{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":20,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":20,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"01faf2ac840f","filters":{"venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law"}},"results":[{"id":"W1544132179","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering Res Judicata: A Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Scope (computer science); Doctrine; Law; Adversary; Political science; Action (physics); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Yuval Sinai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.25700860748035,"gpt":0.3939149846991725,"spread":0.1369063772188225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01199626,0.0006199208,0.0008966108,0.004889956,0.01572854,0.02295459,0.003791584,0.0204627,0.01480026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01269293,0.0005302448,0.001033952,0.005073192,0.03895761,0.01575663,0.005057051,0.01570348,0.00146555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03142516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01014705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04591636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07902678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864281,0.007550151,0.0002667026,0.001119943,0.002124878,0.002510217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858103,0.01083487,0.0007288302,0.0004173669,0.001563542,0.0006450108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006261963,0.000009828132,0.00007044608,0.00002814571,0.000002621644,0.0001053723,0.002375741,0.00004668349,0.00003284362,0.9917169,0.003996411,0.001608714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004127107,0.00009313885,0.002243568,0.00088685,0.00003581834,0.0002891559,0.02639842,0.0004788544,0.0002425525,0.351124,0.6181023,0.00006414564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01150959,0.04153601,0.001542136,0.06892095,0.00158655,0.00002499092,0.00004212457,0.0000187862,0.874819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8288515,0.03335107,0.001253758,0.0514243,0.008731769,0.0001572189,0.0000861911,0.00009759124,0.07604666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04591636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2280066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594403803","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of the Pinochet Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Politics; Human rights; Jurisdiction; International law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Byers","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02956073755263248,"gpt":0.3427954605210797,"spread":0.3132347229684472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003706441,0.0003432113,0.0003874863,0.001290056,0.02717936,0.01295429,0.001908653,0.007940935,0.008719117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093111,0.0007023404,0.0002910075,0.001663819,0.02591604,0.005882418,0.01224457,0.01238547,0.0005239744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01395654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007874538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06588258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07909228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934628,0.001778166,0.00008264624,0.0008560145,0.000811521,0.003008944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983115,0.0009773826,0.0001996014,0.0001063125,0.0001081724,0.000296977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003048854,0.00001890662,0.001019326,0.00002599812,0.000004424165,0.002445816,0.01122073,0.0001762559,0.0000868734,0.9739211,0.008744228,0.002305923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001300346,0.00009075654,0.01537498,0.001023888,0.00005052398,0.003000008,0.09228133,0.001558509,0.001071614,0.3373812,0.5478415,0.0001957446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1542573,0.002940837,0.001082026,0.03536129,0.000393424,0.0001033792,0.00004282928,0.00002407028,0.805795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239655,0.000896203,0.0002398113,0.01018095,0.0001368548,0.0001770504,0.00002232204,0.00002150492,0.06435992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06588258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1309982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524727478","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required Under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Letter of credit; Payment; Issuer; Position (finance); Commission; Constructive fraud; Business; Law; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Securities fraud; Accounting; Law and economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Supreme court; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Gao Xiang","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ross P. Buckley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0551072959462793,"gpt":0.3083150857105404,"spread":0.2532077897642611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0187105,0.0002798799,0.00081583,0.006367633,0.003998508,0.01384565,0.001659868,0.004217792,0.00673112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1159852,0.0005462387,0.001367252,0.005930954,0.01291934,0.008464252,0.004392403,0.005396033,0.0008984827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01114469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004991827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008183408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008592246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9500188,0.01960391,0.003427951,0.002198932,0.02031927,0.004431037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8755373,0.07657915,0.01793342,0.007562467,0.01955329,0.00283433],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004229554,0.0002537757,0.02339957,0.0001967383,0.00007816698,0.000595217,0.005207523,0.00107654,0.0007053671,0.9432292,0.003597827,0.02123706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004167528,0.002477828,0.4036422,0.001640298,0.0006024221,0.002334985,0.03093778,0.008663372,0.007412383,0.411223,0.1301338,0.0005152092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5554009,0.003948394,0.009809331,0.007709425,0.0003454263,0.0002919425,0.0003492277,0.00006883065,0.4220766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916779,0.0007234837,0.001487275,0.001113108,0.0001562931,0.0000840705,0.00009879716,0.00002301707,0.004636042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0187105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09895176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528881838","doi":"","title":"Siting Foreign Law: How Derrida Can Help","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Judaism; Sociology; Law; Classics; History; Political science; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Pierre Legrand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09109940972700245,"gpt":0.3394804521501871,"spread":0.2483810424231846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00554408,0.0007699303,0.000486105,0.0009035467,0.01875152,0.01540192,0.002531722,0.01051114,0.06343011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009738266,0.0004405336,0.0005346021,0.0006887311,0.009950285,0.01697643,0.009377044,0.01367536,0.0264664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006023368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008451311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02077947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05218497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962167,0.001955184,0.0000970458,0.0003705713,0.0004920962,0.0008683974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955196,0.001061974,0.0001411365,0.0002414683,0.0006646389,0.002371186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749573,0.000105382,0.00092891,0.0001000986,0.000008039854,0.001027109,0.03017377,0.00004895945,0.0001397856,0.05846032,0.8527867,0.05620355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005279735,0.00001078264,0.0002569594,0.0001922492,0.0000022773,0.0002772134,0.02678111,0.00003615091,0.00004548086,0.005660525,0.9667202,0.00001185516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006066304,0.01551232,0.001425133,0.6598805,0.01217656,0.00005954329,0.00007468203,0.000422107,0.3043828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08763538,0.01046083,0.003700873,0.3017762,0.002401824,0.0001317517,0.0001993442,0.0007731217,0.5929207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06343011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2121948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512500917","doi":"","title":"Canada/United States Military Interoperability and Humanitarian Law Issues: Land Mines, Terrorism, Military Objectives and Targeted Killing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Terrorism; Law; Political science; Geneva Conventions; International law; Municipal law; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth Watkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02247084032529224,"gpt":0.3083153047281898,"spread":0.2858444644028976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00308777,0.0003214537,0.0003480517,0.002589244,0.01263807,0.01256243,0.001347453,0.003923533,0.01387624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005186514,0.0001803887,0.0004686257,0.004357446,0.0180665,0.005984884,0.003304525,0.004760422,0.0003506089],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05873418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07633106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9373551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969069,0.0006296668,0.00007210506,0.0001379835,0.000897389,0.001355866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952765,0.00150243,0.0003929052,0.0001025558,0.001649856,0.001075668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004525668,0.00006495474,0.009791808,0.0001092015,0.00002800997,0.000352627,0.01265302,0.0003694224,0.0001330658,0.8924928,0.06088215,0.02307757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005396269,0.00006869796,0.0991985,0.001398774,0.00013711,0.000314579,0.1901272,0.001578757,0.0006401677,0.2392785,0.4670471,0.0001567228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1072218,0.02534114,0.001421622,0.2517144,0.0009872863,0.00005492548,0.0004264156,0.00002938581,0.612803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399311,0.008489192,0.0007414736,0.02072383,0.0002835962,0.00002822217,0.0001284442,0.00002652927,0.02964759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4261483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505551132","doi":"","title":"Class Actions: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Civil procedure; Commission; Economic Justice; Law; Class (philosophy); State (computer science)","authors":[{"name":"Garry D. Watson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07552962021589309,"gpt":0.3288667592884061,"spread":0.253337139072513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006815299,0.0007301658,0.0008835706,0.002252842,0.06629544,0.01267268,0.004586839,0.005560108,0.03853696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01206973,0.0007577795,0.0009285932,0.006442441,0.01848285,0.004774071,0.009493723,0.01064565,0.002686716],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1566429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3028176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883321,0.001170655,0.0002258824,0.001013806,0.003822388,0.005435263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847999,0.001255033,0.0004787916,0.0004953441,0.003138582,0.009832429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001421791,0.0004362354,0.01763739,0.0003325143,0.00004144741,0.002175687,0.1594453,0.0002509667,0.0003144935,0.216615,0.4650908,0.137518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002095807,0.00002890655,0.00949786,0.0002591153,0.00001656718,0.0002865523,0.05019528,0.00008442847,0.00007389505,0.002810446,0.93666,0.0000658949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1310746,0.01976074,0.0009846652,0.2089895,0.004442098,0.00025763,0.001580016,0.0001410895,0.6327696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6524788,0.02391588,0.001273864,0.05443214,0.0007286666,0.0001574,0.0007953155,0.000327346,0.2658907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1566429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566065845","doi":"","title":"HIV/AIDS and Blood Donation Policies: A Comparative Study of Public Health Policies and Individual Rights Norms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Public health; Donation; Health policy; Political science; Right to health; Economic growth; Public policy; Public administration; Health care; Medicine; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Francine A. Hochberg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104416251881595,"gpt":0.3760002981467664,"spread":0.2715840462651714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01034877,0.00008991687,0.0002073723,0.001618506,0.002917424,0.003607905,0.0005314053,0.001026792,0.003251368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02188294,0.0001584459,0.0001479293,0.002619157,0.006849873,0.003140776,0.001791459,0.001348501,0.00007212313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007302197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006658355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04209612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04788047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918389,0.005920007,0.0001321624,0.0001828091,0.0008996886,0.001026445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819809,0.01430301,0.001757783,0.0003462881,0.001027346,0.0005847337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004628206,0.001041887,0.1173606,0.0003724702,0.0000973696,0.0006924305,0.206533,0.001547774,0.0003458811,0.578444,0.003665688,0.08943608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001111162,0.0006253296,0.3947329,0.001406246,0.0001041489,0.0006797749,0.4410274,0.002070346,0.001056916,0.05583805,0.1022567,0.00009101499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282545,0.003214222,0.0004229817,0.006145963,0.00003402367,0.00002871468,0.00005715036,0.000003742288,0.06183874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980744,0.0009404006,0.00009234569,0.0002762334,0.00001235504,0.00001444597,0.00001517191,0.000002124945,0.0005723567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04209612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08370221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125255200","doi":"","title":"Shift Happens: Pressure on Foreign Attorney-Fee Paradigms From Class Actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liability; Civil procedure; Res judicata; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Rowe","is_ca":false},{"name":"D. Rhidian Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05653539633804575,"gpt":0.2970454123421685,"spread":0.2405100160041227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00957227,0.0002490596,0.0003640849,0.001159058,0.009573704,0.0185234,0.001502265,0.007667083,0.009186404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01919938,0.0002188547,0.0006309875,0.00136682,0.02382401,0.01939456,0.006913885,0.01289746,0.001056634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01172529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006606255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01288508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01215127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908819,0.002828773,0.0002449924,0.001361753,0.002630034,0.002052608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990726,0.005471999,0.0008218095,0.0008037774,0.001292788,0.000883662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001433566,0.00002092851,0.001128232,0.00002011417,0.000003433402,0.0001025315,0.01124821,0.00004146593,0.0001346473,0.9682049,0.01020435,0.008876954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002644376,0.00005836085,0.005554467,0.0003746149,0.0000154056,0.0002356468,0.05783027,0.000513175,0.0008322902,0.5113421,0.4231433,0.00007390805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1104661,0.00355637,0.005027847,0.2342898,0.001795278,0.00003803501,0.00008578771,0.00006892665,0.6446717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940772,0.001129229,0.0007568475,0.03483659,0.0007869819,0.00004928561,0.00003464142,0.00007159793,0.02156299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0185234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08507335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1501055903","doi":"","title":"Banking on Cooperation: The Role of the G-20 in Improving the International Financial Architecture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Corporate governance; Architecture; Financial crisis; Financial regulation; Global governance; Finance; Political science; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law","authors":[{"name":"Arie C. Eernisse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02439780466707629,"gpt":0.2470833049928548,"spread":0.2226855003257786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01222234,0.0005579968,0.0002272612,0.001247226,0.005063314,0.01523908,0.00143804,0.008823853,0.01093172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270335,0.0002161274,0.0002355842,0.001388171,0.01553679,0.01047506,0.01279386,0.006045539,0.001715034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006648362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01436156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00585135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006926698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924905,0.004156472,0.0001930843,0.000546366,0.0009593084,0.001654321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919435,0.001784081,0.0006971686,0.000504129,0.001166315,0.003904873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007139603,0.00005384554,0.002742684,0.0001702676,0.000007779538,0.000352997,0.005906469,0.0005785362,0.000300534,0.7050002,0.2057997,0.07901563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002842239,0.000110552,0.006737416,0.0007107396,0.000008361204,0.0002278915,0.009711696,0.0007171442,0.0002775537,0.2611538,0.7202702,0.00004622706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03678445,0.01000712,0.00371169,0.7327538,0.00500964,0.00006303204,0.00007148107,0.0002178251,0.211381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325269,0.009772857,0.006196826,0.1181212,0.003200858,0.0001062381,0.0001023242,0.0001472814,0.02982545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01523908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06463867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130157079","doi":"","title":"Foreword: Debates Over Group Litigation in Comparative Perspective: What Can We Learn From Each Other","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Enforcement; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Rowe","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Y. Thomas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05096546427562636,"gpt":0.2880559885885263,"spread":0.2370905243128999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01710145,0.0009835515,0.002089953,0.006317905,0.01241474,0.02275252,0.006255616,0.02193648,0.02305166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0427973,0.0004457312,0.001185774,0.008958315,0.04265017,0.04380329,0.005996728,0.02120074,0.003393815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01388327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007336757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01189155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01222362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880954,0.007658523,0.0003985979,0.001141497,0.001713228,0.0009927505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.931632,0.05860514,0.001898086,0.001383368,0.004314729,0.002166583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003129049,0.00003490241,0.0002334851,0.0005646361,0.00001532821,0.0001468559,0.008040537,0.00009301603,0.00002716119,0.7901393,0.1842852,0.01638838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001985056,0.00003476789,0.001100601,0.003935904,0.00001615693,0.0002274204,0.02628948,0.0001833003,0.00004707824,0.3398467,0.6282583,0.00004046973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.001397841,0.1071245,0.001136746,0.7746913,0.01564082,0.00002021443,0.00007477665,0.0000204866,0.09989327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1505372,0.17631,0.002957216,0.5092376,0.1326846,0.0003502047,0.000252325,0.0002435967,0.02742713],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02305166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1007307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592699941","doi":"","title":"The NSA Phone Call Database: The Problematic Acquisition and Mining of Call Records in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United States National Security Agency; Government (linguistics); National security; Warrant; Call to action; Political science; Phone; Business; Computer security; Law; Advertising; Finance; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Andrew P. MacArthur","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07208240911005974,"gpt":0.3741470031674995,"spread":0.3020645940574398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003764332,0.0001883977,0.000334961,0.007019834,0.002555522,0.002867853,0.001170175,0.0008549393,0.0008812387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02810611,0.0002471584,0.0001655149,0.01444038,0.0009044144,0.001476673,0.001364346,0.001055046,0.0009061871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008801694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01701836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8293906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8833694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948513,0.0007100573,0.0005567105,0.0004829944,0.003000372,0.0003985834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696178,0.009275269,0.003675522,0.003030184,0.01283226,0.00156886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000254414,0.0001706591,0.59411,0.0004088771,0.0001047578,0.0009175845,0.01460982,0.001938827,0.001903411,0.006389942,0.1259161,0.2532758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001748907,0.00003206479,0.858583,0.0002408068,0.00007013432,0.0004302792,0.0121072,0.02015337,0.002858063,0.001281689,0.1041337,0.00009209335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070123,0.001940154,0.004214685,0.005226989,0.0001393416,0.0002638264,0.06508778,0.0008615616,0.01525332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9093138,0.001747838,0.01367796,0.0006017584,0.00006004867,0.000141542,0.0682217,0.0002166862,0.006018694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1706094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3432282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515053903","doi":"","title":"Interoperability of United States and Canadian Armed Forces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infantry; General partnership; Terrorism; National security; Law; Political science; Public administration","authors":[{"name":"Gary Walsh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03615724309948942,"gpt":0.341010317478981,"spread":0.3048530743794916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003732332,0.0002879526,0.0002668951,0.004981877,0.00905695,0.008575697,0.001478417,0.001129567,0.009022854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152073,0.0002083059,0.000530228,0.007551835,0.003548745,0.003623355,0.003814451,0.001294202,0.000556776],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05509558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05810069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933224,0.0004902364,0.0002072683,0.000573751,0.003586794,0.001819589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927853,0.0006914467,0.0003292973,0.0004915086,0.005152695,0.0005498486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001409155,0.00003479835,0.03738656,0.0001334459,0.0000705809,0.0002929738,0.01534594,0.002525078,0.0005104411,0.7830602,0.03954775,0.1209513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000406299,0.00005141443,0.1914328,0.0007033208,0.0001576434,0.000322036,0.03518917,0.007180193,0.00113984,0.0650932,0.6984459,0.0002438824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08595943,0.002779647,0.002344544,0.006410656,0.0001849135,0.00008880152,0.001436004,0.0001115801,0.9006845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662624,0.002078798,0.002118487,0.001220869,0.00004220941,0.00005605806,0.001273068,0.00005774516,0.02689037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3997483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494523486","doi":"","title":"Defendant Class Actions and the Right to Opt Out: Lessons for Canada from the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Opt-out; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Certification; Opt-in email; State (computer science); Business; Computer security; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Vince Morabito","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04401911796247775,"gpt":0.3058400170368867,"spread":0.261820899074409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006216459,0.0004146306,0.001143884,0.002424266,0.03783096,0.01587204,0.003587206,0.01093682,0.01264509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02141738,0.0005394231,0.0009560247,0.004213129,0.01832762,0.004682916,0.005187451,0.0148281,0.0005933931],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1444683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2294286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908094,0.001292346,0.0002272863,0.0005745863,0.001791763,0.005304528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860702,0.004067989,0.0006435118,0.0004857451,0.005612861,0.003119775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002459414,0.0001772691,0.0355075,0.0001461682,0.0001059579,0.001030756,0.05166202,0.001379187,0.000250474,0.7642408,0.0918454,0.05340856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003225617,0.0001163065,0.1371044,0.00268139,0.0005161911,0.0004479014,0.1976772,0.003052193,0.001084993,0.1427811,0.5136394,0.0005762923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3936021,0.01587137,0.001616548,0.2125729,0.0007313453,0.0001243343,0.0009616181,0.00003913167,0.3744806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94347,0.004076736,0.0005477797,0.01546552,0.0001048113,0.00003932014,0.0001751091,0.0000427724,0.03607789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1444683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82930102","doi":"","title":"MISPLACED BOLDNESS: THE AVOIDANCE OF SUBSTANCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE'S KOSOVO OPINION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; International law; Independence (probability theory); Public international law","authors":[{"name":"Timothy William Waters","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04087776638970086,"gpt":0.3618997799491497,"spread":0.3210220135594488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009956952,0.0003425873,0.0005224264,0.001328357,0.01424821,0.01634203,0.001928647,0.01154349,0.001144561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01837727,0.0004344495,0.0005810955,0.00119913,0.02714325,0.006124165,0.006274874,0.02073481,0.0001978596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01192313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009777101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07700263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08957113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879346,0.004374525,0.0005948866,0.001357763,0.003275234,0.002463009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957455,0.002357288,0.000486642,0.0002162564,0.0007436052,0.0004507556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001863542,0.000009734902,0.0007664118,0.00002316991,0.000009125448,0.0006874213,0.03860737,0.00008555843,0.0003008605,0.9377313,0.01781285,0.003947699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003839078,0.00005545248,0.005997233,0.0007964293,0.00005603684,0.0006328191,0.05879322,0.0006890188,0.0009234729,0.2717291,0.6600715,0.0002173346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1581852,0.01260726,0.004004147,0.3671644,0.005492553,0.00005680912,0.00007003198,0.00004863717,0.452371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8914882,0.001549852,0.0006485494,0.086847,0.001277962,0.00004070995,0.00002888178,0.00005524389,0.01806361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07700263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1531089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026896640","doi":"","title":"The Basis of Unit Self-Defense and Implications for the Use of Force","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Unit (ring theory); Set (abstract data type); Government (linguistics)","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059649225389648,"gpt":0.3763214579762302,"spread":0.2703565354372655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004365801,0.0004125711,0.0004242324,0.002294713,0.01018646,0.00795278,0.002101866,0.006497904,0.009447859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504638,0.0003371323,0.0004816885,0.001883191,0.07645616,0.01048261,0.005826952,0.006834197,0.000748531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008419878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003917318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01187731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009781728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950877,0.002684717,0.0001425222,0.0006287029,0.0005027418,0.0009537133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965757,0.001997391,0.000332648,0.0004805647,0.0004012991,0.0002123683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003109247,0.000003327779,0.0001091439,0.000004999983,8.494844e-7,0.00004137669,0.001696875,0.0000492312,0.00001072053,0.996924,0.0003688342,0.0007875348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127674,0.00001445512,0.0007584551,0.0001207023,0.000004376791,0.00009314471,0.007341206,0.0003875582,0.0001713674,0.9452479,0.04583147,0.00001661066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07078575,0.004944842,0.00838865,0.0324842,0.0003240396,0.00005546301,0.00007034515,0.00002129563,0.8829254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882783,0.0007119308,0.0006235029,0.001164958,0.0001429306,0.00005596113,0.00001977103,0.00001630952,0.008986309],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01187731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06109071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591907128","doi":"","title":"Lining-Up at the Border: Renewing the Call for a Canada-U.S. Insolvency Convention in the 21st Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; International trade; Political science; Business; Law","authors":[{"name":"Mike Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02760310305378311,"gpt":0.2768128133750561,"spread":0.249209710321273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00442107,0.0002607942,0.0004977728,0.001143362,0.02224822,0.01921555,0.002404463,0.0126007,0.008968507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01542842,0.0003027216,0.0004348885,0.001978408,0.01433894,0.006511524,0.005704758,0.01413719,0.0008098164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06402241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1939691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932368,0.000483529,0.0001017636,0.0004556105,0.002834598,0.002887717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908609,0.0008562633,0.0003486503,0.0003311713,0.003497219,0.004105711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003975174,0.00004257855,0.003565972,0.00005171843,0.00001054132,0.0005372672,0.008368933,0.0005357506,0.0007805562,0.541008,0.4021093,0.04294953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002937915,0.00002215746,0.007553543,0.0002948176,0.00001689694,0.0001419663,0.01456883,0.0005983482,0.0004545425,0.04199529,0.9342459,0.00007831401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05918514,0.009369629,0.003191271,0.7136105,0.004791331,0.00004486979,0.0002471377,0.0001473414,0.2094128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5897507,0.007031711,0.004827702,0.2812362,0.001121892,0.00004203053,0.0002767327,0.0002187245,0.1154943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06402241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4645173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593179291","doi":"","title":"The Priority Rules of the United Nations Receivables Convention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounts receivable; Convention; Bankruptcy; Debtor; International trade law; Law; Statutory law; Conflict of laws; Letter of credit; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Creditor; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Michel Deschamps","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07232836053494365,"gpt":0.2889957975240048,"spread":0.2166674369890611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01782612,0.0012647,0.0010406,0.003304177,0.004674331,0.01669483,0.004194728,0.009107894,0.0139053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02734313,0.001274148,0.001220932,0.002958343,0.007105509,0.00806309,0.004031687,0.01189931,0.008199942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006417224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01992323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03155404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02930568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9659051,0.006659509,0.004271174,0.003236771,0.01740993,0.002517497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857351,0.004380152,0.001021994,0.002552771,0.005663994,0.0006458793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001520057,0.00002382062,0.0001307757,0.00007290807,0.000004261437,0.00005977275,0.0003119268,0.0004393513,0.000184295,0.9549456,0.03003558,0.01377653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412557,0.00003598506,0.0003504062,0.0006209401,0.00001109426,0.0001161732,0.0001934611,0.0006343275,0.0005400365,0.2088411,0.7885644,0.00006795658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003303017,0.006099589,0.04135304,0.009746914,0.004891673,0.0008430385,0.001344666,0.0004051682,0.9320129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2013278,0.01761594,0.2067316,0.02794682,0.007622956,0.005105105,0.00529401,0.0009716127,0.5273842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03155404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09427458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121682222","doi":"","title":"Are Muslims the New Catholics? Europe’s Headscarf Laws in Comparative Historical Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Political science; Population; Secularism; Sociology; Referendum; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Kahn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1408511560791885,"gpt":0.3737837721688877,"spread":0.2329326160896992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001618744,0.0001820615,0.0001887296,0.001484876,0.003779388,0.005152801,0.0003729958,0.001618399,0.006159956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001147007,0.0001582019,0.00009793472,0.002523418,0.01070718,0.003225724,0.00152879,0.001813379,0.0002358867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002977928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006546099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01118269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01433568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992836,0.0003442749,0.00002089947,0.00009964836,0.00005811883,0.0001934809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992306,0.0004219942,0.0001430544,0.00004369288,0.00005520233,0.0001054482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003738633,0.00003328185,0.004262234,0.0001291812,0.00001131558,0.0005372581,0.1275706,0.00005992012,0.0001837044,0.8382344,0.007751527,0.0211891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007613962,0.00005143301,0.03788032,0.0009471082,0.00001040184,0.0006472155,0.1273201,0.00007355272,0.0001786766,0.01873202,0.8141305,0.00002099576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3530771,0.08631501,0.0003965613,0.02625632,0.0007231456,0.00001168946,0.0001467609,0.000009248744,0.5330642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755883,0.01269101,0.0001131928,0.001608615,0.0004401417,0.000004382986,0.00004187453,0.00000770005,0.009504735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01118269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02223521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884602605","doi":"","title":"Best Interest of a Minor Theist: An American and Religiously Informed Response to Canada’s A.C. v. Manitoba","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Kevin M. Simmons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05154950500784888,"gpt":0.3708197334195116,"spread":0.3192702284116627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00352424,0.0005508801,0.0003554095,0.0005834008,0.04027971,0.005106396,0.003061127,0.02085222,0.006098157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007791447,0.0008471552,0.0005176634,0.0008235823,0.007233103,0.001260538,0.00277316,0.02066094,0.0007182885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04652371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1024933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9588108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960645,0.0005884095,0.00007705433,0.0002486714,0.0009706008,0.002050794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957424,0.001264898,0.0001628877,0.00008734281,0.001277318,0.001465139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090078,0.0001649469,0.01076544,0.0001068016,0.00003907451,0.005163643,0.06151605,0.0002900888,0.002188833,0.1643177,0.739473,0.01586537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000592283,0.00004881605,0.0110541,0.0003616368,0.00005980828,0.0005444871,0.04574986,0.0004674256,0.001109596,0.006617737,0.9337822,0.0001452005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06952853,0.005252913,0.0006855315,0.7303813,0.003076896,0.0001678324,0.0002871866,0.00007885916,0.1905409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2761146,0.002061633,0.0006529109,0.5513688,0.0005782956,0.0001029297,0.00007489309,0.00007198559,0.1689739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04652371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3375547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W896809431","doi":"","title":"A State’s Right to Military Power: The International Legal Implications of Potential SDF Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; State (computer science); Guard (computer science); Use of force; Political science; Rules of engagement; Power (physics); International law; Proportionality (law); Mathematics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Mueller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03056213749016148,"gpt":0.3485913024835739,"spread":0.3180291649934124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003729858,0.0003345582,0.0002780341,0.0009840169,0.008153128,0.008835997,0.00120959,0.01264181,0.01025824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005378009,0.0003507541,0.0005123275,0.0008469639,0.02192206,0.005385526,0.004203717,0.008694946,0.000843293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004030548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004908085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02972191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04505978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971391,0.001122462,0.0001142212,0.0003031747,0.0004057798,0.0009152722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974548,0.001637322,0.0001739325,0.0001782498,0.0003182135,0.0002374547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002083384,0.000003222432,0.0001025372,0.0000038235,5.529654e-7,0.00004290769,0.0008058198,0.00002993178,0.00001288358,0.9942394,0.004126733,0.000630038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002886836,0.00002066019,0.002003629,0.0005479652,0.00001719115,0.0002723941,0.007965114,0.0008378481,0.0003612271,0.692493,0.2954176,0.00003445978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0107229,0.002517944,0.001794857,0.0949943,0.0004370371,0.00001839718,0.00009043877,0.00001572602,0.8894085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007666,0.002511851,0.001323038,0.02958362,0.0008063195,0.000126414,0.00008062191,0.00003325733,0.06476822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02972191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05909783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}