{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"193292bc3ae9","filters":{"venue":"Critical Analysis of Law"}},"results":[{"id":"W2609191095","doi":"10.33137/cal.v4i1.28144","title":"The Legitimate Scope of Criminal Law: A Question for Legal History?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Public law; Appropriation; Private law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Normative; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Kerr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04854440001557365,"gpt":0.3962482599841172,"spread":0.3477038599685436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008019824,0.00006174353,0.0002602347,0.00003931077,0.001178303,0.0001003117,0.0003820749,0.00008727562,0.000101131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009727739,0.00004335957,0.0002702197,0.00006673391,0.003423439,0.0002048124,0.00003190987,0.00006834262,0.000003770041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000488954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000543068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01458078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004812174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.0001016653,0.0002406488,0.0001346108,0.0002665564,0.0002050113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998682,0.0004887212,0.0001079475,0.0002921861,0.0003561366,0.00007299397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002685447,0.00004399995,0.00004391718,0.00001781051,0.0001997535,0.000001273888,0.001201371,0.000007889431,0.0001019286,0.9973838,0.0004100939,0.0005613508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004230837,0.0002168019,0.001098085,0.0001876609,0.009179724,5.25659e-7,0.004821935,0.002213797,0.002894565,0.05846141,0.9201772,0.0003252401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08040553,0.009296963,0.001682215,0.01655809,0.001095059,0.0003619941,0.00002124977,0.00006211175,0.8905168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980355,0.0001675692,0.0003952307,0.00008304117,0.00009905745,0.000008111215,0.000003295203,0.000004226125,0.001204001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612230206","doi":"10.33137/cal.v4i1.28143","title":"Making Modern Criminal Law Theory: Reflections on Farmer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Public law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Political science; Order (exchange); Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal justice; Philosophy; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Vincent Chiao","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2597425342217548,"gpt":0.5072798401635514,"spread":0.2475373059417967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008517035,0.00009882804,0.0002992048,0.00008581128,0.003164496,0.0003986637,0.0005152729,0.00008689982,0.0007116013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001114577,0.00008915892,0.0003235185,0.0001584499,0.003101818,0.0003538004,0.00007186061,0.0001438534,0.00003804312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004322933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003561406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00551756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02572966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985204,0.0001882501,0.0002147364,0.0002882449,0.00046803,0.0003203404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984109,0.000611235,0.00007156802,0.0005431999,0.0002340559,0.0001290348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003403656,0.00008419669,0.00008985728,0.00001156703,0.0001483678,0.000008033673,0.001965705,0.00002475861,0.0001788093,0.9962776,0.0000370074,0.001140033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001653723,0.000177014,0.002274935,0.0001735948,0.009760121,0.000001411604,0.005583584,0.00107332,0.0007543138,0.8432363,0.1362809,0.0005191036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02944256,0.0001015098,0.003866455,0.0111644,0.0002214368,0.00006186034,0.00001779756,0.00004761017,0.9550764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978602,0.000008459941,0.0003946939,0.0008588399,0.0001453196,0.00000558551,0.000002012533,0.000006348544,0.000718532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341925358","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i1.20923","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Legal Studies Beyond Both Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Meaning (existential); Virtue; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Critical reflection; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Pedagogy","authors":[{"name":"Mariana Valverde","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07251374655372697,"gpt":0.4522436948004163,"spread":0.3797299482466893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00127663,0.0000917187,0.0003861783,0.0001445206,0.0008219181,0.0002301552,0.0001152925,0.00007443634,0.00007647069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002572282,0.00008065096,0.00007968523,0.000668789,0.0011019,0.0007041504,0.0001667467,0.0002246293,0.000003162492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003160105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006646008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001770907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006133796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987307,0.0002695489,0.0002998566,0.0002490262,0.0002614361,0.0001894558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973759,0.001946292,0.00007108988,0.0001531023,0.0002954122,0.0001582023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008668365,0.00007681219,0.0199147,0.0000319112,0.0004018118,4.030564e-7,0.009973747,0.000002671327,0.00001159376,0.9685653,0.0005179321,0.0004943915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008202954,0.000359566,0.3010423,0.0001116041,0.01168244,0.000002546298,0.07630261,0.003478369,0.00009126151,0.3285504,0.2765957,0.0009629496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7574515,0.0003985881,0.002153096,0.1875482,0.0001609235,0.0001264157,0.00004877871,0.0000464877,0.05206596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998288,0.00003316791,0.0006582859,0.0003895457,0.000136693,0.000007065101,0.00000854616,0.000003657342,0.0004749975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.640015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6321613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863631935","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i1.22512","title":"New Historical Jurisprudence: Legal History as Critical Analysis of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Empirical legal studies; Private law; Legal realism; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06176028810172116,"gpt":0.3814619539286307,"spread":0.3197016658269095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008141129,0.0001898244,0.001145316,0.0004560519,0.0002277232,0.00003719301,0.0005177461,0.0002094031,0.002428038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003415101,0.0001900816,0.0009941516,0.001751133,0.005894404,0.0003482204,0.0000838877,0.0002286033,0.00003258159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001263053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002537702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1574235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008868838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964521,0.0003789557,0.0007639091,0.000411668,0.001463699,0.0005296709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954188,0.00189394,0.0001167464,0.0004220283,0.001048696,0.001099721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002718759,0.0002081573,0.0005774187,0.00001099556,0.001502759,0.00002548736,0.0006954585,0.00009542981,0.00002602886,0.9912573,0.005524211,0.0000496248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001255998,0.000112464,0.0001663011,0.00001140607,0.01903785,0.000001124994,0.0005073934,0.0003226665,0.00003970677,0.01184762,0.9675457,0.0002821476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004531939,0.002436748,0.0113435,0.009947078,0.0006333779,0.00007526849,0.00009270904,0.0000692428,0.9708701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991625,0.00001796989,0.002285645,0.001519355,0.000276611,0.000003694851,0.0000228609,0.000008415287,0.004240513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980788208","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i1.32563","title":"Chester Brown and the Queerness of Johns","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Memoir; Comics; Innocence; Scholarship; Mainstream; Construct (python library); Gender studies; Romance; Human sexuality; Identity (music); Sociology; Kinship; Narrative; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Political science; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Ummni Khan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02413871455967018,"gpt":0.3259577212149494,"spread":0.3018190066552792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006424212,0.00004555191,0.0002939618,0.0000481874,0.0000640929,0.0000178827,0.0001462661,0.00005419736,0.0003558629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002941744,0.00002917967,0.0001583635,0.0002933892,0.001519598,0.00005937435,0.00003167804,0.00005088425,0.000007684906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005238431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003015994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002077188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001411123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991769,0.0001255535,0.0001738012,0.0001112653,0.0002730444,0.0001394596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989015,0.0007219717,0.00003157528,0.0001558834,0.000114405,0.00007467593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001381601,0.00003677739,0.005594104,0.0000268852,0.0001992829,4.303215e-7,0.01476097,0.000002258949,0.000127896,0.9789197,0.00003980726,0.0002780243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007471372,0.0003940522,0.2221524,0.0002699822,0.03100351,0.000003190385,0.314935,0.003096777,0.0132581,0.1644051,0.2413382,0.001672415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098136,0.0003395685,0.0001372704,0.004878384,0.0001204815,0.0000948641,0.000008582562,0.000008659459,0.1845986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999021,0.00007820461,0.00004403199,0.0003115859,0.0000368991,0.000002026075,0.000001372254,0.000002168526,0.0005027001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8145147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5599022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608446170","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.26083","title":"Effect and Technique in Legal Aesthetics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Legal realism; Balance (ability); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Legal pluralism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Art; Psychology; Philosophy; Black letter law; History; Comparative law; Private law","authors":[{"name":"Simon Stern","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01970634848195237,"gpt":0.3583304323864481,"spread":0.3386240839044957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001072082,0.00004780773,0.000209139,0.00001410114,0.00006416813,0.00003058997,0.00009649963,0.0001138115,0.00006653408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003816861,0.000038195,0.0001002868,0.0005017561,0.0009771102,0.00009726577,0.00002419952,0.00009375942,0.000001831987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000240487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002375896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001356398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001915581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991927,0.0002210907,0.0001176111,0.0001078975,0.0002231271,0.0001375882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995146,0.0001889849,0.00001302163,0.0000802508,0.0000878307,0.0001153612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005164727,0.00003929461,0.001568646,0.000009132125,0.00003611293,0.000005165511,0.001923568,0.000005680872,0.00006378756,0.9959275,0.0001568066,0.0002591997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001585248,0.001134031,0.001977271,0.000187655,0.006457852,0.000007486457,0.01903878,0.001438317,0.009795294,0.2413302,0.715851,0.001196823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4681228,0.001470371,0.0008023686,0.01359959,0.0001109925,0.0003490167,0.00001133796,0.00008967511,0.5154439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991845,0.00003158432,0.0004264965,0.0001964785,0.00002368447,0.000008198068,0.000001704966,0.000002002597,0.0001252918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7545972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3600203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383346827","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i2.22160","title":"Uncovering the Latent Disunity of Property Law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Igor Shoikhedbrod","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03150024398313946,"gpt":0.3200148942817202,"spread":0.2885146502985808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007367264,0.0000526708,0.0002245026,0.000004008763,0.0004075662,0.00002854487,0.0002585597,0.00007000371,0.0002457164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003503369,0.00002554509,0.000300556,0.0004015338,0.001840628,0.00009234517,0.00004760885,0.00009452055,0.000003697266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001540707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001441426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006047214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006320002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998992,0.0002239733,0.0001794133,0.0001049318,0.0003465275,0.0001532073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991961,0.0003268359,0.0000365735,0.0001846616,0.000191241,0.00006463791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002492131,0.00006178549,0.0006521964,0.00001560498,0.0001822984,1.431404e-7,0.002872152,0.0001010107,0.000157537,0.9956623,0.0001196952,0.0001728253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003778723,0.0001844823,0.005529441,0.00010727,0.007365534,3.027995e-7,0.01403045,0.002575995,0.004175095,0.2387664,0.726342,0.0005452249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2476027,0.0002697041,0.0006705234,0.01917489,0.0001799996,0.0001643971,0.00003231954,0.00005452203,0.731851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987267,0.00002129127,0.00009961773,0.0006226361,0.0000623669,0.00000262011,0.000002466394,0.000002235736,0.0004600283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7568958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9141619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982100027","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i1.32562","title":"Queering Queer Legal Studies: An Unreconstructed Ode to Eve Sedgwick (and Others)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Extant taxon; Sensibility; Field (mathematics); Ode; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art; Political science; Literature; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Brenda Cossman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03571448415165963,"gpt":0.3698533264607879,"spread":0.3341388423091283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004159817,0.0000962076,0.0003880698,0.00002060703,0.0002555748,0.0000746189,0.0001801298,0.0001145403,0.000518364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002548768,0.00008113357,0.0001773484,0.0005691458,0.0008355593,0.0002866045,0.0000458651,0.0001066459,0.00002032488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004843284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003414669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001583973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004094566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988283,0.0001320849,0.0002128374,0.0002692449,0.0002991533,0.0002583637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.0002547857,0.00002757052,0.0001820566,0.0002672024,0.0002045985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007266532,0.00003168455,0.003381379,0.00002690966,0.0007136094,0.000001489097,0.01997579,0.00006539647,0.0003909417,0.9750526,0.0001875738,0.0001653512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001451913,0.0004507823,0.008877904,0.0003877859,0.009900203,0.000003189565,0.4644885,0.003120802,0.001742995,0.06950855,0.4378,0.002267311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301224,0.0006424364,0.0001107584,0.006075928,0.0001758723,0.000144562,0.00002000302,0.00006364898,0.06264444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968891,0.00005791102,0.0007140328,0.001355362,0.00008270747,0.000004374809,0.000002263249,0.000005876897,0.0008883803],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.905544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5675722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998011070","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i2.33495","title":"Still Comfortable After All These Years: A Response","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Law; Tone (literature); Sociology; State (computer science); Function (biology); Law and economics; Political science; Literature; Politics; Art","authors":[{"name":"Trevor Ross","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02170926411736386,"gpt":0.3427174305297845,"spread":0.3210081664124206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007903549,0.00006570462,0.0002632532,0.00001509521,0.00002633247,0.00005439439,0.0002131406,0.0001282235,0.004227506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002552505,0.00005464365,0.0003500672,0.000490162,0.0006507228,0.000166658,0.00003966997,0.0001017371,0.0001179476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003004272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003477379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006953742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008047977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987678,0.0002407833,0.0001683139,0.0001762428,0.0003903706,0.0002564844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989936,0.0005161956,0.00002395229,0.0002299504,0.0001168022,0.0001194716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002084823,0.000163437,0.003428192,0.00001635589,0.0006918492,0.00001258633,0.04546982,0.00003254128,0.0004493627,0.9489231,0.0005515743,0.00005267379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001377403,0.00004577146,0.004475152,0.00001823007,0.001218457,1.350266e-7,0.005359195,0.0001303799,0.00008014539,0.006973455,0.9814011,0.0001602323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665514,0.0002944239,0.00001372742,0.00282957,0.00007186135,0.00007555506,0.0000349209,0.00003010398,0.03009848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948919,0.00003147335,0.000218119,0.001658476,0.00004121986,0.000006661835,0.000004745593,0.000004470998,0.003142975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998376606","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i2.33491","title":"Writings and Their Publics: Law and Literature in the Eighteenth Century","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Scholarship; Expression (computer science); The Renaissance; Diversity (politics); Literature; Publics; History; Law; History of literature; Literary criticism; Sociology; Aesthetics; Classics; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Art history","authors":[{"name":"Brian Cowan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01167516891836183,"gpt":0.2852737298423287,"spread":0.2735985609239669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006404927,0.00007784784,0.0002273338,0.00001344383,0.0002527019,0.0002836404,0.0001812181,0.0001365262,0.0001193411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009762503,0.00004440426,0.000126901,0.0006258076,0.001047094,0.0002995997,0.00004155261,0.0001852172,0.000001567626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008893801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008816544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005021502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001228278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990706,0.0001847722,0.0001467332,0.0001849195,0.0002152897,0.0001976654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992206,0.0004367806,0.00002351219,0.0001346215,0.0001166362,0.00006792715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002112882,0.00003774233,0.001655909,0.00002186743,0.00007028552,0.000001424621,0.02199388,2.226826e-7,0.00003687279,0.9759359,0.0001550746,0.00008872478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005344303,0.00008056467,0.005432324,0.0001826117,0.0009656009,0.000003695827,0.1672723,0.0003147559,0.0001026325,0.1056606,0.7189737,0.0004767582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5591993,0.01432251,0.00000714435,0.02727787,0.00008405244,0.0002186438,0.0000741292,0.00002946399,0.3987868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994859,0.001230438,0.00005402637,0.003710641,0.0000590031,0.000003063451,0.00001184633,0.000002486486,0.00006949645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8702753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.385806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210278999","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.25699","title":"Judgment, Communication, and Coercion: What’s Wrong with Private Prisons?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Coercion (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Law; Core (optical fiber); sort; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Malcolm Thorburn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1263092498907243,"gpt":0.3937366212724663,"spread":0.2674273713817421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009179835,0.00007186017,0.0002603368,0.00006286943,0.0003024588,0.0001351534,0.0002199715,0.00009309625,0.00004773325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006770362,0.00005951915,0.00006232816,0.0004330011,0.003124363,0.0005338811,0.00007326733,0.0001569575,0.000005510515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003350112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006463828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009919936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001109746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.0002792208,0.0002056205,0.0001517464,0.0004028991,0.000226913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.0006701247,0.00003505663,0.0002848483,0.0003300585,0.0003609648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001153629,0.00006624369,0.001014995,0.000009245365,0.0001413627,0.000001268099,0.002114774,0.00001059515,0.000002384124,0.9964842,0.00005468813,0.0000887671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003947394,0.0001352768,0.002020748,0.000119272,0.002579219,8.191408e-7,0.008143868,0.0006044653,0.0001380404,0.9367161,0.04884186,0.0003056343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1923494,0.0055735,0.004833946,0.3345428,0.0001779487,0.000378138,0.00003150135,0.0001737804,0.461939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970841,0.0001986534,0.001331411,0.00126985,0.00003845271,0.000004541382,0.00000661031,0.000003982759,0.00006232872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8047348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385596985","doi":"10.33137/cal.v3i1.26460","title":"Saving Faith","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Faith; Promotion (chess); Religious freedom; Exportation; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economic freedom; Social psychology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Anna Su","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03185523707320964,"gpt":0.3601018746784835,"spread":0.3282466376052739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002062247,0.00004036816,0.0001702604,0.00005633522,0.0001972453,0.0000137633,0.0001220942,0.0000336791,0.001294295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006586828,0.00002721798,0.0001534585,0.0003055609,0.002972113,0.0001014753,0.0000188357,0.00002370016,0.00002614052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000311493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001527991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001374626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992452,0.00007711884,0.0001404057,0.0001008969,0.0002441932,0.000192247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987211,0.000876761,0.00002087082,0.000101106,0.000151083,0.0001291131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001271829,0.00001840926,0.001544237,0.000001372118,0.0001064391,0.000001535272,0.00006338392,0.000001318872,0.0001524684,0.9976718,0.00007630659,0.0003614421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001132001,0.00003076925,0.003597185,0.00003582841,0.001900737,3.582108e-7,0.000613169,0.00002122849,0.0002410543,0.03608782,0.9571293,0.00022937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0199847,0.00007351992,0.008069307,0.01092989,0.00006906089,0.00002337989,0.00005933671,0.00003132332,0.9607595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980019,0.00001124357,0.0003788012,0.0005278168,0.00008451558,0.000001161959,0.000001163864,0.000001644428,0.000991744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913946162","doi":"10.33137/cal.v5i2.32053","title":"Literary Analysis of Law: Reorienting the Connections Between Law and Literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Law and literature; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Sociology; Common law; Political science; Work (physics); Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Simon Stern","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02435589788577672,"gpt":0.3485908631076953,"spread":0.3242349652219185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008082794,0.0001058225,0.0005031431,0.00004289981,0.001263605,0.0001806298,0.0002626053,0.0001897671,0.0003156298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002685183,0.0000727334,0.0006028163,0.00308137,0.004694554,0.0002896286,0.00007456126,0.0001821644,0.000001832005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001543205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001526415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00657109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984235,0.0003022788,0.000363923,0.0002670656,0.0003955431,0.0002477021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979242,0.0009353823,0.00008999852,0.0002960906,0.0006331751,0.0001211313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003225205,0.00003850758,0.002639431,0.00001395227,0.003059673,9.349529e-7,0.02547458,0.00000225293,0.00006968989,0.9685373,0.0001117933,0.00004862965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004825988,0.0002285478,0.01148657,0.000253551,0.1188763,0.000001240793,0.03030369,0.001280716,0.002098563,0.3711183,0.4629509,0.0009190036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3896244,0.003735962,0.000484361,0.01512216,0.000239687,0.0002141459,0.0006573849,0.00009607374,0.5898258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977935,0.00005554333,0.0002865792,0.001242215,0.0002874029,0.000003723679,0.00005471293,0.000004174256,0.00027215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6081691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127957706","doi":"10.33137/cal.v7i2.35219","title":"Modernism and the Criminal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Crime and Detective Fiction Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; McGill University","keywords":"Modernism (music); Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Lindsay Farmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1108068936086169,"gpt":0.3051361915094752,"spread":0.1943292979008583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006746897,0.00005513892,0.000247542,0.00002896762,0.0002420588,0.00005934097,0.00005003846,0.00001056629,0.000728048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001028977,0.00003222971,0.0001596057,0.00004187123,0.001605113,0.00005747906,0.00004399525,0.00005511178,0.00001166178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001637657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000202556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002153165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001935834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995365,0.00003382918,0.0001397472,0.0001092721,0.0001084042,0.00007231689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994592,0.0002967958,0.00001619804,0.0000674447,0.0001199701,0.00004041381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004767725,0.00001234842,0.00001165098,0.0000138536,0.0004399809,6.77753e-7,0.01455148,0.000003843628,0.00001863592,0.9845414,0.0002221366,0.0001363264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002765078,0.0004877058,0.001495745,0.0000257729,0.0447602,0.000002488677,0.07701015,0.0728434,0.001224515,0.1350128,0.6636216,0.0007505225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1340251,0.004125881,0.008471306,0.06793879,0.0001892895,0.0001846988,0.0001603376,0.0001256807,0.784779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973769,0.00001494986,0.00001928858,0.002314947,0.00012131,0.000003812186,0.000001302295,0.000002575178,0.0001449179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7971616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}