{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"4518145a9e5a","filters":{"venue":"Defense Counsel Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Rouhette","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04235538640228112,"gpt":0.3418535535635373,"spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717408,0.0004428171,0.0008485856,0.004213084,0.001630647,0.01379484,0.002406652,0.009564579,0.005904029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01234054,0.0002884873,0.0006627698,0.005784655,0.01403503,0.01584602,0.003628735,0.006239364,0.0007342495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003720468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00263071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00359918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002337835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947786,0.001461344,0.0004161792,0.001443266,0.001381301,0.0005193748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910981,0.004319576,0.001892119,0.0007708027,0.001243996,0.0006753845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004531418,0.00004925779,0.00402461,0.0002130622,0.00002882249,0.0002717464,0.0009254162,0.0002925468,0.00008449027,0.9232404,0.01108781,0.05973655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002148861,0.0001551543,0.03035029,0.003085543,0.0000480471,0.002374231,0.00286437,0.0009096255,0.0002779861,0.3558021,0.6040158,0.0000953638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06196013,0.4204705,0.0190363,0.1462439,0.006145145,0.00003876345,0.0006262219,0.00008839148,0.3453907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954862,0.1262394,0.00607663,0.03729818,0.01228479,0.000102409,0.0004849077,0.0001266466,0.0219008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01379484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0302369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510858968","doi":"","title":"Pension Plans and Class Actions: The Vivendi Case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Class action; Pension; Commission; Business; Judgement; Political science; Public administration; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Louis Charette","is_ca":false},{"name":"Josee Dumoulin","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bernard Larocque","is_ca":false},{"name":"François Parent","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02570893351656532,"gpt":0.2206407790875725,"spread":0.1949318455710071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006739558,0.0004166105,0.0004587668,0.001403801,0.01644352,0.007132959,0.002776918,0.01194824,0.00850574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007906132,0.0005821219,0.0007037594,0.001114898,0.008723841,0.003116553,0.006701095,0.01569326,0.0008847324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01815152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02075304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3759324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4915311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9938384,0.0007243906,0.0001120978,0.000414119,0.001235407,0.003675568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969684,0.001010375,0.0002504896,0.0002590221,0.0003395831,0.001172083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006394072,0.0001038597,0.006431117,0.0000252563,0.00001620589,0.001919373,0.004974224,0.0002849268,0.0001036577,0.9176153,0.05788615,0.01057605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002774943,0.00009981092,0.01664303,0.0008046057,0.0001028422,0.001902779,0.01328413,0.001783042,0.0006642848,0.1182787,0.8459986,0.0001606342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1042624,0.006395502,0.001154491,0.1016439,0.0007959425,0.0001532236,0.0003180158,0.00004648116,0.7852302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681031,0.002893112,0.0004865881,0.04629445,0.0007702935,0.0001676014,0.0002114615,0.00002970361,0.08104379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3759324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7474884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Steven F. Rosenhek","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vaso Maric","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01908005545827297,"gpt":0.2530409978543282,"spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007398702,0.001030014,0.001080219,0.002620065,0.03140074,0.01560456,0.005984904,0.02367019,0.01350337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02240971,0.001486024,0.001682704,0.003179153,0.007796746,0.002630846,0.004579173,0.02006514,0.001732635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08482594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1932707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9798305,0.0007081461,0.0005044293,0.002030679,0.01066035,0.006265949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875298,0.003261111,0.0003811645,0.0008195809,0.006317291,0.001691111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009112727,0.00006443823,0.004820807,0.00009978742,0.00007033379,0.001592807,0.002974455,0.0008496391,0.001004701,0.6883255,0.2820453,0.01806102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361513,0.00006515004,0.01102195,0.0007398039,0.0004023253,0.0003623192,0.002166094,0.002649406,0.002143531,0.05698527,0.9228271,0.0004008746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05078175,0.004731525,0.003743048,0.1051114,0.002866777,0.0004340577,0.002789399,0.0003252852,0.8292168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5459915,0.004696866,0.004356599,0.1637672,0.001801333,0.0003559571,0.00133351,0.0002805423,0.2774165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08482594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952393837","doi":"","title":"Moving beyond Uberrima Fides? the General Duty of Honesty in Contractual Performance and Punitive Damage Awards in Anglo-Canadian Contract Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Fides; Law; Honesty; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Business; Political science; Liability; Philosophy; Restitution; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Conrad Flaczyk","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicolas Glaudemans","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01678027225537957,"gpt":0.2867413488882816,"spread":0.269961076632902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01627222,0.0003437906,0.0006689213,0.001739211,0.02498752,0.01716808,0.002588585,0.009010851,0.00696101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0382128,0.0006649839,0.00043147,0.002007187,0.04255787,0.008729389,0.004976876,0.0128753,0.0004528785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06727117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1229358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.971962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983867,0.003997984,0.0004936173,0.001248875,0.00451156,0.005880866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822085,0.007141998,0.001204274,0.00104233,0.005764106,0.002638755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002307462,0.00002876019,0.002734956,0.00002325954,0.000007516795,0.00008075275,0.01693963,0.0002200808,0.00009603144,0.9594496,0.008239852,0.0121566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006781938,0.00005791518,0.04119881,0.0009219068,0.0001113818,0.0003101247,0.09520672,0.00257984,0.0005606348,0.6372628,0.2214014,0.0003206264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1836801,0.006553799,0.005263048,0.2902775,0.0007737725,0.00008806124,0.0001200968,0.00003337618,0.5132102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622269,0.001011113,0.0008605539,0.01144945,0.0001427166,0.00002430953,0.00001230025,0.00002073823,0.02425204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06727117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4880887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212664854","doi":"","title":"International Class Actions in the Canadian Context: Standing, Funding, Enforceability and Trial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Liability; Law; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Political science; Res judicata; Business; Multinational corporation; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Glenn M. Zakaib","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeremy M. Martin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05975093314548166,"gpt":0.2907563899156499,"spread":0.2310054567701683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007219153,0.0005071877,0.0004978931,0.002276922,0.02989113,0.02451989,0.00432408,0.0124725,0.02085174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508426,0.0005857652,0.0005707975,0.002961856,0.01493248,0.005109394,0.004963156,0.00959912,0.001140084],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1671706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3731461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835424,0.001171746,0.0003488831,0.001349245,0.005728598,0.007859084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852818,0.003766871,0.0009959242,0.0004681884,0.004143298,0.005343969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004690689,0.00005337918,0.005653353,0.0001788109,0.00001735116,0.0007374059,0.006801715,0.0006337097,0.0003743406,0.7681642,0.1716699,0.04566891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003542532,0.00005848166,0.0165914,0.001029493,0.00007627934,0.000398474,0.02200735,0.001219207,0.0007292803,0.04435845,0.9133075,0.0001886368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04932376,0.01355541,0.003023142,0.3058066,0.001714819,0.000258369,0.000567678,0.0001464407,0.6256037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7262598,0.01174453,0.003788149,0.07243336,0.0007628151,0.0001701572,0.0003220432,0.0001166894,0.1844025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1671706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9659641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224296180","doi":"","title":"Constitution, Crime, Clergy: First Amendment Implications of Sexual Abuse Claims: Church Law and Discipline, Constitutional Limitations, Damage Caps and Statutes of Limitations Raise Perplexing Issues in These Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Constitution; Statutory law; Sexual abuse; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Poison control; History; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Michael F. Aylward","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07104623176890848,"gpt":0.3335079804758323,"spread":0.2624617487069238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009482143,0.0006516078,0.0008893594,0.002442233,0.02074993,0.01344515,0.00305365,0.0277886,0.005979247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01755417,0.00113774,0.001073757,0.001963859,0.02276748,0.008232055,0.00697857,0.02078978,0.0006652247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01185187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01059226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08450904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1196442,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915847,0.003158161,0.0006160809,0.000750119,0.00193806,0.001952903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864054,0.01049417,0.0009510955,0.0006203456,0.0009945784,0.0005343839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007604617,0.00006483137,0.0008933207,0.00002465983,0.000006354835,0.0008799832,0.003584515,0.0001694733,0.0001359045,0.9850709,0.006437822,0.002724552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009212466,0.0001686156,0.01275823,0.001582236,0.00009972314,0.00241759,0.021104,0.003006712,0.002010616,0.5755067,0.3809975,0.0002558931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1495606,0.01553032,0.009681574,0.1618451,0.002007686,0.000403242,0.0004109814,0.0001070953,0.6604534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575505,0.006682565,0.00521896,0.04254806,0.002184954,0.0008419006,0.000177496,0.00006935534,0.08472622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08450904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1680343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527306418","doi":"","title":"The Test for Causation in Canada: But for, but ... Maybe Not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Test (biology); Confusion; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"J. J. Lawrie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Annie Leeks","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gordon McKee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04677605707819044,"gpt":0.2875057320167952,"spread":0.2407296749386048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009407118,0.0005975466,0.0008331942,0.002307949,0.0173999,0.009630291,0.003022425,0.006050478,0.007297992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03115972,0.0006011635,0.0007405137,0.003232065,0.02511686,0.003694278,0.002279516,0.008211791,0.000730296],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.169965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3224787,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9852228,0.002074274,0.0004710081,0.001474848,0.007957148,0.002799865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809215,0.005851738,0.0008552807,0.0004711117,0.01046051,0.00143988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002879743,0.00001116164,0.00375514,0.0003687453,0.000037671,0.0003744233,0.004176992,0.00024401,0.0001815621,0.6941153,0.2652088,0.0314974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005803179,0.00002475666,0.01660982,0.001416512,0.0001236323,0.0001696051,0.00567713,0.0007932932,0.0005584054,0.1309386,0.8434162,0.0002140333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01007246,0.06364044,0.005253411,0.7096599,0.006555495,0.0001265668,0.001770311,0.0001256235,0.2027958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5742884,0.05438172,0.01290652,0.2382222,0.003593256,0.0001536882,0.001283807,0.0002343511,0.1149362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.169965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261832368","doi":"","title":"Insurance Industry Woes in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina & Rita","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; History; Tragedy (event); Hurricane katrina; Storm surge; Luck; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural disaster; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Geography; Meteorology; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David J. Rosenberg","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kenneth M. Portner","is_ca":false},{"name":"Matthew Stool","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01118003042774189,"gpt":0.2740141526062536,"spread":0.2628341221785117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00151353,0.0004256867,0.0002678245,0.001098089,0.01012954,0.005141018,0.0005145011,0.002580699,0.01411428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00483389,0.0003287265,0.0003843958,0.0006416126,0.001607062,0.001721143,0.003889642,0.005590174,0.003226578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002435376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003078478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02386442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06577795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990993,0.0001250073,0.00002875663,0.00005095157,0.0003487574,0.0003473282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978668,0.000126253,0.0003065317,0.00005639565,0.000464011,0.001179941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002887074,0.0004823697,0.0723213,0.000280215,0.000102563,0.007964157,0.06698462,0.0002148872,0.001855507,0.005908971,0.7296842,0.1139126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001601746,0.0003176038,0.1040716,0.0003323005,0.00002646281,0.00146018,0.2142771,0.0002462686,0.0003272912,0.001318586,0.6775585,0.00004804022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.5804513,0.01011105,0.0004830464,0.2713337,0.01975008,0.0001146311,0.0006524726,0.0002411334,0.1168627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8199819,0.01147686,0.0007123942,0.04669138,0.005509727,0.00008771419,0.001038934,0.0001784775,0.1143226],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02386442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04745102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227614572","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Consumer protection; Product (mathematics); Law; Business; Legislation; Commission; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Liability; Commerce; Politics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Peter J. Pliszka","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard D. Butler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09851926336921897,"gpt":0.3031498479018137,"spread":0.2046305845325948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005907859,0.0007467898,0.00090193,0.001761687,0.01486469,0.01544788,0.003007175,0.01818829,0.02820802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01783897,0.0007539615,0.0009645572,0.003171352,0.01085681,0.0070678,0.002719988,0.01347151,0.006141726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07399209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1937394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9521329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.977881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867784,0.000816386,0.0002867842,0.0009924545,0.008132482,0.002993477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829454,0.002379793,0.0005947817,0.000843635,0.01023316,0.003003333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186298,0.00001395558,0.0002870948,0.00007689803,0.000006720679,0.00009989464,0.0004990192,0.0000253294,0.00009512371,0.04761852,0.9387279,0.01253775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007554626,0.000004675215,0.0006871852,0.0001170882,0.000008648859,0.00003585027,0.0004649847,0.00003232272,0.00004789913,0.001841679,0.9967303,0.00002199202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001684205,0.01518166,0.0004493755,0.8298687,0.01426756,0.00003573225,0.0005563693,0.0001916423,0.1377647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04172418,0.0157518,0.001486481,0.6952502,0.005151761,0.00004421597,0.0006472188,0.0002168044,0.2397274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07399209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5368527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30121777","doi":"10.1007/s00261-018-1731-9","title":"Recent Developments under the Montreal Convention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Liability; Law; Damages; Aviation; Political science; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Tory A. Weigand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02068525859264109,"gpt":0.2947030903993148,"spread":0.2740178318066737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005281858,0.0007668396,0.0005025678,0.001837517,0.00358666,0.00736737,0.002283338,0.004562147,0.0594859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009894093,0.000301651,0.0005603109,0.001889119,0.003815864,0.002689088,0.003019554,0.004298249,0.01486921],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01240807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02707078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2001684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.200991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954882,0.0007233815,0.0001788807,0.0007786509,0.001990556,0.0008403545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946413,0.0006705253,0.0003941005,0.0003763845,0.002755884,0.001161715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004617295,0.00004702736,0.001093804,0.0003473622,0.00001344766,0.0002785706,0.0004171432,0.0002284651,0.0006456742,0.1981573,0.5546106,0.2441144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002320528,0.000008830663,0.0008128539,0.0001156411,0.000002550746,0.00006235809,0.00004086701,0.00002752102,0.0000686276,0.001496818,0.9973534,0.000008136757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004199717,0.1414409,0.005774642,0.2018463,0.05813217,0.0002265514,0.001774032,0.0007006694,0.585905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07471866,0.09488194,0.01125875,0.07195992,0.03018173,0.0003685835,0.001443128,0.000472095,0.7147152],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2001684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3980066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109525249","doi":"10.12690/0895-0016-81.1.fmiii","title":"<i>President's Page:</i>IADC Pride: The Global Connection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Connection (principal bundle); Pride; Law; Political science; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Molly H. Craig","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01289122412988128,"gpt":0.2075620390018075,"spread":0.1946708148719262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019261,0.0009010049,0.0005305202,0.0006385874,0.006603484,0.009954495,0.001086666,0.006902744,0.1518669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004100496,0.0004203087,0.0003854879,0.0009358351,0.0009752366,0.004064239,0.002807577,0.009516335,0.08697057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002333308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003207896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01145342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03855506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990644,0.0001090386,0.00004534266,0.000156276,0.0003828968,0.0002420512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970607,0.0002662014,0.0001207716,0.0001048608,0.001032377,0.001415081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001667935,0.000003367539,0.00003739566,0.000008733839,2.172492e-7,0.00002020706,0.00003314057,0.000001656983,0.00001744764,0.000193359,0.9981844,0.001498418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001515702,0.000004165707,0.0002821063,0.00003664572,6.535156e-7,0.00004475065,0.0002542617,0.000005656902,0.00002327938,0.00005385505,0.9992886,0.000004565989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.001202892,0.005907355,0.000398816,0.3314,0.2451697,0.0002152136,0.00107491,0.001099521,0.4135316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007984441,0.004818364,0.000329951,0.1206787,0.05219601,0.0001259221,0.0006630924,0.0008139292,0.8123896],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1518669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757274567","doi":"","title":"Did You Really Send It? Email Evidence in Litigation and Arbitration in Argentina","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Arbitration; Law; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Liability; Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lisandro A. Allende","is_ca":false},{"name":"Arturo E. Fontana","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05439256140919605,"gpt":0.287463436352665,"spread":0.233070874943469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007924611,0.0003568211,0.0007367999,0.002889819,0.008858711,0.006619634,0.001453178,0.00664707,0.01029038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02452814,0.0004059668,0.0002526524,0.003427126,0.005808865,0.003348572,0.004673362,0.003032635,0.0006114094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01105211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005256949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03957924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05009706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909952,0.003736395,0.0005885178,0.00069137,0.002320478,0.001668079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869542,0.008115528,0.002432742,0.0003240619,0.00146302,0.0007104662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000654215,0.0005120473,0.08371209,0.001574371,0.000134958,0.02095636,0.09655824,0.000705031,0.0009442481,0.5452539,0.111198,0.1377966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001864978,0.0002735041,0.1936387,0.005532143,0.000214078,0.006482872,0.08813955,0.003542988,0.0009654509,0.07597119,0.6248795,0.0001736218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235385,0.07179152,0.001580915,0.1046204,0.001223142,0.0001739377,0.0004047167,0.00004001419,0.2966269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758177,0.007513142,0.0004443701,0.004687099,0.0005504204,0.00006118098,0.00009738391,0.00001355917,0.01081516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03957924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08018899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W292880592","doi":"","title":"Antipodean Alignment: Impact of the Proposed Australian Consumer Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Corporation; Commission; Law; Population; Competition (biology); Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Stumpff Morrison","is_ca":false},{"name":"Richard D. Abraham","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mary Sheargold","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02131163582588744,"gpt":0.3287517080437196,"spread":0.3074400722178321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01000169,0.0002525823,0.0002999081,0.001294089,0.009860689,0.01095484,0.002091717,0.008981073,0.01200414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02427846,0.0005169361,0.0007057825,0.001454466,0.007900097,0.005273389,0.007803958,0.01242492,0.001332094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01421967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02773087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08592568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840225,0.004309511,0.0003924582,0.001087672,0.007908935,0.002278845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912213,0.003359682,0.000857893,0.0005264795,0.002685746,0.001348945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005519911,0.0002823836,0.006515633,0.0001323809,0.00001274065,0.001019616,0.01420263,0.0003243971,0.0005230026,0.8688067,0.05793075,0.05019445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004339985,0.0002955031,0.03454034,0.000434296,0.00004475915,0.0005223997,0.01530454,0.002503743,0.0009855366,0.09339574,0.851836,0.00009383554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1154953,0.001913238,0.002078025,0.1663107,0.001912127,0.0002283977,0.00008919011,0.00006503946,0.7119081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6727033,0.002306111,0.002595322,0.1232344,0.0008411942,0.0002126932,0.000093487,0.00006652719,0.197947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08592568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1708511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610650896","doi":"","title":"Surety in the 21st Century: Everything Old Is New Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surety; Underwriting; Bond; Indemnity; Payment; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Allen Gibson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bruce E. Kahn","is_ca":false},{"name":"Pamela McGovern","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04374422698752627,"gpt":0.2617451296919239,"spread":0.2180009027043976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005507592,0.0004382154,0.0008843995,0.002366265,0.009959524,0.01919295,0.001636639,0.009871299,0.006680951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01232155,0.0003505701,0.0004907388,0.002693016,0.04840716,0.0222226,0.007227668,0.01506557,0.0009382353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01094131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01087543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01721218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02215191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931901,0.002137531,0.0003104922,0.0009621881,0.002506292,0.0008935223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914418,0.004411878,0.0006253296,0.0008479008,0.001482965,0.001190183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001630121,0.00001690402,0.0005112111,0.0001301015,0.000008469595,0.0001910387,0.009022005,0.000112575,0.00009709046,0.9084892,0.04051542,0.04088974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004256498,0.00002255642,0.001056132,0.0006647685,0.00000554165,0.000277991,0.004810151,0.00008165138,0.00007455502,0.2445012,0.7484698,0.00003143993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01446,0.2797459,0.005802818,0.4603266,0.01052153,0.00001965525,0.0001220932,0.00009763847,0.2289039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4667242,0.2523928,0.003778263,0.1530548,0.02556326,0.00007879752,0.0001684481,0.0002354053,0.09800405],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01919295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07938516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566894743","doi":"","title":"The Evolving Landscape for Pharmaceutical Product Liability Litigation in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Mass tort; Product liability; Class action; Law; Liability; Business; Tort; Product (mathematics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Gordon McKee","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robin D. Linley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04030235086632047,"gpt":0.3866159461024432,"spread":0.3463135952361228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005610093,0.0004513108,0.0006108339,0.006676811,0.01772181,0.01539373,0.003626568,0.006670327,0.01557869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01672105,0.0007782941,0.0009997683,0.006820824,0.01339127,0.003856539,0.004224114,0.008214944,0.0008773421],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3322467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9844713,0.001181192,0.0005429017,0.001251492,0.008502007,0.004051122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796351,0.004092033,0.001770449,0.0003426735,0.008313312,0.005846502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000546415,0.00009120827,0.00920381,0.0004436549,0.00004059643,0.002418459,0.003058539,0.001874233,0.0009174965,0.6749462,0.1820171,0.124934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005980177,0.0000701463,0.03757074,0.001617297,0.00007317939,0.001655414,0.004984318,0.003954157,0.0006231898,0.06970601,0.8793991,0.0002866609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03738479,0.06433,0.006231231,0.5663255,0.001928065,0.0002497883,0.0007854847,0.0003055476,0.3224595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6825338,0.0960016,0.01675771,0.1343246,0.002360583,0.0001376231,0.0007523872,0.0002330738,0.06689861],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8534701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174261786","doi":"","title":"Environmental Prosecutions: Criminal Liability without Mens Rea and Exposure under the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Law; Statute; Indictment; Liability; Doctrine; Officer; Business; Corporate liability; Plaintiff; Corporate title; Damages; Legal liability; Political science; Criminal law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Douglas S. Brooks","is_ca":false},{"name":"Thomas C. Frongillo","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0462503031042415,"gpt":0.2606485412822747,"spread":0.2143982381780332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006660446,0.0006211862,0.001050701,0.001170103,0.00549149,0.007821212,0.002040063,0.02053006,0.005738593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01780521,0.0005652864,0.001163377,0.000639139,0.02774329,0.01381675,0.006862042,0.01623072,0.00132072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002506826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005347974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007268563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00523757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899899,0.002763623,0.0006918671,0.001782043,0.002834532,0.001938128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913973,0.005351678,0.000770304,0.0009766669,0.001076178,0.0004279159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008710575,0.00001177291,0.0002965813,0.00001730457,0.000003957666,0.0004146021,0.0005811333,0.0001387266,0.0000800905,0.9939546,0.001948907,0.00254372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003374581,0.00004018497,0.0008859397,0.0001498219,0.0000174422,0.0008167238,0.0006926948,0.001034159,0.0003114583,0.9707239,0.02525675,0.000037208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0870017,0.01040062,0.06222539,0.1349446,0.002198199,0.0003278928,0.0002644932,0.0001174812,0.7025196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122068,0.004558439,0.01087847,0.02817661,0.004093729,0.0005110548,0.0001018467,0.00005818168,0.03941501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02053006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283144324","doi":"","title":"When Children Refuse Medical Treatment: Role of Government and Assessments; a Standardized Test to Assess a Child's Maturity and Understanding Would Help Judges in Their Solomonic Roles to Render More Uniform Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Maturity (psychological); Jurisdiction; Psychology; Informed consent; Consistency (knowledge bases); Guardian; Law; Family medicine; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","authors":[{"name":"Carla E. Burden-Osmond","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07059676368038773,"gpt":0.3535994504383672,"spread":0.2830026867579795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02366702,0.0002610653,0.0003061529,0.001448186,0.007002105,0.006234224,0.001762538,0.005780556,0.003442565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05955353,0.0003763059,0.0004857893,0.0009412815,0.009665176,0.003395039,0.003708678,0.006659043,0.0005814875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01161753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0767134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1781773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4518787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9785821,0.007794472,0.001538827,0.0009520651,0.008002483,0.003130123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748526,0.008810518,0.004413962,0.00123036,0.006727104,0.00396548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001671577,0.0002641707,0.1319035,0.0003212807,0.00007020628,0.009121188,0.04726764,0.001071134,0.003183394,0.2826206,0.2571976,0.2668123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766766,0.0005278992,0.2407801,0.002982871,0.0001657447,0.009492626,0.09586703,0.003692104,0.008257737,0.1206617,0.5168677,0.0005277764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.2162074,0.008627254,0.01760933,0.4509893,0.002911278,0.001480921,0.0005865016,0.000300995,0.301287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932102,0.002270167,0.01351414,0.036416,0.0004113318,0.0002868194,0.0001680749,0.00005669535,0.01477482],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1781773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3542803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252615043","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: 2005 State of the Union: Growing, Expanding, and Developing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Sean McKee","is_ca":false},{"name":"Martha E. Cook","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415921890431619,"gpt":0.2130225137226774,"spread":0.1988632948183612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002696859,0.0003636081,0.0003587513,0.004572579,0.01449606,0.01307714,0.002479657,0.003219478,0.007556858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007003066,0.0005596626,0.0006717367,0.006443815,0.004022522,0.001574468,0.002486852,0.00359481,0.0007714141],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.202774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3612609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899906,0.0002211072,0.0002323153,0.0005165084,0.006609586,0.00242983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916481,0.0006392216,0.0006172118,0.0001381172,0.004608061,0.002349243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089585,0.0001531381,0.04403226,0.0008723408,0.00005800437,0.001289747,0.01000321,0.001419007,0.001097682,0.2323976,0.407373,0.3012144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001096345,0.00002114805,0.06012034,0.0005203842,0.00003943263,0.0001641496,0.004887704,0.0004441442,0.000436752,0.001862662,0.9314192,0.00007312709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.130665,0.0736412,0.002905603,0.0872107,0.002435473,0.0006276669,0.006959347,0.0005964402,0.6949586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.630061,0.05822792,0.005862891,0.02828412,0.0005992514,0.0001952812,0.004622395,0.0002055837,0.2719416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.202774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9246692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W326731111","doi":"","title":"City of Ontario V. Quon: Electronic Privacy in the Workplace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pager; Notice; Supreme court; Confidentiality; Law; Officer; Business; Privacy policy; Rulemaking; Internet privacy; Political science; Public administration; Information privacy; Telecommunications; Engineering; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jacqueline J. Harding","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05021492539422646,"gpt":0.2281554069760165,"spread":0.17794048158179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002186303,0.0002960325,0.0002091982,0.0006173574,0.02083584,0.007031913,0.001298754,0.01139331,0.01527807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005889863,0.0005419044,0.0003315807,0.001135859,0.006162946,0.002324776,0.002052084,0.004318377,0.001428529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04697797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05592926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942147,0.0004721429,0.000158208,0.0004290538,0.002718381,0.002007514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962181,0.001437726,0.0002541812,0.0002330577,0.001224086,0.0006328739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008814513,0.00004430926,0.009780121,0.00015285,0.00001222222,0.002627821,0.01526884,0.0001838431,0.001109784,0.249546,0.6979321,0.02325397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004360512,0.0000309604,0.01491207,0.0004066309,0.00003262977,0.0003717355,0.005772909,0.0002245581,0.0006267922,0.00718406,0.9703178,0.00007625253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04142119,0.005084939,0.001083447,0.2005238,0.001795103,0.0001534557,0.0007743899,0.00008316287,0.7490805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4704322,0.005379959,0.0005408505,0.1364867,0.001172176,0.0001401922,0.000324361,0.00006883605,0.3854547],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3408506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168443748","doi":"","title":"Defending against Suits Brought by Illegal Aliens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Law; Plaintiff; Tort; Misrepresentation; Jury; Doctrine; Lawsuit; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Liability","authors":[{"name":"Jerry Joe Knauff","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01437180594359614,"gpt":0.2864605411120291,"spread":0.272088735168433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121771,0.000659159,0.0003739503,0.001660567,0.009698981,0.006945403,0.002773597,0.01441852,0.007431109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009254293,0.000334846,0.0007983753,0.0007338183,0.006848064,0.001839815,0.005387919,0.004717187,0.001292276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00529732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00592112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0318516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04163978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995501,0.0007040894,0.0002658857,0.0005016198,0.001179744,0.001847771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959265,0.002279167,0.00058258,0.0002562498,0.0005839924,0.0003715418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001166174,0.0002578262,0.02032324,0.0002691792,0.00009929678,0.02882724,0.03016869,0.003362532,0.00497525,0.7520074,0.09621595,0.06337683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006945403,0.0004623268,0.02146208,0.002644871,0.0002918182,0.008645413,0.05025551,0.005629478,0.006887697,0.09613892,0.8072962,0.0002161333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2236651,0.005448566,0.0062477,0.06523544,0.00136731,0.0002997969,0.0001231792,0.0003056927,0.6973072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895235,0.003676925,0.001874385,0.02127349,0.0008961933,0.0001029128,0.00006088528,0.00002959562,0.07685055],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0318516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06333238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483029253","doi":"","title":"Why the Development of Mass Torts in Canada Is Important to Corporate America: Not Only Are American Manufacturers Liable to Suit in Canada, but That Nation's Class Action Regime Is Developing the Potential for Increased Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Punitive damages; Law; Jury; Supreme court; Product liability; Political science; Business; Liability; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Sean McKee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03335652660145427,"gpt":0.2525355978755726,"spread":0.2191790712741183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003714857,0.0004003751,0.0003927239,0.00158231,0.02510849,0.01392274,0.001922677,0.006095557,0.01396559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01862384,0.0004753135,0.0006267118,0.002155098,0.01632255,0.00575188,0.00255957,0.007934863,0.00138674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1041614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1691036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918001,0.0005629383,0.0001179166,0.0006553881,0.003876965,0.002986749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822389,0.0017919,0.001037332,0.000442272,0.009677411,0.00481222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067056,0.00007310336,0.03733744,0.0002163411,0.00006863287,0.001280986,0.007742062,0.0005650995,0.001131292,0.5287333,0.3625372,0.06023396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005814828,0.00005184644,0.07692073,0.000932443,0.0001323551,0.001076722,0.02086409,0.001240679,0.001578294,0.05601448,0.8408836,0.0002466065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05460262,0.01184095,0.003136291,0.6226706,0.002139505,0.00007720697,0.0003876879,0.0002099807,0.3049352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599864,0.01052873,0.002673862,0.1531559,0.0008110502,0.00003380765,0.0002534832,0.0001882987,0.07236852],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1041614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7557476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Sean McKee","is_ca":false},{"name":"J. Michael Lawrie","is_ca":false},{"name":"Robin L. Reinertson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicole J. Henderson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03459947066285354,"gpt":0.3473230870400769,"spread":0.3127236163772233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179521,0.000935261,0.0006518846,0.002827634,0.007100448,0.01188935,0.003236686,0.00475268,0.4438544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03679266,0.0006405056,0.0007220807,0.002223065,0.003615463,0.003337806,0.00524079,0.004111388,0.1089181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01351743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02355602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1605911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2535349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922377,0.001151246,0.0003903707,0.0006698756,0.004552599,0.0009982337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980576,0.004020083,0.0007205092,0.002234148,0.008282427,0.004166903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004395317,0.00001426896,0.0001748079,0.00009102766,0.00000435036,0.0002754316,0.0003291912,0.00008972246,0.0003031256,0.03064626,0.9329786,0.03504927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003883888,0.000005464862,0.0001344952,0.00005188661,0.000001880068,0.00008517429,0.0001581484,0.00007517989,0.00007847109,0.0008647026,0.998533,0.000007577071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002038233,0.002656007,0.005051796,0.04706605,0.09367819,0.0004343267,0.002164399,0.00166531,0.8452457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03018946,0.002106858,0.003526642,0.005371175,0.008573815,0.0001543172,0.0006842382,0.001062424,0.9483311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8394089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7932743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47744283","doi":"","title":"New Wave of Tainted Blood Litigation: Hepatitis C Liability Issues","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Medicine; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis; Plaintiff; Class action; Law; Damages; Virology; Political science; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"R. Jo Reser","is_ca":false},{"name":"Barbara A. Radnofsky","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01603098732651171,"gpt":0.2726613930764651,"spread":0.2566304057499534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01890737,0.0004134032,0.0006261181,0.002836279,0.01167722,0.01535701,0.00336485,0.0348221,0.01777975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03980151,0.0006226971,0.001249236,0.001977163,0.009610047,0.01015394,0.003772808,0.02143913,0.002129681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01104658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01685459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03722169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06472834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826173,0.002506301,0.0009466442,0.001916645,0.009428986,0.002584084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9412866,0.03597515,0.002956248,0.002282078,0.009787626,0.007712265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004286707,0.0002076954,0.006141948,0.0001803281,0.00004205026,0.004238755,0.002009318,0.0002465066,0.0004692229,0.2543306,0.6341873,0.09790345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009210435,0.0001886794,0.0135063,0.001322246,0.00009715096,0.0110665,0.004141978,0.001548007,0.0009188086,0.08954433,0.8773528,0.0002211359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01164439,0.01811067,0.002013736,0.8342193,0.004987956,0.00004166228,0.00008604276,0.0001323979,0.1287639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2161472,0.0213308,0.002677634,0.6862517,0.02017408,0.00006534153,0.0001811562,0.0001212351,0.05305088],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03722169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09999293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310650258","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Intellectual property; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science","authors":[{"name":"John S. Fairbairn","is_ca":false},{"name":"S. Stuart Clark","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08291134681595079,"gpt":0.3240730206455401,"spread":0.2411616738295893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00327002,0.0002154626,0.0003161149,0.003551746,0.008441675,0.007860625,0.001145911,0.00663816,0.00828463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008407947,0.0003313936,0.0006813779,0.003694376,0.004977209,0.004457537,0.006048138,0.00417933,0.0008505778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01368177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01263665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04026842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03630595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952825,0.0008857016,0.0003096056,0.0004790602,0.002224761,0.0008184506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996221,0.001591189,0.0006668337,0.0001694606,0.0009268092,0.0004247065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003199384,0.0001705194,0.007943633,0.0005787502,0.000036899,0.0074495,0.02892641,0.001197614,0.001316544,0.7571661,0.0463605,0.1488215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000199227,0.0001638357,0.03346692,0.001144579,0.00004974444,0.005428056,0.007647723,0.002773263,0.0009000441,0.08758478,0.8607539,0.00006724051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2043603,0.05208778,0.005531241,0.0651587,0.001176341,0.0003528142,0.0001914035,0.0001466232,0.6709949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7924417,0.03464837,0.003459871,0.03152809,0.001032591,0.0002304972,0.000188903,0.00004839254,0.1364216],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09926867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307199044","doi":"","title":"IADC International Law Committee Survey of Electronic Discovery and Data Privacy Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Rights and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; Directive; Confidentiality; Information privacy law; Law; Privacy law; Data Protection Directive; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Statute; European union; Business; Member state; FTC Fair Information Practice; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science; Privacy policy; European Union law; Member states; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"James M. Sullivan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04276911238971663,"gpt":0.331297695531351,"spread":0.2885285831416344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03080082,0.0009475274,0.001159079,0.02293087,0.006461983,0.01811237,0.004196902,0.00872307,0.02212005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04929096,0.001009647,0.001112056,0.03078949,0.005497971,0.009930547,0.004848112,0.008411824,0.00960863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01870213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04625164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0593791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03378235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9625207,0.004513689,0.003135922,0.002681112,0.02395033,0.003198386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275346,0.0246095,0.004571832,0.005239468,0.03503305,0.003011518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001789216,0.0001242937,0.002316369,0.0006236337,0.00001266931,0.0001057223,0.0007020197,0.0004279318,0.0002307749,0.2769245,0.60822,0.1102942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002773799,0.000008150339,0.001177906,0.0008835768,0.000005311519,0.00006380279,0.0002617668,0.0001388913,0.00009984256,0.00564904,0.9916949,0.00001403205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003457361,0.0863156,0.00860579,0.09410105,0.002931339,0.0007338339,0.005296252,0.0007240163,0.7978348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09387189,0.2648003,0.02823742,0.1381034,0.006259442,0.003268028,0.01997936,0.001270135,0.4442101],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0593791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1628922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316256093","doi":"","title":"Theft of Pharmaceuticals in Brazil Governed by American Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aviation law; Liability; Aviation; Air cargo; Corporation; Political science; International law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Michael J. Holland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01081596907580072,"gpt":0.3285026247719364,"spread":0.3176866556961357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479921,0.0003606798,0.0004454536,0.001803416,0.005978638,0.01032213,0.00112576,0.007422268,0.01146741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270213,0.0005025319,0.0007815765,0.001619214,0.009072404,0.00362651,0.004680687,0.009499648,0.002258509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01318919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01937531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07141068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07421652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918297,0.001476027,0.0005188708,0.001367039,0.003238452,0.001570007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933529,0.00267727,0.0009146238,0.0007599405,0.001640931,0.0006543694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001227795,0.00003272078,0.001327799,0.00005731023,0.00001308056,0.0003819434,0.001366503,0.00007222231,0.0004116675,0.9436183,0.0334838,0.01922252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132422,0.00004129553,0.003519843,0.0004101316,0.00004542703,0.0005855896,0.0005601626,0.0003561695,0.0006164983,0.06488342,0.9289201,0.00003991975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02101902,0.01549568,0.004127319,0.08178866,0.0008745806,0.0001251598,0.0001908379,0.0001281472,0.8762506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.623385,0.01910355,0.005245403,0.1194359,0.001884921,0.0003799207,0.0002490794,0.0001662819,0.23015],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07141068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1419901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74597807","doi":"","title":"Dispelling Stereotypes of Lawyers in Today's World","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"L. Gino Marchetti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06180371161904504,"gpt":0.3523954114170204,"spread":0.2905916997979753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01522171,0.0004418309,0.000472015,0.002785854,0.01331578,0.009699193,0.001525765,0.002676273,0.006864246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234622,0.0006793031,0.0003802423,0.001355242,0.0163762,0.01045138,0.009342654,0.007855332,0.0009294943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006461405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00331108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02205019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04674562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867148,0.008552608,0.0003123398,0.0008756496,0.002431288,0.001113378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969971,0.01733309,0.005039084,0.002136974,0.003288488,0.002231239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003076972,0.00006443958,0.006603992,0.00003223772,0.000004753767,0.0002483127,0.9777611,0.00001009142,0.0004460842,0.006141809,0.003039423,0.005616887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105595,0.0000304095,0.005253789,0.0001110527,0.000005553652,0.0001309483,0.9688843,0.00007806384,0.0002517625,0.002321279,0.02290632,0.00001604274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279787,0.0005264543,0.001639636,0.01320004,0.0003679768,0.0000638047,0.00008399833,0.00002735296,0.05611207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882666,0.0003769877,0.0006457724,0.004878767,0.0001282094,0.00006897205,0.0000565902,0.00004899286,0.005529142],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02205019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08050108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303070228","doi":"","title":"Global Strategies and Techniques for Defending Class Action Trials: Defending the Global Company in Multinational Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Damages; Mass tort; Law; Compromise; Legislation; Plaintiff; Multinational corporation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Liability; Tort; State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Susan M. Sharko","is_ca":false},{"name":"Glenn M. Zakaib","is_ca":false},{"name":"Colin Loveday","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05994085514934693,"gpt":0.3413598973563367,"spread":0.2814190422069897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06106307,0.001281302,0.001161698,0.005941816,0.006791987,0.02219062,0.003502934,0.01099289,0.009642933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05773073,0.0009217906,0.001675752,0.003787031,0.03107097,0.01472297,0.01396567,0.0114109,0.002501694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006670315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01021866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006650343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01127713,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9695795,0.02044702,0.001021441,0.002915845,0.004187552,0.001848647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586219,0.02735216,0.00262771,0.006713017,0.003190797,0.001494362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058344,0.00002666037,0.001451843,0.0001248797,0.00003542284,0.0002154499,0.005579688,0.001222317,0.0003955578,0.9346832,0.009243669,0.04699079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009769694,0.0001689364,0.001585665,0.001469148,0.0001292747,0.000594532,0.005730346,0.0049579,0.001239485,0.7572192,0.2267173,0.00009053042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03040642,0.01430115,0.4328426,0.09547909,0.001278963,0.0009088485,0.00009577759,0.0006636209,0.4240235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6725685,0.007808793,0.2219114,0.02683892,0.001471136,0.001582214,0.0001377989,0.000578444,0.06710276],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06106307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3229362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}