{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":267,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":267,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3917872511e0","filters":{"venue":"Ecological Indicators"}},"results":[{"id":"W2085605077","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013","title":"Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":627,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sustainability; Sustainable development; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Economics; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02555664044945688,"gpt":0.2515764819924344,"spread":0.2260198415429775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000679659,0.0001603372,0.0004549231,0.0004840413,0.00008721139,0.00001495955,0.0005627566,0.0001546857,0.0001005702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002983263,0.00009091209,0.0002769585,0.002462705,0.0004994539,0.0001023517,0.00007255188,0.0002452343,2.135307e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002706606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003689657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001112614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983587,0.0002260951,0.0005526459,0.0001906103,0.0003713762,0.0003005917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.0003907535,0.000234357,0.0005532071,0.00008994583,0.00008360716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003574526,0.0006240348,0.443767,0.0001318239,0.0008285075,0.000005669644,0.001475978,0.5275815,0.0003543418,0.01164672,0.0001838782,0.01336481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001349564,0.0001884226,0.9764154,0.00001041328,0.0003544086,3.848202e-7,0.003167607,0.01196552,0.006330552,0.0009446773,0.000358984,0.0001286926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946792,0.00005433432,0.004615027,0.00009522062,0.00005334184,0.0002942118,0.00001065389,0.00005356881,0.000144512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999761,0.00001127208,0.0001270971,0.00005033078,0.00001099766,0.00001295361,0.0000026579,0.00000815752,0.0000155765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5326483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3707287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997906851","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.045","title":"Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":438,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"VIKOR method; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Scope (computer science); Purchasing; Operations research; Environmental economics; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02184576249015843,"gpt":0.2847681450560215,"spread":0.2629223825658631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004505717,0.0001788506,0.0003038888,0.0006569474,0.0001166571,0.00004175302,0.000471419,0.0001161509,0.0003211523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009338508,0.0001567375,0.0001136211,0.0008083018,0.0001127826,0.000392851,0.0002736177,0.0000796397,0.00004343394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001045933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001844559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002142013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005187129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980003,0.00007675104,0.0005413011,0.000410227,0.0006564796,0.0003149541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997313,0.0002636576,0.001695464,0.0003804321,0.0003292839,0.00001822835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021145,0.001180425,0.1457053,0.002305696,0.0002695248,0.000001542307,0.0001085787,0.002051216,0.0001868545,0.5683825,0.00427197,0.2753342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003949765,0.0002217632,0.5931749,0.00004297679,0.001072328,3.474518e-7,0.002638618,0.09625994,0.0003473631,0.1207564,0.181015,0.0005205328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237034,0.00006187329,0.0104526,0.003203619,0.0003020516,0.005755932,0.000007804289,0.0001498522,0.05636281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966012,0.000004761009,0.001277293,0.0004877731,0.0003142223,0.0009715735,0.00008416491,0.00002087134,0.0002381088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4476261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1030035719","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.012","title":"A new index for assessing heavy metals contamination in sediments: A case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Heavy metals in environment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Contamination; Pollution; Sediment; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Biota; Aquatic ecosystem; Water quality; Pollutant; Heavy metals; Water pollution; Enrichment factor; Ecology; Geology; Chemistry; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05137159859868157,"gpt":0.3355197878136456,"spread":0.284148189214964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002072143,0.00019256,0.000308826,0.0001283637,0.0001054373,0.00005141091,0.0002332118,0.0001595408,0.00119116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004983866,0.0001586182,0.00005794115,0.0004366527,0.0001249829,0.0003584393,0.000266825,0.0002021681,0.0002045938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009970688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004560497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005195121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004874599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978307,0.0003246403,0.0004630895,0.0005109059,0.0004527386,0.0004178923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998958,0.0002472875,0.0001651874,0.0002397578,0.000003625775,0.0003861508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002931256,0.001766515,0.9752445,0.000002478099,0.00002472948,0.0008268595,0.001605889,0.001193041,0.0000633541,0.00002297445,0.001293157,0.01792724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003253412,0.001017578,0.9791845,0.000005567435,0.00004764842,0.0001298719,0.007294577,0.001287456,0.000338289,0.0007325421,0.006347477,0.0003610681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917574,0.00001791624,0.004961076,0.0001828291,0.0002018484,0.001517648,0.000002096795,0.00004299703,0.001316216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949995,0.000001017118,0.004069197,0.0003086411,0.00004171075,0.000284398,0.000003637016,0.00001590022,0.0002760579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01756617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177281010","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.041","title":"Multiple afforestation programs accelerate the greenness in the ‘Three North’ region of China from 1982 to 2013","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":375,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Center for Atmospheric Research","keywords":"Afforestation; China; Geography; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03624495852512673,"gpt":0.2329804457891984,"spread":0.1967354872640716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003898896,0.0000981984,0.0001300574,0.0000268506,0.00008802945,0.00003224778,0.0005612861,0.00007306621,0.0001367159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003707146,0.00004330207,0.00003339893,0.0004712285,0.0000468512,0.0001274391,0.0001542978,0.0001105246,0.0002686652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005293717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006897167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009282925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1851978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989933,0.0001207944,0.0002192761,0.0002087867,0.0002462188,0.0002116556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994495,0.0001021828,0.0001239692,0.0002316365,0.000004545562,0.00008815234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002484863,0.0001442665,0.9917727,0.000002447962,0.000004057568,0.000008896645,0.001999689,0.001323682,0.000003682028,0.00001250851,0.0007016553,0.004001577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002208135,0.0001583314,0.9947708,0.000005774048,0.000006010464,0.000001290674,0.0003677548,0.001752807,0.0000240163,0.0007867325,0.00183123,0.00007442897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975401,0.00001366665,0.00003490367,0.001290946,0.00008074162,0.0005853731,0.000005924004,0.00001755024,0.0004307769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999474,0.000006641621,0.00006477156,0.0002529143,0.00003813017,0.0001232313,0.00003025501,0.000004604368,0.000005456297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1759149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087070249","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106935","title":"Integrated phenology and climate in rice yields prediction using machine learning methods","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":283,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Key Research and Development Program of China; Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Phenology; Support vector machine; Random forest; Oryza sativa; Linear regression; Climate change; Food security; Yield (engineering); Agriculture; Regression; Environmental science; Population; Regression analysis; Growing season; Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning; Agronomy; Computer science; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02561875380290357,"gpt":0.2751271816732883,"spread":0.2495084278703847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123445,0.0001380755,0.0002056751,0.00004569606,0.0001311794,0.00002137946,0.0001220798,0.0002676447,0.0006201069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004956975,0.00009557686,0.00002751563,0.0006702943,0.0002027911,0.00008839543,0.0002628054,0.0006530455,0.00005717875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001428799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004770064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001102389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005542828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985462,0.0004313101,0.0002369558,0.0003848623,0.0001066772,0.0002939319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995418,0.0001497708,0.0001064794,0.0000621352,0.000002827668,0.0001370257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002925781,0.00007143845,0.9265984,0.000008038828,0.00001034954,0.00003992102,0.0007938941,0.004189972,0.05689346,0.00003136846,0.0001101072,0.01122385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002677719,0.0002578598,0.8706864,0.00000690379,0.00001652083,0.00002781848,0.0002498644,0.1227343,0.001291183,0.00008229263,0.004212761,0.0001663814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959703,0.00004406824,0.001015981,0.000627685,0.00008204573,0.0001468778,0.000002904378,0.0001066361,0.002003501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664313,0.00005860742,0.0328914,0.000556997,0.0000290809,0.000001320153,0.000009742587,0.000007836824,0.00001367117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1185443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6789735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607998451","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.031","title":"Analyses of landuse change impacts on catchment runoff using different time indicators based on SWAT model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Nipissing University; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Surface runoff; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Evapotranspiration; Runoff curve number; Interception; Flood myth; SWAT model; Streamflow; Land use; Runoff model; Drainage basin; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Geography; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1059930378330556,"gpt":0.3188840714926405,"spread":0.2128910336595849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003710072,0.0002600102,0.0003795154,0.0003071625,0.0001541428,0.00001082094,0.0003101468,0.0001808805,0.0008859127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008872242,0.0001666873,0.0001045756,0.0003751426,0.0002944551,0.00007903043,0.0002940833,0.0001971869,0.0003879162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003703687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001237166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006974749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001244681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982582,0.0001461711,0.0002855012,0.0004148884,0.0004573758,0.0004379106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991117,0.0001042486,0.0002126818,0.0002887183,0.00000388607,0.000278782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000210793,0.002247035,0.8499766,0.00001494715,0.00014823,0.00004741236,0.0008505473,0.139855,0.0008036459,0.0000672048,0.005354936,0.0004236545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00174178,0.002273674,0.8804955,0.0000401033,0.0002176988,7.505121e-7,0.00009383859,0.102309,0.01105351,0.0006309187,0.0005496609,0.0005935452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940345,0.00001056073,0.00006911757,0.0005385142,0.00007913243,0.0003584783,0.00001345791,0.00005330763,0.004842884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982009,0.000009394215,0.0001468721,0.001422772,0.00002946745,0.00004511331,0.00001517022,0.00001196142,0.0001183796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03754603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987344671","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.022","title":"Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted Urban Proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Geography; Metric (unit); Urban planning; Weighting; Environmental planning; Land use; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Business; Civil engineering; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009316159040989517,"gpt":0.1976993976246829,"spread":0.1883832385836934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004320111,0.000100814,0.0001285324,0.00003278619,0.0001603767,0.0000347863,0.0001971914,0.00008193874,0.0007835604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003019565,0.00005419405,0.00002361423,0.0002188544,0.00001959663,0.0001445897,0.0001312739,0.00007183452,0.0004133108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007322561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006861737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001600657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002436204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989862,0.00005168918,0.0002390581,0.0002539034,0.0002804141,0.0001887544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.00003297572,0.000143376,0.000153315,0.00001538471,0.0001198808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001878764,0.0001797259,0.9709164,0.00003814667,0.00002252041,5.039539e-7,0.0009692122,0.0000672054,0.01925255,0.0001684819,0.001694286,0.006672213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001915466,0.0001921755,0.9773883,0.000007292264,0.00001889238,0.000001024435,0.00008664025,0.01007764,0.009622902,0.0001748883,0.002105979,0.0001327779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976515,0.00004544669,0.00006461382,0.0005033322,0.00003774993,0.00100027,0.000001821018,0.00002694698,0.0006683209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.000004976625,0.00007645674,0.0002880463,0.00004794887,0.0002865087,0.000002990387,0.000005462809,0.00001387041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01001043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8579437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514368667","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.051","title":"Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) “A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Water use; Water scarcity; Life-cycle assessment; Footprint; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Water resources; Water resource management; Business; Computer science; Economics; Production (economics); Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723898021909124,"gpt":0.2456006941186998,"spread":0.2183617138996086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002713846,0.0002897513,0.0002414899,0.00008903194,0.0004820467,0.00007786682,0.0005164766,0.0002143965,0.004088043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001835885,0.00008201988,0.00009134909,0.0001228521,0.001083775,0.00009205886,0.001009143,0.0003752535,0.0005588938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008438115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008800615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001287411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968669,0.0008435786,0.0003574786,0.0006095694,0.0003469319,0.0009755137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998614,0.0005598171,0.00003275443,0.0005065612,0.000003120692,0.0002837554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002294705,0.001203162,0.710273,0.00001935377,0.00005625388,0.0001930294,0.01540684,0.00007849836,0.2627947,0.002448285,0.0004888747,0.004743316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000460118,0.0005897924,0.8488302,0.00001421306,0.000008220695,0.000007476018,0.001120931,0.000008206077,0.1262916,0.01680113,0.005585108,0.0002829107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530931,0.000002001624,0.0001925008,0.04441077,0.00006332629,0.0008542169,0.000004846942,0.00004054674,0.001338725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977817,0.00001281226,0.00003057722,0.001378976,0.00002141136,0.0001360178,0.000001259409,0.00001751667,0.0006197644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1385572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043335249","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.017","title":"Trophic networks: How do theories link ecosystem structure and functioning to stability properties? A review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Trophic level; Ecological stability; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Ecological network; Psychological resilience; Environmental science; Resilience (materials science); Stability (learning theory); Food web; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03326152222062691,"gpt":0.2596959823939613,"spread":0.2264344601733344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003066665,0.0007245988,0.003064761,0.0001180232,0.0004712906,0.0002319401,0.0007173508,0.0009812248,0.00523055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00223279,0.0004052283,0.0005130843,0.001783553,0.000435366,0.000190056,0.00107195,0.0009311558,0.0001962919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001009615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002241037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001206346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943739,0.001778092,0.00104842,0.001454117,0.0005419766,0.0008035011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973897,0.0003721237,0.0006876528,0.0007782569,0.00004327979,0.000728949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565943,0.0001602025,0.008347487,0.022316,0.0002632797,0.00004122419,0.0001540633,0.0001950677,1.242544e-7,0.0001628079,0.002598041,0.965746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007716894,0.0003444237,0.001167175,0.003045273,0.0006791459,0.0000273127,0.0001479442,0.00002757839,7.343672e-8,0.000292153,0.9935794,0.0006123114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007066438,0.9880785,0.00004390851,0.0006453589,0.0002770304,0.003438136,0.00004253439,0.0001261921,0.0002819283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07891954,0.9194019,0.00005724219,0.0003597771,0.00026306,0.0007682478,0.00003466387,0.00003389844,0.0001616731],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110828928","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.023","title":"A global Water Quality Index and hot-deck imputation of missing data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Aboriginal Affairs Northern Dev Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Water resources; Sustainable development; Sustainability; Missing data; Imputation (statistics); Environmental economics; Index (typography); Business; Computer science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037816725524828,"gpt":0.3421787064887267,"spread":0.2383970339362439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007562704,0.00008297379,0.0001402219,0.00001950677,0.00008404333,0.00001318524,0.0002691396,0.0001034591,0.00387542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004352802,0.00005365801,0.00002107637,0.0001175852,0.0003323184,0.0001805234,0.000532908,0.00005684778,0.00006790136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006809327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007938193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005948343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001153719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988725,0.0001915914,0.0002845612,0.0002770092,0.0001809972,0.0001933112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994988,0.00003011974,0.0001085435,0.0002437409,0.00000246003,0.0001163357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003825878,0.0002486452,0.9910156,0.000009858433,0.00001300908,0.000004913524,0.001335658,0.000005562224,0.0003271875,0.0005374945,0.0004169678,0.006046858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001833986,0.00006714096,0.9918597,0.000001784289,0.00000697092,0.000003259553,0.0001233934,0.00008122277,0.0009095312,0.005600621,0.001075157,0.00008782209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955165,0.00000504383,0.001241464,0.0002361527,0.00005408954,0.0001010725,0.00003928735,0.00002358866,0.002782793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979746,0.00000264027,0.001683579,0.0002811631,0.000009197377,0.000003058997,0.00002211511,0.00000221609,0.00002138958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005959036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200417038","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108457","title":"Honey bees as biomonitors of environmental contaminants, pathogens, and climate change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Government of Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Honey bee; Biomonitoring; Biology; Sentinel species; Apiary; Ecology; Pesticide; Pollinator; Environmental science; Pollen; Pollination","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0236455410246892,"gpt":0.254345301022373,"spread":0.2306997599976837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002379065,0.0001171387,0.0002125331,0.00002165677,0.0001900298,0.00002442678,0.0001312873,0.0001713968,0.003813043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008437526,0.00004630979,0.00006771921,0.0002522652,0.0002337874,0.00005625518,0.0002075297,0.0001292284,0.00007415505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001930975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007252077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004656954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009169918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0001411928,0.0001960317,0.000274989,0.0002062564,0.0003528554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994168,0.0002828701,0.00008094576,0.00004490116,0.00001197587,0.0001625511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002085651,0.000276951,0.6601599,0.000009418191,0.00001230472,0.0001202459,0.0000895286,1.05434e-8,0.2676668,0.0005513337,0.00003223086,0.07106041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001012395,0.0004730819,0.9735881,0.000009822267,0.000009878792,0.0000220292,0.00043545,0.000001882673,0.02260795,0.0001650323,0.002469559,0.0001159461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976938,0.0007925443,3.782221e-8,0.0003622363,0.0001024354,0.0001508559,0.000193396,0.00002061664,0.0006840569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977652,0.001789045,0.00002384039,0.00017455,0.0001152949,0.00002311691,0.00005940642,9.494444e-7,0.00004856626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3134282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344187305","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.043","title":"Biased richness and evenness relationships within Shannon–Wiener index values","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Species evenness; Species richness; Mathematics; Statistics; Diversity index; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01854329084846799,"gpt":0.2371598363321724,"spread":0.2186165454837044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006378225,0.0001299577,0.0001591561,0.00007538513,0.0004781924,0.00001221336,0.0001594014,0.0002063923,0.001450459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000569206,0.0000766685,0.00003064031,0.0002997439,0.0007549296,0.0001765857,0.0002204645,0.0001680523,0.0004507603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009570324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009128983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005162951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001547787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988282,0.0001961592,0.0002414074,0.00034729,0.000140276,0.0002466756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998987,0.0006266221,0.0001374162,0.0001283573,0.000006680389,0.000113994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007383645,0.00008078771,0.9959081,0.00000165015,0.00001329486,0.000005961884,0.0003003683,0.00008984729,0.00009387231,0.002541527,0.0003243941,0.000632836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002949417,0.00006983167,0.9829654,0.000005326598,0.00001119099,0.000003852262,0.0001303392,0.0002740854,0.00005167275,0.01568809,0.0003581564,0.0001471125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943693,0.00002509172,0.0006872369,0.001167497,0.0001595932,0.0001545959,0.000005262814,0.00007256775,0.003358908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979665,0.00002244167,0.0003392869,0.0002543413,0.00002065865,0.00006101122,0.000002295066,0.000007193886,0.001326279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01314657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994624,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047679555","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.008","title":"Addressing the removal of rare species in multivariate bioassessments: The impact of methodological choices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Ordination; Multivariate statistics; Multivariate analysis; Rare species; Ecology; Biology; Statistics; Habitat; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2521586095370466,"gpt":0.386577674110558,"spread":0.1344190645735115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467555,0.0001371679,0.0002971571,0.00005931051,0.0001818924,0.000006018829,0.0006009569,0.0001212302,0.007132581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006277533,0.00005750408,0.0001251116,0.0004594745,0.001562628,0.00009750644,0.0006724854,0.0002384735,0.00002556575],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007719507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008919462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004686909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000408865,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983422,0.0006259839,0.0003579934,0.0002338597,0.0001614298,0.000278589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985141,0.0008945226,0.0003313495,0.0002231723,0.000005365908,0.00003149465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005176292,0.0003847319,0.9951702,0.000004342831,0.00007662694,0.00002246496,0.0009749618,0.00009264487,0.0003245336,0.0009360609,0.001243338,0.0007183694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002098376,0.0002325092,0.9959328,0.00000588094,0.00001980777,0.000002875486,0.0007693931,0.00003668985,0.0003559163,0.001952542,0.0004094306,0.00007233171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321487,0.00003131411,0.00005614026,0.0002290509,0.0000695071,0.0003085007,0.000005220847,0.00001416683,0.06713738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978929,0.00004995837,0.001646003,0.0001627574,0.00001164184,0.0000326036,0.000001193549,0.000003904172,0.0001990389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06693834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073851087","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.021","title":"Indicators for Sea-floor Integrity under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Directorate-General for the Environment","keywords":"Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Marine ecosystem; European union; Ecosystem; Computer science; Ecology; Business; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03113122702102794,"gpt":0.2476991312091698,"spread":0.2165679041881418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000902109,0.0002246066,0.0001884586,0.00007376844,0.0003291802,0.00003879036,0.0007021524,0.0001216932,0.01651695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001443637,0.0001321767,0.0001325582,0.0005485794,0.0005372487,0.00009321897,0.003380912,0.0005087493,0.000725935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001112757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003244003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002752057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983082,0.0002399663,0.0002688518,0.0004910275,0.0002323013,0.0004596092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991381,0.0001809745,0.0001527285,0.0003316254,0.00000536387,0.0001911766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000958864,0.001187865,0.4114592,0.00001067109,0.0001146656,0.00003358506,0.0007003206,0.00004288996,0.00001102149,0.03629079,0.009264345,0.5407888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000170579,0.0002932478,0.9188626,0.000002913579,0.00003216775,0.000001528953,0.0004118508,0.0000181217,0.00008710531,0.06702242,0.01290044,0.0001970062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5173786,0.000005127908,0.00233011,0.0004899713,0.0001955926,0.0006557544,0.0000109885,0.000120616,0.4788133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957317,0.00001402187,0.001494605,0.0009710512,0.00008512165,0.0001252634,0.00001149258,0.00001942413,0.001547291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5405917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843821,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769322819","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.054","title":"Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"Autoritatea Natională pentru Cercetare Stiintifică","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Green infrastructure; Urban ecosystem; Urban planning; Environmental planning; Ecosystem services; Urban density; Urban climate; Environmental resource management; Land use; Context (archaeology); Geography; Land-use planning; Business; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04460777872306088,"gpt":0.3240205900675258,"spread":0.2794128113444649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008912326,0.0002163713,0.0005372842,0.0000353484,0.0007578669,0.00007927421,0.0009963816,0.0004869192,0.002345362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009526804,0.0001384295,0.0001653179,0.0001180082,0.0002025784,0.0003378245,0.0004037467,0.0002795921,0.00005078444],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009496439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001609322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002158217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001655833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998158,0.0001657557,0.0003800804,0.0004522906,0.0002339402,0.0006098949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978734,0.0008622777,0.0005861098,0.0005105197,0.00001363122,0.0001540276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114269,0.00009387348,0.9858964,0.00006511453,0.00005508582,0.00002754168,0.000581526,0.0003135711,0.00004485855,0.007988336,0.004563515,0.0002558779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006636918,0.0004298669,0.9054424,0.00002241054,0.00005480269,0.000003081659,0.0003759103,0.0002545992,0.0003040619,0.06791887,0.02429139,0.000238889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872054,0.00008636778,0.006642743,0.0005313396,0.0001867107,0.0006321213,0.00002657123,0.00005487644,0.004633878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873263,0.000006264659,0.01168665,0.0005338942,0.0001950962,0.00008845311,0.000006596463,0.00001318536,0.0001436153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.080454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210334954","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.001","title":"Natural variability or anthropogenically-induced variation? Insights from 15 years of multidisciplinary observations at the arctic marine LTER site HAUSGARTEN","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Water column; Oceanography; Arctic; Environmental science; Marine ecosystem; Observatory; Polar night; Ecosystem; Sampling (signal processing); Seafloor spreading; Pelagic zone; Physical geography; Geology; Ecology; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03080280697745143,"gpt":0.2529539758579868,"spread":0.2221511688805354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005125732,0.0001650937,0.0002787541,0.0000584575,0.0002938964,0.00002779937,0.0003766538,0.0001794354,0.00523472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009157303,0.00009344467,0.00009867397,0.0004365259,0.0004217686,0.0001840154,0.0002156415,0.0003366427,0.0002448355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005208507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002051699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005405763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982094,0.000311369,0.0004485118,0.0003799108,0.0003737058,0.0002771039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974497,0.001652864,0.0002431842,0.0003671548,0.00007730956,0.0002097754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001587083,0.0001449604,0.9966655,0.000004976399,0.00006062206,0.00002216653,0.0009538391,0.0002769047,0.000100897,0.0001527218,0.00009899105,0.001359732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004050514,0.0002393975,0.9856054,0.000004965023,0.00005517914,0.000005877784,0.0002349253,0.008518964,0.00001015676,0.004436375,0.0003333194,0.0001503775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974861,0.00001830183,0.00006577736,0.0009915124,0.0005451912,0.0002968633,0.0001147224,0.00003934055,0.0004421551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964113,0.00001243499,0.002355091,0.0003569363,0.000121999,0.000004878578,0.0005352103,0.000004748502,0.0001974153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01106007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999759947","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.014","title":"Soil quality in Life Cycle Assessment: Towards development of an indicator","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Soil quality; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Soil functions; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Soil water; Sustainable development; Impact assessment; Environmental quality; Environmental impact assessment; Soil fertility; Soil biodiversity; Soil science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03207200417692355,"gpt":0.3007874149537588,"spread":0.2687154107768353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001519623,0.0001763549,0.0003503105,0.00005923413,0.0001257137,0.00001876019,0.0003836765,0.0002803573,0.00118386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001624859,0.0000732995,0.00009180693,0.000571991,0.000128374,0.0001694554,0.0001555259,0.0002585103,0.00003700408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001183886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008478326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001320861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008862866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979127,0.000298356,0.0006025858,0.0002891403,0.0003699686,0.0005272654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989966,0.0001781497,0.0002615926,0.00008297824,0.00001863007,0.0004620951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002440209,0.001581632,0.9439814,0.000008055074,0.00001953002,0.000002029909,0.0003373339,0.000005498533,0.003429398,0.001116762,0.0000109665,0.04948296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000183719,0.0001322546,0.9963867,0.000003395448,0.000005213206,9.404468e-7,0.0004930865,0.0001268189,0.001764171,0.0001789722,0.0005238342,0.0002008617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970315,0.00005661222,0.000002075125,0.0001420144,0.0001305749,0.0001758432,0.00001711374,0.00006765172,0.002376675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985248,0.000007482979,0.0008916543,0.0003446932,0.0001062818,0.00004627108,0.00006763397,0.000001503142,0.000009658203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0524053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478911749","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.049","title":"Enhancing life cycle impact assessment from climate science: Review of recent findings and recommendations for application to LCA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Climate change; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Context (archaeology); Metric (unit); Environmental resource management; Robustness (evolution); Impact assessment; Climate sensitivity; Global warming; Environmental impact assessment; Computer science; Environmental planning; Climate model; Environmental economics; Business; Ecology; Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01375218549883979,"gpt":0.3437802758176286,"spread":0.3300280903187888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325699,0.0001219403,0.0002194064,0.00005624054,0.0002406719,0.00001615558,0.0002344438,0.00005960108,0.005456648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006523708,0.00007507356,0.00005672293,0.0003937625,0.000399467,0.0002282725,0.0003390981,0.000060176,0.000052834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008935863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004423028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003663655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001329691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985709,0.00005472154,0.0003626653,0.0004142423,0.0002395932,0.0003578455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990028,0.0002445111,0.0001486607,0.0002391357,0.00001013178,0.000354778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003442725,0.0004983601,0.845616,0.0001284801,0.0000164872,3.549025e-7,0.000252856,0.0000114886,0.04129278,0.0003916011,0.001659846,0.1100973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001991745,0.000252413,0.9865528,0.00009218579,0.00001630167,3.203223e-7,0.00008160347,0.00002545052,0.004459434,0.0009773294,0.007212697,0.0001302784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988355,0.00005247428,0.001960509,0.007833618,0.0000395391,0.0009915187,0.00007439392,0.00001996436,0.0006730254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908677,0.002899925,0.004628822,0.001369759,0.00001250576,0.0001909587,0.00001417021,0.000006559108,0.000009592901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1409368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020580585","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.014","title":"The Planktonic Index of Biotic Integrity (P-IBI): An approach for assessing lake ecosystem health","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Ohio Lake Erie Commission","keywords":"Plankton; Trophic level; Eutrophication; Environmental science; Zooplankton; Phytoplankton; Trophic state index; Ecology; Ecosystem; Water quality; Lake ecosystem; Chlorophyll a; Biology; Nutrient","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02125524702893359,"gpt":0.2859670277939934,"spread":0.2647117807650598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847243,0.0001765293,0.0003690398,0.00004471298,0.0004832683,0.00006646962,0.0005187217,0.0002055831,0.0001474037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001151005,0.0001066015,0.0001018676,0.0002992756,0.000153551,0.0001420033,0.00006918656,0.0003160871,0.00001669435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002274379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007062439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003634258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001391112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980597,0.0002508131,0.0005793358,0.0003744839,0.0002716127,0.000464065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998639,0.0003179036,0.000484675,0.0003439237,0.000007705465,0.0002067653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007161158,0.001462725,0.9240223,0.0001211337,0.00004910298,0.000003797654,0.0005801745,0.003259348,0.00006570316,0.01797514,0.002122349,0.05026658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004155615,0.0008511867,0.9124678,0.00002326119,0.00001256657,0.00001251677,0.000543393,0.07689734,0.00002838573,0.002403007,0.006093933,0.0002510646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850415,0.00004581728,0.01001906,0.0003770614,0.0001593788,0.0008287813,0.00006354351,0.00005533027,0.003409502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969105,0.00001122424,0.002641195,0.0002539316,0.00004902391,0.00002945466,0.00004852571,0.000008783933,0.00004740564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07363799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069718219","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.013","title":"A standardized cotton-strip assay for measuring organic-matter decomposition in streams","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation; Directorate for Biological Sciences; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"STREAMS; Decomposition; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Watershed; Organic matter; Ultimate tensile strength; Chemical process of decomposition; Population; Benthic zone; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Composite material; Materials science; Biology; Geotechnical engineering; Computer science; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01110261117532369,"gpt":0.2150874620438105,"spread":0.2039848508684868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003979671,0.0001399486,0.0002239375,0.00008250637,0.0001775627,0.00004693398,0.0002701816,0.0001972129,0.04371233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005162604,0.0001177732,0.00006851568,0.0002316155,0.0001867902,0.0002443454,0.0002093627,0.0001606307,0.004589962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004110926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001124584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001764311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008466527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986846,0.0001214063,0.0002346805,0.0003511333,0.0001541007,0.000454106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999499,0.0001479393,0.00008268783,0.0001224246,0.000007191974,0.0001407863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004554004,0.0003059173,0.960724,0.000007583171,0.00001687065,0.00001194427,0.0002182293,0.0001139826,0.007157312,0.00003557615,0.02999094,0.001372122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001415815,0.0002865246,0.9819762,0.000005863951,0.00001421478,0.000004856548,0.0001824724,0.0008180992,0.007929754,0.003665778,0.003420077,0.000280377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938997,0.000004244507,0.0005839945,0.0007774081,0.0001121345,0.0005987445,0.00001872187,0.00004459274,0.003960436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973682,0.000002802053,0.0011299,0.001132229,0.00001620613,0.0001057615,0.00002960254,0.000009003694,0.000206267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03912237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130676187","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.039","title":"Developing a multi-layered indicator set for urban metabolism studies in megacities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fondazione Centro Studi Enel; Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung","keywords":"Megacity; Context (archaeology); Urban metabolism; Environmental planning; Population; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Set (abstract data type); Geography; Environmental economics; Urban planning; Regional science; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Environmental health; Urban density; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07843567388148348,"gpt":0.3271132473535557,"spread":0.2486775734720723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001954319,0.0002645252,0.0006888758,0.0001923194,0.0003471093,0.00003740377,0.0004611454,0.0002965644,0.0007113906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002612431,0.0001891823,0.0001878577,0.0007343675,0.0006726985,0.0001710635,0.0003832069,0.0002189911,0.0001977755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007328882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002414547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009154493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005320104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973708,0.0003610532,0.0006324151,0.0006714954,0.0002568669,0.0007073196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984337,0.000887669,0.000238254,0.000246284,0.00001443829,0.000179616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275851,0.0003603536,0.9831311,0.00007411207,0.000130285,0.00001171819,0.002534364,0.0006036186,0.00005672573,0.009014416,0.001754521,0.002286075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124616,0.0002042493,0.9311751,0.00001254039,0.00005088566,0.00000235936,0.005715335,0.001335353,0.0002221331,0.01088793,0.04874395,0.0005255303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956576,0.0001383477,0.001982023,0.0009067039,0.0001840453,0.0007171289,0.000008593423,0.0000901646,0.0003153531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934056,0.0000257899,0.004739228,0.0008158275,0.00007221611,0.0006679885,0.000008968517,0.00001232903,0.0002520876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05195593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7789229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511444160","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.022","title":"Assessing the ability of MODIS EVI to estimate terrestrial ecosystem gross primary production of multiple land cover types","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; Australian Research Council; Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences; Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Biome; Primary production; Evergreen; Deciduous; Environmental science; Enhanced vegetation index; Terrestrial ecosystem; Plant functional type; Vegetation (pathology); Atmospheric sciences; Land cover; Carbon cycle; Climatology; Latitude; Ecosystem; Physical geography; Leaf area index; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Ecology; Geography; Land use; Biology; Geology; Vegetation Index","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01537043099609013,"gpt":0.2701279532205704,"spread":0.2547575222244802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005996286,0.0001056006,0.0002087795,0.00002101695,0.00008873742,0.00001690244,0.0002222984,0.0001119741,0.0001725478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000916196,0.00004407899,0.00006028651,0.0002406338,0.0002546985,0.0001460872,0.0001704151,0.00008416169,0.00009549224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000199798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001389142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003598239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005552361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.0001786381,0.0003028153,0.0002970659,0.000269075,0.0001796618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991329,0.0003123031,0.0002342587,0.0002522328,0.000008459047,0.00005983878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004006542,0.0001815834,0.8545006,0.00001671699,0.00001393146,0.000001537626,0.0001274687,0.002719817,0.133867,0.000004389966,0.001137623,0.007389267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001650196,0.0000802275,0.9844002,0.00002857346,0.00001158813,0.000003546073,0.000009336726,0.0001378045,0.01418568,0.00007569083,0.0008261136,0.00007624419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975456,0.000004438496,0.0001063787,0.0006026307,0.000356839,0.0004255071,0.000007510682,0.00002402876,0.0009270468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988112,0.00000182959,0.001025714,0.00002608903,0.00006595328,0.000003989995,0.000002094269,0.000004720921,0.00005843128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1298996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1889277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007137746","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106240","title":"Snail as sentinel organism for monitoring the environmental pollution; a review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Libanaise; Université de Strasbourg; Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Pollution; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Extraction (chemistry); Contamination; Environmental pollution; Water pollution; Organism; Sentinel species; Biodiversity; Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Ecology; Biology; Environmental engineering; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04780034670759768,"gpt":0.3317490237104549,"spread":0.2839486770028572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004237544,0.0004157326,0.001067094,0.0000338623,0.0005145643,0.00003402146,0.0005782518,0.0002320396,0.006710634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003959085,0.0002319485,0.0005257272,0.0004185048,0.0003795511,0.00007155317,0.0005257376,0.0004078137,0.004768181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003736445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004399506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002800009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.500414e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978824,0.0002058405,0.0006129596,0.0005197963,0.0003571408,0.0004218341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987031,0.0003021104,0.0004798047,0.0002820659,0.000001831955,0.0002310418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002733137,0.0001613933,0.001375465,0.003037775,0.0002469524,0.00002151979,0.0001690871,3.130687e-7,0.000005625071,0.0001192328,0.0663436,0.9285163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007741498,0.00005985452,0.001875011,0.000970516,0.0005233742,0.00002342265,0.00003815589,2.637423e-7,0.000003912035,0.00006019837,0.9960951,0.0002728021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001628643,0.99462,0.000008471172,0.001252879,0.0002678347,0.001835115,0.00006220927,0.00006290724,0.001727755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000898224,0.995716,0.00007251068,0.001608311,0.0002571516,0.0006309213,0.0000476063,0.00003286092,0.00073642],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960067,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330683372","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.011","title":"Using plane tree leaves for biomonitoring of dust borne heavy metals: A case study from Isfahan, Central Iran","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Isfahan University of Technology; University of Alberta","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Bioindicator; Environmental science; Pollution; Environmental chemistry; Atmospheric dust; Air pollution; Atmospheric pollution; Sampling (signal processing); Heavy metals; Chemistry; Aerosol; Ecology; Biology; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1502585332426616,"gpt":0.3210712437962411,"spread":0.1708127105535796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004967768,0.0002183101,0.0005060838,0.00004284232,0.0002156354,0.00004069674,0.0003057471,0.000268308,0.0002743017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002966687,0.00008754637,0.0001467295,0.0004186028,0.0001549024,0.0001100679,0.0001458964,0.0001735379,0.00001163368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008819362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002682871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002299527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00316327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981161,0.0002236244,0.0004730589,0.0004540353,0.0001969757,0.0005361494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985926,0.0006673322,0.0002417686,0.00008671522,0.0000481337,0.0003634378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002774612,0.002327221,0.9670966,0.000007061038,0.0002034721,0.0006435753,0.001297891,0.00001641447,0.02047023,0.00009505345,0.0004780867,0.007086899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012476,0.004123573,0.9661772,0.000007607326,0.0001642204,0.0001062364,0.01807656,0.0001667145,0.007601024,0.0003343487,0.001604735,0.0003902236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979841,0.0001386572,0.000008464547,0.000224459,0.0005539587,0.0006903964,0.0001790453,0.00006807952,0.0001528619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879,0.000003700685,0.0004413059,0.00008238432,0.0005629291,0.00004474384,0.00003798037,0.000002257587,0.00003467483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01677867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3570037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285585573","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109164","title":"Impacts of climate change and human activities on vegetation NDVI in China’s Mu Us Sandy Land during 2000–2019","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; China Meteorological Administration; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Vegetation (pathology); Land cover; Physical geography; Environmental science; Precipitation; Climate change; Land use; Enhanced vegetation index; Geography; Ecology; Vegetation Index","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01139051168689123,"gpt":0.2306996531957612,"spread":0.21930914150887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002380364,0.00008785371,0.0001579249,0.00009003132,0.0002100899,0.00001222307,0.0001072589,0.00004861084,0.001266427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004946246,0.00006572351,0.00002295801,0.0001827131,0.00002430489,0.0001350535,0.0002134303,0.0001279885,0.00002261435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000163173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004108525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008988901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002484062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991803,0.00008605987,0.0001577728,0.0001910655,0.000157845,0.0002269534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997049,0.0000314007,0.0001214971,0.000083454,4.827466e-7,0.00005824588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002783859,0.0001445215,0.9978002,0.00003223084,0.000003736566,0.00001258098,0.00113714,0.0002377353,0.000383731,0.00001710839,0.000004186002,0.0001989384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003773284,0.0003117954,0.9985276,0.00001293025,0.000004335878,0.000003200476,0.00009046328,0.000054519,0.0004076936,0.00006695562,0.00005617058,0.00008704518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978018,0.0000433908,1.837956e-8,0.00005517679,0.00005193145,0.0001944722,0.00001543062,0.00001662175,0.0018211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999768,0.0000553788,0.000003411184,0.00007892127,0.00001977882,0.00005228461,0.000009136696,0.000005398265,0.000007727595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001966104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607438179","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.003","title":"Effects of seawater acidification and salinity alterations on metabolic, osmoregulation and oxidative stress markers in Mytilus galloprovincialis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Centro de Estudos Ambientais e Marinhos, Universidade de Aveiro","keywords":"Mytilus; Salinity; Glycogen; Mussel; Seawater; Antioxidant; Citrate synthase; Osmoregulation; Carbonic anhydrase; Oxidative stress; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology; Biochemistry; Enzyme","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01174374508815401,"gpt":0.2446122200413141,"spread":0.2328684749531601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004158429,0.0001147643,0.0001993504,0.0001799701,0.000318159,0.00008918616,0.0001379233,0.0001142903,0.0001223116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005696478,0.00007878638,0.00002477715,0.00008415969,0.0003572766,0.00020752,0.00002081298,0.0001141424,0.000008728824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005105498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002454721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002589707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004121499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989713,0.000265895,0.0002101939,0.0002632626,0.0001395881,0.000149719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989021,0.0005705687,0.0002366454,0.0001741109,0.00001895891,0.00009762852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001648175,0.0001163345,0.9678755,0.00004145585,0.00001952029,0.000006398591,0.0002489817,0.0000656747,0.0008804869,0.0007291734,0.00002656119,0.0298251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000351932,0.0002068172,0.9871202,0.00001634252,0.00001588955,8.072086e-7,0.00004289798,0.0007343193,0.0109942,0.0002806809,0.0001404852,0.00009544779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984006,0.0001276182,0.00001859346,0.0003650093,0.00008936958,0.0004063167,0.0000405136,0.00001373961,0.0005382532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994926,0.0001443112,0.0001677863,0.00006321828,0.00003085132,0.000006101137,0.00004701948,0.000002344677,0.00004570113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02972965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3212815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201496521","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.049","title":"Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Ecology; Abiotic component; Process (computing); Psychological resilience; Natural resource management; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Ecological systems theory; Resource (disambiguation); Resilience (materials science); Natural resource; Computer science; Biology; Psychology; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01896297605746762,"gpt":0.2688250783974753,"spread":0.2498621023400077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001103238,0.0002770591,0.0003767005,0.0001257877,0.0004355276,0.00004554836,0.0003522165,0.0002334953,0.0008113559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003073561,0.0002138243,0.00009235455,0.0002967359,0.0009546925,0.000165537,0.0006344619,0.0001994811,0.00045565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001982583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001656724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009027391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007651548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979483,0.0001638173,0.0003848042,0.0006542266,0.0002443394,0.0006044926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985919,0.0006365839,0.0001976922,0.0001847615,0.00001344509,0.0003756471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005036735,0.0004499462,0.9826301,0.00001332278,0.0000791092,0.00001674193,0.0002761799,0.0001650872,0.00001107632,0.01169073,0.003599718,0.001017571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00159947,0.00052657,0.9733138,0.000004072546,0.00006489348,0.000008350214,0.0007485069,0.0005260729,0.00007239161,0.01366983,0.009136956,0.0003290777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834674,0.0001207215,0.0000833848,0.001306559,0.0002329111,0.0008052479,0.00002370999,0.0001539017,0.01380614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994208,0.0001465887,0.004093185,0.0005734915,0.00004253267,0.0004207418,0.00003436114,0.0000158545,0.0004652817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01334085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8883778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912897125","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.083","title":"Phenology of the avian spring migratory passage in Europe and North America: Asymmetric advancement in time and increase in duration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"Russian Academy of Sciences; Suomen Kulttuurirahasto; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Phenology; Duration (music); Spring (device); Geography; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009200724268578203,"gpt":0.2059072305537483,"spread":0.1967065062851701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001792366,0.00006849821,0.0001309385,0.00008223157,0.00002045292,0.00000584259,0.0001134293,0.00005117391,0.002567405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001238606,0.00005015994,0.000009814476,0.001002765,0.0001859845,0.00006065821,0.0002342578,0.0001113477,0.0001038258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002071555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004995753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000216426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003252587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992264,0.0001111985,0.0002028625,0.000194159,0.0001041773,0.0001612133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997126,0.00006216532,0.00009242347,0.00008908382,0.000001882327,0.00004188272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009461369,0.0001304094,0.9975089,0.000002831867,7.811571e-7,0.000004707178,0.00009232204,0.00001203983,0.0003899228,0.00006529719,0.00001460912,0.001768688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003411482,0.00006891127,0.9975446,0.000003952202,0.000001260704,5.542079e-7,0.0001926479,0.00005547708,0.00009055637,0.00001020444,0.001632832,0.0000578098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972669,0.00005279601,4.176889e-7,0.0001877168,0.0000200253,0.0002161448,0.000008287941,0.000004750363,0.002243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999571,0.000157093,0.00001248265,0.0002057278,0.000001780789,0.00001247798,0.000005449339,0.000002549213,0.00003140588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003036161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344727237","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.057","title":"A forest structure habitat index based on airborne laser scanning data","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Biodiversity; Habitat; Species richness; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Geography; Index (typography); Environmental science; Land cover; Remote sensing; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Land use; Computer science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01563267697596427,"gpt":0.2470177212555005,"spread":0.2313850442795363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000204448,0.0001454605,0.0001332242,0.0000610815,0.0002006335,0.00002623498,0.0005979892,0.0001562675,0.002945649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002171188,0.00008261687,0.00003558151,0.0003271555,0.0003554186,0.0001003383,0.0002843341,0.0001458821,0.0007415377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001367459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000188233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002428416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003152903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998626,0.00006734754,0.0001722018,0.0005469428,0.0002726207,0.0003148891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986925,0.0002405125,0.00009266447,0.0007900965,0.000003169957,0.0001810548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002529592,0.0001702408,0.9229085,0.000001701245,0.000008483755,0.00001398888,0.00002111534,0.001745685,0.0008567431,0.0001153905,0.03114723,0.04298556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002531967,0.00009100762,0.9584824,0.00001014614,0.000007217873,0.000002066728,0.000008366548,0.003399957,0.0004778312,0.0006882303,0.0364231,0.0001564505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868872,0.000001832242,0.001259278,0.002658411,0.00007712733,0.0001926355,0.00006101807,0.00009877464,0.008763748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970883,0.000001140022,0.001374258,0.001138584,0.0000567612,0.000003842417,0.00003599323,0.00001318523,0.0002879193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04282911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749038040","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.07.059","title":"Influence of crop type, heterogeneity and woody structure on avian biodiversity in agricultural landscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Arable land; Agriculture; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Agricultural land; Bird conservation; Land use; Crop; Ecosystem services; Spatial heterogeneity; Agroecosystem; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008502536843596574,"gpt":0.2327070957335022,"spread":0.2242045588899056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000792127,0.0000752338,0.0001259339,0.00002750965,0.0003075614,0.00001096063,0.0001940207,0.0001118365,0.0001511822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001381043,0.00005008831,0.00001650043,0.00006680146,0.000400118,0.000088382,0.0002417596,0.0001234151,0.00004480709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003368009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002578216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004381075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00278299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994885,0.00003514634,0.00009713828,0.0001815044,0.00007055124,0.0001271004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999675,0.00004644471,0.0001231971,0.0001066958,0.000004506741,0.00004416858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109568,0.000047504,0.9983625,0.000002212159,0.000006662494,0.000004577693,0.0001159281,0.0009697858,0.0002951848,0.00008464568,0.0000404416,0.00005955117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001701504,0.0001257572,0.9989454,0.00000235996,0.00000362232,9.998389e-7,0.00003080222,0.0000146178,0.0003454901,0.000264911,0.00003091583,0.00006502254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985916,0.000007472854,9.127198e-8,0.000217581,0.00003421877,0.00008296503,0.00001216346,0.000007260605,0.001046663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998198,0.00001751927,0.00003434379,0.0001049769,0.000003540101,0.000001648294,0.000002741762,8.102745e-7,0.0000146684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002739179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2365545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992269705","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.030","title":"Development of a macroinvertebrate multimetric index for the assessment of low-land streams in the neotropics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universidad de la República Uruguay","keywords":"STREAMS; Environmental science; Biotic index; Water quality; Index of biological integrity; Ecology; Species evenness; Biomonitoring; Invertebrate; Hydrology (agriculture); Dry season; Bioindicator; Community structure; Canonical correspondence analysis; Watershed; River ecosystem; Habitat; Species richness; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01389032884948255,"gpt":0.2371036566782357,"spread":0.2232133278287532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004872648,0.0001163811,0.0002046528,0.0000901547,0.0001632439,0.00001602848,0.0006368094,0.0001174275,0.003850773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006160504,0.00006052332,0.00006458737,0.0005245249,0.0003984302,0.00008599894,0.0002623393,0.0001599903,0.00009985136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001081378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003414772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003191514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001499267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988235,0.00009616229,0.0003531286,0.0002054366,0.0002230451,0.0002987144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991912,0.0003746104,0.0001915899,0.0001841027,0.000009179198,0.00004930063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009000016,0.0004217425,0.9894151,0.00001511843,0.00002518735,0.000001940971,0.0006527954,0.0007064992,0.0002773953,0.0001130382,0.001828402,0.006533746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050188,0.0001531936,0.9769488,0.00000297941,0.000009414891,8.640428e-7,0.0004832667,0.01983045,0.0006845494,0.0002825366,0.001019257,0.00008280183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975333,0.000007968056,0.0005103149,0.0003762514,0.00007023348,0.0007717304,0.000007941728,0.00000682102,0.0007154862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966207,0.00000757209,0.002735682,0.0004502961,0.000006992832,0.0001127547,0.000007601454,0.000003974618,0.00005444856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01912395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002831740","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.020","title":"A review on China's pollutant emissions reduction assessment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Development and Reform Commission; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Pollutant; Sustainability; China; Government (linguistics); Environmental economics; Business; Plan (archaeology); Environmental science; Environmental planning; Emissions trading; Investment (military); Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Greenhouse gas; Economics; Ecology; Geography; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02911665054398614,"gpt":0.354646412153692,"spread":0.3255297616097058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007299787,0.0006273781,0.001513707,0.0001081017,0.0003302403,0.00004168383,0.0006430256,0.0005537214,0.05454395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002295331,0.0003780329,0.0006450588,0.0007022083,0.0004780511,0.0001413597,0.000568969,0.001104415,0.00406778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002779908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008328601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002799077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.289665e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964848,0.0006397202,0.0008414148,0.0008998049,0.0004855324,0.0006486953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980384,0.0001049011,0.0005682255,0.0007418338,0.000001936365,0.0005446942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001039804,0.0006907451,0.0001633127,0.003188492,0.00003537998,0.00001664022,0.00001319326,0.000001821194,7.663839e-7,0.00005382958,0.02905078,0.966784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005884254,0.0003075892,0.008428742,0.003962519,0.0002581617,0.00003656016,0.0000144666,0.000001244481,5.689618e-7,0.0001696554,0.9863107,0.000450917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005297011,0.9735214,0.000003270184,0.0003600173,0.000237829,0.002988394,0.00002994212,0.0001008326,0.02222862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004410055,0.9959774,0.0002566884,0.0004661581,0.00007196888,0.0006962199,0.000068472,0.00003958667,0.001982527],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978229288","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.12.007","title":"Exploring the dynamics of ecological indicators using food web models fitted to time series of abundance and catch data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Environmental science; Marine ecosystem; Biomass (ecology); Trophic level; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Ecological indicator; Geography; Fishing; Food web; Physical geography; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0929568623853465,"gpt":0.2768577348491663,"spread":0.1839008724638198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000644373,0.0001761082,0.000345305,0.0001205572,0.0001999594,0.00002872361,0.001110933,0.0001301766,0.001584593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002506473,0.0001169605,0.00004394358,0.0009948172,0.0007606354,0.0004725624,0.001605124,0.0002648088,0.00001332724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001288575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003746521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004108195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001516299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998126,0.0001340361,0.0004174531,0.0004802854,0.00041836,0.0004238935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988315,0.0001952951,0.0001756024,0.0005873317,0.000009713684,0.0002006221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002999673,0.001448253,0.9225912,0.00005411718,0.0001157196,0.00003568434,0.00129955,0.002703284,0.002283121,0.005030222,0.001503144,0.06263573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003309024,0.00196834,0.9621071,0.00001061001,0.00003221161,0.0000127742,0.000397387,0.02859336,0.0006758104,0.001987626,0.003525152,0.0003587472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908877,0.0000075552,0.0001077027,0.0009721423,0.00003264389,0.0003766658,0.00009065914,0.00002763703,0.007497265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978298,0.00008108078,0.001709699,0.0001810137,0.00001820095,0.00001869702,0.00002207692,0.000008809246,0.0001306038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06227699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2729831436","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.047","title":"Undervalued and under pressure: A plea for greater attention toward regulating ecosystem services","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Plymouth State University","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Interdependence; Provisioning; Unintended consequences; Plea; Risk analysis (engineering); Service (business); Business; Environmental resource management; Fundamental human needs; Ecosystem; Environmental planning; Ecology; Computer science; Economics; Marketing; Psychology; Political science; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02589852874404626,"gpt":0.2539583611066894,"spread":0.2280598323626431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003854463,0.0001536461,0.0002255075,0.0000283547,0.0007551688,0.0002216387,0.0003886872,0.0001799647,0.0008114795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001564245,0.000103574,0.00006707665,0.00004242506,0.00004214681,0.0003509371,0.0003507846,0.00007011196,0.0001348876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004640386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003843523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001412447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009278123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988092,0.00005258942,0.000236338,0.0004227311,0.000161946,0.0003172517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992067,0.000057257,0.0002892466,0.0003099671,0.000005354395,0.0001315277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003947688,0.00005779415,0.9978265,0.0002339441,0.00006481232,0.000003027337,0.0002425038,0.0001605156,0.0002030874,0.0002473274,0.000151137,0.0007699278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005373858,0.0001211762,0.9889534,0.00003406795,0.00005894584,0.000005191558,0.000174747,0.005615661,0.0001406244,0.001697184,0.002480353,0.0001812341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969173,0.00002473496,0.0000544843,0.0006887748,0.0001659401,0.0004499441,0.00001912508,0.00005759445,0.001622079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999127,0.000007132175,0.0003044282,0.0001977698,0.00007974006,0.00008174548,0.00001028036,0.00001204424,0.0001798533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008873018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8885131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773277936","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.026","title":"What counts in making marine protected areas (MPAs) count? The role of legitimacy in MPA success in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Stakeholder; Marine protected area; Business; Perception; Key (lock); Environmental resource management; Public relations; Politics; Political science; Ecology; Habitat; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009714628957529862,"gpt":0.2308583744006571,"spread":0.2211437454431272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002389759,0.00008667403,0.0001806866,0.00003798606,0.00009050512,0.00003300989,0.0003957354,0.00004174634,0.001486361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001206183,0.00005628485,0.00001560679,0.0001588965,0.0001243402,0.0001626257,0.0005867984,0.0001729138,0.00003001218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005118428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005939026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5837288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991655,0.0000464159,0.000217998,0.000174699,0.0001711846,0.0002241598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.00006152528,0.0001472604,0.0001790998,0.000003126871,0.00002637633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008886514,0.00004535712,0.9901683,0.000004290232,0.000002044031,0.00002609399,0.00006350764,0.00001806644,0.000007329273,0.00005652038,0.0001269572,0.009472664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001593853,0.00001560452,0.9939923,0.00002457822,0.000001215193,0.000001173541,0.0002338198,0.0002086613,0.00002872665,0.0005865542,0.004675575,0.00007245591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773878,0.00002972286,9.098537e-8,0.0003937953,0.0001352254,0.0003372638,0.000002620029,0.000004237272,0.02170922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996673,0.00003689466,0.000005414038,0.00006417064,0.00001085073,0.00008625416,0.000001224235,0.000003319147,0.0001245332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.390752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137703289","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107580","title":"Determining the impacts of deforestation and corn cultivation on soil quality in tropical acidic red soils using a soil quality index","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Major Science and Technology Projects in Yunnan Province; Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Topsoil; Environmental science; Soil quality; Soil carbon; Agronomy; Soil water; Soil retrogression and degradation; Deforestation (computer science); Soil pH; Soil biodiversity; Soil fertility; Soil test; Soil organic matter; Red soil; Soil science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04600791386082777,"gpt":0.3071586495990034,"spread":0.2611507357381756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006453674,0.0001478195,0.0003012078,0.00003322682,0.0001621017,0.00004212074,0.0001374389,0.0002399979,0.00005336747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001155342,0.00005727362,0.00009301336,0.0005817792,0.0002500873,0.00007973039,0.00009321899,0.0002632287,0.000001512735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001001868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004047905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003432868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00699147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979925,0.0006471823,0.0004672575,0.0003226668,0.0002931019,0.0002772584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985297,0.0009116231,0.0003119273,0.00007541212,0.00006602317,0.0001053163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007123752,0.0002179785,0.9803501,0.000008611424,0.000009108545,0.000003943602,0.000136987,0.00003355932,0.01365725,0.0005225969,0.000007025842,0.004981623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003717406,0.0001905359,0.993125,0.00001487298,0.000008128569,0.000002200956,0.0007146713,0.001509133,0.003271213,0.0006537801,0.000008516783,0.0001302221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989381,0.00001744195,0.000005820761,0.0006485107,0.00005047214,0.000148598,0.00001621554,0.0000252366,0.0001496148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994505,0.00001535315,0.0000323252,0.0004005781,0.00004449454,0.00001083579,0.00003883792,0.000001312894,0.000005749748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01277491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3901404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990206718","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105932","title":"Variation in ecosystem water use efficiency along a southwest-to-northeast aridity gradient in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Key Research and Development Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Water-use efficiency; Environmental science; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Arid; Shrubland; Ecosystem; Growing season; Vegetation (pathology); Precipitation; Aridity index; Physical geography; Eddy covariance; Atmospheric sciences; Leaf area index; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Irrigation; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005825440389590641,"gpt":0.1850233123852182,"spread":0.1791978719956275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006282594,0.0001373473,0.0001871435,0.0001936105,0.00006316906,0.00003701841,0.0002151318,0.0001451038,0.0007559072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042908,0.0000922595,0.00004441862,0.0004549788,0.0000291526,0.0001615861,0.0001789915,0.0002605026,0.001600623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007602709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001059576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005936159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984788,0.0001588657,0.0003404411,0.0004090044,0.0002077571,0.0004051306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995509,0.00005630962,0.00007474438,0.0001973219,0.000001688703,0.0001190395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009331225,0.0002137771,0.9437309,0.000001900669,0.000001980394,0.00001575517,0.0009697378,0.05462973,0.0002288034,0.00009393936,0.000002136305,0.0001020073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002557082,0.00008798082,0.9806365,0.000007020873,0.000003317425,0.000003884263,0.00001597886,0.01845567,0.00002605343,0.000156232,0.0002025009,0.0001491563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983674,8.810618e-7,0.00009598791,0.00007807331,0.0001642621,0.0005326154,0.00002680702,0.00003042409,0.0007035203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996875,0.000002371364,0.0001097896,0.00005014198,0.000007554711,0.00003834336,0.00002270471,0.000007042898,0.000074576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03690559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790367555","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.050","title":"A mega-index for the Americas and its underlying sustainable development correlations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable development; Sustainability; Equity (law); Index (typography); Intergenerational equity; Environmental resource management; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02727215587630798,"gpt":0.2762189648348024,"spread":0.2489468089584944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003693307,0.0001554992,0.0001252097,0.00006415136,0.00134336,0.00005189666,0.0002443617,0.00009661183,0.003014738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001734615,0.0001043006,0.0000337899,0.0004139592,0.0005218723,0.0001641432,0.0004287356,0.0001169597,0.0002605371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004121324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003525327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003511824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002633097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986829,0.00003151171,0.0002094523,0.0003223711,0.0001871993,0.0005666157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993582,0.000276455,0.00009195778,0.0001214322,0.000006823498,0.0001451626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001644587,0.000657743,0.8586106,0.00005052655,0.0002090613,0.00005168351,0.009639001,0.0006978129,0.0003347405,0.01781098,0.02950584,0.08226755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002689701,0.0001147131,0.8259579,0.000001647301,0.00001322809,0.000004322425,0.002991378,0.001092457,0.0001865688,0.001155205,0.1680275,0.0001860709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871908,0.00005130548,0.001950449,0.001028495,0.00008047098,0.0007779277,0.000001057924,0.00005441056,0.008865047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906337,0.00001647972,0.0007587142,0.0008576553,0.00004454165,0.0002572093,0.000004234858,0.00001271587,0.007414811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1385217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090460728","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106999","title":"EOLakeWatch; delivering a comprehensive suite of remote sensing algal bloom indices for enhanced monitoring of Canadian eutrophic lakes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Eutrophication; Suite; Algal bloom; Environmental science; Remote sensing; Bloom; Environmental monitoring; Ecology; Phytoplankton; Geography; Biology; Environmental engineering; Nutrient","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02644628735479034,"gpt":0.235958288011118,"spread":0.2095120006563276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000140865,0.0001553331,0.0003765209,0.0001196413,0.0001233739,0.00001057554,0.0002395038,0.0001536019,0.000203446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001143324,0.0001384034,0.00009694565,0.0005266597,0.0001644204,0.00006336463,0.00009960875,0.0001486768,0.00002149477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009839652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005010244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01170916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01623206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986882,0.00005163307,0.0004259866,0.0002938333,0.0001966636,0.0003436519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990129,0.0002077696,0.0003330239,0.0001304554,0.00001797427,0.0002978219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002322835,0.0001514338,0.6307442,0.0006847398,0.0003413477,0.00009843766,0.01016589,0.01311908,0.2987443,0.0004739157,0.0003174003,0.04492695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001676093,0.001587528,0.8065667,0.0002459897,0.0001531602,0.00001285977,0.002191605,0.05125052,0.1238328,0.0005823016,0.01093287,0.0009675829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971928,0.00003798776,0.001226082,0.0001455583,0.0001239455,0.0003853053,0.00005563417,0.00002197229,0.0008106909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895157,0.00002381457,0.01026894,0.00009392643,0.00006532101,0.000002249358,0.000008831268,0.00001264621,0.000008596077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1758224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119698584","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.04.009","title":"Monitoring temporal dynamics of Great Artesian Basin wetland vegetation, Australia, using MODIS NDVI","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; Australian Government; National Water Commission","keywords":"Wetland; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Environmental science; Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer; Vegetation (pathology); Hydrology (agriculture); Satellite imagery; Structural basin; Physical geography; Remote sensing; Ecology; Climate change; Geology; Geography; Satellite; Oceanography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01984282371908318,"gpt":0.2475805200347103,"spread":0.2277376963156271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001441741,0.000177101,0.0002308478,0.00005813765,0.0001340179,0.00004115165,0.0002333858,0.0002341775,0.001612564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006492552,0.0001255236,0.00007833655,0.0004281422,0.0003066064,0.0002124775,0.0001105093,0.0002141629,0.0003818652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003553886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007690825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008915378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001572243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986356,0.00008557651,0.0003271646,0.00031678,0.0003024695,0.0003323813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993513,0.00006105348,0.0002148392,0.0001889845,0.00001280107,0.0001710155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001971192,0.00007626781,0.9926149,0.000006626449,0.00001145043,0.000008104458,0.000105908,0.001911546,0.003118915,0.0000234288,0.000441595,0.001679304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126114,0.00006496735,0.9921778,0.00001877545,0.00001560527,0.00001097148,0.00008579286,0.004563645,0.001883937,0.0007725167,0.0001098538,0.0001699666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974405,0.000005767648,0.0001969471,0.0002190973,0.0001985475,0.0002745414,0.000002454891,0.00004403499,0.001618079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919536,0.000003112485,0.007665516,0.00002901734,0.0000626211,0.000003058526,0.000009974504,0.000009960085,0.0002631022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007468569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079181170","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.009","title":"Use of single versus multiple biotic communities as indicators of biological integrity in northern prairie wetlands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Water Research Institute; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wetland; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Ecosystem; Ecology; Index of biological integrity; Habitat; Plant community; Indicator species; Biology; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06409777466738237,"gpt":0.2777066488255536,"spread":0.2136088741581712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005469717,0.0001675985,0.0003788907,0.0001967514,0.0001226556,0.000005334711,0.0003039675,0.0003393478,0.0005940402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001098732,0.0001238395,0.00008597718,0.0005841588,0.001658854,0.0001825503,0.0004081446,0.0003962955,0.00009772581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001671401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001607021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003373521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01365859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.0002662348,0.0004648887,0.0001688722,0.0001679284,0.0003861399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976168,0.001739374,0.0003221821,0.0001992304,0.0000100798,0.0001123672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026757,0.001291855,0.9960946,0.000006414796,0.00003468502,0.000001846602,0.001086941,0.00007140494,0.0002132316,0.0005738852,0.00004434816,0.0004781543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004795465,0.0006264226,0.9962406,0.000007130544,0.00001404101,0.000001144489,0.001136977,0.00004111893,0.0007886385,0.0001749802,0.0003511077,0.0001383234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972935,0.00003562071,0.00001062037,0.000126388,0.0001910504,0.0002116869,0.00001434215,0.00002840591,0.002088427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993718,0.00003182198,0.00043253,0.00007908336,0.00001152414,0.00002343516,0.00002197475,0.000006800497,0.00002102878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01332124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7621815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909240159","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.014","title":"Metabarcoding of storage ethanol vs. conventional morphometric identification in relation to the use of stream macroinvertebrates as ecological indicators in forest management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Guelph; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Taxon; Relative species abundance; Morphometrics; Biology; Forest management; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; STREAMS; Invertebrate","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02346541604199838,"gpt":0.2311486532823621,"spread":0.2076832372403638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008001635,0.0001737189,0.000322893,0.0008132411,0.00008186748,0.00001631285,0.0004598533,0.0001586502,0.002180257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002294726,0.0001324615,0.00009622752,0.002361401,0.0003616417,0.0002113469,0.0006864802,0.000229193,0.0008123688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004418361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004020494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009866415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008045119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978564,0.0002396863,0.0006019782,0.0004710085,0.0005349123,0.0002960419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988821,0.0003918407,0.0003788692,0.0002660954,0.000004020481,0.00007708737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003361737,0.0005101277,0.9850484,0.00001581432,0.00002679672,0.000006933298,0.0001409836,0.01196094,0.00052313,0.0008279025,0.0003092101,0.0005961289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004344877,0.0002346673,0.9966003,0.00001477795,0.00002173586,7.69133e-7,0.0004026835,0.0003852448,0.000924982,0.0001808175,0.0006596748,0.000139861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978408,0.00001713906,0.00004808186,0.0002788647,0.0001086074,0.001024212,0.00002095495,0.00001397734,0.0006473649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984178,0.00006380815,0.001031967,0.0001639826,0.000004408334,0.00006258505,0.0000256879,0.000006939285,0.0002228563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947837746","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.055","title":"Making ecological indicators management ready: Assessing the specificity, sensitivity, and threshold response of ecological indicators","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; National Research Foundation; Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement","keywords":"Fishing; Environmental science; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Ecological indicator; Biomass (ecology); Fisheries management; Trophic level; Fishery; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Overfishing; Sustainability; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03502620992867532,"gpt":0.3080184517881603,"spread":0.272992241859485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004981198,0.0004815539,0.0007385817,0.0005221515,0.0005901391,0.0002126144,0.00101327,0.0006323737,0.01897109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004569899,0.0003084678,0.0001959897,0.00188329,0.00228693,0.0003155436,0.003954229,0.001187977,0.0004802046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005154176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002240835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003843625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943232,0.001320582,0.0008466912,0.001190043,0.001182723,0.001136791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963985,0.001908544,0.0005256011,0.0007848325,0.00001388771,0.0003686546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002146339,0.0008190786,0.9832944,0.00002973583,0.00007174174,0.0003072928,0.0001561807,0.00004197071,0.0004217638,0.002937687,0.001319261,0.01038626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004948243,0.0006593357,0.9711747,0.00001181757,0.00003876778,0.00003511784,0.0006772638,0.0002077301,0.0002442507,0.0005764714,0.02548015,0.0003995384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539025,0.0000115399,0.00001936778,0.0009679951,0.0001745476,0.001076082,0.00001261143,0.0000989637,0.1437364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972564,0.00009275151,0.0005648948,0.0009078468,0.0000595095,0.00008401398,0.00001303874,0.0000327698,0.0009887657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1433539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378576490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110399","title":"Decoupling of economic growth and resources-environmental pressure in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China; China Three Gorges University; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Decoupling (probability); Geography; Sustainable development; China; Environmental science; Economy; Economics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005391259094533255,"gpt":0.2212581904978226,"spread":0.2158669314032893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006760323,0.0001683543,0.0002197422,0.00008115849,0.0001511512,0.0000205226,0.0003913944,0.000138043,0.002145201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003588658,0.000120334,0.00007236487,0.0001232241,0.0009589205,0.0001733278,0.0004621262,0.0002222287,0.0002825022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002584686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006493364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000316881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000810245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986625,0.0001262417,0.000308792,0.0003868499,0.0001404979,0.0003751216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993503,0.000186023,0.000123186,0.0002351384,1.431316e-7,0.0001051773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001545724,0.0001024455,0.9952197,0.00000723536,0.00001051058,0.000009850408,0.001663818,0.001935576,0.0001022942,0.0001015495,0.0002963823,0.0005351655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002738115,0.0001308459,0.9951653,0.000001870034,0.00001439245,0.000004057645,0.0007439559,0.000923787,0.0001678031,0.001532974,0.0009011014,0.0001400932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965219,0.00004432494,0.000001092342,0.0003115368,0.00004442166,0.0003516926,0.00002842757,0.00002530306,0.002671263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995486,0.0001114725,0.00004271415,0.0001034179,0.00002287159,0.0000323637,0.0000123608,0.00001087604,0.0001153414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003026644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001207441","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.030","title":"Availability and utilization of waste fish feed by mussels Mytilus edulis in a commercial integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system: A multi-indicator assessment approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"European Social Fund; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Mussel; Seston; Aquaculture; Mytilus; Fishery; Biology; Condition index; Blue mussel; Animal science; Mariculture; Monoculture; Bay; Commercial fish feed; Trophic level; Ecology; Nutrient; Phytoplankton; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02080472292988568,"gpt":0.2663262703796532,"spread":0.2455215474497676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008863715,0.0003444501,0.0006349986,0.0001016075,0.0002276194,0.00003646595,0.0003672146,0.0003565213,0.0003410354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002968253,0.0002336809,0.0001080421,0.0006444494,0.0006808783,0.000131604,0.0004428076,0.0004555188,0.00002393745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003160749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002123186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004068433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000491674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972785,0.000544311,0.0006495596,0.0007270148,0.0003774235,0.0004231688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990245,0.0001198288,0.0003653135,0.0002671276,0.00001863386,0.0002046011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004285446,0.001942961,0.9876998,0.0001267379,0.00005024976,0.000003132866,0.001116447,0.00004741725,0.002067326,0.0001969594,0.003567743,0.003138373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001467006,0.0002444703,0.984685,0.00002415183,0.00004356389,0.000002729784,0.001596275,0.007412135,0.0004165816,0.00001179968,0.003791108,0.0003051652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949343,0.00003936452,0.001324246,0.0002716447,0.00007508128,0.0008792543,0.00006350249,0.00007610871,0.002336512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952556,0.00003740312,0.004032761,0.0002325211,0.00002545941,0.0001425038,0.0001171821,0.00001454385,0.0001419786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007364718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9529232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1078914472","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.008","title":"Functional response of lignicolous fungal guilds to bark beetle deforestation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt","keywords":"Lichen; Biology; Ecology; Decomposer; Species richness; Bark beetle; Habitat; Epiphyte; Species diversity; Biodiversity; Picea abies; Botany; Bark (sound); Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03723700391193496,"gpt":0.2300355601410217,"spread":0.1927985562290867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006944982,0.0001147229,0.0001959158,0.00004683352,0.0002154027,0.0000117806,0.0002239215,0.0002007954,0.000730762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008993605,0.00004580467,0.00007948778,0.0005175698,0.0001860727,0.00005962512,0.0002004854,0.0001105146,0.0004649909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007446626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002925581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002721771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001880813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988667,0.0001833317,0.0002142977,0.000254,0.0002199055,0.0002617718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990543,0.0004812843,0.0001024584,0.00004532602,0.00009256198,0.0002240367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001799623,0.0005511214,0.9141413,0.000002902183,0.00004902601,0.00003144005,0.0002768475,0.00006335979,0.005322243,0.0007778647,0.07439526,0.002589027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001913626,0.002054911,0.9852762,0.000002200575,0.00001243226,0.000004536058,0.000496145,0.000002854812,0.00108287,0.0005086368,0.01025518,0.0001126248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961354,0.00002898758,0.000002675993,0.002498829,0.0002561818,0.0002084658,0.00005487539,0.00005591145,0.0007586391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00000332515,0.0001563328,0.0007234744,0.00008449087,0.00002004046,0.0000297273,4.799006e-7,0.0003211921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07113497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8001332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266933621","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.015","title":"Energy–Landscape Integrated Analysis: A proposal for measuring complexity in internal agroecosystem processes (Barcelona Metropolitan Region, 1860–2000)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Agroecosystem; Dilemma; Environmental resource management; Sustainability; Metropolitan area; Land use; Biodiversity; Disturbance (geology); Energy flow; Agriculture; Energy (signal processing); Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02697200863630221,"gpt":0.243104782545629,"spread":0.2161327739093268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279587,0.000337304,0.0008289028,0.0004855741,0.0002733516,0.00006901755,0.0007045731,0.000311805,0.003437012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001373686,0.0001878782,0.000370708,0.003179543,0.0005456581,0.0002528748,0.0002876526,0.0001812655,0.00007650862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002684911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001393907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001729286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02783985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963831,0.0004732635,0.0009069183,0.0009603451,0.0004238389,0.0008525519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982621,0.0006118047,0.0003804395,0.0003481309,0.00006405334,0.0003334626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001331628,0.0005244509,0.9940916,0.00004536904,0.0002707853,0.00003960068,0.0001394089,0.00009480422,0.00005024893,0.002001011,0.0005681593,0.002041443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00135518,0.0007456807,0.9672869,0.00006325662,0.000368019,0.00001605519,0.002788887,0.001803548,0.0004929054,0.01926296,0.005062719,0.0007538435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850428,0.00005984925,0.01078209,0.001240996,0.00007534932,0.0005928854,0.00002338116,0.0001300968,0.002052598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981022,0.00001336967,0.0005283662,0.0001353152,0.00005588967,0.000471715,0.00001753028,0.00001440232,0.000661237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02680461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024661381","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2003.08.002","title":"Understorey indicators of disturbance for riparian forests along an urban–rural gradient in Manitoba","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Guild; Geography; Ecology; Understory; Disturbance (geology); Riparian zone; Indicator species; Forestry; Agroforestry; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Canopy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01387721315534549,"gpt":0.242990056790803,"spread":0.2291128436354575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003814143,0.0001865736,0.0003023015,0.0001794043,0.0002293309,0.000009601687,0.0003649981,0.0002174222,0.0001380876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001559117,0.0001566208,0.00009020639,0.0005173262,0.0007640447,0.0001805915,0.0001393079,0.0002007822,0.00004108917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005498041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002668598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001769969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02619105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984918,0.00006952892,0.0004314482,0.0003790219,0.0001762985,0.0004518949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992408,0.0001613343,0.0002496928,0.0001930689,0.000005689019,0.0001494045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342933,0.0005822566,0.9825302,0.00000863419,0.00001849698,0.000008389743,0.0008367361,0.001754451,0.00001573284,0.0137804,0.000128249,0.0003030022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000901458,0.0004959864,0.9812531,0.000008015182,0.00001496127,0.000001732984,0.0006385933,0.0001076456,0.00009067291,0.01610478,0.0001968791,0.000186184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973578,0.00003905659,0.0004350926,0.0003215254,0.0002178575,0.0005807102,0.00001371009,0.00003866894,0.0009956221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986424,0.00001273187,0.0008544879,0.0002132759,0.00002638889,0.000179988,0.00002732297,0.00001187037,0.00003151048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02601406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064842038","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.02.001","title":"Comparative study of ecological indices for assessing human-induced disturbance in coastal wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Macrophyte; Environmental science; Water quality; Ecology; Aquatic plant; Index (typography); Hydrology (agriculture); Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04058392728286184,"gpt":0.2925321715648048,"spread":0.2519482442819429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002527412,0.0001552414,0.0004043387,0.00006459834,0.0002617071,0.00001034097,0.0004508169,0.0001340838,0.0001434687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005176909,0.00009028446,0.00009079566,0.0004665333,0.0005721474,0.0001136108,0.0002734493,0.0002012594,0.000003632721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007065226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001360364,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007921692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00250316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985107,0.0001756123,0.0004437154,0.0003169663,0.0002865375,0.0002664632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992052,0.0002150334,0.0003355106,0.0001764977,0.000008270992,0.00005945796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002423463,0.001997554,0.9956228,0.000005196977,0.00001465883,0.000006353006,0.001800881,0.0001553741,0.0001943197,0.00003378883,0.0000915096,0.00005332738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000994502,0.0007374784,0.9956568,0.000008029235,0.00001601162,0.000002008937,0.001245602,0.0001518525,0.0005369452,0.0004859825,0.00004988087,0.000114874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983098,0.000003449431,0.000005875785,0.0000351305,0.00009995284,0.0006350419,0.00001570245,0.00001564302,0.0008794264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997787,0.000001657607,0.00004951925,0.00002406195,0.00001410868,0.00007158602,0.00001279136,0.000005178056,0.00004241983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002423943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3681694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601550552","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.028","title":"Implementing the connectivity of natural areas in cities as an indicator in the City Biodiversity Index (CBI)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Parks Board - Singapore","keywords":"Biodiversity; Metric (unit); Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental resource management; Index (typography); Landscape connectivity; Natural (archaeology); Diversity index; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science; Ecology; Species richness; Business; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02295421069766996,"gpt":0.2779122592242379,"spread":0.2549580485265679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001282247,0.0001006531,0.0001359804,0.00007332925,0.000726207,0.00007916916,0.0008315247,0.00008849421,0.001756779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000390587,0.00005851886,0.00005124087,0.0001914098,0.0005968752,0.0004169786,0.000430945,0.0003727739,0.00004748182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001308013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001993626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005561303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00992268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987749,0.0002471655,0.0002219091,0.0002420275,0.000238836,0.0002751173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990396,0.0002318411,0.000320234,0.0003651262,0.000004727418,0.00003847965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872608,0.0001750912,0.9970571,0.000001024072,0.000004827185,0.000005331361,0.0007661131,0.00000452646,0.00003452401,0.0003081007,0.0002621844,0.001362441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000216947,0.00007166109,0.995275,0.000003235636,0.000004743913,0.000002714785,0.001951043,0.0001066456,0.0001379091,0.000877444,0.001273372,0.00007930162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944338,0.00000336245,0.000002412777,0.00195874,0.00008917734,0.0002580864,0.000009255479,0.000009807411,0.003235387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991778,0.000004417343,0.00001233582,0.0007386113,0.0000161617,0.00002521855,0.000005230701,0.000001801445,0.00001845932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004743993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}