{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":3,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8e6464f3c654","filters":{"venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique"}},"results":[{"id":"W818722406","doi":"","title":"CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT OF POLICE THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Police department; Presentation (obstetrics); Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Police science; Political science; Law; Metropolitan police; Public administration; Criminology; Criminal justice ethics; Criminal justice; Sociology; Management; History; Medicine; Theory of criminal justice","authors":[{"name":"Roxanne Helme","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09988885100022876,"gpt":0.3798649060798382,"spread":0.2799760550796094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005968751,0.0006752477,0.0006973649,0.002149522,0.06874707,0.01190803,0.003244365,0.003605326,0.01135886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01634546,0.000965186,0.0004912766,0.007291531,0.02593903,0.003873205,0.007215203,0.008633642,0.0006529012],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2390336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3169428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847693,0.002925144,0.0003298697,0.0009063825,0.004240035,0.006829238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823515,0.0022206,0.0009399873,0.0004469285,0.006152233,0.007888718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007989271,0.0001063996,0.0139248,0.0001715421,0.00002361261,0.002473316,0.7987986,0.0004918911,0.0005913482,0.09786222,0.05244261,0.03303383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001699341,0.00004877332,0.01434128,0.0002691957,0.00001541406,0.0005810173,0.6263037,0.0002682625,0.0002192298,0.002540886,0.3552572,0.0001381418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6106698,0.00763856,0.001334727,0.1015552,0.001282715,0.0002036843,0.0004703243,0.0001391142,0.2767058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674837,0.00297235,0.0003730753,0.004191415,0.00006664437,0.0000318999,0.00006869782,0.00004459531,0.02476762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8826131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498532345","doi":"","title":"MEETING POINTS BETWEEN THE TRADITIONS OF ENGLISH–AMERICAN COMMON LAW AND CONTINENTAL-FRENCH CIVIL LAW. Developments and the experience of postmodernity in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Comparative law; Sociology; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Csaba Varga","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03298547501506394,"gpt":0.2771350715746441,"spread":0.2441495965595802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003605984,0.0004738979,0.0002924075,0.001835216,0.03399004,0.0138066,0.001825824,0.002904906,0.00770899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388878,0.0002419755,0.0002718349,0.003376977,0.03899421,0.003833265,0.003737557,0.004176739,0.0004775706],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1760858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1338688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952533,0.001237402,0.0000777447,0.0004813742,0.001302547,0.001647596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955652,0.001290356,0.0003546477,0.0001587308,0.001573069,0.001057968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004111097,0.00002491367,0.002331659,0.00004838977,0.000007329924,0.0004709815,0.2010569,0.0001657831,0.0003450031,0.7640405,0.01517334,0.0162941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001215372,0.00002863845,0.01224723,0.0002362846,0.00001722484,0.0003015237,0.1935338,0.0006024988,0.0004345401,0.04201996,0.750487,0.00007923743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2369201,0.02099948,0.004791839,0.1460694,0.0006989962,0.00006794377,0.000308455,0.0001424405,0.5900013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465244,0.001630849,0.0006662368,0.003164893,0.00005607971,0.00001594654,0.00002950276,0.00004052118,0.04787155],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1760858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9556237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600676903","doi":"","title":"The necessity of a distinct regulation for public-private partnership contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private sector; Business; General partnership; Divestment; Public sector; Public–private partnership; Private investment in public equity; Private finance initiative; Function (biology); Finance; Public relations; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Private equity; Private equity firm; Economic growth; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Corina Alexandra Vitelar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04045918301076147,"gpt":0.2765137184193247,"spread":0.2360545354085632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07148635,0.0006886855,0.001703314,0.001457722,0.00838774,0.01747199,0.005771405,0.02481611,0.006355911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09027169,0.001361648,0.001663322,0.002074288,0.01422708,0.0131655,0.006781959,0.02398611,0.00377295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04171281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01254754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01118644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9088143,0.02655777,0.008260923,0.01100305,0.03977311,0.005590723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9014006,0.04721123,0.003838081,0.02007646,0.02343945,0.004034122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005432057,0.00002281487,0.00005885804,0.00001539169,0.000001572549,0.00002965377,0.0003415498,0.00006826832,0.00009255105,0.9932681,0.00415445,0.001941369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001168333,0.00009363407,0.0007404521,0.0005625405,0.00002402489,0.0005277495,0.0007411222,0.001654086,0.0008596939,0.5612976,0.433238,0.0001443405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01028795,0.001756607,0.2877864,0.094578,0.003921473,0.003808794,0.0008581012,0.0005869622,0.5964157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4334856,0.001650121,0.3019752,0.0804988,0.003074726,0.01119695,0.001117287,0.0004083347,0.166593],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07148635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3780605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}