{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":15,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"5ca45a937404","filters":{"venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning"}},"results":[{"id":"W2065075932","doi":"10.1080/14664200208668041","title":"Language Planning and the British Empire: Comparing Pakistan, Malaysia and Kenya","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Sovereignty; British Empire; Context (archaeology); Language planning; Element (criminal law); Colonialism; History; Imperial unit system; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Ancient history; Politics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07511536278664666,"gpt":0.461930281182147,"spread":0.3868149183955004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006687873,0.0001323285,0.0002380794,0.00007719215,0.0006103574,0.0006125754,0.0001936055,0.00006361907,0.000195155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003693646,0.0001248422,0.0000289512,0.0002061046,0.0003743451,0.0001619135,0.00007761626,0.0003168896,0.00001203149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003670141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001842267,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007208655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007658195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986987,0.0002282623,0.0002466249,0.000248077,0.0002163218,0.0003620615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993217,0.0003077242,0.00008982707,0.0001404989,0.00001958435,0.0001206741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001335662,0.00003642299,0.0999256,0.00005297356,0.000008768608,0.00005524299,0.8407589,0.00004602621,0.00001268207,0.001303489,0.001977937,0.05580866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003969302,0.00002911351,0.06053112,0.002172805,0.00005738728,0.00007001082,0.5719774,0.01773652,0.0000501911,0.0002516153,0.3421915,0.0009630596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8581058,0.1214726,0.00001144091,0.0005296539,0.0003520951,0.0001941766,0.00000517314,0.00007546112,0.01925362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996538,0.0007322371,0.0001327467,0.0001864183,0.0005758572,0.00001479622,0.00001199228,0.00001322703,0.001794674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3402135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474086251","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2016.1204058","title":"University administrators as forced language policy agents. An institutional ethnography of parallel language strategy and practices at the University of Copenhagen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche","keywords":"Internationalization; Danish; Globalization; Language policy; Political science; Sociology; Higher education; Foreign language; Immigration; National language; Pedagogy; Law; Linguistics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0622605912711023,"gpt":0.3583219060071018,"spread":0.2960613147359995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003320701,0.0001543413,0.0002166404,0.00020807,0.0002967823,0.00003475578,0.0002789426,0.00005592525,0.003628421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001630866,0.0001122251,0.00006390247,0.0001011356,0.0004818643,0.0004061488,0.0001115557,0.0002075729,0.00002443643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004586738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007961509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007677646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002362551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989463,0.0002439547,0.000172678,0.0002423638,0.000180231,0.0002144603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999088,0.0002204472,0.0003530779,0.000233197,0.00003260597,0.00007263711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000340148,0.0001877302,0.01328056,0.0002275866,0.0001277231,0.000426559,0.9173282,0.0001176968,0.002662987,0.02448543,0.001180699,0.03963467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001818601,0.0002831236,0.01006266,0.0006368629,0.00009199074,0.00002293227,0.8650663,0.0001124353,0.0007721258,0.00002399619,0.1207063,0.0004026767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728771,0.009373686,0.00002196418,0.0001144939,0.00008659014,0.0001319383,0.0001307431,0.00004353333,0.01721998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935699,0.00009458547,0.00005795123,0.00002198064,0.0001427926,4.317996e-7,0.00007880662,0.00001051719,0.006023015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1195256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045487171","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2020.1785751","title":"Language solidarity, vitality and status: Sibe family language attitudes in North-western China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Solidarity; China; Residence; First language; Ethnic group; Psychology; Pessimism; Social psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Demography; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08885588543288668,"gpt":0.4903039594177494,"spread":0.4014480739848627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004447659,0.000205811,0.0003164616,0.000158385,0.0001368177,0.0001720805,0.0002854617,0.00009346135,0.0001111426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007189545,0.0002135245,0.00004248608,0.0004735269,0.0001631839,0.0002806723,0.0001393359,0.0004597028,0.00003260114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009298039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001388767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01280141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980942,0.0002910242,0.0003402293,0.0003911718,0.0003243744,0.000558999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992692,0.0001372983,0.0001017077,0.0001830248,0.00002133239,0.0002874512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120379,0.0000542823,0.4087288,0.00009523396,0.000004025668,0.00005238844,0.5788879,0.00001698869,0.0002237037,0.00008599513,0.00009822394,0.01174037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007718918,0.0000358432,0.7709573,0.0002798425,0.00001146258,0.000001213666,0.2101543,0.000204728,0.0001631617,0.00001422054,0.01693251,0.0004735036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724859,0.02258122,0.00001081299,0.0006970775,0.0003093628,0.0002789507,0.00005995885,0.0001225645,0.00345413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980878,0.0003273116,0.0001508227,0.0004899059,0.0006485421,0.00001439698,0.00009907458,0.00001907921,0.0001630428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3687336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085570244","doi":"10.1080/14664200802354427","title":"‘Nehiyawewin Askîhk’: Cree Language on the Land: Language Planning Through Consultation in the Loon River Cree First Nation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Government (linguistics); Logging; Geography; Land use; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Forestry; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1725047305963811,"gpt":0.4754170041622889,"spread":0.3029122735659078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001236941,0.0002326,0.0002300847,0.0002213467,0.0006579787,0.0001219684,0.0005724485,0.000131537,0.0002670348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002322646,0.0001654951,0.0000662802,0.0006759396,0.0002848788,0.0002934436,0.00004561376,0.0006239851,0.0001104618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001529595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001253349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01486445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975436,0.0006264521,0.0003769095,0.0003335556,0.000629282,0.0004901894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977611,0.001600532,0.0001886691,0.0003345413,0.00005352313,0.00006166289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003309745,0.0001285882,0.01790986,0.00002606532,0.000007403861,0.0001006077,0.9715987,0.0005230862,0.00004188064,0.001794829,0.003873639,0.003962174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001786422,0.00007943756,0.05788588,0.0011397,0.0000270236,0.00001876858,0.8008445,0.001276472,0.0005237365,0.0002755415,0.1354352,0.0007073277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668832,0.008465089,0.00004057413,0.002909882,0.0006332026,0.0005901064,0.0000284676,0.0001024649,0.020347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964736,0.0002195822,0.000167553,0.001145501,0.001030466,0.00006895098,0.0001472307,0.00002098083,0.0007261683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1707543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398771300","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2024.2358278","title":"The politics of distraction in planning English-medium education policy in schools","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Distraction; Politics; Language planning; Medium of instruction; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02512083632744707,"gpt":0.3581373855733363,"spread":0.3330165492458892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005475275,0.0001381174,0.0001697831,0.0005580955,0.0001137006,0.000271047,0.0001632745,0.00004959628,0.00009021507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006977036,0.0001115388,0.00003979866,0.0001633591,0.00006658155,0.0002905147,0.00003415671,0.0009125127,0.000009420093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001485187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001401263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004003395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005923141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988292,0.0001243884,0.0003788168,0.0002003602,0.0001592402,0.0003079821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993672,0.0003452214,0.00007634277,0.0001532344,0.00002387207,0.0000340795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000138421,0.0001064771,0.03308312,0.0003539826,0.00001108204,0.00005982636,0.864382,0.0006306545,0.00007286954,0.042975,0.001054654,0.05725646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003636571,0.00004437618,0.01274715,0.006432399,0.00001378971,0.000007727667,0.670507,0.001535583,0.0001749166,0.001015206,0.3067985,0.00035976],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115004,0.07695315,0.000007293142,0.0002673909,0.002168469,0.0001215647,0.00001167969,0.0000747282,0.008895314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962341,0.00006786056,0.00002212944,0.00002847833,0.002221278,0.00002330729,0.00008299686,0.00001994966,0.001299882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3057438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6051962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292266611","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2022.2111933","title":"Family language policy in Indigenous and bilingual communities: case studies of Nahuatl-speaking caregivers in Mexico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nahuatl; Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Linguistics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1079220431512046,"gpt":0.5098333153107389,"spread":0.4019112721595344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148669,0.0001407466,0.0003135961,0.0009123461,0.0003089436,0.00002899149,0.0002557174,0.00004581491,0.00004710966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006269698,0.0001581106,0.00003008753,0.000826358,0.0002489366,0.0001162804,0.000216221,0.0004857407,8.564716e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004073353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003819333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.221606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03923169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99816,0.0006511832,0.0003628467,0.0001759476,0.0002631754,0.00038685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991049,0.000491337,0.0001395228,0.0001733971,0.00002975816,0.0000610766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001468871,0.00009497897,0.07503763,0.0000830379,0.000007162961,0.0005721104,0.9049274,0.0006741114,0.00003260612,0.0002500617,0.00001847582,0.01828778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004560531,0.00002892163,0.002153461,0.0002287681,0.000004078009,0.0000253738,0.9918314,0.00008833584,0.00003046057,0.00002835364,0.004965059,0.0001597462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462542,0.05149933,5.294005e-7,0.0001107665,0.000339539,0.0002605286,0.00003877864,0.00002897109,0.001467371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989422,0.000589098,0.00006552909,0.0000856169,0.0001552466,0.0000261584,0.00002483218,0.00001282847,0.00009852114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1823743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067000131","doi":"10.1080/14664200408669079","title":"Conceptions of Literacy in Canadian Immigrant Language Training","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Immigration; Literacy; Refugee; Political science; Language policy; Training (meteorology); Language planning; Sociology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Computer science; Law; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07902543946898309,"gpt":0.515854195392868,"spread":0.4368287559238849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004836679,0.00009036482,0.0001677008,0.0004113378,0.00009192612,0.00003678534,0.0001869383,0.00006052114,0.0002708097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005336652,0.00009823958,0.00003534561,0.0004566064,0.0001097444,0.0001542287,0.00001148536,0.0002172474,0.00001803652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002354276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006700816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7620422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5755125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989108,0.00009809893,0.000263058,0.0001497988,0.0001530263,0.0004252197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995263,0.00008329846,0.00006591167,0.0001174698,0.00002891455,0.0001780565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000248773,0.00003759966,0.01621942,0.00001800781,0.000001707907,0.00002549356,0.9516968,0.0002749361,0.0001022811,0.003900727,0.00002515107,0.02769539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018767,0.0000212358,0.02933184,0.001410601,0.000007161811,0.00000273013,0.8656323,0.0001326006,0.0003498932,0.00031146,0.101418,0.0003633744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980261,0.009244355,0.000009797897,0.0005217982,0.0004587013,0.0001545274,0.00002634763,0.00002671179,0.009296724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998884,0.00007451168,0.0003812635,0.00008971975,0.0002846899,0.00001154095,0.00004378441,0.000007799139,0.0002226962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1865296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4322332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983290622","doi":"10.1080/14664200802139521","title":"Assessment policy in teacher education: responding to the personnel implications of language policy changes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Churchill Northern Studies Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Language planning; Language policy; Education policy; Pedagogy; Political science; Policy development; Language education; Language assessment; Teacher education; Sociology; Higher education; Public administration","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09843918909330573,"gpt":0.5410410158178237,"spread":0.442601826724518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007167755,0.0001250929,0.0001791021,0.001364987,0.0002849185,0.00003598166,0.0004226093,0.00006227374,0.0001490755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001310613,0.0001103697,0.00003859767,0.002216502,0.0001196781,0.00009763538,0.00006478579,0.0002600455,0.00001798613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003853304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001278626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02544321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00314144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986028,0.0003002805,0.0002570206,0.0002227963,0.0002480884,0.0003690332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999231,0.0001776538,0.000112997,0.0003043394,0.00005027811,0.0001237007],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004862077,0.0001808587,0.04875825,0.00002072376,0.000002738671,0.000002098633,0.8847666,0.00004789358,0.0003084558,0.01789096,0.001131966,0.0468846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002318061,0.00002225002,0.2344657,0.000325346,0.000005238144,0.000005847429,0.5251899,0.0000385781,0.0001507825,0.00008444508,0.2392375,0.000242541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326393,0.005190749,0.0000186395,0.02152881,0.0003499198,0.0004318342,0.00001811795,0.00004188263,0.03978078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901782,0.000223663,0.0004296711,0.0005910519,0.00223194,0.0001152794,0.00002697451,0.00001362833,0.006189624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3595767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399282499","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2024.2355016","title":"Slogans as a policy distractor: a case of ‘washback’ discourse in English language testing reforms in Japan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Linguistics; Language assessment; Language policy; Political science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06802258255881054,"gpt":0.5263330013664648,"spread":0.4583104188076542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008258522,0.000163214,0.0002504604,0.0006861312,0.00006208483,0.00009783158,0.0002277561,0.000102986,0.0001215367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00380799,0.0001506941,0.00004803625,0.001303696,0.0001551751,0.000292794,0.0000545621,0.0005027413,0.00001719469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002953413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004677557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1000956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01852052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984406,0.000155813,0.0004333124,0.0002894858,0.0002123719,0.0004683641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991745,0.0004012767,0.00008585609,0.0001890913,0.00003189042,0.0001173592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007530493,0.0001270009,0.02557551,0.0001705873,0.000003421934,0.0009012087,0.8997742,0.00005567775,0.0001370885,0.003725605,0.00005063759,0.06947152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004291967,0.00003465734,0.005454827,0.002548801,0.000009014446,0.00004138,0.9815043,0.0007584516,0.0002214612,0.0002148154,0.00843512,0.0003479523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707962,0.0076477,0.000001325675,0.0002724857,0.0006622081,0.0002275549,0.00004270993,0.0001011408,0.02024866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998149,0.0000613786,0.0001280048,0.00002733069,0.001013663,0.00002211483,0.00003883346,0.00001857701,0.0005411037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08173012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400316128","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2024.2370670","title":"Distractive language education policies and the endangerment of Indigenous languages in Bangladesh","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Language planning; Linguistics; Languages of Africa; Language policy; Political science; Native-language instruction; Sociology; History; Pedagogy; Teaching method","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03358203997026831,"gpt":0.4969437280823845,"spread":0.4633616881121162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006476844,0.00009782279,0.0001615206,0.0002538774,0.00007770378,0.00008961085,0.0001488083,0.00004973089,0.00007284438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003226943,0.00007538703,0.00003162811,0.0003468037,0.000236043,0.0001274076,0.000032486,0.000231076,0.000006047496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009866367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002619109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02280505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002052363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990159,0.0002164235,0.0002127517,0.0001575281,0.0001782329,0.0002191915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993994,0.0003651227,0.00006008514,0.0001111462,0.00001839429,0.00004588038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001205444,0.00006831376,0.007165785,0.00009890567,0.000005775117,0.000006305699,0.8523488,0.000007262987,0.00008568379,0.007792249,0.0001345835,0.1322743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003986521,0.00001448753,0.03706818,0.00104897,0.00001802834,0.000004214623,0.9265347,0.00006908503,0.0006344848,0.000233835,0.03377764,0.0001977539],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.887638,0.1013049,0.000002937367,0.000720015,0.0004769857,0.0002847089,0.00001859623,0.00003513011,0.009518748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978662,0.0006753684,0.00004939943,0.00006095254,0.0004447418,0.00003911426,0.00003229853,0.000008689291,0.0008232028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1320765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416711364","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2584511","title":"Towards a political economy of immigrant languages and multilingualism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multilingualism; Immigration; Politics; Language planning; Language policy; Citizenship; Sociolinguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04771109186042525,"gpt":0.5255249826171354,"spread":0.4778138907567102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004156684,0.00009644822,0.0002006774,0.0002410491,0.00008070854,0.000038983,0.0001511344,0.00006752117,0.00006393752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006951775,0.00009601924,0.00003508964,0.0001970456,0.0002017432,0.0000743135,0.0000480041,0.000157244,0.000002805762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005062002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001922613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007915192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002949387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.0001226214,0.0002454267,0.0001738329,0.00009592261,0.0003019474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.0001968593,0.00005403303,0.0001211281,0.0000414442,0.00009137783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001392565,0.00009968495,0.01497064,0.0001898144,0.00001227725,0.000009794379,0.5063698,0.000002820805,0.00009965855,0.4076794,0.0002718931,0.07028031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001230697,0.00002796236,0.01838263,0.001403354,0.0000394691,0.000002350568,0.6006234,0.0005362731,0.003954201,0.008402047,0.3649291,0.0004685903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.805204,0.02734011,0.0000387476,0.002483481,0.000485037,0.0002098385,0.00001481005,0.00005813389,0.1641658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984701,0.00006224692,0.0003850354,0.0002865779,0.0002357261,0.000009787642,0.00001124735,0.000005162706,0.0005341266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3992774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411147288","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2516345","title":"To count or not to count ‘francophones.’ Reading language planning and policy through the words of quantification","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Count data; Reading (process); Linguistics; Statistics; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08849691424363162,"gpt":0.5317048793862983,"spread":0.4432079651426667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009885217,0.0001550052,0.0002515893,0.0003333483,0.0003282198,0.0001205582,0.0003487932,0.000075429,0.00007887088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002301474,0.0001225802,0.00003023943,0.001198643,0.000113637,0.0001328967,0.0000861502,0.000240478,0.00002165583],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001600415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003211215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01774397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001015587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984704,0.0002021936,0.000368927,0.0002908368,0.0003081936,0.000359468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988613,0.000568473,0.0001180245,0.0002852007,0.00007176182,0.00009520766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009332391,0.00004435488,0.004800655,0.0001002822,0.000009619443,0.000004867159,0.9623705,0.0003648262,0.001205089,0.005254107,0.003351883,0.02240051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003996725,0.00003847555,0.01924703,0.001918304,0.00002023637,0.000001522157,0.6093572,0.0002499218,0.003151958,0.00009037092,0.3651947,0.0003306242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789457,0.006206902,0.0007819965,0.006026138,0.001508509,0.0006296692,0.00003805896,0.00007594852,0.005787048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944279,0.000107226,0.0006271815,0.001237103,0.0006448113,0.00004139046,0.00001880345,0.00001255701,0.002883046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3618428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417024252","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2592367","title":"GenAI-empowered teachers as active actors of change in developing (inter)national human capital in Singapore","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Developing country; Human resources; Capital (architecture); Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0830869567479857,"gpt":0.4531942138439348,"spread":0.3701072570959491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008132021,0.0001483599,0.0002721061,0.0006261421,0.00008452724,0.00003624456,0.0003246541,0.0001225413,0.0001484904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004700975,0.000176546,0.00003763915,0.0004366531,0.0001495105,0.0003172347,0.000104266,0.00031693,0.000009756252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001261703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003181276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00431875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003793327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985406,0.0001757505,0.0004147311,0.0002852329,0.0002366343,0.0003470358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995087,0.0001849351,0.0001488687,0.00008577495,0.00003706884,0.00003462223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009260443,0.00005591219,0.3731954,0.00003630413,0.00001223579,0.00001687633,0.6150877,0.000006848145,0.00008000082,0.00448845,0.0001430665,0.00686791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001251973,0.00001986946,0.5843608,0.003174041,0.00000658176,6.412491e-7,0.3946732,0.00003751559,0.001162599,0.003311782,0.01146832,0.0005326714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856881,0.002162693,0.000006989119,0.0004706036,0.0006932187,0.000329127,0.000007200721,0.00003352558,0.01060853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991371,0.00004886372,0.0003162844,0.00008478462,0.0001010234,0.00005171557,0.00005819235,0.0000099733,0.0001920717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2204145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7199338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413119082","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2535820","title":"Language ideologies, policies, and media discourse in census questionnaires: a historical comparative analysis of four multilingual societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Census; Linguistics; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Gender studies; Politics; Population; Law; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1214549932689681,"gpt":0.5336530137048086,"spread":0.4121980204358405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006019329,0.0001388234,0.0004459991,0.0007736056,0.0001050842,0.0000335208,0.0002014749,0.00009827696,0.00002865394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001902696,0.0001350126,0.00006814149,0.001242922,0.0003351844,0.00008897194,0.00006710613,0.0002637852,7.607484e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003479749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002055578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03499041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01687515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998551,0.0003175579,0.0003808798,0.0002349683,0.0002200187,0.0002956422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988401,0.0007599733,0.0001307084,0.0001450236,0.00005583833,0.00006837337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002073985,0.0001134061,0.1175213,0.00004877924,0.0000475222,0.000009582684,0.8671769,0.0002387338,0.00003748367,0.002924837,0.001016455,0.01084424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006333539,0.00001659619,0.1891751,0.000653181,0.0001658827,3.641551e-7,0.7906858,0.002068672,0.000142245,0.000233403,0.01592007,0.0003053349],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.953851,0.04252192,0.00001845173,0.000805677,0.0005786274,0.000147561,0.00003941256,0.00004500725,0.001992368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984103,0.0003812662,0.0003038652,0.00005720783,0.0001473356,0.00001404827,0.00005712317,0.000003769295,0.0006250389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07649116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412151029","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2025.2524285","title":"Evaluating the validity of census data for tracking speaker numbers: an investigation of Canada’s Indigenous languages","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Language Planning","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna","keywords":"Census; Indigenous; Tracking (education); Linguistics; Geography; Statistics; Natural language processing; Genealogy; Computer science; Sociology; History; Demography; Mathematics; Population; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2232075762142746,"gpt":0.5056563730349884,"spread":0.2824487968207139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258945,0.00006819524,0.0001604611,0.00006348517,0.0001729775,0.00002069142,0.0004200583,0.00004649007,0.00001903572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003958389,0.00005859823,0.00001617663,0.0001800111,0.00009672021,0.00008251226,0.00006456051,0.0001079756,1.01321e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007437517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007798512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2318654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2413185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987671,0.0003351931,0.0002916588,0.000177318,0.0002363703,0.0001923016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987296,0.0006236513,0.000201107,0.0002944776,0.0001207264,0.00003038743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005190469,0.00009756922,0.2605855,0.0003914887,0.00005000207,0.00001326801,0.6886221,0.000868028,0.001588052,0.01298384,0.00254275,0.03220549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003089635,0.0002865614,0.2368919,0.002675231,0.0004006142,0.000004102744,0.6765286,0.01440814,0.008147674,0.005219946,0.05140207,0.0009455445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949711,0.001931289,0.0003502579,0.0003076041,0.0008844528,0.0003692493,0.000184831,0.00001766883,0.0009835664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977099,0.00001120561,0.00153573,0.00005574593,0.0002421946,0.000007605156,0.0003332437,0.000004889913,0.00009944149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04885932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7732497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}