{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":266,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":266,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"2eba35d16c2a","filters":{"venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning"}},"results":[{"id":"W2612680643","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i2.165","title":"Towards a Theory of Change for Community-based Research Projects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of change; Summit; Excellence; Order (exchange); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Political science; Engineering; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8789432957913801,"gpt":0.6002574341838695,"spread":0.2786858616075106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9578946,0.0003210045,0.0006504124,0.001238195,0.8379158,0.0005002402,0.002169678,0.0004232226,0.00008167745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6780214,0.0002740283,0.0001773763,0.0002716133,0.0008779703,0.000907679,0.001454873,0.7982246,0.00002068853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005256176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001072471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005857866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003841296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2066008,0.7893288,0.0008570658,0.0002302993,0.001411316,0.001571667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6475305,0.3489099,0.0005692401,0.00118423,0.001243474,0.0005626865],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00136139,0.0007251772,0.01850418,0.004307326,0.00008937118,0.000009850671,0.9160471,0.000008562234,0.002343328,0.000383094,0.0007818348,0.05543878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003680001,0.003346208,0.01449639,0.005444152,0.00002146837,0.000007605065,0.9337883,0.0002676063,0.0002183511,0.002474004,0.0360036,0.0002522987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866106,0.0006574893,0.0006129953,0.0009370383,0.0004851978,0.002681939,0.00003273524,0.0000790118,0.00790301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924653,0.0002537059,0.004091756,0.0004607308,0.000579691,0.0005205768,0.000118081,0.00009280273,0.001417422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8370379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751518082","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i1.201","title":"Research as Reciprocity: Northern Cree Community-Based and Community-Engaged Research on Wild Food Contamination in Alberta’s Oil Sands Region","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Treaty; Government (linguistics); Duty; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Environmental protection; Geography; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.370557798458128,"gpt":0.503296459739941,"spread":0.1327386612818129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9622752,0.0006868114,0.001263972,0.003552995,0.9489148,0.001924935,0.003480821,0.001263626,0.00006106816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.883904,0.0006500565,0.0001899308,0.0009672293,0.002400608,0.001352789,0.004444925,0.9357363,0.0001299506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002498585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001564947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1537217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3019766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1147549,0.876986,0.001349429,0.0005783915,0.002409909,0.003921329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.435831,0.5580892,0.0005758943,0.002225721,0.002575387,0.0007027886],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001370129,0.001217801,0.06003831,0.0007107328,0.0001810561,0.0001073515,0.9193915,0.0001035504,0.0006442044,0.0001477631,0.0006859559,0.0154017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005421144,0.00647565,0.07062146,0.002781448,0.00002353722,0.00008131153,0.8916374,0.0001913688,0.0000310542,0.001025607,0.02119682,0.000513146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483209,0.0004710566,0.00002894224,0.006342525,0.0003441097,0.001249493,0.000007981885,0.0001233245,0.04311161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921269,0.001395738,0.0002552153,0.00050077,0.0005070377,0.000325514,0.00008219825,0.0002148866,0.004591783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167850970","doi":"10.15402/esj.v7i1.70768","title":"Indigenous and Trans-Systemic Knowledge Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Traditional knowledge; Discipline; Theme (computing); Sociology; Colonialism; Knowledge-based systems; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Ecology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.114064314462431,"gpt":0.4065233550803234,"spread":0.2924590406178925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8229648,0.0002482508,0.000444514,0.0006190033,0.8457471,0.002473038,0.0005829863,0.000362179,0.00003927994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1001303,0.0002247322,0.00009466732,0.0005799303,0.0004890013,0.0008919432,0.00002620478,0.5714644,0.00002230944],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005068783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008752527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03678577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04364612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3384318,0.6593752,0.0004154943,0.0002190399,0.0006839357,0.0008745474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8397141,0.15803,0.0001845184,0.0003761926,0.000881597,0.0008135877],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001756089,0.0001978304,0.00117746,0.000228083,0.00006560605,0.00005361686,0.9906524,0.00004330387,0.0005145656,0.0005043589,0.0000466442,0.006498552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003822517,0.0001145132,0.001120375,0.0004362417,0.00001587267,0.000498658,0.6666554,0.0000234349,0.00001408733,0.0000811865,0.3304769,0.0001810286],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462611,0.02487812,0.000262363,0.0001840324,0.000677416,0.0004197911,0.000002377373,0.0001286503,0.02718615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549003,0.0290214,0.0004138919,0.00001435201,0.0009480114,0.000005272529,0.00001255403,0.00005128609,0.0146329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947700472","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68338","title":"Confronting Gentrification: Can Creative Interventions Help People Keep More than Just Their Homes?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gentrification; Psychological intervention; Placemaking; Equity (law); Public relations; Sociology; The arts; Public housing; Political science; Economic growth; Urban planning; Psychology; Urban design; Engineering; Civil engineering; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5971572805437616,"gpt":0.5947866108442185,"spread":0.002370669699543138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8742275,0.0003128007,0.0005648658,0.0009329686,0.4571759,0.002609266,0.001436026,0.0002619288,0.0005466448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6804712,0.0002900509,0.0003126228,0.0009466435,0.0007705215,0.001368514,0.000622145,0.5652498,0.00007207114],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006442126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006783268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00546602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001456036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3180535,0.6787394,0.0004836341,0.0002899277,0.001326949,0.001106603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7682917,0.2287572,0.0003600621,0.0006577864,0.0009417498,0.0009915492],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006575394,0.0002270896,0.03928383,0.0001078791,0.0001735426,0.00001340964,0.9344976,0.0001332585,0.006090596,0.0002420532,0.0001694387,0.01899558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007288888,0.0003543795,0.06412715,0.0006345973,0.00002716405,0.00002381954,0.9193862,0.0004925725,0.0001521976,0.0002750135,0.01351563,0.0002823748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864886,0.001798301,0.001538851,0.001671766,0.0002686607,0.0006258595,0.000007467383,0.0001754473,0.007425083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872866,0.0005622679,0.002769649,0.00004578041,0.0003897239,0.00004241462,0.00002035558,0.00006797491,0.008815294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5649879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310224743","doi":"10.15402/esj.v8i2.70780","title":"“We Cannot Write About Complicity Together”: Limits of Cross-Caste Collaborations in Western Academy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Diversity and Impact of Dance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Caste; Complicity; Sociology; Scholarship; Gender studies; Colonialism; Indigenous; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2636261443381419,"gpt":0.4594271419927345,"spread":0.1958009976545927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6345118,0.0002596282,0.0004906655,0.001087219,0.3003423,0.0007604299,0.001276454,0.0001978133,0.0004428798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1763393,0.0002846558,0.0001204741,0.000955171,0.0004344935,0.001050149,0.0008528745,0.6712668,0.00002523887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003183578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001796136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001380329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001532119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3491048,0.6486507,0.0005196973,0.0002256802,0.0008238476,0.000675239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9017642,0.09684504,0.0003540644,0.0004346785,0.0002630233,0.0003389764],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004708229,0.000692198,0.1390386,0.00006150175,0.0001505742,0.00006433526,0.8339213,0.003459621,0.01397826,0.0001223755,0.0007108026,0.00732966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002051902,0.0008068582,0.187904,0.0001849584,0.00001368104,0.0001792887,0.7734469,0.00009000191,0.0001043057,0.00007965443,0.03488444,0.0002539293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911426,0.001878224,0.00009288279,0.0009507631,0.0002070122,0.0002902373,0.0000539681,0.00006139656,0.005322861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937643,0.0002200605,0.0003989841,0.0002056626,0.00010891,0.00001967116,0.00002003652,0.00004800181,0.005214383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.671069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755229385","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i1.206","title":"Creating Ethical Research Partnerships – Relational Accountability in Action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Reflexivity; Indigenous; Sociology; Public relations; Construct (python library); Photovoice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4855732261293578,"gpt":0.5361320540082213,"spread":0.05055882787886351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9587811,0.0001924915,0.0003161342,0.0009252651,0.9275746,0.003534138,0.001224538,0.0007418933,0.000126981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.643832,0.000176433,0.00009068274,0.0003936172,0.001672031,0.002179156,0.00006695344,0.8198419,0.0000370742],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001263576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006699606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1384532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1579776,0.8377821,0.0005272188,0.0003084191,0.002125036,0.001279519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6395471,0.3576907,0.0003015486,0.0007034593,0.001147088,0.000610107],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009931282,0.0001976447,0.01579149,0.00004907466,0.00001758592,0.00001134085,0.9731403,0.00004088128,0.000119918,0.006130299,0.00005537114,0.004346754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004388187,0.0001189847,0.06786638,0.0003088056,0.000004099715,0.00002139858,0.7543066,0.00008064716,0.00001116104,0.002258819,0.1744277,0.0001566032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165803,0.0002176571,0.00004349527,0.00280769,0.0003273444,0.0003943527,8.69643e-7,0.00006422048,0.07956409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988955,0.002195074,0.001286271,0.00002350779,0.001208765,0.000007574356,0.000009592683,0.00003475487,0.006279487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9259026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808074494","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.310","title":"From “Academic Projectitis” to Partnership: Community Perspectives for Authentic Community Engagement in Health Professional Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vancouver Foundation","keywords":"General partnership; Participatory action research; Community engagement; Accountability; Public relations; Community organization; Community health; Health care; Inclusion (mineral); Community-based participatory research; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Medical education; Nursing; Medicine; Political science; Public health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2823346082429954,"gpt":0.5057543804097552,"spread":0.2234197721667597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8869237,0.0004192601,0.0006126674,0.001414722,0.6589839,0.001351913,0.002478449,0.0003579466,0.0001373621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5716191,0.0004369077,0.0001562041,0.001121359,0.0008280535,0.001063714,0.001315624,0.7102409,0.00003587622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001664863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001975135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1008768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2327694,0.7638222,0.0007509965,0.0002833207,0.001162823,0.001211274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7473125,0.2495391,0.0004044577,0.0009639358,0.000959563,0.0008204633],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002101692,0.001215472,0.002876296,0.0001284716,0.0000798525,0.000001311441,0.9528168,0.00006473768,0.0006105078,0.0004000197,0.001944052,0.03965233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101377,0.00126193,0.01703041,0.001639281,0.0000172638,0.000007075374,0.8638796,0.00009918945,0.00002519624,0.002181255,0.1124807,0.0003642784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850818,0.0009192416,0.0005836086,0.005975109,0.0005777169,0.001516454,0.00000739623,0.0002470042,0.005091691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892123,0.0003575544,0.005056034,0.0007570119,0.001083586,0.0002196168,0.00007346506,0.00008806976,0.003152403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7098829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910802795","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i2.61747","title":"“Community First” for Whom? Reflections on the Possibilities and Challenges of Community-Campus Engagement from the Community Food Sovereignty Hub","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Community engagement; Sociology; Public relations; Community organization; General partnership; Community building; Community organizing; Community studies; Political science; Social science; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3780238893588316,"gpt":0.4257523209124561,"spread":0.04772843155362455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.842216,0.0005101732,0.0007068209,0.0004419607,0.7401947,0.002169676,0.003908057,0.0003695176,0.0001420977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4547741,0.0003775803,0.0002951943,0.0005393663,0.001789348,0.0007986088,0.002290969,0.6709275,0.00001544942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000405343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003164838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03727448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01473502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3303411,0.667088,0.0005792134,0.0001672392,0.001045794,0.0007786853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5414609,0.4556362,0.000391222,0.001739043,0.000520134,0.0002524559],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001988733,0.0008131402,0.001279928,0.0002253395,0.0004249614,5.368543e-7,0.9773039,0.0003003872,0.000580287,0.007331298,0.0003503961,0.011191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244469,0.00233673,0.01466795,0.0008165247,0.00006567109,0.000007867961,0.9042113,0.00004772679,0.0000654932,0.01023502,0.06595971,0.000341564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704529,0.001999027,0.00006844959,0.009228426,0.0002781852,0.001147648,0.00003368735,0.0001859668,0.01660571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947593,0.002827839,0.0006738995,0.0005875052,0.0002515582,0.00009482443,0.00004329586,0.00009014883,0.0006715881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753934857","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i1.205","title":"Negotiating and Exploring Relationships in Métis Community-Based Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Participatory action research; Indigenous; Negotiation; Community-based participatory research; General partnership; Sociology; Transparency (behavior); Objectivity (philosophy); Public relations; Citizen journalism; Traditional knowledge; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Ecology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.9420464784349308,"gpt":0.6961543151078272,"spread":0.2458921633271036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9712681,0.0002836254,0.0004999602,0.002246717,0.8967199,0.002277246,0.001753268,0.0003212929,0.00005966787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9481648,0.0002803289,0.00005395043,0.0006677058,0.0009746214,0.003063633,0.002037477,0.8876454,0.00004686303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007656001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001021704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01371974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001860517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1165736,0.8782153,0.001159508,0.0003108204,0.001631592,0.002109173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4157922,0.5810794,0.000494996,0.001098516,0.0007732668,0.0007616506],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006086576,0.00006903776,0.1953816,0.0002555212,0.00001370443,0.00002168549,0.7945776,0.0002404254,0.001294106,0.0001645125,0.0003993028,0.007521619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654073,0.00024539,0.2547416,0.001199518,0.000003994556,0.00002044728,0.721663,0.001131328,0.000009203715,0.0004734084,0.01867475,0.0001832342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873345,0.0001944953,0.0003846783,0.00655757,0.0002711206,0.0007205327,0.000005353738,0.0001009568,0.004430743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932622,0.0003264476,0.004826459,0.0004152064,0.0003217264,0.0001676055,0.00000951629,0.00007325961,0.0005976246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891388218","doi":"10.15402/esj.v3i2.334","title":"Doing Indigenous Community-University Research Partnerships: A Cautionary Tale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; General partnership; Colonialism; Sociology; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public relations; Geography; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2122357824915388,"gpt":0.4340846517824962,"spread":0.2218488692909574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9219959,0.0002819778,0.0003905575,0.001791025,0.9498516,0.001695238,0.001939263,0.0004754474,0.0001810714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1638707,0.0002777951,0.0001338249,0.00148084,0.003263289,0.001741808,0.0001282098,0.7410879,0.0001525486],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001458736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009408912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1518639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2187343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2751434,0.7209645,0.0003731069,0.0002453401,0.001632494,0.001641196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7108648,0.2849692,0.0002364405,0.0007809096,0.002046024,0.001102643],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001043022,0.0004319847,0.001058427,0.00006348781,0.00006415458,0.00004416148,0.99101,0.00001048162,0.0002173353,0.00149035,0.0003612147,0.005144154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003306093,0.0004148623,0.001393693,0.0001860359,0.000009095031,0.00006402259,0.5448702,0.000009061198,0.00001700984,0.0004208726,0.4521121,0.0001724347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9026502,0.0006381975,0.000160018,0.0005448593,0.0003732676,0.0005377076,0.000003308966,0.0001977727,0.09489468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764489,0.003770417,0.002522349,0.00003977111,0.001548804,0.000002229247,0.00002375228,0.00005836669,0.01558543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1929036661","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i1.41","title":"Towards a Better Future for Canadians with Bipolar Disorder: Principles and Implementation of a Community-Based Participatory Research Model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Bipolar Disorder and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Community-based participatory research; Psychosocial; Bipolar disorder; Participatory action research; Mental health; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2878624349380798,"gpt":0.4434404959032185,"spread":0.1555780609651388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5959432,0.0002764295,0.0004855173,0.0009349443,0.1650237,0.0003555677,0.0003304748,0.0001822529,0.0000081472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07250164,0.0002138694,0.0000933108,0.0003799623,0.000473101,0.0003891182,0.0002244103,0.3820151,9.088519e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003127508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001284574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00906709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5509734,0.4472111,0.0003106459,0.0001364869,0.0007801985,0.0005881788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570869,0.04037321,0.000148325,0.0005568349,0.000998468,0.0008362517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008654497,0.0007652916,0.1252034,0.0006257299,0.0004178458,0.00001626732,0.7944441,0.0008105203,0.001938671,0.00007355778,0.000261738,0.07457738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006439068,0.004230923,0.04009458,0.0003302929,0.0001328872,0.0001233606,0.9114068,0.003076764,0.00022755,0.0002342065,0.03348655,0.0002170733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888743,0.00484453,0.001904318,0.003303661,0.00002670175,0.0007895036,0.00002555793,0.00004693855,0.0001845486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881099,0.0001905854,0.01106373,0.0001290257,0.0001327385,0.00009976886,0.00009378976,0.00007803853,0.0001024524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5234416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947991891","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68342","title":"Unpacking the Layers of Community Engagement, Participation, and Knowledge Co-Creation when Representing the Visual Voices of LGBTQ Former Foster Youth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Albany; California State University, Northridge","keywords":"Photovoice; Unpacking; Participatory action research; Visual research; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Process (computing); Visual methods; Order (exchange); Community-based participatory research; Public relations; Psychology; Visual arts; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Cognitive science; Anthropology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.606972601332517,"gpt":0.6142411360764379,"spread":0.007268534743920974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8931354,0.0002172384,0.0004207928,0.0004689467,0.3113078,0.0009861068,0.001179207,0.0001583962,0.00007810808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6233708,0.0001494582,0.0001273445,0.0005587342,0.001676615,0.001258123,0.0009179481,0.3482518,0.000006874463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001455825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003354865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004347763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005390922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1509346,0.8460926,0.0006575069,0.0001652919,0.001369552,0.0007805083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6687861,0.3292028,0.0004821322,0.0005607225,0.0007048277,0.000263352],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009506864,0.0001782909,0.05466003,0.0001024223,0.0001283921,6.600023e-7,0.9103163,0.00009825679,0.01328386,0.0001339181,0.00008014204,0.02092259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006631404,0.0003887121,0.04014739,0.0003394636,0.00005049423,0.000003117513,0.9499545,0.0006645514,0.001141728,0.0003922626,0.006110223,0.0001444808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860491,0.0007262005,0.000431825,0.0005398193,0.00009369865,0.0005760817,0.000002905434,0.00003962821,0.01154072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984186,0.0002411866,0.0004770345,0.00004299107,0.0001367501,0.00001826769,0.000006428603,0.00003650432,0.000622193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5178515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9509051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947419096","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68333","title":"“Just” Stories or “Just Stories”?: Mixed Media Storytelling as a Prism for Environmental Justice and Decolonial Futures","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Sociology; Narrative; Indigenous; Media studies; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Law; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5277316118733104,"gpt":0.579440673949687,"spread":0.0517090620763766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8098208,0.0003922487,0.0006153302,0.0006792735,0.4406848,0.002011702,0.001048383,0.0004468193,0.0002394919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8123213,0.0003527456,0.0001438452,0.0003999182,0.001353531,0.001589857,0.0006255051,0.4416658,0.00003321028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008095166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000965342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009807789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007529395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4058514,0.5906725,0.0004088572,0.0003375445,0.001553304,0.001176388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6338088,0.3642807,0.0002327493,0.0003838169,0.000259953,0.001033979],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008443116,0.0002065882,0.003772018,0.0001845535,0.0001225173,0.00004735206,0.9437193,0.00008072396,0.01096855,0.0001873533,0.0004134982,0.0394532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152575,0.001035785,0.005471232,0.000174106,0.00008831057,0.00004687501,0.8742089,0.000356081,0.0001692494,0.0001697747,0.1163817,0.0003722833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929408,0.002413797,0.0009578862,0.0005067074,0.001012006,0.0008334108,0.000007936476,0.00013019,0.001197295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982269,0.001254661,0.01074091,0.0001000654,0.001214774,0.00005631486,0.00001134323,0.0000934866,0.004259465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.441219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948016590","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68331","title":"Narrative Métissage as an Innovative Engagement Practice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Sociology; Business; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1510092985865021,"gpt":0.4583566287305121,"spread":0.3073473301440101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.921831,0.0004645295,0.0005688026,0.001100278,0.6643798,0.003757697,0.002053941,0.0003646369,0.0009797838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7402269,0.0004665695,0.000131224,0.001562496,0.0005848131,0.004140811,0.001042532,0.7878674,0.0002986651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006820367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007126405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01087297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004246908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1992365,0.7963492,0.0006005194,0.0004131227,0.002166188,0.001234533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6635755,0.3323601,0.0004669804,0.000971801,0.001840694,0.0007849904],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002028163,0.000529852,0.001124099,0.00003948903,0.0002136352,0.00005611309,0.9630988,0.0003240163,0.002550924,0.001332936,0.0003126836,0.03021464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009654687,0.001215134,0.001544308,0.0002667258,0.00002194026,0.00006069282,0.6914776,0.00006925411,0.00004308567,0.0002668106,0.3037026,0.0003664393],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8899347,0.0005057806,0.0001411855,0.002484948,0.0003950815,0.0006494269,0.000001121397,0.0003408943,0.1055469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835939,0.0006839157,0.006300901,0.0007647352,0.0004556244,0.00003324417,0.00003229683,0.0001039144,0.008031488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7875028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915735523","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i1.67849","title":"Campus Food Movements and Community Service-Learning: Mobilizing Partnerships through the Good Food Challenge in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Transformative learning; Food systems; Service-learning; Public relations; Sustainability; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Food security; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2017022037203495,"gpt":0.3674980856331172,"spread":0.1657958819127677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7353865,0.0004913897,0.0006434451,0.0004364325,0.4959287,0.001755877,0.002357807,0.0002974918,0.0001032935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2320879,0.0004367773,0.0001132662,0.001007132,0.0003671635,0.001274113,0.001689633,0.7202387,0.00001650073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001215953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7123656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8503112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3223049,0.6742037,0.0005546869,0.0002745388,0.001447591,0.001214603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7703168,0.227534,0.0003563429,0.0009173765,0.0004016611,0.0004738081],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007039535,0.0002994049,0.0280597,0.0001665514,0.0001940388,0.00001201201,0.9604582,0.001617826,0.0002030645,0.0004221586,0.00004877302,0.008447905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001501924,0.001152814,0.0108662,0.0005669693,0.00002204506,0.0000254746,0.9037467,0.0003282555,0.00001267184,0.0006500178,0.08070167,0.0004252707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741341,0.002158055,0.00001820816,0.003349573,0.0002619762,0.0006934538,0.000002855385,0.0001404847,0.01924125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966646,0.00144098,0.0002507557,0.0005550744,0.0001677551,0.00004293247,0.00001891023,0.00009212779,0.0007668489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7199412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910948534","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i2.61748","title":"Learning to “Walk the Talk”: Reflexive Evaluation in Community-First Engaged Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Introspection; Participatory evaluation; Sociology; Accountability; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Community building; Community engagement; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Corporate governance; Political science; Psychology; Management; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2546402542475389,"gpt":0.4734688999873672,"spread":0.2188286457398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9797032,0.0005421776,0.0007400623,0.002578995,0.7916131,0.004239166,0.004306291,0.0005250446,0.0005251824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8428411,0.0004866864,0.0002292703,0.003255791,0.0009207151,0.001585424,0.002615199,0.8977349,0.0003648902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001943148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008560561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03970158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0167292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.06432424,0.926736,0.0009980602,0.0005291624,0.005024329,0.002388212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5011794,0.4947471,0.0002926262,0.001440018,0.001621875,0.0007189374],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001950715,0.0003976061,0.0066388,0.00008634647,0.00009985688,0.00002037973,0.9442194,0.009775209,0.002142563,0.0001510597,0.0004001036,0.03587367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001484343,0.001202848,0.01445768,0.0009697108,0.00002562371,0.00003175795,0.8228355,0.0009449392,0.00003427327,0.0005013569,0.1570732,0.0004387779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496523,0.0007956791,0.00004200431,0.005697604,0.000397608,0.00169123,0.000001382006,0.000267463,0.04145475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909836,0.0007889009,0.0007797535,0.0003252465,0.0004733064,0.0001536421,0.00003425479,0.0001426826,0.006318578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763919310","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i1.207","title":"Co-Producing Community and Knowledge: Indigenous Epistemologies of Engaged, Ethical Research in an Urban Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Conceptualization; Participatory action research; Sociology; Community-based participatory research; Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Citizen journalism; Social science; Political science; Geography; Anthropology; Ecology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.312456589926222,"gpt":0.5081462930924991,"spread":0.1956897031662772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9554233,0.0003209375,0.0007208812,0.001550821,0.9054963,0.002797097,0.002584585,0.0008625173,0.00002408038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4858977,0.000291251,0.00009619346,0.00046212,0.004580022,0.001732149,0.0001536759,0.8177265,0.00001090005],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000696169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007078425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2429177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3358518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1433084,0.8526202,0.0007768909,0.000366467,0.001371222,0.001556754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6408727,0.3550726,0.000468446,0.001378848,0.001421484,0.0007858959],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001227533,0.0005795977,0.02846795,0.0002483191,0.00003850626,0.00002661519,0.9546861,0.000008407593,0.0006278122,0.0007220702,0.00004526179,0.01442663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008758905,0.00081071,0.06655382,0.0007608673,0.000009726661,0.00005679665,0.9014041,0.00001569954,0.0001570219,0.001104045,0.02797441,0.0002768762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980209,0.002552966,0.00001352298,0.0006525047,0.0002865827,0.0007409503,0.000003966937,0.00008120204,0.01545931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918127,0.005531462,0.000584742,0.00002212503,0.0005832561,0.000008677919,0.00001363026,0.00005960002,0.001383823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152991785","doi":"10.15402/esj.v6i2.69398","title":"Boundary spanning leadership among community-engaged faculty: An exploratory study of faculty participating in higher education community engagement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan State University","keywords":"Boundary spanning; Scholarship; Exploratory research; Community engagement; Context (archaeology); Institution; Boundary (topology); Higher education; Perception; Pedagogy; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social science; Geography; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.629836221243881,"gpt":0.4858757323133066,"spread":0.1439604889305744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9016689,0.0006659196,0.001060434,0.001411642,0.6726083,0.002843307,0.002768917,0.0004756479,0.0003231793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5047988,0.0007357348,0.0002214175,0.00194569,0.0009865864,0.00301587,0.002013113,0.8098279,0.00001306533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009849342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001339103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03639426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02751913,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1596322,0.8348693,0.00133029,0.0004113253,0.002215598,0.001541328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7591613,0.2359634,0.0007591586,0.001800005,0.00142418,0.0008919699],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001068417,0.005612315,0.0655921,0.0002237541,0.0002158603,0.00004138392,0.9079991,0.00167877,0.002000731,0.00004234382,0.0001600496,0.01632677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001998853,0.00115632,0.1712203,0.001118235,0.00007854112,0.00001314491,0.8151686,0.00009980569,0.00009484942,0.0001617638,0.008334379,0.0005552012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912129,0.0007653028,0.00004088923,0.0006491579,0.0004343265,0.0007473521,0.000006508721,0.0003226885,0.005820873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956051,0.0001362246,0.001311722,0.0002757482,0.0003178703,0.0002224203,0.0002134293,0.0001443643,0.001773096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8093522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095439237","doi":"10.15402/esj.v6i1.68178","title":"Using Boundary Objects to Co-Create Community Health and Water Knowledge with Community-Based Medical Anthropology and Indigenous Knowledge","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Boundary-work; Sociology; Indigenous; Boundary object; Community health; Health equity; Traditional knowledge; Community-based participatory research; Photovoice; Framing (construction); Public relations; Political science; Social science; Economic growth; Negotiation; Geography; Anthropology; Law; Health care; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2678749211166991,"gpt":0.508142241505722,"spread":0.2402673203890228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7040867,0.0005459406,0.001221549,0.0007878985,0.824228,0.0004365124,0.0009609537,0.0005674689,0.0000972856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2082841,0.0004158494,0.0000785669,0.0004570444,0.001539567,0.0004029591,0.002623499,0.7161577,0.0000424499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007796974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003148326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0188506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02871071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3367141,0.6598247,0.0007022336,0.0002639838,0.000491799,0.0020031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8168256,0.1792871,0.0002811904,0.0006288344,0.0006963533,0.002280887],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005694123,0.0004808262,0.02593633,0.001355131,0.0002010474,0.00006564235,0.9644061,0.00004463322,0.0009339869,0.000007798031,0.0002696203,0.005729502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003077313,0.006033503,0.003840678,0.001180139,0.00003505219,0.00032826,0.9523774,0.0003463977,0.00003198689,0.00003609103,0.03229586,0.0004172612],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886381,0.003473165,0.0007216229,0.003449101,0.0001850274,0.001141093,0.00001052112,0.0001866779,0.002194717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993383,0.0007427123,0.001990216,0.003137096,0.0003502988,0.00004239379,0.00007628486,0.0001353791,0.0001425851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8226884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386414615","doi":"10.15402/esj.v9i1.70805","title":"Co-authorship with Community Partners as Research Co-creation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Academic community; Reflection (computer programming); Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Existentialism; Co-creation; Process (computing); Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5799570758055788,"gpt":0.6428732770022645,"spread":0.06291620119668573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9657097,0.0003594551,0.0005438548,0.003270504,0.8182852,0.001343989,0.001746051,0.0005261136,0.0003695412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8188878,0.0002918869,0.00009373577,0.003238627,0.001401205,0.001587321,0.0005670898,0.8818213,0.001543131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001031366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003107913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008566637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007258622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1528607,0.8395034,0.0008419353,0.0003749998,0.003413505,0.003005455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4997946,0.4956496,0.0002662052,0.0009385168,0.001577636,0.001773374],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004456234,0.0002313669,0.04058608,0.0004613261,0.00005955817,0.00004995709,0.9193485,0.0001656606,0.004183734,0.00008668946,0.02346295,0.01091858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001140279,0.001537555,0.05465874,0.001142011,0.00000703869,0.00006990595,0.8499593,0.0003731394,0.00007937285,0.0007767727,0.08999934,0.000256608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518831,0.0002010608,0.00009708301,0.003234212,0.0002551281,0.001049399,0.000006363492,0.0003827547,0.04289093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837949,0.0008115423,0.000695548,0.0002412906,0.000728825,0.0001898802,0.0002053853,0.0001025634,0.01323003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8812951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897302676","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.305","title":"Community Service-Learning in Canada: One Size Does Not Fit All","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; University of Alberta","keywords":"Competition (biology); Service (business); Unit (ring theory); Contrast (vision); Service-learning; Order (exchange); Computer science; Variable (mathematics); Community service; Service delivery framework; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Business; Psychology; Mathematics education; Marketing; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2018844941525156,"gpt":0.3942366980412613,"spread":0.1923522038887458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8548022,0.0005222433,0.0007737915,0.0007996451,0.6269168,0.002149265,0.003024627,0.0003713108,0.0005248855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6456614,0.0004916962,0.0001392823,0.00130892,0.0006869697,0.001294335,0.001751474,0.7965438,0.00004811502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002239394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00232868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9439125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9502413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2732266,0.7222497,0.0007258048,0.0002941618,0.001912401,0.001591208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6452166,0.3512968,0.0004117608,0.001037163,0.00108877,0.0009488632],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001899564,0.0003897393,0.01168151,0.0001088311,0.0001721339,0.00004404203,0.9586446,0.000655117,0.003350225,0.00006383494,0.0003292951,0.02437071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001168912,0.0004405266,0.03166125,0.0006278449,0.00003166484,0.0000238521,0.8374667,0.0003916008,0.0001180529,0.0001821067,0.1273905,0.0004970498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748871,0.000274531,0.00004126647,0.007128751,0.0003861226,0.0003745501,0.000003450318,0.0002956839,0.0166086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922553,0.0006213081,0.001659218,0.001537765,0.0006449375,0.00002522436,0.00001789188,0.0001110196,0.003127369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7961724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624217975","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i2.162","title":"Leadership in Community-Based Participatory Research: Individual to Collective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Participatory action research; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Community-based participatory research; Collaborative leadership; Collective leadership; Collective efficacy; Sociology; Shared leadership; Political science; Leadership style; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8643976675344336,"gpt":0.5899694748799591,"spread":0.2744281926544745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9620259,0.0004414533,0.0008033675,0.003117751,0.8759623,0.001594369,0.003600405,0.00059976,0.0001347714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8938923,0.0004346968,0.0001198359,0.0009268932,0.0009609409,0.001055147,0.003468334,0.9119605,0.0002064155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002007577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003824617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009477386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008231117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1719573,0.8217416,0.001076296,0.0003238689,0.001999269,0.002901647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5421086,0.4533993,0.0003559583,0.001720561,0.001032524,0.001383048],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006156678,0.0005494255,0.06163418,0.0005546742,0.00006177948,0.00006703674,0.9196203,0.0001493136,0.0009095239,0.00004036435,0.003859957,0.01193779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002608531,0.0009233293,0.2257859,0.002538153,0.000009065188,0.00001347465,0.7344874,0.00009974214,0.00003491957,0.0005912274,0.03259291,0.0003153846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752327,0.0004132001,0.0001267846,0.008665437,0.0003660324,0.001512631,0.000007666981,0.0001246117,0.01355097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918599,0.00009026951,0.00247662,0.002304163,0.0003010609,0.0003123778,0.00002978255,0.0001138929,0.00251194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9113607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166783230","doi":"10.15402/esj.v7i1.69979","title":"wahkotowin: Reconnecting to the Spirit of nêhiyawêwin (Cree Language)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Autonomy; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Ceremony; Insider; Sociology; Indigenous language; Pneumatology; Agency (philosophy); Law; Political science; Social science; Theology; Philosophy; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1255592891830979,"gpt":0.4278300548080021,"spread":0.3022707656249042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8376961,0.0001762675,0.0003205804,0.0004416567,0.7593946,0.001025177,0.0009015576,0.0001894215,0.0002230024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3678646,0.0001349972,0.0001278151,0.0007990698,0.0002985812,0.0005704126,0.00005147351,0.5075144,0.00003105581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002798465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004371466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04918424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1568365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3012687,0.696557,0.0004038053,0.0001782319,0.000856647,0.0007356035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8045748,0.1934431,0.0001992615,0.0005014546,0.0007951093,0.000486253],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002151235,0.000119348,0.0006734025,0.00004692647,0.00004454654,0.00002435808,0.9824634,0.00009749462,0.001091745,0.0005449078,0.0001974422,0.01467494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001968985,0.0001092262,0.001607759,0.000225937,0.00000900306,0.00005740213,0.661967,0.00001102743,0.0002686762,0.0001022677,0.3353328,0.0001120005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.960545,0.001789844,0.0001882016,0.003577001,0.0004108712,0.00032272,0.000001756474,0.00006508566,0.03309949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854281,0.001863422,0.002812959,0.0001083624,0.001045745,0.000003174923,0.000006978709,0.00003698298,0.008694304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7590961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807907453","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.303","title":"Community Service-Learning in Canada: Emerging Conversations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publishing; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Political science; Work (physics); Service-learning; Media studies; Sociology; History; Engineering; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1512480799715405,"gpt":0.3919908937684297,"spread":0.2407428137968892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8464623,0.0003892165,0.0005331105,0.001076705,0.7198087,0.001576484,0.002110383,0.0002556895,0.0003768429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5300589,0.0004284068,0.0001025224,0.001678647,0.0005906416,0.001237981,0.001160157,0.7862519,0.00005478439],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002166951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002738055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.950437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9414521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2886157,0.7080069,0.0005745966,0.0002171954,0.001366229,0.00121941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7562937,0.240676,0.0003419339,0.0008004387,0.001127023,0.0007608887],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006062494,0.000168476,0.01940656,0.00005745838,0.00008474103,0.00002733595,0.9526204,0.001214783,0.0006784981,0.0001079698,0.0005034108,0.02506973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008871139,0.000268951,0.02296966,0.000437507,0.00001937398,0.00002746518,0.833757,0.00101799,0.00002362248,0.000154629,0.1400714,0.000365319],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668223,0.0003557033,0.0001575648,0.004469624,0.0003788715,0.0002946429,0.000001585614,0.000251052,0.0272686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957691,0.0004225447,0.001061816,0.000637227,0.0004661489,0.00001957267,0.00002548425,0.0000814603,0.001516682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912990543","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.321","title":"The Nature of the Space: Walls to Bridges as Transformative Learning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Adult and Continuing Education Topics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Experiential learning; Reflexivity; Sociology; Pedagogy; Space (punctuation); Class (philosophy); Power (physics); Learning community; Mathematics education; Psychology; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06149575004102606,"gpt":0.4151560366465335,"spread":0.3536602866055074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.708979,0.0001533353,0.0001973476,0.0002139852,0.5980838,0.001268276,0.001273382,0.0002136319,0.00004454944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7068898,0.00009911884,0.0001173452,0.000577157,0.0009366421,0.0005308409,0.0002662904,0.5800135,0.00002182478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001598503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003921313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001628263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008243484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4237199,0.5746911,0.0002278493,0.00009764087,0.0008182119,0.0004453435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8579863,0.1402878,0.0002072712,0.000350837,0.0008677935,0.0003000541],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004248408,0.00003474946,0.002810308,0.000009401323,0.00003624457,8.896079e-7,0.9589435,0.00003580828,0.001159415,0.0008552392,0.0008561985,0.03521577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001755404,0.0001935844,0.008773123,0.0001771272,0.000007456566,0.00001021519,0.6884651,0.0000313643,0.0002618528,0.0003203487,0.3014962,0.0000880566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696254,0.0005160926,0.0001849926,0.01091704,0.0005319272,0.0002526898,5.479785e-7,0.00005387035,0.01791743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985158,0.0003795407,0.0003614895,0.0001604676,0.0006931776,0.00000701001,9.127521e-7,0.00002365952,0.01321577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894019477","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.306","title":"Establishing the Roots of Community Service-Learning in Canada: Advocating for a Community First Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Scholarship; Political science; Documentation; Service (business); Public relations; Institutionalisation; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1736961145998887,"gpt":0.3823311455129772,"spread":0.2086350309130885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8834672,0.0004415979,0.0007314869,0.0007348256,0.7129917,0.001630406,0.004152006,0.0002935643,0.00003918536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6780035,0.0003998445,0.0001616385,0.001734677,0.0009054882,0.001204261,0.001835913,0.7196606,0.00000351288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001422496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002182064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.946787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9302165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2739684,0.7224748,0.0008071221,0.0001821117,0.001339165,0.001228438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5458151,0.4506118,0.000603302,0.001135984,0.001394829,0.000439013],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001224824,0.0003814524,0.01280063,0.0003067893,0.0001144543,0.000002671135,0.9585224,0.004173875,0.00051457,0.0001082386,0.0003122182,0.02264017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00118741,0.0005192382,0.03169961,0.0007421346,0.00003597831,0.00002341853,0.9259977,0.002564064,0.00003423459,0.0002310531,0.03660525,0.0003598721],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830251,0.000388481,0.0006875733,0.002220212,0.0002338086,0.0006944741,0.00000421702,0.0001437344,0.01260237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957018,0.0001779408,0.0027862,0.0003988874,0.0004007221,0.00006718106,0.00004032355,0.00009545327,0.0003314302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7193671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153966546","doi":"10.15402/esj.v6i2.70165","title":"Community engagement in Canadian health and social science research: Field reports on four studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario HIV Treatment Network","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community-based participatory research; Community engagement; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Context (archaeology); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Public engagement; Health equity; Psychology; Political science; Public health; Medicine; Nursing; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.8922623287255171,"gpt":0.711796411807926,"spread":0.1804659169175912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9671258,0.0002614533,0.0005831392,0.002896813,0.794461,0.0007932415,0.0008559418,0.0002060062,0.00007594102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9276353,0.0002517509,0.00005182746,0.002007793,0.001055264,0.001007167,0.001687808,0.7848353,0.00001920696],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003175633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01042154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1424243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1063189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1174856,0.8759003,0.00120922,0.0004140075,0.002173283,0.002817536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4500443,0.5447137,0.0004315106,0.0008485595,0.001982949,0.001978976],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003457673,0.00007267214,0.01608798,0.0002879752,0.00002295834,0.0001818174,0.9636948,0.00001000588,0.0008370276,0.000195116,0.005043864,0.01353129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007241955,0.0006350976,0.03828783,0.0009144553,0.000002397065,0.0001267342,0.8772884,0.00002910252,0.00002679566,0.000603063,0.08118942,0.0001725104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.957689,0.0006307322,0.00001548983,0.03526481,0.0003293161,0.0006198899,0.000004999455,0.00005500359,0.005390733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888556,0.0008172989,0.0009556319,0.00819083,0.0002539091,0.0000585216,0.000008106884,0.00003980551,0.0008202904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7934057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310349472","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i2.115","title":"Enabling Community Well-being Self-Monitoring in the Context of Mining: The Naskapi Nation of Kawawachikamach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; First nation; Baseline (sea); Political science; Community development; Context (archaeology); Geography; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Law; Archaeology; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07661388373695721,"gpt":0.322264409845848,"spread":0.2456505261088908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7203368,0.0002676258,0.0003994774,0.000794419,0.1277706,0.0003638631,0.001433804,0.0001537716,0.00001119683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2002518,0.0001558971,0.0001297283,0.0005509785,0.0002714787,0.0004101328,0.0004075388,0.3860855,0.000003046171],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001844609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004746365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004361745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003493232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4021617,0.5958552,0.0005982241,0.0001091722,0.0007790993,0.000496574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7818779,0.2170007,0.0002066109,0.0006173626,0.0001928992,0.0001045491],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003825205,0.0001509735,0.008821205,0.0002240882,0.0001653357,0.00001191358,0.9249027,0.0026087,0.02393484,0.00005120752,0.0000783956,0.03901243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001055338,0.0002641719,0.01020635,0.001322597,0.00002925106,0.00006607859,0.9777417,0.001261151,0.001600109,0.00005146185,0.006215629,0.0001861423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920027,0.001110521,0.0004049303,0.0003490142,0.0001625079,0.0002304149,8.472644e-7,0.0001073078,0.005631737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982458,0.0006432979,0.0007112602,0.0000192064,0.0001760852,0.00001454339,0.000002170161,0.00005818181,0.0001294633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.520085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8733649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946917722","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68329","title":"Engaged Scholarship and the Arts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Artistic and Creative Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visual arts; Metaphor; Scholarship; Storytelling; Witness; Art; Immediacy; Photography; Fine art; The arts; Sociology; Narrative; Aesthetics; Literature; Political science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1873024973228579,"gpt":0.3781347368591732,"spread":0.1908322395363153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8814023,0.000357721,0.0005477925,0.0005742221,0.6368387,0.004733027,0.0008988901,0.0001476257,0.001142708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.631579,0.000239216,0.0001601932,0.0001538505,0.001943427,0.001418157,0.0007861913,0.7921494,0.0002198727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001208346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005615638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001035973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2857542,0.7117172,0.0004098735,0.0002662632,0.001039753,0.0008126535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6332588,0.3652296,0.0001589719,0.0005079003,0.0004491872,0.0003955561],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004456407,0.0001243108,0.002309294,0.0001016431,0.0002043252,0.00003315688,0.9507665,0.00002675237,0.001456934,0.02310322,0.0005876156,0.02084062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00267785,0.0003667891,0.003267617,0.0003122103,0.0000290554,0.0001568725,0.88827,0.0003307481,0.00002894736,0.002358566,0.1019224,0.0002790168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166142,0.002444003,0.00009410414,0.001408095,0.0001328973,0.0004653691,0.000003577629,0.0001042314,0.07873349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827738,0.0006226829,0.0003556295,0.0001801643,0.0005931387,0.0000238719,0.000009919417,0.00007686752,0.01536392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7920018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947967263","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68343","title":"Hey, Hey, Hey—Listen to What I Gotta Say: Songs Elevate Youth Voice in Alberta Wildfire Disaster Recovery","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Roads University","keywords":"Lyrics; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Dance; Sociology; Music festival; Studio; Musical; Visual arts; Media studies; History; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07792749590824281,"gpt":0.3658368812952806,"spread":0.2879093853870378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6541467,0.0004160226,0.0005816245,0.001108793,0.2146939,0.006768518,0.00202609,0.0002889301,0.0001362339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2980941,0.0003817296,0.0001957394,0.001078577,0.000398747,0.005366918,0.001251481,0.4217337,0.0003234537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004536379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002398489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01575259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008164397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4588008,0.5378132,0.0004882961,0.0003945982,0.001315338,0.001187756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.912947,0.08511665,0.000240557,0.000750291,0.0001829896,0.0007625066],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000182947,0.0002048364,0.01554142,0.00006526843,0.00007011344,0.00003366377,0.938564,0.0004480712,0.0009852302,0.00004740038,0.0005493185,0.04330774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009399643,0.0004574413,0.008335621,0.00133063,0.00002045072,0.00001501426,0.9243027,0.0001239175,0.000008245335,0.000244751,0.06376659,0.0004546856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.968407,0.0006477917,0.00005847076,0.004276422,0.0006723116,0.0006849698,0.00000177859,0.00009465357,0.02515662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632016,0.0008800318,0.0004438691,0.0004632968,0.0003511659,0.0000153614,0.00001652136,0.00007700235,0.03455117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4541462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341444000","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i1.25","title":"Learning the Development of Community-Engaged Scholars Through Course-Based Learning: A Student Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Acknowledgement; Timeline; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Pedagogy; Service-learning; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2583599331435894,"gpt":0.4583305314866282,"spread":0.1999705983430388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9338884,0.0007105907,0.0009640293,0.0008674733,0.7728781,0.003017474,0.00399813,0.0004999525,0.0001110542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7413496,0.000622196,0.0003428014,0.001625728,0.001674036,0.001664812,0.001797392,0.8583467,0.00006174327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001588368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002513369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008762137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00176428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1693524,0.8239396,0.001137545,0.0003711992,0.003598569,0.001600649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6690599,0.3257019,0.0008162156,0.001079827,0.002476857,0.0008652782],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002127106,0.001036965,0.007358307,0.00006900525,0.0004175914,0.00001683313,0.9670282,0.01034656,0.0009282178,0.0002494079,0.0002932533,0.01204298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002327312,0.001241683,0.008159146,0.0005628446,0.00009594385,0.00002797744,0.861421,0.0001925759,0.0001274132,0.0002909144,0.1249935,0.0005596711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665627,0.001907519,0.001230913,0.002527365,0.0003359611,0.0007192821,0.000001354436,0.0004460893,0.02626884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896922,0.0003060261,0.006630913,0.0002486269,0.0003335042,0.00006534544,0.00003224112,0.0001569801,0.002534156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623364780","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i2.164","title":"From Suspicion and Accommodation to Structural Transformation: Enhanced Scholarship through Enhanced Community-University Relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; General partnership; Agency (philosophy); Conceptualization; Habitus; Public relations; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law; Cultural capital","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.180003479248963,"gpt":0.4246386376113823,"spread":0.2446351583624193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5782875,0.0002993,0.0003903117,0.0004775587,0.7811747,0.004161912,0.002099801,0.0003157384,0.0001197334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3537877,0.0003275092,0.0001071112,0.0003318619,0.0005874052,0.004859039,0.0009448936,0.5354998,0.00003401533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004518677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001979523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02666016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4096795,0.5885869,0.0002962646,0.0001757431,0.0007326548,0.0005289589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8875951,0.1099997,0.0003358877,0.001009806,0.0005507609,0.0005086996],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001328712,0.00007363956,0.001030822,0.00002344107,0.0000796043,0.000004137442,0.9465011,0.0003736316,0.007822242,0.0003929136,0.0000439957,0.04352165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199708,0.000279942,0.04745629,0.0004364781,0.00003807434,0.00000671776,0.9270305,0.0001062375,0.0003490693,0.001878534,0.02088294,0.0003355144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972658,0.000147495,0.004384998,0.004132679,0.000225501,0.0004018943,0.000006512184,0.0001940224,0.01784885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925004,0.0004016688,0.005554646,0.0001332838,0.0002911857,0.000006536024,0.0000542672,0.00004094507,0.001017118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7805873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947764220","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i2.68336","title":"Extemporaneous Lessons on Place, Space, and Identity: Graffiti as a Pedagogical Disruption","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graffiti; Sociology; Identity (music); Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Ideology; Pedagogy; Space (punctuation); Affordance; Social psychology; Visual arts; Psychology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Art; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2260601249007147,"gpt":0.4863280597191402,"spread":0.2602679348184256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7813963,0.0002992094,0.0004394947,0.0008217371,0.4343229,0.004074911,0.0008704725,0.0003300626,0.000391614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5937523,0.00028139,0.0001245648,0.0005769643,0.0006918559,0.002610194,0.0005744475,0.595298,0.0003310577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003599368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003175033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003209728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009036709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3993535,0.5978762,0.0002645266,0.0002799502,0.001454291,0.0007715208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.827041,0.1712764,0.000200146,0.0004445043,0.0002855383,0.0007523778],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002177001,0.0002836378,0.006709766,0.00005031012,0.00008789402,0.0001329701,0.9664795,0.000202618,0.002443321,0.007941804,0.0008709446,0.01457957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000944038,0.0007120963,0.004288259,0.0002948604,0.00001422094,0.0002264697,0.8230944,0.0001245364,0.000009339302,0.001458109,0.1685466,0.0002869921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419665,0.0006604617,0.0001023335,0.005460716,0.0002672929,0.0003879001,0.000001863441,0.0001910589,0.05096189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818789,0.001387255,0.0006237244,0.0001583995,0.0003968837,0.0000105095,0.000008785497,0.00005410026,0.0154814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.594968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095460600","doi":"10.15402/esj.v6i1.70665","title":"Cultivating Well-being: Young People and Food Gardens in Tanna, Vanuatu","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"Christensen Fund","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Indigenous; Traditional knowledge; Geography; Population; Food security; Economic growth; Pacific islanders; Archipelago; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Ecology; Agriculture; Medicine; Environmental health; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09779085824312103,"gpt":0.3618626269996586,"spread":0.2640717687565376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6539667,0.0002382453,0.0004227308,0.0003136265,0.451849,0.00137787,0.0005070069,0.0001949658,0.00007811207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5459771,0.0002229728,0.00009018101,0.0005308672,0.0003394498,0.0005288819,0.0004682235,0.5456767,0.00001100483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001409743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001288238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001467759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002446175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4157677,0.5823095,0.0003148603,0.0002095553,0.0006921284,0.000706212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8882667,0.1106842,0.000142131,0.0001806053,0.0001940244,0.0005323454],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003792164,0.00004496179,0.04590344,0.00004168513,0.00004749255,0.00002015068,0.9493668,0.0001318555,0.0002746438,0.00009521296,0.0007690327,0.003266781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008021218,0.0004186063,0.01227066,0.0002112418,0.00001015908,0.00002974288,0.9513982,0.0005279075,0.000004733562,0.0002406438,0.03384107,0.0002449137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966504,0.0008532107,0.0001342794,0.002819976,0.00009460155,0.0002128409,0.000001035999,0.00009143603,0.09914217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958212,0.001315258,0.0009043749,0.00008721019,0.0004531724,0.000006639673,0.000003974095,0.00003841119,0.001369806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5454817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897205497","doi":"10.15402/esj.v3i2.335","title":"How are Educational Researchers Interacting with End-users to Increase Impact?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Intermediary; Scholarship; Stakeholder; Work (physics); Prioritization; Public relations; Service (business); Relation (database); Dissemination; Stakeholder engagement; Business; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Marketing; Computer science; Engineering; Process management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2329145197509622,"gpt":0.4030439172385237,"spread":0.1701293974875616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6558983,0.0003120235,0.0005005336,0.001632919,0.3254585,0.004279235,0.001048064,0.0001633744,0.0004130497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7051353,0.0002980797,0.0001334171,0.0008729347,0.0003891113,0.001929167,0.0006692732,0.5081675,0.0001177793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008069395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000299641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003591777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005080234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.589138,0.4091583,0.0003657438,0.0002321448,0.0003097993,0.0007959212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8578573,0.1396395,0.0003863222,0.0005848744,0.0005581743,0.0009738925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004032663,0.000311616,0.1311768,0.00004496493,0.0003648956,0.00002625807,0.8466454,0.00007660175,0.0009591104,0.0002376041,0.003208886,0.01654461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000907353,0.001020942,0.1608064,0.000434407,0.000006842691,0.0001219155,0.8009066,0.0001612951,0.00002813551,0.0008954937,0.03427872,0.000431912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844046,0.0004561579,0.0003996138,0.005565733,0.0001759434,0.0002408155,0.00001010197,0.00006575692,0.00868123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99042,0.0001090439,0.004287392,0.0001623966,0.0005519341,0.00001534416,0.00002200109,0.00008028358,0.004351615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5080041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475092493","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i2.117","title":"Charting the Trajectory of a Flexible Community-University Collaboration in an Applied Learning Ecosystem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Community engagement; Context (archaeology); Experiential learning; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Service-learning; Service (business); Community organization; Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Pedagogy; Marketing; Management; Computer science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.334630157187209,"gpt":0.4936869298633171,"spread":0.1590567726761081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9164436,0.000199237,0.0004061601,0.001268998,0.2958488,0.00106659,0.001559261,0.0001480623,0.0001878674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4786078,0.0001259288,0.00008635672,0.001290447,0.0002551955,0.001988518,0.0004657541,0.4307733,0.00002892347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003154468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003443128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002390096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1777001,0.8190444,0.0007490451,0.0002096297,0.001817789,0.0004790519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6828334,0.3148549,0.0005496281,0.0006976554,0.0008370545,0.0002272657],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002314278,0.0002090185,0.03015424,0.00002462788,0.00003523414,0.000005884495,0.8088651,0.004336713,0.04737929,0.0001730151,0.00005872238,0.1085267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00129759,0.0005277308,0.04199013,0.0002394118,0.000008369534,0.00002197208,0.9453058,0.002302732,0.0003205636,0.0002789803,0.007550198,0.0001565191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934219,0.0001107985,0.001817844,0.0006416698,0.0001083293,0.0002760899,0.000002577336,0.00005823066,0.003562591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980434,0.00007227427,0.0006562113,0.0000307566,0.00007639977,0.00000602794,0.000004380857,0.00002473287,0.001085806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5051334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168307644","doi":"10.15402/esj.v7i1.70759","title":"Radical Acts of Re-imaging Ethical Relationality and Trans-systemic Transformation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Praxis; Traditional knowledge; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Ecology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1150113960854168,"gpt":0.420987041515158,"spread":0.3059756454297411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7998199,0.0001483237,0.0003101063,0.0003684665,0.609208,0.0006077983,0.0003120504,0.0003634016,0.00007112193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1425093,0.000136264,0.00008909414,0.0003909509,0.0007271132,0.0009492832,0.00001093712,0.5381336,0.000002685351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002553778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004487309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006544059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01268956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3245907,0.6734139,0.0004604499,0.0001431856,0.0009289961,0.0004628139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8517152,0.1467842,0.0001791215,0.0002151595,0.0006503266,0.0004559923],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003647182,0.0001026556,0.001055447,0.0001626028,0.00003097617,0.00001157214,0.9870865,0.00004496397,0.001033245,0.006828543,0.0000146535,0.003592414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005863041,0.00006385039,0.003799958,0.0004740457,0.00001801645,0.0001846784,0.851317,0.0001121903,0.0001131685,0.001153386,0.1420386,0.0001388256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660558,0.001944972,0.001420416,0.003593681,0.0001746342,0.0002305836,0.000002154496,0.00005449997,0.02652325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902462,0.007191126,0.001504957,0.0000497726,0.0002814444,0.00000155198,0.00001929977,0.0000214205,0.0006841887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6573106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301603079","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i2.111","title":"Reflections on the Opportunities and Challenges of Youth Engagement: Youth and Professional Perspectives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Youth Development and Social Support","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Positive Youth Development; Agency (philosophy); Youth studies; Youth engagement; Public relations; Youth participation; Action research; Youth work; Citizen journalism; Process (computing); Participatory evaluation; Power (physics); Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5133530667026328,"gpt":0.4599112314884163,"spread":0.05344183521421653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6817373,0.0001862547,0.0002598779,0.0004210873,0.4020873,0.0004685812,0.0003890232,0.0001603929,0.00006603717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3597341,0.0001162722,0.00006164506,0.0001720094,0.001295703,0.0006489612,0.0003335576,0.2393429,0.000001869963],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001246691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003012476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004645222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001349642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4829525,0.5157205,0.000204794,0.0001363543,0.000633352,0.0003524501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8815107,0.1175462,0.0001683965,0.0001826316,0.0003079161,0.0002842144],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004839423,0.00008403789,0.001733752,0.00001940395,0.00007448532,0.000004044923,0.96706,3.037979e-7,0.0003455595,0.007307993,0.00003264121,0.02328936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004347498,0.0002455919,0.01359959,0.0004805072,0.00002050632,0.000006047513,0.975733,7.973863e-7,0.00001366597,0.000665996,0.008646331,0.0001532577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634407,0.002331808,0.00001955192,0.01047772,0.0001235208,0.0002288146,0.000006313483,0.00005821512,0.02331342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746798,0.02244734,0.0001902315,0.00004985827,0.0002202672,0.000009138458,0.000002040575,0.00002520202,0.002376177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4007916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.762412,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156447324","doi":"10.15402/esj.v6i2.69984","title":"PhoneMe Poetry: Mapping Community in the Digital Age","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Upload; Representation (politics); Space (punctuation); Phone; Digital media; Social media; Sociology; Visual arts; Media studies; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Literature; Linguistics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3073493500711398,"gpt":0.4660465802128426,"spread":0.1586972301417027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8339829,0.0002727774,0.000405484,0.0005976708,0.6001592,0.001897154,0.001082728,0.0002780607,0.00008543795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7358499,0.0002212444,0.000125822,0.0009057218,0.0002670229,0.001073585,0.0006908564,0.8531125,0.0001050174],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004143814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005041197,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00139796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002713331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2924497,0.7052175,0.0005671227,0.0001647968,0.0007389706,0.0008619548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6300747,0.3683454,0.0002090972,0.0007261964,0.0003469978,0.0002976502],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793297,0.000453346,0.01284602,0.0001498176,0.00004510994,0.0001195614,0.954666,0.00009614839,0.001621793,0.00004536925,0.001922734,0.02799623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006916928,0.0001291142,0.03965077,0.0008330345,0.000006543079,0.0001357451,0.8231069,0.00005474436,0.000006970391,0.0006428853,0.1345521,0.0001894737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443482,0.0009365255,0.0002137707,0.001275068,0.0003946304,0.0002586854,0.000004011941,0.0001089033,0.0524602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937286,0.0002540295,0.0006194352,0.000498743,0.0004498259,0.0000273331,0.00009394833,0.00005901482,0.004269022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157938205","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i1.315","title":"Production of the Global Health Doctor: Discourses on International Medical Electives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subaltern; Sociology; Narrative; Colonialism; Resistance (ecology); Discourse analysis; Meaning (existential); Gender studies; Medical anthropology; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0985310645178885,"gpt":0.4665959520953681,"spread":0.3680648875774796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6824934,0.0001691089,0.000344795,0.0002952671,0.2083673,0.0001705839,0.0004756867,0.0001371502,0.00008204405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7216671,0.0001123438,0.0001282498,0.0004236933,0.0006159018,0.0002804861,0.0002597167,0.4868265,0.00001003606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005207476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001065484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004879647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009979092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4789625,0.51876,0.0003484692,0.0001444206,0.001327915,0.0004567193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444396,0.05335427,0.0002795744,0.0004868032,0.0006711572,0.0007686248],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003216298,0.002401904,0.2382093,0.0004554367,0.000579245,0.00006770045,0.4044242,0.0000745091,0.003881796,0.0009695372,0.01622961,0.3294905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001833083,0.003138558,0.4302777,0.00306412,0.00002348972,0.001748665,0.4964864,0.0002338157,0.0002845704,0.000534584,0.06217175,0.0002032404],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786779,0.0005361466,0.00007999271,0.01474,0.001120701,0.0002341789,0.000002400653,0.00004887534,0.004559841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967309,0.0004352381,0.0003812422,0.0006290025,0.001087596,0.000004081308,0.00000692651,0.00001967238,0.0007053784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4866894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7926633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239685506","doi":"10.15402/esj.2015.1.a09","title":"Learning the Development of Community-Engaged Scholars Through Course-Based Learning: A Student Perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Futures contract; Community engagement; Service-learning; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Service (business); Learning community; Sociology; Pedagogy; Community service; Political science; Business; Computer science; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2583599331435894,"gpt":0.4583305314866282,"spread":0.1999705983430388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9338884,0.0007105907,0.0009640293,0.0008674733,0.7728781,0.003017474,0.00399813,0.0004999525,0.0001110542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7413496,0.000622196,0.0003428014,0.001625728,0.001674036,0.001664812,0.001797392,0.8583467,0.00006174327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001588368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002513369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008762137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00176428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1693524,0.8239396,0.001137545,0.0003711992,0.003598569,0.001600649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6690599,0.3257019,0.0008162156,0.001079827,0.002476857,0.0008652782],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002127106,0.001036965,0.007358307,0.00006900525,0.0004175914,0.00001683313,0.9670282,0.01034656,0.0009282178,0.0002494079,0.0002932533,0.01204298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002327312,0.001241683,0.008159146,0.0005628446,0.00009594385,0.00002797744,0.861421,0.0001925759,0.0001274132,0.0002909144,0.1249935,0.0005596711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665627,0.001907519,0.001230913,0.002527365,0.0003359611,0.0007192821,0.000001354436,0.0004460893,0.02626884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896922,0.0003060261,0.006630913,0.0002486269,0.0003335042,0.00006534544,0.00003224112,0.0001569801,0.002534156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414327715","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i1.38","title":"Construction and Mediation of the “Other†in Community-Engaged Scholarship: The Importance of Not-Knowing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Reciprocal; Sociology; Instrumentalism; Colonialism; Mediation; Engaged scholarship; Qualitative research; Community engagement; Public relations; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1866878801349504,"gpt":0.4032873908775774,"spread":0.2165995107426271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9099737,0.0002518194,0.0004556616,0.0005553415,0.4086898,0.0006295225,0.001777847,0.0002579167,0.00002057739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7108236,0.0001889561,0.0001226491,0.001034999,0.001440067,0.00107393,0.0008724921,0.673469,0.000001981108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003177985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004663383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006952418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003914575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1875061,0.8097094,0.000677308,0.0001515486,0.00140803,0.0005476598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7327709,0.2649804,0.0005633349,0.0007861758,0.0006256275,0.0002736002],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008949269,0.0001430622,0.121376,0.00006652029,0.00006054401,0.000002217133,0.8593532,0.0004585581,0.00317407,0.000267163,0.00003631958,0.01497284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001132675,0.0002209171,0.07281931,0.0005037659,0.0000225182,0.00002844658,0.9178804,0.0001206054,0.0002130509,0.0009622629,0.005923893,0.0001721847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920359,0.001233979,0.00008694328,0.002301727,0.0002122572,0.0003897806,0.000001734602,0.00005864333,0.003679093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975268,0.0005985366,0.001299631,0.0001671654,0.0001320618,0.00001295887,0.000004850704,0.00004107255,0.0002169038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6732111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247090134","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i1.39","title":"An Institutional Process for Brokering Community-Campus Research Collaborations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Community mobilization; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Service (business); Mobilization; Public relations; Knowledge integration; Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Knowledge engineering; Marketing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4447195931932405,"gpt":0.5126455162448806,"spread":0.06792592305164014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9375224,0.0003364094,0.0004518698,0.001450034,0.8115667,0.004356587,0.002682648,0.000387523,0.00003561228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7759058,0.0003541012,0.0001068894,0.002010432,0.00137213,0.00267617,0.0006780573,0.7303402,0.00003029914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009835708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002497251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003302807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2692471,0.7266398,0.0004965315,0.0002484498,0.002144882,0.001223181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7256742,0.2668667,0.0002231578,0.0009350393,0.004951076,0.001349801],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001910405,0.0007010196,0.001895513,0.0000915534,0.00008964176,0.00001226494,0.9748849,0.006087048,0.001111771,0.001071787,0.0006905909,0.01317288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001411202,0.001122176,0.001080371,0.000325869,0.00001984725,0.00004051259,0.8567916,0.0009936935,0.00004680636,0.001930583,0.1359062,0.0003311394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762447,0.0006449624,0.001878801,0.001528775,0.0003487673,0.0007667078,0.000007453965,0.000360115,0.01821973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928235,0.0002128409,0.004524372,0.0001401028,0.0007756872,0.0001364412,0.00009251571,0.00008666562,0.001207836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8101946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753966975","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i1.195","title":"Indigenous Communities and Community-Engaged Research: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Scholarship; Indigenous; Sociology; Engaged scholarship; Promotion (chess); Community engagement; Power (physics); Public relations; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6850413730741164,"gpt":0.4238471398040486,"spread":0.2611942332700678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.919507,0.0005409225,0.001083751,0.002034988,0.857862,0.007876658,0.00260886,0.000483385,0.00007966746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6414324,0.0005973413,0.0001467538,0.0002176727,0.002608988,0.002862043,0.003728957,0.8135695,0.00002816709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003236171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001955126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01378685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001783254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2869371,0.7103591,0.0007895965,0.0002554297,0.0004358831,0.001222871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6919689,0.3047822,0.0005581659,0.001563402,0.0004119837,0.0007153543],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007595098,0.0003029013,0.01126131,0.000253887,0.0002472576,0.00004101642,0.9340094,0.000003420688,0.0001400987,0.001095671,0.0001822405,0.05238683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284467,0.0007747334,0.09757777,0.0004878615,0.00001334239,0.0002006329,0.8457115,0.00006853546,0.00001027913,0.007822918,0.04551019,0.0005377086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501217,0.02404888,0.00003362267,0.00305283,0.0002019004,0.0003946774,0.00002347275,0.0001358847,0.02198704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151954,0.08168012,0.0007484443,0.00009631185,0.0002172639,0.00002788387,0.00003260242,0.0001208869,0.00188111],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.855253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916801290","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i1.67848","title":"Teaching and Learning Within Inter-Institutional Spaces: An Example from a Community-Campus Partnership in Teacher Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; General partnership; Dialogic; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Pedagogy; Learning community; Mathematics education; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3086743917857897,"gpt":0.4505821104065704,"spread":0.1419077186207807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7781343,0.0003613506,0.0004999442,0.0009786169,0.3653132,0.00246084,0.0009292271,0.0003346937,0.0001607795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3760788,0.0003635878,0.00009112351,0.0004328246,0.0008284256,0.002326669,0.0004137141,0.6845958,0.00002849682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006311911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008584079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1406994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01142509,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3412803,0.656602,0.0004416369,0.0002935884,0.0007296595,0.0006527746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8595552,0.1387514,0.0003228648,0.0005008681,0.0002642754,0.0006053556],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007361628,0.0005429551,0.06979349,0.00004291848,0.00005362102,0.000003818335,0.8869541,0.0001679214,0.0008706653,0.0003324991,0.00007243772,0.04109191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009785633,0.0002950157,0.03475671,0.0006349823,0.00001910506,0.00002738646,0.9207572,0.0002716455,0.000004577964,0.0006004621,0.04128783,0.0003665772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851224,0.001030272,0.0001397395,0.002680951,0.0003562443,0.0003791447,6.972888e-7,0.0001840309,0.01010653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894868,0.0001242923,0.002586073,0.0002404842,0.0005813537,0.00002847437,0.0000461889,0.0000583465,0.006847955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.684261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906039525","doi":"10.15402/esj.v3i2.333","title":"Developing an Evaluation Capacity Building Network in the Field of Early Childhood Development","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capacity building; Citizen journalism; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Early childhood; Work (physics); Capacity development; Stakeholder engagement; Community development; Stakeholder; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Environmental planning; Developmental psychology; Geography; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5309831729930177,"gpt":0.5467348984614054,"spread":0.01575172546838777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9582144,0.0001920842,0.0003206121,0.000859839,0.2592672,0.001640237,0.00158253,0.0001409199,0.0001586176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7119093,0.0001321319,0.00006612566,0.001205696,0.0002037359,0.001584321,0.0003549492,0.3792692,0.00001628923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002107039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007887561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002675763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003715253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1354986,0.8588446,0.0009812331,0.0002652903,0.003821947,0.0005882916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6989662,0.2983455,0.0004318775,0.0006383486,0.001442106,0.0001759182],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004365645,0.0001056109,0.02634442,0.0000066309,0.00002566934,0.000001779247,0.7585791,0.001492026,0.0008199206,0.0001419506,0.0001193569,0.2123199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006712349,0.0006765254,0.4243174,0.0002789849,0.00000811348,0.00003713075,0.5612175,0.003368726,0.0002778167,0.003366595,0.005611104,0.0001688698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901244,0.0001700618,0.00679273,0.0007472473,0.0001866828,0.0003114683,2.659361e-7,0.00002126667,0.001645894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729524,0.00003200253,0.02634813,0.0002909179,0.0002977512,0.0000156917,0.000003276807,0.00001671787,0.00004309064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5634676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993961,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170555908","doi":"10.15402/esj.v7i1.70010","title":"Ethical Indigenous Economies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Indigenous; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Normative; Traditional knowledge; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Ecology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1159759726536066,"gpt":0.3522062617804548,"spread":0.2362302891268483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7768907,0.0002403881,0.000355349,0.000763843,0.4622931,0.004197039,0.0005304537,0.000322647,0.0004543205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4997872,0.0002419469,0.0001095314,0.0003970688,0.0001975468,0.001492892,0.0007283224,0.7471189,0.0002760342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002339829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002861551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002882349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006403329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5191324,0.4791464,0.0004728684,0.0002161826,0.000431066,0.0006010365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9129922,0.08544399,0.0002748099,0.0003975449,0.0007933179,0.0000981901],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112126,0.0004407072,0.02047108,0.0003507647,0.0004108193,0.000349028,0.8397616,0.0005463628,0.006374234,0.005638175,0.008161516,0.1173836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007770828,0.00002815451,0.01290831,0.0001185076,0.00001176314,0.0001306551,0.6663392,0.0002342722,0.00004427323,0.001499354,0.3176266,0.000281879],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710377,0.0003120887,0.0002431856,0.003232276,0.0004107871,0.0001176632,5.066926e-7,0.0001401005,0.02450571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905317,0.0001208848,0.002041496,0.003132031,0.00096153,0.00000925232,0.00003611454,0.00005508462,0.003111862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482202830","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i2.112","title":"Métis Community Perspectives Inform a School-based Health Promotion Intervention Using Participatory Action Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Health promotion; Psychological intervention; Community-based participatory research; Community health; Citizen journalism; Indigenous; Intervention (counseling); Action research; Medical education; Nursing; Population health; Medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Public health; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6711067698201629,"gpt":0.604789840832016,"spread":0.0663169289881469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9329421,0.0004008417,0.0006542957,0.002367339,0.7342267,0.0005654352,0.00107409,0.0004586566,0.0003208538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7031546,0.000320724,0.000184102,0.001002439,0.0006400718,0.001906211,0.001393727,0.7834315,0.0001241351],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005154763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003181759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009888458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002877344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1791388,0.8154035,0.00129286,0.0002867915,0.001716306,0.002161769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6893159,0.3054303,0.0006740719,0.001095503,0.002002963,0.001481324],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006254003,0.001272434,0.02044396,0.001197202,0.000104616,0.000009997701,0.8591428,0.00006432761,0.005852809,0.00008684039,0.0008946672,0.110305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003229444,0.002049156,0.05045844,0.006147425,0.00001181086,0.00004400705,0.9241825,0.0004771039,0.00004906995,0.0006464999,0.01239793,0.0003065708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863884,0.0009741319,0.004543724,0.004935415,0.0003643534,0.001320655,0.000005981606,0.0002882958,0.001179028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940351,0.0007004717,0.003329743,0.0002440485,0.0003798137,0.000138448,0.0000303051,0.00009832155,0.001043789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755171089","doi":"10.15402/esj.v2i1.202","title":"Traveling Together? Navigating the Practice of Collaborative Engagement in Coast Salish Communities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; University of Victoria","keywords":"Participatory action research; Indigenous; Community engagement; Public relations; Action research; Context (archaeology); Community-based participatory research; General partnership; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Outreach; Political science; Geography; Pedagogy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5885818048437204,"gpt":0.6314241159150877,"spread":0.04284231107136738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9618058,0.0002553826,0.0004967697,0.0003119471,0.6817682,0.003822819,0.002670023,0.0002093353,0.00004644723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9369078,0.0002132191,0.0001078019,0.0004997439,0.002648461,0.002598154,0.001243183,0.7092788,0.000004401555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003922426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008804506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03033277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005089444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1028027,0.8931714,0.0007021737,0.0001879555,0.002060061,0.001075689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4695277,0.5272533,0.0006801597,0.0008808786,0.001276366,0.0003816408],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001364868,0.0002043399,0.01024872,0.00003975757,0.00009253306,0.00003206731,0.9500431,0.0003495058,0.003686969,0.0003729395,0.0000546665,0.03473893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008428346,0.0003365991,0.01003425,0.0009758107,0.00002022589,0.00001532155,0.9623611,0.0004556221,0.0002110751,0.0003782094,0.02416747,0.0002014664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834394,0.001100298,0.0003410898,0.002593776,0.0001634153,0.0005002708,0.000003881082,0.00004707009,0.01181084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909128,0.001368279,0.007073945,0.00008792544,0.0002424245,0.00003814863,0.000002828913,0.00004828686,0.0002253548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7090694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025204728","doi":"10.15402/esj.v5i3.70364","title":"Beyond Employability: Defamiliarizing Work-Integrated Learning with Community-Engaged Learning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Higher Education and Employability","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Employability; Context (archaeology); Conversation; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Process (computing); Pedagogy; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Law; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1622198942245343,"gpt":0.3953330680023587,"spread":0.2331131737778243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8881996,0.0007212564,0.001003701,0.0008108791,0.7737827,0.004131893,0.002041364,0.0005772399,0.0003443142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.855472,0.0006709473,0.0002966381,0.002522167,0.00182059,0.001939686,0.0007988132,0.8918343,0.0001052142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008575813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001180113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007571559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009633027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2786983,0.716554,0.0008280717,0.0005217374,0.001831572,0.001566346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.614453,0.3812714,0.0004705055,0.0007378876,0.001244469,0.001822762],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003220616,0.0003425589,0.1613632,0.000115479,0.0001616472,0.00003072986,0.8148304,0.001970233,0.001514978,0.00004162157,0.0003347007,0.01897229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001312988,0.001147489,0.0192162,0.0005155339,0.0000607582,0.00003895444,0.8747639,0.00009701629,0.00003733545,0.0001976192,0.101931,0.0006812377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857453,0.0006589572,0.001625671,0.003877281,0.0002496229,0.0006258167,0.00000236346,0.001022007,0.006193036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889178,0.0003830319,0.006790957,0.0004838749,0.0006323264,0.0000393956,0.00006911351,0.0001903591,0.002493193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.891257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}