{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"488d096fb1ad","filters":{"venue":"Critical Discourse Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2734529596","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2017.1352002","title":"The strategic ritual of emotionality in Chinese and Australian hard news: a corpus-based study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Macquarie University","keywords":"Feeling; Construct (python library); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Competition (biology); Media studies; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; History","authors":[{"name":"Changpeng Huan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1835186246069062,"gpt":0.4948764277654411,"spread":0.3113578031585349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009231928,0.00009688472,0.0002379645,0.00001754143,0.002210522,0.0001156282,0.0003618982,0.00002963951,0.000008365712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002804342,0.0000611991,0.00004077217,0.00006096798,0.003492229,0.0001191519,0.0001728479,0.0001282984,0.00000178228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000287168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007438295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001772094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04919454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987619,0.0003189119,0.000230247,0.0001619903,0.0002961995,0.0002307861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983788,0.0009196723,0.00007254003,0.0003927872,0.0001723378,0.00006388968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004835174,0.0006032438,0.6567364,0.00004416622,0.00008345329,0.00000647144,0.01494512,0.00000118984,0.00000940931,0.3245817,0.0002104075,0.002730086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003743994,0.00008256827,0.7042223,0.00004210942,0.00002838808,6.054102e-8,0.2705068,0.00001101819,7.999567e-7,0.02444076,0.000219531,0.00007125668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347678,0.001497526,0.000001189924,0.06006102,0.000216732,0.0002606926,0.00001000773,0.000008850124,0.003176176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998687,0.0009380382,0.0000314484,0.00003273681,0.00009272071,0.00005045259,6.520308e-7,0.000003320275,0.0001636435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.300141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011915667","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2011.637685","title":"European parliaments under scrutiny: discourse strategies and interaction practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Political science; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Ideology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Irena Knežević","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2415652680950774,"gpt":0.4878597289372961,"spread":0.2462944608422187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006301451,0.0001630078,0.0001822113,0.00003999157,0.0007633053,0.0002364495,0.0001815779,0.00003015917,0.0001117383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002644667,0.0001344589,0.00004782899,0.0001037711,0.002740155,0.001722942,0.0001479201,0.0001965924,0.0001132461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003690118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006430982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007615168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008544951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982138,0.0005834026,0.0002201309,0.0003110495,0.0002787533,0.0003928227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989221,0.0004697781,0.0001659052,0.0001604321,0.0001233554,0.0001584269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002794137,0.0001544193,0.000799495,0.00002807,0.00007224116,0.00003475791,0.03178273,5.93112e-7,0.00003331874,0.9632942,0.00112667,0.002645567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000280139,0.0001254625,0.07144125,0.0002302463,0.0001468094,0.000004059886,0.8792096,0.000003821777,0.00005491196,0.03085815,0.01728653,0.0003590003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2404421,0.003117718,0.0002934657,0.008454124,0.0008538655,0.0001674876,0.00001667902,0.0001269205,0.7465277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947268,0.002230725,0.0001983023,0.0006167659,0.0004024044,0.000007106194,9.35772e-7,0.00001845158,0.001798471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321368969","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2023.2179648","title":"‘New’ Dutch Civic Integration: learning ‘Spontaneous Compliance’ to address inherent difference","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Nadine Blankvoort","is_ca":false},{"name":"Debbie Laliberté Rudman","is_ca":true},{"name":"Margo van Hartingsveldt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anja Krumeich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2027526555819701,"gpt":0.5003716655864453,"spread":0.2976190100044752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003292421,0.0002116574,0.0004016784,0.00009539524,0.002262322,0.000107534,0.0002649495,0.00008390559,0.00006967142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642721,0.0001607374,0.0001115918,0.0006919069,0.001164527,0.0001123125,0.000269964,0.0002873532,0.0005101913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001104268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007344705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005386473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979116,0.0001967835,0.0002579371,0.0003449813,0.0005393943,0.0007493393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983655,0.0009298066,0.00003237382,0.0001293676,0.0002532728,0.000289675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005775383,0.0001057384,0.001389857,0.0001152611,0.000243723,0.0002756172,0.4425644,0.0000269179,0.0001531441,0.4590394,0.03688125,0.059147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002580984,0.0001904544,0.02877901,0.000510703,0.00008810277,0.0000050238,0.8997936,0.00002724288,0.00005714212,0.06442303,0.005324423,0.000543126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5070163,0.003709436,0.001034104,0.304655,0.007333005,0.001722652,0.00007275313,0.002133114,0.1723236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777669,0.001117671,0.00008708167,0.0004174521,0.001555961,0.00007612203,0.000003753801,0.00001663136,0.01895839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4707506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388125626","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2023.2273324","title":"Settler colonialism and therapeutic discourses on the past: a response to Burnett et al.’s ‘a politics of reminding’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Colonialism; Indigenous; Politics; Emic and etic; Identity (music); Criticism; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Economic Justice; Identity politics; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Rafaël Verbuyst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06800452590700751,"gpt":0.4547053526653991,"spread":0.3867008267583916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051796,0.0001398863,0.0002404678,0.0001185583,0.003925436,0.00005657575,0.0001760163,0.00005542916,0.00002482544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005144879,0.00008343087,0.00005258265,0.0003561838,0.002149895,0.00005997508,0.0000107971,0.0001529809,0.00004744267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008780398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001407091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001605299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01503224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977551,0.0007583126,0.0002292261,0.0002452387,0.0004335571,0.0005785743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953048,0.00406706,0.00004003389,0.0002057613,0.0002142424,0.0001681065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004604172,0.00006587643,0.0001493212,0.00002050742,0.00003190204,0.000004030137,0.332329,7.57652e-7,0.00001186359,0.6556458,0.01166426,0.00003061777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001979755,0.0003454722,0.01385333,0.0002308986,0.0000831296,0.000001789095,0.3656797,0.000003176388,0.00008077994,0.04166577,0.5776159,0.0002420763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6293222,0.0004528286,0.000001827317,0.3636207,0.0005330482,0.0003215699,0.00004266488,0.00003548914,0.005669685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865826,0.002488155,0.00002182843,0.003805389,0.0002860371,0.00002139516,0.000001997979,0.00001574411,0.00677681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6139801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311298579","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2152063","title":"Unfit and cast aside: portrayals of mothering with intellectual disability in Québec court reports","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Scholarship; Critical discourse analysis; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Aside; Injustice; Power (physics); Discourse analysis; Disability studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Laura Pacheco","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rahel More","is_ca":false},{"name":"Marjorie Aunos","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rachelle Rose","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0470788422940813,"gpt":0.3833986682748937,"spread":0.3363198259808124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003049978,0.0001454381,0.0003816943,0.00004169782,0.00014597,0.000007798805,0.00006202408,0.00002325176,0.001043512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004194623,0.0001166142,0.00004575388,0.000141397,0.001428358,0.00004826477,0.000138398,0.0002351021,0.000002710795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006706605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004537644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00254068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00795014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987062,0.0001019957,0.0003632303,0.0003754957,0.0001880045,0.0002650942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988655,0.0007215391,0.00004441747,0.000269875,0.00004064291,0.00005796779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005927127,0.002398419,0.859888,0.000262084,0.0007006357,0.00226707,0.1002978,0.00005203657,0.00008585014,0.02147541,0.003490197,0.008489755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093562,0.0009019778,0.7332803,0.0001627046,0.0002097906,0.0008358788,0.2578032,0.0000131545,0.00009275851,0.004035605,0.001119702,0.0004513684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873815,0.003695578,0.00001711691,0.003636839,0.0001924761,0.0001783718,0.00002359916,0.00002317882,0.004851317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995352,0.00002407796,0.00002982197,0.00008609166,0.00004235405,0.00008019838,0.0000015537,0.00001750659,0.0001831877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1575054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293084307","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2087702","title":"An ideological square analysis of the podcast discourse in “Chinese Dreams” of the BBC World Service","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Discourse analysis; China; Critical discourse analysis; Narrative; Media studies; Gender studies; Politics; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Laksup Apirakvanalee","is_ca":false},{"name":"Yida Zhai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05156717200208051,"gpt":0.4280905043609075,"spread":0.376523332358827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007639449,0.0001832824,0.0005961115,0.0001712144,0.0007498548,0.0000351801,0.0009223662,0.00004054907,0.0002438051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002144044,0.00009897617,0.0003506729,0.003524034,0.003624565,0.0002453406,0.0005237946,0.0003062926,0.000001654214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001015196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001521453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001239814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04809461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99702,0.0008310219,0.0004563633,0.0003276927,0.0009289149,0.0004359864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997997,0.001068605,0.0001131496,0.0005086617,0.0001955619,0.0001170404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000754023,0.001417774,0.7664818,0.00007851371,0.0004724824,0.00001977189,0.06955092,0.0009977454,0.00007601034,0.1582889,0.0006313416,0.001909361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002413859,0.00008276003,0.6861227,0.00005544725,0.0006161218,9.311941e-7,0.3008496,0.0003234131,0.00001105016,0.01119426,0.0003028874,0.0001994059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642731,0.001012669,0.000003444687,0.02530825,0.0006486971,0.0002624241,0.0002199717,0.00001882984,0.008252604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988561,0.00002672676,0.00001485793,0.0005528457,0.0001381608,0.00005926601,0.000004864135,0.000009347998,0.0003378137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2312987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280553537","doi":"10.1080/17405904.2022.2072920","title":"Recovery rhetoric: a critical discourse analysis of substance use recovery","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Discourse Studies","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Sociology; Rhetoric; Biopower; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Power (physics); Empowerment; Intersectionality; Interpretation (philosophy); Neoliberalism (international relations); Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Social science; Law; Ideology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Sandra McNeil","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3520217220203465,"gpt":0.5298737558067884,"spread":0.1778520337864419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001331698,0.0003460367,0.001152144,0.0004405307,0.002437219,0.00001505845,0.0003089178,0.0001004017,0.001802219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001608388,0.0003044059,0.0004416922,0.001310406,0.0009255476,0.0004318373,0.0003820114,0.0008885753,0.00006226803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007052016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000269788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002444426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007171134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99419,0.001432738,0.001414793,0.0006844782,0.001040151,0.001237825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909485,0.007279701,0.0002232419,0.0006639687,0.0004647621,0.0004198485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004646695,0.007708801,0.3715985,0.01083355,0.00779434,0.0003427743,0.06900099,0.0008598908,0.0002892093,0.4152809,0.1052568,0.006387531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004123648,0.006454473,0.1152131,0.003865481,0.01387603,0.000006596321,0.7873744,0.001511645,0.000111003,0.04229699,0.02234177,0.002824784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741123,0.00605668,0.0007331414,0.006038886,0.005851001,0.001004093,0.003146687,0.00009348904,0.002963763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915986,0.001205831,0.0005317847,0.002763736,0.0002620546,0.0009843084,0.0002961563,0.00004195327,0.002315599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7183735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}