{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":32,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"e24898964be8","filters":{"venue":"Ethics & Behavior"}},"results":[{"id":"W2025563565","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1503_1","title":"To Stay or To Go, To Speak or Stay Silent, To Act or Not To Act: Moral Distress as Experienced by Psychologists","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Psychology; Distress; Context (archaeology); Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Moral injury; Mental health; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3149142723381163,"gpt":0.6148544175381077,"spread":0.2999401451999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008714491,0.0007704339,0.0009296123,0.0003568711,0.001825579,0.0001698393,0.002272506,0.001904959,0.01559979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07042848,0.000574889,0.0001306733,0.001657642,0.0002744746,0.0004804375,0.001512811,0.0113248,0.01720836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001286982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002046532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001926318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02239484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881779,0.003010241,0.001702905,0.001887883,0.002943565,0.002277494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814554,0.01074566,0.0003596262,0.002270428,0.001013177,0.004155631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01729116,0.002794558,0.004934704,0.0002664193,0.00005148503,0.0008776493,0.3311859,0.00005506685,0.03155426,0.001606891,0.5540514,0.05533048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001763787,0.003794537,0.01961824,0.001007622,0.0001395784,0.00002169397,0.03148009,0.000003071602,0.006609063,0.00006335775,0.9339706,0.001528373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7762547,0.00001327325,0.002328427,0.207878,0.00338913,0.005849474,0.0006996551,0.0003839349,0.003203393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6318108,0.00004093563,0.03523907,0.2373909,0.001180997,0.003789558,0.00006059865,0.0002137862,0.09027333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3799192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146163237","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3","title":"How Informed Is Online Informed Consent?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Recall; Reading (process); Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science; Cognitive psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3405017553896106,"gpt":0.5363866975708118,"spread":0.1958849421812012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366309,0.0001681683,0.0002240571,0.000102283,0.0007014501,0.0002229671,0.000323015,0.0004297486,0.0005537914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006400545,0.0001540899,0.0001313228,0.0003400298,0.000915069,0.0005527601,0.00006428198,0.0009326066,0.0001025488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001936894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976367,0.0005428318,0.0003124926,0.0002073751,0.0008137673,0.0004868119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959547,0.00305286,0.000162321,0.0002399776,0.0003525794,0.0002375477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316049,0.0003905643,0.006873551,0.0000516758,0.00002729145,0.00001369406,0.601705,6.431623e-7,0.0003907229,0.1510546,0.01687083,0.2225899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000418669,0.00006546074,0.008622694,0.00003846256,0.0000409501,0.000001588771,0.04578221,0.000003865546,0.0005202973,0.0006800249,0.9435522,0.000273577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8008624,0.0004247886,0.0009138927,0.1649311,0.001020689,0.0008517563,0.0001856725,0.000295694,0.03051399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7631865,0.001362377,0.1286378,0.016536,0.001542907,0.0001485709,0.00008777228,0.00005568079,0.08844245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116064712","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1002_03","title":"Value-Based Leadership in Organizations: Balancing Values, Interests, and Power Among Citizens, Workers, and Leaders","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Value (mathematics); Power (physics); Public relations; Promotion (chess); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2070177051205732,"gpt":0.4306549328162699,"spread":0.2236372276956967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002188184,0.0002174713,0.0002893495,0.0002098707,0.00103377,0.00003032964,0.0001613185,0.0005907093,0.001118077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008302003,0.0002247434,0.00002054985,0.0004702719,0.0003319999,0.0001259039,0.00009047447,0.00327809,0.00006746107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002460845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001155298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002226636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004210488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968817,0.001204442,0.0005926745,0.0003296552,0.000300235,0.0006913476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974606,0.001623688,0.0001020645,0.0003491039,0.000153687,0.0003108352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000529648,0.00007985631,0.9427181,0.0002733092,0.000004269315,0.00001885094,0.05085443,0.000006163604,0.00001659373,0.0002414288,0.001588771,0.004145213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001451141,0.00005861162,0.9472207,0.001585404,0.00002741862,0.000003075854,0.04656496,0.00006559581,0.00001247697,0.0002648056,0.002460241,0.0002855528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979323,0.000919656,0.00005732142,0.01728045,0.0002509864,0.001090459,0.000009855466,0.0001315643,0.0009366686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851233,0.0002550349,0.001553099,0.01076128,0.00003903141,0.0001380365,0.00004929192,0.00004936683,0.002031497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006519173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990733516","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2019.1694024","title":"Examining the impact of ethical leadership and organizational justice on employees’ ethical behavior: Does person–organization fit play a role?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical leadership; Organizational justice; Economic Justice; Organizational culture; Business ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Organizational behavior; Organizational commitment; Organizational ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3469705358014958,"gpt":0.4545960742654311,"spread":0.1076255384639353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008503716,0.0003239605,0.0004168379,0.0002991154,0.0007310683,0.0004743149,0.0008918521,0.002322988,0.001620847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02819147,0.0001910812,0.0001073143,0.001499422,0.0007684896,0.0002499954,0.0001876407,0.00644289,0.0001792753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000134083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001174406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002561176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009453166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941533,0.001127056,0.000746525,0.0007870005,0.00278809,0.0003980125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806595,0.01490248,0.0004842319,0.0009235518,0.002842,0.0001881913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005308975,0.000418615,0.8935062,0.00004564694,0.00002377259,0.000005279444,0.05879569,0.0002740508,0.007564066,0.03745115,0.0006512083,0.001211256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003868999,0.00031845,0.967312,0.000127059,0.0002277404,0.00002868042,0.02679637,0.0001381113,0.0009451463,0.003331115,0.00005571713,0.0003327339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803785,0.00005047888,0.0002105318,0.01751736,0.0009829769,0.0004705014,0.00004552743,0.00005604113,0.0002880865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966709,0.00003810127,0.0004045272,0.001843563,0.0002490339,0.00002997635,0.00004483412,0.00005985886,0.0006592156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07380579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061925875","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1602_1","title":"A Re-Visioning of Boundaries in Professional Helping Relationships: Exploring Other Metaphors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bridge (graph theory); Boundary (topology); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Professional boundaries; Ethical issues; Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2411299620485944,"gpt":0.4291522961316174,"spread":0.188022334083023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002962709,0.0001344365,0.0002104437,0.00022292,0.0004367752,0.00007315433,0.0001484805,0.0003109515,0.0006670816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004240468,0.0001278054,0.00007937576,0.0003187391,0.0001387473,0.000326325,0.00005123192,0.001625637,0.00004638977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003291635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001501136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00438492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002812175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979029,0.0005834729,0.0005406473,0.0002973367,0.0004271192,0.0002485812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980759,0.001252415,0.0001807672,0.0003210618,0.0001358646,0.00003397554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003624709,0.001585692,0.6786696,0.00009083869,0.00004167769,0.0001144454,0.22394,0.0002010133,0.005244117,0.05741071,0.001011644,0.03132775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002076071,0.0002204229,0.745095,0.001459545,0.0002599967,0.00001579457,0.07501115,0.0001756164,0.00113974,0.004504188,0.1691887,0.0008537683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930986,0.00165449,0.000182373,0.001094194,0.001982806,0.0002204091,0.000007317276,0.00004821983,0.001711642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963771,0.00003598032,0.001559402,0.00009034583,0.00009027228,0.0001466467,0.00001133417,0.00003244517,0.001656474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.168177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7304077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990651003","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1301_10","title":"Voluntary Assent in Biomedical Research With Adolescents: A Comparison of Parent and Adolescent Views","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; University of Warwick","keywords":"Vignette; Autonomy; Psychology; Informed consent; Turnover; Perception; Social psychology; Asthma; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.751738866568881,"gpt":0.6569981701594663,"spread":0.09474069640941474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01675434,0.0002091023,0.0006923327,0.0004322699,0.0001270554,0.00002636297,0.0002593671,0.0009508393,0.0001264444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01090367,0.0001620335,0.00007831838,0.0007955237,0.002024114,0.00004911655,0.0002195946,0.01286227,0.00002143413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002743383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001766628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002813925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001900588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922618,0.001394711,0.001042617,0.0006656337,0.003931514,0.0007037789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993314,0.003945383,0.0001421931,0.000785991,0.001198075,0.0006143656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004044243,0.005629088,0.982733,0.001229069,0.0000154663,0.0002001817,0.001969288,4.941292e-7,0.002273118,0.002030354,0.000529795,0.002985761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003814103,0.002605514,0.9721601,0.008205966,0.0001105102,0.00004408407,0.003248696,0.00004880015,0.002729081,0.0008133237,0.00597096,0.0002488435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911577,0.001257646,0.0001308553,0.00547371,0.0001422296,0.001367101,0.00001041561,0.00002241082,0.0004380055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960345,0.0009218187,0.002075661,0.0004378538,0.00005317549,0.0001187579,0.00001596312,0.0000397703,0.0003024849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800434608","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1466301","title":"A Wake-Up Call? Issues With Plagiarism in Transnational Higher Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Collusion; Work (physics); Plagiarism detection; Higher education; Academic integrity; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Business; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06700317219200898,"gpt":0.4109973970169084,"spread":0.3439942248248994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001977476,0.0001082963,0.0001142334,0.0001008636,0.0004315852,0.00005966345,0.0002601052,0.001530475,0.001262965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000146859,0.00009762182,0.00003061824,0.000281481,0.0006318076,0.0002042544,0.00001283893,0.003017412,0.00006724652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001326979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00713841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0180127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982326,0.0003353697,0.0001894005,0.0002357317,0.0007387307,0.0002681914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991246,0.0002161235,0.00005956055,0.0001150503,0.0003897506,0.00009488979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003836654,0.0001960675,0.02114307,0.00000606636,0.000005691285,0.000004230464,0.1092865,4.673639e-7,0.0002182324,0.8567489,0.008522302,0.003830081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000377866,0.0001051615,0.1361666,0.00006520333,0.00004799586,0.000003393427,0.005103071,0.000004121336,0.0004508561,0.01063346,0.8467157,0.0003266076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7533001,0.0002095031,0.0002464552,0.1982085,0.002952233,0.0006392896,0.00002544224,0.000118645,0.04429984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565835,0.00003653962,0.001180334,0.002014102,0.0008971957,0.00007502542,0.00002552362,0.00001266958,0.03917512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020903994","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1604_7","title":"The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Sociology; Narrative review; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.7844652283520209,"gpt":0.7154801608445555,"spread":0.06898506750746547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1654182,0.0003957414,0.0009282605,0.0001359742,0.002796597,0.000191336,0.001004588,0.003114431,0.0002275857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2740535,0.0002644309,0.0002488649,0.001394232,0.005495517,0.0001569784,0.0005903072,0.08240249,0.000158049],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001838229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007541882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002682505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.97871,0.007380842,0.001770493,0.001244582,0.009607594,0.001286509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7619762,0.2100941,0.0006325658,0.003693494,0.022625,0.0009786779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003806281,0.002357435,0.01287887,0.2945718,0.0001916125,0.0008820539,0.02790435,5.353901e-7,0.001753763,0.5604897,0.07580344,0.02278579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001487036,0.001455779,0.01344909,0.2396094,0.0008812398,0.0003092041,0.003569802,0.000005737992,0.0008482791,0.1775895,0.5597699,0.001025077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005438042,0.3967594,0.00002411241,0.5872068,0.0002374699,0.003252672,0.00001756867,0.0001055468,0.006958388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02098419,0.9330776,0.0009826928,0.0296676,0.0004573679,0.001016727,0.00004655817,0.0001092825,0.01365795],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5575392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971296458","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1301_11","title":"The Ethical Ideologies of Psychologists and Physicians: A Preliminary Comparison","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Ideology; Ethical code; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Professional ethics; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2359084662476602,"gpt":0.5820438396315746,"spread":0.3461353733839143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01887281,0.0001717498,0.0003489486,0.00003767033,0.002136975,0.00001385111,0.0003909386,0.00221311,0.00008180719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06747706,0.000121112,0.00006164957,0.0001863098,0.002709297,0.00007812793,0.0001997564,0.02818778,0.0000600698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000447647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004054157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001218486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002242332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9874655,0.01011018,0.0008032348,0.0003471291,0.0007793469,0.0004945908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941512,0.05678631,0.0005015709,0.000636046,0.000462749,0.0001013513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003398182,0.0006544514,0.1332451,0.0004003365,0.00004824724,0.00003903982,0.04784013,0.000002439441,0.001636801,0.7844989,0.01669057,0.01460409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002374688,0.001513933,0.5473673,0.001274575,0.0005580889,0.00003361437,0.09788366,0.00004975937,0.001038776,0.180398,0.1667756,0.0007319403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8013558,0.004542697,0.001961096,0.1529578,0.004255473,0.002092163,0.00002025489,0.0002650984,0.03254958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865722,0.001008116,0.00347348,0.007901417,0.00008310086,0.0002553248,0.000003019317,0.00002551717,0.0006778246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6041009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996875105","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.869747","title":"Cognitive Enhancement and Academic Misconduct: A Study Exploring Their Frequency and Relationship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Cognition; Scientific misconduct; German; Academic integrity; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Medical education; Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; History; Alternative medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3347493990962226,"gpt":0.4257224083423317,"spread":0.09097300924610902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002780359,0.0001257437,0.0001372554,0.00006124566,0.0009630934,0.00008388363,0.0001366701,0.0007687259,0.0002582598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001840111,0.0001137187,0.00002030099,0.000127015,0.0004510208,0.0006315086,0.00006588211,0.004680012,0.00004962219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004722255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001497066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006307067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009100984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982567,0.0005887834,0.0002308802,0.0002853062,0.0003698997,0.0002683873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997857,0.001635931,0.00008278577,0.00008462942,0.0001944596,0.0001451623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003919527,0.00009729778,0.3933378,0.000008249051,0.00001455756,0.00001188939,0.5765371,1.555729e-8,0.001535581,0.01820444,0.00008561857,0.01016348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060295,0.0001722574,0.4903273,0.0001999884,0.0001759761,0.00001113109,0.4803045,0.000003430283,0.0008463189,0.02582832,0.001071268,0.0004565201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917665,0.000527796,0.0001215612,0.004222811,0.0002606274,0.0009566945,0.000007713658,0.00004354593,0.002092786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973804,0.0005603928,0.0002084654,0.0002782979,0.0001527517,0.0004833136,0.000005156176,0.000009382436,0.0009218586],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0969895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081971933","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1304_2","title":"Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Psychology; Animal testing; Observational methods in psychology; Animal welfare; Psychological intervention; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Observer (physics); Relation (database); Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.822465978733046,"gpt":0.5727639251869654,"spread":0.2497020535460807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002967939,0.0001450666,0.0001718537,0.0001950563,0.0002926282,0.000033763,0.0002063086,0.0003294075,0.0007285781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001620618,0.0001480033,0.00004335275,0.0003552362,0.0001080975,0.0001231868,0.00002423602,0.001452121,0.00002781606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009053274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009476208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04228106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05104706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972346,0.001016784,0.0003364792,0.0003234265,0.0008541563,0.0002345453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983271,0.0003803452,0.0001127567,0.0002879168,0.0006939553,0.0001979497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001929971,0.002852728,0.8775086,0.00002465711,0.00006075172,0.0003312434,0.0357039,0.0000439607,0.0182039,0.06279708,0.0003355251,0.00194458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006480369,0.003919584,0.9889315,0.00002444345,0.0001292848,0.00004562553,0.004124332,0.0002450071,0.0001910475,0.0004612484,0.001051193,0.0002286731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960784,0.0000257549,0.000006024816,0.0005515027,0.0001611018,0.0004299228,0.00002990601,0.00004276308,0.002674567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975575,0.000001532173,0.00178983,0.0003109184,0.00008721414,0.00009104203,0.0000268998,0.00002381853,0.0001112399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1114229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984687891","doi":"10.1080/10508420802623682","title":"Believers and Skeptics: Where Social Worker Situate Themselves Regarding the Code of Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Ethical code; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; EXPOSE; Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Sociology; Faith; Meta-ethics; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Law; Nursing ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1265037699525921,"gpt":0.4462281004230726,"spread":0.3197243304704805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004930156,0.0001133141,0.0001615668,0.00003373178,0.003088997,0.0001556614,0.0002815549,0.0005846395,0.0002714879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002505799,0.00009616394,0.0000845992,0.0004232664,0.0008428414,0.0002114655,0.00003347103,0.001982319,0.00002149535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006228941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006347137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005516598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002451971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997509,0.001100482,0.0002277474,0.0001891521,0.0007069213,0.0002666955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996506,0.00266843,0.0002207865,0.000157123,0.0003613271,0.00008636837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002985123,0.0001389227,0.005160562,0.000009383221,0.00002229367,0.000002649541,0.699372,0.000001046116,0.0003540669,0.2659203,0.007204623,0.02178428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004749014,0.00006548336,0.08073962,0.00007324963,0.0003928335,0.000002616985,0.2880411,0.000002620236,0.0001698227,0.01674776,0.6128743,0.0004156368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3958779,0.0008654917,0.0001175739,0.56181,0.001270087,0.0005846195,0.00001789627,0.00012426,0.03933214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891008,0.0008653126,0.0005389201,0.002982683,0.0004202942,0.00001312644,0.000002351396,0.00001257314,0.006063914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6056697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001126839","doi":"10.1080/10508420903035455","title":"A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Regina","funders":"American Psychological Association","keywords":"Debriefing; Popularity; Psychology; Personality; Function (biology); Applied psychology; Trustworthiness; Medical education; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1555302156714623,"gpt":0.5011636353466175,"spread":0.3456334196751552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002394987,0.0001810556,0.0002484677,0.0001521527,0.0002086737,0.00004149332,0.0001954386,0.0005950323,0.00186529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000383781,0.0001874366,0.00006403383,0.0002512462,0.00002154684,0.0001716087,0.00002388262,0.001587632,0.0004448865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001163754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002263039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001229436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01724872,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975552,0.000746822,0.000463197,0.000468868,0.0002753029,0.000490631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983872,0.0004967071,0.0003617342,0.000460497,0.0001107716,0.0001830951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001111515,0.004526734,0.2407075,0.000319477,0.00006960928,0.002239812,0.4749509,0.00001271402,0.007642493,0.07182031,0.03468424,0.1619147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002079533,0.0003154093,0.9215804,0.00007440839,0.0001126781,0.0003305063,0.007652652,0.0000185246,0.0007959494,0.001391091,0.06514711,0.0005017767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787326,0.0005777684,0.0005522446,0.01049407,0.0007443498,0.0005673158,0.00001880215,0.00008965534,0.008223153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747903,0.00002433866,0.005687958,0.008894588,0.0001749269,0.0001495483,0.00003349565,0.00002832032,0.01021658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6808729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006269789","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1202_4","title":"On Boredom and Experimentation in Humans","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Boredom; Debriefing; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Ethical issues; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1883832211984424,"gpt":0.3834059668395874,"spread":0.195022745641145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001197651,0.00005552673,0.00004729248,0.00005512963,0.0001024088,0.00003471117,0.00004282001,0.00007354325,0.000178261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001059398,0.00005480369,0.00001304362,0.00006509791,0.0000536923,0.00006668074,0.00001255624,0.0003009074,0.00004054424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001658424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003313943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002428449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001557807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993963,0.00006839953,0.00008953198,0.0001889085,0.0001598586,0.0000970579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997579,0.00009809124,0.00002333328,0.00008792779,0.000006339812,0.00002636895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009929742,0.0004327834,0.005418619,0.000008289216,3.320596e-7,0.00005563876,0.01349485,0.000009183658,0.9549602,0.01379609,0.0002484752,0.01156557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021557,0.0004743868,0.1418496,0.0001409683,0.00002246666,0.00001649039,0.001216392,0.0006085778,0.8497416,0.001610856,0.001658397,0.0005045576],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982459,0.00002632149,0.00002918854,0.0004253135,0.000121062,0.00009537012,0.000002135572,0.00002525946,0.001029443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998714,0.00003918753,0.00004179436,0.0003879426,0.00001513559,0.00003132353,0.000001025421,0.00000674593,0.0007628616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.136431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.223483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079178579","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2014.950270","title":"Structural and Interpersonal Benefits and Risks of Participation in HIV Research: Perspectives of Female Sex Workers in Guatemala","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Sex work; Interpersonal communication; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Family medicine; Psychiatry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2737290850287933,"gpt":0.5003943284700195,"spread":0.2266652434412262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002700054,0.00006053816,0.0001542144,0.000166192,0.0001267497,0.00002139242,0.00008323139,0.0002414514,0.00002924652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007304508,0.00005499208,0.00001700767,0.0002910317,0.0009004668,0.0000913326,0.00004611602,0.0006342236,6.164257e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000376797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000712407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007131029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006032403,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984087,0.0006709082,0.0001987209,0.0001747135,0.0003501573,0.0001967424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990754,0.0006030906,0.0000624438,0.00007346006,0.0001320093,0.00005356032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001642147,0.00002801728,0.6159829,0.000008050522,0.000002134191,9.756931e-7,0.3773154,0.00001477547,0.0001086385,0.001765418,0.000001507926,0.004755779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002444983,0.00005716071,0.7427252,0.0001844622,0.000009723656,2.8305e-7,0.2559204,0.00008612265,0.000294287,0.0004027178,0.00001784895,0.00005732336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976785,0.0009705429,8.201578e-7,0.0006832168,0.0000422945,0.0001674554,0.000001708892,0.000005958436,0.0004495412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993608,0.0003283273,0.0001339747,0.000004429703,0.00002398468,0.0000118339,0.000001238347,0.00000529905,0.0001300925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1267423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396856568","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2347658","title":"Fraudulent participation in psychological research using virtual synchronous interviews: ethical challenges and potential solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster Children's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.6571028878007732,"gpt":0.6432007040709535,"spread":0.01390218372981966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02644902,0.0001130682,0.0001877701,0.0002120902,0.0006851833,0.0001640938,0.0001682343,0.0008240193,0.0001725209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00210987,0.0001017894,0.00006758974,0.0003627127,0.001429406,0.0001578402,0.0001401067,0.003591125,0.00002742475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002133042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001732621,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001040941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002178308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893113,0.008561015,0.0003378717,0.0004631288,0.0007887715,0.0005378601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973608,0.002118034,0.00003017139,0.0001490506,0.000191727,0.0001502544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665253,0.0003332675,0.0000833083,0.00003500508,0.000007273497,0.0001031226,0.2571549,0.000008950161,0.0009761865,0.4684533,0.00003510819,0.272793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00205319,0.004454543,0.2851836,0.003259531,0.0004498479,0.00009260899,0.3925552,0.01177019,0.0003013054,0.2437906,0.05367332,0.00241606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586865,0.009447233,0.006992702,0.02237616,0.0008837389,0.0004081872,0.000008455912,0.00008053862,0.001116444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944414,0.002260611,0.002708001,0.0001061419,0.0002512117,0.0001182857,0.000002352262,0.00001390662,0.00009806783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2851003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323568189","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2023.2187804","title":"Grey zones and good practice: A European survey of academic integrity among undergraduate students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1455307160907965,"gpt":0.4581476099517395,"spread":0.312616893860943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02858218,0.0001618284,0.0002480317,0.0001277682,0.0006262469,0.00009505705,0.00067431,0.001324578,0.00002696092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01655714,0.0001586368,0.00005397278,0.0007130628,0.0009497473,0.0004964487,0.0002998617,0.009885268,0.0001116014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003688947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01472945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924255,0.005084974,0.0004394952,0.0003444846,0.001296964,0.0004086074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994917,0.00379159,0.0003031787,0.0001915939,0.0006091467,0.0001874762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002237837,0.00009361869,0.9299154,0.00001813121,0.00002635018,0.00003780923,0.04949702,5.273317e-7,0.0001127758,0.01582922,0.001427652,0.003019125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002068415,0.0000436639,0.9836394,0.0000973691,0.00009748358,0.000002632321,0.009814885,0.00000455782,0.00005361438,0.001640551,0.004206319,0.0001927501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849741,0.0001256407,0.00006321417,0.00937596,0.0005406818,0.0003485064,0.00007016883,0.0001529928,0.004348662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938257,0.002842456,0.000159281,0.000314375,0.0001129657,0.00001312305,0.0000369499,0.00002342746,0.002671706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05372394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898159239","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1526087","title":"How Can Ethics Support Innovative Health Care for an Aging Population?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"AGE-WELL; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Autonomy; Population ageing; Bioethics; Dementia; Health care; Agency (philosophy); Population; Face (sociological concept); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Social science; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3627123737524311,"gpt":0.6071143627369627,"spread":0.2444019889845316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324567,0.0001892451,0.0003003681,0.0002087705,0.001613707,0.00007390065,0.0003149737,0.00108406,0.0002093697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000775522,0.0001996258,0.00005713184,0.0004354117,0.000534013,0.0001312579,0.00004243456,0.003099134,0.0000238356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003331591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003118626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01021617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03298896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964316,0.001465359,0.0003861304,0.0005816238,0.0003987052,0.000736523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949031,0.0009150284,0.0002145908,0.0006160014,0.003093407,0.0002579006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002616568,0.0001647642,0.3051663,0.00009882769,0.00002189549,0.000002665197,0.6250198,2.964715e-8,0.00003330447,0.04658843,0.004547866,0.01832996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007086689,0.002516974,0.7202233,0.00004344075,0.00003433765,0.00001665547,0.2197901,8.149095e-7,0.00009122154,0.001712237,0.05445816,0.0004041233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8398566,0.0002520807,0.000342932,0.1544539,0.002773404,0.001454254,0.0002483847,0.0001299477,0.0004885327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811656,0.0000218885,0.001585306,0.01092615,0.001279215,0.0006080783,0.001365511,0.00005770702,0.002990492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.415057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411426071","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2518270","title":"Bots, scammers, and fraudulent responders: a year of disrupted data collection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Data collection; Computer science; Internet privacy; Business; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1591134270294539,"gpt":0.4568331882725826,"spread":0.2977197612431287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009423239,0.0001342226,0.0002832949,0.0002360365,0.0001158157,0.00001947131,0.0001840724,0.000327115,0.00008555681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001138769,0.0001290442,0.00003302297,0.0005140648,0.0002116189,0.00009289044,0.0002408411,0.000873697,0.00001568047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007620027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005043593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004058349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002688028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985495,0.0001478641,0.0003128861,0.0003897822,0.0004086175,0.0001914117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984345,0.0003217587,0.00008555529,0.0008701686,0.0001834942,0.000104521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003854388,0.003658001,0.5825447,0.001544732,0.0005154806,0.0003274668,0.06125959,0.000002418123,0.1123109,0.006292264,0.1088253,0.1188648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00805059,0.001142526,0.8569016,0.001610583,0.002908458,0.00006055359,0.0542759,0.0005450686,0.01643974,0.0003615294,0.05707965,0.0006238368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896821,0.0006033677,0.0003892698,0.006161778,0.0003575431,0.0007416651,0.0001232882,0.00008085236,0.001860085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892448,0.0004135755,0.0024365,0.0005325237,0.00005078077,0.00003142507,0.0002102188,0.00002806703,0.007052113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2743569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5262271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093840756","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2012.748634","title":"What Would I Do? Civilians' Ethical Decision Making in Response to Military Dilemmas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Moral dilemma; Psychology; Social psychology; Social dilemma; Dimension (graph theory); Ethical decision; Dilemma; Moral reasoning; Ethical dilemma; Moral disengagement; Political science; Epistemology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2017176179654245,"gpt":0.4172194608172201,"spread":0.2155018428517956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029061,0.0002069162,0.0002063754,0.000242628,0.0002246484,0.00005302122,0.0004338245,0.0012426,0.0003450524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003003953,0.0001915898,0.00009453376,0.0003949588,0.000228255,0.0004730136,0.0002404933,0.00441483,0.0006831537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001392119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007038542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002071883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007172438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965842,0.0009565518,0.0003870016,0.0005642463,0.0008739238,0.0006340752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967228,0.00246682,0.00004186104,0.0004447446,0.00004849588,0.0002753198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007671432,0.003565436,0.06937149,0.00004215078,0.000006090944,0.0009369052,0.04452755,0.0001389197,0.7338991,0.007982616,0.00834076,0.1235175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007813742,0.0003209448,0.9565759,0.0007112144,0.00002279013,0.0001239174,0.0007256459,0.00001211507,0.008808956,0.002582044,0.02881018,0.0005249588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574655,0.0003041633,0.0001526659,0.03860474,0.002940072,0.000349543,0.00001252467,0.00005764983,0.0001131431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679023,0.0001123501,0.00161129,0.02986847,0.0001322171,0.00009127316,0.000001658189,0.00002328919,0.0002571354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391607910","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2306134","title":"Bibliometric review and mapping analysis of publication ethics research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Originality; Publishing; Misconduct; Bibliometrics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Intellectual property; Research integrity; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Qualitative research","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4041699495895388,"gpt":0.552038113106941,"spread":0.1478681635174021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05139836,0.00007137932,0.0002428126,0.0241014,0.0006031473,0.0002009596,0.0003342327,0.001475656,0.0005633684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0204237,0.0000672694,0.0001015214,0.1460156,0.0006472983,0.0002978923,0.00008922047,0.008870618,0.00003681103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008959518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008511556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005401503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008491143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957339,0.001815308,0.0003432026,0.000283122,0.001549648,0.0002748208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922266,0.005681658,0.00007207134,0.0002009906,0.001703661,0.0001150429],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002468646,0.0001027749,0.01730948,0.002130618,0.0003490772,0.00001197629,0.1501123,4.42202e-7,0.0004795983,0.6903405,0.02848449,0.1106763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004848658,0.00003418519,0.04951664,0.001368954,0.002844588,0.000001932268,0.006600927,0.0001084584,0.00007813615,0.004226421,0.9349028,0.0002684758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09033427,0.3067921,0.002253459,0.5509446,0.000914377,0.001805282,0.0002152493,0.0003623723,0.0463784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195145,0.2715647,0.0008119181,0.002425852,0.0001773842,0.00009321014,0.00006984704,0.00001602222,0.005326613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070221634","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.865525","title":"The Judas Within: A Look at the Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"John Jay College of Criminal Justice","keywords":"Sexual abuse; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08772144611088523,"gpt":0.3874448111754265,"spread":0.2997233650645412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483082,0.0001922538,0.0001704572,0.00001740512,0.005542456,0.0004888786,0.001079982,0.0003063672,0.0001964086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009122147,0.00008185117,0.00009140022,0.0003788518,0.001775261,0.0002093237,0.0001908675,0.00168061,0.0004618677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002895986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09415977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961832,0.001433008,0.0003106161,0.0002943537,0.001204268,0.0005746192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969864,0.002049712,0.0001379609,0.0004696448,0.000277023,0.00007924149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003881863,0.00006360291,0.01161205,0.000002917696,0.00001078441,0.000005689218,0.9745772,0.000002442593,0.0002252721,0.002698866,0.009517265,0.001279946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002457989,0.00004639504,0.2546033,0.000013457,0.00009690307,0.000003920558,0.5994353,0.000004420856,0.00007604466,0.0003482891,0.1448364,0.0002898673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992246,0.000636936,4.421054e-7,0.09674896,0.0003876375,0.001127171,0.000006114021,0.00004946473,0.001818617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868304,0.0003618107,0.0000359387,0.002974591,0.0002876772,0.0009262736,0.000002466591,0.00001539908,0.008565478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.375142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039778749","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1203_3","title":"Applied Ethics in Mental Health in Cuba: Part II-Power Differentials, Dilemmas, Resources, and Limitations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Nursing ethics; Ethical dilemma; Criticism; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Mental health; Applied ethics; Professional conduct; Action (physics); Professional ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1782055018577115,"gpt":0.3965893256575285,"spread":0.2183838237998171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002157376,0.0001987992,0.0002944038,0.0002015965,0.0004152708,0.00006529766,0.0001628213,0.0006053361,0.0009876554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002428997,0.0002051662,0.00004468339,0.0002570094,0.000129131,0.00009955661,0.0001004551,0.003226388,0.00007026683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006374603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000540957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001026512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00792152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975268,0.0006287237,0.0005498045,0.0004922017,0.0003799642,0.0004225598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980505,0.001258936,0.0001358744,0.000376248,0.00004769005,0.0001307357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001678248,0.003608237,0.01223444,0.0000484275,0.00002454233,0.00005265704,0.7869129,0.000004907972,0.0004585671,0.01291354,0.009741136,0.1738328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002829093,0.0004179547,0.1255046,0.0001930221,0.00004797667,0.00002531525,0.01087274,0.00007469485,0.000009344396,0.0003941209,0.8591016,0.0005295307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514869,0.005157969,0.00001731469,0.03895291,0.0008805497,0.000624226,0.00004614533,0.00005910356,0.002774874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879001,0.007909592,0.0002892846,0.002454306,0.00005905976,0.000139446,0.00005839047,0.00003731817,0.001152482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8493605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075988183","doi":"10.1080/10508420802063863","title":"Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Empirical research; Variety (cybernetics); Nothing; Food and drug administration; Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.641743448509592,"gpt":0.6522462024212058,"spread":0.01050275391161382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02906997,0.0002647458,0.0005752964,0.001637528,0.001009457,0.00005111736,0.0004889711,0.00390336,0.000305518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01497597,0.0002370735,0.0001414308,0.003210036,0.001260279,0.00007271166,0.0003126999,0.05445961,0.0009398941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005409009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003638149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002208781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004315739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865514,0.004405933,0.0008061685,0.0009906038,0.005747922,0.001497964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863026,0.009227964,0.00005405081,0.001074836,0.002593451,0.0007471194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004486632,0.002123264,0.8860065,0.0004817401,0.000007503158,0.007729263,0.03685721,0.000002663423,0.00009617431,0.01430737,0.05057162,0.001368047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017767,0.003099767,0.8368754,0.0002762541,0.00004904473,0.000218171,0.001823171,0.00002165439,0.0003393143,0.002324927,0.1527382,0.0004574347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8335692,0.002018121,0.000001731794,0.155179,0.0003832921,0.0009413777,0.00000883789,0.00009557731,0.007802803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769696,0.01024248,0.0007330636,0.00380002,0.002593269,0.0002657599,0.00002603293,0.00008051741,0.005289248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.151379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069671793","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1302_05","title":"Dual Relationship Activities: Principal Component Analysis of Counselors' Attitudes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Typology; Deliverable; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Exploratory factor analysis; Variance (accounting); Social psychology; Dual purpose; Survey instrument; Statistics; Applied psychology; Mathematics; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Accounting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1368557992179677,"gpt":0.4295233606012192,"spread":0.2926675613832515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222059,0.000158307,0.0003350146,0.0002999245,0.0002259131,0.00003881739,0.0001391504,0.0003784546,0.002484524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003405577,0.0001576359,0.0002162567,0.0006287769,0.0001385892,0.0001405961,0.00002073103,0.001055162,0.00006527705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003737195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001166597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005073045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005712187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977351,0.0006757476,0.0004418243,0.0003403865,0.0005620441,0.0002448324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966303,0.002327783,0.0002088901,0.0005667447,0.0001830983,0.00008318308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151248,0.002240704,0.8576995,0.0000382261,0.0009747415,0.00007373794,0.05879493,0.0002827688,0.001933032,0.07434352,0.0002619735,0.003205569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005794786,0.0001459732,0.953742,0.00002646125,0.003032236,0.00001769191,0.0028223,0.00006193219,0.0001328117,0.0001087512,0.03901317,0.0003171882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951054,0.0006412033,0.0004217224,0.0002355447,0.0006628379,0.0001845416,0.00004013144,0.00004972739,0.002658908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974235,0.0001210651,0.0006624598,0.0001193838,0.00002983556,0.00004859138,0.00004680927,0.00002113579,0.001527279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09604247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411028296","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2512069","title":"Bridging ethics and culture: a co-created, culturally sensitive informed consent framework for research in Bimoba and Mamprusi communities in Ghana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Bridging (networking); Research ethics; Cultural sensitivity; Culturally sensitive; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Engineering; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5439419092564145,"gpt":0.6475948913198467,"spread":0.1036529820634322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05046863,0.0001949679,0.000381505,0.0005009091,0.002214901,0.0004175649,0.0002768957,0.001297374,0.000008818631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04312221,0.0001809962,0.00005325754,0.001053671,0.0056619,0.0002605202,0.0002487407,0.009680648,0.000001780695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000385694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003246826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04175296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2040157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9842144,0.0131083,0.0004617019,0.0003328925,0.001035246,0.0008474924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309168,0.06729385,0.00008438074,0.0002277865,0.001281278,0.0001959045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001022881,0.00006381104,0.00717292,0.0002995105,0.00001367393,0.00001987912,0.6200332,5.971046e-7,0.0001113586,0.3659043,0.0001638958,0.006114521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001000198,0.0001557343,0.009298929,0.002795509,0.00002631998,0.000002998042,0.8671678,0.00007911062,0.0003497791,0.1074707,0.01130517,0.0003476737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8587938,0.001893707,0.005618233,0.1233875,0.0002496668,0.003347393,0.0001706821,0.0000877727,0.006451274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416679,0.01290025,0.04120487,0.002102365,0.00007763204,0.000414106,0.00004588547,0.00002289244,0.001564157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2584336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790852260","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1447383","title":"Can Norman Daniels Help You Get a Wheelchair? A Commentary on Durocher et al.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bruyère; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Equity (law); Distributive justice; Assistive technology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Health care; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Health equity; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Human–computer interaction; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1580694616617526,"gpt":0.5003347327486768,"spread":0.3422652710869242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002443073,0.0002142298,0.0002464929,0.0001047804,0.001469794,0.000009201218,0.0006217508,0.0006760873,0.001037856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000429644,0.0001995894,0.00007115203,0.0001735125,0.0006698123,0.00006273532,0.0005495373,0.004864467,0.0005810467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003031986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003374607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001272139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00859528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969259,0.001436585,0.0004706076,0.0003867575,0.0003275604,0.0004526072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996852,0.000851372,0.0002255642,0.001531507,0.0003951982,0.0001444027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001289667,0.001171,0.3796043,0.00003669124,0.00003738226,0.00001439624,0.01953808,1.179634e-7,0.002325082,0.01124135,0.5815039,0.004398743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008812517,0.0003766191,0.234028,0.0001612271,0.00005466051,0.000002337232,0.003859277,0.000009946722,0.0005264849,0.000478102,0.7593423,0.0002797757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5557021,0.00003455125,0.0001897789,0.4299428,0.0008378845,0.001150153,0.0001426497,0.0005031235,0.01149692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7221727,0.00004664574,0.000844211,0.2745464,0.00008924846,0.0005785679,0.00007954364,0.00003281312,0.001609885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1778384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410694487","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2500356","title":"A qualitative evaluation of ETHICA-4P, a toolkit for ethical clinical decision-making and overcoming cultural barriers in psychotherapy in the United Kingdom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychotherapist; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3553685669880825,"gpt":0.6327728980917181,"spread":0.2774043311036356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04444535,0.000167276,0.0003474671,0.0003231763,0.000184717,0.00007545435,0.0002995866,0.001261428,0.0001197873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01221542,0.000127109,0.0001286381,0.0007222837,0.0002766262,0.0001155577,0.00002636309,0.003886304,0.000001572107],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005057396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003715351,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911436,0.006379298,0.000997958,0.0004851886,0.0007358977,0.0002580413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626734,0.03605208,0.0002212634,0.0003915172,0.0006197423,0.00004205733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002905065,0.0005577495,0.02001141,0.00004805483,0.00006522997,0.00001100727,0.6886241,0.00006450436,0.0002407023,0.08059496,0.000529609,0.2063476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02729087,0.001560682,0.3694014,0.00435561,0.00124475,0.00002920849,0.3348869,0.01637902,0.00001876989,0.1968364,0.04681771,0.001178687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831795,0.0006694425,0.002316401,0.01193005,0.0006662442,0.001084324,0.00001396245,0.00001336244,0.0001267422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915006,0.0003000236,0.002818886,0.005007962,0.00003809189,0.0002949123,0.00001049549,0.0000148417,0.00001419461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3537371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1742562591","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2011.570168","title":"Ethical Elder Care for Families","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Elder care; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.214425687137705,"gpt":0.4891901297156915,"spread":0.2747644425779865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008156901,0.0001616079,0.0002554974,0.00009065963,0.0009647718,0.000006093714,0.0002052765,0.00170823,0.0008312705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004162691,0.000144762,0.0001430788,0.0001264396,0.0001368908,0.00004586613,0.00007317407,0.003406724,0.0002015702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008256196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005231711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001594439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00141164,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.0003362599,0.0003651577,0.0002921443,0.0002493818,0.0004929068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998054,0.0007274475,0.0001056814,0.0003649903,0.0006132669,0.000134655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002398616,0.0001966109,0.03703826,0.0005401035,0.00002124902,0.00001841227,0.8894287,3.960013e-8,0.000445256,0.02376713,0.02294149,0.02536293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002426126,0.0008309052,0.3261831,0.0004261167,0.0007594228,0.000004999436,0.3627447,0.000001072429,0.002035188,0.004786992,0.2989188,0.0008824655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349959,0.001387538,0.001522489,0.004427701,0.01123311,0.00369917,0.0002349309,0.000666515,0.04183263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870852,0.000109316,0.006062911,0.00197574,0.0004454383,0.0009460847,0.00007077421,0.00006167976,0.003242825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5266839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406431030","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2447955","title":"Ethics in Action: Personal Reflections of Canadian Psychologists","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Applied psychology; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3018000422771403,"gpt":0.5323434103995274,"spread":0.2305433681223871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002013544,0.0001194128,0.0001670619,0.0008910568,0.0002600396,0.0000281129,0.000195657,0.000957272,0.001402791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004976607,0.0001295322,0.00008063056,0.001161242,0.0001384545,0.00008460128,0.00001995018,0.003664543,0.00007539189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001005076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008289125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3708252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7567818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983506,0.0004636268,0.0003263333,0.0003305935,0.0002469231,0.0002819268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983806,0.0008445125,0.00007280282,0.0003586927,0.0002530469,0.00009033085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008300748,0.003722935,0.148294,0.0002604943,0.0002239692,0.0007493394,0.3382002,0.00003839035,0.01356061,0.1302202,0.03304036,0.3308594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008058036,0.0001558934,0.294932,0.0001442902,0.0001158718,0.00004889613,0.007760611,0.00001536465,0.0001106764,0.0007279631,0.6949213,0.0002613792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8650999,0.001680027,0.0001833495,0.05866411,0.006131458,0.000395591,0.00004815495,0.00007214559,0.06772525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880157,0.0008896053,0.0004629129,0.002438796,0.00006384923,0.00007311581,0.0000146889,0.00001446546,0.008026932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092314123","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2020.1822175","title":"Neuropsychological validation of a brief quiz to examine comprehension of consent information in observational studies of substance users","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Cognition; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Logistic regression; Receiver operating characteristic; Informed consent; Neuropsychology; Test (biology); Proxy (statistics); Cognitive impairment; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.5550257426068418,"gpt":0.5161979715579029,"spread":0.03882777104893886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007972869,0.0001004731,0.0003280199,0.0001213689,0.0000276489,0.000003493617,0.0001435295,0.0002088291,0.00005216196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001539484,0.00009111363,0.0000496588,0.0004262752,0.0001745395,0.0000766993,0.00002911272,0.0004243242,0.00001029654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002328886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008445149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001373351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000526871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979138,0.0004064944,0.000906634,0.0001830615,0.0004559323,0.0001340971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.001436775,0.0003550167,0.0002066129,0.0006080789,0.00007111448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003689259,0.002332048,0.4051479,0.001074418,0.0001217257,0.000302976,0.4034013,0.002417025,0.1271175,0.007881311,0.00197983,0.04453478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006685516,0.0004973253,0.9929289,0.0002133189,0.00001633007,0.000008526892,0.00362664,0.0000161928,0.001417066,0.00007571193,0.0004474106,0.00008401302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946712,0.00007072997,0.0003322763,0.00407034,0.0003301908,0.000395053,0.00005939305,0.00001552559,0.00005533833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977066,0.00004525717,0.001015743,0.00114534,0.00001712103,0.00002269048,0.00003240888,0.000006636275,0.000008240165],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5877811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3715506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908879940","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1563866","title":"The End of Dependence? Ethical Issues in the Adoption of Assistive Technologies: An Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Assistive technology; Sustainability; Reflection (computer programming); Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05538514951678071,"gpt":0.4194989172025427,"spread":0.364113767685762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005901629,0.0001144028,0.0002703844,0.00010358,0.0001107125,0.00001576947,0.0003147323,0.001232467,0.00003434196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002775124,0.00006701871,0.00006530739,0.0003853603,0.0006226507,0.0000694069,0.00005943735,0.005735332,0.000007750427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006261105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003707782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007604571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005561368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976502,0.0005196964,0.0004778674,0.0002634546,0.0008865807,0.0002022011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971685,0.001291333,0.0002020026,0.0007225857,0.0005834571,0.00003214467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006440002,0.001393368,0.4276596,0.001075658,0.00004885484,0.00006756659,0.06313172,0.00001887656,0.01584295,0.3965743,0.0006998673,0.0928432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001615399,0.004592197,0.8040941,0.0004895327,0.0004724906,0.0001124689,0.1043589,0.0001317374,0.01562472,0.007606245,0.06044848,0.0004537618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8650358,0.001110548,0.00002380696,0.1324272,0.0004419589,0.0006928964,0.0000101415,0.0000396479,0.0002179374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972937,0.00128947,0.000691787,0.0002742169,0.0002194475,0.00004992022,0.00002104308,0.00001189736,0.000148516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3889681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}