{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"aec410b30a75","filters":{"venue":"DPCE Online"}},"results":[{"id":"W2782812234","doi":"","title":"PNR EU-Canada, la Corte di Giustizia blocca l’accordo: tra difesa dei diritti umani e implicazioni istituzionali","year":2018,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Chiara Graziani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02394469672120847,"gpt":0.3006807070223689,"spread":0.2767360103011604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649274,0.0005174034,0.000593846,0.001391602,0.01474272,0.01644707,0.002160846,0.01087106,0.02660192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364319,0.0004947678,0.0005766969,0.002955841,0.006601517,0.004599659,0.005873059,0.01265464,0.002071047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03783565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09958483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9407875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992082,0.0008885326,0.0002113494,0.0007293429,0.002872353,0.003216515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948702,0.00135259,0.0002026417,0.0003409795,0.002000411,0.00123319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005768914,0.00005172908,0.00294145,0.000138175,0.00002259684,0.0002707182,0.009547032,0.0001536456,0.0003664324,0.6724712,0.2935617,0.02041767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002930205,0.0000182999,0.009832649,0.0003184249,0.00002796171,0.0000904572,0.008608945,0.0002134393,0.0004300755,0.01836493,0.9620044,0.00006115698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03772852,0.007554412,0.001148227,0.2970937,0.003546142,0.00008234396,0.001720767,0.000126416,0.6509995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3722242,0.003577747,0.002143173,0.09006817,0.0006527259,0.0001397896,0.0005419487,0.0003196765,0.5303327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05921251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2745182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967729953","doi":"","title":"L’interculturalismo nel diritto costituzionale: una storia di parole","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interculturalism; Multiculturalism; Accommodation; Pluralism (philosophy); Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Humanities; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constitution; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Cinzia Piciocchi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01730697849315601,"gpt":0.3066321473039607,"spread":0.2893251688108047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005662714,0.0002724423,0.0003186034,0.00111239,0.005079242,0.01004582,0.0007607655,0.002001701,0.006036191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006982352,0.0002170317,0.0002383805,0.001021567,0.01785523,0.00875738,0.00582463,0.005211887,0.0006455505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004013062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003040741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008148406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01160713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936423,0.003630594,0.000132277,0.0005875144,0.001170151,0.0008370183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961583,0.001848542,0.0003478947,0.0007662966,0.0004269362,0.0004520585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001423887,0.00001264173,0.0006779535,0.00003424665,0.000002830999,0.00009605545,0.01292321,0.00005414266,0.0003209861,0.9706751,0.00283915,0.01234949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002364243,0.00005435755,0.00621294,0.0004853222,0.00001314598,0.000565888,0.02560897,0.001048783,0.001250875,0.2781141,0.6865427,0.00007920904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09726777,0.006942493,0.01453606,0.04430079,0.0008182768,0.00004245701,0.00006077197,0.00008410265,0.8359473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976283,0.0009688105,0.001838676,0.001946939,0.0003708763,0.0000453947,0.0000176736,0.00005871374,0.01846992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01004582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02994764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2705872271","doi":"","title":"Canada. La Supreme Court conferma la legittimità costituzionale di alcune disposizioni dell’Anti-Terrorism Act del 2001","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Gabriele Marino","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0574433989104105,"gpt":0.3407198303696061,"spread":0.2832764314591956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310124,0.0009441539,0.0009230007,0.002127727,0.0174633,0.009436722,0.003421461,0.02071655,0.0361145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01334039,0.001605717,0.001997549,0.002541229,0.00302222,0.001887036,0.00192376,0.01628019,0.00682518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07341654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1882796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897208,0.0004154967,0.0003668701,0.0007831563,0.005855044,0.002858704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838064,0.00318107,0.0003884844,0.0005724987,0.01013866,0.001912977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735976,0.00006578225,0.002410902,0.0001234341,0.00003894705,0.0003433188,0.0003942769,0.0002185081,0.0005299651,0.06349388,0.9246429,0.007650801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001400896,0.00003051909,0.01483548,0.0004423744,0.0001211251,0.0001259123,0.0006408941,0.0004835324,0.001028472,0.004700471,0.9772987,0.0001524282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0122942,0.007053547,0.001035398,0.2527721,0.007372665,0.0005703359,0.02253744,0.0003484775,0.6960158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07667812,0.003050138,0.001870946,0.1616703,0.0008087953,0.000373675,0.003481244,0.0001721985,0.7518947],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07341654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5326768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945873252","doi":"","title":"National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: past, present and future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislator; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; National security; Counter terrorism; Law; Work (physics); Public administration; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Arianna Vedaschi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chiara Graziani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01530204935218442,"gpt":0.2974412642447383,"spread":0.2821392148925538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003071821,0.0004571492,0.0006721062,0.005729149,0.01179881,0.008756776,0.001612231,0.002112873,0.007439301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01092849,0.0003377372,0.0005736508,0.01402889,0.008093677,0.003133044,0.002730767,0.00321509,0.00027302],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2484044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3483095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959175,0.0004781388,0.0001304204,0.0002578969,0.001748174,0.001467849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865368,0.002910544,0.001195184,0.0002021984,0.007364923,0.001790307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003008556,0.0001489319,0.09294692,0.005403227,0.0002753893,0.001213275,0.03340978,0.002254836,0.0005258339,0.3665761,0.1817082,0.3152367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004416936,0.00007578437,0.1879031,0.007813244,0.0003253366,0.0003671691,0.09715468,0.001133844,0.0007721672,0.0291302,0.6750058,0.000274613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1486186,0.3534148,0.0009208704,0.3221236,0.001640878,0.00009088676,0.003172926,0.00006520993,0.1699521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6937245,0.2648129,0.001915099,0.0176828,0.0004203807,0.00004524063,0.0009389085,0.00003548006,0.02042472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2484044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8717443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944849589","doi":"","title":"The Relations between Canada and Quebec: An Appraisal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Secession; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Independence (probability theory); Politics","authors":[{"name":"Roberto Louvin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01435392799333505,"gpt":0.3125900362392932,"spread":0.2982361082459581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002946867,0.0008327949,0.0008208519,0.01249281,0.01523698,0.0103958,0.002990638,0.002313148,0.01329752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007857874,0.0004709393,0.000815739,0.02584988,0.005124718,0.002106438,0.002272274,0.002734859,0.0006100583],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2679969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3282793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927393,0.00070349,0.0002440519,0.0004186693,0.003616475,0.002278127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889637,0.001361818,0.0005981817,0.0002173949,0.007533977,0.001324839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003422262,0.0001737749,0.05729469,0.005949447,0.0004246572,0.002534153,0.01810168,0.002760239,0.0007804889,0.2686991,0.3426232,0.3003164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003044153,0.0000505759,0.1490083,0.004841526,0.0001803209,0.0003107466,0.02144459,0.0005267723,0.0002261199,0.003229325,0.8200048,0.0001465081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06756757,0.4453647,0.0008090939,0.1064685,0.002703492,0.0002279628,0.007367575,0.0001217059,0.3693694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972955,0.2234251,0.001384324,0.02085435,0.000779849,0.0001374717,0.002398529,0.00008932298,0.05363539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2679969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8490198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922517696","doi":"","title":"Giurisdizione religiosa: la questione islamica in Canada e Stati Uniti","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Minority rights; Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Secularity; Religious pluralism; Law; Islam; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics; Geography; Social science; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Maria Francesca Cavalcanti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01101678655234353,"gpt":0.2743389499674471,"spread":0.2633221634151036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001109314,0.0001572091,0.0002176168,0.0009418955,0.01962586,0.007076251,0.0007853425,0.001812983,0.005851048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002781045,0.0001579945,0.0001185635,0.002609337,0.01022406,0.00116896,0.001959345,0.002641761,0.0002466436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08520753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1256424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985932,0.0001727027,0.00002307946,0.000109226,0.0004974756,0.0006042911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985009,0.0003404519,0.0001151646,0.00004796674,0.0004982563,0.0004972264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006687855,0.0001150334,0.04429113,0.0001771673,0.00002175192,0.00129004,0.1745845,0.0003255804,0.0008960941,0.6322878,0.06760901,0.078335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002035168,0.00003539826,0.09834418,0.0004379637,0.00002566476,0.0004933559,0.2150821,0.0009198244,0.000597744,0.01661497,0.6673518,0.00007656875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019212,0.01700242,0.0005913125,0.1198217,0.0005166829,0.00005038663,0.000375457,0.00003898106,0.2596819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972347,0.002458974,0.0002182995,0.002519981,0.00003347364,0.000005421644,0.00003361693,0.00001200621,0.02237119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08520753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6182268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114986408","doi":"","title":"The post-Brexit negotiations and the level playing field criterion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Negotiation; Competition (biology); European union; Liberalization; Political science; International trade; Level playing field; Field (mathematics); Economics; State (computer science); International economics; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Massimiliano Montini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07859376896161564,"gpt":0.3500228425865442,"spread":0.2714290736249286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009151674,0.0003370503,0.0005806778,0.00236593,0.007044327,0.009378953,0.001583544,0.004480134,0.0155412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02045794,0.000229543,0.0005458479,0.001406352,0.01175595,0.00729449,0.004816088,0.006272805,0.001123707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006452499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006699089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005276156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004093517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918731,0.002557091,0.0003328982,0.000995125,0.00212576,0.002116128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879777,0.005541566,0.00165027,0.0007312234,0.00224306,0.001856088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006324117,0.00005194799,0.00128002,0.00001409904,0.000005692563,0.0001567258,0.0009326006,0.0004373431,0.0001137506,0.9914757,0.001445402,0.004023467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001138518,0.00024424,0.009660848,0.0002540116,0.0000125781,0.0002722479,0.008759169,0.005419441,0.0006423672,0.9388837,0.0356801,0.00005750215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2955242,0.0008255939,0.02060045,0.009813979,0.0002838713,0.0002405165,0.0001649732,0.00003498861,0.6725113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873912,0.000101072,0.002022963,0.0004036413,0.00005125205,0.00009867113,0.00006300527,0.00001487712,0.009853248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05199051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774874957","doi":"","title":"Bobbitt’s Paradise: Canadian Constitutional Interpretation and Public Meaning Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutionalism; Original intent; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Oliphant","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05075330785836103,"gpt":0.3391241005377399,"spread":0.2883707926793789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005967808,0.0002968676,0.0003997148,0.002508005,0.02096667,0.01193899,0.001682919,0.004613006,0.006141665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01430425,0.0002017245,0.0003653341,0.00495263,0.03919665,0.004160455,0.003131485,0.007540287,0.0003197954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08958781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07333722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9403325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932775,0.001812887,0.0001409638,0.0005356043,0.002978644,0.001254454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908476,0.004573178,0.0003337695,0.0004187751,0.003307636,0.0005189669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116272,0.000004449947,0.0002977805,0.00004422496,0.000004253473,0.0001535063,0.01684518,0.000109587,0.00007371435,0.9388633,0.03712842,0.006463878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001827811,0.00001018606,0.003985033,0.000622771,0.00002855721,0.0001738143,0.0421637,0.0007282327,0.0006026321,0.2430655,0.7084985,0.0001028141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0494848,0.02035421,0.004307319,0.4125988,0.002119747,0.00004081359,0.0003091669,0.00007822415,0.510707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9290722,0.005935098,0.001434919,0.02084953,0.0004084071,0.00001698967,0.00009237463,0.00006332676,0.04212703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08958781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6500081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944851300","doi":"","title":"Canadian Rights: A jurisprudential Canadian “Style”?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Federalism; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Rights of Nature; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Giuseppe Franco Ferrari","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0099812534809071,"gpt":0.2758636277001305,"spread":0.2658823742192233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004550162,0.0005722877,0.0005376521,0.003296166,0.02164857,0.01647531,0.002513386,0.004845256,0.01026304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01171201,0.000394178,0.0003882404,0.005766589,0.03512411,0.006793798,0.003169263,0.007882798,0.0008391365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1129822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1351985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921481,0.001221875,0.0001458001,0.0009638083,0.003955996,0.001564364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943797,0.001216196,0.0001641968,0.0003127544,0.003156662,0.0007704321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005337566,0.00000361391,0.0001955375,0.00002635554,0.000002698315,0.00002686692,0.004245163,0.00004890094,0.00004854668,0.9336671,0.05353944,0.008190437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001036723,0.000007060565,0.001783796,0.0002492531,0.00001368829,0.00006568406,0.009106259,0.0002585502,0.0001332387,0.1021259,0.8862004,0.00004579718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00624593,0.01339516,0.005230298,0.3617497,0.004481233,0.00004946311,0.0003283835,0.00007700992,0.6084428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6690121,0.02307878,0.009269348,0.0945768,0.002430395,0.0001162944,0.000343702,0.0002920262,0.2008806],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1129822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8197469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621555350","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema apre la strada al suicidio assistito","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Justice and Penology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Francesco Gallarati","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04754549557239367,"gpt":0.3618697693608454,"spread":0.3143242737884517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005493213,0.0003897554,0.0003140587,0.0008598832,0.009599347,0.003730208,0.0009840239,0.002441219,0.03172812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00263396,0.0003707206,0.0004229423,0.0009361436,0.001239088,0.0008196188,0.001395796,0.004946066,0.002196509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0384277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1361423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989231,0.00005536509,0.00002149463,0.00007327259,0.0003710946,0.000555542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982411,0.0001513943,0.00005671988,0.0000365509,0.0007875204,0.0007267335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002427035,0.0001877647,0.02660207,0.0002573027,0.00005733232,0.001831919,0.002780972,0.0004170723,0.0012655,0.05647657,0.7995945,0.1102863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008295661,0.00007365812,0.06071909,0.0002303724,0.00004694299,0.0004054225,0.005274335,0.0003274236,0.0007570604,0.002368473,0.929655,0.00005931898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.153154,0.009774419,0.00139012,0.287546,0.005714691,0.0004222911,0.01124323,0.0005945227,0.5301608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1887257,0.004510726,0.001760383,0.02996611,0.0004563329,0.00008850442,0.001487089,0.0001356031,0.7728695],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0384277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2788138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135453247","doi":"","title":"Indipendenza senza autonomia. I delicati rapporti fra potere esecutivo e giudiziario in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Executive branch; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Constitutional law; Executive power; Power (physics); Autonomy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Eleonora Ceccherini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03320402103025619,"gpt":0.283810711327999,"spread":0.2506066902977428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002822128,0.0001970482,0.0003737995,0.002018848,0.01613791,0.007289554,0.0009661001,0.001339125,0.008442816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006430771,0.0002854482,0.0002516175,0.003328062,0.01052469,0.001322464,0.002283686,0.003844786,0.0003934008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09607963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1167661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951808,0.000505975,0.00008218031,0.0006871503,0.001604434,0.001939371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949885,0.00111704,0.0004988774,0.000167753,0.001913609,0.001314177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009445834,0.00006093201,0.04339204,0.000207331,0.00005661966,0.0008573477,0.04546973,0.0007768973,0.001167228,0.7724908,0.070916,0.0645107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005146029,0.0000534957,0.2461514,0.0005320149,0.0001207643,0.0003380039,0.05319271,0.001828415,0.001190493,0.03956131,0.6568235,0.0001564805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4164199,0.01065551,0.002219747,0.09957691,0.000434752,0.00008044342,0.0009062962,0.00008021956,0.4696262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648319,0.001642892,0.0004094337,0.003149071,0.00004757811,0.000009652712,0.0000771151,0.00003318334,0.0297991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09607963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6971097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620240063","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema ha affermato che nella provincia dell’Alberta non vige alcun diritto costituzionale al bilinguismo legislativo","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Francesco Santolini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01343907342737482,"gpt":0.3018798078495352,"spread":0.2884407344221603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001565357,0.0003837012,0.0003685359,0.001993831,0.008704017,0.006605239,0.001491228,0.001780761,0.03200644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003064075,0.0004363404,0.0006015621,0.002504891,0.002755228,0.0008525163,0.001794502,0.003225526,0.002135034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05049133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0844693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965533,0.0001876459,0.00007111076,0.0003589891,0.001631121,0.00119782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.0004250164,0.0001481793,0.0001374136,0.001828775,0.0005155535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001883124,0.00007346815,0.04204821,0.0003252273,0.0001705306,0.0008116606,0.006907035,0.0009534162,0.003964478,0.4494365,0.4221003,0.07302088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004377784,0.00002177232,0.08854195,0.0001258282,0.00006690287,0.0001652954,0.00393354,0.0004850192,0.00123832,0.005276103,0.9000123,0.00008914391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1030086,0.003920127,0.002923131,0.07593472,0.00154721,0.0001456248,0.009532173,0.0006645813,0.8023238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4094452,0.001416026,0.00346366,0.01428903,0.0001520654,0.00008516492,0.0023406,0.0001712678,0.568637],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05049133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3663419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944789027","doi":"","title":"Judicial review of discriminatory laws in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Normative; Invisibility; Political science; Inequality; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Nausica Palazzo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02492551798569338,"gpt":0.3365467047887538,"spread":0.3116211868030604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01220623,0.0002298707,0.00066879,0.003223287,0.01623022,0.008676978,0.002869155,0.005239043,0.001940761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05331365,0.0004807984,0.0003414296,0.004974883,0.007352314,0.001442244,0.003045471,0.005381481,0.0002313515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08935106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2385469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9517933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9750397,0.002419861,0.0009762162,0.001311503,0.01384263,0.006410002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513417,0.01284363,0.00222247,0.001413916,0.02864082,0.003537375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001120439,0.00008558058,0.01724257,0.0004987353,0.0001046609,0.001415149,0.01397961,0.00286488,0.001585779,0.6469618,0.2134936,0.1016556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001317563,0.0000892531,0.06269681,0.001097243,0.000201356,0.0003493637,0.01083458,0.0040374,0.003158059,0.05319606,0.8638886,0.0003195127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2221149,0.02552717,0.004595732,0.2544371,0.002375612,0.0004520396,0.001027229,0.0001992286,0.4892711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231934,0.008093192,0.001801422,0.02997118,0.0005193078,0.00006584777,0.0002422262,0.00003519418,0.03607824],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08935106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6482903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946696988","doi":"","title":"Refractive and Prismatic Analysis in Implicit Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Section (typography); Comparative law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03598531139458209,"gpt":0.3576870263817483,"spread":0.3217017149871662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006437011,0.0005053443,0.0004964534,0.004488794,0.006406316,0.007092858,0.002410977,0.002116223,0.01371348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01702427,0.0004066991,0.0006805352,0.006134925,0.03455688,0.01296905,0.005832816,0.004396782,0.0007776275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01720631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01214154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07638341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08261248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936486,0.003061515,0.0001506579,0.0006435216,0.001919492,0.0005761333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948166,0.002871699,0.0002722195,0.0008682974,0.001011407,0.0001598149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.822684e-7,4.706482e-7,0.00001286321,0.000005012325,4.777038e-7,0.000002653972,0.0002079973,0.0000461582,0.000005448132,0.9989856,0.0002088876,0.0005234921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006421773,0.000002689927,0.0001090342,0.00003431614,0.000004062126,0.00001217644,0.0005664296,0.000515923,0.00006314322,0.9737768,0.02490472,0.000004325096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01936422,0.003630423,0.07230457,0.017232,0.0003881145,0.00006385123,0.0002650128,0.0001213954,0.8866304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355454,0.002035214,0.01913244,0.00175962,0.0002918894,0.0001542742,0.0001959414,0.0001403233,0.04074492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07638341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1518776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}