839,0.0000423085,0.0001593744,0.000296436,0.0007518532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998535,0.0007597906,0.00008033007,0.00003812908,0.0001497544,0.0004369302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001438995,0.000262774,0.006510484,0.0002078387,0.00003334445,0.0400285,0.04331079,0.0006481408,0.001649514,0.3068914,0.5834665,0.01684696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001617548,0.0001943185,0.008694201,0.0007892697,0.00005939886,0.007259616,0.05077214,0.0005417095,0.0009811675,0.02195228,0.9084826,0.0001116419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09774302,0.01190488,0.000862761,0.503683,0.003076542,0.000107308,0.00008650975,0.0000429408,0.3824931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4445236,0.005383102,0.0004415434,0.3051392,0.0008465833,0.0001169062,0.00003843653,0.00005106417,0.2434595],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1514487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3011343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95515725","doi":"10.21991/c9sh4s","title":"THE QUEBEC SECESSION REFERENCE: THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Obligation; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Alan C. Cairns","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04053616749368175,"gpt":0.2969032487083726,"spread":0.2563670812146909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0133257,0.001511452,0.001811116,0.003443609,0.0237584,0.01915151,0.006886122,0.04325851,0.0243961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02805806,0.002234418,0.001862397,0.005169769,0.01128697,0.005160377,0.004867018,0.02991423,0.003979574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2115615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9824807,0.003307286,0.001044208,0.001439999,0.007374256,0.004353528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814869,0.005358122,0.0006091456,0.00155867,0.009176467,0.001810808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000604237,0.00009146314,0.000771124,0.000141874,0.0000277451,0.0004333451,0.003340499,0.0006094598,0.0004385423,0.4344382,0.5470074,0.01263998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001022608,0.00002667692,0.006321642,0.0006180778,0.00005498568,0.0001411422,0.002039058,0.0006916451,0.0004716374,0.0147293,0.9745123,0.0002912451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01435897,0.01691801,0.004830355,0.2438849,0.00821693,0.0006675744,0.005683793,0.0005420712,0.7048975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1144869,0.005460958,0.008993879,0.09752736,0.0017309,0.000838528,0.001654203,0.0005156327,0.7687916],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8211313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229666626","doi":"10.21991/cf29371","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Legitimation; De facto; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Beaton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01423789150904763,"gpt":0.2509128879879251,"spread":0.2366749964788775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009184286,0.0003240464,0.000773155,0.002459834,0.02692934,0.02158644,0.002840632,0.008739715,0.00551143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01902559,0.0004818759,0.0004374234,0.003242381,0.04087074,0.005522575,0.005733399,0.01179364,0.000326391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1057285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1262462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.940161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9484043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876667,0.002142856,0.0002616351,0.001337548,0.005020503,0.003570708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909182,0.003927569,0.0003171552,0.0006433595,0.003364401,0.0008292902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003422359,0.000002591272,0.000219236,0.000005505996,0.00000428014,0.00004880451,0.002763075,0.0001209805,0.00002906775,0.9900174,0.00477366,0.002012079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003568375,0.00001035686,0.003351534,0.000247785,0.00005743474,0.00007024875,0.009065613,0.001803216,0.0005249938,0.7149561,0.2697571,0.0001199656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0821342,0.009888867,0.01062591,0.1601081,0.0009015218,0.00008976774,0.0003536551,0.000105009,0.7357931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569208,0.001459105,0.001942034,0.006356667,0.0002178029,0.00003246116,0.00005962755,0.00005122779,0.03296033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1057285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7671174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555579280","doi":"10.21991/c9x09r","title":"Accessing with Dinosaurs: Protecting Access to Government Information in the Cretaceous Period of Canadian Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Period (music); Legitimacy; Status quo; Accountability; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Kazmierski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01890384342914863,"gpt":0.2478984333810817,"spread":0.2289945899519331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00419519,0.0002355954,0.0003034533,0.002094276,0.03839488,0.01034246,0.002133347,0.00293399,0.005880297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01313467,0.0003185242,0.0002816332,0.003403935,0.0184194,0.002912565,0.00542427,0.003572534,0.0003212677],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1183653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1775715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951834,0.0005958079,0.00009824939,0.0004035956,0.001410174,0.002308696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924354,0.001726138,0.0004987611,0.0007626493,0.002801033,0.001775978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001668756,0.00005265381,0.03483052,0.0001483414,0.00003002969,0.001671033,0.3935919,0.0005066621,0.002373461,0.4358321,0.04323415,0.08756234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000267953,0.00003886965,0.07340526,0.000369705,0.00004732094,0.0003858775,0.1759302,0.0004265124,0.001284322,0.01998376,0.7279476,0.0001537553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5767975,0.003699261,0.002614728,0.05372454,0.0003120663,0.000163325,0.000626087,0.00009594701,0.3619665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711235,0.0008626915,0.001197043,0.003754349,0.00002342423,0.00002704624,0.0001128695,0.00002449401,0.02287473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8816347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8588043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271257012","doi":"10.21991/c9qh3s","title":"MARSHALLING THE RULE OF LAW IN CANADA: OF EELS AND HONOUR","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Honour; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Russel Lawrence Barsh","is_ca":false},{"name":"James Youngblood Henderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03069806144180974,"gpt":0.2435154940380979,"spread":0.2128174325962882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007413972,0.0005984257,0.0009162822,0.003644548,0.04652531,0.02416498,0.003466886,0.006462482,0.00863445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02371528,0.0008524769,0.0007142662,0.006246819,0.03325833,0.008734854,0.007217533,0.01243019,0.000419134],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2950182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4816791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881579,0.001322053,0.0002334963,0.0008929071,0.00352555,0.005868101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855039,0.00338392,0.0005735743,0.0004126896,0.00622424,0.003901659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006849414,0.00004383808,0.005587949,0.0001271185,0.00004181651,0.0003965808,0.04927893,0.001165243,0.0001934118,0.816388,0.08014747,0.04656129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004352079,0.00002711747,0.02627388,0.0007366941,0.0000896954,0.0001424362,0.09662179,0.001929903,0.000645604,0.1069055,0.7662374,0.0003465403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.189346,0.02867661,0.004510856,0.3401238,0.001452399,0.0001360506,0.0005985401,0.0001191029,0.4350365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792578,0.009200483,0.002053381,0.01570499,0.00023373,0.00004646003,0.0001334285,0.0001433019,0.09322653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2950182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.817679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519800358","doi":"10.21991/c9k37x","title":"CUSTOMS CENSORSHIP AND THE CHARTER: THE LITTLE SISTERS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Charter; Political science; Law; History","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bruce Ryder","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04244499575329223,"gpt":0.2150635908340262,"spread":0.172618595080734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006410062,0.0002784063,0.0009275356,0.001652235,0.01563841,0.009324181,0.001822456,0.0147477,0.01250558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01705436,0.0006325633,0.0006136663,0.002659496,0.02058835,0.009262406,0.00641716,0.01187839,0.0005265119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006276225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008323426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05921257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08332676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962248,0.001282211,0.0001124893,0.0004588758,0.0007729761,0.001148673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937521,0.003995897,0.0005174705,0.0003940667,0.0003920665,0.0009483975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003774257,0.00003921247,0.0008088904,0.00001199893,0.000005273081,0.0005394192,0.004103769,0.00008826408,0.00006591128,0.985954,0.005290878,0.003054648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002817108,0.0001293514,0.003652767,0.0004711821,0.00006674287,0.001149289,0.02021486,0.001368323,0.0005128823,0.836311,0.1357321,0.0001098011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3423865,0.003509884,0.002136417,0.08066998,0.0004965504,0.00007135751,0.00008084346,0.00002129467,0.5706272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490281,0.0008735666,0.0003092365,0.01074614,0.0003123475,0.00006205883,0.00002038936,0.00002311559,0.03862511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9407874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1177358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543043721","doi":"10.21991/c98s9s","title":"NOVEL CONCEPTS: A COMMENT ON EGAN AND NESBIT V. THE QUEEN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Art; Biology; Zoology","authors":[{"name":"Carl F. Stychin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04111659868266362,"gpt":0.2977348988346435,"spread":0.2566183001519798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02338097,0.001162242,0.002014437,0.001366272,0.01791909,0.01123343,0.01027814,0.09778126,0.00876039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04569547,0.001506657,0.002466474,0.002232268,0.02431659,0.0137489,0.007332019,0.07736054,0.00355954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01551825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02143653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05390036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0725666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834815,0.004332758,0.001300016,0.002447774,0.006149089,0.002288911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736485,0.0180462,0.001741222,0.00089665,0.004392274,0.00127515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003381338,0.00001635248,0.00009013049,0.00008025298,0.000009663832,0.0002423201,0.002598295,0.00004858768,0.0001218241,0.1980806,0.7972975,0.001380666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006481991,0.00001610869,0.0003060613,0.0002955914,0.00001974823,0.0001876659,0.002298707,0.000121991,0.000335949,0.05700445,0.9392808,0.00006812596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004649078,0.00145733,0.0002540111,0.9767744,0.007415831,0.00001476611,0.0001029636,0.00001751612,0.01349836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009257343,0.0006793148,0.00039467,0.9714959,0.007104664,0.00007332214,0.00003388356,0.00004005258,0.01092076],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09778126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1236519,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Trevor C. W. Farrow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04711717255424792,"gpt":0.2850996094726049,"spread":0.237982436918357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487959,0.0003983384,0.0005704943,0.001343805,0.02090383,0.01040261,0.002833405,0.008687673,0.005904678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01523893,0.000435698,0.000508296,0.001283344,0.03789145,0.004099495,0.005967099,0.008739277,0.000479725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08983638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06671356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7884713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8936877,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867374,0.003935943,0.0003454095,0.0009936303,0.004633636,0.003354028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922712,0.003384879,0.0003667726,0.0005826825,0.002283544,0.001110872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002714692,0.000008792177,0.0005692965,0.00004831498,0.00000661144,0.0001195587,0.02647669,0.000130675,0.0001663937,0.9235947,0.04123083,0.007621014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003913692,0.000009851364,0.002234531,0.0002106891,0.00001876056,0.00005541454,0.01236098,0.0003783362,0.0002979916,0.08894254,0.8954144,0.00003739811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04579755,0.006416454,0.005467426,0.4156603,0.004217129,0.00007475082,0.0001332895,0.0000582241,0.522175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835729,0.001853866,0.001983999,0.04690525,0.001478043,0.00006318702,0.000057582,0.00008813244,0.111841],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211786802","doi":"10.21991/cf29431","title":"Constitutional Forum constitutionnel 30.2","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jonnette Watson Hamilton","is_ca":true},{"name":"Fay Faraday","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jennifer Koshan","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sonia Lawrence","is_ca":false},{"name":"Joshua Sealy-Harrington","is_ca":true},{"name":"Richard Moon","is_ca":false},{"name":"Patricia Paradis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02915598466457876,"gpt":0.287842262644756,"spread":0.2586862779801773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003885109,0.001084277,0.001116278,0.002813405,0.005720195,0.009781303,0.002339717,0.01960923,0.1363631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01214322,0.0009244723,0.00139547,0.001829707,0.001656479,0.003193532,0.00292031,0.01163678,0.06768467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004914119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005645326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02650909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03683506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995374,0.0006731273,0.0002473338,0.0006348998,0.002323714,0.0007470175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976422,0.0009800547,0.0001140698,0.0002401594,0.0007824592,0.0002410384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034944,0.00015091,0.0002876194,0.0002131232,0.00001888474,0.0001720621,0.0002449115,0.0001566031,0.001490437,0.1349249,0.8391271,0.02311001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041183,0.00002216706,0.00128295,0.0001522257,0.00001054518,0.0000365671,0.00007053032,0.0001038083,0.000296272,0.008757629,0.9891989,0.00002728054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001794021,0.006873911,0.001579542,0.02297615,0.01751407,0.0004577058,0.004455654,0.0007512078,0.9435977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01632487,0.001703852,0.0009708594,0.02609467,0.01002825,0.0005671164,0.001326825,0.0004655357,0.942518],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1363631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256842593","doi":"10.21991/c9mm3w","title":"GOVERNING THE CANADIAN STATE: THE CONSTITUTION IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION, NEO-LIBERALISM, POPULISM, DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Peasant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Charter; Limited government; Liberalism; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Harry W. Arthurs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03275263109901524,"gpt":0.2720643479479774,"spread":0.2393117168489622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002350864,0.0004141629,0.0002918919,0.00185689,0.02892219,0.01036642,0.00134438,0.004248368,0.005452079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00419809,0.0002497404,0.0002373156,0.00360681,0.02838947,0.003891424,0.002060072,0.005136359,0.0003097577],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1530066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1655616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997197,0.0004809799,0.00003763868,0.0002648668,0.0009259229,0.001093548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984564,0.0004229203,0.00008025813,0.00008209349,0.0006056001,0.0003527447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001034458,0.00000947449,0.0004733953,0.00003397984,0.000003281448,0.00009816774,0.008405373,0.0002156731,0.00009873935,0.9423457,0.04067099,0.007634893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001751667,0.00001360606,0.007960481,0.0003145467,0.000015041,0.00009174264,0.02560941,0.0005741697,0.000228439,0.100097,0.8649814,0.00009653575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04438645,0.04004724,0.001647685,0.3050212,0.001471669,0.00005438801,0.0003057959,0.00007573875,0.6069899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574741,0.01650246,0.001568648,0.01793295,0.0004113309,0.00003536062,0.0001089311,0.00006303567,0.1059031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1530066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174120049","doi":"10.21991/c95m2g","title":"INVERTING IMAGE AND REALITY: R. V. SHARPE AND THE MORAL PANIC AROUND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child pornography; Supreme court; Moral panic; Pornography; Fantasy; Meaning (existential); Law; Dissent; Psychology; Politics; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Art; The Internet; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Lise Gotell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05404433395630701,"gpt":0.2946135925161257,"spread":0.2405692585598187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017727,0.0003138139,0.0002100561,0.0004939441,0.005893568,0.007094564,0.0006299885,0.004129077,0.002244961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004440647,0.0002410082,0.000201133,0.0003708669,0.02116973,0.006354745,0.004260233,0.009495229,0.0003655226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002968312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001177759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00543028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01003097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979451,0.001383623,0.00002519694,0.0001191811,0.0002227121,0.000304151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985826,0.0009267873,0.0002353189,0.00006134219,0.00005512398,0.0001388042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004305183,0.00008229278,0.002570707,0.0001042561,0.000009866948,0.002777253,0.3223172,0.00009421446,0.0005005207,0.6092488,0.03566154,0.02659023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002267738,0.0001987079,0.008157379,0.0005612739,0.00001595461,0.006073216,0.4318362,0.0002796899,0.0007869612,0.1173192,0.4346744,0.00007436292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2885188,0.03053392,0.002787631,0.3630739,0.002787441,0.00004669969,0.00003603631,0.00006668211,0.312149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493983,0.00790311,0.0003497168,0.02690238,0.001463233,0.00002594963,0.000009144655,0.00003587465,0.01391233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007094564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02153671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598691393","doi":"10.21991/c9p07t","title":"THE REGULATION OF PRIVATE HEALTH CARE UNDER THE CANADA HEALTH ACT AND THE CANADIAN CHARTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Health care; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Health policy; Politics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Martha Jackman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03051911058648152,"gpt":0.2754743430732622,"spread":0.2449552324867807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01612351,0.0009929537,0.00143961,0.003184449,0.02599916,0.01586752,0.004923997,0.01659859,0.007667635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04300551,0.00213699,0.00178776,0.005031943,0.01724475,0.003636963,0.004403085,0.02033785,0.0007357923],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2138409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5573065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9487963,0.006418526,0.001738891,0.002943938,0.02531211,0.01479024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954694,0.0111265,0.002051594,0.002453031,0.0206691,0.009005802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004544212,0.00004570499,0.001276981,0.00007540236,0.00003224189,0.0001125683,0.002664473,0.0006524856,0.0003037444,0.8780059,0.1113441,0.005440955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002991119,0.00005909216,0.03477902,0.0008454719,0.0001403678,0.0001242774,0.003512807,0.002906328,0.000701006,0.08616529,0.8698579,0.0006093362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03358715,0.009550094,0.005123428,0.3237084,0.004192265,0.0007594618,0.00598921,0.0003047636,0.6167852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4929421,0.007969604,0.0169844,0.1717077,0.002170653,0.0009655427,0.002357977,0.0003035015,0.3045985],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7861591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}