{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":95,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":95,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"b4007ccb13d4","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W3123409510","doi":"","title":"International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":301,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Law; Third world; Sociology; Political science; History; Economic history","authors":[{"name":"Graham Reynolds","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04254255933461592,"gpt":0.2609358282391206,"spread":0.2183932689045047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095786,0.00040576,0.0004869966,0.002399375,0.00281299,0.01074701,0.0005947041,0.002922222,0.007870624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00225346,0.0002154632,0.0002830248,0.005685764,0.008189702,0.007475523,0.002419652,0.004189696,0.001430817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005888556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009318743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02365595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03165565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99902,0.0003232616,0.00003844981,0.00007416045,0.000378795,0.0001653351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990662,0.0004407149,0.0001115844,0.0000506191,0.0001904789,0.0001404423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007111487,0.00003397058,0.0005575513,0.0002214899,0.000006246583,0.00008986501,0.004504863,0.0002361441,0.00009539123,0.6508668,0.2595775,0.08380306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003346095,0.00001224642,0.00194933,0.001357176,0.000005364942,0.00009987532,0.003299188,0.0000827851,0.00006134104,0.1035767,0.8895414,0.00001114682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003718139,0.570826,0.001311191,0.09765201,0.002842914,0.00002811836,0.00009480421,0.00004606164,0.3234808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1729102,0.5939828,0.0009048887,0.02424964,0.005470402,0.0001518903,0.0002426295,0.0001270625,0.2019605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02365595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04703653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531009826","doi":"","title":"The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Robbie Moser","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03918575256515755,"gpt":0.379507126859882,"spread":0.3403213742947245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01840707,0.0008792136,0.001554804,0.003666383,0.004169268,0.01020807,0.003543547,0.009347276,0.003077206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02374094,0.0006765804,0.001049338,0.004402922,0.05340924,0.0220229,0.004487238,0.01265313,0.001802796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006518484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01064649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004759139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004581162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795965,0.01297237,0.0007781181,0.001122911,0.004775168,0.0007550555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825016,0.01363633,0.0009953782,0.0009553388,0.001589973,0.0003213609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003402966,0.000004066635,0.00002066768,0.00008561247,0.000002428379,0.00001974926,0.0007013818,0.00009093831,0.00001574647,0.9808258,0.01272498,0.005505093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008695488,0.00001257949,0.00008183577,0.0003592412,0.000002830998,0.00006228367,0.00042931,0.0001898883,0.0000401478,0.8583738,0.1404309,0.000008407614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002579884,0.3312763,0.0722812,0.377559,0.007789312,0.0001168059,0.00007417973,0.0001010882,0.2082223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3110627,0.3488549,0.07876837,0.1160419,0.04098858,0.001570274,0.000236058,0.0004959599,0.1019812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01840707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09734702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340946344","doi":"","title":"Following Digital Media into the Courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court Principle in the Information Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Publicity; Publication; Economic Justice; Democracy; Narrative; Social media; Freedom of the press; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Shauna Claire Hall-Coates","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05299997535309214,"gpt":0.3500924784065506,"spread":0.2970925030534585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061269,0.0003123346,0.0004007767,0.001977915,0.02443881,0.03356571,0.002112527,0.007656305,0.007820195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02270611,0.0006515721,0.0003417377,0.002116486,0.08087966,0.01830798,0.0136436,0.008552555,0.0009192313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02103061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02053965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1332678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1467856,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834383,0.00967506,0.0005234427,0.001532066,0.003005269,0.001825782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801198,0.01409119,0.001235,0.001640806,0.001549953,0.00136323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009011716,0.00001482766,0.0003652818,0.00002226171,0.000002774463,0.000184428,0.02671942,0.0001222434,0.0001100301,0.9618065,0.00285093,0.007792203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004130513,0.0000602122,0.002820343,0.0007216095,0.00003152011,0.0003068284,0.0661407,0.0008759461,0.001304719,0.5956943,0.3318705,0.0001319657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07639804,0.003482663,0.01459327,0.09383985,0.0003800415,0.00005845371,0.00007113473,0.00008351431,0.811093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720561,0.0009479083,0.001300691,0.005631207,0.0001697306,0.0000466749,0.00001214941,0.00003209308,0.01980349],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1332678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2649843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545063720","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-Decision-Making Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Legislation; Guardian; Paternalism; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Sarah Burningham","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0310029482683927,"gpt":0.3772667542394297,"spread":0.346263805971037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004890339,0.0004819099,0.0003363223,0.002475809,0.01304568,0.006474694,0.002787195,0.003071704,0.01185634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009443963,0.0003609319,0.0006282851,0.003425633,0.01100736,0.001745352,0.002776841,0.003717832,0.0005051435],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.221988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2772956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991949,0.0006667376,0.0002773084,0.001019336,0.004058536,0.002029125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881048,0.001759639,0.0004517335,0.0003497087,0.007125996,0.002208067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002938794,0.00003064039,0.00680732,0.0001613132,0.00001387902,0.0005356303,0.0140431,0.0006084386,0.0002604232,0.8597099,0.06452178,0.05327827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001258007,0.00001629023,0.01444481,0.0003379348,0.00002403441,0.0001984394,0.003285336,0.000711296,0.000202437,0.01436156,0.9663272,0.00007816992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.08300807,0.03166967,0.008366282,0.1229947,0.001588836,0.0002535053,0.001489347,0.0002657592,0.7503638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7403721,0.02030253,0.01205402,0.02986412,0.0005129114,0.0001169537,0.0006986129,0.000117591,0.1959611],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749212531","doi":"","title":"Stories of 0s: Transgender Women, Monstrous Bodies, and the Canadian Prison System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Transgender; Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Gender studies; History","authors":[{"name":"Allison Smith","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02995210207593185,"gpt":0.29853962858674,"spread":0.2685875265108081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003236328,0.001098741,0.0006404098,0.002578431,0.07266212,0.01136872,0.003689472,0.005125971,0.005171655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007048577,0.0006750295,0.0005493642,0.002805524,0.04595716,0.005724351,0.009219592,0.008587572,0.000387051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1207221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07400392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939632,0.001985734,0.00007475707,0.0003522388,0.001254458,0.002369651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996114,0.001016399,0.0002655967,0.0001272034,0.0009624913,0.001514268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003194277,0.00001525429,0.002317518,0.0000588313,0.00000738312,0.001318255,0.9375557,0.00007587576,0.0002052794,0.02863058,0.02374086,0.006042424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003860844,0.00001533945,0.00283474,0.0001645015,0.00001295643,0.0004208882,0.8741347,0.00007777687,0.0001095323,0.001649413,0.1205221,0.000054133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6237186,0.01437042,0.001055142,0.1665976,0.001709729,0.00009908395,0.000510614,0.0001070156,0.1918318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970177,0.003481581,0.0002648084,0.007915009,0.0001172054,0.00002768941,0.00006080192,0.00005009592,0.01790591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1207221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8759044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152849106","doi":"","title":"The Story of Jane Doe: A book about rape","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Drew Mildon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03192146707410422,"gpt":0.3366811567286839,"spread":0.3047596896545797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003531594,0.0007542508,0.0006074564,0.001162284,0.002932613,0.003112455,0.0008484893,0.002800697,0.02034689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002539138,0.0003752125,0.0002839524,0.001865225,0.002150702,0.003062307,0.001265008,0.003355996,0.006771665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002468287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004142636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0301541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09374768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994942,0.0001272767,0.00001795254,0.0000334802,0.0002735908,0.00005352958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991012,0.000437121,0.00007380101,0.000028788,0.0002280238,0.000131089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004889802,0.000003720912,0.00004005725,0.0001255496,0.000002757776,0.0001379628,0.001182271,0.00001960952,0.00006568188,0.002452412,0.9817376,0.01422748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001173135,0.000004929095,0.0002132816,0.000358936,0.000003207949,0.0003789303,0.0009533878,0.000006169171,0.00003751291,0.0006964064,0.9973418,0.000004266997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001252657,0.6392453,0.0008869402,0.1091595,0.01564044,0.00006355409,0.0004127387,0.0001589412,0.2331799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02073392,0.3403578,0.001339439,0.0518119,0.007733266,0.0001002052,0.0005280972,0.0002959295,0.5770995],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0301541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06806707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125497815","doi":"","title":"Autonomous Weapons Systems: Taking the Human out of International Humanitarian Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Adversary; Geneva Conventions; Law; Political science; International law; Convention; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"James Foy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05581112191346898,"gpt":0.2957282492508475,"spread":0.2399171273373785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009956512,0.0004174171,0.0003429913,0.001532889,0.005764721,0.01424645,0.002277592,0.01009995,0.008376357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01337361,0.0003723573,0.0004856747,0.00121648,0.03347059,0.01775069,0.007915881,0.007821645,0.001502853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006560793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01409411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01891637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01894416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993202,0.002539658,0.0003120119,0.0007284178,0.002415918,0.000802057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924717,0.003874905,0.0006847557,0.001131232,0.001107732,0.0007296767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002578086,0.000005618013,0.0000900126,0.00002205814,0.000001230649,0.00003937575,0.0009142603,0.0001602444,0.00006684678,0.9791186,0.01104906,0.008530202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001187019,0.00002813986,0.0002971631,0.0003345467,0.000006854133,0.0001274864,0.002558514,0.001118856,0.0004253625,0.6363857,0.3586771,0.00002838367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009402564,0.006853463,0.0708821,0.2279603,0.001886472,0.0001174885,0.0001041813,0.0003358663,0.6824577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.665145,0.01242967,0.06278398,0.09806219,0.002776896,0.0004797344,0.0002242442,0.0002753283,0.157823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01891637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0526557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529607162","doi":"","title":"Uncertain Territory: Family Reunification and the Plight of Unaccompanied Minors in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Refugee; Immigration; Legislation; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Convention; Best interests; Immigration law; Minor (academic); Convention on the Rights of the Child; Family law; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Alison Luke","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03172936707329431,"gpt":0.3190165483207383,"spread":0.287287181247444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009573874,0.0001893473,0.000329559,0.0008022116,0.02328402,0.002965093,0.001505281,0.001096215,0.003530697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003640915,0.0002003824,0.0002458006,0.001104474,0.006921659,0.001015678,0.003453837,0.002337276,0.0001037449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04865443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06654233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984612,0.0001804331,0.00003331113,0.00008659043,0.000216699,0.00102169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976555,0.0002082507,0.0003296044,0.00005057694,0.0004559358,0.001300094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119254,0.0001598806,0.2574005,0.0001023278,0.00003532946,0.007038772,0.6393961,0.0004152828,0.0006720126,0.03229579,0.01589342,0.04647131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001108876,0.00005464241,0.1137998,0.000195056,0.00001687133,0.001394182,0.8527398,0.0002305847,0.0001620804,0.00149393,0.02985511,0.00004693135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764236,0.0008458089,0.00005914225,0.009470275,0.00006328375,0.00001787544,0.0000523329,0.000003835586,0.01306378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962832,0.0005575723,0.00003525606,0.0005384443,0.000006724541,0.000002920828,0.0000146535,0.000002326339,0.002558787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04865443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3530142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528019720","doi":"","title":"Risky Business: A Review of Dual Class Share Structures in Canada and a Proposal for Reform","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Corporation; Common stock; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Institutional investor; Corporate structure; Voting; Accounting; Business; Corporate law; Agency cost; Dual (grammatical number); Finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Cipollone","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05390135005255746,"gpt":0.2931138911210068,"spread":0.2392125410684493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006646179,0.0007034973,0.00136595,0.011837,0.006510691,0.008908592,0.003801401,0.004580097,0.003901381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01827737,0.0005894545,0.00105305,0.02235407,0.01248214,0.004438099,0.002320946,0.004461936,0.0003836727],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1591931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3213036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.970104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9763821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934937,0.0005663167,0.0003578844,0.0005359493,0.003835049,0.001211131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979736,0.004739824,0.001353877,0.000385535,0.01114139,0.002643414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008248971,0.0001097269,0.005046038,0.008421814,0.00008819254,0.0006706789,0.005128883,0.0009531809,0.00031804,0.3989632,0.1895927,0.3906251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000211617,0.00002994912,0.01598364,0.01382458,0.00008341629,0.0002715549,0.002358571,0.0003261821,0.0001327882,0.01190718,0.9549801,0.00008091294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003119631,0.9163114,0.0004750431,0.05343409,0.00157771,0.00004138978,0.0002174033,0.00002131624,0.02480206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05393033,0.9176016,0.0009515724,0.02097059,0.001103083,0.00004873075,0.0002001976,0.00002896932,0.005164842],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1591931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9752168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516859696","doi":"","title":"Sex Trafficking from Thailand to Japan: Human Beings or Illegal Goods?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Sex trafficking; Human trafficking; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Law; Order (exchange); Criminology; Business; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Kara Patterson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04094101819058774,"gpt":0.3426702433908624,"spread":0.3017292252002747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008940277,0.0002226508,0.0001959181,0.0007507932,0.00427661,0.005050482,0.0003066314,0.001770372,0.006690439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001598212,0.0001539794,0.0001221601,0.0008261679,0.01478635,0.004583435,0.001747475,0.001176143,0.0003802409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001955716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003942501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02875784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03964235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993439,0.0003422499,0.00003074186,0.0000449372,0.0001028532,0.0001353236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990219,0.0003959733,0.0002294727,0.00006660646,0.0001356113,0.00015043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006144635,0.0000943947,0.01620995,0.0007054202,0.00001571735,0.006291653,0.3901578,0.0001808031,0.0009784509,0.4645294,0.02524549,0.09552938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009681654,0.000112683,0.01681726,0.001704455,0.00002854677,0.003504542,0.6379676,0.0002642621,0.0007272004,0.045597,0.2932196,0.00004702713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.439369,0.04305631,0.002362116,0.1608624,0.001444397,0.00006360526,0.0001413469,0.00003864268,0.3526622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409932,0.02495365,0.0006535765,0.006756023,0.0004495719,0.000023727,0.0000445113,0.00002009598,0.02610568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02875784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792288245","doi":"","title":"Ethics, Legal Professionalism and Reconciliation: Enacting Reconciliation Through Civility","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Law; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Harassment; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Healey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2484231277062361,"gpt":0.4922463388024223,"spread":0.2438232110961862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03334583,0.0005357956,0.0004965033,0.002227959,0.02894679,0.01905325,0.002626902,0.006343717,0.002521686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02453285,0.0005174645,0.0004691609,0.001415839,0.1083954,0.01035838,0.01685002,0.01028735,0.0003413785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0411699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1227563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2079693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2995701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9587013,0.02794757,0.0007780975,0.001520984,0.005771351,0.005280835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822118,0.01014141,0.001640475,0.001502339,0.002599099,0.001904774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005065786,0.00002053916,0.0004803464,0.00006445814,0.000004733293,0.0002532588,0.2045641,0.0002785574,0.0001813167,0.7788733,0.002753312,0.01252102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001615201,0.00003124586,0.00182677,0.0005361688,0.0000162063,0.0004110394,0.2252807,0.001063368,0.001275136,0.4496264,0.319857,0.00005978765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1165663,0.006584059,0.07442245,0.206226,0.0006924784,0.0003698498,0.00003668398,0.0001558926,0.5949462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962932,0.001120756,0.01392883,0.006421122,0.00006773495,0.0001124988,0.00001311853,0.00004991038,0.01535403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2079693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4135175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1910688488","doi":"","title":"A Dangerous Step Backwards: The Implications of Conditional Permanent Resident Status for Sponsored Immigrant Women in Abusive Relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Domestic violence; Government (linguistics); Residence; Immigration law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Jurisprudence; Institution; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Pam Hrick","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07167891146118106,"gpt":0.358519669594341,"spread":0.2868407581331599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002940109,0.0001904487,0.000212356,0.0006896799,0.01629494,0.004413099,0.001402476,0.003259778,0.004701883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009860833,0.0002036513,0.000489976,0.0009134297,0.01184042,0.002990606,0.004365223,0.003855217,0.000228435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02023228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4078829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6682995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973388,0.001269902,0.00005742887,0.0001282334,0.0002587067,0.000946913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953164,0.002241912,0.0007584158,0.0001512417,0.0004752869,0.001056685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001401322,0.0002047386,0.1631714,0.0001998381,0.00004111636,0.008258742,0.5900465,0.0002505924,0.000600628,0.145342,0.02353085,0.06821349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009741496,0.00007459373,0.07897054,0.0007143894,0.00004347774,0.00113273,0.8829348,0.0001484634,0.0001996144,0.00958342,0.02614016,0.00004809615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7732987,0.002980425,0.0002299129,0.1699462,0.000294406,0.00003598557,0.0000625458,0.000006783499,0.05314497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983668,0.002436577,0.0001271295,0.01005013,0.00008513049,0.000017648,0.00001687235,0.000005862251,0.003592573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5921171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8110175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W897471759","doi":"","title":"HIV and Shared Responsibility: A Critical Evaluation of Mabior and DC","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Autonomy; Harm; Obligation; Law; Criminal law; Supreme court; Sexual assault; Political science; Criminology; Confidentiality; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Kevin Rawluk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07367276692934686,"gpt":0.4010684395194092,"spread":0.3273956725900623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07837827,0.000821811,0.001101633,0.004950078,0.02516288,0.02152698,0.003469917,0.01088607,0.006126976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0643574,0.0004332528,0.00102986,0.002616054,0.07105502,0.0194662,0.01377993,0.01581369,0.0003035291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05690638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07352283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05563508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08272187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9518088,0.03535694,0.001114158,0.001912217,0.00681931,0.002988633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.913759,0.06635083,0.001340633,0.002300187,0.01332246,0.002926948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002858705,0.00002030867,0.0002990951,0.0002545157,0.0000112898,0.00009998043,0.00963806,0.00009659102,0.00002289558,0.9635322,0.01084522,0.0151512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001166946,0.0001516664,0.00116183,0.006147083,0.0001691371,0.0003298639,0.08587734,0.0008983485,0.000496972,0.5266918,0.377869,0.00009018683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01973439,0.05942611,0.009861773,0.5999416,0.004746254,0.000664317,0.00006167818,0.00003248777,0.3055314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456779,0.02070956,0.006158008,0.107912,0.001890233,0.001064459,0.00003010662,0.00007592689,0.01648191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07837827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4145089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548292026","doi":"","title":"Compelling War Correspondents to Testify: A Prerogative of International Criminal Tribunals?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Privilege (computing); Law; Tribunal; Witness; Political science; Legitimacy; Criminal procedure; Confidentiality; Sociology; Business; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer S. Jones","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04074360226860753,"gpt":0.3659157563073452,"spread":0.3251721540387377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01695446,0.0005327417,0.0006537327,0.0009506874,0.01654058,0.01793649,0.002803153,0.02320042,0.007822933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05067167,0.0007876134,0.0007716369,0.0006454096,0.01516697,0.008591982,0.01370637,0.01941692,0.001393013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003013661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01002904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01127577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02381983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835223,0.00466931,0.0007811057,0.001846499,0.002546467,0.006634449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759218,0.01280766,0.001764869,0.002695918,0.002537508,0.004272282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002739481,0.0004362422,0.01381031,0.0001792023,0.00006344261,0.006751763,0.07486539,0.0003068976,0.006034567,0.7307774,0.07351444,0.09298637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001677443,0.001180466,0.02727736,0.001094121,0.0001776922,0.00415739,0.1217988,0.001270141,0.008259755,0.1132223,0.7209812,0.0004129983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2226818,0.004192615,0.007649774,0.3411086,0.003941382,0.0002235849,0.00003442127,0.0001987175,0.4199691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757286,0.0006846779,0.001517914,0.07851852,0.0008373646,0.00009236419,0.00001785923,0.00003852215,0.04256422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02320042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08966476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767010817","doi":"","title":"'The Melancholy Truth': Corrective and Equitable Justice for Omar Khadr","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Harm; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Appeal; Order (exchange); Proposition; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Faith; Repatriation; Law and economics; Remedial education; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Stobo Sniderman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05605805057015369,"gpt":0.3831973261374007,"spread":0.327139275567247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01012671,0.0002756902,0.0005377836,0.0008325462,0.02481911,0.01122031,0.001377136,0.01054179,0.003433469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01443667,0.0003135686,0.0003249993,0.0006291386,0.02629399,0.003997139,0.00519254,0.01113184,0.0003660889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01789955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03197239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2528425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4193631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914186,0.002706632,0.0003586963,0.0006243159,0.00261159,0.002280178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946035,0.002390121,0.0005728155,0.0004147489,0.001414757,0.0006041083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005178536,0.00005501609,0.001849775,0.0001191872,0.00002021749,0.001042489,0.02412248,0.0002864867,0.0006669508,0.9198889,0.03323752,0.01865901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009110674,0.0001298333,0.01171292,0.0009412895,0.0001080849,0.001509425,0.0946144,0.001117273,0.002773931,0.3471257,0.5395694,0.0003066344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1349662,0.01406092,0.004083205,0.6162264,0.002455362,0.0001409193,0.00008925116,0.00009243342,0.2278853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399727,0.001539579,0.001835661,0.04198379,0.0003457532,0.00001793914,0.00001204437,0.00002018896,0.01427242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7471576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5027415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344828161","doi":"","title":"Edward Snowden: Hero or Traitor? Considering the Implications for Canadian National Security and Whistleblower Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Law; National security; Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Mark W. Friedman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1241615815569067,"gpt":0.3764097731773454,"spread":0.2522481916204387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483657,0.0004047937,0.0005169984,0.001679248,0.0402559,0.01258376,0.002647476,0.00888382,0.005768013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01284866,0.0004090908,0.0003911796,0.002558732,0.02409794,0.00518338,0.0033108,0.008853273,0.0003283097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1168045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948531,0.0007702425,0.0001042579,0.0005705672,0.001873614,0.001828268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921885,0.003239883,0.0002968563,0.000237253,0.002853717,0.001183804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001742229,0.00001603705,0.001957543,0.0000536147,0.000005873188,0.0007449068,0.03299464,0.0002048702,0.0001698638,0.833314,0.1227081,0.007813092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003020397,0.0000245902,0.005814087,0.0006096982,0.0000345972,0.0003397652,0.09111478,0.001082095,0.0004040164,0.1062744,0.7941025,0.0001692837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05825035,0.01142262,0.001235148,0.6150247,0.001520772,0.00006006962,0.0001421354,0.00004530653,0.3122989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7611198,0.01157535,0.001865245,0.1228792,0.0004647591,0.00004600663,0.00008176703,0.00006704545,0.1019008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7417997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529612912","doi":"","title":"When All Else Fails, Blame the Parents: An Analysis of Parental Responsibility Laws in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Poverty; Moral responsibility; Political science; Legal responsibility; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michelle G. Roy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04361686647031889,"gpt":0.3376268931768372,"spread":0.2940100267065183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131731,0.0003145033,0.0004830716,0.00482146,0.01798462,0.004722857,0.002360175,0.001550005,0.004032711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01561324,0.0004480437,0.0007064975,0.009605699,0.003486286,0.000916635,0.002021438,0.002472801,0.000201702],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1512469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2096111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926816,0.0004117934,0.0001924442,0.0002907705,0.003186578,0.003236891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847566,0.002751893,0.002140246,0.0003395206,0.007265866,0.00274574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002121521,0.0004307377,0.6888046,0.0002666931,0.0001587943,0.003732311,0.1287164,0.002680603,0.0005152277,0.08375745,0.03037837,0.06034672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003344397,0.00005020563,0.8108064,0.0004057075,0.0001217701,0.0003818405,0.1325141,0.0022995,0.0002821861,0.001669878,0.05133393,0.0001010064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.932848,0.002614201,0.0002751154,0.006069758,0.00004580544,0.0002095264,0.001162841,0.00001906518,0.05675564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907782,0.002080265,0.0002177336,0.0007829605,0.000009167442,0.00002894757,0.0004710506,0.00001474456,0.005616819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1512469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793194118","doi":"","title":"When Google Becomes the Norm: The Case for Privacy and the Right to be Forgotten","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Charter; Right to be forgotten; Personally identifiable information; Globe; Jurisdiction; Norm (philosophy); Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Data Protection Act 1998; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Belbin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04989791015890382,"gpt":0.3422379807863614,"spread":0.2923400706274576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02253745,0.0003578837,0.0008410833,0.00196456,0.01707959,0.03017333,0.003155693,0.03871463,0.00469899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05748716,0.0006915728,0.000997216,0.002998597,0.07760286,0.0367833,0.01120168,0.02382817,0.001231924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009456805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02251272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05729309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03864975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9637229,0.01356753,0.001549749,0.003935921,0.01146346,0.005760401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656146,0.02168003,0.002897207,0.004448221,0.003460309,0.001899642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000173325,0.00001321908,0.0007578474,0.00002849862,0.000004523548,0.0003528457,0.0106832,0.0000550499,0.00006965314,0.9676369,0.01538056,0.005000343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002696526,0.00002606498,0.001283704,0.0006077294,0.00002281275,0.0007678226,0.02218483,0.0003790196,0.0004834259,0.6936308,0.2804812,0.0001057059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0464822,0.004592618,0.003827841,0.665951,0.001020275,0.00005083497,0.0001262469,0.00006697181,0.277882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8233115,0.003155405,0.001874259,0.1382967,0.001342497,0.0001068768,0.00007806531,0.0001464935,0.03168811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05729309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1191908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530321078","doi":"","title":"Dual Citizenship and Forced Marriages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); International law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Human rights; Phenomenon; Power (physics); Political science; Forced migration; Forced marriage","authors":[{"name":"Alison Symington","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05587629666437637,"gpt":0.3436201593320794,"spread":0.287743862667703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002404357,0.0001530948,0.0003503616,0.001095899,0.005356082,0.003196212,0.0005536162,0.001603102,0.005570958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007743693,0.0001824678,0.0002609312,0.0006074961,0.02102942,0.003006157,0.008567812,0.001986106,0.0002469318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001426164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002022812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005134518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006387657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995936,0.001850537,0.0001295919,0.0003740165,0.0005437202,0.001166039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970493,0.001006136,0.0006689726,0.0002369111,0.0002092989,0.0008293143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003445833,0.00007963234,0.01826454,0.00003624396,0.000008155073,0.001945846,0.1172635,0.00008098964,0.0001833923,0.8363118,0.002043886,0.02374742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004663162,0.0001570847,0.02594627,0.0005344315,0.00002790727,0.008329452,0.2550112,0.0007455184,0.0005922527,0.5664511,0.142092,0.00006613899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8089426,0.002933304,0.002993207,0.01782992,0.0003034373,0.00002322411,0.00003854877,0.00001782483,0.1669178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957709,0.0002919844,0.0001201286,0.0003707244,0.00002917627,0.00000748812,0.000005390868,0.000002591475,0.003401665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005570958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0186367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524468930","doi":"","title":"Of Mice and \"Man\": Patentability of Genetic Material and the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Patent law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Adam L. Crane","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07132463815187216,"gpt":0.2311163816889268,"spread":0.1597917435370546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007559602,0.0004322529,0.0005457443,0.001004376,0.001929724,0.005592027,0.000773442,0.003239575,0.006089915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008877059,0.0002519519,0.000443036,0.0007230089,0.02907871,0.006811808,0.002062149,0.004148725,0.0005597974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003074327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003924061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01020937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01523931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966505,0.001747761,0.0001122237,0.0003826407,0.0007967566,0.0003101315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944246,0.00320482,0.0009530314,0.0008446934,0.0003262153,0.0002466972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000523033,0.00000989337,0.0006685905,0.00004196588,0.000009646189,0.0001193197,0.0009763807,0.00008997306,0.0007972833,0.9786699,0.002903498,0.01566111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398746,0.0001421691,0.004089674,0.000330837,0.00003686328,0.0007625873,0.001224371,0.0003674712,0.00251005,0.7408141,0.2496459,0.00004197099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08804531,0.0645447,0.06103708,0.2101864,0.002416671,0.00009858631,0.0003054723,0.0002926249,0.5730731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655599,0.02200995,0.01639628,0.03522676,0.001263326,0.0001291497,0.00006938465,0.00008131996,0.05926377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01020937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03997946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414595098","doi":"","title":"Comfort Women in Japan and Korea","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Comfort women; Pleasure; Human rights; Law; World War II; Political science; Work (physics); International law; Sociology; Gender studies; History; Psychology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Grace Leung Lai","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05175822352926611,"gpt":0.2389391361095546,"spread":0.1871809125802885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000860368,0.0003556403,0.0002823591,0.000686703,0.01227575,0.004838948,0.0004203517,0.001607085,0.005713891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009017122,0.0003847866,0.0001806677,0.001110418,0.007530452,0.003762267,0.006150715,0.002183664,0.0002967358],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005285835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004748398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03934911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1065562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.0001557879,0.00002723343,0.00009039047,0.00005376234,0.0004514858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994134,0.00005354792,0.0001486482,0.0000209659,0.00004783977,0.0003154945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001963768,0.00009682462,0.04816628,0.0002995455,0.00002821675,0.006955807,0.7547754,0.00007961181,0.002919168,0.1580875,0.008396176,0.01999901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000331837,0.00009778688,0.04443646,0.0002230786,0.00004165636,0.001265323,0.7321358,0.00009757448,0.0004690613,0.004208116,0.2169274,0.00006463163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.937867,0.00288908,0.0001223715,0.007532878,0.0001583051,0.00002145876,0.0000297993,0.000008182166,0.0513709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844111,0.001127099,0.00006943987,0.00220459,0.00003445229,0.00001484991,0.00001784479,0.00001140962,0.01210909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03934911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07824016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531384980","doi":"","title":"Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (Canadian Edition)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Programming language","authors":[{"name":"Roxanne Porter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02816303593882678,"gpt":0.2816169343690297,"spread":0.2534538984302029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003011695,0.001269247,0.001175644,0.003074124,0.004464521,0.007012749,0.002408716,0.003206569,0.06860729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005478313,0.0008891709,0.0008452266,0.007836383,0.004947178,0.005207552,0.002557925,0.002951831,0.02367951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02067959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0576646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4634487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5292782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962528,0.0005483624,0.0001808602,0.0002839589,0.002309282,0.0004247012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977183,0.0005211263,0.0001093505,0.000159197,0.001296877,0.0001951655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002105426,0.00002011368,0.0001612881,0.00107555,0.00001149445,0.0001249644,0.00100367,0.000392753,0.000196683,0.06858075,0.7685799,0.1598318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000298938,0.000005010951,0.000207128,0.0004709437,0.000005350311,0.0000815389,0.0002068548,0.00002984448,0.00005537508,0.008269755,0.9906554,0.000009724002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004491081,0.4765876,0.008896621,0.02027904,0.005034178,0.0002773802,0.001867212,0.0004920526,0.4861168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02218068,0.4510592,0.01431454,0.006028374,0.002299955,0.0004278475,0.001775041,0.0003827246,0.5015317],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4634487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9215022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173424207","doi":"","title":"International Commercial Arbitration in China: Locating the Development of CIETAC in the Context of International and Domestic Factors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"China; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Commission; Principal (computer security); Work (physics); International trade; Domestic market; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jeff Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02791212757199301,"gpt":0.2750681242874617,"spread":0.2471559967154687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002782961,0.0002280342,0.0002704972,0.004340589,0.004031867,0.00634805,0.0007406246,0.0005707706,0.002925698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004059409,0.0002319041,0.0002137457,0.007273274,0.006008099,0.002779061,0.002786178,0.001192709,0.0001328493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01281397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01764935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06978428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09494135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984414,0.0002961411,0.0001076022,0.0001730951,0.0003792745,0.0006024662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967839,0.0006888845,0.0007971391,0.0002289866,0.0008001926,0.0007010671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001064761,0.00009620805,0.3587733,0.0002034275,0.00003203718,0.002094529,0.05701314,0.0009805528,0.001758878,0.4741178,0.003474111,0.1013494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001805427,0.0001422301,0.8602762,0.0002999727,0.00003282968,0.0006347008,0.04329307,0.004584,0.001525071,0.02052971,0.06858329,0.00008084643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.907719,0.001631914,0.0004383871,0.002208049,0.00002087357,0.00005733479,0.00005249101,0.00001362639,0.08785845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974523,0.0003398353,0.0002064938,0.00005592639,0.000005893518,0.00000871426,0.00001936698,0.000002326733,0.001909161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06978428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1387562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339319031","doi":"","title":"You Can't Take the Sky from Me: A Gramscian Interpretation of the Common Heritage of Mankind Principle in Space Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Hegemony; Interpretation (philosophy); International law; Space (punctuation); Space law; Sociology; Political science; Outer space; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Greg Melchin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02772045313309172,"gpt":0.2916276520619447,"spread":0.263907198928853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002704028,0.00031673,0.0002990014,0.00110448,0.008804847,0.008033917,0.001087662,0.005717153,0.003004189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003558677,0.0002341546,0.000276808,0.001508204,0.03790161,0.006445192,0.003754909,0.005528287,0.0004061127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01143982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006974032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04274692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04118206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976102,0.001060815,0.00005133097,0.000269852,0.0005355026,0.0004722179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990205,0.0005659841,0.0001182601,0.00006590688,0.0001510796,0.00007819907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002592946,0.000003250422,0.00005652682,0.000004236521,4.276813e-7,0.00003371285,0.002456458,0.00005114845,0.0000197399,0.9933436,0.00289194,0.001136333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001579007,0.00001173153,0.0006670826,0.00008172238,0.000004227377,0.0000495981,0.004354076,0.0004791109,0.0001460619,0.8798978,0.1142753,0.00001743744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06517731,0.009214866,0.01132334,0.1901066,0.0008805599,0.00003697503,0.00008537959,0.00006841731,0.7231066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933484,0.00246332,0.002052793,0.02055516,0.0006486197,0.00006117266,0.00003268503,0.00005225155,0.04065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04274692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08499622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492725761","doi":"","title":"Throwing Caution to the Wind: The Precautionary Principle, NAFTA and Environmental Protection in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Corporation; Law; Economics; Arbitration; Environmental law; Damages; Political science; Law and economics; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Paul Guy","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01896458910047785,"gpt":0.2265818589985372,"spread":0.2076172698980593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002209537,0.0003164939,0.000390085,0.001803839,0.02730727,0.01351272,0.00180148,0.007493678,0.003837568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008445535,0.0004791054,0.0004818621,0.002975377,0.01276283,0.002844247,0.002350712,0.00760139,0.0002223067],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1485263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2532026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954655,0.0003556263,0.000117279,0.0003619114,0.001928006,0.001771755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969366,0.001076979,0.0001907178,0.00007627421,0.001335563,0.0003838395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002349539,0.00001899911,0.004756741,0.00008041084,0.00001779193,0.0006021962,0.008190404,0.0007704382,0.0002077571,0.9071236,0.06578893,0.0124192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005561833,0.00003209605,0.02597785,0.001005831,0.0001392257,0.0003596591,0.02433317,0.002338814,0.0008198198,0.1030729,0.8416231,0.0002419173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08658244,0.04227172,0.001552089,0.2779201,0.001108721,0.0001122,0.0004470723,0.00005282476,0.5899529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8054243,0.02421875,0.002223138,0.05488275,0.0003046822,0.00006732903,0.0001836009,0.00004689291,0.1126485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1485263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489364563","doi":"","title":"Six Degrees of Separation: Canadian Accessory Liability in Afghan War Crimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Doctrine; Causation; Law; Torture; Commit; Political science; Liability; War crime; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; International law; Criminology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Deborah Bayley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1631688397814176,"gpt":0.4029547802337898,"spread":0.2397859404523722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001193153,0.0002929055,0.000370676,0.002127797,0.02426152,0.004569904,0.001485744,0.002061354,0.00501358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006298062,0.0003191431,0.0003699631,0.003117607,0.01285977,0.001673888,0.007728778,0.004916978,0.0001799613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05832256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06760949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9765989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964091,0.0002937129,0.00009479263,0.0002563764,0.001030603,0.00191546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970451,0.0003979451,0.0004613288,0.0001128712,0.0007727779,0.00120999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670828,0.0001328368,0.08904789,0.0001274202,0.00003833814,0.005112458,0.1325038,0.0007414993,0.0005781015,0.6865002,0.02848159,0.05656873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001051165,0.0001139723,0.3235996,0.0007889685,0.0001819678,0.007172256,0.2696949,0.002169122,0.0007896399,0.07827009,0.3167627,0.0003516917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7440417,0.002723802,0.000660997,0.0202205,0.0001472466,0.00007745357,0.0002099908,0.00001422427,0.2319041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902887,0.0008329524,0.0001794303,0.001589188,0.00002175998,0.00001103102,0.00005226084,0.000007793034,0.007016892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05832256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4231617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530070683","doi":"","title":"Consultations Under the WTO's Dispute Settlement System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Negotiation; Plaintiff; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute board; Settlement (finance); Law; Dispute mechanism; Order (exchange); Respondent; Element (criminal law); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Online dispute resolution; Business; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Robert Alilovic","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02513638386793917,"gpt":0.3150890213499274,"spread":0.2899526374819883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03057192,0.0003886961,0.0006907699,0.001029775,0.01205414,0.01137122,0.002008387,0.01039621,0.006339913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04227622,0.0005030934,0.0005742115,0.002204598,0.01389221,0.006696717,0.009444169,0.008243716,0.001326879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008585551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01789251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01188789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01179887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9232195,0.04612738,0.003642316,0.003085572,0.01880453,0.005120658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739875,0.01700574,0.002869014,0.001860178,0.003028403,0.001249184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005018693,0.00002405991,0.0005372549,0.0001277117,0.00001006217,0.000618688,0.01020122,0.001010155,0.001316298,0.9467437,0.01687859,0.02248213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001087773,0.0001294925,0.002835329,0.0007290622,0.00003559336,0.001159806,0.01011315,0.004796423,0.00203706,0.4344014,0.5434477,0.0002061329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06904282,0.005590695,0.1116336,0.1523016,0.001984278,0.0009502515,0.0005204412,0.000403006,0.6575732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789751,0.002521328,0.03591874,0.01835632,0.00114271,0.000841471,0.0001933366,0.00009366486,0.06195731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03057192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1616817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116816638","doi":"","title":"Grassroots Capitalism or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About Financial Risk in the Exempt Market and Love Equity Crowdfunding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity crowdfunding; Seed money; Grassroots; Prospectus; Business; Equity (law); Finance; Economics; Market economy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Marco Figliomeni","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04221272740766346,"gpt":0.2959191528971964,"spread":0.253706425489533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006547892,0.0003491412,0.0003318008,0.0006834483,0.01095466,0.01232024,0.001420311,0.005972231,0.0130434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01198602,0.000233947,0.000410179,0.000436428,0.03269266,0.01229114,0.004939656,0.009056008,0.00276119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01588932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01979108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.129437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.198167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961932,0.001071764,0.00008829249,0.0004859562,0.00127255,0.0008882418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943304,0.00160707,0.0003423823,0.000679681,0.001318315,0.001722218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002917398,0.00004640537,0.001326602,0.0001011744,0.000009655872,0.0003542942,0.01319741,0.000180037,0.0004331855,0.6769119,0.2537085,0.05370157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001464763,0.00002823302,0.000676464,0.0002868052,0.000006940085,0.0001608138,0.006865201,0.0002463013,0.0003467314,0.1196573,0.8716795,0.00003109598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01190801,0.007623869,0.00719965,0.7424896,0.003444252,0.00006837903,0.00008104304,0.0001533657,0.2270318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.449166,0.009153292,0.008903211,0.2387315,0.002368371,0.00009907784,0.00008068842,0.0002801858,0.2912177],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.129437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2573671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W639780213","doi":"","title":"Gaps, Issues, and Prospects: International Law and the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Cultural heritage; Expansive; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; Industrial heritage; Underwater; Cultural heritage management; Political science; Exclusive economic zone; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; History; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental science","authors":[{"name":"Lowell Bautista","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0254266179827002,"gpt":0.2590668253630501,"spread":0.23364020738035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008541088,0.0003337252,0.0004498053,0.002555392,0.009267878,0.02026089,0.001838891,0.0101605,0.009830979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373521,0.0002956029,0.0003652136,0.005026219,0.03073108,0.01908077,0.006624543,0.008154836,0.0006268349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01135796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02040995,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04027229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04913174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965263,0.001513113,0.0001458686,0.0003232975,0.0007242311,0.0007671731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934323,0.004319892,0.0005649843,0.0003060287,0.0008042963,0.0005723871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006665371,0.00002686431,0.0005557452,0.00007669473,0.000001738937,0.0001237277,0.00401874,0.0000963769,0.00004388791,0.967414,0.01222128,0.01541433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001104218,0.00003489156,0.003499337,0.002211364,0.00001661864,0.0003218577,0.05958102,0.0004938,0.000300354,0.4120733,0.5214012,0.00005536552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02061347,0.06870497,0.002246129,0.5073039,0.001784527,0.00002731611,0.00007494161,0.00002867385,0.3992161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7639297,0.08386693,0.003211349,0.08949343,0.004208572,0.0001149514,0.0001365873,0.00004332942,0.05499512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04027229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08240807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528086873","doi":"","title":"What’s in a Name? The Feasibility and Desirability of Naming Forced Marriage as a Separate Crime Under International Humanitarian Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Phenomenon; Law; Forced marriage; Forced migration; Sierra leone; Sociology; International humanitarian law; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Political science; International law; Refugee; Social science; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Krista Stout","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05770563033119879,"gpt":0.3799258292793224,"spread":0.3222201989481236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04473418,0.0007053877,0.001250778,0.002123124,0.01515282,0.01990071,0.004417777,0.01502287,0.002700248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1232696,0.0005431825,0.0007972064,0.001694178,0.07436048,0.02811252,0.01045588,0.01644514,0.0008371734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005687773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009070034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01467878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9368086,0.04432008,0.002577983,0.004633118,0.008892707,0.002767558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222444,0.05054324,0.009062295,0.005585539,0.01016015,0.002404393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004403878,0.00004840328,0.005119521,0.0003287166,0.00002757054,0.0006192908,0.08131536,0.0001496252,0.000398451,0.8721836,0.01266614,0.02709932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004104531,0.0002555265,0.007639642,0.004390666,0.0001304705,0.002847622,0.2454414,0.001433536,0.002066965,0.3150336,0.4203996,0.0003199547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.135716,0.01922616,0.02414062,0.6152543,0.0137414,0.0001720943,0.00009750367,0.000123821,0.1915281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781601,0.005608294,0.007689579,0.09220497,0.004898342,0.0002399633,0.00005670745,0.0001298486,0.01101234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04473418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2365798,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099982348","doi":"","title":"Does The Charter Follow the Flag? Revisiting Constitutional Extraterritoriality after R v Hape","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Law; Political science; Charter; Comity; International law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Chanakya Sethi","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02177700274324962,"gpt":0.3187983158087409,"spread":0.2970213130654913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01364575,0.0004454904,0.0007880834,0.0009670983,0.01677371,0.0157199,0.003106053,0.01730899,0.00577975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03638524,0.0007102641,0.0006581239,0.001352656,0.03823785,0.01172128,0.005014964,0.02871314,0.0007841144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03543114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05111104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6399537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7039471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9872106,0.002763476,0.0004132037,0.002424814,0.00350718,0.003680713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866205,0.006605552,0.0003970813,0.001460873,0.003901026,0.001014891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006782945,0.000005481128,0.0001442742,0.00001889384,0.000002815425,0.00009822164,0.002209087,0.0001135711,0.00005512342,0.9713199,0.02277766,0.003248315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003747161,0.00003820557,0.0008882725,0.000385128,0.00002702938,0.0001138506,0.004315381,0.0007672303,0.0006956749,0.3034567,0.6891046,0.0001705109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02960118,0.009002583,0.0166285,0.4518792,0.008872374,0.0001665373,0.0002881731,0.0002224566,0.4833389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6552511,0.003713232,0.004648548,0.2202536,0.003375735,0.0001500278,0.0001193194,0.0003333362,0.1121551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3600463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7243334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546484979","doi":"","title":"(Un)Chained Wives: Understanding the Bruker v. Markovitz Decision, and Possible Alternative Legal Claims for Jewish Women Who Are Denied a Get","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Wife; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Doctrine; Hebrew; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Political science; Psychology; Theology; History; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Lindenberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04250719309193344,"gpt":0.3305376994849445,"spread":0.2880305063930111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373685,0.0002437722,0.0003020827,0.0008257287,0.009714914,0.006031726,0.001403708,0.009586141,0.006081257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007568396,0.0003079045,0.0004808329,0.0006398387,0.01345791,0.003780515,0.003080126,0.00630714,0.0004264473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007717767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00742166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1133574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1902368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998128,0.0006074392,0.00004168708,0.0002165253,0.0003347529,0.0006716766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983612,0.001002241,0.0001225088,0.0000950046,0.0001712088,0.0002478137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001330931,0.000006292518,0.0004774362,0.000003295659,0.000002023525,0.0002893103,0.001609397,0.0001637625,0.00004659951,0.9943715,0.001573912,0.001443084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006832147,0.00004602266,0.001894836,0.0001559041,0.0000255457,0.0003833739,0.008480211,0.003865679,0.0003734877,0.9207628,0.06388263,0.00006118307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.245731,0.003341347,0.0125911,0.1352212,0.0003797741,0.0001093787,0.0001406389,0.00004865852,0.6024369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626368,0.0006807377,0.001177581,0.01297742,0.0001335785,0.0000461107,0.00002012791,0.00001433334,0.0223132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2253951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594295794","doi":"","title":"Who is harmed by fantasy? A deliberative and Charter analysis of Canada's pornography law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Law; Charter; Harm; Sociology; Legislation; Child pornography; Law enforcement; Criminal law; Political science; The Internet","authors":[{"name":"Emily Hansen","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02556712861865641,"gpt":0.3228689394636592,"spread":0.2973018108450028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004598733,0.0003244297,0.0002916355,0.00217108,0.02645183,0.01223157,0.001697998,0.003673924,0.003187534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01248844,0.0003021729,0.0003179031,0.002242714,0.03808282,0.004784516,0.003882462,0.004942216,0.0001605504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08521444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08365286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9464105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9477959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934267,0.001828768,0.000121085,0.0004901261,0.002472326,0.001660998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992077,0.003982434,0.0006865741,0.0003852522,0.002156941,0.0007119595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006594491,0.00001118089,0.001617703,0.00001495084,0.000002288569,0.0001987877,0.06748687,0.0001804975,0.00006303364,0.9193366,0.005275902,0.005805547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002189911,0.00002360272,0.01553398,0.0003816118,0.0000323625,0.000317961,0.251508,0.002569084,0.0009897779,0.2968052,0.4317144,0.0001020094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2472605,0.003965961,0.01083171,0.1080239,0.0002825071,0.0002028152,0.0003366482,0.00007469611,0.6290212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744768,0.0005778609,0.001219284,0.002015448,0.00002136505,0.00003011409,0.00003988526,0.0000189295,0.0216004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08521444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.618277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133624854","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Role of Precedent and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Trial and Intermediate Appellate Level Charter Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Doctrine; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Adryan J. W. Toth","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03883818339344456,"gpt":0.3320733023357368,"spread":0.2932351189422923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02117781,0.0002730273,0.0007058948,0.00268815,0.008929106,0.01766422,0.002792496,0.005964593,0.003100108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03105376,0.0005237248,0.0009499286,0.002501556,0.03732703,0.01259167,0.006123744,0.01088041,0.0003354983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02699237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07369599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847948,0.006841921,0.0008046168,0.001480006,0.003707179,0.002371466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797266,0.01394667,0.001799522,0.001639154,0.002109806,0.0007782473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002567469,0.000003250845,0.0002017766,0.000006784834,9.796094e-7,0.00009480974,0.001312694,0.0002153488,0.00002568993,0.9967372,0.000299306,0.001099661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001880589,0.00002993406,0.001590327,0.0002635035,0.00001902971,0.0001352827,0.004940138,0.003258776,0.0003150316,0.9560794,0.03329938,0.00005032445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1736694,0.005354905,0.1924624,0.06037655,0.000851977,0.0003869536,0.0002707049,0.0001264332,0.5665007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663823,0.0009244735,0.01852403,0.002584198,0.0002370532,0.00010252,0.00004814103,0.00003231502,0.01116498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07369599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1465341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511552638","doi":"","title":"Student-on-Student Harassment: A New Paradigm for Canadian Human Rights Legislation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Law; Legislation; Complaint; Human rights; Respondent; Duty; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"William Georgas","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05912060140927287,"gpt":0.4190949606743664,"spread":0.3599743592650935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007912115,0.0006713971,0.0008367778,0.004865242,0.03548753,0.02300172,0.004894163,0.01188157,0.008106384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01219135,0.0006367247,0.001280844,0.004259677,0.04199509,0.009393295,0.00652449,0.01332572,0.0005805173],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1823954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2272737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865019,0.002990125,0.0003124118,0.001307447,0.005202253,0.003685894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927127,0.001746571,0.000291134,0.0003938459,0.003454545,0.001401138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007210671,0.00000879627,0.0005115812,0.00003083281,0.000003412069,0.0001358157,0.006231708,0.0001678425,0.00008698622,0.9774176,0.009483688,0.005914485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004880371,0.00004415933,0.004643173,0.0006162458,0.0000508027,0.0003609237,0.02494864,0.001930229,0.000259467,0.334011,0.6328773,0.000209287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01834044,0.008777621,0.01437477,0.3698827,0.00167926,0.0001971222,0.0001656894,0.00008125485,0.5865012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.722431,0.01478686,0.02680355,0.1053758,0.0009517848,0.0003811828,0.0001671705,0.0001397555,0.1289629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1823954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789297527","doi":"","title":"Profit Shifting by Canadian Multinational Corporations: Prospects of Reversal under Canada's Country-by-Country Reporting Rules","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Multinational corporation; Profit (economics); Unitary state; Apportionment; Law; Economics; Business; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Oladiwura Ayeyemi Eyitayo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02240880709952163,"gpt":0.2642316486831777,"spread":0.2418228415836561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01363601,0.0003999713,0.0004425822,0.00215832,0.01150238,0.01344643,0.003097035,0.002834715,0.001932508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03471974,0.0004575677,0.0008017443,0.002751501,0.003866553,0.002454758,0.002479406,0.003802471,0.000224079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09591309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2741895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9799731,0.00120127,0.0007773808,0.0008439866,0.01245027,0.004753999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546108,0.005075187,0.002631886,0.002074835,0.0331738,0.002433374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002731243,0.0002116255,0.08159202,0.0002537797,0.00009413008,0.001520214,0.01154639,0.007773621,0.002367314,0.5602382,0.1380144,0.1961151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002558949,0.0002689434,0.2361818,0.0009958934,0.0004064572,0.0007420137,0.02533928,0.01990426,0.009186726,0.03576433,0.670075,0.0008793151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4830814,0.006300665,0.008036776,0.1386275,0.001241996,0.0005637611,0.001318016,0.0003055562,0.3605243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315286,0.003836786,0.008818912,0.01151475,0.0001332958,0.00007272317,0.0006076023,0.00004866922,0.0434386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09591309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945093393","doi":"","title":"A Queer Critique on the Polygamy Debate in Canada: Law, Culture, and Diversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Polygyny; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Population; History","authors":[{"name":"Erin Fowler","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06875747520976568,"gpt":0.3248081914181574,"spread":0.2560507162083917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004249161,0.0006069133,0.0008032638,0.003024191,0.04578591,0.0125164,0.004224461,0.008656327,0.006509156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008908482,0.000418464,0.0006220182,0.005326983,0.04516335,0.004421156,0.004042455,0.01314938,0.0003364811],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1446259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1889158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948018,0.0008625365,0.00009170994,0.0005761422,0.001845903,0.001822018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938226,0.002291632,0.0002445839,0.000200872,0.002286919,0.001153484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002025591,0.00001338137,0.001736738,0.00005623654,0.0000123187,0.0003324699,0.02540001,0.0002252626,0.00008313474,0.8785034,0.07930425,0.01431249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006070808,0.00001973282,0.01387063,0.001114185,0.00006263886,0.0002898898,0.04523972,0.0009211242,0.0002386862,0.1816334,0.7563851,0.0001641283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02944124,0.03050513,0.001609538,0.6885767,0.001612165,0.00004346975,0.0003250548,0.00004640243,0.2478404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018653,0.02372071,0.001621293,0.1913435,0.001682146,0.00008018006,0.0001538841,0.0001047211,0.07942817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1446259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529238904","doi":"","title":"Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expectation of privacy; Charter; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Search and seizure; Privacy law; Power (physics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Privacy policy; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Information privacy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Tipper McEwan","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06641061789450314,"gpt":0.3639180378415194,"spread":0.2975074199470162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002474592,0.0002864474,0.0004222725,0.000710078,0.01450804,0.00889315,0.001822798,0.009743274,0.003162935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981634,0.0004297888,0.0005894374,0.0006875572,0.01802813,0.002963887,0.002952821,0.007560958,0.0004408085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02810894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03589573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8092948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7998736,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956465,0.0008723685,0.00009557192,0.0004337433,0.001283965,0.001667749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981748,0.0008495669,0.00009358918,0.0001695486,0.0004822015,0.0002303221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144489,0.000005151575,0.0002305723,0.0000131562,0.00000325984,0.0003025859,0.002847329,0.0001656514,0.00005214933,0.9813156,0.01305037,0.001999723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007056775,0.00005631498,0.004170514,0.0009124855,0.0000669021,0.0004734057,0.01397975,0.001838825,0.0008585359,0.5373143,0.4401219,0.0001364596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06146384,0.01273083,0.004671739,0.1103328,0.0006099343,0.000102722,0.0002204734,0.00009591153,0.8097718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542441,0.002635291,0.001623392,0.05320067,0.0002157657,0.0001006798,0.00004885258,0.00004983607,0.08788135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1907052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3836565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343821668","doi":"","title":"Canadian Prison Needle-Exchange Programs: Can the Health Benefits Overcome the Current Legal Barriers?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Harm; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Charter; Public health; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Adrien Iafrate","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064202084657119,"gpt":0.3714246316988311,"spread":0.2650044232331192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007720488,0.000605526,0.000858027,0.002938325,0.005572918,0.004407677,0.002659447,0.002806783,0.007660374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03759542,0.0002679287,0.0008787262,0.0044819,0.00326144,0.002747936,0.001551986,0.00258904,0.0003048091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07777754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2365794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933891,0.001432994,0.0002016638,0.0002776888,0.003643597,0.00105493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830456,0.004267474,0.00136686,0.0003132334,0.00895415,0.002052759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005189381,0.0003172247,0.04225744,0.01309389,0.0005277278,0.0006502458,0.005934455,0.0009225601,0.000376612,0.09399251,0.2059008,0.6355075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005295197,0.0004961955,0.2088358,0.03095435,0.001850793,0.0004987096,0.01828716,0.001081796,0.0006307603,0.01735418,0.7191296,0.0003511497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03283836,0.4062868,0.0004519419,0.4756883,0.00174794,0.0002309689,0.001641228,0.00004285599,0.08107164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4760829,0.4351671,0.002850414,0.0751105,0.001339024,0.0001484455,0.0008576976,0.0000301323,0.008413814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07777754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5643182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528975407","doi":"","title":"The Role of Dignity in Canadian and South African Gender Equality Jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Disadvantage; Law; Sociology; Gender equality; Political science; Gender studies","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Foster","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05552596357015496,"gpt":0.3365089801633838,"spread":0.2809830165932288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01388838,0.0005542983,0.0009192803,0.0053413,0.03488421,0.01291998,0.002425146,0.006445613,0.003273001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02829936,0.000519897,0.0006538707,0.004012299,0.05822023,0.005773523,0.007994652,0.008854521,0.0001752282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1246364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.919198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9832704,0.003598751,0.0006139154,0.001389471,0.007012174,0.004115276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859495,0.007125715,0.0006170057,0.0004366445,0.004398988,0.001472135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001887747,0.000006301434,0.0009121063,0.000129608,0.00000802975,0.0003690455,0.03750559,0.0001328258,0.0002371705,0.9412066,0.003122331,0.01635159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004402367,0.00005139698,0.01126769,0.003185307,0.00009587094,0.000813318,0.08643366,0.0005645028,0.001358797,0.263182,0.6327239,0.0002795042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1039804,0.05946862,0.007223925,0.2185762,0.00190503,0.0001469103,0.0001454259,0.00004298712,0.6085106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496184,0.01084474,0.003010369,0.01578325,0.0001484497,0.00005662248,0.00002788357,0.00003378871,0.02047651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8906397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163197924","doi":"","title":"From en ventre sa mere to Thawing an Heir: Posthumously Conceived Children and the Implications for Succession Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Ecological succession; Legislation; Law; Estate; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Warrant; Probate; Political science; Sociology; Common law; Business","authors":[{"name":"Christine Doucet","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02231917713437125,"gpt":0.3173481726711056,"spread":0.2950289955367343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004169102,0.0002320605,0.0004193394,0.001011849,0.03606136,0.00948673,0.002994927,0.00414814,0.005206233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009181644,0.0003912195,0.0003708174,0.001777172,0.01932402,0.002030451,0.005148413,0.00679337,0.0001702238],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1522195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2957742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948121,0.0005589462,0.0001283004,0.0003555809,0.001192346,0.002952693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941655,0.001688102,0.0005852286,0.0001264057,0.001501335,0.0019334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894328,0.0001165046,0.04872932,0.000152005,0.00002658781,0.003460401,0.1245148,0.000858258,0.0008346888,0.7599922,0.02975007,0.03148625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334292,0.0001843469,0.137645,0.001397982,0.0001340124,0.001920892,0.4265626,0.002716877,0.001973651,0.06051749,0.3664045,0.000409256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6723602,0.006910006,0.001204389,0.1211891,0.0003805319,0.0001403062,0.0002979637,0.00002850682,0.1974891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652667,0.002139997,0.0006427291,0.01254713,0.00003870912,0.00002327335,0.00004195077,0.00001142881,0.01928821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1522195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848878169","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Fresh Water and NAFTA: Clearing the Muddied Waters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Law; International trade law; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); International trade; International law; Clearing; Water trading; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Water resources; History; Politics; Ecology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Scott Gordon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01686170981512266,"gpt":0.2602034572963276,"spread":0.2433417474812049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001616109,0.0002044966,0.0002752752,0.001147198,0.02139398,0.009743412,0.001384886,0.00421505,0.004302876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004405637,0.0002433521,0.0002888223,0.002033067,0.01206307,0.002864536,0.002573749,0.003864303,0.000215844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08410329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1808606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970931,0.0003005071,0.00005535228,0.0002564249,0.00139848,0.0008961931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982362,0.000462975,0.000101733,0.00005703638,0.0008187506,0.0003233634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002433783,0.00001358107,0.003343864,0.0001200035,0.0000165713,0.0006824732,0.01872491,0.0004939974,0.0004542579,0.8542947,0.09075343,0.031078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118085,0.00001169156,0.004999305,0.0003079082,0.00002561563,0.0001124393,0.0200106,0.0003666863,0.000455825,0.02942688,0.9442129,0.00005831589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1003657,0.02710641,0.002555543,0.37767,0.00140458,0.00007500205,0.0004741784,0.0001074248,0.4902412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8100911,0.01481325,0.00336082,0.05618434,0.0001992963,0.00004842762,0.0002080913,0.00005343988,0.1150411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08410329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6102149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527736621","doi":"","title":"Defining the Protected Groups in the Law of Genocide: Learning from the Experience of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Tribunal; Law; International law; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; War crime; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Alison Hopkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03542694991797377,"gpt":0.3293822217876631,"spread":0.2939552718696893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01269911,0.0008862477,0.0004905866,0.001300347,0.01919713,0.01168158,0.002190857,0.005901508,0.003188237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01767585,0.000714844,0.0004241776,0.001110812,0.03156793,0.02020814,0.009099795,0.01632161,0.0009895321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007119338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006649984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01300169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03110208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900146,0.007887172,0.0001483909,0.0003183905,0.0005785036,0.001053029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991154,0.006335162,0.0005631658,0.0003603271,0.0006568371,0.000930628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000242443,0.00006810819,0.001463637,0.0001857967,0.000005851753,0.0007190278,0.8410971,0.000148778,0.0004382922,0.08465315,0.03724531,0.03395077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009141569,0.00008201005,0.001817807,0.001226969,0.00000861302,0.0007432809,0.6261767,0.0001169052,0.0004357297,0.02265601,0.3466853,0.00004155191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2412653,0.0617486,0.01050354,0.4891118,0.0055274,0.0001551026,0.00006344937,0.00007319183,0.1915517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8827791,0.03827519,0.004896044,0.03418354,0.001659773,0.0001440253,0.00007191027,0.0002274461,0.03776304],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01919713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06716013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174983601","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Canada (A-G) v. S.D. Meyers, Inc., [2004] 3 F.C.J. No. 29.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Damages; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Investment (military); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Angela Cousins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0224753131167044,"gpt":0.246952587945943,"spread":0.2244772748292386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001474125,0.001269881,0.000644855,0.001406625,0.02102297,0.005756809,0.00371632,0.03441578,0.01795016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005591489,0.0009130647,0.001281304,0.001932942,0.00302186,0.002299095,0.001298944,0.01709068,0.003119534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03431388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05178765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9443955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9697545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970915,0.0001364618,0.00008570393,0.0004244297,0.001097557,0.001164303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982784,0.0005250833,0.00008192519,0.00003875282,0.0008518023,0.0002241328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005291304,0.0000388726,0.001863602,0.00006007228,0.00001914387,0.001376562,0.002000992,0.0001947135,0.0003601314,0.03243496,0.9575917,0.004006311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008660293,0.00003537904,0.007656357,0.0002921071,0.00009188114,0.0007422693,0.005361279,0.0005890816,0.0009115756,0.005727845,0.9783161,0.0001894134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01505905,0.004272293,0.0009301963,0.7106335,0.005296054,0.0002953437,0.003922681,0.0002801403,0.2593107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05667289,0.002594553,0.0007320862,0.7035875,0.001162156,0.0001909782,0.0009405218,0.00008771456,0.2340316],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05560452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2489659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916515311","doi":"","title":"Balancing Privacy and the Open Court Principle of Family Law: Does De-Identifying Case Law Protect Anonymity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Internet privacy; Common law; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Right to know; Right to privacy; Sociology; Information privacy; Business; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Sujoy Chatterjee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04861317570297575,"gpt":0.3553008274656192,"spread":0.3066876517626435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02970009,0.0003606917,0.0008483491,0.001697494,0.008090151,0.01264496,0.002238109,0.009273281,0.003792755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0571896,0.0004409014,0.0009520439,0.001558126,0.05249823,0.02456136,0.009746565,0.007933635,0.0005397075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005356638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008584224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005429242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003717508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9678128,0.02006231,0.0009620589,0.002456186,0.005609559,0.003096986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957155,0.03321465,0.003000775,0.003940092,0.001641473,0.001047975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009697089,0.00001624519,0.000498416,0.00002116528,0.000007435356,0.0001478461,0.003773991,0.0001419389,0.00005151075,0.9863715,0.001384215,0.007576068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001537058,0.00002093561,0.0005699016,0.0002242622,0.00001576249,0.0003152805,0.002701391,0.0003157607,0.0002252551,0.9608089,0.03476501,0.00002207482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08796427,0.01153274,0.1101631,0.4196772,0.001322797,0.0001430251,0.0001264573,0.00007515234,0.3689953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511613,0.003930033,0.009156172,0.02503626,0.001434453,0.0001516336,0.00003529551,0.00004245271,0.009052435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02970009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.157071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534225366","doi":"","title":"Canadian Health Law & Policy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Julie A. Godkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07395744038177174,"gpt":0.4701974363972741,"spread":0.3962399960155023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526059,0.0009709709,0.0007061636,0.004738735,0.007327692,0.007373154,0.001799625,0.00454694,0.1297897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005092706,0.0007118515,0.000605819,0.007450986,0.002363182,0.001565139,0.001273869,0.002208555,0.02347918],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08434179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1858039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996873,0.0001519392,0.00006226394,0.0002000699,0.002181351,0.0005314411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971528,0.0001791125,0.00004914599,0.0001039111,0.002033836,0.0004812208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001510544,0.000002535337,0.00004217877,0.00005130075,0.000001199466,0.000009653319,0.00004113754,0.00002847792,0.00000983615,0.0115184,0.9776883,0.01060543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001495783,9.661701e-7,0.0003775017,0.00008667741,0.000001558644,0.000006451318,0.00006009331,0.00001706965,0.000006432267,0.0009290872,0.9985078,0.000004812297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003253412,0.06179583,0.0003225643,0.08178005,0.007151769,0.0001511108,0.00663987,0.0002592233,0.8415742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008808482,0.04121188,0.0009661459,0.01693707,0.001249634,0.0001126509,0.002704561,0.0001408264,0.9278687],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9156582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173772894","doi":"","title":"Bringing Meaning to First Nations Consultation in the British Columbia Salmon Aquaculture Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Seriousness; Aquaculture; Supreme court; Sociology; Political science; History; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Archaeology; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Mark S. Rappaport","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03386310706164827,"gpt":0.3246822346768829,"spread":0.2908191276152347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005752389,0.0002356624,0.000317688,0.001090875,0.05279716,0.01149007,0.001378563,0.007788686,0.005302851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01549185,0.0004669188,0.0002177964,0.001630812,0.0255945,0.003472895,0.008795053,0.008176785,0.0004345332],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0715585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1060637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880932,0.0045325,0.0002038929,0.0004693428,0.002103256,0.004597806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872254,0.007112405,0.0006853574,0.000286316,0.00219115,0.002499264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005036451,0.00006215813,0.01162911,0.0001468235,0.00001289172,0.004946561,0.4522354,0.0004732535,0.001019832,0.4578815,0.04669427,0.02484773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002644728,0.00005630503,0.03339563,0.0007936214,0.00003208418,0.001022758,0.578319,0.0008488524,0.0005990625,0.03864074,0.3460438,0.0002215926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3593149,0.005180692,0.0008765414,0.1117226,0.0002712542,0.00004789735,0.00004329166,0.00003679365,0.5225061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956231,0.00115493,0.0003332896,0.01195208,0.00002121749,0.00002885361,0.00001107247,0.00001334548,0.03025427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0715585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5191957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552407563","doi":"","title":"Governing the Sulphur Dioxide Emissions of Multinational Corporations: Putting the Breaks on the Race-to-the-Bottom","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Race to the bottom; Multinational corporation; Harm; Greenhouse gas; Race to the Top; Race (biology); Global warming; Corporate governance; Environmental law; State responsibility; Politics; Political science; Business; Law; Climate change; International law; Sociology; Globalization; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Maren Zimmer","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03130295072663826,"gpt":0.3190632385508857,"spread":0.2877602878242475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01502983,0.0004389188,0.00056338,0.0008102924,0.008645355,0.01569997,0.00217971,0.01169138,0.005220081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01597818,0.0003861578,0.0008848773,0.0006206701,0.01604435,0.0168041,0.01011314,0.009411176,0.0006156971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006499526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01606723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01482983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01750046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892757,0.004538344,0.0003121344,0.0009519192,0.002822709,0.002099146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902121,0.005057554,0.001111963,0.00064648,0.001868772,0.001103123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004220228,0.00007036334,0.002194439,0.0001841533,0.00003458637,0.0003578966,0.01177197,0.001828484,0.0007857631,0.9438457,0.0104648,0.02841963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003217496,0.000144053,0.002923633,0.001176094,0.00005318208,0.0001208472,0.01791169,0.003474894,0.002240703,0.7191015,0.2527348,0.00008636594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1051642,0.01733892,0.02117086,0.5643647,0.003362525,0.00007067918,0.00003502816,0.00006357472,0.2884296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915621,0.008012693,0.006275303,0.04715682,0.001168346,0.00009386938,0.00002329392,0.0000789474,0.02156971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01569997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07948631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130495","doi":"","title":"All Convictions Are Not the Same: Rethinking CUPE’s Abuse of Process Doctrine in Cases Involving Plea Bargains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Plea; Rebuttal; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Warrant; Innocence; Sociology; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Lara Kinkartz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1048256228253378,"gpt":0.3827937724761825,"spread":0.2779681496508447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06546596,0.0006728785,0.001262835,0.003343792,0.0214102,0.02061114,0.006255758,0.0251872,0.001939057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1013367,0.001378577,0.001927829,0.002674485,0.05328728,0.01862551,0.01416517,0.03651216,0.0004148293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02288357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03698298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1922124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3090713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9481056,0.01692259,0.002613432,0.006351169,0.01797164,0.008035531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9228879,0.05849567,0.002956643,0.006243493,0.007449912,0.001966439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004463777,0.00004203484,0.002536484,0.00005062065,0.00002387778,0.003633034,0.02220184,0.000464634,0.0004055726,0.9471744,0.008775135,0.01464778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000252622,0.000179872,0.01358862,0.002426508,0.0004011288,0.006677353,0.0413721,0.01087074,0.003927407,0.5966344,0.3230922,0.0005770157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2210797,0.007261956,0.05861045,0.2528561,0.002879603,0.0005337879,0.000127147,0.0001836654,0.4564675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307727,0.001833275,0.01014453,0.04553559,0.0008423578,0.0001600333,0.0000399899,0.00007972153,0.01059176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3821873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516282538","doi":"","title":"The Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Is the Inconsistent Application of the European Union Biotechnology Directive’s Moral Exclusion Clause Undermining Investor Confidence in Europe, Providing a Competitive Advantage to the United States?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Patentability; European union; European commission; Legislation; Parliament; Convention; Law; Commission; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; International trade; Intellectual property; Biology; Politics; Patent law","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Donnelly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1314218278115191,"gpt":0.2663411164857857,"spread":0.1349192886742665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02867392,0.0002683856,0.0007267147,0.001625619,0.003766229,0.01546707,0.001934188,0.01699231,0.002847084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08312416,0.0004659969,0.0008258283,0.001932487,0.02667398,0.01477505,0.003504694,0.01152297,0.0007437667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006272518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007403914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007326651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004331409,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816173,0.006399413,0.001067277,0.0024544,0.006650679,0.001810881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341313,0.05364989,0.005033344,0.001677485,0.004416409,0.001091633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007983657,0.00006328568,0.002247419,0.0001492582,0.00001664241,0.0004223149,0.003811924,0.0001716075,0.0004253334,0.9141707,0.02554863,0.05289306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005714487,0.00009347555,0.008003185,0.001194073,0.00004920759,0.0005611192,0.005728915,0.0007046417,0.001680589,0.7867432,0.1951061,0.00007826593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08285844,0.05224037,0.006743856,0.693161,0.003222157,0.0000426023,0.0001216229,0.00003373991,0.1615763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.819563,0.02737603,0.002146055,0.1340817,0.003394619,0.00006764771,0.0001123953,0.00003771019,0.01322092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.151644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}