{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":824,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":824,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"be37ac2582f9","filters":{"venue":"Evolution"}},"results":[{"id":"W2151541130","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01025.x","title":"EARLY BURSTS OF BODY SIZE AND SHAPE EVOLUTION ARE RARE IN COMPARATIVE DATA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":889,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive radiation; Biology; Clade; Divergence (linguistics); Evolutionary biology; Rate of evolution; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Phylogenetic tree","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03604005238871529,"gpt":0.2681305588826712,"spread":0.232090506493956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000303956,0.0001137074,0.0002237563,0.0000912665,0.0001286774,0.00001166514,0.0001990289,0.0001111409,0.0002803946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000201938,0.0001028115,0.00001894732,0.0002253265,0.0002862363,0.0003940022,0.00003408116,0.0002384821,0.00004979479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007407728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003995329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003709584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1739412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999009,0.0001009352,0.0002294362,0.0002965281,0.0001591328,0.0002049876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992436,0.0002181071,0.0001394766,0.0002714914,0.00006607412,0.00006124077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005215082,0.00001934779,0.9978865,0.00001213155,0.00001171444,0.0000020086,0.0003252163,0.00002182964,0.0002800446,0.0004235287,0.0006062819,0.0003592791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003833463,0.00006594645,0.9818776,0.0000272223,0.00001239034,0.0000087063,0.0005650637,0.0158224,0.000006432356,0.0008022328,0.0003188039,0.0001098552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925764,0.002815089,0.00008526556,0.0002498677,0.0003811134,0.0001598589,0.000192109,0.00002667234,0.003513609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999274,0.00003817072,0.0004346113,0.00001868515,0.0000750605,0.000001146309,0.00007425591,0.000001474054,0.00008264207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1702317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8411322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922073939","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01619.x","title":"MODELING STABILIZING SELECTION: EXPANDING THE ORNSTEIN-UHLENBECK MODEL OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":712,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Trait; Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Brownian motion; Constant (computer programming); Statistical physics; Evolutionary dynamics; Evolutionary biology; Stochastic process; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09601755532720588,"gpt":0.2311475967129869,"spread":0.1351300413857811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002928519,0.00009155543,0.0001074405,0.0000098712,0.000422653,0.000010201,0.00008452238,0.00005224166,0.00001902924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031472,0.00003229609,0.00006489014,0.0002230233,0.00003702583,0.0002750871,0.00004816568,0.00008789904,0.000008766018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001229428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007162148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003692292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007787967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992443,0.00004792618,0.0001586459,0.0001203486,0.0001727138,0.0002560544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997531,0.0000560438,0.00006426989,0.00001592156,0.00007495691,0.00003569757],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009828895,0.00009390654,0.06127286,0.000008268744,0.00002767976,5.202381e-8,0.000590228,0.02939126,0.8920871,0.01420853,0.0001863293,0.002035522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001230851,0.0001793494,0.1411466,0.00005614361,0.00004224944,0.000006142562,0.004045961,0.847972,0.003009388,0.003097133,0.00007870767,0.000243205],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900427,0.001130182,0.007720819,0.0001087877,0.00006398699,0.0001145666,0.00001317901,0.0000479251,0.0007578523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993666,0.00002641323,0.0001686636,0.000009075148,0.0003472457,0.00001078365,0.000003593895,6.923549e-7,0.00006695275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8890777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3250748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162253232","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01269.x","title":"THE GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF ADAPTATION UNDER MIGRATION-SELECTION BALANCE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":677,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center","keywords":"Genetic architecture; Biology; Local adaptation; Allele; Adaptation (eye); Selection (genetic algorithm); Quantitative trait locus; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Directional selection; Trait; Genetic drift; Stabilizing selection; Ecological genetics; Gene; Genetic variation; Population; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01406685643772728,"gpt":0.1955337616394473,"spread":0.18146690520172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006408061,0.00004996614,0.00003735108,0.00001605271,0.0001180262,0.000005606772,0.00006583735,0.00004998091,0.00001106296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001741014,0.00003798377,0.00003212446,0.00004756776,0.00004059818,0.000001403613,0.00001460198,0.00002883453,0.000004360454],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005649231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002696848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001344743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002187251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996251,0.0000309577,0.00008871555,0.0001022339,0.00006781176,0.00008511832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997707,0.000005354858,0.00006014905,0.00008620243,0.00005965983,0.00001794485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004029098,0.000138356,0.07561063,0.00003248725,0.0001205258,5.753192e-7,0.00100005,0.009994234,0.8857281,0.00623112,0.006342167,0.01439882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004947762,0.0006217365,0.9092897,0.00002119197,0.00004151744,0.00002508555,0.0009449981,0.004702997,0.06128,0.005398333,0.01694655,0.0002330954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8711172,0.0006210877,0.1266052,0.00007172497,0.0001169744,0.00007661655,0.000006268527,0.000007390116,0.001377464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975305,0.0001232916,0.001794388,0.00002429965,0.0000685528,0.000003158169,0.00001552499,0.000002870397,0.0004374793],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1548933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056697366","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00299.x","title":"HETEROGENEOUS GENOMIC DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN WALKING-STICK ECOTYPES: \"ISOLATION BY ADAPTATION\" AND MULTIPLE ROLES FOR DIVERGENT SELECTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":610,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Biology; Ecotype; Local adaptation; Evolutionary biology; Genetic drift; Ecological speciation; Reproductive isolation; Genetics; Background selection; Adaptation (eye); Directional selection; Locus (genetics); Genome; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Genetic divergence; Gene flow; Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Genetic variation; Gene; Genetic diversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01388985096920344,"gpt":0.2062855652462756,"spread":0.1923957142770721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004612904,0.000101706,0.00008181474,0.00004017712,0.0003004618,0.00001288502,0.00004336051,0.0001320928,0.00001077625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000390499,0.000113083,0.00004448321,0.00004083383,0.00002605724,0.000009189197,0.00002811172,0.0000336666,0.000003742376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003775457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002138802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003308415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008212772,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993828,0.00003812755,0.0001378113,0.0002335498,0.00008498311,0.0001227064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996926,0.00001297871,0.00009237356,0.00007410585,0.00008168723,0.00004621867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001703316,0.00003688741,0.668431,0.00002630009,0.0001021664,1.250691e-7,0.0004274661,0.01436892,0.3106014,0.00005085351,0.002490368,0.003294165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001181288,0.0003052853,0.9353349,0.00000555988,0.00008501275,0.00001212481,0.00006208962,0.03090617,0.02602505,0.000404518,0.005404449,0.0002736105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8023275,0.0003006623,0.1969454,0.00002221768,0.00009815811,0.0002032615,0.00007916011,0.00001397939,0.000009731914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965815,0.00007795072,0.001591033,0.0000202315,0.0002000189,0.000007896878,0.001344291,0.00001017863,0.000166898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2845764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.461139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147834809","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00203.x","title":"THE BALDWIN EFFECT AND GENETIC ASSIMILATION: REVISITING TWO MECHANISMS OF EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE MEDIATED BY PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":529,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Phenotypic plasticity; Evolutionary biology; Assimilation (phonology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Phenotype; Accommodation; Adaptation (eye); Natural selection; Genetics; Neuroscience; Gene; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.005461716835107325,"gpt":0.2375757977921723,"spread":0.232114080957065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004561386,0.0001505395,0.0001298985,0.00004164786,0.0002418858,0.00001157072,0.0001137253,0.0001365859,0.000008434673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002663721,0.0001262336,0.00005364577,0.0001451842,0.0001387252,0.000006621532,0.00008552305,0.00009173474,0.000005190552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005288508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003335972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003368239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007806788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988121,0.0001290295,0.0003022595,0.0002700739,0.0002135541,0.0002729717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993356,0.0001225572,0.0001650603,0.0001825901,0.0001103807,0.0000838181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003795934,0.000054413,0.02709435,0.00007416904,0.00008806027,0.000002223785,0.00005941038,0.0003673389,0.9536406,0.003974454,0.002272069,0.01199327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002152474,0.0008859095,0.9144902,0.00007365263,0.0001059216,0.00005998494,0.0001139087,0.04866912,0.02518564,0.002150246,0.005607314,0.0005056657],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6429813,0.006410308,0.3491521,0.0002455955,0.0002552118,0.0004691441,0.00005254659,0.00002944972,0.0004043023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976293,0.0001875382,0.001565174,0.00006971155,0.0002704803,0.00001698972,0.0001462669,0.00001609268,0.00009840136],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.928455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5147658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174783960","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00160.x","title":"PERSPECTIVE: PURGING THE GENETIC LOAD: A REVIEW OF THE EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":515,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Inbreeding depression; Biology; Inbreeding; Genetic load; Population fragmentation; Trait; Outbreeding depression; Genetics; Genetic Fitness; Population; Genetic drift; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Demography; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04101634988664304,"gpt":0.3257681326609011,"spread":0.2847517827742581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001586817,0.0001849674,0.0003233011,0.00001760483,0.0001370582,0.00001017407,0.0004500604,0.0001568646,0.0001294408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001719187,0.0001076734,0.0004242538,0.0001841808,0.000115268,0.000002629465,0.0002166192,0.0001417155,0.00001735661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001529234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001884907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000313273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003569393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987905,0.000269917,0.0002642616,0.0002746279,0.0002750515,0.0001256337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989482,0.00001513138,0.0003142908,0.000567963,0.0001293366,0.00002513595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004702618,0.0002923908,0.00041555,0.1297344,0.00131132,0.000007299847,0.001312659,0.0001549077,0.002234499,0.002966311,0.1884125,0.6731111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004787801,0.00003292223,0.0001598798,0.019716,0.000316541,0.00005096391,0.00005380202,0.000002915186,0.00005421088,0.00001595439,0.9794103,0.0001386231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005106043,0.9983261,0.0000731127,0.0001064207,0.0002829373,0.0005972308,0.00001648224,0.000003776596,0.0005428605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001988216,0.9966419,0.00006519239,0.00009666652,0.0001953473,0.00002244749,0.00001101878,0.00001182058,0.0009673935],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4390793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058971217","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00449.x","title":"ESTIMATING NONLINEAR SELECTION GRADIENTS USING QUADRATIC REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS: DOUBLE OR NOTHING?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":507,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nonlinear regression; Regression; Selection (genetic algorithm); Quadratic equation; Statistics; Regression analysis; Linear regression; Mathematics; Polynomial regression; Directional selection; Applied mathematics; Biology; Natural selection; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05899087293662813,"gpt":0.2879706462540791,"spread":0.228979773317451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001434047,0.0001150034,0.0001121787,0.00002029843,0.0008769568,0.00002251901,0.00007403004,0.00009068394,0.0001037115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004610329,0.00004193947,0.00005249147,0.0004766526,0.00005238953,0.0002588194,0.00002692581,0.0001163804,0.00003416147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001510288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001608661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006971093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006590352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989991,0.00003928013,0.0002002093,0.0003141179,0.0002351604,0.0002121944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996685,0.00001673154,0.0001177485,0.00004226073,0.00009972321,0.00005500092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003446191,0.0003781749,0.05968278,0.00001405304,0.000007037929,0.000007687472,0.0005398641,0.002612843,0.9275656,0.00003097078,0.0002615918,0.008554717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001191994,0.001359752,0.5587429,0.0003063744,0.00009088977,0.0008403686,0.0006649737,0.4077158,0.02527094,0.00007155008,0.002927631,0.0008167849],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969826,0.00004362153,0.001977668,0.0000849892,0.0005390817,0.000189632,0.000002769097,0.0001341345,0.00004555755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947986,0.000003235322,0.004081523,0.00001596583,0.000598339,0.000005258436,0.00003094118,0.000001476362,0.0004646479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120909936","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01300.x","title":"THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF BROWN TROUT (SALMO TRUTTA L.) INFERRED FROM PHYLOGEOGRAPHIC, NESTED CLADE, AND MISMATCH ANALYSES OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA VARIATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":486,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Brown trout; Salmo; Phylogeography; Allopatric speciation; Trout; Evolutionary biology; Biological dispersal; Demographic history; Mitochondrial DNA; Population; Ecology; Zoology; Genetic variation; Phylogenetics; Fishery; Genetics; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01741010919811307,"gpt":0.2411144082762223,"spread":0.2237042990781092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000561113,0.000104077,0.0001366362,0.00006541286,0.00008157869,0.000005761617,0.00011566,0.0001811598,0.00002716476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008046302,0.00009150922,0.0000907028,0.0001217375,0.0001605857,0.000008943839,0.00004931887,0.00005687157,8.826078e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003879829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008825261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007872257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000128912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991432,0.0001159674,0.0002568791,0.0002035919,0.0001693249,0.0001110814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993076,0.00003058549,0.0002309214,0.0002424674,0.0001503339,0.0000381082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003962149,0.00004233956,0.05318733,0.000010081,0.0001308041,3.860048e-7,0.0002291326,0.0003515597,0.9412446,0.0002523722,0.003498083,0.0006570926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008724972,0.0001227547,0.9771442,0.00001040403,0.0001150711,0.000005575045,0.0001210878,0.0006088068,0.004534743,0.001383804,0.01495855,0.0001225406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990384,0.004678608,0.003867192,0.0000893741,0.0005308181,0.0001328181,0.00005155986,0.000007385894,0.0002582887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981051,0.0002538601,0.0007567396,0.00001796575,0.0001860764,0.000003357026,0.0002613013,0.000005956561,0.0004096426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3731638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176235393","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01606.x","title":"HOW MUCH OF THE VARIATION IN ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE CAN BE EXPLAINED BY GENE FLOW? AN EVALUATION USING LAKE-STREAM STICKLEBACK PAIRS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Gene flow; Stickleback; Gasterosteus; Evolutionary biology; Divergence (linguistics); Genetic variation; Genetic divergence; Local adaptation; Population; Ecology; Genetics; Gene; Genetic diversity","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02380078520459045,"gpt":0.2374757696056939,"spread":0.2136749844011034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001723296,0.00008861395,0.00007112313,0.00003101692,0.00009557004,0.0000108697,0.0001074163,0.0001224321,0.00001462947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007235242,0.00008146094,0.00003722738,0.0001483873,0.0000414652,0.0000134527,0.00004498919,0.00004915051,2.828165e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009262474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001256717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004804067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002862049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991964,0.0001306269,0.0001192622,0.0002057276,0.000235562,0.0001124074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994977,0.000002973871,0.0001158236,0.0001951792,0.000156893,0.00003149142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000732609,0.00006768811,0.01841541,0.000006764479,0.0000242296,2.230175e-7,0.000867865,0.1615297,0.818143,0.0001865496,0.0001207215,0.0005645761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002919161,0.0004104051,0.6187629,0.00004096365,0.0001577177,0.000008055042,0.002243639,0.05858719,0.3128087,0.003355817,0.0002828047,0.0004226978],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753453,0.0001006151,0.02377053,0.0001864285,0.0001866746,0.0002382429,0.0001507744,0.000003904543,0.00001756827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969405,0.000007928435,0.002583631,0.0000293901,0.00005749055,0.000004161228,0.0003399334,0.000005209351,0.00003178864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6003474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3321881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164993772","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01747.x","title":"REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION CAUSED BY NATURAL SELECTION AGAINST IMMIGRANTS FROM DIVERGENT HABITATS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":478,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Reproductive isolation; Biology; Ecological speciation; Immigration; Evolutionary biology; Natural selection; Ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Incipient speciation; Genetic algorithm; Population; Assortative mating; Mating; Sexual selection; Demography; Sociology; Genetics; Gene flow; Genetic variation; Geography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0169505574812833,"gpt":0.1973518750586835,"spread":0.1804013175774002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007039596,0.00009526658,0.00008925896,0.000006790508,0.0003111842,0.00002035625,0.00005729624,0.0000490671,0.00004910848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004101685,0.00004087115,0.00004492253,0.0001629875,0.00002046035,0.0002206514,0.00001863376,0.0000833822,0.00009320826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001125502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002371523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009188227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992623,0.00003794719,0.000118745,0.0002744526,0.0001424458,0.0001641206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997993,0.00003638155,0.00006487914,0.00001396717,0.00005563458,0.0000298177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003636519,0.00004282099,0.04879766,3.865112e-7,0.00001500072,1.87762e-7,0.00008699771,0.00001268724,0.9111311,0.00001071252,0.02462183,0.0152442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008959862,0.00005926698,0.9783802,0.000008220687,0.000008810137,4.237492e-7,0.0001100032,0.001680611,0.0111954,0.00008306943,0.008260625,0.0001237658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968432,0.001296084,0.00002033639,0.001187588,0.0002021015,0.0001074953,0.0000671389,0.00008824401,0.0001878184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981772,0.00006962664,0.0000375689,0.00007175835,0.0007937254,0.000006618553,0.0002066756,5.419238e-7,0.0006362808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9295825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5127246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176015754","doi":"10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[2455:paheot]2.0.co;2","title":"PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND HISTORICAL ECOLOGY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC INTERTIDAL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":438,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Intertidal zone; Barnacle; Biological dispersal; Obligate; Rocky shore; Population; Crustacean","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008099720601272484,"gpt":0.1641861289556564,"spread":0.1560864083543839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004379282,0.00003951219,0.00006673641,0.00003310288,0.00004743358,0.000002269003,0.00006746164,0.00003234511,0.000166129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001373906,0.00002437129,0.00002690082,0.0001149614,0.00005627924,0.00002708326,0.00001492932,0.0000536289,0.000009490519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004147872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009285556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01680495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08937476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996545,0.00004005473,0.00008313524,0.00008198,0.00004358206,0.00009675178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999838,0.00003294667,0.00003656599,0.00005976482,0.00001047837,0.00002223807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002428962,0.000005879187,0.989689,0.000002764431,0.00000376554,0.000001335631,0.00001107521,0.00001431688,0.00001790771,0.00004830257,0.0004025283,0.009778856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005083855,0.00009519237,0.9877124,0.000001464919,0.000005515223,0.00004000244,0.000007148346,0.0005578932,0.00000167827,0.0003497028,0.01114738,0.0000307919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954872,0.0001558249,0.00004533019,0.0002030801,0.0002357026,0.00003977599,0.000005380994,0.000006682953,0.003821056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994272,0.00003969613,0.00001519078,0.0000506133,0.00004361175,2.168541e-7,0.00001667863,4.349228e-7,0.0004063486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07256981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179816938","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01713.x","title":"CLIMATE CHANGE AND SIZE EVOLUTION IN AN ISLAND RODENT SPECIES: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE ISLAND RULE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":433,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bergmann's rule; Ecology; Biology; Climate change; Last Glacial Maximum; Mainland; Gigantism; Latitude; Glacial period; Geography; Paleontology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03022079944132302,"gpt":0.2357952128662245,"spread":0.2055744134249015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002883681,0.000154537,0.0001535605,0.00007334853,0.0003564161,0.00004167476,0.0001075911,0.00008498236,0.0003774043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001007042,0.0001083385,0.0000344119,0.0002137645,0.0001777317,0.0003242236,0.00001253796,0.000178403,0.0001278213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000636995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003652165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00508302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3663196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988619,0.000125292,0.0001648691,0.0003241549,0.0001919405,0.0003318176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995164,0.0001353766,0.0000670886,0.0001666612,0.00003144825,0.00008298572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001058605,0.00004139862,0.9823338,0.00000653546,0.000008712054,0.000004082919,0.00600173,0.0004743137,0.00001881406,0.01023145,0.0003811137,0.0003921607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006332203,0.0002375823,0.9865495,0.00004010291,0.00001018186,0.0000103883,0.006838412,0.0008177747,0.00000242959,0.004446358,0.0002729948,0.000141066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786888,0.007489504,0.0002735313,0.002964509,0.0002940127,0.000331202,0.0000638064,0.00004843967,0.009846142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982439,0.0008856542,0.00008671178,0.0001679711,0.0003464314,0.000004869637,0.00001434846,0.000003016177,0.0002471285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3612366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7684039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231469877","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00760.x","title":"PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND HISTORICAL ECOLOGY OF THE NORTH ATLANTIC INTERTIDAL","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":414,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Intertidal zone; Barnacle; Biological dispersal; Obligate; Phylogeography; Population; Phylogenetic tree","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008099720601272484,"gpt":0.1641861289556564,"spread":0.1560864083543839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004379282,0.00003951219,0.00006673641,0.00003310288,0.00004743358,0.000002269003,0.00006746164,0.00003234511,0.000166129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001373906,0.00002437129,0.00002690082,0.0001149614,0.00005627924,0.00002708326,0.00001492932,0.0000536289,0.000009490519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004147872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009285556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01680495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08937476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996545,0.00004005473,0.00008313524,0.00008198,0.00004358206,0.00009675178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999838,0.00003294667,0.00003656599,0.00005976482,0.00001047837,0.00002223807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002428962,0.000005879187,0.989689,0.000002764431,0.00000376554,0.000001335631,0.00001107521,0.00001431688,0.00001790771,0.00004830257,0.0004025283,0.009778856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005083855,0.00009519237,0.9877124,0.000001464919,0.000005515223,0.00004000244,0.000007148346,0.0005578932,0.00000167827,0.0003497028,0.01114738,0.0000307919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954872,0.0001558249,0.00004533019,0.0002030801,0.0002357026,0.00003977599,0.000005380994,0.000006682953,0.003821056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994272,0.00003969613,0.00001519078,0.0000506133,0.00004361175,2.168541e-7,0.00001667863,4.349228e-7,0.0004063486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07256981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252806976","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01874.x","title":"USING THE AMOVA FRAMEWORK TO ESTIMATE A STANDARDIZED GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION MEASURE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Measure (data warehouse); Evolutionary biology; Computational biology; Computer science; Data mining","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01415083790984334,"gpt":0.2656713546961554,"spread":0.2515205167863121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001045826,0.00008992224,0.00007225673,0.0000250002,0.0002122915,0.00003938544,0.00009653507,0.00008501197,0.00001531181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004776591,0.00006932042,0.00005184375,0.00007625984,0.00002362703,0.000001646261,0.00005016521,0.00004664829,0.000008890072],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002249108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003050399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001129491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003955237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.00004557517,0.0001066597,0.0001810285,0.0001513051,0.000163014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996727,0.000005958406,0.00004542536,0.0001706193,0.00007053096,0.00003472707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001604609,0.00006891152,0.04429036,0.00001745824,0.00005052186,0.000002155625,0.00009636344,0.02370829,0.9204682,0.001687292,0.008307729,0.001142258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244189,0.0003821037,0.9035092,0.0001509947,0.0001952851,0.00004662583,0.0002322247,0.01011346,0.04611106,0.007488455,0.02978186,0.0007445116],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6296163,0.0002876809,0.3694858,0.0001008819,0.0001213361,0.0000989431,0.00001708562,0.00001031258,0.0002616815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888003,0.000005416498,0.01060774,0.00006546661,0.000283949,0.000003769035,0.00003017359,0.000006550119,0.000196637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8743572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2826805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176339624","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01232.x","title":"FIXATION OF NEW ALLELES AND THE EXTINCTION OF SMALL POPULATIONS: DRIFT LOAD, BENEFICIAL ALLELES, AND SEXUAL SELECTION","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":399,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Fixation (population genetics); Allele; Genetic drift; Effective population size; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Small population size; Genetic load; Balancing selection; Population size; Genetics; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Genetic Fitness; Genetic variation; Ecology; Biological evolution; Demography; Inbreeding; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02519925361612139,"gpt":0.2822560501940689,"spread":0.2570567965779475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003061203,0.0002245923,0.0004716407,0.0000891826,0.0001000648,0.00001309063,0.00008852294,0.0003951077,0.00001522655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009961944,0.0001826367,0.0001208282,0.0001561857,0.0001459595,0.000006106771,0.00005246108,0.0001250654,0.000001277877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005151896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003120465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004498381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00186891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986306,0.0001893502,0.0005516319,0.000331301,0.0001610885,0.0001360581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991309,0.0000227403,0.0004774057,0.0002008711,0.0001211255,0.00004695955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002756541,0.00008274322,0.0003031124,0.001864764,0.0001970211,9.609646e-8,0.0001307944,0.001057325,0.0003943619,0.002192872,0.001013244,0.992488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002533117,0.0006839976,0.006795385,0.0009084929,0.001339963,0.00009756545,0.0001408802,0.007381324,0.00003193964,0.001695615,0.9777108,0.0006809183],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008602647,0.9795388,0.0109204,0.00002778282,0.0001156963,0.0005864257,0.00003574117,0.0000112765,0.0001612501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008114631,0.9886966,0.001249473,0.000008933077,0.0002983801,0.00002400902,0.0007011713,0.00002687203,0.0008799784],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7447709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177632925","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00115.x","title":"PERSPECTIVE: TEACHING EVOLUTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Mathematics education; Scientific literacy; Science education; Creationism; Sociology of Education; Biology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Mathematics; Evolutionary biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06046174296144419,"gpt":0.2817107952733987,"spread":0.2212490523119545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002858851,0.0001137982,0.00009409252,0.0003429318,0.0004139303,0.000104031,0.0001239386,0.00005266556,0.006404085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007826621,0.0001140071,0.00004899711,0.0001309435,0.0001364954,0.0008771693,0.00001559628,0.0002278813,0.0008232633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001784936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007987306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00248082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009537637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989209,0.0001152698,0.00021561,0.0002746886,0.0002300309,0.000243512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995123,0.00002312081,0.00008313268,0.0001781712,0.0001434449,0.0000598508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000266324,0.0002756838,0.002159868,0.000005440658,0.000001929023,1.346868e-7,0.01437877,0.00001999563,0.0001183491,0.9627334,0.01959947,0.0007043001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007215602,0.000146654,0.3903796,0.000171467,0.00002582425,0.000009531416,0.05299127,0.008110044,0.000008018568,0.1789975,0.3677146,0.0007238593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.176327,0.002513098,0.0003441205,0.01066844,0.006489304,0.000322608,0.000003277657,0.0002170978,0.803115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784122,0.000004995527,0.00009689984,0.0001768798,0.001265771,0.00003506005,0.000005031711,0.000009155303,0.1199939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175064082","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01281.x","title":"MATING SYSTEMS, SPERM COMPETITION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIRDS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":373,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Washington","keywords":"Sexual dimorphism; Biology; Mating system; Sperm competition; Plumage; Zoology; Sexual selection; Mating; Polygyny; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Competition (biology); Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetics; Demography; Genetics; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0155979772301725,"gpt":0.2119187182786697,"spread":0.1963207410484972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004069776,0.00005793672,0.0001008583,0.00001476309,0.000124112,0.00001322812,0.00005011271,0.00005050179,0.00002707071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003338319,0.00001994343,0.00001647247,0.0002541854,0.0001187317,0.0001039667,0.00002228985,0.00006704439,0.000006337435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009097123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000456584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006632934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006727474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993291,0.0001016036,0.0001872922,0.0001562793,0.0001234732,0.0001022893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997765,0.00003825588,0.00008267488,0.00003696214,0.00004837866,0.0000172667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001519951,0.00009862515,0.4295278,0.00002415362,0.000004730404,0.000001486605,0.0002492742,0.000127743,0.5176064,0.04686504,0.00009827743,0.005244425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002209309,0.00008735453,0.9956191,0.00002513762,0.000009981299,0.00003573037,0.002146661,0.0009589954,0.0000565357,0.0005638636,0.0002173362,0.0000583847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977806,0.000932552,0.00009183874,0.0005115762,0.0001411967,0.000183236,0.000004357011,0.00002584985,0.0003288563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995308,0.00003250877,0.00001064105,0.000003916904,0.0002162224,0.000009311371,0.00001032339,4.801823e-7,0.0001858194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5660913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180675910","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01432.x","title":"ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE AND THE BALANCE BETWEEN SELECTION AND GENE FLOW: LAKE AND STREAM STICKLEBACK IN THE MISTY SYSTEM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stickleback; Gasterosteus; Inlet; Gene flow; Biology; Ecology; Genetic divergence; Fishery; Genetic diversity; Oceanography; Genetic variation; Geology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Gene; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008541436636432713,"gpt":0.1752837709844894,"spread":0.1667423343480567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002575885,0.00005830116,0.00007052194,0.00000942242,0.0002800249,0.000010113,0.00004664138,0.00002683063,0.00003305908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002101381,0.00003579323,0.000006094331,0.00009004375,0.0002368084,0.0000920541,0.00008763552,0.00006082238,0.00001452727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004451202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.146183e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001618763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004828728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995054,0.00009915102,0.00007079292,0.0001485628,0.0000744501,0.0001016598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998217,0.00007861114,0.00003140749,0.000053466,0.000002669268,0.00001210393],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001309338,0.0000107634,0.9948253,0.000008827742,0.00001190639,8.549429e-7,0.000784921,0.0001504274,0.000008561346,0.000377869,0.003030761,0.0007767288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003161992,0.00003314028,0.9709733,0.000005726718,0.00002307502,0.000003554906,0.0005319528,0.02759965,0.000002275334,0.0002351869,0.0002332742,0.00004270485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950753,0.0002691009,0.0009226653,0.0007269466,0.00004042765,0.0002873988,0.000006415947,0.00001428688,0.002657442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994006,0.0002225546,0.0001348843,0.00005148712,0.00002303026,0.00002103299,9.872233e-7,0.000001585487,0.0001438076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02744922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2694543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118632834","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00793.x","title":"SEX-SPECIFIC GENETIC VARIANCE AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CROSS-SEX GENETIC CORRELATIONS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":349,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; University of Alberta","keywords":"Biology; Sexual dimorphism; Trait; Selection (genetic algorithm); Genetic architecture; Evolutionary biology; Sexual selection; Covariance; Population; Genetic correlation; Genetic variation; Variance (accounting); Statistics; Genetics; Quantitative trait locus; Demography; Zoology; Gene; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05104532505678072,"gpt":0.2628570898237286,"spread":0.2118117647669479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005658956,0.0002743127,0.001671802,0.00002312877,0.0002351933,0.00002518835,0.0002804027,0.0001626616,0.00002368297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001613532,0.00009112046,0.0002306815,0.0004838934,0.0002969257,0.00005535988,0.00007528409,0.000159395,0.00001654607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001167077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003045516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001347308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006524906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976749,0.0004566095,0.001034709,0.0003335428,0.00030127,0.0001989165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983269,0.0004890191,0.0009255814,0.0000956751,0.000124421,0.00003842083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002460974,0.0001454817,0.0006103456,0.8512049,0.0002684808,0.000003954361,0.00009737672,0.000006005536,0.0001552724,0.004497099,0.0009520298,0.1420345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000609961,0.0008180576,0.1187823,0.79638,0.005354672,0.0003925922,0.0002111614,0.000294307,8.344579e-7,0.002035133,0.073942,0.001178992],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004989537,0.9974357,0.00009185605,0.00003596851,0.00006153643,0.00155998,0.0001397552,0.0000207036,0.0001555085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006119874,0.9931065,0.0000508439,0.00001069699,0.0001619812,0.00009151983,0.00003943289,0.000001783211,0.0004173133],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1408555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3715785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967453970","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01748.x","title":"LEAKY PREZYGOTIC ISOLATION AND POROUS GENOMES: RAPID INTROGRESSION OF MATERNALLY INHERITED DNA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Introgression; Biology; Reproductive isolation; Mitochondrial DNA; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Gene flow; Chloroplast DNA; Genome; Gene; Genetic variation; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006228305939154386,"gpt":0.2135901013169312,"spread":0.2073617953777769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006143814,0.00006958238,0.00006864796,0.0000398491,0.00004938545,0.000008537734,0.00005063648,0.0001052378,0.00005506878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001230949,0.00006905877,0.00002270309,0.00005161164,0.00003724327,0.000006999384,0.00004588097,0.00003283034,0.000004813399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001292273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001557672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001036559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001695584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995286,0.00003294862,0.0001297342,0.0001404347,0.00008348581,0.00008479685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997107,0.000002107718,0.00008956037,0.0001101156,0.00005504024,0.00003247649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001524236,0.00003333862,0.08364137,0.00003566856,0.00003355791,4.060643e-7,0.0002192445,0.0009260207,0.8875291,0.000151246,0.000561823,0.02671575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009810276,0.0003134628,0.9353108,0.00002922895,0.00003938031,0.00003086031,0.0001089616,0.001459084,0.04204761,0.0002553075,0.01922148,0.0002028192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943011,0.001790066,0.003376178,0.0001061794,0.00007213343,0.00008826921,0.00001032798,0.000008262115,0.0002474574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997143,0.0001279974,0.002136985,0.00004177053,0.0001412295,0.000001148254,0.0001000571,0.000005468568,0.0003023319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8516694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2816135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056580026","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00558.x","title":"PURGING THE GENOME WITH SEXUAL SELECTION: REDUCING MUTATION LOAD THROUGH SELECTION ON MALES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":297,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sexual selection; Genetic load; Mutation; Sexual conflict; Genetics; Mutation rate; Mating; Population; Mechanism (biology); Mutation Accumulation; Evolutionary biology; Gene; Demography; Computer science; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05349185896191694,"gpt":0.2790186841622736,"spread":0.2255268252003567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001949064,0.0003245804,0.000407658,0.00002542527,0.001074351,0.00006464811,0.0001457721,0.0002518052,0.00008634691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002781666,0.0001017424,0.0001573565,0.00096947,0.00009124666,0.000240289,0.00002270877,0.0004584976,0.0001008662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007119465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001021783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007010682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002441902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980819,0.0002194707,0.0003241488,0.0006670705,0.0004182556,0.0002891855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993337,0.00006898537,0.0003318212,0.00007827563,0.000150418,0.00003680282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005447557,0.0001158866,0.0001221431,0.0002733461,0.00006102522,0.000006083286,0.0001805396,0.0002360992,0.001316433,0.0001879984,0.0005372548,0.9969087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008671108,0.001269708,0.01087424,0.000936539,0.0003336532,0.002076107,0.0002935397,0.00003634679,0.00002903394,0.00003549829,0.9834658,0.0005628421],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02871446,0.9685389,0.0001240821,0.0002039089,0.0003820669,0.001113018,0.00001567269,0.0002791077,0.0006288165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03378301,0.9611025,0.00009312018,0.00001749206,0.002942437,0.0001556761,0.0002702191,0.000007678857,0.001627858],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8263149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1907641588","doi":"10.1111/evo.12713","title":"Evaluating methods for estimating local effective population size with and without migration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Population; Population size; Evolutionary biology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03156396895803518,"gpt":0.3628562341356912,"spread":0.331292265177656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155381,0.00007042522,0.00007928056,0.00001381508,0.0001559854,0.00001231582,0.00002583987,0.00005735514,0.00001098363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007400504,0.0000610574,0.00001069068,0.00009423077,0.00006643232,0.0003155445,0.00002057047,0.00004822012,0.000008314201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002800978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000125845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005567777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004886017,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992966,0.000197764,0.0001088624,0.0001885364,0.0001016677,0.000106563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995527,0.0002203199,0.00009414356,0.00006492307,0.00002543799,0.00004248769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001216436,0.00001272743,0.8823709,0.000005798589,0.00000549125,3.541572e-8,0.0003108501,0.02936591,0.000608141,0.0001318892,0.00008490811,0.08698164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003503079,0.0002030616,0.5140895,0.000007286346,0.0000178474,0.000003436224,0.00005273571,0.4817061,0.00004652755,0.003461163,0.00001437848,0.00004770581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5093157,0.000009127167,0.4901267,0.0001188524,0.00005591959,0.0002975947,2.822011e-7,0.00002017992,0.00005568217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6030347,6.622892e-8,0.3967596,0.00004093003,0.00002914011,0.00008945903,0.000007461524,0.000004133613,0.00003454127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4523402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2489848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014300152","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00188.x","title":"THE ECOLOGY AND GENETICS OF FITNESS IN CHLAMYDOMONAS. XII. REPEATED SEXUAL EPISODES INCREASE RATES OF ADAPTATION TO NOVEL ENVIRONMENTS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Biology; Adaptation (eye); Genetic Fitness; Experimental evolution; Chlamydomonas reinhardtii; Sexual reproduction; Evolutionary biology; Chlamydomonas; Local adaptation; Ecology; Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Genetics; Gene; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01240395254162675,"gpt":0.2367084323316606,"spread":0.2243044797900339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001697624,0.00008073568,0.000100071,0.00004480188,0.00004347162,0.000003254054,0.00007940277,0.00009805069,0.000006197466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001215293,0.00007301859,0.00001778335,0.00008828846,0.0001256968,0.000002743254,0.00006593356,0.00003807552,0.000002485613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002429229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001571886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001286043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009777258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.00006270544,0.0002469111,0.0001779768,0.00008513691,0.0001286787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996222,0.00002354896,0.0001012779,0.0001778764,0.00003578051,0.00003926925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001276627,0.0002491038,0.07971344,0.00002001217,0.00003040866,4.188415e-7,0.0002924557,0.01727715,0.8979415,0.000275227,0.0002296109,0.003843063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001310836,0.0005377847,0.8662336,0.000011288,0.00001905947,0.000008305529,0.0004566577,0.1088688,0.02102185,0.0001276426,0.001243446,0.0001606735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909982,0.0012394,0.007367312,0.000107075,0.0000454198,0.0001681519,0.00002044967,0.000002094375,0.00005189951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981177,0.0003780019,0.0009684952,0.00002445331,0.00002020129,0.00001278688,0.00004143077,0.000007668858,0.0004292101],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079104518","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00259.x","title":"THE GENETICS OF ADAPTIVE SHAPE SHIFT IN STICKLEBACK: PLEIOTROPY AND EFFECT SIZE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Natural Sciences; Canada Research Chairs; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Pleiotropy; Stickleback; Quantitative trait locus; Evolutionary biology; Adaptation (eye); Directional selection; Quantitative genetics; Sexual dimorphism; Local adaptation; Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Disruptive selection; Gene; Genetic architecture; Allometry; Genetics; Ecology; Genetic variation; Zoology; Phenotype; Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01900856258575995,"gpt":0.2821161863001148,"spread":0.2631076237143549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008557776,0.00006844918,0.0001160907,0.00003119587,0.00006525856,0.000007644217,0.00006321689,0.00006840323,0.00002432334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008247709,0.00004405437,0.00002668256,0.0001568837,0.00006811247,0.00002410664,0.00003788844,0.00009836755,0.000003989783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004632925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001114363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002601915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007862253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993368,0.00007930933,0.0002150853,0.0001021422,0.0001180415,0.0001486453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975564,0.002181273,0.00008530763,0.0001230935,0.0000264518,0.00002748398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002803704,0.000211414,0.1464984,0.00006508928,0.00004063275,0.000009082369,0.0003241847,0.00002814762,0.004009637,0.833833,0.0007490412,0.01395101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004135775,0.0002386411,0.9227808,0.00002201922,0.00001785483,0.000002010111,0.00007560245,0.003709395,0.0004340211,0.07213342,0.0001052061,0.00006746424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445001,0.000472772,0.0537603,0.00006618152,0.00006161971,0.0002082596,0.000003662181,0.0000135364,0.0009135989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904819,0.00002025262,0.009405606,0.000008157067,0.00003876836,0.000004059598,5.967855e-7,0.000005365455,0.00003533924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7762824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1796485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022887147","doi":"10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0573:hpoacs]2.0.co;2","title":"HOLARCTIC PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF ARCTIC CHARR (SALVELINUS ALPINUS L.) INFERRED FROM MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Université Laval","funders":"Bundesamt für Umwelt; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Arizona State University","keywords":"Biology; Phylogeography; Salvelinus; Mitochondrial DNA; Zoology; Arctic; Evolutionary biology; Beringia; Monophyly; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); mtDNA control region; Lineage (genetic); Molecular clock; Haplotype; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Fishery; Clade; Genotype","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009562496299583521,"gpt":0.2235850230680212,"spread":0.2140225267684377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005186871,0.0001217626,0.0001286938,0.00006923255,0.00008059741,0.00001416615,0.0001554422,0.0001804177,0.000100508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006932348,0.0001256466,0.0001247495,0.0001632296,0.0001000729,0.000007745498,0.00005468408,0.00007468042,0.00001559502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001581738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004630897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006354834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001296268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991482,0.00006519953,0.0001884684,0.0002661134,0.0001757883,0.000156157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.000008650802,0.0001247022,0.000251101,0.0001259667,0.00006091854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002109015,0.00004991234,0.2479804,0.00001512693,0.0001140886,0.000003290064,0.0001182144,0.0003939322,0.7493677,0.0001630199,0.0006208338,0.0009626024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001254286,0.0002831279,0.9494604,0.00003135907,0.00009592459,0.00002160677,0.0001781874,0.000105847,0.03261434,0.003995758,0.01165198,0.0003071517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949978,0.0008266116,0.00295654,0.00008468932,0.0006616476,0.0001297004,0.00006938741,0.00001250787,0.0002611193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978625,0.00006730845,0.001090803,0.00006719409,0.0004404702,0.000004059346,0.0003389627,0.000007581366,0.0001211314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7167533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.512372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172599765","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01508.x","title":"QUANTIFYING PHYLOGENETICALLY STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Variation (astronomy); Phylogenetic tree; Trait; Phylogenetics; Niche; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Population; Mammal; Zoology; Genetics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01893441860226278,"gpt":0.2152443714544532,"spread":0.1963099528521905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001463782,0.00008429034,0.00008155024,0.00004246009,0.0002312177,0.0000116654,0.00005093836,0.00006767194,0.001730739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005508713,0.00007583999,0.00003304068,0.00007811227,0.00007437258,0.00008047891,0.000002378986,0.0000735075,0.0003529811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001212427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001774271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001112718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00553401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992469,0.0001254108,0.0001294282,0.0001748543,0.0001356351,0.000187782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997603,0.0000434631,0.00004580735,0.00009215814,0.000007911351,0.00005032563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008242341,0.000007000295,0.9940096,0.000002090784,0.00001245217,9.471062e-7,0.0001023688,0.000514626,0.0008104172,0.003263981,0.0001089852,0.001159257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001777296,0.00003792991,0.9934832,0.000001686366,0.00001142234,0.00001244613,0.0001057195,0.002043093,0.0000464829,0.001894843,0.002090624,0.00009479218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646957,0.002901811,0.009310263,0.0001046054,0.0008209156,0.000140662,0.000031745,0.00005851117,0.02193581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974872,0.00003613263,0.002210732,0.00006770103,0.00004996201,7.169562e-7,0.00003230564,0.000001511432,0.000113778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03279149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141427956","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00779.x","title":"DISENTANGLING THE EFFECTS OF EVOLUTIONARY, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS: ATLANTIC HERRING AS A CASE STUDY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":262,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"European Science Foundation; European Commission","keywords":"Biology; Clupea; Herring; Atlantic herring; Pelagic zone; Genetic structure; Population; Natural selection; Ecology; Intraspecific competition; Genetic diversity; Population genetics; Genetic drift; Effective population size; Demographic history; Biological dispersal; Selection (genetic algorithm); Genetic variation; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.004487006904110198,"gpt":0.2151564391031848,"spread":0.2106694321990746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002153411,0.0001081287,0.0001017873,0.00005673157,0.0001581687,0.000006629809,0.00006939588,0.00006933091,0.000003274236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003669254,0.00008685826,0.00005215341,0.00008710226,0.00006688407,0.000007700965,0.00004820054,0.00007037169,8.456953e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001645995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001258627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002383957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001251532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993461,0.00007056065,0.0001710325,0.0001710535,0.0001414572,0.0000998363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999652,0.00001344497,0.0001208115,0.0001622973,0.0000202486,0.00003116754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001894375,0.00003007848,0.8793263,0.00001702402,0.00003171303,0.000008771014,0.0007055493,0.0007288645,0.1188527,0.00002665563,0.000006203431,0.0002471944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003726729,0.0002676435,0.9915655,0.00001531597,0.00008777166,0.0001907715,0.003118792,0.0003622079,0.003596931,0.0003240239,0.000006083337,0.0000923094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997566,0.001915824,0.00006788422,0.000006869309,0.0001242368,0.0003013518,0.00001145515,0.000004481841,0.000001875128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999653,0.00001857806,0.0002086774,0.00001185527,0.00003858339,7.548381e-7,0.00005833745,0.000004510683,0.000005640818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1152558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3541977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000003516","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01277.x","title":"ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ADAPTIVE GENETIC DIVERGENCE UNDER MIGRATION, SELECTION, AND DRIFT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":260,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Genetic drift; Divergence (linguistics); Adaptive evolution; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Mutation rate; Range (aeronautics); Effective population size; Statistical physics; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Genetics; Physics; Computer science; Demography; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008282439076177293,"gpt":0.2006596035912658,"spread":0.1923771645150885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007213911,0.00008140162,0.00006753088,0.00003313656,0.00006042738,0.000004487648,0.00004266602,0.00007236211,0.00001359062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002133327,0.00008103193,0.00001843952,0.00007617792,0.0001055241,0.000005560694,0.00004869862,0.00003304484,0.000001291423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001568299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003736323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001942909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007341838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994346,0.00003290652,0.0001376899,0.0002108899,0.00007035861,0.0001135872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996445,0.000002870864,0.00006960407,0.00009977135,0.0001342148,0.00004899591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003471843,0.0002462071,0.5839422,0.00005961366,0.0001460379,0.000001078603,0.001009111,0.002012531,0.3788071,0.02603698,0.004423799,0.002968136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003201608,0.0003667893,0.9816161,0.00001110238,0.00002271185,0.00002265241,0.000267676,0.007919223,0.006267597,0.002403562,0.0006433488,0.0001390427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8152755,0.001061139,0.1831367,0.00003887229,0.00006275404,0.0001040743,0.000007661941,0.000006831719,0.0003063614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924506,0.0005234063,0.006576672,0.00003952657,0.00002933108,0.000007931837,0.00001069643,0.000006408318,0.0003554603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.397674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3304386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175258576","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00356.x","title":"ANTAGONISTIC PLEIOTROPY, MORTALITY SOURCE INTERACTIONS, AND THE EVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF SENESCENCE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto; Toronto Zoo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Pleiotropy; Senescence; Organism; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Demography; Longevity; Natural selection; Genetics; Phenotype","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009035853643971928,"gpt":0.2333296106961786,"spread":0.2242937570522066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004234141,0.0001037354,0.0001111397,0.00002381524,0.0001520614,0.00001036031,0.00009581153,0.00006347035,0.00002039082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002403267,0.00008311441,0.00005866764,0.00005464969,0.0004050442,0.000004932888,0.0000523919,0.00008286662,0.000004114258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002231571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006260036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008867082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000316152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990667,0.0002869054,0.0001842805,0.0002110189,0.0001135243,0.0001376385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994462,0.00003586075,0.00009942632,0.0003024277,0.00007924415,0.00003684692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005979639,0.0003522594,0.161329,0.0001472899,0.0003314317,0.000002074754,0.001470035,0.002956306,0.6577448,0.1709209,0.002413003,0.001734922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005237113,0.0005323981,0.678148,0.00009046814,0.0005617532,0.0004045882,0.002759591,0.009147251,0.2008733,0.06890685,0.03221815,0.001120486],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7402298,0.002149257,0.2566649,0.00007771527,0.0002287745,0.0001505857,0.000009320825,0.000009676781,0.0004800298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983038,0.0002077001,0.0007095919,0.00006919919,0.00008903517,0.000008624325,0.00002050488,0.00001052085,0.0005809743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.516819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3389308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112294153","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01310.x","title":"SELECTION FOR RECOMBINATION IN SMALL POPULATIONS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Recombination; Biology; Epistasis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Allele; Adaptation (eye); Genetic drift; Genetic recombination; Genetic variation; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02213259466112335,"gpt":0.2801470661920075,"spread":0.2580144715308841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001382446,0.00006113783,0.00004770437,0.00007459072,0.00006516837,0.000007450383,0.00004257533,0.0001004362,0.000008293668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007901926,0.00007207633,0.00003809801,0.0001481862,0.00001187296,0.000003454656,0.00001131396,0.00003433705,0.000006152761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007603309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003260157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006491257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003881277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999499,0.00002854722,0.0001337305,0.0001716553,0.00003525576,0.0001318241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997714,0.000003497422,0.00004025333,0.0000849828,0.00007529453,0.00002459934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003545696,0.0004735524,0.5532285,0.00002990236,0.00002599515,3.870094e-7,0.00008299208,0.03330749,0.3405396,0.05045284,0.007199102,0.014305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00178237,0.0004195163,0.7599814,0.00001357505,0.00001574603,0.00002609944,0.00006904944,0.1856099,0.001604619,0.02045813,0.02971109,0.0003085161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737858,0.00009684731,0.324705,0.0002227642,0.0001930428,0.0002226801,0.00000360938,0.0000156635,0.0007545722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924442,0.0000333574,0.004981082,0.00004815222,0.0001193213,0.00005157337,0.0003148362,0.000009621313,0.00199791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.338935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2939187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173426795","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01490.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF STATIC ALLOMETRY IN SEXUALLY SELECTED TRAITS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Allometry; Biology; Trait; Sexual selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Stabilizing selection; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Genetics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Genetic variation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01215243590444477,"gpt":0.2186916418775697,"spread":0.2065392059731249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003512753,0.00006069372,0.00007290117,0.00001610446,0.0001297574,0.000009071684,0.00006841165,0.00005632411,0.0000355075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001867349,0.00002090579,0.00002659035,0.0008402299,0.00004951868,0.00008312176,0.000006897595,0.00008159446,0.000008535115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001484359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000220948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000373968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009276886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992215,0.000130122,0.0001801792,0.0001590931,0.0001502338,0.000158898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997281,0.00006011869,0.0000686325,0.00003083341,0.00008967238,0.00002265808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111327,0.0001091998,0.08103362,0.000003742404,0.000003563618,3.156717e-7,0.00007854527,0.00002935591,0.9030178,0.005224552,0.0001728937,0.01029532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007408425,0.0001699693,0.995621,0.000005745347,0.000005217018,0.000004197522,0.0008397616,0.00004583921,0.001551675,0.0009885107,0.0006357459,0.00005821176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986808,0.0004426315,0.00007950382,0.0001521106,0.0001031425,0.0001408079,0.00000332496,0.00002366886,0.0003739714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995662,0.00001303701,0.00004536598,0.000003220911,0.0000399841,0.000007533159,0.00000610318,4.80378e-7,0.0003180493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9145874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09980025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200393587","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01406.x","title":"CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF MALE AND FEMALE MORPHOLOGIES IN WATER STRIDERS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Sexual dimorphism; Gerridae; Clade; Coevolution; Evolutionary biology; Heteroptera; Antagonistic Coevolution; Predation; Zoology; Sexual selection; Sexual conflict; Ecology; Phylogenetic tree; Gene; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02458131557101005,"gpt":0.2037829186854891,"spread":0.179201603114479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001059595,0.00005905898,0.00008191742,0.00001903703,0.00005952908,0.000005693049,0.00003891852,0.00008090462,0.0003813377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001857386,0.00002172645,0.00002450042,0.0001480151,0.0000728029,0.0001235294,0.00002397279,0.00006685108,0.00002827032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005817095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.895236e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007920433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001302698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994433,0.00003406879,0.00013487,0.000176631,0.00007851099,0.0001326266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998777,0.00001161416,0.00003372808,0.00002995494,0.00002797822,0.00001901034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001866064,0.000062569,0.2668067,0.000003395468,0.000001502415,0.00000160001,0.00009375509,0.00003396583,0.7278347,0.00009454966,0.0001607253,0.004887865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001095862,0.0001657939,0.9906349,0.00001157928,0.000006581947,0.00002027163,0.0006593969,0.0004009377,0.007610677,0.0001639638,0.0001428873,0.00007343856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985754,0.0006617957,0.00001132018,0.0002317225,0.00009496085,0.0001011665,0.000003183176,0.00002789731,0.0002924876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992991,0.00005431283,0.00001870255,0.000002906363,0.0000373391,0.000004100064,0.00001020619,3.950651e-7,0.0005729372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7238281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4175381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174592132","doi":"10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0459:pmatad]2.0.co;2","title":"POPULATION MIXING AND THE ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS IN DISCRETE POPULATIONS: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EMPIRICAL TESTS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":245,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Population; Divergence (linguistics); Sympatric speciation; Mixing (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Stickleback; Covariance; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07229392608316618,"gpt":0.3370567739952844,"spread":0.2647628479121182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002860904,0.00006006423,0.0001079257,0.00001141341,0.0001391728,0.000008357284,0.00004572424,0.00006592682,0.00001483621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000391108,0.00002083824,0.00004465643,0.000248857,0.0001863195,0.0001042549,0.00001773977,0.00007182816,6.850997e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002305377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003336706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003005757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999347,0.000103026,0.0001713995,0.0001760528,0.0000998473,0.0001026561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995551,0.0002832841,0.00007118715,0.00002321874,0.00004778163,0.00001940608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004961129,0.00003854234,0.3088571,0.000002076987,0.000002255267,1.993581e-7,0.0002671559,0.00004160125,0.002668516,0.6826904,0.000005481344,0.004930484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001124543,0.0001574479,0.7943371,0.00002360094,0.00001069135,0.000002501898,0.0003927655,0.00207659,0.0000232887,0.2028148,0.000005039282,0.00004377639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908219,0.0002268962,0.006981211,0.001534574,0.0000623286,0.0003327264,0.00001043265,0.00001238655,0.00001752361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974705,0.00001369488,0.002385172,0.00001108646,0.0000692713,0.00002632526,0.00001454696,5.547212e-7,0.000008851727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.48548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1070418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180171672","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00854.x","title":"A BIRD'S-EYE VIEW OF THE C-VALUE ENIGMA: GENOME SIZE, CELL SIZE, AND METABOLIC RATE IN THE CLASS AVES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Genome size; Biology; Genome; Cell size; Evolutionary biology; Value (mathematics); Metabolic rate; Hierarchy; Genetics; Gene; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01051122738095556,"gpt":0.1934420937315261,"spread":0.1829308663505706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001564395,0.00007160632,0.00009442752,0.000005313988,0.00008325287,0.000006861078,0.0001802828,0.00003924286,0.0002820486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009121188,0.00003474622,0.00004527967,0.000290288,0.0002152081,0.00006275798,0.00009398706,0.00009459964,0.0001025497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002573929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002119313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001906668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005847108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993038,0.0001588277,0.0001357424,0.0001453024,0.0001260508,0.0001302933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996399,0.0001422022,0.00005359461,0.0001369011,0.000003465789,0.00002391455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003386028,0.0001126669,0.003271412,0.000005231073,0.000001956779,2.109119e-7,0.0002290254,0.0002342479,0.9951964,0.0005680945,0.0001241354,0.0002532224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380725,0.00002261752,0.9871914,0.000004258838,0.00000991957,5.411201e-7,0.00005038372,0.001054997,0.003357218,0.005128644,0.002981281,0.00006069425],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960459,0.001033995,0.00001634262,0.00102241,0.00002178533,0.0001642119,0.000004972657,0.00001406581,0.001676249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990011,0.000220771,0.0001039078,0.0003352519,0.00001885191,0.00001414573,3.045758e-7,0.000003793251,0.0003018498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3088234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151414636","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00179.x","title":"NATURAL SELECTION IN POPULATIONS SUBJECT TO A MIGRATION LOAD","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Texas at Austin; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Maladaptation; Biology; Natural selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Local adaptation; Parapatric speciation; Directional selection; Evolutionary biology; Disruptive selection; Ecology; Stabilizing selection; Adaptation (eye); Population; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Demography; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03527792581427856,"gpt":0.2396431237831206,"spread":0.2043651979688421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001866948,0.00004872841,0.00004943176,0.00001710526,0.0001237156,0.00001205396,0.00003160615,0.00003172079,0.00001560641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000496628,0.00002068942,0.00002166969,0.0004574207,0.000005479736,0.00008555053,0.00001070592,0.0000506023,0.00003880464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001598657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003206013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002762208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4443656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995272,0.00001371593,0.00009775841,0.0001084348,0.0001061258,0.0001468093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998884,0.00002523531,0.00002044854,0.000004316418,0.00003731525,0.00002424439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005072838,0.00002549733,0.3994156,6.860087e-7,0.000001199879,6.68447e-7,0.00008136441,0.00001430663,0.5917407,0.0006167655,0.0007520755,0.007300394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003565574,0.00006317049,0.9961695,0.000006601016,0.000001401182,0.000002323793,0.0000918706,0.0001988339,0.0006646122,0.0002573553,0.002448124,0.000060527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985641,0.000122011,0.00007519756,0.0005745739,0.00006570714,0.00009821244,0.000003016441,0.00004241363,0.0004547417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.000003063012,0.0001006408,0.00004431378,0.0001814464,0.000003876225,0.00001210423,2.075981e-7,0.0002104179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.596754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5657732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167653088","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01462.x","title":"ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MIXED-MATING PLANTS PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR SELECTIVE INTERFERENCE AND STABLE MIXED MATING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":240,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University; Queen's University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Evolutionary Synthesis Center; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Selfing; Biology; Inbreeding depression; Outcrossing; Mating; Inbreeding; Mating system; Evolutionary biology; Zoology; Ecology; Population; Pollen; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.139869686982601,"gpt":0.2633454994208143,"spread":0.1234758124382133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774825,0.00006804955,0.0001665523,0.00003571224,0.0001254179,0.00001251255,0.00006736829,0.00003587358,0.000005630211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002766094,0.00002960031,0.00003193256,0.0003176627,0.00002399102,0.0002211674,0.00006151637,0.00004289294,3.459894e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002800278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000307843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00133952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008076306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994014,0.00003567955,0.0001777913,0.0001693146,0.00007114645,0.0001446669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994647,0.0003256329,0.0001309553,0.00001026538,0.00004973591,0.00001872834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007940865,0.0000241021,0.6980059,0.00001877621,0.00002932201,1.808677e-7,0.0006317773,0.000005578488,0.2941398,0.00002867466,0.00001873454,0.007017811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004967867,0.0001582922,0.9803156,0.000271702,0.00004106776,5.241941e-7,0.001654644,0.007004184,0.01020955,0.0002240609,0.000002275108,0.00006846444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990722,0.0004516189,0.0001561269,0.0000103642,0.00001730027,0.0001329697,0.00002659188,0.00001475759,0.0001181038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994676,0.00002948401,0.0004442394,0.000002367829,0.00002004776,0.0000188931,0.000007513127,3.42942e-7,0.000009496449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2839302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4506768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899680050","doi":"10.1111/evo.13639","title":"A meta‐analysis of the agents of selection on floral traits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":239,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Evolutionary Synthesis Center","keywords":"Pollinator; Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Abiotic component; Trait; Pollination; Ecology; Directional selection; Stabilizing selection; Disruptive selection; Biotic component; Natural selection; Evolutionary biology; Pollen","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2646419262940082,"gpt":0.3045794541907408,"spread":0.03993752789673255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001384966,0.0001207051,0.0008770283,0.00002611334,0.00009301213,0.000003973708,0.0001518552,0.00009298125,0.0001531211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000174934,0.0000292825,0.001320073,0.001097255,0.00004427669,0.00001913703,0.0000334465,0.00006298555,0.000008269954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000261246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007082528,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001519982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001918319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992207,0.0001266815,0.0002370177,0.0001514071,0.0001719641,0.00009217815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995392,0.00007533618,0.0003085795,0.00001575809,0.00004836989,0.00001275163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791885,0.0007079528,0.0009466887,0.00309821,0.3455645,6.985796e-7,0.0001685454,0.00002095165,0.001529017,0.002084436,0.01106534,0.6347345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002993461,0.0003620331,0.1051539,0.0005442855,0.2994889,0.000001542175,0.00001606494,0.00004475467,0.00002466403,0.00008339315,0.5940203,0.0002302901],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003876056,0.9952734,6.648705e-7,0.00002066613,0.00004460301,0.0001788499,0.0002366769,0.000009770594,0.0003592863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04641767,0.9529325,0.000005268397,0.000007726107,0.0001670812,0.00001785843,0.0000460561,6.202872e-7,0.0004052359],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6345041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1676568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111258054","doi":"10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1273:mibdci]2.0.co;2","title":"MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION BETWEEN DEVELOPMENTAL COMPARTMENTS IN THE DROSOPHILA WING","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Morphological variations and asymmetry","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Wing; Variation (astronomy); Morphometrics; Evolutionary biology; Drosophila melanogaster; Compartment (ship); Principal component analysis; Drosophila (subgenus); Anatomy; Zoology; Genetics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07705496305852154,"gpt":0.3110530533845867,"spread":0.2339980903260651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004671529,0.00009175712,0.0001232308,0.00004578275,0.0001306393,0.00002669629,0.0001406478,0.00007833755,0.000642222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009427498,0.00005775368,0.00003829536,0.0002590012,0.0000334397,0.0001004633,0.0000164768,0.0001679209,0.0001819782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001387636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001191219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002478319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007974662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990854,0.0001545858,0.0002576244,0.0001538215,0.000188694,0.0001598469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999631,0.0001841215,0.00004402488,0.0001050299,0.0000129404,0.00002290015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001149406,0.00229003,0.4084802,0.00003512754,0.00008740134,0.0001254724,0.00309557,0.0001387009,0.006206102,0.4776118,0.03968208,0.06213255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003914298,0.00005000723,0.912921,0.00002273936,0.00001317311,0.00002468783,0.0002481832,0.0004781423,0.00008096436,0.08444905,0.001200338,0.0001203292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980895,0.00001392052,0.008011168,0.0004197772,0.00003163859,0.0002202541,0.000006711711,0.00004254996,0.01035894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873954,0.000002408049,0.01215085,0.0001160981,0.0000913095,0.00002770837,0.00004480962,0.000004528974,0.0001668912],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5044408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7031881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893385597","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01649.x","title":"PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY FACILITATES MUTATIONAL VARIANCE, GENETIC VARIANCE, AND EVOLVABILITY ALONG THE MAJOR AXIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematics and Physics","keywords":"Evolvability; Biology; Phenotypic plasticity; Phenotype; Genetic variation; Evolutionary biology; Trait; Genetics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Quantitative genetics; Phenotypic trait; Genetic architecture; Variance (accounting); Population; Quantitative trait locus; Adaptation (eye); Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00446669593659695,"gpt":0.2025205234542487,"spread":0.1980538275176517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002738072,0.0001317684,0.0001058995,0.00002888502,0.0001454374,0.00001158971,0.00009507392,0.0001171904,0.00006832387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001283871,0.0001140531,0.00005039257,0.00007601871,0.0002245502,0.00002010648,0.00007303941,0.00007262118,0.00001164463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005497306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004796157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006994364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004330775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989648,0.0001331531,0.0002640513,0.0002374076,0.0001790585,0.0002215553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995277,0.0000427416,0.0001196339,0.0001997394,0.00003995698,0.00007023883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002851324,0.0005934472,0.4395359,0.0000952451,0.0002130893,3.539101e-7,0.0009336009,0.006147483,0.5392947,0.01074343,0.0004041597,0.001753424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003907175,0.00009007526,0.9890533,0.000004217135,0.00004381195,0.00001391125,0.00008452102,0.008089386,0.0006800586,0.0009464371,0.0004791117,0.0001244334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755155,0.001280602,0.2225868,0.00004335293,0.000146483,0.0001938403,0.0001061821,0.000007237493,0.0001200543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944896,0.00004134306,0.004878347,0.00003742721,0.0001701388,0.00002337573,0.0001046653,0.000009723733,0.0002453762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5495174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4650949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012296090","doi":"10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[1063:cctamc]2.0.co;2","title":"CHILL-COMA TOLERANCE, A MAJOR CLIMATIC ADAPTATION AMONG DROSOPHILA SPECIES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Baie-Comeau","funders":"","keywords":"Temperate climate; Biology; Adaptation (eye); Range (aeronautics); Drosophila (subgenus); Tropical climate; Ecology; Drosophila melanogaster; Zoology; Cold climate; Coma (optics); Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01050464647823986,"gpt":0.2241485892250521,"spread":0.2136439427468122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008707941,0.0001021596,0.00008944864,0.00003928951,0.0001802901,0.00001272791,0.00007472739,0.000142244,0.00009840336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001834467,0.00009898224,0.00006714783,0.0000827778,0.00007759169,0.000009953466,0.00002522714,0.00007150994,0.00005770546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002192374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002107304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001774331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001798419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993638,0.00003399942,0.0001471856,0.0001896519,0.00007024391,0.000195074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997077,0.000003744433,0.00006286505,0.0001514704,0.00003888641,0.00003535473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001807627,0.000222066,0.3705978,0.00001610574,0.00002716506,0.00001323232,0.000151923,0.0002719519,0.6241825,0.001181016,0.002069248,0.001086219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005670192,0.0002200807,0.9818218,0.00001289114,0.00003140709,0.0000384644,0.0001036962,0.001093087,0.01293685,0.0003585633,0.002619733,0.0001963793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945052,0.0001934383,0.001925465,0.0000938415,0.0002844489,0.0001473905,0.000005209427,0.00002428497,0.002820716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959502,0.00005693509,0.0002186597,0.0000929835,0.000427271,0.00003194916,0.0001488807,0.000009918124,0.003063256],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6112456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097579478","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00118.x","title":"INBREEDING AND OUTBREEDING DEPRESSION IN CAENORHABDITIS NEMATODES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Inbreeding depression; Biology; Outbreeding depression; Inbreeding; Selfing; Zoology; Outcrossing; Genetics; Ecology; Population; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006737675068869013,"gpt":0.2332011046802713,"spread":0.2264634296114023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002923773,0.0001006282,0.00008810543,0.00008098568,0.00008068441,0.00001831863,0.00007122719,0.0001339589,0.000005287633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006648846,0.0001070893,0.00002310452,0.00006811076,0.00004863114,0.000006985935,0.00009015104,0.00008127381,0.000003391571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003280476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001591912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001417459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004359126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992382,0.0000171819,0.0001653137,0.0002469176,0.00009799798,0.0002343726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997218,0.000008812794,0.00004786663,0.0001266314,0.00003281033,0.00006209575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002581289,0.00002442538,0.3440837,0.00001999539,0.000006201482,0.000004023183,0.0003693712,0.0001367029,0.6510906,0.0001657029,0.0002819112,0.003791601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005618552,0.0000977646,0.8586221,0.00004603175,0.00001039286,0.0000483544,0.0004264663,0.0008039068,0.1376339,0.0005090979,0.001006051,0.0002340011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451631,0.001154843,0.05269563,0.00004183906,0.0001829331,0.00008800715,0.00000174357,0.00001369106,0.0006581855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979446,0.00009814682,0.001520764,0.00005569913,0.0002536113,0.000002943028,0.00001681694,0.00001428765,0.00009312649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5145385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4366975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109020517","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01444.x","title":"DIRECTIONAL SELECTION IN TEMPORALLY REPLICATED STUDIES IS REMARKABLY CONSISTENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Variation (astronomy); Sampling (signal processing); Directional selection; Natural selection; Biology; Statistics; Stabilizing selection; Econometrics; Computer science; Machine learning; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09865917574401567,"gpt":0.2646452929420786,"spread":0.1659861171980629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002232507,0.00007726115,0.0000968041,0.00001934317,0.0001384801,0.000006419713,0.00004355474,0.00006624902,0.0002149779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004311169,0.00003214738,0.00004727733,0.0003705605,0.00005005854,0.0001234148,0.00001956618,0.00007991945,0.00004005177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001327152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006995118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001090795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007849564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992216,0.00005096663,0.0001781734,0.0003047194,0.0001150463,0.0001294809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999744,0.00001284853,0.00006685429,0.00002877174,0.0001207338,0.00002680503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001263914,0.000203849,0.4705239,0.000004734262,0.00001544578,0.000001707457,0.0002452876,0.000001199452,0.5171747,0.0003946681,0.002739307,0.008568849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000605112,0.000176558,0.9897048,0.00001188945,0.000008924541,0.00001757094,0.0003563177,0.0000164318,0.006983357,0.0007345452,0.001839242,0.00008978975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972593,0.0003599991,0.000005529494,0.000377034,0.0001678299,0.0001828714,0.000003153327,0.00009375886,0.001550573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986382,0.00004780641,0.0001268188,0.000035333,0.0001374424,0.00004011597,0.000009505911,5.837235e-7,0.0009641852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.519181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2353857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541080281","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01440.x","title":"PARALLEL AND NONPARALLEL ASPECTS OF ECOLOGICAL, PHENOTYPIC, AND GENETIC DIVERGENCE ACROSS REPLICATE POPULATION PAIRS OF LAKE AND STREAM STICKLEBACK","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":222,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; University of California, Davis; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; National Human Genome Research Institute; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; David and Lucile Packard Foundation","keywords":"Stickleback; Gasterosteus; Biology; Parallel evolution; Ecological speciation; Divergence (linguistics); Ecology; Natural selection; Replicate; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat; Trait; Genetic divergence; Population; Evolutionary biology; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Genetic diversity; Phylogenetics; Statistics; Genetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0169905031552878,"gpt":0.2333616640497351,"spread":0.2163711608944473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006170313,0.00008835563,0.0001207465,0.0000179687,0.00006930017,0.000004691708,0.00005147933,0.0001217421,0.00002862548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003510149,0.00008427615,0.00002133472,0.000040878,0.0001493648,0.000006159402,0.0001143087,0.00003331362,5.094154e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000354337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008638234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001476219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004971642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993892,0.00003419682,0.0001640309,0.0002352723,0.00006885607,0.0001084048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996101,0.000006255954,0.00013081,0.0001462114,0.00005621837,0.00005039127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000150842,0.00004982336,0.9728577,0.00005960719,0.00003530318,8.398902e-7,0.0003417947,0.000221497,0.02317903,0.001002267,0.00006461878,0.002036742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003585124,0.0002315861,0.9949699,0.000006747945,0.00002505566,0.000008226562,0.0001218679,0.0001516077,0.001559361,0.00239819,0.00008100667,0.00008792987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975559,0.0005265509,0.001513065,0.00001311214,0.00003826829,0.0001303955,0.00004527424,0.000004847333,0.0001725485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949489,0.0002964152,0.004636827,0.00001121627,0.00001854965,0.000002114662,0.00003913443,0.000003973054,0.00004287072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02211228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3436682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177795929","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00145.x","title":"ECOLOGICAL GENETICS OF AN INDUCED PLANT DEFENSE AGAINST HERBIVORES: ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE AND COSTS OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Phenotypic plasticity; Herbivore; Ecological genetics; Ecology; Quantitative genetics; Genetic variation; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Gene; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03164308981305116,"gpt":0.2323479253734077,"spread":0.2007048355603565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001049667,0.00008415562,0.0001427662,0.00001496615,0.00008757564,0.000009065167,0.00008817104,0.0001135598,0.0002499407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001302325,0.00003776457,0.0000266925,0.0001662546,0.0001158755,0.00004497042,0.00003960836,0.00009932753,0.000006851415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003732041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007920168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001545976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005316305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.0001467383,0.0001638316,0.0001752417,0.0001805977,0.0001929746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999405,0.0003011599,0.0000841534,0.00003511086,0.00009443317,0.00008020024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002451912,0.0007551499,0.04324205,0.00003780725,0.00003383221,0.00002549945,0.000354162,0.0002327116,0.8439001,0.001411394,0.0002852771,0.1094768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001758692,0.001080858,0.9769788,0.00003370053,0.000009828487,0.000008829503,0.00008969533,0.0163241,0.004789955,0.0003651791,0.00004136072,0.0001018276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988184,0.0003335799,0.0000345586,0.00003128984,0.00003499482,0.0001527617,0.000126579,0.00001229076,0.0004555686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994963,0.0001433945,0.0002096148,0.00001710253,0.00009432008,0.000006073169,0.00002277562,6.926833e-7,0.000009720089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2736675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174716789","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01516.x","title":"POLLEN TRANSFER BY HUMMINGBIRDS AND BUMBLEBEES, AND THE DIVERGENCE OF POLLINATION MODES IN PENSTEMON","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Pollination; Pollen; Bumblebee; Hand-pollination; Pollinator; Divergence (linguistics); Botany","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01584434455182207,"gpt":0.1749801860123275,"spread":0.1591358414605054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001642159,0.00003992131,0.00007196526,0.000004323197,0.00009269689,0.00000629366,0.00002539797,0.00002412126,0.000007160966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002073247,0.00001311759,0.00001164688,0.0000779245,0.00007099078,0.00005089415,0.000008333035,0.00002572224,3.978987e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006840048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001070763,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009110715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002043909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996743,0.00004754393,0.00007446944,0.00007752867,0.00006008654,0.00006607299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999044,0.00005420678,0.00001392283,0.000005575895,0.00001149455,0.00001040717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001673361,0.00006191343,0.3604813,0.00001677878,0.0000117559,4.493602e-7,0.0006728499,0.00000484949,0.5869007,0.04211912,0.000378205,0.00918479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003574361,0.00006649055,0.9930612,0.00001687949,0.000006890213,0.000001738535,0.0007993908,0.0002783527,0.002525899,0.002177716,0.0006424798,0.0000655714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956444,0.003339754,0.00001476765,0.0003326201,0.000008410636,0.00007505918,0.00001420588,0.000004756734,0.000566024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999184,0.0007042812,0.000006296658,0.000009142241,0.000008848157,0.000002714071,0.000001848455,1.542764e-7,0.00008276899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6325799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1377274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176301239","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01489.x","title":"SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND ADAPTIVE SPECIATION: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME ECOLOGICAL COIN","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":217,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assortative mating; Biology; Sexual dimorphism; Genetic algorithm; Disruptive selection; Evolutionary biology; Sexual selection; Ecological speciation; Ecological selection; Ecology; Mating; Incipient speciation; Zoology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural selection; Genetic variation; Gene flow; Genetics; Gene","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009833636353196515,"gpt":0.2318039608986563,"spread":0.2219703245454598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001374433,0.00007168619,0.00007163607,0.00001399687,0.00007134573,0.000004369819,0.00005921167,0.00008078458,0.00002618684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001345236,0.00005505195,0.00003209282,0.00006593036,0.0001391057,0.000002189751,0.00004503303,0.00005227413,0.000003722088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002666948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005432768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001812122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002415447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994147,0.0001061369,0.0001251699,0.0001614927,0.00008727859,0.0001052587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996763,0.00001123929,0.00007269256,0.0001522592,0.00005699598,0.00003053869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001334719,0.0003529581,0.1926641,0.00002193072,0.0001080511,0.000001402263,0.0001998404,0.00518598,0.6522835,0.1412744,0.006412755,0.001361648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009668619,0.0004618671,0.9713799,0.000007270666,0.00003055082,0.0000378806,0.0003553285,0.003072467,0.0104787,0.005821204,0.007183124,0.0002048156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894462,0.0005579605,0.007197533,0.0001520396,0.0001563241,0.0001250114,0.00001210506,0.000005464692,0.002347408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976811,0.00002547065,0.0009659242,0.00009421983,0.00007706393,0.000004654449,0.00001117875,0.000004814506,0.001135594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7787158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2244953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180001676","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00326.x","title":"DIVERGENT SELECTION DRIVES THE ADAPTIVE RADIATION OF CROSSBILLS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; New Mexico State University; National Geographic Society; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural selection; Adaptive radiation; Adaptive evolution; Fitness landscape; Ecology; Population; Adaptive strategies; Evolutionary biology; Machine learning; Geography; Computer science; Demography","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01436168709814281,"gpt":0.2240512545237621,"spread":0.2096895674256193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001452313,0.00004993398,0.00004424371,0.00001076957,0.0001570011,0.000007275643,0.00005227633,0.00003037241,0.01456642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005033649,0.00003700104,0.00003557111,0.0002178187,0.0001103597,0.0001086846,0.0000187942,0.00003867826,0.0003867442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005435314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006267856,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001851775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001364928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994652,0.000063001,0.00009696063,0.0001024377,0.0001657159,0.0001067024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999802,0.00001580719,0.00007109869,0.00007570859,0.00001206458,0.00002332186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006647482,0.0003393584,0.6971333,0.000007372499,0.00003410557,3.87286e-7,0.001820458,0.003276643,0.07609818,0.170016,0.04661893,0.004588783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001628755,0.00005470342,0.9656789,0.00000178936,0.000008691542,0.000002035941,0.0008618942,0.0004979253,0.01069292,0.0007455326,0.02123111,0.0000616142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625725,0.0001133672,0.004674692,0.0001199858,0.0002219259,0.0001713194,0.00001533384,0.00002460751,0.03208625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994767,0.00003121332,0.00003474933,0.00002702529,0.0000123107,0.00001032123,0.000007562356,0.000002678236,0.0003974634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2685456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108639548","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01577.x","title":"DOES GENE FLOW CONSTRAIN ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE OR VICE VERSA? A TEST USING ECOMORPHOLOGY AND SEXUAL ISOLATION IN TIMEMA CRISTINAE WALKING-STICKS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Ecomorphology; Divergence (linguistics); Isolation (microbiology); Evolutionary biology; Gene flow; Gene; Genetics; Ecology; Bioinformatics; Genetic variation","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03853624080906514,"gpt":0.2233838640469785,"spread":0.1848476232379134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009940862,0.00009203841,0.0001134941,0.00001227305,0.0002122399,0.00001447318,0.00004795469,0.0000623654,0.0000688556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001033845,0.00003252277,0.00001255088,0.0001575045,0.00009504287,0.0001015003,0.00004972102,0.0000669284,0.00001037776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008348349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001151671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001691294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993927,0.00003077728,0.0001214397,0.0002059802,0.0000723486,0.0001767282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997253,0.000147069,0.00005270713,0.0000106166,0.00003231248,0.00003197359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002337234,0.0001291907,0.2402202,0.000008461122,0.0000126494,0.00005875848,0.0005257675,0.0003176682,0.7519296,0.0001619435,0.00006327697,0.006338823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002664574,0.0004372247,0.9892623,0.0000343682,0.00001381373,0.00004358116,0.001030493,0.007611818,0.000535468,0.0005447172,0.00006504267,0.0001547321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989628,0.0001209147,0.0003589641,0.0002084626,0.0000690993,0.0001041463,0.00009539849,0.00002595054,0.00005431514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987217,0.00002619027,0.001057273,0.00003023579,0.0001134044,0.000003068795,0.00001723942,4.738791e-7,0.00003045978],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7513941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7845029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107128330","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00178.x","title":"CLINAL VARIATION IN MHC DIVERSITY WITH TEMPERATURE: EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF HOST?PATHOGEN INTERACTION ON LOCAL ADAPTATION IN ATLANTIC SALMON","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Pathogen; Major histocompatibility complex; Adaptation (eye); Genetics; Host (biology); Local adaptation; Virulence; Genetic diversity; Allele; Species richness; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Immune system; Gene; Population","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01368079110990869,"gpt":0.2649562936914225,"spread":0.2512755025815138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005136287,0.00007696518,0.00007000926,0.00007560231,0.00006807968,0.000005304374,0.00007753259,0.0001080653,0.000001628877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009737083,0.00006275433,0.00003267093,0.0001516123,0.0000394356,0.00001174838,0.00003445109,0.00008788349,0.000001166186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001326036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004987008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000610177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006498624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993298,0.00005284364,0.0001762529,0.0001877656,0.0001273599,0.000125982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996009,0.00006561224,0.00009832878,0.0001284464,0.0000877839,0.00001889645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005510039,0.0002589145,0.1982163,0.00003609683,0.00003016825,0.000001649109,0.0008365789,0.1476984,0.6401762,0.001830579,0.0000367349,0.005368353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006530479,0.0005777834,0.8920898,0.00007625543,0.00001742994,0.000004516823,0.0007898718,0.1011745,0.004234852,0.0001497467,0.0001377744,0.00009445648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8371976,0.0003039631,0.1620215,0.00007073621,0.00008337823,0.0002785614,0.00000459377,0.00000370077,0.00003594047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993285,0.00005748745,0.0004296592,0.00002825116,0.00006631809,0.000009732783,0.00005347744,0.000005717428,0.0000208675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6938735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3626385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151593272","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01284.x","title":"A GENETIC INTERPRETATION OF ECOLOGICALLY DEPENDENT ISOLATION","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biology; Reproductive isolation; Genetic algorithm; Evolutionary biology; Hybrid; Ecological speciation; Ecological niche; Ecology; Isolation (microbiology); Genetic variation; Habitat; Genetics; Population; Gene flow; Gene; Bioinformatics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006700272027542414,"gpt":0.2200203644515348,"spread":0.2133200924239923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005252159,0.00005316645,0.00005317898,0.00003235624,0.00003633379,0.000004925568,0.00006249103,0.00009436459,0.00007680322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003573542,0.00005355253,0.00003791413,0.00005733709,0.00002263746,0.000003079038,0.0000309601,0.00002697269,0.00001132681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001475406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001914955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001578633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004811008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995541,0.00003763565,0.0001230379,0.0001274696,0.00008420754,0.0000735448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997157,0.000003210977,0.00007517773,0.0001072371,0.00007535148,0.00002335927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003817388,0.00007551476,0.5129253,0.00001678395,0.00004697163,0.000001938858,0.0001817983,0.03577742,0.4365727,0.0008262962,0.0007520865,0.01244142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003253768,0.0002231593,0.9902282,0.000004652893,0.00001777256,0.00001747099,0.00005948974,0.003251677,0.002955966,0.001310754,0.001516597,0.00008886607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8729621,0.0001393786,0.1253807,0.0000305967,0.0001126207,0.00007986225,0.000004052453,0.000006128371,0.00128458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972231,0.00003156505,0.002282305,0.00004056882,0.00006424414,0.000002351713,0.00004723322,0.000003179937,0.0003054374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4773029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2183809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}