{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3cbe31b13eda","filters":{"venue":"Deakin Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W1537485993","doi":"10.21153/dlr2006vol11no1art230","title":"The Stolen Generations - Canada and Australia: the Legacy of Assimilation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Project commissioning; Duty of care; Liability; Jurisprudence; Damages; Publishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); Duty; Fiduciary; Tort; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Julie Cassidy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04886536736657516,"gpt":0.3357519580704449,"spread":0.2868865907038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002524111,0.0002548426,0.0004318698,0.001873581,0.03182108,0.009265085,0.001419473,0.002853932,0.003840611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005731904,0.0002692593,0.0003034376,0.002648084,0.01772539,0.002599929,0.006061451,0.005006525,0.0001299144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08322399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1218511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948026,0.0006280366,0.0001015774,0.0004194388,0.002265312,0.001783008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653,0.0007368458,0.0002954555,0.0001627174,0.001292212,0.000982812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005424971,0.00006593956,0.01384791,0.0002664235,0.0000390317,0.003207201,0.1918364,0.0004063798,0.0005375031,0.6609521,0.02217964,0.1066071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001509181,0.00006980886,0.08045242,0.001021947,0.00008170415,0.001420046,0.1990741,0.000517563,0.0005785491,0.03195999,0.6846329,0.0001757978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4990195,0.04207253,0.0007774484,0.08351658,0.0008051685,0.00007248437,0.0001387707,0.00002660001,0.3735709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558672,0.01385629,0.0003255901,0.005543008,0.00008409279,0.00001410648,0.00002301694,0.00001612638,0.02427061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08322399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6038351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230923987","doi":"10.21153/dlr2005vol10no2art297","title":"ANOTHER MODEST PROPOSAL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Law; Mainstream; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; History; Political science; Literature; Human rights; Art; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Desmond Manderson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05319497522807289,"gpt":0.3641740767031132,"spread":0.3109791014750403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008245923,0.0006904603,0.0005101653,0.00140484,0.005830967,0.00762328,0.002979279,0.01065463,0.04793716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01904107,0.0003342971,0.0009926755,0.0008624656,0.01366833,0.0119186,0.004993845,0.01230547,0.0146302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005889881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01004248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006923157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006191785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942254,0.001898754,0.000206069,0.001239144,0.001688695,0.0007418953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928297,0.00263828,0.0002393747,0.001261356,0.002203815,0.0008274306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000996507,0.00001562947,0.00006464677,0.00003002317,0.00000225935,0.00004335851,0.0004774549,0.00005984006,0.00007390508,0.9523246,0.04201576,0.004882531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001673629,0.00002258073,0.0002455855,0.0001530934,0.000005906518,0.00008776702,0.001102594,0.0003809177,0.0001288085,0.4042263,0.5936124,0.00001743811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004446317,0.002726912,0.01569318,0.4391865,0.01174983,0.0001551218,0.0002607687,0.0001598049,0.5256216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2587812,0.004625984,0.01879337,0.2479171,0.01050282,0.00078687,0.0005254592,0.000355211,0.4577121],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04793716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1603658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345100582","doi":"10.21153/dlr2013vol18no2art43","title":"The Legal In/Security of Temporary Migrant Agricultural Work: Case Studies from Canada and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Right to work; Dismissal; Notice; Legislation; Labour law; Work (physics); Redress; Business; Repatriation; Law; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03702364322765113,"gpt":0.3172549224014932,"spread":0.2802312791738421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004456496,0.0003021934,0.0005730931,0.00307151,0.01385344,0.003389582,0.001736349,0.002224667,0.001817224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008569736,0.0003059643,0.0003716413,0.007866998,0.005793673,0.001089107,0.003023334,0.002022959,0.0001073778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08064096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08788733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951705,0.001191222,0.0001555316,0.0002618397,0.001451911,0.001768909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938309,0.0026692,0.0005660311,0.0001615259,0.001892091,0.0008801691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002393956,0.0004552534,0.1250156,0.002238284,0.0001355468,0.01425449,0.5034276,0.002038633,0.0009688077,0.171936,0.03041378,0.1488766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004764014,0.0001416087,0.2521584,0.002666733,0.000214573,0.002461581,0.5250412,0.001301022,0.0004722597,0.002966898,0.2124036,0.0001246089],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925085,0.02516814,0.0003819927,0.008155297,0.0000923536,0.0001382383,0.0001611212,0.000008743776,0.07338564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745557,0.01472323,0.000372504,0.001250072,0.00002500234,0.00003693623,0.00006596802,0.000007867381,0.008962735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08064096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5850939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971206311","doi":"10.21153/dlr2019vol24no1art875","title":"Recommendations on the Optimal Constitutional Recognition of the First Nations in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commonwealth; Treaty; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Law; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Comparative law; Legal realism","authors":[{"name":"Benjamen Gussen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07175335148650308,"gpt":0.3638970022578252,"spread":0.2921436507713221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04907638,0.001313365,0.002330301,0.004833877,0.005924373,0.0126248,0.006992976,0.03080167,0.01409201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08283269,0.001482665,0.002768557,0.002829276,0.009946838,0.01616261,0.009865847,0.02841138,0.004003572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01269776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07790946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0945311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0892982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9499338,0.02235989,0.005033338,0.003524109,0.01309418,0.006054718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454612,0.02518521,0.003154918,0.002344205,0.0189904,0.004864125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000399317,0.0001760547,0.0006918737,0.001257424,0.0000347015,0.0004888604,0.004364163,0.000938412,0.0004756316,0.4910279,0.465047,0.035458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007396001,0.0000644367,0.002098586,0.004945304,0.00005423109,0.0001718315,0.003154258,0.0004525906,0.0002973284,0.06374202,0.9248152,0.0001301976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003999473,0.05310747,0.003881567,0.8214753,0.02526188,0.0006670843,0.0003831945,0.0001885052,0.09103556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05525894,0.05611024,0.03772299,0.6712401,0.01032848,0.002516991,0.0007487163,0.0002216623,0.165852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0945311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2595438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W247585863","doi":"10.21153/dlr2013vol18no1art58","title":"Police Bargaining Disputes and Third-Party Intervention in Australia: Which Way Forward?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Business; Third party; Collective bargaining; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Giuseppe Carabetta","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07817230228492522,"gpt":0.4136270090679255,"spread":0.3354547067830003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01721122,0.0001858742,0.0007073642,0.002120604,0.00936418,0.007727256,0.001957132,0.003327334,0.005641133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03601918,0.0005373804,0.0004516334,0.002795524,0.01252132,0.005743166,0.007496582,0.005379468,0.0004310216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0150047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03344122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1065738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1140214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9732624,0.01492426,0.0009778863,0.0009545269,0.006953456,0.002927549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792804,0.008113028,0.006557669,0.000701139,0.003193791,0.00215393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007246179,0.0005302427,0.02848045,0.001374887,0.00005458827,0.002087765,0.4127005,0.0007049744,0.000881476,0.3398674,0.01226434,0.200981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006298494,0.0004190069,0.1380917,0.004920698,0.00007345701,0.001846348,0.4076733,0.001766782,0.0005628356,0.06657856,0.3778647,0.0001395567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6369228,0.05014038,0.003782819,0.08863734,0.0005956414,0.0002202696,0.00001978421,0.00002307815,0.2196579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703751,0.01543558,0.000735124,0.003773892,0.0001143062,0.00006959928,0.000009347818,0.00001037082,0.009476698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1065738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2119069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097262663","doi":"10.21153/dlr2010vol15no2art122","title":"Control Orders Post 9-11 and Human Rights in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada: A Kafkaesque Dilemma?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Commonwealth; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Convention; Scope (computer science); Dilemma; International human rights law; Public administration; Business","authors":[{"name":"Sascha-Dominik Oliver Vladimir Bachmann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03113774515172246,"gpt":0.3277600244995543,"spread":0.2966222793478318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004703816,0.0002537813,0.0005195871,0.002894337,0.01466665,0.01376505,0.002119991,0.006419386,0.006967282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02092401,0.0005553105,0.000403138,0.004455119,0.0153523,0.004908486,0.00334029,0.006507398,0.0003744835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1225359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2122525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887704,0.001150054,0.0003416667,0.0006691646,0.004727672,0.004341058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886714,0.002980264,0.0009190762,0.0003429614,0.005325801,0.001760548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005968385,0.00005295235,0.006087927,0.000138363,0.00003509292,0.0005925252,0.01722408,0.0004037368,0.000182561,0.9059362,0.03307474,0.03621205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009945599,0.0000698347,0.08355819,0.001263748,0.0001171161,0.0004727839,0.05027029,0.001062821,0.0006892463,0.06809548,0.7939199,0.0003810586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1872465,0.03083257,0.0008477955,0.1871633,0.0007690255,0.0001245835,0.0003554126,0.00003737126,0.5926234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89803,0.01235453,0.0006468121,0.02498425,0.0002050606,0.00005413513,0.000130834,0.00003050903,0.06356394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1225359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1936271412","doi":"10.21153/dlr2009vol14no2art146","title":"Crown Immunity in a Food Crisis: A Consideration of the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Law; Criticism; Fell; Government (linguistics); Political science; Listeria; Public health; Listeria monocytogenes; Sociology; Medicine; History; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Shelley L Miller","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shauna N Finlay","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03384199023218695,"gpt":0.3054331807311877,"spread":0.2715911904990007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003203785,0.000340069,0.0004852662,0.002116426,0.02831065,0.01037658,0.002681332,0.01205555,0.002578335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01156116,0.0004006508,0.0006053189,0.003250554,0.009011525,0.002307271,0.002753373,0.008134498,0.0001265862],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1511197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2794465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975141,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949008,0.0003794489,0.00009152928,0.0002077022,0.001590395,0.00283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935759,0.001843956,0.0004668305,0.00008109885,0.002643779,0.001388562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001633521,0.0002169766,0.03870682,0.0005794326,0.00009190817,0.0126499,0.0646285,0.00361384,0.001154871,0.4752331,0.3509999,0.05196127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012288,0.000123799,0.145537,0.001182089,0.000217275,0.001137351,0.1544334,0.004195933,0.0007320134,0.03739902,0.6545255,0.0003937702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2237129,0.02667332,0.0006090858,0.5626783,0.001632438,0.0001926794,0.000339867,0.0000429271,0.1841185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585778,0.01431468,0.0005828993,0.09658904,0.0005917111,0.00004582785,0.0001271556,0.00002411584,0.0291467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1511197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}