{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":18,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"de01f93be4de","filters":{"venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation"}},"results":[{"id":"W1972548285","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2013.767624","title":"Assessing statistical aspects of test fairness with structural equation modelling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Measurement invariance; Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Item response theory; Social psychology; Statistics; Psychometrics; Test validity; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics; Computer science; Developmental psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8738377455316619,"gpt":0.6435779505699563,"spread":0.2302597949617057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299373,0.00007252405,0.0001390823,0.0005194827,0.0002893362,0.0005325719,0.0002015101,0.00003988286,0.001965525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1212204,0.00004815019,0.00001244173,0.001383647,0.0002156028,0.0008394137,0.00004754601,0.0001646507,0.00004205663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007830153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007182315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002756359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008790206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949804,0.0007247317,0.0003956738,0.0003469921,0.00331354,0.000238651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9068164,0.08746363,0.0002147373,0.0002720208,0.005084917,0.0001482897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000510238,0.0002189025,0.3536878,0.00004387392,0.00002585977,3.675041e-7,0.001043514,0.02011895,0.002186822,0.1255162,0.002257361,0.4948493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011597,0.00007618684,0.3260706,0.0000123356,0.000002194918,0.000002156089,0.0008300514,0.3031575,0.00005974195,0.3696504,0.000006346218,0.00003131996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8903921,0.0001383288,0.1000552,0.00145083,0.0001052935,0.0003536895,0.000004016052,0.00000436946,0.007496204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462619,0.00000450642,0.05339193,0.000007885283,0.0001182303,0.00005482688,0.00002487934,0.000004892989,0.0001309854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4948179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999097841","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383489","title":"Reflection on Teaching: Types and Goals of Reflection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Elaboration; Cognition; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3760522189486467,"gpt":0.6269748441534377,"spread":0.250922625204791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008097867,0.00006090586,0.00007149443,0.0003468978,0.0009569364,0.00009286078,0.00007147019,0.00007723358,0.0002261031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009838794,0.00006138942,0.00001329065,0.0004027153,0.0003118079,0.000493875,0.00001747222,0.0002854301,0.00003925623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006935991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00138101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001648912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005804764,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972333,0.001013433,0.0001626903,0.0002504392,0.001149248,0.0001908342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975659,0.001127839,0.0001032321,0.0001122218,0.0009923022,0.00009850336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002749707,0.0009108479,0.01290311,0.0000398993,0.00004307479,6.787134e-8,0.03467089,0.0002370717,0.0118505,0.8128632,0.001951306,0.124255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005223121,0.0007030726,0.1714575,0.00009052442,0.00002427954,0.000003172435,0.006834874,0.00008994309,0.002455735,0.7967499,0.02093502,0.0001335898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8096282,0.0002909089,0.00003766343,0.01782432,0.0003584941,0.0004174896,9.020089e-7,0.000008641125,0.1714334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961259,0.0003814561,0.001255627,0.00004165435,0.0005585679,0.0001000604,0.0000156575,0.000006844223,0.001514246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1864977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066162995","doi":"10.1080/13803610902804382","title":"Factors influencing academic success and retention following a 1st-year post-secondary success course","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Youth Substance Use and School Attendance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Academic achievement; Coping (psychology); Impulsivity; Attendance; Anxiety; Openness to experience; Mental health; Disadvantaged; Developmental psychology; Study skills; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1829247299426056,"gpt":0.4844617614922884,"spread":0.3015370315496828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005429334,0.00009618227,0.0001126,0.0001930527,0.0012421,0.0002312148,0.0001716674,0.0001242725,0.0004012278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001727298,0.00009196052,0.00003346469,0.0004580162,0.0001886698,0.001244457,0.00002307155,0.0004620568,0.00001902644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002194231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008479932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008369273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970116,0.0004800478,0.0002154467,0.0003323022,0.001553011,0.0004075938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981955,0.0005287392,0.00007135305,0.0001094797,0.0008501048,0.0002447822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007228324,0.0000993481,0.910207,0.00002798388,0.00003161185,8.130766e-7,0.03778651,0.000007722356,0.00246417,0.01659253,0.002351072,0.0303589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002788857,0.00006978837,0.9581619,0.00007293336,0.00001629795,3.584133e-7,0.01299337,0.00006410082,0.00006106214,0.02780798,0.0003624008,0.0001109373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828004,0.002408665,0.000003768395,0.009872962,0.0002709564,0.000424694,0.000007654675,0.00001533944,0.004195588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982731,0.0003656461,0.00007228043,0.0001283599,0.000375844,0.00003317327,0.00007118585,0.000006164074,0.0006742752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04795483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9553351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145422031","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.185.3869","title":"Technology Integration for Students with Disabilities: Empirically Based Recommendations for Faculty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Adaptation (eye); Sample (material); Medical education; Psychology; Assistive technology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4490256415916569,"gpt":0.6137609149944456,"spread":0.1647352734027888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004232898,0.00007681375,0.00009034335,0.0002206284,0.0009717458,0.0003263952,0.0002289076,0.00007276668,0.0005109065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01437979,0.00006543986,0.00003079017,0.0005640338,0.0007460564,0.0005806264,0.00002400075,0.00008559281,0.000009420412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005599523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001570123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002438116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003974114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979825,0.0001690804,0.0002081643,0.0003153477,0.001010163,0.0003147573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938026,0.003134432,0.00004986731,0.0001467929,0.002761515,0.0001047634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008357188,0.002878856,0.4202909,0.0001160851,0.00006408006,2.200151e-8,0.01714402,0.00004528111,0.0000464079,0.3294834,0.04594315,0.1831521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001165525,0.0008597694,0.02873165,0.00007234331,0.00002134716,3.839263e-7,0.08579426,0.001482811,0.00005769597,0.7946508,0.08698776,0.0001756582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532913,0.0000391671,0.002267095,0.1350694,0.0001164957,0.003174385,0.00014283,0.0000281061,0.005871241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841739,0.00001085807,0.004764524,0.00007685303,0.0001912148,0.004519241,0.001097182,0.000009391966,0.005156832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4651674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072781869","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.223.3863","title":"Developing a Computer-Assisted Tutoring Program to Help Children at Risk Learn to Read","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport Québec","keywords":"Formative assessment; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Computer science; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Social constructivism; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Program evaluation; Multimedia; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2832570754041315,"gpt":0.5312908933485849,"spread":0.2480338179444534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004801281,0.00006329457,0.00006599911,0.0002188902,0.001428305,0.0002174375,0.0001599984,0.00004599557,0.0005801009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001956845,0.00006394812,0.00001497914,0.0009389966,0.00008180686,0.0002247657,0.00008129884,0.0001519241,0.0005440025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007603582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001232822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003592763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006870931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974714,0.0003817032,0.0001367537,0.0002711246,0.001316282,0.0004227368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982717,0.0003895721,0.00003224202,0.0001172893,0.0008675954,0.0003216179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005800821,0.00009317135,0.4174922,0.000004812804,0.00001269582,1.214071e-7,0.006325831,0.00009613183,0.00002603433,0.001112371,0.01347163,0.561307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001383613,0.0001444566,0.905765,0.00004362976,0.000003728862,0.000001626705,0.0006380117,0.0003306484,0.00001662762,0.001010046,0.09181935,0.00008849427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.966164,0.0001121141,0.00008558046,0.02766053,0.0001845022,0.0009864857,0.000001993258,0.00002302604,0.004781805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793089,0.0003111854,0.007436674,0.0002156313,0.003031339,0.0006228592,0.00008000083,0.00001009846,0.008983338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5612185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027477741","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383479","title":"Students' Experiences With Good and Poor University Courses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Coding (social sciences); Context (archaeology); Teaching method; Pedagogy; Sample (material); Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2813300470844611,"gpt":0.5690290472988807,"spread":0.2876990002144196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006565021,0.00004554671,0.00004656582,0.0001343465,0.001339089,0.0001972893,0.000142936,0.00003237964,0.0005360152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002024168,0.00004186626,0.000005974333,0.0002623182,0.0005694054,0.0006968028,0.00003551296,0.0001244347,0.00002528264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002575612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001955959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003094281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002292693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968658,0.0006811533,0.00006390159,0.0001729028,0.002043339,0.0001728912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981869,0.0008516438,0.00004753512,0.00006555459,0.0007105874,0.0001378075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002668712,0.0009742188,0.2035022,0.00002066017,0.00007508001,0.000001252562,0.3898708,0.0001195508,0.0001174812,0.3855625,0.002253132,0.0172362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00103642,0.0003233271,0.3293645,0.00005547358,0.00002608188,0.000003048087,0.63752,0.00004215874,0.00003937995,0.01494446,0.01651502,0.0001301558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528521,0.0002707249,0.00001622814,0.03651663,0.00007003811,0.0003307072,0.000001057817,0.000008571798,0.009933932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963318,0.0001667125,0.0005475244,0.00003533536,0.000142147,0.00002802193,0.000008834833,0.000002939264,0.002736722],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.370618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058115470","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383539","title":"Acquisition of Complex Systemic Thinking: Mental Models of Evolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Similarity (geometry); Complex adaptive system; Pathfinder; Complex system; Mental model; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.377250872500605,"gpt":0.4398021171032117,"spread":0.06255124460260664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238157,0.00005831344,0.00009019524,0.0003067489,0.0003971051,0.00004872895,0.0001095309,0.00002846877,0.001296817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001636876,0.0000542384,0.00002624882,0.00014408,0.0004588616,0.0004936585,0.00002335886,0.00007499721,0.00002372131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003650491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008889053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005998461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000156374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998062,0.0001487045,0.0002756898,0.000161832,0.001203934,0.0001478724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978923,0.0001340133,0.0001204045,0.0001169515,0.001678175,0.00005812824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002286787,0.0002279281,0.0003020717,0.00004706031,0.000007885104,7.162583e-9,0.02549071,0.0007706058,0.005726559,0.9654474,0.001649686,0.0003072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006242128,0.0002465487,0.02408673,0.0001796695,0.00001344469,0.000005505068,0.0229247,0.009787199,0.000537893,0.9412178,0.0002809026,0.00009541723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737657,0.0005613836,0.0003835109,0.004094062,0.0004183747,0.0004710509,0.00002343579,0.000006618669,0.02027582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986271,0.00002895426,0.000277547,0.0000171504,0.0002603079,0.00005079945,0.0001645091,0.000004280493,0.0005694082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0248613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019696548","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383499","title":"Cross-Case Study of Self-Regulated Learning as a Series of Events","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Self-regulated learning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Construct (python library); Adaptation (eye); Strengths and weaknesses; Exploratory research; Test (biology); Computer science; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.279952846329902,"gpt":0.6007857704695032,"spread":0.3208329241396012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110383,0.00006867365,0.00011788,0.0003146901,0.0003032124,0.00001701275,0.00007465991,0.00005599167,0.00127808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002923076,0.00006533916,0.00001660295,0.0005596936,0.0001272247,0.0001134427,0.00003202916,0.0003751394,0.00003024284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009073636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005089394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00185472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002782931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962417,0.002315362,0.0002850917,0.0002214454,0.0007594069,0.0001769732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972855,0.0006599219,0.0001371624,0.0001570339,0.001714383,0.00004600889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007868014,0.007021782,0.6774561,0.00009745664,0.0004459697,0.00001473373,0.2510782,0.003232707,0.004413905,0.02616762,0.0002173472,0.02906737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001945414,0.002509324,0.9437311,0.0000391766,0.00002135299,0.0001302313,0.03021524,0.00007803579,0.0003327708,0.02078119,0.0001363672,0.00007979266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957423,0.0001167249,0.00003368188,0.0003753155,0.000152602,0.0004288799,9.515286e-7,0.00001023746,0.003139354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961901,0.000001842674,0.0008238713,0.000003892542,0.00008362954,0.00008423717,0.00001994756,0.000009616646,0.002782855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.266275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065172628","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2011.563087","title":"Studying for success: diaries of students' study behaviours","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Set (abstract data type); Academic achievement; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.641263373496236,"gpt":0.6376982019110164,"spread":0.003565171585219518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0206622,0.00006646706,0.0001087313,0.0002896278,0.0003233847,0.00003137997,0.0001757891,0.00003782203,0.001833939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002373463,0.00006074607,0.00001792875,0.0002469168,0.0001529375,0.00008374266,0.00004407494,0.0002286209,0.00001511542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005306917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002086558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007451366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004175635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965517,0.001941002,0.0002271049,0.0002472253,0.0008226279,0.0002103584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968418,0.001512531,0.00008535208,0.0001749136,0.001339251,0.00004618349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001954568,0.002264192,0.9049432,0.000008705206,0.00007795553,9.377283e-8,0.06142258,7.848533e-7,0.00007195623,0.01343717,0.001130608,0.01644726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007307596,0.0009949035,0.9691514,0.00001024534,0.00002765702,5.462676e-7,0.01965216,0.00001427362,0.00005111255,0.009221873,0.00009047816,0.00005459317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932012,0.0001863842,0.0004422025,0.0002005532,0.0003622079,0.001134727,0.000005491278,0.000006172109,0.004461073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955789,0.000001283807,0.001783997,0.000008202232,0.0001449737,0.0007123459,0.0000325641,0.00001033088,0.001727413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06420815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970473206","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.161.3867","title":"Backs to the Wall: Supporting Teacher Professional Development With Technology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Education and Technology Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Professional development; Connection (principal bundle); Faculty development; Curriculum development; Engineering management; Pedagogy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1854220204988851,"gpt":0.5366876010260208,"spread":0.3512655805271357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005515093,0.0000595177,0.00005028721,0.000332146,0.001560922,0.00007451965,0.0002000826,0.00009438227,0.002668637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002487974,0.00003983464,0.000006964063,0.0009771488,0.0003068689,0.0001317865,0.00003373269,0.0002879181,0.000267717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003484021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002477226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005122568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979882,0.0002788567,0.0001543916,0.0002181093,0.001042945,0.0003175221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981432,0.0002897618,0.00004813498,0.000134599,0.001280254,0.0001040459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007850867,0.000618818,0.2906868,0.000006552732,0.00003547091,4.1373e-7,0.04428672,0.000009822671,0.0002443798,0.2517041,0.07944745,0.332881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001966154,0.0001008856,0.2304124,0.00004392779,0.000005798162,0.000006754147,0.05337685,0.0001300158,0.0001872888,0.0281249,0.6872993,0.0001152587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6888188,0.00007074847,0.00004648832,0.2965842,0.000165137,0.0005836288,2.285154e-7,0.00001936976,0.01371141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627318,0.00002031246,0.001067016,0.0002375683,0.0001921154,0.0007973168,0.00003186137,0.000005556561,0.03491645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6078519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995874702","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2014.997915","title":"What response rates are needed to make reliable inferences from student evaluations of teaching?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Statistics; Confidence interval; Stability (learning theory); Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3841725397005639,"gpt":0.6224553468616918,"spread":0.2382828071611279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06037384,0.0001076211,0.0001664121,0.000472268,0.001422941,0.0006376741,0.0003798661,0.00008898683,0.001799176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08054115,0.0001068775,0.00003137282,0.0004978644,0.0002789024,0.001083772,0.0001018285,0.0003412331,0.0002034729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003554278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007677795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004638789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862183,0.00859986,0.0004041464,0.0004076834,0.004039878,0.0003300765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820212,0.01421815,0.0002566345,0.0003213306,0.002915258,0.0002673909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001922328,0.002671622,0.2344193,0.00005999624,0.0002410927,2.300689e-7,0.3396611,0.003256903,0.009580683,0.1698703,0.1300956,0.1082209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006066111,0.0004015348,0.7075664,0.000285538,0.00005168014,2.310838e-7,0.1255289,0.002288506,0.000366542,0.1054463,0.05725489,0.0002027877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8305631,0.0004047102,0.000061527,0.1630583,0.0005797557,0.0007831887,0.000006758305,0.00001396738,0.004528666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920956,0.0001551477,0.002171646,0.0004046936,0.0005144461,0.0003080333,0.00006598508,0.00001057199,0.004273884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4731472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058526604","doi":"10.1080/13803610600587008","title":"Variation in socioeconomic gradients among cantons in French- and Italian-speaking Switzerland: Findings from the OECD PISA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"German; Socioeconomic status; Variation (astronomy); Multilevel model; Inequality; Psychology; Literacy; Demography; Geography; Sociology; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08711754206741903,"gpt":0.415676199344836,"spread":0.328558657277417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004176562,0.00004903298,0.00005671517,0.0001451624,0.0005075278,0.000164519,0.00009835087,0.00005509735,0.0005940565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004597871,0.00004320373,0.000008716639,0.0001687921,0.0001696791,0.0004565034,0.0000190077,0.0001798943,0.00004035834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003581141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005823324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1790378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3741565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.0003222368,0.0001563477,0.0001864981,0.0004952168,0.0002307339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988396,0.0008940869,0.00003705494,0.00006743108,0.0001152817,0.00004660566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062406,0.00003093662,0.978211,0.000001879206,0.000002150986,5.14297e-8,0.01630264,0.00002307884,0.00005723737,0.001664814,0.002397124,0.001302811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002666498,0.000009895184,0.9587958,0.00002287024,0.000002004654,9.124702e-8,0.00162971,0.001245469,0.000004120638,0.03699604,0.0009793504,0.00004802012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862347,0.0004261759,9.271267e-7,0.009789722,0.000152806,0.0003117626,0.000007990876,0.000002461675,0.003073508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986593,0.0001675939,0.00002723572,0.00003683118,0.0005099701,0.00008702375,0.0000752886,0.000003262864,0.0004335157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1951187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8264291,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093238068","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2020.1830119","title":"Effective numeracy educational interventions for students from disadvantaged social background: a comparison of two teaching methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Mathematics education; Socioeconomic status; Numeracy; Subtraction; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Teaching method; Social constructivism; Mastery learning; Social studies; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Medicine; Population; Literacy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3621773880824998,"gpt":0.6742622103928949,"spread":0.3120848223103951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005676711,0.000113168,0.0002755397,0.0001732831,0.0003525686,0.00008769799,0.0001710976,0.00004368048,0.00209468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006037673,0.0001039621,0.0001073294,0.0001415008,0.00009506279,0.0002378335,0.0001194418,0.000239007,0.0000721195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000251828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002773428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006168377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003371648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971403,0.0008470491,0.0004417667,0.0002938746,0.001065428,0.0002115136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797677,0.01897317,0.0001665445,0.0001126877,0.0009024015,0.00007749023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005792561,0.01328859,0.08273414,0.001470898,0.0008776666,6.125653e-8,0.02389511,0.000006288928,0.01124153,0.6642212,0.01478604,0.1868993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001174767,0.000167892,0.1423737,0.0003075711,0.00005574033,4.314438e-7,0.002614543,0.0007684712,0.0008508827,0.8515108,0.00006793185,0.0001071984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875306,0.0001871005,0.006126776,0.00161586,0.0002031713,0.002037361,0.00005553836,0.00000560867,0.002237913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204307,0.000002403303,0.07722922,0.00001434748,0.0002536981,0.0006595379,0.0003727403,0.00001418568,0.001023217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1872897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004698653","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2012.704171","title":"An interdisciplinary analysis of microteaching evaluation forms: how peer feedback forms shape what constitutes “good teaching”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Microteaching; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Teaching method; Peer feedback; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Psychology; Sample (material); Peer assessment; Perception; Session (web analytics); Pedagogy; Computer science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3791535234857442,"gpt":0.5708644718789562,"spread":0.191710948393212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03131589,0.0001310485,0.000207935,0.0008182371,0.001517401,0.0004464889,0.0002428358,0.0001093196,0.001515701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004590264,0.0001176034,0.00008458056,0.0008579036,0.0006228106,0.003490186,0.0000763778,0.0003844292,0.00002232835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006181078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001372817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003218938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001202328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994076,0.00197161,0.0002831868,0.0003154813,0.002837197,0.0005165559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958319,0.001163184,0.0001659233,0.0002425267,0.00230539,0.0002910846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005241382,0.00126872,0.1519628,0.00003723102,0.0005243775,2.175468e-8,0.6035361,0.00005023999,0.0006145908,0.05547159,0.003970542,0.1825113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002809219,0.00008507004,0.3855582,0.00005132566,0.0003432044,5.509812e-7,0.5987926,0.003205979,0.00005085107,0.008851834,0.002624556,0.0001549225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016514,0.002757801,0.00005941181,0.08699906,0.0004218133,0.0007842378,0.000008264445,0.00001395526,0.007304005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971227,0.0001297576,0.0004849828,0.00006503094,0.0006368547,0.0002603972,0.0004819594,0.00000950939,0.0008088218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2335953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138121929","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2021.1902354","title":"Linking personality to teachers’ literacy in classroom assessment: a cross-cultural study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Formative assessment; Psychology; Literacy; Competence (human resources); Personality; Pedagogy; Big Five personality traits; Empathy; Mathematics education; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3451683761205265,"gpt":0.6177916604486202,"spread":0.2726232843280937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007226261,0.00007393266,0.00009562528,0.0001254399,0.0006990921,0.0007890092,0.000207131,0.00004507515,0.001270168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002294073,0.00007151397,0.00002158488,0.0008172659,0.0001397975,0.0007060949,0.00008402336,0.0003113312,0.00008254984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005120414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001201182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00126924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959885,0.001010708,0.0002005033,0.0003464323,0.002126968,0.0003268134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979138,0.0006380613,0.00003548997,0.00007600218,0.001089393,0.0002472563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002413306,0.0002702442,0.8048605,0.000004262383,0.000008065348,2.436779e-7,0.1861819,0.000008242295,0.00007859927,0.002309792,0.0009238812,0.005330147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005006884,0.000167154,0.9386687,0.00001558743,0.00000440866,6.134508e-8,0.05335585,0.0005311088,0.000001147081,0.002368171,0.004310113,0.0000769745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457912,0.00008685523,0.000006110958,0.03467498,0.0001143778,0.001038607,0.000002397707,0.000008689523,0.01827675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973008,0.00001597839,0.0004106427,0.0001783468,0.0008254659,0.0002446477,0.0000420534,0.000005085067,0.0009769781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1338082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066424609","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383469","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Postsecondary Instruction: The Old Science of Phrenology and the New Science of College Teaching","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Ideological and Political Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Phrenology; Science education; Mathematics education; Postsecondary education; Pseudoscience; Psychology; Higher education; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08567639787092902,"gpt":0.4682868208877472,"spread":0.3826104230168182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454109,0.00004591409,0.00006989804,0.0001831686,0.002449732,0.0000821518,0.0003467065,0.00002993044,0.0005996078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01639448,0.00002365977,0.00001336675,0.001067283,0.007197023,0.0002396077,0.0000758683,0.0002406342,0.00002044265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002407428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004764014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002658641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003704176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974752,0.000479301,0.0001698058,0.0002207247,0.001408305,0.0002466453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975675,0.001099053,0.00006165127,0.0001687489,0.0009860146,0.0001169789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007875051,0.00004588032,0.000050082,0.000002413178,0.000002052469,5.357211e-9,0.01364955,0.000050965,0.0003169526,0.9538333,0.006451887,0.02551815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007202161,0.0003846465,0.117582,0.0000241468,0.00001247885,0.000006094659,0.02407519,0.00007620987,0.002130684,0.8018693,0.05304678,0.00007222902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963643,0.00005504361,0.000002815998,0.3897034,0.0006371419,0.0004047444,0.000002077264,0.000001315513,0.01282917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894889,0.00003318365,0.000146243,0.0002681334,0.008654369,0.00003218084,0.000001999805,0.000001509303,0.001373472],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3931246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404492912","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2024.2424351","title":"Learning outcomes as perceived enjoyment in studying accounting – personal & environmental factors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Accounting; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1488242718146422,"gpt":0.4099923288152525,"spread":0.2611680570006103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087705,0.0001477271,0.0001147111,0.0007717625,0.000485546,0.0009198398,0.0001272091,0.0000583693,0.004597099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001675115,0.0001359121,0.00004065375,0.0005731315,0.00009155396,0.0011498,0.0001038907,0.0004233062,0.0008877122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004453546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003146099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006942631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001434289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974828,0.00007067891,0.0002349471,0.0004145223,0.001440741,0.0003563324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990273,0.0005662343,0.00005241587,0.00009279561,0.0002326043,0.00002865885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001514762,0.0002077874,0.9735955,0.0001009396,0.00003363919,5.794767e-7,0.005065392,0.00007038466,0.001084568,0.002460459,0.003821186,0.01354439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000222038,0.00001294769,0.9513288,0.00008604258,0.00001768002,0.000001357418,0.01870885,0.00637406,0.000004233658,0.002660286,0.02042009,0.000163602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870617,0.0004400228,0.000003444394,0.005314361,0.0005521878,0.0003973716,0.00000148651,0.00003239424,0.006197024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950878,0.00003081307,0.00003065048,0.0002145737,0.000784886,0.0001439023,0.0004417388,0.00002343797,0.003242216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02226672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414618650","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2025.2562417","title":"Exploring research-related knowledge and attitudes: a study among university students in Lebanon","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Qatar National Library","keywords":"Knowledge level; Qualitative research; Research methodology; Data collection; Statistical analysis; Higher education","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4192136329234551,"gpt":0.5727066749372391,"spread":0.1534930420137841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01300087,0.00007738855,0.0001294249,0.001875765,0.0004414269,0.00006034786,0.0001297787,0.00006673551,0.0002028293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005786581,0.0000801096,0.00001073825,0.002830844,0.0003743603,0.0003213423,0.0001636596,0.0007059067,0.00003101321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009863202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001659782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003603672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003536799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967941,0.0008104537,0.0002516671,0.0003880176,0.001465838,0.0002899019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967744,0.0008134309,0.00002713725,0.000221036,0.002069753,0.00009422314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001160105,0.00257221,0.9610161,0.00009676784,0.00004873921,0.000001483258,0.006511525,0.000002937419,0.00008773788,0.003487141,0.003688932,0.02237039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001704455,0.0002550608,0.9787715,0.0003423716,0.00001884405,0.000001320008,0.01515204,0.0008150011,0.00001436544,0.002161327,0.0007118606,0.00005182971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863063,0.0004422253,0.000002499479,0.004595065,0.0002172218,0.001672586,5.715877e-7,0.00000834563,0.006755174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937117,0.0002062962,0.0000936447,0.00001425468,0.00008320332,0.0002341553,0.00004750273,0.000006676237,0.005602645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6927496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}