{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":881,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":881,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"3d38bc0904ae","filters":{"venue":"Ecology"}},"results":[{"id":"W1987431381","doi":"10.1890/08-2244.1","title":"A distance‐based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Trait; Weighting; Multivariate statistics; Statistics; Measure (data warehouse); Entropy (arrow of time); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08568954839371135,"gpt":0.2101645319110596,"spread":0.1244749835173483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000566258,0.00006057323,0.00009764042,0.000002926598,0.0004921753,0.000009413173,0.00009159542,0.00009148729,0.0003989848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001557945,0.00002458169,0.0000568636,0.00003981337,0.00003828113,0.0000257698,0.00006299982,0.0001028366,0.00002177642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007418888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002635197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001504069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04962078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995666,0.000009768132,0.00005808086,0.0001563736,0.00005483774,0.0001543136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991525,0.0007457671,0.00002996264,0.000008343362,0.00002686919,0.00003659748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002002446,0.00009714453,0.8106005,0.00000215603,0.00002402225,0.000002621396,0.00004966619,0.000002887477,0.1791271,0.002240412,0.001606801,0.006046535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391664,0.00006758847,0.9742904,0.000001941595,0.000006487315,2.942201e-7,0.00003014125,0.00008751777,0.0005865573,0.006703349,0.0180153,0.0000711984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979827,0.00002514775,0.0002721042,0.0009700983,0.0002593292,0.00008767871,0.0001951721,0.00003883643,0.0001689432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980866,0.000001764781,0.001126768,0.0002565348,0.0004318476,0.00001619045,0.00003394458,2.945151e-7,0.00004608194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1785405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028596084","doi":"10.1890/08-1823.1","title":"Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3933,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Ecology; Statistics; Inference; Statistical inference; Indicator value; Indicator species; Association (psychology); Index (typography); Confidence interval; Resampling; Preference; Habitat; Geography; Biology; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0157358628586391,"gpt":0.2668450623420914,"spread":0.2511091994834523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001130364,0.00004295302,0.0001268388,0.00001969409,0.0001022005,0.000004068739,0.00003501556,0.00005439873,0.0002549634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001936111,0.00004047225,0.000005424118,0.00004529781,0.0003058839,0.00005616534,0.00005582476,0.00005589611,0.00001632366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001899051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003374139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001190764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001187471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996108,0.00003705839,0.0001148247,0.0001034027,0.00003830827,0.00009560664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993264,0.0005473515,0.00006408938,0.00003218834,0.000004779781,0.00002517748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001064609,0.000016761,0.9881292,0.000001098418,0.000008286139,6.63453e-7,0.000512629,0.000007864919,0.00006778841,0.01060003,0.0001218782,0.0005327318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032418,0.0001478466,0.9762122,5.981875e-7,0.00001270584,4.95635e-7,0.000055799,0.00009101253,0.000007293742,0.02328596,0.00004463295,0.00003823822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948597,0.00002285996,0.0002497177,0.0006430886,0.00001649533,0.00004744909,0.00003550359,0.000006798793,0.004118375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986975,0.00005503729,0.0009621602,0.0001395481,0.000008786985,0.000001532617,0.00001370881,0.000001054948,0.0001207338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.279167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142329269","doi":"10.1890/03-8006","title":"ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD-SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Geography; Scale (ratio); Macroecology; Biology; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005125479815528542,"gpt":0.1913477168491092,"spread":0.1862222370335807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001142321,0.00006506915,0.0001252699,0.00003264006,0.0001016877,0.000002428948,0.00005958784,0.00006502515,0.001569815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001006589,0.00005124675,0.0000215485,0.00004519186,0.0002795734,0.00004071686,0.00008506232,0.00004215793,0.00002762432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000135188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001794587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004723964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003940956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994552,0.00006395303,0.0001183136,0.0001489341,0.00004051791,0.0001730744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997975,0.00005674508,0.0000348055,0.0000794958,0.000005472407,0.00002604101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002183084,0.00004509558,0.9957111,0.000004070262,0.00001148085,0.00000211517,0.0002238006,0.00005403636,0.0009329223,0.002838907,0.00006536013,0.0001088656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001897777,0.00006907727,0.9899598,8.139203e-7,0.000009325003,0.000008056714,0.0001075182,0.00005567247,0.001794637,0.003269227,0.004469628,0.00006651683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867705,0.00004656044,0.0002872084,0.0001688911,0.0001574332,0.00003673524,0.000002659491,0.000009408948,0.01252067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971945,0.0001683847,0.0001327608,0.0001602434,0.000005354488,0.0000128028,0.000003824018,0.000003701573,0.002318471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01042402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037840294","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:vposdm]2.0.co;2","title":"VARIATION PARTITIONING OF SPECIES DATA MATRICES: ESTIMATION AND COMPARISON OF FRACTIONS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2315,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Canonical correspondence analysis; Canonical correlation; Canonical analysis; Estimator; Variation (astronomy); Correspondence analysis; Redundancy (engineering); Statistics; Community structure; Mathematics; Econometrics; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Abundance (ecology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02401297172762255,"gpt":0.2839607431773022,"spread":0.2599477714496797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001227696,0.000031379,0.00009558301,0.00002491764,0.00008916134,0.000002256409,0.00005601735,0.00003751873,0.0003533899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000618472,0.0000321999,0.000006181127,0.00007439106,0.0001468077,0.0001394854,0.0000868365,0.00003220882,0.00001756902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001827409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003729865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001709951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002985003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995956,0.00002989614,0.0001827587,0.00009537803,0.00004150838,0.00005488924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995497,0.0001738674,0.0001693838,0.00009243147,0.000008294163,0.000006304537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003232017,0.00008225776,0.9667091,0.000009198742,0.000007696027,1.065759e-7,0.0002160599,0.0270623,0.0006998087,0.004396677,0.0006377092,0.0001758108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008517762,0.00003150387,0.8795598,0.000001422341,0.00001718737,7.283894e-7,0.00006992002,0.1163924,0.00007294533,0.003567337,0.000177817,0.00002377299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803789,0.00004139937,0.01335976,0.0002496615,0.00008136423,0.00006581278,0.00001391345,0.0000082765,0.005800921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926815,0.00001428733,0.007104829,0.000009865784,0.000008547528,0.000003873687,0.0000520029,0.00000150496,0.0001235671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08933014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3869371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103336148","doi":"10.1890/11-1952.1","title":"Coverage‐based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Council; McGill University","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Extrapolation; Completeness (order theory); Species richness; Stopping rule; Sampling (signal processing); Sample size determination; Statistics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0160467218125516,"gpt":0.2456126078063487,"spread":0.2295658859937971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002267726,0.00008268817,0.0001204901,0.0000132662,0.0002821867,0.000008901478,0.00004196462,0.00007321411,0.00290139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005031158,0.00007826638,0.00001914322,0.00005219519,0.0001756756,0.0001726057,0.00004610499,0.0000683346,0.0000825923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008426608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005424883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003102836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007456077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993744,0.00009363081,0.000112641,0.0001408937,0.00006234879,0.0002161073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994292,0.0003856484,0.00006251198,0.00006851937,0.000006035962,0.00004806188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001764237,0.0000389489,0.995427,0.000003181898,0.00001282836,3.988668e-7,0.0003401923,0.0002268947,0.00206986,0.000196195,0.001233695,0.0004331776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003807817,0.00004773122,0.9851217,0.00000102049,0.00001114055,0.00000385957,0.00009825463,0.0005888347,0.0001550993,0.0006240963,0.01287265,0.00009478728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899536,0.0001208615,0.006225389,0.000576505,0.0002582159,0.000117634,0.00001900771,0.00002842773,0.002700336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982353,0.00002701631,0.0007872197,0.000530251,0.00002856727,0.00002058285,0.00001278903,0.000006704629,0.0003516036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01163895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988619277","doi":"10.1890/07-0986.1","title":"FORWARD SELECTION OF EXPLANATORY VARIABLES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Statistical Methods and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Univariate; Multivariate statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Variance (accounting); Variable (mathematics); Statistics; Econometrics; Feature selection; Model selection; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07268296521155287,"gpt":0.364527027550163,"spread":0.2918440623386102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001133613,0.00003323199,0.0001110848,0.00002577115,0.00004838676,5.823504e-7,0.00004049695,0.00004703853,0.000573208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004528272,0.00003060615,0.00001752327,0.0000682117,0.00004693985,0.00001110394,0.0000103008,0.00004199341,0.00001726291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001205045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002487759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000581618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001154493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996465,0.00004417032,0.0001261884,0.00007002069,0.00003456576,0.00007856821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989223,0.0009007932,0.00004987081,0.00007000289,0.00003555838,0.00002140402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004527728,0.00008936253,0.005760729,0.00001790058,0.00001551556,0.000001318418,0.00008371037,0.00000122598,0.001382669,0.9766749,0.01514401,0.0008241878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001876811,0.00009015624,0.03389545,0.000002332929,0.00002099338,0.00003540477,0.00003009608,0.0003693173,0.004766048,0.9541943,0.006345693,0.0000625332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4328136,0.00001091648,0.5501262,0.0001881634,0.0001355372,0.0001840717,0.0000162882,0.00005975775,0.01646544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5343518,0.000007645265,0.4651054,0.00004791995,0.00003489716,0.00003806837,0.000001315297,0.000005687657,0.0004072463],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1015382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6276226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028644412","doi":"10.1890/04-0953","title":"WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1365,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Geological Survey; National Science Foundation","keywords":"National park; Ecology; Trophic level; Trophic cascade; Geography; Biology; Food web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009518809618625109,"gpt":0.242566763542704,"spread":0.2330479539240789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002517096,0.00009694432,0.000120225,0.00006062973,0.00009226111,0.000005979359,0.0001746758,0.0001419373,0.00458984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001057267,0.0001028145,0.000025465,0.0001683614,0.0002708862,0.0002915037,0.00009014616,0.000155239,0.001338055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003140585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003096343,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001352128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005896266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990017,0.00006878493,0.0002600475,0.0002591026,0.0001442879,0.0002660362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.00008680169,0.00007831947,0.0000769254,0.000009558393,0.00004467829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001385246,0.0002093833,0.9906778,8.859805e-7,0.000004525932,0.00001234805,0.0002389505,0.00490278,0.001550805,0.000137891,0.001401088,0.0008496333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033774,0.00005914514,0.9933417,0.000001938681,0.000004768367,0.000009678271,0.00003895656,0.0008134741,0.0001090833,0.000557963,0.004554208,0.0001056553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952615,0.00001444529,0.000004151713,0.001943103,0.00007847529,0.0001975059,0.000003408604,0.00002482134,0.002472595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924583,0.0000116722,0.000494051,0.005414807,0.00004994974,0.0002080818,0.000006832052,0.000006388287,0.001349926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005761053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125262103","doi":"10.1890/02-0413","title":"VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Biology; Mutualism (biology); Ecosystem; Range (aeronautics); Terrestrial plant; Botany; Glomeromycota; Mycorrhiza; Ecology; Native plant; Plant community; Symbiosis; Parasitism; Introduced species; Ecological succession; Host (biology); Bacteria","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01249956925848937,"gpt":0.2059528690654555,"spread":0.1934532998069661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003564799,0.00007355566,0.0001106903,0.00003328358,0.00007361934,0.00001636312,0.00005391115,0.00007774628,0.002873362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007966427,0.00003330539,0.0000200907,0.0001973771,0.000003064609,0.00005172014,0.00001772703,0.00009384365,0.0003239674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003074155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009408461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001521425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001139701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991545,0.0003008257,0.000125024,0.000188719,0.00005017264,0.0001807787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972163,0.002641447,0.00002828255,0.00002630128,0.00002020491,0.00006743975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001463731,0.0002732231,0.6369943,0.000007037245,0.00003071982,0.0002246131,0.001300837,0.00020355,0.3310053,0.0229298,0.004366688,0.001200151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006160459,0.0003483055,0.9526086,0.000009506884,0.000004847936,0.0001234885,0.0001444907,0.0001236023,0.0003018587,0.001347066,0.04481563,0.0001109362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969356,0.0000836589,0.00001190715,0.0006734681,0.0002866805,0.0001793141,0.000187237,0.0000164789,0.001625644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988977,0.00007012893,0.000114983,0.0004673397,0.00003721479,0.00002312794,0.00007836876,5.1738e-7,0.0003105947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3307035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163976466","doi":"10.1890/04-0669","title":"ARE INVASIVE SPECIES THE DRIVERS OR PASSENGERS OF CHANGE IN DEGRADED ECOSYSTEMS?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Competition (biology); Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Invasive species; Seed dispersal; Biomass (ecology); Introduced species; Ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Perennial plant; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04347857837625087,"gpt":0.2518729450250767,"spread":0.2083943666488259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001593683,0.00007019821,0.0001555396,0.00003599442,0.00008674653,0.000002173685,0.0001497837,0.00007102166,0.001987016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001286348,0.00004664206,0.00002665379,0.0001347682,0.0002705137,0.00007901433,0.00009967332,0.00008914082,0.0002455894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001390189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008071779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006690685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3597117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993723,0.0001009131,0.0001607408,0.0001355024,0.00005563407,0.0001749245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993559,0.0003556671,0.0001632718,0.0001009232,0.000006007944,0.00001822602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001001941,0.00004243672,0.9952115,0.00000540939,0.00001307256,0.00001025996,0.002264558,0.0004384911,0.0001047041,0.0002610026,0.001506883,0.0001316963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000248154,0.00005075201,0.9947256,0.000004252101,0.000006184849,0.000004101211,0.00129536,0.0005814284,0.0001230321,0.00008821496,0.002817847,0.00005505644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910645,0.00002963071,0.000002213151,0.005748886,0.0001599534,0.0002286968,0.000004200574,0.000008462589,0.00275348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980432,0.0001003669,0.00008361255,0.0007852689,0.00003525686,0.0000652455,0.000001319566,0.000003747359,0.0008820019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3596448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010216127","doi":"10.1890/09-2335.1","title":"Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade‐off in tropical trees","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1057,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Trade-off; Canopy; Biology; Panama; Shade tolerance; Trait; Ecology; Specific leaf area; Tree canopy; Growth rate; Tropics; Tropical forest; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008717080885782887,"gpt":0.2195454088534508,"spread":0.2108283279676679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001981844,0.00005765248,0.0001089736,0.00001418397,0.000129742,0.00000426187,0.00006778626,0.0000885784,0.00116735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001228032,0.00003928794,0.00002237315,0.00005663933,0.0009084647,0.00004873597,0.00005721233,0.0002229305,0.00006337454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001544401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005396121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002877473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07069699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994583,0.00008591042,0.0001187478,0.0001524143,0.00004847124,0.0001361621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995966,0.0003081844,0.00002745116,0.00004203883,0.000001802259,0.0000239252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002332951,0.00004394693,0.9722143,7.390155e-7,0.000008649078,0.000002771644,0.0002835123,0.00003283448,0.0002058545,0.02628769,0.0004491003,0.0004472024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008128542,0.00002701189,0.9843377,1.832804e-7,0.000007027848,0.0000111621,0.0000396799,0.00101214,0.000005080905,0.01334252,0.0003612639,0.000043317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987269,0.00001359613,0.00002399584,0.007375035,0.0002060062,0.0001012551,0.000001275801,0.000009460198,0.005000383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988676,0.00001843614,0.00009002641,0.0007634981,0.00003259465,0.00002653777,0.000001073472,0.000002360817,0.0001978541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07066822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036110753","doi":"10.1890/08-1034.1","title":"Confirmatory path analysis in a generalized multilevel context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1033,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Path analysis (statistics); Generalization; Multivariate statistics; Hierarchy; Context (archaeology); Multilevel model; Statistics; Path (computing); Statistical hypothesis testing; Test (biology); Hierarchical database model; Mathematics; Econometrics; Computer science; Ecology; Geography; Data mining; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1054447037851779,"gpt":0.4272428493426234,"spread":0.3217981455574455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002940029,0.0001025539,0.0004562619,0.0001340126,0.00003011098,0.000004860105,0.00008474294,0.00009684335,0.0003478886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006860069,0.0000920957,0.00007788131,0.0001526034,0.0000404855,0.00003166754,0.00001566134,0.0001178681,0.00001507767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004239219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002303703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001398646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002757753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989685,0.0002017869,0.00031587,0.0002048209,0.00006290351,0.0002460897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988412,0.0007910039,0.00008252395,0.0001818035,0.00003821094,0.00006532051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005744467,0.0002847362,0.001765699,0.00001151561,0.0001155335,0.0001052013,0.0006074846,0.0001776569,0.0005386304,0.957879,0.0008364822,0.03762063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327256,0.0001078334,0.03925344,0.000004651924,0.0001342797,0.000004205284,0.00006979078,0.03507703,0.0001216778,0.9226204,0.001102308,0.0001771221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.232574,0.00004214736,0.7653028,0.0002650361,0.00007338517,0.0001836149,0.00002059429,0.0000391807,0.001499189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6804023,0.00000651705,0.318406,0.0008409943,0.00001473381,0.00001557487,0.000003457016,0.00000526413,0.0003051782],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4478283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3809136,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148447782","doi":"10.1890/05-1459","title":"DIVERSITY AND HOST RANGE OF FOLIAR FUNGAL ENDOPHYTES: ARE TROPICAL LEAVES BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1028,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Endophyte; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Ecology; Host (biology); Biome; Tropics; Species diversity; Tropical climate; Taxon; Botany; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01144357795238525,"gpt":0.2071757978468964,"spread":0.1957322198945111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007613393,0.00009597153,0.0001610215,0.00004386784,0.0002764986,0.000002293888,0.0001071078,0.0001475465,0.00002600796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006812999,0.00009453898,0.0000708673,0.00004042594,0.0001602177,0.000003148477,0.0005745073,0.00005411564,0.000006131796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007394335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001416583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001885809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002184251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993743,0.00003529816,0.0001020555,0.0002208218,0.00005973352,0.0002077778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996344,0.00003376248,0.00007069486,0.0001198948,0.00004275392,0.00009848359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002893717,0.00008443781,0.9764336,0.00001760151,0.00004150846,0.00007535189,0.00005059241,3.060192e-7,0.02233852,0.0000595869,0.0005492258,0.00005990311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005582303,0.0002667676,0.9895851,0.000002834143,0.00003762248,0.00002278396,0.0001183372,0.000001144517,0.009037896,0.00001555109,0.0002527972,0.0001009238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983894,0.0005453635,0.00009359331,0.00005395708,0.0001246616,0.00008370852,0.0004943228,0.000007349604,0.0002076608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993608,0.0001563845,0.0000765279,0.0002189012,0.00008157862,8.164788e-7,0.000002497564,0.000003011437,0.00009948305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01330062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3855188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163611769","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2152:faioba]2.0.co;2","title":"FISHES AS INTEGRATORS OF BENTHIC AND PELAGIC FOOD WEBS IN LAKES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":711,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Benthic zone; Trophic level; Ecology; Lake ecosystem; Ecosystem; Food web; Environmental science; Food chain; Fishery; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008248812168514759,"gpt":0.2018910207067585,"spread":0.1936422085382438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001736949,0.00007797727,0.0002001001,0.00007577298,0.0000309308,0.000003752749,0.0001516392,0.0001125446,0.01548279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001571346,0.00007212936,0.00002873236,0.0001937461,0.0003125603,0.00006882622,0.0001394266,0.0001242484,0.0005607494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006251787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003494286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004386441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02210269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992229,0.0001002446,0.0002006224,0.0002080639,0.00006564124,0.0002025252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996213,0.000136446,0.00006573457,0.0001390781,0.0000035812,0.00003388686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002752614,0.00008663813,0.9967064,0.000002487959,0.00001082627,0.000009387702,0.0004795409,0.00007291153,0.0001665181,0.0004354086,0.001143565,0.0008835403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003344548,0.0005408881,0.9890888,0.000002630987,0.00001622462,0.00001949038,0.0003094618,0.001011209,0.0008996564,0.003495444,0.004171212,0.0001104948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718056,0.00007911753,0.000002495606,0.0006200564,0.00008161314,0.00008185865,0.000001154042,0.000007798651,0.02732031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986346,0.00006612637,0.0001578478,0.0003329,0.000008802288,0.00001275993,8.213894e-7,0.00000535753,0.0007807462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02682904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957414,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155334482","doi":"10.1890/08-0851.1","title":"Contrasts between habitat generalists and specialists: an empirical extension to the basic metacommunity framework","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":688,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Metacommunity; Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Habitat; Species richness; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Spatial variability; Geography; Population; Biology; Biological dispersal; Statistics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02750525568518598,"gpt":0.3113884156293034,"spread":0.2838831599441174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004561867,0.0001133118,0.0002065714,0.00002461327,0.0005134497,0.0000179199,0.0002170288,0.0001322449,0.0003197197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000253973,0.00008262521,0.00002746916,0.0001268067,0.0002573329,0.00009186735,0.0001710832,0.0002492451,0.0002082493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007078678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005766213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005229372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988799,0.0003624915,0.000169154,0.0002524058,0.00008288451,0.0002531591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991504,0.0004160549,0.00004146335,0.0002735405,0.00001200897,0.0001065094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001614292,0.00007714381,0.9907013,6.783114e-7,0.00001553388,0.000008179914,0.001229645,0.0003496535,0.0001004592,0.001279183,0.003204513,0.003017591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000127719,0.0003163344,0.9822956,0.000001378835,0.00002193364,0.000006254704,0.00007249326,0.0003227932,0.00001025292,0.01419615,0.002530139,0.00009900027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783013,0.00003926626,0.000724712,0.01934895,0.0001879394,0.000196871,0.000004705608,0.00002694303,0.001169318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841064,0.0000180464,0.003191434,0.01240039,0.0001414945,0.00001210953,0.000007104687,0.00000507347,0.0001178977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0142166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.796238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045076507","doi":"10.1890/10-0773.1","title":"Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity–productivity pattern","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":668,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Productivity; Biology; Ecosystem; Ecology; Complementarity (molecular biology); Niche differentiation; Interspecific competition; Competition (biology); Species diversity; Niche; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009513444028660053,"gpt":0.1820325988364107,"spread":0.1725191548077507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001193964,0.00007347153,0.00008557003,0.000006187399,0.0004839437,0.00002276555,0.0002400119,0.00008458299,0.007623306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007718112,0.00002275751,0.0000520907,0.00006675289,0.00002345012,0.00005482927,0.0001961397,0.0002863588,0.0013171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006757166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004531251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001360884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04638745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994504,0.00006220543,0.00007167487,0.0001787515,0.00005091936,0.0001859934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987803,0.001057583,0.00004391992,0.00005400394,0.00002418383,0.00004001446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417315,0.00007938936,0.6465104,0.00000124365,0.00001556487,0.00001104216,0.0001398136,0.000001348501,0.2856844,0.0004944092,0.05658573,0.0104625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002921041,0.0001188814,0.6557952,0.000002462279,0.00001534436,0.0001231525,0.0001359775,0.00004681829,0.004531112,0.000648293,0.3384269,0.0001266129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987738,0.00001065126,0.000001260628,0.007384538,0.001602484,0.00009054792,0.000522025,0.00003183942,0.002618713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976396,0.00003213721,0.000004415384,0.0006007553,0.0005335788,0.000004516559,0.0002224173,3.36914e-7,0.0009622697],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2818412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972221753","doi":"10.1890/08-0349.1","title":"TESTING THE SPECIES TRAITS–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS: THE FOURTH‐CORNER PROBLEM REVISITED","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":656,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Trait; Environmental data; Abundance (ecology); Multivariate statistics; Table (database); Variable (mathematics); Statistic; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04450940267024455,"gpt":0.2167529652094522,"spread":0.1722435625392076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000506004,0.0001065733,0.0001138679,0.00001494836,0.001631559,0.000007459813,0.0002382479,0.00007286752,0.001506988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002730106,0.00006082867,0.00003943349,0.0001695964,0.000908835,0.00007039907,0.000179645,0.000289867,0.00134621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009359331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000089934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009550789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002720284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989458,0.0002633172,0.0002150674,0.0002193053,0.0001074129,0.000249135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986026,0.001068888,0.0001125602,0.000182128,0.000006899545,0.00002691059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004301289,0.00004651341,0.9767395,0.000001807298,0.00002429403,0.000008362996,0.001627985,0.009042157,0.0001549173,0.003927824,0.008070564,0.000351791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001247367,0.00005207751,0.9803078,0.000001488498,0.0000169348,0.00004970841,0.0001823434,0.001566079,0.000004069514,0.004549668,0.01306621,0.00007888316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8625763,0.0001139706,0.0005070788,0.01343056,0.0001272972,0.0006113617,0.000003741869,0.00006166482,0.122568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882984,0.00006350987,0.002474996,0.0009888251,0.00005559275,0.0001004374,0.000003260943,0.000008570699,0.008006471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1257221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148397634","doi":"10.1890/07-1880.1","title":"Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad‐leaved forest of China","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":641,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Gamma diversity; Habitat; Beta diversity; Biodiversity; Spatial heterogeneity; Species diversity; Macroecology; Species distribution; Spatial variability; Spatial ecology; Geography; Alpha diversity; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009858451484508063,"gpt":0.2225741100289956,"spread":0.2127156585444876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008898264,0.00004464998,0.000113156,0.00002407625,0.0001243684,0.000001177365,0.00008412312,0.00005933028,0.0005447273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003645248,0.00004498392,0.00002271983,0.00008140336,0.0001451139,0.00005416017,0.0001514365,0.00007712296,0.00007448121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005674646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003369601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009982657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02045895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995384,0.00004334097,0.0001139894,0.0001171635,0.00004244387,0.0001447118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999827,0.00004540358,0.00004478815,0.00005976487,0.000002839221,0.00002020877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116332,0.00008348913,0.9944116,0.000001102566,0.000003598504,0.000005955845,0.0004641102,0.001906999,0.00006297958,0.00272003,0.0001428981,0.0001855946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002736633,0.0001441859,0.9889745,0.000001285798,0.000004418233,0.000001571498,0.00002842584,0.001134091,0.00002105477,0.009343657,0.0000317913,0.00004138209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909407,0.000007616339,0.0001081071,0.0009338612,0.00005720798,0.00006198316,8.641895e-7,0.000008511607,0.007881159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993463,0.000009805879,0.0002724682,0.0002028491,0.000006535211,0.000002635132,0.000002565831,0.000001134165,0.0001557015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02035912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003315067","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:smietf]2.0.co;2","title":"SPATIAL MODELING IN ECOLOGY: THE FLEXIBILITY OF EIGENFUNCTION SPATIAL ANALYSES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":636,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spatial analysis; Eigenfunction; Flexibility (engineering); Ecology; Spatial ecology; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Mathematics; Topology (electrical circuits); Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Biology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03274840353725991,"gpt":0.2674052946257218,"spread":0.2346568910884619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003341915,0.00007175012,0.0001607404,0.00002868333,0.00007143088,0.000004820209,0.0001419077,0.00008999383,0.001748475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001418995,0.00004701691,0.00004135705,0.0001122407,0.00002961225,0.0000688329,0.00009067864,0.00007180212,0.0001425751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008824163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001119808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05245512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6181362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991421,0.0001191814,0.000273564,0.000195792,0.00008209787,0.0001872986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996569,0.00006789355,0.00008235322,0.0001712442,0.000005953447,0.00001563382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002416123,0.0000666095,0.735651,0.000004802636,0.000004516786,0.000001599574,0.00005595843,0.2631294,0.0004983311,0.000007006789,0.00003632747,0.0005202774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001735274,0.0000537425,0.6576937,0.000001146627,0.00001033409,0.000001362989,0.0000334484,0.3402169,0.0004564461,0.001254095,0.00006184047,0.00004341575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996531,0.00001310908,0.0006112132,0.0001765628,0.0002504498,0.0001365283,0.00000274161,0.00001134256,0.00226707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997504,0.000003560977,0.00004183128,0.00007317037,0.00008281688,0.00001515567,0.000008433331,0.000003896253,0.0000207865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.565681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027334892","doi":"10.1890/12-0976.1","title":"The AIC model selection method applied to path analytic models compared using a d‐separation test","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":592,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Akaike information criterion; Path analysis (statistics); Model selection; Statistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Test statistic; Mathematics; Generalization; Multivariate statistics; Statistic; Separation (statistics); Path (computing); Normality; Latent variable; Statistical hypothesis testing; Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07198916841485963,"gpt":0.3472428033528066,"spread":0.2752536349379469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006873977,0.0001150349,0.0001597073,0.00007700182,0.0003402173,0.00009266863,0.0003711543,0.00008030373,0.000002703684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003613095,0.00009292941,0.00003218301,0.000363389,0.00001931047,0.0002827939,0.000115072,0.0001346417,0.00004499204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001162887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001189547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002287707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005726721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988866,0.00009651365,0.0002156654,0.0002622016,0.0001209812,0.0004180708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992077,0.0002297265,0.0000794097,0.000279933,0.00008507217,0.0001182004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006157421,0.0000531972,0.0002312276,0.000001732861,0.00001076822,1.579829e-7,0.000735514,0.905057,0.004328472,0.08663611,0.0003367138,0.002602907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008923402,0.00003837321,0.0004216283,0.000001930631,0.00001358232,0.00001074575,0.00001498711,0.9732161,0.0004013128,0.02564334,0.00003584158,0.0001129078],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02737042,0.00002219646,0.9708642,0.0003074581,0.0001764647,0.0001741118,7.977411e-7,0.00009597249,0.0009883798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7522891,0.000001906722,0.2471621,0.0003828993,0.00005553879,0.00003128459,9.443336e-7,0.000005801835,0.00007053898],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7249186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3789551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034077112","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1915:hltcat]2.0.co;2","title":"HABITAT LOSS, TROPHIC COLLAPSE, AND THE DECLINE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":590,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Trophic level; Ecosystem services; Ecology; Ecosystem; Habitat; Overexploitation; Habitat destruction; Food chain; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Provisioning; Trophic cascade; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecosystem management; Environmental science; Food web; Environmental resource management; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.002734884919810031,"gpt":0.1911077004768039,"spread":0.1883728155569939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002585065,0.00006093729,0.0001628237,0.00001452655,0.0001419123,0.000003759748,0.0001063492,0.00005678536,0.0001983855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000151464,0.00004079489,0.00002283869,0.00007433158,0.0004512174,0.00003600037,0.0001663181,0.00004620237,0.00008856823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002255116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003917469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001615754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09804797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994294,0.00009569981,0.0001809098,0.0001239107,0.00004935206,0.0001207514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994922,0.0002951531,0.0001026451,0.00008874929,0.000008699404,0.00001255434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003654806,0.00003245731,0.9906554,0.00001716419,0.00001460151,0.00000320653,0.0001226651,0.001207761,0.00006544674,0.007346249,0.0004636044,0.00003495253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008958871,0.0000554778,0.9797229,0.000001841141,0.00001782589,0.0000128593,0.00006316341,0.003378045,0.00002133186,0.01428596,0.001498471,0.00004621472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902886,0.0001577078,0.00001352135,0.003103861,0.0001261183,0.0001467091,0.000005327098,0.000009489054,0.006148719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988021,0.00005055132,0.0001768511,0.0004024715,0.00001978222,0.0000227222,0.000002939023,0.000003408154,0.0005192107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09788639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9184103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002368560","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2773:peocco]2.0.co;2","title":"POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ECOSYSTEM AND TREE SPECIES DISTRIBUTION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":590,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; BIOCAP Canada; Forest Genetics Council of British Columbia","keywords":"Climate change; Ecology; Habitat; Ecosystem; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Species distribution; Ecological niche; Environmental science; Boreal ecosystem; Boreal; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006358671444860438,"gpt":0.1889062645526913,"spread":0.1825475931078308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007849382,0.00006071499,0.0001635884,0.00001208263,0.00006849783,0.00003346268,0.00006426622,0.00008509577,0.006070497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001884465,0.00009107975,0.00002957975,0.0001101095,0.0001060856,0.00006316023,0.00008682261,0.00005386479,0.0001259947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002918906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001645282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005530074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5276604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992265,0.00005514743,0.0001706359,0.000197671,0.00009583523,0.0002542138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997696,0.00004102119,0.0000715511,0.00008086208,0.000004652133,0.00003235453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001345306,0.0002582648,0.9881533,0.00005866809,0.000002567492,0.00007912828,0.00002481905,0.000006318397,0.00130045,0.0004466416,0.006466602,0.003189723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004249,0.0001580461,0.9953164,0.00001729212,0.000005880832,0.00001772581,0.00008625109,0.00005283796,0.0002221613,0.00007608995,0.003365183,0.00008168909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924807,0.00003491294,0.000004256741,0.0001073572,0.000224479,0.0002613856,0.0003010012,0.00001835085,0.006567558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992926,0.0002165596,0.000002911576,0.00005368316,0.00004123673,0.00004751483,0.0001638947,0.000005078055,0.0001765252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5221303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153708878","doi":"10.1890/13-0196.1","title":"Combining the fourth‐corner and the RLQ methods for assessing trait responses to environmental variation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":580,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Trait; Ordination; Complementarity (molecular biology); Ecology; Multivariate statistics; Biology; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01652339736172185,"gpt":0.3010919659702358,"spread":0.2845685686085139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00116803,0.00007592729,0.0001183893,0.00001600519,0.0006121823,0.00003337185,0.0001192045,0.00005667845,0.00052459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003371256,0.00004435223,0.0000292949,0.00004447975,0.000417449,0.0001156755,0.0001522216,0.00008477824,0.00008538732],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004991589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004712341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003505338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001613662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989812,0.0004835009,0.0001429199,0.0001747645,0.00003928318,0.0001782703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968358,0.002960758,0.00007008685,0.0001033717,0.0000032879,0.00002666938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004472076,0.0002634944,0.7648857,0.0000138089,0.0003088155,0.000001983156,0.03380515,0.004610769,0.01905796,0.04112289,0.004815387,0.1306669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005555817,0.00006499752,0.9613358,6.90706e-7,0.00002439533,0.000005683522,0.0005539976,0.01971503,0.00002011799,0.01624443,0.001417379,0.00006183967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410421,0.00002965977,0.04225025,0.01406453,0.000247072,0.000765086,0.000002351275,0.00001381228,0.001585159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654076,0.000008302107,0.03048097,0.002667018,0.00002034838,0.0004263213,0.000001922009,0.00000644503,0.0009811326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1964502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5743893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143070308","doi":"10.1890/07-0370.1","title":"NOVEL WEAPONS: INVASIVE PLANT SUPPRESSES FUNGAL MUTUALISTS IN AMERICA BUT NOT IN ITS NATIVE EUROPE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":578,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; University of Montana; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Biology; Native plant; Invasive species; Introduced species; Range (aeronautics); Botany; Ecology; Understory; Native forest","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03104135735112229,"gpt":0.2252510988507617,"spread":0.1942097414996394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007577715,0.0001248303,0.0002186448,0.00004649167,0.0001087984,0.00001088871,0.0001955619,0.00009645502,0.003487312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009403827,0.00005717192,0.0000357859,0.0003678276,0.00002498105,0.0001194916,0.00007354876,0.0002417442,0.0007179978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003374938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003118512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002181277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01422477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989545,0.0001496175,0.0002348921,0.0002696337,0.00008542657,0.0003058687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958301,0.003947095,0.00007676174,0.0000346285,0.00005148837,0.00005994663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004246986,0.0007186939,0.3502422,0.00001041226,0.00002324707,0.001240611,0.001319763,0.0001122359,0.6250267,0.001275122,0.01893619,0.0006701456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001967767,0.0004768218,0.9309617,0.00003550738,0.000004203754,0.0005492585,0.0004826426,0.0001240946,0.01514053,0.00004736431,0.05170973,0.0002713635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914,0.00007657812,5.460956e-7,0.001257824,0.0003442621,0.0001810249,0.002066172,0.00002451032,0.004649094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963447,0.001137577,0.00003215241,0.001005626,0.0001201706,0.0000364175,0.0005872208,0.000001033766,0.0007351099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6098862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974236,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162790191","doi":"10.1890/09-1162.1","title":"General stabilizing effects of plant diversity on grassland productivity through population asynchrony and overyielding","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":578,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Biodiversity; Asynchrony (computer programming); Productivity; Population; Ecosystem; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Grassland; Economics; Demography; Asynchronous communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006587119235023578,"gpt":0.214154729684388,"spread":0.2075676104493644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001319918,0.00005940489,0.0001119575,0.00001476506,0.0002495557,0.000002216809,0.00004364743,0.00007072902,0.0000719168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001365468,0.00005430478,0.00001416927,0.0000362823,0.0001470596,0.00009965822,0.00021836,0.000116442,0.000007150193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000331977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002147912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003463278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01196665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995341,0.0000462857,0.00007329362,0.0001792536,0.0000529832,0.0001140958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996315,0.0002104864,0.00006330739,0.00007534536,0.00000348125,0.00001583677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001308963,0.00004935699,0.9918081,0.00001370343,0.00000942826,0.000002181117,0.0003414751,0.0002626932,0.005796711,0.001441695,0.0000562431,0.0002053869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001957272,0.0001330676,0.9943569,0.000001765128,0.0000101262,0.000003141726,0.00000861476,0.0004365016,0.001138147,0.003627945,0.00003343449,0.00005460318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982695,0.000006305433,0.00004416672,0.0001291916,0.0004415853,0.0001461014,0.000003170913,0.0000107127,0.0009492933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993513,0.00001247808,0.0005040566,0.00004690863,0.00002522618,0.000005174929,0.000004233636,0.00000244825,0.00004813867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01162032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6677671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123298206","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2662:trilcb]2.0.co;2","title":"THE RELATIONSHIP IN LAKE COMMUNITIES BETWEEN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":556,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara","keywords":"Species richness; Productivity; Ecology; Phytoplankton; Macrophyte; Biodiversity; Plankton; Primary producers; Biology; Nutrient","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01801404069980005,"gpt":0.2168509416611351,"spread":0.1988369009613351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004317956,0.00005190735,0.00009594511,0.00001022555,0.000237899,0.00001391728,0.0001085696,0.00004415033,0.0007473259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002795792,0.00003879781,0.000008400875,0.00007822224,0.0002394373,0.00007254088,0.00006194806,0.000132903,0.000108314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004946068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005985169,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009125704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07262821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994478,0.0001654865,0.0001217384,0.00008145497,0.00005301034,0.0001305278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.0007293632,0.00003107902,0.000159196,0.000001435886,0.00001801883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003214494,0.00001054224,0.996748,0.000003624345,0.00000175055,6.260769e-7,0.0004874857,0.00008993781,0.000001622215,0.0006913423,0.000177922,0.001783958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007673358,0.00001896156,0.9648812,0.000002533098,0.000002111273,0.000003875383,0.0001045738,0.00009538334,9.38265e-7,0.002711121,0.03205538,0.00004718949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644884,0.00002238073,0.000005389818,0.0006687224,0.0000468015,0.0001314728,0.000009932252,0.000009483451,0.03461742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947257,0.00001866693,0.00004419008,0.00003315096,0.00003070681,0.00001512169,0.00001043841,0.000003569944,0.005118428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07253695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9442939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055939482","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2985:troeas]2.0.co;2","title":"THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPATIAL PROCESSES IN STRUCTURING LAKE COMMUNITIES FROM BACTERIA TO FISH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":553,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Metacommunity; Zooplankton; Ecology; Phytoplankton; Trophic level; Community structure; Abundance (ecology); Plankton; Biology; Environmental science; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.002851140732352589,"gpt":0.1673800641890454,"spread":0.1645289234566928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006281044,0.00005407733,0.00009116146,0.000009055224,0.00007048438,0.000009668163,0.0001082796,0.00003408056,0.0007010104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005408943,0.00004313725,0.00000643009,0.00002067674,0.00009466476,0.00003277395,0.0001326592,0.00004612551,0.00001500908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002844493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003953837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007590968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7197996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995906,0.00003985135,0.000140356,0.00007196731,0.00004736245,0.0001099102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996933,0.0001461128,0.00004889317,0.00009437701,7.486223e-7,0.0000165063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009249399,0.0000156765,0.9951212,0.000003026083,0.000002101792,6.413089e-7,0.0006792351,0.0002122456,0.001698166,0.00002199962,0.00001996808,0.002216482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001045048,0.00003539243,0.9910658,0.000003510324,0.000001818822,0.000001767083,0.0005422827,0.0006728775,0.0005977852,0.001349126,0.005576205,0.00004891781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984792,0.00001954463,0.000006338651,0.00004729519,0.00005105373,0.0001025782,0.0001145944,0.000003289268,0.001176127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997522,0.000008894482,0.0001062242,0.00003166178,0.00002107729,0.00001037089,0.00002255249,0.000004122474,0.0000429405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7122086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161000103","doi":"10.1890/05-1051","title":"FUNDAMENTAL TRADE-OFFS GENERATING THE WORLDWIDE LEAF ECONOMICS SPECTRUM","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":547,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Biology; Ecology; Trade-off; Tropical climate; Productivity; Photosynthesis; Tropics; Nutrient; Economics; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005318008055316366,"gpt":0.1779880370361917,"spread":0.1726700289808754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001128584,0.00008059278,0.00007948511,0.00001536967,0.000193273,0.0000294734,0.000146363,0.00004907952,0.001031299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002052063,0.00006226435,0.0000377937,0.00005482371,0.0001112827,0.00006506492,0.00007962913,0.0001047335,0.0003552531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001700116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006449163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002636072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009943145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993725,0.00003485437,0.000154394,0.0001682447,0.00003972574,0.0002303061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997503,0.00004237496,0.00005258802,0.0001302975,3.533912e-7,0.0000241193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006768289,0.00007462591,0.7249247,9.568296e-7,0.00001380283,0.00001453669,0.0001265805,0.2594898,0.002277843,0.006691123,0.004709452,0.001669821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003511172,0.00006101785,0.7289854,0.00000104408,0.00001737811,0.0001089423,0.00003718005,0.1915574,0.0004421998,0.007013791,0.07118548,0.0002390588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724348,0.000011617,0.00008506767,0.002640513,0.0002462044,0.00009436926,0.000009307239,0.0000221136,0.02445603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956933,0.000008087773,0.0004296124,0.0005549628,0.0001104084,0.00001060011,0.00002557182,0.000008161095,0.003159344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06793241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113332887","doi":"10.1890/11-0252.1","title":"Gradient forests: calculating importance gradients on physical predictors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":544,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Environmental gradient; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Random forest; Ecology; Environmental science; Univariate; Beta diversity; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Gradient analysis; Forest inventory; Geography; Physical geography; Multivariate statistics; Forest management; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Ordination; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0308317147254162,"gpt":0.2433215238192842,"spread":0.212489809093868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006410146,0.00009516476,0.0001053197,0.00001437916,0.00009828315,0.000004267097,0.0001378782,0.00004657968,0.03658658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003664099,0.00008256654,0.00005138535,0.0001006279,0.0001543864,0.00005325332,0.00008669289,0.00008143957,0.002079599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003751626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002517886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006463227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001514761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991993,0.00002403348,0.0001168617,0.0002382733,0.0001184189,0.0003030908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996524,0.00002183679,0.00006088928,0.0001623753,0.000003628746,0.00009881488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001269717,0.0002264421,0.9888807,0.00000126181,0.000005560742,0.00001387959,0.0005842935,0.000005787701,0.0001045685,0.004910006,0.004989235,0.0002655935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001996257,0.0002251258,0.9950145,0.000001337957,0.000005558615,0.000004022755,0.0001924959,0.0001833277,0.0003211214,0.000697233,0.003068023,0.00008763019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131917,0.00000191561,0.000005178487,0.00005876218,0.0002638357,0.0001066302,0.00001453118,0.00004546223,0.08631195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993674,0.000002237862,0.00001996127,0.0002801952,0.00003408106,0.00003100198,0.00002083128,0.000007759111,0.0002365454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08617565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166153649","doi":"10.1890/07-1131.1","title":"REVISITING THE CLASSICS: CONSIDERING NONCONSUMPTIVE EFFECTS IN TEXTBOOK EXAMPLES OF PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":524,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Ecology; Keystone species; Predator; Trophic cascade; Apex predator; Population; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02544204019337252,"gpt":0.229477796122482,"spread":0.2040357559291095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001396228,0.00007584547,0.0001824032,0.00006198791,0.00009838281,0.000004492736,0.0001155918,0.00005020174,0.0009178002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001852395,0.00005327907,0.00003038555,0.00007572882,0.0001827281,0.000073754,0.00003368073,0.0001725125,0.00007757323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003067898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005597655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002143937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03820522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992336,0.0001858197,0.000203479,0.0001469895,0.00004025655,0.0001898458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766,0.002096745,0.00009408614,0.000106292,0.00001404894,0.00002878758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002429403,0.000005321697,0.9701016,0.00001527203,0.0000139582,0.00004949897,0.0002718712,0.0001251466,0.000147082,0.0001150441,0.0001447311,0.0289862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001796349,0.00008210154,0.9924905,0.00001434136,0.000006087832,0.000190985,0.0001620765,0.0009138347,0.0002388933,0.0002917247,0.005362958,0.00006685264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690098,0.0001649985,0.00002679909,0.0002038191,0.0002186752,0.0001510045,0.00001822493,0.00001274254,0.03019396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989534,0.00008902938,0.0002237112,0.0002637662,0.00007751417,0.000003436368,0.00002730186,0.000001470174,0.0003603891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03606128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172260544","doi":"10.1890/07-0774.1","title":"LONGEVITY CAN BUFFER PLANT AND ANIMAL POPULATIONS AGAINST CHANGING CLIMATIC VARIABILITY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":524,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Vital rates; Longevity; Climate change; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Perennial plant; Population; Precipitation; Population growth; Geography; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04141241393739543,"gpt":0.2465792300287399,"spread":0.2051668160913444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001880958,0.0000791056,0.0001177908,0.00002213359,0.0002925923,0.000006811763,0.0000648341,0.00006213749,0.01148518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007066444,0.00007545145,0.00002301331,0.0001158971,0.0002030175,0.00004396649,0.0001406505,0.00007084577,0.0002314193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005554129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009532121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003023886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992641,0.00006355744,0.0001256961,0.0001988896,0.00007665071,0.0002711055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997022,0.00004858579,0.00004039539,0.0001241297,0.000003987609,0.00008065786],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006471205,0.00007529794,0.9962888,0.000005006908,0.000002838784,0.00001360434,0.0003904969,0.000006813124,0.0005491247,0.001513042,0.0009879551,0.0001605838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001497676,0.00003774184,0.9969311,9.551056e-7,0.000005280006,0.00003681475,0.0001859083,0.0004884185,0.00003876728,0.0000925438,0.001948213,0.00008444646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883533,0.000006136826,0.00002169031,0.000956694,0.0001183979,0.0001272917,0.00008940202,0.00003602808,0.01029108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999157,0.00002725356,0.00007937763,0.0004969614,0.00001963139,0.00001770896,0.00009009985,0.000004531562,0.0001074863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058647354","doi":"10.1890/06-1017","title":"EXPANDING THE LIMITS OF THE POLLEN-LIMITATION CONCEPT: EFFECTS OF POLLEN QUANTITY AND QUALITY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":516,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; US-UK Fulbright Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pollen; Ecology; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07638714987814064,"gpt":0.2885263165267632,"spread":0.2121391666486225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003519452,0.00004686182,0.0001294033,0.000003624772,0.0001664284,0.000003226955,0.00009841613,0.0000451488,0.000009335727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002390194,0.0000124937,0.0000379784,0.00009632197,0.0001731008,0.00002040195,0.00005415259,0.00004594199,0.000001065603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005294887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002380138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01039444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995041,0.0001015509,0.0001382774,0.00007843311,0.00006343657,0.0001142033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982574,0.001572198,0.0001171714,0.00001494218,0.00002487752,0.00001341003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032103,0.00003707051,0.676957,0.00001343118,0.00001766318,4.288657e-7,0.0004952535,2.58154e-7,0.3155122,0.004070571,0.0001872288,0.002676755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009366445,0.0001483733,0.9726098,0.000007172757,0.000007387438,8.885581e-7,0.0006001584,4.961436e-7,0.02599961,0.0003220695,0.0001798864,0.00003045835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978645,0.0003902947,7.411964e-7,0.0008758549,0.00007678128,0.0001189381,0.000009134154,0.000005281431,0.0006584898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996834,0.00007542464,0.000005730996,0.0001064374,0.00004822802,0.000001613292,0.000001059138,1.893475e-7,0.0000779496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2956528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108266150","doi":"10.1890/05-1182","title":"EXTINCTION DEBT OF FOREST PLANTS PERSISTS FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY FOLLOWING HABITAT FRAGMENTATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":515,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Extinction debt; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Local extinction; Habitat; Population; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat destruction; Occupancy; Habitat fragmentation; Geography; Biology; Biological dispersal; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00610381496997122,"gpt":0.2293768068300407,"spread":0.2232729918600695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001132223,0.00007148227,0.0001194301,0.0000321836,0.0001651236,0.000002744818,0.000060416,0.00007770133,0.0001040709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003043816,0.00007123901,0.00007011328,0.00004832877,0.0001070567,0.00008656402,0.00003737808,0.00003758324,0.0000324727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009199822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005376126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006287059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01469599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994146,0.00002653202,0.0001624854,0.000162554,0.00006140128,0.0001724635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996723,0.0001464332,0.00009775333,0.00006065306,0.000006680471,0.00001619499],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002813942,0.00007144248,0.9933397,0.00000750997,0.00002093417,0.000001868004,0.0003326274,0.00414394,0.0009373071,0.0003221248,0.0005847071,0.0002096598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005160772,0.0001204964,0.9929595,0.000002453013,0.00002175595,0.000002649049,0.0003939486,0.002758991,0.0001286763,0.002743579,0.0002835023,0.00006837323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957575,0.0000353773,0.000824929,0.0002905305,0.0004235568,0.0002486372,0.000007967803,0.00001633041,0.002395207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981915,0.000008513946,0.001259612,0.00009544616,0.00002510854,0.00007205777,0.0000578226,0.000006229694,0.0002836983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01463312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8200709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999209507","doi":"10.1890/11-0426.1","title":"Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosystem stability","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":510,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phylogenetic diversity; Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Species diversity; Ecosystem diversity; Biomass (ecology); Evolutionary ecology; Community; Evolutionary biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01487460212299217,"gpt":0.213889102802222,"spread":0.1990145006792298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000323692,0.00006667778,0.0001055603,0.00001125609,0.0003477123,0.000001893265,0.0001113182,0.00007087414,0.003766604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005803529,0.00006186456,0.00002643617,0.00005885456,0.0001361115,0.00008120367,0.0005737413,0.00006408434,0.001670429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001238504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003227923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002022733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003344414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993207,0.0001072064,0.00009668253,0.0001425653,0.00005391508,0.0002789421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996725,0.0001044053,0.00004509415,0.000113937,0.000005122174,0.00005895156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003012064,0.00009589313,0.99833,0.000004341072,0.00001048911,6.458571e-7,0.0007649838,0.00002927013,0.0002058347,0.0001995839,0.0002163667,0.000139554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001050217,0.00004974889,0.9981236,3.239298e-7,0.0000103032,0.000003821786,0.00007936684,0.0001988646,0.000178752,0.0006052208,0.0005771425,0.0000677705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879733,0.00002765413,0.00005484802,0.0002126066,0.0003575593,0.0001491503,0.000004080598,0.00002778305,0.01119301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999314,0.00000420951,0.00029144,0.0001402898,0.00002801455,0.00001628292,0.000001816676,0.000003018783,0.0002009594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01134066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104354220","doi":"10.1890/14-0235.1","title":"A new probabilistic method for quantifying <i>n</i>‐dimensional ecological niches and niche overlap","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":510,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"ArcticNet","keywords":"Ecological niche; Niche; Environmental niche modelling; Ecology; Multivariate statistics; Bivariate analysis; Pairwise comparison; Niche segregation; Probabilistic logic; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02486976146815026,"gpt":0.2915020981684184,"spread":0.2666323367002682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064479,0.0001591249,0.0003609956,0.00004024525,0.000185817,0.00001628575,0.0002171466,0.0002107948,0.002646273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001108047,0.0001363903,0.00008291572,0.0001185253,0.0001914859,0.00006787053,0.0003417081,0.0001457026,0.0002962461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002745077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007521332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002694207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983148,0.0002913189,0.0002878215,0.0005596997,0.0001049487,0.0004414206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974565,0.002056109,0.0001156884,0.0002297482,0.00001132589,0.000130652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001506308,0.0003762841,0.8639099,0.00003405528,0.0001182513,0.00001271308,0.0002459814,0.01093428,0.009934626,0.03437597,0.05122028,0.02868702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001350846,0.001045089,0.8038133,0.000002895887,0.000149871,0.00008207289,0.00003929975,0.06678508,0.0004579116,0.07319928,0.05267859,0.0003958001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9278196,0.00003561599,0.06012707,0.003765297,0.000579873,0.0009022533,0.000004093019,0.00009045704,0.006675719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122207,0.000003927298,0.2829068,0.003077476,0.0001098733,0.0001163773,0.000007251131,0.00001813268,0.001539442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2227798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982654,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088571921","doi":"10.1890/08-0134.1","title":"Comparing niche‐ and process‐based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":489,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Commission","keywords":"Niche; Climate change; Environmental niche modelling; Ecology; Ecological niche; Range (aeronautics); Species distribution; Complementarity (molecular biology); Biology; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0813473818650165,"gpt":0.2831881854473398,"spread":0.2018408035823233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001842102,0.0001189922,0.0001739066,0.00005579431,0.0000961368,0.00002143417,0.0001111896,0.00008511463,0.003349023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000135053,0.0001190029,0.00002052993,0.0002404947,0.00008436902,0.0001728443,0.00006600702,0.00009773162,0.000142763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004744022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005556689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009205262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003912083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99898,0.00003995459,0.0001736789,0.0003100218,0.0001240902,0.0003722119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996985,0.0000250955,0.00004516552,0.0001209797,0.000007882451,0.0001023745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004974896,0.0007400564,0.9209491,0.0000490268,0.00000888251,0.00002534689,0.004907157,0.05388368,0.004082976,0.008496923,0.004042171,0.002317206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634812,0.0001398336,0.9815829,0.00001036492,0.000005044216,0.000002514851,0.0008747293,0.01522379,0.00009629395,0.0008566786,0.0004530204,0.0001199622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785154,0.00002632473,0.00005353509,0.003412984,0.000103868,0.0003573269,0.00003268046,0.00005588255,0.01744202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975148,0.00005156826,0.00002643766,0.002216788,0.00003445947,0.00007369558,0.00003411057,0.000006002849,0.00004218128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06063388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133845722","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[150:tgtahs]2.0.co;2","title":"THE GROWTH–DEFENSE TRADE-OFF AND HABITAT SPECIALIZATION BY PLANTS IN AMAZONIAN FORESTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":485,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Herbivore; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Amazonian; Niche; Ecological niche; White (mutation); Amazon rainforest","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01265672986036411,"gpt":0.1859995180914809,"spread":0.1733427882311168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007941116,0.00005831455,0.0000824313,0.000004200653,0.0002144216,0.00002285795,0.00006002306,0.00004996165,0.00003231939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002745919,0.00001915919,0.0000132649,0.00005971946,0.00006619583,0.00002764131,0.00002386779,0.00004055711,0.000008465274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006459876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001511333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001553551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2429665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995374,0.00003736021,0.00009590377,0.0001119296,0.00004006556,0.0001773548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997143,0.0002258335,0.00002859667,0.00000635544,0.000004678092,0.00002030577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000215404,0.00002571773,0.9535858,7.490085e-7,0.000002233962,0.000007233151,0.00002275417,2.205686e-7,0.005181591,0.001543628,0.03573776,0.003870742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008513314,0.00008856395,0.9703113,0.000001690057,0.000001235803,0.000006088954,0.00006899785,0.00001222282,0.0001077557,0.003240497,0.02602403,0.00005249373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916875,0.0005511083,7.96428e-8,0.003948397,0.00005055555,0.0000742344,0.00002585382,0.00001313744,0.003649136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.0003523036,0.000001670581,0.0001339666,0.0001421653,0.000006569524,0.00002355113,3.130055e-7,0.0001452543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2428112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7708474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094353923","doi":"10.1890/11-2241.1","title":"Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":478,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Hidden Markov model; Computer science; Markov model; Markov chain; Variable-order Bayesian network; Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Variable-order Markov model; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07015033126805864,"gpt":0.3071856308862854,"spread":0.2370352996182267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004255392,0.00006116561,0.0001169033,0.00002285484,0.00009182704,0.000003969571,0.00006313547,0.0001063719,0.0003899228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001436989,0.00005819376,0.000007112109,0.00005766574,0.0001671471,0.0006403423,0.0004678013,0.0001018974,0.00002612145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001603955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001282919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005582244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008834628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993404,0.00006788388,0.0001416202,0.0001908598,0.00005696975,0.000202323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995114,0.0001783177,0.00004835483,0.000182842,0.000005884377,0.00007317522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005679623,0.00009995532,0.9929704,0.000005296527,0.00001258136,0.000002899485,0.000123244,0.000148791,0.0005353194,0.001607707,0.003357484,0.001079506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001780801,0.00008740831,0.7821202,0.000001499737,0.00002757349,0.00007614492,0.00009974527,0.215319,0.00002304213,0.001799148,0.0001967472,0.00007150393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947047,0.00007843083,0.001694469,0.001500095,0.00008012541,0.00008813012,0.000005571451,0.0000127441,0.001835778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852545,0.00004664118,0.01405241,0.000514233,0.000035378,0.000005294819,0.000008258658,0.000004966039,0.0000783406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2151702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4269381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085971088","doi":"10.1890/07-2096.1","title":"Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":440,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Spatial ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005323717114933871,"gpt":0.2037619171022623,"spread":0.1984381999873284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004948102,0.00007348765,0.00009549357,0.0000099664,0.0001148467,0.00002431621,0.0001036481,0.00004895289,0.001224542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001717121,0.00004436568,0.0000105443,0.000055336,0.00001176506,0.0001353204,0.00007358527,0.00005347522,0.0003716434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004143414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002900408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001352922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04285543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994939,0.00004599514,0.00007047999,0.000186746,0.00005925461,0.0001436513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997249,0.0001001521,0.00002955729,0.00009175625,0.000005699128,0.00004791003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006212563,0.00005934592,0.9610158,0.000007695139,0.0000184121,0.000007879709,0.00327267,0.0001071019,0.0008033713,0.000008857296,0.0004393534,0.0341974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001641843,0.0002249647,0.9951578,0.000004680017,0.00001095108,0.000002958105,0.0001015573,0.00006184237,0.001599612,0.001420685,0.001183183,0.00006761956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960679,0.000009614109,0.00009574166,0.001386493,0.0001426468,0.0002732277,0.00001396493,0.00001473429,0.001995609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979038,0.000008823298,0.0000227353,0.001884631,0.0001077624,0.00004091006,0.000005626806,0.000003137281,0.00002261648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0415025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129176716","doi":"10.1890/05-0219","title":"ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":428,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Herbivore; Interspecific competition; Generalist and specialist species; Biology; Ecology; Old field; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02804582294095885,"gpt":0.1990283653203451,"spread":0.1709825423793863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004715058,0.00009466796,0.000134594,0.000005477437,0.0002305292,0.00002227604,0.00004740086,0.00004648838,0.000130677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003742993,0.00003379857,0.0000100573,0.00003077696,0.0001190799,0.00007412985,0.00005925331,0.00003760631,0.000007325962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000109716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002464581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001245845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01344893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994791,0.00002714312,0.00006998997,0.0001968618,0.00004778299,0.0001791842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998003,0.00007720164,0.00002970222,0.00001133055,0.000009287677,0.00007213689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004353567,0.0003430248,0.683044,0.00001202369,0.0001195319,0.0001133472,0.001644079,0.000005833786,0.2102824,0.001909561,0.0038513,0.09823956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002170865,0.0009753507,0.9490582,0.000003762579,0.00001320448,0.00006298031,0.001593651,0.00005212901,0.0009296446,0.00004090037,0.04689724,0.0001558007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975787,0.0008800715,1.027632e-7,0.0007433665,0.00001747481,0.00006652666,0.00003054177,0.00002766298,0.0006554955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984834,0.0007865044,0.000123946,0.0002904019,0.00012614,0.00001201879,0.00001464607,4.873549e-7,0.0001624573],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2660143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.750482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136856947","doi":"10.1890/12-2003.1","title":"Early onset of spring increases the phenological mismatch between plants and pollinators","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":423,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Pollinator; Phenology; Pollination; Biology; Ecology; Population; Pollen","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03328848075598251,"gpt":0.2026398652321115,"spread":0.169351384476129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008505138,0.00006195782,0.0001494113,0.000004036686,0.0001358755,0.00001155461,0.0001156344,0.00006011112,0.0001674359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004438065,0.00001730368,0.00002251697,0.00004244862,0.0001246763,0.00002828851,0.0001010079,0.00006041898,0.00003789909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002998334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000138686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002509086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00167234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995288,0.00005369925,0.0001095347,0.0001041963,0.00004480012,0.0001589465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992782,0.0006168286,0.00004813213,0.00001127837,0.00001286738,0.00003269422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004640406,0.00001563906,0.9939008,0.000001138619,0.00001270512,0.000001683583,0.00003726214,2.09278e-8,0.003101849,0.00008024159,0.0003394631,0.002504561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004390863,0.0001857945,0.9974252,0.000003007605,0.00000401916,0.000004369768,0.0002395858,0.000001256835,0.0002164012,0.001223332,0.0006066146,0.00004653262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979928,0.0001608152,3.536901e-8,0.001303984,0.00001438965,0.0000873657,0.00002924573,0.00001615784,0.0003952711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996936,0.00007027686,0.00000936461,0.0001022436,0.00007222855,0.000007711723,0.00000229021,2.363577e-7,0.00004202876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003524382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3793005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175417890","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[86:tpsoan]2.0.co;2","title":"THE PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF A NEOTROPICAL FOREST TREE COMMUNITY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":420,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Community structure; Null model; Phylogenetic diversity; Ecology; Quadrat; Community; Biology; Habitat; Shrub","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005177450728771137,"gpt":0.2085369469836851,"spread":0.203359496254914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006775688,0.00004904029,0.00008230974,0.00000731723,0.0003742417,0.000002369031,0.000167901,0.00006004194,0.000203105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004178055,0.00003350183,0.00002270026,0.00005286859,0.0006002071,0.00001236189,0.0001324332,0.0001356779,0.00003440135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002950221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002502606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2239441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994917,0.0001525914,0.0001188583,0.00006179511,0.00003999359,0.0001350867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994702,0.0003204879,0.00005536908,0.0001374943,0.000005401177,0.00001107875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006603711,0.00003476503,0.990901,0.000001302399,0.000007017991,6.459277e-7,0.00007088193,0.002469459,0.001324933,0.004104868,0.0007386476,0.0003398826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001342356,0.00009156016,0.9617713,2.578045e-7,0.000006138902,0.0000033768,0.0000404783,0.0005266002,0.00008597567,0.03661232,0.0006964947,0.00003124684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928449,0.00002716017,0.00004786477,0.0004542615,0.0000995257,0.0000692664,0.000002622783,0.000006533032,0.006447898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.0000060188,0.0002185451,0.00009970515,0.0000151729,0.000005066845,0.000003284754,0.000002666741,0.0003832056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2236938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7902169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995168451","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1500:sasdit]2.0.co;2","title":"SPECIES AND STAND DYNAMICS IN THE MIXED WOODS OF QUEBEC'S SOUTHERN BOREAL FOREST","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":418,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quadrat; Chronosequence; Snag; Taiga; Abies balsamea; Ecology; Dominance (genetics); Forestry; Ordination; Balsam; Boreal; Environmental science; Black spruce; Geography; Basal area; Yellow birch; Ecological succession; Shrub; Hardwood; Biology; Habitat; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00397485560700545,"gpt":0.1858605851121879,"spread":0.1818857295051824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003000891,0.00006592163,0.0001243699,0.00001667243,0.00003104534,0.000008518067,0.0001463924,0.00006006839,0.0008281413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000192077,0.00004702896,0.00001591439,0.00008577134,0.0002126498,0.00004253278,0.00003517518,0.00007048089,0.0001096185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001358804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006969407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01553372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7807817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993612,0.0001337295,0.0001320994,0.0001281052,0.00008212098,0.0001627778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996319,0.0001672275,0.00003770485,0.000141555,0.000001405064,0.00002016637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001877743,0.00005066736,0.9865381,0.000008661774,0.000003914089,0.00001139447,0.001254782,0.00009216342,0.00005363435,0.0003000581,0.0007096519,0.01095823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002365541,0.0001006786,0.991347,0.000003232389,0.000003290943,0.000009412611,0.0007457914,0.004497463,0.00001274807,0.0002795908,0.002712444,0.00005181924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972156,0.00001996672,0.000004070997,0.000325649,0.00005392776,0.0001729588,0.00001511311,0.000006378132,0.02724592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976925,0.000009700924,0.00003704514,0.00005127434,0.00001392907,0.00001057669,0.000004039985,0.000005648993,0.00217529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.765248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042099788","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1411:eeont]2.0.co;2","title":"EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF NEUTRAL THEORY","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":414,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Multinomial distribution; Null hypothesis; A priori and a posteriori; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Econometrics; Falsifiability; Statistical physics; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Physics; Biology; Epistemology; Quantum mechanics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01936279659410575,"gpt":0.2966233356995152,"spread":0.2772605391054095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006438068,0.0000362615,0.00006973094,0.00001475975,0.00005469555,8.310391e-7,0.00005103257,0.00005253997,0.002562282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005583697,0.00003274536,0.00002057907,0.0000556637,0.000206383,0.00003074674,0.0000414133,0.00003901175,0.0002391141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005721623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009122999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001876622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002401765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994488,0.0001818389,0.0001095929,0.00009592272,0.00006687137,0.00009701706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997395,0.0001342832,0.00004639513,0.00005917922,0.00001175149,0.000008931844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006604446,0.00006968766,0.9791378,8.038066e-7,0.000005769846,5.108665e-7,0.00009237973,0.01059691,0.000226977,0.007307605,0.002119142,0.0004358034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018869,0.00004001851,0.8993679,2.037108e-7,0.00001859461,0.000001579926,0.00001974042,0.003103176,0.0001180505,0.09692147,0.0001914102,0.00002917705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282005,0.00001779333,0.0001068651,0.0003460499,0.0001221381,0.00007679488,7.185438e-7,0.000008266101,0.07112088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895,0.000001268864,0.0002029908,0.0001605451,0.00001618033,0.00001696756,0.000003492938,0.000002091592,0.0006464439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08961386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966168558","doi":"10.1890/09-2190.1","title":"Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Network analysis; Landscape connectivity; Network theory; Ecological network; Graph theory; Habitat; Network science; Vulnerability (computing); Ecology; Complex network; Computer security; Mathematics; Ecosystem; Engineering; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01763878238527985,"gpt":0.2662968402113827,"spread":0.2486580578261028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000305177,0.00008137048,0.0001117545,0.0000179903,0.000219472,0.00002391744,0.0001277596,0.0001477919,0.003089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006421189,0.0000807818,0.00004191784,0.0001658709,0.00007633264,0.0001151699,0.00006034392,0.0001990026,0.0005269883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005714972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002126645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001635348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01027186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.00004087139,0.0001445215,0.0002337956,0.00007534038,0.0002318671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991106,0.0005246348,0.00006001844,0.000203697,0.00002528568,0.00007577012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006481457,0.00006970711,0.7301266,0.000001745834,0.00001358846,9.080139e-7,0.0001092635,0.0007216508,0.003823471,0.01281491,0.2462128,0.006040463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101173,0.0000945027,0.589091,0.000002133082,0.000005807989,0.000005044752,0.00001457977,0.00108598,0.0001267213,0.009828173,0.3995633,0.00008159289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517136,0.000001611584,0.02117133,0.02110268,0.001716982,0.0004009288,0.000004444704,0.00004897167,0.003839487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660656,8.619468e-7,0.02110303,0.01149453,0.000348758,0.0002600534,0.000004646086,0.000009565122,0.0007129317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1533505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080897135","doi":"10.1890/00-0634","title":"GIVING MEANINGFUL INTERPRETATION TO ORDINATION AXES: ASSESSING LOADING SIGNIFICANCE IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Resampling; Ordination; Statistics; Multivariate statistics; Dimensionality reduction; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Curse of dimensionality; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Dimension (graph theory); Data set; Range (aeronautics); Econometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009228635271812655,"gpt":0.2549268807439082,"spread":0.2456982454720955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006924559,0.00008755688,0.0001639561,0.0002118516,0.0001003596,0.00002314059,0.0001201074,0.00005930572,0.00182729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002055465,0.00009535594,0.00003680774,0.0006494877,0.00005133072,0.0002003842,0.00009358604,0.00009427376,0.0002809351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005338448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008494003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001084223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008315822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989175,0.0001930881,0.0002249085,0.0003098699,0.00009432485,0.000260315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996216,0.0001145652,0.0000861069,0.0001237154,0.000005917416,0.00004803612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007885086,0.0000899853,0.8035813,0.000005357622,0.00004545294,0.00001508417,0.001318004,0.1867097,0.00144582,0.005821419,0.0001403982,0.0008196069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001565216,0.00005389099,0.9733455,0.000004254723,0.00003830381,8.011145e-7,0.0003233642,0.02276827,0.0002947139,0.001126866,0.001772944,0.0001146379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305947,0.000002668226,0.05199072,0.0002047503,0.0002063779,0.0002234174,3.042332e-7,0.00002292376,0.01675407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964972,0.000001062625,0.002690788,0.0003529915,0.000007042506,0.0000579062,0.000003794024,0.000005651571,0.0003836015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1697641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990852,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998997607","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2418:tpapos]2.0.co;2","title":"THE PROBLEM AND PROMISE OF SCALE DEPENDENCY IN COMMUNITY PHYLOGENETICS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":390,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Geological Survey; International Institute of Tropical Forestry; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Community; Community structure; Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic diversity; Null model; Biogeography; Biology; Scale (ratio); Spatial ecology; Geography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004738514776436936,"gpt":0.2085187341934766,"spread":0.2037802194170397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002856274,0.0000362524,0.00006684387,0.000009456842,0.0001957129,0.000001884412,0.00008578868,0.00004299553,0.00003633623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001494599,0.00002744117,0.000007650017,0.00004991589,0.0004029775,0.00001562747,0.0001336722,0.0001005735,0.00001146531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002230195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004184914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003257342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1606229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995561,0.0001346056,0.0001192799,0.00005769723,0.00002683413,0.0001054946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.0001951243,0.00004543457,0.00007455467,0.000003910816,0.000008049154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004307111,0.00006843616,0.9973096,0.000003445487,0.000001875112,4.64028e-7,0.0002542087,0.0004257309,0.0004465485,0.0007417406,0.00006872918,0.0006749353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596297,0.00006364554,0.9620093,7.678785e-7,0.000002443333,0.000002065397,0.00009332241,0.0003188688,0.00009340035,0.03711794,0.0001117064,0.00002687837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.982235,0.00005726045,0.000008866025,0.0002894473,0.00002187085,0.0001238266,8.317245e-7,0.000003268545,0.01725967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988598,0.00004263023,0.0006498281,0.00002977773,0.000002759044,0.00002150596,7.959649e-7,0.000001873859,0.0003910835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1602972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8546935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139938002","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[140:mtlhap]2.0.co;2","title":"META-ANALYSIS: TROPHIC LEVEL, HABITAT, AND PRODUCTIVITY SHAPE THE FOOD WEB EFFECTS OF RESOURCE SUBSIDIES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":388,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Subsidy; Productivity; Trophic level; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Food web; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0920959446166184,"gpt":0.3025760171019756,"spread":0.2104800724853572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002233058,0.0004984438,0.004434376,0.0003468326,0.0002033251,0.00001596902,0.0007958335,0.0004425916,0.001445143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005590026,0.000299469,0.001803017,0.001422528,0.001275144,0.00007045949,0.0007790771,0.0005519949,0.0001715172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005207781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002302396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01005489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954668,0.001862971,0.000855661,0.0009616339,0.000299956,0.0005530246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951645,0.002832592,0.0008606564,0.001047942,0.00001978612,0.00007449448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003348328,0.0008994502,0.01201021,0.007562222,0.6106515,0.0001609269,0.0006980672,0.0002895501,0.00002101571,0.000430478,0.005858819,0.3613843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009415817,0.0003341689,0.007737958,0.00001476731,0.3566018,0.0000375483,0.00001261207,0.00002102274,0.000008218603,0.0001453366,0.6346945,0.0002979042],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005353886,0.9920925,0.00001407618,0.000253232,0.0001123328,0.001157737,0.00003309873,0.00002200522,0.0009610849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01933364,0.9774222,0.0004629445,0.0002427558,0.0001008057,0.0005130602,0.00002441001,0.00005624195,0.001843931],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6288357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142280873","doi":"10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1185:sdpdfs]2.0.co;2","title":"SPECIES DIVERSITY PATTERNS DERIVED FROM SPECIES–AREA MODELS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":375,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Canadian Forest Service; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Body size and species richness; Species diversity; Relative abundance distribution; Dominance (genetics); Gamma diversity; Species distribution; Global biodiversity; Macroecology; Spatial ecology; Community; Spatial distribution; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Geography; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03408928842845107,"gpt":0.1941151464879299,"spread":0.1600258580594788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005183086,0.0001042346,0.0001566491,0.00002151056,0.0004503223,0.000007113222,0.0002102853,0.0000957263,0.04819823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002326152,0.0001032217,0.00004524105,0.00005685652,0.0002585273,0.0001425328,0.0007605039,0.0001078957,0.001811207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000131598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000133953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000192931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992326,0.00005184781,0.000118982,0.0002622022,0.00008867259,0.0002456765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995994,0.0001415597,0.00005639929,0.0001470022,0.000006568195,0.00004906402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003949941,0.0000726146,0.9900509,8.388311e-7,0.00002842785,0.00002015577,0.001784469,0.00217598,0.0002169629,0.0004139474,0.005126114,0.0001056217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002495108,0.00004571999,0.9790826,8.509579e-7,0.00001466926,0.000001559527,0.0002360709,0.01491533,0.00004414142,0.004494619,0.0007993968,0.0001155599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215154,0.00002009311,0.001279368,0.0009750259,0.000310825,0.00008347236,0.00003213877,0.00003942176,0.07574424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889474,0.0001426843,0.0003119411,0.0007772489,0.00003463801,0.000007978035,0.00001168791,0.000004955112,0.009761453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.067432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156080010","doi":"10.1890/08-2090.1","title":"Trade‐offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":375,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Ungulate; Forage; Ecology; Trade-off; Geography; Spatial ecology; Scale (ratio); Biology; Habitat; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009481072498204906,"gpt":0.221057903844102,"spread":0.2115768313458971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002843475,0.0001179119,0.0001986281,0.00005600912,0.0001093371,0.00001542368,0.00010331,0.0002043961,0.0001600575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003349466,0.0001151022,0.00002535577,0.0001347062,0.0001406089,0.0002664911,0.00003263924,0.0001918565,0.00005516298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007286473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000173295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000166396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003441697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989858,0.0001824418,0.000235002,0.0002728477,0.00006774597,0.0002561525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995494,0.0001778885,0.00009398205,0.0001205739,0.000001978128,0.00005615227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001023402,0.00002977082,0.9939409,0.000001901184,0.000007141318,0.000005611553,0.0006521338,0.00006586145,0.0001448798,0.00006596187,0.0003674014,0.004708166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004400234,0.0002192339,0.9897364,0.000002797166,0.00002632895,0.000001775606,0.0000756477,0.0001527076,0.00005966724,0.008607144,0.0005592492,0.0001190667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974349,0.00002239748,0.000118281,0.00168321,0.00004554979,0.0002369061,0.00001376634,0.00003139953,0.000413572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992995,0.00001475335,0.00015233,0.0003693267,0.00005307115,0.0000150962,0.0000322512,0.000005384952,0.000058305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008541183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4693732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134070232","doi":"10.1890/05-1454","title":"TROPHIC LEVELS AND TROPHIC TANGLES: THE PREVALENCE OF OMNIVORY IN REAL FOOD WEBS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":362,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Trophic level; Trophic cascade; Ecology; Food web; Food chain; Herbivore; Omnivore; Biology; Trophic state index; Habitat; Predation; Nutrient; Phytoplankton","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01322407720038594,"gpt":0.2381331910582384,"spread":0.2249091138578524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009218097,0.00009961546,0.0002084537,0.00007480237,0.00006508154,0.000003178682,0.0003152052,0.0001279641,0.001813469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001246227,0.00007718968,0.00003863272,0.0002500989,0.0006694092,0.00008405246,0.0002216218,0.0001701425,0.00009075765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001258558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001644626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006372059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005875853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987661,0.0001713856,0.0003243106,0.0002784719,0.0001152824,0.0003444314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991831,0.0003588263,0.0001260561,0.000285587,0.000006665159,0.00003975595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002277713,0.00007661367,0.9942304,0.00001760162,0.00001419302,0.00002191223,0.0004405623,0.0001967582,0.003380761,0.0006808853,0.0001002006,0.000817311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002953566,0.0003592866,0.9961246,0.000002788567,0.00002264159,0.00002101293,0.0001023673,0.0001376531,0.0005296473,0.001924732,0.0004027192,0.00007721847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946893,0.0000873934,0.00004710766,0.0004156253,0.0001017135,0.0001884598,0.000003359793,0.000009388192,0.004457612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984338,0.00008434486,0.0003158874,0.0003087015,0.00002677999,0.00001437599,3.670023e-7,0.000008053082,0.0008076383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005812132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}