{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":69,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":69,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"114f9f82ddfd","filters":{"venue":"Electoral Studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W2067087535","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.007","title":"A general measure of district competitiveness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Turnout; Margin (machine learning); Measure (data warehouse); General election; Variable (mathematics); Electoral system; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Computer science; Voting; Democracy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1435658534152968,"gpt":0.3898526955696818,"spread":0.246286842154385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002241106,0.00007898529,0.000237077,0.00002813037,0.0004533444,0.000006183563,0.00008459402,0.00004114086,0.00005810512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002746454,0.00006617743,0.00006294301,0.0003008638,0.0004160079,0.0000756083,0.00001604918,0.00005674424,0.00001579015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001062436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009780134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01766785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01617398,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988635,0.0002143607,0.0001913091,0.0001144557,0.0003226773,0.0002936711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993905,0.0001158711,0.00006525285,0.00006709366,0.0002883764,0.00007286321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002028666,0.00006596289,0.9507036,0.00002535492,0.00008422845,0.000005843128,0.002247489,0.000005473475,0.001250057,0.04314858,0.00183965,0.0006034728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004362488,0.0002499555,0.9343379,0.00007468428,0.00004084596,0.000002611477,0.0003191795,0.00001175382,0.004418547,0.001002959,0.05878409,0.00032119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947255,0.001941122,0.00004423533,0.0007316056,0.0001798232,0.0001355249,0.000004506309,0.00004296342,0.002194754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979796,0.00002911046,0.0000392678,0.00004382737,0.0003431961,0.00001790363,0.000001813953,0.00000515803,0.001540147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05694444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000281270","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.007","title":"Referendums and deliberative democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Democracy; Politics; CLARITY; Direct democracy; Brexit; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; European union; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2829394158639238,"gpt":0.4545444389521537,"spread":0.1716050230882298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000369226,0.00007808696,0.0001577581,0.00002298565,0.0003958881,0.00004415352,0.00004614247,0.00004296715,0.000014163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006657459,0.00006213623,0.00001717088,0.0001557857,0.0002019445,0.0001554477,0.00002693299,0.00007060736,0.00004229222],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001298104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007572141,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01547077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05978469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990203,0.0002095518,0.0001301419,0.0001316062,0.0002099484,0.0002984926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993692,0.0001114807,0.00003592476,0.00005041458,0.0002444369,0.00018852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005812906,0.00006993797,0.4939778,0.00002626983,0.0001915234,0.000008980119,0.03048693,0.000003484779,0.0002562921,0.3674923,0.0960395,0.01138888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002151191,0.001522448,0.2971138,0.0001546564,0.0001795053,0.000005888652,0.0131402,0.00009758356,0.001828643,0.2919118,0.3904243,0.001469924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858742,0.003665128,0.00002834179,0.006434963,0.0002873157,0.0001545061,0.000001507389,0.00008280227,0.003471179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965773,0.00001845147,0.0001149949,0.0001849408,0.0003905802,0.00001029872,0.000001057062,0.000005223359,0.002697141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2943848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079970571","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.014","title":"Manipulating electoral laws in Singapore","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Dominance (genetics); Authoritarianism; Political science; Hegemony; Political economy; Democracy; Electoral system; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09881133439723412,"gpt":0.3880717933669963,"spread":0.2892604589697622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004426697,0.0001432638,0.0002603626,0.00007911107,0.0004673876,0.00009345728,0.0001993837,0.00007497513,0.0005142278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003600144,0.0001425865,0.00004604007,0.000308198,0.0002092521,0.0003301284,0.00007137733,0.0001656313,0.0004300886],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006522812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001084345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01298594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04571186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998547,0.0001329438,0.0002838116,0.0002490564,0.0002047847,0.0005824639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.0001784686,0.00009264612,0.00009203539,0.00009560745,0.00006517205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002101682,0.00002068467,0.9728546,0.000006559202,0.00004006439,0.00000345123,0.006466695,0.000003396536,0.0001230799,0.001466352,0.01185283,0.007160209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000462756,0.00004840955,0.9468951,0.00006083525,0.000009965241,9.204532e-7,0.01024999,0.00003938793,0.0001984184,0.006879565,0.03459002,0.0005646828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862663,0.001162228,0.000002320348,0.002253407,0.0005163858,0.0003448196,3.59912e-7,0.0001321255,0.009322071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956059,0.00003382285,0.0008478518,0.0002819401,0.0002777478,0.00008620285,0.000002032735,0.00001538187,0.00284906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03272592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064286289","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(99)00061-x","title":"Declining cleavages and political choices: the interplay of social and political factors in the Netherlands","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Voting behavior; Political economy; Loyalty; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1355722758856662,"gpt":0.4562969713248585,"spread":0.3207246954391923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006050111,0.00008279002,0.0001598948,0.00002768689,0.0007029429,0.0000401733,0.0001039833,0.00003606247,0.00001344771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006722344,0.00004346901,0.00003136444,0.0001324347,0.0008362942,0.00006629999,0.0000505277,0.0001143684,7.211872e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004575195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000394034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005397724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02865389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989094,0.000268241,0.0001893082,0.0001122172,0.0002100569,0.0003107859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985535,0.001243693,0.00003807791,0.00003454724,0.00009766335,0.00003247804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001123278,0.0000274251,0.5735265,0.000005689084,0.00004476307,3.978039e-7,0.03515942,1.275566e-7,0.000008208218,0.3900282,0.001104297,0.00008368579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001108152,0.00007016386,0.8445097,0.00001451662,0.00002075565,0.000001402141,0.1307856,0.000003536824,0.00003304,0.01195402,0.01240727,0.00008925881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622872,0.001078819,0.000002420129,0.0342358,0.0001258984,0.00007600443,0.000004291524,0.000006672209,0.002182825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981807,0.00007728895,0.00001023155,0.0008827513,0.0005865233,0.00001372713,0.000001575324,0.000002890876,0.0002443072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3780742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004014127","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.013","title":"The impact of motivational and contextual factors on turnout in first- and second-order elections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Turnout; Competition (biology); Voting; Political science; Order (exchange); Salient; Voter turnout; Politics; Political economy; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1198849138845915,"gpt":0.388257621676223,"spread":0.2683727077916315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002276028,0.00008015103,0.0001455755,0.00003836439,0.0004767123,0.00001847372,0.00004007704,0.00003946959,0.00004368931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005334382,0.00004825054,0.00002744457,0.0001954017,0.0003268881,0.00008508126,0.00001428439,0.00008342553,0.000001202488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009186356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004814644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03978571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2291318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992704,0.0001106046,0.0001647866,0.0001031069,0.0001159351,0.0002351877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.0004990564,0.00005597578,0.00004231616,0.0001158755,0.00004492596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002282964,0.0000294651,0.9805392,0.00000420783,0.00005196195,1.521515e-7,0.005531529,0.00000130745,0.00005276447,0.01316687,0.0004637801,0.0001359182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001309145,0.0002691206,0.9961625,0.00001403857,0.000004433968,1.36249e-7,0.0005458503,0.000007412639,0.0001250395,0.002244401,0.0004360419,0.00006015109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997925,0.0007738133,0.000001513577,0.0002315413,0.00005931222,0.0001494496,0.000005064833,0.00001063168,0.0008436429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995757,0.00002731997,0.000003595705,0.00001404073,0.00005004565,0.00001498827,6.406378e-7,0.000003682029,0.0003099453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.189346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666085,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079127360","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.005","title":"Does low turnout matter? Evidence from the 2000 Canadian federal election","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; McGill University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Population; Demographic economics; Voter turnout; General election; Public administration; Economics; Voting; Demography; Sociology; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04216701789567799,"gpt":0.3408536668405069,"spread":0.2986866489448289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577032,0.0001396682,0.0001930225,0.00003117811,0.001695437,0.0002115145,0.0001727001,0.00007778015,0.0003898171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002591668,0.00007487883,0.00006530706,0.0002988333,0.0002204447,0.0002444808,0.00001659606,0.0001462701,0.0003133534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008911657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003268272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981925,0.0003349503,0.0002340775,0.000232954,0.0003299424,0.0006755669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991736,0.0003213186,0.00006762771,0.0001308445,0.0001776328,0.0001289064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006225982,0.000009996143,0.9335704,0.00000477983,0.00002914315,0.000001758724,0.001029423,0.000005578282,0.0002809719,0.0005640808,0.06421248,0.0002851289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008375904,0.00004002829,0.9505802,0.0001269623,0.00002594674,2.587084e-7,0.000192323,0.00001248574,0.0005903365,0.004670822,0.04344969,0.0002271536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659076,0.003464671,0.000009566962,0.02827409,0.0009940621,0.000306899,0.00001472017,0.00007031821,0.0009581185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917212,0.00002281193,0.00001114376,0.0006905255,0.002303158,0.00005188552,0.000006226889,0.00001024862,0.005182832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02758357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049548963","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102200","title":"Do young voters vote for young leaders?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Turnout; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Voter turnout; General election; Focus (optics); Test (biology); Voting; Demographic economics; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1894769831263216,"gpt":0.4088726975056647,"spread":0.2193957143793432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001393223,0.00007992191,0.0001342372,0.00001860624,0.0005572543,0.00006013539,0.0001044803,0.00003644201,0.000006876075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000288275,0.00007069283,0.00007254022,0.000145506,0.0001998581,0.00008970718,0.00002761165,0.00005713661,0.00001254023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000680676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004738508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002273981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006829142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991174,0.00004839731,0.0001132187,0.000186899,0.0002088497,0.0003252437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996458,0.00005724479,0.00004158289,0.00004772612,0.0001227231,0.00008489892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008654431,0.00006252894,0.340635,0.0001698828,0.0006862003,0.00001056085,0.3988027,0.00006312005,0.002868365,0.03634244,0.2151624,0.005110299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003470307,0.001055689,0.09173027,0.00008240576,0.0004332527,0.000003615658,0.518393,0.0006578871,0.006885012,0.02535085,0.3499916,0.001946099],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288035,0.01333276,0.003277302,0.1346664,0.004139259,0.001888835,0.00003819524,0.0004666402,0.01338714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972232,0.00006535976,0.0002098114,0.0004237255,0.0008265323,0.00002714496,0.000002704426,0.000008585049,0.001212909],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2489047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4286006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004949851","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.007","title":"Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Focus (optics); Disapproval voting; Politics; Process (computing); Decision process; Political science; Computer science; Voting behavior; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Economics; Management science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07962281699408218,"gpt":0.4097058309488127,"spread":0.3300830139547306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005032725,0.0001003054,0.0001697014,0.00002101337,0.001057075,0.0001128888,0.0001007028,0.0000578179,0.00004490096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001334339,0.00006011474,0.00003741452,0.0002042831,0.0004673947,0.0002027604,0.00007041255,0.0001244683,0.0001146685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001366065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005238568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02224744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04035483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.000265668,0.0001965316,0.000168029,0.0002177165,0.0006008649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.0007257649,0.00003658245,0.00007827795,0.000246942,0.0001707754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004424669,0.00004299076,0.2299382,0.00002018643,0.00003936631,5.342837e-7,0.001680244,2.384146e-7,0.000108108,0.748939,0.009076738,0.01015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005614964,0.0003148915,0.8236857,0.0001823393,0.00009153152,0.000003818378,0.00322263,0.0007570586,0.0005535989,0.09293441,0.07701611,0.0006764202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819303,0.003211745,0.0001060984,0.01045382,0.0002953759,0.0004999322,9.079696e-7,0.00007813046,0.003423744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982404,0.000005054824,0.00005304423,0.0002016126,0.0005589523,0.00007617932,3.29099e-7,0.000006500365,0.0008579626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6560045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1163814443","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.006","title":"Regional variation in voter turnout in Europe: The impact of corruption perceptions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Language change; Legislature; Ballot; Political science; Socioeconomic status; Government (linguistics); Multilevel model; Perception; Voter turnout; Politics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economics; Voting; Sociology; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1465786776799941,"gpt":0.4024772156909618,"spread":0.2558985380109678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007106994,0.00005417302,0.0001092048,0.00007299006,0.0000868532,0.00001548717,0.00007728295,0.00002521757,0.00007558527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002689637,0.00003784318,0.00002807069,0.0003733335,0.00009132027,0.0001134318,0.00002592318,0.00007172731,0.00004092827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005844976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002249657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01013455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05026373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999327,0.0001428388,0.0001782247,0.00009224225,0.0001179416,0.0001417475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996679,0.00005006363,0.00006025264,0.00005257066,0.0001408514,0.00002840775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005851982,0.00007312223,0.9078304,0.000001926978,0.00002486882,8.279295e-7,0.08200874,0.0005711941,0.0001242688,0.0008130904,0.00345495,0.00503807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002103747,0.00003889919,0.9940223,0.00001081938,0.000001837571,3.309731e-7,0.002964299,0.0000929278,4.097458e-7,0.0002679651,0.002338876,0.00005094069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959804,0.000199648,0.00001524126,0.002141777,0.0001816832,0.0001273755,9.847568e-7,0.00001057884,0.001342338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989777,0.0001242108,0.00003064053,0.00005148627,0.00008130845,0.00001348637,0.000001970868,0.00000278136,0.0007164373],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08619191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883667544","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2018.07.002","title":"What makes people believe that their party won the election?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Parliament; Split-ticket voting; Primary election; Single non-transferable vote; General election; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Test (biology); Whip (tree); Realigning election; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Socialism; Geography; Communism","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1136041824505604,"gpt":0.3978521741450243,"spread":0.2842479916944639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007120526,0.0001646148,0.0002452586,0.00003153073,0.002136594,0.0002679077,0.0002032252,0.00007950622,0.0001706164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000293275,0.00009752208,0.00008838668,0.00051287,0.0005939041,0.0004703012,0.00004846718,0.000146297,0.0002019209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001884644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008022545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01420502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.437256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980861,0.0004170334,0.0002041582,0.0002442166,0.0003739264,0.0006745509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989343,0.0003615678,0.0000937035,0.0001832795,0.0003267577,0.0001004161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009411007,0.0001548337,0.7609685,0.00004265957,0.000463632,0.000001814059,0.06450467,0.000002219422,0.00104816,0.04596616,0.1130871,0.01366608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004229434,0.0008575103,0.2789156,0.0001526177,0.0001082706,0.000003228458,0.02050492,0.00004178264,0.01137741,0.02656315,0.6603072,0.0007452957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683539,0.005392966,0.00002615389,0.02127972,0.00254561,0.0004564616,0.000002721064,0.0001728383,0.001769665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923606,0.000192217,0.000006945828,0.0006501367,0.002262625,0.00009440836,0.000001961723,0.00001291366,0.004418174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094145922","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.12.004","title":"Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Skepticism; Voting; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Competence (human resources); Representative democracy; Centrality; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0978313216538471,"gpt":0.4073795205594935,"spread":0.3095481989056464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002998274,0.0001126335,0.00029877,0.00005196952,0.000344588,0.00002866014,0.0001345134,0.0001132747,0.0001960591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001550013,0.00009120905,0.00007228553,0.000287771,0.0005342262,0.0001247791,0.00003579436,0.0002047303,0.00004614171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007441096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001069968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01134057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2768697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986208,0.0001009163,0.0003022063,0.0001438858,0.0003656274,0.0004665359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989493,0.0002965052,0.000120154,0.0001252342,0.0003602425,0.0001485451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006003981,0.0001362014,0.5320218,0.0001316742,0.000186101,0.000004343816,0.003918475,9.020222e-7,0.01004311,0.3574006,0.09464707,0.001449759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009226307,0.0005952558,0.4064447,0.0001813793,0.0001250105,0.000002088136,0.0016843,0.00001033091,0.01247239,0.01991544,0.556851,0.0007955371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896699,0.0001917085,0.000004966171,0.00556968,0.0006525885,0.0001655808,0.000007002102,0.00007921275,0.003659384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981505,0.000008905027,0.00007895183,0.0003355242,0.0005730445,0.00002272129,0.00000223258,0.00000802632,0.0008200762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4622039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2434378327","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.003","title":"Come hell or high water: An investigation of the effects of a natural disaster on a local election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Turnout; Flood myth; Flooding (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Population; Political science; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Psychology; Voting; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01753247608198083,"gpt":0.2939381396653146,"spread":0.2764056635833338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001555742,0.00007874097,0.0001388576,0.00003554498,0.0001965801,0.00001057942,0.0001686328,0.00002616664,0.000009220802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101027,0.00002988393,0.00003798423,0.0002011516,0.0006853972,0.000174689,0.00005883701,0.00003953024,0.000005406958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006986489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001775341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006996079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008383241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990671,0.0002015353,0.0001269393,0.0001294504,0.0002895724,0.0001854405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995979,0.0001353022,0.00007033191,0.00009955591,0.00007277665,0.00002414198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00122748,0.0004659317,0.347319,0.0008599179,0.0005846948,0.000006204752,0.09205502,0.00001443282,0.4366841,0.02064116,0.005732474,0.0944096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001799761,0.00297815,0.3536998,0.000953197,0.0001380593,4.683004e-7,0.005756214,0.00001787097,0.6245246,0.006780293,0.002901281,0.0004503111],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979565,0.00012174,0.00001806164,0.0009756705,0.0005773301,0.0002382932,5.446557e-7,0.00001948807,0.00009243321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954408,0.00002570169,0.000006456939,0.0000750084,0.00008014719,0.00001165544,3.634207e-7,0.000004021812,0.004355817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1878405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4678046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048424507","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.01.001","title":"An experimental comparison of question forms used to reduce vote overreporting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Michigan","keywords":"Turnout; Sample (material); Face (sociological concept); Voter turnout; Psychology; National election; Political science; Social psychology; Voting; Law; Sociology; Politics; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1925925731612072,"gpt":0.5568222792902369,"spread":0.3642297061290296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001838285,0.00008843886,0.000212384,0.00006704491,0.0001694714,0.00001015797,0.0001188136,0.00003847462,0.00007873436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003886214,0.00008364683,0.00003257893,0.0001787717,0.00004475336,0.00006060642,0.00003122471,0.00009225981,0.00001832968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001283564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002553162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004192956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005883015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989846,0.00009656444,0.0004512988,0.0001686909,0.000125544,0.0001732938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992015,0.00004750278,0.0002372302,0.0003213673,0.0001475027,0.00004485231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006694724,0.0006995867,0.922933,0.00001541156,0.00003642268,4.328126e-7,0.01414726,0.00002605021,0.03473385,0.006797383,0.01662073,0.003922947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003100869,0.0004808514,0.9398494,0.00003795787,0.00001037362,0.000002849994,0.0129011,0.00001926351,0.03884398,0.0002513705,0.00711982,0.0001728811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925319,0.004658658,0.0000442428,0.001012735,0.0004863071,0.0002024854,0.000001975904,0.00006785157,0.0009938307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985684,0.000001336898,0.0006278495,0.00007704442,0.0001512877,0.0000838444,0.00001922252,0.00001059157,0.0004604342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01691647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6338522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091064756","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.002","title":"One voter, two first-order elections?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"National election; Order (exchange); Political science; Turnout; General election; Voter turnout; Politics; Primary election; Ranked voting system; Public administration; Political economy; Voting; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.183378032523813,"gpt":0.4137218253264262,"spread":0.2303437928026132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000247217,0.0001206247,0.0002477209,0.00005512091,0.001883317,0.00002950379,0.0001067877,0.00005857452,0.0001488248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005174894,0.0001169492,0.00006430833,0.0006230097,0.000359866,0.0001825812,0.00002664545,0.0001330712,0.0002377081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002551016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001083121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04807194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2140307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.0001727817,0.0002366668,0.0002134491,0.0003636116,0.0005897619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991693,0.0001777418,0.00006179079,0.0001140679,0.0003418981,0.0001351493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005405087,0.0003964762,0.8703915,0.00004948105,0.0003987477,0.0000150934,0.008888048,0.00004216919,0.0009899802,0.05412181,0.06245092,0.002201695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001930188,0.0009173495,0.3694274,0.0001509272,0.000160425,0.00001228978,0.0005366761,0.0001152553,0.002648182,0.0196926,0.6029109,0.001497845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786738,0.003136544,0.0002060415,0.01145508,0.0007777671,0.0003839173,0.000002832822,0.0003070482,0.005057002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925863,0.00008923651,0.0001540717,0.000249227,0.00106295,0.00006837291,0.00000197635,0.00001198316,0.005775937],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.54046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077013175","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2010.11.006","title":"Valence politics and economic crisis: Electoral choice in Canada 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Political economy; Voting; Prime minister; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04178338393602016,"gpt":0.35226380440405,"spread":0.3104804204680298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002801212,0.0001415731,0.0002695625,0.00004844865,0.0003824961,0.0000484765,0.0001314921,0.00006711612,0.00007182384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003711582,0.0001357439,0.00002518735,0.0001630265,0.0001796275,0.0001746937,0.00003435945,0.0002542791,0.00001539284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008523784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001151893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984187,0.0001304105,0.0002789079,0.0002449929,0.0002074634,0.0007195572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992629,0.0002743894,0.0000664682,0.0001098542,0.00008378732,0.0002026394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002768006,0.000009488272,0.9796574,0.00001449804,0.00001802039,0.000002892864,0.0003173054,0.000003021923,0.0001693816,0.007810379,0.01182876,0.0001660872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000355184,0.00008258574,0.9146771,0.00002945978,0.00002633081,0.00000202879,0.0006035092,0.00007845615,0.0005855688,0.002581173,0.08050388,0.0004746962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931711,0.001189447,6.651261e-7,0.004400526,0.0007950712,0.0001709785,0.0000125146,0.00002902401,0.000230664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987332,0.00002286711,0.00002426375,0.0002999703,0.0005552738,0.00003044405,0.000001630013,0.00000993927,0.0003224588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06867512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121933130","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.03.005","title":"Searching for electoral irregularities in an established democracy: Applying Benford’s Law tests to Bundestag elections in Unified Germany","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Benford's law; Democracy; Political science; Precinct; German; Variation (astronomy); State (computer science); Political economy; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.212681193899514,"gpt":0.3924594744567582,"spread":0.1797782805572442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007739268,0.0003624637,0.0006031099,0.0004724133,0.0005680635,0.0001192025,0.0002718761,0.0001531539,0.00001877741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004255011,0.0003618408,0.0001043711,0.0009619865,0.000117573,0.0007575702,0.0001151962,0.0004535193,0.000005428999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004539775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008690129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006094504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3145637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974757,0.0001468209,0.0006294415,0.0005093933,0.0002860584,0.0009525169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987302,0.0004177906,0.0001263254,0.0003352193,0.0002506782,0.0001397423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001900897,0.002062535,0.228885,0.001171317,0.0004981279,0.00007063497,0.01941101,0.0001874542,0.02519527,0.6974106,0.001716929,0.02149026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004298314,0.003659197,0.1792774,0.0005690898,0.0001958094,0.00004386986,0.003707757,0.001707642,0.02556208,0.7745962,0.003928813,0.002453865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943244,0.0002456799,0.002083848,0.0001209356,0.0003036063,0.001823974,0.00001097484,0.0002784986,0.0008080579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867061,0.000006456987,0.01168127,0.000140452,0.0001584547,0.0009040744,0.000009870462,0.00007146022,0.0003218645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3084692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967434382","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.07.001","title":"Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of New Brunswick; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Axiom; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Positive economics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04202619816170314,"gpt":0.4143547376118129,"spread":0.3723285394501097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009632956,0.00006243407,0.0001675691,0.00002422876,0.0002687323,0.000009789102,0.00005695511,0.00004660253,0.0000348966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002104732,0.00005326803,0.00003620213,0.0001041349,0.0004038942,0.00005860777,0.00001410619,0.00005976015,0.000009609101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004797249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001358865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006066631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001045557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992839,0.0001031091,0.000101673,0.000112064,0.0001136958,0.0002855232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997055,0.0001029498,0.00002599267,0.00004229625,0.00005129458,0.00007196383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003731819,0.0002919352,0.442153,0.00002797396,0.0001799838,0.000005250635,0.02209835,4.293693e-8,0.007904305,0.4638062,0.03094956,0.03254612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000229844,0.0005068264,0.967719,0.00002311351,0.00002707552,5.383517e-7,0.005482232,3.111051e-7,0.0003974361,0.02007967,0.005421636,0.0001123112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862099,0.00201679,0.000009619952,0.004633252,0.0002341938,0.0001042525,0.00000143782,0.0000361846,0.006754408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998708,0.00009843653,0.00004303745,0.0005838439,0.0001979438,0.000003645011,5.236145e-7,0.000002221508,0.0003623984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.525566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092468239","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2014.05.002","title":"Fundamental models for forecasting elections at the state level","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometrics; Voting; Presidential election; Presidential system; Computer science; Economic forecasting; State (computer science); Economics; Politics; Political science; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3722710289322902,"gpt":0.425154844127967,"spread":0.05288381519567675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006872098,0.0001011018,0.0001602568,0.00002160913,0.002228523,0.00006003787,0.00009612216,0.00003312402,0.00002229258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004429142,0.00006962306,0.00007724226,0.0001823009,0.0002260599,0.0001378991,0.00003780242,0.00006850753,0.00001962806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003337954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004220839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01284138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2483815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987108,0.0001791556,0.0001948725,0.0001666706,0.0002190922,0.0005294621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999007,0.0005817456,0.0000736443,0.00008235013,0.0001812494,0.00007395106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003843803,0.0003405355,0.2148058,0.0002708397,0.001220091,0.000001695004,0.04506926,0.006386156,0.004950476,0.4451151,0.2177338,0.06372196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001872545,0.001563298,0.01699479,0.0001420168,0.0002573424,0.000005061752,0.002230155,0.03480705,0.004562594,0.3702328,0.5659285,0.001403854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842381,0.001016714,0.005231659,0.005644158,0.000692159,0.0008059413,0.00003217286,0.0001179081,0.002221204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876892,0.000005417398,0.00009601581,0.0002112847,0.0005423132,0.0001946291,0.000004061545,0.00001113896,0.01124595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3481948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549592443","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.010","title":"The role of partisan cues in voter mobilization campaigns: Evidence from a randomized field experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Preference; Mobilization; Heuristics; Phone; Voter turnout; General election; Social psychology; Public relations; Voting; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05122575791456549,"gpt":0.3835610146247909,"spread":0.3323352567102253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003942041,0.00006315471,0.0002422634,0.00001495786,0.0001949388,0.00001474322,0.0001133033,0.00004074824,0.0000296761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004557889,0.00003277474,0.00005514354,0.0001035079,0.0003951436,0.00008880549,0.00002818328,0.00003264197,0.000004753979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008191204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005679072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01323534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.0004789669,0.0002059661,0.00009708026,0.0002103538,0.0002079441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944932,0.005240735,0.00007651872,0.00007649955,0.00008400308,0.00002900088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002982697,0.00006139903,0.7068818,0.000006449176,0.000202614,0.000001189638,0.2410306,5.776301e-7,0.01277065,0.00772839,0.001211007,0.02712257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02699823,0.000380296,0.01083378,0.00126311,0.000166066,1.039725e-7,0.2287155,0.00002608142,0.5278136,0.1760158,0.02710926,0.0006781337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972479,0.02370287,0.00002626135,0.002964618,0.0003437777,0.0003093309,0.000001357531,0.00001788149,0.000154852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996895,0.002511735,0.00002387025,0.0000546202,0.0002522854,0.0001399017,1.513655e-7,0.000003239622,0.0001192295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.696048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084833011","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.009","title":"The 2014 parliamentary elections in Bulgaria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Legislature; Political science; General election; Political economy; Extreme right; Public administration; Geography; Law; Politics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1011849241717467,"gpt":0.3848039865413619,"spread":0.2836190623696152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000635593,0.00005858469,0.00008064041,0.00001790689,0.0006270697,0.00003899912,0.0001537496,0.00001707137,0.000009424788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005799029,0.00004098983,0.00002285669,0.0002467807,0.0002445512,0.00009332013,0.00003982738,0.0001069039,0.0001058367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001907484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009432836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02523448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2932444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991021,0.0002197007,0.0001109004,0.0001010344,0.0001938773,0.000272444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995978,0.0001541571,0.00004468285,0.00008059379,0.00006976527,0.00005298059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003331675,0.00004287349,0.1641559,0.000001670818,0.00005137132,0.000006072082,0.00883014,0.00001063406,0.00002194482,0.08053262,0.7430966,0.003216791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001671558,0.00004370232,0.05709978,0.000006793571,0.000003759168,3.112047e-7,0.002826112,0.000001591701,0.00004446179,0.003651434,0.9360772,0.00007765542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182146,0.05735887,0.00002588097,0.04147082,0.003227485,0.000597694,0.000009168846,0.0002521032,0.1788434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987494,0.001285743,0.00002145607,0.000580095,0.0003891384,0.00001530148,3.488901e-7,0.000005286422,0.01020862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2692794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916893145","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.011","title":"What is the cost of voting?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Democracy; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Public economics; Cardinal voting systems; Voting behavior; Work (physics); Political science; Ranked voting system; Voter turnout; Business; Economics; Politics; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08518817712502742,"gpt":0.4081846821944641,"spread":0.3229965050694367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004193349,0.00006264527,0.0001619641,0.00001412725,0.0002478723,0.00004726205,0.0001174203,0.00003409667,0.000162666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001906093,0.00003921374,0.00005378967,0.0002124631,0.0001980287,0.0001902574,0.00002613611,0.00006440437,0.0001300934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006329646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003912058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007937125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01631189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990507,0.0001466245,0.0001624883,0.0001028085,0.0002615765,0.0002758218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992681,0.0003592182,0.000074993,0.00009102608,0.0001694604,0.000037171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001256556,0.00003077075,0.9018317,0.00004310792,0.0001063941,2.890611e-7,0.01006436,0.000005145438,0.0005529734,0.07148544,0.01311677,0.002750473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007193808,0.0005738104,0.3379923,0.0004553539,0.0001152043,6.73998e-7,0.01364049,0.0001249864,0.009990308,0.007742195,0.6280054,0.0006398713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832383,0.004333636,0.000003098985,0.009822896,0.000945162,0.0004039898,0.00000152011,0.00002626911,0.001225107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950615,0.00004780019,0.000003258555,0.000410174,0.0002155103,0.00001728593,3.711812e-7,0.000004333339,0.004239811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6148887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087277790","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102204","title":"Policy congruence and its impact on satisfaction with democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Respondent; Democracy; Ideology; Politics; Political science; Elite; Public policy; Public administration; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07337371087409572,"gpt":0.4187214845802972,"spread":0.3453477737062015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001048539,0.0001077337,0.0001783214,0.00002649709,0.000476523,0.00004656845,0.00004065402,0.00003569861,0.00002368357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005031901,0.00007256409,0.00002400115,0.0003203806,0.0001160332,0.0001704074,0.00001285682,0.0000908536,0.00003806114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001496246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03801354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02920805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990469,0.0001263382,0.0001107797,0.0001671547,0.0002245247,0.000324322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994507,0.0001429956,0.00005076111,0.00003724072,0.0001181538,0.000200082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327769,0.00001493281,0.9477386,0.00003182408,0.0001127792,0.000004916283,0.003440143,0.00003287131,0.00125326,0.04307981,0.001583019,0.002575102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003677584,0.00147369,0.9932471,0.00005306016,0.00003162739,0.000001234481,0.000277239,0.00008433191,0.0007727198,0.00215209,0.001259245,0.0002798895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.977477,0.0004494774,0.000006062548,0.02139283,0.00004154922,0.0001981877,0.000004041643,0.00006836032,0.0003624508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986502,0.00002355202,0.000008744675,0.0006602127,0.0005086933,0.00001234305,6.13455e-7,0.000006984716,0.0001286389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04550855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058796927","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00018-4","title":"Sovereignty, leadership and voting in the Quebec referendums","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Voting; Sovereignty; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2069303900131124,"gpt":0.3724996880939619,"spread":0.1655692980808496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005086449,0.00006669312,0.0001270088,0.0000126526,0.000331091,0.00005127575,0.0001126232,0.00003510487,0.00001932056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004308727,0.0000427154,0.00001988301,0.0001815294,0.0002182646,0.00009672466,0.00002441057,0.0001096791,0.00000975145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001071195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002925089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3532346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8392912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990129,0.0001725872,0.0001074272,0.0001196526,0.0002158852,0.0003715776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996203,0.0002391507,0.00003346744,0.00004910387,0.00002480481,0.00003320149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005617636,0.00001581211,0.3401399,0.00001145624,0.00001404341,0.00001067945,0.006947395,2.143791e-7,0.000006904235,0.645395,0.003458051,0.003994921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000210307,0.00003703641,0.8042494,0.00007454692,0.000007472423,0.000002384926,0.01239877,0.000003568843,0.000008760178,0.004075697,0.1787756,0.0001564275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636902,0.01017288,0.000002706278,0.009755291,0.0001260694,0.0001411203,0.000001225733,0.00002849558,0.01608204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948896,0.0001045129,0.000004591955,0.0005990675,0.0003297267,0.00001064533,1.566558e-7,0.000002944625,0.00405871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6413193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6510723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078433006","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.03.001","title":"Leaders, voters and activists in the elections in Great Britain 2005 and 2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Position (finance); Political science; General election; Political economy; Voting; Economics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2175875668172094,"gpt":0.3972908247296066,"spread":0.1797032579123972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005068546,0.0000774883,0.0001378296,0.00005768805,0.0002360341,0.00002978701,0.00005425512,0.00004675518,0.00001159051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001708588,0.00005719713,0.00001401815,0.0002402564,0.0003617659,0.0001368245,0.00001423609,0.0001330684,0.000003356019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008681422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002602102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09655259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6053308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989773,0.0002693258,0.0001291821,0.000140184,0.0001170207,0.0003669605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997038,0.0001499839,0.0000257677,0.00004898832,0.00002446502,0.00004694469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001447617,0.00003573568,0.9650638,0.00001117352,0.00001515827,0.000004392533,0.02795401,1.717316e-7,0.00009554895,0.003512455,0.002225938,0.001067203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000179112,0.00008414537,0.989665,0.00002488353,0.000009269825,0.000001607087,0.004413707,0.00000608067,0.00005337362,0.002845774,0.002606686,0.0001103183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928551,0.002089298,0.000002893703,0.004074641,0.00008615385,0.0002095131,6.33491e-7,0.00001542438,0.0006663581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991692,0.00007445017,0.00001458954,0.0001292011,0.00008866057,0.00003873606,3.196585e-7,0.000003812308,0.0004810871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5087782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W750601527","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.06.004","title":"Refining vote choice in an ethno-regionalist context: Three-dimensional ideological voting in Catalonia and Quebec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Salient; Context (archaeology); Politics; Voting behavior; Political economy; Democracy; Sociology; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2258783977460743,"gpt":0.4305851226910416,"spread":0.2047067249449673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051396,0.0001293352,0.0002996537,0.00006524887,0.0002381879,0.00004933925,0.00009207986,0.0001060644,0.000004314669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00128729,0.0001092941,0.00002217359,0.0003125708,0.0003845087,0.0002839186,0.00005778945,0.0002108864,0.000007374727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003599597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001294785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.963297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982525,0.0003696459,0.0003073917,0.0002732234,0.0003090017,0.0004882902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999117,0.0004160063,0.00007319938,0.00006365876,0.0001567226,0.0001734634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002248988,0.00003377215,0.9961759,0.000007181022,0.000007362233,0.000009655234,0.00022456,0.00002272824,0.0000497406,0.002260927,0.00024357,0.0009420641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003935811,0.0001175027,0.9966909,0.00006450068,0.000005065099,8.413789e-7,0.0000315715,0.0001908436,0.00001278651,0.0002417556,0.002090251,0.000160432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937654,0.002499375,0.000003137682,0.003416854,0.0001393737,0.0001220995,0.000001909321,0.00004013579,0.0000117778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991041,4.413991e-8,0.00004723022,0.000280481,0.0002555881,0.00003082581,0.000006083966,0.00000690467,0.0002687245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03655303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4456885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2572457745","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2017.01.002","title":"Political opportunity structures and the representation of women and visible minorities in municipal elections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; CONTEST; Victory; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Political opportunity; General election; Political economy; Public administration; Demographic economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social movement","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1220416834995226,"gpt":0.4204884887496825,"spread":0.29844680525016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003771619,0.00005105123,0.0001564321,0.00004024843,0.0009481969,0.00007682431,0.00008326174,0.0000288989,0.000006199352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001101422,0.00003587205,0.00001691066,0.00005230397,0.001447516,0.0001180297,0.00007986073,0.00006809348,9.387213e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006885441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005425618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05970163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03064142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992152,0.0001660361,0.0001215583,0.00009978651,0.0001334318,0.0002639662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.0002002781,0.00006962798,0.0001118585,0.00007311194,0.00006897551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003014147,0.00001293082,0.399423,0.00001736985,0.00005408855,9.008974e-7,0.04150371,8.345343e-7,0.00005035318,0.5581872,0.00008301128,0.0006364135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005664974,0.00003508383,0.6825389,0.000006193987,0.00001376567,0.000001043728,0.06338075,0.00002466522,0.0002096047,0.2528779,0.0002826067,0.00006303711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923769,0.0008512023,0.000001084852,0.003047207,0.00009313233,0.0001285432,0.000002221802,0.000006084728,0.003493648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991639,0.0002566834,0.00001993118,0.00003667416,0.00008698116,0.00001879873,5.004053e-7,0.000002315324,0.000414173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3053094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193750065","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102381","title":"Permissive electoral systems and descriptive representation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Permissive; Representation (politics); Descriptive statistics; Descriptive research; Proportional representation; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Statistics; Politics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1518317482776346,"gpt":0.4122111342318009,"spread":0.2603793859541664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001574379,0.00008724469,0.0001694747,0.00003546005,0.0006263817,0.000142829,0.0000475472,0.0000464635,0.00001845791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005054523,0.0000804822,0.00003640618,0.0002528549,0.0001973048,0.0001702618,0.00004574488,0.00007514292,0.000008218995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001405486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001482526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007526097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006063853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987983,0.0002702439,0.0001398587,0.0002440563,0.0002648375,0.0002827431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991647,0.0001061788,0.00005999891,0.00008223718,0.0005033918,0.00008347506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004594482,0.0001603415,0.6900964,0.0001410086,0.0009476145,0.0001929302,0.1332009,0.00008175793,0.01493069,0.118298,0.03655612,0.005348339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001947893,0.000339199,0.3780831,0.0001820707,0.0003620815,0.00006265476,0.4891067,0.0004309944,0.02136951,0.02156477,0.08515885,0.001392119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680688,0.02353507,0.0000737888,0.002121795,0.0009725464,0.0002535786,0.000005251712,0.00007307999,0.00489611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922775,0.0004620661,0.00007713884,0.0000521705,0.0003807802,0.00002359339,0.000006379446,0.000007257315,0.006713116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3559059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027604014","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.030","title":"Electoral accountability in the developing world","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1566432705004029,"gpt":0.433581351244147,"spread":0.276938080743744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001003443,0.0001303804,0.0002246844,0.00006739032,0.0005575126,0.0001422878,0.0002487605,0.00004954994,0.0001443196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005169003,0.00008633417,0.00005145308,0.0009566791,0.0002532284,0.0003308959,0.00003142809,0.000188296,0.0001954363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004289633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001184013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1673498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6496006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978898,0.0005508965,0.0003021358,0.0002043283,0.0003862133,0.0006666355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990506,0.0004926656,0.00005994309,0.0001373727,0.0002070173,0.00005241517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006862449,0.00004191475,0.9455686,0.00001952494,0.00002479504,0.000001136122,0.004633909,0.000001177454,0.0001518588,0.03585554,0.01214019,0.001554516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001544659,0.00004834313,0.9489561,0.00003945096,0.00001012863,3.450464e-7,0.001334516,0.000009999088,0.0001663786,0.01537669,0.03365075,0.0002528109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821977,0.0009294323,0.000009920404,0.01367562,0.0002683479,0.0005842627,6.74296e-7,0.00006218211,0.002271839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974962,0.000004975961,0.00006107632,0.0008879969,0.0004433282,0.0002496849,0.000001093742,0.000006932831,0.0008486781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4822508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8381949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980233304","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102070","title":"The measurement of electoral competition, with application to Indian states","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Carleton University; Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Competition (biology); Legislature; Political science; Power (physics); Political economy; Economics; Law; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04015134022713287,"gpt":0.3423227522382233,"spread":0.3021714120110904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006855419,0.00009463981,0.0001841259,0.00003208921,0.0004534025,0.00003803326,0.0001352446,0.0000294159,0.00001709334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001115605,0.00005941022,0.00002971454,0.0004059705,0.0001584461,0.00007372037,0.00001820761,0.00006513664,0.00008026409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001094887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01474894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1817304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985216,0.0001367807,0.0002179161,0.0001569131,0.0005936717,0.0003731004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988893,0.0001340508,0.00009750812,0.0001382083,0.0006509973,0.00008988164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002233551,0.0001017812,0.8994508,0.00009519311,0.000268236,5.907375e-7,0.006458519,0.0002108664,0.005808777,0.07804453,0.006072869,0.003264525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001300633,0.003362442,0.5137867,0.0004093872,0.0001230615,0.000001044126,0.005890875,0.00009585833,0.02165007,0.01032198,0.4419728,0.001085141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935017,0.0006021861,0.0001172065,0.004160542,0.0001466912,0.0008145978,0.000003495847,0.00004412112,0.0006094938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.000008588498,0.00002908491,0.000103234,0.0001305508,0.0001093292,0.000002588647,0.000007897892,0.000264384],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4358999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760318507","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.010","title":"When heuristics go bad: Citizens' misevaluations of campaign pledge fulfilment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Pledge; Heuristics; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Heuristic; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1890293047350583,"gpt":0.4537980593728693,"spread":0.264768754637811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007171638,0.0001204534,0.0002990202,0.00003538086,0.001566278,0.00008770802,0.0002621925,0.00006582215,0.0001816326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002280047,0.0001054276,0.00008185217,0.00006779623,0.0005454807,0.0001273081,0.0000674307,0.00008463872,0.00006877691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001812578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001429459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01197983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04313267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983911,0.0002297957,0.0003248333,0.0001807382,0.0004504321,0.0004231031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986199,0.0002429696,0.0002422299,0.0002817884,0.0004869991,0.0001261128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639586,0.0002111841,0.739557,0.0001236881,0.0003870869,0.000005480993,0.01357787,0.00001440845,0.00143685,0.1335154,0.1075838,0.003540827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00156475,0.0007998563,0.7237846,0.0003447486,0.0004356072,9.993972e-7,0.001723507,0.0001909511,0.004288328,0.09961616,0.1662345,0.001015951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973978,0.002358036,0.0001790653,0.007293816,0.001218476,0.0006698535,0.00003980439,0.00008706014,0.01417582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943731,0.00002480333,0.0001797488,0.00005929242,0.0005339266,0.00004719754,0.000003421768,0.000009235987,0.004769245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05865077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079953312","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.025","title":"The Kramer problem: Micro-macro resolution with a Danish pool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Macro; Danish; Political science; National election; Perception; Positive economics; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Political economy; Computer science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04748012977054439,"gpt":0.3488763703806542,"spread":0.3013962406101098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004120091,0.0001161511,0.0001567739,0.00001724488,0.001646653,0.0001889399,0.0001379655,0.00004965361,0.00004822118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002048202,0.0000661125,0.00003825259,0.0002855324,0.0004815189,0.0002063515,0.00002968621,0.0001213394,0.000202539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001925582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008663021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05243628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1135392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983727,0.0002480995,0.0001983685,0.000175532,0.0003142572,0.0006910047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991283,0.0002287088,0.00008126374,0.0001166955,0.0003362684,0.0001088063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384402,0.0002173015,0.4400857,0.00009920289,0.0007348465,0.000006777592,0.01347772,0.00002979772,0.01015932,0.1429475,0.3767473,0.0153561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008666049,0.001115596,0.1666024,0.0002032212,0.0001403176,0.000004302814,0.003359953,0.00008359136,0.002830992,0.02558236,0.7982389,0.0009717674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684358,0.004459718,0.00005830353,0.02053585,0.0002845751,0.001234319,0.000002351173,0.0001733442,0.004815801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931069,0.00003167975,0.000136863,0.0001895428,0.0003759812,0.0002604085,0.000001249833,0.00001041796,0.005886936],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4214916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187826436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.010","title":"The British general election: Synthetic forecasts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Presidential election; Context (archaeology); General election; Political science; Public opinion; History; Politics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1279759146736838,"gpt":0.39558219403436,"spread":0.2676062793606762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000783855,0.00008854546,0.0001538783,0.0000125326,0.002536931,0.0004059322,0.0001340351,0.00005196606,0.00001370604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009877601,0.00006925099,0.00005584568,0.0002990455,0.0003472717,0.0001277644,0.00002898091,0.00009987376,0.00007951751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002994324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001429457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05899097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.420482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983943,0.0003033735,0.0001981896,0.0001589211,0.0003877936,0.0005574639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.0001780401,0.00005571889,0.00009631209,0.0003553453,0.0001775602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008973738,0.0001312097,0.1674931,0.00003534933,0.0003735179,0.00002750174,0.004707494,0.00003663353,0.0001476116,0.106483,0.6183686,0.1021062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000269953,0.0002450946,0.007832059,0.00003472647,0.00003288953,0.000009012922,0.0006020417,0.00008281305,0.0002314642,0.02042581,0.969967,0.0002671212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601015,0.01656733,0.00004669904,0.01050643,0.002213374,0.0004157125,0.000002173001,0.0002125579,0.009934203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828748,0.00006465574,0.0000246064,0.0001309343,0.001414023,0.00006996603,8.914367e-7,0.00000936639,0.01541082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.361491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386996164","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102676","title":"Weaponizing post-election court challenges: Assessing losers’ motivations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Negotiation; Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Petitioner; General election; Kenya; Vulnerability (computing); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1764850748186986,"gpt":0.3995127728387146,"spread":0.223027698020016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004944212,0.0001308145,0.0002108181,0.0001283644,0.003169044,0.00007493415,0.0001150059,0.00005864992,0.00002417807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001313302,0.0001211377,0.00007436115,0.0009454652,0.0004443896,0.0003445201,0.00007714164,0.000132054,0.0001801159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000268434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001739154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004159209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02398705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985961,0.000122295,0.0001735435,0.0002425076,0.0004144093,0.0004510901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990393,0.0002976313,0.00009332882,0.0000662008,0.0004482573,0.00005528598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006051406,0.0003215081,0.1739473,0.0001091849,0.001962538,0.00007967616,0.08110879,0.0001240678,0.005058683,0.5726818,0.06235721,0.1021887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004725667,0.0001725173,0.618009,0.0002444916,0.0001224203,0.000002898931,0.1163436,0.0000345844,0.0003528691,0.03677757,0.2266596,0.000807905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8518242,0.02794593,0.00008598014,0.07345591,0.002511919,0.0004974453,0.000009794591,0.001417389,0.04225146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943665,0.003920923,0.00004352309,0.0001851004,0.0008178634,0.00004744478,0.000005430032,0.000009143855,0.0006040927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981287,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159479758","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102334","title":"Is compulsory voting habit-forming? Regression discontinuity evidence from Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Regression discontinuity design; Political science; Scope (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Group voting ticket; Voting behavior; Single-member district; Ranked voting system; Economics; Law; Computer science; Politics; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1457805920220383,"gpt":0.4420809344766271,"spread":0.2963003424545888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004789202,0.0001591942,0.0003538718,0.0000240579,0.001006422,0.0001197553,0.0001538613,0.00008867856,0.0002266916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00185303,0.0001297564,0.000110561,0.0003548343,0.0002477844,0.0003749891,0.0001187454,0.0001787689,0.00008575697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002463562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001572778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02771575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1041344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978398,0.0004365436,0.0003290969,0.0003536252,0.000488142,0.0005528035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985157,0.0006856248,0.0001363524,0.0001596734,0.0003559441,0.0001467273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001673803,0.00004565572,0.961794,0.00003662753,0.0000898903,0.00001603457,0.008914267,0.000001568775,0.003343825,0.002314345,0.01666128,0.006765745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007246562,0.0002379449,0.8819166,0.003288874,0.0002134889,0.000002433042,0.003657756,0.0004097564,0.03867924,0.01422568,0.0553541,0.001289498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764889,0.0128075,0.00007667652,0.009192063,0.0006588888,0.0001443255,0.000008112515,0.0001032387,0.0005202638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943155,0.0000586623,0.0001918506,0.0004725805,0.0009586958,0.00001778894,0.000004797922,0.00001080108,0.003969344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07987747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985106340","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.03.008","title":"A rational or a virtuous citizenry? – The asymmetric impact of biases in votes-seats translation on citizens' satisfaction with democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Respondent; Democracy; Voting; Political science; Antipathy; Politics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2344208997091653,"gpt":0.4423984735701867,"spread":0.2079775738610214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006843422,0.0001337091,0.000264451,0.0001546421,0.0002876471,0.00003911646,0.0000725858,0.00005848473,0.00002915236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001543256,0.0000742823,0.00006653531,0.001211004,0.0002003645,0.0001774522,0.000007368572,0.0001202698,0.00000978845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004880796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003970526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06956558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2526839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981727,0.0004502895,0.0002909908,0.0001675968,0.0005550876,0.0003633201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982777,0.001109097,0.0001296329,0.00008895866,0.0002909756,0.0001036365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006621694,0.00007827901,0.98231,0.00001165126,0.0001172268,0.000004125396,0.002787898,0.00116323,0.0001028018,0.002625208,0.001179699,0.008957717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001100251,0.002176854,0.9918326,0.0001215936,0.00004423473,0.000002635426,0.0005094107,0.0003057257,0.0002252763,0.003320869,0.0001483286,0.0002122081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967724,0.0004698168,0.00003776863,0.001619066,0.00009906897,0.0004554213,0.00001070055,0.00003433738,0.0005014135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.00001370965,0.00004517155,0.0000523535,0.0002083104,0.0000472685,0.000004843218,0.000009407186,0.0001265719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1831183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076034436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.010","title":"Scope conditions of economic voting: The Danish exception?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Scope (computer science); Danish; Economics; Positive economics; Generalizability theory; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08771620065684411,"gpt":0.4132340846454458,"spread":0.3255178839886017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002648966,0.00006801295,0.0001520727,0.00001921495,0.0005903598,0.00004415051,0.0001165523,0.00003323896,0.0005756428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001778762,0.00004687562,0.00005124793,0.0001102957,0.0004140581,0.0001692171,0.00002402919,0.00006015273,0.0003455032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001202046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006363637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03882392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05350494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.0001727675,0.0002183361,0.0001014298,0.0001327805,0.0002697535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994002,0.0002286481,0.00009150757,0.00008030488,0.0001454928,0.00005384789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004542687,0.00006225276,0.4476826,0.00003373892,0.0001885493,2.966333e-7,0.003885914,0.0000459653,0.002583878,0.4231254,0.1212453,0.001141469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004676583,0.0003571086,0.8913262,0.0001142684,0.0001072872,9.53812e-7,0.002775449,0.00009703681,0.002849236,0.05252208,0.04886167,0.0005210633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899181,0.0008051039,0.00001221477,0.005571652,0.00032853,0.0003570668,0.000004722273,0.00004064304,0.00296197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979416,0.00001301169,0.000009212264,0.0000964983,0.0004080565,0.00008917532,0.000001975691,0.000005019348,0.001435482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4436435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137312298","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102317","title":"Did you see it coming? Explaining the accuracy of voter expectations for district and (sub)national election outcomes in multi-party systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Sophistication; National election; Preference; Politics; Political science; Voting; Work (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Microeconomics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1622570637828363,"gpt":0.4382771896651659,"spread":0.2760201258823295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004019731,0.00009948338,0.0002589669,0.00004606107,0.0005774088,0.00006217632,0.00006093273,0.00005132238,0.000003817114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002692371,0.00007281877,0.00004995208,0.000323039,0.0001164932,0.0001686774,0.00002431057,0.00008210424,0.000001578083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001748976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009610816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006218813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07964262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986672,0.0002582896,0.000351291,0.0001745536,0.0002693528,0.0002793428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978762,0.001462909,0.0001406839,0.00006238915,0.0004166379,0.00004123218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005582845,0.0003126058,0.9265963,0.0001608858,0.0003076531,0.000002191515,0.03581456,0.0002474839,0.004113767,0.02818939,0.003397909,0.00080137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003356058,0.0004727952,0.9028548,0.0003276382,0.0001760676,0.000004855973,0.06519008,0.005079558,0.004733458,0.003177773,0.01378554,0.0008414055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931527,0.001468327,0.0004924617,0.003957193,0.0003331835,0.0004628054,0.00001986949,0.0000230072,0.00009046453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.00001728396,0.00004930744,0.00006043096,0.0001382169,0.000253538,0.00001208602,0.000006613647,0.0003971075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07342381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125711898","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2007.07.005","title":"Estimating voter migration in Canada using generalized maximum entropy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of maximum entropy; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08628621678495313,"gpt":0.3877137230064647,"spread":0.3014275062215115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005577391,0.00009490268,0.000189928,0.00004478258,0.0003186742,0.00002764666,0.00006126489,0.00003708615,0.00002738019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002889211,0.00008621188,0.00002555403,0.0003065592,0.00005663967,0.0001172798,0.00001454759,0.00008251261,0.000003748217],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00230629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005050196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998556,0.0001410955,0.0003039155,0.0001429226,0.0003028869,0.0005531337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995441,0.0001293282,0.00007723316,0.0000560294,0.00010663,0.00008663216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001833084,0.00001158674,0.9905215,0.00001650268,0.00002551087,0.00001331576,0.001448872,0.0005799498,0.002629183,0.002763664,0.0008174481,0.001154139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002516774,0.0002706079,0.8908058,0.0004651528,0.0001415629,0.000005640361,0.004423026,0.03671459,0.01247268,0.02407827,0.02601709,0.0020888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997138,0.0004749125,0.0004940908,0.001020449,0.0005874351,0.0001696819,0.00000113773,0.00002229933,0.00009202549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980206,0.000001827799,0.001167145,0.0001578909,0.0005331963,0.000006985675,0.000001818631,0.000006755971,0.000103788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09971569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6030869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801030683","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.005","title":"Introduction: Personality, party leaders, and election campaigns","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Authoritarianism; Machiavellianism; Big Five personality traits; Dark triad; Narcissism; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Great Rift; Personality; Political science; Democracy; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1102069166066805,"gpt":0.4194065303650357,"spread":0.3091996137583552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003089075,0.00007969837,0.0001385369,0.00002873383,0.001045232,0.00002925621,0.00006104735,0.00006145276,0.0004188796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002352452,0.00006987176,0.00003242728,0.0002532663,0.001482335,0.0001287348,0.00002478356,0.00009302127,0.00007258977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001012407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000251481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001973641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02857947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999112,0.0001536567,0.00009632804,0.0002233254,0.000141255,0.0002735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996386,0.00004158191,0.00003710381,0.00005453619,0.0001808533,0.00004728277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008328228,0.00007015189,0.1006643,0.00001112564,0.0002372738,0.000001445766,0.08575711,2.241319e-8,0.001424938,0.01442651,0.7848211,0.01250279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001896699,0.0004648309,0.04957344,0.000006018701,0.00002526492,0.000003623416,0.02734723,8.631999e-7,0.0003862478,0.003754871,0.9180635,0.0001843869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528027,0.002353579,0.00002864489,0.03627736,0.002623982,0.0001268122,0.000001037087,0.0001323766,0.005653492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982995,0.000171752,0.00004052481,0.0005915766,0.01079899,0.00001340304,9.11231e-7,0.000005277218,0.005382518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1332425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391908148","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102747","title":"Limited supply: Youth underrepresentation in the Canadian House of Commons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Commons; House of Representatives; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.195543793207689,"gpt":0.4115949959938603,"spread":0.2160512027861713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003376643,0.00004854691,0.0000794383,0.0001130538,0.0003001106,0.00007147359,0.0001063605,0.00003147856,0.000008671679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001114873,0.00003426925,0.00003266115,0.0004585295,0.0001796103,0.00006478882,0.00001210246,0.00008603225,0.000007373885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001563818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002428812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.812427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99919,0.0001815172,0.0001115327,0.00009700881,0.0002127233,0.0002072238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996545,0.0001630292,0.00001778539,0.00007222265,0.00005658113,0.00003585239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000463034,0.00004162298,0.4280518,0.00003966085,0.000133402,0.00002042278,0.4792302,0.00007636736,0.00005239833,0.07808521,0.01283407,0.001430218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002915955,0.00008978374,0.6102147,0.00009141122,0.0001034154,0.000001422445,0.3499212,0.0001701365,0.0003761186,0.02504893,0.0134272,0.000264025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728279,0.004228658,0.000005678486,0.01501179,0.0004556055,0.0002912434,0.00001874355,0.0000532655,0.00710714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994913,0.00009077712,0.00000769126,0.00008599464,0.00009929544,0.0000105145,0.000006251262,0.000005726638,0.0002024509],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.182163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2308238,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214080342","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102421","title":"Communicating safety precautions can help maintain in-person voter turnout during a pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Priming (agriculture); Distancing; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; Politics; Disease","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1355020953358742,"gpt":0.4357874996500697,"spread":0.3002854043141955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002433814,0.0001468431,0.0002813688,0.00006226802,0.0003745807,0.00001135788,0.0001298565,0.00005988596,0.0001416038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008973904,0.0001412024,0.00006296934,0.0003049143,0.00007455926,0.00003430929,0.0001410953,0.0003648812,0.0000307613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001420709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006028381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1169947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985671,0.0002946559,0.00026225,0.0002877112,0.0001027407,0.0004855303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999261,0.000229545,0.00006613344,0.0003318981,0.00004631057,0.00006512899],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001650297,0.000187486,0.9670436,0.0001352147,0.0001853793,0.00008112734,0.02082702,0.000006610901,0.00231189,0.0008078162,0.000485917,0.007762944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001357628,0.0001343936,0.9788863,0.0002115178,0.00002588951,0.00005082393,0.01338288,0.000009413337,0.0004812751,0.0002222912,0.004982698,0.0002548566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802594,0.0143184,0.00001292778,0.004024593,0.0003155009,0.0002129255,0.00001874442,0.00007971114,0.0007577856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970885,0.0003246344,0.00009346945,0.0006728335,0.0001015267,0.00007880135,0.00001340439,0.00001626235,0.001610565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1109663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9113149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169641487","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102347","title":"The political phenotype of the disgust sensitive: Correlates of a new abbreviated measure of disgust sensitivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Disgust; Politics; Social psychology; Ideology; Psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Anger","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.116122226030439,"gpt":0.3166177601585866,"spread":0.2004955341281476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000201709,0.000130391,0.0003302101,0.00001479603,0.000192002,0.000005096356,0.0001253407,0.00004483388,0.000008064275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001710175,0.00007043777,0.000145179,0.000361243,0.0008345448,0.00003537264,0.000176529,0.0001683243,0.000004176961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003595764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009420337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001829877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004465396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984834,0.0003833178,0.0002847478,0.0002209124,0.000353402,0.0002742113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984978,0.0007966754,0.0001645414,0.0002228358,0.0002713444,0.00004676321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003590325,0.00045416,0.1003991,0.0001009479,0.0003211412,0.00003448446,0.0005173481,0.00005004254,0.8526902,0.03578193,0.006435472,0.002856077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003543374,0.0001142426,0.410956,0.0001329561,0.00006998499,0.00002774798,0.0003425624,0.00003261376,0.5853595,0.002341523,0.0001671302,0.0001013794],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886781,0.001600281,0.00002007963,0.008743747,0.0004580975,0.0001257787,0.00003433095,0.00001279092,0.0003268146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991716,0.0000742765,0.0000161331,0.0002694272,0.00005270636,0.000001476587,9.005211e-7,0.000006538958,0.0004069456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3105569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383213518","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102642","title":"Electoral outcomes and satisfaction with democracy: A comparison of regional and national elections","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); National election; Political economy; Quality (philosophy); Public administration; Sociology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1602063671754859,"gpt":0.450944190037832,"spread":0.2907378228623462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003088152,0.0001097979,0.0002795896,0.0001132399,0.0007001026,0.00003346488,0.00003360987,0.00005508471,0.00001012085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002982661,0.00008725736,0.00002690919,0.000559521,0.000362338,0.0001697759,0.00002009164,0.00009842693,0.000005958834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001050479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01633166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1754207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987222,0.0001327258,0.0002275127,0.0001807521,0.0004322833,0.0003045498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990853,0.0003852206,0.000102842,0.00004221109,0.0003002236,0.00008420445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000211117,0.00001665397,0.979959,0.00001985942,0.00009102977,3.209148e-7,0.0009114618,0.000007408335,0.0003328607,0.01496364,0.002997383,0.0006792711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002241857,0.000196084,0.9929585,0.00002337905,0.00002836029,0.000001117446,0.0003570811,0.00008457864,0.0001094203,0.004470895,0.001426391,0.0001200174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941654,0.0005941208,0.00001699083,0.004741823,0.00008248255,0.0001883851,0.000004762017,0.00009585267,0.0001101968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992404,0.00002931141,0.00007459806,0.00005441137,0.0001170779,0.00003369557,0.000004466627,0.000008128683,0.0004379127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.159089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161542587","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102340","title":"Electoral incentives and elite racial identification: Why Brazilian politicians change their race","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Race (biology); Extant taxon; Political science; Incentive; Competition (biology); Political economy; Politics; Identification (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Position (finance); Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.110760537061196,"gpt":0.3992520931591698,"spread":0.2884915560979737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004713049,0.0002060663,0.0003717475,0.00006261483,0.001131793,0.000211836,0.0001292252,0.0001108879,0.00009479449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006156568,0.0001893837,0.00008784865,0.0005866282,0.000476378,0.0004659985,0.00007491613,0.0001652915,0.00004103816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002360301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000143041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008868342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1844045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975297,0.0005725413,0.0003581678,0.0004046121,0.0003595923,0.0007753603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987575,0.0002351188,0.0001198678,0.0001695792,0.0005045701,0.0002134117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007677122,0.0003479855,0.7355384,0.0002340126,0.0005527238,0.00004261757,0.05202119,7.483297e-7,0.01495816,0.1550234,0.0149716,0.02623244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007436647,0.0001950458,0.5103018,0.0002631896,0.0001407174,0.000006526539,0.005162133,0.00003040753,0.01210547,0.01405568,0.4559912,0.001004133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556585,0.02335811,0.00004893049,0.01860661,0.0009009106,0.000476724,0.00003380081,0.0001740721,0.0007423543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950891,0.0002732475,0.0000309634,0.0009997969,0.001892669,0.0001005488,0.00001623111,0.00001792549,0.001579516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4410196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389497203","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102717","title":"Still sacrificial lambs? Yes! Minority groups in Canadian federal elections, 2015–2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Diversity (politics); Indigenous; Politics; Racial diversity; Minority group; Intersectionality; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Public administration; Ethnic group; Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06964776523357982,"gpt":0.3861933462238704,"spread":0.3165455809902906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004314935,0.00009896571,0.0001594376,0.0002118442,0.0007145776,0.00008284524,0.0001048343,0.00007541064,0.00006065765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003065765,0.00009916112,0.00004876792,0.0008572093,0.0001308255,0.0001048506,0.00002869955,0.0001413035,0.0001281482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005511293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004647638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9084963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984476,0.0001589462,0.0001641805,0.0002194202,0.0002577421,0.0007521231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995323,0.00007078735,0.00003204606,0.00007639679,0.0001223988,0.0001660904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767617,0.00003700814,0.8783258,0.00001450704,0.000074324,0.00004113232,0.01791401,0.00002365593,0.0001007554,0.01403898,0.08768938,0.00173064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003032163,0.00007938407,0.8099468,0.00001338808,0.00001784342,0.000001004854,0.01615498,0.00008624372,0.0001071137,0.01005711,0.1628807,0.000352297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844239,0.00120398,0.000001717689,0.007022938,0.00135218,0.000230904,0.00001342314,0.00007192865,0.005679073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939449,0.000253299,0.00001377923,0.00009289304,0.0008490712,0.00002932034,0.00001410341,0.000006939321,0.004795732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08748225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5496025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400535817","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102829","title":"Are young candidates “sacrificial lambs”? Evidence from the 2012, 2017, and 2022 French legislative elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"NOMINATE; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Young adult; Demographic economics; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Developmental psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1185328943893584,"gpt":0.4015150407435569,"spread":0.2829821463541985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002708628,0.00009805309,0.0001237748,0.00003137283,0.001291238,0.000229137,0.0001089278,0.00004257051,0.00007731596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004132889,0.00006541605,0.00004206249,0.0002682178,0.0003404553,0.0002250243,0.00005683098,0.0001701124,0.00002891414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009707185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001019811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1042148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4174518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989279,0.0001834209,0.0001166855,0.0002435128,0.0002581725,0.0002702982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991218,0.0005795645,0.00005094188,0.00008324329,0.0001188771,0.00004556217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001043952,0.0000236131,0.4025038,0.0000187915,0.0004880399,0.00002169396,0.1010636,0.000004337476,0.0006188681,0.005567132,0.4879912,0.001688507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000158633,0.0001244405,0.7671953,0.0003006566,0.000276605,0.000004555804,0.03789758,0.0002337282,0.0004940504,0.03413811,0.158685,0.0004913466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7262447,0.245852,0.000102416,0.01991201,0.003029045,0.0004201977,0.00008469543,0.0001539014,0.004200922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986919,0.002648107,0.00001932952,0.00006888041,0.001113999,0.00003501231,0.000003473251,0.000006504302,0.009185663],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3646915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401841929","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102848","title":"Cultural sources of gender gaps: Confucian meritocracy reduces gender inequalities in political participation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Meritocracy; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Gender studies; Gender equality; Gender gap; Sociology; Demographic economics; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2204947970467916,"gpt":0.4358736646470374,"spread":0.2153788676002458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004485577,0.0001773436,0.0003843164,0.0001120728,0.0003983505,0.0001003396,0.0001145497,0.00006944933,0.0000819702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004064854,0.0001393285,0.00008727644,0.0003560589,0.000609315,0.0003445159,0.0000668548,0.0001255482,0.00002105509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000215291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000150855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002665651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01078221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982311,0.0001751884,0.0004415695,0.0002849843,0.000299159,0.0005680019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993787,0.0002383494,0.00006628662,0.00006341244,0.0001772107,0.00007603432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003773555,0.000118103,0.3514129,0.0003188293,0.0007781168,0.0000184729,0.337862,0.000006824799,0.0002745798,0.2915166,0.01595155,0.001704335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005627634,0.0001435175,0.303332,0.0003010945,0.0001553962,0.000002603972,0.5367212,0.00001837442,0.005195891,0.03524525,0.1173412,0.0009806561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530652,0.0303532,0.000003839753,0.002210784,0.0005159104,0.0002125039,0.00001034808,0.0001092789,0.01351893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973285,0.0007924268,0.00008241164,0.000149732,0.0004707782,0.00008199947,0.000005767754,0.000009275379,0.001079146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2562714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6016726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385657738","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102648","title":"The education and income voting divides in Canada and their consequences for redistributive politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Cleavage (geology); Elite; Redistribution (election); Political science; Redistribution of income and wealth; Politics; Democracy; Political economy; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Unemployment","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06755846940226314,"gpt":0.3790570063339703,"spread":0.3114985369317071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004491452,0.00006072819,0.0001134412,0.00001797282,0.0008517292,0.00004714335,0.00004354569,0.00001919279,4.0479e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001252816,0.00003949208,0.000009327625,0.0002023182,0.0003037658,0.00005535072,0.00002393782,0.00004437643,3.117329e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003261049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006759464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9513569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992304,0.0001143186,0.0001392856,0.00009933802,0.0000869603,0.0003297421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998458,0.001309147,0.00004226048,0.00002843511,0.0001076043,0.00005460453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003157641,0.000003129283,0.9189271,0.00002492542,0.00001887777,2.55391e-7,0.002019838,7.553184e-7,0.00003672821,0.07480203,0.001252921,0.002910309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001408203,0.00007202835,0.908096,0.0001020866,0.0000113535,5.813703e-7,0.0176896,0.0001090285,0.0003165383,0.0604067,0.01287487,0.0001804048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897221,0.00259336,0.000002083757,0.007159549,0.0002255256,0.0002202568,0.00001874594,0.00001603384,0.00004239015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999431,0.00006281455,0.000003782168,0.00005631308,0.0001628604,0.00007967517,0.000002822227,0.000002853759,0.0001979095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04593634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6550899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124921334","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.008","title":"Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns: Language patterns matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential system; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03034882238968054,"gpt":0.376936692103599,"spread":0.3465878697139184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000313098,0.0001155791,0.0002178381,0.00006003199,0.0001474875,0.00003349211,0.0001200118,0.0000658503,0.0003268411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004506716,0.00007662733,0.00004434561,0.0002232151,0.0001190387,0.0002163327,0.00004113862,0.00006619095,0.0003653273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002324095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004440151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2300851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984139,0.0003602978,0.0002190956,0.0002046158,0.0002646912,0.0005374652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993552,0.0003246723,0.00005351191,0.0001061888,0.00007437695,0.00008607352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008824124,0.0000286889,0.9890828,0.0000405125,0.00002358591,0.00001446466,0.003664435,1.494932e-7,0.001594462,0.00215091,0.002237939,0.001153244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004888653,0.0001014961,0.9915723,0.0002708583,0.00001801254,5.274524e-7,0.0003647721,6.671788e-7,0.001920683,0.003188109,0.001818614,0.0002550569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958352,0.0009595647,0.00007655368,0.00184522,0.0004657332,0.000298456,0.000004329907,0.00005753698,0.000457446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967753,0.00001035617,0.00000920967,0.0001746898,0.000539072,0.00009233671,9.120361e-7,0.00001057849,0.002387572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1895361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322102733","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102599","title":"Spatial voting in non-partisan cities: A case study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Ideology; Voting; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public administration; Voting behavior; Political economy; Public relations; Politics; Economics; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1282627583898071,"gpt":0.4363183695699442,"spread":0.3080556111801371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000954758,0.0001237567,0.0002771327,0.0001222902,0.0006478785,0.00006009779,0.00008789703,0.00004959914,0.00003442535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005644023,0.0001134197,0.00004388865,0.0009593692,0.0001337112,0.0001329298,0.00005657054,0.0001305611,0.0001188707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002132248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006304549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3867625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8495513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981015,0.0003451692,0.0003232387,0.000233766,0.0003214719,0.0006748023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999347,0.0003099656,0.0000592946,0.00008545633,0.00009878194,0.00009948052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007149935,0.00006930384,0.9712693,0.00001682588,0.00003768138,0.0007143525,0.02475272,0.00001800095,0.00004176047,0.0004799977,0.001325011,0.001267886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001812489,0.00126154,0.858748,0.0001747386,0.000083042,0.00002651617,0.130263,0.001370735,0.0002092223,0.001200806,0.0038768,0.0009730674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978597,0.0001286576,0.000007360558,0.000615604,0.0004167446,0.0005353745,0.00000199772,0.000158817,0.0002757435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983776,0.000002179201,0.000004210598,0.00003960839,0.0005585989,0.0001573044,0.000001212333,0.00001170271,0.0008476303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4627888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6173211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}