{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":26,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f72fc2bac76e","filters":{"venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2149054725","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000408","title":"Religion in the Public Forum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Impossibility; Relevance (law); Irrational number; Democracy; State (computer science); Human rights; Religious belief; Religious freedom; Margin of appreciation; Law; Political science; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Epistemology; Christianity; First amendment; Separation of church and state; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Religious studies","authors":[{"name":"Roger Trigg","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05067172917526061,"gpt":0.3004998651400729,"spread":0.2498281359648123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000889004,0.0000622485,0.00008542708,0.0000346296,0.0009487381,0.0001104269,0.0003458053,0.00005801793,0.0004188016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003744141,0.00004214341,0.00006287034,0.0001631262,0.001141038,0.0002117007,0.00002030367,0.0003409625,0.00008700419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006653753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004466003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002071846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005703477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985985,0.0003170443,0.0001949785,0.00007897292,0.0003809551,0.0004295408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993283,0.0002734743,0.00005007624,0.00008192286,0.00006953993,0.0001967004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000629678,0.00005302479,0.001322543,4.286518e-7,0.000003137709,0.00006859688,0.0008317205,2.691478e-7,6.137916e-7,0.9953461,0.001856333,0.0005109375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001414185,0.00005551336,0.001891108,0.00001178243,0.000008816512,0.0001717415,0.004424265,0.000005564025,0.000002509945,0.1249878,0.8682026,0.00009679542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004779404,0.00009746838,0.003645183,0.01438265,0.0003288957,0.00006489305,0.000002251041,0.00001715352,0.9766821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948766,0.00004125075,0.0008373689,0.003721882,0.000439256,0.000002333277,4.59229e-7,0.000003753491,0.0000771296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7297022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Norman Doe","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0124212563372787,"gpt":0.2969896724442739,"spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589627,0.00008576108,0.00008938795,0.00001101338,0.004512066,0.0004655435,0.0004338321,0.00006961484,0.0001079866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004505281,0.00003942138,0.0000793096,0.000107688,0.0008958129,0.000145408,0.00003400875,0.0003517348,0.00005169997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001140442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001379553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006243651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982191,0.0004205557,0.0002379638,0.00009931982,0.0006431658,0.0003798453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.0005209741,0.00009802359,0.0001319893,0.000116501,0.0002486385],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003065179,0.00006214322,0.00004322907,8.323627e-7,0.000008024173,0.000005747313,0.001511152,0.00001107781,0.0001325946,0.8546433,0.1033717,0.04017963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003685576,0.0000801908,0.0003646573,0.00002051175,0.00002727939,0.00005203041,0.003134312,0.0004215009,0.0003272034,0.05093526,0.9441536,0.0001148844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007325934,0.001046736,0.004740687,0.1241285,0.0006039201,0.0003307634,0.000007326462,0.00006907617,0.861747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965502,0.0002163536,0.0001925798,0.0006016448,0.001053044,0.000002388075,0.000001059282,0.000008478814,0.001374268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381281564","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000042","title":"Personnel Files, Confidentiality and the Right to Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Duty; Reputation; Internet privacy; Dignity; Administration (probate law); Business; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Clyde Muropa","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02150842892609846,"gpt":0.2412290387387289,"spread":0.2197206098126305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006388241,0.0001086675,0.0002038802,0.00003188803,0.002176101,0.00027718,0.0001792163,0.00003199277,0.003750786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001605136,0.00006094049,0.00008245213,0.00003309582,0.001500342,0.00009226944,0.000132366,0.00027675,0.0004408229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000101311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001331559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001462589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001053473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990569,0.0001566064,0.0002065291,0.0001311289,0.000169998,0.0002787809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991688,0.0004783873,0.00004290152,0.0001059237,0.00007059401,0.0001334538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090884,0.00001232037,0.00001147525,0.000005018335,0.00006122829,0.00003368644,0.01759861,0.000001902683,0.000003795401,0.9674624,0.01424967,0.0004508137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001400338,0.00009827041,0.001131783,0.00003737702,0.0001099256,0.000168812,0.01393595,0.00007495599,0.00002917748,0.1601307,0.8226797,0.0002030044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.460923,0.001033611,0.001151826,0.05711117,0.004016317,0.0005533649,0.0001198411,0.0003354003,0.4747554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994391,0.00003242327,0.00002887263,0.00167445,0.001181548,0.000008585807,0.000001427991,0.000009222124,0.00267251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125427894","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x10000074","title":"The Failure of Proportionality Tests to Protect Christian Minorities in Western Democracies: <i>Alberta</i><i>v</i><i>Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Taxis; Population; Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Demography","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007630129611010211,"gpt":0.2514103856929762,"spread":0.243780256081966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001304975,0.0001064743,0.0002614085,0.0001349796,0.001186417,0.0002835263,0.0004484014,0.0001443888,0.0002265273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001019937,0.00009877447,0.0001056122,0.0002773527,0.002010803,0.0002108958,0.000044725,0.0005772242,0.00001447289],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001789833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008258923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.260827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980711,0.0002145073,0.0005666979,0.0001614299,0.0005909277,0.0003953796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985996,0.0004155812,0.0002390442,0.0001774447,0.0002220107,0.0003463456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007390117,0.0009167938,0.08346174,0.0003653831,0.000143989,0.0001990851,0.05964066,0.00004774873,0.01821285,0.7948918,0.0279924,0.01338847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006022541,0.0002706613,0.07977112,0.0002390947,0.00004507632,0.00009385264,0.003578424,0.000006301416,0.0004920797,0.009566965,0.9049901,0.0003440623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660848,0.0001109821,0.0001429171,0.01815486,0.0008251503,0.0005860839,0.00005545432,0.00001494634,0.01402482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981015,0.00001062021,0.0005122619,0.0001899644,0.0003928049,0.00001487401,0.000001035168,0.00001033507,0.0007666391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9125084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052277509","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x08001191","title":"And Then There Was One: Freedom of Religion in Canada – the Incredible Shrinking Concept","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Conscience","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.020007781718485,"gpt":0.2486210360515062,"spread":0.2286132543330212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003387639,0.00006659349,0.0001544703,0.00001664365,0.0007957958,0.00002919851,0.0001903379,0.00003353311,0.0001245086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002167065,0.00004771212,0.00002988816,0.0001030579,0.001851975,0.00009071099,0.00003609903,0.0002929978,0.000001270562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000153452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9298017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8661064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987829,0.0002000605,0.0002375188,0.00007997081,0.0004314222,0.0002680782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989471,0.0006662604,0.00008714875,0.00006776603,0.0000759404,0.0001557609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001036897,0.00001243067,0.009025769,0.000001500386,0.000008980765,0.00005152394,0.0007446916,0.0001474525,0.000005574801,0.9892986,0.0005665863,0.0001264746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003548416,0.0004787395,0.1475953,0.0008979458,0.0001982976,0.002093542,0.04385269,0.001012171,0.000284289,0.1236344,0.6749659,0.001438354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5784103,0.001410557,0.0007129296,0.006462853,0.0003612928,0.0001431073,0.00002244672,0.00001142965,0.4124651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985421,0.0002439831,0.000389783,0.0004402061,0.0003342285,8.179676e-7,4.589421e-7,0.000004213035,0.00004418687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8656642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158089866","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x12000403","title":"What's Sincerity Got to Do with It? Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Plaintiff; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Democracy; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Theology","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02053939208946261,"gpt":0.2872372470460888,"spread":0.2666978549566262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006644872,0.0001191034,0.0002626263,0.00002245124,0.000538659,0.0001404589,0.0002198228,0.00005952818,0.0001442658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004159366,0.00008430177,0.00004262562,0.0002369876,0.0003122244,0.0007352416,0.00005871439,0.0003273091,0.00001239314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001062082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003765155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9259389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980078,0.0001993298,0.0003174882,0.0001209187,0.0007683561,0.0005860773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988449,0.0002902762,0.0001003432,0.0000772317,0.0001700862,0.0005172145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006255298,0.0006321478,0.280944,0.00006234802,0.0001960994,0.0002001465,0.08501152,0.001413575,0.0002178967,0.5923601,0.02720163,0.01113492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001880282,0.0004111457,0.6061887,0.001204173,0.0001174373,0.00007650298,0.1582397,0.00005809754,0.0003516485,0.002008534,0.2283583,0.001105526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.961458,0.0009498933,0.0002789144,0.01778065,0.001401229,0.0002829944,0.000006734552,0.00001366823,0.01782794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973295,0.0001591334,0.001448647,0.000441625,0.0005785206,0.000003538692,3.482293e-7,0.000007311085,0.00003139793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4142984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044882823","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000743","title":"The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Liturgy; Constitution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Political science; History; Archaeology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03313965380810882,"gpt":0.2977859506097624,"spread":0.2646462968016536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001479776,0.0002847326,0.0004094875,0.0000221606,0.00835555,0.0005334724,0.0007410744,0.0002205519,0.0005985491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006866995,0.0001787931,0.0002920879,0.0002082538,0.003426286,0.0004301943,0.0001540433,0.00117441,0.000319108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007664572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004929058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01646628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996065,0.0007776319,0.0005884304,0.0003274079,0.001119713,0.001121775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976333,0.0008952225,0.0001971354,0.0002284161,0.0003541289,0.0006918419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001016728,0.0001581264,0.001383407,0.00000265496,0.00009496195,0.0000916051,0.01322434,5.880593e-7,0.00001328426,0.9817318,0.001683766,0.001513779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002573474,0.00124277,0.2152537,0.0002413996,0.0004795839,0.0003255805,0.08925056,0.0001823529,0.0001771377,0.3687405,0.3198055,0.001727527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08741293,0.001526445,0.001786474,0.01303545,0.003634734,0.0008297195,0.00002453461,0.000378544,0.8913712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965373,0.0002557281,0.001060742,0.0005418266,0.001455433,0.0000142256,7.685358e-7,0.0000241479,0.0001098338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563036451","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16001587","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Advertising; Engineering; Business","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0182172439342845,"gpt":0.2709534100097946,"spread":0.2527361660755101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000432295,0.00008009541,0.000196491,0.000008024783,0.0008030715,0.0000165327,0.0003646236,0.00005221621,0.0004269159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008781844,0.00003677751,0.0001067779,0.0001190378,0.0009859797,0.00007814771,0.00007526232,0.000147997,0.000001627295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002618391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003749548,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3300494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5958394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983079,0.0002288025,0.0002961088,0.00008882069,0.0007435071,0.0003348579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.0003417245,0.0001647792,0.00009355495,0.0002393711,0.0001792741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004952379,0.000103241,0.01756136,0.00001655242,0.0001630599,0.00002560241,0.004312035,0.00002089999,0.008032749,0.9476639,0.0158222,0.006228892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002135717,0.000230458,0.7332579,0.000534536,0.0001955545,0.00008227719,0.00966543,0.00003590122,0.01203554,0.0149205,0.2261822,0.0007240218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090562,0.0001483589,0.0001476826,0.02063786,0.0006837588,0.0001315656,0.00002722664,0.000009748024,0.06915756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00002231457,0.0002625301,0.0001238391,0.000422167,0.000001164975,4.703599e-8,0.000005005323,0.0007235394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106265496","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000068","title":"Judicial Restraint and Neutral Principles in Anglican Church Property Disputes: <i>Bentley v Diocese of New Westminster</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Synod; Statutory law; Political science; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08927004415386,"gpt":0.3050188155178458,"spread":0.2157487713639858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006845364,0.0001784401,0.0003631851,0.00004443794,0.0005968249,0.00008781142,0.000307903,0.0001281185,0.0001708529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502304,0.0001120188,0.00009627546,0.0001939372,0.001341753,0.0003264436,0.0001252866,0.0004654776,0.000006734134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000128163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001605621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02513915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03013888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979843,0.0002377166,0.0005215192,0.0002417253,0.0004572081,0.0005575364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989768,0.0001466483,0.0001604346,0.00009333662,0.0001104098,0.0005123912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005767623,0.0009457007,0.09829318,0.00008400558,0.0001659517,0.0003671873,0.1824089,0.00002542317,0.0009212154,0.6818037,0.001072384,0.03333554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002288684,0.00080656,0.9371334,0.0005172228,0.0001129346,0.00007975361,0.02198142,0.00009405478,0.0005854672,0.01182605,0.02388134,0.0006930816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9385145,0.0002957788,0.00009442172,0.002353441,0.00025776,0.0003028972,0.000006945229,0.000031433,0.05814281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996919,0.0001779886,0.001936133,0.0001345454,0.0005999545,0.000004300661,5.832613e-7,0.0000122922,0.000215162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101827679","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000471","title":"Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Test (biology); Trial court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Questions and answers; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01569907010677685,"gpt":0.2675490999569741,"spread":0.2518500298501973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004439538,0.00008102173,0.0001375034,0.00007216162,0.0014851,0.0001857365,0.0001853158,0.00007667486,0.002171376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003133298,0.0000711436,0.00005305716,0.0001628192,0.0006885664,0.000260677,0.00002074888,0.0003111158,0.0006765759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003292397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006239412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9048387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9531163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.0001040815,0.0002151355,0.000107973,0.0003520299,0.0006499064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989425,0.0001278703,0.00003177573,0.00004401813,0.000133339,0.0007204865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002562998,0.00002297891,0.006770579,4.832698e-7,0.000008007873,0.00006769047,0.000466464,0.000008523475,0.000005344544,0.9859367,0.004725818,0.001984834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003225158,0.00003774384,0.07633701,0.00005387193,0.00001321381,0.00004606069,0.002645024,0.00004220892,0.000006229744,0.3737161,0.5465254,0.00025462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06104563,0.0003616217,0.0001347826,0.02389854,0.0006802424,0.0001610577,0.000005145023,0.00002494341,0.9136881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971834,0.00006897534,0.0001684124,0.001712152,0.0007580018,0.000006606727,4.565974e-7,0.000004406783,0.00009757875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233277998","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1400088x","title":"The All Party Parliamentary Group on International Freedom of Religion or Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Government (linguistics); Population; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02045384112125888,"gpt":0.3015496449100306,"spread":0.2810958037887717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009186601,0.0000888401,0.0001297816,0.00002209077,0.0009909506,0.0001129339,0.0003844633,0.00005820965,0.0002828874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006595824,0.00005438346,0.00009591859,0.00005847466,0.001655532,0.0001160407,0.00003913585,0.0002788382,0.00004070162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001021892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002035611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002144122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003774049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983239,0.0002746428,0.0003200317,0.0001102289,0.0006620364,0.0003091404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979808,0.001412734,0.0001444689,0.0001040253,0.0001152779,0.0002426701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001151119,0.0000742355,0.0002160243,0.000001000893,0.00003093055,0.000006161507,0.0000974678,0.0000469548,0.00001035564,0.988869,0.007779881,0.002752859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002621788,0.0002259439,0.0004361137,0.00003527396,0.00002175418,0.0000198679,0.0003367291,0.0000949993,0.00001536692,0.01947973,0.9789872,0.00008485131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01808978,0.0001102507,0.0164993,0.03074548,0.003842008,0.0001940023,0.00004727473,0.00005354901,0.9304184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943164,0.0001917572,0.001142758,0.002248767,0.001757684,0.000002290682,0.00000371191,0.0000064048,0.0003302394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7621691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607013338","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000533","title":"How Relevant to the United Kingdom are the ‘Religious’ Cases of the US Supreme Court?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CITES; Law; Constitution; Kingdom; Relevance (law); Political science","authors":[{"name":"Frank Cranmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04003939813465544,"gpt":0.2961833361482097,"spread":0.2561439380135543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007648446,0.0001166755,0.0001586826,0.00002672619,0.002044353,0.0001767595,0.000760098,0.00006173075,0.00007583811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002809278,0.00004228348,0.0001536611,0.0002943172,0.003021562,0.00008725687,0.0001041084,0.0002943705,0.00002573681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005409986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003169452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004222058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997875,0.0005612105,0.0002445134,0.000119556,0.0007627045,0.0004370483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967428,0.002231188,0.0001897434,0.000257712,0.000327037,0.0002514526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002136849,0.00002142611,0.001454691,0.00000128687,0.0000238736,0.00002269037,0.0002650776,0.0000463148,0.00004631678,0.9902556,0.007630466,0.0002109185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001569559,0.00005741218,0.002753606,0.0001240982,0.00005900103,0.0001986706,0.001588553,0.000008995284,0.00008703288,0.005671026,0.9891868,0.0001077988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.35114,0.0002536658,0.01173665,0.6038764,0.001855038,0.00050892,0.0002070165,0.00005081532,0.03037155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948973,0.00005179369,0.0001167652,0.003460209,0.00109787,0.000003283417,2.596987e-7,0.000008721856,0.0003637983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998635348","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19001868","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Theology; Political science; Law; Advertising; Philosophy; Business","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01420695677101327,"gpt":0.2652995725323078,"spread":0.2510926157612945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004244952,0.00008128612,0.0002247443,0.000008298901,0.0006110317,0.00002350277,0.0003736119,0.00005563095,0.0006356412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003788063,0.00004826866,0.0001128231,0.0001471392,0.0005288103,0.00007130054,0.00007872854,0.0002624822,0.000003667837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002149702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003852697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4403092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5145524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982944,0.0002055251,0.0002892902,0.00009226095,0.0007964784,0.0003220456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991384,0.0002231599,0.0001665607,0.0001032572,0.0002178671,0.0001507878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005216065,0.0001228402,0.04809431,0.00004129984,0.0001889538,0.00001819989,0.008070407,0.0003329747,0.003545132,0.9283704,0.009887504,0.001275841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001539375,0.0002326487,0.8173391,0.0002765952,0.0001560956,0.0000600449,0.02031882,0.0002924514,0.003893204,0.005647929,0.1496205,0.0006233075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9006292,0.0001047493,0.00001306194,0.003933969,0.0005955697,0.0001265926,0.000009808725,0.000005176727,0.09458192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998413,0.00001080431,0.0002484359,0.0001593703,0.000298217,8.23621e-7,1.437037e-7,0.00000525169,0.0008639027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496097228","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00004592","title":"Illuminating the Law: Medieval Legal Manuscripts in Cambridge Collections, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge edited by Susan L'Engle and Robert Gibbs, Harvey Miller Publications, Imprint of Brepols Publishers, London/Toronto, 2001, pp. 263 (pbk £30.00) ISBN 1-872501-53-2","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Classical Studies and Legal History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Art history; Media studies; Art; Classics; History; Sociology; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Fr Robert Ombres Op","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02269282348941363,"gpt":0.2161159865100958,"spread":0.1934231630206821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001015019,0.0004373751,0.0006615437,0.0001139395,0.00263851,0.001380227,0.000488115,0.0001757222,0.007245306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005446037,0.0003336462,0.0002462491,0.000205501,0.001729404,0.001454854,0.0002254575,0.001195812,0.00002995563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006647636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008114052,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06252503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99615,0.0003470415,0.001238754,0.0005219439,0.0008242075,0.0009180541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975864,0.0006084777,0.0004176127,0.0003743427,0.0005230411,0.0004901043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000407929,0.0005018749,0.0001096113,0.00003079433,0.0001198023,0.00002528183,0.00115884,0.000003218184,0.00008972303,0.1572555,0.83966,0.001004534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001164686,0.0002481226,0.002384688,0.00009480428,0.00008502971,0.0001372928,0.002721435,0.0008832793,0.00002716562,0.00005403554,0.9917961,0.0004033883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02708113,0.03917649,0.0003055525,0.03550914,0.005586078,0.001408135,0.0006920085,0.000244907,0.8899966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572115,0.001543364,0.0001451491,0.001518888,0.002235642,0.00007531494,0.00004692588,0.00008263518,0.0371406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001088505","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1500006x","title":"Queen of Canada and Not of Babylon: The Constitutional Status of the Crown in Canada and Freedom of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Conscience; Political science; Citizenship; Statutory law; Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Politics","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01539206997554961,"gpt":0.2457909525076007,"spread":0.2303988825320511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004157001,0.00005701305,0.0001895623,0.00001394826,0.0001659015,0.000006699871,0.0001372921,0.00002955566,0.00001755971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007225059,0.00003591113,0.00002359936,0.0001000861,0.004894423,0.0000466181,0.00004255959,0.0001570882,2.157139e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002306411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02312829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986104,0.0001715251,0.0003564785,0.00005877584,0.0005956398,0.0002072312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986604,0.0006041074,0.0002087115,0.00006827255,0.000249661,0.0002087797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003725795,0.000009470424,0.04541076,0.000008002347,0.00001207912,0.000004063791,0.0001944443,0.0002938133,0.00001764337,0.9533121,0.0006534631,0.00004691486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004054488,0.0004242224,0.7210816,0.0009165616,0.0002915607,0.0003257322,0.0173,0.0005154125,0.002370702,0.04218812,0.2098409,0.0006906804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528773,0.0003808369,0.0002326191,0.002832106,0.0003505762,0.000112365,0.0002816303,0.000001062756,0.04293145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995545,0.00004851295,0.0001754588,0.0001460665,0.00005469064,3.408558e-7,3.982385e-7,0.000001528298,0.00001850962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.911124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225131920","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x22000242","title":"Institut de Taoïsme Fung Loy Kok c Ville de Montréal","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Willink","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01527663489589245,"gpt":0.2537257874834631,"spread":0.2384491525875706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001815414,0.0002550484,0.0003746081,0.00004517945,0.01316568,0.0001492896,0.0005052573,0.0001564522,0.006895546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003412753,0.0002567225,0.0003232251,0.0003617609,0.001424658,0.0003379468,0.0002560626,0.001719879,0.0002084412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002061242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005921994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001365936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006697135,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961329,0.00119359,0.0004484608,0.0002852688,0.0008554792,0.00108434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987409,0.0001131863,0.0001740698,0.0001392785,0.0001078689,0.0007247727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119107,0.0004382633,0.0003030919,0.00002315977,0.0001525535,0.00162862,0.04766726,0.002688915,0.00009025807,0.8835684,0.05328069,0.01004687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000473514,0.0002682403,0.000232843,0.00004886244,0.0001670512,0.001426791,0.04100554,0.0003584915,0.000005122901,0.01933665,0.9363623,0.0003146105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02482053,0.1400481,0.01037978,0.0908775,0.0129858,0.0004282201,0.0001293844,0.0001681655,0.7201625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824297,0.0006546623,0.001688225,0.002073664,0.00328466,0.00002448559,0.000001885775,0.0000283325,0.00981443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971640652","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19000565","title":"<i>Oikonomia</i>, Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition Kevin Schembri Pontificio Istituto Orientale, Rome, Kanonika 23, 2017, 327 pp (hardback €35.00) ISBN: 978-88-97789-39-0","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Byzantine Studies and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Canon (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Religious studies; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology","authors":[{"name":"W Becket Soule","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02528865149082345,"gpt":0.2187637255524007,"spread":0.1934750740615772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009068957,0.0003905387,0.0005750202,0.0001054569,0.001359292,0.0007119102,0.0004142355,0.000121617,0.001562556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006744215,0.0002895485,0.0002275224,0.00007500045,0.0008705184,0.0006079115,0.00012541,0.0009775105,0.0006644698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000486583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007965793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003794326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002535007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974021,0.0002358591,0.0007502555,0.0004849357,0.000503748,0.000623098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987466,0.0002783039,0.0002635911,0.0003730738,0.0001123886,0.0002260892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002262325,0.0003494394,0.0011595,0.0001074366,0.00009467632,0.0002407354,0.007821052,0.00001188534,0.0001308002,0.9562366,0.03291272,0.0007089126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001511797,0.0003363314,0.003911918,0.0002763109,0.000104564,0.0004268218,0.007436104,0.0003350469,0.00001305288,0.0005773664,0.9845761,0.0004945943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3675034,0.004738636,0.0003226733,0.002807369,0.003581687,0.0006822029,0.000154375,0.00007564729,0.620134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912897,0.0002953212,0.0002543684,0.0009181277,0.002145216,0.00001207179,0.00002685054,0.00004675911,0.005011602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131691028","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x14000507","title":"Solemnisation of Same-sex Marriage and Religious Freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economic freedom","authors":[{"name":"Rex Ahdar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01243104088167637,"gpt":0.2745990669765543,"spread":0.262168026094878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006986269,0.00006944262,0.0001573354,0.00002813005,0.0005645643,0.00006310702,0.0001144742,0.00006876265,0.0001454095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005796257,0.00006266646,0.00005026487,0.00005557173,0.001708264,0.00009957141,0.00002395511,0.0001755639,0.0000128329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003798976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002283804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00166131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005143465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988782,0.0002129535,0.000239474,0.00009323943,0.0003373491,0.0002387964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989338,0.000525481,0.0001033157,0.00006784627,0.00009836083,0.0002712001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008692595,0.00001828524,0.0006582948,0.000003391708,0.000008297173,0.000003589699,0.0004286233,0.00002331823,0.00004477029,0.996534,0.0005194931,0.001749202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008250094,0.000306886,0.003320469,0.00008698909,0.00009514355,0.0001506461,0.002312223,0.000559701,0.0001155231,0.2187201,0.7731591,0.0003481655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0549354,0.0002090546,0.06653114,0.004013859,0.0005961869,0.0001085112,0.00001805398,0.00004185477,0.8735459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946993,0.00006152518,0.003760176,0.0004328732,0.000879384,5.902276e-7,9.298601e-7,0.000005237343,0.000159964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6294171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396776965","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000127","title":"Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"David Willink","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04011560889809949,"gpt":0.2545120736414452,"spread":0.2143964647433458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003438421,0.00012209,0.0001498074,0.00005883227,0.0007382865,0.001571664,0.00009531307,0.00004822589,0.003953245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004785983,0.00008574225,0.00007941015,0.00002328664,0.0003030164,0.000504018,0.00003502764,0.0005187243,0.0003462317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003134396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003260335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001705488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009385204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990511,0.00005984152,0.0002851885,0.0001297919,0.0002475554,0.0002265436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994629,0.0001113749,0.00003443105,0.00008251987,0.00006874593,0.0002400477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362678,0.00003520129,0.00001624697,0.0000478712,0.0000347005,0.0001124836,0.003903531,0.000003047886,0.000004835485,0.9685972,0.0171961,0.01002516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003787851,0.0001526527,0.0008814101,0.0001586704,0.00005807641,0.0002989167,0.002351123,0.003141692,0.00002380601,0.04381181,0.9484898,0.0002532236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1236467,0.001877606,0.007567952,0.007190153,0.002955831,0.0001696783,0.0002683092,0.0003491484,0.8559746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966362,0.00005238934,0.0001210019,0.0005071643,0.001500111,0.000001369964,0.000007042287,0.00001507142,0.001159682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9312937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156426881","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000361","title":"Sacramental Sharing in Roman Catholic Canon Law: A Comparison of Approaches in Great Britain, Ireland and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canon law; Law; Canon; Political science; Classics; History; Sociology; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Eithne D'Auria","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0421797874766863,"gpt":0.2471173930228601,"spread":0.2049376055461738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004121166,0.0001291964,0.0003351984,0.00005950403,0.0002808435,0.00005432634,0.0001091654,0.00005225822,0.0001206776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002233621,0.0001119057,0.00002974136,0.00002420098,0.0006161778,0.0001007699,0.00006566182,0.0003930144,7.692643e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004614642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4747345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998859,0.0000454044,0.0004379561,0.0001532303,0.0001604114,0.0003439403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995705,0.0001541714,0.00008240859,0.00006575733,0.00002275529,0.0001043548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001082113,0.0001007545,0.07929701,0.00002494885,0.00002663436,0.000171486,0.008157086,0.00002232174,0.000009206388,0.9109012,0.00006411176,0.001117007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01115691,0.001607217,0.7134709,0.001451183,0.0003323806,0.001819888,0.1018995,0.001597907,0.001208754,0.07292227,0.09028674,0.00224632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441534,0.0009322619,0.00001606091,0.0001802783,0.000135398,0.00006484837,0.000009386209,0.000005352065,0.05450306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995949,0.000006325909,0.00004558526,0.0001231755,0.0001490265,0.000001908169,0.000001838839,0.000009293164,0.00006799504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.837979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5287634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320468231","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006554","title":"Emerging Legal Issues Involving Islam in Europe","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Conversation; Political science; Subject (documents); Soviet union; Classics; Law; Theology; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Library science","authors":[{"name":"Mark Hill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01271117894001443,"gpt":0.2993663938580527,"spread":0.2866552149180383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008628907,0.00009615658,0.0001403461,0.00009500983,0.0007529251,0.0003794072,0.0002045781,0.00007258928,0.0002003174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004481448,0.00008938676,0.00005208375,0.0003429136,0.0002653581,0.0004497872,0.00003002308,0.0003009194,0.00006053815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009455479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009439293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02977913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05233679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983513,0.0002466135,0.0003380358,0.0001446503,0.0004969038,0.0004224694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.0001133542,0.0000733458,0.00006731253,0.0001597552,0.000102515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000751,0.00006165917,0.0009464671,0.000002765386,0.000002103733,0.0001292783,0.001131008,0.0001596239,0.0001638424,0.9919119,0.004400468,0.001083365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001320863,0.0001327304,0.02384557,0.0002291296,0.0000458169,0.0001188857,0.007895471,0.001545477,0.0003600736,0.7977048,0.1661589,0.0006422756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07372724,0.001322267,0.002046493,0.005957667,0.000747895,0.0001009862,0.000001381556,0.00007222682,0.9160239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963399,0.000239167,0.0008989124,0.0001641306,0.001644764,0.000001251438,0.000001545925,0.00001241003,0.0006979526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336029995","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000077","title":"‘A Delicate Exercise’: Balancing Freedom for and Freedom from Religion in Canada: <i>Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Free Exercise Clause; Establishment Clause; Freedom of religion; Conscience; Political science; Sociology; Freedom of thought; Human rights; First amendment","authors":[{"name":"M. H. Ogilvie","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01013666590072542,"gpt":0.2383026582407323,"spread":0.2281659923400068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004594319,0.0001762102,0.0003333199,0.00004320354,0.0007354641,0.0001266248,0.0002704228,0.0001123307,0.0001512527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006305554,0.000134394,0.00006903033,0.00009849251,0.00080982,0.0002760653,0.00005003253,0.0002535792,0.00001458726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00115219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005162966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997957,0.0001504505,0.000498993,0.0002815116,0.0004622372,0.0006498052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978737,0.000941499,0.0001465261,0.0001341096,0.0001753707,0.0007288093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006741936,0.00001913277,0.007682685,0.000003328083,0.00001615051,0.00003863503,0.00005045478,0.00004361257,0.0002286109,0.9831246,0.006973674,0.001751767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004059061,0.0001192534,0.04650453,0.0008824883,0.000187066,0.00006303688,0.0007390705,0.0004241662,0.0002730702,0.06922041,0.8763958,0.001132095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7857163,0.002655635,0.1160239,0.04043306,0.004446111,0.00114442,0.001277995,0.0001402737,0.04816234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886763,0.0002486472,0.007523654,0.001388718,0.001874881,0.00001292304,0.000005237036,0.00001729528,0.0002523161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.915888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054019724","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000476","title":"The Foundations of Medieval English Ecclesiastical History: Studies Presented to David Smith","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Classics; History; Art; Philosophy; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Glyn Watkin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.059591540746817,"gpt":0.2917244463257526,"spread":0.2321329055789356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001695453,0.0002349211,0.0003969006,0.0001376427,0.001343003,0.000168704,0.0004113582,0.00007579807,0.0007044315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002317169,0.0001528343,0.0001949799,0.00006282696,0.001789995,0.0002406118,0.0001003303,0.0007072925,0.00008475409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003686758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001615723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002618081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001395063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973763,0.0001548687,0.0008302418,0.0002374954,0.0008105817,0.0005904768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959571,0.001885411,0.0001972711,0.0002766935,0.001183777,0.000499785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002881118,0.0001279083,0.000008849379,0.00003189647,0.0001606463,0.00005118999,0.03633239,0.000003123198,0.00004551435,0.8705302,0.0913133,0.001106795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003734264,0.0003312697,0.0001595605,0.0001115555,0.0001325665,0.0000331523,0.005472124,0.00002072148,0.00004623334,0.002897636,0.990237,0.0001847799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01264917,0.02019623,0.008149409,0.0059938,0.02707839,0.0008556173,0.00008306053,0.0002434319,0.9247509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832865,0.00008160047,0.000911484,0.000974,0.008967965,0.000009827884,0.000005268835,0.00004687139,0.00571651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170656","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000838","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Theology; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01420075893949067,"gpt":0.284790262601031,"spread":0.2705895036615403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004165329,0.00007719955,0.0002103965,0.00001250092,0.001057169,0.00002586201,0.0003797352,0.00005540218,0.0001787141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007759364,0.00004695855,0.0001083816,0.0002424454,0.0007862263,0.0000507073,0.00009194867,0.0002577403,4.982181e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006154099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.480263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6813512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985149,0.0002214188,0.0003075216,0.00008597214,0.0005790647,0.0002911049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991611,0.0002669765,0.0001254347,0.00009045235,0.0002452584,0.0001107845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002249718,0.00006262065,0.007991371,0.00002092447,0.0001217929,0.000009631802,0.002333466,0.00009528565,0.0006831502,0.973302,0.01403693,0.001320331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001407042,0.0001105889,0.7092928,0.0004688226,0.0002839487,0.00002505735,0.0192756,0.0002435361,0.005284626,0.01937828,0.2437227,0.0005070359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.713247,0.000386036,0.0001456373,0.01878687,0.001079991,0.0001819259,0.00001752133,0.00001098107,0.2661441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.00001684479,0.0003038363,0.0002768198,0.0002122699,0.000001365549,1.155374e-7,0.000003063172,0.00110777],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130993,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170771","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000589","title":"VII: Edmund Wood (1841–1932)","year":2025,"lang":"la","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Robin Ward","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02515036976331724,"gpt":0.3120235028224869,"spread":0.2868731330591697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001809354,0.0003754042,0.0005864145,0.00008417215,0.005066137,0.000657215,0.0008729649,0.0006626516,0.005735639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004896963,0.0003680632,0.0006174968,0.0006392089,0.002305226,0.0004903083,0.0001419412,0.002044012,0.0007560406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007875169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006093917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957348,0.0008441134,0.0008547876,0.0004695428,0.0009162675,0.001180463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976917,0.0006316603,0.0002548964,0.0003106792,0.0002477633,0.0008632872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007188861,0.0003493264,0.0004917899,0.00004670641,0.0002153913,0.0001909794,0.004997212,0.00002956163,0.00007747977,0.9269004,0.06466689,0.001962408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001225073,0.0002084006,0.004085617,0.0004974832,0.0004720213,0.00007485179,0.01042753,0.00007832442,0.00009253917,0.02782725,0.9543467,0.000664214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04413295,0.001756285,0.009538299,0.01560303,0.01349454,0.0004814811,0.00005818129,0.0001807727,0.9147545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969419,0.000293252,0.0009080181,0.001952921,0.002505529,0.000003567258,0.00000208981,0.00002555137,0.02489004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9252861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332931160","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000902","title":"Joint Assembly of the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Synod; Convention; Context (archaeology); General assembly; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Alan T. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01756096524075337,"gpt":0.2477105737714764,"spread":0.230149608530723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000788286,0.0001138593,0.0003337772,0.00001051033,0.0007294386,0.00004679171,0.0003546099,0.00005142097,0.0002167311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009155393,0.00005549691,0.00007087186,0.0001876942,0.001116494,0.0000786278,0.0001008678,0.0004679835,7.358487e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006496936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001419344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975159,0.0005579873,0.0004478468,0.000117401,0.0009442681,0.0004165866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985333,0.0007549943,0.0001731416,0.0001112297,0.0002228037,0.000204527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004917577,0.00043976,0.1490442,0.0001943482,0.0008441863,0.0001393459,0.09288232,0.0005188951,0.006827364,0.6645961,0.05950226,0.02451941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001120597,0.0000277444,0.9686894,0.00008808072,0.00003497082,0.00002107103,0.02429769,0.0003018584,0.000234871,0.001850146,0.00315991,0.0001736819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627624,0.0002938363,0.000005061822,0.02338083,0.0002098176,0.0002848172,0.000007595915,0.000002482967,0.0130532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992982,0.00002944818,0.00005814011,0.0003649681,0.0001530546,0.000008043586,1.049505e-7,0.000006027532,0.00008205019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5610325,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}