{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":20,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":20,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"01faf2ac840f","filters":{"venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Yuval Sinai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.25700860748035,"gpt":0.3939149846991725,"spread":0.1369063772188225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007542265,0.0001423962,0.0004301477,0.0001528632,0.0003758909,0.0001210006,0.0005201025,0.00006276739,0.0006370611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001353351,0.0001230519,0.0001634475,0.0001948838,0.0005934883,0.001056131,0.00004986016,0.0003096375,0.00006700416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003266842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003624707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006595315,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981098,0.0002661495,0.0005767279,0.0001663172,0.0006697603,0.0002112884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967309,0.000240178,0.0007434255,0.00008099315,0.002044062,0.0001604109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159575,0.0001129556,0.0005525336,0.000002106219,0.0002331119,0.00002284219,0.1153116,0.00001019461,0.0001428561,0.881342,0.002080568,0.00002961073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007560106,0.0003076408,0.001952032,0.0002229368,0.00005144505,0.0000601739,0.1028922,0.00002353521,0.005838765,0.09310542,0.7944976,0.0002921686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08743487,0.0007261143,0.0004400399,0.001159226,0.001183446,0.0001341276,0.00001022274,0.00001994792,0.908892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971203,0.00006346333,0.0008681355,0.0002221189,0.000969458,0.000005122346,9.642333e-7,0.000006633129,0.000743796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6975372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594403803","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of the Pinochet Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Politics; Human rights; Jurisdiction; International law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Byers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02956073755263248,"gpt":0.3427954605210797,"spread":0.3132347229684472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004504847,0.0000740812,0.0001354312,0.00002362319,0.0008955397,0.0001157718,0.0004482732,0.00003155792,0.0004326515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001944272,0.00004066591,0.0001154757,0.00003274034,0.001177281,0.0002357417,0.0000283479,0.0001783908,0.000008449655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007769449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009566748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007762634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004284287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986832,0.0001892504,0.0003689993,0.00006300458,0.0005742209,0.0001212917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.000355287,0.0002899574,0.00007683749,0.0006463572,0.00006119213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003423251,0.00003667369,0.00004386379,8.324886e-7,0.00008418067,0.00002456327,0.003282634,0.00002555744,0.00002030127,0.9960021,0.0004041254,0.00004090591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002385197,0.0000387038,0.0003027944,0.00002898691,0.00001566012,0.0002848103,0.0003744762,0.00003359765,0.0005850578,0.2416197,0.7564288,0.00004886423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4532865,0.00009345962,0.000006701092,0.002349214,0.0003800012,0.00004943748,0.00001491079,0.000002008168,0.5438178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842299,0.0000293529,0.00006339746,0.0005791247,0.0005339266,0.000001039262,6.773893e-7,0.000003233394,0.01455938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7560247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6887858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524727478","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required Under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Letter of credit; Payment; Issuer; Position (finance); Commission; Constructive fraud; Business; Law; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Securities fraud; Accounting; Law and economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Supreme court; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Gao Xiang","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ross P. Buckley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0551072959462793,"gpt":0.3083150857105404,"spread":0.2532077897642611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007331905,0.0001742416,0.0007405984,0.0003372541,0.00007676028,0.00006880033,0.0007683137,0.00005294845,0.0004558412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008577606,0.0001084322,0.0004261002,0.0005855717,0.001023231,0.0006352466,0.00009003235,0.000265215,0.000004375179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009012343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006210122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002609454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007780261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974207,0.0001166747,0.001161366,0.0001428967,0.001014205,0.0001441508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960054,0.0003825908,0.001856624,0.000197776,0.001544008,0.00001365773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002856794,0.000216761,0.007243793,0.00001492357,0.001448362,0.000002278164,0.0004497579,0.01579802,0.0009807245,0.9714306,0.00212525,0.000003862212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005403453,0.0002794601,0.1367832,0.0007017747,0.001948351,0.00001582889,0.004614221,0.01074356,0.03596017,0.2198052,0.5831069,0.0006379149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5891076,0.0001933776,0.004784538,0.003262103,0.001244345,0.0002108994,0.0001122893,0.000004967225,0.4010799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976988,0.000007942761,0.0002535676,0.001530222,0.0003350863,0.000003085216,0.00001238434,0.000007060833,0.0001518856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7516254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4991141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528881838","doi":"","title":"Siting Foreign Law: How Derrida Can Help","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Judaism; Sociology; Law; Classics; History; Political science; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Pierre Legrand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09109940972700245,"gpt":0.3394804521501871,"spread":0.2483810424231846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833222,0.0001050858,0.000213218,0.00008408455,0.0003577719,0.0001445193,0.0003685601,0.0000520072,0.0005283276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003217905,0.00009436726,0.0001572433,0.00008286016,0.0002955758,0.0005959754,0.00003313413,0.0002106447,0.00001243219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001603127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001147223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001613462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004275211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998614,0.0001439074,0.0003214335,0.0001027572,0.0006331375,0.0001847829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983997,0.0001127064,0.0004731219,0.00006275198,0.0008129412,0.0001388141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005876473,0.00005881753,0.00123126,0.000001167785,0.00009894354,0.00001980118,0.01353233,0.000009011969,0.000219749,0.9838958,0.0006035467,0.0002707688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005029837,0.000165424,0.002875949,0.00006677405,0.00002920355,0.00003784363,0.007836765,0.00008399213,0.002953461,0.02393526,0.9613614,0.0001509255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1398115,0.0000774755,0.0007858932,0.002230014,0.0007426583,0.00007200667,0.00001003739,0.0000145987,0.8562558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963812,0.00002712665,0.0007397074,0.0005299064,0.0009967906,0.000001487573,0.000003229211,0.000006528292,0.00131401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5784817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512500917","doi":"","title":"Canada/United States Military Interoperability and Humanitarian Law Issues: Land Mines, Terrorism, Military Objectives and Targeted Killing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Terrorism; Law; Political science; Geneva Conventions; International law; Municipal law; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth Watkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02247084032529224,"gpt":0.3083153047281898,"spread":0.2858444644028976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006380925,0.000198334,0.0004028637,0.0001138169,0.0008099866,0.00002883562,0.000230479,0.00004961017,0.0001186586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008127854,0.0001657762,0.00006957931,0.000103236,0.0008921757,0.0006679922,0.0001022052,0.0002495293,0.000001167488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002280044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001559543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5780542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9510018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981238,0.0003696029,0.0005567822,0.0002224338,0.0005019429,0.0002253968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985115,0.0003887323,0.0001360855,0.00008744274,0.000709634,0.000166635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001423826,0.0005236205,0.0282292,0.0000639729,0.00167118,0.0001096631,0.378481,0.002015061,0.0002604891,0.5679502,0.01885512,0.0004166182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007032965,0.0002195335,0.01078157,0.0001041241,0.00004281317,0.00002580501,0.03982143,0.0008697764,0.0001422701,0.003996993,0.9430497,0.0002426696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550269,0.01463221,0.0000320077,0.007096152,0.0004443854,0.0001421008,0.0001150674,0.00001387901,0.02249734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959228,0.001210983,0.0006579631,0.001211906,0.0005376973,0.000003105678,0.00003018687,0.000007182442,0.0004181625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6760156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505551132","doi":"","title":"Class Actions: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Civil procedure; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Class (philosophy); State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Garry D. Watson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07552962021589309,"gpt":0.3288667592884061,"spread":0.253337139072513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001680729,0.00008970568,0.000117145,0.0001928318,0.0004277156,0.0004129527,0.0004085307,0.00002827968,0.001151765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002840965,0.00006284163,0.0001108279,0.000229635,0.000138069,0.001241819,0.0000323259,0.000208241,0.000245002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001776046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008043704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01067787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1387057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991121,0.00001322766,0.000285716,0.00007718301,0.0003696357,0.0001421935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988637,0.00004296104,0.0003052322,0.00008818311,0.0006689299,0.00003098224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002550892,0.00004331595,0.001179656,7.858456e-7,0.00005344616,0.00001181398,0.0001032053,0.0003406225,0.0000661312,0.9845815,0.0133616,0.0002323673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002159584,0.000006541915,0.006195536,0.000017687,0.00001489229,0.00007435479,0.0009096993,0.001865595,0.00002385139,0.001879685,0.9887258,0.00007037516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03897183,0.00005742499,0.0004925595,0.01177904,0.00140933,0.00005839622,0.000002503283,0.00001043501,0.9472185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927172,0.00001831321,0.00004000509,0.004139439,0.001243509,0.000006113374,0.000005078159,0.000005122961,0.001825205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9827018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566065845","doi":"","title":"HIV/AIDS and Blood Donation Policies: A Comparative Study of Public Health Policies and Individual Rights Norms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Public health; Donation; Health policy; Political science; Right to health; Economic growth; Public policy; Public administration; Health care; Medicine; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Francine A. Hochberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104416251881595,"gpt":0.3760002981467664,"spread":0.2715840462651714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008937817,0.0001549546,0.0004853771,0.0003655266,0.0004943797,0.0002033651,0.0003216827,0.00006496188,0.0001193649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003735968,0.0001167517,0.0000616823,0.0003034032,0.0006590745,0.0006273817,0.00006482819,0.0002727821,0.000003950881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007890538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006742904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001330376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001475022,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975455,0.0005116804,0.000667094,0.0001460635,0.0009045431,0.0002251573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978647,0.0003312861,0.00080484,0.00006688455,0.0007312706,0.000201043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002368451,0.0008572529,0.01208951,0.000003260855,0.000606665,0.000003461751,0.4949955,0.0000450875,0.0000275042,0.4905274,0.0006684223,0.0001522617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006642661,0.004685444,0.06805837,0.000300684,0.0002341033,0.0001315036,0.561177,0.0005239177,0.0005125038,0.009906874,0.3472559,0.0005710245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296797,0.001360656,0.00003231953,0.002943842,0.0002231836,0.0002204069,0.00001391889,0.00001074226,0.06551525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983721,0.0003063393,0.0002539751,0.000152081,0.0002603957,0.000003167321,0.000004651551,0.000004606967,0.0006426414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4806205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4760998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125255200","doi":"","title":"Shift Happens: Pressure on Foreign Attorney-Fee Paradigms From Class Actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liability; Civil procedure; Res judicata; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Rowe","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Rhidian Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05653539633804575,"gpt":0.2970454123421685,"spread":0.2405100160041227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000201629,0.0001976078,0.0002979103,0.0002261661,0.0002340435,0.000352482,0.00036601,0.00006754682,0.00182021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000542396,0.0001695985,0.0002451203,0.0001758831,0.0001033884,0.001330988,0.00003641584,0.0003494462,0.000466373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008651205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004643483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007729387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001565009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985067,0.00004071326,0.0005009142,0.0001854114,0.0005776625,0.0001886472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985835,0.0001368611,0.0006474016,0.0001521505,0.0004466105,0.00003349652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001214366,0.0002917323,0.0008166328,0.00000422275,0.000367097,0.000009558481,0.00004147728,0.001679789,0.0001418152,0.9804102,0.01605606,0.0000600065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008375344,0.00003345577,0.004110417,0.00007156686,0.00009621462,0.00001225513,0.0002366331,0.001323257,0.0002418933,0.01927192,0.9736002,0.0001646218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01600767,0.000111393,0.002509935,0.001757194,0.001510563,0.000114864,0.00003331629,0.00002844895,0.9779266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954339,0.00001340118,0.0001944114,0.001768565,0.001225581,0.000008359365,0.00003471153,0.00001533904,0.001305702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1501055903","doi":"","title":"Banking on Cooperation: The Role of the G-20 in Improving the International Financial Architecture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Corporate governance; Architecture; Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Global governance; Finance; Political science; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law","authors":[{"name":"Arie C. Eernisse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02439780466707629,"gpt":0.2470833049928548,"spread":0.2226855003257786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006957768,0.0001056406,0.0002073463,0.00009206795,0.0001328809,0.00006976196,0.0007069386,0.00004171453,0.0002052939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001682608,0.00006048555,0.0001667741,0.0001505183,0.0001298093,0.0002570478,0.00008181777,0.0003185275,0.00001933362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001262531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004860438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004211463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001306328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998868,0.00005006927,0.0006658339,0.00009114766,0.0001918627,0.0001330818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987599,0.0001494327,0.0007462387,0.0001352372,0.0001858861,0.00002329766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551506,0.0000811634,0.01721247,9.926806e-7,0.00003257014,3.256735e-7,0.001055749,0.004095582,0.0002742342,0.976192,0.0003789728,0.0006004475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005119231,0.00005628328,0.09787571,0.00005071619,0.000006418524,0.00002516047,0.0002150804,0.001751305,0.003046558,0.0489113,0.8474442,0.0001053879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7203236,0.001134872,0.001155488,0.007137929,0.002969357,0.0001983664,0.00008003593,0.000003698847,0.2669966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980337,0.00001164309,0.00008894129,0.0009788421,0.0006358995,0.000005083245,0.000003118725,0.000005179629,0.0002375822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2466529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130157079","doi":"","title":"Foreword: Debates Over Group Litigation in Comparative Perspective: What Can We Learn From Each Other","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Enforcement; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Rowe","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Y. Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05096546427562636,"gpt":0.2880559885885263,"spread":0.2370905243128999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004841697,0.0002001916,0.0008005514,0.0003229972,0.0000959941,0.0002581968,0.000406104,0.0001011325,0.0009604893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002483773,0.000237428,0.0002252344,0.0001545473,0.0002565561,0.001555121,0.00004278915,0.0003321547,0.0001503316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007708747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003496103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004006513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00643284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979852,0.00008126,0.001257256,0.0003157523,0.0001237991,0.0002367534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980404,0.0002030642,0.001259022,0.0001408457,0.000248771,0.0001079461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001952677,0.0001913457,0.05880902,0.000002247014,0.0002927387,0.000009923582,0.00922187,0.000674214,0.00004835145,0.9301194,0.0003797499,0.00005584815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003209248,0.0003010614,0.05686653,0.0003252511,0.00001721898,0.00003442175,0.01000768,0.007282818,0.0004198229,0.636332,0.2846626,0.0005413597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7967677,0.004112949,0.002133189,0.001968653,0.001879895,0.0002131888,0.0002257645,0.00001102932,0.1926877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972372,0.0005578313,0.0002011067,0.0005247216,0.0009226258,0.00001058857,0.00002970734,0.00001910517,0.0004971162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2937874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592699941","doi":"","title":"The NSA Phone Call Database: The Problematic Acquisition and Mining of Call Records in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Government (linguistics); National security; Warrant; Call to action; Political science; Phone; Business; Computer security; Law; Advertising; Finance; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Andrew P. MacArthur","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07208240911005974,"gpt":0.3741470031674995,"spread":0.3020645940574398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002974461,0.0001140168,0.0001724483,0.00008306048,0.0004232941,0.0001251198,0.000581365,0.00003455771,0.00002226476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001128077,0.00005292697,0.00003535324,0.0002934689,0.0007747359,0.0001896103,0.00004505714,0.0003483083,5.383699e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001412307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001587487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3390702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6126308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977701,0.0006040622,0.0005635999,0.0000920185,0.0007330732,0.0002371559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965028,0.002417198,0.0004413155,0.0001165378,0.0004481771,0.00007398923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005774518,0.000173396,0.009907194,0.00003644135,0.0003133337,0.00007186402,0.2233045,0.0006087665,0.0002588621,0.7463847,0.01806917,0.0002943276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001689925,0.0003525621,0.1449526,0.001017821,0.0001449072,0.0001746945,0.3306502,0.004783703,0.0002653314,0.007488003,0.5081114,0.0003688758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851534,0.0001168995,0.0004059586,0.01233644,0.000378379,0.0001912062,0.00004853971,0.000002333899,0.001366795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982185,0.00009876373,0.00003191689,0.001312836,0.0001811802,0.000003850751,0.00001787575,0.000003742103,0.0001312834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7388967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.665331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515053903","doi":"","title":"Interoperability of United States and Canadian Armed Forces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infantry; General partnership; Terrorism; National security; Law; Political science; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Gary Walsh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03615724309948942,"gpt":0.341010317478981,"spread":0.3048530743794916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005067409,0.00006818583,0.0001986382,0.0001460499,0.0001757577,0.0000256101,0.0001806271,0.00002347368,0.0002540964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000769025,0.00005450792,0.00005822459,0.00009488624,0.0005589772,0.0003140091,0.00002170926,0.0001113576,0.000003601475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001202831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04324054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4475702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990479,0.0001544134,0.0003390702,0.00006766547,0.0002754439,0.0001154695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.000183746,0.0001730054,0.00003929944,0.0007428842,0.0001293361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324538,0.0000578849,0.007232383,0.000003979964,0.0001983035,0.000003730109,0.05035429,0.000409488,0.00005403976,0.9392737,0.001949535,0.0003302156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003367316,0.0001179632,0.006417487,0.00004405495,0.00001448966,0.000006344775,0.01554281,0.0002728697,0.0003788815,0.005251078,0.9715431,0.00007415891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7766236,0.0003925108,0.00003766556,0.003629737,0.0001804915,0.00004719876,0.00002964994,0.00000267612,0.2190565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984029,0.0002793925,0.0003308502,0.0004081665,0.0001752166,7.939253e-7,0.000005192207,0.000001924115,0.0003955839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494523486","doi":"","title":"Defendant Class Actions and the Right to Opt Out: Lessons for Canada from the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Opt-out; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Certification; Opt-in email; State (computer science); Business; Computer security; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Vince Morabito","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04401911796247775,"gpt":0.3058400170368867,"spread":0.261820899074409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001944856,0.0001019889,0.0001636461,0.00007820134,0.0004082927,0.0002967284,0.0003037932,0.00001659524,0.00007884829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004980498,0.00005635136,0.00008961369,0.0001372446,0.0001243888,0.000353663,0.00005693012,0.0001572935,0.0000105666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001382824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001028139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07522128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4600337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991965,0.00001918633,0.0002864082,0.00008827601,0.0002962625,0.0001133178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986452,0.0003451133,0.0002993067,0.00007893373,0.0006075609,0.00002380981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001617219,0.00003998241,0.00004143125,0.000001452,0.0001936313,0.000001888645,0.0001976607,0.008895807,0.00003558224,0.9667969,0.02359536,0.00003856486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001344394,0.000008721283,0.001583539,0.00003652813,0.00006716927,0.000006680435,0.001450188,0.002833997,0.00008368656,0.01299864,0.9795147,0.00007174218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2046447,0.0001963805,0.03422233,0.4892373,0.003382331,0.000593191,0.0003686357,0.00002381269,0.2673313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901112,0.00001855653,0.0001496565,0.00868949,0.0006763074,0.00001444443,0.00006045058,0.000006256294,0.0002736805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9309369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82930102","doi":"","title":"MISPLACED BOLDNESS: THE AVOIDANCE OF SUBSTANCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE'S KOSOVO OPINION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; International law; Independence (probability theory); Public international law","authors":[{"name":"Timothy William Waters","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04087776638970086,"gpt":0.3618997799491497,"spread":0.3210220135594488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001448617,0.000121704,0.0002963367,0.00009772411,0.0001203955,0.0000805597,0.001598271,0.00005761771,0.0002785203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002806287,0.0000769095,0.0001529504,0.000208535,0.0008394669,0.0005648976,0.00003765579,0.0003532326,0.0000152634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001650842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001881343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006716868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001564991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972066,0.0004023311,0.0007838148,0.0001091834,0.001299699,0.0001983269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960152,0.00138166,0.000826402,0.0001405731,0.001574081,0.00006208478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009655021,0.0001768707,0.001555743,0.000008751374,0.00008220923,0.000002240608,0.01119491,0.0004576584,0.0006295677,0.9838733,0.001867293,0.00005488249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00331462,0.0004310206,0.09977343,0.001025532,0.0001272999,0.0000886787,0.06071758,0.0110772,0.00253994,0.1675755,0.6528171,0.0005120805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6427504,0.0003172767,0.00115661,0.01899206,0.002394438,0.0003382758,0.00006139275,0.000005028522,0.3339845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979625,0.000169818,0.0004434047,0.0006330844,0.0003960249,0.000009473827,0.00000568799,0.000005200255,0.0003748385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8162978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3136278,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026896640","doi":"","title":"The Basis of Unit Self-Defense and Implications for the Use of Force","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Unit (ring theory); Set (abstract data type); Government (linguistics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059649225389648,"gpt":0.3763214579762302,"spread":0.2703565354372655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007135152,0.00006569154,0.0001508709,0.00005049905,0.0003861612,0.00006406154,0.0002909327,0.00002605249,0.00001697811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001519814,0.00003796025,0.0001210063,0.00009965374,0.0004137474,0.0005088394,0.00001844464,0.0001049837,5.742791e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006695237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009672673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007584428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002886806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991043,0.0001415193,0.0003348114,0.00004367169,0.0002536949,0.0001220468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966115,0.001826913,0.0005326826,0.000090594,0.0008680136,0.00007028552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008367965,0.00006478369,0.004754215,0.00000215366,0.0001658785,3.903236e-8,0.01346305,0.00002660218,0.0001884994,0.9762424,0.004788019,0.0002206913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002431201,0.00007491264,0.02412585,0.00002241711,0.00005338746,0.000006128635,0.001237236,0.00005574204,0.0003560503,0.003878776,0.969901,0.00004535083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7254988,0.009588202,0.005169424,0.0233696,0.003219293,0.001075778,0.0004721135,0.00002110964,0.2315857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972004,0.0002016629,0.0007707376,0.0001623727,0.0003031046,0.000004563838,0.000001932469,0.000003815571,0.001351388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2970079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591907128","doi":"","title":"Lining-Up at the Border: Renewing the Call for a Canada-U.S. Insolvency Convention in the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; International trade; Political science; Business; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mike Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02760310305378311,"gpt":0.2768128133750561,"spread":0.249209710321273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007242502,0.0001320246,0.0001771638,0.00004163263,0.0003310466,0.0001924237,0.0007008816,0.00002711005,0.0003519892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004864014,0.00006924998,0.0001384521,0.0001820549,0.0001002564,0.0005493701,0.00004815565,0.0002592593,0.00001271865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001426328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001136272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02790387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3273771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986252,0.00004581804,0.0005151586,0.0001159063,0.0005362838,0.0001616014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853,0.0002861047,0.0006670924,0.0001315826,0.0003766767,0.000008542183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005869051,0.0001250524,0.002970897,0.00001995704,0.0001289808,0.00001973182,0.001068033,0.00181067,0.00007547512,0.9479608,0.04095754,0.00427599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006666783,0.00002088476,0.009501521,0.00009799858,0.00002863471,0.000019366,0.000757903,0.00130548,0.0000399659,0.002788142,0.9846835,0.00008989986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6044733,0.002212932,0.000143298,0.02905383,0.002740182,0.0005420136,0.00004428032,0.000008693682,0.3607815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924949,0.0001363699,0.00001303557,0.004942931,0.001080116,0.00001690583,0.00002080378,0.000007337152,0.001287635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9785694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593179291","doi":"","title":"The Priority Rules of the United Nations Receivables Convention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounts receivable; Convention; Bankruptcy; Debtor; International trade law; Law; Statutory law; Conflict of laws; Letter of credit; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Creditor; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Michel Deschamps","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07232836053494365,"gpt":0.2889957975240048,"spread":0.2166674369890611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000393584,0.000109271,0.0001705481,0.0003431896,0.0003317221,0.0002140462,0.0007244646,0.00003404928,0.0003122327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002821295,0.00006568503,0.000194131,0.0003728704,0.0005392155,0.0007024939,0.00008679059,0.000201035,0.00004313631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005779725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001626513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001160387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001757561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985219,0.00004435932,0.0006027778,0.00008477623,0.0006383134,0.0001079254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996882,0.0003251164,0.001032409,0.0001175392,0.001631838,0.00001105068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003669872,0.0001289169,0.001365726,0.000008152533,0.0001502348,0.00000114485,0.00008732207,0.0003982551,0.0001706727,0.9893237,0.00825204,0.0000770988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005018583,0.00001778212,0.006878237,0.00009598809,0.00004286212,0.00001112729,0.0001645683,0.006411137,0.0005129497,0.04420708,0.9410763,0.0000801083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1579082,0.000258527,0.001248453,0.01078341,0.003504172,0.0001843198,0.00002829549,0.00001577804,0.8260689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963015,0.0001364699,0.0001476859,0.0005360255,0.0009647596,0.000002787551,0.00001309981,0.000006643027,0.001891051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3418729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121682222","doi":"","title":"Are Muslims the New Catholics? Europe’s Headscarf Laws in Comparative Historical Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Political science; Population; Secularism; Sociology; Referendum; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Kahn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1408511560791885,"gpt":0.3737837721688877,"spread":0.2329326160896992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007401149,0.0001590221,0.0003709098,0.0001844754,0.000252555,0.00009394859,0.0007239029,0.0000629518,0.0001502794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001657014,0.0001151103,0.0001667045,0.0003178178,0.0004048081,0.0005192779,0.00005058112,0.0004033868,0.00004697987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001190903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002933479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01394834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03238339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977699,0.0005116867,0.000542245,0.0001718367,0.0007863701,0.0002179515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971738,0.0002426485,0.000835427,0.0001125398,0.001479299,0.0001562463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001562052,0.000184526,0.001238373,7.037183e-7,0.00005114734,0.00002940167,0.1690139,0.00006238589,0.00003616149,0.8141249,0.01507399,0.00002832206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001593916,0.0002986943,0.03055362,0.0001115538,0.00005857716,0.00005424206,0.1066148,0.0001142137,0.0005386236,0.1069359,0.7527919,0.0003338555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05900695,0.0007868353,0.000646446,0.006336712,0.001488917,0.0001973866,0.000005642282,0.00001325972,0.9315178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957071,0.00009432986,0.0003753831,0.000498713,0.0008468305,0.000004656367,0.000001434014,0.000007369671,0.002464173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884602605","doi":"","title":"Best Interest of a Minor Theist: An American and Religiously Informed Response to Canada’s A.C. v. Manitoba","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Kevin M. Simmons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05154950500784888,"gpt":0.3708197334195116,"spread":0.3192702284116627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003966313,0.0001039309,0.0002648447,0.0001150227,0.0001971186,0.00005266146,0.0003894722,0.0000225044,0.00005245237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002812385,0.00009099454,0.0000494333,0.000127203,0.001910683,0.0002071194,0.00004694471,0.0001170028,0.000005994435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003464422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003362161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4174851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9348207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985902,0.000209013,0.000433261,0.00009546815,0.0005006956,0.0001713827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974034,0.0004690603,0.0005737878,0.00008315965,0.001201783,0.0002687554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008623681,0.0000642907,0.001712929,0.000001485793,0.00007772874,0.00001258459,0.004057491,0.000009247888,0.0002983681,0.9906461,0.001946996,0.0003104206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002326077,0.0008225791,0.003887194,0.00006304521,0.00001631011,0.00003980589,0.01087757,0.000007405847,0.0005685344,0.0005109868,0.9828652,0.0001087663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703505,0.00002488597,0.0001612292,0.002871122,0.0004055937,0.00006736477,0.00006152633,0.000003275152,0.2260545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996058,0.00001369856,0.001222515,0.001484606,0.0005207487,0.000001509,0.000002676484,0.000004264239,0.0006920148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7039992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W896809431","doi":"","title":"A State’s Right to Military Power: The International Legal Implications of Potential SDF Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; State (computer science); Guard (computer science); Use of force; Political science; Rules of engagement; Power (physics); International law; Proportionality (law); Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Mueller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03056213749016148,"gpt":0.3485913024835739,"spread":0.3180291649934124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004654275,0.0001144596,0.0002236387,0.0001381912,0.0003560645,0.00006303512,0.0007103349,0.00003296883,0.001550974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008720482,0.00008109555,0.0001967462,0.0001511832,0.0003887356,0.0008128201,0.00009034935,0.0002065991,0.00008250535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001581698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001393415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002286859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003902436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981878,0.0001816571,0.0005798024,0.0001296938,0.000759666,0.0001613776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975057,0.0002332356,0.0003034622,0.0001156515,0.001734,0.0001079847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002032464,0.0002043613,0.0008517734,0.000001989965,0.0004878376,0.000004545489,0.01151443,0.00107442,0.004081864,0.93639,0.04482225,0.0003632681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004447321,0.0002022418,0.0346135,0.00003794895,0.00003027793,0.0000384193,0.01153718,0.0001105591,0.0015033,0.02869312,0.9226432,0.0001455427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5926822,0.0002801679,0.001923798,0.03511121,0.002096684,0.0002842184,0.00007289212,0.00001170727,0.3675371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964304,0.00009665987,0.0005833844,0.0007672098,0.0004530087,0.0000151608,0.000006132145,0.000004642359,0.001643405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}