{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"2cce91853685","filters":{"venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal"}},"results":[{"id":"W1472680384","doi":"10.53300/001c.6926","title":"A case of champagne: A study of geographical indications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Food systems; Population; Government (linguistics); Food processing; Subsidy; Economic growth; Business; Agriculture; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Geography; Law; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Tim Jay","is_ca":false},{"name":"Madeline Taylor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01130165391274941,"gpt":0.2251673287893546,"spread":0.2138656748766052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001790755,0.0001241235,0.0002206599,0.0001372094,0.00009916484,0.00005999215,0.0002460729,0.000057691,0.001254148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009400472,0.0001075137,0.00009927282,0.0004292593,0.00006181408,0.0007798749,0.0001258413,0.0002767544,0.00005066658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001076202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001809895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002951429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004373156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989009,0.00001368868,0.0004610999,0.0001547798,0.0002851935,0.0001843479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987823,0.00002895047,0.0007634784,0.0002413304,0.0001621091,0.00002183809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007938462,0.003914047,0.939229,0.0001089495,0.0002192375,0.0008219373,0.0009962055,0.00007631951,0.0004557343,0.001806717,0.04509191,0.007200527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002588633,0.0001541332,0.9866987,0.0001856738,0.0001308427,0.0005662959,0.002488972,0.000806966,0.000100731,0.001397457,0.004596657,0.0002849681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961824,0.00004943791,0.00009430441,0.0008640484,0.0001744085,0.000272693,0.000004969753,0.00001684179,0.002340851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984454,0.000005033101,0.00004795489,0.0001165757,0.001241916,0.00002481332,9.960725e-7,0.00001220898,0.0001051202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04746964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551576429","doi":"10.53300/001c.6899","title":"The Statutory Derivative Action in Australia: An Empirical Review of its Use and Effectiveness in Australia in Comparison to the United States, Canada and Singapore","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Notice; Jurisdiction; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Common law; Empirical research; Derivative (finance); Business; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Melissa A. Hofmann","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0643303785036615,"gpt":0.3245597409637282,"spread":0.2602293624600667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007925315,0.0001670665,0.0002715927,0.00006787678,0.00008566653,0.0001225171,0.0001858994,0.00003779893,0.00001297723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002700592,0.0001173951,0.00002062403,0.0006151946,0.00005207444,0.001088104,0.00007921328,0.00042421,0.000001281674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003154091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000779569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3728961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8495251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998612,0.0001072827,0.0004916693,0.0002153782,0.0003080788,0.0002655383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.0001634862,0.0004981073,0.0001398884,0.0001017625,0.00002610272],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003360062,0.0001020906,0.98791,0.0004940729,0.00001007172,0.00003701497,0.0003182632,0.003841521,0.00004579399,0.0001493362,0.003980841,0.002774965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005099816,0.0000209728,0.9296979,0.003452896,0.000008947116,0.000004355428,0.0001415207,0.002270752,0.00004473241,0.00004000834,0.06368025,0.0001276715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952118,0.00236364,0.00002877379,0.001870749,0.0001508526,0.0003465113,0.00001887302,0.000003589628,0.000005168036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946856,0.004251033,0.00002015568,0.0008732117,0.00009515048,0.00001534866,0.000008732436,0.000009286396,0.00004146132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.476629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6312799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499187758","doi":"10.53300/001c.6913","title":"Corporate Social Responsibility – A Well-Meaning But Unworkable Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate social responsibility; Stakeholder; Shareholder primacy; Meaning (existential); Business; Stakeholder theory; Public relations; Corporate governance; Social responsibility; Accounting; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Finance; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Bruce L. Welling","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02286664361633565,"gpt":0.2510156367326284,"spread":0.2281489931162927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001858305,0.0004015414,0.0005545939,0.0001250324,0.0008483791,0.0007296894,0.0005285357,0.0001656844,0.0008194975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001486976,0.0004123517,0.0003593167,0.0008856296,0.0001708441,0.001910715,0.0002180798,0.0007369755,0.0003387094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004046686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002642786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003025122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001263888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963949,0.00008676411,0.001075409,0.0006695767,0.0009722393,0.0008011276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597,0.0001010702,0.003019444,0.000419707,0.0004296876,0.00006010832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01193388,0.002209279,0.4362195,0.000269522,0.0003661315,0.00407166,0.003688752,0.001143102,0.03335196,0.1295971,0.1126855,0.2644636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004584439,0.0001686395,0.7308439,0.0005526083,0.0002324415,0.0001479054,0.002105328,0.004823248,0.001345743,0.1585973,0.09445877,0.002139652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573328,0.0001710778,0.001240593,0.003296754,0.0009687387,0.0003741811,0.00001011932,0.0002713793,0.03633438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907976,0.00001283959,0.0003450747,0.002708211,0.003273471,0.000005925996,0.00001039593,0.00004233341,0.002804192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2946244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144607359","doi":"10.53300/001c.10815","title":"Why Hayne May Change Compliance Internationally","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Securities Regulation and Market Practices","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Compliance (psychology); Remuneration; Business; Mandate; Accountability; Misconduct; Corporate governance; Accounting; Public relations; Best practice; Commission; Political science; Finance; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Niall Coburn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03173654858575287,"gpt":0.261886935099797,"spread":0.2301503865140442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002767351,0.0001744878,0.0001781236,0.0000892554,0.0001134084,0.0004675448,0.0004128249,0.00004493705,0.008386212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008894764,0.0001673164,0.0001107803,0.0001775986,0.00003317024,0.003790754,0.0001953952,0.0002216449,0.001573842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007337541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001414553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002542498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009035563,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986197,0.00001326227,0.0002850589,0.000251754,0.0005323378,0.000297875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989676,0.00004851216,0.0005973773,0.0002125793,0.0001531016,0.00002085329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008420119,0.0004424159,0.4175664,0.0004056063,0.00019971,0.0001072855,0.0004486314,0.0001021033,0.0006295774,0.1322252,0.4050285,0.0420025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007224151,0.000008162945,0.1368486,0.0002395235,0.00001238856,0.00001925396,0.00008891787,0.004189113,0.00001225165,0.000545157,0.8571202,0.0001939865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6195852,0.001308758,0.002162319,0.04209625,0.008526599,0.000726552,0.00002427291,0.0002539184,0.3253161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961494,0.0001419075,0.0002015567,0.02958178,0.002439391,0.00001722756,0.00001431908,0.00002919096,0.006080622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4520917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151014515","doi":"10.53300/001c.10816","title":"Impact Analysis: ASIC is Firm About Psychologists in Board Rooms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Plan (archaeology); Criticism; Accounting; Application-specific integrated circuit; Business; Management; Political science; Engineering; Finance; Economics; Law; History","authors":[{"name":"Niall Coburn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0207445406795484,"gpt":0.2809341795152566,"spread":0.2601896388357082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006363562,0.0002419864,0.000695719,0.0003318225,0.00009178575,0.0001871395,0.0005923052,0.0001347948,0.005619485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007771484,0.0002558877,0.0005396596,0.0009256502,0.00003677708,0.0005103347,0.00009988134,0.0005897779,0.001494805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005853177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004817894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001537334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000450296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998184,0.00003840785,0.0007858218,0.0003539742,0.0001182053,0.0005196016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.000048657,0.0007040427,0.0005049855,0.0000264067,0.0001433079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385659,0.0001559548,0.9918461,0.000004958355,0.0003648296,0.00001717804,0.001943148,0.0001523665,0.000005213866,0.0004002553,0.003193506,0.001852647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001007918,0.00007584999,0.9880753,0.00004803974,0.00001626759,0.000005227939,0.00007344409,0.000657565,0.000004276881,0.001855758,0.00787971,0.0003006574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719567,0.002699708,0.0003824756,0.0006100494,0.000595582,0.0001448957,0.0001244629,0.00002243522,0.02346371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946704,0.001519393,0.0001491401,0.0005253117,0.00009132246,0.000005987026,0.000009412235,0.00002258513,0.003006474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02271369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}