{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":43,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"454823d15907","filters":{"venue":"Ethics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2050353949","doi":"10.1086/662294","title":"Desert and Avoidability in Self-Defense","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Morality; Relevance (law); Self defense; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2551081103067132,"gpt":0.2924957985916468,"spread":0.03738768828493361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001269511,0.00006914197,0.00008549919,0.00004213911,0.0002140148,0.00004518617,0.00006966501,0.0001475138,0.0003504143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003674877,0.00006295317,0.00001903819,0.00001847187,0.0003141923,0.0001257038,0.00002521052,0.0007024907,0.00006411759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002010124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000640152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001253495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00944863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993197,0.0001330935,0.0001545801,0.0001577544,0.0001151981,0.0001197215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993461,0.0002855854,0.00003672441,0.0001740539,0.0001196964,0.00003783686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001106947,0.00006910139,0.002309729,0.00008103489,0.000004166232,0.000001541415,0.5421889,1.404772e-7,0.00001178184,0.4547971,0.0002205825,0.0003048548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008281047,0.0001887639,0.05998238,0.0001189854,0.00006405625,0.000005552103,0.06069818,0.0003425379,0.0008252662,0.5315246,0.344736,0.0006855409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8197154,0.0002335572,0.00003382353,0.002995105,0.0005912886,0.0002220197,0.00001041453,0.0001662854,0.1760321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973805,0.00006905951,0.0003770971,0.0005725129,0.0001320246,0.000009094463,0.000003064894,0.00000864194,0.001448009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4814907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5272557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07888899985329968,"gpt":0.3151188666197435,"spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010289,0.0001626627,0.0002380949,0.00002121542,0.001020506,0.0001304236,0.00039549,0.0003249111,0.0002577223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993246,0.0001273559,0.00005284301,0.0003406089,0.0004238134,0.0004660884,0.00009738691,0.0008752922,0.00003276879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001334379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001200758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009455315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.0002437989,0.0001811662,0.0003208392,0.0004459834,0.0004038483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998976,0.000120632,0.00009663124,0.000251898,0.0002386797,0.0003161424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004324857,0.00006290048,0.00004913778,0.0001685585,0.00002914104,0.00003813349,0.008534242,0.00001505677,0.00002833623,0.5327661,0.4536707,0.004594455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004030896,0.00004437248,0.00005018435,0.0001541214,0.00007489687,0.000002165169,0.0004678948,0.00000680092,0.00008681729,0.001191439,0.9973033,0.0002149302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001120517,0.4299822,0.001261785,0.1070132,0.001869522,0.001612102,0.00005271009,0.0004858986,0.456602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0102753,0.6083132,0.003360326,0.01784311,0.001793128,0.000004525945,0.00002674707,0.00004577264,0.3583379],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324475652","doi":"10.1086/657967","title":"Korsgaard, Christine M. <i>Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xiv+230. $35.00 (paper).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Identity (music); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1033488878095019,"gpt":0.2813579560327743,"spread":0.1780090682232724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006915317,0.0002819173,0.0002609273,0.00007407229,0.0007586342,0.00009147124,0.0007141685,0.0004140809,0.0004197242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009315727,0.0002736459,0.0001077028,0.0004039752,0.0008607044,0.001267438,0.0005148236,0.001719733,0.00005497203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000536843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002670205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007935404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002665207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977664,0.0002998093,0.0003047821,0.0006550287,0.0005239524,0.0004499825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987358,0.0002489122,0.0001594858,0.0004976387,0.0001280286,0.0002301051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000155806,0.0006975411,0.006719138,0.0004355347,0.00004672115,0.0008829952,0.006299182,0.000007448598,0.01317188,0.9430432,0.02677533,0.001765249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006940813,0.0001220154,0.003799508,0.00009777799,0.00006870144,0.0001132432,0.0001565349,0.0001399546,0.0125449,0.006970933,0.9747939,0.0004984213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2647971,0.005444283,0.005556636,0.005957502,0.005604031,0.001471849,0.0006543294,0.00168861,0.7088257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638866,0.025173,0.002348912,0.00188174,0.0003264882,0.000005950985,0.00001298831,0.00003090311,0.006333459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296779938","doi":"10.1086/720780","title":"Táíwò, Olúfẹmi O. <i>Reconsidering Reparations</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 280. $33.99 (cloth).","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Economic history; Theology; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0896249172726964,"gpt":0.3096966193328786,"spread":0.2200717020601822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128002,0.0001442499,0.0001873708,0.00007254385,0.003844332,0.0001170091,0.0004852218,0.0002220673,0.001138866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004615011,0.0001744316,0.0001222834,0.0004905847,0.0003222932,0.0003493953,0.000349189,0.001357178,0.00001260759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002100249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009292968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001706817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00335311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976158,0.0005775093,0.0002165562,0.0003707272,0.000792256,0.0004271619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987507,0.0004459712,0.0001541255,0.0002863229,0.0001805093,0.0001823382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008778284,0.0001322429,0.002377911,0.00004743093,0.00008045649,0.0000804675,0.08798262,0.0006620969,0.0001701368,0.816937,0.08945431,0.001987512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002598503,0.00003484989,0.0001368834,0.00001098965,0.00002265485,0.000004716594,0.01175058,0.000208735,0.00007226055,0.001187039,0.9860892,0.0002221925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0582449,0.002392889,0.000615293,0.02458253,0.003818055,0.0008841989,0.0002555185,0.0006640966,0.9085425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5849592,0.01236862,0.001790991,0.004371852,0.001633351,0.00005207315,0.0001089973,0.00008961004,0.3946253],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8966349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517918421","doi":"10.1086/524879","title":"Book ReviewsCatherine Audard, . <i>John Rawls</i>.Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2007. Pp. 328. $75.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07224834276563313,"gpt":0.3502776998650652,"spread":0.2780293570994321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001810455,0.000183107,0.0002449769,0.00004469527,0.002195538,0.00007666258,0.0004752534,0.0003749882,0.004019127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00281532,0.0001935592,0.0001230689,0.000606933,0.0005303583,0.001345782,0.00007792321,0.001574658,0.0004062784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003120914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001630005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06155195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001189296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997363,0.0009097516,0.0003312188,0.0003493423,0.0006571212,0.0003895761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974656,0.0009402818,0.0002852435,0.0004502208,0.0006355912,0.0002231034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001875389,0.0001268333,0.0001190916,0.00002534252,0.00002503802,0.00001425238,0.009266175,0.000005139097,0.00001680817,0.07013068,0.9196236,0.0006282561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000243399,0.00002377407,0.0006973814,0.00003494358,0.00003252643,0.000004970586,0.001630303,0.000003473885,0.00002757584,0.0002513294,0.9968176,0.0002327495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002404649,0.009663406,0.0001029708,0.2161576,0.001589332,0.0006529648,0.0001006664,0.0003798888,0.7711127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01333422,0.4588973,0.002431601,0.06848568,0.001734308,0.0000286503,0.0000845378,0.00007647517,0.4549272],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4492339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514096663","doi":"10.1086/233280","title":"Book ReviewMartin Hollis, .<i>Trust within Reason</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. 170. $54.00 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Media studies; Download; Art history; Sociology; Library science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04111027398522599,"gpt":0.3171682237101601,"spread":0.2760579497249341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00610949,0.0003909436,0.0005746387,0.00004128165,0.002780264,0.0004534719,0.001021146,0.001255965,0.0006263378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003159052,0.0004204531,0.0003019337,0.0005927209,0.001574026,0.001471387,0.0001479816,0.00319083,0.0003664514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005403635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002147927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07168944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005490909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944888,0.001792933,0.0005428971,0.0006811092,0.001520459,0.0009738379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967781,0.001064911,0.0003310304,0.0007045009,0.0004581758,0.0006632656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000762285,0.0001157953,0.0002663157,0.000104749,0.00005692027,0.00006562213,0.01525071,0.00001828934,0.00004111617,0.1568798,0.8258172,0.001307237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004302836,0.00007464563,0.0005609091,0.0002333158,0.00008264382,0.000003249841,0.001807951,0.00002774546,0.00005972318,0.0003572912,0.9958301,0.0005320995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02394849,0.07793902,0.00004695637,0.1010302,0.001539886,0.00153227,0.0003448928,0.0008084498,0.7928098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07658037,0.4781865,0.0006189449,0.04998968,0.002351182,0.00001353524,0.0001000233,0.0001478304,0.392012],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4007979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317017778","doi":"10.1086/657959","title":"Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. <i>Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 354. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2193559932793061,"gpt":0.3851364791892516,"spread":0.1657804859099455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006379343,0.0001370052,0.000225295,0.00005847234,0.001018385,0.00006710752,0.0007756628,0.0006200681,0.000332783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004806926,0.000122099,0.000112592,0.0007363994,0.001336251,0.0007407325,0.00009084734,0.002744707,0.000006080194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006957575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003177406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0465847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01028407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996785,0.001477986,0.0003778137,0.0002248267,0.0008473592,0.0002869907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946927,0.002843968,0.0005299242,0.0004798983,0.001351981,0.0001015351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005214839,0.0001695326,0.002605556,0.00007152982,0.00005572387,9.893466e-7,0.1273841,0.000008308231,0.00004404646,0.8551116,0.01411978,0.0003767335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002353759,0.00003202203,0.00195355,0.00004462709,0.00006636294,8.352454e-7,0.02271418,0.00001133521,0.0009296986,0.00506236,0.9688025,0.0001471122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02370419,0.0006506029,0.001699726,0.243591,0.002890519,0.0007218336,0.0001448652,0.0001427256,0.7264546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763291,0.004535274,0.00124469,0.003584071,0.0002354473,0.00000418201,0.00001492645,0.00002174584,0.01403049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324111193","doi":"10.1086/656509","title":"McMahon, Christopher. <i>Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Download; Political philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05282347929712096,"gpt":0.3178973300274681,"spread":0.2650738507303471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004274442,0.0002560597,0.0003764792,0.00004364716,0.0009844502,0.00006736054,0.0008299664,0.001006362,0.0001920693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004444454,0.0002697127,0.000215825,0.0003235432,0.004188078,0.0003939494,0.0002411266,0.003011342,0.00006228791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001382897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001514562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04524435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009397732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956438,0.001254706,0.0003771411,0.0004669278,0.001144266,0.001113145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995666,0.00229437,0.0001584011,0.0006354867,0.0004959524,0.0007498368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007212407,0.0002183744,0.0006976197,0.0001278715,0.00003450296,0.0000217418,0.002105933,0.000001424102,0.0001999938,0.9839716,0.01249242,0.00005639633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007266211,0.00009874712,0.005657393,0.00008143074,0.0001415422,0.000004497444,0.003976663,0.00003482974,0.001289282,0.08685126,0.9005513,0.0005863881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04543105,0.0006909503,0.0004349758,0.04505104,0.001377838,0.0004994845,0.0009475424,0.0002504329,0.9053167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791601,0.0002967163,0.0002589641,0.002092765,0.0008274362,0.000003213322,0.00001742199,0.00002612598,0.01731727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512672195","doi":"10.1086/233437","title":"Book ReviewsPatricia Smith, .<i>Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation</i>. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. 271. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Obligation; Liberalism; Download; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06357273097434996,"gpt":0.3112157524176009,"spread":0.247643021443251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006599783,0.0001194372,0.0001631742,0.00001658217,0.001059757,0.0001157188,0.0002953373,0.0002340726,0.0002792858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009860002,0.0001208536,0.00006397425,0.0003220082,0.0003173724,0.0003994139,0.00005857564,0.0005652789,0.00007757322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008606801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004627721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009137531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008176776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986812,0.0002913477,0.0001845495,0.0002513552,0.0003408736,0.0002506033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.0003149598,0.000111978,0.0002188277,0.00006407942,0.0002084992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001397851,0.00004730832,0.0001877628,0.00005110602,0.0000238234,0.000003248334,0.04452339,0.00004890136,0.0000061152,0.2796725,0.6582324,0.01718954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001767561,0.00001180812,0.0003515477,0.00004584923,0.00003158148,6.269382e-7,0.0006740525,0.00004782091,0.00001452078,0.002369942,0.9961233,0.0001522613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120597,0.1543453,0.001039733,0.2061076,0.0003807605,0.002544763,0.0002071172,0.000661355,0.6226537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03670553,0.5847309,0.005465966,0.02057376,0.00143709,0.00002113957,0.0000548075,0.00005351627,0.3509573],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4303856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515810133","doi":"10.1086/374017","title":"Book ReviewsJan Narveson, . <i>Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice: Essays on Moral and Political Philosophy</i>.Lanham, Md.: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2002. Pp. xiv+313. $75.00 (cloth); $24.95 (paper).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1678064557612107,"gpt":0.49721281546417,"spread":0.3294063597029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04079606,0.0005220041,0.0007800739,0.0001431411,0.002135631,0.00009268522,0.0003480788,0.002052818,0.001998222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3262976,0.0004778741,0.00009383881,0.0004667359,0.001106427,0.000835694,0.0002889332,0.02637365,0.0005465004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002816668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001171735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004164153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004348451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9647049,0.03031425,0.001271981,0.001046579,0.001224264,0.001437995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.886214,0.1110068,0.0005533408,0.000953921,0.000494112,0.0007778554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000290655,0.0002196331,0.0009363902,0.0009860978,0.00003914079,0.00007946531,0.01406917,9.054883e-7,0.0000720813,0.8684049,0.1147586,0.0001429233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001250836,0.0001822897,0.0001914528,0.001946022,0.0001043392,0.0001157278,0.01317997,0.000009998141,0.00001236769,0.2172304,0.7652918,0.0004847472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002091442,0.120869,0.0004271024,0.2900822,0.00185319,0.00179632,0.00004283094,0.0002483603,0.5825896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1818686,0.1202046,0.01438117,0.6625283,0.003175132,0.0003799776,0.00004026371,0.0004100559,0.01701186],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6511745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083311401","doi":"10.1086/736732","title":":<i>Dancing with the Devil: Why Bad Feelings Make Life Good</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Plant and fungal interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Work (physics); Motivated reasoning; Affect (linguistics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0357948238466952,"gpt":0.2626977618327608,"spread":0.2269029379860656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003326818,0.00007392357,0.00007425399,0.000005062554,0.0004756403,0.00008687871,0.0001815146,0.0001060575,0.00006722245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001815227,0.00001946762,0.00003922467,0.0002516509,0.00005308456,0.00004959876,0.00004230642,0.0006266948,0.00003447111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009852535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002728427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003638042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008194927,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994407,0.00006251965,0.00008697908,0.0001301901,0.0001351647,0.0001444061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987003,0.001109953,0.00003605748,0.00003949411,0.0000758419,0.00003831098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003301515,0.0004504823,0.03697807,0.00008410095,0.0003066883,0.00003619911,0.005878613,0.0001056419,0.4104326,0.1058221,0.3779317,0.06164365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007257381,0.00005271971,0.01647921,0.00007598755,0.00002089113,0.000005351586,0.0008503945,0.00008368851,0.001427893,0.0006473198,0.9801786,0.000105381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6949304,0.0004057809,0.0001687343,0.2715511,0.0004688187,0.0001685498,0.00003731454,0.0001359829,0.03213338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704024,0.00005276386,0.00005558944,0.02513115,0.0001864385,0.000009069624,0.00001548419,4.440323e-7,0.004146689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6022469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4572962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328636456","doi":"10.1086/669489","title":"Kisner, Matthew J. <i>Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. 261. $85.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Personal autonomy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07001448226231942,"gpt":0.2588945721819901,"spread":0.1888800899196707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005623052,0.0003345235,0.0003900102,0.00003696906,0.00120298,0.0003283444,0.0004899626,0.0002578063,0.001052413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001642184,0.0002315406,0.0001903808,0.00003408826,0.002290388,0.0002930487,0.0002594366,0.001493278,0.0007659916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005871435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004972926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003770177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977872,0.0004865292,0.0003349197,0.0004417596,0.0004323955,0.0005171633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978532,0.0008761126,0.0001435984,0.0005614907,0.0002111308,0.0003544592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005273006,0.0001203978,0.00003675008,0.00006194351,0.00007562179,0.000005972532,0.001382814,0.000001448002,0.000005118864,0.8609388,0.1372587,0.00005963962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001515352,0.0001239705,0.0009870621,0.00007471405,0.00009361751,0.000004276169,0.0004524158,0.0001084449,0.0000334266,0.01145257,0.9847978,0.0003563359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02760457,0.003381667,0.00001984053,0.1545841,0.001479389,0.001198136,0.0003825872,0.0003439017,0.8110058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8658739,0.001136219,0.00004622656,0.01114553,0.002723709,0.0000269866,0.00007110161,0.00005908655,0.1189172],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8494863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320147873","doi":"10.1086/666531","title":"Kamm, F. M. <i>Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War</i>Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 178. $35.00 (cloth).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Download; Permission; Law; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Human rights; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1417600390908812,"gpt":0.29682872230104,"spread":0.1550686832101588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065009,0.0002797595,0.0002858655,0.00006397128,0.001491186,0.0001285136,0.0003013008,0.000766988,0.0002746785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006878485,0.0002733997,0.000125116,0.0000271765,0.0008678053,0.000733273,0.0001205284,0.0019272,0.00001695027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007871183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002444704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008286496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001504727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981545,0.0002222161,0.0003135042,0.0003641655,0.0004160175,0.0005295938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970796,0.001490248,0.0002159483,0.0004287576,0.0005730017,0.0002124341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001021244,0.0001379389,0.000396685,0.0007855852,0.00007990981,0.000001370614,0.2521672,0.000005706616,0.00004604109,0.6586937,0.08689278,0.0006909372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004370385,0.00007477611,0.0001615357,0.00006707076,0.0001192135,0.000002699868,0.01855794,0.00008113583,0.0002110012,0.003649461,0.9762704,0.0003676965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06218686,0.07485425,0.01914158,0.1826257,0.03290195,0.007606043,0.005714792,0.00310064,0.6118681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7402783,0.04897848,0.004378171,0.01624294,0.01039906,0.00008254161,0.0008994863,0.0002924497,0.1784486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510645367","doi":"10.1086/339591","title":"Book ReviewsJerome Neu, . <i>A Tear Is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotion</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 342. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Queen (butterfly); Download; Media studies; Permission; Sociology; Art history; Art; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1811916182180168,"gpt":0.3263223591487596,"spread":0.1451307409307428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008252709,0.0002170777,0.0003005652,0.00004681209,0.0003569466,0.00003691084,0.0006203054,0.0004263938,0.009495991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002299785,0.0001779168,0.0001717577,0.0003089022,0.0003054671,0.0002223178,0.0001168671,0.001457687,0.0002602561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005920815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008318097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001068082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004496842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980123,0.0005633248,0.0003554779,0.0004016958,0.0003296641,0.0003375037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998271,0.0003611867,0.000216923,0.0008271465,0.000171858,0.0001518926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362503,0.0002110937,0.000183238,0.00002852149,0.00003984809,0.000009134485,0.0730305,0.000003801242,0.0001154392,0.008921437,0.9135578,0.003875537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003563159,0.0002364153,0.0005364685,0.00008917338,0.0001231263,0.00002233222,0.002160106,0.00005077373,0.0001179711,0.00009623792,0.9960184,0.0001926689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.2328135,0.3189259,0.004854425,0.0855334,0.006261905,0.005009065,0.0004696884,0.001394174,0.344738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1627329,0.07902125,0.003169295,0.03282199,0.00100474,0.00001469668,0.00007678335,0.0002208477,0.7209374],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3761995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404952390","doi":"10.1086/732625","title":":<i>Morality and Socially Constructed Norms</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1249822985326092,"gpt":0.4246395499417757,"spread":0.2996572514091665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051691,0.00006787911,0.00009466364,0.00002511084,0.0006276585,0.0001817386,0.0001041724,0.0004442241,0.0001326903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019411,0.00006422195,0.0000411858,0.0001820279,0.001886177,0.0001597642,0.00004204649,0.001278479,0.0000728746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003404204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001588097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001261352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001232702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998751,0.0003201789,0.0001204068,0.00016983,0.0003779341,0.0002606153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981321,0.001517867,0.00001297992,0.00007791584,0.00009477727,0.0001643435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001643875,0.000004704246,0.00006892699,0.00005092287,0.000008624861,0.000008595009,0.01904544,6.981043e-8,0.00002199598,0.9792011,0.0006604503,0.0009275533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003502792,0.000007439679,0.0002702657,0.00002915825,0.00001113222,0.000001088979,0.0009769107,0.00001154528,0.00001926055,0.7870806,0.2114756,0.00008197624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135494,0.0007189905,0.0001554251,0.4876697,0.001198093,0.0001141757,0.00004220441,0.0003842706,0.4961677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935876,0.0002824897,0.0003899081,0.004424452,0.0006614681,0.000002156136,0.000002355098,0.000007108293,0.0006425207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6949698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973221726","doi":"10.1086/704353","title":"Smith, Holly M. <i>Making Morality Work</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. 432. $67.00 (cloth).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Media studies; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1395383083906957,"gpt":0.4448116272267267,"spread":0.305273318836031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01623961,0.0003678779,0.0005456656,0.00007780633,0.002263081,0.00004148743,0.001116271,0.002613713,0.001147842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152655,0.0003687008,0.0001656759,0.0005369132,0.0006079348,0.0006953526,0.001016467,0.02736548,0.0007865101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002236344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000877542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000160303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883156,0.007448536,0.0007676759,0.0007931738,0.001549436,0.001125573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784443,0.01827379,0.0007499353,0.001480542,0.0006606052,0.0003908102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009038646,0.0003968766,0.1849378,0.003893907,0.000254958,0.0001374665,0.02360068,0.0001554634,0.0001230405,0.4721671,0.3123724,0.00105654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001112234,0.0000619622,0.007098045,0.001177531,0.00007769241,0.000002639154,0.004962113,0.0001153024,0.00002119712,0.005794707,0.9791523,0.0004242734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05826661,0.002683614,0.004599927,0.107654,0.01135046,0.00281428,0.0001361723,0.001078376,0.8114166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8831781,0.007098019,0.008685027,0.03314215,0.001352587,0.0000239481,0.00004206345,0.0001707569,0.06630731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510913775","doi":"10.1086/233327","title":"Book ReviewJules L. Coleman, , and Christopher Morris, , eds.<i>Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 253. $54.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Economic Justice; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Law and economics; Art; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05439097592583868,"gpt":0.3253019295358414,"spread":0.2709109536100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001591613,0.0002242247,0.0003321384,0.00002115726,0.002657971,0.0001139957,0.0002459735,0.0005943725,0.00005499117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003813864,0.0002439232,0.0001023319,0.0001005874,0.001869678,0.000359212,0.00008618672,0.0009692255,0.00001684208],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001213939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002883948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975761,0.0006377284,0.0002840311,0.0004108865,0.0005919934,0.0004993093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979147,0.001355364,0.0001127633,0.0001731178,0.000181403,0.0002626423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005705206,0.00006068968,0.00002333706,0.0003604089,0.0000271579,0.0000064299,0.002186244,0.000002798633,0.00000495313,0.66138,0.3353518,0.0005390968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006037556,0.00005870009,0.0004601052,0.00006687025,0.0002172781,0.000002626796,0.0005914215,0.0001187342,0.00001010196,0.004482433,0.9930935,0.0002945008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.009294504,0.2526017,0.001023688,0.2780223,0.001899188,0.004869029,0.003308949,0.0006055516,0.4483751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2534295,0.4497759,0.002890042,0.1157057,0.01102072,0.0001680907,0.0005604869,0.0001973634,0.1662521],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6577417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2720829538","doi":"10.1086/691575","title":"Price, Carolyn. <i>Emotion</i>. Cambridge: Polity, 2015. Pp. viii+199. $22.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Download; Permission; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07166658084283045,"gpt":0.4170584727122006,"spread":0.3453918918693701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004162002,0.0002014256,0.0002408252,0.00004272971,0.006683097,0.0003636294,0.00136238,0.0007386959,0.0005476852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007591054,0.0001991662,0.0001336658,0.0001906579,0.001321714,0.0008228879,0.000430454,0.001820202,0.0007820981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002364089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001731471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01406227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006324723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963577,0.0007850383,0.000340251,0.0004310234,0.001412592,0.0006733663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966341,0.0009272116,0.0003377275,0.001020208,0.0007131108,0.0003676559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006838816,0.00009230486,0.01172803,0.00002756505,0.00002430112,0.0000109519,0.006715131,0.000004046598,0.000244701,0.8155488,0.1651849,0.0004124531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003357637,0.0000292905,0.1243659,0.0001167873,0.0000337804,0.000003039232,0.002015532,0.00001717098,0.0001285898,0.03878539,0.8338003,0.0003683869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04776756,0.001344599,0.000184456,0.2205794,0.007291471,0.0006376191,0.0001827724,0.0003706453,0.7216414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522626,0.002189974,0.001064765,0.004872682,0.002020137,0.00002479041,0.00002723561,0.00003885521,0.03749898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.904495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389802239","doi":"10.1086/727275","title":":<i>Subjects of Intergenerational Justice: Indigenous Philosophy, the Environment and Relationships</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Download; Economic Justice; Permission; Sociology; Reuse; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Ecology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0529604956228928,"gpt":0.2743060659527221,"spread":0.2213455703298293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003646016,0.0000822991,0.00007299282,0.000007956362,0.0006312376,0.000007540531,0.0001088388,0.00006525271,0.0004134628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006444355,0.00005178506,0.0000284843,0.0001291896,0.0006948974,0.00005443762,0.0002765061,0.0003329086,0.0003285477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003336473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003445317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002277047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008325085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991939,0.00008673904,0.0001441541,0.0001519279,0.0002987433,0.0001245269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995242,0.0002639913,0.00005997288,0.0001152391,0.00000194414,0.00003470215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007446431,0.0004875866,0.6043257,0.0002825872,0.0002492132,0.00003093412,0.1572327,0.03818442,0.108328,0.02809118,0.02542828,0.03728488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006523368,0.0004293094,0.8651446,0.00005513332,0.0002072506,0.00003147134,0.01148196,0.001074724,0.006067725,0.04833088,0.06581835,0.0007062359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754544,0.0002350591,0.00009368852,0.005387472,0.000159757,0.0001781618,0.00001484559,0.00002808811,0.01844856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972461,0.0009333935,0.0003257921,0.0004684833,0.00004800117,0.00001608494,0.00001374306,0.000005840576,0.0009425557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2608189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4855033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508937116","doi":"10.1086/233289","title":"Book ReviewElliott Sober, , and David Sloan Wilson, .<i>Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior</i>. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998. Pp. 394. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Download; Art history; Sociology; Media studies; History; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06946279802970198,"gpt":0.2949337000046876,"spread":0.2254709019749856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104907,0.0001842664,0.0002339148,0.00003155148,0.0003335612,0.0000283454,0.0003514351,0.0002722635,0.0001471021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008375846,0.0001525479,0.00006438127,0.0001564298,0.001091908,0.0002422699,0.0000602586,0.0007067634,0.00005126517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004206679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004761338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003487383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002992842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980602,0.0005495508,0.0002548371,0.0005274328,0.0003362982,0.0002716377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990362,0.0002856899,0.0001413162,0.0003882035,0.00004229404,0.0001062822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006273437,0.0007199154,0.005775271,0.0002507669,0.00004977499,0.0001077655,0.001778076,0.00003258661,0.02969046,0.02264856,0.9282297,0.01008981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006170206,0.0001761389,0.0224615,0.00007452729,0.00007215741,0.00008840502,0.0000463243,0.00004405104,0.0005043733,0.000473144,0.975267,0.0001753612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7890974,0.08675748,0.001227857,0.07236605,0.002382098,0.002970893,0.0005342567,0.0003745976,0.04428942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2468621,0.5977575,0.00127417,0.1019287,0.0004422056,0.00005494308,0.00003370308,0.0001060709,0.0515406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5422353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6220722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311743327","doi":"10.1086/722129","title":":<i>The Right to Higher Education: A Political Theory</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Higher education; Politics; Sociology; Plea; Argument (complex analysis); Middle class; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07690918853229915,"gpt":0.4038831134318028,"spread":0.3269739248995036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004422408,0.00006631605,0.00006991461,0.00002512751,0.004826241,0.00009047357,0.0004997472,0.0001345529,0.001485214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002160604,0.00005379213,0.00005734332,0.0002930548,0.0007437419,0.0000508941,0.0001677357,0.001591373,0.0002205876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001816742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005256672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001106134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968269,0.001561122,0.0001354418,0.0001595647,0.0007854269,0.0005315537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951357,0.004106898,0.00002108603,0.0002343834,0.0001257051,0.0003762916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009771163,0.00004283911,0.00001060739,0.000002476557,0.000004088475,0.000001301829,0.006719447,0.000001046998,0.000002148942,0.9815661,0.01145278,0.0001874169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001601622,0.00001408472,0.00004198927,0.000001564157,0.000003481529,4.395527e-7,0.001364428,1.39453e-7,0.000006624551,0.4967942,0.5017123,0.00004475424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002394239,0.0000914637,0.00002100675,0.4899338,0.001581765,0.00008608918,0.00000746319,0.00004271446,0.5079963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8489916,0.000006268401,0.00006661253,0.100421,0.001505565,0.00007476092,0.000001838854,0.000008585082,0.04892382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8487521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331411158","doi":"10.1086/662051","title":"Dworkin, Ronald. <i>Justice for Hedgehogs</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011. Pp. 506. $35.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1894415451764812,"gpt":0.2715142025469825,"spread":0.08207265737050132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001091813,0.0002409223,0.000247237,0.00005911585,0.001217782,0.0001302579,0.0004531547,0.0004069002,0.0008374488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002528927,0.0002518859,0.0001561826,0.00003064181,0.0007013882,0.0003905842,0.00009641051,0.001048413,0.000519706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007653538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002487859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002359577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001339091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983303,0.0001860133,0.00029685,0.0004380947,0.0003452009,0.0004035417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978082,0.0006639604,0.0002078563,0.0004900846,0.0006912895,0.0001386776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001198996,0.000109884,0.00002348849,0.0003750075,0.00004875679,0.000004835922,0.03433828,0.000005139555,0.00002623954,0.6187456,0.3460125,0.0001903836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004594341,0.00008197988,0.0003041896,0.00006174511,0.00022769,0.000001773983,0.00647423,0.0001328967,0.0003150728,0.002039781,0.9895616,0.0003396162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004099104,0.003628174,0.01124377,0.01007286,0.0121419,0.002083435,0.001700801,0.001014016,0.954016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2864379,0.01325877,0.005836665,0.01283576,0.01032849,0.00008599418,0.0008164278,0.0003180319,0.670082],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6435491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513414","doi":"10.1086/738314","title":": <i>Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Limit (mathematics)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09361536783431028,"gpt":0.3137126932497398,"spread":0.2200973254154295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002557751,0.00008393226,0.0002162522,0.00003925816,0.0002478076,0.00002548911,0.0002016567,0.000138317,0.00002717181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009342759,0.00004345444,0.00005455165,0.00007215358,0.002153659,0.00003619777,0.0001121491,0.001179099,0.000001110282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006108906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009334618,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007949016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001656844,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987472,0.0005885523,0.0002522355,0.0001059582,0.0002091489,0.00009689939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950796,0.004319062,0.0001051369,0.0002762383,0.0002029397,0.00001698186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001217432,0.00004013595,0.00004312859,0.0001110307,0.00001725229,6.631872e-7,0.0216065,0.000004904511,0.00004866095,0.9772668,0.00008518109,0.0006539727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006183344,0.0000318607,0.0005171499,0.0003391705,0.00002803096,6.138495e-7,0.001708624,0.0002275899,0.0002568299,0.9618965,0.03432263,0.00005261676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4817605,0.005889691,0.0000215313,0.2068303,0.0006058034,0.0004362741,0.00004721286,0.00002839512,0.3043803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996003,0.001079133,0.000006381913,0.002494188,0.00006148795,0.000003751001,0.000002140984,0.000004891494,0.0003450525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5142425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7935245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314031533","doi":"10.1086/656500","title":"Beitz, Charles, and Goodin, Robert, eds. <i>Global Basic Rights</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. 272. $85.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02018214438300254,"gpt":0.2821255170888731,"spread":0.2619433727058705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510082,0.0001573422,0.0001604738,0.00002751011,0.001601766,0.0001488476,0.0004797048,0.0006256007,0.0004544019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104168,0.0001445769,0.00007689313,0.00007758432,0.0009149343,0.000421162,0.0001096931,0.001307686,0.00002272034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008945254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003109289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05499922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983969,0.000167138,0.0001547081,0.0003192727,0.0006012461,0.0003606741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989944,0.00021661,0.0001051825,0.0002005345,0.0002735418,0.0002097614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001789528,0.00004002439,0.0006529487,0.000009441334,0.00002170384,0.00001856168,0.00171995,9.71263e-7,0.00001020826,0.986538,0.01077803,0.0001922925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002555628,0.00002308165,0.001164091,0.00001372237,0.0000211877,0.00000328148,0.0000645945,0.00001779456,0.00005598749,0.1254506,0.8727488,0.0001813578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2322029,0.0005618965,0.0001111575,0.009126707,0.002525378,0.0004071762,0.0003640156,0.0002224939,0.7544782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061269,0.00182314,0.0007521873,0.001139702,0.001556154,0.000003279744,0.00005855061,0.00001798544,0.08852214],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8619708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513363","doi":"10.1086/738306","title":": <i>Consent Under Duress</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1215015945001448,"gpt":0.474237453308916,"spread":0.3527358588087712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009543406,0.0000909638,0.0001749107,0.00008073315,0.0001499021,0.00001711484,0.00007690745,0.0005093345,0.00009569313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001683136,0.00007872372,0.00006478341,0.0002611345,0.0001217795,0.00001900924,0.00005473327,0.002449609,0.00006081578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006388806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001722131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002879854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001346776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998969,0.0001087732,0.0002154373,0.0001939736,0.000309879,0.0002029298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980832,0.001172372,0.00003045049,0.0003335167,0.000266248,0.0001141669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008863757,0.0001654165,0.01196175,0.002232201,0.00009798003,0.0001237965,0.00434426,0.00001888729,0.0003582407,0.9021438,0.07571111,0.002753908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008355898,0.00009381719,0.008440619,0.0004508364,0.0001098955,0.00002092342,0.0008341768,0.0000521881,0.000849029,0.0411013,0.9470596,0.0001520581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02510552,0.007925625,0.003136043,0.6942899,0.002072861,0.0004115028,0.000009054393,0.0002143431,0.2668351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005365,0.001587713,0.0009407531,0.07287725,0.0003398363,0.0000088126,0.000009682672,0.00001190847,0.02368751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.875431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656410037","doi":"10.1086/691572","title":"Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. <i>Luck Egalitarianism</i>. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. Pp. 280. $94.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Download; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09705229263328174,"gpt":0.3913213722091125,"spread":0.2942690795758308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005568641,0.0004449901,0.0005593402,0.00004911264,0.006409667,0.0009739524,0.002192369,0.00202471,0.001064462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01183408,0.000435132,0.0003505583,0.0001838931,0.004513292,0.001200156,0.0004527859,0.004192849,0.001609186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000177668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001845547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02230258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006941754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943286,0.0009867485,0.0006208343,0.0008022576,0.001795123,0.001466396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944962,0.002029453,0.0003085579,0.00173074,0.000543316,0.0008917545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003432387,0.0001367576,0.0003801022,0.00006477643,0.00005778676,0.00006482776,0.01054136,0.000004162151,0.0003150082,0.9234473,0.06436902,0.0005846269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004408753,0.00007533269,0.0007618335,0.00009158142,0.00005099293,0.000004346964,0.000756154,0.000021718,0.0002595736,0.2960169,0.7010384,0.0004823129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004036635,0.008233329,0.0001110645,0.460253,0.004291412,0.0005146391,0.00009521634,0.0004500574,0.5220147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398968,0.01145932,0.0007801392,0.02896009,0.006754405,0.00003563574,0.00002117193,0.000106867,0.01198556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9358602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402349420","doi":"10.1086/731427","title":":<i>Getting Things Right: Fittingness, Reasons, and Value</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01921131324268457,"gpt":0.2498919865775157,"spread":0.2306806733348311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012224,0.0001444033,0.0001185325,0.0001148544,0.0005633364,0.0007629711,0.0001305908,0.00009523172,0.0001946359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006394335,0.000123214,0.00003517106,0.0004504461,0.00007509239,0.001007048,0.0003415604,0.000418144,0.0002846329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001374061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001727062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001599526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002026595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990219,0.00001097828,0.0001681769,0.0002856623,0.0003192858,0.0001939408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994906,0.0002460197,0.00005624212,0.0001026499,0.00009632742,0.000008122356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002174824,0.000008944228,0.005099731,0.0008086765,0.00004049804,0.00002253492,0.0004885778,0.000006281751,0.00003748427,0.9521165,0.03944174,0.001926776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001047418,0.000002735269,0.004401428,0.0002663537,0.00008947257,0.000001963516,0.0003231454,0.00399825,0.00002292492,0.1062509,0.8842807,0.0002574238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05403944,0.02827962,0.009885456,0.2844647,0.005543667,0.0009297386,0.000007135476,0.003787558,0.6130627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642242,0.0004731675,0.001827627,0.02435002,0.00319064,0.00001175222,0.00003691448,0.00007109075,0.005814598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9101847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7357348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512817360","doi":"10.1086/379907","title":"Book ReviewsOtfried.  Höffe, <i>Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity</i>. Translated by Mark Migotti, with a foreword by Kenneth Baynes.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002. Pp. 311. $26.50 (paper).","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterpoint; Reprint; Modernity; State (computer science); Permission; Download; Sociology; Art history; Media studies; Library science; Law; History; Political science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02479086253973759,"gpt":0.2574473436432803,"spread":0.2326564811035427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001267559,0.0003116007,0.0004894445,0.00000999441,0.00107473,0.00006141468,0.0007122894,0.0005883218,0.0002005832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009748124,0.0002880049,0.0001828082,0.000448418,0.00107795,0.0006247157,0.0001033518,0.001198319,0.00002203834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003885509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006790089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00966943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01031567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969952,0.0006392405,0.0003054314,0.000551687,0.0009044799,0.0006039299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982494,0.0002593144,0.0002368741,0.0003661954,0.000490723,0.0003974567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001118535,0.000666859,0.00008824735,0.0004531763,0.000304893,0.00007804257,0.1442275,0.0006744069,0.0007871636,0.1271417,0.7242128,0.0002466071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009556764,0.0001530371,0.00002290645,0.0001697928,0.0001161584,0.000002252614,0.002338477,0.00001962105,0.0002048622,0.0006616205,0.994967,0.0003885864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04980488,0.2891325,0.08111153,0.1724193,0.001355862,0.01472015,0.006825357,0.003004493,0.3816259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1818807,0.4823763,0.02133463,0.04053424,0.0004226272,0.00003389509,0.0004555349,0.0003618938,0.2726001],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2707542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517982792","doi":"10.1086/343021","title":"Book ReviewsMargaret Moore, . <i>The Ethics of Nationalism</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. 260. $45.00 (cloth).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Nationalism; Download; Media studies; Section (typography); Sociology; History; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06908773803624252,"gpt":0.3342064231024572,"spread":0.2651186850662147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006369988,0.0001468068,0.0002150376,0.00004336236,0.001097692,0.00005360013,0.000530778,0.0006290292,0.0002801255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006265516,0.000127678,0.0001430085,0.0003833359,0.0009503782,0.0002978271,0.00005460397,0.001250274,0.000008661908],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001757258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001328817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005713906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002787127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960509,0.001882553,0.0003154382,0.0002529948,0.001171146,0.0003269799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966713,0.001750149,0.0002884073,0.0003311393,0.0008341451,0.0001249053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007251886,0.00003363719,0.0002101707,0.00006530063,0.00001210737,0.000001567683,0.008899613,0.00003184498,0.000006161415,0.7249275,0.2657026,0.0001022132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002246594,0.00002410353,0.0001292672,0.00006539741,0.00004472632,9.114721e-7,0.002821723,0.00002543525,0.0001098171,0.02690112,0.9695023,0.0001505534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003177203,0.02674431,0.001779092,0.0353657,0.000853861,0.0007179761,0.00006426367,0.00009363909,0.9340634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121921,0.7400664,0.002731334,0.02617651,0.0007348532,0.0000244461,0.0001353631,0.00007481738,0.1081352],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8637754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091245296","doi":"10.1086/664939","title":"Teichmann, Roger. <i>Nature, Reason, and the Good Life: Ethics for Human Beings</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 224. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Download; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1127588511121139,"gpt":0.4540705135994523,"spread":0.3413116624873384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04604336,0.0004341425,0.0006211917,0.00006709674,0.008094721,0.0000565669,0.001026414,0.005826539,0.000204772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06921507,0.0003418955,0.0001857243,0.0002174545,0.001970491,0.0007617873,0.0009252549,0.0500298,0.00004734596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002089068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001512773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001385483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006175463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865379,0.009282919,0.0007982287,0.0006245143,0.001422438,0.001334031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088683,0.08688469,0.0009195626,0.001221644,0.001294405,0.0008113633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003669073,0.0001212755,0.006763224,0.001022026,0.0001351431,0.000003218861,0.01827719,0.000001387892,0.00001483397,0.8730733,0.100092,0.0001295047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003000329,0.00008240641,0.001423873,0.0003194381,0.0003076376,0.000004711535,0.009001331,0.00006639599,0.00003088684,0.05842293,0.9269571,0.0003829148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01412199,0.04093636,0.01102436,0.5959217,0.01060011,0.008425565,0.0004864375,0.001146868,0.3173366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7579995,0.05339489,0.01116026,0.1428693,0.006742063,0.0002571332,0.0002805046,0.0003651794,0.02693114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8268651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334278313","doi":"10.1086/673504","title":"Murphy, Timothy F. <i>Ethics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices about Children</i>.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012. Pp. 194. $27.00 (cloth).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Sexual orientation; Permission; Orientation (vector space); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0419001357368044,"gpt":0.3569268610519801,"spread":0.3150267253151757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002616407,0.0004249828,0.0005697262,0.0001068491,0.0005754944,0.0002238505,0.0002901385,0.001611449,0.0002982361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003052249,0.0003823714,0.00009155116,0.000306831,0.0006794652,0.000508422,0.0001931642,0.007017234,0.0003436395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008148301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000954294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01466972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002790625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958643,0.0004865666,0.0007796779,0.0008575379,0.001308775,0.0007031427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949565,0.001944662,0.0002856007,0.0008154907,0.001351826,0.0006459478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001768702,0.0006827154,0.1993607,0.004985059,0.000540295,0.00008463961,0.03508842,0.00002462753,0.0003702384,0.03772592,0.7148576,0.006102836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002641987,0.0007935818,0.1603997,0.0004129415,0.0003548422,0.0001265167,0.001050637,0.0002343544,0.0005675817,0.001658815,0.8308502,0.0009088115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5346496,0.1970232,0.0008735178,0.2014593,0.006265375,0.005579227,0.0005592622,0.001037373,0.05255318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.809323,0.04890696,0.007249148,0.06853929,0.008977511,0.000237083,0.0008492068,0.0003298159,0.05558799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2746734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513428","doi":"10.1086/738305","title":": <i>Wrongs and Rights Come Apart</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Right to property","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04377356748421739,"gpt":0.4016327150304381,"spread":0.3578591475462207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005000489,0.00002928352,0.00004403482,0.00001358802,0.0007745339,0.00005622886,0.00009705764,0.0001004037,0.0000300827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104254,0.00002633327,0.00001313176,0.0001303784,0.0002390931,0.0000494756,0.00003786908,0.0002638729,0.0000301198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000167932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001230001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00236987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004555513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995905,0.00005773183,0.00005843088,0.00008670711,0.0001106,0.00009600646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995409,0.0002771365,0.00001427329,0.00008452952,0.00004271342,0.00004041834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.285012e-7,0.000006844069,0.0003658964,0.000003935934,0.000002123649,1.719897e-7,0.005092347,4.026938e-7,0.00001935827,0.9916114,0.002536778,0.000360348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004155324,0.000001765463,0.0008308332,0.000006519506,0.000003750444,4.274343e-8,0.0003278513,0.000009380149,0.00005706795,0.1115849,0.8871068,0.00002949784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04405154,0.0002355812,0.0009010393,0.1304613,0.0002096038,0.0001758339,0.000005701924,0.00009683416,0.8238626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827465,0.00009415092,0.0002642698,0.002569956,0.00006690291,0.000008686132,0.000001011894,0.000001427115,0.01424703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5957167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763843","doi":"10.1086/725812","title":":<i>The Roots of Normativity</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Reuse; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1234007244199977,"gpt":0.3137599496110649,"spread":0.1903592251910672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00187483,0.00005454168,0.00008003754,0.00002929469,0.0005604818,0.00005412443,0.00017373,0.00007922389,0.00009354756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006996754,0.00003525809,0.00005531724,0.00005332571,0.0007059164,0.00005530381,0.00006993353,0.0007196177,0.0003092142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004128801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005418271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000420917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003644421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992682,0.0001192972,0.000151133,0.00006483933,0.0002615106,0.0001350029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973293,0.002267146,0.00005596278,0.0001781686,0.0001404881,0.00002896871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004770785,0.000007864944,0.00000290028,0.00002808541,0.000009378199,0.000001169487,0.01583771,0.000003509305,0.0000555131,0.982335,0.0009184717,0.0007955855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004104188,0.00001547007,0.0000417189,0.00001319918,0.000002791469,1.540253e-7,0.0005551882,0.00005919373,0.0001052615,0.6799819,0.3191476,0.00003640947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06030348,0.0003043649,0.00003811936,0.1487999,0.002252216,0.0001602504,0.00006915274,0.0002863727,0.7877861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960219,0.0001471128,0.000002658795,0.000944473,0.0003163863,0.000004795771,0.000003879632,0.000008545374,0.002550296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4310829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210574273","doi":"10.1086/713946","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Metaphysics; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1565313624180392,"gpt":0.3206170423183418,"spread":0.1640856799003026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005445882,0.00008076012,0.000110934,0.00001999208,0.0003423494,0.0001119251,0.00007965664,0.000143534,0.001931718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002212579,0.00006476107,0.00006986087,0.0000198929,0.0002840983,0.00003842031,0.00003604665,0.00115193,0.0004058675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001259623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001200489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002801743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002128675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992446,0.0001286067,0.0001104662,0.0001412503,0.000235539,0.0001395554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974772,0.001997587,0.00002773492,0.0001788486,0.0002635955,0.00005500224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006850424,0.00004259295,0.000002960102,0.00001242332,0.00001436271,0.00002604653,0.008830396,0.000002431678,0.0000550643,0.9905312,0.0001596601,0.0003160124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009636372,0.00002603202,0.000008253673,0.00002407822,0.000005074335,7.582063e-7,0.0002016167,0.000007785684,0.001087517,0.6544269,0.344047,0.00006864685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02066283,0.0004140837,0.00008657562,0.2367957,0.002047839,0.00006579241,0.00009550988,0.0001477168,0.739684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791294,0.00004920844,0.00001297222,0.01801955,0.0009177914,0.000002788069,0.00001598703,0.00001129793,0.001840986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240472568","doi":"10.1086/700086","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1778925733173622,"gpt":0.4400288569167705,"spread":0.2621362835994083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972581,0.00005642872,0.00007439639,0.00002212276,0.000913812,0.00004054544,0.0001629743,0.0003914412,0.0002064684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01512335,0.00004924534,0.00003864794,0.0001196335,0.00153053,0.00005796899,0.00002056575,0.0008388173,0.0009995395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003434073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002942924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009684495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007445583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987641,0.0003010344,0.00008541549,0.0001173565,0.0004314745,0.000300643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962329,0.003252365,0.00002196777,0.0001242898,0.0002180962,0.0001503243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006187054,0.00001521028,0.00007869246,0.000002147239,0.000003106183,0.00000115986,0.01286799,1.78314e-7,0.00001139589,0.9861888,0.0005629183,0.0002622328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006893907,0.00007515783,0.0002712123,0.00001559899,0.000003733825,7.905544e-8,0.0002730427,0.000003735561,0.0007386776,0.5870544,0.4114215,0.00007393449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01115983,0.00001995626,0.0003136156,0.2646826,0.001115151,0.0000779171,0.00001163723,0.0001333029,0.722486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804012,0.00002090753,0.000078959,0.0166554,0.002195,0.000001621924,0.000001028482,0.000004962331,0.0006409153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210430162","doi":"10.1086/713947","title":"Index to Volume 131","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1387434982659299,"gpt":0.4159471192512222,"spread":0.2772036209852924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001421683,0.000053284,0.00008348779,0.00002107638,0.0005387233,0.00006883592,0.000171079,0.0004010005,0.0004990133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008475349,0.00005884852,0.00004650282,0.0002992006,0.0002957798,0.00007647869,0.00007450952,0.001081322,0.0008483782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004292547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009549056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001676719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985386,0.0003593091,0.0001027274,0.0001594896,0.0005209343,0.0003189917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985977,0.0006515832,0.00001341904,0.0001681917,0.0002762969,0.0002928266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001719511,0.00001773756,0.000448775,0.000007274995,0.000003684312,0.00001556758,0.02177106,0.000006411024,0.00002308606,0.9744457,0.0028876,0.0003713935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003430253,0.000007657958,0.0009712236,0.00001209385,0.000003039512,4.257015e-7,0.001291868,0.000007030869,0.0001049392,0.3564968,0.6409934,0.0000773177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004364774,0.0000628077,0.001342053,0.4157565,0.0006735652,0.00005243726,0.000007127968,0.00008149928,0.5776592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521852,0.00003473309,0.0004227074,0.03126648,0.0007951263,0.000003269986,0.000001839544,0.000006648559,0.015284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392672923","doi":"10.1086/728629","title":":<i>Bias: A Philosophical Study</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3254537809377154,"gpt":0.3729506229512032,"spread":0.04749684201348775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001701714,0.0001651596,0.0002173895,0.00007540662,0.0003939537,0.0003249406,0.0001986932,0.000206598,0.0005201809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003664231,0.000134135,0.0001399376,0.00005321035,0.000642073,0.0001572429,0.000068252,0.002295282,0.0008904968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002205504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001852874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001387447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009001754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984809,0.0003120711,0.0002633166,0.0003222702,0.0003858338,0.0002355641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998215,0.001224956,0.00003291228,0.0002934423,0.0001610784,0.00007263151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005048519,0.000117607,0.00003343243,0.0001188714,0.00007068895,0.00006061702,0.1940757,8.600319e-7,0.000009139842,0.8013967,0.003590739,0.0005206091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001321696,0.0001957674,0.00001953626,0.00006529556,0.00007474993,0.000004678373,0.009650679,0.00005102219,0.00001947132,0.3144926,0.6751102,0.0001839069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1373971,0.005439529,0.0002800963,0.1736744,0.01746362,0.0009314505,0.0001134229,0.001730997,0.6629694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975879,0.00006744918,0.00003976793,0.003982127,0.003682725,0.00002494889,0.000008959895,0.000037645,0.01627734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.838482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508103237","doi":"10.1086/233378","title":"Book ReviewsAlan Gewirth, .<i>Self‐Fulfillment</i>. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998. Pp. 217. $37.50 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Permission; Library science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Physics; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0591796670968227,"gpt":0.3606394377069332,"spread":0.3014597706101105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002437119,0.0001679164,0.0002040269,0.00003742649,0.001430343,0.0002326578,0.0005528202,0.0003458615,0.003787354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007960732,0.0001785288,0.00008948258,0.0005838127,0.0003437406,0.001331708,0.00005741848,0.001607456,0.0007218943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003085025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002048928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008904042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972784,0.0009268514,0.0003252488,0.0003653351,0.0006944545,0.0004097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.0006377165,0.0002223972,0.0004557316,0.0002362796,0.0002120419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003863722,0.0003964705,0.0007814199,0.0001002069,0.00006530325,0.000009975916,0.04797788,0.00001854487,0.00003034902,0.3250245,0.6180079,0.007548801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001942357,0.00002208595,0.0004628696,0.00005048528,0.00004126097,0.000001748612,0.0009466115,0.000009023273,0.00004609443,0.000302907,0.9977018,0.0002208616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002824214,0.01103856,0.00009434403,0.1731884,0.001203194,0.00101524,0.00003844924,0.0005781424,0.8100194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02165707,0.3263609,0.006819118,0.05768561,0.002059504,0.00003749247,0.0001159758,0.00007675916,0.5851876],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780847921","doi":"10.1086/694283","title":"Moschella, Melissa. <i>To Whom Do Children Belong? Parental Rights, Civic Education, and Children’s Autonomy</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. 212. $110.00 (cloth); $32.99 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01841731600738509,"gpt":0.3124469544639122,"spread":0.2940296384565271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461033,0.0005220157,0.0006884201,0.0001435785,0.002667886,0.0004265375,0.0007935205,0.001048725,0.00006617151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001083334,0.0005088515,0.0001604815,0.0001764361,0.0007604629,0.000531406,0.0005545458,0.003582079,0.0001053131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004408967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004978463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06347404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008736365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963996,0.0003361591,0.0005737889,0.00107811,0.0008621275,0.000750166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995559,0.0003740574,0.0004012309,0.001783378,0.0007679625,0.001114416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024755,0.000886544,0.4740795,0.000565523,0.0003746137,0.00008762026,0.008938642,0.000005665545,0.00007019558,0.04658427,0.4643223,0.003837536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001323339,0.000205459,0.4668848,0.000346192,0.0002319476,0.0001204422,0.0002816992,0.00001626453,0.000151287,0.00006626177,0.5298483,0.0005240146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575712,0.032316,0.00009730941,0.05815232,0.002607448,0.002868052,0.001101843,0.0003698479,0.04491591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633023,0.007942139,0.001196527,0.003618154,0.002422313,0.00001722978,0.00040874,0.00008220967,0.02101043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.105731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512842440","doi":"10.1086/521285","title":"Book ReviewsJonathan Glover, . <i>Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 121. $17.95 (cloth).","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Download; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05620986063998375,"gpt":0.3427639817100764,"spread":0.2865541210700927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005064759,0.0003470223,0.0005761534,0.00004271219,0.0004693907,0.00004779323,0.0002614248,0.0009899557,0.00009653487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001032064,0.0003334793,0.0001534594,0.0003175171,0.0006178987,0.0002494054,0.0001965248,0.003201245,0.000005371141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004915493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001420634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001717797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968608,0.0004511938,0.0005802321,0.0006617091,0.000781923,0.0006641317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967914,0.001360422,0.0002112018,0.000721538,0.0003424129,0.0005730546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001520828,0.00123035,0.3465451,0.007473562,0.000421885,0.0006677222,0.008017382,0.00006108414,0.0002887043,0.02776658,0.5266552,0.07935163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009008389,0.0002302022,0.01058456,0.0003217614,0.000200917,0.00008140851,0.0001394561,0.00005320589,0.0002055968,0.000266457,0.9866775,0.0003381305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01257882,0.9208892,0.01105162,0.03422078,0.0009926944,0.00320258,0.0001875179,0.0003891593,0.01648761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03742342,0.911225,0.01566089,0.0247509,0.002281623,0.000005830318,0.000170663,0.0001255569,0.008356147],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4600223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324775572","doi":"10.1086/670936","title":"Nuccitelli, Susana, and Seay, Gary, eds. <i>Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. 270. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Naturalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07028475651126415,"gpt":0.4159039267057364,"spread":0.3456191701944722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01041741,0.0005331936,0.0006714576,0.0001169437,0.003020682,0.00009727429,0.0009354734,0.003977581,0.0007812054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01646444,0.0005015526,0.0001478538,0.0004138143,0.001584227,0.0009838647,0.001216534,0.0535623,0.001402103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003617405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002031495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009740053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003470949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9858868,0.009098903,0.0008998705,0.001014682,0.001724386,0.001375388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658727,0.02980186,0.0005690877,0.001086349,0.001570786,0.001099233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009220946,0.0001196326,0.00117557,0.001080764,0.00005915374,0.00004744058,0.002078717,0.000002331958,0.00009661999,0.1916959,0.8025457,0.001005877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001228187,0.00008108022,0.003719703,0.0006418172,0.0001285699,0.00001821901,0.001919658,0.0007197274,0.00006368192,0.001719013,0.9891556,0.000604752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05441014,0.08618505,0.004294178,0.6167175,0.02021856,0.007315878,0.0005583405,0.001926419,0.208374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5343456,0.2391975,0.006450802,0.1194107,0.005538037,0.0001769925,0.0005079996,0.0004835004,0.09388887],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4973068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779239962","doi":"10.1086/694282","title":"Mikkola, Mari. <i>The Wrong of Injustice: Dehumanization and Its Role in Feminist Philosophy</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Pp. 298. $99.00 (cloth); $35.00 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Dehumanization; Download; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social injustice; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05750578523421754,"gpt":0.3193781774447451,"spread":0.2618723922105275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001553701,0.0001501355,0.0002419754,0.00003372223,0.003035386,0.00007261702,0.0006340219,0.0004310435,0.00003481698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001159655,0.0001403962,0.0000464531,0.0001042392,0.001430638,0.0003085263,0.0003472934,0.0006715288,0.000003331272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006454399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003167904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00267956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005926641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984408,0.0004211401,0.0002314157,0.0002936161,0.0003153817,0.0002976556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984519,0.0006679145,0.0003003008,0.0003477142,0.0001626004,0.00006954995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018899,0.0001575941,0.09578347,0.0003286808,0.0001061158,0.00002679395,0.1202934,0.00002475287,0.0000541339,0.7740847,0.008171337,0.0007799864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008359592,0.0001180303,0.07746068,0.0001775164,0.000106568,0.000002929595,0.0294851,0.0001083785,0.0001201668,0.01515064,0.8760607,0.0003733774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08693376,0.01276302,0.00007664995,0.0275747,0.001277088,0.0008936575,0.0001156772,0.00009572742,0.8702697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852282,0.00993281,0.00008015503,0.000358547,0.0001883344,0.000003361324,0.000005449021,0.00001112264,0.004192016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8982944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513773266","doi":"10.1086/599234","title":"Book ReviewsSharon R Krause, . <i>Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation</i>.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008. Pp. 262. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06982247493154563,"gpt":0.3299020432084936,"spread":0.2600795682769479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001965731,0.0002296458,0.0003173626,0.00003249666,0.001592218,0.0001402507,0.0003572605,0.0005708291,0.0001353933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001127444,0.0002282123,0.00009850721,0.000231121,0.0007454482,0.0006615391,0.0001232304,0.001461691,0.00004626184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000178833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006198305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000443545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004486217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996794,0.001030085,0.0003667949,0.0004466529,0.0007897624,0.0005726405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981547,0.0006351875,0.0001551506,0.0003588602,0.0002539356,0.0004421838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002233106,0.0001390724,0.0001316666,0.00009719348,0.0000218178,0.00002193232,0.004579459,0.00002899335,0.00005572996,0.8523255,0.1418126,0.0007636553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003051018,0.00007646766,0.0007275601,0.0002413552,0.00006986401,0.000001890358,0.0001989825,0.0001597257,0.0001233636,0.07263225,0.9251572,0.0003061894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003376029,0.09609056,0.001919675,0.4268366,0.001192017,0.002688243,0.0001238413,0.0007975278,0.4669755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3774832,0.4316802,0.005110152,0.1233021,0.002836888,0.00002872462,0.0001057423,0.00008673487,0.05936613],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7833446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}