{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"20795b047c19","filters":{"venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad"}},"results":[{"id":"W2760343167","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3803","title":"Del referéndum a la secesión – El proceso quebequense de acceso a la soberanía y las lecciones aprendidas con respecto a la autodeterminación = From referendum to secession – The Québécois process of accession to sovereignty and its teachings with respect to self-determination","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Politics; Philosophy; Law","authors":[{"name":"Dave Guénette","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alain‐G. Gagnon","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01388106474947319,"gpt":0.3495078409839114,"spread":0.3356267762344382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461328,0.0001617675,0.0001212321,0.0005465295,0.006434824,0.005218284,0.0005426076,0.0008577192,0.007280953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001541857,0.000121008,0.00009503851,0.0007675966,0.01553578,0.001538762,0.001811982,0.001709668,0.0003511427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01654092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01974839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.647209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.806412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991267,0.0003501778,0.00001682959,0.00009433324,0.0001711928,0.0002407813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991678,0.0001928552,0.0001160653,0.00006623155,0.0002407752,0.0002164466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002568555,0.00002344028,0.008046001,0.0000550391,0.000005359863,0.0004622688,0.154176,0.0002207851,0.0006720262,0.7963985,0.007944818,0.03197013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000153412,0.00005338344,0.06158498,0.0005481975,0.00001142629,0.000331827,0.1327132,0.0006717175,0.001091793,0.05075022,0.7521715,0.0000564181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2992567,0.002414849,0.002989931,0.01485404,0.0001983504,0.00004311542,0.0000792301,0.00002918891,0.6801347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437464,0.0006680802,0.0003536218,0.0005910548,0.00001990635,0.00001092245,0.00002138128,0.00001159639,0.05457709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.352791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7097373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757225934","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3804","title":"La incidencia democrática de la nebulosa obligación de claridad del Dictamen relativo a la secesión del Quebec = Democratic Impact of the vague Obligation of Clarity in the Reference re Secession of Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Obligation; Law; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"François Rocher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02310144802289439,"gpt":0.3872741607202332,"spread":0.3641727126973388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006295958,0.0001356317,0.0003046046,0.001224735,0.005664585,0.006732676,0.0005668706,0.0007764247,0.01640876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01942665,0.0001777487,0.0002731018,0.002021526,0.008721449,0.001876186,0.00390523,0.002134824,0.0003369522],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02221728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01685955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.654925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7511938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918893,0.00235397,0.0001801747,0.0006966077,0.002519325,0.002360703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983381,0.005848453,0.004063284,0.0009509868,0.004302535,0.001453829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996251,0.00006593124,0.2810109,0.0002377764,0.0001386966,0.0008616807,0.0788002,0.002596888,0.00139464,0.5485213,0.01301084,0.07306147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004743899,0.000110358,0.6659252,0.0004620492,0.0001338013,0.0004143059,0.0925858,0.003200189,0.001238603,0.03546894,0.2003006,0.0001127675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.6847,0.001478042,0.001685349,0.01168659,0.0000727587,0.00006901372,0.000427022,0.00002878539,0.2998524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953259,0.0001364477,0.00008912288,0.0002191441,0.00001192775,0.000007548257,0.00002788229,0.000002990972,0.004178886],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.345075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6942143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140104593","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2015.2499","title":"Recensiones: Georgios Varouxakis (2013), Liberty Abroad","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Derogation; Ridiculous; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy)","authors":[{"name":"R Mejuto Fernández","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03051243141287549,"gpt":0.3289354863850574,"spread":0.2984230549721819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001772092,0.0007422542,0.0009202478,0.003013921,0.001331808,0.004644638,0.001092735,0.00333557,0.01111017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005144046,0.0002301128,0.0003045117,0.004313828,0.002910441,0.00493343,0.00270754,0.003335918,0.003002771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001370383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004623962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004676022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005963723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.0002182546,0.00005044538,0.0001766356,0.0001316781,0.00004496866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997956,0.001190089,0.0002258895,0.00004804483,0.0003940778,0.0001857587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008138415,0.00004126122,0.00110529,0.006724991,0.00005627694,0.0004137881,0.004120747,0.0002110236,0.0002205855,0.06226805,0.7852297,0.1395269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002506801,0.00001674703,0.001570722,0.007099695,0.00004363812,0.0004246579,0.002903242,0.00007683631,0.00009180277,0.01509971,0.9726295,0.00001834568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006040454,0.8627923,0.0002097192,0.1058243,0.02619765,0.00000526434,0.0001005794,0.00001847528,0.004247769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01893217,0.8723154,0.0004169117,0.04022725,0.05609893,0.00003889043,0.0001362436,0.0000350705,0.01179912],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01111017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03716719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140100909","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2196","title":"El dominio del Derecho. Recíproca rendición de cuentas e imperio de la Ley","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Reciprocal; Rule of law; Core (optical fiber); Ideal (ethics); Ethos; Corporate governance; Public law","authors":[{"name":"Gerald J. Postema","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01193247785691747,"gpt":0.3604413863930477,"spread":0.3485089085361303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593661,0.0003432984,0.000272447,0.001523057,0.004294422,0.0100454,0.0009520403,0.001712713,0.007878973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007548909,0.0002652632,0.0002837102,0.001369901,0.01813287,0.007074646,0.004693398,0.002528146,0.001430214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005304634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003794722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01543439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01870329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969949,0.001430461,0.00006138816,0.0005094263,0.0006622325,0.0003415958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978601,0.000780989,0.0003223912,0.0005097433,0.0003784737,0.0001483123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002233529,0.000008302886,0.0004445197,0.00002876123,0.000002729864,0.00008000018,0.01511712,0.0001057335,0.000151288,0.9664233,0.004996615,0.01261938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001479375,0.00001937123,0.00152309,0.0002013163,0.00001305959,0.0001910934,0.01755679,0.0002992578,0.0005389449,0.2070875,0.772529,0.00002564701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04805428,0.006285448,0.01052498,0.02348652,0.0007621093,0.00003251184,0.0001296285,0.0002037451,0.9105208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062229,0.002115075,0.00176257,0.001002781,0.0003665462,0.00004309875,0.00006890353,0.0002029412,0.08821528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01543439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03848797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133682114","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2013.2146","title":"La interpretación constructiva en el constitucionalismo commonwealth: ¿activismo o vandalismo judicial?","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constructive; Supreme court; Duty; Constitutionalism; Legislation; Focus (optics); Judicial interpretation","authors":[{"name":"Mariano C. Melero de la Torre","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01099672946303922,"gpt":0.3574376200741742,"spread":0.346440890611135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006623727,0.0003933406,0.0004820923,0.002577246,0.008932191,0.01584135,0.001740241,0.003356114,0.002129113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01028403,0.0003084616,0.0003541813,0.002098656,0.07828506,0.006966909,0.004327083,0.005559415,0.000214033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01391897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01033405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07528156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07789853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927526,0.003409283,0.0001827111,0.000830795,0.001779437,0.001045184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948906,0.003118459,0.0006059196,0.0005030883,0.0006764616,0.0002054049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001490678,0.000002168134,0.0001359993,0.000007641883,8.256264e-7,0.0000225675,0.007750302,0.00002721313,0.00003919252,0.9901663,0.0004878569,0.00135844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001805963,0.00002038376,0.002390488,0.0003645589,0.00002307701,0.0001663849,0.03075408,0.000844183,0.0005422955,0.7555119,0.2093329,0.00003174712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1098657,0.005780195,0.02926638,0.05842167,0.0009482409,0.0000532203,0.00008614798,0.00006888527,0.7955096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854518,0.000873451,0.001151398,0.001057356,0.0002654307,0.00002695565,0.00002015565,0.00003009392,0.01112332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07528156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140138948","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2207","title":"Autoridad","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Harvard University; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Autonomy; Point (geometry); Work (physics); Action (physics); Power (physics)","authors":[{"name":"Mariano C. Melero de la Torre","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01077353301665095,"gpt":0.3386855326548961,"spread":0.3279119996382452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001087053,0.0005742725,0.0004448648,0.001363259,0.002345916,0.005214612,0.001109439,0.001822772,0.2756774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003253486,0.0002678253,0.0004695567,0.001044864,0.001449316,0.003272317,0.003581361,0.002135806,0.1171209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001805237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002142171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004277526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006564159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.0002112756,0.00005819818,0.0002654839,0.0004780921,0.000163975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987752,0.0001957447,0.00009221386,0.0002763656,0.0003848012,0.0002757664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002631937,0.00009443509,0.00149674,0.0004333851,0.00001546392,0.0006022649,0.002324998,0.0002412593,0.00118851,0.3298503,0.4218702,0.2416192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007462113,0.00001026491,0.0003139287,0.0000660374,0.000002983153,0.0001925196,0.0001994887,0.00006310552,0.0002314924,0.005167359,0.9937395,0.000005944228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004657293,0.00297837,0.003032896,0.007048342,0.002426703,0.00005641193,0.001379431,0.001677312,0.9767432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05639657,0.002355761,0.003121386,0.002267361,0.0005597326,0.00008113313,0.001568782,0.0009339862,0.9327153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2756774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140095246","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2248","title":"John Stuart Mill: La cuestión negra (1850). Stuart Mill y su réplica a Thomas Carlyle sobre la inferioridad racial","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; University of Toronto; University of Oxford","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mill; Theme (computing); Subject (documents); Identity (music)","authors":[{"name":"Ricardo Cueva Fernández","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00849495227221076,"gpt":0.3052429176425764,"spread":0.2967479653703656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001702411,0.0010053,0.0005869122,0.0017025,0.005490037,0.004368083,0.0006869069,0.002990621,0.01488713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003443649,0.0004351782,0.0002779551,0.002155022,0.007288508,0.007092458,0.002197615,0.004615967,0.002819516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002874243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001656355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0289852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07912134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.0005383387,0.000039806,0.0001192098,0.0001937794,0.00008138434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991033,0.000486725,0.0001003375,0.00005638966,0.0001603254,0.00009305296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004144877,0.00002618238,0.0004826046,0.0001967493,0.00001220642,0.0002084295,0.01738621,0.0000692791,0.00008974304,0.192141,0.7357836,0.05356267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003080766,0.000003609728,0.0005249804,0.0004592312,0.000003158282,0.0000793275,0.00221433,0.0000161589,0.00006126388,0.01386596,0.9827623,0.000006687601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002594688,0.6386984,0.0007853538,0.1700195,0.01318186,0.00001531902,0.0002006654,0.00003192835,0.1744723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2029842,0.3558821,0.001598202,0.04603815,0.01497017,0.00008898672,0.0002119078,0.0002468642,0.3779794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0289852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05763298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}