{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":28,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4518145a9e5a","filters":{"venue":"Defense Counsel Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04235538640228112,"gpt":0.3418535535635373,"spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003687546,0.00007625727,0.0001246234,0.00004845181,0.0008478577,0.0001176044,0.0003063525,0.0000457372,0.00009539941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005280672,0.00004885827,0.00006051185,0.0005269473,0.0005318581,0.0002097046,0.00002570035,0.0003200261,0.00001029757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001021733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002832097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004097147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007196362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.0002575197,0.0004098152,0.0001142627,0.000404334,0.0003164323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983908,0.0008014556,0.0002016282,0.0001464946,0.0003362986,0.0001233434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001118336,0.0008892283,0.02866448,0.00002956027,0.0001688241,0.0005050295,0.2282658,0.0001769084,0.003192663,0.6018135,0.0102207,0.124955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000791829,0.00009665619,0.04545507,0.0000603328,0.00002777525,0.00005490271,0.04871481,0.00002949136,0.0003353591,0.00248032,0.9017515,0.0002019974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390044,0.0006352371,0.0006616244,0.002858213,0.0002723514,0.000220446,0.0000198275,0.00001969688,0.05630823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971521,0.0009151461,0.0001428949,0.0001722295,0.0002099034,0.000002384625,0.00000108134,0.000006938464,0.001397302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510858968","doi":"","title":"Pension Plans and Class Actions: The Vivendi Case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Class action; Pension; Commission; Business; Judgement; Political science; Public administration; State (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02570893351656532,"gpt":0.2206407790875725,"spread":0.1949318455710071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005851777,0.0001231898,0.0001197667,0.00007092953,0.0008022383,0.0005554045,0.0001069416,0.00004616757,0.0001252958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006680508,0.00008087112,0.0000583287,0.000146874,0.00006771238,0.0006446873,0.00003905866,0.0002920585,0.0001474962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001692862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001675381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001763075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007294971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999225,0.00002180478,0.0001870548,0.000135104,0.0002287759,0.0002022938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993044,0.0000859054,0.0002740282,0.0001612211,0.0001544413,0.00001997549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006792388,0.0002808138,0.04279474,0.0002071937,0.0002386832,0.008972808,0.00137408,0.0004765827,0.003076791,0.2900349,0.5234389,0.1284252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005265131,0.00001459157,0.004832092,0.00004084047,0.00007384811,0.00908745,0.0005302729,0.003125057,0.00000639511,0.005341494,0.9762653,0.0001561067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845536,0.0002194579,0.0009647857,0.002652824,0.0007209727,0.00008731551,0.000003740581,0.0000392744,0.01075803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941028,0.0002328176,0.00002369961,0.003497594,0.001853589,0.000002537309,0.000002733483,0.00001591632,0.0002683246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4528265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.617025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225236535","doi":"","title":"Canadian Price-Fixing Class Actions: The Supreme Court of Canada Gives the Green Light to Indirect Purchaser Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Damages; Class action; Legislation; Certiorari; Political science; Original jurisdiction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01908005545827297,"gpt":0.2530409978543282,"spread":0.2339609423960552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002661773,0.0001325123,0.0002153026,0.00009932093,0.003149084,0.0002612641,0.000630959,0.00008675163,0.000124227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004351458,0.00007917073,0.00007968002,0.0005095546,0.0001265232,0.0001925248,0.00001868835,0.0004173985,0.00001115361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005718046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004867033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975733,0.0004439766,0.0003510189,0.0001495546,0.0009069828,0.0005751532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.0003154819,0.0002523556,0.0002015059,0.0005246883,0.0004755576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147165,0.00006749154,0.01105895,0.00008103411,0.0004515044,0.00008703696,0.1989075,0.0004809347,0.0009541515,0.04539834,0.7335991,0.008799233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009977377,0.00003147323,0.001778731,0.00005538753,0.00003445877,0.00003527018,0.009563899,0.00002113599,0.00008231055,0.002283242,0.9858868,0.0001275372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5162268,0.001424863,0.0003876444,0.2496339,0.004115255,0.0008798266,0.0000619002,0.0000459399,0.2272239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937186,0.0001195094,0.00001105309,0.002623709,0.001540209,0.000009708051,5.798719e-7,0.00001444382,0.001962234],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4774917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952393837","doi":"","title":"Moving beyond Uberrima Fides? the General Duty of Honesty in Contractual Performance and Punitive Damage Awards in Anglo-Canadian Contract Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Fides; Law; Honesty; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Business; Political science; Liability; Philosophy; Restitution; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01678027225537957,"gpt":0.2867413488882816,"spread":0.269961076632902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001749814,0.00009995739,0.0001759504,0.0001005043,0.0007712975,0.0001569741,0.0002278624,0.00008899173,0.00008801712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001223167,0.00007824804,0.00003861517,0.0002590868,0.0007329225,0.0003906273,0.0000176989,0.0004120462,0.000006504726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001653207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000601261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1151145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6553005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986989,0.0001917683,0.0003071025,0.0001317734,0.0002755692,0.000394855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999068,0.000215221,0.0001542896,0.0001183221,0.0002456715,0.0001984607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002574802,0.0002701296,0.3266791,0.00002390392,0.00008819912,0.0002310529,0.1758166,0.0001978237,0.0014871,0.4738492,0.001938135,0.01916131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001413545,0.0001184769,0.8724439,0.00009211771,0.00002707867,0.0001120273,0.008000968,0.002951775,0.0001455757,0.004581171,0.1098097,0.0003036321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710951,0.0001465911,0.00002260025,0.001690892,0.0001094636,0.0001789899,0.00003425265,0.000005345115,0.0267168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981026,0.0003819911,0.00008646047,0.0009855721,0.0003360633,0.000006542882,0.00000192923,0.000008026887,0.00009081836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8907781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W212664854","doi":"","title":"International Class Actions in the Canadian Context: Standing, Funding, Enforceability and Trial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Liability; Law; Class (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Political science; Res judicata; Business; Multinational corporation; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05975093314548166,"gpt":0.2907563899156499,"spread":0.2310054567701683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001488613,0.0001173468,0.0001140558,0.0003633419,0.0007747145,0.0009430583,0.0002002525,0.00007411341,0.0007431813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001779656,0.00008971307,0.00007999982,0.000246467,0.00008279009,0.001304386,0.00002112936,0.0004274023,0.00007296765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003128124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001091024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01078002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1353279,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988272,0.00003588799,0.0002751534,0.0001100735,0.0003562623,0.0003954838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994363,0.00007246194,0.0001611826,0.0001184548,0.0001410442,0.0000705579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001395824,0.0004022557,0.1038418,0.00002145096,0.0001246466,0.00003181418,0.001774866,0.00002853419,0.00002330133,0.7807539,0.09946095,0.01214076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003652253,0.000008690467,0.02071844,0.00001202229,0.0000299337,0.0001176082,0.002499743,0.000413392,2.278787e-7,0.0007765639,0.9716617,0.0001093603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5639861,0.0002407816,0.0003860238,0.00805309,0.004915542,0.0003875304,0.00001561384,0.00003793292,0.4219774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949276,0.0000765181,0.00001115645,0.002409447,0.002296356,0.00001398894,0.00001003422,0.000009748714,0.000245167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224296180","doi":"","title":"Constitution, Crime, Clergy: First Amendment Implications of Sexual Abuse Claims: Church Law and Discipline, Constitutional Limitations, Damage Caps and Statutes of Limitations Raise Perplexing Issues in These Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Constitution; Statutory law; Sexual abuse; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Poison control; History; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07104623176890848,"gpt":0.3335079804758323,"spread":0.2624617487069238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008081223,0.0001626737,0.0002865041,0.0001971501,0.001119774,0.00009942827,0.000118128,0.00008252066,0.00005056032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008375407,0.0001600041,0.00004587201,0.0003026705,0.007386167,0.0004339896,0.0000173962,0.0002218811,0.000001481042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001172515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001926447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009807573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981896,0.0002864539,0.0006058744,0.0002156774,0.0003880155,0.0003143864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968404,0.001839663,0.0003078895,0.0001443502,0.0006403712,0.0002273895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002371213,0.0001547217,0.01289443,0.00002253237,0.00004379587,0.00001518273,0.01197195,0.0003205666,0.0002639696,0.9738083,0.000408417,0.00007246205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002960944,0.0005392265,0.05551612,0.0005603924,0.0004490979,0.001361038,0.1368167,0.00009019279,0.00030787,0.06012871,0.7401158,0.001153892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290182,0.003493519,0.002409157,0.001774957,0.0001831037,0.0003623467,0.0005635697,0.00002453314,0.0621706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909123,0.005613307,0.002997152,0.0002452117,0.0000698655,0.0000174014,0.00002615088,0.000006092926,0.0001125784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527306418","doi":"","title":"The Test for Causation in Canada: But for, but ... Maybe Not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Test (biology); Confusion; Political science; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04677605707819044,"gpt":0.2875057320167952,"spread":0.2407296749386048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007934698,0.00006592365,0.00008868227,0.00002364586,0.002329548,0.00008952494,0.00021033,0.00004030853,0.00001027584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005407425,0.00005092796,0.00005756101,0.0001109796,0.00009225112,0.00009685555,0.000006555628,0.000151367,0.000003723515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005670815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003035906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5222145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9253759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989793,0.00003910363,0.0002473276,0.0001001954,0.0003123752,0.0003216737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982621,0.00112628,0.0001329915,0.00009566364,0.0002747255,0.0001082569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005292544,0.0004184967,0.0608439,0.00004496223,0.0001433216,0.0001410122,0.05701002,0.001053388,0.003152197,0.3988209,0.4358706,0.04197187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005520398,0.00002707996,0.01490943,0.000008670732,0.00001172123,0.00005817313,0.005060554,0.0005593695,0.00009782753,0.005916729,0.972666,0.0001323843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659694,0.0003168785,0.004255966,0.02362881,0.0005976713,0.0008303577,0.0001908482,0.00001927784,0.004190787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953438,0.0008752523,0.0004099886,0.0005972147,0.0005011696,0.00007365379,0.000002847459,0.000008881375,0.002187187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5367954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261832368","doi":"","title":"Insurance Industry Woes in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina & Rita","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storm; History; Tragedy (event); Hurricane katrina; Storm surge; Luck; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural disaster; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Geography; Meteorology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01118003042774189,"gpt":0.2740141526062536,"spread":0.2628341221785117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110311,0.00007874507,0.0001192925,0.0001043557,0.0002763398,0.0001518719,0.0004906703,0.00008131075,0.00005297618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004314337,0.00005324379,0.00006090058,0.0004343658,0.00030953,0.0002558834,0.00001593364,0.0003564036,0.000009234537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002729541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008179931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005904034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001008711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985279,0.0002479781,0.0002663958,0.00009599683,0.0005963865,0.0002653642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994909,0.0001033745,0.0001683619,0.0001207942,0.0000781242,0.00003847413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000684152,0.000411764,0.8849744,0.00003407801,0.00002013056,0.0003807202,0.04365625,0.0002229079,0.0002035472,0.03207414,0.02985446,0.008099256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004773905,0.00004142273,0.854063,0.00009861823,0.00001364527,0.00005672453,0.02803829,0.000009283242,0.0000107916,0.008858986,0.1081613,0.000170491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.943429,0.0006634804,0.00001826168,0.001110691,0.0001913296,0.00009008699,0.000002787252,0.000008978552,0.05448541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980978,0.000306549,0.00003655912,0.0001922556,0.0002750742,0.000003158503,3.720742e-7,0.000004005,0.001084196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07830688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2171219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227614572","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Consumer protection; Product (mathematics); Law; Business; Legislation; Commission; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Liability; Commerce; Politics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09851926336921897,"gpt":0.3031498479018137,"spread":0.2046305845325948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008194214,0.0001190493,0.0001574655,0.00004741962,0.0007750809,0.0001551346,0.0003010427,0.00005384236,0.003150312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004775649,0.0000950559,0.00006071963,0.0002265739,0.0001503187,0.0003363145,0.00001318674,0.0002997936,0.00005505609],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001616135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007507883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7523993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9525084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983007,0.0001420044,0.0002701395,0.0001825593,0.0006876083,0.0004170337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988765,0.0001356257,0.000154807,0.0001654771,0.0002538936,0.0004137171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004447465,0.00005373775,0.005122707,0.00001030446,0.00006212583,0.0008999489,0.04609878,0.000002337521,0.00003429297,0.01248358,0.9099509,0.02483651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001966895,0.0000436851,0.001503203,0.00005286172,0.00004600603,0.0003850514,0.002571614,0.00000201534,0.00003786687,0.001881701,0.9931022,0.0001770934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4475767,0.01358421,0.003089302,0.08078692,0.01143919,0.001248933,0.00003506413,0.0002894037,0.4419502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791451,0.0009258585,0.0009581768,0.001441917,0.001355615,0.000002635147,6.087503e-7,0.00001261091,0.01615755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30121777","doi":"10.1007/s00261-018-1731-9","title":"Recent Developments under the Montreal Convention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Liability; Law; Damages; Aviation; Political science; Business; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02068525859264109,"gpt":0.2947030903993148,"spread":0.2740178318066737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001197005,0.00005466991,0.00004834312,0.00003373867,0.001007496,0.0002106544,0.0001801547,0.00006046509,0.0007100124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008540119,0.00003848681,0.00004713837,0.00008305647,0.00009350288,0.0001750858,0.000007315818,0.0003090963,0.0001224466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000820724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002832547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003452508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00834789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.0001122707,0.0001640355,0.00007247755,0.0005427183,0.0001729255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00007664518,0.0001268518,0.00005625762,0.0004183873,0.00007551452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005917474,0.0001038081,0.003694798,0.000001205052,0.00008056452,0.00002091608,0.009596103,0.00002448641,0.0008424526,0.8904675,0.02230318,0.07280578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002644954,0.000008652431,0.03356086,0.000007097844,0.00001104811,0.00005400002,0.001153839,0.00002570218,0.00005049746,0.03462342,0.9301625,0.00007787805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8654443,0.0001036796,0.00114368,0.009680483,0.004243999,0.0001231215,0.000003433699,0.00003053749,0.1192268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928901,0.001114994,0.0001567664,0.0009148244,0.0008019833,0.000003149883,0.000004897742,0.000005826855,0.004107507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7774138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109525249","doi":"10.12690/0895-0016-81.1.fmiii","title":"<i>President's Page:</i>IADC Pride: The Global Connection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Connection (principal bundle); Pride; Law; Political science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01289122412988128,"gpt":0.2075620390018075,"spread":0.1946708148719262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037133,0.0001935598,0.0001819564,0.00005158035,0.0006793265,0.001130971,0.0003656161,0.000068517,0.0003681227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001959701,0.0001336342,0.0001515336,0.0003818588,0.00007770614,0.001060941,0.00006434446,0.0003110344,0.0009547944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007231927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004416225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000254319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004578359,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985273,0.00003803226,0.0003351046,0.0002019854,0.0005413464,0.0003562212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987644,0.00006746592,0.0005260245,0.0002748515,0.0003401918,0.00002706707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003368827,0.0001397904,0.07400012,0.00007683961,0.000125407,0.0001652182,0.0001380151,0.0005492389,0.0005866045,0.2240862,0.6733805,0.02641522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007929165,0.00001407545,0.02330781,0.00004747611,0.00009507691,0.0003169933,0.0001631611,0.001521481,0.00001728223,0.04768667,0.9257879,0.0002492166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9244609,0.0006214959,0.007254929,0.006356409,0.003303707,0.0002337974,0.000004881498,0.0001659537,0.05759786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984553,0.0001392862,0.00002874774,0.009997547,0.004894735,0.000005262978,0.000005406388,0.0000210588,0.0003549042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2524074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757274567","doi":"","title":"Did You Really Send It? Email Evidence in Litigation and Arbitration in Argentina","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Arbitration; Law; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Liability; Economic Justice; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05439256140919605,"gpt":0.287463436352665,"spread":0.233070874943469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000775609,0.0001163207,0.0001388777,0.0002746532,0.0005330034,0.001352536,0.000156204,0.00006794088,0.00007625917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003246819,0.0001146036,0.00004024187,0.0001419913,0.00005343384,0.002719182,0.00003791748,0.0002916652,0.00004831873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006089993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004280323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004479829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004374603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989328,0.00002243752,0.0003466795,0.0001869152,0.0002786929,0.0002325176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991996,0.00003258328,0.0003917542,0.0001893157,0.0001612322,0.00002547733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008019767,0.00124864,0.7332565,0.0006371262,0.0001071627,0.001094054,0.003163155,0.001269788,0.00759282,0.1529028,0.04508727,0.05283869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00190288,0.00002483322,0.8454111,0.0009688612,0.0000483148,0.0001853782,0.001335064,0.01522465,0.000014978,0.009920276,0.1245813,0.0003823945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683455,0.0002522936,0.0002961682,0.005102399,0.0004205613,0.0001227436,9.207357e-7,0.00001884115,0.02544055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969763,0.001165201,0.00005221623,0.001054095,0.0005054348,0.000007322971,0.000004572177,0.00001091728,0.0002240128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1429825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W292880592","doi":"","title":"Antipodean Alignment: Impact of the Proposed Australian Consumer Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Corporation; Commission; Law; Population; Competition (biology); Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02131163582588744,"gpt":0.3287517080437196,"spread":0.3074400722178321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007524881,0.00008331554,0.0001098203,0.00002179309,0.000912409,0.0001436788,0.0003954469,0.00007884979,0.0004526856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004884117,0.0000512363,0.0002043834,0.0001658171,0.0005886338,0.0001343689,0.0000187158,0.0004267956,0.00003106837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004408321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002347688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002650044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.0001084764,0.0002264076,0.00009440383,0.000428349,0.000265846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991382,0.00005191911,0.0002110928,0.0002261901,0.0002026195,0.000169924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004779306,0.000288999,0.03452523,0.000008714951,0.0001755403,0.00001309446,0.0163961,0.00003875296,0.06824785,0.8589218,0.01958698,0.001749134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006501352,0.00005428055,0.02245541,0.00002914265,0.00007436828,0.0001272948,0.001087512,0.00002022126,0.002542119,0.01752253,0.9552065,0.0002304622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710349,0.00002415223,0.00002402028,0.002612249,0.0003442243,0.0001923724,0.00003123835,0.0000156303,0.02572118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983608,0.00006340221,0.0001450364,0.0001357148,0.0002438787,0.000001572358,7.526741e-7,0.000008150756,0.00104073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9356195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7017605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610650896","doi":"","title":"Surety in the 21st Century: Everything Old Is New Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surety; Underwriting; Bond; Indemnity; Payment; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04374422698752627,"gpt":0.2617451296919239,"spread":0.2180009027043976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001205657,0.0001659071,0.0001731199,0.0001271363,0.0007868808,0.002512486,0.0009582206,0.00007601734,0.0002848271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004509963,0.0001198497,0.0001388956,0.00007718469,0.0001156512,0.001329706,0.00006568189,0.0004841195,0.0001917205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005179193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005842023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008613153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002576942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985204,0.00002262103,0.0003378636,0.000187324,0.0006039527,0.0003278318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.00008155937,0.0004612577,0.0003621964,0.0001891344,0.0000255204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001704749,0.0002399754,0.08175096,0.00007821315,0.000157345,0.000654489,0.003773532,0.0001049049,0.0001200872,0.4946148,0.3998498,0.01848543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187655,0.00001055838,0.04961467,0.0001403466,0.00005120843,0.000145963,0.001198551,0.0008091663,0.000006043244,0.04383794,0.9027108,0.0002871264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4898973,0.002523563,0.001967009,0.06208384,0.01068372,0.0005553786,0.00002759371,0.0001291378,0.4321325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761016,0.001177656,0.00009557624,0.01631134,0.005414165,0.000001559596,0.000006800993,0.00002119586,0.0008700829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.502861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566894743","doi":"","title":"The Evolving Landscape for Pharmaceutical Product Liability Litigation in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Mass tort; Product liability; Class action; Law; Liability; Business; Tort; Product (mathematics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04030235086632047,"gpt":0.3866159461024432,"spread":0.3463135952361228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005766963,0.0001224619,0.0002083559,0.0000354374,0.001118959,0.00004567571,0.0001807642,0.00007638038,0.0004203897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005398495,0.00008012445,0.00005575969,0.0001579455,0.00006375375,0.0001774217,0.00001919152,0.00126598,0.00001870014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003642367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.173667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6792573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968724,0.0009359262,0.0008261786,0.0002080121,0.0005076574,0.0006498804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930021,0.005756587,0.0002704232,0.000231605,0.0005452023,0.0001940374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004687019,0.0001339465,0.626717,0.000309504,0.00002215525,0.00003481413,0.001500292,0.00007934533,0.0001465937,0.002422252,0.3619962,0.006169229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001323913,0.00003830086,0.119366,0.000141475,0.00003649443,0.00003131268,0.004324362,0.003519526,0.00003085838,0.008877738,0.8621507,0.0001593258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484249,0.00165089,0.0003121733,0.04394958,0.001849401,0.000890718,0.00001647727,0.00002121309,0.002884593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960712,0.0002096822,0.0002563523,0.001108014,0.001724898,0.00008719875,0.000009213136,0.00001399284,0.000519479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.507351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174261786","doi":"","title":"Environmental Prosecutions: Criminal Liability without Mens Rea and Exposure under the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Law; Statute; Indictment; Liability; Doctrine; Officer; Business; Corporate liability; Plaintiff; Corporate title; Damages; Legal liability; Political science; Criminal law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0462503031042415,"gpt":0.2606485412822747,"spread":0.2143982381780332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420195,0.0001951959,0.0001749193,0.00004690755,0.0007799105,0.00008173526,0.0001869212,0.0001046182,0.001828312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006689133,0.0001326429,0.00007672281,0.0001306432,0.0008040029,0.000446914,0.00008866144,0.0004516213,0.0002368802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001469064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004856895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004442579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981991,0.0004019092,0.0003493711,0.0002319753,0.0004016832,0.0004159677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989979,0.0001550218,0.0002837795,0.0003084215,0.00001886761,0.0002359765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003784226,0.0003142784,0.9766263,0.000006251104,0.00008098406,0.00001829277,0.002690898,0.0001621568,0.008650287,0.001617673,0.008158985,0.001295443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006420789,0.0001207772,0.9632934,0.000009958037,0.0002172747,0.001749128,0.002759811,0.0001167894,0.000388536,0.00216671,0.02829586,0.0002396653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949152,0.0008445915,0.0005349559,0.002370254,0.0001767124,0.0001694923,0.000008900614,0.00002537033,0.0009544914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948757,0.0004524706,0.0006730901,0.002442627,0.0001213091,0.00001275923,0.000005197274,0.00001342576,0.001403468],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02013688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W283144324","doi":"","title":"When Children Refuse Medical Treatment: Role of Government and Assessments; a Standardized Test to Assess a Child's Maturity and Understanding Would Help Judges in Their Solomonic Roles to Render More Uniform Decisions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Maturity (psychological); Jurisdiction; Psychology; Informed consent; Consistency (knowledge bases); Guardian; Law; Family medicine; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07059676368038773,"gpt":0.3535994504383672,"spread":0.2830026867579795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276776,0.0002586274,0.000564554,0.0002109203,0.0002587854,0.0001026861,0.0001350773,0.000378633,0.00014967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000833496,0.0001927729,0.00008631333,0.0002455047,0.0001005977,0.0001167276,0.0000898605,0.001194449,0.000001676868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007660776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000215514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001055495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005665118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971672,0.0001238717,0.000602124,0.0003459226,0.001331928,0.0004289855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979271,0.0006340793,0.0001692222,0.0002873121,0.0001248301,0.000857438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002493721,0.002583443,0.8222493,0.0002139276,0.0009952872,0.001282645,0.07807814,0.00003620558,0.0004571756,0.003525418,0.006065015,0.08201972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05643312,0.02141663,0.6477063,0.01125243,0.001995953,0.02283629,0.1314803,0.006339311,0.001782137,0.03053421,0.06490135,0.003321978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762455,0.006883157,0.0006256507,0.01430513,0.00006421923,0.0004749644,0.0002808365,0.0000181309,0.001102431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805534,0.0162387,0.001629284,0.001292045,0.0001679533,0.00001417066,0.000007751868,0.00003160767,0.00006512905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.174543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7861052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W252615043","doi":"","title":"Class Actions in Canada: 2005 State of the Union: Growing, Expanding, and Developing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; State (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415921890431619,"gpt":0.2130225137226774,"spread":0.1988632948183612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002970212,0.0001021167,0.0001268083,0.000160527,0.0003394775,0.0001431458,0.0001204069,0.0000240211,0.00005608985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002152036,0.00008004432,0.00004555921,0.0003503485,0.00004396488,0.0005757401,0.00003709714,0.0002259985,0.000003724978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003065894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004874949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2179282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8245873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990385,0.00002123396,0.0003114757,0.0001021877,0.000276515,0.0002500924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994935,0.00002815975,0.0002486583,0.00009268561,0.0001219749,0.00001506719],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010132,0.0002620763,0.3877973,0.0002540797,0.0001846972,0.0001707038,0.0002410997,0.01095449,0.002574981,0.2784615,0.2944857,0.02451204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004972453,0.000001529832,0.2381385,0.0001051878,0.00002464774,0.00009787866,0.0005294761,0.00112348,0.0000402902,0.002342728,0.7569516,0.0001474832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758676,0.0003316127,0.001065313,0.004330032,0.0008067871,0.00009241079,0.000005184333,0.00001545987,0.0174856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982793,0.0001572905,0.00004060093,0.0008067425,0.0002605783,0.000002707267,0.000002335764,0.00001097528,0.0004395217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6066591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7872797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W326731111","doi":"","title":"City of Ontario V. Quon: Electronic Privacy in the Workplace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pager; Notice; Supreme court; Confidentiality; Law; Officer; Business; Privacy policy; Rulemaking; Internet privacy; Political science; Public administration; Information privacy; Telecommunications; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05021492539422646,"gpt":0.2281554069760165,"spread":0.17794048158179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00186737,0.000161677,0.0002123527,0.0001661044,0.0001996386,0.0001766892,0.0005414277,0.0001077966,0.0006755863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008240996,0.0001134212,0.0001097485,0.0004609952,0.0000865158,0.0007310723,0.00004940232,0.0009860822,0.000055304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001229958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003884448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01155175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03957669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985737,0.00003130347,0.0003883645,0.0001472414,0.0004320857,0.0004272888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990328,0.00005892098,0.0003407016,0.0002657116,0.0002898649,0.00001199266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001230202,0.001037484,0.6819525,0.0002320965,0.0001717637,0.0004360885,0.0295857,0.00006670907,0.0001266863,0.2629986,0.01763969,0.004522454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001658416,0.00004517616,0.3154539,0.0002001248,0.0001471005,0.0003791918,0.0007997288,0.0001051316,0.00002456397,0.1136268,0.567108,0.0004518405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670608,0.0003073984,0.0005431748,0.0008279082,0.0003723307,0.0001210945,3.217537e-7,0.00001937077,0.0307476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969477,0.00007397744,0.0001101373,0.002032281,0.0004829677,0.000003771717,0.000002150607,0.00001602467,0.0003309785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5494683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168443748","doi":"","title":"Defending against Suits Brought by Illegal Aliens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Law; Plaintiff; Tort; Misrepresentation; Jury; Doctrine; Lawsuit; Immigration; Political science; Sociology; Liability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01437180594359614,"gpt":0.2864605411120291,"spread":0.272088735168433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001516816,0.0001961532,0.0002921876,0.0001064231,0.001971659,0.0007056278,0.0003914631,0.0001774177,0.0001568983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003299607,0.0001784059,0.0001652563,0.0004493615,0.0001544653,0.0006966728,0.00001198524,0.0004730102,0.0001170683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002124912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004060288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004242522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004300873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972769,0.0002436419,0.0004555259,0.0002484474,0.00101063,0.000764824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986466,0.0001119491,0.0002860519,0.0001307589,0.000373129,0.0004515043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001196868,0.0003100743,0.001962269,0.0000203364,0.0001110428,0.0005527291,0.04664024,0.00005122563,0.004515525,0.04087444,0.8571786,0.04766383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004414894,0.00008729208,0.0001807243,0.00007872761,0.00002316418,0.0001135981,0.002984583,0.00001096521,0.0001138918,0.003976596,0.9916798,0.0003092048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5606796,0.00799041,0.001730252,0.00781649,0.003093255,0.0003620088,0.00004573897,0.0002847603,0.4179975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907551,0.002014142,0.00009249319,0.002376636,0.002123836,0.000001865699,0.000005168811,0.00001787939,0.002612924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4300755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483029253","doi":"","title":"Why the Development of Mass Torts in Canada Is Important to Corporate America: Not Only Are American Manufacturers Liable to Suit in Canada, but That Nation's Class Action Regime Is Developing the Potential for Increased Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Punitive damages; Law; Jury; Supreme court; Product liability; Political science; Business; Liability; State (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03335652660145427,"gpt":0.2525355978755726,"spread":0.2191790712741183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009907563,0.0001818801,0.0003386165,0.0001144293,0.0007353487,0.0001372366,0.000378208,0.00004644131,0.00001703688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001311443,0.0001294074,0.00004701046,0.0006940045,0.00006692452,0.0001689814,0.00002038925,0.0002560125,7.092409e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005043023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03183084,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973409,0.0001338683,0.000637193,0.0002418125,0.001135401,0.00051078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981557,0.0001278701,0.0009394714,0.0001334731,0.0004302709,0.0002132603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003316574,0.0002357961,0.4201166,0.0003567044,0.0009004709,0.001122958,0.2376991,0.02798947,0.004390613,0.001107763,0.2527614,0.05000254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001825224,0.0001707793,0.2623893,0.0007072689,0.000071336,0.00008400762,0.2573182,0.00008749659,0.008216602,0.002078832,0.465894,0.001156972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624999,0.00008313263,0.00251647,0.03365502,0.0005471489,0.0005798605,0.00005885971,0.000005349501,0.00005428997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834243,0.00007360295,0.000552325,0.01569213,0.0001545065,0.00003508536,0.000003227469,0.00001565107,0.00004914331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2131326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03459947066285354,"gpt":0.3473230870400769,"spread":0.3127236163772233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205125,0.00006252075,0.00009135505,0.00007513841,0.0009266972,0.0001154185,0.0001302127,0.00005802307,0.00002638136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001045124,0.00004708671,0.00003708973,0.0002453783,0.000481362,0.0005438825,0.000006970208,0.0002440464,0.000002142842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008656852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008139289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1217601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3892367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988282,0.000108292,0.0002096927,0.00006655099,0.0003439334,0.000443314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986652,0.00031306,0.0001078736,0.00004505005,0.000285552,0.000583242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002590091,0.00003068072,0.8018084,0.000007006232,0.00001167934,0.000002768681,0.05284615,3.429139e-7,0.00002229117,0.1416766,0.002980631,0.0005875172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003070966,0.0001238443,0.6451995,0.0001104849,0.00007121562,0.0002414651,0.1322311,0.00002889369,0.00007107229,0.0303872,0.1909952,0.0002329199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984314,0.001546328,0.000008603534,0.002859245,0.0001638445,0.0001215738,0.000003860693,0.000003919114,0.01097864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979374,0.001636006,0.00007624579,0.0001024102,0.0001362503,0.000003475391,2.037528e-7,0.000003346595,0.0001046679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2674766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47744283","doi":"","title":"New Wave of Tainted Blood Litigation: Hepatitis C Liability Issues","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Medicine; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis; Plaintiff; Class action; Law; Damages; Virology; Political science; State (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01603098732651171,"gpt":0.2726613930764651,"spread":0.2566304057499534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000610364,0.0001096304,0.0002703818,0.0000741312,0.00009505379,0.00002692486,0.00005489539,0.0002009423,0.006184371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009724848,0.00008370575,0.0001464747,0.0002111835,0.0003103276,0.00007340506,0.000005700653,0.0004556769,0.00002558758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003674697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003700022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001675272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000192074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984838,0.00007969861,0.0004797721,0.0001426224,0.0006324699,0.0001815883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988121,0.00006835405,0.0001347241,0.0001937965,0.0004578717,0.0003331907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001247029,0.001187441,0.01536164,0.0004819226,0.0008497749,0.0008324441,0.01247962,0.00004526401,0.01369505,0.009183499,0.05009648,0.8945398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0131643,0.003433325,0.2780701,0.002303847,0.001354334,0.01383809,0.0005214874,0.004876773,0.01495339,0.1627587,0.5039151,0.0008106087],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647543,0.00231723,0.001772554,0.02703041,0.0002809589,0.0001820995,0.00001188595,0.00003887455,0.003611725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840994,0.004076902,0.00490115,0.0006460439,0.00086483,0.000001065229,0.00002380525,0.0000155674,0.005371249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310650258","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Intellectual property; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08291134681595079,"gpt":0.3240730206455401,"spread":0.2411616738295893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008524495,0.00007417784,0.0001052722,0.0001220652,0.0006356246,0.00008471662,0.000115646,0.00008774961,0.0009176365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002530509,0.00005662977,0.00006138535,0.0002629774,0.0001923055,0.0002842264,0.000006170941,0.0003180159,0.0001329166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001633872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002754832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001523822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001483725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987584,0.0001856533,0.0002444795,0.0001082296,0.0004307633,0.0002724904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.00008257373,0.00007762818,0.00006384905,0.0001835278,0.0001389103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003518489,0.0004177227,0.05557223,0.00001367173,0.00005845611,0.0009311958,0.7735211,0.0001133027,0.001468838,0.007474394,0.1256664,0.03441077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005565989,0.00009850389,0.01671439,0.00004798134,0.00000834676,0.0004725913,0.003090055,0.00008631279,0.00007410529,0.001704056,0.9769601,0.0001870184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839552,0.0001049542,0.000280062,0.001144145,0.0004995594,0.00009933636,0.000001071142,0.00002944728,0.01388619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892201,0.001354384,0.0001010979,0.000146687,0.0005711346,0.00000289383,0.000001241972,0.000006375026,0.008596101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307199044","doi":"","title":"IADC International Law Committee Survey of Electronic Discovery and Data Privacy Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Rights and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; Directive; Confidentiality; Information privacy law; Law; Privacy law; Data Protection Directive; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Statute; European union; Business; Member state; FTC Fair Information Practice; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science; Privacy policy; European Union law; Member states; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04276911238971663,"gpt":0.331297695531351,"spread":0.2885285831416344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440729,0.000107631,0.0001782705,0.00005009943,0.0008213803,0.0006306805,0.0009839153,0.00009001001,0.0003277135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001041821,0.00007732621,0.00004165367,0.00006883818,0.000798548,0.001342012,0.0001016178,0.0006423348,0.00001085902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004163339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003794082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009304219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2464457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983655,0.0002158576,0.0002918376,0.0002051362,0.00060061,0.0003210791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987175,0.0002628538,0.0002104332,0.0003555234,0.0003132671,0.0001403463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004887278,0.00006484452,0.002172405,0.000002347226,0.0000579607,0.000013571,0.003205742,3.056317e-7,0.0001351368,0.9911739,0.002892371,0.0002325709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006253662,0.00004806427,0.01141071,0.00001900706,0.00002949118,0.00007982033,0.0001284376,0.00004330943,0.0000386983,0.1407788,0.8466087,0.0001895629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561732,0.0002746235,0.0001789098,0.001213736,0.001346032,0.000101488,0.0001551158,0.00001957309,0.04053731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972422,0.0004089792,0.0001106013,0.0003107848,0.000555597,5.580368e-7,0.00004309827,0.00001087988,0.001317346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.850395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316256093","doi":"","title":"Theft of Pharmaceuticals in Brazil Governed by American Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aviation law; Liability; Aviation; Air cargo; Corporation; Political science; International law; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01081596907580072,"gpt":0.3285026247719364,"spread":0.3176866556961357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007548166,0.00005884452,0.0001164057,0.00003844601,0.00016727,0.00005992283,0.0001432426,0.00003255418,0.0001882293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004547568,0.00005469898,0.00005894501,0.0001465872,0.0002739309,0.0001650862,0.000005348112,0.0001533021,0.00001816294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001372085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009899087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009257346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005827566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987482,0.0001678681,0.0002595001,0.00007787019,0.0005538083,0.0001927307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993954,0.0001390693,0.0002098922,0.00004066738,0.0001596282,0.00005539633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001130693,0.0002465063,0.02060054,0.000003601038,0.00002401343,0.00002847615,0.00216031,0.00007444752,0.005949614,0.9501935,0.01795973,0.002646161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001016341,0.00006078359,0.01083502,0.00003689517,0.00001994398,0.00002477191,0.0008872932,0.0001290997,0.00231483,0.04135753,0.9431121,0.000205447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681002,0.0002331966,0.0003804672,0.002169721,0.0002154893,0.00006486016,0.00002680518,0.00001270377,0.1287965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976518,0.0002605387,0.00009215607,0.0007371779,0.0002479804,0.000001167867,0.000004066458,0.000005816919,0.0009993035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74597807","doi":"","title":"Dispelling Stereotypes of Lawyers in Today's World","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06180371161904504,"gpt":0.3523954114170204,"spread":0.2905916997979753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010878,0.00005303952,0.0001013306,0.000241475,0.0003716499,0.00006800604,0.0001337752,0.00003569368,0.000742942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003448567,0.00005140568,0.00004300034,0.0007553213,0.0001612386,0.0005213838,0.000004290905,0.0004498199,0.00004525155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007907824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008462734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001081985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004522363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989442,0.0001742416,0.0002949886,0.00007090584,0.0003384383,0.0001772768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999099,0.0002791497,0.0002001706,0.00007464354,0.0002682613,0.00007884253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002230978,0.0007472111,0.2082274,0.0000224691,0.000088922,0.0002108434,0.3854433,0.0005813788,0.000435076,0.2970065,0.09975576,0.007258018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003489708,0.00001911365,0.01201073,0.00004592348,0.00001026927,0.00007699607,0.009515214,0.00002846563,0.00004893712,0.003921328,0.9738432,0.0001308664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412141,0.0004048785,0.0004159883,0.01838262,0.001048009,0.00009261561,0.000002684336,0.00001817249,0.1384209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937699,0.0007914593,0.0006984458,0.0005408117,0.0002553613,0.000001067205,8.548014e-7,0.00000550294,0.003936551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8740875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8134695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303070228","doi":"","title":"Global Strategies and Techniques for Defending Class Action Trials: Defending the Global Company in Multinational Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Redress; Damages; Mass tort; Law; Compromise; Legislation; Plaintiff; Multinational corporation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Liability; Tort; State (computer science)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05994085514934693,"gpt":0.3413598973563367,"spread":0.2814190422069897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002288422,0.0001866609,0.0002480726,0.0001732495,0.0007722602,0.001887254,0.0001762616,0.0001333183,0.00005468716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005492053,0.0001455935,0.0001558501,0.0004369621,0.0001133497,0.001933114,0.00003586103,0.0003416906,0.000008076232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001842388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001148718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001933347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985126,0.00006189384,0.0005504474,0.0002121735,0.0003469685,0.0003158818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987525,0.0002468271,0.0005124615,0.0001091502,0.0003470446,0.00003197995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001941515,0.0001185791,0.01765592,0.00006085688,0.00006105665,0.000006356879,0.0000676726,0.0001643103,0.001104051,0.9298377,0.004522935,0.04620642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00302014,0.00003789503,0.1065752,0.0001702484,0.000251478,0.0006275772,0.008334613,0.04006421,0.00004238224,0.2181494,0.6221166,0.0006101864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9199483,0.0002328541,0.05211805,0.003835122,0.002404635,0.0007984824,0.00005615211,0.0002034821,0.02040288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964461,0.00006930575,0.001268611,0.0004526318,0.001659187,0.00004840522,0.0000287698,0.000012362,0.00001467844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7116883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}