{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":13,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"07f7f71a8707","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance"}},"results":[{"id":"W3159747714","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10017","title":"Freedom of Thought in Canada: The History of a Forgetting and the Potential of a Remembering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Phenomenon; Freedom of thought; Law; Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; Forgetting; Freedom of the press; Freedom of association; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03029012862506462,"gpt":0.2543291883215786,"spread":0.224039059696514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007923509,0.0003087081,0.0007159236,0.003347683,0.03042381,0.01622889,0.002888174,0.004197533,0.0133095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0214983,0.0003869628,0.0005139237,0.004888343,0.06417114,0.005001254,0.005539413,0.007733317,0.0004473357],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1603203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1800303,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906865,0.001608681,0.0002800243,0.001058651,0.003753954,0.002612244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782492,0.008839109,0.0009097975,0.00183615,0.007273075,0.002892568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003528767,0.00001425245,0.001205669,0.00006559123,0.000008562115,0.0002864997,0.01833484,0.000295852,0.00007629126,0.9339222,0.02104257,0.02471248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002951781,0.00002690505,0.007527186,0.0008641306,0.00003087301,0.0002991577,0.02136854,0.00078714,0.0003967394,0.2048006,0.7636978,0.0001714695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0997482,0.01911126,0.005976837,0.2140937,0.001350851,0.00008181218,0.0007458676,0.0001477074,0.6587438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626539,0.004041716,0.0009637013,0.006641566,0.0001919537,0.00001807781,0.00008939863,0.00006361884,0.02533595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1603203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390519823","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10066","title":"Rule by Metrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University; Brigham Young University; University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Order (exchange); Intervention (counseling); Data science; Computer science; Management science; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Marta Infantino","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mauro Bussani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05201412681779061,"gpt":0.3097679852978599,"spread":0.2577538584800693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01647061,0.001236056,0.001980706,0.003469904,0.003045668,0.01400628,0.003123368,0.00428331,0.01614215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06394271,0.0006529706,0.002085559,0.003660999,0.01532085,0.01401389,0.006113882,0.005738365,0.005366461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004054792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00475769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003648191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002665722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9676409,0.01203734,0.0033976,0.008112565,0.007535897,0.001275653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526861,0.02173089,0.003231879,0.01420542,0.00691438,0.001231283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000787806,0.00001116416,0.0003895552,0.00005445591,0.00001850032,0.00003932057,0.0001489121,0.001737662,0.00007512164,0.9780617,0.004414392,0.0150414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008083984,0.00001272134,0.0001140611,0.00005664616,0.00001032125,0.0000543661,0.00005881355,0.004206313,0.0001440022,0.9620431,0.03327867,0.00001290048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009061188,0.002774872,0.6893229,0.0172919,0.001295158,0.0004463386,0.001075808,0.000836795,0.2778951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221917,0.004057835,0.3929687,0.00536555,0.002425699,0.001582455,0.002484268,0.001026095,0.06789757],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08710593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392109082","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10068","title":"Investment in Infrastructure: A Comparative Study of the Regulation of Online Single Submission in Indonesia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indonesian; Investment (military); Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Business; Statutory law; Normative; Finance; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Widhayani Dian Pawestri","is_ca":false},{"name":"Vincentius Sutanto","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kukuh Leksono Suminaring Aditya","is_ca":false},{"name":"Qona’aha Noor Maajid","is_ca":false},{"name":"Khofifah Nura Adila","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02785636637159275,"gpt":0.2716685645830257,"spread":0.2438121982114329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843375,0.0001964417,0.0004950523,0.002810799,0.006599538,0.004714374,0.001210884,0.0006616867,0.003430918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007179566,0.0002872008,0.0002701258,0.005222917,0.005879622,0.001676349,0.002115058,0.001599579,0.0001523716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07220499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06948553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970095,0.0003368641,0.00009962604,0.0002648733,0.001204883,0.001084202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992956,0.001421021,0.001810338,0.0002286513,0.002125843,0.001458109],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000314293,0.0007847287,0.5389987,0.0003997266,0.0001206592,0.003153683,0.3632511,0.0008654147,0.002647599,0.04789504,0.004883034,0.03668594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001504837,0.00006499059,0.6686116,0.0001744863,0.00004077982,0.000188411,0.3148252,0.0007650146,0.0003107783,0.0004697184,0.0144653,0.00006872299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.98682,0.0001560584,0.00006076108,0.0005227216,0.000004200258,0.00003641809,0.0001043549,0.000002274469,0.01229302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982064,0.0002100093,0.00006151582,0.00006862017,0.000001396519,0.00001387479,0.00006733697,0.000003731772,0.001367145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07220499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5238863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122199453","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060013","title":"Inside the Judicial Mind: Exploring Judicial Methodology in the Mixed Legal System of Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Jurisdiction; Political science; De facto; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Judicial opinion","authors":[{"name":"Rosalie Jukier","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1913512860324122,"gpt":0.3513547767073328,"spread":0.1600034906749206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010684,0.0002873563,0.0003731096,0.003644438,0.01436641,0.01139933,0.002326002,0.001643448,0.00352108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02198915,0.0003296897,0.0002776408,0.003887047,0.0155861,0.003221562,0.003591068,0.002030311,0.0001406616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09669288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08697185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9342633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9757274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889153,0.006153553,0.0002150955,0.0007475141,0.002192801,0.001775729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752535,0.01367896,0.002251383,0.0007547163,0.006188809,0.001872667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290027,0.0001370875,0.1014527,0.0002262752,0.0001286987,0.001696296,0.2748821,0.003103549,0.002629563,0.5279124,0.008108363,0.07959406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109364,0.0001764417,0.3028068,0.001301919,0.0001592441,0.0006411657,0.4423934,0.01743038,0.001986184,0.0741087,0.1586278,0.0002585243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8291218,0.00392158,0.01225428,0.02098526,0.00009085647,0.0001876562,0.000199727,0.00004106423,0.1331978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948313,0.0003107358,0.001596078,0.000448059,0.00001257229,0.00002878388,0.00002721798,0.000007596327,0.002737765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09669288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7015592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172109281","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10018","title":"Introduction to a Comparative Study of the Right to Freedom of Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Bethany Shiner","is_ca":false},{"name":"Patrick O’Callaghan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04399751502040146,"gpt":0.326293321170352,"spread":0.2822958061499506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005740451,0.0007862307,0.001148586,0.005564358,0.003411707,0.005140926,0.001398374,0.004321896,0.04429157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373704,0.0004680773,0.001546512,0.006288129,0.008148179,0.008082296,0.003506513,0.008106008,0.002935016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005926946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002492505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005083362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004405288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963591,0.002159712,0.0001885952,0.0004195085,0.0007022769,0.000170813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984721,0.0127298,0.0002528148,0.0005861088,0.001315431,0.0003947094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001635505,0.00003588997,0.0001003601,0.0003390925,0.00001272006,0.00007438794,0.0006141394,0.0001929914,0.0001202336,0.8772586,0.1033297,0.01790551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001344375,0.00004236107,0.0008346322,0.001517262,0.0000114916,0.0001000935,0.0005338262,0.0001716906,0.00007067962,0.3245592,0.6721253,0.00001992046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002732014,0.2259495,0.02436986,0.1704658,0.03086443,0.0003251274,0.001996694,0.0001183187,0.5431783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.218903,0.31332,0.05745051,0.09329221,0.1193128,0.002889325,0.003620616,0.0006711117,0.1905404],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04429157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14817,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123521668","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101007","title":"Comparative Legal Scholarship as Ordinary Legal Scholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Law; Comparative law; Sociology; Subject matter; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Stephen A. Smith","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06198581062873119,"gpt":0.3434962238909628,"spread":0.2815104132622316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02053517,0.0005936991,0.001561148,0.006052417,0.007315565,0.01487337,0.002502089,0.0062443,0.005735269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02885239,0.0003517877,0.0005234603,0.005485558,0.0730426,0.02081128,0.01053461,0.00582945,0.0006975736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008308821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007665254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002127954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002285978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9773734,0.01611973,0.0006724307,0.00140464,0.003563592,0.0008661801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9568585,0.03106693,0.00174249,0.00483294,0.003143061,0.002356036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002183329,0.000006487592,0.00006599829,0.00004016406,0.000001592941,0.00001565695,0.001641663,0.0000431483,0.00001268105,0.9953309,0.0007446713,0.002094786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005127987,0.00001433119,0.0000914899,0.0002210742,0.000002205656,0.00005108903,0.002125564,0.0001889857,0.00003656862,0.9419691,0.05529039,0.000003936037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05663065,0.08203413,0.07490794,0.162704,0.007330725,0.0001595481,0.0001241839,0.0001810902,0.6159278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322827,0.01460079,0.01766124,0.01184412,0.006703673,0.0002676661,0.0001166155,0.00008792907,0.01643523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02053517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1086017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415134675","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10106","title":"Comparative Analysis of Individual Case Reviews in Assisted Dying Oversight Systems Internationally","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); State (computer science); Retrospective cohort study; MEDLINE","authors":[{"name":"Betheli O’Carroll","is_ca":false},{"name":"Madeleine Archer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lindy Willmott","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ben White","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.3482609536579014,"gpt":0.4340181675431241,"spread":0.08575721388522267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1944823,0.0003049492,0.00115264,0.01504831,0.001824327,0.008158429,0.002457327,0.001689126,0.005374018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4289683,0.0005443619,0.001169128,0.01465654,0.003278572,0.003987666,0.004623282,0.001576184,0.0003512825],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01493664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01296356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01213104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02476796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.68235,0.2484113,0.0204608,0.0085163,0.03194207,0.008319547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2640476,0.4947162,0.1208237,0.02102635,0.09334354,0.006042683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00269469,0.0006664333,0.3598766,0.008281566,0.003783936,0.001587922,0.0670817,0.01512011,0.001773525,0.2550103,0.01749788,0.2666253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000604019,0.003540974,0.6830274,0.01388871,0.003357166,0.003343677,0.0825212,0.01098621,0.004430125,0.03690198,0.1569058,0.0004926987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7632822,0.04492287,0.02102183,0.008271202,0.0003917355,0.00325783,0.002371466,0.0001437657,0.1563371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985643,0.003545418,0.006092143,0.000684673,0.0001494866,0.0007925775,0.0004409219,0.00003248241,0.002619324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1944823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796901051","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060016","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Statutory law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Gerrit Pienaar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07231443054933451,"gpt":0.3534564155081441,"spread":0.2811419849588096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01619549,0.0006649626,0.0008578975,0.007945572,0.004729485,0.007589827,0.002620805,0.002678944,0.01035834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137674,0.000589864,0.001297133,0.00986883,0.01392901,0.004944562,0.003984847,0.004030437,0.002934836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008171356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0137397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01354251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9781713,0.009791913,0.002488986,0.003026719,0.00550354,0.00101765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832191,0.008746978,0.002059484,0.001852058,0.003923792,0.0001985926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002754998,0.00005587488,0.0053773,0.0005085785,0.00003360866,0.0003310147,0.01704451,0.0005604686,0.001144686,0.9161065,0.009926054,0.0488838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003230786,0.0001568119,0.01258016,0.001547169,0.00004180142,0.001024873,0.01580397,0.002330312,0.003598223,0.2956333,0.6671375,0.0001136058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04274988,0.0043146,0.5443929,0.01025609,0.002416143,0.005982861,0.005463959,0.0003237801,0.3840997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3253991,0.005783207,0.539813,0.006561743,0.0008552655,0.01231471,0.003451029,0.0005171893,0.1053048],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01619549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08565098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774451565","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00404001","title":"Tribal Courts, Restorative Justice and Native Land Claims","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Restorative justice; Political science; Sovereignty; Federal jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Treaty; Economic Justice; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Eminent domain; Sociology; Geography; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Zia Akhtar","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06678477496682644,"gpt":0.3497930897305864,"spread":0.28300831476376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954513,0.000130111,0.0002844222,0.002280932,0.009227304,0.008045744,0.001509982,0.004249956,0.00573926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130332,0.0001786699,0.0002688097,0.002399529,0.03460587,0.005713481,0.005304363,0.003234404,0.0002253663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006114024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005635337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04946206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954731,0.002176853,0.0001692735,0.0003082098,0.0007163619,0.001156196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906347,0.005349797,0.001701127,0.0004378144,0.0009647917,0.0009117206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009850442,0.000069195,0.00384579,0.00003177637,0.000006232338,0.0004208225,0.01496447,0.0001953579,0.00004981734,0.9728476,0.001586736,0.005972249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000356425,0.00006523199,0.02281745,0.0005199524,0.00002810903,0.0007139546,0.102752,0.001217784,0.0002265326,0.8165548,0.05501302,0.00005548487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5141713,0.0144156,0.002374883,0.03736483,0.0002319792,0.00003909057,0.00004164858,0.00001380633,0.4313468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958053,0.0009854969,0.0001145759,0.0007479051,0.00006998544,0.000009024528,0.000005247401,0.000002043908,0.002260419],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03418127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529929387","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101006","title":"Double Reasoning in the Codified Mixed Systems – Code and Case Law as Simultaneous Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Jurisprudence; Law; Tort; Syllogism; Jurisdiction; Causation; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of law; Terminology; Correctness; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Liability; Linguistics; Philosophy; Algorithm","authors":[{"name":"Vernon Valentine Palmer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05827337701842011,"gpt":0.3064186016921694,"spread":0.2481452246737493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0384363,0.0007850851,0.0009226394,0.007399014,0.00338661,0.0145856,0.003189306,0.002805367,0.005156853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08476233,0.001243647,0.001544147,0.004458568,0.03844406,0.01806492,0.009633889,0.005040321,0.0006150851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006014803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006105552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003648697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9254466,0.05246764,0.003830117,0.00460799,0.01210879,0.001538809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8924308,0.07917577,0.004797118,0.01691666,0.005696561,0.0009830294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007660973,0.000007300092,0.0003096964,0.00003261021,0.000006646365,0.00002846163,0.001196469,0.0004671428,0.00008213434,0.989117,0.0001576284,0.00858732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001736587,0.00001412234,0.0002339613,0.00008971556,0.00000882847,0.0000887376,0.0005949606,0.008240791,0.000489419,0.9829115,0.007293177,0.00001747302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02250669,0.0009307582,0.9123856,0.002867287,0.0001165922,0.0002541406,0.00007432086,0.0001220799,0.06074261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5405596,0.0003545657,0.4510967,0.0005554057,0.0001233105,0.0009166278,0.0001083756,0.00009996786,0.006185358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0384363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2032731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310047289","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10043","title":"Penalty Default Rules in French, German and Louisianan Contract Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Default rule; Order (exchange); Bad faith; Incentive; German; Contract theory; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Zackary Goldford","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02904507673815903,"gpt":0.2335450668967266,"spread":0.2044999901585675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005226429,0.0001622703,0.0003791421,0.002198634,0.005236037,0.006775217,0.0008436728,0.00241291,0.004115642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123309,0.0001797733,0.0004632871,0.00177393,0.007317504,0.002095561,0.001687777,0.002312863,0.000260349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02261185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008414032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.381021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3332915,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947888,0.001575502,0.0003299697,0.0005453943,0.001354408,0.00140606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925557,0.003206712,0.0008872295,0.0005591197,0.002232773,0.0005585806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002618268,0.00002575125,0.006647605,0.00001166492,0.000008248257,0.0001464601,0.002170641,0.001120104,0.0001199495,0.9799858,0.003975746,0.005761891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001554007,0.0001007574,0.0979221,0.0004531366,0.00007216136,0.0007262912,0.01018115,0.02387507,0.001010036,0.6281237,0.2370942,0.0002859893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.622349,0.002911621,0.01321737,0.01570428,0.0001093097,0.000123696,0.0007848159,0.0001246208,0.3446753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990944,0.0001922525,0.001333695,0.0008013478,0.00001800036,0.0000321817,0.00009833747,0.000006611961,0.006573534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.381021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7576063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404128434","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10076","title":"The Legal Landscape of Freedom of Association in Canada: The Complex Path to Half of a Constitutional Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Path (computing); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Association (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Dwight Newman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0298917890657874,"gpt":0.2762792482642417,"spread":0.2463874591984543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006067113,0.0002336194,0.0006354973,0.00271306,0.0312223,0.0206003,0.00230255,0.003162675,0.007520846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01095364,0.0004050566,0.0004634015,0.003925142,0.05971121,0.00521135,0.006638207,0.006395361,0.0002332379],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1692796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1952919,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900899,0.002005069,0.0002123662,0.001021032,0.003727471,0.002944233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873269,0.003985499,0.0005070839,0.0007896392,0.004293181,0.003097697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001007092,0.000007318999,0.000946929,0.00002075722,0.000006684903,0.00008925113,0.00804758,0.0003278467,0.0001088285,0.9769712,0.005963328,0.007500226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002362486,0.00002390781,0.01484645,0.0006199866,0.00003728189,0.0001621439,0.04614018,0.002026335,0.0003804022,0.5429013,0.3926419,0.0001966226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1787727,0.009950572,0.00939967,0.1793183,0.0004328052,0.0000730765,0.0004666513,0.00008001916,0.6215062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845589,0.00140845,0.001310522,0.00339586,0.00004905086,0.00001493515,0.00004853704,0.00002789865,0.009185975],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1692796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424384152","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101004","title":"Unification of Private Law in Europe and ‘Mixed Jurisdictions’: A Model for Civil Codes in Central Europe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Commercial law; Law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Political science; Competition law; Unification; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Economics; Market economy","authors":[{"name":"Mónika Józon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03611103223499261,"gpt":0.2892941634247746,"spread":0.253183131189782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004106889,0.0003080264,0.0006030173,0.002917844,0.005580944,0.0135982,0.001570366,0.003671433,0.005098297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005546128,0.0003644966,0.001093088,0.00258314,0.02419722,0.009391552,0.008208502,0.002352454,0.0003091357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01361334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007462914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05878458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04406447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996051,0.001763723,0.00009502118,0.0005355194,0.0005463561,0.001008516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972416,0.001092904,0.0003173927,0.0004629241,0.0004459818,0.0004390577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003850404,0.000004159129,0.0002296228,0.000002501185,0.000001961909,0.00002434338,0.0007540492,0.0003796252,0.0000179585,0.9976649,0.00008232096,0.0008346591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000361645,0.00003018598,0.002284143,0.0001732869,0.00002063875,0.0001395595,0.004655257,0.007294903,0.0001081277,0.9635704,0.02166096,0.0000262925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4007563,0.002268011,0.05512607,0.01116279,0.0001319855,0.0001250352,0.0000950914,0.00005931297,0.5302755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918842,0.0001555219,0.00258281,0.0003299086,0.00001542263,0.00004340359,0.0000138867,0.000006769866,0.004968045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05878458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1168848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}