{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":307,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":307,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"684aeb533e3a","filters":{"venue":"Diversity and Distributions"}},"results":[{"id":"W2030391896","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00341.x","title":"Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1050,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Beta diversity; Biological dispersal; Biodiversity; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Spatial ecology; Spatial analysis; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0726584178926167,"gpt":0.2892719942265549,"spread":0.2166135763339382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002948099,0.00007364863,0.0001278894,0.00005507969,0.001515707,0.000005110274,0.00008391246,0.00005615098,0.0000403828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008341702,0.00008070598,0.00003254668,0.0001582422,0.0001713716,0.0001414186,0.002173247,0.00008201055,8.978955e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001468958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005006007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005166121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00500775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993744,0.00003332706,0.0001071883,0.0001987094,0.0001322149,0.0001541923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997157,0.00004719981,0.00005074683,0.00006818958,0.00001767558,0.0001004603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002522219,0.00008112227,0.9925026,0.000005712478,0.00002120038,0.000005439495,0.001012673,0.005598759,0.00002639874,0.0006606748,0.00003063431,0.00002950781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003485809,0.00002025399,0.9861117,0.000005295695,0.00006122067,9.668247e-7,0.000710034,0.01221069,0.00001450793,0.0004229026,0.00001293216,0.00008092757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8927394,0.00001148489,0.1064542,0.000161681,0.00001963761,0.0000863796,0.0004532793,0.000006758806,0.00006724487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978256,0.00005420924,0.001991849,0.00005859018,0.000002810389,2.663112e-7,0.00006037835,6.250623e-7,0.00000565759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1050863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164790793","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x","title":"A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1013,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Terminology; CLARITY; Ecology; Invasive species; Propagule pressure; Process (computing); Introduced species; Biology; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Population; Biological dispersal; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01843914731353278,"gpt":0.2089823318937359,"spread":0.1905431845802032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002640804,0.00004762984,0.00005650322,0.00001357495,0.001243657,0.000005153008,0.00006328223,0.00003183026,0.0001532315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003962118,0.00004815412,0.00001977923,0.00008431352,0.0002347019,0.0000675715,0.0007334664,0.00004268466,0.0002290393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007003552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000409565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001975195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002652556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996743,0.000007655128,0.00004264545,0.0001210641,0.00002738183,0.0001270004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998466,0.00002410038,0.00001255755,0.00005140082,0.000005637855,0.00005963707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007740376,0.00006984401,0.9104924,0.000001884804,0.0000106769,0.00001210819,0.001060556,0.0007387534,0.0001932094,0.08659364,0.0007577662,0.00006142771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002103469,0.00004546231,0.987707,0.000001415547,0.00001360775,0.000005969591,0.0001851759,0.000004623359,0.0001188935,0.01075112,0.0008959637,0.00006047744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907067,0.000008288451,0.003176322,0.002614446,0.00004856869,0.00005645099,0.00009781995,0.00002063986,0.003270735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.00002404927,0.0003010791,0.0003087154,0.00000622276,0.000002558319,0.00002433479,7.256116e-7,0.0002967484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07721455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815931204","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x","title":"The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":648,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Spatial ecology; Marine protected area; Physical geography; Bay; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03175126363526555,"gpt":0.2463591572443447,"spread":0.2146078936090791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001531439,0.00006279633,0.00006079534,0.00001864351,0.002709114,0.00002251049,0.0001400765,0.00004977567,0.0004936373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004538353,0.00005178282,0.00008370724,0.0002553444,0.0005567785,0.0001193563,0.0004121349,0.00005696009,0.00001138924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001722545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001981458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003138371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005762898,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995171,0.000009639639,0.00009664853,0.0001297542,0.00006983923,0.0001770272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995712,0.00009210778,0.0000698279,0.0001574764,0.00004172799,0.00006766236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009985087,0.0000444601,0.8961226,0.000003512112,0.000006047962,2.494651e-8,0.000039577,3.802398e-8,0.0004716757,0.1000793,0.001694372,0.001528335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001819617,0.0000202112,0.9551228,0.00000113818,0.00002729161,9.688556e-7,0.000194448,0.00001272434,0.0001107546,0.002571085,0.04169641,0.00006025432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856907,0.00003720123,0.0004956058,0.005197505,0.0001224686,0.0003272001,0.005926665,0.0000311057,0.002171573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998799,0.0004716511,0.00005955162,0.0001302605,0.00001240534,0.00005303203,0.000468662,0.000001807125,0.000003673623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09750825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040926197","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00342.x","title":"Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":545,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Grain size; Species distribution; Biodiversity; Sample size determination; Ranking (information retrieval); Ecology; Sensitivity (control systems); Statistics; Biological system; Environmental science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Materials science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04934278090149152,"gpt":0.2412059781241939,"spread":0.1918631972227024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005658899,0.0001103948,0.0001496573,0.0000281751,0.0004490793,0.00001006225,0.00008281139,0.00007699426,0.001414632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001306313,0.0001195186,0.00005186334,0.0004864474,0.0002619017,0.0002824986,0.0009026236,0.00008925033,0.00003544483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005452422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003760518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003421081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005901798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990278,0.00004688561,0.0001553008,0.0002372224,0.0002359926,0.0002967679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995015,0.0001203928,0.000051976,0.0001248646,0.00003007139,0.0001712282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001554539,0.0003686368,0.9675168,0.0000116704,0.00001050239,0.00002550407,0.003396886,0.00005482273,0.001413067,0.02352206,0.002576004,0.0009485821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002881157,0.00004834794,0.9939406,0.000009518795,0.00001329233,0.000003095913,0.00250416,0.0002774662,0.0007184789,0.0004542597,0.00161999,0.0001226988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688458,0.00001386163,0.02164422,0.0004592886,0.00006432415,0.0002586051,0.005589798,0.00002915994,0.003094881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.00003882327,0.00002742085,0.0001083132,0.00001398443,0.000005081275,0.000414255,0.000002269476,0.00004558797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0304984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071848559","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00243.x","title":"Scale for resource selection functions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":496,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Scale (ratio); Selection (genetic algorithm); Spatial ecology; Ecology; Occupancy; Sampling (signal processing); Habitat; Resource (disambiguation); Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Cartography; Machine learning; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008407503567313927,"gpt":0.1785465181059585,"spread":0.1701390145386445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005734402,0.0000341405,0.00003241202,0.000008817397,0.002162063,0.000007624786,0.00003042398,0.00004167542,0.0002148205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001177413,0.00003313436,0.00002225664,0.00009701529,0.00009265421,0.0001043777,0.0001314769,0.00003135524,0.00004620261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005067138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002516213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004729376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007393264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999715,0.0000109907,0.00004131388,0.0001056174,0.00003816274,0.00008888164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998869,0.00002952222,0.00001726441,0.00003483019,0.000006877775,0.00002463375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001014219,0.00004061197,0.9526609,8.071467e-7,0.000001633529,7.676607e-8,0.00002236606,0.00005457522,0.00006903586,0.0009084675,0.04601942,0.0002119811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001666789,0.00002064465,0.9409996,5.752879e-7,0.00002146337,0.000001753544,0.00005510623,0.0003521364,0.00004209971,0.002141167,0.05615317,0.00004560095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507715,0.000002508816,0.04541142,0.0009992714,0.00003276109,0.00008949082,0.0001243898,0.00003472223,0.002533994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969761,6.260003e-7,0.0002016154,0.0001034492,0.0000269377,0.000008362262,0.0002161697,9.589869e-7,0.002465721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04620472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006770852","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12125","title":"Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":402,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biogeography; Ecology; Species distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Environmental niche modelling; Insular biogeography; Geography; Conservation biology; Biology; Habitat; Ecological niche","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0678570843045361,"gpt":0.2063815144883514,"spread":0.1385244301838153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000955658,0.00010537,0.0001000033,0.0000279802,0.0007246248,0.00004210746,0.00007705282,0.00006866761,0.00251523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002350013,0.0001084273,0.0000235958,0.0002096406,0.0002907552,0.000509253,0.0006903972,0.00006460294,0.00009726531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001940949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003488346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00227108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008938654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992687,0.00002609137,0.0001149063,0.0002321257,0.0001439586,0.0002141834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999724,0.00002621037,0.00003690962,0.00008218454,0.0000210825,0.0001096486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008276603,0.000116911,0.9428805,0.0000139275,0.000009181927,0.000002133951,0.0006401401,0.000003255371,0.0001055288,0.05106837,0.003452877,0.00169895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000309334,0.00001375498,0.9847685,0.000006480207,0.000007720993,0.0000025748,0.002343782,0.0002041091,0.00003762382,0.003317967,0.008858074,0.0001301282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990975,0.0002643233,0.000406772,0.002521675,0.00003314531,0.0001863856,0.0006513052,0.00003496287,0.004926452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960844,0.002947875,0.00003231581,0.00009453969,0.00000376293,0.00001603432,0.0007644424,0.000001878137,0.0000547661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0477504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136251117","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00262.x","title":"Patterns of invasion in the Laurentian Great Lakes in relation to changes in vector activity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":397,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Ballast; Habitat; Benthic zone; Invertebrate; Estuary; Ecology; Salinity; Oceanography; Introduced species; Euryhaline; Environmental science; Structural basin; Invasive species; Fishery; Biology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0162798543255535,"gpt":0.2014784224012278,"spread":0.1851985680756743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114576,0.00003539609,0.00005190126,0.00003500949,0.0001409625,0.000003674548,0.0000644025,0.00003448907,0.0004033853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002772898,0.00003029483,0.000009757875,0.0001723809,0.00004398343,0.00009286823,0.000247801,0.00006178256,0.000005742579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006013387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001664844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009446034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3877061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996755,0.00004950746,0.00004619873,0.00009020692,0.00005799031,0.0000806309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998741,0.00004099027,0.00001815482,0.00005330238,0.000002218709,0.00001128538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009277448,0.00008020785,0.9977778,0.000002491352,4.033622e-7,0.000002956908,0.000489343,0.00004823242,0.0002878462,0.0009164258,0.0002560925,0.0001289102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001559594,0.00002205016,0.9985259,0.000006114364,0.00000223877,3.618615e-7,0.0002094788,0.00001869969,0.0002946685,0.0003559709,0.000376291,0.00003222673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975865,0.000002955104,0.00006064334,0.001163725,0.00001672953,0.0000987082,0.00007621106,0.000002285188,0.00099228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998486,0.00000894665,0.000004627114,0.00002907292,0.0000043237,0.000003210182,0.00005199725,4.356407e-7,0.00004876363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3782601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1909427271","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00153.x","title":"Potential impacts of climate change on the distributions of several common and rare freshwater fishes in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Endangered species; Freshwater fish; Geography; Species distribution; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Wildlife; Climate model; Environmental science; Distribution (mathematics); Environmental niche modelling; Effects of global warming; Fishery; Global warming; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Ecological niche; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02032509884761245,"gpt":0.2035310295140808,"spread":0.1832059306664684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009620475,0.00008963583,0.0001282895,0.00001464708,0.0005166893,0.00000982213,0.0001114827,0.0000373903,0.003013984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002183569,0.0000712039,0.00003324236,0.0001432493,0.0002448403,0.0001368121,0.0005876449,0.00008510414,0.000007109839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003925762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001343651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3811658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8213384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993043,0.00003990281,0.0001392193,0.0001296895,0.0001718552,0.000215013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996756,0.00004456366,0.00006575873,0.00011831,0.00001271449,0.0000830807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005081147,0.0001424642,0.9884616,0.00001591599,0.00001018347,0.000005638522,0.0005312435,0.00002508275,0.0001351644,0.005822461,0.00433248,0.0004669351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003103891,0.00002763664,0.9954678,0.00001465013,0.00001837293,0.000003493961,0.001376278,0.0002507438,0.0005174121,0.00007137285,0.001860118,0.00008176231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823284,0.00003632072,0.00001583709,0.002489773,0.00002888139,0.0001322719,0.01421025,0.000005422715,0.0007528784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999158,0.0002495624,0.000004945406,0.0001387001,0.000008249018,0.00000422009,0.0004295601,0.000001608481,0.000005144992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4401726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131843212","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12212","title":"Dendrochronological reconstruction of the epicentre and early spread of emerald ash borer in<scp>N</scp>orth<scp>A</scp>merica","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Fraxinus; Agrilus; Infestation; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Horticulture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007508604315261257,"gpt":0.1813797930274992,"spread":0.1738711887122379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010871,0.0000740446,0.0001209408,0.00002236889,0.0003962018,0.000005925001,0.0001321519,0.00008240827,0.00005497428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002177451,0.00006110306,0.00004146899,0.0001637585,0.0006708838,0.000112903,0.0008206448,0.000100323,0.000008967983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003609645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005720501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001098797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005969517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993997,0.00006151546,0.000121152,0.0001717133,0.00009122022,0.0001546771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999594,0.0001282384,0.00009396327,0.0001239637,0.000009302685,0.00005047144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002352744,0.0001027468,0.9903934,0.000009563403,0.00001265376,7.700293e-7,0.0004038141,0.00003007159,0.0001351728,0.005234873,0.001897706,0.001776855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002420451,0.00006901628,0.9907643,0.000009343389,0.00003478329,0.000004966985,0.0004862429,0.00004545421,0.0002414663,0.00218164,0.005901045,0.00001969552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947806,0.00004010841,0.000307489,0.00008982154,0.00008000916,0.0001315692,0.00005785808,0.000009138961,0.00450341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995729,0.00007665996,0.00008549468,0.00006294393,0.000005805063,0.000002548025,0.00001011322,0.000001215502,0.000182348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004792276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3047304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518772429","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00798.x","title":"Recreational boating: a large unregulated vector transporting marine invasive species","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Invasive species; Fishery; Ecology; Niche; Introduced species; Geography; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03306917290446931,"gpt":0.1929067128259448,"spread":0.1598375399214755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001001825,0.00008216694,0.00008909833,0.0000173343,0.001492889,0.000007584834,0.00009958122,0.0000557025,0.02703588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001162273,0.00008271603,0.00004202589,0.0001364548,0.0002762172,0.0001966243,0.0007702613,0.00008509695,0.00008383652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006199356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008341724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000547872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001684059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994102,0.00002443766,0.0001050894,0.0001792805,0.00009340769,0.0001875661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997211,0.00004481277,0.00005535123,0.0000799211,0.00001721571,0.00008160679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001954473,0.00009593708,0.9702218,0.000003123846,0.00001543821,0.000009489813,0.00108355,0.000001460441,0.0001680218,0.02714406,0.001171536,0.00006604871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002555289,0.00003733334,0.9935433,0.000003422863,0.00002787455,0.000003647115,0.0004360541,0.00001960336,0.0007579242,0.002396767,0.00241999,0.0000984977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9387572,0.000004080809,0.0006989119,0.0001568014,0.00004755746,0.00008585949,0.0002197039,0.00003552913,0.05999436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976356,0.00002431879,0.0002998264,0.00007347292,0.00001562679,0.000002991893,0.000303219,0.000001897125,0.00164302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05887843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241512264","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12411","title":"Applying global criteria to tracking data to define important areas for marine conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Aage V. Jensens Fonde; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Geography; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Replication (statistics); Marine protected area; Marine conservation; Population; Range (aeronautics); Global biodiversity; Taxonomic rank; Conservation biology; Ecology; Taxon; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06041110819948489,"gpt":0.2757561526971208,"spread":0.2153450444976359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001869398,0.00006150006,0.00006756068,0.0000094431,0.0008394525,0.00001672901,0.0001680577,0.00003858282,0.0003063488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002753334,0.00005404267,0.00001459548,0.0001284325,0.00005159093,0.0002771921,0.00151848,0.00001701811,0.00005002279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001059581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008393607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005377357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001703159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994237,0.00001329865,0.0001000709,0.0002433748,0.00006938471,0.000150207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996023,0.00006002359,0.0000313138,0.0001788728,0.00001770861,0.0001098135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004681648,0.00002787539,0.9738218,0.000001939277,0.000005640688,0.000001114728,0.00002763843,0.000001315079,0.0002513093,0.002197644,0.01963992,0.003977045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002635076,0.00003400535,0.976486,0.000006144957,0.00002379254,0.000002823194,0.00003568897,0.0001171702,0.00002776945,0.002054711,0.02086396,0.00008448456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.925932,0.000002070793,0.06192859,0.009061464,0.00007267233,0.0003770554,0.002440535,0.00002576939,0.0001598518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962405,0.000003464354,0.001654817,0.001508633,0.00001899069,0.0000341314,0.0004790733,0.000001412509,0.00005901091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07030848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6456475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155058384","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00650.x","title":"Rarest of the rare: advances in combining evolutionary distinctiveness and scarcity to inform conservation at biogeographical scales","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":240,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Habitat; Biodiversity hotspot; Species richness; Conservation biology; Environmental resource management; Convention on Biological Diversity; Endemism; Prioritization; Biology; Geography; Phylogenetic tree; Management science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007519541757318474,"gpt":0.2114496654726628,"spread":0.2039301237153443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008652764,0.00004172998,0.00005900146,0.00001691679,0.001362923,0.000003185113,0.00006209923,0.00003852036,0.00002454618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009748634,0.00003483346,0.00001580026,0.0002153214,0.0007542199,0.000155183,0.0009990017,0.00007277216,0.000001838014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002777471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003488145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002491179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01278149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996782,0.0000187628,0.00006797816,0.00009500908,0.00006742182,0.00007264442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997726,0.00009606287,0.00003206434,0.00005243894,0.00001337049,0.00003346309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001890596,0.00002952271,0.988178,0.000003932934,0.000002219342,2.300305e-7,0.0001845261,0.00002453225,0.00007856279,0.01133591,0.00002468539,0.0001189617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722568,0.00001257292,0.9953445,0.000004534927,0.000006481938,0.000001623543,0.0001254039,0.0002753636,0.00001984878,0.00363709,0.0003585896,0.00004176044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998161,0.00003225663,0.0002298985,0.0009506659,0.00005340438,0.00009067875,0.0001902224,0.000005141279,0.0002867186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997914,0.00003035934,0.00008960875,0.00004526348,0.00000159099,0.000003813019,0.00002765609,5.01894e-7,0.000009797771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01253237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122430456","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00218.x","title":"Modelling local and long‐distance dispersal of invasive emerald ash borer <i>Agrilus planipennis</i> (Coleoptera) in North America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency; McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Biological dispersal; Agrilus; Fraxinus; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Invasive species; Introduced species; Quarantine; Infestation; Biology; Buprestidae; Population; Geography; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009348325851148311,"gpt":0.1841499367576883,"spread":0.17480161090654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004345437,0.0000760711,0.0001009298,0.00001801518,0.0004009237,0.000007116823,0.00008955909,0.00003613003,0.0001443908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007047583,0.00007864666,0.0000210754,0.0001335162,0.0004216809,0.0001818846,0.0005892375,0.00007613789,0.00001705001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007565085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004313081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00331406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03305178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994698,0.000018024,0.00009557497,0.0001768406,0.00008359987,0.0001562015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997845,0.00002994996,0.00003953787,0.00007632273,0.000005585403,0.00006414569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004454104,0.0001421398,0.9384602,0.00000965586,0.00001150935,0.00001427698,0.001170468,0.05679548,0.000004054299,0.001580627,0.001173318,0.0005936786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004609751,0.00005565408,0.9714946,0.000006506724,0.00002716749,0.000002656248,0.0003114873,0.02421671,0.00002193309,0.0001568372,0.003119617,0.0001258233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9388225,0.00003755527,0.05993097,0.0002753425,0.00001766848,0.0001068782,0.0001929841,0.000008890705,0.0006071873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992725,0.0001918901,0.0001695812,0.0002318517,0.000006191216,0.000002946211,0.00008805979,0.000001355689,0.00003561042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06044999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091712078","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13167","title":"Trends in the detection of aquatic non‐indigenous species across global marine, estuarine and freshwater ecosystems: A 50‐year perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":231,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Serono Symposia International Foundation; International Council for the Exploration of the Sea; Galapagos Conservancy; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Environmental Protection Agency; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; North Pacific Marine Science Organization","keywords":"Ecology; Indigenous; Estuary; Geography; Perspective (graphical); Ecosystem; Freshwater ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Aquatic ecosystem; Oceanography; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01470476572092252,"gpt":0.219979829593384,"spread":0.2052750638724615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000922727,0.00007322345,0.0001066124,0.00001176911,0.0006620683,0.00001738379,0.0001098705,0.00004351933,0.0005463252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000436159,0.00005838547,0.00003215394,0.0002368161,0.0003057073,0.0001165956,0.0008416825,0.00008309371,0.00001606606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000319665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01640778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1021665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994699,0.00004083124,0.00008617661,0.000164912,0.00009399676,0.000144152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998069,0.00002917176,0.00003816309,0.00007095305,0.000008316363,0.00004653846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003129699,0.00005274088,0.9901041,0.000005515783,0.00001164447,0.00000560907,0.008320574,0.000006288059,0.00007707063,0.000872925,0.0001922001,0.0003199753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003188547,0.0001089106,0.9890922,0.000001470419,0.00001940228,0.000006688574,0.00832416,0.0001763797,0.00007300725,0.0006918584,0.001123387,0.00006368782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943427,0.00001217584,0.0003125751,0.0006690783,0.00002449403,0.00009952427,0.0002601375,0.000007746467,0.004271583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997875,0.00002434808,0.00002108752,0.00005430613,0.00001604599,0.000002733949,0.000037182,9.334617e-7,0.00005587192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08575868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539065580","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00864.x","title":"Multicolony tracking reveals the winter distribution of a pelagic seabird on an ocean basin scale","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor; Miljøministeriet; Sight Research UK; Natural Environment Research Council; Northern Ireland Environment Agency; Microsoft Research","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Seabird; Oceanography; Scale (ratio); Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Geology; Biology; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03310241593703619,"gpt":0.232020723008052,"spread":0.1989183070710158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001625081,0.00007180053,0.00008171116,0.000007934904,0.001062991,0.00000655755,0.0001577603,0.00007830645,0.0006121244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002837994,0.00005609529,0.00004512369,0.00009202743,0.0005021477,0.0001812631,0.0003161684,0.0001328928,0.00005795918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006288225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003034347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001153846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009310674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994201,0.00007878403,0.00008984993,0.0001627219,0.00009319265,0.000155327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996906,0.0000348856,0.00005071916,0.000147809,0.00001278678,0.00006318893],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003006821,0.0002454437,0.9966788,0.000001582486,0.000004031717,0.000004962807,0.001199782,0.000001872695,0.00006874447,0.0002016078,0.001241751,0.0003213662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017458,0.0001260401,0.9976559,0.000004570319,0.00005251785,0.000004917425,0.0004843941,0.00001684719,0.0006918439,0.0004216462,0.0002979156,0.00006878464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978148,0.000001869104,0.0005007717,0.000691544,0.00003467674,0.0001240301,0.0003982596,0.00001706631,0.0004169992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994327,0.000001869552,0.00003623439,0.0003585099,0.000008243416,0.000001317035,0.00009247499,0.000001637647,0.00006700791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001617922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8175772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891721636","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00336.x","title":"Impacts of <i>Dreissena</i> invasions on benthic macroinvertebrate communities: a meta‐analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dreissena; Benthic zone; Ecology; Invertebrate; Biology; Zebra mussel; Species richness; Bivalvia; Mollusca; Mussel","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06128535597158426,"gpt":0.2578625494114816,"spread":0.1965771934398974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004042736,0.0001036201,0.0002598872,0.00006253279,0.001472278,0.000007708136,0.0001666796,0.00008607467,0.006820001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002434884,0.00009032752,0.0002270858,0.0005298734,0.0004863525,0.0001313637,0.0006725642,0.0001430147,0.0001795543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000538313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000749641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003608014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01134794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992821,0.00006981136,0.0001505062,0.000126592,0.0001540946,0.00021688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993815,0.0001786862,0.00008029026,0.0002077086,0.00001548611,0.000136343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003101969,0.0004262795,0.9869974,0.000006175024,0.004203679,0.00001357641,0.001746761,0.00007961054,0.0002247929,0.004693359,0.00153168,0.0000456346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003749298,0.0001449648,0.9570752,0.000003048733,0.03544492,0.000004438425,0.002444666,0.0003489421,0.002703638,0.001084748,0.0001570804,0.0002133676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949887,0.00002778354,0.002415939,0.000216607,0.00002402754,0.00009776392,0.0003918119,0.00001834116,0.001819004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992943,0.00002623427,0.00009387294,0.0003392783,0.000002634003,0.000001668373,0.0001425724,0.000001845776,0.00009761218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03124124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062430846","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12087","title":"Unifying measures of biodiversity: understanding when richness and phylogenetic diversity should be congruent","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Biogeography; Spatial analysis; Geography; Species diversity; Biology; Evolutionary biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.100529920695467,"gpt":0.2344333512356607,"spread":0.1339034305401937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001045293,0.00008033714,0.0001135254,0.00002956524,0.003120124,0.0000133892,0.00009904529,0.00006173758,0.0002303599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003085756,0.00008257649,0.00002791892,0.00009148345,0.0007174474,0.0001817648,0.002620404,0.00006836145,0.00001199008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001147788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003428543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001891683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006126903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994437,0.00003582038,0.00007165941,0.0001722517,0.0001328959,0.0001437206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997086,0.0000686574,0.00005181245,0.00006830585,0.00002300114,0.00007964644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000541311,0.00003558662,0.9942344,0.000009038296,0.00003708275,0.000001382261,0.001831756,0.00003866817,0.00008435702,0.002895855,0.0007666079,0.0000598782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003293823,0.00003093237,0.9866372,0.000004030698,0.0000905476,0.000001564492,0.004449028,0.0002437551,0.00003205374,0.007977338,0.0000959895,0.0001081169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916483,0.00005874676,0.006142065,0.0009855616,0.0000409341,0.0001289227,0.0001720965,0.00001625191,0.0008070843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996197,0.0001074262,0.0001011586,0.0001048529,0.000001966766,0.000001097249,0.00002196119,8.094103e-7,0.00004102978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00797136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112876065","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00502.x","title":"Range‐wide patterns of greater sage‐grouse persistence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Biome; Population density; Population; Vegetation (pathology); Steppe; Physical geography; Ecosystem; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02619450126910567,"gpt":0.1818449593081024,"spread":0.1556504580389967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004186426,0.0000555995,0.00006954847,0.00001169242,0.0007368833,0.000004208237,0.00009373276,0.00002193363,0.0005067713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008717518,0.00004998627,0.00004390975,0.00006322418,0.0001519287,0.0001018251,0.0005760238,0.000033798,0.0000431774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002687857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001236368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006404406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003737319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995695,0.00001438546,0.00005807941,0.000126252,0.0001197279,0.0001120027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998005,0.0000136154,0.00002381129,0.00009709293,0.000003894205,0.00006105512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006134671,0.00004004479,0.9974037,0.000005715595,0.00000748072,0.00001517204,0.0007140539,0.00001226268,0.000008466459,0.00004318977,0.001531345,0.0002124043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002500144,0.00002136036,0.9958497,0.000005667946,0.00002316046,0.00000453311,0.0002515538,0.0000238632,0.00005710135,0.00003570778,0.003411495,0.00006584187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946415,0.00001804496,0.003052713,0.000254122,0.00002434048,0.00005758185,0.0002091285,0.00001451519,0.001728039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990452,0.0001270603,0.00003864388,0.0001010104,0.00000598049,0.000001074463,0.00002153743,0.000001179877,0.0006583211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004403677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5667585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106565253","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12279","title":"Accounting for spatially biased sampling effort in presence‐only species distribution modelling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Climate Change and Emissions Management Corporation","keywords":"Statistics; Weighting; Sampling (signal processing); Sampling bias; Logistic regression; Sample (material); Regression; Species distribution; Rare species; Sample size determination; Mathematics; Econometrics; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0640575195228535,"gpt":0.2468567385032044,"spread":0.1827992189803509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003487212,0.0001341744,0.0001530663,0.00002560771,0.001461545,0.0000701169,0.0001640899,0.0000869076,0.00180124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001681418,0.0001445451,0.00007286909,0.0002407294,0.000191347,0.0002970651,0.0005995129,0.00009866434,0.00004305588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003592377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008780483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000962363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001175027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989226,0.00002226355,0.0001823386,0.000312534,0.000203932,0.0003563206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995192,0.0001334624,0.00007375405,0.000137986,0.00003002178,0.0001055499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007286672,0.0001890065,0.9396926,0.00003348694,0.0000106688,0.000001300717,0.0004483873,0.004732559,0.0003284428,0.05106658,0.001898515,0.001525594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059078,0.00005664674,0.9122151,0.00002722366,0.00004037305,0.000003285757,0.0009608615,0.04217059,0.0001780394,0.002006833,0.04094047,0.0003415198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375535,0.00000914026,0.2589809,0.0002117532,0.00008106446,0.0002059637,0.001421348,0.00004117003,0.001495123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974373,0.0000325713,0.0003166075,0.00005550186,0.00003534014,0.00001258532,0.002032081,0.000004221608,0.00007376869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2598838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143010751","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12150","title":"Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Division of Materials Research; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Conservation biology; Biogeography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0130542267780338,"gpt":0.2341043951013692,"spread":0.2210501683233354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009284709,0.00002993832,0.00004524485,0.00001634962,0.001365579,0.000007089041,0.00008153517,0.00002215842,0.0005577269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001661935,0.0000285534,0.00001418721,0.0001285068,0.0005159799,0.0002061347,0.0007318177,0.00003324561,0.00005795615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000319808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000443331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005668279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008963657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996737,0.000007017472,0.00005612279,0.00009205804,0.00007640853,0.00009464434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998077,0.00005985632,0.00001937451,0.00005066907,0.00002185523,0.00004061473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001380069,0.00003892845,0.9829516,0.000004035855,0.000003750461,5.359887e-7,0.0007553922,0.00001780721,0.002251574,0.01008919,0.003483753,0.0004019938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001086534,0.00003468195,0.9904327,0.000004385176,0.00001205582,0.000001284107,0.0006532882,0.000788012,0.001319164,0.006364403,0.0002295134,0.00005188444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842662,0.000007567334,0.003102714,0.0006425594,0.00003501094,0.0000524297,0.00001223811,0.000007569117,0.01187371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993163,0.00001452077,0.0003380438,0.0001127523,0.000001686715,0.000001690067,0.000003580289,3.794737e-7,0.0002110817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01505006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146771238","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12112","title":"A highly aggregated geographical distribution of forest pest invasions in the<scp>USA</scp>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; University of California, Santa Barbara; U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Propagule pressure; Species richness; Habitat; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Propagule; Introduced species; Invasive species; PEST analysis; Biology; Geography; Species distribution; Colonisation; Biodiversity; Population; Biological dispersal; Colonization; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01290390487394692,"gpt":0.1890748415737179,"spread":0.176170936699771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000173117,0.00008405291,0.00009495458,0.00002912024,0.0008397542,0.00001680239,0.000215456,0.00008129438,0.0002001099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001287867,0.00006795683,0.00005050116,0.0004372195,0.000523764,0.0002044328,0.000745688,0.0001304974,0.0001382621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004689374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004523451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005393333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004489983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992801,0.00006488982,0.0001248818,0.0001676619,0.0001430702,0.0002193715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999567,0.0001448521,0.0000548094,0.0001507724,0.00001399999,0.00006851534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001724579,0.0002260549,0.9700207,0.000004741391,0.000008655251,0.000004607345,0.0002727891,0.00007847754,0.00003065051,0.02124352,0.008008857,0.00009928107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002648778,0.00005808245,0.9904069,0.000005642455,0.00002689592,0.000004226543,0.0003776257,0.0001839402,0.0000144038,0.005806549,0.002819336,0.00003146611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996972,0.00001529681,0.0006809463,0.0003421612,0.00003787582,0.0002832468,0.0001985754,0.00001382238,0.001456067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.00005312599,0.00002051128,0.00009528766,0.000004941198,0.00002297345,0.0003755848,0.000001289786,0.00006390832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02038632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8153143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013967449","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00543.x","title":"Human land use, agriculture, pesticides and losses of imperiled species","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecoregion; Habitat; Agriculture; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Population decline; Pesticide; Range (aeronautics); Agricultural land; Urbanization; Population density; Geography; Population; Land use; Land cover; Biodiversity; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02288819185066276,"gpt":0.2100915149821499,"spread":0.1872033231314871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002207551,0.00004194965,0.000067486,0.000007630744,0.001530117,0.00000434183,0.00002975304,0.00002702958,0.0000949018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003505954,0.00003526723,0.00001409852,0.00005332848,0.0005779444,0.0001120065,0.0003473203,0.00002968247,0.000003826487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001220038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000125131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003385388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007277027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997525,0.00001062475,0.0000481089,0.00008060348,0.00004389657,0.00006426134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998633,0.00003908235,0.00002562298,0.00003153063,0.00001059044,0.00002986092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001679309,0.00002967359,0.9955305,0.0000027423,0.000009056903,0.000002103025,0.0004082987,0.00002026996,0.0002284564,0.00305283,0.0007117003,0.000002631721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001234293,0.00002247804,0.9988302,0.000001723541,0.00001878645,0.000006953802,0.0001463202,0.0000118712,0.00007038227,0.0004854167,0.0002383137,0.00004409965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983453,0.00003157503,0.0001861112,0.00005335248,0.00001210604,0.00003565249,0.0001441741,0.000008448003,0.001183309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993358,0.0001487497,0.00006456282,0.00001434292,0.000003802642,6.91332e-7,0.00003012658,4.875071e-7,0.0004014169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003299668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997697,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201068657","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12387","title":"Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population‐level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision‐making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Department of Environment and Water","keywords":"Threatened species; Genetic diversity; Conservation genetics; Population; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05801832338141514,"gpt":0.3008262183457196,"spread":0.2428078949643045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001327008,0.00008604456,0.0000776596,0.00002216212,0.001208665,0.00005771611,0.00007613625,0.0001042034,0.000003461941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001466601,0.0000770803,0.00003129481,0.0000700712,0.00006231033,0.00001075919,0.0003124376,0.00005059233,3.883073e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001878926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003275522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006953371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006255099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994401,0.00002802778,0.0001029125,0.0001942174,0.0001206184,0.0001141522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995629,0.00004540297,0.00006716445,0.0001219316,0.0001339673,0.00006861515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001263126,0.00002632836,0.9556563,0.00001717818,0.00005356715,0.000001092187,0.0003361343,0.00058158,0.0001147182,0.03268997,0.002186951,0.008209808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005573664,0.00005595358,0.9604477,0.000020882,0.00007194982,0.00001398353,0.0002683105,0.002553743,0.00003856945,0.03463565,0.001213952,0.0001219636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5566044,0.0001022659,0.4422853,0.0002361518,0.00007509584,0.000148447,0.0005283396,0.000006172046,0.0000138375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734885,0.00004813103,0.02509723,0.0002144019,0.00007384261,0.000004825158,0.001055678,0.000003197961,0.00001424141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.417188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9296193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744366492","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12601","title":"The diversity, distribution and conservation status of the tree‐cavity‐nesting birds of the world","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Facultative; Nest (protein structural motif); Excavator; Ecology; Obligate; Species richness; Geography; Conservation status; Biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04435163844946721,"gpt":0.2451093677257312,"spread":0.200757729276264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002174667,0.0000828417,0.00009238074,0.000006070517,0.01031552,0.00005466937,0.0004234246,0.00004060415,0.0002129772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003583103,0.00005000207,0.00007202925,0.0001692885,0.001819796,0.0001878061,0.005692757,0.00009989615,0.000003884029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001792735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001146292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004615311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00875485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992117,0.00005931725,0.0001222095,0.0001380172,0.0002647337,0.0002040427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991686,0.0001074175,0.0002567998,0.0003561793,0.00004259835,0.00006843167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001324799,0.0000343423,0.9810155,0.000006155046,0.000008689862,1.704748e-7,0.0001784644,0.000001288109,0.0001932032,0.01518276,0.002825789,0.0005403577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002741477,0.000009419447,0.9890603,0.0000128249,0.00005509451,0.000001231155,0.0007969255,0.00006397617,0.0006894973,0.000691017,0.008286288,0.00005925751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912524,0.00003485772,0.00007231648,0.003418049,0.0001347926,0.0001568891,0.002113673,0.000009273925,0.002807776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995301,0.0001045605,0.000002541753,0.00003905721,0.000006243268,0.00000136931,0.0000551164,0.000001397242,0.0002595881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01449175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983425407","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12073","title":"Origin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alien; Ecology; Introduced species; Herbivore; Biodiversity; Predation; Biology; Invasive species; Habitat; Ecosystem; Biota; Alien species; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08791533251231255,"gpt":0.2339857009053757,"spread":0.1460703683930632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003916966,0.0001074763,0.0001081866,0.00001092526,0.0018182,0.00007154595,0.00009900381,0.00004811168,0.0004634936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002023862,0.00004842845,0.00005006082,0.0001253136,0.0001723054,0.0001759537,0.000257664,0.00007351638,0.0001209059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002502394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002051712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002279872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009685211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999415,0.00003235511,0.00007659433,0.0001820347,0.0001032466,0.000190791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997109,0.00007830805,0.00003826461,0.00001992221,0.00005482856,0.00009774224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139154,0.00004439215,0.9884307,0.000002171984,0.00003256917,0.000002714931,0.0002883094,4.470341e-7,0.0005358877,0.003288444,0.006961273,0.0003991564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001245701,0.00005860728,0.9906412,0.00001147017,0.00002684179,0.000001471948,0.000913127,0.0000086787,0.00007374635,0.0003920024,0.00762129,0.0001270327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940376,0.00002392801,0.000003191702,0.002407608,0.00003495666,0.0001631738,0.001910517,0.00004507238,0.001373999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991692,0.00002991579,0.00000923838,0.0002506225,0.00001644448,0.000007490568,0.0002784701,2.919388e-7,0.0002383368],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005131636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1811836629","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00713.x","title":"Alien flora of mountains: global comparisons for the development of local preventive measures against plant invasions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica","keywords":"Alien; Flora (microbiology); Ecology; Alien species; Geography; Invasive species; Biology; Paleontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05622797926189521,"gpt":0.2267675065451501,"spread":0.1705395272832549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001535396,0.00005392756,0.0001076597,0.000002324917,0.001384542,0.000004401836,0.0001233142,0.00005441691,0.00001269124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004581726,0.00002096819,0.00004628843,0.00007931802,0.0002701822,0.00003064211,0.0002777033,0.00005524922,6.721623e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001013329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001292006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001732273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01750337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996178,0.00001871012,0.0001061494,0.00008686121,0.00006920254,0.0001012768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995199,0.0002884223,0.00005953865,0.00002322739,0.00007558142,0.0000333414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001579643,0.0004673461,0.9411347,0.00001910466,0.0003163152,8.42822e-7,0.001267808,0.00001074712,0.004710431,0.03007282,0.005646225,0.0161957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001349932,0.00004371533,0.9839509,0.000007499159,0.00005462352,9.839766e-7,0.004080905,0.00006280678,0.001246982,0.0002969266,0.01005909,0.00006058509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904766,0.00006663096,0.002965895,0.0003372171,0.0000735048,0.0001531808,0.005824747,0.000007027431,0.00009519139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995049,0.00002036169,0.0001499834,0.0000181289,0.00001129641,0.000005507952,0.0002825478,7.829927e-8,0.000007167646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0428162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008814302","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12220","title":"Conservation opportunities across the world's anthromes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Biome; Biodiversity; Geography; IUCN Red List; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biodiversity hotspot; Conservation biology; Protected area; Ecosystem services; Biology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03497684774253346,"gpt":0.2509959924115737,"spread":0.2160191446690402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001465276,0.0000376887,0.00004128007,0.000004683393,0.003570476,0.00001290275,0.00006256611,0.00001736443,0.0002009791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003811505,0.00002909274,0.00001556565,0.00006567589,0.0006360151,0.0001041778,0.0005521363,0.00004142825,0.00003414056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001987765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001931183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001886094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004067101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997103,0.00003201846,0.00004208425,0.00007385886,0.00005006031,0.00009164618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997743,0.0001113467,0.00002387757,0.00005746105,0.00000801406,0.00002496675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000231924,0.00001707957,0.9415405,0.000001310323,0.000007600562,4.178854e-7,0.0007873419,0.00001815401,0.000003896844,0.05267746,0.004368017,0.0005758933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009008477,0.000009369847,0.9734756,0.000001254563,0.00001116307,9.510236e-7,0.001020832,0.0008618888,0.000006448623,0.003809592,0.02067041,0.00004237192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982422,0.00001493017,0.002566372,0.006951479,0.00005578012,0.00004412735,0.00007738212,0.00001980969,0.007848098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978476,0.00004511808,0.00002964198,0.0005371675,0.00000634553,0.000001902149,0.00002811175,6.122168e-7,0.001503467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04886787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145947806","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12130","title":"Ontario freshwater fishes demonstrate differing range‐boundary shifts in a warming climate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Biological dispersal; Ecology; Ecosystem; Climate change; Niche; Species distribution; Ecological niche; Global warming; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02259232130686416,"gpt":0.2000697293517017,"spread":0.1774774080448375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009622947,0.0001248007,0.0001224041,0.00002509344,0.001179014,0.0001100079,0.0001369683,0.00007130696,0.04499996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001450586,0.0001225661,0.00005051346,0.0001355489,0.0002633066,0.0004845935,0.001106239,0.0001439917,0.0007783294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006111971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006545578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03815404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1768191,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.00002462293,0.000135818,0.0002468275,0.0001484694,0.0003779258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.00002387362,0.00003426109,0.00011724,0.000009943814,0.0001417147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008828953,0.00006588747,0.9971009,0.000005564434,0.000004240927,0.00000993924,0.0007941771,0.000002587966,0.0001592058,0.0002918602,0.001228218,0.0003286159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004070303,0.00001440851,0.9911364,0.000008909463,0.0000105687,0.000003321196,0.0008238196,0.0000724349,0.00006614249,0.0003772966,0.006924817,0.0001548374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903933,0.000018871,0.00008304022,0.0003399429,0.00008835868,0.0001584055,0.0004471622,0.00003772346,0.008433225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999341,0.00004078873,0.00003937895,0.0001024879,0.000006950332,0.00001414107,0.000221198,0.000002853564,0.0002312592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.138665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160376427","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00123.x","title":"The ones we left behind: Comparing plot sampling and floristic habitat sampling for estimating bryophyte diversity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Bryophyte; Ecology; Floristics; Sampling (signal processing); Ordination; Habitat; Species diversity; Forest ecology; Geography; Gamma diversity; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Biology; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0720751626970954,"gpt":0.2540298437137258,"spread":0.1819546810166304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001637957,0.0001103319,0.0001453619,0.00000542804,0.01339644,0.00009065176,0.0001363296,0.00004720259,0.000005947949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008418139,0.00004891747,0.00006859719,0.00004411051,0.0001798631,0.0001216872,0.001429767,0.00009943639,0.000001937485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003359001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002747377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004391867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004000444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993014,0.0000171826,0.0001095014,0.0002133446,0.00009714406,0.0002613949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.0005355366,0.00005839797,0.00003493414,0.0000642699,0.00009007923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195403,0.0001338986,0.9009372,0.00006259912,0.0001376978,0.000001225497,0.002595198,0.0002567282,0.0003124448,0.003985252,0.001866044,0.08959219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002619059,0.00008902596,0.9635006,0.0000397277,0.00009713235,0.000005202957,0.002242203,0.005155097,0.000008523682,0.00204848,0.026331,0.0002211273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918486,0.0005692846,0.003939537,0.002405779,0.0005371792,0.0001679676,0.0004234941,0.00004911665,0.00005898226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971256,0.0002905444,0.001807704,0.00003482696,0.0006345182,0.000002224138,0.00006412595,5.084474e-7,0.00003990431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08937106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028990296","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12030","title":"The challenge of understanding the origin, pathways and extent of fungal invasions: global populations of the <i>Neofusicoccum parvum–N. ribis</i> species complex","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria; University of Pretoria","keywords":"Geography; Population; Ecology; Biology; Host (biology); Genetic diversity; Distribution (mathematics); Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1068878728971276,"gpt":0.2406743277168879,"spread":0.1337864548197604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007571928,0.00006836914,0.00008727935,0.000005897334,0.001030414,0.00001237446,0.0001449775,0.00004010493,0.000009397188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006587843,0.00003844432,0.00007520644,0.00007393417,0.0004639004,0.000006540307,0.0005340172,0.00003595958,2.449485e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001221995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002471779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001193863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001472277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995179,0.00005042692,0.0001246287,0.000102867,0.0001018961,0.0001022553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995569,0.00004018602,0.00009865081,0.000185343,0.00007781985,0.00004111905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004864438,0.0001869546,0.6092644,0.00004268494,0.0001065518,6.153656e-7,0.0002019311,0.00001919974,0.06350318,0.3225841,0.003866087,0.0001756025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000237378,0.00006117148,0.9882531,0.00001969044,0.00008904211,0.000003882624,0.002162604,0.00005635528,0.0008603695,0.007104889,0.001081443,0.00007005213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987262,0.00107485,0.001089484,0.0005392656,0.0000536037,0.0001898866,0.00917538,0.00000265302,0.0006129228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991076,0.000673095,0.00001398484,0.00002267173,0.0000139901,0.000002547627,0.0001525334,0.000001168582,0.0000124197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3789887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7925218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258469095","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12400","title":"Use of expert knowledge to elicit population trends for the koala (<i>Phascolarctos cinereus</i>)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"","keywords":"Phascolarctos cinereus; Bioregion; Population; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Population size; Marsupial; Wildlife; Biology; Estimation; Demography; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04416711155499416,"gpt":0.2550919167658682,"spread":0.210924805210874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007771527,0.00004501388,0.00005332863,0.00001582944,0.0007723997,0.000005801582,0.00007887308,0.0000371762,0.0002187002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009798196,0.00002906522,0.00003260161,0.0001221822,0.00008360158,0.0001824613,0.0002901825,0.00001738127,0.00001626428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004604131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002592312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006506069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007286952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996653,0.00001947726,0.00006778955,0.0001077623,0.00004851985,0.00009114226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996208,0.000196812,0.00002813153,0.00009764951,0.00001401807,0.00004256486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003057655,0.00004834345,0.9734476,8.280159e-7,0.00000823264,7.279018e-8,0.00025459,0.000009450006,0.0004888747,0.002080866,0.01599159,0.007638988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002069119,0.00003557927,0.9817038,0.000003939692,0.00001932932,3.592933e-7,0.00002899054,0.00008594441,0.0001396847,0.0002170722,0.01751299,0.00004543087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801719,0.00001198326,0.01574639,0.003503097,0.00006019567,0.000119746,0.0002789454,0.00001140804,0.0000963025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989796,0.00001080342,0.0001245848,0.0001993882,0.00001518987,0.00001289471,0.00003644795,0.000001203736,0.0006199045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01880765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5940753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130900723","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00472.x","title":"Combined modelling of distribution and niche in invasion biology: a case study of two invasive <i>Tetramorium</i> ant species","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität für Bodenkultur Wien","keywords":"Niche; Environmental niche modelling; Ecological niche; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Invasive species; Biology; Species distribution; Macroecology; Biogeography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05095516354796907,"gpt":0.2512937353755003,"spread":0.2003385718275312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000928454,0.00008019575,0.0001515501,0.00003064725,0.0004752809,0.000001951244,0.00004932412,0.00009151114,0.000003132551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003098398,0.00007853039,0.00003062287,0.00009198676,0.0002576757,0.000007860651,0.0004032437,0.00007451729,1.300935e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009163615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000249582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007480662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005540206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994842,0.00005412072,0.0001478668,0.0001679671,0.00003660673,0.0001092864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997075,0.00002743948,0.00006747725,0.00009420329,0.00006661576,0.00003680233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001008652,0.0007465057,0.9648398,0.00001289684,0.00001992822,0.0001076359,0.00089313,0.00006225661,0.0328196,0.000341279,0.00002950269,0.00002666111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0105957,0.004732179,0.7775774,0.0000420585,0.0003238248,0.0007474797,0.0123275,0.0005381166,0.1917267,0.0007575572,0.00004564436,0.0005858167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998063,0.0001013355,0.001161301,0.00001193296,0.00003216051,0.0001669134,0.0004477299,0.000003258395,0.00001237267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992709,0.0002234689,0.00002700016,0.000006671713,0.000009882219,0.000003348881,0.0004475259,0.00000152465,0.000009718133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1872623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3655524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900852816","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00451.x","title":"Predicting the number of ecologically harmful exotic species in an aquatic system","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Introduced species; Invasive species; Global biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03476467227730041,"gpt":0.2372529883612292,"spread":0.2024883160839288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004144838,0.00004888509,0.00007666628,0.000008268732,0.0007111553,0.000005939424,0.0001211175,0.0000555348,0.001198776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004541912,0.00003585623,0.00001997071,0.000120305,0.0003380986,0.0001153036,0.0003628073,0.00008310586,0.0001077937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009892164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004400626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003403108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001727136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994906,0.00004886077,0.0001184422,0.0001061877,0.00009141309,0.0001445443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997168,0.0001052038,0.00004706991,0.00008130594,0.000005595411,0.00004402432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007077238,0.00009514685,0.9955789,0.000003420973,0.0000021858,0.00001363589,0.0005949658,0.00001118528,0.00006348432,0.003500331,0.00005456544,0.00007505011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001408476,0.00002645657,0.9950556,0.000004329868,0.00002681604,0.000008919638,0.00353078,0.0007907399,0.00006478769,0.0002934319,0.00001483997,0.00004242863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954942,0.00000169766,0.001036922,0.00006689202,0.00004862663,0.0001030151,0.00002908304,0.0000129739,0.003206603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997853,0.000001126832,0.00007657886,0.00002715531,0.000006725626,0.000001313545,0.00001459305,7.998687e-7,0.00008637906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004291142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977149118","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00560.x","title":"Phylogenetic relatedness and plant invader success across two spatial scales","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Ecology; Herbarium; Occupancy; Phylogenetics; Invasive species; Introduced species","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01188284591487568,"gpt":0.2345279138678064,"spread":0.2226450679529308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005778726,0.000058883,0.00006630031,0.00000655817,0.001934864,0.00001413941,0.00005546605,0.00004334377,0.00004632774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001491481,0.00005709638,0.00001350165,0.0000587289,0.0003445011,0.00008864447,0.0004267263,0.00006266525,0.00001759838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002244635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001490532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003544005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002432221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995936,0.00001821586,0.00005433371,0.0001442013,0.00005490304,0.0001347756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998404,0.00002792039,0.0000228322,0.00004720686,0.000005867629,0.00005573148],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008917511,0.00004129683,0.9966822,0.000001477201,0.00000712748,0.000005051947,0.000654569,0.00007589437,0.00004334503,0.001575848,0.00008856494,0.000815747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003044064,0.00002527454,0.9959649,0.000002142529,0.00001627776,0.000006106471,0.0001632768,0.0006910464,0.00002568516,0.002634787,0.00009172381,0.0000744027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972363,0.00006297409,0.001396053,0.0004405288,0.00003612694,0.00005443999,0.0002673806,0.00001570326,0.0004905048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996478,0.00007700839,0.00003428201,0.0001089447,0.000006225496,9.208551e-7,0.00006581085,6.818669e-7,0.00005834539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002411492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287528554","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12427","title":"Metabarcoding reveals strong spatial structure and temporal turnover of zooplankton communities among marine and freshwater ports","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Abbott Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental DNA; Taxonomic rank; Ecology; Zooplankton; Arctic; Habitat; Beta diversity; Identification (biology); Biology; Geography; Taxon","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01413086218914672,"gpt":0.190874787915035,"spread":0.1767439257258882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006830101,0.0001036439,0.0001360452,0.00001856062,0.0008936067,0.00001188996,0.00007405464,0.0000478442,0.0006944644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001043409,0.00007891697,0.00002135923,0.00003135856,0.001119497,0.0002657707,0.002946435,0.00006096035,0.000002184529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004681223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.464757e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007470999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003500207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994683,0.0000316399,0.00008807929,0.0001415602,0.0001320286,0.000138384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997196,0.0000435139,0.00005921182,0.0000998013,0.000004580135,0.00007335479],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001195847,0.00001581263,0.9977963,0.000008222116,0.00002417629,0.0000030702,0.0005332369,6.135951e-7,0.0008143802,0.0001107946,0.0002804882,0.0004009561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003401571,0.00003243063,0.9974533,0.00001361759,0.00005698615,0.000004203496,0.0006473387,0.000007832144,0.0007448734,0.0003385579,0.0002558269,0.000104854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968949,0.00002970266,0.000191495,0.00009907104,0.00002487888,0.000087049,0.0025106,0.000009973312,0.0001523077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993781,0.0001055354,0.0003112137,0.00001253282,0.000005732321,4.948149e-7,0.00009223025,0.000001785649,0.0000923519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003970792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140376690","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00703.x","title":"A hitchhiker’s guide to the Maritimes: anthropogenic transport facilitates long‐distance dispersal of an invasive marine crab to Newfoundland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Bay; Biological dispersal; Carcinus maenas; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Oceanography; Biology; Population; Crustacean; Decapoda; Archaeology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009054486574263653,"gpt":0.2263307657910364,"spread":0.2172762792167727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001523949,0.0001184605,0.0001400939,0.00002266292,0.001188712,0.00001459009,0.0003142372,0.00006196449,0.004906473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001495482,0.00009709982,0.00005696254,0.0002063883,0.0006257354,0.0002151619,0.0009371494,0.0001398614,0.0001017165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005976399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002008508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01268421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2843879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999168,0.00002850578,0.0001429608,0.0002802993,0.0001514443,0.0002287603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.00008027505,0.00003460461,0.0002643355,0.00003134106,0.0002059041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005808448,0.0001182539,0.991692,0.00000625372,0.000017275,0.00001101312,0.001064106,0.00004821942,0.0006986674,0.002569633,0.003292956,0.0004235239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002125263,0.0001312798,0.9710253,0.000002649459,0.00003392096,0.000007689629,0.0006362164,0.00002035361,0.000265463,0.0003253711,0.02721294,0.0001262761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908703,0.000005884018,0.002425013,0.001940487,0.000122191,0.0002616366,0.001050509,0.00001830042,0.003305711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977419,0.00001818924,0.0003683289,0.0002773977,0.00002311259,0.000008123679,0.000191901,0.000002694455,0.001368345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2717037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465954948","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12465","title":"Early detection of aquatic invaders using metabarcoding reveals a high number of non‐indigenous species in <scp>C</scp>anadian ports","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operational taxonomic unit; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Environmental DNA; DNA barcoding; Biodiversity; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Phylogenetics; Zooplankton; Taxonomic rank; Global biodiversity; Evolutionary biology; Taxon; 16S ribosomal RNA; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02153376306559547,"gpt":0.2069678912672623,"spread":0.1854341282016668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001294262,0.0000946066,0.0001705584,0.00004742002,0.0005469508,0.000005121531,0.0001077037,0.00005484449,0.00008610098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000922983,0.000087455,0.00005160671,0.0002019906,0.0005455388,0.0002552977,0.0006229253,0.00004950606,0.00002548841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003027571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009070426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006572735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992335,0.00003368149,0.0001521356,0.0001858015,0.0001892679,0.0002056225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995949,0.0001094065,0.000116729,0.0001086585,0.000005307825,0.00006499499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002806837,0.00005162823,0.9666173,0.00000826591,0.00002098116,0.000005483316,0.002185876,0.000009314184,0.03089586,0.00003512346,0.00003275268,0.0001345981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002904193,0.00002744509,0.9873526,0.0000228786,0.00005549233,0.000002672362,0.001896474,0.000006243479,0.00999262,0.0002570428,0.0000446836,0.00005147646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980602,0.00001671785,0.001110801,0.00002978222,0.00003586526,0.0001443636,0.0003506555,0.000006158215,0.0002454085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993851,0.00006118556,0.0004326698,0.000009511728,0.000003686534,8.982419e-7,0.000007036001,0.000002173429,0.00009772237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02090324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083956291","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12142","title":"Seamount benthos in a cobalt‐rich crust region of the central <scp>P</scp>acific: conservation challenges for future seabed mining","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Marine Biology and Ecology Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Seamount; Benthos; Benthic zone; Fauna; Geology; Crust; Range (aeronautics); Species richness; Oceanography; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Paleontology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03907391619360163,"gpt":0.2178731132715517,"spread":0.1787991970779501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001545248,0.00005796435,0.00009439879,0.00002861565,0.0007272204,0.00001059556,0.0001247809,0.0001115129,0.00007107089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001644416,0.0000436155,0.00003269905,0.0001145793,0.0001658252,0.0001134643,0.00009052211,0.00008967533,0.000004343075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008081346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003101699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00144784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004612545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994084,0.00007820605,0.00008637527,0.0001349068,0.00006422237,0.0002279169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994597,0.0002869214,0.00004699271,0.00007840084,0.00006899671,0.00005898013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001206983,0.00002417198,0.9950107,0.00002256131,0.00001073986,8.077755e-7,0.0008437513,0.000008370605,0.000001850659,0.00105459,0.002343583,0.0006668459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002752014,0.00005190308,0.9903171,0.000005808951,0.00001027423,0.000003434649,0.005512422,0.001012902,0.00001072259,0.0005006265,0.002274511,0.00002508361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959979,0.0002941061,0.00003673172,0.002434646,0.0001380095,0.0003002333,0.000251607,0.000007052357,0.0005397054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991686,0.0002799263,0.00002387606,0.00005957577,0.00003289026,0.00000337987,0.0002943848,4.661149e-7,0.000136837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004693548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5593265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150461836","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12391","title":"Predicting invasiveness of species in trade: climate match, trophic guild and fecundity influence establishment and impact of non‐native freshwater fishes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","keywords":"Guild; Invasive species; Ecology; Introduced species; Trophic level; Biology; Fecundity; Freshwater fish; Range (aeronautics); Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0195983405457476,"gpt":0.2276869002127924,"spread":0.2080885596670448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001624756,0.00006825621,0.000135978,0.00002722231,0.0002989088,0.000008140282,0.00006125632,0.00003355812,0.00002857674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000737585,0.00006042405,0.00001661566,0.00009867185,0.0005532421,0.0002931326,0.001112886,0.00005082863,4.336392e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006466029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000431627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001521126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003161132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995311,0.00002826472,0.0001003909,0.0001323426,0.00008253652,0.0001252971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997723,0.00004911351,0.0000626113,0.00005602851,0.00001011109,0.00004985278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003101832,0.00006106884,0.9966581,0.00002568338,0.00002011787,0.000003097869,0.002337066,0.0002034606,0.00005235531,0.00009931883,0.0004933254,0.00001531226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004624842,0.0001036007,0.9968557,0.00001630851,0.00002964961,9.789753e-7,0.001715218,0.0001264637,0.0001262819,0.0004844044,0.00002372314,0.00005523405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986659,0.0000169052,0.00002970244,0.0001894462,0.00001350643,0.0001196724,0.0005705145,0.000004533474,0.0003898698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.0001814406,0.00003917581,0.0000145409,0.000001969484,0.000002406588,0.00002058847,8.601218e-7,0.000006730363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001640005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2464021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131196113","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00351.x","title":"Expansion pathways of the exotic common reed (<i>Phragmites australis</i>): a historical and genetic analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Phragmites; Introduced species; Invasive species; Biology; Dominance (genetics); Ecology; Marsh; Wetland","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01757354496349899,"gpt":0.1873974961472718,"spread":0.1698239511837728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001127772,0.00006122985,0.0001136305,0.00002440746,0.0006446285,0.000007633299,0.00009895702,0.0000439083,0.00004695339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001987342,0.00004856153,0.00006355718,0.0003589898,0.0001237162,0.00005331622,0.0008961265,0.00005583888,0.00000238758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001738833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002288186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002891588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006237412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994586,0.00002472383,0.0001142555,0.0001353647,0.0001416485,0.0001254477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996636,0.00005013818,0.00005453519,0.0001441187,0.000006954398,0.00008069193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008402943,0.00004272602,0.9981477,0.000005724019,0.00001889192,0.000005446387,0.0002163543,0.0001172098,0.0008837288,0.0001322889,0.0001603738,0.0002611514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001147134,0.00001780912,0.9982575,0.000003039087,0.0002026159,0.000007305578,0.0001189508,0.0007336265,0.00008329916,0.0002454301,0.000156918,0.00005885013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973546,0.00002342651,0.002086227,0.0001043737,0.00003386232,0.00006839031,0.0001636469,0.000009123292,0.0001564065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998124,0.00001280784,0.00006966847,0.00001317055,0.000004008301,3.796481e-7,0.00002212354,0.000001133619,0.00006434091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003345825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4958026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900510493","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00640.x","title":"Range size, taxon age and hotspots of neoendemism in the California flora","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, India; California Department of Parks and Recreation","keywords":"Endemism; Ecology; Taxon; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Species richness; Flora (microbiology); Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00998499249514237,"gpt":0.205966019869657,"spread":0.1959810273745147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001335342,0.00003558159,0.00005200706,0.00000702436,0.0005636204,0.000003992659,0.00006102578,0.00003837445,0.00009406724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007412981,0.00002784684,0.00001242722,0.00007273642,0.0003661272,0.00004874511,0.0002784235,0.0000971179,0.000007497988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007671764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001431309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003197118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003596274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997377,0.00002103436,0.0000470999,0.00007512421,0.00004848988,0.00007051056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997967,0.0001060589,0.00002078712,0.0000517167,0.000003644308,0.00002112263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004673274,0.00003399029,0.9959018,0.000002374022,0.000002904568,0.000005671524,0.000955622,0.000004034449,0.0001495791,0.002528116,0.0002845778,0.0001266187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001835242,0.000009065375,0.9965301,9.171802e-7,0.00001076891,0.000002194933,0.0003282148,0.0001026725,0.000005813865,0.001960493,0.0008346989,0.0000315584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974769,0.00001438515,0.0001131736,0.0005819495,0.00002712204,0.00006033346,0.0001890402,0.000003784938,0.001533351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997513,0.00003686026,0.00007394164,0.00008937249,0.000002907236,0.000001982895,0.00001035642,4.368741e-7,0.00003288272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003276562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4334969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937635027","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00361.x","title":"Algal communities in human‐impacted stream ecosystems suffer beta‐diversity decline","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"New York State Department of Environmental Conservation","keywords":"Species richness; Beta diversity; Ecology; Environmental science; Biota; Periphyton; Alpha diversity; Ecosystem; Gamma diversity; Biodiversity; Algae; Species diversity; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02471350411640918,"gpt":0.2241826900739168,"spread":0.1994691859575076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004479444,0.000135109,0.0001780609,0.00007249072,0.003521825,0.00002826794,0.0003337006,0.000134045,0.002618132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001335836,0.0001491698,0.00005719644,0.0002241736,0.000444999,0.0003712223,0.006079347,0.0002097423,0.0001417196],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002841228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005100879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04601902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1808507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989799,0.00007775674,0.000152356,0.0001911513,0.0001823999,0.0004164472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994926,0.00007720859,0.00005282793,0.0001750813,0.00001651056,0.0001857326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004143231,0.0001934393,0.9924231,0.00000694004,0.00001727053,0.00004253037,0.002356147,0.00003839408,0.00008096432,0.0009533873,0.00377217,0.00007422012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009405913,0.00009025176,0.9907399,0.000007265792,0.00003811944,0.000007841916,0.003926723,0.0002849703,0.0002804929,0.0007455566,0.002734317,0.0002039378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954002,0.00001433942,0.0004893281,0.0001716664,0.00009091898,0.0001296321,0.0006316889,0.00004813255,0.003024091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989482,0.00001587895,0.0000338652,0.0001921521,0.0000126224,5.282057e-7,0.0006414545,0.000002463411,0.0001528827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1348316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133738736","doi":"10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00119.x","title":"Present day risk of extinction may exacerbate the lower species richness of dioecious clades","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Dioecy; Threatened species; IUCN Red List; Species richness; Ecology; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03712876558050371,"gpt":0.1983586080202732,"spread":0.1612298424397695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009785279,0.00005029116,0.00008542022,0.000003317204,0.0009160592,0.000007981748,0.00008920057,0.00002736684,0.0001015812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002939301,0.00001735837,0.00005277205,0.00009786379,0.0001818986,0.0000584945,0.0002911182,0.00004435864,0.000003032446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007952234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001076403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002140255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000580932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996315,0.0000345821,0.00007479981,0.0000803487,0.00009309089,0.00008562619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997125,0.0001369458,0.00006658169,0.00001595615,0.00004550803,0.00002255944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005316991,0.0002378163,0.982076,0.000005669428,0.0000509736,8.286424e-7,0.000391342,0.00001188089,0.006991972,0.002121162,0.002543932,0.005515232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005769966,0.00006447612,0.9652393,0.000004514075,0.00003930004,6.62195e-7,0.0006673101,0.00001492241,0.001024055,0.0001383669,0.03270724,0.00004215883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966451,0.0003019942,0.00002402325,0.0008700471,0.00002353765,0.00005482802,0.001194303,0.00001024797,0.0008759238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990442,0.0006175539,0.000003761406,0.000006355325,0.00007428385,8.138973e-7,0.00003226014,9.416527e-8,0.0002206999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0301633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.704568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094851011","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12185","title":"Isolated with persistence or dynamically connected? Genetic patterns in a common granite outcrop endemic","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Outcrop; Biology; Phylogeography; Endemism; Genetic diversity; Range (aeronautics); Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Paleontology; Population; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01200493290535867,"gpt":0.1986188934569827,"spread":0.186613960551624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006479784,0.00007669101,0.0001049766,0.00001902282,0.0008124611,0.000008936971,0.00009530123,0.00005144453,0.0001438266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002643127,0.00006354302,0.00001727408,0.0001375892,0.0002528547,0.00007486842,0.0003700489,0.0001023658,0.00002530341],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007201524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004030564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000460645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02074351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994637,0.00005207624,0.00008275493,0.0001769746,0.00006760726,0.0001568982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999737,0.00008474874,0.00003476472,0.00007937899,0.000009956663,0.00005416363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004246733,0.0000528434,0.9983701,0.000004711038,0.000009790851,0.000009359729,0.0006195128,0.0002382359,0.00001772881,0.0004155365,0.00001228517,0.0002074779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004515645,0.0001179903,0.9778672,0.000008852106,0.00002749934,0.00001062941,0.0003270431,0.0206529,0.000001097767,0.0003969073,0.000041408,0.00009690751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804265,0.000006250793,0.0187252,0.0002540043,0.00001792537,0.00008584693,0.0001044791,0.00002140657,0.0003583592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995869,0.00002639035,0.0001319046,0.0001250473,0.000002143456,0.000003566987,0.00005074876,0.000001738774,0.00007151483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014598932","doi":"10.1111/j.1472-4642.2006.00299.x","title":"Body size, rarity, and phylogenetic community structure: insights from diving beetle assemblages of Alberta","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Dytiscidae; Phylogenetic tree; Supertree; Ecology; Biology; Community; Community structure; Biodiversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Generalist and specialist species; Ecosystem; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009724953106011808,"gpt":0.1877345785536306,"spread":0.1780096254476188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003335211,0.0001076771,0.0001328131,0.0000110422,0.002056252,0.00001542274,0.0001577752,0.00006280097,0.0001775531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004281217,0.0001110003,0.00002966837,0.00007966354,0.000699516,0.0001329989,0.00311859,0.0001181259,0.00000971626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006146302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.407558e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05786584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005364666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993992,0.00007386129,0.00008904209,0.0001681642,0.0001475302,0.0001221427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994898,0.0002409658,0.00005504317,0.0001524324,0.00000482581,0.00005685926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005000618,0.0001015096,0.9853752,0.000005119698,0.00001864406,0.000001241581,0.0006079612,0.00001260608,0.01317356,0.000183977,0.0004760932,0.00003905629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002661647,0.00003008433,0.991176,0.000005104328,0.0000678459,7.697614e-7,0.0004458752,0.00001497862,0.00328943,0.004413432,0.00017472,0.000115575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979748,0.000131852,0.00005865466,0.00006429412,0.00002605383,0.00008160427,0.0007763765,0.000009910611,0.000876431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994276,0.00004558773,0.0003049863,0.00002431475,0.00000708004,4.660505e-7,0.0001393847,0.000001791123,0.00004884374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05250117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473766486","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12456","title":"Microclimate predicts within‐season distribution dynamics of montane forest birds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; Division of Environmental Biology; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Oregon State University; U.S. Department of the Interior; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Microclimate; Occupancy; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Biodiversity; Habitat; Spatial ecology; Range (aeronautics); Spatial distribution; Montane ecology; Species distribution; Geography; Spatial variability; Physical geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0161636966166969,"gpt":0.2046058485530931,"spread":0.1884421519363962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000136557,0.0001314679,0.0001472072,0.00001598969,0.0008039447,0.00001571435,0.0001737284,0.00009389425,0.003423217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008874893,0.0001034282,0.00007223614,0.0002217601,0.0005302269,0.000259968,0.000988931,0.00005795669,0.0001435373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006306052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007960211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005077547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001528187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990352,0.0000266291,0.0001779888,0.0002500303,0.0002421035,0.0002680206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994448,0.00004211899,0.0001170549,0.0001852666,0.00003870537,0.0001719998],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005651724,0.0001584816,0.9559439,0.00001431523,0.00001723079,0.000005374091,0.0001254736,0.000004189506,0.001645725,0.03749275,0.003933799,0.0006022131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008113383,0.00008531161,0.9921879,0.00002763139,0.00006539971,0.00001346605,0.0007466774,0.0002369247,0.00139681,0.001206177,0.003027284,0.0001950537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746404,0.00002533623,0.00779587,0.0008977696,0.00009854967,0.0001322222,0.01477847,0.00006437533,0.001566983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981313,0.0001483053,0.00002031174,0.00002345047,0.00000904901,0.00000428499,0.001484039,0.000004092022,0.0001752195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03628657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913960938","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12897","title":"Projected 21st‐century distribution of canopy‐forming seaweeds in the Northwest Atlantic with climate change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada); Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Intertidal zone; Fucales; Climate change; Ecology; Species distribution; Oceanography; Fucus vesiculosus; Environmental science; Biology; Algae; Geology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01490199929360305,"gpt":0.1836787302145396,"spread":0.1687767309209366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001088912,0.00006980208,0.0001016606,0.00002776023,0.0003306234,0.00001255298,0.0001058283,0.00004113289,0.00008301087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006730007,0.00004452669,0.00002004071,0.0002447921,0.00007431387,0.0001433884,0.00007902261,0.00008612885,0.00001083542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004028407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001489964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06941333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05937015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994738,0.00003820676,0.00007991171,0.0001189786,0.00009738487,0.0001917208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997579,0.0000544583,0.00004629177,0.00008153089,0.00002703747,0.00003272391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005713472,0.00002111748,0.9949654,0.00002513139,0.000005624335,0.000005892514,0.0003270858,0.000003709907,0.000001888286,0.001542057,0.000009311506,0.003035623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002437412,0.0001301336,0.9956216,0.00001657736,0.00001990698,0.00001903381,0.00151828,0.0001855694,0.000003550533,0.00002311797,0.002149289,0.00006924908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941959,0.00005176418,0.0000105196,0.0001116372,0.00003696745,0.0002220173,0.003250699,0.000009372346,0.002111148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991905,0.0002149619,0.000004067468,0.0000354423,0.00001309811,8.745851e-7,0.0078163,4.15098e-7,0.000009810392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01004319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9577939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787385086","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12712","title":"Both rare and common species make unique contributions to functional diversity in an ecosystem unaffected by human activities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biology; Species richness; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Metacommunity; Rare species; Species diversity; Null model; Common species; Abundance (ecology); Gamma diversity; Macroecology; Habitat; Beta diversity; Population; Biological dispersal","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02054279416770301,"gpt":0.2379278106571822,"spread":0.2173850164894792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001444234,0.00009464466,0.0001392613,0.00003310396,0.0052473,0.00001898057,0.0001413558,0.0001029878,0.0007751163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001965552,0.0001053998,0.00002055634,0.000145254,0.0004870314,0.0001871482,0.002331967,0.0001580382,0.00001891489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001818848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005999315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002509993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07147362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992551,0.0002313525,0.00007560634,0.0001886344,0.00005801548,0.0001912491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999616,0.00008155355,0.00003133615,0.0001320392,0.00001737718,0.0001216481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008230353,0.000216336,0.9661677,0.00000505223,0.00001449823,0.000002832368,0.001388298,0.000008256493,0.01112387,0.005093874,0.01585888,0.00003810352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003883336,0.0002107048,0.992677,0.000005775277,0.00001743852,0.000003781733,0.0006073778,0.00002528646,0.0005249556,0.0009999902,0.004409079,0.0001303261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945716,0.000005261671,0.0004143667,0.0002618617,0.00004845794,0.0001596718,0.003829985,0.00003810556,0.0006706468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987568,0.000004624802,0.000009752808,0.0001499216,0.00001640165,0.000002640156,0.0009400041,0.000001568601,0.0001183242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06896363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798118092","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12753","title":"Species’ thermal ranges predict changes in reef fish community structure during 8 years of extreme temperature variation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Government of Western Australia","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Species distribution; Range (aeronautics); Relative species abundance; Climate change; Trophic level; Latitude; Coral reef fish; Ecological niche; Ectotherm; Effects of global warming on oceans; Reef; Environmental niche modelling; Niche; Environmental science; Global warming; Ecosystem; Occupancy; Habitat; Biology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01834988914954767,"gpt":0.1848742622906561,"spread":0.1665243731411084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007345221,0.00005093854,0.00008068897,0.00001599967,0.000669267,0.00000719778,0.00008778954,0.00004092733,0.0002944712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003142421,0.00004948385,0.00001464322,0.0001244243,0.0001551826,0.00008983363,0.00097603,0.00009901797,0.000002342789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004260278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001819592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002085312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01767534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996376,0.00004791339,0.00005435804,0.00008212312,0.00008468691,0.00009328564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998175,0.00002028047,0.00003285747,0.00009182849,0.00001187125,0.00002568008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003121479,0.00005366351,0.9688454,0.00001796534,0.00001169503,0.000001895768,0.006399829,0.000002239037,0.02389838,0.00007940888,0.0004171238,0.0002412167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002345632,0.00003456662,0.9974901,0.00001090758,0.00001048474,0.000001013877,0.0007806476,0.00001022163,0.0009872424,0.00009679801,0.0002926576,0.00005077519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984779,0.000007867801,0.000005021946,0.0002376884,0.00005596841,0.00007552488,0.0006525631,0.00001163147,0.000475803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997559,0.00001795544,0.00001130552,0.00001367175,0.00003245778,9.33787e-7,0.00005134143,0.000001047826,0.0001154372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02864475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552354358","doi":"10.1111/ddi.12508","title":"Assessing the effectiveness of China's protected areas to conserve current and future amphibian diversity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diversity and Distributions","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; China Scholarship Council; Sociedad Española de Nefrología","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Protected area; Geography; Amphibian; Endemism; Range (aeronautics); Global biodiversity; Species diversity; Species distribution; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02637829729945251,"gpt":0.2553644952097969,"spread":0.2289861979103444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002755717,0.00008878742,0.0001022576,0.00001397268,0.001887211,0.00002910152,0.00013174,0.00004047038,0.001013753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007534138,0.00005654538,0.00003802186,0.0001905163,0.0003832344,0.0002066996,0.002228853,0.00005890753,0.0000209333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000512407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003902235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001042064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992952,0.0001315954,0.00006632221,0.0001949352,0.0001587922,0.0001532072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995892,0.00009616487,0.00004371095,0.000125183,0.00002389598,0.0001218689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005041233,0.00008458299,0.9904824,0.00002294663,0.00001125578,0.000001451897,0.0003089008,2.62059e-7,0.00135623,0.003992732,0.000631054,0.003057733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000378032,0.0000287951,0.9949623,0.00002882794,0.00002866531,0.000002992419,0.0007130083,0.000001687237,0.0005859626,0.0003367676,0.002844764,0.00008822879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955973,0.00004335475,0.001194446,0.001242422,0.00008218262,0.0002810938,0.0009474478,0.00002190096,0.0005898776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999842,0.00006459861,0.000006515751,0.00001938686,0.00001265734,0.00000497565,0.00004019928,0.000001398468,0.000008220268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00447983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}