{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":144,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":144,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"db305dfec0c9","filters":{"venue":"Environmental DNA"}},"results":[{"id":"W2974095620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.29","title":"Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":566,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Victoria","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Innovate BC; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Standardization; Detection limit; Computational biology; Biology; Limit (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Data mining; Computer science; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02239968010380166,"gpt":0.221611921267427,"spread":0.1992122411636253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062107,0.0002678151,0.0002802295,0.00003336444,0.0003834887,0.000021698,0.0002558781,0.0001120803,0.0008434019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005110634,0.0002269072,0.0001426379,0.00006730588,0.000697981,0.0002856795,0.0003868979,0.0001449255,0.0005765661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003329283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001252021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002897687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001018955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.0000691236,0.0006932011,0.0006214528,0.000472942,0.0003378714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.0001586725,0.0008575524,0.0004753294,7.362542e-7,0.00008015367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003120857,0.00009835308,0.4110963,0.0000110949,0.00002645959,7.181841e-7,0.0002872116,0.00007474902,0.5800162,0.000007719574,0.00009657891,0.008253432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004543879,0.0002059579,0.7899522,0.00000858016,0.00005501999,0.00001495442,0.00120803,0.0003813113,0.2017274,0.00006645863,0.005686133,0.0002394839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964284,0.000141202,0.0002262233,0.0001452121,0.0001958062,0.001084432,0.00009490542,0.00002625664,0.00165759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972605,0.0001790366,0.0009483593,0.0001102793,0.00002907953,0.00005553012,0.00004343725,0.00002840115,0.001345395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3788559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9253007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937376009","doi":"10.1002/edn3.7","title":"Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Biology; Relative species abundance; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02011396674511366,"gpt":0.2217362322353749,"spread":0.2016222654902612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002886056,0.0003659027,0.0007858302,0.0001334538,0.00009684708,0.00001582632,0.0004326439,0.0001630888,0.01236233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005090541,0.000348182,0.000630482,0.0003384711,0.0003412675,0.0002398782,0.0004684924,0.0002426632,0.000861063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006191119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001625927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007283411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000341773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974394,0.00006241344,0.0005088336,0.0007813447,0.00071671,0.000491308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989008,0.0001220802,0.0002541756,0.0006269669,9.75564e-7,0.00009502155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004413198,0.0003342058,0.9437253,0.00001824336,0.0046203,0.000007568327,0.0008341265,0.001237183,0.04867626,0.000009349251,0.0002889203,0.000204423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006970053,0.0001553129,0.9535154,0.000007250228,0.005077156,0.000001467353,0.001214526,0.00005998528,0.02903327,0.0000655366,0.009739973,0.0004331241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994649,0.001354055,0.00004872713,0.0002158866,0.0002239264,0.0008783305,0.0001560042,0.00001885537,0.002455225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903914,0.0004488568,0.004827253,0.00007285909,0.00002921927,0.00007268788,0.00005713128,0.00002861259,0.004071992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01964299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137682792","doi":"10.1002/edn3.189","title":"A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; European Cooperation in Science and Technology","keywords":"Environmental DNA; In silico; Scale (ratio); Sampling (signal processing); Computational biology; Data mining; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Cartography; Genetics; Geography; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01912046158312183,"gpt":0.2132340897207088,"spread":0.194113628137587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000307371,0.0003848198,0.0003655726,0.00004214852,0.000507527,0.00003871489,0.0005067786,0.0001068681,0.002586706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004341964,0.0003441108,0.0002244219,0.0001688823,0.0006533212,0.0002894252,0.001220702,0.0001461154,0.0006929977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007356812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000321669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002471461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009711768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973949,0.0001029894,0.0004742465,0.0007420565,0.0007551955,0.0005306574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987861,0.0001817193,0.0001986563,0.0006566552,0.000002059072,0.0001747984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720341,0.0002621961,0.4185396,0.000008863745,0.00003578221,0.000006740353,0.0007334704,0.0002112781,0.576505,0.000003322802,0.0005121892,0.003144343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004272725,0.0001108019,0.5289682,0.00001494367,0.00006152792,0.00001180635,0.001568871,0.00002273625,0.4626291,0.00002922774,0.005905357,0.0002501973],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959046,0.0001160391,0.0002871645,0.0004884316,0.0003331368,0.0007608404,0.00057334,0.00003146686,0.001504997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889618,0.0001782957,0.006177077,0.0001751344,0.0001454794,0.0001013156,0.0001221423,0.00004304774,0.004095751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.113876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107492607","doi":"10.1002/edn3.164","title":"The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Innovate BC","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Workflow; Biology; Biodiversity; Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Transparency (behavior); Limiting; Risk analysis (engineering); Ecology; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02277426875810653,"gpt":0.1875528840193473,"spread":0.1647786152612408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002402843,0.0003753782,0.0002550483,0.00003289511,0.0008490011,0.00007887684,0.0003423133,0.0001192757,0.0002849347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004485464,0.000339432,0.0001153831,0.0001153476,0.001079828,0.0003459927,0.0006203927,0.0002505265,0.0002357062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007981654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001924186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000346447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002624302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978049,0.00008850768,0.0003499776,0.000679761,0.0005202582,0.0005565754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991881,0.0002056652,0.0001360903,0.0002556954,4.701038e-7,0.0002139732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001389723,0.000110501,0.8274787,0.00001089005,0.0000251285,0.000007182408,0.0008587382,0.001199236,0.1656948,0.000004054497,0.0003515078,0.004120334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001393905,0.0003222507,0.9015945,0.00001113154,0.00004093835,0.000003148996,0.004693042,0.002221504,0.06828731,0.00005200997,0.02090197,0.0004783565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963399,0.0004051531,0.0004033027,0.001100555,0.0002624848,0.0008409849,0.0001153135,0.00005300968,0.0004792983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968709,0.0004773359,0.001743495,0.0002689155,0.000137586,0.0001085085,0.00002681987,0.00003832245,0.0003280532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09740748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042728572","doi":"10.1002/edn3.111","title":"Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Trawling; Environmental DNA; Demersal zone; Demersal fish; Fishery; Biodiversity; Species richness; Water column; Bottom trawling; Whiting; Fishing; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Vulnerable species; Environmental science; Endangered species; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04001602727590221,"gpt":0.1987654007028483,"spread":0.1587493734269461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004634998,0.0002658011,0.0004174966,0.00002690882,0.0002071895,0.00001210811,0.0005819335,0.00005381137,0.0007025899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002102384,0.0002415839,0.00005757057,0.0001360228,0.001237526,0.0002058702,0.0008575216,0.0002657067,0.00001122673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002398536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005334954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1619783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1630496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997875,0.0003358476,0.000471967,0.0003133593,0.0006684572,0.0003353297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.0003097154,0.0002083092,0.0002716639,5.567745e-7,0.0001042527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003521406,0.0001142558,0.9855043,0.00001586729,0.00003661502,0.000006886053,0.003605607,0.0005930617,0.009313107,0.00000371532,0.0003959015,0.0003754232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005310774,0.00009368984,0.9814506,0.00001362505,0.00003606492,0.000003841089,0.0121128,0.0005360463,0.004201557,0.000005670555,0.0007868724,0.0002281907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979798,0.0002278361,0.00001440623,0.0001684457,0.0000329904,0.0002727368,0.0006170301,0.000006319992,0.0006804141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985774,0.0003775035,0.0003614095,0.0004976771,0.000008082909,0.000007003906,0.0001457039,0.00001481868,0.00001045987],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008507192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973214152","doi":"10.1002/edn3.33","title":"Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universität Zürich; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; Velux Stiftung; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Gamma diversity; Beta diversity; Nestedness; Taxon; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Alpha diversity; Ecosystem diversity; Identification (biology); Sampling (signal processing); River ecosystem; Biology; Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecosystem; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03297630764086952,"gpt":0.2420965153283801,"spread":0.2091202076875106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001861324,0.0003524417,0.0004117791,0.00002165303,0.0006729135,0.00002868894,0.0005013419,0.0001195476,0.003473832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003838434,0.0003490168,0.000193446,0.0001091184,0.0009941864,0.0006190623,0.005179517,0.0001998938,0.001492089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008193771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.664517e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003991085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009681955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975139,0.0001018259,0.0003198826,0.0006169628,0.0008042158,0.00064316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990794,0.00006141415,0.00025631,0.0004535949,9.494887e-7,0.0001483357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002682849,0.0002675718,0.8937253,0.00001110201,0.0000563773,0.00000777126,0.001055106,0.001814379,0.1023196,0.000003322802,0.0001671974,0.0005454702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007675674,0.0000771995,0.9921448,0.00003170178,0.00004899691,0.000005626272,0.001001703,0.0004852701,0.004258515,0.00006086986,0.0007450518,0.0003727296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974805,0.00006771508,0.00005055741,0.00001556007,0.0003632374,0.0004052605,0.00007914796,0.00003201509,0.001506035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969289,0.0000479252,0.002429963,0.0001237644,0.00003665647,0.000002284935,0.0000397532,0.00002409536,0.0003666045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09841951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980835560","doi":"10.1002/edn3.35","title":"Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and species collection for documenting Arctic metazoan biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; ArcticNet","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Arctic; Ecology; Phylum; Species richness; Biology; Invertebrate; Beta diversity; Marine biodiversity; DNA barcoding; Pelagic zone; Fishery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0172696622891152,"gpt":0.1903587254623572,"spread":0.173089063173242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263359,0.0002879269,0.0003205646,0.00006114881,0.0006792866,0.00006233712,0.0002176822,0.0000686856,0.002649442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001462494,0.0003052297,0.0001327619,0.0001052045,0.0004261439,0.0005092475,0.0009202732,0.0001357358,0.001503619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006612439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.858131e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001273392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002029705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982392,0.00005035809,0.0002259252,0.0006559682,0.000380497,0.0004481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994051,0.00009719589,0.000134401,0.0002385353,0.00000107624,0.000123727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003569171,0.0000774567,0.9356685,0.00002123885,0.00007375505,0.000001711026,0.0004876275,0.0000820214,0.06252015,0.00001788226,0.0007798608,0.0002341437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124953,0.0001277813,0.9685383,0.00001167815,0.0001246983,0.000008423356,0.00170258,0.00028397,0.0138359,0.00007168404,0.01377434,0.0003956395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994654,0.0001364388,0.00007609368,0.0001431417,0.000247793,0.0007697053,0.00004405951,0.00004931284,0.003879475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919807,0.0001761992,0.004111693,0.0001608422,0.00002507409,0.00001933215,0.00004485649,0.00001449818,0.003466825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04868425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087942109","doi":"10.1002/edn3.135","title":"Using environmental DNA for biomonitoring of freshwater fish communities: Comparison with established gillnet surveys in a boreal hydroelectric impoundment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; GDG Environnement; Université Laval","funders":"EnGlobe; Mitacs; Hydro-Québec","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Fishery; Species richness; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Biology; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03260397586120575,"gpt":0.2340108886491891,"spread":0.2014069127879833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005093399,0.0005616423,0.0006691121,0.0001043999,0.0003684725,0.0000441426,0.0006420171,0.000154442,0.0009349426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009708488,0.0005537912,0.0001580577,0.0002636509,0.001017501,0.0005235675,0.0008926725,0.000322432,0.0000798176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001342102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005505789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001577862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000682301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996643,0.0003712401,0.0006937648,0.0006912413,0.0007942201,0.000806537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987903,0.0001668812,0.000330771,0.0004491581,0.000001174471,0.0002617184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001500323,0.000657925,0.8916076,0.00003149115,0.00007998988,0.00001407857,0.00400842,0.002042589,0.1000307,8.199509e-7,0.000365938,0.001010426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003266637,0.001348066,0.8772935,0.00004530157,0.0001193808,0.00001141762,0.008677079,0.006652308,0.09910414,0.00001645728,0.002547608,0.0009181327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966531,0.00007681279,0.0005437415,0.0001271181,0.00008801248,0.00110062,0.001074576,0.0000416218,0.0002944361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930538,0.0001086507,0.005919739,0.0002286248,0.00005230051,0.0000640239,0.0004570075,0.00006833432,0.00004750966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01431414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378229030","doi":"10.1002/edn3.432","title":"Toward a national <scp>eDNA</scp> strategy for the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Environmental DNA; Resource management (computing); Environmental planning; Natural resource; Business; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04018921604400201,"gpt":0.2393783268587878,"spread":0.1991891108147857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003452582,0.0002933535,0.0001666203,0.00007401998,0.0007038025,0.00005169721,0.0005258346,0.00009066702,0.0008479874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006338822,0.0002379243,0.0001482911,0.0003491247,0.0008253467,0.0002109756,0.0007221809,0.0001621385,0.005931434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005327582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003068328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008733862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001161805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978058,0.00005206886,0.0002415365,0.0005163802,0.0008052081,0.0005789936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988654,0.0006494572,0.0001012686,0.0002566821,0.00000192103,0.0001252552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359969,0.0005038699,0.3306347,0.00003491682,0.0004467016,0.00002584655,0.005476379,0.08424851,0.02122022,0.000315431,0.5536246,0.003432869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007238874,0.0002661565,0.7002857,0.000005143429,0.00005025103,0.000006744215,0.007163862,0.004341017,0.003737668,0.001353906,0.281876,0.0001896377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949425,0.00008758012,0.00014106,0.0006804696,0.000191353,0.0007528152,0.0008209371,0.000155596,0.002227663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907855,0.0008029973,0.0005663338,0.000957075,0.00008347045,0.0001892139,0.0008323953,0.00004175419,0.005741216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.369651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025890805","doi":"10.1002/edn3.88","title":"Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Salmo; Environmental science; Brown trout; Dispersion (optics); Fluvial; River ecosystem; Rainbow trout; Abundance (ecology); Hydrology (agriculture); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Ecology; Geology; Ecosystem; Biology; Biodiversity; Physics; Geomorphology; Structural basin","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02173306456648412,"gpt":0.2256656313660058,"spread":0.2039325667995217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002431671,0.0005648081,0.000462546,0.00004886224,0.0006655001,0.00003573057,0.000411023,0.0001148214,0.001406545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003389697,0.0004711831,0.000127148,0.0001429166,0.001017516,0.0003600769,0.002297067,0.0003397497,0.001003141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001145235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003085276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005675432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006997089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965798,0.0001595954,0.0005358043,0.001196844,0.0008649756,0.0006629496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989823,0.0001235659,0.0001226402,0.0004118671,7.19815e-7,0.0003589478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002217493,0.0004425689,0.5434812,0.00001666355,0.0001513247,0.0001614538,0.01411486,0.01316518,0.4221738,0.00001202176,0.005401906,0.0006572633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004545982,0.001003021,0.8665815,0.00009425304,0.0002232554,0.00007124019,0.0355358,0.02864299,0.04943465,0.0001851156,0.01101628,0.002665906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920347,0.0008958759,0.00001928159,0.005602453,0.0001537277,0.0009021346,0.0001442356,0.00004844208,0.0001991104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923705,0.0009961014,0.0008361208,0.005407792,0.00006691909,0.00007426634,0.00005168182,0.00004536517,0.0001512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3727391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031983174","doi":"10.1002/edn3.89","title":"60 specific eDNA qPCR assays to detect invasive, threatened, and exploited freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates in Eastern Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Environmental DNA; Biology; Invasive species; Invertebrate; Ecology; TaqMan; Endangered species; Fishery; Zoology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Polymerase chain reaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01495843198879293,"gpt":0.169867664160413,"spread":0.15490923217162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008148391,0.0004096325,0.0003371553,0.00004551285,0.0002184122,0.00005450054,0.0002811601,0.00008875648,0.001783783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001975783,0.0004034572,0.00003533854,0.0001606185,0.0004378715,0.0003491883,0.001318496,0.0001976308,0.0009503312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005072249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000517633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03838526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1666473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977769,0.00007902591,0.0002954189,0.0008754777,0.00045642,0.0005167525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991779,0.00006607131,0.00006404097,0.0002290262,7.437073e-7,0.0004622422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004626179,0.00003278748,0.8707755,0.00001074757,0.00002146797,0.0001246947,0.001045438,0.00008735213,0.1195943,6.517665e-7,0.006977727,0.001283067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009740447,0.0002379746,0.9290637,0.0000237038,0.00001955117,0.00001160336,0.002342555,0.0003029494,0.0586271,0.0000547626,0.007723166,0.0006188662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968997,0.0004007553,0.000009220056,0.001432614,0.0000685171,0.0004722082,0.0001684208,0.00002968661,0.0005188977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944789,0.0006550341,0.001368994,0.003164096,0.00002894701,0.00002899595,0.00003793921,0.00003368207,0.0002034055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1282621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998417,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317534803","doi":"10.1002/edn3.388","title":"Answers blowing in the wind: Detection of birds, mammals, and amphibians with airborne environmental <scp>DNA</scp> in a natural environment over a yearlong survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Genome Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Texas Tech University","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biological dispersal; Vertebrate; Natural (archaeology); Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007898787262493262,"gpt":0.1816141688891341,"spread":0.1737153816266409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009491692,0.0005271559,0.0004439623,0.0002226205,0.0002583282,0.00003711831,0.0004857484,0.0001710354,0.0002060041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001889357,0.0004492116,0.0001085268,0.0004619426,0.001337057,0.0004683878,0.0007918931,0.0004782933,0.0004814981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007951531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003121122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001067683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001070124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962313,0.0003822062,0.0005197398,0.000972039,0.001079693,0.00081509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987571,0.0003747286,0.0002053518,0.0005316957,3.936908e-7,0.0001307848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004864833,0.000319138,0.8984376,0.00001133888,0.00004054651,0.0001083762,0.003456623,0.0008298818,0.09413485,8.858697e-7,0.0001168009,0.002495304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001451809,0.0002791677,0.9820985,0.00003036649,0.00003672018,0.00002622407,0.006127967,0.0002503694,0.008342262,0.00001350376,0.001069207,0.0002739445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982942,0.0003189379,0.000004868277,0.00006188608,0.00008372329,0.000844729,0.0001900005,0.00004040395,0.000161279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981864,0.0009421073,0.0001302422,0.0001542391,0.00002033245,0.00004601427,0.0000956814,0.00005631596,0.0003686427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08579259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036144229","doi":"10.1002/edn3.112","title":"Pathway to Increase Standards and Competency of eDNA Surveys (PISCeS)—Advancing collaboration and standardization efforts in the field of eDNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Environmental DNA; Field (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Library science; Engineering; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Biodiversity; Computer science; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004517643098230186,"gpt":0.2143524556125901,"spread":0.20983481251436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006916763,0.0001639875,0.0002376011,0.00003193347,0.00011888,0.00001439031,0.00014778,0.00005181908,0.0002371912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001260714,0.0001424132,0.00002699263,0.0001737494,0.0003104252,0.0002222304,0.00040327,0.00008933946,0.000007656231],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000167981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006431188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000214682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002234028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984019,0.0002147171,0.0002970514,0.0003217697,0.0005850102,0.000179564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994504,0.0001571742,0.0001266831,0.0001592549,0.000002619413,0.0001038138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821759,0.0001032825,0.906404,0.00003866102,0.00001358683,0.000007901975,0.005549432,0.0005530062,0.08222249,0.00003773009,0.0007003508,0.00428137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006617617,0.0006115845,0.9520172,0.00002610191,0.00002027689,0.000001984541,0.003084381,0.00007303982,0.03927361,0.0000599561,0.003982958,0.0001871594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966099,0.0001433166,0.0005557975,0.0008272075,0.0000287416,0.000494542,0.0004506943,0.000007198029,0.0008826293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974393,0.0002469448,0.00168515,0.0005632387,0.00001110572,0.000008341045,0.00002394853,0.000008770016,0.00001314706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04561321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168150887","doi":"10.1002/edn3.221","title":"Fish community shifts along a strong fluvial environmental gradient revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Estuary; Fluvial; Biodiversity; Ecology; Brackish water; Habitat; Fish migration; Geography; Coastal fish; River ecosystem; Community structure; Marine habitats; Fishery; Biology; Coral reef fish; Salinity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01424732117600984,"gpt":0.1994524907396633,"spread":0.1852051695636534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005523923,0.0007881002,0.0006361416,0.00005827428,0.00181679,0.00009889917,0.000880149,0.0002326563,0.0105533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004337663,0.0008912364,0.0003941623,0.0002025546,0.001460694,0.0006129545,0.003126359,0.0009959668,0.003092094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001932762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000532293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003282912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001417926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949191,0.0007502965,0.0007040206,0.001169304,0.001283777,0.001173462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978759,0.0001959592,0.0002698122,0.001140449,0.000001184541,0.0005166624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004906543,0.001616145,0.650102,0.00001544209,0.0001965454,0.0001537037,0.001987278,0.00009734747,0.3277245,0.000008336026,0.01422532,0.003824272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001852443,0.0002295271,0.8795098,0.00002914199,0.0002011797,0.00007442119,0.005062494,0.00006743498,0.06804471,0.00009094481,0.04362372,0.001214172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918023,0.000458204,0.0000692398,0.0003776052,0.0003678169,0.0005377653,0.001252133,0.0001215516,0.005013357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921275,0.0005916829,0.001922373,0.001084068,0.00008274954,0.0000601885,0.001015661,0.00008554965,0.00303017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2596798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175518271","doi":"10.1002/edn3.224","title":"Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Tributary; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Geography; Cartography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03968858173605139,"gpt":0.2175332388751342,"spread":0.1778446571390828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007525107,0.0004407247,0.0005887919,0.00007239218,0.0003476602,0.00003357689,0.0009086005,0.0001522244,0.004409761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001954563,0.0004645695,0.0001511971,0.0001787915,0.001568962,0.001305929,0.002174159,0.0003513492,0.0004464487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001422475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007086863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005767901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005576973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963267,0.000540038,0.000858806,0.0007478253,0.0009361235,0.0005904721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981195,0.0001257395,0.0002336087,0.001360729,0.000001515503,0.0001588561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004383246,0.0007428089,0.8899031,0.000125432,0.00006920861,0.00005429225,0.005467183,0.00006220348,0.1020592,0.00001411538,0.0002789109,0.001179664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001385988,0.0001053593,0.8989091,0.0001301075,0.0001294844,0.00005739317,0.03604512,0.0005429352,0.05890551,0.00002747145,0.003130106,0.0006314533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946707,0.0002334902,0.00005879061,0.0001247177,0.0001253555,0.0006979726,0.002095392,0.00004442,0.001949179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957123,0.0003366942,0.002097738,0.0001792127,0.00001962487,0.00003651496,0.001423884,0.00003584572,0.0001582044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04315371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166490348","doi":"10.1002/edn3.220","title":"A statistical model for calibration and computation of detection and quantification limits for low copy number environmental DNA samples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sample (material); Calibration; Statistical model; Statistics; Computer science; Data mining; Biology; Mathematics; Ecology; Biodiversity; Chromatography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02575239369455978,"gpt":0.2415516179943898,"spread":0.21579922429983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001468863,0.0002294004,0.0002429924,0.00002303486,0.0003356555,0.00003001661,0.00006913424,0.0001122259,0.0001547686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003190124,0.0002599353,0.00006267787,0.00004001627,0.0006083581,0.0003095406,0.0001731214,0.00006736119,0.00002076385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002341617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003004243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001604666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002421923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984771,0.00005450939,0.0003306798,0.0006073021,0.0002829217,0.0002475001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999384,0.0001925513,0.0001607013,0.0001537936,0.000001778847,0.0001071397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001691362,0.000397455,0.2291421,0.00008557887,0.00005308195,0.000001340584,0.0008364157,0.002354451,0.753992,0.0001043996,0.0002648615,0.01259914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001651417,0.0002334913,0.5394368,0.00001942492,0.0001428759,0.00001872151,0.0009878423,0.1962065,0.2591872,0.001402157,0.0002786217,0.0004348659],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7937434,0.00007337402,0.2043531,0.00007145655,0.00005143334,0.0006291333,0.001035862,0.00001598616,0.00002623636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631985,0.000249894,0.03567389,0.00008776511,0.00001850867,0.00008783796,0.0005204069,0.00002551761,0.0001377072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4948048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187900929","doi":"10.1002/edn3.245","title":"DNA metabarcoding marker choice skews perception of marine eukaryotic biodiversity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylum; Biology; Biodiversity; Taxonomic rank; DNA barcoding; Evolutionary biology; 18S ribosomal RNA; Ecology; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; Environmental DNA; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Gene; Taxon","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01292271756084958,"gpt":0.1976457125751617,"spread":0.1847229950143121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002018341,0.0003409585,0.0003615335,0.00005054783,0.0003665566,0.00002067872,0.0003606203,0.0001191511,0.03762615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003670501,0.0003701535,0.0002419491,0.0001990296,0.0007957425,0.0004233693,0.00229601,0.0002064681,0.004468752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008711441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000434318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002882484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000475437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976041,0.0001474067,0.0003502191,0.0007334038,0.0007082539,0.0004565662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990573,0.00008236407,0.0001719859,0.0005102027,0.000002179836,0.00017595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001787816,0.0003122707,0.816725,0.00001317954,0.00006301879,0.00003327478,0.0003607591,0.00004150783,0.1770408,0.00000190563,0.001648974,0.003741377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006081077,0.00006694689,0.9629072,0.000009246157,0.0001223869,0.00001909502,0.001227,0.00002471601,0.02489138,0.00002888389,0.009728238,0.0003668098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909045,0.00008834835,0.00003261489,0.0002431513,0.0001967281,0.0002316176,0.0001578793,0.00004258372,0.008102615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903495,0.0004232046,0.005565004,0.000362774,0.0000346888,0.000006952459,0.0001792575,0.00001808286,0.003060489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1521494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315796344","doi":"10.1002/edn3.385","title":"Airborne eDNA documents a diverse and ecologically complex tropical bat and other mammal community","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Edwards Lifesciences","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Citizen science; Environmental science; Biology; Filter (signal processing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02859164218727955,"gpt":0.2289150415937809,"spread":0.2003233994065013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001995705,0.000309497,0.0002638903,0.00004244422,0.0008795958,0.00004176652,0.0002998674,0.0001185447,0.005049778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001763767,0.0002901221,0.00006222163,0.000107268,0.001803356,0.000223092,0.002878829,0.0003032353,0.003159458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002784423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.174249e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002157198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006392337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981803,0.0002170092,0.0002199482,0.0004878526,0.0004064,0.0004884769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999249,0.0001252448,0.00007346978,0.0003143835,4.158376e-7,0.000237488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818225,0.0002069706,0.9801626,0.00000734977,0.00003788813,0.00003316153,0.0006541431,0.00001618148,0.01076212,0.00002403479,0.004367746,0.003689627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008840119,0.0002604692,0.9763063,0.000005272657,0.00003399638,0.00001606858,0.001576104,0.0000798601,0.000284131,0.0003312352,0.01990704,0.0003154807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952829,0.00003077042,0.000005032386,0.000304527,0.00006517114,0.0003444084,0.0001627734,0.0001056878,0.003698724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962804,0.0002911843,0.00117511,0.0009512033,0.00002289905,0.00002075604,0.0000412286,0.0000215315,0.001195715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01553929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982308128","doi":"10.1002/edn3.46","title":"Fly‐derived DNA and camera traps are complementary tools for assessing mammalian biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service London; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Environmental DNA; Ecology; Biology; Invertebrate; Habitat; Transect; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Alpha diversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02178222599515423,"gpt":0.2138458354199158,"spread":0.1920636094247615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001984971,0.0004225688,0.0003864972,0.00004907925,0.0006821602,0.0001260917,0.0003773152,0.0001188773,0.005860565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001014772,0.0004537534,0.0001595809,0.00007747539,0.0007478002,0.001083734,0.0010339,0.000175166,0.002234409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006344059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001896749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001240734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002737098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976246,0.00007565163,0.0002927255,0.0009001744,0.0004886051,0.0006181987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990472,0.0001335203,0.0002033657,0.0003949055,0.000001190511,0.0002198222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004476263,0.0001749209,0.8521061,0.00002378953,0.00005556205,0.00001162816,0.0005421288,0.00002137739,0.1380035,0.000003098449,0.004237419,0.004775732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001592248,0.0001753174,0.9436975,0.00001591971,0.00007924915,0.00001030974,0.006103308,0.00004022466,0.01649008,0.00004042103,0.03118258,0.0005728072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958251,0.00008927169,0.00004917008,0.0005628691,0.0002639809,0.00109789,0.0008495855,0.00005678742,0.001205324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939355,0.0001123247,0.00390981,0.00111376,0.00003779914,0.00002624672,0.0002975785,0.00002452023,0.000542412],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1215134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217457303","doi":"10.1002/edn3.266","title":"Effect of biotic and abiotic factors on the production and degradation of fish environmental DNA: An experimental evaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Perch; Ecology; Biotic component; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Fishery; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01516286236921069,"gpt":0.2235679632135156,"spread":0.2084051008443049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004914112,0.0003025545,0.0002740184,0.00003850674,0.0002871349,0.0000169758,0.0001409372,0.00009264848,0.001306504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000769426,0.0002389972,0.00007206306,0.00008124715,0.001229268,0.0003318195,0.0003875578,0.0001270708,0.00003420391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003756724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002163237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002811134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009205673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976647,0.0004349194,0.0002969833,0.0006198636,0.0007603214,0.0002231724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991364,0.0001816645,0.0002002888,0.0003858612,0.000001114294,0.00009465178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004844551,0.0003403488,0.3946091,0.00001336012,0.00003323899,0.0000015103,0.0009297552,0.00005340526,0.6017224,0.000004031938,0.00007610492,0.002168334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002639434,0.0006189218,0.4662915,0.00001655861,0.00007838808,0.000007256072,0.001254116,0.00009967158,0.5312008,0.000007206984,0.00003065298,0.0001309815],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985649,0.0002134842,9.713327e-7,0.0001473671,0.000121597,0.0007021021,0.00009460186,0.00001166211,0.0001433351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993669,0.000179571,0.000107631,0.00006941946,0.00001665664,0.00001768383,0.0001056938,0.00001956239,0.0001168171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07168248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112053409","doi":"10.1002/edn3.171","title":"Lateral and longitudinal fish environmental DNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Habitat; River ecosystem; Environmental science; Fish migration; Biology; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Snow; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Biodiversity; Geography; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008022807901971707,"gpt":0.1843294899568425,"spread":0.1763066820548707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001173727,0.0004767959,0.0003667604,0.00003181452,0.000295843,0.00004014684,0.0003330907,0.000141451,0.003234938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001306591,0.0005217743,0.000109776,0.0001254797,0.001117553,0.0005539052,0.001413695,0.0003278936,0.001814906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001022454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001456725,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005820673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005281795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972999,0.00008869358,0.0003945319,0.00101499,0.0005677946,0.0006340771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992134,0.00004107067,0.0001229341,0.0002730585,2.882263e-7,0.0003492476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007894538,0.0002517905,0.9482322,0.00001067409,0.00002713539,0.0001144366,0.0007193328,0.0001177029,0.04728947,0.000002564444,0.001053027,0.002102665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001234444,0.0002758733,0.9887156,0.00001111142,0.00003510238,0.0000256415,0.0003480775,0.0007045101,0.002499043,0.00003548336,0.005567045,0.0005480716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968287,0.000139344,0.00003693369,0.00120127,0.00008609676,0.000466301,0.0008607167,0.0000590739,0.0003215504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973733,0.0005407302,0.0004417489,0.0007936927,0.00003317318,0.00002514753,0.0005317499,0.00003475659,0.0002256294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04479043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011674956","doi":"10.1002/edn3.81","title":"An analysis of metadata reporting in freshwater environmental DNA research calls for the development of best practice guidelines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Rubric; Environmental DNA; Data science; Sampling (signal processing); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Information retrieval; Data mining; Biology; Ecology; Geography; World Wide Web; Biodiversity; Psychology; Cartography; Filter (signal processing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1524266381761425,"gpt":0.3693315223589147,"spread":0.2169048841827722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002855369,0.0003354978,0.0006287799,0.0001448544,0.0004100681,0.00003164267,0.0009643081,0.0001219579,0.001452378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006750631,0.0002747879,0.000244753,0.0005095599,0.001137166,0.0007954352,0.001394313,0.0002843888,0.0001348694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000575844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000102647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003630929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004038826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994817,0.0002492304,0.002008704,0.0009095778,0.001441672,0.0005738652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974531,0.0005158663,0.001081507,0.0007495231,0.000007689549,0.0001923133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002022479,0.001182018,0.5909011,0.00002461022,0.0008185644,0.00001649827,0.007657484,0.006082618,0.3867347,0.000006367659,0.0007276465,0.005646136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009110329,0.0004948975,0.7663529,0.0000228183,0.001026458,0.000003806461,0.03071151,0.005552946,0.1572038,0.00001494448,0.03716008,0.000544769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962742,0.0002870168,0.0007425782,0.0009368345,0.00004607729,0.0009208035,0.0005693994,0.00001211171,0.0002109557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438501,0.0002105854,0.05501752,0.0003680795,0.00003278891,0.00007656703,0.0002631651,0.00003117472,0.0001499995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2295308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043916054","doi":"10.1002/edn3.116","title":"Metabarcoding unsorted kick‐samples facilitates macroinvertebrate‐based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Environmental DNA; Water quality; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Taxon; Biology; Sass; Ecology; Taxonomic rank; Environmental science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02801751371999082,"gpt":0.1893161887044626,"spread":0.1612986749844718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002715686,0.0008915662,0.0006366426,0.0001000108,0.001136141,0.00009894888,0.0007539896,0.0001846888,0.005833185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002858668,0.0008673816,0.0002587256,0.0002788856,0.00157442,0.0009395338,0.001015927,0.0004358089,0.004412136],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001443425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001001331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003675516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002767352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954066,0.0001983238,0.0006599303,0.001550116,0.001071464,0.001113514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982502,0.0001330498,0.0003146131,0.0006242727,0.000001482233,0.000676346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000168723,0.0002630028,0.6368831,0.00002038152,0.0001295572,0.00005020911,0.0007116563,0.001530613,0.3584506,0.00000272797,0.0008462261,0.0009432313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003028052,0.0007194846,0.7416936,0.00004821905,0.000271001,0.00002409066,0.00460068,0.004907763,0.2196691,0.00001189617,0.02336024,0.00166592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957892,0.0002544623,0.0005284183,0.0004279623,0.0001287406,0.0009124585,0.000817419,0.0002270892,0.0009142266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886716,0.000150438,0.009453766,0.0008402105,0.0001089845,0.00009164415,0.00042986,0.00009470026,0.0001587996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1387815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080170233","doi":"10.1002/edn3.129","title":"Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity shapes fluvial fish communities as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Spatial ecology; Relative species abundance; Fluvial; Environmental science; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Structural basin","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01600982594125543,"gpt":0.1985720402459806,"spread":0.1825622143047252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002245827,0.0007749232,0.0006221291,0.00004018293,0.001073183,0.00008619647,0.001079242,0.00021157,0.01748477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001727618,0.0008386293,0.0003599226,0.0001405416,0.00168533,0.0007451137,0.002650342,0.0005606205,0.009777876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002849609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001885786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009998649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960235,0.0002997821,0.0006042355,0.0009994269,0.001138823,0.0009342335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984843,0.0001153693,0.0002454839,0.0005340595,6.83726e-7,0.0006201143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000933838,0.0004429523,0.6695483,0.00001282131,0.0001153606,0.00002935401,0.002645411,0.0001030832,0.2953915,0.000001549826,0.02991476,0.001701485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002374903,0.0007978605,0.7177255,0.00002380925,0.0002531263,0.0000501853,0.006850299,0.0004103912,0.1712444,0.00004844399,0.0983188,0.001902253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919431,0.0002821205,0.00003489993,0.001382737,0.0001334724,0.0006587093,0.001401704,0.0001700435,0.00399326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921706,0.0005333733,0.00111333,0.004495811,0.0001214224,0.0000588303,0.0005011716,0.00008515713,0.0009203447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1241471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004206018","doi":"10.1002/edn3.71","title":"Detection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) using environmental DNA in riverine systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Unionidae; Watershed; Sampling (signal processing); Habitat; Biology; Ecology; River ecosystem; Fishery; Environmental science; Bivalvia; Mollusca; Biodiversity; Engineering; Filter (signal processing)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01400101337207219,"gpt":0.1822305512940167,"spread":0.1682295379219445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001710264,0.000437621,0.0004579184,0.0000786982,0.0002147478,0.00002223218,0.0004286876,0.0001678317,0.003105734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009848159,0.0004671762,0.0001553637,0.0002011579,0.0008076692,0.0005081145,0.0010402,0.0002726142,0.001427945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001035026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001889622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004153495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004379499,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971946,0.0001402775,0.0005721531,0.0007964812,0.0007475232,0.0005489966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991072,0.0000341205,0.0002493138,0.0003631038,5.088318e-7,0.0002457311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000499016,0.0002072789,0.3724332,0.00001662287,0.00002806954,0.00003021262,0.001081318,0.003081623,0.6223806,0.00000116462,0.00006835438,0.0006217356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001431386,0.0003588746,0.7932733,0.00002755266,0.00006633172,0.00002376036,0.002816928,0.005044727,0.1891269,0.00001458832,0.007131283,0.0006843239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979245,0.0002179012,0.0001727561,0.00008087319,0.0001853144,0.0006205827,0.0002754595,0.00004349897,0.0004790931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982529,0.000201574,0.001032178,0.0001890488,0.00006090909,0.00001902209,0.00005394523,0.00004618625,0.0001442796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4332536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111891248","doi":"10.1002/edn3.174","title":"Comparing CRISPR‐Cas and qPCR eDNA assays for the detection of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i> L.)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; University of New Brunswick; Université Laval","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Salmo; CRISPR; Biology; Computational biology; Environmental DNA; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Gene; Genetics; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02010587619325833,"gpt":0.2049487843469652,"spread":0.1848429081537069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001700284,0.000253539,0.000269026,0.00001655715,0.0004161217,0.00002218442,0.0002951879,0.00007706707,0.0002795977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002801732,0.0002132107,0.0001161494,0.00008574956,0.0007304277,0.000172742,0.0007119244,0.0001608088,0.0002437132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001872038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.524136e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001738662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002947758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.00004923325,0.0002789648,0.0004827873,0.0003804927,0.0003164984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.0001687779,0.0001529609,0.000236344,7.610134e-7,0.0001336867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007719592,0.00007896168,0.7027131,0.00002356218,0.00005260317,0.000002737193,0.0008325909,0.0002196128,0.2926274,0.000006857309,0.0006346586,0.002730775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007029386,0.0002730137,0.9014385,0.000008388855,0.0001249583,0.000008609019,0.001006861,0.001935533,0.08362907,0.00003139403,0.01057423,0.0002665035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953638,0.0004809967,0.001923774,0.0007328503,0.0001109598,0.0006927722,0.00005005041,0.00003987519,0.0006049358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981539,0.0003869217,0.000850051,0.0004226596,0.0000555323,0.00003043979,0.00001375192,0.00002488675,0.00006182508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2089983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044345051","doi":"10.1002/edn3.120","title":"Development of an environmental DNA metabarcoding assay for aquatic vascular plant communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; DNA barcoding; Biology; Taxon; Internal transcribed spacer; Genus; Invasive species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Ribosomal RNA; Gene; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03075160681221506,"gpt":0.2030492408450367,"spread":0.1722976340328216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004908483,0.0005373336,0.0005653807,0.00005243213,0.0007114526,0.00003082661,0.0008141507,0.0001375866,0.002717335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001737062,0.0005581856,0.0002571023,0.00009122957,0.0009154371,0.0005429369,0.00116928,0.0002332968,0.0008790693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005772725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005503075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004208195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003191893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969123,0.0001895,0.0006821792,0.0006586413,0.0009284064,0.0006289867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986758,0.0001446465,0.0002879794,0.0005182247,5.737289e-7,0.0003728391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001930121,0.001394607,0.2248778,0.00008705952,0.000495412,0.0000169494,0.02773548,0.0006248635,0.7294213,0.0000246924,0.0007418005,0.01438712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003975239,0.001057569,0.4503118,0.00005678648,0.0004817422,0.00001674776,0.04057213,0.00610841,0.4090169,0.00009421851,0.08610823,0.002200259],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965811,0.0001607702,0.001007739,0.0001042161,0.00009284826,0.0009007294,0.0005805345,0.00006782572,0.0005042319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492579,0.0001178429,0.04911938,0.0005153185,0.00004734586,0.00009131447,0.000706108,0.00006143628,0.00008333066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3204043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952272889","doi":"10.1002/edn3.17","title":"High‐resolution biomonitoring of plant pathogens and plant species using metabarcoding of pollen pellet contents collected from a honey bee hive","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Biology; Pollen; Phytophthora; Pythium; Quarantine; Botany; Invasive species; Ecology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03556756965370622,"gpt":0.1741484792313419,"spread":0.1385809095776356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004186951,0.0001103861,0.0002459431,0.00001273619,0.00009766264,0.000008199559,0.00006981638,0.00004120016,0.0001455204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005288414,0.00005096592,0.00004892148,0.00005403977,0.00007593742,0.00005275106,0.0001165502,0.00004054492,0.000004718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002690279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001029729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007661196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001398984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993058,0.00003186721,0.0001773222,0.0001770139,0.0001598851,0.0001481061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997282,0.00009389158,0.0001231344,0.00001569716,0.000002706599,0.00003638886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007116194,0.00004073777,0.129291,0.000003527235,0.00004096566,0.000003016399,0.0001418059,0.000001609215,0.8702493,0.00001160196,0.00002103548,0.0001241952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002414857,0.0001292723,0.7523633,0.00004615997,0.00002674338,0.000003027889,0.001303167,0.00009551807,0.2454371,0.00001119926,0.0002446697,0.00009834215],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915606,0.0005700206,5.698322e-7,0.00002063639,0.00005850077,0.0001383913,0.00759926,0.000007383162,0.00004468832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992033,0.0003757186,0.00009614918,0.000005910022,0.00006641438,0.000001254286,0.0001700088,9.467928e-7,0.00008032399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6248122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.207833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962568139","doi":"10.1002/edn3.62","title":"A new primer for metabarcoding of spider gut contents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Biology; Invertebrate; Spider; Predation; Zoology; Predator; Clade; In silico; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Gene; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.016593724647662,"gpt":0.2113660635360616,"spread":0.1947723388883996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001270314,0.0002550762,0.000324748,0.00003392445,0.0001077737,0.000009441924,0.0003379128,0.00007893066,0.01288508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001275017,0.000249272,0.0002059769,0.00006606977,0.0002500114,0.0002788624,0.0005786009,0.00009086879,0.003643405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002707638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001536705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004233397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983258,0.00002778161,0.0003036934,0.0005066663,0.0004521054,0.0003839172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999254,0.00007202773,0.0001654686,0.0003665705,7.538168e-7,0.0001411384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004112616,0.0001365278,0.6217899,0.000009883807,0.00006185081,9.903928e-7,0.0002119487,0.00006303829,0.3711975,0.00003292863,0.004051107,0.002403165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001635665,0.0003119628,0.8507719,0.00001595214,0.00008153264,0.000003652142,0.000463469,0.00005076449,0.1068584,0.0001387449,0.0392918,0.0003761488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916481,0.0001772539,0.0004180669,0.0000950239,0.0002410919,0.0009165355,0.00009112467,0.0000252065,0.006387554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718282,0.00005917643,0.01839634,0.0002310209,0.00002938181,0.00001722013,0.00002902723,0.00002793007,0.009381715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093962070","doi":"10.1002/edn3.155","title":"Detecting community change in Arctic marine ecosystems using the temporal dynamics of environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"ArcticNet; Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biomonitoring; Ecology; Temporal scales; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Arctic; Environmental change; Biology; Environmental science; Geography; Biodiversity; Climate change","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03387178436375033,"gpt":0.2141492357687644,"spread":0.180277451405014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004959165,0.0004423484,0.0004492359,0.00004966007,0.0005762981,0.00002287053,0.0008064486,0.0001391858,0.003280428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002720553,0.000404334,0.0001764484,0.0002231529,0.00106086,0.0004033903,0.002878786,0.0006935298,0.0003624381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001762337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002177427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004268448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001629471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971517,0.0004858826,0.0005963327,0.0005230102,0.0006793567,0.0005637478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987602,0.0001378184,0.0003458268,0.0005662724,5.626551e-7,0.0001893738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004621943,0.0003305452,0.9507487,0.00003497189,0.00003701344,0.00001856134,0.003770621,0.000283235,0.04226495,0.000002413001,0.00001981721,0.002442962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008597688,0.0002787747,0.9737747,0.00003206274,0.00006149358,0.00002445638,0.008705389,0.009375624,0.005920399,0.00004261158,0.0004369073,0.0004878552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977971,0.00008903453,0.00003027108,0.0003792081,0.0001177871,0.0008369428,0.0002681069,0.00003273497,0.0004488202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981802,0.0001000513,0.0009091423,0.000523962,0.00006083154,0.00003031872,0.0001111603,0.00004715011,0.00003717935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03634455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009315083","doi":"10.1002/edn3.76","title":"Validating environmental DNA metabarcoding for marine fishes in diverse ecosystems using a public aquarium","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Key (lock)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04956433947325507,"gpt":0.2185644860824649,"spread":0.1690001466092098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004012481,0.0006383553,0.0006079535,0.00009510673,0.0006187547,0.00009882594,0.0006997659,0.0001816884,0.006020252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006436743,0.0007063631,0.0003017229,0.000227133,0.0005825487,0.001014283,0.002531457,0.0003301282,0.001237545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001780953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004522673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000221709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007577937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959899,0.0001722295,0.000705138,0.001286972,0.0008061989,0.001039547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986876,0.0001425091,0.0003096441,0.0004217648,7.893589e-7,0.000437709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005700287,0.0003094197,0.7622601,0.00003143721,0.00007544056,0.00004032649,0.001363743,0.0006284916,0.2325893,0.000009447785,0.0006197714,0.002015468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008026571,0.0009737929,0.7956206,0.0000743631,0.0004279253,0.00007197593,0.02147763,0.03397449,0.08418319,0.0002066007,0.05128011,0.003682753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957106,0.0000956549,0.0003072055,0.0005796539,0.0002197324,0.001278138,0.0004784098,0.00008627832,0.001244311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900099,0.0001136656,0.008465101,0.0006586312,0.0001471975,0.00008019272,0.0002628601,0.00007876873,0.0001836568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1484061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386224620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.467","title":"Detection of fish sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> in aquatic systems: A review of methodological challenges and future opportunities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; McGill University; University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Liber Ero Foundation; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Metagenomics; Aquatic ecosystem; Biology; Abiotic component; Ecology; Population dynamics of fisheries; Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity; Fishery","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1686617923765805,"gpt":0.2973472483486995,"spread":0.1286854559721191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274231,0.0006721813,0.002375472,0.0001743682,0.00009108564,0.000007556322,0.000462963,0.0004019263,0.0001810569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008850871,0.0005892222,0.0003831865,0.0002056543,0.0009931354,0.0001925737,0.001222647,0.000413791,0.0001636038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006201004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006166619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001179097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002254666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956874,0.001031722,0.001229401,0.0008340595,0.0007841685,0.0004332038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975365,0.0008711705,0.0009332218,0.0005117644,0.000001109862,0.0001461698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000608502,0.000405127,0.0007019756,0.1040727,0.0004449518,0.00008134876,0.0008866494,0.000002529702,0.0001961858,0.00001117515,0.001780049,0.8914112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003081903,0.0003570743,0.007667569,0.02649391,0.0009700711,0.00006139493,0.00541008,0.000003420665,0.0001106728,0.00002735103,0.9582239,0.0003663697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003477025,0.9932162,0.000001156925,0.0000740412,0.0002663571,0.001590088,0.0003916379,0.000034841,0.0009487058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008514021,0.9987149,0.0002336064,0.0001222236,0.00007347812,0.0001777232,0.0001500508,0.0000557863,0.0003871449],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991423413","doi":"10.1002/edn3.58","title":"Environmental DNA surveys help to identify winter hibernacula of a temperate freshwater turtle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overwintering; Temperate climate; Ecology; Turtle (robot); Environmental DNA; Latitude; Biology; Population; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Fishery; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008443424260243184,"gpt":0.2104905815264887,"spread":0.2020471572662455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005835394,0.0006494516,0.000602074,0.0001111178,0.0002342691,0.0000469012,0.0008740295,0.0002016045,0.04295021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000114177,0.0006354535,0.0003231016,0.0001600884,0.0007587469,0.0005402344,0.00229308,0.0002949206,0.04727782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009929149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000266385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001652948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006412247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958046,0.0002595115,0.0006569314,0.001214684,0.001202857,0.0008614045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983712,0.00006974295,0.0002275698,0.0009576334,0.000001254973,0.0003725507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003201645,0.0002917715,0.5239085,0.000008714288,0.00006429459,0.00001303218,0.0005329283,0.0001608139,0.4714999,0.000001256068,0.002856286,0.0006305361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008710626,0.0003124195,0.8171872,0.00002590782,0.00004826222,0.00001546903,0.000776845,0.00002193508,0.1631478,0.0000231335,0.01692807,0.00064191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938325,0.00007975128,0.00004800368,0.0001786556,0.0004635997,0.001028836,0.0008603957,0.00005703226,0.003451255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900952,0.00009096865,0.001762395,0.0006834076,0.00005571061,0.00004058655,0.0001625503,0.00008096912,0.007028195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3083521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411095492","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70100","title":"A Metadata Checklist and Data Formatting Guidelines to Make <scp>eDNA FAIR</scp> (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; European Commission","keywords":"Metadata; Disk formatting; Interoperability; Checklist; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Database; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03255661795179208,"gpt":0.2827225075798538,"spread":0.2501658896280617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000729333,0.0005179109,0.000458821,0.0001383104,0.000773802,0.0003379801,0.001452033,0.0001419735,0.0003219255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002923323,0.0004921026,0.00005073928,0.0003341609,0.000769792,0.001813164,0.01406184,0.0002870295,0.0004095637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000335625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005037265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003208839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001912852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965976,0.0000859925,0.0006051107,0.001414325,0.0005845677,0.0007124285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980614,0.0001529666,0.000153424,0.001324278,0.000003210002,0.0003047815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002314711,0.0001929087,0.8305581,0.00007738064,0.0002069004,0.00002034683,0.0006487686,0.00009970352,0.02156208,0.00003716616,0.1211854,0.02538816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008799521,0.0001559709,0.5944328,0.0001092039,0.00015971,0.00002586194,0.003022799,0.0005774437,0.006490641,0.000137424,0.3936598,0.0003484752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820734,0.001678531,0.00060585,0.001168543,0.0002131382,0.0007327857,0.0008298412,0.00008182888,0.01261608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792894,0.003756471,0.05574214,0.007613756,0.00009274705,0.00008379535,0.0005370466,0.00008161279,0.05280307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2724744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283589851","doi":"10.1002/edn3.332","title":"Testing the effectiveness of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) to quantify larval amphibian abundance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Laurentian University; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mesocosm; Tadpole (physics); Biology; Amphibian; Abundance (ecology); Leopard frog; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Ecosystem; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01446176739955871,"gpt":0.2048997539819414,"spread":0.1904379865823827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00162872,0.0008195125,0.000685447,0.000127735,0.002053018,0.0000640869,0.001755029,0.0001521895,0.001001566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002832262,0.0007938337,0.0003630304,0.0005751432,0.001833543,0.000431153,0.005507905,0.00074367,0.002510723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002033487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009075281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001184493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000152872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933823,0.001024365,0.0007271671,0.001527479,0.002063925,0.001274712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955174,0.002467804,0.0004536887,0.001158562,0.000001873759,0.0004006772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002236832,0.0006713501,0.6035544,0.00002347185,0.0001008213,0.00003125889,0.0014767,0.002831181,0.3882737,0.000015516,0.002242361,0.0007569055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009060369,0.0009884619,0.9046209,0.00002816341,0.0001004672,0.00005898427,0.006704018,0.00006143343,0.06163952,0.0001202134,0.02453333,0.0002384072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914306,0.0004084955,0.00003334121,0.00006237034,0.0004846087,0.001731582,0.001342987,0.0001075744,0.004398373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961131,0.00006821141,0.001424065,0.0005671295,0.00007728851,0.000299482,0.0001221855,0.0001132511,0.001215353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3266342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312199489","doi":"10.1002/edn3.384","title":"Development and field validation of <scp>RPA‐CRISPR‐Cas</scp> environmental <scp>DNA</scp> assays for the detection of brown trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) and Arctic char (<i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marine Institute","keywords":"Salmo; Recombinase Polymerase Amplification; Brown trout; Arctic char; Salvelinus; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification; Nucleic acid; DNA; Salmonidae; Biology; Trout; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01042353519757662,"gpt":0.193948600832371,"spread":0.1835250656347944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006806099,0.0005187349,0.000492429,0.0001031931,0.001135723,0.00003331193,0.0004898713,0.0001519794,0.0002770833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000964495,0.0005006547,0.0001948295,0.0001504606,0.0009464519,0.0003427056,0.001708459,0.0003614068,0.00005466606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007632857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006272318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001042467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001751998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965653,0.0001721995,0.0007244273,0.0009027683,0.001027123,0.0006081141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978189,0.0009697919,0.0005474811,0.0004796608,0.000002213272,0.0001819627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004893618,0.0006243513,0.3565092,0.00007754532,0.0002524922,0.000008114429,0.007336061,0.0003585634,0.6191038,0.000007802703,0.0007810914,0.0148921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001243787,0.0006053434,0.4682904,0.00001252933,0.0001983684,0.00004641301,0.00955776,0.0001806475,0.5013892,0.00006364389,0.01825649,0.0001553371],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958255,0.001104148,0.0007587451,0.00008894539,0.0002546638,0.001325424,0.0003911747,0.0000335507,0.0002178906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958323,0.0006580256,0.00213947,0.0002737725,0.00004536017,0.0002674584,0.0001043506,0.00005620801,0.0006230464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1177146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997445,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983054701","doi":"10.1002/edn3.56","title":"Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to map invasive and native invertebrates in two Great Lakes tributaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Dreissena; Introduced species; Biology; Ecology; Tributary; Invertebrate; Endangered species; Invasive species; Taxon; Genus; DNA barcoding; Freshwater ecosystem; Habitat; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Mollusca; Bivalvia","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01728929857792769,"gpt":0.2249329248267132,"spread":0.2076436262487855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002806345,0.0006161783,0.000568115,0.0001639641,0.0003791266,0.0000705978,0.0004196817,0.0001128021,0.005085711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000252374,0.0006385127,0.0001233417,0.0001960844,0.0009437875,0.0009010084,0.001995975,0.0003117938,0.004088375],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00157306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004669761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004393866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003559581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966553,0.0001718625,0.000456816,0.001180273,0.0007233678,0.0008123175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989365,0.0001705109,0.0001580638,0.0004223754,7.025461e-7,0.0003118979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004497492,0.0001313551,0.6964541,0.000009992552,0.00004631821,0.00003232381,0.001907354,0.0005036074,0.3002975,0.00001638589,0.0001454472,0.000410588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002335913,0.0002616204,0.8682269,0.00007004535,0.00009091493,0.00003544852,0.006595966,0.0005552873,0.1171436,0.0002683352,0.003212125,0.001203819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964664,0.0003146784,0.00001820978,0.0001934037,0.0002024409,0.001103412,0.0002837887,0.00004041573,0.001377257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945758,0.0002062924,0.00330002,0.000717278,0.00003328727,0.0000373189,0.00007339528,0.00005133636,0.001005297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.183154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999816348","doi":"10.1002/edn3.65","title":"Analytical validation and field testing of a specific qPCR assay for environmental DNA detection of invasive European green crab (<i>Carcinus maenas</i>)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; South Australian Research and Development Institute; Australian Government","keywords":"Carcinus maenas; Environmental DNA; Biology; Shellfish; Fishery; Ecology; Aquatic animal; Zoology; Decapoda; Biodiversity; Crustacean; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02573159281690877,"gpt":0.1947873361184552,"spread":0.1690557433015464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002986245,0.0003256424,0.0003690622,0.00004801115,0.0002128846,0.00001505877,0.0002876915,0.00009902836,0.0005990482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001043436,0.000347093,0.0001485968,0.0001289249,0.0007353565,0.0002732266,0.0007671862,0.0001715501,0.0001777433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002347399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001878963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003917754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000468465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977981,0.0001609103,0.0005171454,0.0006764028,0.0005121417,0.0003352461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988376,0.0003696548,0.0003196383,0.0002686817,0.000001607533,0.0002027757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008743488,0.000138708,0.3982671,0.00003435667,0.00004324436,0.000006777126,0.0005572097,0.0000673329,0.5880134,0.000002172137,0.0002030181,0.01257927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008776751,0.0008498697,0.5120528,0.00001896533,0.00009837979,0.000009645092,0.0008181581,0.0003708999,0.4829754,0.0000324492,0.001586593,0.0003092495],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959565,0.0001075226,0.0006383,0.0002457688,0.00005572618,0.0006210926,0.0003468784,0.00002721056,0.002000976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963455,0.0001393902,0.002901294,0.0002842796,0.00006623282,0.00001278568,0.00006267132,0.00003683082,0.000151027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1137857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991401217","doi":"10.1002/edn3.59","title":"Detection of spatiotemporal variation in ranavirus distribution using eDNA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Bacteriophages and microbial interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranavirus; Abiotic component; Ecology; Biology; Biotic component; Amphibian; Habitat; Population; Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Environmental health","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005613924612785615,"gpt":0.202397503944747,"spread":0.1967835793319613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009245087,0.00008601234,0.00009882243,0.00002282965,0.00003595353,0.000008689212,0.00006724342,0.00005859134,0.002771752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003173782,0.00009287881,0.00004528929,0.00008871426,0.00004841813,0.0003127881,0.00007006923,0.00008480681,0.000441322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004672913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002221889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001648253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001581139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993221,0.00003746344,0.0002075686,0.0001855606,0.0001193904,0.0001279782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997223,0.00001010793,0.0001076789,0.0001320305,5.772858e-7,0.00002732082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002342575,0.00008935024,0.01919682,0.00000265432,0.000003039696,6.479769e-7,0.0001081399,0.000547536,0.9768361,0.000004074024,0.000004267522,0.003183911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994747,0.00004381416,0.8289886,0.000009067738,0.000006683297,0.00000480043,0.00003912963,0.001905553,0.1671972,0.00001886773,0.00139772,0.00008912812],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980485,0.000008164729,0.0009971708,0.00001338857,0.0002056991,0.0002046142,0.0000453247,0.000007903237,0.0004692711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.000008130914,0.0001626088,0.00001864885,0.00001542537,0.000003196865,0.00005255164,0.000008685661,0.000159161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319832609","doi":"10.1002/edn3.392","title":"Optimized <scp>DNA</scp> isolation from marine sponges for natural sampler <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Sponge; Environmental DNA; DNA extraction; DNA; Biology; Homogenization (climate); Biodiversity; Ecology; Polymerase chain reaction; Botany; Biochemistry; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01734538957809457,"gpt":0.2161459356476362,"spread":0.1988005460695416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005176248,0.0008187018,0.0007016907,0.0001711129,0.0009946654,0.000123436,0.0008404129,0.0002815194,0.001694847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002927766,0.0008429054,0.0004611066,0.0003829129,0.000827858,0.0009126145,0.002573559,0.0004206805,0.006549949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001007792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004339511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002533332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004567461,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995241,0.0001698834,0.0006530251,0.001514781,0.001119533,0.001301726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972012,0.001360528,0.0003541754,0.00073725,0.000003287417,0.000343557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006073658,0.0004833825,0.5253162,0.0000350046,0.000524433,0.0000633397,0.00312885,0.002447888,0.4186534,0.00002732666,0.0440254,0.005233954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002456866,0.0001760308,0.8826076,0.00002167288,0.0002547866,0.000008683863,0.003552495,0.002436357,0.0497646,0.000509492,0.05790037,0.0003110465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924713,0.0002892601,0.0003765628,0.0002201679,0.000846183,0.001333869,0.001081207,0.00035194,0.003029516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414282,0.001174535,0.03783314,0.000679169,0.0003358086,0.0002553059,0.002776004,0.0001672455,0.01535059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3688888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366590770","doi":"10.1002/edn3.423","title":"Paired environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and dive surveys provide distinct but complementary snapshots of marine biodiversity in a temperate fjord","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation","funders":"Hakai Institute; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Fjord; Benthic zone; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Marine invertebrates; Ecology; Biology; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Habitat; Ecosystem; Oceanography; Geology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01678042907038937,"gpt":0.1942191617799165,"spread":0.1774387327095272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008191344,0.0006321442,0.0006182322,0.0001874318,0.0005418989,0.00003356909,0.000577573,0.0001647883,0.002859764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003371773,0.0006750832,0.0001707756,0.0003415796,0.002109498,0.0005030015,0.004531639,0.000308153,0.002349227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008743773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003976425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001837152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004287463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958913,0.0004396946,0.0006511566,0.00117873,0.0009095328,0.0009295677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985913,0.0002844806,0.0002847339,0.0005317267,0.000001000133,0.0003067698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002710745,0.0004870821,0.9277738,0.00002904032,0.0000837616,0.00009338455,0.001236422,0.00005681175,0.06555799,0.000001090738,0.002776287,0.001877174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001795637,0.0003016361,0.9773715,0.00001803343,0.00006538082,0.0000130962,0.004400219,0.0001066098,0.01369981,0.00006316281,0.001820632,0.0003443489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996131,0.00006707742,0.000004681998,0.0001381856,0.0001390602,0.0009810976,0.001598772,0.0000755022,0.0008646413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963651,0.0006584529,0.0004633181,0.0001659813,0.00002283754,0.00004295776,0.001239907,0.00003560108,0.001005894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05185818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378086011","doi":"10.1002/edn3.422","title":"Using <scp>qPCR</scp> of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) to estimate the biomass of juvenile Pacific salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus</i> spp.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation; University of British Columbia","funders":"Hakai Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Mesocosm; Environmental DNA; Biomass (ecology); Juvenile; Biology; Fishery; Chinook wind; Hatchery; Oncorhynchus; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity; Ecosystem","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0168484650133872,"gpt":0.2381807936971899,"spread":0.2213323286838027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00102271,0.001267392,0.001233581,0.0003362721,0.001069264,0.00008728926,0.001865916,0.0004502799,0.0004888228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002632327,0.001186384,0.0006633062,0.001076294,0.003225257,0.0007334801,0.004106667,0.0006040795,0.006546849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001413704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000162853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001892755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003047625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919064,0.0003694272,0.001484873,0.00184388,0.002435339,0.001960075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953511,0.001290169,0.001001297,0.001683133,0.000004477738,0.0006698275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076858,0.0006432903,0.3859189,0.0000590409,0.0002068435,0.000056861,0.003869538,0.002571385,0.5875921,0.000007928435,0.01845588,0.0006105974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001035559,0.0006607581,0.6466889,0.00007414308,0.0002574288,0.00004710649,0.01498871,0.0005155744,0.2953731,0.0001423276,0.03998606,0.0002303789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881561,0.0005691336,0.00009700305,0.00008559519,0.0005419304,0.001657769,0.00224821,0.0002008029,0.006443416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903472,0.000542157,0.003308772,0.0002323202,0.0001253877,0.00009822004,0.0002823309,0.0001974164,0.004866183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.292219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094519479","doi":"10.1002/edn3.150","title":"Allometric scaling of eDNA production in stream‐dwelling brook trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) inferred from population size structure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; U.S. Geological Survey; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Allometry; Salvelinus; Trout; Biomass (ecology); STREAMS; Biology; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Scaling; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009980586766796785,"gpt":0.1897565828894024,"spread":0.1797759961226057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001213575,0.0003533073,0.00040917,0.000075527,0.0001497334,0.00002107571,0.0003363086,0.0001520551,0.001782684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001216693,0.000380865,0.0001294942,0.0004130276,0.0002900112,0.0004659695,0.0005099121,0.0002859579,0.0002062668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000594501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001872284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00120693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008635087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973916,0.0001045379,0.00057059,0.0008230822,0.0007269534,0.0003831776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991527,0.00009588749,0.0002913015,0.0003041938,0.000001294957,0.0001546487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006689238,0.0001329116,0.8001684,0.00001126057,0.00002670302,0.000007365117,0.001195588,0.006282356,0.1885017,5.78386e-7,0.000159793,0.00344648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006894553,0.0000951553,0.9442748,0.00002374215,0.00005431781,0.00000186268,0.0007609598,0.0004060903,0.05288095,0.0001134775,0.0003489219,0.0003502897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982896,0.0002358752,0.00004338212,0.000244703,0.0001818044,0.0005007253,0.0002519304,0.00004577725,0.0002062057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937668,0.0001347519,0.005445756,0.0002202916,0.0001117289,0.000007716216,0.0001843014,0.00003268871,0.00009594802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1441064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000222237","doi":"10.1002/edn3.61","title":"A mesocosm comparison of laboratory‐based and on‐site eDNA solutions for detection and quantification of striped bass (<i>Morone saxatilis</i>) in marine ecosystems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Stantec (Canada); Dalhousie University","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Genome Atlantic; Offshore Energy Research Association","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Bass (fish); Morone saxatilis; Mesocosm; Bay; Fishery; Biology; Serranidae; Environmental science; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Oceanography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02418480820726978,"gpt":0.2244156059724027,"spread":0.2002307977651329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001913101,0.0001744308,0.000301856,0.00004485023,0.0001374165,0.000006900075,0.0000943796,0.00007520545,0.0001383313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003182935,0.0001882697,0.00004240352,0.0001219577,0.0003967999,0.0001325241,0.0002358116,0.00009366903,0.00002192534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001853227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001910944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000154536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002109091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987097,0.00007487721,0.0003645904,0.0003925941,0.0002542998,0.0002039301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993939,0.000107187,0.0002479112,0.0001602945,0.000001600674,0.00008914476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009448083,0.0001957709,0.5179676,0.00004162752,0.00001123022,3.132417e-7,0.0004520045,0.0004788353,0.4794626,0.000005128728,0.00007915412,0.001211285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195824,0.0004620093,0.7791692,0.00001584993,0.00003517863,2.983992e-7,0.0007367656,0.007335611,0.2101555,0.0000104287,0.0007221713,0.0001610869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979015,0.0001075842,0.0004878969,0.0002181075,0.00003491971,0.0006997023,0.000474249,0.00001279307,0.00006323632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983636,0.00005845396,0.001379737,0.00007419651,0.000009405636,0.00003725474,0.00005482618,0.00001250721,0.00001008614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.269307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7677415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387519772","doi":"10.1002/edn3.461","title":"How much is enough? Examining the sampling effort necessary to estimate mean <scp>eDNA</scp> concentrations in lentic systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Sépaq; Université Laval; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replicate; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Habitat; Sample size determination; Ecology; Statistics; Lake ecosystem; Aggregate (composite); Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0317125309242281,"gpt":0.2445661668547536,"spread":0.2128536359305255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000437525,0.0004188136,0.0003262866,0.00009781338,0.0008303603,0.0001867197,0.0006739761,0.0001184124,0.0001964831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004729045,0.0003748028,0.00009538386,0.0005072166,0.0005939891,0.0004846471,0.001292807,0.0002910242,0.003533679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008289731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001468694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001087456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969058,0.00009980224,0.0003760468,0.0008499914,0.0008610412,0.0009073305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987984,0.00026447,0.0001380247,0.0005761205,0.00000110437,0.0002219174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003733098,0.0001192878,0.9390254,0.00001853721,0.00005480979,0.00003199754,0.007331928,0.009959394,0.03510028,0.00003337916,0.00772883,0.0005924299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004448579,0.0001539712,0.9518643,0.00004584907,0.000043603,0.000009130154,0.01978244,0.001293063,0.006007056,0.00005142027,0.02005163,0.00025268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956985,0.0002032597,0.0001173108,0.000838246,0.0003848998,0.001004444,0.0001624358,0.0001296606,0.001461221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952022,0.0001893958,0.0006174413,0.0004641827,0.00005918234,0.0001368515,0.00009188164,0.00004616571,0.003192712],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02909323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220882444","doi":"10.1002/edn3.291","title":"Developmental microbiome of the small carpenter bee, <i>Ceratina calcarata</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Microbiome; Zoology; Larva; Pollen; Pupa; Ecology; Brood; Taxon; Honey bee; Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01777131233668329,"gpt":0.143183994478061,"spread":0.1254126821413777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006008946,0.00008636742,0.00008860921,0.000002915921,0.0004387329,0.000007281203,0.0002291439,0.00001406678,0.0008618667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001455228,0.0000306624,0.00007752677,0.00007167771,0.00007623288,0.00002076088,0.0005153226,0.00007724382,0.000024576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000592683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001905322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006723692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001866714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994105,0.00004693315,0.0001166112,0.000148156,0.0001346197,0.0001431417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998937,0.00002479804,0.00004774069,0.00001103039,8.237471e-7,0.0000218858],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001072298,0.00007200496,0.05505294,8.73522e-7,0.000009478513,0.000001916679,0.00008732124,8.088771e-7,0.9417537,0.000005049938,0.001418226,0.001586963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001028848,0.0001091169,0.8272317,0.000002978383,0.000006544968,0.00002931046,0.0009782094,0.00000139464,0.08089648,0.00001037247,0.09051709,0.000113919],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978146,0.0001441531,4.575427e-8,0.0002654248,0.00004055911,0.0001168215,0.000497272,0.000008197879,0.001112933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983175,0.00001510056,0.00001883318,0.0002993307,0.00003195475,0.00001716738,0.00003549616,6.380812e-7,0.001264012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408093578","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70073","title":"A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biomass (ecology); DNA; Environmental DNA; Computational biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Genetics; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0152069212110747,"gpt":0.231003455291777,"spread":0.2157965340807023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003275329,0.0005346012,0.0003840624,0.00008191786,0.001279659,0.00009023421,0.0007498888,0.0002672212,0.0005613259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001554788,0.0004687803,0.0001533647,0.0004120246,0.001613017,0.000303603,0.002216054,0.0005476473,0.003331004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009031156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003843735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006675775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005364182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968344,0.0001975338,0.0004558007,0.001026566,0.0007323328,0.0007533458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974422,0.001328335,0.0001425385,0.0007590269,5.196615e-7,0.0003273281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008967902,0.0001574464,0.9863649,0.000008157112,0.00006659799,0.000009174956,0.0009507591,0.00003300952,0.00401,0.0001890931,0.006631479,0.001570388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003658456,0.0001175114,0.9456708,0.00003039329,0.0001005713,0.000006601576,0.001662447,0.00001820247,0.002399854,0.00160356,0.04779211,0.0002320947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924173,0.0003967297,0.001187579,0.001325016,0.0002059667,0.0008412678,0.0002618039,0.00008475959,0.003279513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911627,0.0001075328,0.00323453,0.00147188,0.00006892406,0.0000796775,0.00008507821,0.00003942164,0.003750228],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04116063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380081328","doi":"10.1002/edn3.438","title":"Enabling robust environmental DNA assay design with “unikseq” for the identification of taxon‐specific regions within whole mitochondrial genomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Biology; Environmental DNA; Mitochondrial DNA; DNA barcoding; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Genome; Genetics; Gene; Ecology; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03341825578848926,"gpt":0.2039027646187931,"spread":0.1704845088303039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008237662,0.0005160578,0.0003964748,0.0001169154,0.001170248,0.0000711018,0.0008681042,0.0001662497,0.0007595328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003172334,0.0004146825,0.0002301846,0.0003513139,0.001910259,0.0004680189,0.0007147596,0.0002616766,0.001876429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007364021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006157289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002613746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001271155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962985,0.0001995348,0.0007429527,0.001014505,0.001040511,0.0007039855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978296,0.0005281752,0.0005574575,0.0009176342,0.000002043871,0.0001651382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003240527,0.0004885711,0.05589519,0.00002102829,0.0002557422,0.00002004884,0.002888849,0.05584975,0.8666369,0.00003841884,0.01484141,0.002739991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004809054,0.001213223,0.5253856,0.00007366385,0.0006207144,0.00005572919,0.02344079,0.007346565,0.3239761,0.0004766598,0.1104586,0.002143279],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669653,0.000771938,0.02477362,0.0009714725,0.0008035059,0.004120678,0.001094739,0.0002068199,0.0002919808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823945,0.001200092,0.01082072,0.0001345924,0.0001646465,0.0004339335,0.0003700746,0.0001012632,0.004380187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5426608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386371864","doi":"10.1002/edn3.472","title":"Critical considerations for communicating environmental <scp>DNA</scp> science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"CLARITY; Transparency (behavior); Environmental DNA; Workflow; Consistency (knowledge bases); Citizen science; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Knowledge management; Data science; Process management; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Computer security; Biology; Biodiversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02951507677489546,"gpt":0.2562009328842991,"spread":0.2266858561094036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007944641,0.0004652326,0.0003460367,0.0001449705,0.002936166,0.0001422869,0.0008798834,0.0001443044,0.00180797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005585836,0.0005116259,0.0002067967,0.0003463817,0.005962147,0.0009079959,0.002682886,0.0003033958,0.009697418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001082903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009024139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002112627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006894396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959962,0.0001028851,0.0004949737,0.001097884,0.001085273,0.001222756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969432,0.001582545,0.0001445943,0.0009231523,0.000002080493,0.0004043773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008084122,0.0005554877,0.3527721,0.00001719474,0.00005076993,0.00003347137,0.002811877,0.0003793302,0.6143486,0.0004173303,0.02705465,0.001551173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001032613,0.0002903501,0.897056,0.00001956921,0.00009297582,0.00004573703,0.006302198,0.001333586,0.06417947,0.002908254,0.02627082,0.0004684302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909424,0.0001012155,0.00007004601,0.0005786052,0.0003231445,0.0008796255,0.0006044006,0.0002535441,0.006247054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863936,0.0002233288,0.0108275,0.0007632874,0.00006919894,0.0001915204,0.0001360952,0.0000596332,0.001335883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5501691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997071661","doi":"10.1002/edn3.66","title":"Specialized bacteriome uncovered in the coralloid roots of the epiphytic gymnosperm, <i>Zamia pseudoparasitica</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Botany; Gymnosperm; Cycad; Epiphyte; Cyanobacteria; Proteobacteria; 16S ribosomal RNA; Bacteria","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009298425427029723,"gpt":0.1791480771989988,"spread":0.1698496517719691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009714442,0.0001148828,0.0001638118,0.000002117683,0.0001037533,0.00001324678,0.000397008,0.00005735041,0.001336921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001655251,0.00003572011,0.0001143506,0.0001869717,0.0003095556,0.00004854651,0.00009061261,0.0001448326,0.0000604211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001553012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002600965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003537634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000404397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990685,0.000177626,0.0001969531,0.0001908588,0.0001793501,0.0001867426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996788,0.0001160259,0.00008019622,0.00007816465,0.000001536958,0.00004529496],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000558552,0.0001258313,0.1572215,0.000002795879,0.000009939765,0.000007241792,0.0003213038,0.000006615912,0.8372061,0.0002334989,0.0003877984,0.004421498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000221992,0.0001656996,0.9879524,0.000005549401,0.00001279058,0.000006355162,0.0005573949,0.0000182172,0.004017309,0.0002695071,0.006675275,0.00009757433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914853,0.00006148661,6.314885e-7,0.005589548,0.00009242044,0.0001871197,0.00006381233,0.00000788523,0.002511771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963198,0.00002963255,0.00001089817,0.003391738,0.0001401825,0.000007359228,0.00002082881,8.437681e-7,0.00007872165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8331888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}