{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":148,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":148,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"6f4f3ddcca3a","filters":{"venue":"Ecological Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2038335062","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025","title":"A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":567,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Natural resource management; Livelihood; Complex adaptive system; Resilience (materials science); Ecosystem management; Process (computing); Enthusiasm; Perspective (graphical); Psychological resilience; Environmental resource management; Adaptive capacity; Resource management (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Socio-ecological system; Management science; Business; Ecology; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Ecosystem; Climate change; Social psychology; Agriculture; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04388033897502572,"gpt":0.2593410575695124,"spread":0.2154607185944867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007012879,0.0001670803,0.0002402506,0.00006322951,0.0003672364,0.00007050874,0.0002428538,0.0001295296,0.0004350904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002351704,0.0001724145,0.0001034276,0.0001191459,0.000349841,0.00009225492,0.0003087223,0.0001351836,0.00004085243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005819348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001439214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009774812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002416636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986569,0.00005331544,0.0003471294,0.0005288305,0.0000450322,0.0003687665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991203,0.0004762572,0.0001827827,0.0001572685,0.000006104503,0.00005729957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008308054,0.0002113981,0.7778633,0.00002047902,0.00002552575,0.00000222029,0.000143852,0.2059236,0.000004189117,0.01058448,0.000700141,0.004437735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007580669,0.000117518,0.7469489,0.000005924212,0.00001807851,2.578382e-7,0.0003150258,0.221844,0.0000040537,0.02004462,0.009764029,0.0001795432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839813,0.000008827461,0.001754118,0.000928846,0.00006421452,0.0008365944,0.00002315635,0.00003178903,0.01237123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228503,0.00005798842,0.07427602,0.002315597,0.00004810097,0.0000847395,0.00004314103,0.000009046698,0.0003151119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0725219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7030858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019761781","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014","title":"What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":489,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Point (geometry); Car ownership; Free riding; Environmental economics; Computer science; Transport engineering; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Public transport; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01999948077635889,"gpt":0.1930638476627719,"spread":0.173064366886413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001651013,0.0000786156,0.0001524724,0.00002557787,0.0000339196,0.00001261906,0.0001750507,0.00006690618,0.0000674421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000262778,0.00005404918,0.00004396612,0.00004932454,0.00006275024,0.0001521248,0.00002718766,0.0001192961,0.000001892052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006299798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009818418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000313843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001467484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994064,0.00001613992,0.0003497809,0.00009770124,0.00001860403,0.0001113599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994903,0.0001770824,0.00007020419,0.0002325441,0.000004438502,0.00002538734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005912206,0.0006880597,0.2008129,0.0008712085,0.0005163985,0.0002351183,0.06461141,0.5721353,0.006951538,0.1427524,0.0004275311,0.009939064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002309376,0.0002924935,0.8708271,0.0001223805,0.0001247433,0.0001131973,0.03202044,0.07513776,0.01381696,0.00342299,0.001249538,0.0005629464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986446,0.000130164,0.00007612225,0.00004893824,0.0003549191,0.0002985829,0.00001704795,0.00001919235,0.000410388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996815,0.00009629709,0.0001065295,0.00004291166,0.00001990043,0.00001923995,0.000004948795,0.000007596411,0.00002106035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6700142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2204061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964018439","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008","title":"Navigating coastal values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Seascape; Ecosystem services; Recreation; Spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Geography; Wildlife; Spatial ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03980733486865879,"gpt":0.2657816395072278,"spread":0.225974304638569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006302934,0.0001316117,0.0002873067,0.000008328394,0.0001452097,0.00002269386,0.0002074183,0.0001131245,0.0005806295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001346439,0.0001079819,0.00008716483,0.00003727255,0.0000171712,0.0003265364,0.0001909795,0.00008474751,0.0001594016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008014798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005691439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001514238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009650786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988202,0.00004324564,0.0004396022,0.0002098329,0.00005278565,0.000434367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992462,0.000194749,0.0002778325,0.000137379,0.000005929016,0.0001379275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002346102,0.000112422,0.9818955,0.0001758802,0.00002845037,6.296503e-7,0.001661964,0.01435294,0.0001829018,0.00005176878,0.00002860786,0.001485467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001259259,0.0003674002,0.7405451,0.0002079377,0.00006325795,0.00001319484,0.004364422,0.2388548,0.002667099,0.001007788,0.00997704,0.000672675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979544,0.00003807971,0.000219127,0.0000390075,0.0003856915,0.0002669971,0.00005312159,0.00003413386,0.001009427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986119,0.000005248925,0.0009029054,0.0001506455,0.0002323646,0.00005994779,0.00002091631,0.00001173679,0.000004327499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2413504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6357486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066555278","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.007","title":"The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Discrete choice; Scrutiny; Market penetration; Preference; Alternative fuel vehicle; Consumer behaviour; Theory of planned behavior; Marketing; Economics; Driving range; Electric vehicle; Environmental economics; Business; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Engineering; Control (management)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01919269149006924,"gpt":0.2299593888287355,"spread":0.2107666973386663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001518106,0.000150595,0.0002293709,0.00003968952,0.0002676919,0.00002612674,0.0002375306,0.000188643,0.00004270577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002013895,0.0001053098,0.00007915403,0.00005921811,0.0002590891,0.00008452915,0.00003241766,0.0001377489,0.00002588409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001572288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003242393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002560545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01097045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990265,0.00003098576,0.0003426203,0.0002438622,0.00003435548,0.0003216745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983122,0.0013369,0.0001171267,0.0001845266,0.000007660528,0.00004158393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389676,0.000117205,0.3654007,0.00001552072,0.00007212369,0.00000584833,0.0002047977,0.2684472,0.00003627654,0.316494,0.0001752824,0.04889216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003603907,0.0007859824,0.657325,0.00001449298,0.00004083623,0.000005931723,0.00111682,0.1547309,0.002234002,0.1190291,0.06036706,0.0007459951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942768,0.0001516057,0.00009798008,0.0006114825,0.0001281516,0.0002408162,0.00001170625,0.0001327484,0.004348763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976436,0.001021816,0.0005233507,0.0001237141,0.00003509739,0.0001020732,0.00002420174,0.00001404662,0.0005120756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2919242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118181057","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.001","title":"Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundación Caja Madrid","keywords":"Virtual water; Commodity; Grain trade; Water resources; International trade and water; Water use; Water security; Business; Water trading; Water conservation; Productivity; Food security; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Water scarcity; International trade; Economics; Agriculture; Trade barrier; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01451521958850839,"gpt":0.228767823054133,"spread":0.2142526034656246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001876821,0.00008133683,0.0001339303,0.00001476301,0.0000188555,0.000008865723,0.0001993008,0.00007294326,0.006216576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008475513,0.00006036605,0.00004696019,0.0000246015,0.0001349924,0.0001562986,0.00006930901,0.00009036926,0.00006812229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003847713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003835121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006157025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003141045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992799,0.00001928505,0.0002643016,0.0001916949,0.00004131687,0.0002035608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997677,0.00001442223,0.00004575806,0.0001159095,6.044997e-7,0.00005566904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003924477,0.0006440208,0.9870557,0.00000193871,0.000004186413,0.00001580103,0.000263302,0.006801185,0.001802974,0.001108482,0.00003986768,0.002223327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002367137,0.0001430779,0.9642902,4.802428e-7,0.000001240533,0.00000239428,0.0001224812,0.001138251,0.0008240147,0.03277989,0.0003758546,0.00008538897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726094,0.000002749607,0.000001549805,0.001724181,0.00003746415,0.0001028882,0.000003772743,0.000007315015,0.02551065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989371,0.00001594145,0.0001828778,0.0006363809,0.00001391713,0.00000304627,0.000007360336,0.000002548896,0.0002008493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03167141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594012331","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027","title":"Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Respondent; Climate change; Public economics; Climate policy; Opposition (politics); Turnover; Sample (material); Political science; Survey data collection; Public policy; Business; Environmental resource management; Politics; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7367389942336753,"gpt":0.4722084882722747,"spread":0.2645305059614006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003387017,0.0000516719,0.000147503,0.00003040963,0.0006626258,0.00007074018,0.0003623113,0.00006150509,0.000904642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003762242,0.00004719104,0.00007393311,0.00001046401,0.0001857343,0.0001627865,0.0001322348,0.0000400864,0.00003145769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001078524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003514562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001380082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002509982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994983,0.00003147524,0.0001634284,0.000100164,0.00002338984,0.0001832465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993274,0.0001565643,0.0001683844,0.000255328,0.00003123744,0.00006113531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070065,0.000301146,0.05507096,0.00005298149,0.00003228465,3.526737e-7,0.009840676,0.00003693819,0.0001164639,0.7626721,0.0003146901,0.1714544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000680071,0.0002219505,0.7903236,0.00001191089,0.00001656141,2.933887e-7,0.003304851,0.0003882795,0.0001045976,0.01927118,0.1854393,0.000237443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8838809,0.000002899742,0.00000846304,0.003971138,0.0002242928,0.000171414,0.00005554029,0.0000223659,0.1116629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984289,0.01474168,0.0001706068,0.00016326,0.0002526189,0.00006831149,0.00002162554,0.000004774783,0.0002881353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7434009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738006973","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007","title":"Unpacking the Relationships Between Pro-environmental Behavior, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Ecological Threat","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Life satisfaction; Unpacking; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04457386597033414,"gpt":0.2662079032669694,"spread":0.2216340372966353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006174855,0.0001902961,0.0002129748,0.00001233426,0.002232676,0.0001827332,0.0003330164,0.0002125039,0.005381019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003999815,0.0001374603,0.00007527443,0.00001310646,0.001407266,0.0004080318,0.0005714335,0.0004238698,0.0004337704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000656962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001650388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001049472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003124951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.0001661979,0.0003241622,0.0004994626,0.00008937246,0.0003118464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987273,0.0002697242,0.0002148008,0.000534643,0.000001867918,0.0002517297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005772061,0.000125045,0.9950551,0.000001155725,0.000007501369,0.000001327345,0.0002291554,0.0001268918,0.00002613684,0.0003797046,0.0001218981,0.00392031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509011,0.00007791856,0.9930379,7.536222e-7,0.00002986444,0.000005919861,0.001236327,0.0001674753,0.000005484486,0.003085589,0.001916037,0.0001857629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909297,0.000008473095,0.00000806564,0.003700811,0.0001242682,0.0006064445,0.00001510243,0.00003004486,0.00457706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985589,0.00009638546,0.0003044994,0.0003929994,0.00007504937,0.0001206387,0.00001268951,0.00001158938,0.0004272363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007629183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965642028","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033","title":"Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Underpinning; Representativeness heuristic; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Ecosystem; Social psychology; Ecology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02409506323758828,"gpt":0.2606986162016861,"spread":0.2366035529640978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003525111,0.0001107657,0.0002524661,0.000007685432,0.0003451176,0.00007628361,0.0001924992,0.00006382854,0.0001013916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000298093,0.00006630992,0.00005502914,0.00002483819,0.00004109029,0.0002108793,0.00018043,0.00005761166,0.00001096681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004369057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004327314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001835023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992321,0.00006361362,0.0002699032,0.0002100475,0.00004266781,0.0001816886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995458,0.0001501081,0.0001839152,0.00007377309,0.000005190947,0.00004123923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004540143,0.000156087,0.9440161,0.0001984422,0.0001433546,3.134462e-7,0.0032435,0.02189033,0.0001664194,0.02784448,0.0001633263,0.002132258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006180133,0.0001843334,0.5291602,0.00001087396,0.00002606579,0.00000398858,0.001850281,0.4615889,0.0001037329,0.003628425,0.00266363,0.0001615809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931386,0.000005757128,0.00007475227,0.0003392271,0.000104018,0.000259385,0.0000113379,0.00001518801,0.006051751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990321,0.00001154791,0.0005924597,0.0002389377,0.00007198728,0.00002624767,0.00001347183,0.000005332435,0.000007852696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4396985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.270404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015325442","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.018","title":"Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: A dynamic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Copper; Tailings; Material flow analysis; Environmental science; Tailings dam; Lithosphere; Copper mining; Geology; Waste management; Metallurgy; Materials science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004632455790527608,"gpt":0.207617823716781,"spread":0.2029853679262534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001529522,0.0001452865,0.0002771439,0.00004963622,0.00007376499,0.00002791547,0.0001469107,0.00008741261,0.00368706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002726408,0.0001287747,0.00009241924,0.0002252123,0.0002470392,0.0002253181,0.0002706204,0.0001604091,0.0002205344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009612835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005609306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988965,0.00005192247,0.0002664435,0.0003909911,0.00004895893,0.0003451397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.0000514508,0.0000660429,0.0001998438,0.000001051042,0.0001537749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000165304,0.0002313126,0.9175028,0.000001353904,0.00002517708,0.000003398999,0.0002451358,0.06643902,0.00001534121,0.000004429539,0.00003939838,0.0154761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002304902,0.00007294269,0.9393142,2.138371e-7,0.00003007525,0.000001015645,0.0002721065,0.05259899,0.000002876432,0.00009454357,0.007226695,0.0001557968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970848,0.0000395782,0.00003592702,0.0003815863,0.00002914971,0.0002132165,0.00001512427,0.00001713937,0.002183483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976097,0.0003578878,0.001067897,0.0007102321,0.00001010839,0.00001976801,0.00002189601,0.000006202449,0.0001963527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02181146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995425070","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.013","title":"Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Recreation; Valuation (finance); Economics; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09539834136989948,"gpt":0.2086410228556226,"spread":0.1132426814857232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006657543,0.0001482222,0.0003494417,0.0001539345,0.00004805109,0.00002951871,0.0001897019,0.0001604513,0.00229037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001598624,0.0001730924,0.00007056339,0.00004268092,0.0001000579,0.0004406154,0.00005950377,0.0001027202,0.0008574817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005305527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009333435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000421874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002521354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985572,0.00003342898,0.0007348915,0.0004484567,0.00002124297,0.0002048303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993206,0.00002989977,0.00037374,0.000212221,0.000001930655,0.00006160333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005572381,0.0003931045,0.960889,0.000002888129,0.00001488865,2.223908e-7,0.0003650375,0.005570811,0.00002156464,0.03173596,0.00000168211,0.0009992194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008503641,0.0001387782,0.9260167,0.000002060832,0.000003669957,0.000002248645,0.0001430592,0.001113435,0.00006582333,0.07147419,0.000007280356,0.0001823464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950819,0.0001077889,0.0003969889,0.00006472921,0.0001175627,0.0002810251,0.00008473192,0.00001050331,0.003854748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986747,0.0002287415,0.0007075924,0.0001413845,0.00004161253,0.0000344805,0.0001227434,0.00001428501,0.00003444588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03973824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090787680","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.003","title":"What matters and why? Ecosystem services and their bundled qualities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Valuation (finance); Function (biology); Environmental resource management; Business; Production (economics); Marketing; Ecosystem; Sociology; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00916344558941495,"gpt":0.1819763894997342,"spread":0.1728129439103192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003663079,0.0001515717,0.0002612869,0.00001503925,0.0001444927,0.0002853373,0.0001596793,0.0001011145,0.0009576376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003119456,0.0001019047,0.00002975663,0.00002142068,0.00003162944,0.000637248,0.0002557493,0.00005463896,0.0003417654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004515187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001360405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001109492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007395647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991153,0.00007532811,0.0002273359,0.0003231381,0.00002663551,0.0002323034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994419,0.000186696,0.0000953765,0.0001516111,0.00000231019,0.0001221621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000158756,0.0003725935,0.950957,0.001246029,0.0002247107,0.000007790522,0.01000535,0.004920162,0.000387918,0.006031453,0.0029311,0.02275714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002128616,0.0007698964,0.4207403,0.0001563631,0.00005032281,0.0001081901,0.01542513,0.1613286,0.0003840053,0.03154584,0.3658496,0.00151317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959127,0.00007946619,0.000007774225,0.002072684,0.000290881,0.0001258449,0.000008369117,0.00003527727,0.001467041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935288,0.0005416417,0.00006196447,0.005709884,0.00006990934,0.00001609884,0.000005793395,0.000008033928,0.00005782791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5302168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979344163","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008","title":"Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; China; Total economic value; Contingent valuation; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Willingness to pay; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1050702986970693,"gpt":0.2499022652335738,"spread":0.1448319665365045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009407962,0.000263571,0.0007470641,0.0001846433,0.0002560118,0.00004998223,0.0002371979,0.0002041152,0.0007252907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004961379,0.0003026114,0.000137838,0.0001205827,0.00004360185,0.0002884195,0.0001190545,0.0001966633,0.0003108091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008637511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005261598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005625517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004282461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975674,0.0000513353,0.001199358,0.000738267,0.00001810166,0.0004255087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988686,0.0001753551,0.0004702459,0.0003454697,0.00001199617,0.0001283242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002516427,0.0007712377,0.9720198,0.00002072266,0.00007031694,0.0001511515,0.0006928672,0.0098641,0.000001284122,0.01613495,0.00008351958,0.0001649025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003966973,0.0004982118,0.8963172,0.000004621214,0.00001198885,0.0005922489,0.001719733,0.08887929,0.000003889642,0.006581586,0.0009684597,0.0004558155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925913,0.00004335679,0.0005180388,0.0003370341,0.0004808744,0.001591574,0.0002682093,0.00004732754,0.004122339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963735,0.00008862335,0.002430516,0.0003791114,0.0001055843,0.0004416546,0.0000579123,0.00003230936,0.00009082511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0790152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132102506","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.001","title":"Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Fishing; Business; Ecosystem services; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Fisheries management; Ecosystem; Marine conservation; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Agriculture","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01775953922216434,"gpt":0.2382880439339661,"spread":0.2205285047118018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050986,0.0001147318,0.0002384042,0.00004651172,0.00008256629,0.00004375578,0.0001498831,0.0001323538,0.003096889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000338865,0.000110847,0.00003802267,0.00005041332,0.0001551299,0.0001906556,0.0003855965,0.0002014109,0.00009340741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006059978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001233012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003034548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005688198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988694,0.00004908002,0.0003464077,0.0003468236,0.00003869904,0.0003496177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994075,0.0002964518,0.0000651792,0.0001129294,0.0000011283,0.0001167707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000292525,0.00002648646,0.968276,0.000005219213,0.000006878114,0.000008803864,0.00006484505,0.00005133768,0.000004264225,0.001189328,0.00006030415,0.03027733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003994434,0.0001086484,0.9809292,8.42212e-7,0.00000267399,0.000005007527,0.0001947736,0.003408531,0.00001123823,0.003944418,0.01086507,0.0001301612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065943,0.000001490448,0.00006808476,0.001556422,0.00004322772,0.0002070804,0.000004806931,0.00001965103,0.0915049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989045,0.00006869005,0.0004637964,0.0002613496,0.0000747502,0.00001313212,0.000008518818,0.00000824666,0.0001970717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09231011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025951156","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.002","title":"An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Fisheries management; Livelihood; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Sustainable management; Environmental economics; Economics; Fishing; Fishery; Ecology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04084062670785343,"gpt":0.2916388727467946,"spread":0.2507982460389411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002441168,0.0001052027,0.0001237503,0.00002852782,0.000274999,0.00009886702,0.000147796,0.00009059912,0.001489388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008401,0.00009971979,0.00003068388,0.00005537227,0.0001122339,0.0002010333,0.00008993138,0.00007734934,0.00002087556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002921932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002015447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001981581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001505089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991645,0.00004226473,0.0001643835,0.000295368,0.00005298614,0.0002805475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995834,0.00009840722,0.00003960185,0.0001434666,0.000003771569,0.0001313642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008549256,0.0003080708,0.8620672,0.00003962698,0.00003174898,0.000009844749,0.0001148366,0.005275088,0.00009313493,0.1121013,0.0001082108,0.0197654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003146327,0.001882078,0.4407634,0.00002750634,0.00002856815,0.00001675523,0.001551466,0.02414517,0.00592287,0.1001741,0.4209344,0.001407447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289233,0.000004324399,0.0130184,0.0001777758,0.0001397506,0.0004257252,0.000007403066,0.00003057711,0.05727275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9083589,0.00002990264,0.09100121,0.0001898073,0.00006351795,0.0002036419,0.000004583942,0.000008101673,0.0001403297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4213039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018327237","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.011","title":"Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: An assessment of payment approaches","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Payment; Ecosystem services; Cash; Incentive; Business; Payment for ecosystem services; Tanzania; Natural resource economics; Conditionality; Additionality; Deforestation (computer science); Disbursement; Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Ecosystem; Economics; Finance; Socioeconomics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1329654634964322,"gpt":0.2828587788122012,"spread":0.149893315315769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009096531,0.0001908821,0.0005140993,0.0001600733,0.0000694007,0.00008819545,0.0002549249,0.0001513481,0.0002867884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001948461,0.0002077485,0.00009199403,0.00007517461,0.00002559924,0.0005178641,0.00007869874,0.00008238616,0.0001415276],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006596505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002143518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001207981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003259496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979408,0.00003588981,0.001075514,0.0005754355,0.00002086367,0.0003514638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999005,0.00008104846,0.0005239955,0.000241571,0.00001317232,0.0001351866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003722784,0.001699032,0.842177,0.000167065,0.00008440184,4.284662e-7,0.0006907823,0.08733188,0.0001102547,0.04862408,0.00005406609,0.01902382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008686177,0.0007764667,0.767215,0.00001316367,0.000005996733,7.731e-7,0.0006556688,0.214953,0.000153323,0.0147049,0.000397821,0.0002552185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904471,0.00002649955,0.004568457,0.00032854,0.000157305,0.0027277,0.00009710164,0.00002841475,0.001618894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525531,0.0000311947,0.04462689,0.0001794615,0.0000398804,0.002357392,0.0001324197,0.00002368985,0.00005597441],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1276211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8471736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016283768","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.022","title":"Managing without growth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Obstacle; Poverty; Unemployment; Developing country; Welfare; Greenhouse gas; Green growth; Natural resource economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Sustainable development; Market economy; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05947683107935072,"gpt":0.2232927299856676,"spread":0.1638158989063169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004588383,0.0002476112,0.0005834327,0.0001941431,0.0001837494,0.0001527115,0.0003537024,0.0002103809,0.002158103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006256675,0.0002959195,0.0001988308,0.00009753519,0.0001155341,0.0003061104,0.0001554348,0.0001879809,0.00457208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003040649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001125365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004767517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003370402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978845,0.00001065282,0.0008740047,0.0006112835,0.00001037277,0.0006092562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990738,0.00008615219,0.0003871239,0.0003211442,0.00001486833,0.0001169253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001361527,0.0001225621,0.1220547,0.00001302317,0.00002136143,0.000003562346,0.00003518019,0.0005015608,0.000002845385,0.8750736,0.002006999,0.0001509503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006808995,0.00006764191,0.08630197,0.00000321418,0.000005415556,0.00001301664,0.00003970209,0.007956109,0.00005187241,0.8506005,0.05376726,0.0005124059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6716445,0.0002363369,0.0005394854,0.003323794,0.0005953743,0.0001832044,0.0001524779,0.0001304428,0.3231944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324,0.0005820423,0.00134261,0.001919324,0.0006416405,0.00005056243,0.00006308402,0.00004246209,0.002118273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3215955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993499059","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00041-1","title":"Northwest coast indigenous institutions that supported resilience and sustainability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia; Northern Arizona University","keywords":"Indigenous; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Environmental ethics; Tragedy of the commons; Environmental resource management; Trespass; Sociology; Political science; Commons; Law; Ecology; Economics; Social science; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06662407721612228,"gpt":0.3374401854482899,"spread":0.2708161082321676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005699724,0.0001783626,0.0003948516,0.00006254723,0.00542264,0.00001410288,0.0001888014,0.0003530096,0.002237576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004056391,0.0001545314,0.00005541592,0.00008960217,0.000398261,0.00013087,0.0004047199,0.0005185104,0.0003501244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009705545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004080485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001970781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1779213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976865,0.0001670855,0.0004808067,0.0004257992,0.00003783426,0.001201953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998676,0.000510911,0.0001984086,0.0002719644,0.0001470853,0.0001956401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020618,0.0002734977,0.976915,0.00005230236,0.00002596579,0.0000263019,0.01460071,0.0002047887,4.774788e-7,0.00551911,0.001332925,0.001028323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006572906,0.0003679605,0.8963767,0.000003639205,0.00001926445,0.00001455993,0.02411396,0.0003403687,0.000001023259,0.002003224,0.07584975,0.0002522528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814731,0.0001070621,0.00003310102,0.002233748,0.0005209127,0.0012092,0.00006953428,0.00009236811,0.0142609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995491,0.001064917,0.00009268219,0.001979962,0.0001181407,0.0002335315,0.0000223061,0.00001050168,0.0009869465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1759505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146904012","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.031","title":"Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"World Agroforestry Centre; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Prosocial behavior; Payment; Public economics; Tanzania; Distrust; Premise; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08386047576948277,"gpt":0.334920429353972,"spread":0.2510599535844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468556,0.0001422408,0.0002730848,0.00003492301,0.0002705358,0.00007115246,0.0001779193,0.0001784862,0.0004272018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114646,0.0001469539,0.00003528848,0.00003682932,0.0004749295,0.0004567556,0.0002783158,0.0001324964,0.0000204712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000433158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006125194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008278942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989361,0.00008831822,0.0002889857,0.0003414743,0.00003904841,0.0003060583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994691,0.0001987128,0.0001039932,0.00008974578,0.00001276205,0.0001256901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005325216,0.000173186,0.9735196,9.58126e-7,0.000008092652,0.000006404579,0.02032067,7.808672e-8,0.0003039939,0.003554607,0.00003587424,0.00202334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004865798,0.000239851,0.9722819,0.00001865672,0.00001423039,5.001732e-7,0.02022485,0.00001175584,0.002558738,0.003758348,0.0001330028,0.0002716246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925117,0.0005019089,8.486934e-7,0.0002518971,0.0002576904,0.0004497792,0.00001049509,0.000029036,0.005986684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973894,0.001149081,0.0008861071,0.0002831708,0.00006041334,0.0001619768,0.000001632589,0.00000758417,0.00006068058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005926004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283830242","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.018","title":"Economic viability and small-scale fisheries — A review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Profitability index; Scale (ratio); Fishing; Sustainability; Fisheries law; Business; Fishery; Fisheries management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Finance; Geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0418292509389675,"gpt":0.2780266871825944,"spread":0.2361974362436269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146614,0.0003918869,0.001636855,0.00002281775,0.0001152582,0.00007275135,0.0005664738,0.0003680202,0.08005159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001326777,0.0002623063,0.000336763,0.00004951275,0.000637593,0.0001549607,0.001475679,0.0003289035,0.002870966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007221063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007787782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000548082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005872676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977053,0.0001961656,0.0007367362,0.0008543332,0.00004375195,0.0004637368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998497,0.0004410237,0.000253898,0.000557437,0.000003371825,0.0002472844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002398463,0.00002786331,0.001485265,0.003162776,0.00002003317,0.000002642678,0.00000204509,9.275686e-8,4.744245e-9,0.00006567824,0.004691111,0.9905401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006764439,0.0001097523,0.0003281232,0.0004892791,0.00005531533,0.00002264185,0.00000118439,0.000005505733,2.546806e-8,0.0005313601,0.9980464,0.0003427537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001791333,0.769186,0.000002354128,0.0004460572,0.0001522643,0.001124893,0.00008747267,0.00004032675,0.2287815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001318745,0.9945772,0.000218699,0.0002932753,0.00009657176,0.0003019077,0.00002537569,0.00002804439,0.004457557],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008379776","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.015","title":"Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reforestation; Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Carbon offset; Developing country; Tree planting; Global warming; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Business; Forestry; Economic growth; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004836107211118263,"gpt":0.2177367852956951,"spread":0.2129006780845769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001214104,0.00009761037,0.0000994704,0.00001247767,0.0002021124,0.00006305579,0.0001109834,0.0001043378,0.0001926488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003251883,0.00009240388,0.0000456495,0.0001186208,0.0002433195,0.00008583962,0.00009764053,0.00004628746,0.00003324712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002154641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000149382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00188368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001325236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992797,0.00001787038,0.0001905897,0.0002478327,0.00002810746,0.0002359253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996929,0.00003235277,0.00007935212,0.0001199727,0.000005017968,0.00007046042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001723478,0.00009795924,0.6737345,0.000002562117,0.000008961545,4.15746e-7,0.000002373127,0.01000268,0.000003940518,0.3061627,0.008749804,0.001216876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002396914,0.00006510298,0.8584485,2.630263e-7,0.00001706118,0.000003359213,0.000001391243,0.008576916,9.80645e-7,0.09655774,0.03598601,0.0001029836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806928,0.000008423414,0.0005023951,0.002131011,0.00005761597,0.0002831681,0.0004629046,0.00004252085,0.01581917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985197,0.00007208198,0.0003403019,0.0002401546,0.0002812274,0.00005495159,0.0002922064,0.000003814513,0.0001956318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2096049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3768121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985091715","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.011","title":"Assessment of net ecosystem services of plastic greenhouse vegetable cultivation in China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse; Ecosystem services; Agriculture; Environmental science; China; Irrigation; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Agronomy; Geography; Biology; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01239642703596907,"gpt":0.2020528255620255,"spread":0.1896563985260564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002760759,0.00009920733,0.0002878395,0.00003416152,0.00002531607,0.000006164063,0.0002394705,0.00009432154,0.001781856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005600443,0.00007688176,0.00005192367,0.0000820034,0.0000139902,0.0002356874,0.0001403001,0.00005965537,0.00006887614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001086669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009541744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000962927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01217775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990733,0.00004139345,0.0004580128,0.0002055686,0.00004911439,0.0001726481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994473,0.0000639099,0.0002821366,0.0001557925,0.00000436808,0.00004642863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001274812,0.0002135343,0.9863107,0.00009117003,0.0000113399,0.00000101313,0.000189652,0.01267649,0.0001331113,0.000302264,0.000003001888,0.00005493995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003077118,0.0001522137,0.9573544,0.00002203898,0.000007886629,7.961376e-7,0.00005820082,0.04099776,0.0004295091,0.0005091386,0.00007368461,0.0000866252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887155,0.000006308924,0.00001376781,0.000007924174,0.0001168053,0.0001610846,0.00001592581,0.00001197034,0.01095071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994238,0.00003486014,0.0004727005,0.00002163664,0.00001208475,0.00001500279,0.000007206349,0.000006099797,0.000006608784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02895631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076715122","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.006","title":"A Box-Cox Double-Hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen's perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Wildlife; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Payment; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Wildlife conservation; Preference elicitation; Public economics; Preference; Economics; Public good; Marketing; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Ecology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1402295939631255,"gpt":0.2388407933036161,"spread":0.09861119934049059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009394061,0.0001939998,0.0004539557,0.00008343939,0.0001706514,0.00004741468,0.0003700072,0.0001755675,0.001856861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000669045,0.0001803327,0.0002176567,0.00006766326,0.0002256899,0.0003399438,0.0001318306,0.000186604,0.001323464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007216783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004217611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004947203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006492999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.00002132418,0.0008634884,0.0004902829,0.00002708508,0.0002990669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988332,0.000114268,0.0005524991,0.0003913461,0.00002362601,0.00008500147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003989242,0.0001870018,0.01286194,0.000003445355,0.00006271035,1.33803e-7,0.0005945337,0.2118067,0.000008366391,0.7731647,0.0008737557,0.0003968149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025873,0.0002110392,0.06257793,0.000004390596,0.00002944691,0.000005097575,0.0008270452,0.4832079,0.0002322981,0.442294,0.007496932,0.0005266193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189562,0.0003073643,0.003207728,0.007718472,0.000200145,0.0004343737,0.0001072208,0.00003225405,0.06903623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929082,0.0004121623,0.002765717,0.002187706,0.0002171333,0.00008459586,0.0000186693,0.00002231716,0.001383497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3308707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781747296","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.026","title":"Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Flood control; Flood myth; Environmental science; Damages; Flood mitigation; Detention basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Geography; Ecology; Surface runoff; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006384755467326371,"gpt":0.1867596895276952,"spread":0.1803749340603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007998455,0.0001558796,0.0003143854,0.00002142837,0.0001678456,0.0001127951,0.000315892,0.00008109557,0.0003711158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000719022,0.0001047701,0.00002208172,0.0001037525,0.00002360612,0.0001705105,0.0001429146,0.0001279049,0.00004407715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002596682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005494228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6219986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998619,0.000207508,0.0003713211,0.0003881764,0.00006760512,0.0003464408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.0002489937,0.0001015228,0.0002388081,0.000004206835,0.00008676323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002667911,0.000200963,0.9947643,0.0000210086,0.00001262243,0.001134292,0.003039224,0.0003412239,7.214855e-7,0.00000355611,0.00008221595,0.0003731918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002048312,0.0004540553,0.9029189,0.00001152407,0.00001703074,0.0003788457,0.0717329,0.02015657,0.000001312983,0.0001369825,0.001917106,0.000226471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966633,0.00001535099,6.847571e-7,0.0002974179,0.0001137463,0.0006570144,0.00003308465,0.00001063705,0.002208732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984001,0.000005049739,0.00001739666,0.001412737,0.00007313467,0.00006584312,0.000001966958,0.000007259413,0.00001652239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3778602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4272402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051200322","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.013","title":"Reassessing the costs of biological invasion: Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Black sea","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anchovy; Fishery; Population; Ecology; Engraulis; Ecosystem; Bioeconomics; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04909316167537908,"gpt":0.2620905252532172,"spread":0.2129973635778382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008874692,0.00009033964,0.0001586456,0.0000125899,0.000108621,0.00004067822,0.000596368,0.0001131562,0.003770584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002345672,0.00004416992,0.0000617624,0.000158977,0.0007267951,0.00009342173,0.0004371037,0.0002552973,0.0001463576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002464704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002289791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004329806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001103228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.0001384989,0.0002547352,0.0002257844,0.0000772185,0.0002598514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.0004070228,0.00006948884,0.0002594868,0.000004053848,0.00004493271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000480239,0.0003540513,0.9652199,0.000003141268,0.00000711949,0.00002057014,0.0002624003,0.004054277,0.00009988966,0.007846402,0.0007207291,0.02136352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004283372,0.0002671561,0.9692091,0.000003190089,0.00000295317,0.00001673629,0.0007258471,0.0007614061,0.00009731871,0.01128811,0.01706503,0.0001348571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8407642,0.00000338118,0.00001413595,0.003623844,0.00002693127,0.0001885207,0.000002572881,0.000006396537,0.1553701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981762,0.0002107373,0.0002407343,0.001246003,0.00003042564,0.00002062103,0.000004363578,0.000003446321,0.00006749973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.157412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063254755","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.014","title":"Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Environmental-Services project in Mozambique: A household level analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group","keywords":"Payment; Business; Consumption (sociology); Household income; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Propensity score matching; Cash; Impact evaluation; Distribution (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Socioeconomics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Geography; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05696713962517162,"gpt":0.2025208703582284,"spread":0.1455537307330568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003185457,0.0001349725,0.0002265015,0.0001090538,0.00009435352,0.00001377733,0.0003564803,0.0001019598,0.0009303816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002954795,0.0001197746,0.0001073987,0.0001710158,0.0001505391,0.0001821042,0.000212298,0.00006421782,0.0000201593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002179107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008995004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005705806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001626751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990046,0.00003740314,0.0003056055,0.0003548831,0.00006908464,0.0002284439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994967,0.00002935719,0.0001661869,0.0002472914,0.000002014315,0.00005844674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008484133,0.0004644085,0.9827901,0.00001620106,0.00004219724,0.000001406045,0.0002048171,0.01493498,0.00003424981,0.000003831515,0.000008522874,0.001414433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004941426,0.000254839,0.9166471,0.000002044813,0.00007095749,1.738509e-7,0.0002855577,0.08134192,0.0001946215,0.00003297109,0.0005282295,0.0001474049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971102,0.00000295251,0.00002814459,0.00002808457,0.00002740905,0.0004028429,0.00008734086,0.00001742078,0.002295551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967864,0.00004164659,0.002485753,0.000373397,0.000007233749,0.00003867961,0.0000629503,0.000005924002,0.0001980294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06640694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190523531","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.012","title":"Opening the black box of energy throughputs in farm systems: A decomposition analysis between the energy returns to external inputs, internal biomass reuses and total inputs consumed (the Vallès County, Catalonia, c.1860 and 1999)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Work (physics); Agriculture; Environmental science; Production (economics); Sustainability; Agricultural engineering; Agricultural science; Energy (signal processing); Environmental economics; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01384072115984351,"gpt":0.2372218664211646,"spread":0.2233811452613211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000756794,0.0002026801,0.0003694105,0.00003844126,0.0001625955,0.0001405183,0.0004270516,0.000126723,0.00004632084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006651562,0.0001037331,0.00007331035,0.0002014885,0.0007624857,0.0002066618,0.0008835963,0.0001571205,0.0000056406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005668655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001643617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009387069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00817131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984604,0.0002684562,0.0004597965,0.0003800109,0.0001342641,0.0002971244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989808,0.0003526743,0.0002171021,0.0002781611,0.000009066964,0.0001622545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001271387,0.0001469897,0.959778,0.00001076737,0.0002527506,0.00001511825,0.002263404,0.0346439,0.0005781474,0.0004522675,0.0002220253,0.001509535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004079874,0.0002783896,0.9900978,0.00001127436,0.0001413272,0.00005308353,0.001284744,0.004511305,0.000444086,0.0008954681,0.001658496,0.0002159922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997299,0.0001453271,0.0004648918,0.001426272,0.00005592057,0.0002712051,0.00004186984,0.000008362649,0.0002871302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991584,0.00006376822,0.00009376311,0.0005107998,0.00004711714,0.00004548977,0.00001941403,0.000007049427,0.00005424334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03031989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920111783","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.005","title":"Climate justice, commons, and degrowth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Indigenous; Climate justice; Livelihood; Commodification; Environmental ethics; Grassroots; Sociology; Environmental justice; Degrowth; Solidarity; Politics; Injustice; Political ecology; Democracy; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Political economy; Climate governance; Economic Justice; Political science; Climate change; Economics; Law; Sustainability; Economy; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01089008159313975,"gpt":0.1747180372230911,"spread":0.1638279556299513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007081626,0.00009193613,0.0001472675,0.00001719298,0.0001474949,0.0001383158,0.00007481075,0.00005336088,0.005248886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005346854,0.00007500756,0.00003212944,0.000003880258,0.0001245701,0.0001334395,0.0000907389,0.0001074603,0.0009316974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002068288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002372013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002606599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008476155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994704,0.00001309846,0.0001375984,0.0001696684,0.00001501619,0.0001942431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997271,0.00008093565,0.00003111413,0.00009928134,0.000003175262,0.00005840537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001282686,0.00006067219,0.01049349,0.00003454796,0.000007128601,0.000002841057,0.000589185,0.000009308746,0.000005244403,0.9868376,0.001248674,0.0006984662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006216448,0.0003066382,0.05473512,0.00001216232,0.00004474408,0.00001056554,0.001946467,0.0008456382,0.00001627976,0.01316076,0.9279457,0.0003543251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6903843,0.00007450658,1.725658e-7,0.0002733648,0.0003263269,0.00007238781,0.00005871439,0.00002195756,0.3087882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946107,0.000222797,0.000095421,0.001996915,0.0001734474,0.000006276289,0.0000302897,0.000008231688,0.002855946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033785671","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.017","title":"Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: The role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clean Development Mechanism; Additionality; Property rights; Incentive; Business; Social capital; Capital (architecture); Pooling; Natural resource economics; Economics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Environmental economics; Climate change; Market economy; Microeconomics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0129834346467067,"gpt":0.1984128950295006,"spread":0.1854294603827939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003494323,0.00006711713,0.0000809777,0.00001652021,0.0003459615,0.00003477188,0.0001848307,0.00004505841,0.0003012151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001786498,0.0000314927,0.00002093035,0.00003731179,0.0002375144,0.00005820582,0.0001673417,0.0001013488,0.00003153844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005001921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001068587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004573905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994882,0.00003256933,0.000158128,0.0001378135,0.00005207819,0.0001312229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997461,0.00008861679,0.00007482722,0.00006983587,0.000003513322,0.00001712332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005262987,0.0005249155,0.9486386,0.00000630934,0.00002320319,0.000002051191,0.01743415,0.0001764719,0.00008210543,0.01569543,0.0003694688,0.01699468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001714765,0.00003415781,0.945002,6.028342e-7,0.000006634006,3.931132e-7,0.001300698,0.000983313,0.00007423179,0.003912859,0.04844988,0.00006379388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946087,0.000001614173,0.000003059835,0.001363227,0.00003735012,0.0003880987,0.000003287253,0.000006086749,0.003588558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999439,0.000003196488,0.0001486724,0.0002221282,0.00002400768,0.00003389571,0.000004859651,0.000001655067,0.0001225795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1166656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8989872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049345493","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.008","title":"Compensation for environmental services from artisanal fisheries in SE Brazil: Policy and technical strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Norsk institutt for naturforskning; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Artisanal fishing; Fishing; Livelihood; Business; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Payment; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Geography; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02326269068410361,"gpt":0.2058083760406245,"spread":0.1825456853565209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009177259,0.00008737962,0.0001115755,0.00002535198,0.0001034862,0.00004454867,0.000127883,0.00007840497,0.001614035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000647976,0.00008150153,0.00002803108,0.00002797115,0.0002273923,0.0002139301,0.0002455515,0.00004725556,0.0000505553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001571962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005132667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001182131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007595322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994125,0.00001823495,0.0001570609,0.0002370995,0.00002991638,0.0001451539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997547,0.00005356199,0.0000582366,0.00008429249,8.551818e-7,0.00004830786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004317336,0.000111034,0.9964799,0.000003407584,0.000006657129,0.000001381425,0.0004739932,0.0001903548,0.00009773011,0.0003974694,0.00004147036,0.002153394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003143584,0.00008443137,0.9836507,0.000001117291,0.000007103578,7.586511e-7,0.001032938,0.001365506,0.00002363478,0.007154936,0.006261123,0.0001033866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902232,0.000006919327,0.00004586712,0.0004729356,0.00002626894,0.0002216815,0.00003823592,0.00001908591,0.008945783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973046,0.00005696021,0.001776474,0.0006827785,0.00002597095,0.00001561823,0.0000378749,0.000003313387,0.00009642054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01282923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073988666","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.017","title":"Managing invasive species: Rules of thumb for rapid assessment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Rule of thumb; Damages; Usability; Control (management); Invasive species; Balance (ability); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Political science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01956002508314583,"gpt":0.2446468979535231,"spread":0.2250868728703772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002540691,0.00008720563,0.000190122,0.00001881937,0.0001352749,0.000008684241,0.0001603653,0.00006783085,0.002998316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006227542,0.00007745633,0.00007553502,0.00002023092,0.0002208715,0.0001074722,0.0001531217,0.00006208201,0.0001594879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002146736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001197174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002325771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004619647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993172,0.00002120552,0.0002491254,0.0002050939,0.00002489076,0.0001824413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992839,0.0004372514,0.0001370658,0.0001003849,0.000006629715,0.00003475058],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009042412,0.0010701,0.4402103,0.00005629407,0.0002575496,0.000002941626,0.001032672,0.2197148,0.000684385,0.2937146,0.008277503,0.03488843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006196669,0.0003068359,0.8806431,0.000003003307,0.00002167206,0.000001595154,0.0002978989,0.03691662,0.00024852,0.0606526,0.02008536,0.000203144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096202,0.00001712467,0.001235319,0.002231769,0.0001092175,0.0002567182,0.00001916538,0.00001697908,0.08649354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797146,0.0004052647,0.01789887,0.0007987393,0.00004819718,0.00005981033,0.00001039234,0.000005358042,0.001058738],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4404328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142411771","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00199-3","title":"The Kyoto protocol and payments for tropical forest:","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Tinker Foundation; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Tropical forest; Carbon sequestration; Carbon sink; Clean Development Mechanism; Ecosystem services; Carbon market; Reforestation; Payment; Payment for ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Order (exchange); Carbon offset; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Climate change; Business; Ecology; Economics; Agroforestry; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0122050456620408,"gpt":0.2419552346378949,"spread":0.2297501889758541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001024011,0.00007748377,0.00007827,0.000004652163,0.0002304653,0.00006205445,0.0001710105,0.00004884329,0.006053644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000199055,0.00004772846,0.0000374985,0.00002045627,0.0001845885,0.0000770193,0.00009392387,0.00004515209,0.0009575186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005509343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002702563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001245731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002220744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994074,0.00001478114,0.0001435027,0.0001758854,0.00002431368,0.0002341879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996903,0.0001001079,0.00003015739,0.0001138411,8.691509e-7,0.00006472042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005035235,0.0002775181,0.5891153,0.0000148388,0.00003291468,0.000002479648,0.00008281681,0.003501745,0.000003262071,0.04903496,0.1035412,0.2538894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003862263,0.0001596709,0.3013596,3.472092e-7,0.00000224362,5.751894e-7,0.000001540256,0.005387378,0.00000160492,0.00939407,0.6832477,0.00005907511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154611,9.40887e-7,0.000006523912,0.001509012,0.00003299764,0.02090025,0.000003363617,0.00002190731,0.06206389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.779497,0.00008666926,0.001814456,0.004319233,0.0003128812,0.1429089,0.000007820858,0.00002840229,0.07102466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5797064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139265487","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107004","title":"Commons grabbing and agribusiness: Violence, resistance and social mobilization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Directorate for Geosciences; National Science Foundation; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Commission; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; FP7 Coherent Development of Research Policies","keywords":"Commons; Agrarian society; Land grabbing; Global commons; Political science; Economic system; CONTEST; Resource mobilization; Political economy; Social movement; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Politics; Agriculture; Law; Biology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01256023648168131,"gpt":0.180814178042967,"spread":0.1682539415612857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001136175,0.0001216108,0.0001968224,0.000004470147,0.0003548684,0.0001042208,0.00007962984,0.0001385731,0.0001209714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003880001,0.00004820705,0.00003120871,0.0001103767,0.00007501427,0.0001106273,0.0001519049,0.00008836883,0.000007844223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003934486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000892899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008637451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002229957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991984,0.00004676977,0.0001993134,0.0003177425,0.00003807871,0.0001997386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999643,0.0001402333,0.00007644355,0.00002464754,0.00005244476,0.00006324721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001459036,0.0007101144,0.4838764,0.0001052969,0.0001169085,0.00007728528,0.0005623495,0.00008457628,0.004244371,0.3496431,0.007271517,0.1531622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001270721,0.0000259728,0.9502876,0.000009610532,0.000006950475,0.000009297581,0.0003121282,0.00004093905,0.0001613069,0.03300063,0.01584277,0.0001757266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968228,0.0002352336,0.000003346346,0.001785993,0.00008336108,0.0001062231,0.00002523143,0.00004158758,0.0008962623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978967,0.0008230494,0.0001893186,0.0005807608,0.0001192801,0.00001594159,0.0001250551,6.974626e-7,0.000249223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4664112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2729397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965430492","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106418","title":"Who promotes sustainability? Five theses on the relationships between the degrowth and the environmental justice movements","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Degrowth; Materialism; Overconsumption; Reproduction; Prosperity; Capital accumulation; Sustainability; Economic Justice; Economics; Ecological economics; Economic system; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Neoclassical economics; Ecology; Biology; Economic growth; Profit (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03212482189813606,"gpt":0.2664866259799272,"spread":0.2343618040817911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002036423,0.0001101501,0.0001641154,0.00001124009,0.001834811,0.0001148884,0.0003401744,0.0001131984,0.0004160897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734352,0.00005230241,0.00005406608,0.00003236164,0.001426557,0.0001419342,0.0001612721,0.0003721389,0.0001372272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005113459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001600129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003383936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984602,0.0006890873,0.0002195415,0.0002215904,0.0001040633,0.0003055286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993091,0.006506554,0.0001167211,0.0002126817,0.000005539801,0.00006751421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005953739,0.00009026868,0.3874274,0.00003785082,0.00003492065,4.039689e-7,0.01481193,0.0001940552,2.473175e-7,0.5963416,0.0002290704,0.000772651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003361123,0.0001065378,0.8268465,0.000007983834,0.00005702914,1.993885e-7,0.1113912,0.0002496122,0.000003409477,0.05499301,0.005906359,0.0001021123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506249,0.0001226487,0.00000201346,0.03315023,0.00008601838,0.001187416,0.00001900791,0.00001256375,0.01479516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934274,0.001343303,0.000009844862,0.003170549,0.0001504147,0.00008316479,0.000003957292,0.000006276343,0.001805088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5413486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131356814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.014","title":"Niche construction, co-evolution and biodiversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Niche; Niche construction; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Trophic level; Ecological niche; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Function (biology); Functional ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecosystem services; Environmental niche modelling; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science; Evolutionary biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01335596210891601,"gpt":0.1899425656308661,"spread":0.1765866035219501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008378272,0.0000590312,0.00009379617,0.00001225667,0.0004189372,0.00000411944,0.00005374915,0.00008273,0.00107898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003475969,0.00005598007,0.00002108188,0.00002593796,0.0007578225,0.00009711258,0.00009831588,0.00006980578,0.0007345949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001362647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005904434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001742275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000188093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995705,0.00002169831,0.00009826928,0.0001773778,0.00001630148,0.0001158822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997847,0.00006506545,0.00004912108,0.00005260672,0.00000342116,0.00004506663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005461969,0.00002571191,0.9957857,4.86438e-7,0.000006577902,0.000002057073,0.0000517679,0.0004924737,0.000006875697,0.00211973,0.00138801,0.0001152223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001847112,0.00004956944,0.9922987,1.27643e-7,0.000004001042,0.00003690882,0.00005989488,0.0009798622,0.000008073752,0.003979943,0.002325841,0.0000724319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985051,0.00001125268,0.0001333669,0.000504952,0.0001024039,0.00006472116,0.000007044349,0.00002629337,0.01409897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979905,0.0002435153,0.001127904,0.0003987631,0.00001022267,0.000003831555,0.000004230231,0.000001080459,0.000219921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01387904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337382490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.007","title":"Ecological monetary economics: A post-Keynesian critique","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Nexus (standard); Post-Keynesian economics; Monetary policy; Interest rate; Keynesian economics; Endogenous money; Debt; Monetary economics; Ecological economics; New Keynesian economics; Monetarism; Macroeconomics; Ecology; Sustainability","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02238594591117234,"gpt":0.2187039078306176,"spread":0.1963179619194452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001243711,0.0005481464,0.001224634,0.0003104702,0.0002765316,0.0001494247,0.0009536553,0.0007049587,0.01445401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502317,0.0004823609,0.0005448246,0.00009871156,0.0004469671,0.0008021726,0.0003287792,0.0003337667,0.01395162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008990712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001045503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003889589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995698,0.00009498704,0.001736175,0.001345645,0.00001018447,0.001115032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971169,0.0007944879,0.0006976646,0.0008507072,0.0000384698,0.0005017748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001011539,0.0003344807,0.01563988,0.00001070019,0.0001057594,0.00001496255,0.00008416166,0.0001338293,0.00002754588,0.9779021,0.001226815,0.004418573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654128,0.0005557699,0.0963143,0.00001003155,0.00001210318,0.00005757482,0.00007172583,0.0004323175,0.0001136906,0.7447305,0.1550314,0.001016451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9062046,0.0002929349,0.0002953126,0.01217738,0.001114111,0.0004459395,0.0008959261,0.0002123215,0.07836148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983656,0.001911864,0.0009384534,0.008293712,0.00075753,0.0001463751,0.00003869084,0.0000725931,0.004184799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2331717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991088917","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.006","title":"Evaluating China's urban environmental sustainability with Data Envelopment Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental Sustainability Index; Data envelopment analysis; Per capita; Beijing; China; Sustainable development; Urbanization; Gross domestic product; Benchmarking; Index (typography); Natural resource economics; Geography; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Population; Statistics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0911556531172484,"gpt":0.3859296661094064,"spread":0.294774012992158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009478276,0.000229235,0.0006060726,0.0003170477,0.0004158252,0.0003781226,0.002417793,0.0001581047,0.004605859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004295504,0.0001529633,0.000186143,0.0008045993,0.0004924591,0.0004323402,0.001099915,0.0004201786,0.0002451213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000284967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002448352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000327802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009637036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962726,0.0002778401,0.0009474817,0.00150749,0.0005404605,0.0004541408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995318,0.001366154,0.0004940247,0.00254221,0.00006907123,0.0002105358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005935046,0.0007041156,0.8853264,0.000001355191,0.0003712085,0.0000125382,0.0003340647,0.07238413,0.0001232366,0.001316939,0.0003902325,0.03897636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002030455,0.000126461,0.7030936,2.586238e-7,0.0002020551,0.000003284418,0.0003097663,0.2868168,0.0000278308,0.004688092,0.004309784,0.0002189511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952045,0.000008973715,0.001711769,0.001257465,0.0001472624,0.0002350333,0.00005678293,0.00003531237,0.001342881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889179,0.000004791058,0.01015412,0.0002092597,0.00007197775,0.00001343099,0.0000908065,0.000008551052,0.0005291748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2144327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967994418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.019","title":"Wood and non-wood pulp production: Comparative ecological footprinting on the Canadian prairies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pulp (tooth); Ecological footprint; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Agriculture; Taiga; Paper production; Wood production; Agronomy; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Biology; Sustainability; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01832144692833927,"gpt":0.2196290303200162,"spread":0.2013075833916769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004500014,0.0001749954,0.0002120935,0.00001812728,0.0006809065,0.00009678865,0.0001868223,0.0001339194,0.001097925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001191397,0.0001172497,0.00005115752,0.00006509605,0.0008580762,0.0001387183,0.0001836408,0.0002577558,0.0002166114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001001681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002866941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008518507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2612134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987735,0.00008286992,0.0002339498,0.0004228428,0.00006145384,0.0004254318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993739,0.0001715098,0.00008303111,0.0002089158,0.000003855077,0.0001588095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003578526,0.0005174241,0.9753401,0.000004513073,0.00001764276,0.00001125873,0.0004139623,0.01048936,0.00009420646,0.008170761,0.003889205,0.001015729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001206714,0.0002343493,0.9829029,0.000001044994,0.000005327871,0.000008244867,0.0004548768,0.0003924191,0.0003735055,0.007524183,0.007815589,0.0001669181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9328458,0.000004674258,0.000001776856,0.008212254,0.00009929489,0.000483404,0.000003114192,0.00002035158,0.05832929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980985,0.000005823552,0.0002094608,0.0007836258,0.00008345614,0.00005405906,0.000003746979,0.000005938168,0.0007554071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195198209","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.007","title":"Debunking trickle-down ecosystem services: The fallacy of omnipotent, homogeneous beneficiaries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Business; Stakeholder; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Service (business); Goods and services; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem management; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01783953341147444,"gpt":0.1965081591854382,"spread":0.1786686257739637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006242957,0.0001765219,0.0003388262,0.00002230741,0.0001719158,0.00007556941,0.000665079,0.0001417631,0.0006861925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002089486,0.0001062763,0.0001081099,0.0001164764,0.00002704389,0.0001980631,0.0004148398,0.00009619971,0.0007973409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002032558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002278271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006119325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0289612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986711,0.00008324904,0.0004822438,0.000318782,0.0001071674,0.0003374493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990374,0.0001618422,0.0002834106,0.0003562738,0.0000156026,0.0001454286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001726078,0.00048605,0.5155751,0.0001497325,0.0001619494,0.00003043797,0.00204819,0.4713093,0.00008676812,0.001597266,0.0005970314,0.007785579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004467951,0.001758956,0.280065,0.0001188421,0.0003224262,0.0003029127,0.007162347,0.4294293,0.00231504,0.03135929,0.2405573,0.002140646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904367,0.000138476,0.00001896124,0.0003295974,0.000322719,0.0002632056,0.00002701851,0.00004450036,0.008418848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.00008210351,0.0001968118,0.0003988971,0.00009887346,0.00002470025,0.00001047952,0.00001259129,0.00003804075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2399603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975183154","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.021","title":"Globalization, trade and migration: Undermining sustainability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Community College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Natural resource; Globalization; Economics; Population; Resource depletion; Population growth; Natural resource economics; Business; Economic system; Ecology; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01060765333933709,"gpt":0.2242821065874442,"spread":0.2136744532481071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000141355,0.00005595483,0.00007611646,0.000006741252,0.00009968745,0.00004647657,0.00007385833,0.00005871886,0.004058233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000523423,0.00005046326,0.00001684322,0.00005404188,0.0001817336,0.0001219963,0.0001348072,0.00004875075,0.00001797989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000246883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001238431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002711658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002062225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994602,0.00002434494,0.0001349429,0.0001918299,0.00003087032,0.0001578462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997942,0.00004714505,0.00002610596,0.00008287189,0.000002857038,0.00004676035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004549802,0.00004260494,0.9832497,0.0000022315,0.000001004608,0.000001757393,0.00001325542,0.0009519606,0.000002032797,0.006319295,0.001460049,0.007951567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009936198,0.00004595032,0.8357145,8.191915e-8,0.000001223351,0.000004003822,0.00006104945,0.004761686,0.000003776339,0.02598847,0.1332524,0.00006755614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8342656,0.000002052343,0.0001672424,0.002197542,0.00001799679,0.0001021445,0.000001484419,0.00002138291,0.1632246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998346,0.00002777748,0.0003470889,0.0002580788,0.00003231048,0.00001004248,0.000009184662,0.000002789384,0.000966684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1640805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770776418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.025","title":"Certified Organic Agriculture as an Alternative Livelihood Strategy for Small-scale Farmers in China: A Case Study in Wanzai County, Jiangxi Province","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; China Agricultural University; Department for International Development, UK Government; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Livelihood; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Business; Organic farming; Context (archaeology); Household income; Scale (ratio); Net income; Poverty; Agricultural science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03182961409428244,"gpt":0.2461811956409217,"spread":0.2143515815466392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003890136,0.000336208,0.000489025,0.00001770935,0.000454703,0.0003778046,0.000784685,0.000328554,0.0002615951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001352791,0.0001319238,0.0000978127,0.0001277517,0.00008986029,0.0003897838,0.000224395,0.0003807415,0.00002556894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002143499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005449239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003660559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3397236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979723,0.0001129432,0.0004716364,0.000823229,0.00006990679,0.000549985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991351,0.0001326931,0.0003148493,0.0001587578,0.00006550542,0.0001931282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002304334,0.04846059,0.6264637,0.000164268,0.0005832332,0.01248901,0.01735752,0.003270643,0.09946295,0.004862485,0.002706328,0.181875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001610423,0.004110963,0.9717421,0.00001458526,0.00002346763,0.000224354,0.01805433,0.0003932889,0.0006104659,0.001725927,0.0008720769,0.0006180056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951432,0.00002200513,3.867817e-7,0.002172192,0.0001907153,0.001693325,0.0001396234,0.00004826829,0.0005903128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989273,0.00004054112,0.000035409,0.0002024279,0.0003493366,0.0001289981,0.000060405,0.000003318176,0.000252264],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3452784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6723248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765221637","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.023","title":"Silencing Agency in Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) by Essentializing a Neoliberal ‘Monster’ Into Being: A Response to Fletcher &amp; Büscher's ‘PES Conceit’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation; Genome Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Governmentality; Neoliberalism (international relations); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Critical theory; Praxis; Capitalism; Politics; Hegemony; Epistemology; Situational ethics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Social science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01644320006015287,"gpt":0.2449035544499578,"spread":0.2284603543898049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007646637,0.0001973674,0.0002633673,0.00005334344,0.0005986997,0.0002422556,0.0006897654,0.0001321398,0.000535041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009332681,0.0001846601,0.00009287113,0.00004548719,0.00008340818,0.0002254584,0.0007409531,0.00009537316,0.0003880528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005166022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001250715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007029721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005548717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998531,0.0001051274,0.0003474982,0.0005504795,0.00008757218,0.0003783627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999051,0.0001655941,0.0002215442,0.0004005379,0.000008102676,0.000153248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009691979,0.0003899251,0.9703175,0.00008141912,0.00007174724,0.00001648421,0.008243703,0.007883021,0.003689604,0.00007881191,0.002171806,0.006086709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001547526,0.0002778565,0.8363287,0.00005298381,0.00002628392,0.000001057935,0.0009261211,0.005652205,0.0003628648,0.001414006,0.1528934,0.0005169759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993471,0.000006897063,0.00009214938,0.003080984,0.0002474745,0.0007277295,0.00002729109,0.00003158325,0.002314907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947865,0.00001558869,0.001094834,0.002401224,0.00004726505,0.0000826046,0.00001279722,0.00001115115,0.001548048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1507216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7530221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138920617","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.024","title":"There is no silver bullet: The value of diversification in planning invasive species surveillance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Portfolio; Business; Expert elicitation; Silver bullet; PEST analysis; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Finance; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01345817136052852,"gpt":0.1927419709737614,"spread":0.1792837996132329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004042813,0.00007216237,0.0001250078,0.00001395058,0.00007818156,0.00000928086,0.0002721418,0.00007105395,0.004522901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001154882,0.00005174887,0.00003572194,0.00004873168,0.0002335248,0.00005857189,0.0002110727,0.00008560323,0.0008241205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001108352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004522438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007349188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005006766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993926,0.00007028579,0.0001703694,0.0001855738,0.00003231092,0.0001488643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993712,0.0003283405,0.000109647,0.0001662837,0.000003795725,0.00002070228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003054715,0.00009281027,0.9310828,0.000005234113,0.00001244597,0.00000151329,0.0004205979,0.04595332,0.0001300559,0.01551802,0.006496535,0.0002560873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001675627,0.00009131297,0.9706527,0.000001653115,0.000001980437,4.121405e-7,0.0001282944,0.00255344,0.00007159737,0.003178494,0.02308509,0.00006747718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302351,0.000006854405,0.00002920694,0.0007023844,0.0001220649,0.0001515681,0.000003583166,0.000007409215,0.06874178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977735,0.000067782,0.000116559,0.001287352,0.00002143556,0.0000125862,0.000003117954,0.000003124921,0.0007145817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0680272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311092030","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107686","title":"Social outcomes of energy use in the United Kingdom: Household energy footprints and their links to well-being","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Overconsumption; Energy poverty; Energy (signal processing); Context (archaeology); Footprint; Economics; Poverty; Ecological footprint; Public economics; Inequality; Natural resource economics; Energy consumption; Distribution (mathematics); Environmental economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Sustainability; Geography; Microeconomics; Ecology; Production (economics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04548361598657195,"gpt":0.2227477071255109,"spread":0.1772640911389389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000328451,0.0001330247,0.0002027741,0.00005586103,0.0002222721,0.00002429973,0.0003231551,0.0001036259,0.0005755107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000312318,0.00009553949,0.00005532563,0.0001401204,0.0001259181,0.00008265979,0.000662579,0.0001976614,0.000004735168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004317552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001065333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000963931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990382,0.0001548683,0.0002366782,0.000247154,0.00006481932,0.0002583113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993786,0.0003085469,0.00008601157,0.0001614128,7.107959e-7,0.00006476304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000576172,0.0003981421,0.4628288,0.00000121489,0.00002730673,0.00001062003,0.0008867746,0.4851494,0.0001957843,0.04798891,0.0005393122,0.00191618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002836385,0.0001476606,0.9201161,5.959128e-7,0.000004486463,0.000003818852,0.00018012,0.0007104892,0.0001742759,0.004672736,0.07354952,0.0001565647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956537,0.000001649627,0.00003742358,0.001161518,0.00005359091,0.00005072742,0.000006057444,0.00001222934,0.003023095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921337,0.00002745931,0.00006834544,0.007527331,0.00001742051,0.00003532509,0.000009225389,0.00001026733,0.0001708736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6301438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483300814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002","title":"Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Payment; Economics; Stylized fact; Dictator game; Ecosystem services; Animal ecology; Public economics; Tanzania; Sample (material); Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Ecosystem; Microeconomics; Ecology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Finance; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07841829704190881,"gpt":0.3416995561109292,"spread":0.2632812590690204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002497139,0.0001261311,0.0001891058,0.00004444109,0.0004258928,0.00009326512,0.0001787247,0.0001232725,0.0006094842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005868443,0.000103346,0.00004622992,0.00004547198,0.0006857625,0.0006042767,0.0001736866,0.00004887702,0.00009733783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008546444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001492817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002512468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002823748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989957,0.00006437722,0.0002700992,0.0003449661,0.00005400456,0.0002708308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987647,0.0008397764,0.0001293772,0.0001023074,0.00003063753,0.0001332234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004606463,0.0001227516,0.7089156,8.654396e-7,0.00002169589,0.000001740454,0.00201136,0.000007227641,0.009865638,0.2772404,0.0006928887,0.001073757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008843904,0.0002709268,0.9284179,0.00004052257,0.00001138523,0.000001428365,0.003202878,0.0001159324,0.00819925,0.04658092,0.01175758,0.0005169154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826792,0.0001628665,0.00002171237,0.01115027,0.0002035639,0.0002114285,0.00003015808,0.00005462557,0.005486127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969429,0.0004540243,0.000840643,0.0009061769,0.0003368258,0.00005510465,0.000003917151,0.000008791292,0.0004516169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2306595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6673424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943386179","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.018","title":"From ecological macroeconomics to a theory of endogenous money for a finite planet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Ecological economics; Macroeconomics; Endogeneity; Corporate governance; Neoclassical economics; Sustainability; Ecology; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02768745844732275,"gpt":0.2427588341434611,"spread":0.2150713756961384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006621752,0.0002276674,0.0006544847,0.00007694043,0.00008030682,0.00004047681,0.000564331,0.0003843779,0.004816561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006838278,0.0002019564,0.0001820856,0.0000656176,0.0001256901,0.00007777156,0.0003004169,0.0001923651,0.0007306827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003095516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000146132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000404346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007444437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979752,0.0001480125,0.0005898343,0.0005947795,0.00004978431,0.0006423399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963506,0.002739861,0.0001332397,0.000463728,0.00006511442,0.0002473825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002649881,0.0007855106,0.006627187,0.00004854407,0.0002267721,0.00001735561,0.0003100905,0.3866757,0.0005393272,0.5894789,0.000392277,0.01224842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00306522,0.003201087,0.02080627,0.000006362344,0.00004125006,0.00001021117,0.001365909,0.01761454,0.00140978,0.7561475,0.1955785,0.0007533202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764497,0.00002361462,0.00009923266,0.0003703125,0.0003057662,0.0007894776,0.0005680941,0.0000538037,0.02134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959026,0.00003087696,0.001549835,0.001201281,0.0001437628,0.0001693733,0.0002459035,0.0000217902,0.0007345889],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3690612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611893769","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.027","title":"The Impact on Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Geographic Shifts in Global Supply Chains","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Latin Americans; China; Natural resource economics; Climate change; Global warming; East Asia; Developing country; Geography; Supply chain; Environmental science; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0105874539138225,"gpt":0.2686541456090285,"spread":0.258066691695206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004531088,0.0001833141,0.0002449759,0.000008441488,0.000461157,0.00007515012,0.0007462767,0.0001448059,0.0008892674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002428411,0.0001135275,0.0001814534,0.00004933679,0.0009537424,0.0001847403,0.0005255184,0.0001505708,0.00009071458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001298678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002337974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001711987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004841954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987499,0.00006968003,0.0003068171,0.0003144287,0.00008260963,0.0004765791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988305,0.00009551623,0.0001939305,0.0006662258,0.00000195994,0.000211892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009420542,0.0003756981,0.9893472,0.000001070827,0.000008323404,0.000005864152,0.00001904643,0.003224216,0.000006751455,0.0009320352,0.000123592,0.005862056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003886609,0.0003799495,0.9794179,0.000002553412,0.000003677335,0.000001975538,0.00007131306,0.001498815,0.00001127775,0.01779072,0.0003077284,0.0001253936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812301,0.00001042214,0.000001891468,0.001010897,0.00007950106,0.0002868719,0.00007919566,0.0000130797,0.01728807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995606,0.0001726142,0.00004236793,0.0001191044,0.00001721933,0.00001329745,0.00000304953,0.000004838515,0.00006689862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01833054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801058835","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.004","title":"The Energy-emissions Trap","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Renewable energy; Dispatchable generation; Natural resource economics; Fossil fuel; Economics; Investment (military); Environmental science; Environmental economics; Ecology; Engineering; Waste management; Distributed generation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02092077682650513,"gpt":0.2675396198972826,"spread":0.2466188430707775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003927333,0.0001128237,0.000141262,0.00002095427,0.0007703407,0.00008457508,0.0004530577,0.0001735103,0.001725506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004921374,0.00006987995,0.000104399,0.0001012708,0.0005648131,0.00006380248,0.0001781009,0.0001476661,0.0003089971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001708666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001091125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002132891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002245869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988188,0.0001179677,0.0002393485,0.0002689332,0.00005125993,0.0005036463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988649,0.000463739,0.00003976567,0.0003618016,0.00008760616,0.0001822159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000575738,0.00007171202,0.0002527978,8.93445e-7,0.00001985464,0.000003386842,0.00002259109,0.0006644152,0.00001649602,0.9438086,0.002761876,0.05231977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513732,0.0001688005,0.00344437,5.754293e-7,0.000002435587,0.000003710981,0.0001344913,0.00303114,0.0002632146,0.2361381,0.7565665,0.00009528952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6306109,0.00005930927,0.00005252588,0.004324715,0.0003888075,0.00006156437,0.00000285894,0.00008922634,0.3644101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868798,0.0001707751,0.00009130588,0.0009264582,0.0003461239,0.00003501607,0.000004396985,0.000009006827,0.01153712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030774491","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.010","title":"Improved cooking stoves and firewood consumption: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Northern Peruvian Andes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Chile; International Development Research Centre; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Stove; Firewood; Consumption (sociology); Frame (networking); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Waste management; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02325550966048693,"gpt":0.2152943978304811,"spread":0.1920388881699941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001345517,0.0001489456,0.0001442513,0.000004965871,0.0002578019,0.0001030782,0.0002132899,0.00009984128,0.0126132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005100931,0.0001008681,0.0000400703,0.000017414,0.0004171928,0.0004265709,0.0002630503,0.0001245644,0.0007665961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001681005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004642365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006651451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001221204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991483,0.00005623305,0.0001807955,0.0003209172,0.00004672963,0.0002470193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.0003752052,0.00008205961,0.0002006729,0.000001353518,0.0001288708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002585515,0.0002883634,0.9794703,0.000001714769,0.00002717657,0.000002074178,0.0008433958,0.003173967,0.00715316,0.00005629657,0.0003635894,0.008594162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002346772,0.0002539738,0.9923591,0.000006019955,0.000008080369,0.000004358154,0.0002625915,0.004294971,0.001074033,0.0003843137,0.0009373122,0.0001805458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976558,0.0002691538,0.0000241444,0.0009827646,0.00008238755,0.0002653231,0.000005167944,0.00002639031,0.0006888439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978197,0.0003750759,0.0003130943,0.001203071,0.00005749895,0.00006475618,0.000004812037,0.000008652545,0.0001533921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810013445","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.012","title":"A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Probabilistic logic; Focus (optics); Sustainability organizations; Measure (data warehouse); Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Management science; Econometrics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0309769053503057,"gpt":0.2689050920034535,"spread":0.2379281866531478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003363636,0.00009400609,0.000152654,0.00002152998,0.0001979872,0.00001977557,0.000147928,0.0000684111,0.0005591435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001314536,0.00008494585,0.00004571872,0.00008753803,0.0006444087,0.0003068449,0.0001481223,0.00004664694,0.0000385374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005319485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003693542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002089954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000124715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992163,0.00002189848,0.0002405595,0.0002431439,0.00003647257,0.0002416751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.00009217072,0.000132481,0.0001253512,0.00001546392,0.00005352546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002990784,0.001018834,0.9219313,0.00009713232,0.00003999051,6.574956e-7,0.001118136,0.0317091,0.0004969599,0.02836873,0.001707469,0.01321263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000420676,0.0007522842,0.8709787,0.000001269424,0.00001069949,0.000001566054,0.001957564,0.1088811,0.0008249885,0.01362942,0.002307393,0.0002344067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765911,0.00000145227,0.004202757,0.00009889915,0.00003962306,0.0003916868,0.000004826658,0.0000144927,0.01865515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662845,0.000005515557,0.03306257,0.000129654,0.00002690301,0.00007359965,0.00001681315,0.000006495438,0.0003939345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07717197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6122229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972991779","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106447","title":"Metabolic relationships between cities and hinterland: a political-industrial ecology of energy metabolism of Saint-Nazaire metropolitan and port area (France)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Urban metabolism; Metropolitan area; Port (circuit theory); Industrial ecology; Political ecology; Politics; Industrial symbiosis; Order (exchange); Material flow analysis; Economic geography; Regional science; Ecology; Sociology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Urban planning; Political science; Sustainability; Economics; Engineering; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0209356353048452,"gpt":0.206463687420699,"spread":0.1855280521158539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008672159,0.0001915423,0.0009768669,0.00008796481,0.00009757357,0.00001750406,0.0001893772,0.0003843353,0.001866729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005193882,0.0001525187,0.0001529456,0.0001405026,0.0007154227,0.0001602368,0.0003223841,0.0002133319,0.00001384557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002916216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002585708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002135043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007094063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980274,0.0002567825,0.0007564979,0.0004438965,0.00008468746,0.0004306693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983721,0.0008187025,0.0003182713,0.0002403796,0.00002157725,0.0002289427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001963519,0.00006022847,0.8888656,0.000009776165,0.00008532881,9.213199e-7,0.00004727509,0.000140655,0.00001634775,0.1100161,0.00001882653,0.0007193159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005523776,0.0002407006,0.9613556,0.000002724192,0.0001115561,0.000004643261,0.001421178,0.0004743683,0.0001119172,0.03135327,0.004200401,0.0001712935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950877,0.0001146082,0.00002752775,0.000540762,0.00009337718,0.0002260001,0.00004652458,0.0000148481,0.003848684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991497,0.00006557073,0.0001761952,0.0001100422,0.00005809408,0.00001830674,0.00001131368,0.000007870397,0.0004028751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07866281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}