{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":26,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f72fc2bac76e","filters":{"venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2149054725","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000408","title":"Religion in the Public Forum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Impossibility; Relevance (law); Irrational number; Democracy; State (computer science); Human rights; Religious belief; Religious freedom; Margin of appreciation; Law; Political science; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Epistemology; Christianity; First amendment; Separation of church and state; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Religious studies","authors":[{"name":"Roger Trigg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05067172917526061,"gpt":0.3004998651400729,"spread":0.2498281359648123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005360758,0.0001957187,0.0002383951,0.0007218348,0.008486303,0.01013872,0.000688485,0.0081508,0.03563548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008572758,0.0001918788,0.0002506495,0.0005965016,0.008533952,0.008476266,0.005362528,0.006007194,0.002430965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004230981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005179907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004200742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004918614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966372,0.001758963,0.00005757101,0.0002194709,0.0005042397,0.0008224969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956376,0.002180071,0.0003686918,0.0003882452,0.0003460208,0.001079434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001208661,0.00005128159,0.0004176749,0.00002573188,0.000002865548,0.000141445,0.00457931,0.00008303914,0.0001367542,0.9095174,0.07213061,0.01290176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001953892,0.00002274316,0.000875123,0.0001592739,0.000004201469,0.00007752713,0.005024984,0.0002502504,0.000125718,0.1942139,0.7992117,0.00001505398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0284423,0.005491101,0.002070407,0.4091505,0.003206355,0.00002623466,0.000141439,0.0001008697,0.5513708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8569391,0.001222374,0.00042971,0.03228265,0.003211753,0.00003981319,0.00005967047,0.00005701349,0.1057578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03563548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1192125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Norman Doe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124212563372787,"gpt":0.2969896724442739,"spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122903,0.000414544,0.0004387803,0.001051301,0.01399637,0.01324745,0.001322602,0.01245845,0.002390946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01437665,0.0005826653,0.000400195,0.0008013205,0.01375422,0.003254339,0.004881962,0.010962,0.0005276874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01780026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03157096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04008922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881621,0.005445755,0.0006924138,0.001355532,0.002509083,0.001835125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944127,0.001858219,0.0004342156,0.0006104914,0.001895715,0.0007885683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001647457,0.00001647392,0.0005018864,0.00002268814,0.000002869769,0.0001308683,0.00524209,0.0001066035,0.0001883332,0.9796938,0.01056498,0.003512896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007197383,0.0001459954,0.00441775,0.000769246,0.00002515007,0.0004341161,0.01233206,0.0009186864,0.001056956,0.1341249,0.8455146,0.0001885723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1849452,0.01926068,0.01778303,0.1322825,0.007585705,0.0006404997,0.0001632616,0.0001168222,0.6372223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8040789,0.001993204,0.01143953,0.02959188,0.001026745,0.0004102298,0.0000800947,0.0000432801,0.1513361],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03157096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06657857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381281564","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000042","title":"Personnel Files, Confidentiality and the Right to Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Duty; Reputation; Internet privacy; Dignity; Administration (probate law); Business; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Clyde Muropa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02150842892609846,"gpt":0.2412290387387289,"spread":0.2197206098126305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01296007,0.0002201647,0.0003336711,0.0008783223,0.006391954,0.007661602,0.001089936,0.004811385,0.006386456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02449764,0.0003405412,0.0002943907,0.001112848,0.02207602,0.008742743,0.005651684,0.004626746,0.0008068194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002932436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008762601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007755629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005951568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830964,0.009686757,0.0007409979,0.001103341,0.00349527,0.001877247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98224,0.01004986,0.001956259,0.003308367,0.00149302,0.0009525548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001241739,0.000009545088,0.000485092,0.00003001461,0.00000277502,0.0001054639,0.008410611,0.00008970145,0.00006748445,0.9799371,0.004135679,0.006714006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004783286,0.00008708391,0.002768449,0.0008364797,0.00001808442,0.0008330048,0.01328703,0.0005159106,0.0006837936,0.5979845,0.3828795,0.00005829161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08262321,0.00827715,0.02995915,0.1497171,0.001054308,0.0001604387,0.0003787281,0.00007172935,0.7277582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396845,0.003080034,0.005335774,0.0120889,0.0007572068,0.0001845855,0.0001061977,0.00003449647,0.03872815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01296007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06854016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125427894","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x10000074","title":"The Failure of Proportionality Tests to Protect Christian Minorities in Western Democracies: <i>Alberta</i><i>v</i><i>Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Taxis; Population; Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Demography","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007630129611010211,"gpt":0.2514103856929762,"spread":0.243780256081966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06404162,0.0004841618,0.000866468,0.002338425,0.004741936,0.003065469,0.003115712,0.001748615,0.007726682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1835952,0.0005687309,0.0007174303,0.002114302,0.0093878,0.00395932,0.002315494,0.004325538,0.000678632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005322581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01321544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2037765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1971614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9733129,0.01444867,0.0007955994,0.002832638,0.006069659,0.002540508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8189395,0.1406156,0.008883444,0.01214356,0.01556846,0.003849395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001836499,0.0004312172,0.2531486,0.0003443042,0.0005581173,0.0008442963,0.01670541,0.004506047,0.002016602,0.3867416,0.03809369,0.2947736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008433439,0.001966387,0.3882769,0.001011901,0.0007428883,0.001789104,0.02703555,0.07546896,0.01697439,0.3462145,0.1393091,0.0003669621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7239648,0.001955476,0.05532814,0.02902515,0.001176599,0.0004346601,0.0009173222,0.000342717,0.1868552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856409,0.0001165091,0.007089683,0.001303588,0.0001437797,0.00008480943,0.000109488,0.00002569217,0.005485504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4051808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052277509","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x08001191","title":"And Then There Was One: Freedom of Religion in Canada – the Incredible Shrinking Concept","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Conscience","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.020007781718485,"gpt":0.2486210360515062,"spread":0.2286132543330212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003342839,0.0003470062,0.0004563128,0.001857609,0.01900447,0.01182998,0.002203169,0.005143079,0.008698962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007638793,0.0002712599,0.000528321,0.00329083,0.02401381,0.005557264,0.004171421,0.009134636,0.0004440657],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1542293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2296863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937443,0.0006128355,0.000115902,0.0006451021,0.003237988,0.001643931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924198,0.0008032365,0.0002654667,0.0002723599,0.003264803,0.002974408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811016,0.0000344833,0.006285218,0.0001861827,0.00003335673,0.0005153185,0.01054709,0.0003738837,0.0004806145,0.7246236,0.1799597,0.07687945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002733185,0.00002805552,0.01389184,0.0004515161,0.00002891757,0.0002544907,0.01037749,0.0004743593,0.0003061517,0.07011986,0.9038815,0.0001585067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03997943,0.04412664,0.002661214,0.755639,0.004873963,0.00005345767,0.0008131487,0.0000707794,0.1517824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7092631,0.03093524,0.004993845,0.1688616,0.001462555,0.00004319629,0.0004779052,0.0001407247,0.08382172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1542293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158089866","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x12000403","title":"What's Sincerity Got to Do with It? Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Plaintiff; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Democracy; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02053939208946261,"gpt":0.2872372470460888,"spread":0.2666978549566262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003580345,0.0003133672,0.0005720349,0.001295242,0.02495633,0.01324689,0.002331003,0.006363369,0.01015746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009473866,0.0004031348,0.0006910194,0.001959472,0.01336163,0.003231297,0.003227348,0.009610959,0.0004343312],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1752819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2261501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.0004584194,0.0001655344,0.0006265737,0.002605068,0.003039354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991258,0.00178777,0.0002718831,0.0002172821,0.003478415,0.002986634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006523664,0.0000572217,0.01415303,0.0002169093,0.0000768241,0.001275152,0.01088346,0.0006468877,0.0008247417,0.7232122,0.2072226,0.04136565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009208195,0.00005702964,0.03823819,0.0007710284,0.0001072833,0.0003406131,0.01866051,0.00123832,0.000839807,0.05771665,0.8815211,0.0004173183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1025797,0.01869,0.001019114,0.5977722,0.00272182,0.00009233996,0.0009216559,0.00007681228,0.2761264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7804947,0.009513936,0.001424982,0.1248065,0.0004623488,0.00003738339,0.0003101174,0.00007473899,0.08287513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1752819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044882823","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000743","title":"The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Liturgy; Constitution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Political science; History; Archaeology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03313965380810882,"gpt":0.2977859506097624,"spread":0.2646462968016536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065436,0.0003002053,0.0003868269,0.007295798,0.006134425,0.009243483,0.000823906,0.00349288,0.00436812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01660731,0.0004913901,0.0002202745,0.008481814,0.02115288,0.008351283,0.004296366,0.005406195,0.0006998375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007243142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004255276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01339264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959224,0.001722719,0.0003323292,0.0004992308,0.001037693,0.0004856745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852785,0.01076177,0.001085673,0.0007736308,0.001740093,0.0003603921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003429548,0.00005492206,0.001373611,0.0003349203,0.00001143733,0.0006756846,0.03618403,0.0001481523,0.0001205898,0.8721653,0.03149404,0.05740305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002386971,0.00001952706,0.004324118,0.001122267,0.000006319535,0.0005604763,0.01044631,0.00006371558,0.0003073611,0.01365356,0.9694689,0.00002499639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1266384,0.4090744,0.002467492,0.04626855,0.004507775,0.00006669382,0.0003804767,0.00004146571,0.4105547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672964,0.2483232,0.001198308,0.01212749,0.003099764,0.00009086807,0.0003148168,0.00009208821,0.06745695],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05255294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563036451","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16001587","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Advertising; Engineering; Business","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0182172439342845,"gpt":0.2709534100097946,"spread":0.2527361660755101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000978855,0.0002963518,0.0003392554,0.001070239,0.01388236,0.002796012,0.000724214,0.001218952,0.06413947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001558937,0.0002927218,0.0001234479,0.001280312,0.001154485,0.0008401986,0.002055354,0.001732732,0.005169827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02010114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03252653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991172,0.00009021261,0.0000233664,0.0001291244,0.0003352422,0.0003048581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970403,0.0000772821,0.00006149602,0.00008410264,0.001383331,0.001353474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005095813,0.00002176059,0.001944076,0.0001141315,0.000003178181,0.0002045097,0.002707362,0.0000347742,0.001006926,0.009808755,0.9590209,0.02508284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002935828,0.000004419204,0.003691926,0.00005409787,7.650223e-7,0.00004716273,0.002276453,0.00001121435,0.00007520837,0.00009550549,0.993732,0.000008298773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0445376,0.02180562,0.0008544555,0.06185737,0.01493934,0.0004621533,0.006816491,0.0002765002,0.8484505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1554902,0.007346956,0.0007825124,0.01237892,0.001233809,0.0001284657,0.001636972,0.0002252671,0.8207769],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1714456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3449106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106265496","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000068","title":"Judicial Restraint and Neutral Principles in Anglican Church Property Disputes: <i>Bentley v Diocese of New Westminster</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Synod; Statutory law; Political science; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08927004415386,"gpt":0.3050188155178458,"spread":0.2157487713639858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01485999,0.0003795638,0.0007581926,0.001225121,0.02178668,0.02417713,0.005130805,0.01951002,0.003759998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0245641,0.001103715,0.0004702054,0.001442048,0.03927722,0.004820403,0.005297136,0.01744257,0.0009215043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02373613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0372599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4233955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5428088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859512,0.00489649,0.0007962016,0.002003347,0.003153104,0.003199677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882306,0.006822179,0.0005989746,0.00112961,0.002199308,0.001019446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002156177,0.00001992243,0.0005913472,0.00002423418,0.000008377986,0.000404006,0.01184387,0.00008888359,0.0003455939,0.9738607,0.01018517,0.002606298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002481436,0.00008021207,0.005126736,0.000899517,0.000120811,0.0007300819,0.04327109,0.001765416,0.002415582,0.5176403,0.4273937,0.0003083956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1635431,0.006940729,0.009679047,0.1158101,0.001074248,0.0003180236,0.0002173841,0.0001346468,0.7022826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220409,0.0008636822,0.002247043,0.03304174,0.0004116021,0.0002387123,0.00005799902,0.00005156277,0.04104671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4233955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8418621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101827679","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000471","title":"Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Test (biology); Trial court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Questions and answers; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01569907010677685,"gpt":0.2675490999569741,"spread":0.2518500298501973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007230422,0.0005489151,0.0004920395,0.002444477,0.03533746,0.01001221,0.002889503,0.008778764,0.008592973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01959411,0.0007841401,0.0007744764,0.003156472,0.01112337,0.002253766,0.003523007,0.008112322,0.0006152877],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1763781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.241023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868253,0.001272734,0.0003628058,0.00114956,0.004842391,0.005547216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889901,0.002160689,0.0004291898,0.0003349876,0.00606387,0.002021165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001328412,0.00008503429,0.02108062,0.0003056624,0.00007477931,0.002505067,0.03690044,0.0007615772,0.001835033,0.7144863,0.1872328,0.03459992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001081064,0.0001181962,0.0929043,0.0007697906,0.0002373828,0.0006788414,0.04661426,0.002304141,0.002013671,0.03083994,0.8229331,0.0004783596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1946021,0.008865215,0.001646157,0.1503928,0.001600025,0.0003296221,0.001082566,0.0001329196,0.6413486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416745,0.003623678,0.001724485,0.04391294,0.000248288,0.00008360168,0.0002738048,0.00005707254,0.1084016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1763781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233277998","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1400088x","title":"The All Party Parliamentary Group on International Freedom of Religion or Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Government (linguistics); Population; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02045384112125888,"gpt":0.3015496449100306,"spread":0.2810958037887717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005220945,0.0006226639,0.0005991914,0.001475272,0.00366869,0.006398384,0.001371885,0.005573891,0.03477479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01156195,0.0003714816,0.0004276857,0.001993566,0.001849906,0.002473536,0.003376742,0.005958018,0.009339041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002472816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008694054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02337477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02245379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958541,0.0007398656,0.0002461084,0.0003420849,0.001586305,0.001231548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956832,0.001507805,0.0003808088,0.0006456636,0.0009029958,0.000879536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008514644,0.00006393603,0.00171922,0.0002119581,0.00001429313,0.0001407158,0.0007044406,0.00007973087,0.0007266543,0.1114952,0.8267424,0.05801628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001079176,0.00001626663,0.006504206,0.0001371437,0.000005628663,0.000022374,0.0002324234,0.00004091795,0.0002456077,0.003455745,0.9893156,0.00001329977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007713004,0.008193882,0.001229516,0.06464446,0.010871,0.0005419496,0.009322762,0.0002300103,0.8972535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09168784,0.007660494,0.003198895,0.03528871,0.005007804,0.001505248,0.00777028,0.000307546,0.8475733],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1163332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607013338","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000533","title":"How Relevant to the United Kingdom are the ‘Religious’ Cases of the US Supreme Court?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CITES; Law; Constitution; Kingdom; Relevance (law); Political science","authors":[{"name":"Frank Cranmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04003939813465544,"gpt":0.2961833361482097,"spread":0.2561439380135543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006273076,0.0002578028,0.0004536274,0.002474542,0.006759996,0.0149552,0.001008056,0.006285266,0.006318195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04285032,0.0003582767,0.0004413148,0.003764339,0.01143281,0.009805835,0.002817355,0.004732287,0.001662434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00911604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006209744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.136287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2679497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886335,0.006897861,0.0005177577,0.0006913667,0.001462478,0.001797078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803002,0.01054782,0.002483228,0.0007760171,0.004503084,0.001389729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002142813,0.0000715648,0.0268605,0.0007965172,0.000158841,0.002992089,0.04592534,0.0005280968,0.0007199328,0.6558557,0.191433,0.07444419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004910826,0.00007018031,0.1084003,0.002860234,0.0001686466,0.001462016,0.09901713,0.000404985,0.0009402136,0.09904451,0.6874,0.0001827387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.161333,0.05697189,0.001173971,0.2792951,0.003401663,0.00003973694,0.0003658349,0.00003562975,0.4973831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446086,0.01176926,0.0002422578,0.03306253,0.0007784826,0.00001913863,0.0001427734,0.00003232687,0.009344756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.136287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2709875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998635348","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19001868","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Theology; Political science; Law; Advertising; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01420695677101327,"gpt":0.2652995725323078,"spread":0.2510926157612945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005115362,0.0002840515,0.0002671981,0.00075508,0.01399094,0.002392895,0.0005463413,0.0009581512,0.0924645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001058658,0.0002640845,0.0001058398,0.0009752486,0.001041585,0.0007379885,0.001572792,0.001660033,0.006805961],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01742206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02536602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8560366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9656774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995178,0.0000476522,0.00001051132,0.00007664459,0.0001721276,0.0001751956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987912,0.000042706,0.00003090347,0.00004128603,0.0005684103,0.0005255307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003913762,0.00001659624,0.00231769,0.0001105509,0.000003370289,0.0002804594,0.003444968,0.00003449695,0.0007070004,0.01447498,0.9406553,0.03791532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001564704,0.000002955808,0.003195849,0.00004077893,6.480533e-7,0.00004943591,0.002343447,0.0000113994,0.00005698808,0.0001306173,0.9941612,0.000005067796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03853327,0.0184483,0.000752622,0.0442043,0.00832059,0.0002233109,0.004517243,0.0002538233,0.8847465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09341771,0.003332614,0.0003673384,0.003653729,0.0003409952,0.00003032632,0.0006213345,0.0001155159,0.8981205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3093246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496097228","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00004592","title":"Illuminating the Law: Medieval Legal Manuscripts in Cambridge Collections, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge edited by Susan L'Engle and Robert Gibbs, Harvey Miller Publications, Imprint of Brepols Publishers, London/Toronto, 2001, pp. 263 (pbk £30.00) ISBN 1-872501-53-2","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Classical Studies and Legal History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Art history; Media studies; Art; Classics; History; Sociology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Fr Robert Ombres Op","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269282348941363,"gpt":0.2161159865100958,"spread":0.1934231630206821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001932216,0.0009304769,0.0007231382,0.005351877,0.004214187,0.0135758,0.001597693,0.002267536,0.0977963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005867276,0.0009916669,0.0002733414,0.007500717,0.007412308,0.00837204,0.003492153,0.002465486,0.0187738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008319853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005367154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0344189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1087211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987724,0.0003035497,0.00008358436,0.0001522099,0.0005988954,0.00008930066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978392,0.0007105305,0.0002488414,0.0002183575,0.0004877417,0.0004954671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001567828,0.00001072081,0.0001466793,0.0005704611,0.000006202107,0.00008970569,0.0057775,0.00004007382,0.0002844147,0.02338387,0.9011721,0.06850272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003112346,0.000003358493,0.0009531666,0.0005848204,0.000002394843,0.0001193864,0.002220453,0.000007153663,0.00004676132,0.002114706,0.9939389,0.000005804373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022206,0.7346127,0.0009060326,0.04629346,0.007938134,0.00004031272,0.0005995941,0.0002218209,0.2071674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04302996,0.4610849,0.003529998,0.006318851,0.01011559,0.0001166798,0.0007583441,0.0004756244,0.4745699],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0977963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3271612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001088505","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1500006x","title":"Queen of Canada and Not of Babylon: The Constitutional Status of the Crown in Canada and Freedom of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Conscience; Political science; Citizenship; Statutory law; Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Politics","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539206997554961,"gpt":0.2457909525076007,"spread":0.2303988825320511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002288306,0.0002404839,0.0003940683,0.0009595426,0.02849643,0.00920569,0.001865623,0.004395541,0.006313915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006256704,0.0004222025,0.0003371204,0.001295287,0.01715301,0.001628262,0.002914843,0.005446696,0.0003115183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1694623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945544,0.0004842766,0.00009165583,0.0004196923,0.001449354,0.00300054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996796,0.0007320715,0.0001455847,0.0001329956,0.001207639,0.0009857545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004721258,0.00001106222,0.004408145,0.00004475448,0.0000160008,0.0004852842,0.01559076,0.0001724598,0.0004153346,0.944798,0.02752792,0.006483034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009440008,0.00004974212,0.04789891,0.0007403445,0.000107576,0.0002985991,0.03951043,0.0007980834,0.001273381,0.08494473,0.8239599,0.000323904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2077041,0.01011665,0.001157259,0.07788403,0.0005603867,0.00007772793,0.0008404578,0.00005364417,0.7016057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125518,0.001535334,0.000485541,0.01200825,0.00007205417,0.00003036828,0.00009061974,0.00002776577,0.07319838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7502083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225131920","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x22000242","title":"Institut de Taoïsme Fung Loy Kok c Ville de Montréal","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Willink","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01527663489589245,"gpt":0.2537257874834631,"spread":0.2384491525875706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007852872,0.001025899,0.0007580818,0.001154764,0.00452843,0.00565341,0.0007779507,0.001337549,0.2809666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001952362,0.0003643338,0.0004541014,0.001439512,0.00199827,0.001787826,0.00164541,0.002635364,0.02875427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01118497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01249559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4768555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4894374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989623,0.0001775348,0.00002845926,0.0001941622,0.0003889057,0.000248596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988627,0.0003150637,0.00008044255,0.0001065444,0.0002742047,0.0003609626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004884858,0.0001328349,0.008436632,0.001008357,0.000116677,0.00275294,0.003399849,0.001255478,0.006209983,0.4226261,0.2992885,0.2542842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000307015,0.00003483365,0.01267252,0.0002453665,0.0000116337,0.000523933,0.001145905,0.0003682833,0.001166303,0.004909102,0.9788551,0.00003637094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02388381,0.04038936,0.003255935,0.01670265,0.001813058,0.000101674,0.004601786,0.0007232021,0.9085286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1106997,0.00985074,0.002112882,0.0004362247,0.0002001348,0.0000543035,0.0007118717,0.0002028321,0.8757313],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5231445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9481599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971640652","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19000565","title":"<i>Oikonomia</i>, Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition Kevin Schembri Pontificio Istituto Orientale, Rome, Kanonika 23, 2017, 327 pp (hardback €35.00) ISBN: 978-88-97789-39-0","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Byzantine Studies and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Canon (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Religious studies; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"W Becket Soule","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02528865149082345,"gpt":0.2187637255524007,"spread":0.1934750740615772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005367253,0.0002606323,0.0002273174,0.0004792833,0.002170308,0.003619843,0.0003600507,0.001004147,0.01097422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000693165,0.0001502803,0.00008260485,0.001676851,0.005144909,0.002857659,0.001443872,0.001796583,0.001477098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00327876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002378089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02242153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05112532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997205,0.00009338915,0.00001803039,0.00003423069,0.00007650917,0.00005737298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997838,0.000081094,0.00004490616,0.00001573123,0.00002878635,0.00004559619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848496,0.00004744683,0.002637322,0.0007171418,0.00001152475,0.0005124693,0.03661631,0.00008529498,0.0005359494,0.4920365,0.3352549,0.1314767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007876994,0.0000128545,0.007511672,0.000906005,0.000005071704,0.0003054348,0.01837675,0.00002095525,0.00006981715,0.01895363,0.9538207,0.000009247492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0155709,0.6967554,0.0003162813,0.05240027,0.003721213,0.00001455287,0.00004715817,0.00001682773,0.2311574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3371997,0.4060347,0.0005270684,0.007702252,0.002891281,0.00003252489,0.0000835508,0.00005353292,0.2454754],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02242153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04458207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131691028","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x14000507","title":"Solemnisation of Same-sex Marriage and Religious Freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economic freedom","authors":[{"name":"Rex Ahdar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01243104088167637,"gpt":0.2745990669765543,"spread":0.262168026094878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003222914,0.0001333086,0.0003761745,0.0006309169,0.00824666,0.004271683,0.0007180664,0.002783226,0.003735005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006071948,0.0002809895,0.0002933734,0.000450657,0.03727887,0.002340364,0.005745644,0.004277715,0.0002887815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005992241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01053719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1513472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2715541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963297,0.001014665,0.0001538264,0.0003258817,0.001054555,0.001121318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971399,0.0009771864,0.0004245848,0.0004268335,0.0004557397,0.0005757136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001615651,0.00001978363,0.002669304,0.00001925812,0.000003852623,0.0002386388,0.01373361,0.00008224155,0.0003865337,0.9767164,0.0008663176,0.005247831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009434731,0.0002234559,0.0684877,0.000894958,0.00005534045,0.001624868,0.04773816,0.001240251,0.001770846,0.4605473,0.417158,0.0001648625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2744461,0.001588438,0.003404412,0.01790226,0.0001965082,0.00007725631,0.00007506714,0.00002199588,0.702288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784198,0.0003613828,0.0004768257,0.001306167,0.0000550466,0.00002544071,0.0000160633,0.000006184456,0.01933317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1513472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3009325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396776965","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000127","title":"Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Willink","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04011560889809949,"gpt":0.2545120736414452,"spread":0.2143964647433458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005813745,0.0006093343,0.0002606252,0.0005430536,0.00868021,0.003037854,0.0005444286,0.002977145,0.06141187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001400792,0.0004088292,0.0001904273,0.0004541893,0.003250689,0.001190138,0.002037423,0.004970749,0.009417596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01131108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008745459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5255598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993481,0.00009899853,0.00002093085,0.0001145283,0.000153086,0.0002643332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996902,0.00005730071,0.00002382206,0.0000284105,0.00008253143,0.0001176952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001617348,0.00002613777,0.001534261,0.0001207151,0.00001534119,0.001655861,0.006736871,0.0001592026,0.0008356841,0.1710937,0.762228,0.05543247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009418158,0.000006469246,0.002186337,0.0001084404,0.00000149323,0.0001215756,0.001627169,0.00001541197,0.0001347062,0.002308903,0.9934728,0.00000724247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02148598,0.03327263,0.0005879407,0.09595426,0.008903373,0.00007634656,0.0008520337,0.0001371833,0.8387302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04587535,0.001520446,0.0001878242,0.005811033,0.0001570246,0.00002503857,0.00008758291,0.00005696565,0.9462788],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7820101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4334422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156426881","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000361","title":"Sacramental Sharing in Roman Catholic Canon Law: A Comparison of Approaches in Great Britain, Ireland and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canon law; Law; Canon; Political science; Classics; History; Sociology; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Eithne D'Auria","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0421797874766863,"gpt":0.2471173930228601,"spread":0.2049376055461738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003034315,0.0002930094,0.0006442174,0.004222122,0.02444751,0.01123701,0.002529574,0.002249684,0.003765417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00789796,0.0003188091,0.0003252048,0.008307949,0.01555046,0.001551311,0.00649883,0.002977496,0.0002241764],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.171537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1500915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917262,0.00140052,0.000147176,0.0004411445,0.002260441,0.004024595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951717,0.0008446487,0.0002778562,0.0001989748,0.001772951,0.00173385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002756338,0.0001920048,0.03791292,0.000383249,0.00008767551,0.001935709,0.402236,0.001267316,0.0008217455,0.4274647,0.01917756,0.1082454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007066767,0.00006332519,0.1352783,0.0006872006,0.000084955,0.0004321689,0.586295,0.0009711187,0.0004791856,0.00910035,0.2663745,0.0001631434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6549242,0.005021123,0.0005201835,0.01022692,0.00007923388,0.0001116384,0.0001043669,0.00003024787,0.328982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804518,0.002051787,0.0003489591,0.001256935,0.000007642112,0.00004343605,0.00005310762,0.00001820165,0.01576822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.171537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9608997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320468231","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006554","title":"Emerging Legal Issues Involving Islam in Europe","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Conversation; Political science; Subject (documents); Soviet union; Classics; Law; Theology; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Library science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Hill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01271117894001443,"gpt":0.2993663938580527,"spread":0.2866552149180383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003475585,0.0002064961,0.0003745265,0.001637895,0.006709279,0.01455088,0.001179702,0.0108443,0.004124446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005248943,0.0002173794,0.0003568498,0.002415804,0.01305819,0.004425087,0.005437457,0.004867969,0.0002304913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009442813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004395781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01707726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01620477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956862,0.001333006,0.0002320902,0.0004269119,0.0008140371,0.001507926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977592,0.001270688,0.0003171395,0.0001176713,0.0001917681,0.0003435255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005101766,0.00003343778,0.00238905,0.00009072046,0.00001699221,0.003168524,0.0152761,0.0003698719,0.0002835887,0.9420545,0.0181553,0.01811094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000996681,0.00005793702,0.02488665,0.001270742,0.00003664431,0.003045285,0.0579015,0.0005545011,0.0005965348,0.1906596,0.7208126,0.00007833984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3373348,0.07334371,0.001188542,0.1926458,0.002630501,0.00003499046,0.0001314652,0.00002125345,0.3926688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630516,0.006900334,0.0003375173,0.01610211,0.0005413118,0.00001219884,0.00004338173,0.000009229986,0.01300232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01707726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336029995","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000077","title":"‘A Delicate Exercise’: Balancing Freedom for and Freedom from Religion in Canada: <i>Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Free Exercise Clause; Establishment Clause; Freedom of religion; Conscience; Political science; Sociology; Freedom of thought; Human rights; First amendment","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01013666590072542,"gpt":0.2383026582407323,"spread":0.2281659923400068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003369974,0.0004340023,0.0004607875,0.00118917,0.03420959,0.01212914,0.003556505,0.01299707,0.005776398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007511321,0.0007163908,0.0007449612,0.002117978,0.01302242,0.002729096,0.003050772,0.0110999,0.0004483678],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1451757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.210139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915993,0.001080066,0.000186926,0.000677648,0.002254127,0.00420193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994962,0.001210285,0.0002497825,0.0001202504,0.001816148,0.001641553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008428332,0.00005665004,0.01421521,0.0001501888,0.000056379,0.001523271,0.02302713,0.0005382745,0.0008960826,0.6972796,0.2461154,0.01605752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512978,0.00008080248,0.0772512,0.001203055,0.0002366723,0.0005856311,0.05449404,0.002272222,0.001524263,0.04745938,0.8140906,0.000550771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1279752,0.01607592,0.00201757,0.4054737,0.001220261,0.0002123489,0.0008860234,0.0001022058,0.4460369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7320382,0.003673531,0.001632164,0.1621638,0.0002473993,0.0001234266,0.0001981013,0.00006489296,0.09985851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1451757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054019724","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000476","title":"The Foundations of Medieval English Ecclesiastical History: Studies Presented to David Smith","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Classics; History; Art; Philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Glyn Watkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.059591540746817,"gpt":0.2917244463257526,"spread":0.2321329055789356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162653,0.0002987076,0.0002132559,0.001282307,0.003719111,0.003999714,0.000455015,0.001141942,0.009710131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002181677,0.0002305072,0.00009280813,0.001390207,0.0111085,0.005121891,0.002641093,0.001625099,0.0006675989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005905034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002679465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01980991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03318012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999699,0.0001668538,0.000006925038,0.00002968241,0.00005114607,0.00004641137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990305,0.0005488733,0.00007407909,0.00004832534,0.0001476268,0.0001506428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003485538,0.00004362281,0.0009278503,0.0002650362,0.00001001078,0.0003717666,0.1009675,0.0001559311,0.0002812023,0.7547001,0.1038034,0.03843876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000987809,0.00002292862,0.007814511,0.001107418,0.00000769633,0.0002581946,0.05724281,0.00009044202,0.0002267584,0.08468827,0.8485174,0.00001351335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05916644,0.3334722,0.0009371787,0.1426912,0.001294761,0.00002134327,0.0001053524,0.00002525371,0.4622862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7427893,0.158162,0.0004721818,0.005354944,0.00182149,0.00003877849,0.00006068797,0.00003020028,0.09127039],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01980991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04284424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170656","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000838","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01420075893949067,"gpt":0.284790262601031,"spread":0.2705895036615403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003844713,0.0003002014,0.0002990239,0.001377102,0.01391157,0.00241145,0.0006536315,0.0008796834,0.08390684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009669247,0.0002369484,0.0001061616,0.002481193,0.001402657,0.0008143593,0.00116242,0.001171471,0.005929251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0239218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03020215,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999543,0.00004253249,0.0000123127,0.00006604494,0.0001429859,0.0001932794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992969,0.00004998773,0.00002962029,0.00003291147,0.0003495477,0.0002409538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004257003,0.00001544148,0.003998415,0.0002260387,0.00000530051,0.0003249547,0.01094599,0.00004390903,0.0005093933,0.03863426,0.8980024,0.04725121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002015528,0.000002955056,0.008017494,0.00009078506,0.000001516759,0.00006041998,0.005187165,0.0000123218,0.00006911215,0.000259973,0.9862893,0.000006957842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04345656,0.02291614,0.0005394729,0.02844466,0.003393688,0.0002060118,0.0133892,0.0002543543,0.8873999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1674554,0.006935072,0.0003979956,0.003476948,0.0002866864,0.00004755581,0.001801892,0.0001613297,0.8194371],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08390684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2806963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170771","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000589","title":"VII: Edmund Wood (1841–1932)","year":2025,"lang":"la","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robin Ward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02515036976331724,"gpt":0.3120235028224869,"spread":0.2868731330591697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003274672,0.0005977514,0.0002232767,0.001655148,0.002578806,0.001444701,0.0003425277,0.001388646,0.03757351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001088771,0.0002789486,0.0001627344,0.001398409,0.001243864,0.002047531,0.001164386,0.001876507,0.01305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001880046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008602061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04163777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.0000607273,0.0000135251,0.00006945382,0.00008552146,0.00005212145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998593,0.00004710207,0.00002038302,0.00001119605,0.00004130154,0.00002063365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004935996,0.00001272671,0.0004182581,0.0001386319,0.000004483554,0.0004743527,0.002363169,0.00008641835,0.0002077123,0.07785912,0.8546453,0.0637406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000140403,0.000004657308,0.0006361848,0.0001076979,9.856199e-7,0.0001283096,0.0002009585,0.000008193904,0.00008608298,0.001934333,0.9968883,0.000002981945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009640665,0.144552,0.001054957,0.03162115,0.0202838,0.00007221392,0.001730935,0.0001192199,0.7909251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04301456,0.01442539,0.0002930705,0.003746913,0.002442352,0.00003965327,0.0002603562,0.00007167644,0.935706],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03757351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1256959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332931160","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000902","title":"Joint Assembly of the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Synod; Convention; Context (archaeology); General assembly; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01756096524075337,"gpt":0.2477105737714764,"spread":0.230149608530723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002158409,0.0002285751,0.0002893879,0.001122842,0.0254283,0.004050248,0.001069765,0.001448733,0.007846239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003461997,0.0003785204,0.0001833596,0.001304041,0.00324936,0.0005271942,0.002354423,0.002859102,0.0004108018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06597751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2191944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976925,0.0001713209,0.00003583559,0.0001383784,0.0007732623,0.001188785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948646,0.0003517767,0.0001266903,0.00009897022,0.002251134,0.0023069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019857,0.00008183941,0.02770423,0.0003514293,0.00006109949,0.001754839,0.07521823,0.000604603,0.004107475,0.2467893,0.5313887,0.1117396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009937919,0.00001134578,0.04024842,0.0001549447,0.00001291214,0.0001002098,0.02628929,0.0001422916,0.0005168035,0.001030728,0.9314297,0.00005331861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4784861,0.01986682,0.002048688,0.0846258,0.003564895,0.0004470197,0.002020877,0.0001721155,0.4087677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458936,0.002780398,0.00156198,0.006749908,0.0001355337,0.0000618787,0.000390475,0.00006338261,0.3423628],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06597751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4787026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}