{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":14,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"aec410b30a75","filters":{"venue":"DPCE Online"}},"results":[{"id":"W2782812234","doi":"","title":"PNR EU-Canada, la Corte di Giustizia blocca l’accordo: tra difesa dei diritti umani e implicazioni istituzionali","year":2018,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","authors":[{"name":"Chiara Graziani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02394469672120847,"gpt":0.3006807070223689,"spread":0.2767360103011604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000560253,0.0004841959,0.0005612798,0.0001105918,0.001831996,0.0003473805,0.0007633021,0.0003536394,0.004167346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001718557,0.0004130966,0.0002048646,0.0005440396,0.001154294,0.0003778847,0.0001177871,0.0004777024,0.0004506572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003921774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001717564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3220459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9051391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960439,0.0003347678,0.0008209856,0.0008171531,0.001053891,0.0009292965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978017,0.0002694052,0.000403683,0.000560926,0.000476575,0.000487683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003671576,0.003438821,0.009915697,0.000190287,0.0006087034,0.000332246,0.01873427,0.00003498867,0.003407056,0.3462962,0.5665908,0.05008384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006286855,0.0002588507,0.06558732,0.0001434098,0.0001491844,0.0000114938,0.001269852,0.0011136,0.00008090802,0.001108249,0.9290152,0.0006332744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315562,0.0008547637,0.0003587115,0.01916348,0.003185206,0.0009226672,0.001268501,0.0002115972,0.0424789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402421,0.0004564631,0.0002678158,0.002143253,0.005569016,0.00001503065,0.0003570156,0.0000551932,0.05089418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967729953","doi":"","title":"L’interculturalismo nel diritto costituzionale: una storia di parole","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Minority Rights and Languages","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interculturalism; Multiculturalism; Accommodation; Pluralism (philosophy); Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Humanities; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constitution; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Cinzia Piciocchi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01730697849315601,"gpt":0.3066321473039607,"spread":0.2893251688108047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003606866,0.000331131,0.0004609579,0.00006434195,0.0003986952,0.0002119601,0.0006378251,0.0003042785,0.01000502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001125532,0.0002438793,0.0002152545,0.0003678021,0.0002806798,0.0003709373,0.0001427735,0.0004245608,0.001845798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001677002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001687307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009794637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004487166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974486,0.0002150817,0.0004006804,0.0005734837,0.000717866,0.0006442503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986776,0.0001675189,0.0001959916,0.0004420848,0.0002098778,0.0003069239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004346563,0.005298944,0.05309765,0.0006768177,0.00089018,0.0003437112,0.149924,0.0001862768,0.01029543,0.4372364,0.3054108,0.03620514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598202,0.0001245189,0.01001485,0.0002112882,0.00006687117,0.000004429521,0.008054733,0.0002926414,0.00007002066,0.0004269787,0.9795947,0.0004791184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364957,0.002552952,0.000009591918,0.01180604,0.004326969,0.0006163372,0.0007703062,0.0001299066,0.04329221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8168606,0.0008144028,0.0001413807,0.0008710339,0.003327698,0.000006053069,0.0004072584,0.00002588682,0.1775457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.674184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2705872271","doi":"","title":"Canada. La Supreme Court conferma la legittimità costituzionale di alcune disposizioni dell’Anti-Terrorism Act del 2001","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Gabriele Marino","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0574433989104105,"gpt":0.3407198303696061,"spread":0.2832764314591956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001197872,0.0005089465,0.0006860759,0.00006053007,0.002454411,0.0007564004,0.001807188,0.000404839,0.0007424295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000938272,0.0005012758,0.0002247602,0.0001495177,0.001334695,0.0008696808,0.0004074294,0.0006941117,0.0001460219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003716449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004385965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8181993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957674,0.0004081092,0.0006281455,0.000765903,0.001276599,0.001153841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965053,0.0007804708,0.0005458336,0.001013865,0.0004160769,0.0007384665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004748339,0.002706144,0.1056167,0.0003743713,0.0005374824,0.003155329,0.004824937,0.0004549879,0.002111069,0.05162205,0.8138276,0.01429449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005925538,0.00006055958,0.1001126,0.0004143236,0.0002304468,0.00004260745,0.001157303,0.001787895,0.0001150024,0.0001242203,0.8947247,0.0006377896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7752118,0.001505801,0.000188158,0.1472454,0.004249127,0.000887574,0.002565936,0.0001239573,0.06802228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651803,0.003110324,0.0001955144,0.0009268106,0.001436556,0.00001275313,0.0002264595,0.0000492225,0.02886202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1899685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945873252","doi":"","title":"National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: past, present and future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislator; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; National security; Counter terrorism; Law; Work (physics); Public administration; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Arianna Vedaschi","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chiara Graziani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01530204935218442,"gpt":0.2974412642447383,"spread":0.2821392148925538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001713741,0.00004452927,0.0000719117,0.0000157519,0.00005527775,0.00001933457,0.0000579838,0.00003019087,0.00007713951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001056751,0.00004096557,0.000006230819,0.0000555194,0.00004090776,0.0001085232,0.00002845743,0.0000783994,0.000001922477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001245147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004022367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7833065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993849,0.00003265509,0.0000754029,0.0001200229,0.0002677983,0.0001192195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997821,0.00005417808,0.00002234996,0.00003932297,0.00004505848,0.00005697472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001382653,0.0002905419,0.8042496,0.0002419404,0.00002947886,0.00008582156,0.03560117,0.00002725385,0.0001175095,0.05334902,0.08422513,0.02164426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043642,0.00001768279,0.184029,0.00002632542,0.000003324519,0.00000277568,0.01140134,0.0004689034,0.000002324217,0.001562645,0.8021811,0.0001001627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.964488,0.0004361939,3.356783e-7,0.03124664,0.0001989887,0.00008824844,0.00003847997,0.00000460765,0.00349851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982566,0.0001596087,0.00002943392,0.0003331031,0.0009333607,0.000001394682,0.000008938126,0.000002066551,0.0002754777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.717956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2181365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944849589","doi":"","title":"The Relations between Canada and Quebec: An Appraisal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Secession; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Independence (probability theory); Politics","authors":[{"name":"Roberto Louvin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01435392799333505,"gpt":0.3125900362392932,"spread":0.2982361082459581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000186208,0.00003376436,0.00005780209,0.00000303924,0.0002659818,0.00003842923,0.00009908198,0.00003028014,0.00002845254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001982179,0.00002327628,0.000008835507,0.00005318447,0.00007287464,0.00008578083,0.000013859,0.00006396621,0.00001061752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003877556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994236,0.00006514237,0.00008297772,0.00008069948,0.0001782893,0.0001693545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993834,0.0003617314,0.00003258424,0.00009526789,0.00002245763,0.000104483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000126455,0.00001051882,0.515033,0.000002424351,0.000006595136,7.1662e-7,0.0005258406,0.0000016955,0.000006792468,0.4756356,0.003748648,0.005026853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003233074,0.00000434351,0.4428385,0.000003215032,0.000001544433,6.005939e-8,0.0002425488,0.00002048827,4.845322e-7,0.0002671804,0.5565619,0.00002738941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817051,0.00009388809,0.000008636914,0.007584089,0.0002251646,0.00007362409,0.00008764209,0.00001222649,0.01020958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753642,0.000005135802,0.00003176446,0.0001220894,0.0003913917,0.000001161394,0.000008758851,0.000002824201,0.02407268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2045744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922517696","doi":"","title":"Giurisdizione religiosa: la questione islamica in Canada e Stati Uniti","year":2019,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Minority rights; Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Secularity; Religious pluralism; Law; Islam; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics; Geography; Social science; Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Maria Francesca Cavalcanti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01101678655234353,"gpt":0.2743389499674471,"spread":0.2633221634151036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003512574,0.0002231911,0.0004004907,0.00006903821,0.0002329267,0.00005849846,0.0003048546,0.0001237711,0.0004790268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001520086,0.0002139713,0.00005556495,0.0006909596,0.0001889838,0.0001366213,0.0001270306,0.0003988693,0.0001516584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008618284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002282105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978266,0.0003235393,0.000413408,0.0002999748,0.0005195831,0.0006168918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989437,0.0004193828,0.0001542168,0.0002298824,0.0001245824,0.000128245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002665735,0.001362882,0.1818338,0.0003979044,0.0003470202,0.0003457147,0.1129466,0.001670651,0.0002706675,0.2588134,0.4288624,0.01288239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063772,0.00007740563,0.06514385,0.0001889531,0.00002262039,0.000001714409,0.016023,0.0003034438,0.000008505684,0.0006820179,0.9165432,0.0003675691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8981257,0.001305063,0.000002484263,0.03411367,0.001151734,0.0003528153,0.0006536858,0.00003340626,0.06426144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723563,0.006174183,0.0001060659,0.001769763,0.0004767628,0.000005221592,0.00008007616,0.00002171951,0.01900992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4876808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8725498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114986408","doi":"","title":"The post-Brexit negotiations and the level playing field criterion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Negotiation; Competition (biology); European union; Liberalization; Political science; International trade; Level playing field; Field (mathematics); Economics; State (computer science); International economics; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Massimiliano Montini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07859376896161564,"gpt":0.3500228425865442,"spread":0.2714290736249286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000170647,0.00004113929,0.00004889633,0.000007933253,0.0009286776,0.00009600693,0.0001495627,0.00002869423,0.00003681522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005514043,0.00002276328,0.00002490001,0.0001067674,0.0001544592,0.00007152659,0.00004080634,0.00007956587,0.00001571572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001006808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009557137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001793649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002285415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995502,0.00006070298,0.00008220178,0.00006774304,0.0001301517,0.0001090178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944,0.0003953097,0.00002992383,0.00004632843,0.00003908308,0.00004937962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001312949,0.00002286433,0.002735556,0.000009544655,0.00003308944,0.000002659296,0.1103667,0.000003431179,0.0002720291,0.8454455,0.01646784,0.02450953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009438128,0.00004723325,0.06750278,0.00002500632,0.00001852957,0.000001948888,0.01140471,0.0004147412,0.00001951509,0.01511158,0.904335,0.0001751189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1232932,0.0002164273,0.00008458889,0.8693432,0.0001290749,0.0001322707,0.00001325206,0.00002699062,0.006761009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747498,0.0006058778,0.0003943718,0.02244105,0.0006144266,0.000004084797,0.00001503855,0.000004293778,0.001171053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774874957","doi":"","title":"Bobbitt’s Paradise: Canadian Constitutional Interpretation and Public Meaning Originalism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutionalism; Original intent; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Benjamin J. Oliphant","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05075330785836103,"gpt":0.3391241005377399,"spread":0.2883707926793789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000196452,0.0000678396,0.00009442235,0.00005301559,0.003156249,0.0002238132,0.0001704437,0.00004741176,0.00009987268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005852256,0.00006556073,0.00002418398,0.00004638539,0.002176795,0.0003532291,0.00003488654,0.00008032676,0.00002356988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001219388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000877551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3255724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993053,0.00003179832,0.0000972539,0.0001441276,0.0001876781,0.0002338143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994725,0.00003545476,0.00006528025,0.00008892568,0.0001219713,0.0002158984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003319781,0.00001252848,0.02522977,0.00000118856,0.00001601065,0.000009319786,0.0007038261,0.00000128665,0.000002927416,0.9668573,0.0006652239,0.006497365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002407937,0.00001381266,0.05890482,0.00004610596,0.00002226129,0.000006114768,0.002032607,0.0001949028,0.000001365334,0.0452437,0.893102,0.0001914645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2899445,0.001409334,0.0005255587,0.09224321,0.001505204,0.0002782146,0.0002658023,0.00008969392,0.6137385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998302,0.0001929713,0.0002205101,0.000568768,0.0004342344,0.000005350724,0.00002987137,0.000001935451,0.0002442928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944851300","doi":"","title":"Canadian Rights: A jurisprudential Canadian “Style”?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Charter; Political science; Law; Human rights; International human rights law; Federalism; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Rights of Nature; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Giuseppe Franco Ferrari","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0099812534809071,"gpt":0.2758636277001305,"spread":0.2658823742192233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001569459,0.00007984481,0.0001135842,0.0001223572,0.0009801342,0.00004822255,0.0002081773,0.00008056016,0.001751233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003900701,0.00007526349,0.00004887555,0.0002495758,0.0001551106,0.00009893671,0.00001802413,0.0001020889,0.001293845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005059032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002108464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989378,0.00003612045,0.0001053804,0.0001660828,0.0002332073,0.0005213443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992661,0.00002180146,0.0000227,0.00009221897,0.00009198463,0.0005051842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008553114,0.00005553053,0.05438776,0.000003620606,0.00006091666,0.00007855571,0.003108667,0.000007379158,0.00001744671,0.9205976,0.01785411,0.003819846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001064316,0.00001102385,0.01729714,0.00001193872,0.000008919387,7.897718e-7,0.0008073683,0.000007218008,0.000001936875,0.003617845,0.9780031,0.000126217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.420027,0.0003299599,0.000001908693,0.01890908,0.001387738,0.0002557967,0.0003652827,0.00004759237,0.5586756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944379,0.00005247882,0.00005914234,0.0014139,0.0007528923,0.000003763796,0.00004697582,0.000004016923,0.003228938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621555350","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema apre la strada al suicidio assistito","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Justice and Penology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Francesco Gallarati","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04754549557239367,"gpt":0.3618697693608454,"spread":0.3143242737884517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005446653,0.0002715529,0.0004260755,0.00004007231,0.001333622,0.0003502786,0.001141247,0.0003330916,0.0009156617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007905636,0.0002758958,0.0001081132,0.00008566228,0.0008233351,0.0002175746,0.0002140679,0.0005540906,0.00007527266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003323748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9527799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976104,0.0003323429,0.0003046,0.0004828724,0.0005969862,0.0006727208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979163,0.0005561676,0.0003309917,0.0007224005,0.0001488895,0.0003252627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004946663,0.001722838,0.06100178,0.0004963332,0.0005974576,0.006823316,0.01114903,0.0000825355,0.001702426,0.06613772,0.7313437,0.1184482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004236608,0.00009232335,0.1275681,0.00008860916,0.0002727189,0.00002852475,0.007375803,0.0001783222,0.00003045361,0.0001093597,0.8634797,0.0003523869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8391464,0.0005665973,0.00002239553,0.05259504,0.00305184,0.0002635647,0.001754806,0.00004899165,0.1025503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754733,0.000645899,0.000149973,0.00126975,0.001418197,0.00000324873,0.000115926,0.00002523127,0.02089844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1363269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135453247","doi":"","title":"Indipendenza senza autonomia. I delicati rapporti fra potere esecutivo e giudiziario in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Executive branch; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Law; Constitutional law; Executive power; Power (physics); Autonomy; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Eleonora Ceccherini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03320402103025619,"gpt":0.283810711327999,"spread":0.2506066902977428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003317029,0.0003186816,0.0005847448,0.00007198846,0.0006465169,0.00007858867,0.0004290736,0.0002014686,0.00112302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003355256,0.0003386895,0.0001299206,0.0009949977,0.000410364,0.0001655608,0.0003098779,0.0005516186,0.00006836109],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001570798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968621,0.0002285108,0.0007338068,0.0006505554,0.000735134,0.0007898976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986912,0.0001807684,0.0002532245,0.0002963943,0.0002988902,0.0002795019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002126492,0.003640121,0.6217557,0.0001547245,0.001270924,0.005909863,0.02180148,0.001354411,0.0003963877,0.1635308,0.09103799,0.08893503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001336816,0.00004319083,0.2630239,0.0002790575,0.0001180507,0.00002346054,0.03817951,0.00057536,0.0001708202,0.0037604,0.6914758,0.001013603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966561,0.005125699,0.00004367588,0.04776359,0.001932228,0.0004155326,0.001203486,0.00005584523,0.04680385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989163,0.001608694,0.0002171084,0.005674119,0.0008022446,0.00001530115,0.0001799982,0.00001648705,0.002323024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6004378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620240063","doi":"","title":"CANADA, La Corte Suprema ha affermato che nella provincia dell’Alberta non vige alcun diritto costituzionale al bilinguismo legislativo","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Francesco Santolini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01343907342737482,"gpt":0.3018798078495352,"spread":0.2884407344221603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005430147,0.0004491894,0.0005469347,0.00007385381,0.001420127,0.0006255036,0.001174993,0.0002832233,0.0006847591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001701258,0.0004229297,0.0002033563,0.0001641617,0.0005306963,0.0007134148,0.0002649649,0.0005499393,0.0001521064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004808621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003989662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966984,0.0002597427,0.000564008,0.0007228602,0.0009638016,0.0007911316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972674,0.0004342571,0.0006033007,0.0008970093,0.0003924765,0.0004055208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001308,0.004305577,0.09725901,0.0009001694,0.001664031,0.003966659,0.1943508,0.0004051196,0.01313623,0.03464094,0.6001762,0.04788724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008431054,0.000121861,0.01326262,0.0003835694,0.0001505166,0.00001740824,0.001169896,0.009815124,0.000772366,0.00007426267,0.9727052,0.0006841012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5850034,0.001030795,0.00009824309,0.02448881,0.002909716,0.001322993,0.001348967,0.00006751611,0.3837296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297571,0.0001937964,0.0002228667,0.002768998,0.001242198,0.00001573938,0.0003718,0.00005049334,0.06537699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.372529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944789027","doi":"","title":"Judicial review of discriminatory laws in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Normative; Invisibility; Political science; Inequality; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Nausica Palazzo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02492551798569338,"gpt":0.3365467047887538,"spread":0.3116211868030604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004097262,0.00004484626,0.0001619103,0.00002323528,0.00002562043,0.000003462552,0.0001500799,0.00002177219,0.0008699688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001565676,0.00004286617,0.00002781444,0.0001734186,0.00004947179,0.00007030439,0.00001995342,0.00006020011,0.00001843943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001750287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009860436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.939805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.0001159709,0.0002145904,0.00009286671,0.0003220104,0.0001386604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.0000441483,0.00006946304,0.0001067444,0.00005709083,0.00004989766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001816798,0.0003861949,0.0474482,0.003273654,0.00001383632,0.00001306673,0.00649953,0.000003989739,0.00008029836,0.8792493,0.01829907,0.04471472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006134798,0.00004277546,0.1512239,0.004276803,0.00002997953,2.818772e-7,0.01080201,0.00003182346,0.00007800736,0.004473872,0.8280638,0.0003632248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6667066,0.001518835,0.000001864666,0.01164044,0.000576651,0.0003158296,0.00007142303,0.00001412409,0.3191543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940274,0.001549844,0.00004256684,0.002957588,0.0000523257,0.000002059281,0.00002734337,0.000003906116,0.001336908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9525548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946696988","doi":"","title":"Refractive and Prismatic Analysis in Implicit Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional law; Law; Section (typography); Comparative law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03598531139458209,"gpt":0.3576870263817483,"spread":0.3217017149871662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001738171,0.00006575046,0.0002278911,0.00007379875,0.0002390084,0.00001975026,0.00006166287,0.00003873971,0.0001240561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000317238,0.00005852286,0.00003920496,0.0004848027,0.001060751,0.000130987,0.00003373788,0.00008914423,0.00004675851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007052378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001062347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007998527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05457507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999307,0.00006621039,0.0001393948,0.000155854,0.0001899204,0.0001416123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996131,0.000166739,0.00005258387,0.00005002937,0.00007386111,0.0000436788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001227305,0.00007235105,0.05748693,0.000001569566,0.0001154744,0.000001892642,0.00222041,0.00006977028,0.00002968195,0.9398741,0.00002895951,0.00008663801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001180041,0.00008829445,0.7660943,0.00007832785,0.0003406167,0.000002398102,0.03058345,0.0009550819,0.00003226061,0.1091053,0.09102581,0.0005141945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.823099,0.0002997162,0.0001215073,0.001566228,0.00006516277,0.0001853817,0.00005551346,0.00001719297,0.1745903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990657,0.00004462408,0.0002509316,0.0003460697,0.00006018072,0.000005722125,0.00002603202,8.557851e-7,0.0001998996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8307688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}