{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"9085980187e8","filters":{"venue":"Design Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W1973117896","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.004","title":"The ideation gap:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideation; Conversation; Computer science; Representation (politics); Human–computer interaction; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Communication; Cognitive science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2253938353756923,"gpt":0.3330572810071932,"spread":0.1076634456315009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002057388,0.00005625708,0.0000553559,0.00001719253,0.0002926596,0.00001338902,0.00005342072,0.00001358018,0.00001022104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000180175,0.00003879601,0.00001460144,0.0000936806,0.00004094786,0.0000896139,0.000005761222,0.00005255255,0.0002157378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002501589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001034277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001329644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001187426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996539,0.00004349607,0.00008398397,0.00004789809,0.00007562727,0.00009511803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992055,0.0006168552,0.00001390527,0.00009701037,0.00005069945,0.00001598742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001967673,0.00001915505,0.0003193808,0.00002021349,0.0003011508,0.000009306639,0.009543972,0.005686184,0.001594755,0.00495493,0.9520676,0.02546369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003140835,0.00005383171,0.01013555,0.00001590724,0.00004770152,0.00007648912,0.003972988,0.005272523,0.00539032,0.004068518,0.9703109,0.0003411625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03894854,0.1329321,0.613827,0.007794856,0.009394513,0.001356454,0.000004007176,0.002537603,0.1932049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841541,0.01025539,0.002065817,0.0001305644,0.0001388546,0.00006015294,6.41441e-7,0.00001352932,0.003180951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2772945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010970152","doi":"10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00014-4","title":"Models for estimating design effort and time","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Decomposition; Product (mathematics); Estimation; Process (computing); Industrial engineering; Cost estimate; Operations research; Engineering; Parametric statistics; Design process; Computer science; Systems engineering; Reliability engineering; Operations management; Work in process; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0677622360687686,"gpt":0.264532339000189,"spread":0.1967701029314204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001600667,0.000103235,0.0001426083,0.00003479215,0.0001071321,0.00002410848,0.00003481334,0.00002747056,0.000003116872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002821781,0.00009155019,0.00001403966,0.00004045013,0.00001599683,0.0001188089,0.00001311483,0.00002680959,0.000003246982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001537529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003169242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.235539e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.051595e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995937,0.000006126914,0.0001062725,0.0001032119,0.00004895415,0.0001416971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997286,0.0001420282,0.00001619243,0.00005472463,0.00003675911,0.00002169616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009260253,0.000002513239,0.000004750489,0.00008503816,0.00004847701,8.807152e-7,0.0004304561,0.9907466,0.00004214447,0.00006330651,0.001316774,0.007249855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001669327,0.00003182549,0.000009183988,0.00003099469,0.00002264721,0.000003246942,0.00002971791,0.9929923,0.00120008,0.005291395,0.0001103112,0.0001113186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.000820923,0.001904836,0.9963645,0.00001958385,0.00006608909,0.0002743175,9.097527e-7,0.0002083438,0.0003405365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1672576,0.0006326187,0.8315175,0.00002489937,0.00007373559,0.0001506985,0.000002136182,0.00003113968,0.000309743],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1664366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3733308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109987560","doi":"10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00028-9","title":"The importance of visualisation in concept design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Visualization; Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Originality; User experience design; Information visualization; Usability; Process (computing); Conceptual design; Product design; Product (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1365682094474064,"gpt":0.3651921284358972,"spread":0.2286239189884907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007038432,0.00007963134,0.0001203802,0.00003952877,0.00006330392,0.00001318016,0.00008138382,0.00002410013,0.00001738294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003430024,0.00006048962,0.00001658562,0.000242065,0.00006032763,0.0001277468,0.000007258025,0.00006680884,0.00001411017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004608673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001927767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003604064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001052074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993277,0.000146267,0.0002229852,0.00007447412,0.00009818627,0.0001303398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998385,0.001358166,0.00005273865,0.0001234099,0.00006474847,0.00001590789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006058625,0.0003764127,0.0370454,0.0002052393,0.001261447,0.00006869176,0.09773389,0.2976238,0.01968038,0.02978773,0.3869933,0.1286179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006209353,0.001109245,0.1366793,0.0005381384,0.0003965776,0.0001381987,0.1225727,0.1590511,0.1284194,0.0536869,0.3880602,0.003138907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04827402,0.05956366,0.8783934,0.001834264,0.001770386,0.001285385,0.000002696441,0.0003402491,0.008535954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924972,0.004080626,0.002911642,0.00008305263,0.00004753576,0.00006363338,7.29372e-7,0.00001309102,0.0003025104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2466695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092878148","doi":"10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00009-1","title":"Specifications for computer-aided conceptual building design","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Conceptual design; Computer science; Systems engineering; Computer Aided Design; Engineering drawing; Human–computer interaction; Architectural engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4627504115042274,"gpt":0.343493662422181,"spread":0.1192567490820463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032456,0.0001604224,0.0002033939,0.00008224865,0.0002085148,0.00004971951,0.0001346871,0.00004305806,0.0001089396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002120224,0.0001622811,0.0000488986,0.0001903567,0.00007941248,0.0001898882,0.0000127258,0.00008870104,0.000179407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006802152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000847743,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.584192e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.974087e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991533,0.00009316474,0.0002303188,0.000182351,0.0001010619,0.0002397665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973106,0.002266338,0.00004535569,0.0001883743,0.0001317062,0.00005764041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001717029,0.00009059717,0.00001080461,0.00005102973,0.0004187699,0.000002802708,0.008674295,0.0627274,0.0059349,0.01211307,0.8876538,0.02230537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001450137,0.0003358127,0.0002295071,0.00007807669,0.000222542,0.00003115673,0.005494127,0.4129236,0.01677869,0.003182193,0.5582546,0.001019622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002375719,0.005098679,0.9914238,0.0004739954,0.0009073229,0.0005307173,0.000005320887,0.0003675508,0.0009550235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2850533,0.001402154,0.7110652,0.0002659013,0.0006182692,0.000392002,0.000003325102,0.0000528481,0.001147043],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3501962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.661763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792638555","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003","title":"Cracking open co-creation: Categories, stories, and value tension in a collaborative design process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Service and Product Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Copenhagen Business School","keywords":"Structuring; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Value (mathematics); Design process; Plan (archaeology); Frame (networking); Engineering design process; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Process management; Aesthetics; Art; Work in process; Business; Operations management; Mechanical engineering; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0950627791810337,"gpt":0.3642127226846489,"spread":0.2691499435036152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162459,0.0001793207,0.0002738229,0.0002012924,0.0005011916,0.0003708597,0.0001798482,0.00004980489,0.0000150107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004582956,0.0001532528,0.000006971854,0.001604597,0.0001394377,0.001757058,0.0001604842,0.0000749346,0.00003140685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004825003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007689123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004361003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001725267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989585,0.00005000122,0.0002605373,0.0003474527,0.0001824924,0.0002010015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980379,0.0001279535,0.0002051215,0.0001501987,0.001472874,0.000005916068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007552603,0.0009813197,0.1840593,0.003639345,0.001566313,0.0001809916,0.1617272,0.002053678,0.01492688,0.289749,0.267933,0.06563035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01006728,0.001133834,0.07439864,0.002047315,0.0006846133,0.00002373467,0.2219452,0.01714959,0.04212064,0.4211326,0.2053537,0.003942844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6807108,0.02851415,0.1311026,0.06509583,0.00596897,0.02245575,0.00002431725,0.001344024,0.06478354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913736,0.0001381612,0.002974197,0.003922433,0.001186737,0.0001779164,0.00002410514,0.00002631582,0.0001765653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3106627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6249468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051427411","doi":"10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00055-8","title":"Imagining the building: architectural design as semiotic construction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Semiotics; Envelope (radar); Computer science; Architectural engineering; Product (mathematics); Linguistics; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Telecommunications; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0796670680188692,"gpt":0.3220549067339809,"spread":0.2423878387151117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007920064,0.0001744294,0.0001649334,0.00007071636,0.0002611978,0.0000703032,0.00011239,0.00003185907,0.00005584133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000889946,0.0001279487,0.00003956174,0.0002493522,0.0001320298,0.0001488378,0.00001135701,0.0002220615,0.0001159789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006391484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000401649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.420402e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988913,0.0003735438,0.0001864775,0.0001530859,0.0001428646,0.0002527176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998037,0.001606716,0.00004595439,0.0001902617,0.00007407021,0.00004597507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001905212,0.0001287893,0.0009358635,0.0003171912,0.003281384,0.00007150826,0.06202671,0.4671562,0.06142801,0.1279332,0.1029533,0.1735774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003312774,0.0006520805,0.002112989,0.0004307502,0.001371517,0.006035135,0.08990895,0.0477538,0.3233823,0.1700781,0.3510595,0.003902053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008254908,0.007486568,0.9675665,0.0009068212,0.002093633,0.0004629362,6.861638e-7,0.0004523611,0.01277559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901428,0.0003039167,0.09754037,0.0002528318,0.00009909288,0.000060254,3.749669e-7,0.00002984289,0.0002853437],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.893173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5217598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073661746","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.001","title":"The worlds and modalities of engagement of design participants: A qualitative case study of three medical innovations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Engineering design process; Knowledge management; Object (grammar); Modalities; Design process; Qualitative research; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Operations management; Work in process; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5544391329858422,"gpt":0.4480658684627444,"spread":0.1063732645230978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00341005,0.0001028907,0.0002561101,0.00008838332,0.0001144783,0.000004971705,0.00009357045,0.00002470619,0.00002236061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001338826,0.00007290156,0.00001656681,0.0003010727,0.0002489535,0.00009402083,0.00004069323,0.0001018826,6.91028e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001313687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004643909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001712225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001307196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983538,0.0006823122,0.0005046833,0.00008736578,0.0002393996,0.0001324267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995253,0.004099295,0.0001443744,0.0001767848,0.000294095,0.00003239996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143276,0.0005768245,0.0008438384,0.0001801291,0.001894692,0.00003014417,0.9796053,0.0004612092,0.0002505992,0.009679135,0.001513032,0.004850822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006171941,0.0005939314,0.001294903,0.00006272159,0.0002208975,0.00001707061,0.9883118,0.001470192,0.003348242,0.003853753,0.00007770377,0.000131607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8650317,0.003645999,0.1295398,0.0001147382,0.0002105362,0.0008111495,0.000006251767,0.00004217822,0.0005976421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995222,0.0002840073,0.004283671,0.000009792554,0.000009353429,0.0001495014,1.60665e-7,0.000009832275,0.00003171006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1301902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2972839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092272977","doi":"10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00015-6","title":"An analogy-based model for estimating design effort","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Productivity; Industrial engineering; Computer science; Operations research; Econometrics; Management science; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09497614864358347,"gpt":0.3047526751004871,"spread":0.2097765264569036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000223236,0.0001412372,0.0001759035,0.00006667524,0.0001491517,0.00002691253,0.00008111856,0.00004210006,0.000003039064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003714974,0.0001294193,0.00002906072,0.00007359595,0.00001928969,0.0001152012,0.000005851245,0.00004171662,0.000002083085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003330626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001359178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001009646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002358335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994096,0.00001100934,0.0001515479,0.0001473081,0.00007376639,0.0002067807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996398,0.0001097946,0.00002624314,0.0001192672,0.00006931318,0.00003559316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001972831,0.0000107155,0.00003305577,0.00009544336,0.00004096459,0.000001280288,0.0003651103,0.995167,0.0001015755,0.00003163329,0.0006746746,0.003458824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002646735,0.00006168186,0.00002222745,0.00002482941,0.00003180089,8.250476e-7,0.00003618162,0.9954731,0.002707151,0.001190132,0.00003005883,0.0001572936],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001344954,0.0004212104,0.9973854,0.00001900476,0.0001009855,0.0003078896,0.000002183916,0.0003583023,0.00006005251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4161334,0.00004247285,0.5835438,0.0000394496,0.00004409499,0.0001375698,0.000005309337,0.00002350216,0.00003030119],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4147885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5277568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170433988","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2021.101019","title":"Exploring tutor-student interactions in a novel virtual design studio","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"TUTOR; Studio; Design studio; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Engineering; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5010365717327433,"gpt":0.3921994386358724,"spread":0.1088371330968709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005200366,0.0002147377,0.0002980219,0.0001675585,0.0001351523,0.00007274118,0.0001231119,0.00002389363,0.00005543209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004505829,0.0002270926,0.00005204386,0.0005293337,0.00003324967,0.0007839898,0.00006459188,0.0002769733,0.0001534936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003408015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001091186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008082046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003846534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987236,0.0001747436,0.0003389393,0.0002604032,0.0002087901,0.0002935728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981772,0.00133406,0.0000396609,0.0002334261,0.0001525369,0.00006309999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002090831,0.002422673,0.001848415,0.0002430813,0.003915795,0.0005757562,0.2189351,0.5537349,0.122201,0.009944621,0.04358603,0.04238352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007690978,0.0006470442,0.05764827,0.001384844,0.0008358819,0.0005290771,0.4343172,0.02895466,0.1231438,0.001010355,0.33918,0.004657779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04905707,0.007185343,0.9310868,0.0009054528,0.006041374,0.0006258217,0.000006048258,0.0006016161,0.004490523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794131,0.002181425,0.01628612,0.0001695612,0.0002244234,0.000600204,0.000002571829,0.00004809336,0.001074521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9260567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002082015","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2019.12.003","title":"Make and break details: The architecture of design-build education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Architecture; Generative grammar; Ethnography; Value (mathematics); Design education; Element (criminal law); Meaning (existential); Design process; Architectural design; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Visual arts; Work in process; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07126992020093509,"gpt":0.2978530176064982,"spread":0.2265830974055631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002605541,0.0001156886,0.0001512892,0.00003305715,0.00007730582,0.00002286066,0.00009960626,0.00002949399,0.00001534283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003156023,0.00008237529,0.00002267859,0.0001873075,0.0000688208,0.00005869427,0.0000209937,0.0001245001,0.00001434099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001245962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004880777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003506328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001686388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993859,0.0001434454,0.0001524866,0.0001128515,0.00009723371,0.0001080855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989544,0.0007620853,0.0000437334,0.0001226789,0.00006985856,0.00004729827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002340582,0.0001556721,0.000685566,0.0009828344,0.001384413,0.000004475904,0.1020233,0.04425235,0.03505113,0.004680985,0.2855949,0.5249502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002200161,0.001181401,0.01605584,0.0004832983,0.001594953,0.0002366876,0.08699933,0.03147668,0.1130094,0.02815894,0.716136,0.002467284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01027097,0.06125866,0.9039826,0.01717556,0.0008822883,0.001147062,0.000007284562,0.0003408091,0.004934727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97448,0.002272212,0.02165748,0.001166007,0.0001775479,0.00007731855,0.000001205226,0.00002518236,0.0001430004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3359167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790317456","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.002","title":"Imagining design: Transitive and intransitive dimensions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; European Commission","keywords":"Transitive relation; Metaphor; Representation (politics); Weaving; Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Conversation; Computer science; Process (computing); Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Mathematics; Communication; Engineering; Programming language; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09188465454681484,"gpt":0.326163455504989,"spread":0.2342788009581742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003797889,0.0001574202,0.0001844665,0.00007825652,0.0002066429,0.00003180014,0.0000450582,0.00003502437,0.00003159706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121468,0.0001469913,0.00001960056,0.0001741453,0.0002195707,0.0002421903,0.00001046173,0.0001177195,0.00008502243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003074894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002096243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003021072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002158146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992452,0.0001502512,0.0001385334,0.0001706064,0.00008806083,0.0002072936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987848,0.0008694254,0.00001929482,0.00009859522,0.0001627714,0.00006512846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004020026,0.0001963176,0.0001295893,0.0002239607,0.003650501,0.0001291578,0.5329559,0.004023019,0.1808952,0.004203098,0.1182386,0.1549526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005868498,0.002841679,0.008549604,0.0009681871,0.002171966,0.0006284389,0.1798791,0.1544567,0.4817597,0.01847847,0.1392997,0.005098019],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002755949,0.005827113,0.985015,0.0007751771,0.0005930066,0.0003020356,0.000004553625,0.0003129211,0.004414196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680437,0.001248696,0.02996738,0.0003668339,0.0001781858,0.0000442363,9.807021e-7,0.00002796013,0.0001219776],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5994132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016159524","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.001","title":"Precedents reconceived: Urban design learning catalysed through data rich 3-D digital models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Design studio; Architecture; Focus (optics); Urban design; Studio; Computer science; Replicate; World Wide Web; Engineering; Architectural engineering; Human–computer interaction; Visual arts; Art; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.41637050717904,"gpt":0.3307713186430767,"spread":0.08559918853596321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009318108,0.0002387869,0.0003146682,0.00002728186,0.0005068358,0.0001446173,0.0004741824,0.00006504217,0.0001228513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003203262,0.0001726,0.00003885716,0.0002170038,0.0001195327,0.002840095,0.00007863477,0.0001902321,0.0004829849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009785051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002404856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001855413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004347511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981308,0.000358961,0.0002524071,0.0003892745,0.0002996719,0.0005689038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986838,0.0006727491,0.0001028471,0.0003580561,0.00007030508,0.0001122251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002305488,0.0001102423,0.7525678,0.00007421574,0.0008973478,0.00002343254,0.03909152,0.03101001,0.00007402961,0.00002452523,0.1163062,0.05959013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006140093,0.003298332,0.4811278,0.0009979256,0.001352164,0.0003195186,0.1300287,0.2636793,0.003220589,0.008065256,0.09226127,0.009509019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4445826,0.2125731,0.2583021,0.0004006245,0.004975187,0.002959832,0.00114471,0.001728935,0.07333279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902915,0.0006731894,0.005604248,0.00005744844,0.0002121194,0.000004575495,0.0003719936,0.000008602387,0.002776358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7038422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296831767","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2022.101135","title":"Expansive learning for collaborative design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Expansive; Situated; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Action learning; Action (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Situated cognition; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Cooperative learning; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1394355717047488,"gpt":0.3374829222249707,"spread":0.1980473505202218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006546008,0.0001307846,0.0001817874,0.00008126715,0.0005660441,0.00002738218,0.00009623111,0.00001807324,0.00009505611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000504924,0.0001393891,0.00002767421,0.0003870054,0.00002681579,0.0001285441,0.00003001406,0.0001729949,0.00002746863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001358342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007305101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.279281e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.817771e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990309,0.0003345354,0.0001480383,0.0001492597,0.0001363304,0.0002008727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763,0.001975506,0.0000481774,0.00009180579,0.0002209107,0.00003358772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121474,0.00003320786,0.00001464566,0.00003741547,0.0004074386,0.000005397459,0.02286207,0.6510978,0.00324958,0.0008248601,0.3157757,0.005570476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009982928,0.0007487538,0.00006338926,0.00001305056,0.0001392385,0.00001561179,0.1412656,0.03255469,0.009821507,0.001991134,0.811802,0.0005866436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.000444181,0.009772806,0.9843935,0.000479644,0.001228572,0.001055419,0.00001095948,0.0004117309,0.002203234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894558,0.001363359,0.09044651,0.0006146433,0.0002826726,0.0060249,0.00002066308,0.0001201342,0.006569135],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5684121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122418771","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.003","title":"Estimating design effort for the compressor design department: a case study at Pratt & Whitney Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gas compressor; Parametric statistics; Engineering; Rotor (electric); Parametric model; Estimation; Parametric design; Reliability engineering; Systems engineering; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1171890827529366,"gpt":0.2848378158772387,"spread":0.1676487331243021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004625936,0.00031159,0.0003500037,0.00004334427,0.001263691,0.00003876124,0.0001677137,0.00004023193,0.000008060731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001424407,0.0002260644,0.00004074621,0.0001264251,0.00005160898,0.00009753533,0.00006574768,0.00009988278,0.00000338508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002805683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009498504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005509548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02816182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986487,0.00008911321,0.0003433602,0.0002790845,0.0002510202,0.0003887373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981011,0.001330767,0.00008560679,0.0002815785,0.0001347096,0.00006628345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004568048,0.00003364578,0.0002243199,0.0001163622,0.0004317923,0.0002282395,0.003751042,0.9711855,0.000009753535,0.000001255352,0.02358566,0.0003867592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001404813,0.0002498041,0.0002721573,0.00005331479,0.0003465053,0.0007142202,0.001633343,0.9892722,0.002953025,0.00004416746,0.002440518,0.0006159018],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03228218,0.003256311,0.9611617,0.00004172031,0.0003825448,0.002635208,0.00001094378,0.0002116091,0.00001776306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8422809,0.000147377,0.1556857,0.00005320487,0.00009151726,0.001434961,0.000005345351,0.00005808352,0.0002428955],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8099988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403489516","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2024.101274","title":"That was fun, now what?: Modelizing knowledge dynamics to explain co-design's shortcomings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"IÉSEG Écoles de Management","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Engineering; Management science; Engineering ethics; Systems engineering; Sociology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1659895556525892,"gpt":0.3726717409311865,"spread":0.2066821852785973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009864608,0.0003515154,0.0003610882,0.0003002317,0.0001919644,0.000484843,0.0002261686,0.00009456437,0.0000523265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107022,0.0003401468,0.00008367041,0.0004599981,0.00004229828,0.001057378,0.00005712519,0.0002845143,0.001150213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004005298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006693108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002081357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001825078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998491,0.000163125,0.0002932407,0.0003865561,0.0002211079,0.0004449675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978415,0.001586103,0.00002466561,0.0002950262,0.0001060078,0.0001467042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008451912,0.0001032262,0.00004071309,0.0007527809,0.00124109,0.00009532613,0.05168182,0.0776117,0.004844113,0.00421092,0.7300748,0.129259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002896937,0.0001507256,0.00003209248,0.0008994301,0.0002580989,0.00005523129,0.03776244,0.7647155,0.01278622,0.001774058,0.180038,0.001238455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001358869,0.04408101,0.9428203,0.001178637,0.003025805,0.0006003369,0.000008259103,0.001093063,0.005833741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392274,0.01424224,0.0384405,0.0005844865,0.000489282,0.0005575217,0.00001812758,0.00021861,0.006221802],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411437438","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2025.101325","title":"Unraveling the nature of design thinking disposition: Contributions of trait cognitive flexibility and trait empathy on design thinking potential","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba","funders":"Hong Kong Government; Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee","keywords":"Trait; Empathy; Flexibility (engineering); Disposition; Psychology; Cognition; Design thinking; Cognitive flexibility; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Neuroscience","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07525281675306092,"gpt":0.4019330086179769,"spread":0.326680191864916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002196435,0.0002028229,0.0003905185,0.0001513523,0.0007500189,0.00003863717,0.0002428576,0.0001421428,0.00002459602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001320671,0.0001490592,0.00009688187,0.0005057331,0.0007912013,0.00008633217,0.0000648913,0.0003985401,0.000001341481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004681074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001158651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001609503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002438687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973909,0.001234879,0.0004019859,0.0004255055,0.0002991492,0.0002476134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939305,0.005147036,0.0002356661,0.0002441936,0.0004090338,0.00003358243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007528624,0.004858431,0.002189241,0.0004450667,0.003480023,0.00006508407,0.4832209,0.00636783,0.06999755,0.3773538,0.009878332,0.03461507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006620087,0.003398004,0.2763611,0.002815922,0.002201792,0.00008906786,0.2160306,0.002899143,0.2286886,0.2595747,0.0001167691,0.001204195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1358823,0.003114905,0.8558533,0.002007639,0.000978223,0.001363997,0.0001298885,0.00005979966,0.0006098952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968792,0.00009849928,0.002035998,0.0006933166,0.00004728819,0.00009303656,0.000003839939,0.000008458677,0.000140401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6078456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408151874","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2025.101301","title":"Design education is too important to be left to designers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Coast Mountain College","funders":"","keywords":"Design education; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Visual arts; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08470709154254132,"gpt":0.3621153427805093,"spread":0.277408251237968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000788074,0.0002712746,0.0002963148,0.0003724169,0.0001846634,0.00009290277,0.0002323458,0.00006891263,0.00008596836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005746403,0.0002732358,0.00004826087,0.0006882829,0.00002456682,0.0002032011,0.00004410391,0.0001283594,0.0002955193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002492427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003097969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001468762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005025312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985791,0.0001435059,0.0003910782,0.0003304839,0.0001985684,0.0003572631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985064,0.0006696418,0.00004201847,0.0003746112,0.0002450318,0.0001622882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004858186,0.00006027321,0.00007306584,0.00005421621,0.0002446931,0.000002003892,0.01006071,0.005012893,0.008912761,0.0007756611,0.9613091,0.01344602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004333353,0.0002985145,0.001356217,0.0002184982,0.000317265,0.0000152439,0.01616675,0.00180808,0.1195893,0.003122187,0.8554838,0.001190857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001756111,0.004989715,0.9648051,0.01420598,0.002814746,0.001474565,0.00000514379,0.0004824342,0.009466227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4231322,0.002474055,0.4380012,0.07403709,0.0004557495,0.001661589,0.00001217585,0.000187814,0.06003812],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5268039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412424044","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2025.101326","title":"Researching collaborative housing through design: A case study of co-design workshops involving low-income recent immigrants in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Studies","topic":"Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Demographic economics; Geography; Economics; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1411611359516423,"gpt":0.4212808184803334,"spread":0.2801196825286911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004213758,0.0003217642,0.0008332428,0.0004093694,0.001961335,0.0001467509,0.0003307533,0.00008064714,0.000009629171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004354667,0.0003073171,0.0000343011,0.005254397,0.00048965,0.0005221493,0.0001771971,0.0003616405,6.618538e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002914477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01095215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8059707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904464,0.006696608,0.0007273236,0.0005445823,0.0007932509,0.0007918439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911564,0.006334241,0.0002853942,0.0002844522,0.00185911,0.00008040139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009299485,0.000654335,0.02381791,0.0001952318,0.0009000474,0.007822135,0.9324599,0.02320996,0.0001486919,0.0009880179,0.003698704,0.005175125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001125949,0.0002594501,0.0009057801,0.0005658295,0.00004992189,0.000001997363,0.994098,0.0004024319,0.0006575361,0.001437079,0.0002020757,0.0002939324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290519,0.01452837,0.04674247,0.001125706,0.0004965729,0.006326947,0.00001943865,0.00009531154,0.001613301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928281,0.002813467,0.003770187,0.000120104,0.00004189728,0.0002523552,5.419281e-7,0.00002231405,0.0001509727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1562482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}