{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":16,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4958ea535888","filters":{"venue":"Deleuze Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2156633382","doi":"10.3366/e1750224110000772","title":"What Concepts Do: Preface to the Chinese Translation of <i>A Thousand Plateaus</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Epistemology; Reading (process); Discipline; Event (particle physics); Sociology; Key (lock); Close reading; Philosophy; Linguistics; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0440670010016729,"gpt":0.3999242678490403,"spread":0.3558572668473674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007741341,0.00008642329,0.0001539754,0.00002106748,0.0006180491,0.00008897739,0.0002024364,0.00005923711,0.00002197138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002197882,0.00005218487,0.00004834816,0.0001786534,0.0004214865,0.0002624034,0.00003812248,0.0001941105,0.00001146794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009785077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004270861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002586203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01411104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00008110715,0.0001342049,0.000137953,0.0002843747,0.0001701237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.0003742075,0.00006594344,0.0001448078,0.0001458348,0.00004008684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004980647,0.00008022854,0.003111277,0.00003405355,0.0001777547,0.000002173925,0.8579898,0.00004590238,0.01006208,0.06336272,0.002493642,0.0625905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007536013,0.0001765578,0.01708931,0.0001392651,0.00007519197,0.000001681086,0.1204402,0.00003780073,0.003259103,0.0486599,0.8088612,0.0005061329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971514,0.0024005,0.00003809266,0.01228202,0.001344419,0.0003213527,0.000009627423,0.00003330464,0.01205662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973126,0.001538499,0.00009566038,0.0003135668,0.0002485735,0.00001709468,7.699418e-7,0.000006509125,0.0004666982],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.787429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495377279","doi":"10.3366/dls.2016.0231","title":"The Open Society and the Democracy to Come: Bergson, Deleuze and Guattari","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Deleuze and Guattari; Open society; Democracy; Sociology; Immanence; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09324444690143469,"gpt":0.3208126009585405,"spread":0.2275681540571058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008857234,0.0001915084,0.0003130833,0.00001576566,0.003199969,0.0005143373,0.0004063131,0.00003739108,0.00002545508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002481644,0.0000778299,0.00008562725,0.0000271272,0.002425486,0.0002400368,0.0009076323,0.0001287295,0.00002790723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002446669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002306215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003953133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004333138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.000107871,0.0002611273,0.0002758472,0.0001866645,0.0002976468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982348,0.001075007,0.0000848539,0.0002932801,0.0002458619,0.00006618039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001066897,0.00001273415,0.0001887078,0.00002304349,0.0004758001,0.00000129735,0.07715657,1.748964e-7,0.00001040781,0.8387036,0.07671027,0.006610733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001330834,0.00006298866,0.0002822103,0.00005596496,0.00009160096,0.000003967927,0.01599379,0.00000803097,0.0000119696,0.2953158,0.6866491,0.0001937624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1946187,0.0291875,0.0000778152,0.6748575,0.002487212,0.001760273,0.0001580232,0.0001501955,0.09670277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732203,0.006480037,0.00007245202,0.006463805,0.0008790378,0.00009577844,0.000001298559,0.00002193366,0.01276533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7786016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W278171073","doi":"10.3366/dls.2017.0250","title":"‘A Part’ of the World: Deleuze and the Logic of Creation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Realm; Philosophy; Epistemology; Scholarship; Continental philosophy; Action (physics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1492536360137806,"gpt":0.3345352023612059,"spread":0.1852815663474253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003450159,0.00009423774,0.0002590061,0.00002703525,0.001087774,0.00006265897,0.0002507574,0.00002030557,0.00003255769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002830026,0.00004506603,0.0001000956,0.00001292306,0.003634912,0.00009738128,0.0001912775,0.00009533436,0.000002734928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006213563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000120009,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003326865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005260965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993374,0.0000690607,0.0002280507,0.0001053911,0.0001577746,0.0001022661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0001973331,0.0003074385,0.0003832633,0.0002328026,0.00001162414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003941253,0.00001660105,0.0004400995,0.00006542102,0.000186258,2.830772e-7,0.0265677,0.000001508472,0.000007162305,0.9698524,0.002254063,0.0005691022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001678619,0.00007765602,0.004537288,0.0002463291,0.0003832225,0.000001591307,0.01330586,0.0000497825,0.0004094454,0.7747746,0.2043246,0.000210976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2781051,0.01114543,0.00000490913,0.03246938,0.002547794,0.0005058013,0.00009349612,0.00003308432,0.675095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917015,0.000739153,0.000009078418,0.000292517,0.0004741335,0.00001364049,9.770835e-7,0.000005886926,0.006763113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574641308","doi":"10.3366/dls.2017.0254","title":"The Death of Gilles Deleuze as Composition of a Concept","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Connection (principal bundle); Composition (language); Range (aeronautics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Mathematics; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1174317063091583,"gpt":0.4215313848872549,"spread":0.3040996785780966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005664295,0.00007217811,0.0001952908,0.00001555108,0.002639881,0.00003862341,0.0003700144,0.00004508332,0.000006089274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005179746,0.00004894717,0.00007207313,0.00002406104,0.001840755,0.0001095073,0.0001192852,0.00008577277,0.000002920612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002805334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007611058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00165244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991651,0.0000957073,0.0001739322,0.0001033832,0.0002940291,0.0001678081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986698,0.0004147673,0.0003160658,0.000239847,0.0003330818,0.00002644708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634243,0.00002968922,0.001634169,0.00001062431,0.0001573599,0.000001567001,0.01833377,0.000001795293,0.0003632108,0.9752467,0.0002017134,0.004003101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001531983,0.000665226,0.0605152,0.0005041047,0.0002941988,0.00000366528,0.114168,0.00006646278,0.03698125,0.6222063,0.1623844,0.0006792651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8067371,0.004332473,0.0000494101,0.005987042,0.00042655,0.0002492783,0.00002355716,0.00002595926,0.1821686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973764,0.00194949,0.00005493191,0.00004997084,0.00008586954,0.000007931159,6.770666e-7,0.000004661255,0.0004700923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3530404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025417133","doi":"10.3366/e1750224110000796","title":"McDeleuze: What's More Rhizomal than the Big Mac?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deleuze and Guattari; Scholarship; Corporation; Sociology; Power (physics); Salient; Popularity; Control (management); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07183025543702425,"gpt":0.390319155681736,"spread":0.3184889002447118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003735105,0.0003530265,0.0004577595,0.0001422214,0.0004840477,0.0001246521,0.0006188731,0.000169586,0.0002929039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001166848,0.0002326799,0.000283827,0.0003767466,0.0007062498,0.0001615293,0.0001538996,0.0006478865,0.000813845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002510074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003522405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001863584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007105928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979378,0.0001335502,0.0004131935,0.0004965351,0.0003267609,0.0006921527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979827,0.0003877437,0.0001506701,0.001141955,0.0002249273,0.0001119531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000368523,0.0008924429,0.03987717,0.000117603,0.01052511,0.0002424949,0.0678636,0.00001117037,0.0007567936,0.5166736,0.2132622,0.1494093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001889643,0.0003023925,0.08095906,0.0000621076,0.00100925,0.0001746285,0.05256744,0.0000571433,0.000276736,0.07257181,0.7889025,0.001227296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8484404,0.01735558,0.00003603379,0.0246369,0.01545129,0.0003788726,0.00006026543,0.0002306486,0.09340999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847831,0.001040323,0.00008030453,0.004227976,0.003853375,0.0001191002,0.00001337137,0.00004836881,0.005834095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5756403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803385623","doi":"10.3366/dls.2015.0192","title":"Saints, Jesters and Nomads: The Anomalous Pedagogies of Lacan, Žižek, … Deleuze and Guattari","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deleuze and Guattari; Context (archaeology); The Imaginary; Capitalism; Sociology; SAINT; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History; Art history; Psychology; Politics; Law; Archaeology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2320702814306848,"gpt":0.4285635365273979,"spread":0.1964932550967131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004168864,0.0002577148,0.0005081225,0.0001218745,0.0001583462,0.00002840189,0.0002150368,0.00008904749,0.00001455146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001895687,0.0001790709,0.00007684443,0.0001764799,0.0008822021,0.00007743927,0.0001729715,0.0001574162,0.00002480438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000355117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003555574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005139771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004392203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998484,0.0001762059,0.0003931185,0.0003578778,0.0002108589,0.0003779949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986166,0.0003997411,0.000167973,0.0004832277,0.0002244037,0.0001080527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006059652,0.0004255874,0.5475603,0.0003380596,0.007767988,0.0001123359,0.1625206,0.00002671415,0.00006566127,0.1446792,0.1133931,0.02250444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006708034,0.001990027,0.3815404,0.0001723648,0.002467081,0.0003873307,0.2490544,0.0001209988,0.00009903275,0.1015852,0.2540791,0.001796047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9320523,0.03929985,0.00002352698,0.003551422,0.0006147432,0.0001995989,0.00004879977,0.00004483761,0.0241649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960847,0.001088671,0.0001619299,0.0009818776,0.0002946601,0.00002970509,0.00000469196,0.0000229764,0.001330738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1660198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7302299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054518923","doi":"10.3366/dls.2011.0004","title":"Autism: Schizo of Postmodern Capital","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Autism; Articulation (sociology); Argument (complex analysis); Representation (politics); Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Capitalism; Limit (mathematics); Epistemology; Capital (architecture); Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1555977176817808,"gpt":0.3752531635145758,"spread":0.219655445832795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004019087,0.00009288877,0.0002031483,0.00004313851,0.0003909917,0.000008943472,0.0001930397,0.00008549471,0.00008620245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003741536,0.00008128561,0.00007167142,0.0001233151,0.000893096,0.000131708,0.00008075094,0.0001275775,0.00007093377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003192001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001066778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003971796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007927082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990187,0.00008198206,0.0001768183,0.0001515662,0.0002959056,0.0002750518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994403,0.0001055697,0.00007725545,0.0001344719,0.0001829856,0.00005945598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000212029,0.00006609383,0.004999799,0.00002781075,0.0001462293,0.000007564647,0.6375237,5.216449e-7,0.00002890097,0.3530597,0.001716779,0.002401629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008564793,0.0004629393,0.05333147,0.0001464983,0.0001741145,0.000004133457,0.4674273,0.00001998688,0.0006814705,0.358844,0.1172331,0.0008185533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7780508,0.006050659,0.00004140869,0.002414528,0.001198419,0.0001555575,0.00001304864,0.0001113741,0.2119642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956118,0.001746804,0.0005852911,0.0001377548,0.00009350932,0.000005915927,7.295143e-7,0.000008036179,0.001810157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.217561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6004193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010971541","doi":"10.3366/dls.2015.0173","title":"Cicero's<i>De Fato</i>in Deleuze's Logic of Sense","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Compatibilism; Determinism; Inference; Literature; History; Art; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3040194977327544,"gpt":0.3427124289538361,"spread":0.03869293122108164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002773635,0.0001640935,0.0003851751,0.00008772125,0.00009952513,0.0000240877,0.0001009099,0.00004114811,0.00005270079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000193467,0.000127909,0.00009473294,0.0000721271,0.0005849921,0.0001121982,0.00009684746,0.0001438223,0.00005823862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000687038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003684855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001303368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001192329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989453,0.00007134848,0.0003138455,0.0001954887,0.0001933728,0.0002806327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992826,0.0001521345,0.00009191903,0.0001808688,0.0002158744,0.00007662814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007515353,0.0001526118,0.000402127,0.00006624783,0.0001216819,0.00006664705,0.03135793,0.00004827841,0.0000414198,0.9552203,0.01148081,0.0009667483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001482053,0.0003857958,0.0002252573,0.0001220247,0.00008532771,0.00001235364,0.02575798,0.000163999,0.000497915,0.6333529,0.3374664,0.0004479382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5298239,0.009011562,0.00004345513,0.004743176,0.0009887302,0.0002770986,0.00006664227,0.0001455024,0.4548999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966518,0.0001829385,0.0001113891,0.000584804,0.0006016358,0.00001665577,0.000003587304,0.00001459423,0.001832597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4668279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5215976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001160245","doi":"10.3366/dls.2011.0040","title":"A Criminal Intrigue: An Interview with Jean-Clet Martin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Contemporary Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Reading (process); Epistemology; Dialectic; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Art; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2389852555684208,"gpt":0.2895971237502075,"spread":0.05061186818178676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001634327,0.0001969699,0.0002825399,0.00007016481,0.0002580474,0.0001020882,0.0001533876,0.00002207684,0.001198141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001906234,0.0001305845,0.0000603404,0.0000335051,0.000320259,0.0004254379,0.00006700593,0.0001301283,0.000081973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001188988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001507346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008538234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002567206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999085,0.0000730808,0.000233769,0.000240549,0.0001281403,0.0002394355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.00003554989,0.00005695918,0.0002315486,0.0002346276,0.00006191145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000164178,0.0002215617,0.0001942367,0.0002257947,0.0003280528,0.0001939028,0.340908,3.6312e-8,0.000004338769,0.6158289,0.01740779,0.02452317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005818735,0.001388365,0.0002712118,0.0003026313,0.0002434881,0.00001789354,0.09918731,0.00001496957,0.0001165701,0.00727596,0.8901209,0.0004788342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4251206,0.02723758,0.0001684909,0.002193761,0.001215091,0.0005555262,0.00006690784,0.0004585422,0.5429835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896907,0.00009075848,0.0002138033,0.00166613,0.0004993961,0.00004903661,0.00001173158,0.00002176186,0.007756657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972517648","doi":"10.3366/dls.2010.0103","title":"Critical Forces: True Critique or Mere Criticism of Deleuze contra Hegel?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Criticism; Relation (database); Epistemology; Principal (computer security); Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1015093336478623,"gpt":0.3606250894425724,"spread":0.2591157557947101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004177403,0.0003536763,0.0007763985,0.0001260015,0.0007123864,0.0001439193,0.0003424867,0.0001740782,0.00081309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001960778,0.0002694869,0.0002596506,0.00004907659,0.002951893,0.0004191817,0.0001337562,0.0006304558,0.00005348121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002074866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009008725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003980031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007979415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978365,0.00009687019,0.0006953509,0.0004094569,0.0003957898,0.0005659985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969885,0.001114444,0.0001021286,0.0004210599,0.001239188,0.0001346811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009635949,0.0001410195,0.0000189923,0.0005308717,0.0002593423,0.00004756398,0.03091906,2.757015e-7,0.0006906248,0.9609265,0.005874742,0.0004946836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001343439,0.0005770015,0.00005236733,0.0003599911,0.0003889691,0.00004025758,0.03770993,0.00007643618,0.003562731,0.6876096,0.2674162,0.0008630522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3738323,0.01350006,0.0004657653,0.04754419,0.02129449,0.001395529,0.001943508,0.0008982419,0.539126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916684,0.0004569365,0.0003858488,0.002399152,0.002495473,0.00007655539,0.00001285579,0.00004960999,0.002455185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6178361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737480333","doi":"10.3366/dls.2017.0272","title":"The Anticipations of Sensation: Deleuze and Kant on the Intensive Ground of Sensible Experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Sensation; Philosophy; Common ground; Epistemology; Intensity (physics); Psychology; Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Physics; Optics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2403789757843262,"gpt":0.3620430299226214,"spread":0.1216640541382952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002489061,0.0001030154,0.0002007924,0.00002519286,0.002212034,0.0001107453,0.0001705141,0.00002188656,0.000008352418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008271881,0.00005445863,0.00005697594,0.00001247314,0.002926147,0.0001154063,0.0001292245,0.00009979862,0.000003626569],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008410294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001718228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004715817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001889306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992732,0.00005032306,0.0002390341,0.000126217,0.0001825899,0.0001286749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978827,0.0005249389,0.0002626558,0.0004019622,0.0009110269,0.000016749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002349386,0.00001325954,0.000188075,0.00002848896,0.0001614417,0.000001719656,0.1554187,0.000001898209,0.0000940419,0.8427556,0.0009364826,0.0003767878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008388913,0.0005463357,0.01358259,0.0004809673,0.000288694,0.00001134485,0.6419988,0.000463301,0.003608986,0.278978,0.05869783,0.0005043024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626687,0.001083149,0.000004564454,0.01187083,0.0007778126,0.0001602879,0.00003044343,0.00001181455,0.02339247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977812,0.0008660782,0.00000954312,0.0003467281,0.0002676098,0.00001492339,9.213887e-7,0.000006630907,0.0007063469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5637777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567145022","doi":"10.3366/e1750224109000579","title":"Lessons to Live (2): Deleuze","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Spatial and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Nothing; Work (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1173164244753076,"gpt":0.4210111814404927,"spread":0.3036947569651851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002316665,0.0001591825,0.0002829297,0.00003857779,0.001430229,0.00005222089,0.0002216551,0.00004909913,0.00006458248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005657906,0.0001198545,0.00008873819,0.0003613455,0.0001974243,0.0001254315,0.00008308017,0.00008495263,0.0004302181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001215501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003383264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001620525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01489194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.00006818517,0.0001742199,0.0002708037,0.0003474253,0.0004687829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999305,0.00009657952,0.00004640432,0.0001128383,0.0003047323,0.000134524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000528187,0.0001369475,0.002200764,0.00001085431,0.0003454265,0.00003042533,0.3436824,0.00002819731,0.0002809921,0.1290693,0.1761892,0.3479727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002677331,0.000327797,0.03063781,0.00006141175,0.0000670789,0.000001148011,0.1906215,0.000002447561,0.0001750868,0.01862077,0.7586907,0.0005264917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5747141,0.01707237,0.00009244536,0.2105167,0.001408102,0.000883518,0.00001925117,0.0006583036,0.1946352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875624,0.002809175,0.0004217606,0.003078895,0.0006322835,0.00003570482,0.000001080128,0.000005525535,0.005453156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5825015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089958573","doi":"10.3366/e1750224108000044","title":"Citizen Kant: Flatness and Depth in the Image of Thought","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Philosophical and Historical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Reading (process); Film theory; Painting; Aesthetics; Flatness (cosmology); Epistemology; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07944117864321223,"gpt":0.3857384117150641,"spread":0.3062972330718519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001056807,0.00007792003,0.0002214098,0.00003993349,0.0004777363,0.00001018169,0.000150037,0.00003625401,0.000003249314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004961973,0.00004754031,0.00003744142,0.0003424191,0.0009553214,0.00006016818,0.00008264973,0.00009733016,0.000003032595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004621558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001131501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006417442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01125154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.00008389431,0.0001899982,0.000129354,0.0002697294,0.0002387551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999263,0.0004943382,0.0000499089,0.00007106757,0.00008994358,0.00003172846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008035864,0.0001794584,0.0272693,0.00009693475,0.0001563685,0.00007218395,0.1977807,4.285915e-7,0.0002042044,0.7279873,0.003627832,0.04254492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008729612,0.0001651922,0.2233471,0.00009117035,0.00008892543,0.00000297039,0.1336425,0.000002815305,0.0001925386,0.3502795,0.2908604,0.0004539708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5940773,0.02617324,0.00009075091,0.01691665,0.0003166099,0.000302464,0.000005715087,0.00004530601,0.3620719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962493,0.002952725,0.0001541084,0.0001932969,0.0002366396,0.000008232216,1.991907e-7,0.000003063218,0.000202464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4021719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6278624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011595079","doi":"10.3366/dls.2012.0073","title":"Samuel Fuller's Schizo-violent Cinema and the Affective Politics of War","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Action (physics); Politics; Sociology; Criminology; Obstacle; History; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Political science; Art; Art history","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04191296988720099,"gpt":0.3853356448662612,"spread":0.3434226749790602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002663814,0.0001130339,0.0002319241,0.00003790118,0.0001487888,0.000002834335,0.0000976196,0.00004313033,0.00004586664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002198277,0.00006894717,0.00006058121,0.00009686314,0.0004220787,0.00002643227,0.00004521095,0.0000911408,0.00001390091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001372396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003955711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008058396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000942822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999311,0.00008038177,0.0001697534,0.0001320548,0.00007438772,0.0002324544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.0002639373,0.00008813835,0.0002868159,0.00006345914,0.00003795813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001178985,0.0002470423,0.008066613,0.00002707329,0.0007650944,3.329492e-7,0.0208118,2.598329e-7,0.0001613278,0.9283533,0.02800173,0.01344751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01068978,0.0008667214,0.2867456,0.0002365315,0.0006379225,0.00009247367,0.08117655,0.00003833666,0.00317479,0.2145843,0.400656,0.001100925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8486491,0.09167099,0.002728004,0.004899648,0.0005727661,0.001146864,0.00005789947,0.0001515764,0.05012309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949376,0.003088887,0.0005659164,0.000455334,0.0002049486,0.0002797098,0.000001210088,0.00001364638,0.0004527339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.713769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2811584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013708954","doi":"10.3366/dls.2012.0077","title":"Nathan Widder (2008) <i>Reflections on Time and Politics</i>, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Management; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07732080568790659,"gpt":0.3378411435124296,"spread":0.260520337824523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000387144,0.0001380076,0.0001879572,0.00007266596,0.001778142,0.0000249685,0.0001405674,0.00009114193,0.00002743942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001857379,0.0001433328,0.00005125118,0.0001986939,0.000808333,0.0003555244,0.0001304512,0.0002243191,0.00006265329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002204803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009637841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003176538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986548,0.0002704391,0.00008146966,0.0002101313,0.0002552522,0.0005279485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990692,0.0003353128,0.00006002842,0.0001292997,0.0001988932,0.000207281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001741695,0.0005115533,0.008699675,0.00007599808,0.0009045221,0.00006324044,0.4181126,0.00003829173,0.0001331835,0.4343489,0.135394,0.001543861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002595202,0.00005977756,0.002911388,0.00001568021,0.00007065577,0.00000117833,0.03065654,0.000004468994,0.00003709548,0.0008356368,0.9649422,0.000205902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878695,0.002931254,0.00005263721,0.006618695,0.00130054,0.000421921,0.0002001993,0.000337395,0.4002679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9288799,0.005759141,0.000148534,0.0002851398,0.000251603,4.34932e-7,0.00000397338,0.00001119097,0.06466004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920210730","doi":"10.3366/dls.2015.0204","title":"The Take and the Stutter: Glenn Gould's Time Synthesis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deleuze Studies","topic":"Music History and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Musical; Active listening; Piano; Deleuze and Guattari; Aesthetics; Temporality; Modernism (music); Studio; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Visual arts; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07544858652774035,"gpt":0.2327971712024257,"spread":0.1573485846746854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000450038,0.0001210369,0.0001893037,0.00001007787,0.001552379,0.0001247341,0.0001480788,0.00001940619,0.0001977154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002209931,0.00004977997,0.00005370494,0.0000160976,0.001373974,0.00007619739,0.00007972462,0.00009422793,0.0001915279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002134807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001328466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000413383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00124451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993221,0.000108115,0.0001343451,0.0001253648,0.0001517377,0.000158343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999247,0.0003494988,0.00005526328,0.0001829201,0.0001311883,0.0000341676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005922355,0.00001033972,0.00001359601,0.000009399327,0.0002297412,0.000002859646,0.1521835,7.512399e-7,0.000001843294,0.1741721,0.6683947,0.004921919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002523785,0.00001863496,0.00001890368,0.00001257723,0.00007026725,0.000002548382,0.04306335,0.00001720233,0.000003575245,0.003552098,0.9529054,0.0000831115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1298864,0.0782916,0.000001517782,0.01950333,0.002230764,0.0006166976,0.00005350576,0.0001992299,0.7692169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8654425,0.0006052866,0.000007655504,0.002029769,0.001369115,0.000153297,0.000001625777,0.00001727636,0.1303735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}