{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":24,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"da66cf6640ee","filters":{"venue":"Critical Disability Discourses"}},"results":[{"id":"W1550500331","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23854","title":"INTIMATE ASSEMBLAGES: DISABILITY, INTERCORPOREALITY, AND THE LABOUR OF ATTENDANT CARE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03678561766810474,"gpt":0.4021921887849492,"spread":0.3654065711168444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505625,0.0002379892,0.0005604005,0.0000144398,0.0008042183,0.0001741302,0.0005364848,0.0001566898,0.0001755547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01118617,0.0001569535,0.0002088975,0.0001776529,0.03896786,0.0002667828,0.00043692,0.0004182177,0.000005985633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008576354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001262458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007839643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04043706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968535,0.0007850798,0.0005589759,0.0005224631,0.0007500586,0.0005299799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952293,0.003384705,0.00007886474,0.0006745735,0.0003934496,0.0002390956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006875119,0.0004381228,0.1881512,0.0004198715,0.00003182275,9.447161e-7,0.07265881,2.099649e-7,0.00009073435,0.7339031,0.0002044487,0.00403208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005660269,0.00007198179,0.2557656,0.00004308421,0.0001248162,0.000002012517,0.6104358,0.00001294536,0.000146379,0.1300718,0.002465364,0.0002941849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429693,0.0002679606,0.00004627251,0.0385043,0.0007826584,0.000488803,0.0001984916,0.00007520442,0.01666698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990678,0.00007520765,0.0001224639,0.0002464441,0.0003098351,0.00005020751,0.000007776462,0.00001421654,0.0001059909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485742611","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31564","title":"RACE AND MADNESS: LOCATING THE EXPERIENCES OF RACIALIZED PEOPLE WITH PSYCHIATRIC HISTORIES IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Psychiatry; Gerontology; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02332619082048788,"gpt":0.3193619812963147,"spread":0.2960357904758268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000578514,0.0001477731,0.0003276916,0.00002219637,0.0002265193,0.00001755282,0.0002127145,0.00004693225,0.0003527777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001679151,0.00007263338,0.00002502366,0.0003818909,0.005041403,0.0001363308,0.00004417102,0.0002701249,6.56474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000713403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002003449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6906443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6987801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981804,0.0006206674,0.0003755747,0.0003013486,0.0002475758,0.0002744249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964203,0.00298438,0.00009231768,0.0003172927,0.00005490003,0.0001307618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002589946,0.0008778149,0.3570424,0.0002768591,0.00005328435,0.000006594043,0.4845992,0.000002388095,8.844636e-7,0.1513559,0.001272883,0.001921884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001417604,0.0001760217,0.1130808,0.00003465401,0.0001405716,0.0000147532,0.8740808,0.00007517215,0.00000348563,0.009002482,0.001769612,0.0002040461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827662,0.002323742,0.0001121495,0.01170488,0.0008090114,0.0002700839,0.000007367411,0.00001072871,0.001995802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999248,0.00004276612,0.0001103306,0.0003631067,0.00004773127,0.0001313457,0.000002673984,0.000008094044,0.00004599086],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3894816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1827464074","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31560","title":"THE HUMAN BOTTOM OF NON-HUMAN THINGS: ON CRITICAL THEORY AND ITS CONTRIBUTIONS TO CRITICAL DISABILITY STUDIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Disability studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06730044580323861,"gpt":0.4632368880992967,"spread":0.3959364422960581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004054473,0.0003170951,0.0006351263,0.00002609964,0.00303317,0.0001573414,0.0005880599,0.0002258974,0.0003920245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09912144,0.000234455,0.0002481577,0.000167262,0.03564375,0.0006252917,0.0003377651,0.0005367543,0.00004144301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003121768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001224783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005182971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006153273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952435,0.001548018,0.0007828928,0.0007303317,0.0005006748,0.001194561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752147,0.02243579,0.00003989169,0.000677119,0.0006134837,0.001019004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007188256,0.001441986,0.002565336,0.0001491302,0.00003704326,0.000002547655,0.005109646,5.126385e-8,0.0001087933,0.9899347,0.0001936338,0.0003852265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019349,0.0004029465,0.02921935,0.0001424252,0.00015753,0.000001034653,0.03514414,0.000005126119,0.0006916062,0.9330754,0.0006351118,0.0003318194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8694585,0.000775128,0.0004441658,0.09539185,0.000905538,0.00109085,0.0006056778,0.0001773491,0.03115097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982449,0.0000226425,0.0001103979,0.0009788302,0.0003596296,0.0001660908,0.000003124736,0.00001759803,0.00009679815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1287864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109920990","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23382","title":"FROM TRAGEDY TO ‘CRIP’ TO HUMAN: THE NEED FOR MULTIPLE UNDERSTANDINGS OF DISABILITY IN PSYCHOTHERAPY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Psychotherapist; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1022687467229704,"gpt":0.4665095705524117,"spread":0.3642408238294413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001332774,0.0003445647,0.0006567676,0.00005847027,0.0002271879,0.000087263,0.0008072736,0.0002010966,0.00153487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002397914,0.0002606998,0.0003526314,0.0005590796,0.003300608,0.0001810746,0.00004837485,0.0003647864,0.0000473043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002574153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004538054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002908234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004176103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960391,0.0004893221,0.0009118038,0.001096488,0.0005049584,0.000958306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933601,0.004446131,0.0000393497,0.00156483,0.0001163456,0.0004732599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005222618,0.01890903,0.6047924,0.0002066646,0.00008516327,0.000004548123,0.02644777,0.00004666201,0.01258155,0.3028675,0.01141845,0.01741764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001362238,0.001109421,0.6680627,0.00005495221,0.00003023466,6.269602e-7,0.05264981,0.00003004132,0.0006700089,0.2752312,0.0004654836,0.0003332359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8986644,0.00007052212,0.003296167,0.09302582,0.0003618973,0.002341082,0.0006321121,0.00005865569,0.001549366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968471,9.998168e-7,0.0004802023,0.001862108,0.0002338365,0.0004196319,0.00004456015,0.00002783073,0.00008374544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09818271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102907777","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.37455","title":"Mapping Difference: Critical Connections between Crip and Diaspora Communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diaspora; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08001395641534935,"gpt":0.3283160067433831,"spread":0.2483020503280338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001934898,0.0002013531,0.000269788,0.000009133324,0.0008640088,0.0004849999,0.0002184719,0.0001202981,0.002923914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001240295,0.00007662368,0.00007623139,0.0002942137,0.00213334,0.0007978084,0.0001552234,0.0003117608,0.0000573349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000225135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005348216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003286198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004579791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985576,0.0002316059,0.0003432542,0.0002772755,0.0002002928,0.0003899544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935142,0.005877741,0.00003547995,0.0001099884,0.0002420005,0.0002205524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009578057,0.0008871431,0.7610193,0.0001446472,0.00004285979,0.000001679223,0.001758158,3.504985e-7,0.01257661,0.1375389,0.001413751,0.08460698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000371676,0.0001033082,0.9009613,0.00003704933,0.00002487834,0.000005396574,0.07296298,0.0000323386,0.00006185164,0.02434945,0.001193241,0.0002310887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412898,0.000199202,0.00003400147,0.0570049,0.0001166391,0.0002127633,0.0001515781,0.0001051528,0.0008859582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988707,0.0000375224,0.0001544475,0.0003392957,0.0003486453,0.0000913632,0.0001088823,0.000001323813,0.00004779832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1399419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1711742294","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23386","title":"FEDERAL SUPPORTS FOR ABORIGINAL PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gerontology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01782879150976669,"gpt":0.3859390398241028,"spread":0.3681102483143361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006092543,0.0001950829,0.000299911,0.00002190033,0.005531325,0.0002297923,0.000226424,0.0001189426,0.0004889186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001623814,0.000141816,0.0001254238,0.0001664042,0.00304443,0.0005493894,7.125195e-7,0.0001348896,0.00001810901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002799623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005570315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01986508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5752778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976518,0.0002021643,0.0003096427,0.000458235,0.0004472305,0.0009308851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977934,0.001158198,0.00003465959,0.0003199856,0.0002690436,0.0004246497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006920333,0.001116761,0.03268018,0.0001026685,0.000005192626,5.226466e-7,0.108865,0.000001145959,4.724829e-7,0.8565395,0.0003196186,0.0002996839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006158899,0.001202708,0.1136672,0.0001001295,0.0001171807,0.000007987328,0.2076938,0.00001566423,0.00007508403,0.2918344,0.3837989,0.0008710593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131591,0.00007610617,0.0005853766,0.02258319,0.0006422402,0.001134834,0.00009101746,0.0001505342,0.06157766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953673,0.0001050051,0.0007536216,0.0001466441,0.001078697,0.00002898955,0.0000421041,0.00001325034,0.002464373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5647051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410446515","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39776","title":"Uncovering Ableism in Martha Fineman’s Ontological Vulnerability and Resilience Theory: A Critical Disability Theory Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Perspective (graphical); Vulnerability (computing); Resilience (materials science); Sociology; Disability studies; Critical theory; Epistemology; Criminology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Computer security; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02803330803956263,"gpt":0.417261507166856,"spread":0.3892281991272934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007057348,0.0004001312,0.0007117138,0.00005191804,0.001136773,0.0003190691,0.0005962656,0.0004895785,0.0007024826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1197702,0.0003468766,0.0002388245,0.0005701774,0.04065359,0.0007620184,0.0003757284,0.001166126,0.00001263593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000929232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004019792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003940719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01887208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917091,0.004270105,0.000709988,0.001444293,0.000689894,0.001176689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974279,0.02403109,0.00003893414,0.0008509717,0.000331747,0.0004682537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003213888,0.0014677,0.1455706,0.0002143464,0.00001171198,0.000008879821,0.00622829,0.00001258675,0.000007021054,0.8431997,0.0000608758,0.002896878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002189608,0.00006226796,0.2560296,0.0001059457,0.00004626319,0.000001214656,0.07100521,0.00003856907,0.00001416782,0.6718014,0.0004006706,0.0002757013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8084446,0.001238337,0.001637915,0.1056741,0.0009196739,0.0009527296,0.0001035101,0.0002307977,0.08079834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983052,0.00006910109,0.0002569838,0.0006448969,0.0001595409,0.0001778809,0.000002901313,0.00001380878,0.0003696705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1898606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926460403","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31553","title":"IN THE MATTER OF THE FEMALE MIND: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S APPROACH TO WOMEN AND MENTAL HEALTH","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Mental health; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03688513608631631,"gpt":0.3346762824749945,"spread":0.2977911463886782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079588,0.0000711348,0.0002901723,0.00001608328,0.0002140034,0.00001524821,0.000443871,0.00003117723,0.0001195806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003715378,0.00003541612,0.00006761448,0.0004267253,0.001976712,0.0001169786,0.00006979478,0.00006991566,1.194747e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001092218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004430716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7085708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8170732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982571,0.0005200526,0.0003243353,0.0001709621,0.0004759157,0.0002516378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993013,0.0001672066,0.00006805886,0.000306012,0.00005951601,0.00009789387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002013328,0.0007474569,0.793794,0.0001625873,0.00003733845,4.667215e-8,0.1764968,0.000004627877,0.00002204194,0.02816131,0.0004805579,0.00007316757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004699439,0.0000350026,0.7915693,0.00002045801,0.00003940159,1.333414e-7,0.2061085,0.00001360636,0.00006908165,0.001855435,0.0001903263,0.00005176306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748964,0.00004479153,0.000005026626,0.01778018,0.00007278307,0.0003433536,0.0001386669,0.000001040612,0.006717724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994466,0.000001196493,0.00001522892,0.0004575592,0.00002403713,0.00001584422,7.851115e-7,0.000002779356,0.00003596546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410153629","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39772","title":"Embodied Inequality: Fatness, Human Rights and Systemic Oppression in Ontario Schools","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Embodied cognition; Inequality; Sociology; Human rights; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08918687073742457,"gpt":0.4987180585847542,"spread":0.4095311878473296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001729993,0.0002539694,0.0006604243,0.00009151857,0.001847697,0.00006152994,0.0002440924,0.0004058944,0.001029476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001995809,0.0002080027,0.00006645677,0.0001866466,0.0008042307,0.0006922718,0.0003179748,0.001898368,0.0001205052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007112162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000514355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1479973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6159609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952842,0.001922042,0.001087549,0.0006524044,0.0002842431,0.000769566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955243,0.003329571,0.0001107113,0.0006029839,0.0001411644,0.0002912917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009583117,0.0006039847,0.760648,0.003423481,0.000009518603,0.000005351068,0.001399542,6.594345e-7,0.00005621164,0.232521,0.001096626,0.0001398259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009691903,0.00005542672,0.8238679,0.004281679,0.00006929594,0.000001119147,0.008019486,0.00002279214,0.00001404406,0.1593423,0.003119123,0.0002375897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615217,0.0003504809,0.00007622965,0.0112172,0.0007102509,0.001152101,0.00002863532,0.0001015566,0.02484181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969288,0.000009310587,0.00009539393,0.0007145043,0.0001138711,0.0002625139,0.00002503631,0.00001116199,0.001839462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4679636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150147348","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.37457","title":"Affective (Dis)Ability: Ian Brown’s Search for “Inner Life” in The Boy in the Moon","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Contemporary Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Astrobiology; Art; Psychology; Art history; Psychoanalysis; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04887750907419913,"gpt":0.3196076776800694,"spread":0.2707301686058702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001214436,0.0002546609,0.0003356155,0.00004723961,0.0003482114,0.0009309655,0.0005723622,0.00008503546,0.0008846131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001404711,0.0001364382,0.0002256819,0.0001093426,0.001935874,0.000830126,0.00006353513,0.0004996529,0.00006262925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005929836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006285367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00129148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006733243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972851,0.0007991099,0.00044686,0.0004842635,0.0003762777,0.0006084144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964401,0.002602037,0.00001783275,0.0006806009,0.0001546408,0.0001047563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000521807,0.001546496,0.00744668,0.000245913,0.00001038533,0.00000431029,0.06990142,9.035969e-7,0.00001129456,0.9122747,0.006598593,0.001907081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008810226,0.0004883751,0.1011564,0.000160516,0.00006882747,0.000004437286,0.5737522,0.0002925598,0.00002030466,0.3038832,0.01876821,0.0005239831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7698087,0.0004749673,0.00003707964,0.1917789,0.0003199136,0.00240054,0.0002201668,0.00003911902,0.0349206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994269,0.000001501659,0.00001058671,0.003635509,0.0006868946,0.001121239,0.00004168726,0.00001828816,0.0002153451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6083916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962653127","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23383","title":"CRIP UTOPIA AND THE FUTURE OF DISABILITY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Sociology; Environmental ethics; History; Philosophy; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01904191283916433,"gpt":0.3766859409762452,"spread":0.3576440281370808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001200208,0.0001407645,0.0003212779,0.0000072767,0.0005621809,0.0001254265,0.0002871639,0.0001114017,0.0004324057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001847752,0.00007847658,0.0001812018,0.0001772276,0.0323704,0.0003865085,0.00004530241,0.0001638823,0.000006326946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006635828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005470332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001018961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001292571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976894,0.0007341463,0.0003832166,0.0003720803,0.0004875616,0.0003335639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997758,0.001408673,0.00004359756,0.0004865039,0.0001186781,0.0001845877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008793253,0.0006587511,0.02376661,0.00004423682,0.000005978799,2.135719e-7,0.003173918,8.443351e-7,0.00001027995,0.9534694,0.0001536309,0.0186282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004352434,0.00005488192,0.2614331,0.00001710321,0.00006138904,6.146358e-7,0.0228601,0.00003262583,0.00003489299,0.7107577,0.004176957,0.0001353908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6621903,0.0004654338,0.00007737245,0.3114772,0.0004381858,0.0005753334,0.00003017528,0.00006144459,0.02468448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988178,0.00008328685,0.00009592265,0.0002450106,0.0005158946,0.00001443677,0.000004025028,0.000004320304,0.0002192793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3366275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137080887","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23855","title":"THE DISAVOWAL OF THE BODY AS A SOURCE OF INQUIRY IN CRITICAL DISABILITY STUDIES: THE RETURN OF IMPAIRMENT?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Disability studies; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05590944141961898,"gpt":0.4571043147748395,"spread":0.4011948733552205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003630742,0.0002179365,0.0005128191,0.00001319067,0.0008042712,0.00007286508,0.001109065,0.0001738667,0.0002046901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03880176,0.00009649036,0.0004392614,0.0004805237,0.1023787,0.0003247875,0.0003733356,0.0005517534,0.000003318404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001254252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002553808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004217708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01342837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950913,0.00165189,0.001091982,0.0004733551,0.001128895,0.0005626176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838349,0.01406416,0.000160183,0.001367989,0.0004130132,0.0001597284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001407416,0.003131128,0.3735956,0.0003264453,0.0000413374,2.767485e-7,0.03345882,0.00000522628,0.0006515901,0.5871311,0.0001849572,0.001332841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002866825,0.0001604755,0.3733403,0.0001224596,0.0001283109,0.000001181663,0.286403,0.0000656459,0.001291191,0.3374072,0.0006104163,0.0001831689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220886,0.0001577536,0.00001331658,0.07403371,0.00108769,0.0008082211,0.00003484544,0.00001803578,0.001757879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994844,0.00003245866,0.00002174849,0.00005464071,0.000242967,0.0000681279,0.000001513089,0.00001176351,0.00008236602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2529442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9692948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681414090","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23848","title":"LESSONS TO BE LEARNED: THE DECISION OF THE SOCIAL BENEFITS TRIBUNAL IN TRANCHEMONTAGNE V. ONTARIO (DIRECTOR, DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Program director; Psychology; Political science; Management; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07690490613691789,"gpt":0.4254042561545593,"spread":0.3484993500176414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001689704,0.0002704691,0.000502757,0.00001055167,0.001608379,0.0001546788,0.0009269221,0.0002391899,0.0009100219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008580242,0.0001536239,0.0004309541,0.0004989638,0.01056652,0.0002833939,0.0003005465,0.0008444344,0.000008866938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006047855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000276834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09069031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964364,0.0004759638,0.0006047991,0.0005945046,0.00109288,0.0007954295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968859,0.002074895,0.00006709813,0.0005016526,0.0002208731,0.0002495642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001986505,0.004141701,0.7125259,0.00005997762,0.00003120903,0.000001245032,0.09701781,0.000007722261,0.0003242812,0.08162387,0.0009995694,0.1030681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002900166,0.00007400212,0.9563853,0.00002638238,0.00005833357,5.25512e-7,0.02611834,0.000002921385,0.0001871709,0.005185548,0.01144315,0.0002282773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8286972,0.00002647265,0.000002729763,0.1673966,0.000622956,0.001178539,0.0001107983,0.00005184057,0.001912883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988797,0.000004603973,0.0002123863,0.00022711,0.0002793237,0.0002365858,0.000005529691,0.0000129334,0.0001418379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502938431","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23385","title":"IS THERE REFUGE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES WITHIN THE 1951 CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Convention; Political science; Psychology; Gerontology; Law; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817799142112384,"gpt":0.3781900792505546,"spread":0.3500120878294308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976063,0.0001332483,0.0002115047,0.00001086436,0.0007794257,0.0001330719,0.0002850165,0.00006928146,0.0002028939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006542984,0.00006984045,0.0001239403,0.0002943151,0.002045391,0.0002321149,0.00002437574,0.0001492056,0.00000567413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001218653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005939014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02688771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981074,0.0003406307,0.0003541085,0.0002798621,0.0004479865,0.000469971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974682,0.001608274,0.00007343283,0.0004352936,0.000236853,0.0001779533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007936881,0.0002258918,0.03400581,0.00004942709,0.000009989292,4.626417e-8,0.04081652,0.00007241031,0.00001463506,0.9234577,0.0004196648,0.0008484883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006261022,0.001031989,0.1991017,0.0002727731,0.0002446043,0.000001016355,0.5417317,0.002466521,0.0001765869,0.1920564,0.06173277,0.0005578813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243119,0.0001064534,0.001319244,0.07018664,0.0001443172,0.0009039424,0.0001978323,0.00004526228,0.002784408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977469,0.00001042405,0.0003786681,0.000697535,0.0001268697,0.00007657623,0.00001244851,0.000009340069,0.0009412625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7314014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410153618","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39766","title":"Conversations from the Margins: Disability and the Path to Inclusion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Path (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer network","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01989130976125384,"gpt":0.3797468795836286,"spread":0.3598555698223748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001586356,0.0001421904,0.0002300999,0.000007544565,0.003175019,0.0003201291,0.0004824763,0.00008707818,0.0005152434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008226363,0.00006951176,0.0001340478,0.0003183789,0.02474755,0.0002841641,0.0006977224,0.0001841428,0.00002551349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001673607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001167461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02043028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01473601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971749,0.00124159,0.0003270712,0.000470156,0.0004712419,0.0003150789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907424,0.008307674,0.0000245795,0.0006471001,0.0001147463,0.0001634312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008928819,0.0003875125,0.1091309,0.00002455642,0.00001653227,1.502774e-7,0.01600063,0.00000249907,0.000007644989,0.8684511,0.001689,0.004200274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003806718,0.00001150243,0.3711199,0.00004203565,0.00008886209,5.472e-8,0.05019286,0.0001173937,0.00001067221,0.5665855,0.01134086,0.0001096712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4565341,0.0001626376,0.0005851025,0.52991,0.0004496641,0.0009213705,0.0001047761,0.00005142912,0.01128083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971928,0.00003376731,0.0000823932,0.002023734,0.0002221728,0.0001170034,0.00001437118,0.000004989254,0.0003087919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5406587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242966","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39773","title":"Mapping Out the Monstrosity of Disabled Bodies in Hunt-Kennedy’s Between Fitness and Death (2020) and Nicholas’ Canadian Carnival Freaks and the Extraordinary Body (2018)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Demon; Art history; Gerontology; Medicine; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02780453240648244,"gpt":0.2872994570654211,"spread":0.2594949246589386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004381811,0.0001970582,0.0004017306,0.00004811259,0.0007597138,0.000233702,0.0001426693,0.00007184139,0.0000695833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004931086,0.0001221438,0.00006977192,0.00003947272,0.005592418,0.0002610188,0.0001177181,0.0002592919,6.828533e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006897729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000633051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03782961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2324169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985833,0.0002710646,0.0003408659,0.0003457864,0.0001285247,0.0003305284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984366,0.001070019,0.00003399116,0.0002743558,0.00006602849,0.0001190222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002539184,0.00004067172,0.3700473,0.0001222906,0.00002585386,9.04277e-7,0.006568721,3.937749e-7,0.000006374536,0.6225833,0.00003569656,0.0005430706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000656276,0.00003928504,0.9255806,0.0001429272,0.0001245516,0.000001545044,0.0129561,0.0001567178,0.00001006537,0.05449958,0.005666987,0.0001654126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723107,0.0003931731,0.00004144523,0.01139764,0.0002142315,0.0003934928,0.0002351823,0.00001646846,0.01499771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958269,0.00007923062,0.00001156841,0.00008908478,0.0001550399,0.00003064975,0.00001298252,0.00000779973,0.003786774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5680838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954207522","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31281","title":"DEFINING MORE INCLUSIVE SOCIAL POLICIES FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09757285892550807,"gpt":0.4434857787774283,"spread":0.3459129198519202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006384677,0.0001735581,0.0003126529,0.00002876483,0.001507853,0.00008330634,0.0002591771,0.0001429574,0.0004467781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004390788,0.0001444767,0.0001098103,0.000254651,0.006041921,0.0003599986,0.00007206076,0.0001563739,0.00001234081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000189786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000324587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001949111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01758726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998062,0.0002490541,0.0003208321,0.0003585449,0.0003627999,0.0006467896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975111,0.001629153,0.00004325863,0.0002047732,0.0004048199,0.0002069335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004805421,0.0003166527,0.03187113,0.00013688,0.000009616635,1.961222e-7,0.1357179,4.852761e-8,0.000001582665,0.8280374,0.0002773759,0.003583165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002169604,0.0001609501,0.05789519,0.00003876884,0.0000348507,7.252864e-7,0.8343072,0.000006721561,0.00005894047,0.1005726,0.006409821,0.00029727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033817,0.0001688916,0.001367876,0.2591293,0.0003719481,0.0007827983,0.0002306375,0.0002838288,0.03428297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969463,0.000009736847,0.001601534,0.0006932453,0.0003629335,0.0002450179,0.0000165623,0.00002073084,0.0001039325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7274648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120883853","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23387","title":"ABLEISM KITSCH: THE AESTHETICS OF DISABILITY-RELATED ETHICS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Bioethics and Human Rights Issues","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Kitsch; Ableism; Aesthetics; Disfigurement; Sociology; Art; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0576464287648568,"gpt":0.371213386050108,"spread":0.3135669572852511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001549633,0.0002586336,0.0003829721,0.00001763471,0.0004961033,0.0002580585,0.001655171,0.000307528,0.0001048836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001626929,0.0001567121,0.0002476345,0.0003050748,0.009453778,0.0004419853,0.0002331653,0.001093596,0.00002954313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005281746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006284266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006731092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970019,0.0005090615,0.0006489674,0.0006116723,0.0007313236,0.0004970551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954298,0.002283645,0.00007412421,0.001762838,0.0002516231,0.0001980127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005323572,0.000955336,0.0006726584,0.00005503422,0.000008097044,0.000001710184,0.00255382,0.00001318974,0.00004602072,0.9900233,0.0001088097,0.005556713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001549177,0.0002790727,0.02683536,0.00007364952,0.0000407087,0.000007497328,0.0005916664,0.002028853,0.0006871923,0.9672328,0.00179381,0.0002744439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2613626,0.001069682,0.02242812,0.7039916,0.001015245,0.000664366,0.00005031394,0.0004006748,0.009017427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966801,0.00003950693,0.002167314,0.0009394282,0.00007191844,0.000007527398,0.0000036113,0.000009379848,0.00008125704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7353175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116293957","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39789","title":"From Stigma to Strength: Understanding Psycho-Emotional Disablism and the Transformative Potential of Learning Disabilities","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Learning disability; Conversation; Scholarship; Stigma (botany); Disability studies; Cognition; Social model of disability; Cognitive reframing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03819552461260003,"gpt":0.3774259366628878,"spread":0.3392304120502877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001692172,0.0004743937,0.0009141377,0.00007869527,0.002173695,0.0006781526,0.0005988887,0.0002842725,0.001840458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007676153,0.0003196609,0.0005220544,0.0007436834,0.04919662,0.001062551,0.0002467126,0.0006195634,0.00001641157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004230395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002592968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005512727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001747193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933644,0.002424259,0.001296209,0.001013306,0.001136498,0.0007653366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871008,0.01157739,0.0001247041,0.0005569842,0.0002454669,0.0003945952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000834782,0.001405243,0.006977542,0.0005414273,0.000186945,4.599711e-7,0.06990092,0.0002479256,0.00002672699,0.9149207,0.0003191385,0.004638216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001157434,0.00008930493,0.01177567,0.0004108405,0.0003865215,3.349529e-7,0.4700336,0.001950155,0.00005313622,0.5136827,0.0001912091,0.0002691124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7503034,0.0008911327,0.02845199,0.1916743,0.002363873,0.00215806,0.000978396,0.00008302961,0.02309586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998355,0.0002632848,0.0001232249,0.000123827,0.0004370793,0.00007358025,0.00004686055,0.00001790523,0.0005591842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.401238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410601863","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39778","title":"“The main problem here is one of social behavior”: Intersectional Identities at the Ontario Hospital, Woodstock, 1918-1968","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0262816624982499,"gpt":0.3756384725228771,"spread":0.3493568100246272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006013016,0.0002104307,0.0003206209,0.0000217612,0.001066199,0.00007771741,0.0004917865,0.0001975122,0.01065437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008101758,0.0001391532,0.000328066,0.0001972376,0.00616846,0.0001937097,0.0002041439,0.0006985884,0.0001307854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006089064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001844307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02764038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975268,0.0004237289,0.0006170438,0.0004753782,0.0004833248,0.0004737239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972281,0.001923156,0.0001015436,0.0005129427,0.0001050322,0.0001292049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000665091,0.008205538,0.07971907,0.0002773968,0.0003685677,0.000007712888,0.01577506,2.817991e-7,0.0000709383,0.6142265,0.2728817,0.00780217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001373022,0.0009904645,0.4608478,0.0001711916,0.001349985,0.00001721572,0.07617807,0.000001873027,0.0001050217,0.1615428,0.2967651,0.0006573555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.77619,0.0008008551,0.0001887398,0.1104789,0.006099866,0.0007981962,0.0001721038,0.00005896967,0.1052124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610648,0.000005668612,0.00005212345,0.0006580093,0.0002930507,0.0003001127,0.00001210445,0.00001299173,0.03760114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4526836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908025651","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.23852","title":"“WE CAN’T CLOSE IT YET”: HOW DISCOURSE POSITIONS PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Psychology; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02788669792017323,"gpt":0.3714191419112241,"spread":0.3435324439910509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006007724,0.000376426,0.0004605322,0.00004960409,0.001569544,0.0007480482,0.0005673017,0.0002407019,0.004600655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01053599,0.0002652039,0.0002658942,0.0004664554,0.02414499,0.001091499,0.0001209789,0.0006375483,0.0001146732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001840758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004419347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003525964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1362339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962646,0.0005066885,0.0003938579,0.0008883454,0.0009873904,0.0009590947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927518,0.00531471,0.00005501415,0.0009087746,0.0002841077,0.0006855315],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090024,0.003142576,0.03856492,0.0001529667,0.00004858198,0.000003647878,0.09534334,0.000005776328,0.000232733,0.8524629,0.007807756,0.002125804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444941,0.0003376766,0.01516738,0.000120821,0.0002832059,0.0000130488,0.7951813,0.00007616342,0.0003298253,0.1735322,0.01341698,0.0009968665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6469989,0.00002510862,0.0002286632,0.335634,0.0007572604,0.0006195512,0.0002282148,0.0001750598,0.01533321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949998,0.00003181475,0.0003769549,0.0002082375,0.0006110822,0.000191348,0.00007056314,0.00003751205,0.003472675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.699838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859396277","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.31558","title":"CONSIDERING THE METHODOLOGICAL COMPLEXITIES OF THE INTERVIEW APPROACH WHEN EXPLORING THE WORK OF MOTHERING AND DISABILITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.833005997358399,"gpt":0.5548122252345867,"spread":0.2781937721238122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01662172,0.0001352632,0.0003770011,0.000006524143,0.0006871123,0.00005640268,0.0006746644,0.00006545286,0.0001863673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02916631,0.00005967803,0.0002067232,0.0002076618,0.05628391,0.0001988667,0.0004753722,0.0004539615,4.19721e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004341994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005719663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001659801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004284777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853361,0.01305311,0.0004479175,0.000274801,0.0005232919,0.0003647642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755347,0.02357199,0.00007587512,0.0005681636,0.0001455211,0.0001037911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002951222,0.0002578125,0.04423966,0.000389655,0.00002870656,8.323997e-8,0.1163673,0.0000016195,0.0000286581,0.8275495,0.000009995168,0.01109754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000486297,0.00003432856,0.1653111,0.0001328246,0.00003640522,4.291587e-7,0.2839006,0.00002297465,0.0002409787,0.5500249,0.0001609774,0.00008580105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.935963,0.0008607422,0.01458666,0.03766736,0.0002338835,0.0007411479,0.0000326936,0.00003191995,0.009882594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869208,0.00006295638,0.01276959,0.00008041869,0.00006433399,0.00007947488,2.080923e-7,0.000007722697,0.00001454747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2775246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116338858","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39786","title":"Circumcision and forced disability: Routine male neonatal circumcision and the consequences of amputation within a critical disability studies framework","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amputation; Foreskin; Disability studies; Critical reflection; Ableism; Accommodation; Disability pension","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03818089551922692,"gpt":0.4223748657994112,"spread":0.3841939702801843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003859506,0.0009586894,0.002386033,0.0000727617,0.001222235,0.0002697082,0.0004202042,0.0006141421,0.0003019692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1346675,0.0006643693,0.0005545621,0.0008233668,0.11468,0.0007280066,0.0008171035,0.001226077,0.000009134072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005074736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006607742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005323096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001827973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900509,0.002233309,0.002942366,0.002127221,0.001336756,0.001309524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520624,0.04335792,0.0002687793,0.001837112,0.001015677,0.001458113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01077813,0.004163743,0.5010923,0.02588978,0.0002024453,0.00002808495,0.005957691,0.00001913698,0.0001065487,0.4252823,0.00007120061,0.02640866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004718959,0.001063767,0.2667974,0.003244693,0.00266223,0.00007453057,0.08240812,0.003200526,0.0003067191,0.6348686,0.00001265638,0.0006417595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8683605,0.03496101,0.00227491,0.08915897,0.001416046,0.002825895,0.000699533,0.00007431128,0.0002287987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969758,0.0004181041,0.0007550626,0.001146994,0.0003099755,0.0002544561,0.00004963032,0.00004055166,0.00004941347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2342948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116278418","doi":"10.25071/1918-6215.39784","title":"From Tension to Cross-Constituency Solidarity: Coalition Building in Mad Studies","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Critical Disability Discourses","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Control (management); Lived experience; Action (physics); Public policy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2748554628848459,"gpt":0.5631760762663274,"spread":0.2883206133814815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002769259,0.0006736545,0.001360644,0.0002208752,0.001985414,0.0001367635,0.000468359,0.0005800533,0.0008903398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00984137,0.0006386848,0.0002483831,0.0008488443,0.003705202,0.000607032,0.001007003,0.001404771,0.0003565459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002346092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009677033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005369988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003763945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902219,0.002487687,0.002883005,0.001723216,0.0006711709,0.002013066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880166,0.00907079,0.0001563654,0.001167958,0.0006288307,0.0009594586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001079082,0.004879158,0.8064935,0.01635933,0.00008298257,0.00002470213,0.008231293,0.00002684486,0.0004854965,0.1542249,0.002827722,0.005284983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003509989,0.0007866537,0.3644666,0.04828355,0.0004099663,5.791713e-7,0.1362659,0.0008087883,0.0009487345,0.4403175,0.002927874,0.001273841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9327368,0.003766761,0.001190461,0.04414457,0.01059177,0.00377041,0.001831645,0.00009379248,0.00187379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869035,0.000272725,0.0008552356,0.0101347,0.0006334666,0.0006376268,0.0002477938,0.00003046532,0.0002844287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4420269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}