{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":143,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":143,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"05754fa525de","filters":{"venue":"Dalhousie law journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2918042740","doi":"","title":"Social Membership: Animal Law beyond the Property/Personhood Impasse","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Oppression; Animal rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Will Kymlicka","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0341325230237471,"gpt":0.2735632266385156,"spread":0.2394307036147685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005171074,0.0002192112,0.0004104909,0.0006776939,0.01314156,0.01061575,0.00165451,0.006345445,0.004674866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005774394,0.0001977885,0.0003195358,0.0007154564,0.05419536,0.004587763,0.004712446,0.006975248,0.0004462635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03503411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04534457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7058462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7406511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949356,0.001551166,0.00008355678,0.0005953911,0.001312632,0.001521782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958034,0.001371264,0.0003374732,0.0003680692,0.001111925,0.001007785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005820752,0.00001037135,0.0009511369,0.00001411805,0.000003411895,0.0001009927,0.008435627,0.00009400195,0.0001512716,0.9809107,0.004297514,0.005024887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002518656,0.00006904997,0.009563049,0.000430107,0.00004350768,0.0002164588,0.02217804,0.001040101,0.0007351534,0.4186733,0.5469549,0.00007105993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1498608,0.008577463,0.01126517,0.2734684,0.0006756977,0.00005990927,0.0001034773,0.00008067564,0.5559085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369839,0.001807702,0.001590252,0.02363281,0.0002561587,0.00002776653,0.00002833749,0.00003068814,0.03564237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7058462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5917723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011019483","doi":"","title":"Brightening the Covenant Chain: Aboriginal TreatyMeanings in Law and History After Marshall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Legal history; Law; International law; Political science; Chain (unit)","authors":[{"name":"Mark Walters","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01190556242959798,"gpt":0.2522090899315924,"spread":0.2403035275019944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003274533,0.0003956706,0.0004865904,0.0009050606,0.03400216,0.01341674,0.001322938,0.00843012,0.01375174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007547459,0.0005136149,0.0003034449,0.001107701,0.02548929,0.009452398,0.006830272,0.01524849,0.0006654064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02167227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02212584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4921176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6994666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980709,0.0006436355,0.00004742226,0.0002468454,0.0002950391,0.0006961383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977805,0.001266032,0.0001247065,0.0001332293,0.0002745164,0.0004210221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002323758,0.00001349945,0.0002911627,0.00004208263,0.000003977103,0.0002297955,0.06750997,0.0000408134,0.0001350884,0.8690229,0.05582028,0.00686725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001368457,0.00002314303,0.001638849,0.0002551381,0.0000160786,0.00009632525,0.07457045,0.0001118953,0.0003754835,0.097752,0.8250837,0.00006325718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06853253,0.02350455,0.001369863,0.408334,0.003498462,0.00008542765,0.00008220968,0.00009164061,0.4945014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4504654,0.00412543,0.0006131325,0.03779139,0.0007707082,0.0000675589,0.00001224792,0.0001196997,0.5060344],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5078824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012056615","doi":"","title":"A Comment on the Complementary Jurisdictionof the International Criminal Court: Adding Insult toInjury in Transitional Contexts?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insult; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal court; International law; Criminology; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer Llewellyn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03302652005616499,"gpt":0.3080217081237147,"spread":0.2749951880675497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151382,0.001520556,0.002602965,0.001162802,0.02849476,0.01018641,0.01103526,0.1646785,0.01404645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04507571,0.002155311,0.003396721,0.002474287,0.02125524,0.01808723,0.01022064,0.1143485,0.003841086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008632029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0169727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08902945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1911365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883848,0.00192741,0.001222774,0.002689396,0.001979023,0.003796635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648067,0.02688498,0.001462554,0.001123979,0.003080656,0.002641249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001226958,0.00003492997,0.0008972103,0.0001600202,0.00004016725,0.00128745,0.009245725,0.0001187971,0.0002860585,0.1036412,0.8804523,0.003713512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002284395,0.0001000204,0.006012644,0.001707273,0.0002163478,0.001142394,0.02859777,0.0005149299,0.001331626,0.07434,0.8854053,0.0004032341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001697287,0.0008951577,0.0002382295,0.982311,0.008747283,0.00001518201,0.00009438542,0.00001993738,0.005981592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01360611,0.0006571735,0.0002040308,0.9690544,0.009446191,0.00006101819,0.00002954913,0.00004452179,0.006896979],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1646785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1770225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W789726164","doi":"","title":"Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Government (linguistics); Environmental law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Corporate governance; Public administration; Environmental studies; Legislature; Civil society; Sustainable development; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics; Geography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Meinhard Doelle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007567722227402739,"gpt":0.2424458437110027,"spread":0.2348781214836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464497,0.0004453525,0.0004687218,0.001329024,0.002552741,0.003348636,0.001145911,0.002890711,0.005932281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008080812,0.0003692855,0.0003720242,0.001733816,0.001346775,0.000816605,0.001553302,0.004019507,0.003321665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06514938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7008586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8123484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954317,0.0003646014,0.0001910586,0.00020966,0.002965568,0.0008374435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947034,0.0006627855,0.0003066053,0.0003313945,0.00339765,0.0005982491],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004773015,0.00002299377,0.002123879,0.0002943565,0.00001587584,0.000160658,0.000487632,0.0002648997,0.0002567411,0.0563627,0.9123734,0.02758916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001248261,0.00001041264,0.0111285,0.0004179229,0.00001385826,0.00002991698,0.0001961892,0.00007619596,0.0001314691,0.001463014,0.9865035,0.00001657655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01175673,0.031233,0.002004892,0.1206178,0.01896318,0.000706438,0.02744231,0.0004371486,0.7868386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1857928,0.02792606,0.007720612,0.1133029,0.001582301,0.001430795,0.03392242,0.0002752701,0.6280469],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2991414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6018062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186913287","doi":"","title":"Lawyering at the Intersection of Public Law and LegalEthics: Government Lawyers as Custodians of the Ruleof Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Custodians; Law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Private law; Comparative law; Legal profession; Legal history; Intersection (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); Chinese law; Engineering; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Adam M. Dodek","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02737623722551455,"gpt":0.3189949639396431,"spread":0.2916187267141286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01497152,0.0002734812,0.0006327025,0.001442749,0.03999085,0.0333928,0.001910645,0.01694985,0.01845721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02661582,0.000902899,0.0004352825,0.001507668,0.05675692,0.02465933,0.01528568,0.02216448,0.0008566868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01731823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05411785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06219074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1358374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857928,0.008907343,0.0001533214,0.0009390956,0.0008891226,0.003318236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795232,0.01179218,0.001382484,0.0006726538,0.001002299,0.005627073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004507708,0.0002888421,0.004041252,0.00003143432,0.00000939543,0.0009174185,0.1747932,0.0002409024,0.0002341296,0.7834856,0.01945898,0.01645369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001062178,0.00006589323,0.004918385,0.0003119942,0.00003810067,0.0004968182,0.3844146,0.001328751,0.0004392549,0.4881822,0.1196195,0.00007837143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2456812,0.002467818,0.005155243,0.5566482,0.0006295873,0.00006334009,0.00002410851,0.00005138019,0.1892792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726182,0.0007574265,0.001167087,0.01495424,0.0001537078,0.00003416399,0.00000665131,0.00002338338,0.01028513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06219074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1256531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121574637","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Doctrine of Intergenerational Equity inGlobal Environmental Governance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Equity (law); Corporate governance; Political science; Environmental law; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Public economics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Lynda Collins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01889305756161848,"gpt":0.3162500379848552,"spread":0.2973569804232367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733456,0.0002180885,0.0003513026,0.0006463256,0.002686354,0.005693188,0.001336417,0.003039612,0.00590834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005797855,0.0002701707,0.0004421883,0.0007981068,0.01498629,0.006719128,0.005153085,0.00458695,0.0003992078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004333641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003853454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01177723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976727,0.0006658246,0.00007155944,0.0004995227,0.000508771,0.0005815597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997916,0.0009506301,0.0001934774,0.0005386596,0.0002779074,0.0001233349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.271608e-7,0.000001582439,0.00007929991,8.728516e-7,5.229087e-7,0.000005332092,0.00007707136,0.00009260664,0.000005577022,0.9990541,0.0001144965,0.0005678094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004417375,0.000003336534,0.0003720263,0.00001460658,0.000003380922,0.00001863923,0.0002104665,0.0006563792,0.00006349137,0.9889537,0.009696774,0.000002798719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1079353,0.001439878,0.08091288,0.02761851,0.000254085,0.00004009427,0.0001254856,0.0000499474,0.7816237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772955,0.000304324,0.002677924,0.001598976,0.00009928482,0.0000344771,0.00001738273,0.00001459891,0.01795757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01177723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W881314250","doi":"","title":"Getting Past the Gatekeepers: The Reception of Restorative Justice in the Nova Scotian Criminal Justice System","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Criminal justice; Nova scotia; Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","authors":[{"name":"Don Clairmont","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ethan Kim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03952556069804514,"gpt":0.3143520362815356,"spread":0.2748264755834905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102575,0.0001787191,0.0001938199,0.001017609,0.009433584,0.004363803,0.0007729414,0.0006871278,0.00331696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005200773,0.0001903336,0.0001237743,0.001204271,0.005879773,0.001232967,0.005208355,0.001111622,0.0002366933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02082739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01773682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7924006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9242193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985268,0.0004830012,0.00003906429,0.0001157125,0.0001907106,0.0006447713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971347,0.0006976317,0.0006376992,0.0001030244,0.0004786939,0.0009481983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002367487,0.00004850308,0.1566153,0.0002311652,0.00002415887,0.004027369,0.7610578,0.0004372798,0.002531047,0.01174873,0.00425066,0.05879125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000607336,0.00007957638,0.4813888,0.0002683453,0.00001088573,0.0003168167,0.4833149,0.0001660005,0.0002764179,0.0008331024,0.03328851,0.00005052643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741089,0.000740331,0.0001792475,0.004292879,0.00007405866,0.00002167257,0.00008474494,0.000008423895,0.02048979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954201,0.0002624436,0.00008518079,0.0002166024,0.000009858464,0.000007353943,0.00001860767,0.000004715932,0.003975108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2075994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.417644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W772136316","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Dialogue: Exploring Habermas' Discourse Theory to Explain the \"Magic\" and Potential of Restorative Justice Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communicative action; Humanities; Epistemology; Restorative justice; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Audrey Laurel Barrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02052347065201328,"gpt":0.2809302217859614,"spread":0.2604067511339482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01597498,0.0007989217,0.0008643648,0.004446919,0.01347708,0.01373239,0.003148744,0.006050412,0.003746111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02122778,0.0006295255,0.0009342089,0.002822954,0.0545572,0.02856703,0.01233421,0.007260812,0.000596037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01237762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005644322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003629692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9771294,0.01948641,0.0003971373,0.001005687,0.001216114,0.0007653117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812397,0.01557136,0.001121304,0.0007143028,0.0007625368,0.0005908608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000194223,0.00001697384,0.0001921992,0.00008682434,0.000005153249,0.000164794,0.1911689,0.0002487869,0.000189634,0.803099,0.0006423275,0.004165953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005901634,0.00006557129,0.000473252,0.0006307584,0.00002072504,0.0003266574,0.1529515,0.003846995,0.0007074297,0.7197329,0.1211349,0.00005036577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2196481,0.02817537,0.2478434,0.1046797,0.001567088,0.0005853095,0.0001970345,0.0003916984,0.3969122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745806,0.001947586,0.01487425,0.001336185,0.0001745519,0.0002409089,0.00004067858,0.0000720253,0.006733275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08980632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124269426","doi":"","title":"Are Climate Change Policies Fair to Vulnerable Communities? the Impact of British Columbia's Carbon Tax and Australia's Carbon Pricing Policy on Indigenous Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Carbon tax; Revenue; Climate change; Emissions trading; Disadvantaged; Political science; Politics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Finance; Law; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Karen Bubna-Litic","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nathalie J. Chalifour","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06984569229498805,"gpt":0.2746376265230765,"spread":0.2047919342280884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002838984,0.0002039766,0.0004350452,0.001043564,0.005042512,0.003862015,0.0009172558,0.001150687,0.003050736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107976,0.0001374941,0.0002993285,0.001375088,0.004573912,0.001681281,0.002536927,0.00168375,0.0001326844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02147448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02689446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8641711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9111122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951496,0.001206779,0.00008099756,0.0001923564,0.001190121,0.002180219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946213,0.001231713,0.0007449748,0.0002573592,0.001877786,0.001266875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00135927,0.0007693063,0.3890824,0.0008763647,0.0006673863,0.003060228,0.05557371,0.0267243,0.006565566,0.2400929,0.01343414,0.2617943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001113437,0.0003095656,0.8167089,0.0006476203,0.0002729454,0.0002782386,0.07850928,0.008039809,0.001705283,0.03943492,0.0537955,0.0001867038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9186689,0.001190586,0.0004240826,0.0130576,0.0000555255,0.00005448037,0.0001216804,0.00001267887,0.06641449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967059,0.0003526841,0.0001418669,0.0006375538,0.000007529663,0.00001293755,0.00001624508,0.000003207586,0.0021221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1358289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2732575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133561944","doi":"","title":"Tending the Bar: The \"Good Character\" Requirementfor Law Society Admission","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Law; Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Alice Woolley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02985341971664215,"gpt":0.3175511824486458,"spread":0.2876977627320036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01089008,0.0004432001,0.001346049,0.001580216,0.02019889,0.01000866,0.002434621,0.01396642,0.04864397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06068514,0.0008344837,0.000952527,0.001207882,0.02622829,0.008381182,0.01059643,0.01236416,0.004331443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005313848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01759225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01106655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02485335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9782588,0.005705763,0.0009951226,0.002534572,0.005813013,0.006692664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703584,0.007128268,0.002806672,0.005425557,0.006474579,0.007806542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007767635,0.0001522243,0.003646886,0.00003552323,0.00001105059,0.0001710841,0.002211535,0.0001694221,0.0004768906,0.9749231,0.008852457,0.009272085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000133643,0.000120522,0.01076809,0.0001029551,0.00002611728,0.0004665978,0.006921258,0.001333566,0.0009990425,0.9265016,0.05253526,0.00009130286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2162666,0.0002648817,0.02034251,0.1379843,0.0009668862,0.0004670806,0.0002352931,0.0002151808,0.6232572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969148,0.00005170494,0.002643468,0.00589046,0.0002517331,0.0001496032,0.00004552331,0.00005951236,0.02175998],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04864397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1627303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123241056","doi":"","title":"Time to Unpack the Juggernaut?: Reflections on the Canadian Federal Parliamentary Debates on \"Cyberbullying\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Ideology; Law enforcement; Politics; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Jane Bailey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04187936068515336,"gpt":0.3272539980342994,"spread":0.285374637349146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02074999,0.0009007328,0.00109427,0.005534658,0.09981679,0.02797255,0.006012098,0.01569256,0.007867225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03102793,0.001330043,0.001054054,0.00724839,0.04840984,0.007285935,0.008353475,0.01780338,0.0007263768],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.299715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2866395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9729476,0.006492121,0.0005178066,0.001547531,0.009523371,0.008971644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687442,0.01366762,0.001261867,0.0005817367,0.009671729,0.006072855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001306843,0.00006693544,0.003140291,0.000509474,0.0000440528,0.001331265,0.5370404,0.000443355,0.001214185,0.2485124,0.1760142,0.03155284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002384214,0.00001973347,0.007673616,0.0006813557,0.0000401992,0.0001425257,0.2796713,0.0002336079,0.0005456431,0.008821687,0.7019075,0.0002390782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0861678,0.02731599,0.001480563,0.7645115,0.004685985,0.0001070227,0.0003355334,0.00008704016,0.1153086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400271,0.008395817,0.001310053,0.110998,0.000688598,0.00009241443,0.00009999522,0.0001813538,0.03820676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.700285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8122313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W900759554","doi":"","title":"OSCOLA: The Oxford University Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Legal citation; Legal writing; Law; Style (visual arts); Legal research; Hegemony; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Sociology; Black letter law; Art; Literature; Computer science; Comparative law","authors":[{"name":"John C. Kleefeld","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03368112788637235,"gpt":0.3044695873627082,"spread":0.2707884594763359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02487184,0.002137348,0.002577645,0.02941153,0.002630682,0.02298915,0.006173124,0.005515265,0.1036107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09659781,0.002268633,0.001517007,0.02980911,0.004419347,0.01940535,0.007939492,0.006359291,0.1056447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00937991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02390856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01612464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01332803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9553707,0.008946526,0.01454979,0.001878332,0.0176291,0.001625538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9283476,0.02049308,0.009663087,0.009780014,0.0281234,0.003592795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004322595,0.00001831393,0.0001992739,0.001813322,0.00001011331,0.00003912636,0.0005448062,0.0001294853,0.000124474,0.0287232,0.8939808,0.07437397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001088383,0.00000815877,0.0004330696,0.001602466,0.000004914832,0.00005305301,0.0001870416,0.0000646637,0.00008779881,0.004915774,0.9926044,0.00002763927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002843922,0.2012314,0.1051824,0.06818237,0.07149423,0.003570852,0.1507174,0.0322624,0.364515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03318277,0.2052906,0.1500337,0.02013157,0.01718377,0.01319422,0.1935141,0.02003011,0.3474392],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3466124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121646640","doi":"","title":"The Personal Information Protectionand Electronic Documents Act: A LostOpportunity to Democratize Canada's\"Technological Society\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information society; Political science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Tina Piper","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00823376168224244,"gpt":0.2437238097796308,"spread":0.2354900480973883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005375356,0.0007307244,0.0005008443,0.002612219,0.03133811,0.01818409,0.003482802,0.01943564,0.02087042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01756879,0.0009081889,0.0009836096,0.002924367,0.01563481,0.00478255,0.006117566,0.01778249,0.002150921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1115407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.438109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847698,0.0009524932,0.0002411551,0.0006955788,0.008496753,0.00484432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877109,0.002804547,0.0005348593,0.0008246948,0.004149058,0.003975825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004056692,0.0001105729,0.003544078,0.00005174717,0.00002411919,0.0002899025,0.00497006,0.0004718722,0.0006648122,0.6618761,0.3017875,0.02616879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005165694,0.00003563787,0.01293071,0.0001547638,0.00005478857,0.0001039799,0.005734701,0.001105653,0.001022979,0.03168942,0.9469742,0.0001414408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06308918,0.002355841,0.00207634,0.5813389,0.001641287,0.0001760118,0.001140374,0.0003076328,0.3478745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3192311,0.001880943,0.003261478,0.1492967,0.0005623317,0.0001211623,0.0003993148,0.0001776799,0.5250692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1115407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135674092","doi":"","title":"The Chemical Castration of Recidivist Sex Offenders inCanada: A Matter of Faith","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Criminology; Castration; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine; Internal medicine","authors":[{"name":"Matthew R Kutcher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01387684302201652,"gpt":0.2299509053111198,"spread":0.2160740622891033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001510063,0.0001396957,0.0002650379,0.001280158,0.003580353,0.001667605,0.001214818,0.001492403,0.003894013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122373,0.0002689237,0.0002740073,0.0007472435,0.001588987,0.0007456398,0.0009825414,0.003468414,0.0003495421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003181511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005158416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1588213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3791562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979604,0.000433321,0.00007529444,0.00009061644,0.0006214962,0.0008188812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930119,0.001376229,0.002269434,0.0002856754,0.001906866,0.001149843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006104214,0.000851831,0.9248326,0.00008989336,0.00007282446,0.0009973008,0.006793899,0.0003021232,0.0006360946,0.007981508,0.009547755,0.04728377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002608573,0.0004332701,0.9595314,0.0001090126,0.00006126632,0.0006639481,0.02555469,0.0003629735,0.001035253,0.000745999,0.01145216,0.00002406447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796686,0.0004130135,0.00004026736,0.005796712,0.00006685793,0.00003549897,0.0001688079,0.000003091736,0.01380737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917393,0.0005317192,0.00004387908,0.001815981,0.00005926068,0.00001437395,0.00007934086,0.000002527866,0.005713694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3157937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011946407","doi":"","title":"Need Intellectual Property Be Everywhere?Against Ubiquity and Uniformity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property law; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Property rights; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Vaver","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03940575782523388,"gpt":0.211238274196082,"spread":0.1718325163708482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01873134,0.0005250751,0.002067162,0.002602785,0.01200062,0.01373009,0.002582341,0.01685169,0.009546595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05313831,0.001171366,0.001277679,0.002155124,0.06923854,0.04480943,0.01239729,0.01614827,0.001413347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005436278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004288397,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007332209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006353541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836159,0.005042127,0.0009788092,0.004630224,0.004058428,0.001674378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446781,0.02933442,0.004551982,0.01374265,0.005729969,0.001962911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002812532,0.00001546193,0.0006139132,0.00002259224,0.00001259011,0.00006251508,0.0009282228,0.00007297631,0.00006155297,0.9912548,0.002559121,0.004368075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005147713,0.00003755283,0.001402418,0.0001438869,0.00003635381,0.000234868,0.001775649,0.0003921306,0.000283519,0.9543391,0.04126605,0.0000370877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.138759,0.01101365,0.04154094,0.2431117,0.001515923,0.0001415265,0.0002915465,0.0002451057,0.5633805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542048,0.001268276,0.004414965,0.02371661,0.001451981,0.0001834313,0.00005454686,0.0001293138,0.01457607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01873134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09906197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011900156","doi":"","title":"Was Amerindian Dispossession Lawful? TheResponse of 19th-Century Maritime Intellectuals","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Legal history; Jurisprudence","authors":[{"name":"Diane Bell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01381781044896269,"gpt":0.2876139664376586,"spread":0.2737961559886959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002631497,0.000128497,0.0001792205,0.0008321389,0.01132122,0.007299211,0.000691417,0.002723213,0.008885961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004889868,0.0001582397,0.0001376844,0.0008103638,0.03081036,0.005417593,0.002925429,0.005825165,0.0003211061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009105541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007196421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07450005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1224316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989814,0.0002175343,0.00001686797,0.0001163209,0.0001448993,0.0005228116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997747,0.001003544,0.0002069717,0.0001471698,0.0004183424,0.0004770029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004802243,0.00004658784,0.005270932,0.00002829516,0.000008382137,0.0004508761,0.1849042,0.00002817776,0.0004717878,0.778396,0.01440963,0.01593716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003970569,0.00004959374,0.01741805,0.00029574,0.00001926985,0.0004559294,0.204096,0.0001491568,0.0006217807,0.1196912,0.6571195,0.00004397715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4721747,0.004488898,0.0003994405,0.1176794,0.0005970762,0.00001309516,0.00004198687,0.00001740305,0.4045881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669335,0.0007282682,0.00007654005,0.007802106,0.0001466312,0.00000639256,0.000006869409,0.00000799451,0.02429154],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07450005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1481329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095553","doi":"","title":"The Legislature, The Executive and The Courts:The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is RunningThis Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"A. Wayne MacKay","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0129962240398342,"gpt":0.2663511772989537,"spread":0.2533549532591196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005944774,0.0003559506,0.0008496334,0.001183246,0.0125681,0.0287729,0.001711579,0.01067486,0.02687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008346467,0.0005243687,0.0003323526,0.002382605,0.03128594,0.02620388,0.004132928,0.01189775,0.002391383],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008895352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01815767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08154324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2093834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960189,0.001495603,0.00007001335,0.0004567468,0.0005746004,0.001384149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961598,0.001467968,0.0004169613,0.0001818214,0.000491736,0.001281677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001979252,0.00002869118,0.00107494,0.00002845943,0.00001256918,0.00005599371,0.004078283,0.00005022165,0.00007134124,0.9417028,0.04049991,0.01237682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003414802,0.00002352007,0.004287222,0.0006477988,0.00003839175,0.00007544044,0.0345033,0.000205937,0.0002503156,0.596873,0.3630055,0.00005530922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.02183234,0.0208347,0.001584097,0.7469436,0.001262226,0.000008077243,0.0001050945,0.00002446587,0.2074054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7220047,0.0182912,0.001043061,0.1521042,0.002894864,0.00004745265,0.00007758132,0.00009273826,0.1034442],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1621372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012536637","doi":"","title":"Canadian Law Teachers in the 1930s: \"When the World was TurnedUpside Down\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal education","authors":[{"name":"R. C. B. Risk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0309498824361895,"gpt":0.332850534060498,"spread":0.3019006516243085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002885314,0.0003721364,0.0003500805,0.002101696,0.0387854,0.008888444,0.001632589,0.006864133,0.02008617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008821051,0.0005643651,0.0004178378,0.004056204,0.008758738,0.003674209,0.003584376,0.01031644,0.001122986],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2138516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2640331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956061,0.0002514892,0.0000500901,0.0002601471,0.00113141,0.002700655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949135,0.0003513653,0.0002139037,0.00005609693,0.002018806,0.002446254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001542922,0.0001034726,0.0279297,0.0001665811,0.00002707291,0.001258065,0.2060929,0.0002692538,0.000538596,0.1085759,0.6063672,0.04851714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176325,0.00001687716,0.06457126,0.0002239178,0.00002338026,0.00008539756,0.1298425,0.00006935996,0.0002724143,0.001987497,0.8028085,0.00008140078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2372689,0.007122072,0.0004428173,0.5006586,0.00340079,0.0001106589,0.002551637,0.000113572,0.248331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7390031,0.003937716,0.0003104698,0.05422352,0.0003847924,0.00005106227,0.0005337928,0.0001021146,0.2014535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7861484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124431951","doi":"","title":"Multi-Disciplinary Professional Practices: AConsumer Welfare Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Computer science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Trebilcock","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lila Csorgo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08992156980875435,"gpt":0.4158058668522224,"spread":0.3258842970434681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004966876,0.000371349,0.0004634181,0.004910348,0.01648532,0.01395931,0.002038132,0.007451599,0.0187781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006567266,0.0004348205,0.0004305889,0.002617366,0.02115964,0.008457727,0.008534525,0.004746328,0.0007404182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01618402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01468174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04001328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1371831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935992,0.002290745,0.000172639,0.0004258238,0.001261448,0.002250124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903185,0.003532847,0.0007176134,0.0003807404,0.001878512,0.003171741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002745725,0.000656851,0.01028236,0.00007836761,0.00001416741,0.000914508,0.01773234,0.0002915975,0.0002353244,0.9169918,0.01255562,0.04021962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004545023,0.0003153818,0.04627619,0.001299837,0.00005150774,0.001904435,0.1898369,0.001550195,0.0007322417,0.479599,0.2783102,0.0000786091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1240777,0.007415468,0.007929208,0.2543544,0.0004909914,0.00007188092,0.0001110225,0.00002658778,0.6055228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249364,0.003981868,0.00159758,0.01723596,0.0007386095,0.00009802647,0.00003566256,0.00001719509,0.05135861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04001328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1174239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010839882","doi":"","title":"The Origins of a Coming Crisis: Renewal of theChurchill Falls Contract","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law; Forensic engineering; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"James P. Feehan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Melvin Baker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01942082604207084,"gpt":0.3134432318212428,"spread":0.2940224057791719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005799455,0.0002295369,0.0004985245,0.001062381,0.01773139,0.01621559,0.002397326,0.01092531,0.02025159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01605057,0.000437849,0.0003939975,0.001305453,0.02235424,0.01063053,0.009956455,0.009445047,0.0009522367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02163859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0375585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.186006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2456668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995458,0.001037479,0.0001430404,0.0005771898,0.001067235,0.001717195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949351,0.001377127,0.0003430825,0.000613624,0.001012768,0.001718229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793308,0.00002833634,0.0009320882,0.00001162392,0.00000330119,0.0002630505,0.01305767,0.0001308059,0.00008618495,0.9614592,0.01625051,0.007739433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005245886,0.0000582862,0.006191533,0.0003074041,0.00001527573,0.0003043637,0.05186486,0.001560977,0.0003300589,0.4963969,0.4428278,0.00009012601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2340418,0.001645384,0.004909871,0.1726519,0.0008826088,0.0001111305,0.0002500644,0.00009602971,0.5854113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9348891,0.0002968675,0.0006600479,0.006544668,0.0001592189,0.0000402507,0.00003964689,0.00005981646,0.05731029],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8139939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3698467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011356480","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Regime: Canada-Newfoundland/Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board Issues","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Submarine pipeline; Petroleum; Oceanography; Environmental science; Fishery; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","authors":[{"name":"Angus Taylor","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jim Dickey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01570200130615071,"gpt":0.269986284124776,"spread":0.2542842828186253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008314665,0.0005721486,0.0007818901,0.003550828,0.02153174,0.01879085,0.00379977,0.01473718,0.01313485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01932401,0.001088951,0.00108895,0.00408857,0.005116993,0.00268695,0.003263299,0.008000541,0.001188613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1365594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.250758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871669,0.0007169996,0.0005266765,0.001224102,0.004679611,0.005685633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831815,0.003785732,0.001095516,0.0005238273,0.008232312,0.003181104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004156152,0.0002694037,0.0414838,0.0004266888,0.0002299527,0.003259789,0.007755174,0.002195732,0.003478171,0.336107,0.5605767,0.04380192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002407552,0.0001129564,0.1586399,0.001030792,0.0002854273,0.0004199582,0.0109719,0.001379367,0.002260518,0.006857303,0.8174927,0.000308464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1571779,0.005354779,0.001062186,0.2129624,0.002591452,0.0004651554,0.002841031,0.0002037921,0.6173415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4758642,0.003536283,0.001758373,0.109926,0.0005225281,0.0002162965,0.0008490824,0.0001623237,0.4071648],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1365594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595340809","doi":"","title":"Moving Beyond Rhetoric: Working Toward Reconciliation Through Self-Determination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Indigenous rights; Humanities; Law; Declaration; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Brenda L. Gunn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04941819659242516,"gpt":0.3204686828208407,"spread":0.2710504862284156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05100273,0.001208618,0.0009945257,0.005337997,0.03457722,0.02873765,0.004420915,0.007746474,0.005083296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03635919,0.0006753319,0.0009413981,0.003574104,0.11178,0.02790838,0.01831869,0.01081737,0.001092218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04168238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06678511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.128084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9435245,0.04243797,0.001044011,0.002896623,0.006683186,0.003413678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599148,0.02572721,0.00210881,0.003041407,0.006845202,0.002362489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000998143,0.00001312893,0.0003705684,0.0001092903,0.000008904104,0.0001947346,0.2077122,0.0001792925,0.0002062554,0.7660204,0.009506308,0.01566891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002209072,0.00001717147,0.0002522628,0.0006449157,0.00002156311,0.0001597298,0.08656538,0.0006442589,0.0008091273,0.3970569,0.5137634,0.0000432185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04159908,0.01964747,0.1025153,0.2723688,0.002697955,0.0002330846,0.00008592894,0.0005377221,0.5603146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8835663,0.005228051,0.04078522,0.01711118,0.0009404126,0.00021489,0.0001183521,0.0006511458,0.05138448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3024282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742003287","doi":"","title":"Ikechi Mgbeoji, Collective Insecurity: Liberian Crisis, Unilateralism & Global Order","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Order (exchange); Political science; International law; Development economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Chidi Oguamanam","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01226709351679937,"gpt":0.2837545724333579,"spread":0.2714874789165585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00145353,0.000307807,0.0002944598,0.0006619037,0.006113767,0.005135505,0.0008286854,0.008019251,0.007779932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020933,0.0003417729,0.0002463728,0.0009346807,0.004939058,0.005811113,0.003124862,0.005682118,0.0006934326],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003461273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00265047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01909961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04757943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994389,0.0001254688,0.00003566593,0.00005900373,0.000129281,0.0002116995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994782,0.0003267332,0.00007225216,0.00002409803,0.0000676587,0.00003120969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005548029,0.00003815589,0.0009200259,0.0001428621,0.00001157544,0.0003912122,0.006864947,0.0001273936,0.0004656267,0.9445279,0.03971372,0.006741158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001473535,0.00006608925,0.01663698,0.0006099278,0.00007902624,0.0006816989,0.02473337,0.0007877808,0.002404115,0.4259307,0.5278128,0.0001100694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07453053,0.07888918,0.005544547,0.3029001,0.001624057,0.000150518,0.00055377,0.00008245694,0.5357248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7906136,0.02339986,0.00434257,0.05908297,0.0009338827,0.0003226806,0.000143788,0.00005085614,0.1211098],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01909961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03797692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030605442","doi":"","title":"Child Pornography in Canada and the United States:The Myth of Right Answers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Pornography; Political science; Law; Child pornography; History; The Internet; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Travis Johnson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008716514021694842,"gpt":0.2462354029595577,"spread":0.2375188889378628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005609603,0.0002837445,0.0007345228,0.001703699,0.01396928,0.007316451,0.002286609,0.01102364,0.01248369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02211226,0.0003868809,0.000490004,0.001602868,0.0256589,0.008584933,0.006413787,0.0167963,0.0004851433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02740322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07135248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9182096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9512166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953513,0.0007536574,0.0001784017,0.000383767,0.0009777143,0.002355037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885698,0.00330042,0.0009213836,0.0003841025,0.003400452,0.00342391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001333298,0.0001436314,0.03879512,0.0001364062,0.00006272255,0.001193294,0.03267998,0.0004387903,0.0001845154,0.6104924,0.2496223,0.06611744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000965438,0.00003631527,0.04848961,0.001893201,0.00008459834,0.0007231538,0.1771878,0.0005924225,0.0003591607,0.21075,0.5596113,0.00017592],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03201038,0.006615013,0.0004102549,0.8931602,0.001025451,0.00001182901,0.0003861899,0.00001768208,0.06636295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785371,0.009721304,0.000645383,0.188301,0.001636794,0.00004430689,0.0002734482,0.00008462148,0.02075607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08179039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1988252,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011341383","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing Professional Responsibility:Incorporating Equality","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional responsibility; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Rosemary Cairns Way","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1199380946078848,"gpt":0.4005033235033196,"spread":0.2805652288954347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03936258,0.0006853836,0.0008004187,0.002433361,0.01032676,0.01553025,0.004092345,0.007357641,0.006716932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0615263,0.0007944987,0.0008372315,0.001115812,0.04160312,0.01890503,0.01977244,0.006984359,0.0008142844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01077614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04091755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01355196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01755625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9579262,0.02804698,0.001130389,0.003200588,0.005995902,0.003700066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622942,0.01843444,0.002562575,0.007234416,0.005371216,0.00410311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001529833,0.00009280699,0.0009973886,0.00006414247,0.00001944415,0.00007579166,0.02379213,0.001461399,0.0001793497,0.9353936,0.003884885,0.03402375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002296855,0.00002924604,0.000611529,0.0001656935,0.00002066075,0.00005591723,0.007227358,0.002263002,0.0004168643,0.9505831,0.03857257,0.00003112069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06225744,0.001465796,0.3598994,0.1349076,0.0009710612,0.0002457975,0.00004758209,0.0003055323,0.4398997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381694,0.0003210254,0.04716001,0.003604903,0.0001595113,0.0001373346,0.0000209341,0.00009975318,0.01032719],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03936258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2081717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W936839938","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Regulated Discretion on Police Referrals to Restorative Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Nova scotia; Discretion; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Humanities; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Geography; Art","authors":[{"name":"Diane Crocker","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01805578524122079,"gpt":0.3166555101417782,"spread":0.2985997249005574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008908255,0.0002318329,0.0002718937,0.0009018411,0.003055601,0.002735673,0.00111685,0.001003833,0.00300055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07187235,0.0003385252,0.0003593925,0.0009392926,0.004102523,0.0007977604,0.002755344,0.001508256,0.0002726008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01381239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00737344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1853018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.241772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.965397,0.02260297,0.001120999,0.00195101,0.005263145,0.003664783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8627046,0.07563937,0.03845069,0.007094234,0.008192475,0.007918723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002664988,0.001518834,0.8212466,0.0002650766,0.0002830366,0.001216882,0.06515046,0.002959277,0.004772632,0.008011775,0.002552395,0.08935826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008155799,0.0004644406,0.9821988,0.0001544495,0.00003752102,0.00007318806,0.01165346,0.0006683117,0.0004818496,0.0009548505,0.003197655,0.00003402136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897954,0.0002573513,0.0002149425,0.001220415,0.00001701697,0.00005449772,0.00004208937,0.00000713804,0.008391175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.00007832787,0.00008670428,0.0002001899,0.00001064405,0.00002433179,0.00001372932,0.000002719925,0.0007812738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011379414","doi":"","title":"Oceans Act: Uncharted Seas For OffshoreDevelopment In Atlantic Canada?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oceanography; International law; International waters; Law of the sea; Political science; Law; Territorial waters; Fishery; Public international law; Geology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Aldo Chircop","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bruce A Marchand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0250910467909934,"gpt":0.2907167739443897,"spread":0.2656257271533963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956052,0.000264796,0.0002914884,0.0008681993,0.01555699,0.01023615,0.001522561,0.006887619,0.01190609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007614869,0.0003583668,0.0005145356,0.001355466,0.008131625,0.00321289,0.004766469,0.006165529,0.0006343881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04720603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2142171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973815,0.0001817577,0.0000692684,0.0001525046,0.0007378638,0.00147702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954384,0.0006569873,0.0002643666,0.0002085204,0.001771812,0.001659926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001045581,0.0000400621,0.02623201,0.00006707105,0.00003434372,0.000604743,0.01062375,0.00080157,0.0004056507,0.8482363,0.09120618,0.02164381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007434117,0.00004442599,0.06587746,0.00051838,0.0001328486,0.0001648581,0.05278914,0.001142324,0.0007798659,0.09769899,0.7805868,0.0001905642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2295292,0.003058166,0.0009305003,0.2203799,0.0007040954,0.00005756556,0.0009276225,0.000052198,0.5443608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8338844,0.002362111,0.0006719623,0.04051097,0.00016079,0.00004802758,0.0001854931,0.00005626722,0.12212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04720603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3425053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014058336","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Classification: IndigenousOverrepresentation and Security Policy in CanadianFederal Penitentiaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"D'Arcy Leitch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0364788672087247,"gpt":0.3479918036845599,"spread":0.3115129364758352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01167314,0.0003599641,0.0006388723,0.002769149,0.04158301,0.01545023,0.004266642,0.005965076,0.009178149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02081705,0.0007664677,0.0005832188,0.004023229,0.02408455,0.003811379,0.006210235,0.007262758,0.0002741398],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1517796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2488875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808593,0.002461215,0.0003746298,0.001121518,0.003005964,0.01217739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867625,0.004879001,0.0008449023,0.0008058194,0.004475219,0.002232635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007277794,0.00007772636,0.01917267,0.00006302227,0.00002675386,0.0003127901,0.04255814,0.0006121788,0.0006713221,0.9099302,0.01001909,0.01648326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001408058,0.0002116922,0.2021745,0.001402367,0.0003426841,0.0004297469,0.2434116,0.005549219,0.003196911,0.1771421,0.365437,0.0005612271],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597184,0.001583433,0.001533352,0.04494519,0.0001584249,0.0001397436,0.0003205725,0.00003433142,0.2915667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766798,0.000311493,0.0004620881,0.002562354,0.00002233488,0.00003349494,0.00004165167,0.00001340882,0.01987334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1517796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884951","doi":"","title":"Law's Ambition and the Reconstruction of Role Moralityin Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; International law","authors":[{"name":"David M Tanovich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01158930957451419,"gpt":0.2382614413811142,"spread":0.2266721318066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777723,0.0002651724,0.0006566622,0.00210842,0.03821781,0.01701724,0.002780473,0.004996314,0.01637806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01362166,0.0004434422,0.0004310464,0.003761761,0.0317733,0.003689619,0.004874242,0.007071753,0.0004876268],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1858187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2650181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921458,0.001289718,0.0001003816,0.0007088801,0.00167879,0.004076432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938825,0.001236508,0.0002469237,0.0003119301,0.002666909,0.001655279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003310879,0.00001947578,0.00279064,0.00001754154,0.000007227773,0.00008271228,0.01364131,0.000359537,0.00008589429,0.9660811,0.009446845,0.007434613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009744066,0.00004701244,0.03302205,0.000260018,0.00005714218,0.0001134537,0.08988868,0.002930064,0.0006755242,0.3840449,0.4887132,0.0001504597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2393153,0.001861565,0.002247299,0.07249776,0.0002678528,0.00007316205,0.0003149121,0.00004836075,0.6833737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547553,0.0003397177,0.0003652753,0.001861727,0.00002117854,0.00001305784,0.0000316258,0.00003073356,0.04258145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341238104","doi":"","title":"Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understanding","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scientific evidence; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Humanities; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Nayha Acharya","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07659995695760385,"gpt":0.3594442205778384,"spread":0.2828442636202345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05577126,0.00127304,0.001847596,0.006730409,0.01009208,0.02769244,0.005948808,0.01428851,0.002244313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05690611,0.0009769143,0.002008761,0.003443827,0.1573651,0.02725932,0.01009337,0.02158105,0.0006805349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01593162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02131934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007980539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003677922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9263843,0.05241226,0.002394334,0.003352195,0.01283045,0.002626598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952947,0.03617918,0.002519828,0.004020626,0.003437588,0.0008958726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001271848,0.000002479718,0.00001805751,0.00001075763,0.000001266397,0.000008338323,0.0005831189,0.0000844399,0.000009206948,0.9983138,0.0004290335,0.0005382553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005035783,0.00000444583,0.0000256352,0.00006255665,0.000001730657,0.00001206702,0.0003576748,0.000274498,0.00002385076,0.9896877,0.009539996,0.000004694393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01084621,0.0245384,0.176967,0.4649961,0.003710593,0.0001722289,0.0001361358,0.0001882157,0.3184453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599275,0.01423785,0.05375341,0.04739367,0.007555686,0.000997475,0.0001478093,0.0002572617,0.01572934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2949501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121699755","doi":"","title":"A \"Reasonable\" Expectation of Sexual Privacy intheDigital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Privacy policy","authors":[{"name":"Moira Aikenhead","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02712493627137453,"gpt":0.3105962681194601,"spread":0.2834713318480856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007992514,0.0002365137,0.0003499408,0.000702776,0.004706645,0.006064301,0.0008930091,0.00558032,0.01158083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03424884,0.0003114877,0.0004047984,0.0003144823,0.006790553,0.004044856,0.002745727,0.004592967,0.000891238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00244507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005247584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01012634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01369527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940965,0.002317365,0.0003061022,0.000582382,0.0009906605,0.001706873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853386,0.007424387,0.001782192,0.001700447,0.002126219,0.001628132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000909046,0.00008121405,0.01134458,0.00002572694,0.00001604967,0.000885544,0.005958041,0.0004885197,0.0003995731,0.9695424,0.004374268,0.006793057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000963065,0.0002156885,0.01700167,0.0001715091,0.00005899317,0.003006378,0.02067589,0.0038231,0.00237826,0.8945494,0.0579391,0.00008369017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4135898,0.0007933464,0.02617099,0.1066418,0.0003279218,0.0001305031,0.0004407761,0.000106918,0.451798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905843,0.00007225288,0.0007090865,0.003756453,0.00005166237,0.00002043601,0.00002094669,0.000003938676,0.004781136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01158083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04226899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599308209","doi":"","title":"Defining Métis People as a People: Moving Beyond the Indian/Métis Dichotomy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Genealogy; History; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Brenda L. Gunn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01650442214867186,"gpt":0.2830375867717156,"spread":0.2665331646230438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004265605,0.0004396721,0.0005120502,0.002927048,0.009118745,0.01141661,0.001274318,0.002156676,0.002398081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003871465,0.000242813,0.0004151612,0.001894519,0.04394326,0.01026717,0.0113311,0.005947863,0.0004180414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005979298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005118486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01635981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01763841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940587,0.002938107,0.0002395979,0.0004993783,0.001480651,0.0007834805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980488,0.0005798616,0.0003521421,0.0001839056,0.0003827973,0.0004524866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001243891,0.00001314522,0.002053167,0.00004725556,0.000005120297,0.0001233692,0.1641871,0.00003498224,0.0002692992,0.8252198,0.0009678031,0.007066476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001607796,0.00005541179,0.006482482,0.0006033309,0.00003229963,0.0006440798,0.4052151,0.0004400457,0.0006966518,0.3149592,0.2707923,0.00006291975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3353552,0.007904558,0.02639209,0.06097657,0.00141733,0.0000978508,0.00007774142,0.0000816315,0.5676971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857955,0.001313205,0.00283771,0.002931141,0.0001904108,0.00004972363,0.00002899306,0.00003914236,0.006814314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04338306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121157541","doi":"","title":"The Institutional and Substantive Effectsof the Human Rights Act in the United Kingdom","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International law; Law; Kingdom; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Christopher David Jenkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05428589952675823,"gpt":0.343612094592552,"spread":0.2893261950657938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005525656,0.0002245658,0.0005146533,0.001910336,0.003617156,0.008544933,0.000928768,0.003090892,0.01151098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02953131,0.0005206512,0.0005116701,0.002116722,0.005642976,0.002860523,0.004951858,0.002498596,0.0005385639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02525209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01381767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4764707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5764292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897474,0.004416144,0.0007777025,0.0004928242,0.001869209,0.002696787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786844,0.01328934,0.002981129,0.001012495,0.003088542,0.0009441567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002391753,0.0003864513,0.09554067,0.00142739,0.0002936154,0.003402747,0.02587702,0.007578175,0.001757494,0.743938,0.04062662,0.07678012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002893147,0.0003506546,0.7114306,0.001756848,0.0004441437,0.000438631,0.02829443,0.002527541,0.001986545,0.04796357,0.2042208,0.0002968211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7948216,0.02199768,0.0005458564,0.04248378,0.0003930438,0.00006480854,0.0009512653,0.0000241433,0.1387179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872701,0.002506988,0.0000988014,0.001547506,0.00004132618,0.0000164699,0.00006414101,0.000008164287,0.008446622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4764707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9473947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123270099","doi":"","title":"Environmental Assessment as Planning and Disclosure Tool: Greenpeace Canada v. Canada (A.G.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Martin Olszynski","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01499691839155217,"gpt":0.2718490630947725,"spread":0.2568521447032203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009130999,0.0005315705,0.0003902547,0.001098017,0.02423209,0.01097638,0.003874979,0.01702879,0.004864201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01718661,0.0006181169,0.0007551526,0.002127469,0.007971243,0.003079322,0.002802447,0.01116771,0.0005066548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08306353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2237334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849039,0.001963453,0.0003452331,0.001260308,0.007228892,0.004298239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899279,0.003431163,0.0004088446,0.0003099869,0.004448899,0.001473106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005914094,0.00003047403,0.004255146,0.00008036305,0.00003000855,0.001329325,0.006887117,0.0006213675,0.0005256684,0.5253593,0.4445746,0.01624734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001220242,0.00005225251,0.01462498,0.0004111413,0.0001135835,0.0005268712,0.009266392,0.002041977,0.001388363,0.0536401,0.9174513,0.0003608975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02870093,0.009659774,0.003393226,0.5918394,0.002529079,0.0002325224,0.001090957,0.0001452101,0.362409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.457102,0.005623571,0.00287847,0.4188935,0.0008722678,0.0002237716,0.0003693516,0.00009989728,0.1139371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08306353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6026709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121763336","doi":"","title":"Property Ownership by Married WomenIn Victorian Ontario","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Business; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Susan Ingram","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kris Inwood","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0219949161122358,"gpt":0.1985552373774105,"spread":0.1765603212651747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003986123,0.0001157397,0.0002149215,0.0007641645,0.004596018,0.001661813,0.0007967584,0.0005270395,0.00985952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001959012,0.000308063,0.0002160821,0.002926511,0.001063359,0.000764347,0.001254765,0.0005699669,0.0005480818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02106328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0171346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994094,0.00004235221,0.0000254149,0.00005204643,0.0001580376,0.0003128208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981324,0.000137958,0.000533249,0.00006774697,0.0004196835,0.0007089058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091575,0.0000714282,0.9160846,0.00006914665,0.00002805022,0.0006716979,0.05091674,0.0001202721,0.0003538182,0.003722812,0.009333712,0.01851851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007710839,0.00003108173,0.9026366,0.00006838297,0.000014059,0.0001541799,0.0594384,0.0001673664,0.0001352222,0.0002488224,0.03707881,0.00001940558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805588,0.0005798387,0.00003793891,0.001716089,0.00001275222,0.00002162985,0.001714659,0.000003666944,0.0153547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545454,0.0008317331,0.00004349101,0.0002495694,0.00000990507,0.00001273514,0.000420999,0.000005518499,0.04388066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02106328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1528255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011321608","doi":"","title":"Slow on the Trigger: The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, theFisheries Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishery; Environmental law; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Law; Environmental science","authors":[{"name":"Arlene Kwasniak","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0147561664357298,"gpt":0.2561851339897758,"spread":0.241428967554046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01101629,0.001431452,0.001174575,0.002069033,0.02020143,0.01800657,0.004851677,0.04859048,0.01155133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04481681,0.001464772,0.001195948,0.003317617,0.008749254,0.006317471,0.005406333,0.02641339,0.001781453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06861462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2417237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845462,0.00101224,0.0004659996,0.001279531,0.007868057,0.004828096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845583,0.005314893,0.0007368435,0.0005142271,0.006442748,0.002433044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008563387,0.00004341294,0.002212026,0.0000426823,0.00003740389,0.0001941824,0.002135518,0.000528292,0.000272659,0.4281853,0.5584305,0.007832386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001495112,0.00003557505,0.01208282,0.000376668,0.0001269517,0.00007560071,0.004201713,0.001216961,0.0004162174,0.04564603,0.9353704,0.0003015418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01611774,0.006391675,0.001567372,0.6521633,0.006054827,0.0002570912,0.001856297,0.0002019913,0.3153898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1786921,0.00430122,0.002418719,0.4941184,0.001966605,0.0004391107,0.0006359968,0.0002423682,0.3171854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06861462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4978363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123531963","doi":"","title":"Reading the Judicial Mind: Predicting the Courts' Reactionto the Use of Neuroscientific Evidence for Lie Detection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lie detection; Reading (process); Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Jennifer A. Chandler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1217558973060196,"gpt":0.3621088865846682,"spread":0.2403529892786486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002953907,0.0002905659,0.0002330759,0.0009195313,0.0004860865,0.002149635,0.0004291158,0.00242492,0.008490323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08235534,0.0003228019,0.0002421864,0.0003269459,0.0008251085,0.00112677,0.0008081009,0.001903146,0.0008107075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006140437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005408935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003058583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005077543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985455,0.0005786232,0.0001263797,0.0001505791,0.0004341916,0.0001646747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468228,0.03789822,0.009891862,0.001289579,0.002446522,0.001650928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006873813,0.002540976,0.8620449,0.0002146314,0.0002894402,0.001879525,0.006946447,0.001768183,0.05023166,0.003653235,0.004141129,0.05941609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001996781,0.0009543688,0.9716254,0.00007400904,0.0001076024,0.0008090123,0.003253851,0.007159709,0.00896446,0.004873839,0.001906979,0.00007112067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951984,0.0001119624,0.0002255728,0.0006676983,0.00003484703,0.00002662109,0.00006250569,0.000007363765,0.003665011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982443,0.0001417365,0.0002992715,0.000351523,0.00005020875,0.00001057797,0.00009059381,0.000008469382,0.0008033733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008490323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02840298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751532157","doi":"","title":"Slipping between Danger, Pleasure and the Law: Thoughts on Three Recent Books Addressing Sexuality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Pleasure; Feminist legal theory; Supreme court; Law; Oppression; Jurisprudence; Gender studies; Feminism; Political science; Psychology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Ummni Khan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06014912234441987,"gpt":0.3181516492791546,"spread":0.2580025269347347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001101346,0.001010961,0.001068629,0.004115459,0.003306779,0.01006468,0.001452063,0.0040688,0.0202799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003094757,0.0005761278,0.0009082499,0.007429019,0.00602958,0.01015129,0.002892713,0.005429688,0.005039806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003999993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00408852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00831577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01666997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986548,0.0003499527,0.00007007942,0.0001407628,0.000610864,0.0001734097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982151,0.001089711,0.0001489462,0.00004521278,0.0003217616,0.0001792946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453421,0.00004451338,0.0002924929,0.00165335,0.00002096134,0.0003498365,0.01283529,0.00009465482,0.0002813343,0.05655974,0.8341814,0.09365193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003465398,0.000008718634,0.0003772583,0.001317825,0.000006203231,0.0002220655,0.003940813,0.00001253625,0.00003329453,0.003286767,0.990779,0.00001192304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001340177,0.8669769,0.0005179066,0.04893806,0.0125697,0.00004008858,0.0001267398,0.00003616986,0.06945431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01626247,0.7247841,0.00141466,0.04399802,0.01344397,0.0001734169,0.0003983051,0.0001713032,0.1993538],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0202799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06784308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012108012","doi":"","title":"The Best Things in Law are Free?:Towards Quality Free Public Accessto Primary Legal Materials in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal history; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Teresa Scassa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04655171573101667,"gpt":0.338016501545715,"spread":0.2914647858146983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007117529,0.0002953494,0.0005198672,0.003341708,0.02325229,0.01305283,0.004169894,0.005109702,0.02446296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02575844,0.001003877,0.0007747207,0.004234375,0.006280744,0.00473549,0.00792893,0.005112818,0.001176894],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1594246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.455532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842761,0.001075567,0.0003995539,0.0008396975,0.007827487,0.005581578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705156,0.003369028,0.001086969,0.0009657408,0.01340049,0.01066215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002968893,0.001527421,0.1130722,0.001131623,0.00007887688,0.002168422,0.05906938,0.004038028,0.003108079,0.2235949,0.2405833,0.3513308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000231465,0.0003129325,0.3263465,0.001283689,0.0001485247,0.0007994891,0.06279495,0.008834866,0.004023139,0.02102192,0.5737442,0.0004584152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6052837,0.004564317,0.006784119,0.1520182,0.0005188628,0.001362016,0.002328974,0.0005005109,0.2266393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8763853,0.002051147,0.006998175,0.01309183,0.00007865476,0.0002203343,0.0005484176,0.0001550361,0.100471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W858437278","doi":"","title":"From Idea to Practice: Sustainable Development Efforts in Manitoba","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable development; Political science; Legislation; Nova scotia; Humanities; Earth Summit; Round table; Ethnology; Sociology; Business; Law; Session (web analytics); Art","authors":[{"name":"A. John Sinclair","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lisa Quinn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01114781867640365,"gpt":0.2727882074911724,"spread":0.2616403888147688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009373744,0.0004907842,0.0003769135,0.003086888,0.02581672,0.009029124,0.002691243,0.001905357,0.003870972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008594403,0.0007804378,0.0003205185,0.005554959,0.01532587,0.002870189,0.01055478,0.002174728,0.0004125255],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06826121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1312122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6788885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8794335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940006,0.003606429,0.0001953678,0.000360929,0.0007505774,0.001086132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923263,0.003878154,0.000401889,0.0004497678,0.001454542,0.001489389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003098211,0.000113196,0.01583165,0.0005253512,0.00002185423,0.002367052,0.8921739,0.0002795371,0.001903723,0.02981306,0.004283884,0.05265586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008183152,0.0000486943,0.0160662,0.0008130966,0.0000192937,0.0001918392,0.8752588,0.0001839922,0.0005838211,0.002006307,0.1047918,0.00002792281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.8136151,0.01490156,0.004779872,0.04264309,0.0003654335,0.0009172892,0.000109638,0.0001339033,0.122534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447304,0.00680884,0.00640104,0.002722544,0.00002086999,0.0004183622,0.00006741349,0.0000640733,0.03876645],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3211115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6460052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1424791837","doi":"","title":"Thin-Skull Plaintiffs, Socio-Cultural \"Abnormalities\" and the Dangers of an Objective Test for Hypersensitivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Prudence; Tort; Humanities; Law; Compensation (psychology); Insanity defense; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Liability; Social psychology; Philosophy; Insanity; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Eugene Lim","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03102623084265094,"gpt":0.3632499658862718,"spread":0.3322237350436209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01658292,0.0003668138,0.0004345209,0.002529111,0.003453924,0.003637898,0.001783283,0.002668557,0.00291585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07362048,0.0002523142,0.0005472875,0.0009357954,0.01472839,0.003324322,0.003029152,0.004031597,0.0002735526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003548037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06619207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1386717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909332,0.002455396,0.0005092188,0.0008282363,0.004355424,0.0009185509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716958,0.01432405,0.005840962,0.00287642,0.003750598,0.001512143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003432165,0.0003771905,0.4901498,0.0003110266,0.0001834528,0.007550774,0.02939888,0.0008978968,0.002252505,0.3625075,0.01214749,0.0938803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001709221,0.0006126533,0.6242418,0.002136923,0.0003053308,0.01015322,0.03878381,0.004102068,0.008750761,0.2593379,0.05113788,0.0002667662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475335,0.003103484,0.006802138,0.04633864,0.0005590904,0.0002449413,0.0003437103,0.00003176565,0.09504265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896215,0.0006443692,0.002361739,0.005345449,0.00008916514,0.00004386454,0.00004376509,0.000008600828,0.001841515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06619207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1316136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W844255714","doi":"","title":"Confidential Information and Governments: Balancing the Public's Right to Access Government Records and an Oil and Gas Company's Right to Protect Its Confidential Information","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Business; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Stephen D. Burns","is_ca":false},{"name":"Todd Newhook","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sébastien A. Gittens","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009175805422242464,"gpt":0.2276828582247249,"spread":0.2185070528024824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01191714,0.0005315254,0.0005444535,0.001645506,0.006485126,0.024263,0.002257041,0.01515681,0.02626553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02121246,0.0006072349,0.0005835974,0.003289688,0.02668236,0.01538893,0.008174399,0.007702102,0.002959416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01764291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02726259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03758404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04731705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9799298,0.005334259,0.0006195083,0.001657743,0.008329605,0.0041291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854543,0.008570977,0.001316219,0.001633777,0.002037923,0.0009867308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001640084,0.00001098019,0.0001741262,0.00006612654,0.000002527775,0.00004870697,0.0008506122,0.0001104361,0.00007826881,0.9773356,0.01083301,0.01047325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002704947,0.00005780898,0.001847475,0.001666293,0.00003238602,0.0002881531,0.003793891,0.0004150315,0.0007488714,0.4868675,0.5041954,0.00006007165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603147,0.02443248,0.006960128,0.1359701,0.001155588,0.00009764918,0.0002815067,0.00008359452,0.8149875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436506,0.02932367,0.005749559,0.0339364,0.003220355,0.0002886033,0.0003322239,0.00009071893,0.1834079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03758404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1280088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012192475","doi":"","title":"An Empty Shell of a Treaty Promise:R. v. Marshall and the Rights of theNon-Status Indians","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; International law; Shell (structure); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Pamela Palmater","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006340060536106655,"gpt":0.2292459783888543,"spread":0.2229059178527477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003618852,0.0003083622,0.0006202828,0.0006656893,0.01652855,0.01107579,0.00156304,0.008120383,0.008948707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007175224,0.0004992523,0.0004349905,0.0006328174,0.0192878,0.007028505,0.005950604,0.01036242,0.0008748239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01008586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01108338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1385024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2225882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978921,0.0006504185,0.000050174,0.0002187993,0.0003631329,0.000825285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998594,0.0006584575,0.0001051778,0.0002208556,0.0002099168,0.0002116139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001884967,0.000006094419,0.000101842,0.000007916061,0.000002456096,0.0001075707,0.00342502,0.00005342177,0.00009890686,0.9827607,0.01196862,0.001448655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004564934,0.00003157451,0.001089547,0.0002681233,0.00003977629,0.0001939652,0.01528428,0.0004363905,0.0006371907,0.5926753,0.3891764,0.0001219246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05821608,0.003056975,0.00141649,0.1203535,0.0005782941,0.00003956291,0.000124365,0.00005274513,0.8161619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267242,0.001080095,0.0005825621,0.01795041,0.0004405069,0.00005467836,0.00002686992,0.000067941,0.1530727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8614976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2753925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095817822","doi":"","title":"The Justiciability of Climate Change: AComparison ofUS and Canadian Approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Climate change; Political science; Law; Politics; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Hugh Wilkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1063242017579275,"gpt":0.2872782956223335,"spread":0.180954093864406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006967068,0.0007280459,0.0009670615,0.006977404,0.02316596,0.01692066,0.003608183,0.00544001,0.01119485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01801827,0.0005114175,0.0010242,0.00958927,0.04267218,0.009731544,0.006750905,0.007702088,0.0003047647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1228761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1289023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850346,0.003153684,0.0004058212,0.001234671,0.006230846,0.003940429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865636,0.005159786,0.0004815434,0.001012289,0.005167169,0.001615648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005622655,0.000003455574,0.0003251659,0.00002680404,0.000004853763,0.00001926271,0.002049191,0.0001321802,0.00001992842,0.9913908,0.002589799,0.003432967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002246785,0.00001190749,0.006949464,0.0003926625,0.00007590264,0.00009952021,0.01106245,0.001818286,0.0002296753,0.7810644,0.1981919,0.00008133285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02295175,0.008840276,0.008639137,0.1003974,0.0003896715,0.00003894662,0.0002099756,0.00006163628,0.8584711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457536,0.007546679,0.002797149,0.008212049,0.0002903451,0.00005667216,0.00007337589,0.00006785695,0.03520225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1228761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.891533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W793228858","doi":"","title":"Will the Rotterdam Rules Be Accepted? A Liner Cargo Interest Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Liability; Convention; Welfare economics; Business; Law; Humanities; Art; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Mary R. Brooks","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jason Mackey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04944190867028486,"gpt":0.2745321735469091,"spread":0.2250902648766243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01703316,0.0008400869,0.0009410012,0.001599896,0.01063293,0.02945702,0.005209103,0.0159427,0.01306826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02978675,0.0008207111,0.001129736,0.002518506,0.02216788,0.01771195,0.005439842,0.01908466,0.003109818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02999714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0256088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3461018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1713428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9739939,0.007957515,0.001273202,0.004832384,0.007378916,0.004564007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851165,0.006436085,0.001556611,0.001072948,0.004885932,0.0009319137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007212559,0.000008323263,0.000156489,0.00002819362,0.000003391871,0.000158674,0.002381548,0.0001129065,0.00003842769,0.9811735,0.01206043,0.003870965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002650403,0.00003897605,0.001007929,0.0006231198,0.00001654804,0.0001947017,0.006472106,0.0003907589,0.0002716563,0.2101371,0.7807446,0.00007601143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01632896,0.01545677,0.008689116,0.3013443,0.002899677,0.00008329829,0.0002583169,0.00006161279,0.654878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.537583,0.02159103,0.008592628,0.1466841,0.005537095,0.0003566009,0.0002942627,0.0003676407,0.2789936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3461018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6881746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120118180","doi":"","title":"Off the Grid: Federal Jurisdiction and the CanadianElectricity Sector","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; International law; Business; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Ian Blue","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01015102176714728,"gpt":0.2445563132801033,"spread":0.234405291512956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004506166,0.0004253052,0.0006078019,0.002321382,0.02776893,0.01746185,0.002939221,0.007817402,0.01729051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01655653,0.0006620844,0.0008007513,0.006683019,0.01481207,0.005186068,0.00491804,0.007057564,0.000499903],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1628492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2822115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921855,0.0007833999,0.0001524893,0.0007067746,0.001953016,0.004218871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906625,0.002731838,0.0004629814,0.0005339304,0.003918655,0.001690167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004503443,0.00001994054,0.003888287,0.00004238646,0.00001618433,0.0001780265,0.002541523,0.001144782,0.0001369198,0.9489615,0.03391403,0.009111397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001424214,0.00004763213,0.03379324,0.0006646856,0.0001787821,0.0002141263,0.02442906,0.005637077,0.0008384191,0.2720482,0.6617175,0.0002887674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1128557,0.004709387,0.002708422,0.102812,0.0004558352,0.00009036902,0.0007929055,0.00009313811,0.7754822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062348,0.002321843,0.001108545,0.01562883,0.0001261205,0.00004394057,0.0001793552,0.00006728902,0.0742892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122804512","doi":"","title":"Revising Canada's Ethical Rules for Judges Returningto Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal ethics; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Stephen G. A. Pitel","is_ca":false},{"name":"Will Bortolin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07271359044952126,"gpt":0.3724877803201102,"spread":0.299774189870589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1011432,0.001166917,0.002322657,0.006343073,0.05199181,0.03710781,0.0128249,0.06548964,0.009589678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2493584,0.003150272,0.002484875,0.00467077,0.02823438,0.007524053,0.00913657,0.0581827,0.00164219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1241712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4957619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9558825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8482053,0.02940885,0.0103092,0.01111514,0.05712235,0.04383926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7238473,0.1377645,0.00638212,0.01055346,0.09376761,0.02768501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034787,0.0001346756,0.007108721,0.0001823961,0.00008435932,0.0006379361,0.0186217,0.001354709,0.0006076391,0.61935,0.3303944,0.02142012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004179194,0.000160003,0.02357244,0.003344821,0.0004370145,0.0005180896,0.03589416,0.004162975,0.002594379,0.1668081,0.7611461,0.0009441733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05330126,0.002705251,0.01042634,0.625692,0.005019186,0.001128481,0.0005956105,0.0003592519,0.3007726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5267828,0.001852212,0.02306794,0.325282,0.001621356,0.0009189018,0.0002864167,0.0004867761,0.1197017],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1241712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.900929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123846341","doi":"","title":"Thresholds of Actionable Mental Harm in Negligence:A Policy-Based Appraisal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Plaintiff; Prejudice (legal term); Damages; Compensation (psychology); Legitimacy; Political science; Limiting; Law; Mental illness; Mental health; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Louise Bélanger-Hardy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04658803608178384,"gpt":0.4305237056856898,"spread":0.3839356696039059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01724271,0.0007516487,0.001213705,0.007168698,0.004323446,0.01669596,0.004341106,0.01138401,0.003766394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04910366,0.0006078262,0.001043063,0.004218381,0.02497256,0.009745432,0.004749329,0.008598483,0.0003651154],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07805645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09462233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3289249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3088673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9703254,0.008028222,0.002087052,0.001489563,0.01336906,0.004700698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463754,0.03625845,0.004612289,0.0009585902,0.009859821,0.001935471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001118622,0.0001311061,0.004461449,0.001509228,0.00004863615,0.0002900105,0.002872926,0.004914123,0.0004835046,0.906443,0.01184585,0.06688825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009298293,0.000513916,0.03682725,0.01097765,0.0003866586,0.0006737252,0.02499123,0.008378466,0.001875719,0.6803615,0.2346129,0.0003079649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06052485,0.1756978,0.01308199,0.5948558,0.002915685,0.0002867196,0.0003369595,0.0001473774,0.1521527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8573005,0.08932703,0.004899631,0.03979969,0.002190967,0.0002013427,0.0001276922,0.00004374684,0.006109444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3289249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6540206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330011836","doi":"","title":"The EU as an Arctic Power: Analysis of the Competence of the EU in the Arctic by Policy Areas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Political science; The arctic; European union; Indigenous; Circumpolar star; Member states; Business; International trade; Oceanography; Ecology","authors":[{"name":"Armand de Mestral","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0157155727222681,"gpt":0.3125096319193878,"spread":0.2967940591971197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117219,0.0002728223,0.0003794032,0.003211981,0.003909487,0.01151174,0.0008194868,0.001602437,0.005993255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01694445,0.000139978,0.0005425469,0.004828248,0.004685635,0.006574998,0.005412159,0.001640945,0.0003172486],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008436543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01153277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03052313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03257758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903114,0.00459732,0.0003821997,0.0004744802,0.001812771,0.002421981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894236,0.006432922,0.0008976531,0.0002303969,0.001686135,0.001329215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007992586,0.00006107498,0.01711519,0.0001820162,0.00004426741,0.0004193057,0.01831894,0.001569505,0.000203499,0.9346956,0.002817706,0.02449301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000474013,0.0001617529,0.1268326,0.002591243,0.0001263473,0.0003733322,0.2945196,0.003162667,0.0007439291,0.1681576,0.4032085,0.00007490165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3545161,0.004648731,0.003366781,0.01252714,0.000167557,0.0001018774,0.0002037881,0.00001318155,0.6244549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831173,0.002483691,0.001033783,0.001334441,0.00005226811,0.00006293804,0.0001334505,0.0000216226,0.01176046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03052313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06199211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125510305","doi":"","title":"Foreseeably Unclear: The Meaning of the \"ReasonablyForeseeable\" Criterion for Access to Medical Assistancein Dying in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Law; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Jocelyn Downie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kate Scallion","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02975658005082675,"gpt":0.3149984486671223,"spread":0.2852418686162956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01753281,0.0004694065,0.001314982,0.001958414,0.03059209,0.0208565,0.005529579,0.01155637,0.008323886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06445359,0.0008037025,0.0009364866,0.003445148,0.03101267,0.006836635,0.006613974,0.01732247,0.0002795071],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1847075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.355865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9735554,0.005792158,0.0009524637,0.001892398,0.006289202,0.01151835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579926,0.01864649,0.00178038,0.001389146,0.0150694,0.005122114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005588356,0.00002062062,0.005730682,0.00005743402,0.00001983111,0.0002933878,0.008704291,0.000841064,0.00008585912,0.9640191,0.01596941,0.00420245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596251,0.00006864354,0.05417909,0.001574067,0.0003036562,0.0003820581,0.06078318,0.009124188,0.0008632385,0.6506942,0.2212042,0.0006639703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.198537,0.006086934,0.004943852,0.3092772,0.0007717807,0.0001826302,0.00142856,0.0000592994,0.4787129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788929,0.0007505184,0.0008538384,0.01017037,0.0001139343,0.00003448942,0.00008295182,0.00003512666,0.009065857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9456238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}