{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":95,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":95,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b4007ccb13d4","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W3123409510","doi":"","title":"International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Law; Third world; Sociology; Political science; History; Economic history","authors":[{"name":"Graham Reynolds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04254255933461592,"gpt":0.2609358282391206,"spread":0.2183932689045047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001082069,0.0001209129,0.0002610749,0.0000602557,0.0004797179,0.0001088268,0.0001496841,0.00001880008,0.00005156696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002661517,0.00009244672,0.00006608822,0.00002469865,0.0003025199,0.0003611938,0.00007969714,0.0001768599,0.000008829017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001690233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000459324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001902049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006438676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989951,0.00001755263,0.0004261031,0.0001032687,0.0003106591,0.0001472674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994377,0.000049793,0.0001949626,0.00003681449,0.0002180033,0.00006266112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009060285,0.0001097754,0.0001866415,0.00001877882,0.0005006578,0.00007604289,0.02725631,0.0000014916,0.00001451375,0.9672247,0.003924831,0.0005956921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006146457,0.000030396,0.0006379689,0.00006649356,0.00002176782,0.000001246005,0.001651105,5.88541e-7,0.00001636666,0.03725512,0.9595885,0.0001158472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2364766,0.006437354,0.00008403255,0.01068657,0.003044507,0.000101811,0.0001210249,0.00004421502,0.7430039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672669,0.0001194288,0.0005543624,0.001450943,0.001236098,0.000002485835,0.000004870542,0.00001126035,0.02935364],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3769868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531009826","doi":"","title":"The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Robbie Moser","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03918575256515755,"gpt":0.379507126859882,"spread":0.3403213742947245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310527,0.0001050243,0.0003996954,0.0000939406,0.0003421693,0.00002790623,0.0002862761,0.00002507597,0.000004564489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009264385,0.00006642388,0.0001089933,0.0003544745,0.0005134126,0.000373685,0.00008458599,0.000191989,0.000001555264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001033064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002276295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003008543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001221715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975516,0.000801331,0.0006867778,0.0000974248,0.000675231,0.0001875932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958816,0.002007472,0.000713827,0.00009628663,0.001254765,0.00004600523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002290776,0.0002380376,0.001693259,0.00001556243,0.0003625657,0.00001052908,0.02228292,0.0001357931,0.00003478116,0.9731829,0.001492115,0.000322492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004904143,0.0003237995,0.003571832,0.0001060358,0.00007553153,0.000039625,0.07921722,0.000003150231,0.0003010889,0.006398316,0.9093509,0.0001220696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3542885,0.01493369,0.0006768746,0.00336617,0.0006825288,0.0004483146,0.00001072237,0.000007309774,0.6255859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960511,0.001147639,0.001620928,0.0001039894,0.00007954923,0.00000824259,8.642552e-8,0.000005501251,0.0009829242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340946344","doi":"","title":"Following Digital Media into the Courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court Principle in the Information Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Publicity; Publication; Economic Justice; Democracy; Narrative; Social media; Freedom of the press; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Shauna Claire Hall-Coates","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05299997535309214,"gpt":0.3500924784065506,"spread":0.2970925030534585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006833916,0.00008706399,0.0002364784,0.000008766538,0.001005379,0.001381086,0.0008809256,0.00004872938,0.000001707809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002686519,0.0000333485,0.0001041101,0.0002622276,0.0007239469,0.002743874,0.0002995213,0.0003612846,0.000002054087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009509201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001799208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007401738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004148781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983243,0.0003060006,0.0003378408,0.00005260309,0.000808108,0.0001710938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987001,0.0005812253,0.0002833537,0.00009730858,0.0002828827,0.00005511944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006173988,0.00002655895,0.002718458,0.000003422334,0.0001475638,0.00001461242,0.9054331,0.00001658903,3.0875e-7,0.05832431,0.03170754,0.001545781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797752,0.00002771189,0.002102761,0.00002109184,0.00003508321,0.000008680059,0.3741068,0.000005024383,6.34673e-7,0.01087881,0.61178,0.00005368178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7672843,0.006398917,0.00002780641,0.1597739,0.00114744,0.0007030364,0.000006830715,0.00001526442,0.06464248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969704,0.0008799543,0.00005433604,0.001607521,0.0003019347,0.000009038084,0.000001121608,0.000002771665,0.0001729774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5800725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545063720","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-Decision-Making Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Legislation; Guardian; Paternalism; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Burningham","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0310029482683927,"gpt":0.3772667542394297,"spread":0.346263805971037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008106676,0.00008624706,0.0002234994,0.0001320955,0.0006389088,0.0001131517,0.000187188,0.00004800439,0.000005625686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000455844,0.00007292251,0.00004249152,0.0002318579,0.0001514632,0.0003163834,0.00002042527,0.0001967493,0.000006178889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002830706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004169715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06544399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7096406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988748,0.00005429533,0.0003470033,0.0001017171,0.0003102667,0.0003119061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.0001717902,0.0001403653,0.00005865557,0.0002448955,0.0001888493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004611905,0.00007666317,0.05798117,0.00001016396,0.0001031018,0.0002722817,0.04317319,0.00004228305,0.00002486205,0.8285176,0.004407655,0.06534489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000477574,0.00007822811,0.1866092,0.0002927719,0.0000220278,0.00002607258,0.01149045,0.000003008989,0.00001454815,0.01670504,0.7840533,0.0002277871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098025,0.002618861,0.0000217399,0.0132381,0.0002503698,0.0001952274,0.00001079176,0.0000142776,0.1738482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965342,0.0007179919,0.001098827,0.001409036,0.00014615,0.000001568884,2.03821e-7,0.000004273159,0.00008773868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9407793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","authors":[{"name":"Allison Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995210207593185,"gpt":0.29853962858674,"spread":0.2685875265108081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003120515,0.0001323134,0.0006326049,0.0001007572,0.001186765,0.0001198743,0.0002513073,0.00007280048,0.00000327061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007046064,0.00007980422,0.00009142965,0.0001427432,0.001099889,0.0002931884,0.00002702152,0.0002128328,9.117721e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005656207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.313063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7000428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980511,0.0003658672,0.0005556113,0.0001052652,0.0005788366,0.0003432937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982637,0.0003124183,0.0004878844,0.00008820599,0.0006575961,0.0001901977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000311018,0.00004439157,0.009368723,0.0005988228,0.001029354,0.00003380472,0.6981804,0.00004261649,0.00002690596,0.2811479,0.004223137,0.004992994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00175453,0.0003192393,0.001784979,0.0003756376,0.0001803541,0.00004830395,0.3944597,0.00001009008,0.00005346805,0.002222474,0.5985407,0.000250512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699719,0.0539801,0.0001809516,0.01288345,0.002726057,0.000562009,0.00002297771,0.00004510324,0.05962749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980145,0.0008373864,0.00004168477,0.00009334675,0.000632025,0.000006973034,8.61343e-8,0.00000950698,0.0003644814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152849106","doi":"","title":"The Story of Jane Doe: A book about rape","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Drew Mildon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03192146707410422,"gpt":0.3366811567286839,"spread":0.3047596896545797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002460995,0.00008459028,0.0002851336,0.00004177058,0.001471421,0.00003113241,0.0004762862,0.00003318096,0.0000185695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009613716,0.00005119891,0.0001343775,0.0001418695,0.0006909791,0.0002446399,0.0001211951,0.0003176218,0.000006259741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001532688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001037961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002421559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983926,0.0003816116,0.0004237795,0.00005952253,0.0005387695,0.00020369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977643,0.0008924584,0.000563099,0.0001707642,0.0005516185,0.00005775541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002934736,0.0003100136,0.002475132,0.00005038988,0.001709931,0.00001823345,0.2426887,0.00006892382,0.0003586686,0.06988052,0.3425342,0.3396119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236856,0.00009044886,0.002284142,0.0000476911,0.00004758082,0.000003097116,0.03551371,0.000001817788,0.00005197481,0.0001700664,0.9614962,0.00005644082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1691446,0.6399727,0.0000238319,0.1398625,0.001627576,0.0002738704,0.000003959803,0.0000243721,0.04906664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8287814,0.1653867,0.0002468463,0.0004832068,0.0008373206,0.000005721838,1.206146e-7,0.000007292385,0.004251312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6596369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125497815","doi":"","title":"Autonomous Weapons Systems: Taking the Human out of International Humanitarian Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Adversary; Geneva Conventions; Law; Political science; International law; Convention; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"James Foy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05581112191346898,"gpt":0.2957282492508475,"spread":0.2399171273373785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001147085,0.0001487598,0.0003881219,0.0000918372,0.0004557439,0.0002373468,0.001437777,0.00003683488,0.00001479326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003448737,0.00008435186,0.0001609401,0.00009236001,0.0003511398,0.0006033421,0.0004002186,0.0002676365,0.00001122508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008715947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005342317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002298968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002204114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982789,0.0001831276,0.0006897424,0.0001546344,0.0004955269,0.000198131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979897,0.0002564561,0.0007765325,0.0002865022,0.0006423374,0.00004850613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002131863,0.0001601751,0.0003300984,0.00005369373,0.0009079563,0.00003128739,0.02128933,0.0004841791,0.002969373,0.9588051,0.01211694,0.002830492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001698439,0.002220112,0.002029466,0.0007309738,0.0001905099,0.0003833529,0.004351041,0.01132803,0.004009943,0.01042061,0.9619492,0.0006883121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2006343,0.01564386,0.2388597,0.01782623,0.03344718,0.0008707932,0.00002293106,0.0002896361,0.4924054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977748,0.0000744531,0.0004899475,0.000365602,0.0006249913,0.000002415484,2.674363e-7,0.00001002133,0.0006574724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.350526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529607162","doi":"","title":"Uncertain Territory: Family Reunification and the Plight of Unaccompanied Minors in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Refugee; Immigration; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Convention; Best interests; Immigration law; Minor (academic); Convention on the Rights of the Child; Family law; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Alison Luke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03172936707329431,"gpt":0.3190165483207383,"spread":0.287287181247444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001217319,0.00009445999,0.0003412883,0.000111998,0.00008560313,0.000006943676,0.0001383346,0.00003232664,0.000006764885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009054694,0.00005911545,0.00003473446,0.0001588623,0.000128052,0.0000638927,0.00001593458,0.0002049379,5.912746e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001629522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002936089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5610287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986447,0.0001360301,0.0007075286,0.00009112118,0.0002300509,0.0001905414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987684,0.0004104494,0.0004699065,0.0001245123,0.0001665226,0.00006017566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006806173,0.0004363599,0.6667162,0.0003455023,0.001347612,0.0004781515,0.1631932,0.0001592437,0.0007269023,0.04959511,0.07936631,0.03082927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002361365,0.0001075456,0.9362746,0.00005448274,0.00004127652,0.00005421611,0.04414402,0.000008069292,0.00008895427,0.0003111129,0.01647447,0.0000798622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983287,0.01224499,0.00002550417,0.002002998,0.0006325187,0.0001333586,0.000004775168,0.000002203549,0.00166668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0003504029,0.00007359853,0.0003208583,0.000129492,0.000002648476,7.225284e-7,0.00000594378,0.0001296127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3554233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4418945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528019720","doi":"","title":"Risky Business: A Review of Dual Class Share Structures in Canada and a Proposal for Reform","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Corporation; Common stock; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Institutional investor; Corporate structure; Voting; Accounting; Business; Corporate law; Agency cost; Dual (grammatical number); Finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Cipollone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05390135005255746,"gpt":0.2931138911210068,"spread":0.2392125410684493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006738976,0.0004154208,0.002638343,0.0002032705,0.00008534284,0.00006020027,0.0002734036,0.00008219647,0.00002206892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003360817,0.000258251,0.0002595745,0.0005884011,0.00007410783,0.0008396282,0.0002683266,0.0003560346,9.197509e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004541565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001711876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2156713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.674514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975457,0.00002276555,0.001443817,0.0001927777,0.0004774252,0.0003174714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951106,0.0000829163,0.003652683,0.0001601863,0.000972483,0.000021136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006099147,0.00004497545,0.0003463282,0.5062997,0.0006760642,0.0001357705,0.00003666855,7.88998e-7,1.904545e-7,0.004315891,0.01784688,0.4702358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003113969,0.00001800048,0.0004709276,0.08162396,0.001428992,0.00008109512,0.0001591442,6.08372e-7,1.058263e-7,0.0002755336,0.9153722,0.0002580622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002253128,0.9975365,9.365516e-7,0.0004911714,0.0006409903,0.0006588999,0.0001002418,0.000004387493,0.0003414908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003165077,0.997788,0.00008826642,0.0003218473,0.001343633,0.00002965646,0.00002537252,0.00004107345,0.00004564256],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516859696","doi":"","title":"Sex Trafficking from Thailand to Japan: Human Beings or Illegal Goods?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sex trafficking; Human trafficking; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Order (exchange); Criminology; Business; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kara Patterson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04094101819058774,"gpt":0.3426702433908624,"spread":0.3017292252002747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126445,0.0002036301,0.0005766758,0.000148922,0.00122701,0.0001986752,0.0003292885,0.000126831,0.0001670542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008247441,0.0001381022,0.0001688151,0.0004263984,0.0002574282,0.0003317879,0.00005327206,0.0004136904,0.00002446042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000128498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001533933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000860078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001633711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978407,0.0002739398,0.0005594071,0.0002037055,0.0006910189,0.0004312338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.0003243009,0.0003207816,0.000117087,0.0002570816,0.0002279579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002249018,0.0003468751,0.02790849,0.00002562078,0.002133114,0.0007335958,0.9058174,0.0002757187,0.0009640466,0.008058102,0.04619658,0.00731549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009129241,0.0004841443,0.001563683,0.0003064114,0.0001949283,0.00003330469,0.2966417,0.000001093678,0.0007262098,0.0008963196,0.6978801,0.0003591046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644328,0.005919463,0.00001805039,0.002152614,0.001273671,0.0001349692,0.000002092266,0.00004660006,0.02601974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914098,0.001241837,0.0006312289,0.0003404264,0.000932573,0.000002185325,5.004231e-7,0.00002202585,0.005419424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6516836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792288245","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Legal Professionalism and Reconciliation: Enacting Reconciliation Through Civility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Law; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Harassment; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Healey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2484231277062361,"gpt":0.4922463388024223,"spread":0.2438232110961862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00589672,0.000128221,0.0002800985,0.00009353657,0.002022169,0.0002491066,0.0001715058,0.0001487829,0.0001703742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01667714,0.0001084148,0.00006786311,0.0004834953,0.0006640739,0.00340597,0.00005822704,0.00103939,0.00001701056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000275228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001802676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002367014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005793702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974713,0.0007134186,0.0007060007,0.0001781852,0.0006995849,0.0002315586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936888,0.001531094,0.0009786229,0.0001180465,0.003608999,0.00007450362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002261523,0.0002570946,0.009926248,0.00009934368,0.0004824761,0.00001716488,0.5945417,0.000003412562,0.0003306583,0.3095613,0.06495529,0.01959925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003216028,0.0001233072,0.004262583,0.000112092,0.00005248805,0.00002635272,0.07122537,0.000003975364,0.0002020938,0.007656257,0.9158714,0.0001425018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5417547,0.004039157,0.000363515,0.374769,0.008422394,0.0003220429,0.00001122661,0.00006613156,0.07025182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876165,0.001299875,0.002243009,0.003284192,0.002221507,0.000005780968,0.000001787617,0.00001000265,0.003317395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910688488","doi":"","title":"A Dangerous Step Backwards: The Implications of Conditional Permanent Resident Status for Sponsored Immigrant Women in Abusive Relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Domestic violence; Government (linguistics); Residence; Immigration law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Jurisprudence; Institution; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Pam Hrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07167891146118106,"gpt":0.358519669594341,"spread":0.2868407581331599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145533,0.0001654574,0.0004911332,0.0001102291,0.001177301,0.00004174442,0.0002797299,0.00007013346,0.00002124252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003096482,0.0001055735,0.0001977176,0.0003321765,0.0007087349,0.0005194762,0.00008899366,0.0003276526,0.000004824654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001035149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002114269,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001498565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00416851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972855,0.0005364999,0.0007870363,0.0001238253,0.0006087301,0.0006584225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959674,0.001992534,0.0007398716,0.000120316,0.001008419,0.0001714119],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003475384,0.0003405401,0.1276801,0.00007144128,0.0009628335,0.000006229834,0.8161035,0.000192278,0.0002883296,0.04074989,0.01252799,0.0007293285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007377479,0.0001100877,0.5927197,0.00006115391,0.00009468619,0.000009319747,0.3322155,0.000001621884,0.0000248509,0.001738268,0.07215015,0.0001369708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776554,0.009619712,0.00008381854,0.01066098,0.0003907974,0.0007081137,0.0001536729,0.00001238642,0.0007151504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960487,0.002249182,0.0006447763,0.0001136967,0.0004251238,0.0001411815,0.000005887873,0.00001165974,0.0003597332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.483888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9054968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W897471759","doi":"","title":"HIV and Shared Responsibility: A Critical Evaluation of Mabior and DC","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Autonomy; Harm; Obligation; Law; Criminal law; Supreme court; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Confidentiality; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Kevin Rawluk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07367276692934686,"gpt":0.4010684395194092,"spread":0.3273956725900623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00212731,0.00006420793,0.000252941,0.0001245581,0.0002948423,0.00007890771,0.00006161629,0.00003370756,0.00009028606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004540904,0.00005003055,0.00006216326,0.0001881751,0.0004523566,0.0004159888,0.00004690831,0.00009687822,0.000002183886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000567895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001255589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001320329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002051881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998621,0.0003069987,0.0003247713,0.00009607933,0.0005352017,0.0001159547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974974,0.0005351969,0.000150827,0.0000614415,0.001679432,0.00007572447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007957356,0.0009083211,0.07784396,0.0005404609,0.002068406,0.0000542182,0.4464467,0.00007572147,0.007815783,0.01120063,0.01460169,0.4376484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006909856,0.0003883434,0.07111846,0.0001787199,0.002710163,0.00003834402,0.9165571,0.0004165527,0.0001396842,0.004278761,0.003305301,0.0001775444],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896087,0.005873067,0.00002886756,0.003659832,0.0001324337,0.00008732331,0.000003098251,0.000004091231,0.0006026016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983566,0.001000733,0.0003694467,0.00004631772,0.0001149278,0.000004420296,1.366123e-7,0.000003033182,0.0001043627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4701104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5436214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548292026","doi":"","title":"Compelling War Correspondents to Testify: A Prerogative of International Criminal Tribunals?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Tribunal; Witness; Political science; Legitimacy; Criminal procedure; Confidentiality; Sociology; Business; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer S. Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04074360226860753,"gpt":0.3659157563073452,"spread":0.3251721540387377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007974947,0.000116624,0.0003271364,0.0002350218,0.0003175695,0.00005188593,0.0004335173,0.00003847835,0.00009427337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004247826,0.00009290759,0.0001477289,0.0001093909,0.0002741457,0.0003523267,0.00007106,0.0001631174,0.00001741509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001967845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001601237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007315817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001367344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979517,0.0001163112,0.0006049349,0.0001150815,0.001018627,0.0001932795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972413,0.0003616554,0.0005334712,0.00005516488,0.001734482,0.00007391678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007405034,0.0005025386,0.00595691,0.00002992408,0.0006372136,0.000193531,0.03850725,0.001206265,0.0009089976,0.9414212,0.009418936,0.0004767466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00524557,0.002469544,0.1016697,0.002015731,0.0007689927,0.0001733249,0.03716278,0.0001536636,0.01213106,0.1959491,0.6410378,0.00122278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812771,0.0006069051,0.0004029382,0.001353202,0.001457569,0.0001180264,0.0000263804,0.00001193175,0.01474593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933138,0.00007079005,0.001128467,0.000105455,0.0009649245,0.000002080471,0.00000189722,0.000007888686,0.004404679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7454721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3788661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767010817","doi":"","title":"'The Melancholy Truth': Corrective and Equitable Justice for Omar Khadr","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Harm; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Appeal; Order (exchange); Proposition; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Faith; Repatriation; Law and economics; Remedial education; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Stobo Sniderman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05605805057015369,"gpt":0.3831973261374007,"spread":0.327139275567247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003030512,0.0001002597,0.0002804346,0.00003278822,0.002064894,0.0001667444,0.0002336735,0.00003827157,0.000003163438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005869457,0.00006451138,0.00008861356,0.0001028263,0.0004698877,0.0003911258,0.00007632168,0.0001565811,0.000002822033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007300927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008790044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002834461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987353,0.000153919,0.0003009364,0.0001123507,0.0003543055,0.0003432012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956765,0.003261642,0.0002870372,0.00007433366,0.000600265,0.0001002842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001198736,0.0001287652,0.001818607,0.0002683607,0.0007474053,0.00004012185,0.06710765,0.00007865536,0.0002590055,0.6352127,0.1579687,0.1351713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004844657,0.0005186899,0.0009824712,0.0001091492,0.0003711784,0.00002849293,0.0524892,0.00003539479,0.00006949747,0.01243908,0.932331,0.0001413783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6689311,0.09421959,0.004863396,0.08141429,0.02123561,0.001183354,0.00002852721,0.0001098101,0.1280143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937181,0.002782029,0.0004464161,0.0002116696,0.001085402,0.000006636768,9.129741e-8,0.000008300546,0.001741386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7743623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344828161","doi":"","title":"Edward Snowden: Hero or Traitor? Considering the Implications for Canadian National Security and Whistleblower Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Law; National security; Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark W. Friedman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1241615815569067,"gpt":0.3764097731773454,"spread":0.2522481916204387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444596,0.00009843401,0.0002382949,0.00005163607,0.001596849,0.00006763503,0.0001450164,0.0000396726,0.000007341487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001657723,0.00006165,0.00007563688,0.000123036,0.000681405,0.0002805817,0.00003986407,0.0001351867,0.000001335126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001954119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01792978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6897415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.0001001016,0.0002833491,0.0001032679,0.0002909903,0.0002360163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978722,0.000599305,0.0001329636,0.00005955128,0.00112889,0.0002070287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001615647,0.00005378429,0.002663739,0.00003125573,0.0006894542,0.00002212289,0.1612479,0.00003191176,0.00000772196,0.5474603,0.2869346,0.000695764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003827857,0.0001146953,0.001042524,0.00002220681,0.00005674386,0.00004545203,0.05973573,0.000002152578,0.000004088181,0.04504859,0.8934409,0.0001041197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3215189,0.06705219,0.0001202959,0.3080527,0.005172587,0.001504522,0.0004781689,0.00008354041,0.2960171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967171,0.0006315401,0.0003314456,0.001149036,0.0007970347,0.00001547852,5.413581e-7,0.000006500733,0.0003513301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6751982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529612912","doi":"","title":"When All Else Fails, Blame the Parents: An Analysis of Parental Responsibility Laws in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Poverty; Moral responsibility; Political science; Legal responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michelle G. Roy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04361686647031889,"gpt":0.3376268931768372,"spread":0.2940100267065183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002576651,0.0001457952,0.0007310591,0.0001762135,0.000319178,0.0000837851,0.0005148084,0.0000472722,0.0000402914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009945772,0.0000943385,0.0001739157,0.0009554197,0.0003155516,0.0007219677,0.00007799291,0.0002533908,5.080569e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007112069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001464679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9673333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969087,0.0006678919,0.0009207351,0.000175225,0.0009859977,0.0003414953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980114,0.0004007155,0.0006939573,0.0001887889,0.0005712559,0.0001339181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003397519,0.0002105893,0.9379774,0.00002300591,0.001679243,0.0001899147,0.05405551,0.0006738445,0.00004632904,0.001382664,0.00150732,0.001914416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007458312,0.0002955084,0.5016062,0.0001383454,0.001082229,0.00001294537,0.3563575,0.00007514949,0.00004758037,0.001682932,0.1376213,0.0003344587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909185,0.003893686,0.000005477939,0.002915576,0.0003757817,0.0001316125,0.00001954335,0.000006048565,0.001733782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983867,0.001029019,0.00001920873,0.0002377028,0.0002220218,0.000003156083,0.000001378333,0.000006753651,0.00009399141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4363712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3847013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793194118","doi":"","title":"When Google Becomes the Norm: The Case for Privacy and the Right to be Forgotten","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Charter; Right to be forgotten; Personally identifiable information; Globe; Jurisdiction; Norm (philosophy); Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Data Protection Act 1998; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Belbin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04989791015890382,"gpt":0.3422379807863614,"spread":0.2923400706274576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003604003,0.0001224736,0.0002610563,0.00004464207,0.003679122,0.0002879274,0.0007718018,0.0000406639,0.00001542022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003265923,0.00004878006,0.0001216877,0.0001677893,0.001251368,0.0004617428,0.000516032,0.0002170383,0.000003917631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000645965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009142788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002435158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02148288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986347,0.0003101188,0.0003299571,0.000126138,0.0003248908,0.0002741939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997861,0.001043493,0.0002867791,0.0002642164,0.000469533,0.00007494744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008481987,0.00009490313,0.0007909563,0.00003743344,0.0008442969,0.0001043929,0.4336824,0.000001777868,0.00003188057,0.0646392,0.4827708,0.0161538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000813073,0.0002735256,0.0004610796,0.00001894736,0.0001437605,0.0002611116,0.03077212,0.00001228728,0.00008633601,0.03991619,0.9271457,0.00009594231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4142108,0.005853652,0.0008997479,0.573661,0.001568796,0.001324167,0.00004779388,0.00002622169,0.00240776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923387,0.000914316,0.0005439526,0.003294161,0.002270408,0.0000428821,3.916054e-7,0.00001080904,0.0005844001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530321078","doi":"","title":"Dual Citizenship and Forced Marriages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); International law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Human rights; Phenomenon; Power (physics); Political science; Forced migration; Forced marriage","authors":[{"name":"Alison Symington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05587629666437637,"gpt":0.3436201593320794,"spread":0.287743862667703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008934391,0.0001105939,0.0003001011,0.000095737,0.0006618695,0.00009466374,0.0001229231,0.00004751081,0.00004391719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002905076,0.00007878249,0.00008233905,0.0001611718,0.0003203473,0.0002199039,0.00005389467,0.0001667345,0.000006022312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005486252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008024264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006829678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003914631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987244,0.0001461661,0.0002991961,0.0001028894,0.0004413523,0.0002860074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991482,0.0002080251,0.0001860252,0.00005899027,0.0002545078,0.0001442009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008807438,0.0003195461,0.1422309,0.0001636271,0.003945381,0.005017661,0.4283395,0.00004730631,0.001652742,0.1871215,0.1995758,0.03070538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003685259,0.001049134,0.06759422,0.0002117903,0.0003827392,0.0008725217,0.2041442,0.000004412466,0.0004301071,0.1345246,0.5862615,0.0008394826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493467,0.004739019,0.00002513566,0.005143431,0.0006772512,0.00007715421,0.000002134587,0.00002153227,0.03996763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899686,0.004071554,0.0001569327,0.0002029261,0.0007611714,0.000001285986,1.565015e-7,0.000007759158,0.004829617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3866857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5090632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524468930","doi":"","title":"Of Mice and \"Man\": Patentability of Genetic Material and the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Patent law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Adam L. Crane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07132463815187216,"gpt":0.2311163816889268,"spread":0.1597917435370546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006147026,0.0001248594,0.0004562805,0.0001066318,0.0001269738,0.00003365666,0.0001204665,0.00003734076,0.00002279656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004153354,0.00005515354,0.00007510319,0.0001466375,0.0004261344,0.0003116812,0.0000990878,0.0001230297,6.856923e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009338653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001259891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000723995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005714934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.00005513161,0.000635255,0.00009930207,0.0002245061,0.0001064231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986641,0.00007531018,0.0006109745,0.00007507554,0.0005670951,0.000007439729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1270225,0.005706424,0.03889258,0.0176269,0.007904114,0.0001351199,0.1014468,0.0007214801,0.4432956,0.009807676,0.01312219,0.2343186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04264565,0.01401911,0.3102438,0.006427132,0.005917829,0.001062394,0.02429792,0.01031365,0.4468797,0.07592428,0.05925759,0.003010989],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974601,0.0009761371,0.00005760673,0.0005587586,0.0002063227,0.0002853618,0.000002048454,0.000004047614,0.0004496645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999409,0.0002085085,0.00007448209,0.00007631724,0.0001792306,0.000001709324,2.970246e-7,0.000005077442,0.000045384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2713512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2249096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414595098","doi":"","title":"Comfort Women in Japan and Korea","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Comfort women; Pleasure; Human rights; Law; World War II; Political science; Work (physics); International law; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Psychology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Grace Leung Lai","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05175822352926611,"gpt":0.2389391361095546,"spread":0.1871809125802885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001960118,0.0001020529,0.0003481394,0.00009266862,0.0001369391,0.00005145584,0.00008573417,0.00001971955,0.0001586923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006829824,0.00007088782,0.00005243767,0.00003095014,0.0002802591,0.0002648698,0.00004159229,0.0001912791,0.000008834671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001110256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009297294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008910488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003073479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999121,0.00002787351,0.0003744533,0.00007286437,0.000163125,0.0002407437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995605,0.0000835251,0.0001076396,0.00005081855,0.00008511157,0.0001124536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007395362,0.000393129,0.01010217,0.00008450152,0.0003132499,0.000316761,0.1912392,0.00000554668,0.000009946919,0.7704355,0.0166204,0.01040564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006290837,0.0005336429,0.001754765,0.00005758663,0.00002117295,0.0000426759,0.0150014,0.0000941561,9.909576e-7,0.007078028,0.9746215,0.0001650399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9112055,0.005700117,0.000001293957,0.001513376,0.0003917508,0.00004017505,0.000009072824,0.0000105978,0.08112809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842308,0.000507026,0.00001331862,0.0003607235,0.0003097967,0.000002420984,2.042821e-7,0.000007575024,0.01456818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9580011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2890722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531384980","doi":"","title":"Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (Canadian Edition)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Roxanne Porter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02816303593882678,"gpt":0.2816169343690297,"spread":0.2534538984302029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004388272,0.0001309225,0.0002208536,0.0002457822,0.0004348808,0.0002444586,0.000182954,0.00004337505,0.0008814323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005925421,0.0001083307,0.00009644933,0.0004479196,0.00007409082,0.00327938,0.00002317983,0.0002276819,0.0003888611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001066907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001778146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001188691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00666394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987662,0.00001338927,0.0004332473,0.0001122635,0.0004414519,0.0002334856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984124,0.00005835184,0.0004185715,0.0000929575,0.0009732294,0.00004450549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003651368,0.0008883029,0.005890298,0.0003990865,0.0016024,0.0007365507,0.00103448,0.003270782,0.00002171327,0.291303,0.6334855,0.06100276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003421555,0.00001850089,0.003949332,0.00003923617,0.0001145031,0.00008120463,0.001340002,0.0001079852,0.000002684824,0.0005826379,0.9932996,0.0001221657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03858812,0.003010374,0.00006197307,0.06527887,0.002330238,0.000222859,0.00001051959,0.00009028395,0.8904068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833926,0.001174621,0.0002004221,0.006879851,0.005842042,0.000009800849,0.00001017423,0.0000235832,0.002466922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9651065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173424207","doi":"","title":"International Commercial Arbitration in China: Locating the Development of CIETAC in the Context of International and Domestic Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"China; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Commission; Principal (computer security); Work (physics); International trade; Domestic market; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02791212757199301,"gpt":0.2750681242874617,"spread":0.2471559967154687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007216542,0.0001027237,0.0001989034,0.0002249246,0.00007845964,0.00009837548,0.0003261619,0.0000220136,0.00003537077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003240839,0.00005779944,0.00005031968,0.0001666645,0.0001298348,0.0009183524,0.00009433523,0.0001759289,0.000001811879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004568931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003533016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003977334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008022394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986116,0.00002640671,0.000763899,0.00007282,0.0004397322,0.00008555809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986958,0.0001509446,0.0006720937,0.00004868018,0.0004275024,0.000005008135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002465256,0.001010388,0.6399151,0.0002235969,0.0009239619,0.00001756369,0.05318361,0.0005036937,0.003999614,0.2860342,0.003073222,0.01086849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001033518,0.00003198458,0.9645654,0.000197937,0.00002459789,0.000009204432,0.01823998,0.001276198,0.000283352,0.001811598,0.01241416,0.0001120929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843976,0.0001628917,0.00005384103,0.005159802,0.0004985789,0.0001559919,0.000001211277,0.000002430613,0.009567684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979029,0.0000509061,0.0001909698,0.001621003,0.0002005338,0.000007757069,0.000005206449,0.000004875298,0.00001588951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3246502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2356993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339319031","doi":"","title":"You Can't Take the Sky from Me: A Gramscian Interpretation of the Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in Space Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Hegemony; Interpretation (philosophy); International law; Space (punctuation); Space law; Sociology; Political science; Outer space; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Greg Melchin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02772045313309172,"gpt":0.2916276520619447,"spread":0.263907198928853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003008897,0.0000884081,0.0002620492,0.00003419996,0.00006674736,0.00002171139,0.0001706379,0.00002051665,0.000005687436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002577216,0.00004781125,0.00009972454,0.0001517447,0.0001550135,0.0001679841,0.00007444643,0.0001582601,5.505841e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003869984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005912079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001160858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003385222,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990645,0.000123847,0.0003925987,0.00006171187,0.0002762321,0.00008108521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989425,0.00005851367,0.000608847,0.00013278,0.0002312591,0.00002609554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006937355,0.0007472808,0.5376004,0.00006148581,0.001593207,0.00001029608,0.2057394,0.01765685,0.006298926,0.2174193,0.003480708,0.008698368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008887527,0.001035559,0.4648944,0.00157933,0.0006389643,0.00001407298,0.3448857,0.005677367,0.04520055,0.07618426,0.05024591,0.0007563432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934303,0.0005358079,0.0002637597,0.003552683,0.0004111073,0.000135685,0.00001989327,0.00000233777,0.001648427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995534,0.000008155627,0.0001269786,0.00004042731,0.0001230613,0.000002613153,0.000002775731,0.000007024295,0.0001355451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1412351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1949686,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492725761","doi":"","title":"Throwing Caution to the Wind: The Precautionary Principle, NAFTA and Environmental Protection in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Corporation; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Environmental law; Damages; Political science; Law and economics; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Paul Guy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01896458910047785,"gpt":0.2265818589985372,"spread":0.2076172698980593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003235645,0.00008447823,0.00009883439,0.00006352745,0.00029441,0.00007577285,0.0001137073,0.00001186807,0.000008755948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006366478,0.00004712263,0.00002819893,0.0001141196,0.00004773163,0.000645884,0.00009182636,0.0001557079,0.000004686612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003765763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009544544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1004407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3501044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.00001332437,0.0002635703,0.00007775243,0.0003245145,0.000103266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996871,0.00001824101,0.0001837112,0.00005103614,0.00005203495,0.000007820099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000965381,0.0007421464,0.0796177,0.0002854228,0.001445929,0.00038507,0.008679176,0.1748316,0.007408893,0.7030784,0.01496897,0.00759137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00168817,0.000114803,0.4162368,0.000280625,0.00009324018,0.0001673228,0.009093959,0.001694793,0.0005065918,0.0061541,0.5636361,0.0003334875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716458,0.0005109833,0.00008148279,0.02540773,0.0004787383,0.0002708182,0.000002064377,0.000004728483,0.001597696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920464,0.00004827225,0.0000216593,0.007374527,0.000438125,0.000007954048,0.000001548138,0.000005385046,0.00005618576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6969243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9055495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489364563","doi":"","title":"Six Degrees of Separation: Canadian Accessory Liability in Afghan War Crimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Doctrine; Causation; Law; Torture; Commit; Political science; Liability; War crime; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; International law; Criminology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Deborah Bayley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1631688397814176,"gpt":0.4029547802337898,"spread":0.2397859404523722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001523583,0.0001042847,0.0003630978,0.0001621368,0.000284426,0.00002271709,0.0003584106,0.00006022779,0.00009366201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009601288,0.00008537791,0.0001062413,0.0002592985,0.0004778074,0.000707773,0.0000465809,0.0001856627,0.000005169767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006646665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3428597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.869171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985005,0.0001911323,0.0005293053,0.0001133101,0.000387546,0.0002781976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986981,0.000191995,0.0002969745,0.0001052677,0.0005423113,0.0001653822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003922088,0.0004065459,0.5549697,0.0001939008,0.0003866772,0.0004353162,0.3823898,0.000136735,0.0001900577,0.03989799,0.01479871,0.005802343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484491,0.0006147856,0.7298251,0.0003908111,0.0001932901,0.00002170933,0.1183887,0.000007750599,0.001189258,0.004115947,0.1442877,0.0004164066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.96176,0.00597965,0.000004931922,0.002272485,0.0005413566,0.000103506,0.00000513527,0.000007127454,0.02932579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979128,0.001152075,0.0003676911,0.00006294531,0.0001723987,0.000001964048,1.412203e-7,0.000005028779,0.0003249105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6615162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530070683","doi":"","title":"Consultations Under the WTO's Dispute Settlement System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Negotiation; Plaintiff; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute board; Settlement (finance); Law; Dispute mechanism; Order (exchange); Respondent; Element (criminal law); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Online dispute resolution; Business; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Alilovic","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02513638386793917,"gpt":0.3150890213499274,"spread":0.2899526374819883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006891147,0.00009678014,0.0002107826,0.00004540942,0.001169698,0.0001288652,0.0002721869,0.00002555489,0.0002704569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001134975,0.00005966939,0.0000790842,0.0003941955,0.0004201557,0.0002872271,0.00002553031,0.0001539871,0.00005164553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001960388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001422095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001174329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001065273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.0002445858,0.0004116848,0.00008290559,0.000529639,0.0001957625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.0003177322,0.0002361196,0.00009585739,0.0003814969,0.00007380919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002853536,0.0001099006,0.001758131,0.00002758708,0.0006938967,0.00006466358,0.03909781,0.001734361,0.000038014,0.9090968,0.04491741,0.002432883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004815408,0.00005023039,0.007430586,0.00008111415,0.0001634374,0.00004450284,0.07203802,0.000006969638,0.00005564107,0.0003980056,0.9191192,0.0001307905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4241274,0.009742178,0.0006018539,0.439418,0.003398041,0.0008228324,0.00008556549,0.0002215125,0.1215826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944316,0.0007096794,0.0001517305,0.0005168224,0.0004573827,0.000003067466,7.842926e-7,0.00001082147,0.003718127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116816638","doi":"","title":"Grassroots Capitalism or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About Financial Risk in the Exempt Market and Love Equity Crowdfunding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity crowdfunding; Seed money; Grassroots; Prospectus; Business; Equity (law); Finance; Economics; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Marco Figliomeni","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04221272740766346,"gpt":0.2959191528971964,"spread":0.253706425489533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00299032,0.0003456763,0.0006568831,0.0004693665,0.0003874805,0.001175067,0.0005832263,0.00008548202,0.00001574164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005637112,0.0002311035,0.0001443737,0.0007699646,0.000181872,0.002100166,0.0007603691,0.0006286197,0.00002660759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001201693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000405507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002429729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00146314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.00006956395,0.000607925,0.0003246909,0.0006103703,0.0005820438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981424,0.0004110313,0.0008848619,0.0002181341,0.0003114431,0.00003207928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003160141,0.0006734176,0.4237546,0.001805925,0.0005847266,0.00163014,0.01692689,0.0005530372,0.000927164,0.06219148,0.3082995,0.179493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002885866,0.0004489366,0.5556721,0.001656008,0.0002809322,0.0001742165,0.008749375,0.0004416926,0.00007926478,0.01715131,0.4113333,0.001126984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808115,0.001761056,0.0007691876,0.005227819,0.0009137084,0.0002813031,0.000006237562,0.00003062614,0.01019857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959272,0.0003269247,0.0002241783,0.001309991,0.001225476,0.000006605969,6.839292e-7,0.00003494228,0.0009440113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.178366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639780213","doi":"","title":"Gaps, Issues, and Prospects: International Law and the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Cultural heritage; Expansive; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; Industrial heritage; Underwater; Cultural heritage management; Political science; Exclusive economic zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; History; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental science","authors":[{"name":"Lowell Bautista","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0254266179827002,"gpt":0.2590668253630501,"spread":0.23364020738035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002131409,0.00007824297,0.0002087033,0.0000307645,0.0001905678,0.00006066568,0.00007050143,0.00001443273,0.0000678935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000240965,0.00004014508,0.00004292777,0.00001030997,0.001132006,0.0003343188,0.0001238775,0.0001287481,0.000001110425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000118534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005650512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004516903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003369594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994237,0.00004163513,0.0002561077,0.00006148042,0.0001368866,0.00008017815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999532,0.00003161363,0.0001590035,0.00003452134,0.0002253004,0.00001751659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004404206,0.00005992649,0.0001993069,0.00006861771,0.0004807416,0.00001422604,0.0747012,0.000004083058,0.000234595,0.9180166,0.001117113,0.004663242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001950681,0.0004346153,0.0002769428,0.00009402718,0.00007932912,0.0002722987,0.01897721,0.00003806597,0.0006657712,0.02379651,0.953293,0.0001215043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8185136,0.033174,0.00002201173,0.06528238,0.0008200287,0.0004345541,0.00002285343,0.00002486607,0.08170564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926131,0.001482202,0.0001288699,0.0003656471,0.0006399435,0.000004471367,4.664982e-7,0.000004725222,0.004760526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4170922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528086873","doi":"","title":"What’s in a Name? The Feasibility and Desirability of Naming Forced Marriage as a Separate Crime Under International Humanitarian Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Phenomenon; Law; Forced marriage; Forced migration; Sierra leone; Sociology; International humanitarian law; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Political science; International law; Refugee; Social science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Krista Stout","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05770563033119879,"gpt":0.3799258292793224,"spread":0.3222201989481236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002640004,0.0001100276,0.0003042095,0.00005272055,0.0003711772,0.0001839008,0.0003384897,0.00007379739,0.00002003064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008590597,0.00007850929,0.0000970348,0.0001184016,0.000950832,0.0008595692,0.0001345832,0.0004389851,0.000001139645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000139088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001481378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004104679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1143578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984961,0.000239256,0.0004740491,0.0001379448,0.0004516099,0.0002010543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987141,0.0003274332,0.0003221696,0.0001247295,0.0004487728,0.00006283241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000357383,0.0003724903,0.06618078,0.00005469773,0.0004014155,0.00006564495,0.1267065,0.00007753538,0.001081388,0.8035465,0.0002157598,0.000939946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002872906,0.0006534465,0.2608368,0.0003396451,0.0002098503,0.00009908582,0.3528034,0.0002863868,0.0001499326,0.3586627,0.02254475,0.0005410957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885126,0.001210031,0.000008037805,0.003831658,0.001192119,0.0001673114,0.000005288875,0.000006022079,0.005066912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998639,0.0007138769,0.0001072269,0.000278725,0.0001352624,0.000001553162,4.521291e-7,0.000004852272,0.0001190349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4448838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099982348","doi":"","title":"Does The Charter Follow the Flag? Revisiting Constitutional Extraterritoriality after R v Hape","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Law; Political science; Charter; Comity; International law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Chanakya Sethi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02177700274324962,"gpt":0.3187983158087409,"spread":0.2970213130654913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002162155,0.00008764206,0.0001520049,0.00002384387,0.00112896,0.000222967,0.0002916678,0.00004547304,0.0001001929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007356069,0.00003388298,0.0001490686,0.00007368771,0.0009975596,0.0004235488,0.00004534496,0.0003736938,0.00001065477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004987123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001767544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002937526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002941732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985679,0.000192182,0.000347809,0.00008225711,0.0006473092,0.0001625187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985097,0.0003799437,0.000308088,0.00008263218,0.0006817101,0.00003793943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001060244,0.00004609723,0.01658707,0.00001026084,0.0003104084,0.0000410442,0.01302327,0.000004642118,0.0009198646,0.9620984,0.004449388,0.002403522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002484139,0.00002989979,0.01534847,0.00006220659,0.00006188737,0.00002192356,0.003400216,0.000004513485,0.0001939879,0.00863139,0.9718929,0.000104218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905677,0.000684463,0.0001339043,0.07538241,0.01982897,0.0002048267,0.00002210668,0.00001867216,0.01315692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873496,0.000130317,0.00007996421,0.0004997717,0.01097928,0.000006987071,5.299685e-7,0.000003365101,0.0009501326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8683163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546484979","doi":"","title":"(Un)Chained Wives: Understanding the Bruker v. Markovitz Decision, and Possible Alternative Legal Claims for Jewish Women Who Are Denied a Get","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Wife; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Doctrine; Hebrew; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Political science; Psychology; Theology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Lindenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04250719309193344,"gpt":0.3305376994849445,"spread":0.2880305063930111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002231218,0.0003352431,0.0008289632,0.0001173243,0.003510106,0.0005256699,0.0005705107,0.0001367903,0.00002996431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00284945,0.0002009909,0.0002496734,0.0003466427,0.001453183,0.0009543857,0.0002929122,0.0006847341,0.000002207925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006136826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001452857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007531832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971061,0.0002280828,0.0006826296,0.0003174256,0.0009487837,0.0007170048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995819,0.001878869,0.000881996,0.0001580827,0.001011381,0.0002506152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002230047,0.0004254849,0.04593623,0.0001912975,0.006947799,0.0003301632,0.7284697,0.0001123805,0.001033636,0.135316,0.05267599,0.02633124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004491127,0.0006603893,0.03152041,0.000430579,0.0003521009,0.0000885816,0.7475944,0.0001003523,0.0001319772,0.07671114,0.1370995,0.0008195034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734553,0.004921823,0.001010627,0.01678109,0.001744248,0.0006787906,0.0000372492,0.0000369937,0.001333863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932858,0.002078451,0.001632189,0.0004848649,0.001240806,0.00004565013,5.12119e-7,0.00002824336,0.001203423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08442348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594295794","doi":"","title":"Who is harmed by fantasy? A deliberative and Charter analysis of Canada's pornography law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Law; Charter; Harm; Sociology; Legislation; Child pornography; Law enforcement; Criminal law; Political science; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Emily Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02556712861865641,"gpt":0.3228689394636592,"spread":0.2973018108450028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000309648,0.0001962159,0.0008769538,0.0003675658,0.0001221489,0.00001328692,0.0001985228,0.00009660699,0.0001479898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005255544,0.0001228153,0.0001764122,0.0004779198,0.0004797099,0.0001205648,0.0000694564,0.0001803536,8.4672e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005219876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005969294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02473211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1291664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984039,0.0001161774,0.0006540241,0.0002212667,0.0003054229,0.0002991937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984704,0.0002458382,0.0005563596,0.0002187473,0.0004134899,0.0000951328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007651202,0.0007582816,0.4366409,0.0000425212,0.04694403,0.0006480729,0.0309145,4.698848e-7,0.01072278,0.02572287,0.4236998,0.02314064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007291326,0.00270403,0.4394914,0.000227319,0.009550955,0.000382157,0.0284697,0.000003169774,0.01531248,0.00126109,0.4941365,0.001169852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845275,0.007409174,0.00005245995,0.005171518,0.0004485159,0.00007679547,0.0003121936,0.00001315432,0.001988746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967335,0.0004700766,0.00004495109,0.0008480574,0.00005298416,0.000005892729,0.000001642447,0.00001399703,0.001828897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1044343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133624854","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Role of Precedent and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Trial and Intermediate Appellate Level Charter Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Doctrine; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Adryan J. W. Toth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03883818339344456,"gpt":0.3320733023357368,"spread":0.2932351189422923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00139722,0.00007750875,0.0004177659,0.0001047988,0.0002048836,0.00006391921,0.0002172522,0.00003371626,0.00001385011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002637279,0.00003813536,0.0001254557,0.0003476285,0.0005783536,0.0001841206,0.000141913,0.0001891063,4.701181e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002359338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003916423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003374892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005258441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.0001795544,0.0005645111,0.00008405017,0.0003086579,0.000129607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985872,0.0005173327,0.0005096542,0.0001000897,0.0002461466,0.00003959198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00905258,0.0006718514,0.2218487,0.0001447042,0.01026856,0.000009757632,0.5227669,0.0006372061,0.001411892,0.07601693,0.001181473,0.1559894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04026598,0.0007973296,0.5486514,0.0003263248,0.0031873,0.00001221203,0.3230047,0.001038341,0.001116074,0.02927824,0.05177371,0.0005483716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989644,0.005180134,0.000035765,0.004073987,0.00005644101,0.0003155259,0.000008923615,0.000001713528,0.0006834946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955226,0.004195788,0.0000615141,0.00003530814,0.0001016331,0.00001103646,1.822763e-7,0.000003045574,0.0000688958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3268027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511552638","doi":"","title":"Student-on-Student Harassment: A New Paradigm for Canadian Human Rights Legislation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Law; Legislation; Complaint; Human rights; Respondent; Duty; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"William Georgas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05912060140927287,"gpt":0.4190949606743664,"spread":0.3599743592650935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001101955,0.0001926726,0.0003878123,0.0003013003,0.00222811,0.0002771269,0.0005075327,0.00008473995,0.00006129163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001772131,0.000162775,0.0001698793,0.0002992621,0.0001828238,0.0006933982,0.00003137957,0.0002439543,0.00002317236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001285872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005355792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1033165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6374114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976982,0.000146947,0.0005892855,0.000203597,0.0008671559,0.0004948353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983446,0.0002090348,0.0004663634,0.0001642513,0.0004175474,0.000398216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001254343,0.0008621665,0.0729285,0.0000187616,0.00139805,0.0002068203,0.3557943,0.00033221,0.00006514679,0.4103187,0.1536424,0.004307484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007536588,0.0003815182,0.03099347,0.00007876325,0.0001087329,0.000009620813,0.006927631,0.000001252909,0.00002510252,0.007206379,0.9533188,0.0001951285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710418,0.003448028,0.0001657362,0.03055057,0.005898266,0.001056732,0.00001089545,0.00005187416,0.08777605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888698,0.0002721957,0.0003254913,0.0003306679,0.003164911,0.00001693063,0.000003137001,0.00001788514,0.00699897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7996764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789297527","doi":"","title":"Profit Shifting by Canadian Multinational Corporations: Prospects of Reversal under Canada's Country-by-Country Reporting Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Multinational corporation; Profit (economics); Unitary state; Apportionment; Law; Economics; Business; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Oladiwura Ayeyemi Eyitayo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02240880709952163,"gpt":0.2642316486831777,"spread":0.2418228415836561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009156978,0.0002038297,0.0004437308,0.0002095949,0.000529022,0.0002098949,0.0002158585,0.00006065015,0.00006947771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002172516,0.0001751602,0.00005868174,0.0004229991,0.000189048,0.001125862,0.00006893941,0.0002334717,0.000006943864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003049393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007164238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8253309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9328747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974843,0.00001764057,0.001350967,0.000186058,0.0006539512,0.0003070442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935482,0.00007226387,0.004210936,0.0001141201,0.002008528,0.00004596019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001419832,0.0001429671,0.2765713,0.0004900742,0.0008870576,0.0001900441,0.00139702,0.0001317772,0.002633383,0.0680735,0.6478513,0.001489531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001048827,0.00006913781,0.03616917,0.0004345825,0.0001887413,0.00004239091,0.005827592,0.0004005546,0.0007362188,0.000938873,0.9536547,0.000489216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701251,0.003216021,0.0001136611,0.005401808,0.001611146,0.000374999,0.0001244457,0.00004382163,0.01898897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957632,0.00002427402,0.000360581,0.001661201,0.001228517,0.00000442069,0.00004959657,0.00002464382,0.0008835785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3058033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7142824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945093393","doi":"","title":"A Queer Critique on the Polygamy Debate in Canada: Law, Culture, and Diversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Polygyny; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Population; History","authors":[{"name":"Erin Fowler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06875747520976568,"gpt":0.3248081914181574,"spread":0.2560507162083917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116789,0.00006627418,0.0001657489,0.00003540752,0.000839228,0.00002854169,0.0001228234,0.00003026215,0.00001639061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007338927,0.00004001736,0.00002786224,0.0001268263,0.000145753,0.0002917696,0.000090507,0.0002617908,9.613173e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002610517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002077197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7012489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9676597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989634,0.0002615328,0.0001699654,0.00004795104,0.0003559018,0.0002012873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991778,0.0004695537,0.0001018532,0.00004176843,0.0001200206,0.00008905483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005529395,0.00005906757,0.2575832,0.000009698509,0.0002251464,0.00009396244,0.1501018,0.0000107888,0.00001221802,0.5689248,0.02203811,0.0008858395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005663485,0.000135671,0.282245,0.0001359357,0.0001437015,0.0000223673,0.2113002,0.000005463452,0.00005140188,0.005341223,0.4997618,0.0002908623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514157,0.005926445,0.000003265165,0.008230541,0.000479739,0.00008348007,0.000005382737,0.00000370904,0.03385177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996609,0.0009605373,0.00001282659,0.001534198,0.0001822869,9.641082e-7,1.022606e-7,0.000002553638,0.0006974961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5635836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6454748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529238904","doi":"","title":"Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expectation of privacy; Charter; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Search and seizure; Privacy law; Power (physics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Privacy policy; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Information privacy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Tipper McEwan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06641061789450314,"gpt":0.3639180378415194,"spread":0.2975074199470162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310624,0.0000741117,0.0002280983,0.00003421267,0.0004964916,0.00004791555,0.0006250963,0.00003444915,0.000006369163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001144886,0.0000319244,0.0001063414,0.0001697274,0.0009936345,0.0002457305,0.0001291682,0.0004117176,5.594434e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001487085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009807722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008212267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009308539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986732,0.0002265434,0.0003879305,0.00006618292,0.0004943765,0.0001517911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.0007764637,0.0003974178,0.0001597812,0.0002257665,0.00002536878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172688,0.0003526049,0.2023849,0.0001704549,0.0003685081,0.00002330379,0.6933301,0.0001346392,0.007302935,0.08364086,0.006387747,0.005731218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000737999,0.0002750041,0.6211196,0.0006148124,0.0003826791,0.00005527683,0.1523535,0.0000127842,0.0007495091,0.01574666,0.2077194,0.000232796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738149,0.003089989,0.000005225344,0.02113592,0.0005491449,0.0001458924,0.00000337202,0.000002129359,0.001253415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979613,0.001521987,0.00006160092,0.00009130994,0.0002358619,0.000002380964,2.704969e-8,0.000003369491,0.0001221116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5194383,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343821668","doi":"","title":"Canadian Prison Needle-Exchange Programs: Can the Health Benefits Overcome the Current Legal Barriers?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Harm; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Charter; Public health; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Adrien Iafrate","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064202084657119,"gpt":0.3714246316988311,"spread":0.2650044232331192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002305449,0.0003651193,0.0008586901,0.0002412162,0.000689159,0.000144508,0.0005232125,0.00006610766,0.00001173756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009965294,0.0001854984,0.0002175984,0.0005736605,0.0003063976,0.0002620906,0.0001670743,0.001321474,0.00001764449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001489606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003815009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06193492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3637362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965265,0.000287218,0.0008692331,0.0002411549,0.001214337,0.000861512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963935,0.0001440918,0.0006389488,0.0004516606,0.0009662113,0.001405615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005122744,0.0003136492,0.05716052,0.0003319455,0.00153997,0.0004393654,0.1952657,0.0001111931,0.000003633182,0.001403889,0.2579216,0.4849963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001709288,0.00237645,0.01156215,0.0005191838,0.0002996913,0.0005580272,0.09985487,0.00003775244,0.00001178564,0.00008584952,0.8827401,0.0002448165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6249725,0.1599893,0.000009652977,0.2076832,0.003450091,0.001411567,0.00009715369,0.00005975673,0.002326753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902257,0.003799156,0.00007981424,0.003297595,0.001723671,0.00002868508,0.000008144763,0.00005759301,0.0007796057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6248186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528975407","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dignity in Canadian and South African Gender Equality Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Disadvantage; Law; Sociology; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Foster","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05552596357015496,"gpt":0.3365089801633838,"spread":0.2809830165932288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002306886,0.0001132912,0.0003508932,0.0001133422,0.0009109704,0.0000358503,0.0003977738,0.00005869678,0.000005500577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001733834,0.00007755338,0.0000761649,0.0003797972,0.001283623,0.0002767065,0.00009831513,0.0003245112,0.000002125844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003161937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007862174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2092006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4436526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979429,0.0003644409,0.000507766,0.0001205243,0.0006188011,0.0004455305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984228,0.0004196109,0.0003744192,0.0001307368,0.0003983944,0.0002540142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639492,0.00003635238,0.3338146,0.00001023812,0.0001148617,0.00008463933,0.6570135,0.00001217699,0.00002000866,0.007487838,0.000371371,0.0009881076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004733115,0.0001530112,0.1673038,0.00005539144,0.00005979734,0.00002536703,0.2249253,0.000007598566,0.0001037364,0.006896402,0.5997213,0.0002750336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448121,0.02698683,0.000003472413,0.001794355,0.0002952465,0.0001358436,0.00002391647,0.00000826738,0.02593995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979058,0.001492666,0.000115647,0.0000494518,0.0001631621,0.000002130716,6.452598e-8,0.000006877606,0.0002642264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5993499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7960654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163197924","doi":"","title":"From en ventre sa mere to Thawing an Heir: Posthumously Conceived Children and the Implications for Succession Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ecological succession; Legislation; Law; Estate; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Warrant; Probate; Political science; Sociology; Common law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Christine Doucet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02231917713437125,"gpt":0.3173481726711056,"spread":0.2950289955367343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004700695,0.0001457598,0.0004237205,0.00002332015,0.001120251,0.0001336125,0.0003435427,0.00003912514,0.00001850131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000385878,0.00008386536,0.00007316657,0.0001212975,0.0003411725,0.0004914977,0.00009689581,0.0001839576,0.000001479303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003926627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002033606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9577745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985821,0.000278401,0.0004000163,0.0001629715,0.0002835349,0.000293015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.0008308878,0.0002156823,0.00009016675,0.0003246658,0.0001370071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000547485,0.0001521029,0.327431,0.00002517698,0.001573182,0.00001415113,0.5986028,0.0002835357,0.0007881038,0.02186779,0.02245898,0.02625566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001753257,0.00009212871,0.8550053,0.0001185659,0.0001036578,0.000005034029,0.1276137,0.000009083598,0.0000422488,0.003218318,0.01179702,0.0002417135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401137,0.003439441,0.000002796605,0.0552165,0.0001653252,0.0006673387,0.00005803353,0.00000882833,0.000328071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976603,0.0007275406,0.0002536112,0.0008425125,0.0004077261,0.00004208931,0.00000324446,0.000009050865,0.00005389238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5275742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8616174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848878169","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Fresh Water and NAFTA: Clearing the Muddied Waters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Law; International trade law; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); International trade; International law; Clearing; Water trading; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Water resources; History; Politics; Ecology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Scott Gordon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01686170981512266,"gpt":0.2602034572963276,"spread":0.2433417474812049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005070876,0.00008245116,0.0001810491,0.00002809666,0.0007796295,0.00008685835,0.0001716945,0.00002528555,0.00000946454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001160416,0.00004538327,0.00004603992,0.00005905662,0.0003199804,0.000182312,0.00005112748,0.0001659732,0.000001075337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002017902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003926805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989538,0.00007066897,0.0002349244,0.00007265787,0.0003611805,0.0003067524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999525,0.0001008821,0.0001237468,0.00005950717,0.000115784,0.00007505418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004869285,0.00001689648,0.005599837,0.00001824793,0.0002139919,0.0002978775,0.02264561,0.0001104953,0.0002191391,0.01947652,0.9501144,0.001238311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001809328,0.00002027065,0.01648361,0.00002189183,0.0000253559,0.0000211004,0.003787211,8.235576e-7,0.0002196496,0.0007478796,0.9784105,0.00008079076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8928822,0.002943618,0.000001686357,0.09530361,0.0005209878,0.00006843641,0.0000215751,0.000005745944,0.008252179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991977,0.0004342762,0.00001634665,0.001867501,0.0007357673,8.37287e-7,1.974681e-7,0.000006289496,0.004961799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09909483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5996358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527736621","doi":"","title":"Defining the Protected Groups in the Law of Genocide: Learning from the Experience of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Tribunal; Law; International law; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; War crime; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Alison Hopkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03542694991797377,"gpt":0.3293822217876631,"spread":0.2939552718696893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992994,0.00008901105,0.0001903095,0.00002679567,0.001083358,0.00008997397,0.001198459,0.00004039705,0.00003564617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001198228,0.00003491372,0.0001749878,0.00008727011,0.001020852,0.0001989705,0.0001016203,0.0005716866,5.055971e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003694872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000146259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002483026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01930057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982055,0.0002588114,0.0004655009,0.00008569733,0.000833675,0.0001507831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970597,0.001524323,0.0006416328,0.0001039859,0.0006549356,0.00001540635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001145127,0.00003199392,0.001748246,0.000003952038,0.0001133353,0.000002550595,0.1372976,0.00004281572,0.0006879167,0.8595344,0.00019522,0.0002274597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003160445,0.0006764591,0.1433006,0.0005678709,0.0003987653,0.00007711875,0.2898307,0.0001531691,0.008882043,0.2574127,0.2951073,0.0004328235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901628,0.0004063223,0.00007272215,0.005602111,0.000915933,0.0002433395,0.00001539249,0.000003145549,0.002578183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987261,0.00002887935,0.0002218907,0.0002703393,0.0005404288,0.00001937722,8.372808e-7,0.000005116216,0.0001870007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6021217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174983601","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Canada (A-G) v. S.D. Meyers, Inc., [2004] 3 F.C.J. No. 29.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Damages; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Investment (military); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Angela Cousins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0224753131167044,"gpt":0.246952587945943,"spread":0.2244772748292386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003364157,0.0001796744,0.000286966,0.0001476139,0.0003132344,0.0001707151,0.0002052154,0.00002733768,0.0002249693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001826901,0.0001406119,0.00009050043,0.0001471645,0.00006848806,0.001486935,0.0001117114,0.000177849,0.000111836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002302825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001233678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06366158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2219738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985597,0.00001378315,0.0005821991,0.0001132048,0.0005171374,0.0002140405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982401,0.00005305839,0.000545104,0.00009276012,0.001042908,0.00002610518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007747299,0.0001402368,0.0008082183,0.0000584141,0.0004407758,0.002010014,0.0001211099,0.0003276821,0.00007776166,0.08755586,0.9076704,0.0007120856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006892951,0.00002584975,0.0001233822,0.00004043494,0.00007000128,0.0004608889,0.0004521217,0.000500067,0.0000814382,0.00025161,0.9971412,0.0001637008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4299735,0.005458963,0.0001057412,0.1203052,0.007569357,0.0004694341,0.00003849456,0.0001075525,0.4359718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045447,0.00007998767,0.000318619,0.09012942,0.003663169,0.00000316049,0.00000702204,0.00001872827,0.001235222],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4745712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9425736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916515311","doi":"","title":"Balancing Privacy and the Open Court Principle of Family Law: Does De-Identifying Case Law Protect Anonymity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Internet privacy; Common law; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Right to know; Right to privacy; Sociology; Information privacy; Business; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Sujoy Chatterjee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04861317570297575,"gpt":0.3553008274656192,"spread":0.3066876517626435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560832,0.0001403804,0.0005740073,0.00004037334,0.001575897,0.0003471394,0.000588499,0.00005987985,0.000005899384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006995812,0.00007206482,0.0001216895,0.000127785,0.007574412,0.0007881713,0.0004117031,0.0002642481,8.446422e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008638498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001362865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006820756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01034938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979138,0.0005929096,0.000545589,0.0001506302,0.0004899986,0.0003070224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981005,0.0006096658,0.0006115349,0.000172402,0.000399628,0.0001063099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001435613,0.0000523499,0.001490893,0.00007340998,0.0002741737,0.0002407894,0.03109713,0.00001099096,0.0002504756,0.965452,0.000288971,0.0006252124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01053061,0.0006849943,0.001716529,0.001021006,0.0007744156,0.001402239,0.07152694,0.0001510775,0.002645087,0.1991228,0.7096224,0.0008018723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549314,0.004869739,0.004922193,0.004602842,0.001133619,0.001114004,0.00001132089,0.00003268887,0.02838218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971262,0.0007115013,0.001009068,0.0002978643,0.0004853437,0.000009369539,1.12577e-7,0.00001187275,0.0003486385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534225366","doi":"","title":"Canadian Health Law & Policy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Julie A. Godkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395744038177174,"gpt":0.4701974363972741,"spread":0.3962399960155023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002039251,0.0001411946,0.0005918517,0.0001525793,0.001066158,0.00001424349,0.0002197331,0.00009097895,0.001818749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001331999,0.00009993135,0.000103928,0.0002534141,0.000149504,0.0003196251,0.00003477796,0.001015197,0.0003991997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007072223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002983321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4361463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3949133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972323,0.0006198211,0.000967092,0.0001210754,0.0004075904,0.000652134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976596,0.0006594305,0.0004135419,0.0001827992,0.0003670154,0.0007176196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002973042,0.0002506417,0.01174354,0.0006208591,0.0006852048,0.0003876429,0.0577384,0.00002474958,0.0000103899,0.1098565,0.7663897,0.0519951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004572705,0.0002962728,0.003940817,0.0002763578,0.00002391024,0.00003024552,0.00732803,9.421797e-7,0.00000172159,0.001590271,0.9859687,0.00008544978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2767548,0.01082732,0.000003226729,0.5976331,0.001185569,0.0003573819,0.00003268666,0.0000355695,0.1131703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327077,0.005581818,0.0003447989,0.04910487,0.002693872,0.000006757748,0.000001947342,0.00002119594,0.00953699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6559529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173772894","doi":"","title":"Bringing Meaning to First Nations Consultation in the British Columbia Salmon Aquaculture Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Seriousness; Aquaculture; Supreme court; Sociology; Political science; History; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Archaeology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Mark S. Rappaport","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03386310706164827,"gpt":0.3246822346768829,"spread":0.2908191276152347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001417134,0.0001213134,0.0003374504,0.00006231509,0.004229532,0.001150542,0.0003663161,0.0001284023,0.00002820809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005350038,0.0001135904,0.0001086315,0.0008296115,0.0002502226,0.0006931122,0.00008411982,0.0006796849,0.000009135012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000490438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008135246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04822437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8711457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979109,0.0002285093,0.0005499338,0.0001563128,0.0007959467,0.000358441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979981,0.0008093407,0.0003304507,0.00006317436,0.0007060998,0.00009280363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003098459,0.000281846,0.07410128,0.00006012213,0.0004994039,0.0002150359,0.788808,0.002494089,0.00009015275,0.002912208,0.1166597,0.01384718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008028942,0.0001074162,0.1015334,0.0006139741,0.00008850826,0.00006536641,0.3220128,0.00001261828,0.00001056323,0.0001958346,0.5742596,0.0002970484],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466618,0.003219124,0.00000950206,0.0286468,0.0003682268,0.0004032894,0.000009025761,0.00003364557,0.02064853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994996,0.0009313635,0.0007789068,0.0006305893,0.0007603498,0.00001804201,7.508581e-7,0.000009665669,0.001874371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552407563","doi":"","title":"Governing the Sulphur Dioxide Emissions of Multinational Corporations: Putting the Breaks on the Race-to-the-Bottom","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Race to the bottom; Multinational corporation; Harm; Greenhouse gas; Race to the Top; Race (biology); Global warming; Corporate governance; Environmental law; State responsibility; Politics; Political science; Business; Law; Climate change; International law; Sociology; Globalization; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Maren Zimmer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03130295072663826,"gpt":0.3190632385508857,"spread":0.2877602878242475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003463809,0.0001231746,0.0001963113,0.00004753362,0.003183041,0.0001549785,0.0008301685,0.00004159277,0.00007810519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008567471,0.00005059864,0.0001174621,0.0006826261,0.0007020296,0.0002314063,0.0001393349,0.0007682621,0.00001758971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006528143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002830743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002108597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003266645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976957,0.0004376458,0.0005114396,0.0001079671,0.001044147,0.0002030532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946106,0.003390775,0.0008496557,0.0002217103,0.0008640795,0.00006317503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004225971,0.0002011405,0.01632879,0.00001032886,0.0004745362,0.00001398204,0.09763595,0.002032648,0.006593423,0.8002557,0.0729451,0.003466212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003690651,0.00007462743,0.09651715,0.0001263386,0.0001341715,0.00003892943,0.03987487,0.00006095016,0.001143074,0.001844146,0.8596646,0.0001520455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3574946,0.000552198,0.0001768821,0.6356055,0.001446282,0.0004330681,0.00002212438,0.00002453276,0.00424482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995707,0.0001116026,0.0005235009,0.001164684,0.0009847005,0.000007876915,5.710869e-7,0.0000144212,0.001485637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7984115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130495","doi":"","title":"All Convictions Are Not the Same: Rethinking CUPE’s Abuse of Process Doctrine in Cases Involving Plea Bargains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Plea; Rebuttal; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Warrant; Innocence; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Lara Kinkartz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1048256228253378,"gpt":0.3827937724761825,"spread":0.2779681496508447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00226936,0.0001304256,0.0004286488,0.0001168455,0.0006032761,0.00007764151,0.0004118235,0.000054206,0.000008460421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003628365,0.00008704844,0.000118227,0.0003335444,0.000518956,0.0005503396,0.00006370142,0.000340054,0.00000189042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001181134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001392663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003625999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03894025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980351,0.0003020612,0.0006043976,0.0001315747,0.0006452534,0.000281666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971268,0.001378027,0.0006517081,0.0001267139,0.0006442807,0.00007248722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004446008,0.0005161703,0.120957,0.0004753385,0.0005564733,0.0003627407,0.7882245,0.001800132,0.0007305008,0.07684541,0.007299018,0.001788157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00209395,0.0008834529,0.07208332,0.004077545,0.0007037728,0.0003160503,0.584707,0.0001878188,0.002030996,0.01897947,0.3130704,0.0008661865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816528,0.003219141,0.000017619,0.01300872,0.0004903594,0.0001239148,0.00000364511,0.00001553407,0.001468301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954193,0.003294792,0.00009695066,0.0006640315,0.0004028611,0.000004025826,2.058811e-7,0.000008656556,0.0001092337],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3057714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516282538","doi":"","title":"The Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Is the Inconsistent Application of the European Union Biotechnology Directive’s Moral Exclusion Clause Undermining Investor Confidence in Europe, Providing a Competitive Advantage to the United States?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Patentability; European union; European commission; Legislation; Parliament; Convention; Law; Commission; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; International trade; Intellectual property; Biology; Politics; Patent law","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Donnelly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1314218278115191,"gpt":0.2663411164857857,"spread":0.1349192886742665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002884888,0.0001721501,0.0002872765,0.0001609463,0.0006814398,0.00005212186,0.0007733993,0.00003403704,0.000002678421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002800482,0.00007308795,0.00008589264,0.0009448674,0.0005761014,0.0002616418,0.0008766467,0.0004131149,0.000005199116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007123546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003427179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001597704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001655062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980541,0.0005946015,0.0006704916,0.0001734475,0.0003063864,0.0002009199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975322,0.0002555171,0.001047638,0.0003141273,0.0008398572,0.00001060223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004225233,0.003137696,0.3430824,0.002526818,0.003251631,0.0001761221,0.2446039,0.003896429,0.1652831,0.1556545,0.007359481,0.06680264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004211324,0.001997199,0.289698,0.004365829,0.001081169,0.00007936973,0.4546163,0.006347301,0.1200969,0.005482859,0.1106645,0.001359253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936205,0.000417803,0.0002016716,0.003320738,0.0002682551,0.0006290236,0.000004940565,0.00001451551,0.001522622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.0002739917,0.00001261044,0.0005889498,0.00006079286,0.000007941116,9.545498e-7,0.0000176032,0.00006623082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2100125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5241153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}