{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":586,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":586,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"b36ca31acaab","filters":{"venue":"Ecology Letters"}},"results":[{"id":"W2129163149","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x","title":"The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi‐scale community ecology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacommunity; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Patch dynamics; Spatial ecology; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Biology; Geography; Sociology; Ecosystem; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02206000391789805,"gpt":0.2809498121356493,"spread":0.2588898082177513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007765125,0.0001524022,0.0002166808,0.00002064251,0.002904517,0.00001590875,0.0005987424,0.0001870189,0.0001620566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004521148,0.0001207403,0.0001045236,0.0001089599,0.001795998,0.00008463805,0.0003779189,0.0007585773,0.0002490513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002824788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001393311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002167642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04751246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985256,0.0005453436,0.0002344764,0.0001747815,0.00006239047,0.0004574152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969471,0.002441532,0.0001316342,0.0004119943,0.00001323145,0.0000545184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001175735,0.001000405,0.9364222,0.00001317406,0.0004654607,0.00001043622,0.01242345,0.01890662,0.001360486,0.02096696,0.00731555,0.0009977239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059088,0.000208872,0.9672061,0.000002435787,0.00005407143,0.000008028055,0.0009508657,0.0005191147,0.0001245444,0.02788342,0.00180639,0.0001771091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452536,0.00002430086,0.02549356,0.0275613,0.0006998483,0.0004978022,0.00001085721,0.00005894961,0.0003997996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502844,0.0000212839,0.03400261,0.01525886,0.00002908956,0.0002373123,0.00001234273,0.0000133619,0.0001407787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0472957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164087962","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01113.x","title":"Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4599,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terrestrial ecosystem; Ecosystem; Ecology; Marine ecosystem; Freshwater ecosystem; Habitat; Nutrient; Phosphorus; Terrestrial plant; Marine habitats; Environmental science; Primary producers; Biology; Chemistry; Phytoplankton","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005879303707405728,"gpt":0.199501501123569,"spread":0.1936221974161633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000313479,0.00007335827,0.0002196614,0.00008344639,0.00001643466,0.000003461402,0.00006535607,0.00005402807,0.00001142588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001411299,0.00006783939,0.00003108889,0.000340257,0.0001703029,0.00006183436,0.0001051385,0.00003627715,0.000001247858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001296996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003960365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01238747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992543,0.00003783659,0.0002613762,0.0001974969,0.00009034247,0.0001586773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997084,0.00005373107,0.000107266,0.00009369503,0.000002572847,0.00003436307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009177963,0.00005361808,0.9964353,0.000007101021,0.00009355345,0.000008312843,0.0001534255,0.0004564066,0.0007902305,0.000003458935,0.00009267824,0.001814131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006028491,0.00005906661,0.9968498,0.000002183381,0.0001329699,0.000002706488,0.00002924932,0.001734255,0.0002531878,0.0001888749,0.00008343894,0.00006146688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992815,0.00002022058,0.00002598003,0.0002973417,0.00008728759,0.0001421667,0.00001481347,0.000005047154,0.0001256523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992952,0.00002191148,0.0004597712,0.0001582964,0.00001033653,0.00000286719,0.00004549673,0.000002965655,0.000003181528],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01032418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128791014","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x","title":"Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2437,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Royal Society Te Apārangi; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Miami; Library science; State (computer science); Ecology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Biology; Philosophy; Computer science; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01448278431463055,"gpt":0.257230551820892,"spread":0.2427477675062615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006695596,0.00007588899,0.0001040866,0.000005892915,0.001309451,0.000007146566,0.0003119093,0.00006373001,0.0001748756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008503593,0.00004648339,0.00005850223,0.0000676224,0.0008722931,0.00008367238,0.0004667977,0.0004094146,0.00003389981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003910379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005069171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002947187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02024204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993657,0.00005760984,0.0001394837,0.0001577489,0.00007042364,0.0002090663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964579,0.00316156,0.0001989047,0.0001543506,0.00001139107,0.00001592914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001292899,0.0000249111,0.9859924,0.000002630058,0.00005795499,0.000001514758,0.002252204,0.001899432,0.007257737,0.0002171479,0.001760014,0.0005211748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000329653,0.00005355962,0.9875019,0.000001579123,0.00006393796,0.000006620638,0.000746589,0.009772385,0.0002616968,0.0002864718,0.0009036482,0.00007193454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568599,0.000003500347,0.0007789936,0.04116542,0.0005357767,0.0003457036,0.000002582292,0.00001514915,0.0002929188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929456,0.000002934914,0.001521598,0.005388726,0.00003476352,0.00004983428,0.000001454809,0.000004918191,0.00005014177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03608567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170805839","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x","title":"Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2398,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Typology; Total human ecosystem; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem management; Ecosystem health; Ecology; Service (business); Business; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08720958656541163,"gpt":0.2514940309134169,"spread":0.1642844443480053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004916665,0.0004119846,0.001034164,0.0001241292,0.0004367819,0.00007275882,0.0005801165,0.0004797127,0.0007781597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001062245,0.0003258774,0.000297707,0.0002974707,0.00002670192,0.000311438,0.0001723138,0.0004823943,0.003802201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001070999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001310906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001180234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03177328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976271,0.0004548714,0.0006096147,0.0006016756,0.0001908874,0.0005158374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985093,0.0004323469,0.0004957197,0.0004273265,0.00000238495,0.0001329072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937338,0.0003298474,0.8735752,0.03943459,0.001442299,0.0007343643,0.001321807,0.002903649,0.000002805738,0.0001422261,0.02916776,0.05092609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002511115,0.00003542128,0.009627337,0.003263702,0.0006340577,0.00005970526,0.00008864531,0.0006625098,1.432628e-7,0.00006590165,0.9846234,0.0006880363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04570053,0.940388,0.0001402886,0.0007745309,0.002160775,0.002788157,0.000116389,0.0004908916,0.007440389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03749793,0.9610448,0.0001074809,0.0006184294,0.000261578,0.00009931192,0.0002382183,0.00006849768,0.00006369053],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127367934","doi":"10.1111/ele.12189","title":"Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2019,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council; McMaster University; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, Australian Research Council","keywords":"Process (computing); Identification (biology); Endangered species; Computer science; Decision support system; Construct (python library); Distribution (mathematics); Management science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Economics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02979897432846485,"gpt":0.2388572743118715,"spread":0.2090582999834066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008939961,0.00007819405,0.00008363868,0.00001700134,0.0003015808,0.00003347687,0.0001262711,0.00005291159,0.0691445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002699153,0.00007466988,0.0000563145,0.000115174,0.0002067784,0.0001619543,0.00007547378,0.00005901025,0.002541221],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003834311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003814443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001421671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008245951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992918,0.00002112974,0.0001536506,0.0001802216,0.00008440342,0.0002687298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994664,0.0002697796,0.00005716511,0.0001281694,0.00001426737,0.00006418733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002776307,0.00003439146,0.5249379,8.676849e-7,0.000007395081,5.610688e-7,0.00003524215,0.00001063341,0.01763299,0.001090628,0.4560922,0.0001543314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000235928,0.0000259243,0.9384785,0.000001476885,0.000009789108,0.000003226407,0.000267846,0.0003286062,0.0004065437,0.0002182119,0.05994299,0.00008095391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552107,0.00000197035,0.003336425,0.03598909,0.0002804082,0.0003844411,0.0001337761,0.00006123607,0.00460194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915726,0.00000660619,0.0005177415,0.006636132,0.00005061757,0.0002651974,0.0003257211,0.000007264415,0.0006181244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4135406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096694793","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01515.x","title":"Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1853,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Biology; Niche; Ecological niche; Species richness; Conservation biology; Functional ecology; Climate change; Evolutionary ecology; Habitat; Conservatism; Macroecology; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05072724204918837,"gpt":0.3364987050382053,"spread":0.285771462989017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004219848,0.000296818,0.0007782736,0.0001155382,0.0001233482,0.00002005301,0.0002982753,0.0006656757,0.0191109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001490802,0.0002838358,0.00008163738,0.0002249671,0.0006533558,0.0001118045,0.0002796971,0.0006095662,0.001211961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005184998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004223865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003943094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01634266,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980249,0.0003605562,0.0004737745,0.0006030323,0.00006753065,0.0004701797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990329,0.0002727944,0.0002858613,0.0002958214,0.000005843352,0.0001067815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001859945,0.0003197264,0.7938188,0.000815269,0.0000986129,0.000200226,0.0002807534,0.000001207321,0.0006244478,0.007040406,0.01562179,0.1811602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002348196,0.00005686045,0.1187608,0.00003944697,0.00005539296,0.00007889378,0.00002980201,0.000007910961,0.000001173142,0.00008156757,0.8804063,0.0002470233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.8419809,0.1434879,0.000004078237,0.009686687,0.001254962,0.001199826,0.00009913887,0.00009001603,0.002196452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001292597,0.9846987,0.0001151086,0.01266534,0.00005837339,0.0002484302,0.000741804,0.00003641069,0.0001432727],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120405557","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x","title":"Ecological consequences of genetic diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1804,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Genetic diversity; Biodiversity; Ecosystem diversity; Biology; Conservation genetics; Population; Interspecific competition; Diversity (politics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02887146696864656,"gpt":0.2584489332475169,"spread":0.2295774662788703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009470655,0.0002212095,0.0009149307,0.00006121348,0.0003587896,0.000001832509,0.0004095886,0.0003111525,0.001588121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006971882,0.0001825336,0.0002623193,0.0001449127,0.002380899,0.000033693,0.0008710982,0.0002600943,0.0007755879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000204652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002677561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000326028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003723304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986222,0.0002644811,0.0003806474,0.0003578492,0.0001031359,0.0002717222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998947,0.0004823711,0.0003568761,0.0001649059,0.000005116276,0.00004370122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008609899,0.0004200223,0.8625782,0.001291904,0.000948287,0.0008649611,0.0004485157,0.0003975202,0.000006708738,0.0001785496,0.03597973,0.09687707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002778234,0.0002357555,0.5220218,0.0001585003,0.000669334,0.0003652827,0.00001526031,0.00001154244,4.510931e-7,0.0002862936,0.4753571,0.0006008446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02918163,0.9657627,0.00003114682,0.0005538902,0.0007057561,0.000660011,0.00002429358,0.00004627219,0.00303428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001863152,0.9966636,0.000586396,0.000686772,0.00001950978,0.00003128259,0.000009705271,0.000007709646,0.0001318455],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4393774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142023815","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x","title":"Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1764,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Biodiversity; Spatial heterogeneity; Geography; Land cover; Ecology; Agriculture; Landscape ecology; Natural (archaeology); Cover (algebra); Environmental resource management; Land use; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005870297535078081,"gpt":0.1741893577176829,"spread":0.1683190601826048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001096344,0.00006744541,0.00007213892,0.00002540338,0.0001156269,0.000007838222,0.00006378545,0.00009592431,0.001275173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001734374,0.00005857559,0.00001843977,0.00006876927,0.0001226697,0.000135405,0.00008273345,0.0001785693,0.0003430796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000203258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002908626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005953081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01421231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999498,0.00003519898,0.00007316444,0.0001892292,0.00004755016,0.0001569106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998259,0.00005163894,0.00002914418,0.00005414619,0.000002219917,0.0000369276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019353,0.00002489429,0.9706041,5.842348e-7,0.000005273111,0.000008034068,0.00003167368,0.00002986356,0.01539725,0.00001337806,0.0138341,0.0000306191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449422,0.00002911417,0.9989294,2.627322e-7,0.000005655389,0.00002473058,0.00001937333,0.00005262079,0.0001348797,0.00001397993,0.000371029,0.00007398149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868365,0.00000169344,0.000001773754,0.01250972,0.000237451,0.00006422497,0.000002872618,0.00001815891,0.000327593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963784,0.000001097221,0.00009896245,0.0034493,0.00003388922,0.000005546525,0.00001504006,0.000001250887,0.00001657927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0283253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142834673","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01020.x","title":"Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1745,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Genetic algorithm; Biology; Origination; Ecology; Biogeography; Biodiversity; Taxon; Diversification (marketing strategy); Macroevolution; Reproductive isolation; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetic tree; Paleontology; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03049599645837019,"gpt":0.2418488336547965,"spread":0.2113528371964263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005838004,0.000190831,0.0005169861,0.0002320768,0.001005924,0.0000181807,0.000106552,0.0001804788,0.0001318645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004553454,0.0001241661,0.000126067,0.0002293971,0.00101602,0.00007538156,0.00005297897,0.0002605139,0.00004812305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001448761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001261081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005359384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04056885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988352,0.0003015436,0.0002312988,0.0002947915,0.00009641313,0.0002407391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989984,0.0006223611,0.0002102705,0.00009826374,0.00001958079,0.00005114611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670594,0.000003773138,0.9275674,0.0001839187,0.0001693142,0.000005596304,0.00009132725,0.000001023628,2.017072e-9,0.0002429716,0.001773064,0.06994491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002642148,0.00002213213,0.7129927,0.00004727076,0.0003629012,0.00003442884,0.00002534535,0.00001314579,7.419411e-10,0.0001763463,0.285957,0.0001045101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003477796,0.9930375,0.00005742076,0.00101831,0.0008705141,0.0003535158,0.00003147125,0.00002647837,0.001127036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002901742,0.9960776,0.0000560208,0.0006631897,0.000204814,0.000002245275,0.00006189295,0.000001918246,0.00003060449],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.284184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132791458","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01518.x","title":"Meta‐analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1640,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ocean acidification; Aragonite; Calcite; Ecology; Biology; Calcium carbonate; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Seawater; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02793527038549113,"gpt":0.2600176143270327,"spread":0.2320823439415416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007585608,0.0004322389,0.002495759,0.0006823399,0.0001466129,0.00003547531,0.000508932,0.0004425449,0.004084426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003968295,0.0002896049,0.0009451308,0.00114751,0.0002208089,0.00008035221,0.00002595489,0.0005626804,0.0004160421],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001446885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009307017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001540625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001425805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969963,0.001198916,0.0006283338,0.0006011169,0.0002297429,0.0003456113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929785,0.005333409,0.0008691927,0.0006438385,0.00005379439,0.00012128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002257089,0.000709144,0.01061467,0.02708741,0.492438,0.0002576988,0.0004351492,0.00149383,0.000378914,0.001113295,0.01285269,0.4523935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005464514,0.0008020591,0.04320861,0.0003680295,0.6060616,0.00004021239,0.00001148388,0.0001174015,0.0002750084,0.0003731785,0.3467424,0.001453599],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004952814,0.9862986,0.0002574707,0.001156049,0.002102794,0.003193145,0.0006311129,0.0001486326,0.001259379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004770257,0.9876045,0.002592892,0.001789819,0.0001711568,0.00002034562,0.001813964,0.00003478847,0.001202265],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4509399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101203599","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01094.x","title":"Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1558,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Relative abundance distribution; Context (archaeology); Abundance (ecology); Community; Relative species abundance; Biodiversity; Statistical physics; Data science; Computer science; Biology; Ecosystem; Physics; Paleontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0510968559276894,"gpt":0.3054744877516041,"spread":0.2543776318239147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006125806,0.0004403517,0.0007518023,0.0001097309,0.000445159,0.0001296564,0.0004937974,0.0006168931,0.02338789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004945247,0.0003720773,0.0002267128,0.0006269861,0.0006278363,0.0002810353,0.0002589777,0.0006713042,0.001826958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003474524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002251929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002382681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001372292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974252,0.0002710866,0.0006784814,0.0007426067,0.0002916017,0.0005910324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986256,0.0003728909,0.0003387008,0.0004339534,0.00001906336,0.0002097845],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001762319,0.004792028,0.01292091,0.001455618,0.0005342721,0.0003800901,0.00518309,0.0002253728,0.001242064,0.1510251,0.1355011,0.6865641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001056011,0.0003757319,0.02690108,0.0004233309,0.000203596,0.00005138971,0.0006445281,0.000007203628,0.00003901703,0.000784678,0.9698899,0.0005739285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1181236,0.6179298,0.157417,0.01391416,0.02563933,0.01236986,0.009012599,0.002965305,0.04262846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008128613,0.9584287,0.005417606,0.01519644,0.00161727,0.001046797,0.008675586,0.000171337,0.001317614],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155432052","doi":"10.1111/ele.12141","title":"Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1504,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ordination; Beta diversity; Pairwise comparison; Multivariate analysis of variance; Statistics; Alpha diversity; Comparability; Variance (accounting); Gamma diversity; Diversity index; Index of dissimilarity; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Sampling (signal processing); Species diversity; Ecology; Biology; Species richness; Computer science; Filter (signal processing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02268067988752655,"gpt":0.2418517013363453,"spread":0.2191710214488187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003520011,0.00005388714,0.00008671108,0.000008273016,0.001117708,0.00000716965,0.0003499092,0.00003073197,0.000450151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007637126,0.00004231841,0.0000110927,0.00005557082,0.0008726459,0.0001733644,0.00178816,0.0001838585,0.00009757705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002539594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002272004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009802735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003237319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.0002165489,0.00009168727,0.000105318,0.00005842394,0.0001274919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993077,0.0003207089,0.00006838778,0.0002746029,0.000005819774,0.00002281605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002249899,0.00005620832,0.9933872,0.000002629856,0.00002521965,7.939246e-7,0.001122073,0.0003377941,0.0001814208,0.0001565622,0.004633669,0.00009417051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001332273,0.00002382104,0.997731,0.000001125349,0.00002021216,0.000002359424,0.0002443628,0.0009512531,0.000009118964,0.0007165277,0.0001251039,0.00004187445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861966,0.00000538316,0.0003503787,0.01226639,0.00009779707,0.0001300601,0.000009519496,0.000008822118,0.0009350806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994868,0.000008303771,0.0001499642,0.004898458,0.000004582455,0.000006203731,0.00001284158,0.000001787279,0.00004984974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008671443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8596619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101779884","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x","title":"Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land‐use change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1469,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Pollinator; Pollination; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Foraging; Ecosystem; Land use; Environmental resource management; Competition (biology); Habitat; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Population; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05954058703097932,"gpt":0.2708308874564858,"spread":0.2112903004255065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001685773,0.0001874535,0.0005621694,0.00001090297,0.0001566722,0.00002117115,0.0001746045,0.0002212312,0.00001550389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004484649,0.00005791757,0.0001023812,0.0001105468,0.00007646292,0.00003798885,0.00005163328,0.0001153463,0.000005392323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002001143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002502204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006466764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001163932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00008568602,0.0001998651,0.000246905,0.00006478674,0.0002105128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966813,0.003003411,0.0002447998,0.00002611394,0.00002069084,0.00002372238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007167549,0.0002384934,0.01394283,0.01837514,0.001248033,0.00001770387,0.001709455,8.105518e-8,0.005917751,0.0004715705,0.004635119,0.9533721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008797483,0.000360191,0.002747847,0.001153981,0.0002657206,0.000005528346,0.00009003347,7.616525e-7,0.00007059886,0.000006708432,0.9950306,0.000180101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1663364,0.8306367,0.000001992643,0.0004003381,0.0002090274,0.001998469,0.0003900258,0.00002557789,0.000001383215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0110454,0.9854802,0.00003082542,0.001970426,0.0007315769,0.0006399765,0.00007285879,0.000004097717,0.0000245642],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.236181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113399683","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x","title":"Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1370,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pollination; Ecology; Crop; Ecosystem services; Biology; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecosystem; Pollen","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03233731716747296,"gpt":0.2326474515282086,"spread":0.2003101343607356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004718767,0.0003379355,0.0008052636,0.00002371717,0.0002762497,0.00003013327,0.0002999182,0.0002728214,0.0001333245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007159032,0.0001144067,0.0002943228,0.0001326583,0.00002826196,0.00003515682,0.00007406728,0.0002528377,0.0003455895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004363504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003720996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004664743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001939249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998749,0.0001802004,0.0002176991,0.0003926529,0.0001213539,0.0003390993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992827,0.0003687443,0.0002525334,0.00003199665,0.00001488769,0.00004917443],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001795873,0.0001286404,0.02977537,0.002989387,0.0003724831,0.0007950626,0.00003623294,0.000001091649,0.0001762608,0.00001515287,0.02125324,0.9444391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008428334,0.0001815947,0.1967301,0.001323612,0.00008935288,0.00003996696,0.000009454713,0.000001416274,0.000002886464,0.000002575699,0.8012162,0.0003185339],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.3149364,0.6828595,4.851072e-8,0.001162095,0.0002695184,0.0003482096,0.0001329858,0.00007179288,0.0002193996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002844559,0.9924281,0.000002970581,0.002914351,0.001282818,0.00005897446,0.0002995243,0.000002705431,0.0001659779],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4665369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081626686","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00616.x","title":"Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1352,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Indigenous; Predation; Abundance (ecology); Population; Introduced species; Invasive species; Community; Ecosystem; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00984620691666726,"gpt":0.206531035283414,"spread":0.1966848283667468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001670818,0.0001099915,0.0001089477,0.000019353,0.0004476461,0.000009912171,0.0002488926,0.00007640313,0.001060091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006972969,0.00008136802,0.00004707223,0.0001057269,0.0004554688,0.0001097708,0.0001250714,0.0001411697,0.001242787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001705415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006596429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001025309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001614015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991816,0.00007667895,0.0001414352,0.0002477489,0.00009155239,0.0002609649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994644,0.000244995,0.00007188198,0.0001753213,0.000003260104,0.00004014756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003598545,0.0001907191,0.8341035,0.000005616577,0.00009110242,0.0000445303,0.001823167,0.00462505,0.01862031,0.0003401634,0.1394248,0.0006950519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009044618,0.00007757814,0.9898669,0.000003385281,0.00003552904,0.00001873169,0.0001392307,0.0001380082,0.003123041,0.002212367,0.003268338,0.000212399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115106,0.0000183782,0.000171837,0.08635519,0.0001649701,0.0001420414,0.000003252978,0.0000288264,0.001604896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536764,0.00003531158,0.0002784761,0.04552219,0.00002032638,0.00004531976,0.000003572924,0.000008203211,0.0004101967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1557634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167613475","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00671.x","title":"Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Body size and species richness; Genetic algorithm; Biology; Diversification (marketing strategy); Extant taxon; Evolutionary biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01211006681275961,"gpt":0.2060057591409435,"spread":0.1938956923281838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001185258,0.00005421849,0.0001426821,0.0001168064,0.00005170893,0.000001786568,0.00004790159,0.00005271916,0.00007723113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003812719,0.00005046053,0.00001889648,0.0001006574,0.0002225563,0.00005263435,0.000004216663,0.00005452637,0.000007220626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005949971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002151251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008212249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1042594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995144,0.00004032736,0.0001727736,0.000110042,0.00003514225,0.0001273059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995965,0.0002252401,0.00008815974,0.0000593379,0.00001159817,0.00001918118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001949526,0.00002442945,0.9894624,0.00001345925,0.00001125593,0.000001452329,0.0001409586,0.009819445,0.0003479832,0.00002515156,0.00004170849,0.00009227316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004922219,0.00008162502,0.9985493,0.000008142258,0.00001349655,0.00000317683,0.00005854761,0.0006042361,0.00003980752,0.00007807501,0.00002915081,0.0000421633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967639,0.00009534745,0.0001374498,0.0017911,0.0001511298,0.00009762303,0.00004030149,0.00001063847,0.0009125352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985781,0.00004978261,0.0009327456,0.0004144688,0.00001133688,0.000002299457,0.000008161743,8.869239e-7,0.000002163971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1034382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9120855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151300021","doi":"10.1111/ele.12082","title":"A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1231,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Nature Conservancy; New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station; World Wildlife Fund; Harvard University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Pollinator; Ecology; Habitat; Foraging; Pollination; Agroecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Agroforestry; Biome; Agriculture; Ecosystem; Biology; Pollen","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01222037121369008,"gpt":0.1952834131726716,"spread":0.1830630419589815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001160813,0.0002667013,0.0006235581,0.00003479247,0.00007623771,0.00001781223,0.0001947598,0.0004332887,0.00004092681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006301635,0.0001084608,0.00009676592,0.0001656094,0.0001556193,0.0000386993,0.0000712985,0.00034944,0.00004676963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005683982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004155619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006735128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006455337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986051,0.0002310135,0.0002501025,0.0003837395,0.0001422654,0.0003877725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977927,0.00195961,0.0001745947,0.0000213461,0.00001748581,0.00003427872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006389109,0.00004812608,0.1831619,0.0001604215,0.0001790581,0.0004237233,0.00003642405,0.000002330552,0.002886296,0.00006232863,0.8099215,0.003054012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001798899,0.0006404726,0.9825374,0.00022463,0.00004850526,0.00001549224,0.0001159686,0.00001946857,0.0001732795,0.00005800547,0.01566761,0.0003192035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804321,0.0001672882,2.929428e-7,0.2187046,0.0001180928,0.0002356965,0.000128534,0.00001724083,0.0001961697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826035,0.00005738373,0.00001007257,0.116865,0.0003523503,0.00005930796,0.00002733031,0.000001543498,0.00002354534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4422902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213419599","doi":"10.1111/ele.13898","title":"AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia; Birds Canada; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Trait; IUCN Red List; Biodiversity; Biology; Extant taxon; Evolutionary ecology; Taxonomic rank; Macroecology; Geography; Taxon; Evolutionary biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02753539328103189,"gpt":0.2572490167350133,"spread":0.2297136234539814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006840611,0.000395795,0.0005846469,0.0001107088,0.0006557414,0.00002963361,0.001202819,0.0009829809,0.008343083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002518633,0.0003562402,0.0001280191,0.0001386893,0.001659471,0.0001141685,0.002781066,0.001917106,0.0001825489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001746567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001253461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002925441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000457299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967817,0.0003679719,0.0004057235,0.001405912,0.0002154468,0.0008232464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973592,0.001584647,0.000235447,0.0007416093,0.000006774156,0.00007235759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002396092,0.00007857702,0.0733541,0.00001561806,0.0001837116,0.0005013065,0.00002177108,0.00008481662,0.0000483467,0.0000316592,0.925612,0.00004409887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004929177,0.0004309736,0.1262834,0.000001212694,0.0001873671,0.0001287148,0.00001129845,0.0006763028,2.623141e-7,0.000775233,0.8705999,0.0004124636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.114692,0.00006051038,0.0001542283,0.8820937,0.0009826553,0.0008784353,0.0004694739,0.0001129033,0.0005560716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006108646,0.0001737176,0.002489634,0.986678,0.000464275,0.0005644736,0.002665031,0.00004428086,0.0008119246],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1085834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124019912","doi":"10.1111/ele.12508","title":"A global meta‐analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal; Algoma University; Queen's University","funders":"Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; European Research Council; Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Smithsonian Institution; Sight Research UK; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; Natural Environment Research Council; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Intraspecific competition; Trait; Interspecific competition; Variation (astronomy); Plant community; Species richness; Ecosystem; Community","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03200223263335859,"gpt":0.2412452251746158,"spread":0.2092429925412572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589294,0.00006005243,0.0002768587,0.00005234254,0.00004546712,0.000001300861,0.0001613615,0.0000473384,0.0002351799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003393597,0.00004343253,0.0001271785,0.0004081764,0.0004243085,0.00006155846,0.00009943639,0.00007637872,0.000004541915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001477836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000797857,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007897132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06472433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992102,0.0003075815,0.0002174297,0.00008042026,0.00008733705,0.00009699513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994558,0.0002301171,0.0001635278,0.0001287775,0.000008326343,0.00001341625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001667007,0.00008906735,0.908688,0.000001753088,0.008416922,0.000001367066,0.00802962,0.07031842,0.00008050905,0.004139324,0.0002115548,0.000006762968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001665039,0.00003034404,0.989439,5.591809e-7,0.004953897,8.677019e-7,0.0005971982,0.003159898,0.000004916945,0.001600859,0.000008241365,0.0000377428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947914,0.00002429193,0.000488302,0.003147836,0.00008548196,0.0001045329,0.00003554902,0.000003531778,0.00131902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990481,0.000004661375,0.0003432465,0.0005619408,0.000001810961,0.00001459112,0.000006391469,0.000001410757,0.0000178442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08075094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118123652","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01651.x","title":"Nutrient co‐limitation of primary producer communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1086,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Nutrient; Limiting; Phosphorus; Primary producers; Constraint (computer-aided design); Production (economics); Primary production; Primary succession; Environmental science; Biology; Ecosystem; Computer science; Mathematics; Chemistry; Phytoplankton; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04473420340743619,"gpt":0.2560176100669934,"spread":0.2112834066595572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002209,0.0002455955,0.0007694188,0.00009767895,0.00007668638,0.000006404357,0.0004424262,0.0001891545,0.0002125654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009081525,0.0002044156,0.0001972545,0.0001377798,0.0005127744,0.00008760711,0.0002184445,0.0002795923,0.0006924463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002041328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009574752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001995607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986958,0.0002560584,0.0004306588,0.0002330741,0.0001238008,0.0002606075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990309,0.0001446723,0.0003569647,0.0004202143,0.000005879123,0.00004135627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688528,0.001116791,0.2647506,0.01217066,0.0005966176,0.00004116982,0.00501723,0.00003320112,0.000006783506,0.0003093408,0.07945147,0.6364692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001506178,0.00007126365,0.004921408,0.0003907579,0.0002659623,0.00001905147,0.00002672342,0.000002615345,0.0000019334,0.000188405,0.9937024,0.0002589349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04958707,0.9347836,0.00006750886,0.0004324519,0.001318515,0.002243253,0.0001014528,0.0001231119,0.01134306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002955435,0.9978545,0.0002939859,0.0007038001,0.00004263227,0.0001068052,0.0004948509,0.00003334008,0.0001745316],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8900226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597532406","doi":"10.1111/ele.12757","title":"How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1026,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Helsingin Yliopiston Tiedesäätiö; Norges Forskningsråd; Academy of Finland; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Ecology; Computer science; Inference; Correlative; Community; Conceptual framework; Community structure; Data science; Bayesian probability; Statistical inference; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Habitat; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05377062890756562,"gpt":0.3302279744515207,"spread":0.2764573455439551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002156322,0.00008019895,0.0001358008,0.00001744607,0.000640231,0.00002360074,0.0003043568,0.00006771601,0.00004732145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000239957,0.00008071253,0.000009322616,0.00001476702,0.0006419891,0.0002554244,0.0009598042,0.0001636461,0.00001158292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002597722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004179966,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001567164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008719074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994461,0.00008756996,0.00009787407,0.0001601435,0.00005900523,0.000149326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992693,0.0002175104,0.0001155708,0.0003455721,0.000007418803,0.00004460286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002211947,0.00003872785,0.9757752,0.00001376381,0.00008026818,0.000006093944,0.01590269,0.0004216755,0.0008938819,0.001215175,0.002795127,0.002835277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003425456,0.000106163,0.9917843,0.000004195797,0.00002950578,0.000003309357,0.003427389,0.001030385,0.00005248005,0.002929551,0.0001860921,0.0001041068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703512,0.00001495456,0.002463574,0.02673867,0.0001128342,0.0001915115,0.0000471641,0.000009643999,0.0000704647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906998,0.00001814268,0.002506536,0.006661681,0.00001130587,0.00001563692,0.00002124023,0.000004836301,0.00006083285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0203486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4924204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146616239","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x","title":"The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1021,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Trophic level; Biodiversity; Ecology; Predation; Intraguild predation; Trophic cascade; Ecosystem; Biology; Food chain; Nestedness; Biomass (ecology); Ecosystem diversity; Resistance (ecology); Food web; Mesopredator release hypothesis; Apex predator; Predator","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04068020629321403,"gpt":0.1839663100938908,"spread":0.1432861038006767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003266109,0.00004716797,0.00008987803,0.000007616661,0.0002571777,0.000005471976,0.00009366973,0.00003168811,0.00003056938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001975947,0.00001639329,0.00003279341,0.000105873,0.0001341099,0.00002494064,0.00004978084,0.00006921389,0.00001791175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002401478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001720212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003815702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08586228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995345,0.00003971802,0.0001268464,0.00008888255,0.00005931061,0.0001507526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999568,0.0003166055,0.00007632738,0.000009066979,0.00001397608,0.00001595504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003383925,0.00001588683,0.8534458,7.815214e-7,0.000007666798,0.000004197197,0.00001580834,0.000001440751,0.1451003,0.0002368623,0.0006307738,0.0005066614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006369126,0.00004892687,0.9973736,0.00000178527,0.000002097567,0.000002402068,0.0003562905,0.00001375855,0.0003672625,0.0002118021,0.001520454,0.00003793592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954743,0.00003910519,4.145593e-7,0.004102641,0.00006691036,0.0000562262,0.00001557015,0.000009827327,0.0002350069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995706,0.000004177222,0.00001030289,0.000330828,0.00006948976,0.000001019643,0.000008495958,9.378252e-8,0.000004978559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.144733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9308184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169378631","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01174.x","title":"Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1003,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Food web; Ecology; Biology; Ecological network; Niche; Food chain; Robustness (evolution); Infectious disease (medical specialty); Emerging infectious disease; Computer science; Disease; Trophic level; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04678014598928201,"gpt":0.3482895871965904,"spread":0.3015094412073084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006093288,0.0001730833,0.0004748224,0.0001068987,0.0007578146,0.00003465305,0.0003747291,0.0004650497,0.0001807362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002041295,0.0001280835,0.000168789,0.0003016078,0.0005337432,0.0001121187,0.00003135145,0.0006921412,0.0002731829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000249902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003230328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003661376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00183955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973708,0.001606918,0.000318136,0.000243432,0.0001178579,0.0003428642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987434,0.0008724085,0.0001624439,0.0001667879,0.00001729623,0.00003773094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001621235,0.0002186478,0.001917134,0.0009500467,0.0003600108,0.0001877329,0.01349531,0.0001570256,0.000002740984,0.02746492,0.02968428,0.9255459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006070373,0.00002203886,0.0002593126,0.0003751185,0.00004354812,0.0000183762,0.00008101308,0.000004531967,8.409465e-8,0.0002806183,0.9986967,0.0001578902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001351195,0.9853176,0.00001552893,0.009065567,0.0005515189,0.0005567006,0.000005583962,0.00005293921,0.003083357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004534061,0.996554,0.00006607148,0.002137807,0.0004086329,0.00007917561,0.00002670542,0.00001399047,0.0002601959],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5828574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128149255","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01716.x","title":"Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: heterogeneity over space and time","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Climate change and permafrost","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":977,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; U.S. Forest Service; National Geographic Society; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tundra; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Global warming; Environmental science; Climate change; Climatology; Geography; Physical geography; Ecosystem; Biology; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03186973285559758,"gpt":0.2737228030058333,"spread":0.2418530701502357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001009447,0.00009279197,0.000132874,0.00003011766,0.0000791604,0.00001011661,0.00006720389,0.00004477374,0.003069245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002362345,0.00008422295,0.00003211398,0.00004585332,0.0001057659,0.00009248599,0.0000173041,0.0000440978,0.00008031519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001161513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007688331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004878066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002227953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993671,0.00005262706,0.0001177703,0.0001738274,0.00008152895,0.0002072018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997351,0.00005098694,0.00006405602,0.00008912828,0.000005953049,0.00005480862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002826583,0.00002601986,0.9961377,0.000009227072,0.00001732076,0.00002347161,0.0002814432,0.0000291412,0.003023207,0.00004697507,0.0002765273,0.0001006407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002624342,0.0002361329,0.9971422,0.00000703144,0.00001093701,0.00001491906,0.0000555082,0.001041733,0.001053045,0.00001348806,0.00007542704,0.00008714026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922256,0.00007569479,0.000002578985,0.0002607479,0.0002587036,0.00008821227,0.0001800705,0.00001244302,0.006895882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978637,0.0000187296,0.0002486513,0.001702638,0.00004193369,0.000001106194,0.0001167736,0.000001975143,0.000004481763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978421,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168963665","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01489.x","title":"Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":967,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mesopredator release hypothesis; Apex predator; Pelagic zone; Trophic cascade; Predation; Ecology; Fishing; Demersal zone; Fishery; Marine ecosystem; Overfishing; Ecosystem; Habitat; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Food web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01823368832669168,"gpt":0.2671540681727395,"spread":0.2489203798460478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005605173,0.0001954139,0.0006937017,0.0000608976,0.00005017402,0.000004704934,0.0004743484,0.0003912014,0.0004954251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006787528,0.000118063,0.0000925135,0.00007977372,0.0005786758,0.00003020707,0.0001991302,0.0004500966,0.0001088214],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003458032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001911824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002108788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01003198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985211,0.0004982819,0.0003866814,0.0003030775,0.00005095334,0.0002398371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988863,0.0006397057,0.0002199089,0.0002290111,0.000001930555,0.00002311843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001126924,0.0001081138,0.7848945,0.002234179,0.0001227184,0.0003930513,0.0002897425,0.000002724668,0.00006107266,0.0002309519,0.005632865,0.2060189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001205537,0.00007127018,0.05888313,0.0001841811,0.0001405614,0.0004143919,0.00001938213,9.042551e-7,0.000002168801,0.00003602885,0.9399431,0.000184383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6329708,0.3602847,0.000002962055,0.002925952,0.001275891,0.001521256,0.00007778752,0.0000214272,0.0009192402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03410668,0.9630584,0.00005185579,0.002525285,0.00008665336,0.00008188033,0.00003869316,0.00001335447,0.00003725861],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9343102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5598082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123105630","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00773.x","title":"Models of cooperation based on the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Snowdrift game","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":889,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Social dilemma; Game theory; Salient; Superrationality; Evolutionary game theory; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Repeated game; Computer science; Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Economics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01233108457055908,"gpt":0.2346627946353771,"spread":0.222331710064818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075951,0.00005350721,0.00007985007,0.0000237107,0.0004269699,0.00002028057,0.0001266411,0.000050696,0.0002028808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001390066,0.00003146187,0.00002742166,0.00008548122,0.0007837061,0.0001428601,0.00001205006,0.000100549,0.00001772738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003498644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005014752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007627486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001108334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987792,0.0007720501,0.0001186144,0.0001007217,0.0001082543,0.0001211588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991084,0.0006656572,0.00005448033,0.0001134961,0.00003977109,0.00001824056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000126519,0.00004192349,0.00053981,0.000001138375,0.00001320454,3.882872e-7,0.004536462,0.07220334,0.0004279218,0.9179997,0.003549666,0.0005599506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005422562,0.0004058831,0.02677296,0.00003882265,0.0001474217,0.000004195309,0.002536846,0.8728212,0.001070561,0.02252348,0.06769678,0.000559276],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7709539,0.00001750725,0.002044092,0.2218513,0.00008589744,0.0002793615,0.000001646065,0.00001675094,0.004749539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831366,0.00001575732,0.00007147837,0.01639108,0.0001512849,0.00003244268,0.000002655896,0.000003286046,0.0001953963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.328395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525809904","doi":"10.1111/ele.12686","title":"Can we predict ectotherm responses to climate change using thermal performance curves and body temperatures?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":866,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universiti Malaysia Sarawak; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ectotherm; Climate change; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Thermoregulation; Atmospheric sciences; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04049640019259677,"gpt":0.2793209967551727,"spread":0.2388245965625759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001261699,0.0002718961,0.0005214842,0.00004149146,0.0001649104,0.00001295741,0.0002533632,0.0001519245,0.0005270395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003462183,0.0001575154,0.00009869497,0.000133488,0.0002898263,0.000074966,0.0003119488,0.0002052977,0.00018292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001144794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001566608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001363386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99863,0.0001784149,0.0002264596,0.0004413568,0.0001022307,0.0004215782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993997,0.0001811987,0.0001140868,0.0001793445,0.000002876851,0.0001227472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001917678,0.0003193432,0.01623061,0.009386863,0.0003232754,0.0001541617,0.000315217,0.000007502731,0.2221378,0.00002350995,0.01027572,0.7406342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004738485,0.0007158004,0.1568648,0.01941939,0.0005730175,0.0001671944,0.000007774018,0.00004625402,0.000271809,0.00003680141,0.8194935,0.001929827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.5180009,0.4746114,5.983005e-7,0.005798795,0.0001911167,0.0009796612,0.0002389889,0.00005698344,0.000121504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01193977,0.9817446,0.00008462908,0.005794778,0.0001765246,0.0001535456,0.00001806335,0.00002011674,0.00006795567],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8092178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6423292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106890697","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00884.x","title":"Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":833,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Niche; Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Neutrality; Biological dispersal; Ecological niche; Ecology; Coexistence theory; Competitive exclusion; Relative abundance distribution; Relative species abundance; Biology; Statistical physics; Abundance (ecology); Physics; Competition (biology); Population; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04698286439631342,"gpt":0.1807492333325005,"spread":0.133766368936187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001978895,0.0002416253,0.0003424225,0.00000932358,0.0003914983,0.00007037254,0.0002862347,0.0003783737,0.0001218482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003345822,0.00007524721,0.0001256532,0.00007411562,0.0002614198,0.00003258842,0.00009813081,0.0007532986,0.00005998438],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002422581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003045638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002547229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01081793,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986985,0.0001633117,0.0002082604,0.0003784401,0.0001030343,0.0004485095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982708,0.001524719,0.0001340699,0.00003292438,0.00001686953,0.00002066875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003033181,0.000003549523,0.02441241,0.000005491035,0.00004870175,0.00008752,0.00001259568,5.352768e-8,0.00755617,0.000001227949,0.9665802,0.001289104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038184,0.00003327668,0.4034933,0.000006424638,0.00004364359,0.00001623548,0.00001350566,5.055585e-7,0.00004643709,0.00008365374,0.5960707,0.0001540887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4920176,0.0001306174,2.504679e-8,0.5071747,0.0001189136,0.00009888057,0.00004612357,0.00003049585,0.0003826676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05073029,0.0000887952,0.00001197604,0.9432344,0.003690798,0.00003030712,0.00006911228,0.000002148441,0.002142105],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4412873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.603666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121119057","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01476.x","title":"How do traits vary across ecological scales? A case for trait‐based ecology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":830,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Trait; Community; Interspecific competition; Biology; Variation (astronomy); Functional ecology; Explained variation; Rainforest; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01029145214553507,"gpt":0.249455142613808,"spread":0.2391636904682729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000542295,0.0002658594,0.0003650977,0.00005193555,0.0008278128,0.0000441599,0.00032646,0.00047498,0.0009821523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003303531,0.0002454555,0.0001756491,0.0001403254,0.00144679,0.0001744757,0.0001612781,0.0005201057,0.000148091],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001419639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000184477,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001112938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03213602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979852,0.0001389601,0.0002772789,0.000649419,0.00009116317,0.0008579698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.001125632,0.000159253,0.0002087475,0.00001838523,0.0001438196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002247189,0.001306164,0.8969634,0.00004493226,0.000252925,0.00327386,0.00119982,0.002947333,0.04889543,0.001817875,0.03901275,0.004060775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001747936,0.00038242,0.9883772,7.479318e-7,0.00004693347,0.0007090869,0.0001371821,0.002498881,0.0001162797,0.0007559987,0.00488473,0.0003426666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550434,0.000002948401,0.001218601,0.0414691,0.001032466,0.0006550059,0.00007525616,0.00009002287,0.0004131565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753725,0.000001027169,0.006760042,0.0169852,0.0001172566,0.0004413918,0.00002116772,0.00002201003,0.0002794084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09141372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026847252","doi":"10.1111/ele.13525","title":"Co‐occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":820,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Proxy (statistics); Null model; Community; Co-occurrence; Ecological systems theory; Spatial analysis; Geography; Biology; Computer science; Habitat; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Remote sensing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1348709647601323,"gpt":0.2770431480248636,"spread":0.1421721832647312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005838336,0.00007908739,0.0001642157,0.000004481599,0.0001124028,0.000008800942,0.0001917454,0.00003824295,0.001206657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001324546,0.0000310375,0.00007212587,0.0001169692,0.0001215638,0.00007565636,0.00005257059,0.0001204814,0.0002007178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001063737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002778686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001446187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002970453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993664,0.00004550032,0.0001498135,0.0001965748,0.00007216372,0.0001695718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992656,0.000572758,0.00007527658,0.00001161253,0.00002023468,0.00005449135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005686601,0.00003952842,0.1759014,0.000005308216,0.00001958996,0.00001229812,0.000122474,0.000001076174,0.766409,0.00001909211,0.05634455,0.001068858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000513569,0.0003856171,0.9753962,0.00001032276,0.00001199083,0.000004383809,0.00008029019,0.000025074,0.008627895,0.000007210915,0.01530469,0.00009498732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.90825,0.00002495511,0.000001134706,0.09131221,0.00006440257,0.00006570081,0.00008583931,0.00002931638,0.0001664709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788161,0.0000518966,0.00002461702,0.02096117,0.0001166322,0.000006578547,0.000007979718,1.808258e-7,0.00001486103],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7994947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164571272","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00908.x","title":"Biotic interactions and plant invasions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":800,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ecology; Biology; Abiotic component; Mutualism (biology); Competitor analysis; Biotic component; Biodiversity; Population; Introduced species; Range (aeronautics); Invasive species; Resistance (ecology)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03492088967237813,"gpt":0.1809117604002779,"spread":0.1459908707278997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002491427,0.00004911687,0.00006479427,0.000006357522,0.000192535,0.0000130962,0.00004045318,0.00002031725,0.0001336563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006985079,0.0000178083,0.00001958614,0.00004611269,0.00005284325,0.00003150409,0.00003333557,0.00005107404,0.0000524098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007470284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.182686e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002569719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02584524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996771,0.00001523174,0.00006070434,0.0001002382,0.00002338203,0.0001234069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997928,0.000160141,0.00001938115,0.000005732493,0.000003756923,0.00001822132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006396072,0.00003554285,0.412191,9.427239e-7,0.00001151152,0.00002248819,0.00001104625,8.22321e-7,0.5395697,0.0003362525,0.0469428,0.0008714279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003517359,0.00003289266,0.9748732,0.00000234599,0.000006101892,0.00002497778,0.00003151049,0.000009168873,0.0002509245,0.00007862298,0.02460223,0.00005289838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981387,0.00002841405,3.848417e-7,0.01753152,0.00006916938,0.00003736528,0.00002654459,0.00002568704,0.0008939114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981014,0.00001568941,0.00002077224,0.001517563,0.0001496108,0.000003131251,0.0000221201,1.76871e-7,0.0001695925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091692960","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01861.x","title":"Evaluating life‐history strategies of reef corals from species traits","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":784,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Biology; Generalist and specialist species; Threatened species; Life history theory; Coral reef; Reef; Community; Scleractinia; Trait; Taxon; Life history; Coral; Habitat; Cnidaria","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06362441266866994,"gpt":0.2627831596682992,"spread":0.1991587469996292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468585,0.0001096381,0.0002205155,0.00002193745,0.00006339157,0.000004065843,0.0001403076,0.00004280183,0.005868298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007646812,0.0000976934,0.00005389721,0.00004648282,0.000241724,0.0002337767,0.0001923695,0.00008348802,0.0003198473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002034937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001247292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006073143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007897072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990923,0.0000915995,0.0002253007,0.0001645502,0.0001424962,0.0002837847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999538,0.0001414649,0.0001386049,0.0001135231,0.000005131264,0.00006325715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001526315,0.00006532135,0.8014209,0.000009664718,0.00005459118,0.000002438687,0.001244745,0.00005635391,0.1012486,0.0002172957,0.09482008,0.0008447455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001903453,0.0000604713,0.9880544,0.000003540846,0.00002870061,0.000001211664,0.0003801287,0.00003039432,0.0001696587,0.00008879609,0.01089271,0.0000996576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981431,0.0001736682,0.00002374016,0.001141265,0.0006712766,0.0001198346,0.000006035711,0.0000266899,0.01640646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975712,0.000006891261,0.0005528034,0.0009302864,0.0001837249,0.00001587391,0.000004768759,0.000007301582,0.0007271083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1866335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159593578","doi":"10.1111/ele.12381","title":"Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":781,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Alpha diversity; Beta diversity; Ecology; Gamma diversity; Grassland; Biology; Diversity (politics); Temperate climate; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Plant diversity; Ecosystem diversity; Plant community; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0118003021807186,"gpt":0.1898067334970961,"spread":0.1780064313163775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002967698,0.0001475427,0.0002666792,0.00001565082,0.0006032818,0.00001426899,0.000449998,0.0001352839,0.0000796455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002918656,0.00007174767,0.000146384,0.0001266114,0.0002415835,0.00006771636,0.001130068,0.0001529008,0.00002442701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004045661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000342506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001731402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01538274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988676,0.0001126949,0.0001638508,0.0002890496,0.0001705816,0.0003961996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993659,0.0002987149,0.0001247795,0.00007692919,0.00003470436,0.00009892698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007333032,0.00006103719,0.9266551,0.000005537368,0.00005170187,0.00001359729,0.0001874943,0.00001558014,0.06991709,0.00003233927,0.002354806,0.0006324587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003614049,0.0001621868,0.9898003,0.000004880708,0.00003784159,0.000007777154,0.00009400475,0.0003819839,0.008706879,0.00004007346,0.0002484125,0.0001542849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956623,0.000009923422,0.000003080731,0.003440253,0.0003675786,0.00009010998,0.0002506374,0.00005817702,0.0001179291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961361,0.0000142973,0.00002303858,0.00352345,0.0001288697,0.000001700287,0.0000998328,9.165083e-7,0.00007178654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06314524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8583929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107190886","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00787.x","title":"Allee effects in biological invasions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":763,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Allee effect; Ecology; Biology; Invasive species; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01102540151693364,"gpt":0.2263616928260384,"spread":0.2153362913091048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001000617,0.0000909739,0.00009617737,0.00004596161,0.00003625497,0.00000389011,0.0001288085,0.0001637559,0.00004895987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008433456,0.00008498105,0.00004889776,0.00005175991,0.00009528582,0.00000127809,0.00007984625,0.00009581056,0.000104981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002482918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000194949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003996749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007679198,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992846,0.00008602088,0.0001252933,0.0002344772,0.00003351332,0.0002361128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997283,0.00002684849,0.00002619343,0.0001608509,0.000008725571,0.0000490504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004177215,0.0001861835,0.2808822,0.000005475496,0.00004128007,0.00002288302,0.00004160908,0.004110737,0.6855363,0.0003910477,0.02712125,0.001619254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001352429,0.0003075449,0.9384047,0.000004445697,0.00000794256,0.00003343159,0.0000162761,0.001199342,0.005180558,0.00008475043,0.0531381,0.0002704729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913779,0.0001002886,0.001295416,0.006310453,0.0001460097,0.0001280776,0.00000177089,0.00001234943,0.000627681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837537,0.00006720995,0.002300288,0.01344682,0.0001531856,0.00002228586,0.00005187908,0.000007638959,0.0001970139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6803558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3465427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126692270","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x","title":"A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":737,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Adaptive management; Ecology; Landscape ecology; Context (archaeology); Landscape assessment; Natural resource management; Geography; Ecosystem management; Resource (disambiguation); Conservation biology; Vegetation (pathology); Landscape epidemiology; Resource management (computing); Natural resource; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Habitat; Landscape design; Computer science; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03614633902272998,"gpt":0.3184331900094575,"spread":0.2822868509867276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004950209,0.0001986856,0.0007264194,0.00006277702,0.0001459578,0.000003929527,0.0002099266,0.0002720376,0.0001781563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004360821,0.0001681421,0.0002875872,0.0001060401,0.0002257741,0.00003148286,0.0001112274,0.00009970682,0.000048846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001761764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008929561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002454362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000402654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988006,0.00004941085,0.0004642743,0.0003339664,0.00005841927,0.0002933434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856,0.0009126961,0.0003634641,0.0001270418,0.00001052763,0.00002627008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002081643,0.001238203,0.02825544,0.04402306,0.004559903,0.00006564561,0.0002590971,0.0004324925,0.00001400542,0.01645595,0.1977006,0.7067875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004645298,0.0001468732,0.01246255,0.0001594904,0.0006861939,0.000004487481,0.0000140963,0.000125058,3.577977e-7,0.0002688229,0.9854688,0.0001987099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007915402,0.9354591,0.02072847,0.006594588,0.003126217,0.01698025,0.0003995883,0.0001772622,0.008619085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001715805,0.9800377,0.01444309,0.002162917,0.00006585367,0.00185419,0.0003075661,0.00002951996,0.0009275436],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7877682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6856638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126188438","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01243.x","title":"Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":731,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Stressor; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2277308113657209,"gpt":0.3911335553270759,"spread":0.163402743961355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003387035,0.0003882167,0.001048267,0.00003860657,0.0009757408,0.00001569435,0.000775662,0.0004113093,0.0009814053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004216484,0.0002247924,0.0005702189,0.0001653876,0.001484216,0.00009893715,0.0005449633,0.0004979125,0.001337382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003433474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003431246,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001688836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005846914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979239,0.0002997948,0.0004450515,0.0006232841,0.000119678,0.000588259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958667,0.003476047,0.0002986275,0.0003081869,0.000005703974,0.00004478067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004940282,0.0003531576,0.05342891,0.001536163,0.0006424437,0.0004379155,0.0003169631,0.0000603098,0.00001814889,0.0002608714,0.4960687,0.4468269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007526389,0.0001582063,0.03915791,0.0002314382,0.0005204365,0.0001444623,0.00001708837,0.000002567451,2.353201e-7,0.000007130072,0.9593843,0.0003009484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003915932,0.9908567,0.00002353544,0.002587349,0.0008857942,0.001445151,0.000009793204,0.00007496736,0.0002007891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004944316,0.9956661,0.000327623,0.002078191,0.0001264671,0.001002596,0.000007948928,0.00002586028,0.0002708247],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4633155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071908967","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01173.x","title":"Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":723,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Chronosequence; Ecological succession; Ecology; Primary succession; Geology; Paleontology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04438888329249509,"gpt":0.2920638954182207,"spread":0.2476750121257256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002079634,0.0001829406,0.0006492557,0.00008115155,0.0001266077,0.00000479863,0.0004662942,0.0001931028,0.000623688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009262453,0.0001102102,0.0001266795,0.0003354488,0.0005089617,0.00005353895,0.000191307,0.0003339848,0.0001879998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002973276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004222613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003446419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001268207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986344,0.0002624498,0.000427137,0.0002886288,0.00009186989,0.0002955246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987065,0.0007288678,0.0003117669,0.0002212667,0.000002294439,0.00002935892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002513326,0.0001258677,0.4830642,0.0005046463,0.00006282184,0.0002025483,0.0002050558,0.0002542465,0.00008088595,0.000009805035,0.01861732,0.4968701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000148444,0.0000674635,0.2974152,0.0004970901,0.00007592383,0.0001866452,0.000006508757,0.00002396365,5.817005e-7,0.00002053543,0.7013425,0.0002151475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06007886,0.9326505,0.00000842242,0.001339647,0.0005900343,0.0008786238,0.00001627353,0.00003372674,0.00440392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002552516,0.9967003,0.0001725865,0.0003506652,0.00006072348,0.00008465318,0.00002302584,0.00001239881,0.00004313048],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6827252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6828946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171420116","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01182.x","title":"Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":716,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Home range; Ecology; Foraging; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Data science; Geography; Biology; Engineering; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05107268232173006,"gpt":0.3198694042880913,"spread":0.2687967219663612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005949909,0.0002693223,0.001156574,0.0000850788,0.0002383028,0.000006514548,0.0003401624,0.0004469165,0.0004588696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006114178,0.0002243323,0.0002148613,0.0002615617,0.0004342787,0.00008067367,0.0001948993,0.0004906991,0.00008281071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000209946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004119967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001447154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001686887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980031,0.0004432054,0.0004110299,0.0005376643,0.0001731527,0.0004318208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989478,0.0002120592,0.0004605353,0.0002894491,0.00002155211,0.00006861613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239771,0.0005698866,0.2889907,0.04612679,0.0006545456,0.0006321978,0.000221125,7.782323e-7,0.00004835626,0.001344223,0.5832222,0.07806522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005706392,0.0006184051,0.4224261,0.002527889,0.0009600226,0.0003186742,0.00002129375,0.0000019054,0.00000146452,0.0002728472,0.5717088,0.0005719393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02044295,0.9710922,0.000007797339,0.00531206,0.0002451924,0.00278425,0.00005627365,0.00002049876,0.00003872198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001085698,0.9943606,0.0005855114,0.003625747,0.0001589016,0.0008877984,0.00004086691,0.00003466328,0.0001972978],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1334354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9148004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082684110","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00928.x","title":"Ecotypic variation in the context of global climate change: revisiting the rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":674,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Bergmann's rule; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Taxon; Global change; Environmental change; Diversity (politics); Geography; Biology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04039890713104263,"gpt":0.2941023305082515,"spread":0.2537034233772089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006483028,0.0001895921,0.0004691682,0.00001747824,0.0001209746,0.00002339153,0.0004921137,0.0001490503,0.003020768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003809417,0.0001107251,0.0001810319,0.000282129,0.0002763917,0.00005896976,0.0001514319,0.000206361,0.000819347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008224167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007085034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003067532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001654824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984377,0.0004342781,0.0004110375,0.0002415199,0.0001539777,0.000321507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991061,0.0002064751,0.0003973767,0.0002710295,0.000003839337,0.00001519166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122036,0.000154407,0.03235888,0.002526176,0.00009517284,0.00006121947,0.0009582513,0.000003802129,0.000005862863,0.02109692,0.03246503,0.910262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001238747,0.00001420011,0.2961245,0.0002575736,0.0001615911,0.00002436753,0.000261468,0.000003371356,6.051616e-8,0.00002853219,0.7028515,0.0001489727],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01598805,0.9428628,0.000006840193,0.02105044,0.0008221505,0.002389481,0.0008964839,0.00004358594,0.01594014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006479908,0.9880282,0.000009704379,0.004733557,0.0002615127,0.0002383973,0.0002296015,0.00001315748,0.000005955316],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9101131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142465460","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746.x","title":"Long‐distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":672,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Climate change; Biological dispersal; Gene flow; Ecology; Adaptation (eye); Biology; Habitat; Local adaptation; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04130951184359538,"gpt":0.2636496759989517,"spread":0.2223401641553563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001022123,0.0001978052,0.0004392357,0.00007998659,0.00005507823,0.000006932776,0.0001368437,0.0002873842,0.00003303256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001315726,0.0001897836,0.0001214254,0.0000669473,0.00006587519,0.000003401802,0.0001170232,0.00007534629,0.00001407001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001360039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000159951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007172108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006454161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991038,0.00008808234,0.0002410026,0.0002754013,0.00006150424,0.0002301991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994652,0.00001480017,0.000205228,0.0002141899,0.00002580478,0.00007472332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003640273,0.00002520126,0.01552877,0.001867532,0.0002075425,0.000006443071,0.0001955287,0.00009091747,0.0001547145,0.0000315379,0.0007843322,0.9810711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002189663,0.0001255014,0.04282804,0.0001597246,0.0004309212,0.00002795455,0.00001198737,0.000008227803,0.00002398405,0.000001618444,0.9558967,0.0002664056],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0234408,0.9744509,0.0006407154,0.0001633606,0.0004780013,0.0005716348,0.0002268791,0.000006082583,0.00002156902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006513896,0.98897,0.002483961,0.0006734856,0.000372391,0.00004198315,0.0008900746,0.00002138712,0.00003282339],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7739151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165104590","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01844.x","title":"Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape‐scale patterns in soil microbial communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":668,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government; Natural England","keywords":"Abiotic component; Ecology; Plant community; Ecosystem; Microbial population biology; Biology; Grassland; Biotic component; Community; Range (aeronautics); Biodiversity; Environmental science; Species richness","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009813748358014953,"gpt":0.1776276801640155,"spread":0.1678139318060005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001468976,0.0001108927,0.000150775,0.00002336645,0.00009786651,0.00001800355,0.000124964,0.00009968955,0.0001417036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004379004,0.00005369855,0.00003960187,0.00006760887,0.00009120064,0.00008064657,0.00005927179,0.000160589,0.00001374858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002693666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000220708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005360267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05129789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992342,0.0001275567,0.0001216926,0.0001029024,0.00005145304,0.0003622042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996623,0.0001924923,0.00003601769,0.00002928277,0.000005059413,0.00007481562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013884,0.00005314371,0.967231,0.00000358696,0.000009238614,0.000006957841,0.001345694,0.000002908873,0.03011855,0.000011735,0.0004358703,0.000767379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002608484,0.00005343601,0.9967554,0.000006889364,0.000008932468,0.0000389676,0.001987279,0.0001981239,0.0003416007,0.000005986682,0.0002082143,0.0001343776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967624,0.00002906138,2.591534e-7,0.00276966,0.0001906836,0.00008494644,0.00005683658,0.00002860613,0.00007753674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962796,0.00002993435,0.00001532261,0.003446008,0.0001189657,0.000006599587,0.00009041053,0.000001106773,0.00001202675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05076187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9660134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116044661","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00742.x","title":"The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":660,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Food web; Ecology; Trophic level; Expansive; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Order (exchange); Ecosystem; Space (punctuation); Spatial ecology; Biology; Economics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01756100530743326,"gpt":0.1776173265556868,"spread":0.1600563212482535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001315398,0.0002146851,0.0003362494,0.000009899387,0.0003289251,0.000027585,0.0005073191,0.0003693395,0.0001672305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003553756,0.0000666722,0.0001726623,0.00008939684,0.000266079,0.00002401829,0.0001170877,0.0006166348,0.00005449124],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005727999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007726514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000536638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04953653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987928,0.00008027695,0.0002712686,0.0002537647,0.0001725643,0.000429302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987792,0.0008859672,0.0002411207,0.00003706239,0.00003632047,0.00002031318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001742695,0.00001586618,0.008828297,0.000007804932,0.0001711,0.00004144026,0.00001028585,0.000002148221,0.003386829,0.00004951322,0.9857035,0.001765738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001050272,0.0003982974,0.1342853,0.00001243511,0.00005936318,0.0000125588,0.00001577904,0.0001392314,0.0000293774,0.00005842042,0.8646209,0.000263385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.3644188,0.00009244309,4.167537e-7,0.6346927,0.0002178249,0.0001234465,0.0001272257,0.0000240312,0.0003030465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1729008,0.0003678544,0.00002796249,0.8186665,0.005914172,0.00003555163,0.0004919105,0.000003363364,0.001591862],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.191518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9678069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168592101","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01381.x","title":"It’s about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":650,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Evolutionary biology; Stabilizing selection; Ecology; Natural selection; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02318899877675112,"gpt":0.2615156578606144,"spread":0.2383266590838632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004665027,0.0001718704,0.0004414647,0.00001940278,0.0001469799,0.00001661827,0.0003862704,0.0002242958,0.0001492991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002059953,0.00004324448,0.0002165781,0.0004131085,0.0001324228,0.00003579596,0.00002520535,0.0004194397,0.00004491094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001333617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001102062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001917426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987007,0.0003895621,0.0003255586,0.0002756219,0.000107556,0.0002010404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994938,0.0001728112,0.0002419461,0.00006252807,0.00001604324,0.00001283506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007445291,0.0001060242,0.001881736,0.00009178048,0.00002370331,0.000004379337,0.00005826525,0.000002174532,0.000147322,0.00004581134,0.0122012,0.9854302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004228723,0.0002563203,0.09877859,0.0002090717,0.0002447743,0.00007254186,0.00005588468,0.00001002266,6.398002e-7,0.00002812977,0.9001119,0.0001898263],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.09627432,0.8108628,0.000002653894,0.08786378,0.0008963636,0.003034349,0.00005656456,0.00009416966,0.0009149531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01744717,0.9765624,0.00002062866,0.003852937,0.001009237,0.00009116146,0.0004174652,0.000003580989,0.0005954631],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.182228,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165316090","doi":"10.1111/ele.12424","title":"Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real‐world ecosystem service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":645,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Ecosystem services; Ecology; Relative abundance distribution; Biodiversity; Body size and species richness; Ecosystem engineer; Context (archaeology); Rank abundance curve; Macroecology; Generality; Biology; Geography; Relative species abundance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05352245770024166,"gpt":0.2066351717790977,"spread":0.1531127140788561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001664079,0.0001291022,0.0003875948,0.00002160838,0.00008979883,0.000009508937,0.0002956813,0.00005385944,0.00009159272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000155956,0.00005670462,0.00007017122,0.0002971876,0.000110713,0.00007545677,0.0001311175,0.00008083697,0.00002904581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004115816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008317035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000606594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1419529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990617,0.00008054369,0.0002864544,0.0001890238,0.0001492442,0.0002330137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993112,0.0002877036,0.0002228478,0.0000362726,0.00008959819,0.00005234176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008330293,0.00008468165,0.6076645,0.00002955693,0.00005219757,0.00001466459,0.0002026672,0.00001244564,0.3803666,0.0003840718,0.01098654,0.0001188028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001499704,0.0001475949,0.9713265,0.00002683128,0.00001868099,0.000003356882,0.0004504226,0.00001640262,0.006883862,0.00002589093,0.02082958,0.0001208651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98913,0.00007000937,1.724043e-7,0.007204738,0.0001526126,0.0001092624,0.0001415664,0.00003037972,0.003161279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983472,0.00009357111,0.00003790125,0.000980747,0.0001796342,0.000005149153,0.00002131121,8.624681e-7,0.0003336617],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3734827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8737042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485490013","doi":"10.1111/ele.12648","title":"Navigating the complexity of ecological stability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":644,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Natural Environment Research Council; Universität Zürich; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Sight Research UK; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Trinity College Dublin; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Higher Education Authority; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Ecology; Ecological stability; Ecological systems theory; Biodiversity; Empiricism; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Epistemology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04643097038794173,"gpt":0.3023668216090324,"spread":0.2559358512210907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007659979,0.0002239591,0.0008347665,0.000007500053,0.0001722331,0.00000820665,0.0008008545,0.0002105138,0.00266001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009818247,0.0001057542,0.0003063137,0.0001339549,0.002418648,0.00003617524,0.0005203635,0.000514856,0.000527641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003521263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002282259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005959507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005435376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979549,0.0005586928,0.0005626446,0.0004195927,0.0001595226,0.000344654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982403,0.0007285771,0.0005006142,0.0004742672,0.000004490068,0.00005176273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007827708,0.000458894,0.03635859,0.005395272,0.0002975598,0.00007799444,0.0003014836,0.00003015671,0.0001468599,0.001906267,0.002461663,0.9525574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004017745,0.0002791177,0.05261999,0.005009571,0.0004583292,0.0001753263,0.00006210792,0.0002056716,0.000006200287,0.001851521,0.9377165,0.00121385],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.104606,0.8750868,0.0001598615,0.008682105,0.001922619,0.003580336,0.0002307909,0.00009653119,0.005634928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01726008,0.9815672,0.0003894002,0.0005562661,0.00007246817,0.00009845241,0.00001232795,0.00002276159,0.00002103976],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9513436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095601894","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01795.x","title":"Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":639,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Banff Centre; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Phylogenetic diversity; Biology; Functional ecology; Trait; Trophic level; Range (aeronautics); Phylogenetics; Evolutionary ecology; Biodiversity; Evolutionary biology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007253058441685345,"gpt":0.180747893272189,"spread":0.1734948348305037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002819591,0.00003843816,0.00007816549,0.0000101301,0.0004849021,0.000001017556,0.00005563147,0.00002643242,0.00019902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002304253,0.00002736538,0.00001861237,0.00003484485,0.0004961802,0.00004392994,0.0003671882,0.00004674247,0.0000509467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002467246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.604143e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008651448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007459978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996303,0.00008163664,0.00006914441,0.00006384428,0.00003562605,0.0001193958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999699,0.0001749067,0.00005300573,0.00005471535,0.000001837893,0.00001653903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008492151,0.000009478459,0.9975476,0.000001913083,0.00002484054,1.964772e-7,0.001141807,0.000221064,0.000269263,0.0003058182,0.0004318252,0.00003776104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003285509,0.00001088536,0.9989356,4.781409e-7,0.00002410608,0.000004026449,0.00007415399,0.0003706587,0.00001349293,0.00008029915,0.0001285085,0.00002919228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965034,0.00005105775,0.0001543267,0.001654933,0.0002798869,0.00007902885,4.32312e-7,0.000005224213,0.001271748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986494,0.0000102534,0.00006864488,0.001177086,0.0000190742,0.000005859491,3.729022e-7,0.000001519651,0.00006783646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00214599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3729524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126560241","doi":"10.1111/ele.12165","title":"Spatial memory and animal movement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":637,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Cognitive science; Cognition; Computer science; Data science; Ecology; Neuroscience; Psychology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00902412792349099,"gpt":0.1861515198620967,"spread":0.1771273919386057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004670841,0.00005552162,0.00006204216,0.00000446028,0.00009780435,0.00001601661,0.00004569321,0.00004148625,0.001407009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005269799,0.00002022586,0.00002130686,0.00003061508,0.00006640648,0.0000621768,0.00003448857,0.00005528424,0.0001249574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001147816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.184543e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008111359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003098582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995474,0.00002312251,0.00007009903,0.0001794047,0.0000431732,0.0001367614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998904,0.00001872485,0.0000231845,0.0000200961,0.00001094706,0.00003666405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004600548,0.00001897988,0.1131602,5.251304e-7,0.00000312915,0.000001901918,0.00001487701,1.610376e-7,0.8680642,0.00000862201,0.002713195,0.01600958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004922471,0.00018689,0.9957355,5.316122e-7,0.000005370691,0.000004570111,0.00006493388,0.000006926123,0.003320358,0.00002885782,0.0005369177,0.00005988617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773654,0.000009729858,7.965058e-7,0.02212518,0.0001508962,0.0001396369,0.000001114953,0.00002901288,0.0001782684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965557,0.000004214216,0.00002789547,0.002980515,0.0002580255,0.00001735697,0.000005551555,3.267513e-7,0.0001503823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8825753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974820063","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00935.x","title":"Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped‐back model of species richness in plant communities?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":633,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council","keywords":"Species richness; Niche; Ecology; Facilitation; Biomass (ecology); Competition (biology); Plant community; Structuring; Community structure; Productivity; Biology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01832948387116254,"gpt":0.2209235100891865,"spread":0.2025940262180239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001186722,0.0000763988,0.0001536353,0.00005263486,0.0001127148,0.000002904515,0.0002200057,0.00004408632,0.0006073003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001533852,0.00006071545,0.00004421093,0.0001185272,0.0007746931,0.00007158112,0.0001754447,0.0001497548,0.00002844495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008867609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006162796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002255826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02537578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993722,0.00009886579,0.0002354857,0.0000876124,0.00006084837,0.0001449914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.0002844587,0.0001424577,0.0001560461,0.000005102766,0.000007674565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000672394,0.00009525647,0.8712384,0.000007369943,0.00001367823,7.833727e-7,0.0007054622,0.120104,0.005617859,0.0006880049,0.00151725,0.00000529867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001872212,0.00001625025,0.9662566,0.000009448432,0.00001239147,0.000002724757,0.0004429324,0.03203354,0.000279449,0.0006564994,0.00004149432,0.00006147809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914659,0.000006910565,0.0000740664,0.002349716,0.0001513945,0.0001078708,0.00001829103,0.000004663047,0.005821145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985157,0.00001018292,0.0003261466,0.0007144272,0.000006667632,0.000007688371,0.000005245263,0.000004185509,0.0004097362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09501821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047183373","doi":"10.1111/ele.13576","title":"The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":623,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Office of Science; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; U.S. Department of Energy; European Commission; University of Worcester; Wellcome Trust; National Science Foundation; Tertiary Education Commission; Eesti Teadusagentuur; Scottish Government; Michigan State University; Biological and Environmental Research; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Bio-Protection Research Centre","keywords":"Pollination; Ecosystem services; Agriculture; Crop; Biology; PEST analysis; Agronomy; Pest control; Agroforestry; Perennial plant; Yield (engineering); Crop yield; Ecosystem; Ecology; Botany; Pollen","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02343720807454612,"gpt":0.2039793225238056,"spread":0.1805421144492595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002844507,0.0001965999,0.0003830672,0.00001412721,0.0003907808,0.00004561175,0.0001518964,0.0001952054,0.00001283354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000197994,0.00006862523,0.00006323901,0.00007555156,0.0002539735,0.00003982369,0.00005579565,0.0004023104,0.000006628898],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001501023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002969104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001026963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001641939,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987119,0.0004997936,0.0001585263,0.0003074132,0.0001098278,0.0002124897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884644,0.01130898,0.0001483565,0.00002017143,0.00003413705,0.00002395861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003481619,0.0001461246,0.1069088,0.001053697,0.002003559,0.0005953906,0.0005393291,0.000007444087,0.4915279,0.0005378127,0.3886856,0.00451274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002479724,0.0008022381,0.954089,0.0001920039,0.0001548985,0.00000822187,0.0001762046,0.00003093501,0.0007418626,0.0001216443,0.04313382,0.000301215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6302888,0.0002062577,4.220339e-7,0.3689877,0.0001036394,0.0002038646,0.0001372916,0.00001298772,0.00005897693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.860963,0.0002156099,0.000005005209,0.1383843,0.0003489265,0.00004179218,0.00002331082,0.000001636963,0.00001637535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8471801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.300561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158673360","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01350.x","title":"Evolutionary rescue can prevent extinction following environmental change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":616,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Environmental change; Maladaptation; Population; Population size; Biology; Experimental evolution; Ecology; Biodiversity; Effective population size; Small population size; Evolutionary biology; Evolutionary dynamics; Population growth; Climate change; Genetic variation; Demography; Genetics; Habitat","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005551323963901717,"gpt":0.2115414084523438,"spread":0.2059900844884421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000773904,0.0001118406,0.00008416409,0.00003788958,0.0001060214,0.000004813497,0.00009888669,0.0001233701,0.00004784805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001100885,0.0001245269,0.0001026972,0.00003133279,0.00004590391,0.000003261198,0.00004091456,0.0000766624,0.00002574463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008583786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001547949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006700367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009529692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992219,0.00006344978,0.0001289406,0.000270527,0.00007637727,0.0002388438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997082,0.000003647755,0.00003602904,0.0001900972,0.000003732688,0.00005828806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005716985,0.0002869199,0.06589527,0.000003555275,0.0001067927,0.00003040171,0.0001253943,0.0008822755,0.9155004,0.00003569534,0.01362851,0.003447636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006512739,0.0004658502,0.9782501,0.000003953165,0.0000375087,0.00004794908,0.00004894961,0.001094628,0.00237435,0.00006475708,0.0166881,0.000272525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922265,0.0002244955,0.0005399522,0.006201209,0.0004059781,0.0001923024,0.0000104317,0.00001719054,0.0001819008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891161,0.00006500566,0.0005100511,0.009244647,0.0003101849,0.00002298584,0.0002755561,0.000009898684,0.0004455255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9131261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5078059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}