{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":548,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":548,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"33eef27fb85c","filters":{"venue":"Dialogue"}},"results":[{"id":"W2131124681","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300000561","title":"Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State's Right to Redistribute Resources to Protect the Rights of Dependents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Doctrine; Argumentative; State (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Dependency (UML); Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02331055059832305,"gpt":0.2814694991449554,"spread":0.2581589485466324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001176796,0.00009866059,0.0001224172,0.00004535056,0.0009317683,0.00006644576,0.0003351665,0.00009667288,0.00003551962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008218329,0.0000528172,0.0000453562,0.0002636587,0.0003276351,0.0000643513,0.00006750318,0.0002525074,0.00009728937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005481126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006510751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01599232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01518512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983385,0.0004043706,0.000229446,0.0001997074,0.0005114711,0.0003165681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998648,0.000839444,0.00006236297,0.0002350401,0.00008529995,0.0001298026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005354741,0.00008162706,0.0005279977,0.000006328662,0.00001780354,0.00001034927,0.01182856,0.00009679882,0.0001267721,0.9833071,0.003733341,0.0002097379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001080478,0.00009097524,0.01160215,0.00004177158,0.00001474001,7.213879e-7,0.0002179851,0.000005616888,0.001087539,0.9417839,0.04493118,0.0001153718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8793862,0.0000734397,0.0002203823,0.05083575,0.0002258478,0.001232777,0.0004584936,0.0000451122,0.06752194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985491,0.000004532102,0.00003591723,0.0006306248,0.0002037527,0.00005423893,0.000009284206,0.000004385774,0.0005081547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1191629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030755280","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001013","title":"Philippa Foot's Virtue Ethics Has an Achilles' Heel","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Virtue; Normative; Virtue ethics; Epistemology; Normative ethics; Natural (archaeology); Foot (prosody); Appeal; Philosophy; Consequentialism; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1730607232632752,"gpt":0.4773649661485918,"spread":0.3043042428853167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01004532,0.0002324673,0.0003385793,0.000100578,0.003023929,0.00003658669,0.0005247993,0.001496586,0.0005189176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922625,0.0002126567,0.00008305989,0.0002533202,0.000592491,0.0003377505,0.0002179802,0.01290536,0.002710582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001485586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001017447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006187559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0130169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910843,0.006185066,0.0007099639,0.0004943281,0.0008262059,0.0007000843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830815,0.01514748,0.0002945438,0.0008219192,0.0003486334,0.0003059819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001135649,0.0005740165,0.01432249,0.000325696,0.00003659585,0.00007576803,0.009743007,0.00004950725,0.0008928625,0.9040815,0.06804179,0.001743144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001655729,0.0002056256,0.02282022,0.0002413757,0.00007413194,0.000007562387,0.003419737,0.0002512334,0.00008151594,0.3683631,0.6023381,0.000541668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1690924,0.000871716,0.01676222,0.2337001,0.0132077,0.002602207,0.0002211208,0.002235048,0.5613075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665936,0.0000655058,0.001771712,0.02617472,0.003575152,0.0001122109,0.0002012726,0.00009362942,0.00141215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7975013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322516278","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000948","title":"Le Parménide de Platon et le Parménide de l’histoire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01940320792813196,"gpt":0.22146497622347,"spread":0.202061768295338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058441,0.0003398446,0.0004374543,0.00007776093,0.001113874,0.0002465413,0.0003131387,0.0002719518,0.0003135851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002240498,0.0003662224,0.0002982631,0.00006153767,0.0009961145,0.0003050804,0.0001057167,0.0005661466,0.0004991925],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001237696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003833136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008281794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008168974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977858,0.0004265843,0.000397093,0.0004179366,0.0001967341,0.0007758299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985504,0.0005051056,0.0001490843,0.0004108635,0.00006113176,0.0003234233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005271576,0.0004796687,0.0001391725,0.0001052879,0.00006212973,0.00004301961,0.003396331,0.0001087565,0.0001728052,0.9615606,0.02750423,0.006375297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006449886,0.00009966134,0.0003437978,0.00009719709,0.0000545664,0.00001285366,0.0002302849,0.0003790467,0.0005281797,0.3207748,0.6765081,0.000326539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01976513,0.004347674,0.000949339,0.06929358,0.002236077,0.0002127518,0.0003282203,0.0001825208,0.9026847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669741,0.0002152681,0.0001695691,0.005048571,0.004034049,0.00003602728,0.0001618402,0.00007128185,0.02328925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129005847","doi":"10.1017/s001221731300111x","title":"Authenticity and the Limits of Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Essentialism; Existentialism; Epistemology; Identity (music); Virtue; Autonomy; Philosophy; Personal identity; Aesthetics; Sociology; Self; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05067893851390196,"gpt":0.2412343659520239,"spread":0.1905554274381219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000489321,0.00005795711,0.0001341886,0.00002008863,0.0001363044,0.00002835625,0.00009922124,0.00002990541,0.00008882495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950067,0.00003299188,0.00004955567,0.00001046019,0.00118662,0.00003367141,0.00003246187,0.0001147273,0.00001941547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001435893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005283362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007867855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000670855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995344,0.0001044788,0.0001168467,0.00008021939,0.00008732185,0.00007677789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993001,0.0004412491,0.00004998748,0.0001357148,0.00004518467,0.00002782503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002832473,0.00001861423,0.000009444061,0.00001699418,0.00001246358,1.380211e-7,0.006849921,2.673537e-7,0.00001130068,0.9924015,0.0000250432,0.0006259333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004388751,0.00002911578,0.00007302751,0.00001288973,0.00001528438,2.740802e-7,0.00003697834,0.000109879,0.0000462823,0.9854785,0.01371348,0.00004544238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.175451,0.0002374616,0.00008234899,0.01949328,0.0005414448,0.0001586229,0.00004071559,0.00003727689,0.8039578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980313,0.00001795851,0.000003817369,0.001224653,0.0006114582,0.000004500894,0.000003903929,0.000005677594,0.00009675782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437215,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992034051","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000333","title":"How to Be an Epistemic Value Pluralist","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Monism; Sketch; Value pluralism; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1795796364321984,"gpt":0.2722297903846509,"spread":0.09265015395245252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002695002,0.0001631484,0.000237367,0.00006755758,0.0002521942,0.0001382941,0.0002746635,0.00008673291,0.0002279403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008113504,0.0001433333,0.00009788608,0.0000278794,0.0003637907,0.0002751609,0.00004526265,0.000186109,0.0001682064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002249718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003416878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002825786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01020932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990026,0.0001269307,0.0001696175,0.0002741013,0.0001307522,0.0002960243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.00006275276,0.00006977098,0.0003889132,0.0001245845,0.0001592847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417558,0.00007050457,0.0001279927,0.00002365954,0.00002322231,0.000009743762,0.1061905,4.391688e-7,0.0001916582,0.8881896,0.004687283,0.0004712451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003653381,0.0004332228,0.0009084658,0.00002833409,0.00007134846,0.000006174396,0.01065478,0.00001196927,0.001418284,0.1073949,0.8781667,0.0005404458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5257314,0.0002498729,0.0003964631,0.01768501,0.006823371,0.0007076581,0.0004894478,0.0004657941,0.447451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779319,0.000009381943,0.0003198627,0.005470075,0.001377818,0.00003106267,0.0001181166,0.00003101072,0.01471082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8734795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.584496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122958980","doi":"10.1017/s0012217309990126","title":"Is Davidson a Gricean?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Grice; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Pragmatics; Computer science; Metaphysics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05137000113230383,"gpt":0.2477292614277787,"spread":0.1963592602954748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004037724,0.00008266712,0.0001024754,0.00003125599,0.0001431083,0.00007692346,0.00009702771,0.00002913133,0.001177079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001268413,0.00006604217,0.00007648783,0.00002439932,0.00006715042,0.0001082097,0.00001067949,0.00009034125,0.0009988522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009831906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006756643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002601347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006102322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995123,0.00001405181,0.0001017429,0.0001324379,0.00009333791,0.0001461933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997293,0.00002830691,0.0000249689,0.0001396682,0.00002530217,0.00005249723],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008817664,0.00008388729,0.00001356582,0.000002487335,0.000006786612,0.000007058752,0.006371448,1.583295e-7,0.00003409907,0.9340678,0.05330217,0.006101715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001435244,0.00008177835,0.000448603,0.000006739107,0.000009784877,6.084715e-7,0.00004921494,0.00001004546,0.0001015967,0.285571,0.7134794,0.00009768683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02223699,0.0001327854,0.00001258221,0.01245927,0.000594295,0.00008451537,0.00006359995,0.0001261876,0.9642898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834337,0.00000663693,0.00001329439,0.007173,0.002168688,0.000002405925,0.00002729144,0.000005668547,0.007169359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731738636","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000373","title":"Anti-Theism and the Objective Meaningful Life Argument","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Value of life; Economics; Mathematics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.031437725872132,"gpt":0.2297690984591147,"spread":0.1983313725869827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000270387,0.00009023077,0.0001650939,0.00001678401,0.001428949,0.0001888404,0.0002194508,0.00003447471,0.0003318301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001639857,0.00005359574,0.00005224346,0.000002512243,0.001437079,0.0001235224,0.00008292659,0.0001179971,0.0001128434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000347344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001266172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004179366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000419009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995323,0.00006832051,0.00009029997,0.0001278776,0.00005690613,0.0001243219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993956,0.0001476188,0.00009632378,0.0002904687,0.0000309087,0.00003906149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004738465,0.0000153942,0.0004430596,0.000003488802,0.00005782118,0.000002658531,0.02435686,5.561774e-7,0.000002382953,0.9735332,0.001076692,0.0004605468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002250537,0.00008243875,0.01449375,0.00002739399,0.00008691847,0.000004634408,0.001218767,0.00003385354,0.00005711637,0.8022207,0.1792906,0.0002332561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3870884,0.0008440558,0.000008264778,0.01595194,0.001663374,0.0002562187,0.00004689454,0.00004827777,0.5940925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996016,0.00005345058,0.000004508167,0.001318483,0.001144942,0.0000142158,0.000004958829,0.000006901977,0.001436502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6089276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016744091","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001542","title":"The Transition from the Lower to the Higher Mysteries of Love in Plato's <i>Symposium</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Metaphysics; Transition (genetics); Philosophy; Sight; Recall; Epistemology; Looming; Horizon; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Chemistry; Cognitive psychology; Physics; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02347094333083654,"gpt":0.2177231722770995,"spread":0.194252228946263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002813786,0.00008854693,0.0001051432,0.00001363001,0.0001819987,0.00007669011,0.0002165211,0.00003489594,0.0001894935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001379118,0.00003854459,0.00007353655,0.00004546857,0.0002803333,0.00006725667,0.00002656069,0.0001328668,0.0001185596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001293514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008125797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004950667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01732658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993331,0.00005655054,0.0002061092,0.0001065047,0.0001390714,0.0001587092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989934,0.0006796728,0.00004242321,0.0002299103,0.00003029697,0.00002427158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003679192,0.0001229361,0.00004752469,0.000005021187,0.00003738169,0.000007804975,0.09117091,0.00002606727,0.0004606181,0.8941953,0.01241858,0.001139889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000227149,0.00007616137,0.001629486,0.00002899323,0.00001711311,2.309565e-7,0.001636445,0.000004547269,0.0006437901,0.04502477,0.9506227,0.00008864936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3657693,0.0007637684,0.0001325678,0.1571129,0.00487544,0.0007737308,0.0006593653,0.0000442258,0.4698687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939796,0.00001203139,0.000002370866,0.003395861,0.001669983,0.00000609129,0.00001885534,0.000008959688,0.0009062261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9668637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991779118","doi":"10.1017/s0012217309090040","title":"Heidegger and Galileo’s Slippery Slope","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Galileo (satellite navigation); Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Geography; Geodesy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05229036311156154,"gpt":0.2540020208284872,"spread":0.2017116577169256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001262985,0.000120235,0.0001595812,0.00005122363,0.0002576935,0.0001636271,0.00009455776,0.00006169202,0.0003313019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003364105,0.0001046472,0.00006041969,0.00001430284,0.0002106417,0.0001736362,0.00002109422,0.0001460653,0.0002081179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000855068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001629536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001848731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004159599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.00003238995,0.0001535406,0.000184363,0.0001185001,0.0002039154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996474,0.00003598772,0.0000365235,0.0001633379,0.00004073648,0.00007596792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001723952,0.00005385574,0.00003243181,0.00001193039,0.00001872837,0.00001625588,0.02473333,5.430605e-7,0.0001821591,0.9526451,0.01899201,0.003296444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003489816,0.0001121507,0.001169762,0.00002511232,0.00002598913,0.000005913567,0.0005287556,0.00001227063,0.0001033543,0.2193079,0.7780941,0.0002657062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0744236,0.00130835,0.00002272599,0.01385311,0.002520177,0.0001809141,0.00007487852,0.0001704142,0.9074458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875783,0.00009292836,0.0000178542,0.00541258,0.002488208,0.000004021795,0.00005068435,0.00001092813,0.004344512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9131547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.426739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605472906","doi":"10.1017/s0012217315000682","title":"Luck, Compatibilism, and Libertarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Libertarianism; Luck; Determinism; Free will; Incompatibilism; Action (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Indeterminism; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07616948547582811,"gpt":0.2595572240019069,"spread":0.1833877385260788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007611101,0.00006874234,0.00008504304,0.00002462465,0.00005000785,0.00003179083,0.0001091428,0.00003293956,0.00002449721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003156319,0.00005614215,0.00001606386,0.00008185524,0.00008298565,0.0001066815,0.00005610525,0.00006393599,0.0002171991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007456771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002153197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008686609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000449956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994131,0.00004914995,0.00008569701,0.0002031745,0.0001088363,0.0001400626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996178,0.000070836,0.00002227652,0.0001466302,0.00001194184,0.0001305543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001400792,0.0007509774,0.03683143,0.00007351744,0.00001482083,0.0005810154,0.01784462,0.0001510075,0.4853946,0.2892664,0.1234095,0.04554199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005444867,0.0009196753,0.07550322,0.00006694604,0.00004869601,0.00025304,0.0003611936,0.006719637,0.2540708,0.1953982,0.4595145,0.001699242],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651722,0.00009130353,0.0001010311,0.0007079635,0.0006694804,0.0001076783,0.00002326047,0.00007179057,0.03305523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979098,0.00001211722,0.0001172065,0.001125756,0.0001102102,0.000004190189,0.00000572265,0.000007534314,0.0007074837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.336105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2791727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163695488","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002031","title":"Guerre et paix selon Leibniz","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Coercion (linguistics); Monopoly; Political science; Balance (ability); Law; Politics; Law and economics; Use of force; Order (exchange); International law; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0759315181641709,"gpt":0.285782468978833,"spread":0.2098509508146621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006810634,0.00008811444,0.00009528427,0.00006548822,0.0002637165,0.00009129175,0.00009953461,0.00007117214,0.0004991014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007446815,0.00007982845,0.00004949942,0.00002361673,0.0001453794,0.000140622,0.00001596283,0.0001761019,0.0005369834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001624297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002248848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007949682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993166,0.00003673517,0.0001730993,0.0001508592,0.0001312696,0.0001914811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994965,0.000127196,0.00005533133,0.000174941,0.00009595932,0.00005009945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001601126,0.00007014062,0.0003780597,0.00002807894,0.00001464753,0.000006645148,0.08564309,0.000003210641,0.0002572493,0.8834849,0.01783486,0.01226312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001712179,0.00003303857,0.003392115,0.00001596076,0.00001625479,0.000001261228,0.005415285,0.00001354879,0.0005112518,0.01256187,0.9776971,0.0001711125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1285298,0.0002351859,0.0010608,0.002389762,0.00328027,0.0002304916,0.00008867592,0.000299596,0.8638855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894324,0.00001877622,0.00006370521,0.001374286,0.001376958,0.00000490512,0.0002364885,0.0000154588,0.007477024],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6902015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134908857","doi":"10.1017/s0012217320000244","title":"Aristotle and Scientific Experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1061179352551952,"gpt":0.2408060008274066,"spread":0.1346880655722115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002662958,0.00005143772,0.00006852002,0.00001344368,0.0002276522,0.0001659518,0.00005404453,0.00001359732,0.0005026525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002065539,0.00004284105,0.00002322266,0.00001773733,0.0002621786,0.00007968419,0.00003874022,0.00004889918,0.0002887831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003483776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006061976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001491715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002407341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996291,0.00001084248,0.00006540457,0.0001424799,0.00006852335,0.00008362067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998129,0.00001673126,0.00001502811,0.00006174652,0.00001442807,0.00007918551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009731843,0.0000321349,0.00003940866,0.000008376023,0.000007312035,0.000005016988,0.02346466,1.679166e-7,0.0006064271,0.9662792,0.008491918,0.001055623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001699547,0.00003857668,0.00004952512,0.000003571723,0.000005367531,2.201828e-7,0.0003223763,0.0000443698,0.0005318403,0.06501287,0.9337391,0.00008223581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3548631,0.001276754,0.00003520864,0.01294075,0.002073833,0.0002062448,0.000127205,0.0002003103,0.6282766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975118,0.000001510837,0.00001353592,0.0008489108,0.0007695116,0.000004060149,0.00002170776,0.000005744373,0.0008232175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9252472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5503692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198150422","doi":"10.1017/s0012217321000251","title":"Racial Integration and the Problem of Relational Devaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Devaluation; Solidarity; Subject (documents); Process (computing); Psychology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Monetary economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04500999749142291,"gpt":0.3403515164433712,"spread":0.2953415189519483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006453969,0.00002510064,0.00006190419,0.00001272197,0.0001649361,0.00001251781,0.00003591211,0.00005497722,0.0001294317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003714934,0.00001824894,0.0000274312,0.000115021,0.0003174236,0.00006893226,0.00001079247,0.00004960642,0.00000796624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001464554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000857797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003497099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992945,0.0003445605,0.0001080164,0.00006894956,0.0001278131,0.00005613651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995509,0.0002070955,0.00005311774,0.00003336321,0.0001422088,0.00001336062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002779457,0.00001542642,0.001497883,0.000001003239,0.000007529371,2.075518e-7,0.0366349,9.713124e-7,0.0004038532,0.9307468,0.0005939393,0.03006973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002227592,0.0000654624,0.127614,0.00002908708,0.00005036767,0.000002123717,0.01263447,0.00016429,0.0007260153,0.7952408,0.06110359,0.0001422593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7233925,0.0004469937,0.004867428,0.02214949,0.0008436835,0.0003863127,0.00001006252,0.00002989668,0.2478736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984561,0.00006106088,0.0005225914,0.000245482,0.0002513001,0.00001276354,0.00002509699,0.000001641106,0.0004239758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1951464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028984590","doi":"10.3917/dia.169.0005","title":"Antagonisme et réconciliation entre féminin et maternel","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conciliation; Art; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03904969917509572,"gpt":0.3841088116929724,"spread":0.3450591125178767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002600744,0.0004343444,0.0005969667,0.0003425702,0.0001375012,0.0001616966,0.0005399125,0.0007273603,0.0123312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008586663,0.0004566722,0.0002788624,0.0004887015,0.0003148561,0.0003240085,0.00009642851,0.0009088794,0.01884065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001466655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001635298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005381504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001041678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945622,0.002270829,0.0007474173,0.0009567494,0.0004128987,0.001049888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979303,0.0003996516,0.00026014,0.0009387397,0.000154824,0.0003163285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006005599,0.003065418,0.06495006,0.0001081099,0.0008906662,0.0004708838,0.02621243,0.0001656891,0.004761521,0.1140922,0.5136169,0.2710656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002635808,0.0002956544,0.07971357,0.0000757423,0.0001445132,0.0001613664,0.0005037687,0.0003403057,0.0002738957,0.002190142,0.9131413,0.0005239376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3232456,0.01048718,0.001560068,0.1573755,0.00771969,0.0006629394,0.001213606,0.0001641428,0.4975713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8483043,0.001907796,0.0006504754,0.01249519,0.00178558,0.00009126,0.0008100355,0.0000779963,0.1338774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5250587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018356232","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002365","title":"Ethical Consumption, Consumer Self-Governance, and the Later Foucault","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Consumption (sociology); Corporate governance; Collective action; Reciprocal; Sociology; Virtue ethics; Action (physics); Self-governance; Environmental ethics; Political science; Virtue; Law; Economics; Social science; Management; Philosophy; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02382900522513737,"gpt":0.2511236851681605,"spread":0.2272946799430232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004213607,0.0001365183,0.0002028611,0.00002488049,0.0004348042,0.0001372489,0.0001328183,0.0001697826,0.00005816683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004648169,0.00009176944,0.00007903987,0.000135731,0.0006411489,0.0002937929,0.0000859705,0.0002917137,0.0001615291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002826636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002999877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001274342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001572588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991109,0.00004547544,0.00018187,0.0001899455,0.0002027944,0.0002689786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994437,0.0001497699,0.00008814051,0.0001610287,0.0001383837,0.00001894192],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815651,0.0001391179,0.7112173,0.0001818166,0.0001056949,0.0000523608,0.002949825,0.000004410389,0.000004540812,0.2518342,0.03276582,0.0005632797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003134789,0.000007519392,0.8097194,0.00001610591,0.0001322031,0.00001406805,0.0004070782,0.00018298,0.000003988678,0.02809194,0.157975,0.0003148837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807557,0.000336447,0.00001542621,0.006785954,0.0003996081,0.0003280038,0.000009549535,0.0001326862,0.01123655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908443,0.0003064018,0.00001912233,0.008086977,0.0005925919,0.00001213559,0.00001601389,0.00001147829,0.0001109666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2237423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3742249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172009470","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000041","title":"The Limits of Internalism: A Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Presumption; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09161990156836854,"gpt":0.3120470316840336,"spread":0.2204271301156651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004305228,0.00007260173,0.0001288621,0.00002267321,0.0002645628,0.0000577174,0.0001649291,0.00003506171,0.00005749889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261728,0.00004534033,0.00006825956,0.00001306917,0.0004831422,0.00004946438,0.00003292799,0.0002895223,0.00002894081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002421765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002215575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1209964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999437,0.00008097405,0.0001798623,0.00009767794,0.00008609323,0.0001183589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999143,0.0003480643,0.00008633905,0.0002648275,0.0001279795,0.00002978358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000180846,0.0003511871,0.002306666,0.00001749616,0.0001145262,0.0003579726,0.2401291,2.732625e-7,0.0003183896,0.7494689,0.002037274,0.004880216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001549428,0.0009855045,0.001444813,0.00002743307,0.0002532725,0.0004184969,0.1779284,0.00003562393,0.001272257,0.05413966,0.7614552,0.0004899413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740359,0.00005399755,0.000003874171,0.0003010697,0.0027222,0.0001531534,0.00002077011,0.0000203156,0.02268872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967009,0.000006252539,0.000007563786,0.0001422549,0.0007706556,0.00001407896,0.000002954661,0.00000887791,0.002346395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.759418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8950431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751240348","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000555","title":"Understanding and Undermining the Growth Paradigm","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Industrial Revolution; Consumption (sociology); Environmental ethics; Natural (archaeology); Paradigm shift; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Development economics; History; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Epistemology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1782285984161933,"gpt":0.3111417290218669,"spread":0.1329131306056735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002555082,0.00005378928,0.00007519333,0.000004511372,0.00482995,0.0001951293,0.0001862211,0.00004167795,0.00003751333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001858608,0.00003238015,0.0000236683,0.00001558307,0.0009851143,0.0001308411,0.0000852099,0.00005969373,0.00001674662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006935874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007167483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006505666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006394457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995028,0.00005462997,0.00005550663,0.0001108446,0.0001024919,0.0001736974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.0001245762,0.00005592162,0.00009014286,0.000002818795,0.00004158874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004128402,0.0000190036,0.2345839,0.000003274814,0.00003177535,0.000008618851,0.01995548,6.981137e-7,0.00003058758,0.7415368,0.003058258,0.0007675055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002642451,0.00004221208,0.7269184,0.00001217722,0.00002633302,0.000001403723,0.04550518,0.000004871972,0.00002018829,0.2083301,0.01868428,0.0001905905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6693093,0.0004385264,0.0001166127,0.0295796,0.0004760826,0.0002549429,0.000005247698,0.00005590897,0.2997637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978836,0.001229036,0.00001322387,0.0003001989,0.0001518698,0.000007508761,9.824321e-7,0.000002420375,0.0004112123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5332066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791686470","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001074","title":"Is Death's Badness Gendered?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05609660039177453,"gpt":0.3415346433196397,"spread":0.2854380429278652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001290763,0.0001354396,0.0001551912,0.00005671555,0.0001079421,0.00001533862,0.0001326449,0.000109372,0.001693356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002803324,0.0001295946,0.00006812256,0.00009348196,0.00003626313,0.0000401315,0.00002902931,0.0001038697,0.001967488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005912527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000303683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004772632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004979948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988558,0.00006308704,0.0002187453,0.0003026467,0.0001262881,0.0004334677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994673,0.00003338103,0.0000605717,0.0003159186,0.00002313472,0.00009965333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001041826,0.001204751,0.2081415,0.0001204582,0.00009699818,0.0001430187,0.005164715,0.000001752432,0.0009272476,0.2835068,0.4881674,0.01242108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002406783,0.0002168459,0.6860554,0.0000271973,0.00004335146,0.00003983744,0.0008771035,0.000005689227,0.002926917,0.02131293,0.2856209,0.0004670355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6447213,0.0004764662,0.0003177409,0.0005350039,0.00247448,0.0003049979,0.0002038539,0.0001145426,0.3508516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866433,0.00001442031,0.00009707359,0.002538158,0.0005644384,0.00005274167,0.0002842454,0.0000233625,0.009782311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4779139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317644171","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000656","title":"Lotteries, Knowledge, and Irrelevant Alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Assertion; Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0467119708768763,"gpt":0.2588955233661194,"spread":0.2121835524892431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000101208,0.0001095375,0.0001621099,0.00003929494,0.0001722051,0.0001161287,0.00009087239,0.00004075236,0.0005006568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004113615,0.00008770596,0.00003804126,0.00001119595,0.0005936116,0.0001966161,0.00004895638,0.0001303248,0.0006058333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007646589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001812465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008305171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001490702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994118,0.00006211329,0.0001361215,0.0001619875,0.00005551889,0.0001724962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995192,0.0001410163,0.00004693339,0.0001301805,0.0001043981,0.00005829043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004423581,0.00009533275,0.0007935417,0.00007421294,0.00005958524,0.000003571462,0.08907149,1.724908e-7,0.0003092448,0.872747,0.02407513,0.01276629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002884409,0.00009196538,0.003882258,0.00002695182,0.00002072089,0.000002670926,0.002191069,0.00003563628,0.0002386479,0.08594793,0.9070454,0.0002283372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6255637,0.002923516,0.00007547437,0.001932937,0.002947191,0.0003514519,0.00007077837,0.0001411885,0.3659937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826564,0.0001868211,0.00005858185,0.0006204642,0.001065706,0.00003528083,0.00003153302,0.00001574764,0.0153295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7786964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772620741","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000968","title":"On the Objective Meaningful Life Argument: A Response to Kirk Lougheed","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04834579929190688,"gpt":0.2532739304522672,"spread":0.2049281311603603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005411598,0.0001311124,0.0001490564,0.00004820191,0.001609572,0.0002055846,0.0004607779,0.00004770111,0.001456421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00156422,0.00008556355,0.0000806827,0.000009526471,0.0003845287,0.00009603649,0.00008686005,0.000175068,0.001882427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001670706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003337252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001803266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004748862,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991694,0.0002067609,0.0001157248,0.0001954531,0.0001106627,0.000201974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985204,0.0006668393,0.00009357015,0.0005813837,0.0000542054,0.00008364953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001268911,0.00004612696,0.00004360631,0.000001889207,0.00004957802,0.000008979607,0.03584079,0.000004641387,0.00004718588,0.9474302,0.01510995,0.0001481338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008388394,0.0007851131,0.008916842,0.00007665097,0.00004419703,0.000001812556,0.001461233,0.000008595927,0.000335418,0.569796,0.4173579,0.0003774268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6386077,0.00003742651,0.000006115069,0.03453024,0.001382548,0.0002806499,0.00008398026,0.00005545544,0.3250159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864674,0.0000016633,0.000005543547,0.007255228,0.001048356,0.00004037238,0.000004936206,0.00001330252,0.005163184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4022479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148681169","doi":"10.1017/s001221730000216x","title":"The Pragmatics of Empty Names","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Presupposition; Criticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Pragmatism; Computer science; History; Literature; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01744695712556036,"gpt":0.3220188906668394,"spread":0.304571933541279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008133358,0.00003924047,0.0000607409,0.0000125956,0.00007147213,0.000005766706,0.000211033,0.00004104227,0.00009890769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002004859,0.0000230346,0.00003178427,0.0001151783,0.0004062089,0.00001588058,0.00002499377,0.00006709625,0.0001264291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000470367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006590426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001916601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002230332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994648,0.0000443727,0.0001384696,0.00007749179,0.00009749766,0.000177336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990579,0.0006232183,0.00004647243,0.0002071189,0.00002185438,0.00004343796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001869771,0.00003424244,0.0005404646,0.000001234295,0.000006529061,0.000003220729,0.0007777864,2.008029e-7,0.0001124463,0.9881211,0.0002970682,0.01008699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000148135,0.00007102548,0.03958024,0.000004884595,0.000006221668,0.000004263082,0.00021154,0.000006986755,0.001262589,0.9468808,0.01176216,0.00006115382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1775816,0.0001746471,0.002561611,0.0008779995,0.0008350803,0.00008848486,0.000007962964,0.00002108469,0.8178515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994526,0.000003746648,0.0000926701,0.0001788416,0.0000986259,0.000002216294,0.000001225366,0.00000264143,0.0001674583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1625032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139125503","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000705","title":"How Many Parents Can a Child Have? Philosophical Reflections on the 'Three Parent Case'","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Limiting; Swift; Limit (mathematics); Position (finance); Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1177051105095827,"gpt":0.371256112902743,"spread":0.2535510023931603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004914434,0.0001860342,0.0002684498,0.00008555275,0.000479816,0.00005860336,0.000134179,0.0002431049,0.00003286033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001045591,0.0001203677,0.0001210851,0.0001715681,0.0001306791,0.0000241308,0.00005150438,0.001203408,0.00004113941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009120539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008122809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001587352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005329466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985111,0.0001808478,0.0002247071,0.00034136,0.0003830177,0.0003589377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998517,0.000367831,0.00007329419,0.0006203977,0.0001306383,0.0002908664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003327376,0.001299232,0.09154715,0.0005625617,0.0003324807,0.003372251,0.008994617,0.00002806437,0.00005291212,0.8569764,0.01314379,0.02335775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004788685,0.004679228,0.06419357,0.0008604929,0.0007088353,0.004739806,0.002508925,0.00189559,0.000265408,0.1237306,0.7902238,0.00140511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2632073,0.000330074,0.0004513061,0.6925711,0.001464763,0.0009519131,0.0001341435,0.000163397,0.04072597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987343,0.00008555447,0.00005841545,0.008798257,0.00330388,0.00008505194,0.00008807609,0.00003016041,0.0002076152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5228274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166984122","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000560","title":"Answering the Situationist Challenge: A Defense of Virtue Ethics as Preferable to Other Ethical Theories","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Situationism; Virtue; Virtue ethics; Epistemology; Dilemma; Criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1082554113307076,"gpt":0.3246033670151429,"spread":0.2163479556844353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009477327,0.00009093207,0.0001170574,0.00002964966,0.0002609996,0.00002463248,0.0002623325,0.0001787678,0.00005360254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001950951,0.00006177344,0.00004612462,0.0001044651,0.0002864881,0.00003818696,0.00006586465,0.0005185367,0.0002566804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001098723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003012133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007666686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001034118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987511,0.0004119107,0.0001558021,0.0002411405,0.0002792149,0.0001608009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985967,0.0009989497,0.00004944967,0.0002518703,0.00004449144,0.00005858985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006482601,0.00007939958,0.00006250449,0.00001232972,0.000004619601,0.00000137481,0.003103267,0.0003115745,0.02769685,0.9674217,0.0003304015,0.0009112187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008382095,0.0009067648,0.00500678,0.0001056453,0.00002431322,0.000023794,0.0003088906,0.0003685488,0.1069265,0.800437,0.08465315,0.0004003151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7383243,0.00003802612,0.007986163,0.1498611,0.001011389,0.0004262296,0.00003430103,0.00009460365,0.1022239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757836,0.00001618369,0.0000974513,0.02366677,0.0001196007,0.00002401458,0.000001787814,0.000009467312,0.0002811374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2374592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3299193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125991585","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000275","title":"The<i>Malum prohibitum—Malum in se</i>Distinction and the Wrongfulness Constraint on Criminalization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Polity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Meaning (existential); Criminal law; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03394726165147339,"gpt":0.2471688954973754,"spread":0.2132216338459021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004011569,0.0001009261,0.00009423984,0.00003058332,0.0002727562,0.00006146071,0.0001449397,0.00004015763,0.00002091943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001606092,0.00004415714,0.00002851991,0.0001283016,0.000674961,0.0001087248,0.00004214599,0.00008420008,0.00004824894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003204945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006768284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002101284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989243,0.0002718633,0.0001783498,0.0002586914,0.0001598315,0.0002069459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990621,0.0006075996,0.00007113195,0.0001940162,0.00002270103,0.0000424443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061584,0.0001935082,0.004432776,0.00004437318,0.000005374306,0.0000476944,0.001735227,0.00003283891,0.08379947,0.7176558,0.002059828,0.1893773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01846437,0.0009997162,0.1006618,0.0008537546,0.0000954461,0.0002758133,0.001024968,0.004981037,0.5702469,0.223411,0.07728196,0.001703176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692215,0.00007218747,0.002036942,0.0119713,0.001274619,0.0008533699,0.00003464986,0.00008424749,0.01445113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998646,0.00007584659,0.000003310283,0.0006078379,0.0001107708,0.00007548893,0.000001950919,0.000008481535,0.0004703612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4942448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2486922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152200814","doi":"10.3917/dia.175.0049","title":"Théorie de l'attachement et protection de l'enfance au Québec","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03121720264799736,"gpt":0.368180933135214,"spread":0.3369637304872166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003394167,0.0001461086,0.0001588416,0.0000241538,0.000658888,0.00007280253,0.0003117101,0.0002267349,0.0001627024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004520515,0.0001562024,0.0001149531,0.0006183305,0.0005681196,0.0003013557,0.00004634205,0.0002503546,0.0001189202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003587869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9055784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9382553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978217,0.0002357695,0.000232961,0.0003010257,0.0004601442,0.0009483569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991764,0.0001540729,0.0001945869,0.0001377998,0.00006289345,0.0002742113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005799132,0.0003932615,0.255604,0.00005633161,0.00004652563,0.00004360892,0.2141516,0.0001580493,0.0009789842,0.2884118,0.01287706,0.2272208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002920497,0.0001298653,0.3569622,0.00008128769,0.00003006786,0.000003772648,0.008798997,0.000110422,0.001225599,0.01662866,0.6153657,0.0003712956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8104035,0.002541613,0.02170052,0.09269738,0.003961444,0.0005323353,0.0000291032,0.00009186284,0.06804224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849241,0.0003210245,0.0004540445,0.001557569,0.002019046,0.00003380783,0.000002151342,0.00001167871,0.01067657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6024887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7661299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965097440","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300004212","title":"Context-Sensitivity Beyond Indexicality","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03613052833598403,"gpt":0.2648335681471375,"spread":0.2287030398111535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006999942,0.0002450595,0.0004014025,0.00007048008,0.000537321,0.0003062745,0.00007888781,0.0001560658,0.005759121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005674597,0.0002388001,0.0003047666,0.00005857582,0.0007445819,0.0001036313,0.00003377511,0.0002551088,0.0008691986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000539079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001255872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01105063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01581554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982616,0.0003775323,0.0003439186,0.0003419595,0.0002263503,0.0004486565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988307,0.0002599669,0.0001183498,0.0003420949,0.0002451766,0.0002037287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007455772,0.0003373049,0.001374994,0.00003600871,0.0001702182,0.00009452275,0.002969388,0.00001166344,0.000004417239,0.9798634,0.01183858,0.003292059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003144171,0.00004189772,0.0006110821,0.00002675429,0.0002916605,0.000005068015,0.001924261,0.0001486001,0.0001591375,0.06632046,0.9298235,0.0003331908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03696357,0.008567714,0.0003755768,0.002557123,0.005122515,0.0001581021,0.001036378,0.00004219775,0.9451768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600729,0.0002018462,0.0000338071,0.001576195,0.003439149,0.000005412719,0.0001074387,0.0000231592,0.03454004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107165415","doi":"10.1017/s0012217320000086","title":"Context, Intersubjectivism, and Value: Humean Constructivism Revisited","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constructivism (international relations); Sketch; Epistemology; Realism; Morality; Enactivism; Moral realism; Philosophy; Neurophenomenology; Intersubjectivity; Moral psychology; Autopoiesis; Computer science; Political science; International relations","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09620756138706552,"gpt":0.2673043030094723,"spread":0.1710967416224068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006761384,0.0001099211,0.0001577389,0.00003227091,0.00008802236,0.00002652926,0.0001251589,0.00004549712,0.00005562909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000269244,0.00009797091,0.00004015306,0.000115377,0.0002733747,0.0001022285,0.00007194674,0.0001492731,0.0001291465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001121768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001034755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001108061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001120386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991011,0.0001077645,0.0001311629,0.000379291,0.0001164261,0.0001642765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995951,0.0001145066,0.00004822679,0.00009265578,0.00001215553,0.0001373444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005601431,0.0002292141,0.01046102,0.00009054895,0.00005042272,0.0002982233,0.00442166,0.00001125886,0.6460643,0.2311351,0.032182,0.07449612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01645176,0.003929875,0.1693902,0.0004543059,0.0001960108,0.001436256,0.001432023,0.005301258,0.5039859,0.09434684,0.1997454,0.003330265],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977142,0.00009891675,0.0007031983,0.01185451,0.000364261,0.0001935377,0.00004291443,0.0001280962,0.009472566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980074,0.00003059373,0.00008054722,0.0196235,0.0001314119,0.000004832022,0.000005708617,0.000008933778,0.00004049777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1675633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3995138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993750321","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000382","title":"The Origin of Moral Norms: A Moderate Nativist Account","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological nativism; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Legal norm; Philosophy; Mathematics; Immigration; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1962240234661378,"gpt":0.2898617884950942,"spread":0.09363776502895643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001416115,0.00007209354,0.00008616496,0.00002402704,0.0001368209,0.00001149069,0.0002533343,0.00002514979,0.00003230035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007540472,0.00004368884,0.00004253374,0.00008601158,0.0002458546,0.00008049746,0.00003946069,0.00008290722,0.0001367878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002074098,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001145426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003868338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993322,0.00005197269,0.0001346675,0.0001646019,0.0001485643,0.0001679382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.00008060895,0.00006283454,0.0001586756,0.00002508867,0.00003407122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001650675,0.001830231,0.0132033,0.00004654736,0.00006757281,0.0001478039,0.006194875,0.0001303348,0.1772846,0.742679,0.02537099,0.03139405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001869019,0.0006127469,0.212365,0.00004826482,0.0000283831,0.00006971276,0.0001433393,0.001723763,0.5027747,0.2610108,0.01875263,0.0006016737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692023,0.00002017381,0.0001201082,0.00064023,0.0006037508,0.0001024691,0.00002658763,0.0000251011,0.02925927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986,0.00003421911,0.00007513929,0.0007636298,0.00004968976,0.00001410173,0.000002160999,0.000005089568,0.0004559604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4816682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1781579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331063876","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000552","title":"Descartes and the Seven Senses of Indifference in Early Modern Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Term (time); sort; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Period (music); Computer science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07889041255645106,"gpt":0.198953524157834,"spread":0.1200631116013829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001363635,0.00006458387,0.0001365726,0.00004583412,0.00009974471,0.00001628102,0.0001342215,0.00002245623,0.00003793166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003859163,0.00003950018,0.00002990622,0.00003240993,0.0008208796,0.0001095282,0.00003065019,0.00007953053,0.000009271601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006541073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009230137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009796096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004177142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995062,0.0000560312,0.000134202,0.0001109081,0.00009170265,0.0001009301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996824,0.0001066247,0.00004521078,0.0001118345,0.00002657469,0.00002732462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003896447,0.00003187293,0.001461323,0.000007131329,0.000003291038,0.000002112743,0.3323341,1.76407e-7,0.00001976526,0.6654761,0.00001740707,0.0006077986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003674938,0.00006255891,0.01008862,0.0000195504,0.00000674441,7.480753e-7,0.0002613322,0.0000736853,0.00005095672,0.988776,0.0002110082,0.00008125597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9194435,0.0002011057,0.00001559329,0.0001776213,0.0001341681,0.00009516549,0.00001651545,0.00001165107,0.07990467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996299,0.00001160702,0.00002092523,0.0001137052,0.00010242,0.000007048318,7.572058e-7,0.000003458757,0.0001102067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3320728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3024565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999293167","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005692","title":"<i>Akrasia</i>et<i>enkrateia</i>dans les<i>Mémorables</i>de Xénophon","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Philosophy; Virtue; Epistemology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03693193713021728,"gpt":0.2334201037841062,"spread":0.1964881666538889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003457194,0.0002580292,0.000274896,0.00006749332,0.000445697,0.0001988741,0.0002143103,0.0001000228,0.001259221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001168194,0.0002290771,0.00017453,0.00008261761,0.0003117706,0.00021592,0.00003147144,0.0003380246,0.0006283163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006428809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009170841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003846602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001698121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984692,0.0002305487,0.0002878697,0.0003340103,0.0002044495,0.0004739224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991915,0.0001469569,0.00008476433,0.0003349143,0.00006964606,0.0001722282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001731994,0.0002023047,0.000133015,0.00002216317,0.00002856542,0.00004001935,0.01006741,0.00002207582,0.001789579,0.973092,0.01413237,0.0004531522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004818624,0.00008261389,0.000138339,0.00002537005,0.00003163548,0.00001079952,0.0006716314,0.00001469694,0.002935942,0.1230624,0.8722169,0.000327765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03810059,0.0003289192,0.0002785886,0.001661097,0.001216381,0.0001920968,0.000138319,0.0002300643,0.9578539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859638,0.00005932402,0.0001234608,0.002962097,0.0009973369,0.00003841287,0.00007744995,0.00004906587,0.009729055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604824548","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000020","title":"Multiculturalisme et laïcité en France : les trois républicanismes du rapport Stasi","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1803329185298102,"gpt":0.379575570245579,"spread":0.1992426517157688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001493533,0.0004950881,0.0005449203,0.00009238682,0.0004688143,0.0003721608,0.000659492,0.0005488641,0.0004686596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001620255,0.000434531,0.0002687175,0.000389388,0.001549976,0.001163688,0.0001390115,0.0004441695,0.0005650669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009836757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001561417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06806172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01833168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952868,0.00141892,0.0006837824,0.0006666156,0.0009100159,0.00103387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970632,0.0003995442,0.0003340024,0.0004258209,0.0009584798,0.000818931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148882,0.0003444306,0.03594185,0.00005086846,0.0001587306,0.00003611586,0.4521866,0.0002086629,0.0001640107,0.1983536,0.308939,0.003601322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009591053,0.00006580527,0.04529505,0.00003690915,0.00008367939,0.00001330256,0.04728812,0.0003091472,0.0002186241,0.0005134534,0.9046109,0.0006059098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7337587,0.003529084,0.0003228564,0.239143,0.006089385,0.0010396,0.0008760818,0.0003761816,0.01486513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8871983,0.000842641,0.001505365,0.01557757,0.003495613,0.00007706021,0.0006763218,0.00006315928,0.09056398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.595672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014804218","doi":"10.3917/dia.207.0071","title":"La parentalité dans l'organisation sociale des connaissances de la négligence envers enfant au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05340837960456907,"gpt":0.3394345376558526,"spread":0.2860261580512836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008909959,0.0002300686,0.0002639877,0.00005226629,0.000247401,0.00007354579,0.0002494521,0.000368193,0.0004925656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002000071,0.0002503348,0.000114838,0.0001476809,0.001755426,0.0001711506,0.00004388901,0.0002797828,0.000969675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007541388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001398744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3942085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975885,0.00109931,0.0002912289,0.0003507644,0.0001729339,0.000497235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987592,0.0005403297,0.0001314325,0.0002621072,0.00004849052,0.0002584558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007337694,0.0005026089,0.4850653,0.00004894341,0.0001759763,0.0001646205,0.4217648,0.00002454486,0.0004778781,0.0367564,0.004784958,0.05016058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002557281,0.0002448538,0.6323678,0.0001836882,0.0002414469,0.0002281999,0.07212136,0.00002507711,0.004352958,0.01602416,0.2710007,0.000652487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042568,0.004714792,0.0004597501,0.0007724143,0.001649435,0.0001660251,0.0001296069,0.00007607212,0.0877751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968758,0.0002162007,0.00009341192,0.0003434042,0.0009110337,0.00002464606,0.00007734139,0.00003760739,0.001420587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3496434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086533624","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300006399","title":"Introspection and the Elementary Acts of Mind","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Humanities; Philosophy; Conscience; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01242854239698322,"gpt":0.2786088470858807,"spread":0.2661803046888975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005224012,0.00007674972,0.0001379385,0.00001647184,0.00007617566,0.00001245466,0.0001279225,0.00007853533,0.008978412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003858446,0.0000534665,0.00004505278,0.0001368825,0.001835278,0.00005791768,0.00002276029,0.0001321254,0.0003412476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001244425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008847968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003173302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004955267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.0002666803,0.0001703781,0.0001747854,0.00009065216,0.0001955053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994657,0.0002457678,0.0000427673,0.0001726732,0.00001215015,0.00006094242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002864961,0.0001137072,0.0002311236,0.000005947701,0.00002683518,0.000004353215,0.002267218,0.000001817328,0.0000910271,0.9080136,0.0002966904,0.08866113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002179156,0.0002077392,0.0112117,0.00002700841,0.00007009404,0.00002833501,0.0001127253,0.00008544013,0.0006819924,0.9074662,0.07782535,0.0001042517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3624283,0.002509531,0.00004951408,0.02023775,0.001136159,0.0002069792,0.00006772482,0.00000513715,0.6133589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969825,0.000378373,0.00004695258,0.0007154508,0.0004284336,0.000005470549,0.000006966075,0.000003787141,0.001432127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6345541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158282983","doi":"10.1017/s001221731200042x","title":"W.V. Quine on Analyticity: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” in Context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Empiricism; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Law; History; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0697892899471998,"gpt":0.2719021995674045,"spread":0.2021129096202047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002476566,0.00009045943,0.000197048,0.0002011729,0.00008357353,0.00001568947,0.0001356501,0.00001999399,0.0004958975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003493038,0.00007604335,0.0000607197,0.00005656217,0.000324285,0.0001786778,0.00001896951,0.00008973418,0.000204066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004773496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002702986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001380435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008426801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.00003623781,0.0001936992,0.0001157947,0.0001569303,0.0002237386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995986,0.00006632708,0.00006824992,0.000163037,0.00003727017,0.00006646871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003726405,0.0003936416,0.00507103,0.00001717102,0.00001295652,0.000003915047,0.06956364,0.000007640703,0.0001769982,0.9167089,0.005116515,0.00289027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001540854,0.0003450087,0.01493306,0.00008253004,0.00003961696,0.000001523134,0.003751286,0.00007779982,0.0006144431,0.01712116,0.9610245,0.0004682292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5991768,0.0003025294,0.000002157912,0.0002081725,0.0009120269,0.00007445544,0.00003726254,0.00001854534,0.3992681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969857,0.00000647806,0.000004177568,0.0009924191,0.0007537875,0.000005456211,0.0000121432,0.000007339253,0.001232534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.955908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.542973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230413506","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000466","title":"Knowing Persons","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05444805893723671,"gpt":0.2621693829632847,"spread":0.207721324026048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001820664,0.00008023658,0.0001158097,0.00003486381,0.0002691717,0.00006810611,0.0001141994,0.00006497495,0.0007129795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007518551,0.00007010619,0.00008373892,0.00001204113,0.0003517755,0.00009764395,0.000021396,0.0003532947,0.0004335102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003952406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002827652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000412583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006929767,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995052,0.00002749539,0.00009534269,0.0001277878,0.00007015525,0.0001740655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959,0.0001021909,0.00003151454,0.0001763228,0.00005079743,0.00004920321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001994381,0.00003476051,0.0002302235,0.00001190845,0.00001734907,0.000004377769,0.04366991,1.815194e-7,0.001305048,0.9440291,0.008463191,0.002231956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223154,0.00002121589,0.0002109432,0.000004791394,0.00001799595,0.000001734615,0.00176514,0.0000103678,0.000258869,0.01573655,0.9817274,0.000122737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3123793,0.00007897543,0.00003079825,0.001350289,0.006374881,0.00009669812,0.00005660752,0.0001334597,0.679499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801579,0.000003980089,0.0001014516,0.0008214778,0.002618215,0.000009014611,0.00003311273,0.00001425153,0.01624064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7806625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086611957","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005941","title":"Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02369544873841598,"gpt":0.3195049341400552,"spread":0.2958094854016392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003640298,0.0002110188,0.0002459435,0.00003157952,0.0001752068,0.00006337032,0.0004190532,0.0001934156,0.006117186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007226181,0.000201255,0.0000935936,0.0003282953,0.001940834,0.0002361515,0.00005048608,0.0003619833,0.005204027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002006313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002608074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003908749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000316969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979616,0.0003194792,0.00020196,0.0006507585,0.0002292547,0.0006369625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988481,0.0003252495,0.00002920103,0.0004062927,0.00002270992,0.0003684129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006404563,0.0004351251,0.0004520468,0.00001347088,0.00001257895,0.00008633122,0.002728047,0.000003476123,0.0001899004,0.802334,0.000426413,0.1932545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007038587,0.0004308764,0.01940422,0.00007664401,0.00004266149,0.0001796059,0.00006610686,0.0004454882,0.000184495,0.9345262,0.04353418,0.0004056769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690318,0.002628026,0.0001120319,0.007750775,0.001136543,0.0001384154,0.00007996897,0.00003854592,0.4190839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915842,0.0003807824,0.000114272,0.001264881,0.0008604039,0.00001619896,0.000005618412,0.00001331435,0.005760352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4225524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101374221","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005485","title":"Hypocrisy and the Good of Character Possession","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Hypocrisy; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03731499936768743,"gpt":0.2208704402163899,"spread":0.1835554408487024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004224856,0.0001236927,0.000236436,0.00003054247,0.0002941398,0.00008128874,0.0001244223,0.0001196625,0.001935637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001084603,0.00007656196,0.000100271,0.00002360616,0.002119701,0.0001129187,0.00007654031,0.0003455148,0.000133135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006162883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009781052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004431386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005585864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999099,0.0002111271,0.0002354775,0.0001397865,0.0001369678,0.0001776594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989988,0.0005711761,0.0001061925,0.000195646,0.00006967276,0.00005848069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003562259,0.0001192605,0.00001536212,0.00007385985,0.00003671836,0.00000523327,0.00988329,1.601074e-7,0.00002820264,0.9841908,0.0004677585,0.005143797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008008172,0.00005998047,0.0002051677,0.000110091,0.00005536929,0.000005277455,0.0001680554,0.0001397903,0.00004148058,0.6777877,0.3205253,0.0001009367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038498,0.04856035,0.00001043575,0.1552819,0.003152312,0.00032263,0.0004465904,0.00002597014,0.68835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860271,0.004415132,0.000004557533,0.001622403,0.001447226,0.000006522434,0.000009877931,0.00001369009,0.006453525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112041666","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003541","title":"“Learning to Be Indian”: Historical Narratives and the “Choice” of a Cultural Identity","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnology; Humanities; Identity (music); Sociology; Art; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03749433208614251,"gpt":0.336586302794792,"spread":0.2990919707086495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006165939,0.00009649991,0.0002098123,0.00004239357,0.0004777016,0.0001027056,0.0002042727,0.0001043648,0.00006926123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001368247,0.0000711544,0.00008639071,0.0004464923,0.0005859093,0.0001733173,0.00004458097,0.0002401596,0.00005863116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003555502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01806233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004580138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986659,0.0004517896,0.0002217063,0.0001717016,0.0002757066,0.0002131867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992866,0.0002139577,0.0001193083,0.00009452212,0.0001113239,0.0001742929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001940662,0.00003977633,0.003804514,0.00001526263,0.00002437186,0.000001901801,0.7602688,0.00007987746,0.00004649435,0.2171865,0.01667092,0.001842197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002726614,0.0002961313,0.02985049,0.0001829655,0.00007581089,0.000008137864,0.2460643,0.000003724243,0.00008727618,0.1834387,0.5367618,0.0005040253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8871319,0.004080007,0.00005578788,0.09863938,0.001823326,0.0002521705,0.000004439566,0.00001464032,0.007998334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880792,0.001052266,0.000187445,0.001016013,0.0005236841,0.00001832928,0.000004258067,0.000005407852,0.009113406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5200909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982583836","doi":"10.1017/s0012217309090076","title":"Zombies and Epiphenomenalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Consciousness; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Position (finance); Linguistics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02569113301514596,"gpt":0.3152430680554465,"spread":0.2895519350403005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008588484,0.00007652502,0.0001157389,0.00003670149,0.00006779141,0.00001544426,0.00005585671,0.0000399926,0.00009916867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001368155,0.00006623865,0.00002345925,0.00005656308,0.00004895724,0.00002274169,0.00001524462,0.00005282298,0.0001488337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004536026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000287869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004678861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001668717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995074,0.00002159398,0.00009363198,0.0001608365,0.00004565268,0.0001709333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974,0.00003719836,0.00002304632,0.0001405623,0.00001538686,0.00004379114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005039442,0.0002067288,0.00599234,0.00000479748,0.0000955212,0.00003460529,0.01495961,6.512088e-7,0.000408332,0.7603213,0.1174912,0.1004345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001030758,0.0002208764,0.6539053,0.000008677865,0.00002139534,0.00001651599,0.0009911144,0.000004474985,0.00003119689,0.1380922,0.2053897,0.000287875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5339757,0.004375958,0.0001297602,0.006857618,0.000873924,0.0001083993,0.00001824693,0.00008688134,0.4535735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960238,0.0000734045,0.00007209131,0.001917366,0.0002024129,0.000008083129,0.000007116611,0.00000479158,0.001690872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6479129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2701134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138178481","doi":"10.1017/s001221732100007x","title":"Moral peace and moral pleasure in the<i>Analects</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","keywords":"Pleasure; Contentment; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Eudaimonia; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05202837532901388,"gpt":0.2794423723815375,"spread":0.2274139970525236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004101949,0.00005836403,0.00009343017,0.00002382871,0.0002695496,0.00004419466,0.0001191784,0.00005282048,0.0000392369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001749819,0.00004816876,0.00003510444,0.000282011,0.0001546042,0.00008874838,0.00001868384,0.000138865,0.00001847068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002538906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001099639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001321135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0210749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991559,0.0003307915,0.00007582426,0.000136443,0.0001738482,0.0001271407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.0001018374,0.00001920226,0.0001109118,0.00002777051,0.00004610847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002725272,0.0001537662,0.09911673,0.00002101845,0.0000122626,0.000346079,0.1138991,0.00002165052,0.0002029356,0.7723598,0.01230944,0.001529972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007521538,0.00004442507,0.07974975,0.00002778892,0.00002747132,0.00001731718,0.002877781,0.00002423716,0.00004794933,0.5855058,0.3305597,0.0003656218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7238117,0.002683569,0.000004903673,0.0125434,0.0005114375,0.0001410735,0.00002086421,0.00003355214,0.2602495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980112,0.00004088617,0.0000285805,0.001106179,0.0004030453,0.000005789282,0.00001669512,0.000003751828,0.0003838861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3182503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982207133","doi":"10.1017/s0012217309990400","title":"Three Evolutionary Precursors to Morality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Altruism (biology); Sympathy; Duty; Virtue; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1125525796267109,"gpt":0.2980168057003592,"spread":0.1854642260736483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008418819,0.00008709985,0.0000902777,0.000048724,0.0001009643,0.00001057096,0.000212858,0.00004672311,0.00009407902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001351016,0.00007792354,0.00004783684,0.0001621603,0.0000541613,0.00008387979,0.00002909657,0.00008557581,0.001042924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003195311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001359784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002401972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001242938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991291,0.00003694832,0.0001152637,0.0003113595,0.0001833904,0.0002239205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996179,0.00003905101,0.00002329781,0.0001858849,0.00001465722,0.0001192347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004791247,0.001751066,0.009320547,0.00001060184,0.00001037838,0.0001572339,0.0005449089,0.0007838903,0.2599012,0.2551293,0.4106826,0.06122916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000320037,0.0003338112,0.8494059,0.00001197998,0.000004377612,0.00002625481,0.000004054913,0.00009330121,0.01097497,0.1197378,0.01887511,0.0002124222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490849,0.00002719492,0.0008016981,0.03214851,0.0007102431,0.0002332608,0.00004543399,0.0001272369,0.01682156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862723,0.000004224879,0.0005731427,0.01277372,0.0001624392,0.000009566974,0.00000900032,0.000003571507,0.0001920147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331213766","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000085","title":"Why Philosophy Needs Logical Psychologism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychologism; Normative; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04598380488387317,"gpt":0.2997244156034332,"spread":0.25374061071956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002092026,0.0001704353,0.0001950001,0.00009936981,0.000105153,0.00004525707,0.0005229716,0.0002155363,0.01210191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009308675,0.0001264576,0.0001087557,0.000428495,0.0006542145,0.0001343913,0.00007860061,0.0002710281,0.01431222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001396144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005722556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001617491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.24721e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985555,0.0001655562,0.0002220737,0.0003723382,0.0001825814,0.0005019574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989966,0.000176923,0.00005082025,0.0004820199,0.00004272618,0.0002509237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711398,0.0001954115,0.0003929615,0.000001490859,0.0000128344,0.00001723177,0.0003770321,4.928989e-7,0.0002589869,0.9596378,0.03590966,0.003178966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003472173,0.0001872917,0.01517052,0.000004998482,0.000006372326,0.00001721495,0.0000471378,0.000006306355,0.00004332836,0.9622281,0.02174424,0.0001973257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05783682,0.00007243802,0.001300546,0.02998865,0.001535021,0.0002704419,0.00001292794,0.0001829409,0.9088002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713701,0.000004486053,0.0001428391,0.02735084,0.0006660318,0.0001117516,0.00001374659,0.00001226871,0.0003279451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9135333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320564641","doi":"10.1017/s001221731100031x","title":"Intentional Normativism Meets Normative Supervenience and the Because Constraint","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supervenience; Attribution; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Mathematics; Metaphysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07714598848624295,"gpt":0.2239395533874256,"spread":0.1467935649011827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005077103,0.00008697576,0.0001206731,0.00002961316,0.0002930079,0.00006409837,0.0001333688,0.00003183844,0.0008641043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001269567,0.0000505629,0.00005854185,0.00001434955,0.002722097,0.0001892482,0.00007437058,0.0002035948,0.00008551675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005639557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001856026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003357174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003730262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993789,0.0001227243,0.0001640037,0.00009763885,0.0001138871,0.0001228993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994329,0.0002714681,0.00005132929,0.0001036489,0.00009219546,0.00004843465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003060791,0.0000275828,0.00001207858,0.000006862274,0.00002354156,0.000002659548,0.0872017,5.468716e-8,0.000003208575,0.9121593,0.00004226297,0.0004902032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005410079,0.00003385167,0.0003547562,0.00002090544,0.00001458004,0.000006433058,0.002009354,0.00005831,0.00004075239,0.9926765,0.004153632,0.00008992359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1936128,0.0002993559,0.0001987882,0.009693733,0.0007873836,0.0003566099,0.0002657101,0.00008003583,0.7947056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983008,0.00002848595,0.00002397653,0.00137225,0.0001488797,0.00002125228,0.00001385432,0.00000505,0.00008548096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.804688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104852378","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300003048","title":"Les rapports d'échange selon Aristote.<i>Éthique à Nicomaque</i>V et VIII-IX","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Politics; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Social science; Political science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06192764179791423,"gpt":0.2567654805135705,"spread":0.1948378387156562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002349643,0.0002284609,0.0002655665,0.00008215889,0.0003877967,0.0001358101,0.0001811556,0.0001419366,0.0006496722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004942757,0.0001982757,0.0001684377,0.00004810004,0.0002635887,0.0002183702,0.00006512813,0.0003855714,0.0003643668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006067852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005608485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001238872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006294975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988338,0.00008942596,0.0002677765,0.0003067649,0.0001885117,0.0003137202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993362,0.00008567499,0.00009520638,0.0002863797,0.00007152336,0.0001249965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002012544,0.0002008617,0.00003168504,0.0000187664,0.00002758814,0.00006006624,0.01287708,0.00001073764,0.0001142547,0.9820943,0.003070588,0.001473955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005856741,0.0001161205,0.0003448809,0.00005102619,0.00002789018,0.000008370904,0.0002704882,0.000002937256,0.0006467035,0.4133122,0.5843102,0.0003234695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1288587,0.0007190711,0.0005813848,0.01666094,0.002452588,0.0005948481,0.0002746454,0.0006727436,0.8491851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918274,0.00004852927,0.00007782721,0.004532438,0.001772485,0.00004134311,0.00021683,0.00003807704,0.001445065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8629687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8085447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026112252","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005709","title":"Aristotle on Brutishness","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.101963674197558,"gpt":0.4583551499686385,"spread":0.3563914757710805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009645972,0.0002535003,0.0003699795,0.00008184903,0.001290129,0.00002411062,0.0003096182,0.001633309,0.007612022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07536867,0.0002622889,0.0001011709,0.0003391169,0.0006478485,0.000178397,0.00008552213,0.01041476,0.04008523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003278327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009311499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00116187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005781032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845074,0.01283416,0.0006102619,0.000486635,0.0006357647,0.0009257891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976303,0.02197933,0.0002724004,0.0007441957,0.0002114993,0.0004896046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003040417,0.0004022702,0.0007941994,0.00030053,0.00002859676,0.000105587,0.002640879,0.000008694369,0.0000146052,0.8196934,0.1708859,0.005094983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006018606,0.000106484,0.0008332029,0.0004730648,0.00004760221,0.000008712998,0.0009779789,0.00001559201,0.00006008082,0.3012276,0.6954405,0.0002073071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003354102,0.005154405,0.00262131,0.1157345,0.04323678,0.000722612,0.00007371749,0.0002041373,0.8288984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052212,0.001604996,0.002290345,0.042768,0.002114672,0.00007572022,0.00003223968,0.0001461104,0.04574675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.901867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095068515","doi":"10.1017/s001221731100014x","title":"Bullshit, Social Integration, and Political Legitimation: Habermasian Reflections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Communicative action; Normative; Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Phenomenon; Politics; Critical theory; Philosophy; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1197026472943743,"gpt":0.3694063808539749,"spread":0.2497037335596006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002662361,0.0000599489,0.00008235926,0.00003841359,0.0007437458,0.00004950519,0.00007357048,0.00009438736,0.0004161326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002421053,0.00006005012,0.00003847778,0.000131698,0.0005781661,0.0001749735,0.00001580631,0.0001100914,0.00007029224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000298634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003722452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005225381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004595769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992453,0.0001871222,0.0001120552,0.0001220066,0.0001069111,0.0002266399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996272,0.00009415506,0.00001567373,0.00005697913,0.00006529397,0.00014069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007856701,0.00003540447,0.00009637803,0.000002120553,0.000003919853,0.000002175615,0.01520334,6.324458e-9,0.00001959015,0.9833658,0.0002889666,0.0009744569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009027184,0.00002616077,0.001085339,0.000004484287,0.00001288819,0.000002634208,0.00249337,0.000002009953,0.0001273108,0.9659504,0.03011033,0.00009479507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005019799,0.00001357325,0.001676537,0.008439338,0.0002995927,0.0001099155,0.00001974229,0.00008985939,0.9843317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976323,0.000003822207,0.0004370279,0.0006997079,0.0009576491,0.00001501485,0.00001412925,0.00000522758,0.000235079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5720366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165164915","doi":"10.3917/dia.187.0111","title":"Filiation et universalité : questions à partir du Québec","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0229841351407888,"gpt":0.3026540634787381,"spread":0.2796699283379493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007905814,0.00009726078,0.0001279667,0.00005389426,0.0007467385,0.00009094545,0.0001565909,0.0002012297,0.001826405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004588103,0.0001126441,0.00007315638,0.0002827498,0.0004214528,0.0004809714,0.00002278123,0.0002710421,0.0009733585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001619769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001745662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.740812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988076,0.0003028412,0.00020639,0.0001944182,0.0002135557,0.0002752118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991847,0.0001668212,0.0001133247,0.0001719141,0.0001687695,0.0001945307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003830206,0.0001408721,0.1063712,0.0000261552,0.000009755101,0.000002348,0.04219956,0.00001917084,0.00006155908,0.7877655,0.06147506,0.001924927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001616341,0.00003470653,0.2204788,0.00001703137,0.00004642551,0.000001097076,0.001267737,0.0002974151,0.00001067209,0.02012052,0.757409,0.0001548847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8014953,0.0006905384,0.0003888278,0.1667981,0.00763083,0.0002664341,0.0001089524,0.0001134571,0.02250756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811553,0.001959059,0.0001787388,0.0009626336,0.00179652,0.000009559571,0.00007524346,0.000009777134,0.01385311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.767645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963572718","doi":"10.1017/s001221730000620x","title":"Wittgenstein et les théories du jugement de Russell et de Meinong","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02146930243282702,"gpt":0.3198486804219632,"spread":0.2983793779891362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002039408,0.0002315558,0.0002342411,0.00005336515,0.0001693118,0.00007987159,0.0004172881,0.0002912704,0.001393368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000234477,0.000223147,0.000119742,0.0001989204,0.0008031147,0.0001737591,0.0001208026,0.0004237903,0.001167487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001387254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000156496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007538278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000446688,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972683,0.001065991,0.0002823545,0.0004059705,0.0001978228,0.0007795788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987556,0.0004923512,0.00008330302,0.0003505914,0.00003825654,0.0002799513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006244616,0.0004500769,0.002234499,0.00001995587,0.00004805734,0.00008250128,0.00731658,0.0001672966,0.0006324015,0.9752731,0.002235362,0.01147772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007233967,0.0002239715,0.01235185,0.00006279824,0.00006705577,0.00007123296,0.0002117864,0.0002244549,0.0023758,0.6570027,0.3263339,0.0003510059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1589382,0.002946796,0.009474685,0.1221687,0.001481184,0.0002366682,0.0001426578,0.00008810798,0.704523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833385,0.000551177,0.001856588,0.01031041,0.00128757,0.00002979442,0.00002808691,0.00002319235,0.002574724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286281734","doi":"10.1017/s001221731500102x","title":"Critique of Practical Reason. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Revised edition. IMMANUEL KANT, Trans., MARY GREGOR Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015; 141 pp.; $26.95 (paper)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Classics; Art history; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0553616245122607,"gpt":0.2503323680053842,"spread":0.1949707434931235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007365108,0.0003327318,0.000631573,0.0001088041,0.0001215227,0.00003166139,0.0004851527,0.0001872071,0.00005957685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003415324,0.0002822451,0.0002940493,0.0001114162,0.001185804,0.0007886955,0.00008285202,0.0005905913,0.00002852954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002789024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000455308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002588214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002727121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973527,0.0006640792,0.0006045595,0.0004422206,0.0005510868,0.0003853594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979392,0.0005474511,0.0003272553,0.0006271025,0.000362009,0.0001970051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003741443,0.0005269571,0.00002870397,0.0001734288,0.00004017211,0.000135023,0.001525605,0.000001358007,0.00007865862,0.5018846,0.4951454,0.00008586694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00195163,0.0003327279,0.001651456,0.0002257866,0.0001967669,0.0000282264,0.0006127839,0.00005202519,0.00008186095,0.002154639,0.9922967,0.0004154173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01751621,0.01795602,0.0001301544,0.02937913,0.004565711,0.001980789,0.004092241,0.0002420789,0.9241377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887789,0.0009770845,0.0000498304,0.001001321,0.002526791,0.00002247493,0.0003157289,0.00005409555,0.006273794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144939262","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000564","title":"The Infinite and the Indeterminate in Spinoza","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Uncountable set; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06335847408517385,"gpt":0.2206743228228994,"spread":0.1573158487377255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002484783,0.00008036979,0.0001036107,0.00002026316,0.0002376068,0.00007273273,0.0001500685,0.00002788426,0.0001851988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007381449,0.0000360698,0.00004420307,0.0000208285,0.00090486,0.0000573237,0.00006546917,0.0001605639,0.00007169004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004684789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005694895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005314843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007272947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993666,0.0001048834,0.0001588516,0.0000959059,0.00007355961,0.0002001733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994718,0.0003006675,0.00002838492,0.0001396526,0.00001668571,0.00004275778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005803794,0.00002063869,0.0003344188,0.000003453023,0.000006854293,0.000004424313,0.009589987,1.448937e-8,2.501695e-7,0.9859011,0.00009519514,0.003985695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006381382,0.0000320267,0.004813227,0.00001228736,0.000009045963,0.000001846642,0.0003166051,0.00002577161,0.00001070832,0.6241216,0.369939,0.00007976193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3738393,0.001023502,0.00000246941,0.007483881,0.001232666,0.0004018431,0.00004461003,0.00004613944,0.6159257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971972,0.0001368486,0.000002647498,0.001450529,0.0003215137,0.00002398654,0.000003272676,0.000006111828,0.0008579365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6233579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3333994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}