{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":148,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":148,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"48461d95ffd3","filters":{"venue":"Economic Inquiry"}},"results":[{"id":"W2120416315","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00439.x","title":"GRAVITY REDUX: MEASURING INTERNATIONAL TRADE COSTS WITH PANEL DATA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":532,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Economics; Redux; Measure (data warehouse); Panel data; Gravity model of trade; Trade barrier; Bilateral trade; International economics; International trade; Gravity equation; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2665844723257269,"gpt":0.2701073832481529,"spread":0.003522910922426015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008740423,0.0002330705,0.0004081827,0.0001462021,0.0001095893,0.0001273689,0.000962285,0.0001241103,0.0005082525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000320643,0.0002749816,0.00007603136,0.00005248348,0.0001237699,0.001607611,0.0002506883,0.0002053717,0.002197802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005943179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003245742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002382413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005990152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981306,0.0000131356,0.0006400738,0.0006205237,0.00002859564,0.0005670437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998418,0.00003779304,0.0003539863,0.0009726114,0.000003728981,0.0002138513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001432147,0.0003505112,0.6390002,0.00003343904,0.000601972,0.000008467392,0.001699045,0.0005823694,0.00002395103,0.3062241,0.04644966,0.004883049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00169719,0.00006290096,0.2429465,0.00002910034,0.00002519744,0.0001109076,0.0006259869,0.003401087,0.0001608813,0.003675592,0.7462634,0.001001321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950118,0.00147225,0.0007627332,0.002671819,0.01223885,0.0003216018,0.001305014,0.0001329127,0.08608303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952527,0.000188107,0.001028982,0.000488786,0.002543356,0.00001453325,0.0002671315,0.00004299247,0.0001733802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6998137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116777827","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12061","title":"REFERENCE‐DEPENDENT PREFERENCES, LOSS AVERSION, AND LIVE GAME ATTENDANCE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Attendance; Outcome (game theory); Economics; League; Prospect theory; Microeconomics; Empirical evidence; Inequity aversion; Empirical research; Econometrics; Event (particle physics); Statistics; Inequality","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04582209432422649,"gpt":0.2319790903578786,"spread":0.1861569960336521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006014279,0.0002041288,0.0004271762,0.0001503827,0.00011727,0.0001107831,0.0002669709,0.0001332637,0.002413044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002377547,0.0002270031,0.00006178218,0.00004244344,0.0001768796,0.0003270981,0.0001196616,0.0001901418,0.003692299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001172582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002564772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004554717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001239076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984193,0.00001053885,0.0005887735,0.0006091985,0.00002901485,0.0003431256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989924,0.00004394119,0.0003706256,0.0004385396,0.00001959223,0.0001348761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006338667,0.00008978682,0.5083677,0.0001036764,0.0001456654,0.000007759114,0.003132855,0.001968214,0.00000813121,0.4642736,0.01494058,0.006898674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001623187,0.0002851415,0.2591765,0.00006701557,0.00002188192,0.00003558573,0.0004572468,0.04989915,0.00008903407,0.06428255,0.6228314,0.001231303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682584,0.0007950595,0.00109582,0.0003678995,0.001891375,0.0001328872,0.00009200609,0.00004136663,0.02732518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948208,0.001063213,0.0001327613,0.0004496603,0.0007256175,0.00001298069,0.00002905526,0.00002245519,0.002743412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6078908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129672361","doi":"10.1093/ei/40.1.102","title":"Are the Effects of Monetary Policy Asymmetric?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Economics; Monetary policy; Interest rate; Monetary economics; Keynesian economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07229070160981431,"gpt":0.2390264573626024,"spread":0.1667357557527881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004542534,0.0002625088,0.0006675115,0.0005562025,0.0001466424,0.00005271857,0.0005657946,0.0001533067,0.0009389237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003428379,0.000255763,0.0002916099,0.0002056337,0.0002483145,0.0003586839,0.000110051,0.0002181577,0.006032169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002421305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001045107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001305388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001896477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979941,0.00003463856,0.0009390769,0.0004805482,0.00002299888,0.00052859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976256,0.0003233287,0.001050634,0.0008641498,0.000005381916,0.0001309019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000754275,0.0005421785,0.3193009,0.0005621349,0.001312716,0.00003488626,0.00900115,0.01028402,0.00003371286,0.2131062,0.4297564,0.01599022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004783501,0.0005862605,0.5266469,0.0001169795,0.00007916112,0.0000932589,0.0008281456,0.08514587,0.001432537,0.07980032,0.2983086,0.002178484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9473956,0.008663259,0.0001426642,0.002945165,0.003852046,0.0004223749,0.000168633,0.00005714617,0.03635308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928725,0.0008508921,0.00007936785,0.001907547,0.002118112,0.00002755363,0.000006140501,0.0000408191,0.002097037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.207346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528418513","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12093","title":"NEW MEASURES OF THE COSTS OF UNEMPLOYMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE SUBJECTIVE WELL‐BEING OF 3.3 MILLION AMERICANS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Labour economics; Population; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Point (geometry); Social security; Rest (music); Macroeconomics; Demography; Mathematics; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06897608002079024,"gpt":0.3263980691933064,"spread":0.2574219891725162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005646071,0.0001222711,0.0002897458,0.00003853936,0.00005412232,0.000005618292,0.000394321,0.00009570024,0.0005322342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001430021,0.0000777347,0.0001403565,0.0001004837,0.0003689606,0.00005596547,0.00005261456,0.0001639911,0.00008575875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000708795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003548936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01035196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002139825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985277,0.0004909077,0.0004428165,0.000276224,0.0001028975,0.0001594355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976868,0.001115846,0.0005165488,0.0006131433,0.0000300958,0.00003753437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006485546,0.0001115272,0.823979,0.00001364427,0.0004441392,4.482723e-7,0.03485111,0.00108643,0.01087915,0.01406685,0.02791911,0.08600008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005881572,0.000258017,0.9743829,0.0002397832,0.0000674148,0.000002239565,0.001848207,0.00009043131,0.01295509,0.006748613,0.00267349,0.0001456323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814815,0.0002995938,0.002275757,0.0005543441,0.003019952,0.0001900373,0.000008464604,0.00001462775,0.01215573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989103,0.00006298806,0.00008840713,0.0002496272,0.0004734245,0.000007840483,0.000001603185,0.00001237607,0.0001934448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.150404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755282745","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12934","title":"HIGH SCHOOL CHOICES AND THE GENDER GAP IN <scp>STEM</scp>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Ministère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario; McMaster University","keywords":"Gender gap; Cohort; Mathematics education; Stem cell; Psychology; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08465876082657402,"gpt":0.270473697073116,"spread":0.185814936246542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004909,0.00006642717,0.0001324215,0.00003028466,0.0002216492,0.0001108328,0.0002095288,0.00005484564,0.000187186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001074568,0.00005727727,0.00003229763,0.0000597195,0.00032611,0.0002493173,0.0001250164,0.0000956979,0.0003967151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001407872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001284549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001060995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99935,0.00008727598,0.0001241263,0.0001872911,0.00007079417,0.0001805684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995367,0.0002239393,0.0000521281,0.00006753815,0.000008900182,0.0001108098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000391688,0.0000127395,0.423698,0.00002166146,0.00006345041,0.00001074113,0.2695539,0.00006429616,0.000007597288,0.1435261,0.1618517,0.001150601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004723594,0.00002023025,0.3193189,0.00001394078,0.00003504088,0.00000108509,0.2024383,0.0001924582,0.0000863666,0.01198345,0.4609471,0.0002395787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603671,0.0002524466,0.000007575776,0.003107919,0.00104757,0.0001665267,0.000003078236,0.00003194085,0.03501587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589,0.0001539784,0.0000368742,0.001869012,0.0009770602,0.000005388913,0.000001793195,0.000003889691,0.001061991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2990954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5099102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789363929","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12751","title":"EARLY EVIDENCE ON RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION AND TRAFFIC FATALITIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Recreation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cannabis; Environmental health; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Medicine; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07288600530475496,"gpt":0.3465147545874778,"spread":0.2736287492827228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002355406,0.00008375959,0.0001302078,0.000109569,0.00009698766,0.00005916833,0.00005087669,0.00005797412,0.0008655371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007388497,0.0000781655,0.000033768,0.00004099045,0.0003355677,0.0001782608,0.00002850421,0.00008458048,0.0002650371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001509532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001769651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001033981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003085308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993092,0.00002753204,0.0001585533,0.0002400131,0.0001023399,0.0001623062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996048,0.00001651565,0.00003648686,0.0001882144,0.0000568927,0.00009709269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00183016,0.0001350446,0.01572026,0.0002266597,0.0001466098,0.0000233006,0.00857459,0.0000852232,0.001442088,0.02907372,0.8542588,0.08848354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002002771,0.002952148,0.7788602,0.0005981508,0.0000613973,0.0001099547,0.001284058,0.003449386,0.003869716,0.0008045257,0.2055528,0.0004548315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901801,0.0002483256,0.00004338479,0.005228512,0.0005262783,0.0001903046,0.000007161885,0.00002949571,0.003546461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771929,0.00009875398,0.0000514009,0.0004879113,0.002050563,0.00002332876,0.00002042598,0.00001490411,0.02005984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.76314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9477024,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108518570","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00245.x","title":"REAL COSTS OF NOMINAL GRADE INFLATION? NEW EVIDENCE FROM STUDENT COURSE EVALUATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Simultaneity; Economics; Grade inflation; Course (navigation); Class (philosophy); Econometrics; Point (geometry); Demographic economics; Higher education; Mathematics; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1446022453694003,"gpt":0.5192600345704007,"spread":0.3746577892010003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258144,0.00008975395,0.0001478232,0.0001066715,0.0002895035,0.00005838583,0.0004225452,0.000114281,0.001689209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008704968,0.000107195,0.00004416647,0.000162696,0.000462095,0.0004905129,0.00004881483,0.0001979956,0.0002142519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004274244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002712808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01119056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006846062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986717,0.0002218094,0.0004471072,0.0002417494,0.0002408395,0.0001768084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978657,0.00119353,0.0003045,0.0003512239,0.000194866,0.00009017421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002870359,0.000268208,0.2746601,0.000004148009,0.0001110227,5.454742e-7,0.1067979,0.0009782587,0.009696917,0.5415636,0.0355741,0.03031639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003066078,0.00002813972,0.9558449,0.00004155883,0.00005833205,6.250477e-7,0.0101488,0.0002610935,0.0009981517,0.02449191,0.007600753,0.0002190628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.978013,0.00003036612,0.0006071604,0.003585458,0.01242609,0.0002891968,0.00001474574,0.00002832112,0.005005692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492605,0.00003119462,0.04276552,0.00008296908,0.007062232,0.00003378342,0.00002034964,0.0000107072,0.0007327949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6811848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138623668","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00322.x","title":"CARROTS AND STICKS: PRIZES AND PUNISHMENTS IN CONTESTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Microeconomics; Population; Mathematical economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03274469962926691,"gpt":0.3503654851929759,"spread":0.317620785563709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003275569,0.00008990077,0.0001624247,0.0000523622,0.0001836303,0.00007966424,0.0000912471,0.0000749735,0.00008207128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003984451,0.0001028849,0.00001398717,0.00001636003,0.0007411811,0.0002742304,0.000107978,0.0001199264,0.00003431147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001074715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005527752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003207623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02118828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993211,0.00002859281,0.0001732404,0.000235871,0.00002824633,0.0002129756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996842,0.00007315022,0.00005408033,0.00009426053,0.000006841206,0.00008752342],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001645959,0.00004093161,0.903435,0.000006245432,0.00001452533,0.0000055536,0.05466602,9.032894e-7,0.003444275,0.03339707,0.000679239,0.004293791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003539242,0.0001817333,0.8414087,0.00005550504,0.00003059609,0.0000122105,0.0902389,0.0001211898,0.003260108,0.01250374,0.04747735,0.00117075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874756,0.000197933,2.518144e-7,0.000474764,0.001445753,0.0002148121,0.000005517953,0.00002048067,0.01016484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990137,0.0001632778,0.0001862434,0.0001125252,0.0002640805,0.00002832925,0.000001417067,0.000008015508,0.0002224632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06202631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102077277","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12066","title":"SUPERSTITION IN THE HOUSING MARKET","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Superstition; Real estate; Economics; Immigration; Population; Residential real estate; House price; Financial economics; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Finance; Geography; Demography; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03977489863710382,"gpt":0.2248321360686128,"spread":0.185057237431509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341344,0.0001548169,0.0003147154,0.000217718,0.0001231287,0.0001573912,0.000351677,0.0001097847,0.001062484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007456808,0.0001656678,0.0001025364,0.00007482967,0.000105752,0.0003464608,0.00004723917,0.0001735945,0.002041748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002508227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001744612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002313865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002220416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985896,0.00005304111,0.0005938814,0.0003965715,0.00001388928,0.0003530162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991636,0.0001507128,0.0001839736,0.0004552649,0.000004018921,0.00004238496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009847396,0.0001665051,0.2219972,0.00006375981,0.00005211307,0.00000829238,0.007817702,0.002696462,0.000007960161,0.6595699,0.09045012,0.01707144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001717687,0.0001079816,0.08866725,0.00003297313,0.000008677672,0.00002262505,0.001443184,0.07211214,0.00001915014,0.1398564,0.6950928,0.0009191507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5623092,0.00007207692,0.001090789,0.0008886167,0.002474518,0.0001372903,0.00001149528,0.00003562454,0.4329804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969283,0.0001187723,0.000264799,0.001091719,0.001316327,0.00002127329,0.00001299194,0.00002938531,0.0002164744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6046427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122143160","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00221.x","title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NATIVITY WEALTH GAP<sup>*</sup>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Economics; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Position (finance); Labour economics; Geography; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05572533149695377,"gpt":0.2896387914410373,"spread":0.2339134599440835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624052,0.0001879932,0.000867896,0.0003162586,0.0001412252,0.00005307423,0.0005392093,0.0001405998,0.00107935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001038919,0.0001730655,0.0004064951,0.00047816,0.0003106442,0.0002031061,0.000168844,0.0003625572,0.0001669482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007944783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008700622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001061504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982159,0.00006307763,0.0009072108,0.0004849565,0.00003544514,0.0002933817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979948,0.0002036657,0.0007845399,0.0008953201,0.00003897989,0.00008266108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001976395,0.0001048038,0.2698139,0.00001527537,0.000776855,4.205077e-7,0.003441288,0.00487861,0.00002311822,0.7201812,0.0005894707,0.0001553025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007580023,0.00004741435,0.6202286,0.000007881659,0.0001637504,0.000001798904,0.0005388214,0.2572343,0.0001365543,0.0995756,0.02073968,0.0005675373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.97258,0.00006764509,0.0003352938,0.0004553153,0.00163571,0.0002004376,0.0007917038,0.00001922496,0.02391474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987375,0.00002269529,0.0002019108,0.0002625153,0.0002961958,0.00001698994,0.00002792125,0.00001281327,0.0004214252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6206056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070486653","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12107","title":"WHICH JOURNAL RANKINGS BEST EXPLAIN ACADEMIC SALARIES? EVIDENCE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Ranking (information retrieval); Promotion (chess); Economics; Test (biology); Journal ranking; Political science; Citation; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02452970204178066,"gpt":0.2198136291459315,"spread":0.1952839271041508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001433595,0.0001652157,0.0002409473,0.00007418595,0.0004396878,0.0001584834,0.000920258,0.00009422372,0.001113704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003347995,0.000154337,0.00008316652,0.000135389,0.0002026351,0.001384602,0.0004739756,0.0004992115,0.002419494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001249764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004468589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001690683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004937993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988757,0.00004407838,0.0003311234,0.0003004709,0.0001662973,0.0002823407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923445,0.0003041429,0.006932957,0.0003204184,0.00008148138,0.00001648921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002344617,0.00003672079,0.6463355,0.0001418094,0.0002047108,0.000009937788,0.003433695,0.00559936,0.0005296222,0.01186995,0.2694909,0.06211327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008563756,0.00001430233,0.1145853,0.0004978617,0.0001452019,0.000003090447,0.002182865,0.007239065,0.00004520832,0.003223313,0.8708492,0.0003582269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206333,0.0001676968,0.07133288,0.003661694,0.001489594,0.000142884,0.000007615054,0.00004564484,0.002518658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933811,0.0001875015,0.0001555247,0.001082051,0.004854704,8.489598e-7,0.000008498326,0.00002320097,0.0003066013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6013582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123436593","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12077","title":"LABOR CONTRACTS AND FLEXIBILITY: EVIDENCE FROM A LABOR MARKET REFORM IN SPAIN","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Counterfactual thinking; Labour economics; Economics; Productivity; Labor demand; Flexibility (engineering); Panel data; Value (mathematics); Wage; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05976990546086187,"gpt":0.2812832049007001,"spread":0.2215132994398383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005860039,0.0006243281,0.001737743,0.0004021731,0.00008333375,0.0003768708,0.000783174,0.0008392262,0.001012185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008900334,0.000748398,0.0002107572,0.0001119139,0.0002752044,0.000460488,0.001096166,0.001055361,0.0003112831],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001963974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002200438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01690249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003661369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949055,0.0002091738,0.002131484,0.002007463,0.00005592313,0.0006904727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959172,0.0007370327,0.00130013,0.001754088,0.00005162863,0.0002399366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008857456,0.0003342662,0.7628673,0.0009046196,0.0005439402,0.00007772309,0.004959068,0.001676989,0.00001528496,0.216028,0.002280514,0.009426542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001304727,0.00006383819,0.5071447,0.0005750303,0.00002421308,0.000002543332,0.0001971311,0.05611205,0.00001168851,0.416506,0.01675146,0.001306648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745983,0.007134641,0.0003309457,0.002982533,0.005132086,0.0007159899,0.003673167,0.00007997471,0.00535236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906429,0.004311536,0.001111349,0.001310176,0.001569582,0.0001451921,0.0001777008,0.00008935743,0.0006422208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2557226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999901,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202852766","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13025","title":"Transaction fee economics in the Ethereum blockchain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Database transaction; Blockchain; Unit price; Transaction cost; Unit (ring theory); Service (business); Block (permutation group theory); Economics; Econometrics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Database; Computer security; Economy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02259473687521487,"gpt":0.2491132914927401,"spread":0.2265185546175253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005002313,0.0000931001,0.0001255211,0.00007062689,0.0001019535,0.00007009409,0.0007503908,0.0001342733,0.00005250821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000619638,0.00008763469,0.00005656065,0.000123699,0.00007966297,0.0000912104,0.00006599392,0.0002362457,0.0001346996],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009834749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001018598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003127992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002910879,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991214,0.00007488712,0.0002316962,0.0003561242,0.00002427751,0.0001916343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990157,0.00009293421,0.00005967622,0.000799251,0.00001080174,0.00002162645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003103442,0.000114178,0.0003504461,0.000005738886,0.00002015406,0.0000130288,0.005050082,0.002673077,0.0001216363,0.9392833,0.002142791,0.05022248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001598743,0.00008830911,0.008040564,0.00001813738,0.0000161504,0.0004374535,0.004581394,0.3516583,0.01305485,0.3690725,0.2505506,0.0008830314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.919955,0.0002273635,0.05917387,0.01561285,0.001041486,0.0001633974,0.000003261642,0.0001144116,0.003708388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959533,0.00007315912,0.002508,0.001129184,0.000173936,0.00006234195,0.000002351772,0.000006161563,0.00009155057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5702108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3573639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099443649","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12294","title":"THE DUAL‐PROCESS DRIFT DIFFUSION MODEL: EVIDENCE FROM RESPONSE TIMES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Diffusion; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Econometrics; Decision process; Computer science; Key (lock); Economics; Simple (philosophy); Diffusion process; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Innovation diffusion; Management science; Physics; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3188865080280828,"gpt":0.4526974124004771,"spread":0.1338109043723943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008205101,0.0002525854,0.0004117611,0.0001751761,0.0004308982,0.0009989995,0.001670807,0.0001693848,0.0003315065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004868287,0.0001655324,0.0001739278,0.0001526181,0.0003845654,0.001085367,0.0005006383,0.0002342052,0.00688365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002717663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006255636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001016842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001142066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966854,0.000372164,0.001099376,0.000902541,0.0005377334,0.0004027792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991423,0.006000121,0.0004947851,0.001585012,0.0001970203,0.0003001002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006126282,0.000170167,0.01293749,0.000001849825,0.00004706834,0.00005667049,0.02271195,0.0990613,0.0009031824,0.0007736171,0.4764768,0.3807336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001131811,0.0002327043,0.005281236,0.00009930462,0.00003615787,0.00002244187,0.01029156,0.3516541,0.001182591,0.5593371,0.06993558,0.000795459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900486,0.0004104146,0.001125438,0.002433811,0.00492028,0.0001590179,0.00003552004,0.00007293213,0.0007939888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994799,0.00004851527,0.0006540732,0.0003400979,0.0007123451,0.00002038222,0.000003406791,0.00002938339,0.00339283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5585635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052795645","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00070.x","title":"THE AUCTION MARKET FOR MODERN PRINTS: CONFIRMATIONS, CONTRADICTIONS, AND NEW PUZZLES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Economics; Common value auction; Financial economics; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05024324044731584,"gpt":0.2522723591562265,"spread":0.2020291187089107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006016011,0.00007886508,0.0001027628,0.00005796534,0.0009842933,0.0001178514,0.00006754354,0.00002970627,0.0007111445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002471489,0.00006515283,0.000064147,0.000005348721,0.0002739595,0.0002466237,0.00001390241,0.00005000315,0.00003620369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008284536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003886905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00362607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994328,0.00001951833,0.0002425569,0.0001333463,0.00002617429,0.0001455946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999498,0.0001936291,0.00009680551,0.0001330624,0.00002387921,0.00005463306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232251,0.00001728393,0.0001579211,0.0000125156,0.0001657323,3.076703e-7,0.02174667,0.00002146048,0.000006434829,0.3850457,0.5317208,0.06098199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000269214,0.0000173991,0.0002497245,0.00000360584,0.00004345055,0.000002255375,0.004912789,0.003427119,0.000008552343,0.01186254,0.9791155,0.00008783135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3424386,0.007754803,0.1522912,0.01726448,0.03320193,0.002838121,0.0001803272,0.0006441237,0.4433865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768201,0.0003776686,0.0003149974,0.0004481154,0.006121119,0.0000488298,0.00003232374,0.00002468553,0.1158122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5343815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7786533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985189455","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00055.x","title":"CURBSIDE RECYCLING IN THE PRESENCE OF ALTERNATIVES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cannibalization; Economics; Marginal cost; Drop out; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Demographic economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1822593410193991,"gpt":0.2882170685765399,"spread":0.1059577275571408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002491097,0.00009354566,0.0002220116,0.0001465749,0.00003715191,0.00001680232,0.000299488,0.00005621189,0.0003309913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005394956,0.00009662967,0.00006779547,0.0000466705,0.0001330207,0.0002751769,0.00004622405,0.0001102056,0.0005970754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001677848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008052797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004259178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001172729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987486,0.00001954439,0.0007406577,0.0002665672,0.00001674839,0.0002078651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991218,0.0002109011,0.0003601419,0.0002805044,0.000002131535,0.00002452228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002279002,0.00007613768,0.8381484,0.00001388512,0.00002657561,0.000002760772,0.007991397,0.003093527,0.00006050813,0.147326,0.001096989,0.002141055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005472829,0.00004553916,0.9475039,0.00001550743,0.000002407907,0.000004395449,0.001909643,0.002057913,0.0007598972,0.03981843,0.007138433,0.0001966737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730767,0.0005343986,0.001596354,0.000268111,0.0009336093,0.0001596099,0.00001380314,0.00000654594,0.02341088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986375,0.0001470176,0.0003953559,0.0002409441,0.0003165653,0.000009906486,0.000006593802,0.00001105026,0.0002350502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1093556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7674395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156897438","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbj019","title":"AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COMPLIANCE AND LEVERAGE IN AUDITING AND REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Purdue University; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Enforcement; Audit; Compliance (psychology); Bounded rationality; Rationality; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Accounting; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06721829254950772,"gpt":0.3019875643951509,"spread":0.2347692718456432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001548051,0.0000928552,0.0001602892,0.00009018007,0.00008696621,0.00005316076,0.00006349751,0.00001641586,0.00009738861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002380174,0.0000999691,0.00001068574,0.0000299925,0.00007747294,0.0006795833,0.00009672593,0.00003368524,0.00001426587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004052399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003921861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001197715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001471134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993916,0.000006119953,0.0002430315,0.000204664,0.00004431038,0.0001102625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997169,0.000008616217,0.0001311924,0.0001255579,0.00001047427,0.000007270521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001964691,0.001333221,0.8761401,0.0002535704,0.00009500296,0.000006176986,0.01900733,0.01275658,0.002952647,0.04683262,0.002390692,0.03803565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002385849,0.00008426193,0.9282911,0.00006676925,0.000009763365,0.00000149379,0.03073966,0.03377762,0.0002863836,0.0003091343,0.003758565,0.0002894298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959587,0.0001658678,0.000009453442,0.00006049686,0.0001814358,0.0001834507,3.459655e-7,0.00001743771,0.003422827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990047,0.000004330997,0.00005748641,0.0002109284,0.0006415963,0.0000152336,0.000001852405,0.000007945408,0.00005597279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05215102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4076622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051359108","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00480.x","title":"THE EFFECTS OF PUBLICATION LAGS ON LIFE‐CYCLE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN ECONOMICS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Construct (python library); Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07338443894661059,"gpt":0.2898984242221501,"spread":0.2165139852755395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003137827,0.0001301546,0.0003016858,0.0002875908,0.0001740965,0.00008554644,0.0003146858,0.000104245,0.00005524125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009172501,0.0001265058,0.00006996135,0.0001387082,0.0003045727,0.0007095105,0.00009040507,0.0002376484,0.0006425447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003107862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007623612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002373744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005539428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984188,0.00007514127,0.0006245393,0.0003448373,0.00002433725,0.0005123615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985265,0.0004836065,0.0003171621,0.0005626113,0.00002412801,0.00008595909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004455543,0.0001600906,0.03432615,0.00003982176,0.00002026847,1.049099e-7,0.0007601421,0.00006528176,0.000009243787,0.9547647,0.006699017,0.003110585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000809537,0.0002747584,0.6474134,0.00003174737,0.000002962594,9.292646e-7,0.0003173025,0.0007311479,0.0009749958,0.1307535,0.2183252,0.0003645548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9416687,0.001459095,0.000004777477,0.001573321,0.003244208,0.000425431,0.00001479413,0.0000138387,0.05159583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997225,0.0008759021,0.00002762198,0.0001482901,0.001005462,0.0001223047,0.000006750942,0.00002153093,0.0005671207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8258827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135449671","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12993","title":"Seller reputation and price gouging: Evidence from the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Reputation; Amazon rainforest; Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Microeconomics; Business; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2708771879958795,"gpt":0.4137878163226759,"spread":0.1429106283267965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002244695,0.0001034873,0.0001558205,0.00004182553,0.0004010481,0.0003045293,0.0004011266,0.00007460337,0.0005754702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003617486,0.00007738444,0.00006052959,0.0002069572,0.0002413553,0.0005303918,0.0001752745,0.000149775,0.001481327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008986849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002090832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002938363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002759581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998338,0.0003037729,0.0004452364,0.0005944547,0.0001648582,0.0001536313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897937,0.009096147,0.0002721842,0.0006618946,0.00007025102,0.0001058165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002738068,0.00007882053,0.3735906,0.0000132282,0.0001348641,0.00001458367,0.09874032,0.01058519,0.006131905,0.04929513,0.3976071,0.06378087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002623808,0.0000138375,0.05173851,0.00002763473,0.00002473501,0.00007213104,0.02102636,0.003809574,0.0005522933,0.3201786,0.6021997,0.00009422033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630593,0.001883455,0.02982813,0.00212224,0.001137769,0.0001506535,0.00001886508,0.00006165805,0.001737949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98848,0.0005632994,0.0004869871,0.001555165,0.0008702516,0.00003370522,0.000008458042,0.000009727931,0.007992346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3218521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170578520","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbh045","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Regulator: An Experimental Test of Two Conditional Audit Schemes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Compliance (psychology); Econometrics; Test (biology); Accounting; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02697882091524614,"gpt":0.2687447731032278,"spread":0.2417659521879816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004076181,0.00009503647,0.0001142256,0.00001952993,0.0006200488,0.0001596282,0.0001714893,0.00001608487,0.0002039837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003540147,0.00004938409,0.00004776168,0.00003680316,0.0008718884,0.0003432908,0.00007836726,0.00004918603,0.00007509592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000181713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000154026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002282177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002811545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994622,0.00001913955,0.000196489,0.0001383707,0.00006421812,0.000119612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994017,0.0001628452,0.0001720233,0.000231458,0.00002664475,0.000005325441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001921701,0.00001775528,0.008209268,0.000003784372,0.00003067701,1.048418e-7,0.0001858556,0.00005856374,0.00009477793,0.9796532,0.01141148,0.0003153242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004476754,0.00002570953,0.09779579,0.00002356974,0.00006055922,0.00001155645,0.01503955,0.006957605,0.001876084,0.1168435,0.7564968,0.0003924354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641309,0.0009936944,0.00002711995,0.00281184,0.0009856028,0.0002768524,0.00000314044,0.00002517501,0.0307457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975896,0.00001480583,0.00002169142,0.000752102,0.001058407,0.00003760721,0.000004998806,0.000008439748,0.0005123785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4768977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803097171","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12582","title":"INEQUALITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL‐BEING AS A COMPREHENSIVE MEASURE OF INEQUALITY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Happiness; Inequality; Index (typography); Economics; Income inequality metrics; Economic inequality; Measure (data warehouse); Scale (ratio); Econometrics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07624152352977362,"gpt":0.3737692870480873,"spread":0.2975277635183137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008514504,0.0001918539,0.0005179096,0.0001213831,0.00007196259,0.00000749936,0.0002184937,0.0002518911,0.00379184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001018349,0.0001880126,0.0001542107,0.000113491,0.0006504582,0.00009632432,0.00006123024,0.0002314682,0.001285576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009815657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004966986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001667469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000539635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977832,0.0005678261,0.000772064,0.0004862314,0.0001072145,0.0002834243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982473,0.000352491,0.0005533227,0.0006129927,0.0001525325,0.00008132416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005060416,0.001198025,0.5995588,0.000214619,0.001710227,0.00002007417,0.1037117,0.00007058594,0.0128122,0.2052635,0.03901069,0.03136904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002256911,0.00131959,0.9370548,0.0001081071,0.000063542,0.00002538109,0.006597938,0.0000368209,0.01114662,0.0306052,0.01029632,0.0004887391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8563893,0.00006764635,0.000342542,0.00008569287,0.004855681,0.0001885533,0.00002159692,0.00004854493,0.1380004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979237,0.00000682073,0.00007930308,0.0003801531,0.001282575,0.00001494746,0.00001106871,0.00001833677,0.000283135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.337496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159623187","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00009.x","title":"HOURS FLEXIBILITY AND RETIREMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Health and Retirement Study; Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Econometrics; Labour economics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Medicine; Engineering; Gerontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3146702625368594,"gpt":0.4567654421393776,"spread":0.1420951796025182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003056511,0.00009544706,0.0001349082,0.00003573325,0.0003127863,0.00005959981,0.0001460467,0.00007738125,0.0005934183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000676881,0.0001008068,0.00005100036,0.00003456154,0.0007550807,0.0001575222,0.00006195455,0.00006988765,0.0001476515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005883701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009299466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001894456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004416533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988026,0.00007802549,0.000280007,0.0003324657,0.0001231033,0.0003837807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993991,0.00008739346,0.00006867616,0.0002495157,0.00001668284,0.0001785985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007359448,0.00014894,0.8582412,0.00002829213,0.00003730477,0.000002911145,0.04698483,0.00001294523,0.00006709751,0.04367122,0.01750486,0.03322681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001004989,0.0002022618,0.6559069,0.00003556762,0.00003409788,0.000001025471,0.05301591,0.00003157016,0.0009801106,0.02782767,0.2602435,0.0007163599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357118,0.00008663667,0.00006224554,0.001006787,0.002124314,0.0002719186,0.000002341111,0.00005940372,0.06067458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976811,0.00008702702,0.0001295113,0.0003422727,0.001053366,0.000007653972,0.000002378197,0.000007716264,0.0006889384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2427387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6497514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140927714","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbi040","title":"“NEW” PUBLIC INVESTMENT AND/OR PUBLIC CAPITAL MAINTENANCE FOR GROWTH? THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public capital; Economics; Investment (military); Capital expenditure; Public investment; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Public infrastructure; Capital investment; Labour economics; Finance; Public fund","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08702066101442076,"gpt":0.2505918223325007,"spread":0.16357116131808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006613512,0.0002765651,0.0004111006,0.0003054884,0.0005566324,0.0004754932,0.0006235699,0.0001765977,0.0006529587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002288554,0.0002511015,0.0001371841,0.00008861683,0.0003609791,0.001037921,0.0001144025,0.0001860154,0.001244123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001126505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004022077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0221374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1162379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975643,0.00001489093,0.0007656069,0.0006852721,0.0000204321,0.0009495699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984749,0.0001121171,0.0002910279,0.0005009315,0.0000210269,0.0006000189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133004,0.00001475717,0.006397314,0.000009272932,0.00004506349,7.703874e-7,0.003420559,0.000009041518,5.935242e-7,0.9136648,0.07491639,0.001508089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001122564,0.00009203797,0.01139262,0.000006015667,0.000004548934,0.00003273445,0.0008650227,0.003140661,0.00003596758,0.1684957,0.814261,0.0005510834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6750702,0.002068878,0.001942091,0.1650854,0.006337252,0.001821499,0.0007158208,0.000156483,0.1468025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815817,0.00006376957,0.001215268,0.01101319,0.002647029,0.0002368572,0.00002329527,0.00004655202,0.003172377],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7451691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112989045","doi":"10.1093/ei/39.3.365","title":"Habitual and Occasional Lobbyers in the U.S. Steel Industry: An Em Algorithm Pooling Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Economics; sort; Maximization; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0483394294077415,"gpt":0.2408457229716747,"spread":0.1925062935639332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001298571,0.0002580696,0.0004387404,0.0002339015,0.0001600332,0.0002388641,0.0004670286,0.0003683103,0.0001730552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000219894,0.0002408431,0.00009098442,0.0001131943,0.0001351264,0.0007546946,0.0001068113,0.0005761388,0.0002215423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001645033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003374308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001474572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000120346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980839,0.00004107766,0.0007022852,0.0006945304,0.00002647996,0.0004517128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991049,0.00008017622,0.0002649294,0.0004095503,0.000009446419,0.0001309566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002814414,0.001574279,0.479513,0.00008220548,0.0004701627,0.0001210987,0.0367789,0.004945589,0.00002304316,0.3750357,0.04254364,0.05863088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004011123,0.0004693974,0.769498,0.00003428468,0.00002869875,0.0006265838,0.02739797,0.03119547,0.00001440849,0.044254,0.1204831,0.001986937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705635,0.0009719519,0.0002124623,0.0006279573,0.0009297987,0.0002836946,0.00007878553,0.00003041989,0.02630139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946232,0.0002589899,0.001745513,0.001278876,0.00158426,0.00004606646,0.0000829397,0.0000292857,0.0003508604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3307817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087837578","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00497.x","title":"A CENTURY OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND HOURS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Life expectancy; Economics; Productivity; Wage; Labour economics; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Working hours; Work hours; Earnings; Demography; Population; Sociology; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04526561172632684,"gpt":0.2419607116390071,"spread":0.1966950999126803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006798549,0.000143765,0.0004031222,0.0001640179,0.00007191189,0.00002193481,0.0001364691,0.00009576708,0.0005279866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002433603,0.0001855713,0.00008568206,0.00003036131,0.0001896662,0.0005388665,0.00008656624,0.0001097611,0.0005777686],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009265244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001249902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002035954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001074727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99878,0.00001303427,0.0005224802,0.0003180231,0.000008849764,0.0003576352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991611,0.00003145135,0.0003365031,0.0003237562,0.000005427896,0.0001417912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008245883,0.00005697373,0.6692398,0.00002660627,0.00004586189,2.154113e-7,0.002889616,0.000003377355,0.00008696288,0.3258746,0.00110296,0.0006647891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001474128,0.0001855377,0.8921674,0.00001855319,0.00001928608,0.00003043628,0.001363364,0.00004673086,0.001851617,0.06511425,0.03682391,0.0009047698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779917,0.004416602,0.00004027788,0.0001032326,0.002589779,0.0001176365,0.00008431765,0.00002153913,0.01463492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980819,0.0001478585,0.0001734343,0.00008105265,0.001304912,0.000009791704,0.00001246067,0.00002283563,0.000165774],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2607604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.756738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087964828","doi":"10.1093/ei/41.1.80","title":"Nontariff Barriers and Trade Liberalization","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Economics; Tariff; International economics; Free trade; Liberalization; International trade; Incentive; Commercial policy; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07995389177945957,"gpt":0.2066872043562072,"spread":0.1267333125767476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001997746,0.0001783215,0.0003438766,0.0001379688,0.0001301338,0.0001214235,0.0001710681,0.0001424688,0.003427188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002069701,0.0002416847,0.00008580223,0.00004738585,0.0001138337,0.0005127096,0.00004359696,0.0001162022,0.002509316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001952954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007768006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001500817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003281091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986144,0.000008343941,0.0005600935,0.0004779642,0.00001010976,0.0003290788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992975,0.0000211549,0.0001962863,0.0002854826,0.000002203698,0.0001973666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800593,0.00006019703,0.1555863,0.00003942,0.0001626626,0.000008398624,0.006157635,0.00107603,0.000009765038,0.6798747,0.15437,0.002636913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001539402,0.0001060758,0.03258258,0.00001129024,0.00001320196,0.00004471408,0.0004741161,0.03575886,0.00006392208,0.04323626,0.8853077,0.000861941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991164,0.002761173,0.0003954308,0.003756953,0.003995058,0.0002406061,0.0001506032,0.0001120459,0.08947176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995124,0.0008186428,0.0003233093,0.001891368,0.0006576004,0.00001513242,0.00001718301,0.00003282143,0.001119952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7309377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124162369","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00403.x","title":"DOUBLE MAJORS: ONE FOR ME, ONE FOR THE PARENTS?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coursework; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sample (material); Graduation (instrument); Mathematics education; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1551058563072283,"gpt":0.3210667590808268,"spread":0.1659609027735985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008045273,0.0001066532,0.0001759001,0.00003526168,0.0005741948,0.00006484283,0.0004335273,0.0001183698,0.0002249897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003101722,0.00009786072,0.0001212226,0.0000401912,0.000290416,0.0001907515,0.00004249639,0.0000642483,0.0001293153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001855531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003005284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989985,0.00002633872,0.0002400936,0.0002569343,0.00006502173,0.0004131299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992885,0.000188862,0.0001160183,0.0002730924,0.00005180733,0.00008172023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003413948,0.0002736792,0.01301304,0.00005310078,0.0003406873,3.568524e-7,0.1598103,0.00006134948,0.00005447462,0.7939197,0.0283702,0.003761787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007645997,0.000461368,0.04522848,0.0000484328,0.0004087542,0.000001147787,0.2500454,0.002434571,0.0006066296,0.2055714,0.4861947,0.001353055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145337,0.0004953738,0.02129868,0.001559244,0.01397401,0.002904828,0.000211706,0.000165269,0.04485716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878719,0.0002391237,0.003096439,0.0005840355,0.0031539,0.0003752998,0.00002924379,0.00003043032,0.004619667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507746587","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12741","title":"MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICY DESIGN AT THE ZERO LOWER BOUND: EVIDENCE FROM THE LAB","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"FP7 Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Liquidity trap; Economics; Market liquidity; Zero lower bound; Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Monetary economics; Inflation (cosmology); Inflation targeting; Macroeconomics; Liquidity risk; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1355820265887647,"gpt":0.2745031763652178,"spread":0.138921149776453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001331211,0.0003099362,0.0004533607,0.0001037154,0.0006785317,0.000262689,0.0006794865,0.0001659131,0.002990014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950727,0.0002403357,0.000151704,0.00007568777,0.001053459,0.0006236986,0.000375541,0.0002374929,0.01015525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004778874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01263088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007468486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978142,0.00009007491,0.0007454089,0.0007180346,0.00002642759,0.0006058034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975636,0.0008335678,0.0003827251,0.001062405,0.000005541235,0.000152143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006222447,0.00006865709,0.1145496,0.00001594177,0.0006099096,0.000009066879,0.01656604,0.003990212,0.0000724519,0.01369639,0.8443661,0.005433449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001884023,0.0006390073,0.3725733,0.00008519182,0.00007117659,0.00009167411,0.0005145087,0.06891844,0.0006865043,0.1607379,0.3921999,0.001598303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741365,0.005420796,0.001345783,0.01310905,0.002756169,0.0003764766,0.000296571,0.00004041475,0.002518234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844082,0.001008569,0.0002489402,0.006320685,0.005619403,0.00003171341,0.00001694401,0.00004408665,0.002301447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4521661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052442056","doi":"10.1093/ei/39.4.627","title":"The Effect of Cocaine Prices on Crime","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Simultaneity; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Consumption (sociology); Index (typography); Enforcement; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04518671105167994,"gpt":0.3822261382693548,"spread":0.3370394272176749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007186645,0.00004720128,0.00008626074,0.00002521179,0.0002788981,0.00003774315,0.0001818065,0.00002842208,0.001166712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005867117,0.00003307333,0.00008956083,0.0000262042,0.0002378342,0.00006793682,0.00002090939,0.00004635835,0.0003944625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006567718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001874311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000923948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005429356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994884,0.0000907684,0.0001460764,0.00009155209,0.00004605872,0.0001371997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994328,0.0003158952,0.00007603381,0.0001383476,0.000008482145,0.00002845742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000480843,0.0002043499,0.1407727,0.00005976663,0.0003037658,0.000009528963,0.0292946,0.000215472,0.0005248868,0.2564097,0.4479997,0.1237248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094373,0.0007521333,0.03460905,0.00004800659,0.00002221685,0.000001270348,0.002890657,0.0000871958,0.002756301,0.0008716063,0.9573038,0.0001483168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8917815,0.00009916018,0.00002244963,0.0007135283,0.001642345,0.0001088918,0.000002276682,0.00001560623,0.1056142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952857,0.00008542132,0.000003047488,0.0000488037,0.0007504738,0.00001000274,0.000001102682,0.000004220626,0.003811197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5093042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108509794","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00422.x","title":"NON‐MONETARY INCENTIVES AND OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR: EVIDENCE FROM A LABORATORY PUBLIC GOOD GAME","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Public good; Economics; Free riding; Nash equilibrium; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Public goods game; Public economics; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1225045460018769,"gpt":0.3582258355370235,"spread":0.2357212895351466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006768167,0.0002021848,0.0003062917,0.00008117709,0.0004100552,0.000161466,0.0002916291,0.0001295053,0.0006082291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005350532,0.0002374883,0.00005974876,0.00005491365,0.001082263,0.001947762,0.0002721875,0.0001489742,0.0004834166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005873347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000241289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003427928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001031796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984695,0.0001212134,0.00034533,0.0003962429,0.0000919227,0.0005758421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989634,0.0001664447,0.0001855899,0.0002784937,0.00002710348,0.0003789663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001156644,0.0001197563,0.9496009,0.000004350343,0.00004156884,0.000005029633,0.04141212,3.336085e-7,0.001326226,0.003987597,0.001841212,0.001649381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000778427,0.0001208298,0.8833104,0.00008839407,0.0001786067,0.000002912389,0.06583974,0.00004991088,0.001191771,0.0005148454,0.04670824,0.001215971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892723,0.003888506,0.000006361549,0.0004891731,0.00290608,0.0003268078,0.00009579771,0.00007068027,0.002944276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964268,0.001249278,0.000261714,0.0002123406,0.001473374,0.0001134599,0.00002107361,0.00002393647,0.0002180843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0662905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970385006","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12836","title":"COMMODITY PRICES AND BANK LENDING","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Department for International Development","keywords":"Economics; Commodity; Monetary economics; Loan; Asset (computer security); Shock (circulatory); Asset quality; Sample (material); Price shock; Consumption (sociology); Commodity swap; Macroeconomics; Finance; Microeconomics; Capital adequacy ratio","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03757708055982513,"gpt":0.2482740313250451,"spread":0.21069695076522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008236994,0.0001464772,0.0003479172,0.0001687107,0.0001102328,0.0001032768,0.0002175773,0.0001034847,0.001175272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003365925,0.000185995,0.00006683524,0.00006629944,0.0001411308,0.0004414288,0.0001172778,0.0001189278,0.002869841],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002259262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002125991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009335372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002032241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986271,0.00001322544,0.0005201887,0.0005450077,0.00001793868,0.0002764936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990688,0.0001017698,0.0002963089,0.0004699129,0.000008866755,0.00005435882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006749974,0.00003382933,0.6154703,0.00003729847,0.00002166076,2.675049e-7,0.001516521,0.0004422103,0.00001026195,0.3801531,0.001085821,0.001222005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007984277,0.00007679433,0.8130161,0.0000164116,0.000005195149,0.000008676388,0.0002075119,0.0170488,0.00007203477,0.06682076,0.1013842,0.0005450988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745912,0.0009440008,0.0005048157,0.000265342,0.002870834,0.0002307446,0.00004908918,0.00005862707,0.02048534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984874,0.00006959565,0.0004332856,0.0001051444,0.0003591762,0.000008531324,0.0000126326,0.00002203386,0.0005022688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3133323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997378,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986061851","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00415.x","title":"VANISHING LEADERSHIP AND DECLINING RECIPROCITY IN A SEQUENTIAL CONTRIBUTION EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sequence (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2940964169295662,"gpt":0.3866140379921499,"spread":0.09251762106258371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008717669,0.0001109398,0.0002037896,0.00006431152,0.0002899975,0.00006077918,0.0001281193,0.0001058788,0.0002245934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004905793,0.0001383668,0.0000399594,0.00002978075,0.0004500934,0.0005004129,0.00009988539,0.0001189289,0.00007004193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007959323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008161996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005405853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004586814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988729,0.0001096462,0.0003076174,0.0003085473,0.00004388616,0.0003573648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.00005136267,0.0001114604,0.00009152378,0.00001207137,0.00008373319],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001591102,0.0001342183,0.2748792,0.0000084973,0.00004495427,0.00001579561,0.6463048,0.000006185332,0.002995474,0.07155173,0.000509406,0.003390551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004260303,0.0003564351,0.06760749,0.0001532517,0.00004997278,0.000007977628,0.8229693,0.0001962735,0.08265196,0.01371995,0.006436479,0.001590648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870521,0.000454016,0.00002253223,0.0001960674,0.001412152,0.0002330983,0.000002639596,0.0000447309,0.01058268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.00009272701,0.0005239262,0.0001600473,0.0003790674,0.00005096464,0.000002889244,0.00001032401,0.00006570992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2072717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8172068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039944434","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12109","title":"GONE FISHING! REPORTED SICKNESS ABSENTEEISM AND THE WEATHER","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Absenteeism; Agency (philosophy); Order (exchange); Recreation; Exploit; Business; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03226476062113692,"gpt":0.2193080365608454,"spread":0.1870432759397085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002319957,0.0002122274,0.0005718756,0.0001126124,0.0002153614,0.0002270927,0.000285975,0.0001351358,0.0005987645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001549657,0.0002019761,0.0001394373,0.00004485974,0.000426913,0.0003010491,0.0001374276,0.0001905296,0.00154293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001778138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004330595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007997984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982038,0.0000407044,0.0008422318,0.0005460784,0.00001465053,0.0003525501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998503,0.0002130431,0.0005246236,0.0006604168,0.000009568294,0.00008935889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002516232,0.00006970445,0.04890012,0.00005043099,0.0003156428,0.000005313038,0.005363898,0.0005523845,0.000007124509,0.8910882,0.03644194,0.01695362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004756399,0.00005024484,0.02280216,0.00002157927,0.00003119962,0.00006386163,0.0003922453,0.0475432,0.00002828258,0.2116749,0.7118147,0.0008212545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7429735,0.0003429137,0.001591721,0.003418996,0.004219528,0.0002472621,0.00001596407,0.00008823408,0.2471019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943989,0.0003380314,0.0002048481,0.001113604,0.00149673,0.00002967913,0.00001220433,0.00005276404,0.002353268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6794133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121613258","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00452.x","title":"THREAT AND PUNISHMENT IN PUBLIC GOOD EXPERIMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Public good; Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Social dilemma; Public economics; Institution; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1317126992570316,"gpt":0.3810343282951341,"spread":0.2493216290381026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005124166,0.0001142122,0.0001771777,0.00007924972,0.0002304796,0.00007931855,0.0001392317,0.00007294918,0.0003262481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001010062,0.0001307042,0.00003107084,0.00003223911,0.000366243,0.0008223381,0.0001607823,0.00007002092,0.000270226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008133446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005141042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001539098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000846508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989743,0.00006328771,0.0002205637,0.0002088632,0.00004857211,0.0004843746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995986,0.00003357623,0.0000628347,0.0001351822,0.000005061012,0.0001647206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006133815,0.0001376852,0.8109852,0.000002064263,0.00001773046,8.787109e-7,0.07262014,6.605459e-7,0.0001987982,0.1124358,0.001502289,0.002092623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003262709,0.0001764664,0.32398,0.00004054428,0.00002899695,0.000007749254,0.3353096,0.00002858594,0.008205342,0.00468498,0.3225787,0.001696285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240966,0.001300785,7.703865e-7,0.0007846614,0.001942165,0.0002026999,0.000002692697,0.00003079026,0.07163884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982057,0.0002883963,0.0001411064,0.0001681951,0.0006375353,0.00008019029,0.000002850655,0.00001205129,0.0004639597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4870051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5329964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126006931","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00358.x","title":"DOMESTIC OR U.S. NEWS: WHAT DRIVES CANADIAN FINANCIAL MARKETS?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Economics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Exchange rate; Volatility (finance); Stock (firearms); Monetary economics; Financial market; Financial economics; Central bank; Stock market; Interest rate; Monetary policy; Econometrics; Finance; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05479791294782944,"gpt":0.2497735064287242,"spread":0.1949755934808947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006636791,0.0003602406,0.0006602472,0.0005826522,0.0002841564,0.0004690109,0.0005891417,0.0003583319,0.01783134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002458897,0.000412521,0.0002123641,0.00009232388,0.0002578185,0.00176022,0.00007786694,0.0004915186,0.01614464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003849562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003547971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0536348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1507923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972564,0.00001834251,0.0009590545,0.0007748657,0.00001768215,0.0009736354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980527,0.0001234546,0.0003561701,0.0008309905,0.000006776103,0.000629982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005575338,0.000249516,0.1589468,0.0001461393,0.0005115762,0.0002626651,0.01016889,0.002555979,0.00006149674,0.2993064,0.4750223,0.05221066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001296923,0.0001068945,0.1034021,0.00002495671,0.00001339847,0.0001404163,0.0004023725,0.005985902,0.00003865867,0.03085782,0.8566157,0.001114867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555811,0.000538722,0.000060517,0.002712818,0.01846971,0.0003131595,0.0002703083,0.00006759456,0.02198612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868132,0.0006757773,0.0005766957,0.003619766,0.004055443,0.00004285673,0.00005650643,0.00006494632,0.004094786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3815934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121693044","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00398.x","title":"CAN'T BUY ME LOVE? A FIELD EXPERIMENT EXPLORING THE TRADE‐OFF BETWEEN INCOME AND CASTE‐STATUS IN AN INDIAN MATRIMONIAL MARKET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Newspaper; Incentive; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.138450943437984,"gpt":0.3606077824274311,"spread":0.2221568389894471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008201257,0.0001033389,0.0001624622,0.0001845759,0.0002548522,0.0001597165,0.0003016614,0.00008129951,0.0008514156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006593801,0.00009665208,0.0000386818,0.00008157956,0.0003349431,0.0005157779,0.0001077807,0.0001747829,0.00003207633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002431052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002355132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02343394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03307486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986522,0.0002691305,0.0002554425,0.0002577937,0.0001360213,0.0004294588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993333,0.0001940535,0.00006539992,0.0001974069,0.000008358912,0.0002014874],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000431229,0.0000419421,0.6361386,0.00001604074,0.00001622702,0.00001742407,0.3474196,8.184424e-7,0.00001062739,0.002788225,0.0007969062,0.01271051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006711241,0.0001325075,0.8340822,0.00002023568,0.00001145884,0.000001546973,0.1571994,0.00003092868,0.0004841938,0.003360274,0.003737647,0.0002683798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800549,0.0001561894,0.000002445798,0.001028557,0.000831463,0.0002816825,0.000009242136,0.00001604296,0.01761947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981776,0.0002304171,0.00003758457,0.00007495225,0.0008467556,0.00004086852,0.000002273903,0.00001081965,0.0005787464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1979437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129623343","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00493.x","title":"A CLEAR AND PRESENT MINORITY: HETEROGENEITY IN THE SOURCE OF ENDOWMENTS AND THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Dimension (graph theory); Public goods game; Microeconomics; Public economics; Nash equilibrium","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09632670282260061,"gpt":0.3601434014814309,"spread":0.2638166986588303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00156871,0.00006469219,0.0001695231,0.00003033367,0.0001414501,0.0000308968,0.0001613194,0.000037941,0.00001054833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003076738,0.00004357234,0.00003334963,0.00002577746,0.00118088,0.0002514639,0.0001823237,0.00005567028,0.000002800747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000660984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002242849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004295964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009492982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991653,0.0002574391,0.0002253472,0.0001119525,0.000055045,0.0001849003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995365,0.0001499687,0.0001366616,0.0001339336,0.000006706995,0.00003627022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240288,0.0001448274,0.7941207,0.00001819412,0.00003578751,1.118664e-7,0.1712243,0.000002003806,0.0001935294,0.02639514,0.0002841614,0.007518848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004933727,0.0003061864,0.6615564,0.00003491676,0.00008285228,0.000006904673,0.2956465,0.0002238091,0.005768014,0.002332876,0.02864566,0.0004622229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940954,0.001417931,0.00000101926,0.0007513029,0.0002141984,0.000371347,0.000003076063,0.000003446698,0.003142322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994401,0.0002505434,0.0000278706,0.00005126751,0.000163345,0.00002821109,5.434997e-7,0.000003449526,0.0000347152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1325644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6494241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243431799","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12455","title":"CITATIONS OR JOURNAL QUALITY: WHICH IS REWARDED MORE IN THE ACADEMIC LABOR MARKET?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Economics; POLK; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Psychology; History; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8029192847958765,"gpt":0.6650213172577557,"spread":0.1378979675381208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05655196,0.0001352784,0.0003125216,0.01576732,0.001091145,0.005707259,0.006248323,0.000181939,0.003385295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06186552,0.00007639539,0.0001211185,0.01552741,0.0003736144,0.001426124,0.0005966692,0.0008588307,0.00104592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002138417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007116687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001233598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002073951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949058,0.0005273193,0.001098136,0.0005515835,0.002351193,0.0005659673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906496,0.005917204,0.0007640374,0.001573045,0.0008616822,0.0002344484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007854136,0.00005262042,0.2221611,0.000003515942,0.00002036076,0.00002064306,0.006122168,0.00002938228,0.00002743531,0.001258579,0.7322614,0.03796429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006191237,0.00004590034,0.8710065,0.00000972656,0.000003377312,0.00003055389,0.007952284,0.001805129,0.00003170063,0.01476331,0.1035813,0.0001510315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407729,0.0002740633,0.0001267079,0.04401851,0.003090881,0.000203953,0.00005943824,0.000007089609,0.01144647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870298,0.0007636204,0.0002801077,0.001974212,0.001096433,0.00001686827,0.000001332901,0.00001082402,0.00882682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997319,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056660701","doi":"10.1093/ei/40.1.60","title":"Distortionary Taxation and Optimal Public Spending on Productive Activities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public good; Microeconomics; Revenue; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Public spending; General equilibrium theory; Public capital; Public economics; Capital (architecture); Interpretation (philosophy); Public investment; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09588742443414397,"gpt":0.2383279847106575,"spread":0.1424405602765136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002930865,0.0001895385,0.0003233608,0.0003003442,0.0002052458,0.0001179697,0.0001422031,0.000102045,0.0009454919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008400663,0.0002404241,0.00007833552,0.00004708543,0.0001977478,0.000930456,0.00006694986,0.0001650644,0.00223571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004074004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006052087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003266565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007598916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985785,0.00001526399,0.000467208,0.000587323,0.00001341966,0.0003382564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991245,0.00006186924,0.0004719877,0.0002361275,0.000003278354,0.0001022877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000361795,0.0001453704,0.06385072,0.0000320875,0.0001120432,0.000003114361,0.003223181,0.0002778051,0.00001907976,0.9050661,0.02377381,0.003460461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003045478,0.0007697679,0.5058589,0.00005417031,0.00002367866,0.0001031319,0.002238612,0.04909368,0.0007473371,0.2434589,0.1919943,0.002611982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151481,0.0003729714,0.0001277718,0.001775906,0.001578062,0.0001742147,0.00009767607,0.00005501255,0.08067024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961737,0.00006988563,0.0001511396,0.0002701588,0.001821237,0.00003855716,0.00001710885,0.00003073415,0.001427512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6616072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101318105","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00220.x","title":"DOES RAIDING EXPLAIN THE NEGATIVE RETURNS TO FACULTY SENIORITY?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Monopsony; Economics; Productivity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04171776907124301,"gpt":0.2775459435351934,"spread":0.2358281744639504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022744,0.0002352053,0.0004127648,0.0001309587,0.0002912472,0.0002277382,0.0005692046,0.000161787,0.0009033763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003754697,0.0001626272,0.0001625726,0.0001289298,0.0001479727,0.0003491561,0.000217738,0.0004712055,0.001300922],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001746434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000375714,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005290183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001350053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981357,0.00004557274,0.0007217376,0.0006263925,0.00003072993,0.0004398162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984851,0.0002325902,0.0003347012,0.0007617535,0.00002918053,0.0001566199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003570458,0.00004759981,0.03478657,0.00001616778,0.00009952163,0.000005318087,0.0110456,0.0001049803,0.0001799129,0.9476174,0.004307309,0.001753874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001249203,0.00008750871,0.1244789,0.00001968098,0.00001502434,0.00001047574,0.003732552,0.004539007,0.0009620959,0.5414482,0.3221167,0.001340691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717289,0.00001596197,0.0006391858,0.004854844,0.0102641,0.0003481172,0.0007188534,0.00006116884,0.01136883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936611,0.00001867122,0.001232501,0.001158789,0.002098019,0.00006005544,0.00002922547,0.00003605174,0.00170561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4061693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336529691","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12344","title":"INTEGRATING MARKET ALTERNATIVES INTO THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF OPTIMAL DETERRENCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Microeconomics; Deterrence theory; Maximization; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03664326103578679,"gpt":0.2465113949051027,"spread":0.2098681338693159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002422859,0.0002721115,0.0007741514,0.0002097817,0.0001874398,0.00009664302,0.0009434666,0.0001500853,0.00267609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001485285,0.000240497,0.000298449,0.00003973158,0.0009826372,0.0006632895,0.0002314463,0.0001429702,0.002129704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008070976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001113055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009926979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003623465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970981,0.0001013353,0.001594046,0.0007224638,0.00002368064,0.0004604078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972289,0.0006115381,0.001251883,0.0007815564,0.00001787025,0.0001083042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001122526,0.00002729088,0.03262432,0.00002202507,0.0002630856,0.000001654351,0.007951465,0.0002222784,0.0001069078,0.9398503,0.005255839,0.01356261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003043056,0.0004165227,0.01761252,0.0002722953,0.00003806,0.00003142328,0.006388111,0.007913643,0.004327702,0.8675696,0.09058251,0.001804547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8954101,0.001232647,0.009425616,0.0007467829,0.007894218,0.0004170986,0.0001727238,0.00006002737,0.08464081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954308,0.0004627251,0.000421391,0.0001790986,0.001915479,0.00006290282,0.000004142876,0.00005257339,0.001470846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1000208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965187851","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00152.x","title":"TACIT COLLUSION IN AUCTIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR ITS FACILITATION AND PREVENTION: EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION IN LABORATORY EXPERIMENTAL MARKETS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit collusion; Collusion; Common value auction; Microeconomics; Economics; Facilitation; Competition (biology); Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Industrial organization; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08250359811943878,"gpt":0.4088266828119677,"spread":0.3263230846925289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001057845,0.00009215969,0.0001494182,0.0003216433,0.0001793596,0.00008740401,0.00007829774,0.0000801972,0.000248124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001556788,0.0001009943,0.0000288925,0.0002619467,0.0001004407,0.000806667,0.00002558576,0.00007130123,0.00003986109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000136942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006422213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002287634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003812157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988214,0.0001324886,0.0004515839,0.0003856385,0.00007600131,0.0001328747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.0002854388,0.0001258254,0.0001068357,0.00004705228,0.00005511496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001511792,0.001436954,0.01548774,0.00005288669,0.00005653245,0.000004026731,0.027093,0.009724949,0.4311641,0.4198871,0.05333978,0.0402411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005740685,0.0008276477,0.3987314,0.0000790124,0.00002311683,0.00005918501,0.02446473,0.03817233,0.03650251,0.4588595,0.03565776,0.0008821342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960746,0.0001639338,0.001594433,0.0008202385,0.0003015128,0.0005396292,0.000064265,0.00002327181,0.0004181374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981818,0.00001085178,0.0003596941,0.00009463594,0.0001379077,0.0001701244,0.00001780133,0.000004669252,0.00102258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3946616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4118429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791821935","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12314","title":"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMPOSITION OF MULTINATIONAL ACTIVITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Foreign direct investment; Imitation; Intellectual property; International trade; Technology transfer; Economics; Composition (language); Investment (military); International economics; Business; Industrial organization; Macroeconomics; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3090292166642115,"gpt":0.2518821398130718,"spread":0.05714707685113968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006384153,0.0000842964,0.000131705,0.00008170538,0.0001126874,0.00007491609,0.00009002401,0.00006523409,0.0001332619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002582697,0.0000476648,0.00003321324,0.00005835149,0.0002477091,0.0005491119,0.0001025053,0.0001375101,0.0002165362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004971389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000367482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001004014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002001253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994913,0.00003692099,0.0001685295,0.0001380277,0.00007194017,0.00009323989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996338,0.00006215578,0.0001390821,0.00008102318,0.0000764446,0.000007446196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05787179,0.001510065,0.008705489,0.0006647445,0.0008781996,0.000007008371,0.03671611,0.008291989,0.01035228,0.05304015,0.2906297,0.5313325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02141634,0.0002667901,0.002528327,0.000168448,0.0001468843,0.00003321893,0.002649436,0.8154956,0.01086312,0.007190775,0.1383733,0.0008677978],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896977,0.000011522,0.0006198817,0.0009134104,0.001410628,0.0004921546,0.00000142869,0.00002574203,0.006827543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973953,0.000001569298,0.00001249325,0.0002105554,0.002081516,0.00002655177,0.00000831258,0.000007896325,0.0002558416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8072036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2783208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078510749","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00397.x","title":"CONSUMPTION BENEFITS OF NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE GAME TRIPS ESTIMATED FROM REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE DEMAND DATA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Ticket; Economic surplus; Consumption (sociology); Revealed preference; Economics; Metropolitan area; Attendance; Microeconomics; Advertising; Business; Welfare; Geography; Economic growth; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4297592420107627,"gpt":0.2988583507342691,"spread":0.1309008912764936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005341445,0.0001520651,0.0004043595,0.0001767122,0.00004689299,0.00003479774,0.0003159437,0.0001084919,0.001592801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004833474,0.0001788836,0.00003246909,0.00005160931,0.0001513822,0.0004960166,0.0001435955,0.00009958246,0.0002996099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000685066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003931556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008575376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001681708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984705,0.000008891087,0.0007889778,0.000514837,0.00003000931,0.0001868055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987735,0.00005388181,0.0005883654,0.0004718158,0.0000380717,0.00007439684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001711584,0.0001521979,0.9548357,0.00006752873,0.0002482759,0.000001810554,0.002643189,0.001493566,0.00003939013,0.03422131,0.004531799,0.001594105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001123585,0.00007277171,0.9119034,0.00005526609,0.00001682822,0.000004078042,0.00004856986,0.07420479,0.0002947137,0.01015755,0.001783692,0.0003347554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929699,0.001851317,0.0003973714,0.00002561433,0.000584538,0.0001411462,0.002446627,0.00002170986,0.001561737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965239,0.001707689,0.0007139825,0.00006360399,0.0001608684,0.000006786718,0.0006480091,0.00001792199,0.0001572274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07271122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111046244","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12287","title":"THE EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC OF HONORING SUNK COSTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Cognitive dissonance; Economics; Phenomenon; Function (biology); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3533139611296619,"gpt":0.4440464302118628,"spread":0.0907324690822009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003644628,0.0001292809,0.000291588,0.0001469746,0.0001776839,0.0001845298,0.001077048,0.00008818825,0.000160772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001101604,0.0000865312,0.0001431932,0.0001242915,0.0003751176,0.0003758486,0.0003042323,0.0001241965,0.002978561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004046595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002703606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006980948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005060211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980562,0.0001150505,0.0008958742,0.000401717,0.0002685289,0.0002626571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970417,0.001361332,0.00043164,0.0008643008,0.0001565416,0.0001444654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001924597,0.00008858361,0.05332612,0.000001376451,0.00002845574,0.00001065226,0.001268663,0.006773937,0.00005486174,0.02098582,0.3394085,0.5778606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009943969,0.0002591607,0.02428997,0.00002653941,0.00001928595,0.00006230025,0.008364631,0.008019893,0.0002821243,0.5996984,0.3575112,0.0004720893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792379,0.0003981984,0.0002434078,0.0005406479,0.008004828,0.0001053405,0.00001465345,0.00002653282,0.01142856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976895,0.0000243085,0.0005632307,0.0001067193,0.0006331468,0.000007776881,0.000002276159,0.00001120087,0.000961813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990487729","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12865","title":"THE GREAT OVERESTIMATION: TAX DATA AND INEQUALITY MEASUREMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1913–1943","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic inequality; Economics; State income tax; Income inequality metrics; Income distribution; Inequality; Income tax; Revenue; Enforcement; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Tax reform; Finance; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1910027435565111,"gpt":0.3728397494971005,"spread":0.1818370059405894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00659141,0.0001068033,0.0001488129,0.00004222301,0.0004928028,0.0002308581,0.000823144,0.00007125606,0.0001858049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002660463,0.00007071943,0.00002212925,0.0001147712,0.0003330829,0.00050438,0.0001867905,0.0001513619,0.0002148365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002158737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015143,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01694626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01649452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980786,0.000782223,0.0003514138,0.0002835951,0.0002132262,0.0002909666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984878,0.0004943471,0.0001538232,0.0007841452,0.00003330347,0.00004654255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091219,0.00008033412,0.7162675,0.00004683947,0.0000690881,0.000001600924,0.06738485,0.0003177695,0.000006049978,0.05520205,0.1557433,0.00477153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009528359,0.00004863804,0.1598145,0.00002814979,0.00001631052,0.000001219221,0.01976835,0.005974471,0.000006662366,0.009792337,0.8032888,0.0003077425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835712,0.0001307258,0.00003255932,0.003243657,0.002219406,0.0004178184,0.00009062875,0.00002065852,0.0102733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966143,0.0002389439,0.00003043711,0.001568824,0.0005502268,0.00001103216,0.0001804541,0.000007639835,0.0007981732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6475455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124161177","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00149.x","title":"PRICE MATCHING AND THE DOMINO EFFECT IN A RETAIL GASOLINE MARKET","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Gasoline; Domino effect; Economics; Matching (statistics); Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Agricultural economics; Market share; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Finance; Statistics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01334275266537233,"gpt":0.2076113107652289,"spread":0.1942685580998566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002735535,0.0002597939,0.0007193355,0.0001834659,0.0001154581,0.0001577434,0.0003390389,0.0001519889,0.0003995752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008230696,0.0002145202,0.0001493544,0.00007816702,0.0001526054,0.0004126094,0.00009269638,0.0003006433,0.0003747037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001744961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001513928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001122763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006233555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981106,0.00006503909,0.0008275622,0.0005670847,0.00001572989,0.000413962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987633,0.000365242,0.0003676758,0.0004107365,0.000006016523,0.00008698681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002407144,0.0001611069,0.02779077,0.0000965877,0.0002552712,0.00003109462,0.006603023,0.0003676547,0.0000444631,0.9065105,0.04308519,0.01264716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01880587,0.00050858,0.3469921,0.00009260655,0.00003541083,0.0001036698,0.0004720377,0.004398691,0.00008086787,0.555963,0.07112656,0.001420686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8571082,0.003336754,0.00006166005,0.004528991,0.0009997865,0.0004839892,0.0000201503,0.00003621239,0.1334242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949698,0.0008446698,0.0002142551,0.001691579,0.0007798701,0.0000358512,0.00000848589,0.00001877997,0.001436722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3505476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8747882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082039159","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00374.x","title":"GENDER AND THE INFLUENCE OF PEER ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL ACTIVITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cargill (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual intercourse; Alcohol consumption; Alcohol; Consumption (sociology); Peer group; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Developmental psychology; Demography; Social psychology; Population; Biology; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2454840736410954,"gpt":0.3874719426846241,"spread":0.1419878690435287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005895791,0.00004742037,0.00008312262,0.00002564001,0.0001303012,0.00001724439,0.00009648646,0.00003709602,0.0008129307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003096546,0.00003744261,0.00003718651,0.00001052548,0.0005455777,0.0001281071,0.00003439587,0.00007005977,0.000108783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004587587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002755495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001921135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000356699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995071,0.0001027986,0.000115499,0.0001165816,0.00005972962,0.00009834233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996985,0.00004461073,0.0000836663,0.0001199761,0.00002294669,0.00003029758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006877519,0.0005421576,0.5152912,0.0001342305,0.0002087165,0.000002086942,0.2538163,0.000165509,0.0008981449,0.1925987,0.0212863,0.01436885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005970987,0.00003839037,0.9919921,0.00001964475,0.00001694837,6.898176e-7,0.004028352,0.00004788554,0.0004782497,0.000665111,0.002033113,0.00008245627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937924,0.00002071716,0.00003426541,0.0001453619,0.0003943732,0.0001301471,0.000007193776,0.000009489298,0.005466053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992943,0.0000296509,0.000008486006,0.0001254295,0.0001525193,0.000007875719,5.230866e-7,0.000003196477,0.0003780465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4767009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8901021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969143167","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12829","title":"THE U.S. LABOR INCOME SHARE AND AUTOMATION SHOCKS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"University of California, Irvine","keywords":"Economics; Indexation; Wage share; Investment (military); Wage; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Efficiency wage","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02110859803657688,"gpt":0.2386675677777431,"spread":0.2175589697411662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007357814,0.0001518398,0.0002883904,0.0001058865,0.0001968728,0.0001722317,0.0002797872,0.000110314,0.00168637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000366524,0.0001512506,0.00007105121,0.00004161826,0.0001158928,0.0004063395,0.0001154509,0.0001401183,0.0122826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001576806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002632644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008557984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004636044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998758,0.00002050956,0.000547577,0.0003764119,0.000006301753,0.0002911584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989711,0.0001769342,0.0002944602,0.0004773087,0.000006739792,0.00007343636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001593542,0.000005858038,0.1097092,0.00001656185,0.00003651607,3.049339e-7,0.0009216177,0.00009421268,0.000003857512,0.8856685,0.002228161,0.001299355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105043,0.00008657218,0.2267525,0.00002200894,0.000004438456,0.00001640868,0.0005449415,0.006120594,0.0000770917,0.3618155,0.4028839,0.0005708617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607328,0.001262239,0.00001930899,0.00114183,0.002947161,0.0002242754,0.0001634129,0.00005769712,0.03345123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924596,0.0002621086,0.00004946855,0.0006293845,0.0007832486,0.00002567971,0.00001738101,0.00002749665,0.005745659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771224957","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12531","title":"ASSIMILATION IN THE RISK PREFERENCES OF SPOUSES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Assortative mating; Economics; Preference; Correlation; Econometrics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Mating; Expected utility hypothesis; Biology; Financial economics; Ecology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1310602814346956,"gpt":0.3734627799807295,"spread":0.242402498546034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001945151,0.00004746897,0.0001085714,0.00002709058,0.0004905439,0.00008580143,0.0004879197,0.00006042378,0.0001855847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003169105,0.00003530766,0.00003977145,0.00001330505,0.0004215813,0.0003663177,0.0000315284,0.0000772035,0.00004978371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006026046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001090274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01388106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02200483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992616,0.0002316168,0.0001957581,0.0001084069,0.00007595363,0.0001266638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992013,0.0001712743,0.0002950492,0.0003020053,0.00001424866,0.00001611302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001620166,0.00003605132,0.8567834,0.000006895402,0.000009340689,3.725908e-7,0.0897532,0.00004495086,0.000003933988,0.04098332,0.004204077,0.008158281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001506301,0.00001925712,0.9503616,0.000008816027,0.000005503537,6.707726e-8,0.01144388,0.00008441756,0.00005003456,0.0247924,0.01301148,0.00007187399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8782529,0.00002222603,0.00001029916,0.0004685793,0.001227161,0.00009269937,0.000009500296,0.000006855774,0.1199098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987756,0.000167224,0.00002754149,0.00007011813,0.0008247921,0.000005294124,0.000001396083,0.000002382348,0.0001256737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1205227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}