{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":222,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":222,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3a7eb3776170","filters":{"venue":"Contraception"}},"results":[{"id":"W2072831812","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2012.12.011","title":"Ethinyl estradiol and 17β-estradiol in combined oral contraceptives: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and risk assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Desogestrel; Progestin; Ethinylestradiol; Estrogen; Adverse effect; Pharmacology; Menstrual cycle; Population; Gynecology; Physiology; Family planning; Hormone; Internal medicine; Research methodology; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04982190646967832,"gpt":0.4019698626752822,"spread":0.3521479562056039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001459635,0.0009627143,0.002986473,0.0005205328,0.0001903733,0.0001505572,0.0001509451,0.0007990329,0.0001888259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002518215,0.0008393293,0.0003039684,0.0003438076,0.0004159393,0.0004416785,0.00006098792,0.002491171,0.00004284592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005398944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005100794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002337188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004064773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947933,0.000995861,0.001543059,0.001408994,0.0004472407,0.0008115742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972142,0.0004005561,0.0009665727,0.0005253548,0.0002711692,0.0006221352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001836006,0.0003372737,0.002542858,0.008010591,0.0003372365,0.00006545481,0.0002127522,0.000002868785,0.0001786425,0.0001816128,0.0002840401,0.9876631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02638381,0.002827533,0.1063735,0.01792302,0.01151102,0.001758944,0.0005499766,0.01409197,0.00001164827,0.000590772,0.8150576,0.002920231],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03337612,0.9560767,0.0007539967,0.0004237022,0.0006327002,0.008116256,0.0001316419,0.0001482537,0.0003406129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01393313,0.9822287,0.001053204,0.000142077,0.000838046,0.0008752725,0.0004126447,0.0001273222,0.0003895844],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987237337","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2004.11.004","title":"Interaction of St. John's Wort with oral contraceptives: effects on the pharmacokinetics of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, ovarian activity and breakthrough bleeding","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health; National Center for Research Resources","keywords":"Medicine; Norethisterone; Ovulation; Breakthrough bleeding; Pharmacokinetics; Hypericum perforatum; Ethinylestradiol; Levonorgestrel; Placebo; Metrorrhagia; Population; Gynecology; Internal medicine; Endocrinology; Hormone; Family planning; Research methodology; Pharmacology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02278147515856155,"gpt":0.2736004773021841,"spread":0.2508190021436226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003187975,0.0001499761,0.0002472144,0.00001487663,0.0001611052,0.00002106002,0.00007657902,0.00008855516,0.00005152265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004498,0.00005525198,0.00003323566,0.0001230126,0.00028323,0.0002283492,0.00003306376,0.0003261133,6.920757e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002539896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004282963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001103862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002714521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991536,0.0001747434,0.0001604881,0.0002086224,0.000150285,0.0001522464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985393,0.001098282,0.0002056955,0.0000351417,0.00008026609,0.00004135731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006244886,0.0000846392,0.003411445,0.00002221377,0.00009721941,0.000001689,0.0004875666,0.00001831437,0.843733,0.0003059588,0.0001309017,0.1510826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001816481,0.001869607,0.7823028,0.0001835846,0.0002440114,0.00004456335,0.0007397468,0.001022827,0.2092822,0.0002799922,0.001916861,0.0002973484],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945703,0.0003539883,0.00002763622,0.004340179,0.00008847174,0.000404575,0.00001666264,0.00002124429,0.0001769023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.0003295504,0.0001129522,0.0002102317,0.0001865248,0.00001366957,0.000004600086,0.000001418318,0.00002089598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7788913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.225311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998712186","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015","title":"Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Royal Alexandra Hospital; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Uterine perforation; Laparotomy; Laparoscopy; Perforation; Asymptomatic; Surgery; Cochrane Library; General surgery; MEDLINE; Endoscopy; Family planning; Population; Research methodology; Randomized controlled trial","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06198967582953712,"gpt":0.3825461516725426,"spread":0.3205564758430055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402665,0.0005196765,0.004567732,0.0002293651,0.00007932514,0.00001925752,0.0001136837,0.000388169,0.000161091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005484198,0.0003890914,0.0003333713,0.000271441,0.0001451188,0.0002205319,0.00003429506,0.0005045636,0.00005059647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002833588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005557633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002402119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961873,0.0006635878,0.001847834,0.000719469,0.0002341117,0.0003477128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970242,0.00009605333,0.00126494,0.0009618978,0.0003243052,0.0003286235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003708287,0.00007790337,3.412138e-7,0.5669602,0.0000900232,0.0007923125,0.00004332926,2.869854e-9,0.000007481058,0.0001053891,0.00001867694,0.4318673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009823501,0.0007621165,0.0000142257,0.771309,0.0131239,0.1176198,0.00005391808,0.00001589534,0.000004769855,0.00004137758,0.09568237,0.0003903464],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001135147,0.9909071,0.0001216021,0.00006363564,0.0002664037,0.007245934,0.00002736452,0.00006282028,0.0001699579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002740195,0.9974171,0.0007190992,0.0001754944,0.0005276724,0.0005009291,0.0001547522,0.00006210178,0.0001688654],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.431477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163844137","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2011.06.009","title":"Induced abortion in Canada 1974–2005: trends over the first generation with legal access","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Women's Health Research Institute; B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Environmental health; Pregnancy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04946528913122727,"gpt":0.2903110613826953,"spread":0.240845772251468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002738448,0.0001481635,0.0001977487,0.0001175266,0.0001555328,0.00002309625,0.00007863314,0.00007631013,0.0004825263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003155459,0.00009993899,0.00003096988,0.0002964653,0.00003616171,0.0004523881,0.00001011711,0.0002565112,0.000007871415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006676124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008047206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.623493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9568174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986988,0.00005855625,0.0003087943,0.000329362,0.0003008391,0.0003036104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992983,0.00001334332,0.0001530615,0.000310819,0.0001253952,0.00009906883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002300079,0.0003268679,0.8727104,0.00006687333,0.00006177613,0.0001530613,0.001514895,0.00009768715,0.01341516,0.0005932059,0.004587961,0.104172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001607927,0.0001671992,0.9921479,0.00003371912,0.00004116633,0.00005863925,0.0001087303,0.001014613,0.001276423,0.000008577752,0.00341545,0.0001197188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938565,0.0001221954,0.0003704514,0.003134123,0.000329661,0.0005222146,0.00000315702,0.00002771112,0.001634022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976486,0.0000425117,0.00003075215,0.0009809969,0.0007560743,0.0001379208,0.00004943639,0.00001688728,0.0003368419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3333244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5283325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2646973615","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2017.06.006","title":"Community-based distribution of misoprostol for early abortion: evaluation of a program along the Thailand–Burma border","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Misoprostol; Medicine; Abortion; Unsafe abortion; Family medicine; Population; Nursing; Family planning; Pregnancy; Obstetrics; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08474776531649013,"gpt":0.4227835627396382,"spread":0.338035797423148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003155435,0.0001194958,0.000276297,0.00003946257,0.0005731625,0.00003195307,0.0001348572,0.0001212716,0.00003348888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001078693,0.00008845059,0.0001411396,0.00007293107,0.0002580889,0.0001857541,0.00001272056,0.0002185298,0.000002639222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008735593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002382657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004989147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001710365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984215,0.0002917357,0.0004512931,0.0001793915,0.0004652187,0.0001908608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963529,0.00008926033,0.0007006126,0.000873525,0.001926072,0.00005761018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003645845,0.001416204,0.1722063,0.0008978194,0.0001124771,5.230871e-7,0.00097101,0.0001070347,0.02933622,0.000558452,0.0006588533,0.7900892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005125459,0.001130039,0.9766498,0.0001979464,0.0004080144,0.00000427281,0.0001859458,0.00698127,0.00634522,0.0003211091,0.002568979,0.00008191179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821229,0.0003276979,0.008595974,0.003813263,0.000197557,0.004663639,0.00006634394,0.00003536777,0.0001772326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979035,0.00001833637,0.0002455984,0.00005825291,0.0002564426,0.0008495667,0.0005965705,0.0000123863,0.00005937651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.440836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163749706","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.002","title":"Estetrol-drospirenone combination oral contraceptive: North American phase 3 efficacy and safety results","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Women's Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Drospirenone; Metrorrhagia; Placebo; Adverse effect; Regimen; Pill; Body mass index; Breakthrough bleeding; Gynecology; Obstetrics; Internal medicine; Population; Family planning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02033584017661057,"gpt":0.3303469781986926,"spread":0.3100111380220821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005157473,0.0002808007,0.0006343378,0.0001241256,0.0002709397,0.00006334213,0.00005149757,0.0001055264,0.00006987048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001105484,0.0002762434,0.00009727474,0.0005482137,0.0002994033,0.0003078564,0.00002914064,0.0003976953,0.00007427087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002012316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001980695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006996301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002558342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973649,0.0002526509,0.0006927719,0.0008271914,0.0003902956,0.0004721599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978767,0.0001743747,0.0003551409,0.000495198,0.000730561,0.0003680306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01238319,0.002248858,0.02124158,0.00009513262,0.0001232982,0.0001596172,0.000696054,0.00001672694,0.04984185,0.0004181714,0.0009256486,0.9118499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0352097,0.002231508,0.9440079,0.00007758889,0.0002086851,0.0002063177,0.0003415103,0.0009662404,0.001589291,0.00003668574,0.01482869,0.0002958499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855375,0.0008141784,0.00367478,0.007459158,0.0003011248,0.001151508,0.0000735182,0.0001751241,0.0008130515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951112,0.0009983024,0.0007463372,0.0007089718,0.0005294855,0.00005157933,0.0008163983,0.00003477299,0.001003014],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979722588","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2008.05.004","title":"Ovulation inhibition with four variations of a four-phasic estradiol valerate/dienogest combined oral contraceptive: results of two prospective, randomized, open-label studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bayer (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dienogest; Estradiol valerate; Regimen; Tolerability; Medicine; Dose; Ethinylestradiol; Ovulation; Urology; Internal medicine; Potency; Gynecology; Pharmacology; Population; Adverse effect; Estrogen; Hormone; Biology; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.106620392869835,"gpt":0.3649119039734553,"spread":0.2582915111036203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001895726,0.0003743568,0.001669172,0.000297825,0.0003200034,0.00002448049,0.0001092795,0.0001429149,0.0000332198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001350331,0.0003005358,0.0001453512,0.0006247695,0.0007679809,0.0007866966,0.00003828478,0.0003304875,0.00001310942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000268759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004044167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000312787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001539671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962603,0.000578857,0.001452418,0.0007189724,0.0005909155,0.0003984991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949648,0.0004870338,0.001346223,0.0005216342,0.002513617,0.0001666875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.7222445,0.005505349,0.03275099,0.0007632672,0.002020848,0.00016169,0.008945932,0.0008651663,0.1944724,0.01590207,0.0008108137,0.01555698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.7013184,0.004644978,0.2729372,0.0009513321,0.00106024,0.0005084444,0.0006106973,0.004252378,0.01024172,0.002944393,0.00004816028,0.0004820471],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725226,0.0006757145,0.01634603,0.001442361,0.0002368997,0.007440821,0.00006798931,0.00009428572,0.001173335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920291,0.000661111,0.005536736,0.00008151081,0.0003058855,0.0005986936,0.0001722216,0.00004274203,0.0005719411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2401862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050322437","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2004.05.006","title":"Ovarian follicular development is initiated during the hormone-free interval of oral contraceptive use","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Ovarian function and disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Desogestrel; Ethinylestradiol; Medicine; Follicular phase; Levonorgestrel; Endocrine system; Internal medicine; Endocrinology; Ovarian follicle; Ovulation; Vaginal ring; Hormone; Population; Family planning; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03215052156379795,"gpt":0.2622038506037963,"spread":0.2300533290399984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002067103,0.0001664056,0.0002660585,0.0001004273,0.0001328682,0.00003440757,0.0001025623,0.0001220995,0.0003765129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002214473,0.0001237661,0.0001304062,0.0002046411,0.0001108467,0.0002241581,0.00004330705,0.0001938433,0.00007870014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001490842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001394508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001381367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000885024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.00004886818,0.0003878292,0.0002234126,0.0002743454,0.0002287251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991549,0.00003032042,0.0001465255,0.000350426,0.0002198231,0.00009803513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02145413,0.004830411,0.0532626,0.0004173621,0.004394197,0.0005056908,0.05989015,0.0007866966,0.7667666,0.01695036,0.01213816,0.05860363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0212143,0.0003653194,0.9452596,0.0001453413,0.0001915757,0.00008378294,0.001971482,0.00008936162,0.01882064,0.0004333942,0.01116883,0.0002564076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855518,0.0001950585,0.009635881,0.002998515,0.0001719349,0.0006443865,0.00001228972,0.00008567016,0.0007044664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969521,0.00003713656,0.001284546,0.001062094,0.00004625796,0.00003165956,0.00003230642,0.00002076933,0.0005332019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.891997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5047034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114720923","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2005.09.009","title":"Ovarian follicular dynamics during conventional vs. continuous oral contraceptive use","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Ovarian function and disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Follicular phase; Gynecology; Physiology; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01150087811441911,"gpt":0.2441237272353271,"spread":0.232622849120908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000208735,0.0002338331,0.0003832189,0.0001548399,0.0001778501,0.00009156119,0.00006083158,0.0002131948,0.002604339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001937643,0.0002343313,0.0002444594,0.0001710559,0.0001157106,0.000487951,0.00002136875,0.0002767168,0.0005724868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003054553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008190332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005803754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001963828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998433,0.00007607124,0.0004063535,0.0003826209,0.0003270062,0.0003749439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990275,0.00005108017,0.0001486499,0.0002715882,0.0002723293,0.0002288821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02383713,0.006086872,0.521647,0.0003645828,0.002622006,0.0008011659,0.00211482,0.001544383,0.07881191,0.1645153,0.030235,0.1674198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02267402,0.0003905273,0.904025,0.0001095845,0.0003876642,0.0003747116,0.000698795,0.01589788,0.000686442,0.00020113,0.05402954,0.0005246675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601681,0.0001807605,0.02791325,0.006011278,0.0005401687,0.0009730504,0.00004615805,0.0003340035,0.003833274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853798,0.00004102595,0.001810786,0.001245072,0.0004257576,0.00004196869,0.0002559356,0.00003801603,0.0107617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.382378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157428775","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.015","title":"First impressions: what are preclinical medical students in the US and Canada learning about sexual and reproductive health?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Medicine; Curriculum; Reproductive health; Abortion; Family medicine; Family planning; Infertility; Pregnancy; Medical education; Population; Gynecology; Research methodology; Environmental health; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02396958055330789,"gpt":0.3635145011831626,"spread":0.3395449206298548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219371,0.0001468999,0.0003472808,0.00005096078,0.0002707198,0.00008270516,0.00009587351,0.0001348756,0.00002657736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001918667,0.0001046719,0.00001935469,0.0001009969,0.00009814278,0.0002654882,0.0000289015,0.0007175608,0.000001796423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001449851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003606826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03336567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.185468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975026,0.0003691149,0.0004596929,0.0005962974,0.0007500491,0.0003222538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989445,0.0002057038,0.0002025364,0.0002847981,0.00009942164,0.0002630372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007799647,0.0003514475,0.5739014,0.0001499546,0.00002163771,0.00008130917,0.002824767,0.00001805076,0.0001325986,0.00003547339,0.001920048,0.4197834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001826884,0.0006268655,0.9870209,0.0004216663,0.00002008003,0.0001574719,0.004197177,0.0002668622,0.000003743723,0.00005757065,0.005308295,0.00009253949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.896572,0.01297603,0.00004074025,0.08922536,0.0002060081,0.0009339612,0.000001306426,0.00002291121,0.00002171405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856871,0.006969817,0.00002650172,0.006360243,0.0007587368,0.00004652438,0.00001464129,0.000008211623,0.0001282124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4196908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9730712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071707652","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2003.07.003","title":"What women believe about oral contraceptives and the effect of counseling","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Pill; Family medicine; Medical prescription; Family planning; Developed country; Breakthrough bleeding; Gynecology; Headaches; Population; Nursing; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007199368429853427,"gpt":0.2815071841695964,"spread":0.274307815739743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001826951,0.0001963168,0.0005801492,0.00007342843,0.0001480098,0.0000557358,0.00005654643,0.0001265193,0.00005360398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000393092,0.0001225113,0.0001020727,0.0001369233,0.0005131513,0.0004373387,0.0000141082,0.0002593997,0.00002339411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001413444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007272067,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004899163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001434081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983829,0.0002285954,0.0004078271,0.0003423823,0.0002876284,0.0003506613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989102,0.0002327794,0.0002167269,0.0002987329,0.0001981559,0.0001433937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05115648,0.0003557122,0.01454622,0.0015311,0.0004902703,0.0000358729,0.03693216,0.0003344751,0.1561612,0.00819659,0.0001290234,0.7301309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1779552,0.01257302,0.7321068,0.002574447,0.001267111,0.0006716351,0.01466881,0.0009493098,0.03904724,0.009464297,0.00767493,0.001047174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982392,0.01076052,0.001508302,0.00297911,0.0004217734,0.001694885,0.000002759626,0.00005413319,0.0001865642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951684,0.003511702,0.00008574304,0.0003973196,0.0004065708,0.0001933046,0.00001046891,0.00001960329,0.0002069075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7290837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4995866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024233726","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2011.05.002","title":"Preventing repeat abortion in Canada: is the immediate insertion of intrauterine devices postabortion a cost-effective option associated with fewer repeat abortions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Obstetrics; Family planning; Gynecology; Intrauterine device; Medroxyprogesterone acetate; Population; Retrospective cohort study; Pregnancy; Research methodology; Surgery; Environmental health; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02249038309312546,"gpt":0.2651088319169914,"spread":0.2426184488238659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105741,0.0002566297,0.0004497112,0.0001951656,0.000159765,0.00001603714,0.00008190711,0.0001497393,0.0001001074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004203024,0.0001919739,0.00008601973,0.0006467307,0.00009798734,0.0005154209,0.0000184833,0.0003762158,0.000005494375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001185689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000632597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2044454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4677729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973421,0.0003256716,0.0008820678,0.0005379195,0.000490825,0.0004213993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977098,0.00009279486,0.0008400801,0.0004337874,0.0008039219,0.000119604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005744353,0.0008418544,0.6774592,0.0003061976,0.0002623522,0.00004917908,0.004207199,0.0001213894,0.04792156,0.000393122,0.000154392,0.2625391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002354549,0.0005072966,0.9836693,0.0005610427,0.0001930219,0.00003352359,0.0007491557,0.001322988,0.01008234,0.0001440161,0.0001981892,0.0001845939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914075,0.0004238677,0.001823494,0.001527408,0.000260343,0.004323725,0.00002266024,0.00005703904,0.0001539415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976076,0.0005702529,0.0001229488,0.000465158,0.0001741856,0.000794485,0.0001900918,0.00003073829,0.00004451924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.30621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8008522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999849899","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.008","title":"Stopping and switching contraceptive methods: findings from Contessa, a prospective longitudinal study of women of reproductive age in England","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Medicine; Discontinuation; Unintended pregnancy; Pregnancy; Fertility; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demography; National Survey of Family Growth; Family planning; Cohort; Prospective cohort study; Reproductive health; Family medicine; Developed country; Obstetrics; Cohort study; Psychological intervention; Population; Gynecology; Environmental health; Research methodology; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0320086966735574,"gpt":0.3465971554643517,"spread":0.3145884587907943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003258185,0.0002548027,0.001107165,0.0002972224,0.0000797925,0.00001667623,0.00007274307,0.0001395554,0.00002975625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002576978,0.0002354572,0.00006544146,0.0003026135,0.0001479537,0.0002881383,0.00004274882,0.0004283086,0.000001692526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003373866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007461865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004410299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969046,0.0006533832,0.000836173,0.0008938407,0.0002981906,0.0004138663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979331,0.0005496799,0.0004753791,0.0004608631,0.0004279173,0.0001530905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003686846,0.0009209305,0.6820546,0.0001227674,0.0001635593,0.0000131603,0.06606918,0.00001166773,0.1993421,0.0002659035,0.000002259353,0.04734699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01089906,0.00255891,0.9657014,0.0002621024,0.0001244162,0.00001355843,0.01444432,0.0002833777,0.003816424,0.001642274,0.00006984251,0.0001843076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856815,0.0005846334,0.01069097,0.0001714127,0.0001503694,0.002510316,0.000005674756,0.00003403789,0.0001710594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972744,0.0000487267,0.002016487,0.00002978066,0.0003230191,0.0002245438,0.000008816207,0.00002506474,0.00004916071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2836468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9601666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064100328","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2008.10.016","title":"The use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in contraception and its potential impact on skeletal health","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medroxyprogesterone acetate; Family medicine; Family planning; Gynecology; Population; Alternative medicine; Public health; Developed country; Environmental health; Nursing; Internal medicine; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08158364174902147,"gpt":0.3933262328562359,"spread":0.3117425911072144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001303018,0.0006489137,0.002402404,0.000398015,0.0002121478,0.00008637526,0.0001202735,0.00049365,0.00002180467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003797643,0.0004162028,0.0005449321,0.0003740198,0.0001441719,0.0003334504,0.00002665993,0.001013016,0.00004245686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005987929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006527018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000742444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007048102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953485,0.0008578646,0.001652588,0.000836783,0.000531444,0.000772818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971731,0.0002901343,0.001326062,0.0006204837,0.000240081,0.0003501344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006306767,0.0002554834,0.0000315315,0.003506176,0.0001048418,0.00002292109,0.00006884353,0.00002093591,0.00008261202,0.00007968124,0.0001841699,0.9950121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00877749,0.007676718,0.1268793,0.03578476,0.001671274,0.001541213,0.000091384,0.001404903,0.00001543687,0.0001254121,0.8147534,0.001278795],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02921037,0.9635302,0.0001235314,0.001241876,0.0003273,0.005440198,0.00005636,0.00005737384,0.00001281299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05475042,0.9437038,0.00005486631,0.0001568857,0.0006053766,0.0001781331,0.0002454201,0.00006356307,0.0002415835],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484650117","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.010","title":"Co-administration of St. John's wort and hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Biological and pharmacological studies of plants","field":"Medicine","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Medicine; Administration (probate law); Hormonal contraception; Hormone; Family planning; Gynecology; Physiology; Research methodology; Population; Internal medicine; Environmental health; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07002323333687963,"gpt":0.3918412765022458,"spread":0.3218180431653661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006671214,0.0003880179,0.0036816,0.00005371966,0.00006480751,0.00001072454,0.0001052388,0.0003963805,0.0006047188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005202959,0.0001899488,0.0004421749,0.0001015233,0.0002375665,0.00005178363,0.00002599392,0.0003024696,0.00009672877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007031146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008400514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.442939e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.740867e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976312,0.0003393326,0.001142573,0.0003874521,0.0002577046,0.0002417694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980151,0.0006165104,0.0008764325,0.000185031,0.0001406645,0.0001662666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008615963,0.0001164002,0.000004706528,0.750955,0.0003461557,0.0000407456,0.000004737519,4.473016e-10,0.00003456917,0.00008889525,0.001629726,0.2466929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000585968,0.0008003488,0.0001640759,0.6681119,0.005188035,0.0002853303,0.000008878284,3.90627e-7,0.000002237136,0.000027848,0.3245703,0.0002546609],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002023515,0.9941253,0.00006637671,0.0002133969,0.00007471398,0.004263188,0.0003995811,0.00004076684,0.0007964226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006187293,0.9978322,0.00002984279,0.0002661989,0.0001844211,0.0003959914,0.000271952,0.00001410065,0.0003865535],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3229406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754024114","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.007","title":"Developing a forward-looking agenda and methodologies for research of self-use of medical abortion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; World Health Organization","keywords":"Abortion; Medicine; Medical abortion; Pharmacy; Medical prescription; Health care; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Public relations; Nursing; Medical education; Misoprostol; Political science; Pregnancy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.455530650888096,"gpt":0.5442438616596973,"spread":0.08871321077160127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004925971,0.000083494,0.0003433583,0.0001463139,0.0002619179,0.00002913283,0.00009536989,0.0001947654,0.00001570476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099531,0.00007188696,0.00006135701,0.00005996687,0.0002466717,0.0002650426,0.00005344295,0.0001903159,9.586814e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006786908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001391851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000434867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983666,0.0001923836,0.000406338,0.0002772653,0.0005102123,0.0002472268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978407,0.0005487241,0.0003250372,0.0003681763,0.0008318667,0.0000854785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002001696,0.0001363869,0.05162572,0.002176573,0.0001452007,0.000007282767,0.001704358,0.000002418467,0.1183549,0.01703759,0.0005153599,0.8062925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003198297,0.0007083116,0.9481943,0.0007524032,0.0001189833,0.00003719476,0.0007734828,0.001657024,0.03274118,0.004463871,0.007222536,0.0001323903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925846,0.0005719058,0.09910997,0.006455661,0.0001651548,0.001019122,0.000005144187,0.00002973925,0.0000587132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587893,0.001445016,0.03925874,0.00005343313,0.0002842713,0.00008118802,0.00000957472,0.00001154865,0.0000669501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8965686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920258013","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.001","title":"Segesterone acetate/ethinyl estradiol 12-month contraceptive vaginal system safety evaluation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"NIH Clinical Center; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of California, San Francisco; University of California, Los Angeles; United States Agency for International Development; Ohio State University; National Institutes of Health; Indian Council for Cultural Relations; Eastern Virginia Medical School; Universidad de Chile; University of Southern California; York University; UNICEF; Population Council","keywords":"Medicine; Nausea; Adverse effect; Body mass index; Gynecology; Population; Obstetrics; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02360333776846409,"gpt":0.2994599433552267,"spread":0.2758566055867626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00247169,0.0004303705,0.0008220525,0.0002180115,0.0002198915,0.00006852705,0.0001325554,0.0003719134,0.0008982113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002173271,0.0003965818,0.0002193016,0.0002428806,0.0001203253,0.0006450955,0.00002420065,0.0006406413,0.00151829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001249032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004404594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008725729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004505585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957744,0.0005200212,0.0008786677,0.001026522,0.001088475,0.0007118454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972836,0.0001253176,0.0004582019,0.0008556644,0.0009047647,0.0003724821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01752642,0.001126319,0.0898102,0.002214547,0.0007208372,0.0001156942,0.004601484,0.001471562,0.3236426,0.007964495,0.00222918,0.5485767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01937928,0.002288698,0.9309389,0.0008955756,0.0008697932,0.0006970285,0.003037309,0.0302334,0.002148749,0.0001848327,0.008600206,0.0007262099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622335,0.001714464,0.007226246,0.002938664,0.001788367,0.006980994,0.00002902738,0.0004184039,0.01667034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942799,0.0001344704,0.0005262977,0.0003575016,0.001369538,0.0002920027,0.0003160061,0.0000631917,0.00266116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059656428","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00214-1","title":"Comparison of a novel norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo) with the oral contraceptive Loestrin Fe 1/20","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Collège Shawinigan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Cyclen; Regimen; Ethinylestradiol; Gynecology; Population; Obstetrics; Internal medicine; Research methodology; Stereochemistry; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06414190342348913,"gpt":0.3638670896050844,"spread":0.2997251861815953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001436771,0.0007424643,0.001725193,0.0002704349,0.0004482398,0.0001019597,0.0003286114,0.0004797615,0.0003492874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004714944,0.0005186846,0.0003580401,0.0008007978,0.0009602038,0.0006120397,0.00004578354,0.001283733,0.0001022833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003760913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005298788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000475969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949612,0.0003992138,0.001331541,0.001130639,0.001052595,0.001124831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957284,0.0004714596,0.001108143,0.0009959474,0.001186766,0.0005092542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0435441,0.008390783,0.3853539,0.0005406269,0.001523209,0.0002832572,0.009713793,0.003047224,0.3223169,0.005022608,0.006214099,0.2140495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03464881,0.007304278,0.8914444,0.0007696155,0.001779218,0.001225954,0.009729563,0.01814631,0.007294051,0.0001623563,0.02610902,0.001386396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9387381,0.00139792,0.04245697,0.01039883,0.0003351114,0.00437258,0.00009048586,0.0002618818,0.001948099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940372,0.0001983052,0.002381403,0.0006186937,0.0007293363,0.000319308,0.0001981927,0.000100659,0.00141689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5060905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082322481","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.002","title":"Use of contraceptive methods and contraceptive recommendations among health care providers actively involved in contraceptive counseling — results of an international survey in 10 countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Family medicine; Family planning; Levonorgestrel; Gynecology; Developed country; Population; Obstetrics; Demography; Research methodology; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09764453790673545,"gpt":0.4125908621202364,"spread":0.3149463242135009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005675219,0.0004554463,0.001368866,0.0007771137,0.000126889,0.00005238515,0.0001486063,0.0003858498,0.0001004062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003796537,0.0004637628,0.0001290115,0.0005527628,0.0006421133,0.002921824,0.00004372345,0.0006805023,0.00000413698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008860317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005799925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006928729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933971,0.002376928,0.002035965,0.0008534587,0.0005277894,0.0008088103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939663,0.001718227,0.001573171,0.0004932357,0.00184458,0.0004044202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03023907,0.002011565,0.7133973,0.0004609739,0.0003285162,0.000008989484,0.08167882,0.0002018628,0.02045637,0.000558572,0.0003661058,0.1502918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00951996,0.001099991,0.9607934,0.0006400316,0.00007452007,0.00001061859,0.02144493,0.001104194,0.003601636,0.00003973266,0.001312205,0.0003587606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885056,0.002227309,0.002689648,0.001579754,0.0004802359,0.003579167,0.0007520637,0.00005146893,0.0001347707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888774,0.001716421,0.007634194,0.0002271209,0.0002331819,0.0002041899,0.0009655639,0.00005137309,0.00009056416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2473961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112729447","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.018","title":"Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for heavy menstrual bleeding improves hemoglobin and ferritin levels","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Uterine Myomas and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Bayer HealthCare; College of Medicine, University of Florida; University of Florida","keywords":"Medicine; Levonorgestrel; Ferritin; Hemoglobin; Menstrual cycle; Medroxyprogesterone acetate; Menstruation; Internal medicine; Population; Estrogen; Family planning; Research methodology; Hormone","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02976250123883089,"gpt":0.2866578125473658,"spread":0.2568953113085349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001265926,0.0001734747,0.0002915848,0.00006094804,0.0001187421,0.00004137258,0.00002571444,0.00008953768,0.00001679243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002876221,0.0001522375,0.00006245142,0.00004808325,0.0000360517,0.000246278,0.00002650353,0.00007555237,0.000009576454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001900878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000460192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003173535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990665,0.0000174833,0.0002443668,0.0002061868,0.0001009793,0.0003644662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995055,0.00003938381,0.00008285596,0.000124846,0.00005889886,0.000188558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008727145,0.0003827886,0.03585253,0.001153284,0.0003327905,0.00003085396,0.0006225505,8.711697e-7,0.5876028,0.005740432,0.0002960952,0.3671123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01916043,0.001821836,0.8708908,0.001247064,0.000967089,0.002440607,0.001414077,0.003341771,0.08718139,0.0001319017,0.01062707,0.0007759637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949032,0.0006887981,0.002215308,0.0005248184,0.0004472209,0.0006839688,0.00003427755,0.0001177926,0.0003845873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948428,0.000047904,0.003952219,0.0000537679,0.0007489783,0.00007249019,0.00004354366,0.00002872513,0.0002095534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8350383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6208065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082110754","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00473-0","title":"Serum distribution of the major metabolites of norgestimate in relation to its pharmacological properties","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Hormonal and reproductive studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex hormone-binding globulin; Levonorgestrel; Metabolite; Free fraction; Medicine; Internal medicine; Endocrinology; Testosterone (patch); Ethinylestradiol; Globulin; Albumin; Pharmacokinetics; Hormone; Population; Androgen; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03401485028431556,"gpt":0.2873051260206941,"spread":0.2532902757363785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002211878,0.00005653498,0.0001759468,0.00002394864,0.00003093581,0.000001282525,0.00002277404,0.00003260429,0.00002683648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005144641,0.00003016839,0.00004020772,0.0001748989,0.00005833096,0.00004424606,0.00001322934,0.00006876948,0.000005650896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002959701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001933061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006092091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003690241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994304,0.00006947255,0.0001920423,0.0001079787,0.0001161002,0.00008403347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996696,0.00001432467,0.00006350713,0.00005973913,0.0001737545,0.00001910477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001880127,0.0001387287,0.04536848,0.00005200636,0.00003654298,5.663999e-7,0.0003374293,0.00008343555,0.951623,0.00136805,0.00003403363,0.0007696978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003609824,0.00005788328,0.6428156,0.00002531974,0.00009324373,0.000001953577,0.0001003574,0.00003792128,0.3562549,0.00006319417,0.0001643142,0.00002424413],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961023,0.001280919,0.00009819334,0.001601991,0.00007937804,0.0005241778,0.00001340051,0.000007648972,0.0002919713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994994,0.00004353415,0.00004894406,0.00002340066,0.0000256743,0.00002320478,0.000003554296,0.000002762802,0.0003295294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5974472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1230231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560545385","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2016.11.008","title":"Use of the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system in adolescent and young adult solid organ transplant recipients: a case series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Pregnancy and Medication Impact","field":"Medicine","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Levonorgestrel; Medicine; Solid organ; Pregnancy; Intrauterine device; Young adult; Obstetrics; Organ transplantation; Family planning; Gynecology; Population; Transplantation; Internal medicine; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02383611174508328,"gpt":0.2591231487100322,"spread":0.2352870369649489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001311287,0.0001011873,0.0001979654,0.00005865617,0.00003683016,0.000007657251,0.00003770463,0.00007703731,0.00001976188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001636796,0.00005599505,0.00003572947,0.00008920451,0.0001022115,0.0002310256,0.00001227786,0.00009199865,0.000002838077],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009512978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005106812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001129683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003446541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991993,0.0000688399,0.000302586,0.0001510603,0.0001250975,0.0001531472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999447,0.00002987757,0.0001120939,0.000229973,0.00008664381,0.00009443525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001659197,0.0004236502,0.5399691,0.001007536,0.00008880895,0.0008777214,0.005067305,0.000001975076,0.3072771,0.001244379,0.0003329729,0.1420502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004906072,0.0002402232,0.9453156,0.01445081,0.0001490708,0.01225466,0.0006777829,0.0001980451,0.02124203,0.00001377406,0.0003921733,0.0001597537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955605,0.0001618841,0.001552807,0.001874899,0.0002838054,0.000458535,0.00005338099,0.00003126809,0.0000228699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983385,0.001177397,0.00005414169,0.00007649681,0.00006194071,0.00002287368,0.000005599607,0.00001014527,0.0002528564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4053465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2283412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467955591","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.015","title":"“They made me go through like weeks of appointments and everything”: Documenting women's experiences seeking abortion care in Yukon territory, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Abortion; Medicine; Phone; Service (business); Family medicine; Service provider; Service delivery framework; Nursing; Qualitative research; Pregnancy; Business; Marketing; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007941268283017413,"gpt":0.2602671874530633,"spread":0.2523259191700459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003160471,0.0001575142,0.0003039356,0.0000790359,0.00009064251,0.00001521716,0.00004909393,0.00009720433,0.00008141255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001023078,0.0001213796,0.00003148816,0.00008663041,0.00006335021,0.0004388204,0.00002021442,0.0001189188,0.00000279855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007391919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002532815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02848099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04969778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983498,0.00009799207,0.0004509159,0.0004054844,0.0003308298,0.0003649204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992722,0.00004429237,0.0002466073,0.0002086121,0.0001257035,0.000102582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001454824,0.0001830452,0.2178854,0.0007400356,0.00006785087,0.00004584599,0.1152029,0.000007129967,0.4210612,0.00009956699,0.0002357774,0.2430165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008351704,0.001115307,0.8262161,0.001526568,0.00007300487,0.00007221345,0.1385767,0.000142165,0.01376619,0.0003848878,0.00926857,0.0005065647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961076,0.001133688,0.0004241356,0.000875878,0.0005355894,0.0006125681,0.000005042438,0.00002822588,0.0002772232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985777,0.0002467852,0.0001224629,0.000190886,0.0003009379,0.0002463522,0.00001077089,0.00001487794,0.0002892753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6083307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9779884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077384808","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.003","title":"Evaluation of the effect of a patient decision aid about vasectomy on the decision-making process: a randomized trial","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Male Reproductive Health Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise; University of Ottawa; Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Vasectomy; Regret; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Family planning; Population; Gynecology; Decision aids; Family medicine; Surgery; Research methodology; Alternative medicine; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0382780258208484,"gpt":0.4521079100414704,"spread":0.4138298842206221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0241458,0.0001989074,0.0007389832,0.0001147804,0.0007397961,0.000005970163,0.0002280551,0.0001997901,0.0005700747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07354063,0.00009057327,0.0002628787,0.0003331432,0.000239361,0.00008229508,0.00008599951,0.0007677229,0.00002980274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001353806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000405294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000325386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001501875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906811,0.005746011,0.001238664,0.0003694759,0.001670348,0.0002944672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747906,0.02129551,0.001518151,0.0007860268,0.001569949,0.00003973773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.6992179,0.0001767467,0.004010052,0.0002977251,0.0001139527,1.886758e-7,0.00639018,0.0002481253,0.001344657,0.000671613,0.0004949116,0.287034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.946031,0.001322532,0.02312863,0.004076477,0.0008553101,0.000001581879,0.001171938,0.005813493,0.002193685,0.01440957,0.0007664879,0.000229333],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782212,0.0003705795,0.0005255421,0.0004587402,0.003014827,0.01618519,0.000009065498,0.00002501001,0.001189859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963101,0.00003100877,0.0001261398,0.00009823404,0.0004329612,0.002969081,0.000001449418,0.00001908823,0.00001191699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2868046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9342633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996569200","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00194-9","title":"Knowledge of the risks and benefits associated with oral contraception in a university-aged sample of users and non-users","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Respondent; Sample (material); Family medicine; Family planning; Demography; Population; Gynecology; Gerontology; Environmental health; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03904007970464755,"gpt":0.2831091622241702,"spread":0.2440690825195226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005165549,0.0001305073,0.0003547382,0.0001451776,0.00008312712,0.000006163465,0.00004460222,0.0001377617,0.00001955326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003076269,0.0001021427,0.00004337388,0.0003857375,0.0002312175,0.0001742448,0.00001888274,0.0002051053,7.233463e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001118914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008833849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007840005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003731086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989585,0.0001656236,0.0002596204,0.0002683999,0.0001423533,0.0002054876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.0001550279,0.0002492263,0.0001912206,0.0002342465,0.00008615643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001807641,0.0002481678,0.9523855,0.00008063827,0.00004936507,0.000002875648,0.001659736,0.0000591925,0.0164519,0.0001076709,0.00002040619,0.02712686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006196893,0.0004404501,0.9901726,0.0003526721,0.0001304387,0.00001314812,0.001344703,0.0006292402,0.0004295858,0.00004188452,0.0001543911,0.00009404217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974676,0.0005105836,0.0004142428,0.0004904735,0.00005672562,0.0008692188,0.00001948819,0.00001675942,0.0001549455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990026,0.0006550521,0.00009609281,0.00003308297,0.00003783928,0.000005406246,0.00001744107,0.00001182229,0.0001406256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03778701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4165258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990373422","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.012","title":"The use of hypnosis to improve pain management during voluntary interruption of pregnancy: an open randomized preliminary study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement; Université de Montréal; Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hypnosis; Sedation; Anxiety; Randomized controlled trial; Pregnancy; Abortion; Anesthesia; Physical therapy; Surgery; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04800585686774626,"gpt":0.2957791986807499,"spread":0.2477733418130036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00439354,0.0001457279,0.0003111951,0.0001249115,0.0001598567,0.0001220012,0.0004614713,0.00003168255,0.00001822299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006887737,0.0001091723,0.00007828022,0.0001961721,0.00007567248,0.0004220823,0.0002614729,0.00006877861,0.000006681443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004847458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003259182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001362053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949895,0.003699749,0.0004820084,0.0003638754,0.0002639547,0.0002009275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975371,0.001670235,0.0002785882,0.0004426493,0.00003865325,0.00003274574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1100387,0.002415641,0.01154027,0.0003792002,0.0001494521,0.00003802224,0.001816588,0.004945487,0.5499617,0.001395644,0.0008753047,0.316444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1934561,0.006625748,0.4855729,0.001732884,0.001030586,0.000003288618,0.002179164,0.1796009,0.1255637,0.001838058,0.001225007,0.001171647],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772719,0.00004032231,0.01440911,0.0001225127,0.0001756566,0.007679631,0.000007755223,0.00004103524,0.0002520796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975255,0.00003098661,0.0003065338,0.0000537495,0.00003287681,0.0006357942,0.000005902968,0.0000148387,0.001393865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4740326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4451917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306697786","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.004","title":"Tolerability and safety of the estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraceptive: Pooled analysis of two multicenter, open-label phase 3 trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pfizer Canada; Merck Canada; Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö; Gedeon Richter; Oregon Health and Science University; Bayer HealthCare; Magee-Womens Research Institute; University of Florida; Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; Astellas Pharma; Mylan; GlaxoSmithKline; Fuji Pharma; Pfizer","keywords":"Medicine; Tolerability; Drospirenone; Internal medicine; Adverse effect; Discontinuation; MedDRA; Obstetrics; Pharmacovigilance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07147808475339334,"gpt":0.4090750583203293,"spread":0.337596973566936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005118943,0.0002288932,0.001832425,0.0002237985,0.0003275716,0.00002344306,0.000247409,0.00007674721,0.0007454816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001814715,0.000174636,0.0002971475,0.0009807564,0.0002909644,0.0002045635,0.00020453,0.000364778,0.000001350753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002166105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001892856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003942996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001177484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952697,0.001703319,0.001613108,0.0005772442,0.0005366475,0.000299971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966973,0.0004654012,0.001303516,0.0007718787,0.0006086284,0.0001532426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0565359,0.01130171,0.09946581,0.0002356224,0.003710333,0.000006908823,0.001675141,0.0005031507,0.6463656,0.001291815,0.0002783873,0.1786296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1437024,0.004746449,0.8000481,0.000101644,0.01248274,0.00001590933,0.001385415,0.02878658,0.006909538,0.0003415069,0.001121382,0.0003583032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899045,0.0008637054,0.001584297,0.002665368,0.0003926878,0.004101464,0.0003210374,0.00002649786,0.0001404628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984623,0.00009168005,0.0002998069,0.0004004152,0.0000860879,0.0002226448,0.0001468455,0.00001797214,0.0002722465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7005823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8162501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139383855","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00516-4","title":"The effect of lorazepam on pain and anxiety in abortion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lorazepam; Medicine; Placebo; Premedication; Anxiety; Anesthesia; Abortion; Randomized controlled trial; Observational study; Pregnancy; Psychiatry; Surgery; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007000614105849279,"gpt":0.2864354948099262,"spread":0.279434880704077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111167,0.0000555319,0.00013293,0.00001929263,0.00004695677,0.000003932221,0.00001093232,0.0000378155,0.00001018561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007161559,0.0000293447,0.00002634519,0.00006397689,0.00005877173,0.00001778874,0.000003491391,0.00008816078,0.000002367608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002159072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003626373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004203909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009181369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993977,0.0002627721,0.00009750001,0.00008303518,0.00007096004,0.0000880223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993937,0.0004840283,0.00003335128,0.00004961913,0.00001508767,0.00002423315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00129558,0.0001349062,0.2371653,0.0001265755,0.00004786806,0.000009778807,0.0001374112,0.00002567298,0.1247576,0.001045123,0.0005207357,0.6347335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004362031,0.005771824,0.941845,0.0001171597,0.00006347134,0.000005071527,0.00006284584,0.001131111,0.03963181,0.0002150125,0.006710822,0.0000838482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974604,0.0006644532,0.00008751496,0.0003958993,0.00005124465,0.0003901184,5.687755e-7,0.00001011442,0.0009396783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.000422043,0.000007299489,0.0001536555,0.00002176501,0.00002612778,8.711057e-7,0.000002570479,0.00004100351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1196642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797433836","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.004","title":"Second-trimester surgical abortion practices in the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Obstetrics; Misoprostol; Abortion; Perioperative; Dilation and curettage; Pregnancy; Placenta previa; Gynecology; Surgery; Fetus","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04722104844148887,"gpt":0.3751966535233334,"spread":0.3279756050818445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001193125,0.0001129977,0.0001672662,0.0001682165,0.0001070742,0.00004190407,0.00006379814,0.000108872,0.0006214587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003095521,0.00007577024,0.00004836986,0.0004308139,0.0001206038,0.0002758628,0.000007319993,0.0002794415,0.0002419289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006689571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007262942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001575617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000193396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985886,0.0002982945,0.000314988,0.0002965463,0.0002416416,0.0002599931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998916,0.000156002,0.0002672318,0.0003089645,0.0002821971,0.00006965742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02350179,0.004623534,0.4746895,0.0008149939,0.0002581426,0.0008092216,0.03359358,0.00005630476,0.08582866,0.007754638,0.05467199,0.3133976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002533918,0.0007241618,0.6940442,0.00005395488,0.00005056655,0.0002647188,0.00128587,0.001056831,0.0007169059,0.0003541399,0.2987984,0.0001162862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838657,0.0002832391,0.0002349265,0.01152681,0.0002205562,0.000743119,0.000002573723,0.00005055022,0.003072551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950963,0.0002318542,0.00006105974,0.002027896,0.001620361,0.00006259012,0.0001534846,0.00001087474,0.0007356362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3132813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6804538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000557621","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.008","title":"“We’ve got rights and yet we don’t have access”: Exploring patient experiences accessing medication abortion in Australia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Family medicine; Internet privacy; Nursing; Pregnancy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.131903888559831,"gpt":0.373100399789243,"spread":0.2411965112294119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002326358,0.0001916533,0.0003078889,0.0001416605,0.0001409411,0.00008881601,0.00008080654,0.0001305694,0.0002602438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001729818,0.0001684903,0.00004382222,0.0002340686,0.000100691,0.001301139,0.00003272538,0.0002831788,0.0000232671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001430119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005733556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000236408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980701,0.0001104924,0.0005462605,0.0005894972,0.000366484,0.0003172139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991257,0.00004190148,0.0002492976,0.0001919479,0.0001089256,0.0002822329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002283783,0.0004464529,0.1079654,0.0007702254,0.00005220418,0.00008747319,0.1951891,0.00009596517,0.08590236,0.0002767704,0.001945144,0.6049851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007202703,0.001707386,0.863211,0.001815757,0.000193867,0.00007537416,0.05936668,0.008582613,0.03942508,0.002172427,0.01531609,0.0009309667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984987,0.001288092,0.001307706,0.01091706,0.0004239345,0.0008918198,0.000002323074,0.00008166733,0.0001004496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973788,0.0009088839,0.0002051552,0.0003370176,0.0006456509,0.0004146108,0.00003867756,0.00001408794,0.00005708789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7552456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6870834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744170496","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2017.06.015","title":"“It is just like having a period with back pain”: exploring women’s experiences with community-based distribution of misoprostol for early abortion on the Thailand–Burma border","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Society of Family Planning","keywords":"Misoprostol; Abortion; Medicine; Unsafe abortion; Population; Context (archaeology); Reproductive health; Family medicine; Nursing; Family planning; Pregnancy; Environmental health; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07717069824429072,"gpt":0.3267348914628065,"spread":0.2495641932185158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001377181,0.0002151264,0.0003269889,0.00005066845,0.001222078,0.0001114439,0.0001565847,0.00009235156,0.0001418309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002468946,0.0001339907,0.00006980071,0.0000864357,0.0003150112,0.0004120198,0.00001230063,0.0003309593,0.000007472335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001845416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000141308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001593624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008482997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984365,0.0002017669,0.0003166322,0.0003212026,0.0003560468,0.0003679151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979108,0.0001413316,0.000463388,0.0008663543,0.0005017624,0.0001163593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05995274,0.003007021,0.3299808,0.003897317,0.0004435723,0.00002474036,0.4333386,0.0001814286,0.02451618,0.0003246258,0.004935289,0.1393977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0122516,0.01447288,0.7518434,0.002823698,0.0002243981,0.00003010943,0.1850856,0.002630344,0.01150141,0.00003161682,0.01845638,0.0006485193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753224,0.00004878805,0.01407919,0.008495464,0.0001210872,0.001763332,0.00003231209,0.00003653896,0.0001009237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939363,0.00001850952,0.0001297213,0.001047086,0.0002235737,0.004297913,0.0001176531,0.00002521612,0.0002040066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4218626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9399359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150003350","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00195-0","title":"Preliminary examination of oral contraceptive use among university-aged females","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Pill; Medicine; Harm; Family planning; Family medicine; Developed country; Oral contraceptive pill; Gynecology; Alternative medicine; Population; Demography; Research methodology; Environmental health; Social psychology; Nursing; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04450622865537437,"gpt":0.2830308925564667,"spread":0.2385246639010924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005409779,0.0001833526,0.0003844924,0.0002485469,0.0001314144,0.00001654316,0.00006730007,0.0001971039,0.0002440833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003258269,0.0001874387,0.0001311768,0.0003326224,0.0002402794,0.0007581806,0.00001919012,0.0002413549,0.00003791413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000742683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001789876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983684,0.0002721169,0.0003527432,0.0004104734,0.0002969236,0.0002993239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985893,0.0001273757,0.0002862416,0.00033486,0.0004966715,0.0001655434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007209188,0.000945573,0.6910224,0.0001855918,0.0001457871,0.0002210264,0.002377929,0.00007422394,0.1125496,0.001104254,0.000451869,0.1837126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003052799,0.0009270585,0.989823,0.0001294843,0.0001743897,0.00007121167,0.001404041,0.0006896559,0.001374701,0.0000313529,0.002163261,0.0001590083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899919,0.0001978057,0.006466063,0.000496812,0.0001668648,0.001141502,0.000009835921,0.0001107538,0.001418439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941834,0.0003899011,0.0005822477,0.00006511729,0.0001942738,0.00001131061,0.00009139709,0.00002167865,0.00446069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2988006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.764353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500218910","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.190","title":"“It was as if society didn't want a woman to get an abortion”: a qualitative study in Istanbul, Turkey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"Mitacs; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Qualitative research; Family medicine; Gynecology; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Social science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03302059540113681,"gpt":0.3992470244668246,"spread":0.3662264290656878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001810949,0.0002578565,0.0004686828,0.0001534728,0.0001410694,0.00003405867,0.00009678267,0.0001475689,0.0004028265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052718,0.0001867383,0.0001254518,0.0003433606,0.000088259,0.000448755,0.000024915,0.0002378359,0.0003941578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006201277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002424153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004277037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005728302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969968,0.0004697344,0.0006510398,0.0008192734,0.0004954063,0.0005677021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983231,0.0001195262,0.0001733763,0.0005697905,0.0003859569,0.0004282728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005603295,0.004259699,0.02696289,0.0001319954,0.0001646082,0.00008642156,0.6330419,0.00001506417,0.2247751,0.0008929149,0.007265852,0.09680025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01073535,0.007035146,0.7333294,0.0004475546,0.0001367468,0.00004440565,0.2333109,0.0001803534,0.001304619,0.001630524,0.01122367,0.0006213093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966135,0.00009194957,0.002897875,0.02730846,0.0002385704,0.002789187,0.00001948576,0.0001171467,0.000402314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940418,0.00007987965,0.0003369305,0.002283228,0.0006946284,0.0004924667,0.00002943618,0.00003484492,0.002006811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7063665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7614967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495024682","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.013","title":"Contraceptive use among women with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux","keywords":"Medicine; Multiple sclerosis; Gynecology; Family medicine; Obstetrics; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1090984223567079,"gpt":0.3384862184091591,"spread":0.2293877960524512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402925,0.001034259,0.007507993,0.0003585983,0.0002127591,0.0001382976,0.000331176,0.0004437552,0.000388894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005525923,0.00055127,0.0007172442,0.0005303547,0.0004854678,0.0005087842,0.0001346458,0.0007761355,0.0006634697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003793971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002715346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004113189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940628,0.000997234,0.001690747,0.001029352,0.001122346,0.001097489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940622,0.001835714,0.001338943,0.001366214,0.0008204108,0.0005764698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086466,0.0001332219,0.00006429778,0.815661,0.001732973,0.00004208169,0.0001365846,2.419284e-8,0.00001625357,0.000003507442,0.0009667685,0.1811346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002044076,0.0004044767,0.001450298,0.9079309,0.004523181,0.00006924862,0.00009441112,0.00000423281,5.462184e-7,6.676924e-7,0.08289119,0.0005867753],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001053332,0.9801062,0.0002378807,0.00008680213,0.0001007823,0.01878272,0.0002250377,0.0002447445,0.0001104733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007479886,0.9827472,0.000108938,0.0001667524,0.0002868711,0.01365313,0.0001052654,0.0001843773,0.001999462],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1805478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336818715","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.006","title":"Emergency contraception in a public health emergency: exploring pharmacy availability in Brazil","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Emergency contraception; Medicine; Pharmacy; Medical emergency; Public health; Family medicine; Family planning; Nursing; Population; Environmental health; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1433341841885591,"gpt":0.3796364710413173,"spread":0.2363022868527582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002942004,0.0003308522,0.0006467362,0.0005509068,0.0001234036,0.00001440524,0.0001235855,0.0001338879,0.003525144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009736678,0.0002726118,0.0001670353,0.0007789225,0.00007856046,0.001317402,0.00003129483,0.0004150163,0.0003916632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001175398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004304201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005407233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001765411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954041,0.0005416089,0.001542822,0.0009816339,0.000465124,0.001064701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981936,0.00005939483,0.0003785192,0.0005937071,0.0003104186,0.0004643549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006060231,0.0006711129,0.5089787,0.0001693809,0.00001454095,0.00001148931,0.001018591,0.000002264123,0.05759578,0.0003422754,0.0009188327,0.4296711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006688789,0.0002993185,0.9714743,0.0002162707,0.00001255208,0.00002217961,0.0003320868,0.0002040937,0.0003882763,0.0006629697,0.01940216,0.0002969388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478443,0.002277173,0.003794944,0.04191234,0.001378738,0.002056012,0.00001226166,0.0001686456,0.0005555446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840808,0.01313143,0.0001098226,0.0002996206,0.0008734137,0.0007189859,0.00003344869,0.00004328567,0.0007092049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4624957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088747777","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2003.08.009","title":"Effect of nurses' attitudes on hospital-based abortion procedures in Massachusetts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Medicine; Nursing; Family medicine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Family planning; Pregnancy; Population; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007190448263471075,"gpt":0.3147944364777119,"spread":0.3076039882142408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000486442,0.0001641103,0.0003338016,0.0002045065,0.00003777892,0.000007994948,0.00004182079,0.0001385271,0.00003467313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000518659,0.0001369383,0.00009067694,0.0002100221,0.00006945146,0.0001169702,0.000003054929,0.0002008574,0.00004730304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002462659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001707672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005472938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004785306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986817,0.00009193887,0.0003433377,0.000351113,0.0002885511,0.0002433632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992995,0.00006264939,0.0001611043,0.0002635242,0.0001259335,0.00008734713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01197864,0.003452837,0.6372432,0.002955634,0.00005801691,0.00006854523,0.0008406946,0.004930255,0.1949942,0.0009777439,0.0002698935,0.1422304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00744685,0.006038134,0.927371,0.0008045786,0.00005327609,0.000006144971,0.00002649424,0.00009183092,0.05781568,0.0001008088,0.0001156353,0.0001296003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938908,0.0002895309,0.0004340892,0.003016823,0.0002875997,0.001747173,0.000003425947,0.00006883322,0.0002617828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999104,0.00004690425,0.0001024999,0.0001824603,0.0002934244,0.0001709472,0.00003418011,0.0000188053,0.0000467643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2901278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.558418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159507816","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.026","title":"Family medicine provision of online medication abortion in three US states during COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Family medicine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Residence; Family planning; Psychological intervention; Service (business); Population; Pregnancy; Nursing; Demography; Environmental health; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03799346978328951,"gpt":0.3624336128662154,"spread":0.3244401430829259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007211609,0.0001639495,0.0004468934,0.0002579341,0.00008377714,0.000005973555,0.00005480259,0.0001640177,0.0002561852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001498432,0.0001458294,0.00006224815,0.0004710658,0.0001394034,0.0001961388,0.00001942351,0.000270304,0.00001196523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003572333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005365753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006459687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001012892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997784,0.0001390767,0.0008054936,0.0005010219,0.0004950648,0.0002753698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984354,0.00008676076,0.0003322536,0.0004137067,0.0004709262,0.0002609929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001315809,0.0005896931,0.2177506,0.0009020539,0.00002710844,0.00007537717,0.0008966101,0.0002083296,0.733461,0.00026149,0.0002095009,0.04430243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005275991,0.0003281406,0.984319,0.0003697696,0.00006712443,0.00006998488,0.0009049952,0.001667078,0.004558417,0.001031756,0.00129081,0.0001169238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714124,0.003267464,0.006992379,0.01699372,0.0002723621,0.0008514781,0.00001496014,0.00007271307,0.0001225115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946951,0.002470246,0.0003907001,0.0009379929,0.0005846953,0.00005304286,0.0006943191,0.00001957756,0.0001542956],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7665684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5946751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922412992","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2019.02.008","title":"Foregoing Rh testing and anti-D immunoglobulin for women presenting for early abortion: a recommendation from the National Abortion Federation's Clinical Policies Committee","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Blood groups and transfusion","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Obstetrics; Scopus; Family medicine; Medical abortion; Gynecology; Gestational age; Pregnancy; Misoprostol; MEDLINE","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05479370855646058,"gpt":0.342704902825242,"spread":0.2879111942687814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085869,0.0001302062,0.0002526022,0.00004331196,0.0004362326,0.0001251859,0.00004870271,0.0001354639,0.00004298982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000761186,0.0001048749,0.00008460936,0.0001209348,0.00004398782,0.0003284361,0.00001722174,0.0001585295,0.000006519246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005949411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006763271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009703555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004654676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998722,0.00006621599,0.0005120975,0.000291018,0.0001811284,0.0002276018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976756,0.001333046,0.0002380729,0.000110155,0.0005886107,0.00005453125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007570892,0.0002346588,0.8619851,0.0001351867,0.0001642636,2.760289e-7,0.001512066,0.00003118399,0.03655944,0.0009302113,0.001248887,0.09644166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005099225,0.0003818241,0.9716411,0.0001248609,0.00008939226,0.000007100325,0.0004267414,0.01461809,0.000365825,0.001998856,0.005114899,0.0001321075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974246,0.0000817755,0.0180093,0.00496363,0.0003197033,0.002001728,0.0001118127,0.0000622158,0.0002037886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937024,0.00004850233,0.003662753,0.0006951003,0.001074203,0.0002447977,0.0003641521,0.00002219952,0.000185938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.109656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4276673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016348550","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.007","title":"“It gives you autonomy over your own choices”: A qualitative study of Canadian abortion patients’ experiences with mifepristone and misoprostol","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Women's College Hospital; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences; Society of Family Planning; University of Ottawa; Health Research","keywords":"Misoprostol; Mifepristone; Abortion; Medicine; Medical abortion; Autonomy; Family medicine; Regimen; Obstetrics; Qualitative research; Gynecology; Pregnancy; Surgery; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03774840256159852,"gpt":0.332447254269299,"spread":0.2946988517077005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002248091,0.0001707128,0.0003580205,0.0002026658,0.0001358797,0.00002057933,0.00004543564,0.0000742885,0.0001338258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001740426,0.0001391811,0.00003163685,0.0003709316,0.0001355802,0.0002879991,0.000008872808,0.000159935,0.000007253662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001182855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002769655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0158284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01030206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984446,0.0001348792,0.0003961875,0.0004797318,0.0003007748,0.0002437845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998799,0.00002897291,0.0002648243,0.0001810101,0.0003469894,0.0003791649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001561282,0.0005241511,0.1325335,0.0001216849,0.00007489217,0.00000825159,0.8518451,0.000004275532,0.002602488,0.00002517267,0.0002470838,0.01045208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004412368,0.003523681,0.6376843,0.0000555237,0.00009288904,0.000003397106,0.3505575,0.0001344765,0.0002245667,0.000004412008,0.003152826,0.0001540447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935667,0.000293407,0.0001380548,0.003610614,0.00007485462,0.001900234,0.0000128516,0.00003214153,0.0003711756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985844,0.00002762569,0.0001568307,0.0006455791,0.0001657818,0.0002258475,0.00004174347,0.00001512508,0.0001369968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5051509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794394009","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.008","title":"Heavy menstrual bleeding: is tranexamic acid a safe adjunct to combined hormonal contraception?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Uterine Myomas and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Levonorgestrel; Danazol; Tranexamic acid; Gynecology; Uterine fibroids; Dienogest; Estradiol valerate; Metrorrhagia; Ulipristal acetate; Family planning; Obstetrics; Population; Endometriosis; Estrogen; Internal medicine; Blood loss; Surgery; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01989141761773616,"gpt":0.2861731133334454,"spread":0.2662816957157092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017881,0.0003048066,0.0004648909,0.0001650202,0.0001870849,0.00005202135,0.00009344923,0.0001631619,0.002483288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004080793,0.0002657549,0.0001617908,0.0002313976,0.0001306199,0.00017832,0.00003147303,0.0001673943,0.001554346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001833915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007326115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005544219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004317552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982055,0.00003789707,0.0004044362,0.000481376,0.000393375,0.0004773526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988936,0.00002713141,0.00009641602,0.0003366656,0.0002734574,0.0003727744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006425352,0.001155718,0.01740647,0.00006271834,0.0006189073,0.0001293822,0.002594797,0.00000106543,0.8624797,0.001029231,0.01968315,0.08841352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02759564,0.01369911,0.8178385,0.0003259805,0.0008578392,0.0005365933,0.0004400121,0.001345671,0.08749299,0.0003855131,0.04863213,0.000849958],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866835,0.0001510421,0.002772783,0.005659695,0.0005345697,0.001103808,0.00005059029,0.0001402646,0.002903785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932339,0.00003874624,0.00122492,0.001916981,0.0009033986,0.00008675543,0.000103848,0.00004154992,0.002449936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8004321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074289281","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.010","title":"Is repeat use of emergency contraception common among pharmacy clients? Evidence from Kenya","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Medicine; Pharmacy; Family medicine; Psychological intervention; Emergency contraception; Quarter (Canadian coin); Purchasing; Family planning; Developing country; Population; Demography; Environmental health; Nursing; Marketing; Economic growth; Research methodology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08486246360322738,"gpt":0.3767478815188005,"spread":0.2918854179155731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006591616,0.0003192447,0.0006149886,0.0001759419,0.0001692647,0.00003824169,0.000145517,0.0002627632,0.003804314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008661991,0.0003045431,0.0002930631,0.0002889893,0.000235263,0.001325334,0.00003808169,0.0007656749,0.0001801791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008964609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001008602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001934153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004577308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968821,0.0001857907,0.001077625,0.0007983057,0.000593074,0.0004630767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971424,0.0001896481,0.0006661904,0.000990873,0.000667035,0.0003438534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009474466,0.0002311407,0.4907832,0.00006131265,0.00004584322,0.000006742231,0.0005261955,0.00000414819,0.453213,0.00003879208,0.002109096,0.05203309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00231386,0.0002586725,0.9545452,0.0002884517,0.0003013952,0.00001495701,0.0001016576,0.002283511,0.03241702,0.0002186075,0.00698527,0.0002714224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904104,0.0008178299,0.002601192,0.001903414,0.002321605,0.001587575,0.00005661532,0.0001466834,0.0001546636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939785,0.002073849,0.0006834618,0.0003242813,0.001615068,0.00009596834,0.0001479828,0.00004471496,0.001036193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.463762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986803813","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00303-1","title":"Factors in contraceptive method choice in Bangladesh: goals, competence, evaluation and access","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Health Information","funders":"","keywords":"Pill; Medicine; Sterilization (economics); Family planning; Condom; Fertility; Demography; Logistic regression; Population; Abstinence; Marital status; Female condom; Developed country; Gynecology; Family medicine; Environmental health; Research methodology; Nursing; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Syphilis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08264742372663739,"gpt":0.3876078145591439,"spread":0.3049603908325066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005107406,0.0001375107,0.0003115009,0.0001685125,0.00003757904,0.00003065182,0.00005937333,0.0001140995,0.0005713273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000188343,0.0001131844,0.00003125394,0.0002233822,0.0000357742,0.0002732097,0.0000203311,0.0002292573,0.00001870397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002008144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002208483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008415282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987131,0.0002028096,0.0003076609,0.0002650518,0.0002620317,0.0002493543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994534,0.0001415145,0.00009004783,0.0001075059,0.00009999467,0.0001075737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007382652,0.0001782655,0.9623507,0.00005865546,0.000009838926,0.00001018847,0.0007577838,0.00004979206,0.002231365,0.0002610121,0.0001255555,0.03389302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003403878,0.0001111364,0.9821251,0.0001852593,0.00003275757,0.00001121113,0.0002349252,0.01265983,0.000190783,0.0003190904,0.0006201362,0.0001058951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943439,0.001025109,0.0002231624,0.001414476,0.000112917,0.0008718953,0.000008033203,0.00002666477,0.001973788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988213,0.0002060518,0.0001804394,0.0005238857,0.00009311089,0.00003112842,0.00002061327,0.000008777577,0.0001147298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03378713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6255634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972741541","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.013","title":"Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21–23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Misoprostol; Cervical dilation; Gestation; Obstetrics; Laminaria; Buccal administration; Randomized controlled trial; Cervical dilatation; Gynecology; Cervix; Pregnancy; Abortion; Surgery; Dentistry; Internal medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02018511551571852,"gpt":0.3357657441865345,"spread":0.315580628670816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007037238,0.0001323932,0.0007476722,0.00009019319,0.0001152348,0.00002901391,0.00002715395,0.0001596492,0.0007452256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000408717,0.0000995815,0.0002437105,0.00005127305,0.00007672717,0.0002246257,0.0000132986,0.00007456777,0.00002841607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001078771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005027114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009668721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007256602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998432,0.0001622732,0.000843352,0.0002039763,0.0002123049,0.0001460934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986514,0.000307366,0.000410812,0.0001148734,0.000420828,0.00009467328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.9826872,0.0001627689,0.0002212063,0.000716558,0.00007999181,6.215802e-7,0.0007991566,0.00001346623,0.002418683,0.004158592,0.0001872044,0.008554506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8746615,0.002036965,0.01575591,0.0001528602,0.0002414838,0.00002333693,0.00005079336,0.1035585,0.0004398222,0.0025483,0.0004414202,0.00008911929],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645692,0.0002295126,0.01847452,0.002520864,0.0003446661,0.01353073,0.0000318392,0.00003834875,0.0002603462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985891,0.00002493054,0.0006784,0.00006056003,0.0003016666,0.003387493,0.0003909354,0.00001237483,0.009252662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1080257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8159698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037172291","doi":"10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00145-1","title":"Hypersensitivity reactions following laminaria placement","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Laminaria; Medicine; Laminaria digitata; Abortion; Pregnancy; Anesthesia; Diphenhydramine; Surgery; Dermatology; Internal medicine; Histamine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0197751851115633,"gpt":0.2963947357259561,"spread":0.2766195506143929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003798172,0.0001243178,0.0002137671,0.00006399091,0.0001837708,0.00001828725,0.00002189069,0.00009714227,0.001175515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008617476,0.0001196947,0.0001383023,0.0001353456,0.00003247274,0.0001919122,0.000004076228,0.0001918099,0.0007715571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001535472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005990205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005056846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000102308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988477,0.0000766484,0.000249105,0.0003368824,0.0002187927,0.0002708514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994087,0.00003424847,0.00005229869,0.000292787,0.00007058714,0.0001414272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001356004,0.0005244538,0.004965692,0.00006746805,0.00009933554,0.0001092876,0.0004133289,0.00009759721,0.2608759,0.0004052923,0.001287605,0.7297981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005096251,0.0007084,0.7490473,0.0001954532,0.0003164848,0.000403965,0.0006784543,0.001741486,0.003522774,0.0002021244,0.2377212,0.00036611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690351,0.0001685483,0.0007547648,0.002848623,0.0003340807,0.0006515028,0.000002522554,0.0001589891,0.0260458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985968,0.0001305995,0.0003727793,0.0004636227,0.0007262646,0.00005080941,0.00004327736,0.00001633138,0.01222835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7440816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071327819","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.013","title":"The acceptability of contraception task-sharing among pharmacists in Canada — the ACT-Pharm study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre; University of British Columbia Hospital; Women's Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Medicine; Pharmacy; Family medicine; Medical prescription; Pharmacist; Family planning; Rural area; Thematic analysis; Population; Nursing; Environmental health; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0415664747918187,"gpt":0.3331479983293016,"spread":0.291581523537483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002820808,0.000218446,0.0004105033,0.00006357545,0.0002098111,0.00004024469,0.000246241,0.00007113625,0.0001616993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007881045,0.0001368786,0.00008371727,0.0003477769,0.0001751553,0.0002875098,0.00005359577,0.0005152852,0.00001291285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001149868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2618896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6237819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971529,0.0003796706,0.0008188022,0.0004919079,0.0006891543,0.0004675245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979288,0.0002166958,0.0003782914,0.0007288989,0.0005191891,0.0002281132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00140153,0.000348007,0.8173944,0.00003705668,0.00004918618,0.00001619874,0.002258263,0.0001202709,0.002142482,0.00002672808,0.0006458562,0.1755601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004354153,0.0002438024,0.9828879,0.00001525627,0.00008680196,0.0000191214,0.008066822,0.002086019,0.0005151104,0.0001052383,0.001491776,0.000128043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925741,0.0008307666,0.000110236,0.001698452,0.0007537879,0.003144747,0.00000702129,0.00003348078,0.0008474321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987423,0.0001147053,0.000008926521,0.0001539922,0.0004531918,0.0002653603,0.00001512269,0.00002057918,0.0002258228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3618923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7430255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801317476","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.019","title":"Comparative safety and efficacy of a dedicated postpartum IUD inserter versus forceps for immediate postpartum IUD insertion: a randomized trial","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grand Challenges Canada; Department for International Development, UK Government; Government of the United Kingdom; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Medicine; Forceps; Randomized controlled trial; Intrauterine device; Obstetrics; Surgery; Research methodology; Population; Family planning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04043802340655177,"gpt":0.3440724753561563,"spread":0.3036344519496045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325287,0.0002853594,0.001263366,0.0001848771,0.0002071474,0.0000238399,0.00007360837,0.0002335041,0.0001377091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001410916,0.0002344969,0.0002652587,0.0002228411,0.0006236302,0.0002358077,0.00002375011,0.0002137968,0.00003616051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001045483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002278605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000463919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003778031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973665,0.0003337733,0.0009913126,0.0005683596,0.0003161983,0.0004238612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971925,0.0007634309,0.0005379056,0.0003616428,0.0008759819,0.0002685566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.9700071,0.000354957,0.00009383207,0.0001153973,0.0002318799,0.000001511281,0.00191209,8.406921e-7,0.01912122,0.0005698652,0.000491773,0.007099603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9566045,0.006752409,0.02536825,0.0001930587,0.0006538812,0.00001888448,0.0003318507,0.003037868,0.003870615,0.0002070766,0.002711874,0.000249662],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763007,0.0008377495,0.008195502,0.004782254,0.001461673,0.007889206,0.00003608225,0.00009110433,0.0004057815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957685,0.0004033024,0.000383036,0.0002830321,0.002146448,0.0003984713,0.0002924753,0.00002707135,0.0002976323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02527442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9562508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976169483","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2008.10.013","title":"How does gestational diabetes affect postpartum contraception in nondiabetic primiparous women?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Gestational Diabetes Research and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Medicine; Gestational diabetes; Affect (linguistics); Obstetrics; Diabetes mellitus; Pregnancy; Gynecology; Gestation; Endocrinology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415099142226175,"gpt":0.2548239646032122,"spread":0.2406729731809504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004196849,0.0002174588,0.000353203,0.000378485,0.0001257055,0.00006685162,0.00008620326,0.0001081866,0.0002876426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004548237,0.0001789045,0.00009123679,0.0002787034,0.0001703018,0.000415712,0.00002993505,0.0002612943,0.0001181775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004160154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001226008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000103884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000306142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978334,0.0001431907,0.0002840875,0.0003938221,0.0006359923,0.0007095119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989707,0.0002134865,0.0001035994,0.0002225569,0.000227292,0.0002623966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008350082,0.001718418,0.7690681,0.0009312461,0.0002561041,0.0003748381,0.002576811,0.000250322,0.1760917,0.002000489,0.00326841,0.04262858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003353659,0.0006073148,0.9892469,0.0001051781,0.00002622434,0.0000121503,0.0004046169,0.001483887,0.001578972,0.0006269383,0.002340253,0.0002139088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922366,0.000271658,0.0004485085,0.005036973,0.0001701987,0.001289475,0.00002641788,0.00009360338,0.0004266081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941264,0.0003661778,0.0004369346,0.0004963391,0.0001891189,0.000560742,0.0003203184,0.00002797544,0.003475995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2201788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7295515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020228820","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2009.07.002","title":"A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II extended safety study of two Invisible Condom® formulations in Cameroonian women","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive tract infections research","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Microbicide; Medicine; Microbicides for sexually transmitted diseases; Placebo; Vaginal microbicide; Intravaginal administration; Condom; Adverse effect; Randomized controlled trial; Colposcopy; Female condom; Intrauterine device; Gynecology; Family planning; Obstetrics; Vagina; Population; Surgery; Internal medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Research methodology; Health services; Cervical cancer; Virology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03442375633451116,"gpt":0.3661177938856858,"spread":0.3316940375511747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002958751,0.000248521,0.001194269,0.0007270643,0.0003398182,0.00002388269,0.0001856371,0.0001842387,0.0009075639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005533574,0.0002132796,0.0001818488,0.0005268927,0.0002262785,0.0004546949,0.00004218665,0.0005268002,0.0000955519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002600395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001261587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003020176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000344716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966983,0.001134395,0.001055202,0.0004838812,0.0001098169,0.0005184576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981927,0.0005611362,0.0003610642,0.000522604,0.0003183856,0.00004411496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.8154532,0.007510749,0.0001815389,0.000006418542,0.0004121886,0.000004226494,0.005615723,0.0006223268,0.1495439,0.001608358,0.00002165184,0.01901974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9881442,0.003348898,0.001494885,0.00002188676,0.0001048941,0.0000211348,0.001457707,0.0001804912,0.003793502,0.001098714,0.0001364324,0.0001972568],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875692,0.0004838575,0.001340235,0.000256742,0.0002198973,0.008115839,0.00001157926,0.00007254725,0.001930135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969828,0.00005940313,0.00003159964,0.00002240583,0.0000449959,0.001170291,0.0000634902,0.00001503535,0.001609979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.172691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982662977","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.001","title":"Ethnic Korean women's perceptions about birth control","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Medicine; Ethnic group; Birth control; Demography; Perception; Gender studies; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Population; Family planning; Environmental health; Anthropology; Research methodology; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01347069450419255,"gpt":0.2891729701181402,"spread":0.2757022756139477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005610945,0.0002505583,0.000430595,0.0001989511,0.0002245374,0.00003627851,0.00007234268,0.0002123516,0.001706922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001173038,0.0002296102,0.0001682412,0.0003004614,0.0001515095,0.0002474503,0.000009684522,0.000370545,0.0008102583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004102061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001344415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000128973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007211896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977756,0.0001307131,0.0005122791,0.0005518022,0.0003571947,0.000672448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986841,0.00005686465,0.0001706817,0.0004983173,0.0003215199,0.0002685243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002939322,0.001604541,0.1219563,0.0003786386,0.000141509,0.00007842347,0.001630396,0.0002312785,0.5657123,0.00656311,0.009863172,0.288901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005057534,0.000457867,0.9753444,0.00005605564,0.00008140102,0.00009929282,0.0005825189,0.0005698421,0.0002757712,0.001052401,0.01617339,0.0002495515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762131,0.001249598,0.01157739,0.003324931,0.0003942171,0.001237569,0.00002636413,0.0003524805,0.005624357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880168,0.0002296856,0.0002314413,0.00121809,0.002668316,0.0003418597,0.0001043151,0.00004282424,0.007146617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591194875","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.016","title":"“If I ever did have a daughter, I wouldn't raise her in New Brunswick:” exploring women's experiences obtaining abortion care before and after policy reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contraception","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Society of Family Planning","keywords":"Medicine; Abortion; Daughter; Family medicine; Law; Pregnancy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02804761478493484,"gpt":0.3223769730103499,"spread":0.2943293582254151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003212285,0.0002475028,0.0003825277,0.0002374525,0.0003093211,0.0001312243,0.00009867623,0.0001876558,0.0001612345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002790411,0.0002154162,0.00006542099,0.00009420289,0.0001486737,0.001319643,0.00005229455,0.0003208595,0.00001789711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000806453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000533401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002553761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002978352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980773,0.00004881104,0.0004158037,0.0005977594,0.0002888283,0.0005715239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986662,0.0000112486,0.0002412907,0.0005924097,0.0001546435,0.000334218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001557055,0.00006717019,0.443448,0.0001634022,0.00001815795,0.00005046714,0.1464127,0.00000209395,0.001118591,0.0001552736,0.00002629315,0.4069808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002914351,0.000375024,0.9358229,0.000323795,0.00001935491,0.00002582776,0.0566003,0.0000898692,0.0002987923,0.0001438881,0.003185629,0.0002002987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941789,0.0009725571,0.0001858064,0.002762571,0.0003497318,0.000781158,0.000001983662,0.00006338028,0.000703894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945624,0.0004265202,0.0001225114,0.0003495258,0.002295198,0.0009031916,0.00001556291,0.00003189656,0.001293123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4923749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8784418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}