{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bc3637c1182d","filters":{"venue":"Faculty publications"}},"results":[{"id":"W251065692","doi":"","title":"Beyond Hospital Misbehavior: An Alternative Account of Medical Related Financial Distress","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Health care; Debt; Business; Suspect; Incentive; Actuarial science; Finance; Law; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Melissa B. Jacoby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth Warren","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05364013270014764,"gpt":0.3286993493604173,"spread":0.2750592166602697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004551763,0.0001092289,0.0002195777,0.0001956367,0.0001130264,0.00005686461,0.0005236737,0.0001541605,0.0009464053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003462121,0.0001227172,0.00007839785,0.0003224035,0.00008662976,0.0005156499,0.00009382759,0.0001841143,0.000241109],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001223421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007651159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002633832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006516025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986239,0.00001560915,0.0006574459,0.0003240377,0.0001290251,0.0002499916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989706,0.00001831775,0.000312364,0.0003887429,0.00009911985,0.0002108126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001389584,0.0004735045,0.005450561,0.000009071199,0.00001805236,4.613406e-7,0.001231648,0.0000228086,6.888199e-7,0.9713107,0.01113785,0.01034321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000596285,0.00008394917,0.1601892,0.0000106335,0.000008118715,0.000001684621,0.0001238131,0.002927665,0.00003096508,0.01489691,0.8208861,0.0002446421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.717794,0.000324703,0.003704697,0.2229118,0.0005975824,0.0007209262,0.006257796,0.0001687551,0.04751973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958897,0.00008080812,0.000733599,0.000551091,0.0001930425,0.000111201,0.0009049209,0.00001328082,0.001522332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212354004","doi":"","title":"More Sorry Than Safe: Assessing the Precautionary Principle and the Proposed International Biosafety Protocol","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biosafety; Precautionary principle; Convention on Biological Diversity; Harm; Negotiation; Protocol (science); International regime; Political science; Convention; Conference of the parties; Montreal Protocol; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Biotechnology; Law; Economics; Biodiversity; Biology; Geography; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan H. Adler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04321387997990989,"gpt":0.3523322020966485,"spread":0.3091183221167386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005074074,0.0001063221,0.00008012075,0.00001163739,0.0008820433,0.0005018677,0.0006917074,0.00006862262,0.002434618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000182149,0.00002900984,0.00005587656,0.0003931867,0.0004637546,0.0002415367,0.0001804525,0.0002047561,0.00006912959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000317548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000484738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008812587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005984339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986957,0.0001686874,0.0002131229,0.0002769118,0.0004187447,0.0002267925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993075,0.0002103461,0.00005801829,0.0001442638,0.0001969336,0.00008298624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003419202,0.001420008,0.03943324,0.00003204871,0.0002453253,0.00000201446,0.00251078,0.000201621,0.06678823,0.1616005,0.02463389,0.7027904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002784482,0.0000178707,0.692167,0.000003926883,0.00000425508,0.00001008439,0.0001826957,0.001454276,0.0002793007,0.0006464567,0.3048853,0.0000704648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3950319,0.0000132648,0.00007173159,0.5412757,0.000043363,0.03708195,0.0002476863,0.0001798139,0.02605455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616852,0.000009862058,0.0008951429,0.0005361665,0.0002463,0.02433609,0.0004577345,0.000002428965,0.01183108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7027199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542214041","doi":"","title":"Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Private law; Sociology; Public law; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Evan J. Criddle","is_ca":false},{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09025192314591357,"gpt":0.356500903930992,"spread":0.2662489807850784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374891,0.0000689957,0.00008994768,0.00007188882,0.0008029281,0.0001564801,0.0004747252,0.00004156116,0.0001602195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001905133,0.0000402952,0.00004498195,0.0006371987,0.000331876,0.0003816862,0.0001281193,0.000060549,0.00005125046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005121572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005389376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006256016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989315,0.000161498,0.0002036294,0.0002356084,0.0002244234,0.0002433023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986327,0.000304801,0.0001077657,0.0004534532,0.0003197238,0.0001815543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001300969,0.0000389004,0.002420094,0.00000193167,0.00001165166,1.890063e-8,0.003357292,2.202483e-7,0.0005093786,0.9667106,0.0113509,0.01559771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003501,0.000008501834,0.03906533,0.000009828985,0.000009019231,5.130389e-7,0.001272175,0.000004118929,0.00007921278,0.01259263,0.9467828,0.00007554513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09939358,0.00007146095,0.01074257,0.7830912,0.00005319379,0.001173294,0.000269789,0.0001933592,0.1050115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848578,0.00002788466,0.0009415715,0.001339675,0.0001154188,0.0004003595,0.00001485019,0.000008692802,0.01229372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6175554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246233972","doi":"","title":"Resolving Mass Legal Disputes Through Class Arbitration: The United States and Canada Compared","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Supreme court; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Class (philosophy); Federal Arbitration Act; Arbitration clause; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"S.I. Strong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05417959921893981,"gpt":0.2501517217395624,"spread":0.1959721225206226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001099452,0.0001374262,0.0001058896,0.0001014107,0.0008362529,0.0006141674,0.0002833572,0.00003867095,0.0003012732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009019187,0.0001035146,0.00003577704,0.0007393114,0.0001169049,0.001390356,0.00008331002,0.0001537693,0.00003058794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005851092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5925337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5643008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990528,0.0000147588,0.0002373585,0.0002204399,0.00022996,0.0002447107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991421,0.00004696741,0.0001526924,0.0002927855,0.000339324,0.00002616794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004313049,0.00005338222,0.006079392,0.00001393296,0.00003991344,6.485087e-7,0.0001426039,0.00008172145,0.0000233153,0.7092344,0.2842345,0.00009189326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000162831,0.000001969313,0.04893304,0.000007118842,0.00003524066,0.00000210129,0.002002625,0.01706475,0.00001027937,0.00112355,0.9305204,0.0001361652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1319298,0.0001285571,0.01625014,0.156776,0.0007471764,0.0009607982,0.0003258467,0.00076131,0.6921204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833334,0.00003390124,0.001000211,0.009344131,0.000339806,0.0001509054,0.00268276,0.00002420801,0.003090641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8514036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6431866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784713775","doi":"","title":"Judges Talking To Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do It So Differently From Just About Everyone Else","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Paul Marcus","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1033544531730529,"gpt":0.3937276031233483,"spread":0.2903731499502953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040638,0.0002550125,0.0003058439,0.0004943096,0.0009589012,0.001769566,0.001150408,0.0001928787,0.005173365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004064279,0.0002427426,0.00009900989,0.00166841,0.0002703258,0.00147272,0.0002454509,0.0002819627,0.002073652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000297579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000415122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007567793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0187824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970623,0.0001879488,0.0005552779,0.0006913425,0.0008484208,0.0006546946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973662,0.0006755044,0.0001976518,0.0005963913,0.0007482072,0.000415988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001263564,0.0004976339,0.05241166,0.0000235111,0.00004245172,0.000006368744,0.04863185,0.00007069769,0.0002114805,0.01207005,0.8362455,0.04977618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002163845,0.00001773388,0.4112166,0.00004894166,0.00003187164,0.000001704556,0.01691677,0.00002523266,0.0000402182,0.001785732,0.569369,0.0003298828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216912,0.0002469918,0.0009731471,0.05917281,0.0002952264,0.0008836059,0.0004631721,0.0003230073,0.0159508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846156,0.00005222977,0.003108731,0.003384306,0.0002621843,0.000546013,0.0003467693,0.00003320009,0.007650959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3588049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580136977","doi":"","title":"Privatizing Workplace Privacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expectation of privacy; Pager; Officer; Public sector; Private sector; Concurring opinion; Probable cause; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Information privacy; Business; Certiorari; Engineering; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Paul M. Secunda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08838665354627506,"gpt":0.3010846060106959,"spread":0.2126979524644208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003736057,0.0001337509,0.0001094273,0.0001728879,0.0004077737,0.0004960487,0.0003530079,0.0000979433,0.00049369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005113803,0.0001220739,0.0000551555,0.001080907,0.00005185666,0.003978208,0.0002259907,0.0001920536,0.001541741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003029983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002732159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001271464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989751,0.000005397493,0.0002053032,0.0001735313,0.0002334308,0.0004072196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990745,0.00003732897,0.0001470028,0.0003867583,0.0003259768,0.00002843288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002141265,0.0001428795,0.116151,0.00004714241,0.00001508406,8.976718e-8,0.000142976,0.00001172366,0.00009162273,0.7454915,0.1356718,0.002232022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000122104,4.363457e-7,0.1482182,0.00001024462,0.00001896361,0.000001284936,0.0000621994,0.0002882459,0.00001154121,0.001072321,0.8500431,0.0001513675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2271903,0.0002766567,0.02445706,0.1601301,0.001795472,0.0009065495,0.00002998656,0.002265892,0.5829479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847997,0.000002871989,0.003009203,0.00389533,0.002300897,0.00009140008,0.0005307715,0.00003123656,0.005338635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535565003","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage Claims in Insolvency and Under Guarantee Schemes in OECD Countries: Comparative Law Lessons for Detroit and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Pension; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Context (archaeology); Wage; Business; Debt; Government (linguistics); Debtor; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Labour economics","authors":[{"name":"Paul M. Secunda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05945118811615021,"gpt":0.3090316838074769,"spread":0.2495804956913266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001417545,0.00009875768,0.0002523571,0.0002150824,0.0001431011,0.0001199699,0.0001104379,0.00003465344,0.00001178442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001490464,0.00005961846,0.00003839074,0.0007780447,0.0003114343,0.0006087867,0.00003591508,0.00004067042,4.891268e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002126696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001452457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02707965,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993435,0.00002146808,0.0002640104,0.0001716238,0.00009342519,0.0001059296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991672,0.0001586483,0.0002412459,0.000203086,0.0002228451,0.000006979794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007476374,0.0003735633,0.4313889,0.00004733235,0.0001808477,7.585987e-8,0.003232533,0.001258121,0.0001751068,0.5625765,0.0002509476,0.0004413239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001383632,0.00002510488,0.9276401,0.00002092243,0.0001727764,1.253354e-7,0.002240547,0.0518255,0.00006496027,0.01153662,0.005005093,0.00008459869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923056,0.0001929372,0.0001701585,0.006518852,0.000008489078,0.0006039539,0.0001411751,0.000008066755,0.00005078126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989923,0.0002456893,0.00008822474,0.0002221225,0.000008363381,0.0001334017,0.0002726005,0.000004466062,0.0000328884],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5510399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554110004","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Twenty-Five Years of the Gulf of Maine Judgment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maritime boundary; International court; Boundary (topology); Settlement (finance); Continental shelf; Geography; Treaty; Oceanography; Political science; Square (algebra); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; Law; Fishery; Public international law; Geology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Charles H. Norchi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01047675442781114,"gpt":0.251733212247386,"spread":0.2412564578195749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001385482,0.00004779814,0.00006296202,0.00002301537,0.00005312922,0.00001259084,0.0004097841,0.00003333405,0.007152411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001925792,0.00003876776,0.0000493258,0.0002682448,0.000253372,0.0001530252,0.0001932303,0.0001052555,0.0001739261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003970708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001198288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003644408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002233272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992734,0.00001640171,0.0001795534,0.0001411806,0.0003041174,0.00008539313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993839,0.00002319202,0.0001227683,0.0003802147,0.0000603986,0.00002957672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008989062,0.0006470017,0.06745572,0.000009409917,0.00006309316,1.402373e-7,0.001442548,0.001158564,0.1447803,0.3639717,0.4146161,0.005846441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008877184,0.000009785062,0.4785772,0.000001802548,0.000007880854,0.000002760259,0.00004918697,0.0001112002,0.01031078,0.001239647,0.5095553,0.00004563389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.920687,0.000002773648,0.0001662257,0.03512476,0.0004209602,0.0002564286,0.0001682238,0.00002615983,0.0431475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744405,0.000001090221,0.00380478,0.00008156785,0.0001376213,0.00002423838,0.00007181152,0.000005518752,0.02143292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4111215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545203131","doi":"","title":"Judges and Their Editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Craft; Law; Pride; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art; Visual arts","authors":[{"name":"Douglas E. Abrams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05403533965330897,"gpt":0.396584241780534,"spread":0.3425489021272251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004079634,0.00004848538,0.00004185362,0.00008837116,0.000888372,0.0004282804,0.000163351,0.0000744262,0.001295045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002163077,0.00004133141,0.00001697916,0.0005812189,0.0002077469,0.0009975801,0.00001957699,0.0002964714,0.00009564611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001605666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004438828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009733432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002676471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999503,0.00003735146,0.0001000128,0.000121297,0.0001087159,0.0001296893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991085,0.000173653,0.00005967389,0.0001692134,0.0003703335,0.0001186181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[2.10899e-7,0.00004339467,0.005757316,5.546628e-7,0.000004596002,6.919132e-9,0.008821904,5.820304e-8,0.0002504191,0.5665837,0.4148885,0.003649366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003547239,0.000001984222,0.02694685,3.722088e-7,0.000002408653,5.893469e-7,0.004966433,0.000006555114,0.00003275861,0.002211796,0.96574,0.00005479858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05917193,0.000006696983,0.0001751209,0.5911052,0.001830589,0.0001567702,0.00005404845,0.0001950075,0.3473046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728549,0.000009909814,0.002150995,0.001273829,0.003132324,0.0000903594,0.0001791729,0.000006962949,0.02030157],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9136829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767332693","doi":"","title":"California's Climate Diplomacy and Dormant Preemption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Diplomacy; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Government (linguistics); Dormant Commerce Clause; China; Power (physics); Governor; Foreign policy; Treaty; Federalism; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"David L. Sloss","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05349167589899685,"gpt":0.3903065535542201,"spread":0.3368148776552233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002957322,0.00004532963,0.00004501901,0.0000373228,0.002319356,0.0005960078,0.0002317834,0.00004377964,0.0001241986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003187488,0.00004229223,0.00002353499,0.00003555501,0.0001435264,0.000772217,0.00005775263,0.00004926145,0.0001493977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004546994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004819026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001338812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002012363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994019,0.00002559006,0.000101028,0.0001241093,0.0002000142,0.0001473028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999406,0.00002032394,0.0001252579,0.0001796793,0.0001942719,0.00007447111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001460528,0.00002389381,0.05446821,0.000002152087,0.000005452757,8.25893e-8,0.0006333926,8.096011e-7,0.00004280261,0.9398971,0.002616678,0.002307956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001008515,0.000003963511,0.4723325,0.000005059882,0.000006026756,4.708227e-7,0.0001143337,0.0001844942,0.00002304837,0.004342407,0.522827,0.00005985118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3670501,0.00002092097,0.001147963,0.06023214,0.0002342761,0.0004155107,0.0007109687,0.0002283011,0.5699599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933044,0.00007243295,0.0004439775,0.00009334652,0.0001948538,0.00004399483,0.0002555137,0.000003973513,0.005587511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989795,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060875377","doi":"","title":"An Overview of Canadian Privacy Law for Pharmaceutical and Device Manufacturers Operating in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Privacy law; Privacy policy; Parliament; Legislation; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Government (linguistics); Data Protection Act 1998; Enforcement","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1272945902332519,"gpt":0.333884708193535,"spread":0.2065901179602831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006856756,0.0000645341,0.00007918118,0.00004772946,0.0001262547,0.00002794941,0.000118888,0.00002978254,0.0001370068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003164898,0.00005783705,0.00001221425,0.0002770731,0.00004893922,0.0001792016,0.00002114307,0.0000662153,0.000003110219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002766789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006942211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993966,0.00001891485,0.0001360545,0.0001645022,0.00009620106,0.0001877581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995956,0.00002871219,0.00002747891,0.000139364,0.00001287529,0.0001958982],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004331787,0.0003014072,0.5747845,0.0001504244,0.00007108271,0.000008642867,0.008098741,0.005736969,0.009743433,0.01416965,0.08921112,0.2977197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002451093,0.000009857473,0.5427103,0.00001002883,0.00001102974,0.000006935565,0.0002621424,0.01811339,0.001149485,0.00004453229,0.4373024,0.0001347656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356316,0.0002191197,0.00003587908,0.01746834,0.00005589609,0.0005027291,0.00009755949,0.00001671043,0.04597222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951537,0.00001855997,0.002975549,0.001692015,0.00001080385,0.000004567616,0.00005279286,0.000005704428,0.000086297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3480913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2358526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980143916","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Women Under the Law: The False Promise of Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"S. I. Strong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05406308912076459,"gpt":0.2805880973273655,"spread":0.2265250082066009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001624859,0.00009846588,0.0001427804,0.00002143127,0.001101937,0.00009293672,0.0004219029,0.00002478329,0.004563469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001762643,0.00004623727,0.00008922609,0.00008109205,0.0005121934,0.000241652,0.00004344932,0.0001336909,0.0001267955],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006168504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002690036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005975263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006982618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991112,0.00006563026,0.000294873,0.0001337116,0.0001852904,0.0002093458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990945,0.0000674668,0.00009696061,0.0004472258,0.0002097563,0.00008406321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[6.281008e-7,0.00005853327,0.000002186888,0.00001169133,0.00001308683,7.21552e-8,0.001354236,1.90877e-7,0.000001351886,0.6247904,0.3737435,0.00002408259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007580124,0.00002442712,0.00008517272,0.00002207428,0.00001930758,9.840692e-7,0.0002924225,0.00001832735,0.000001120013,0.01977694,0.9796106,0.00007277582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003358345,0.01132419,0.00005583996,0.1515297,0.000128672,0.0008781076,0.0003274784,0.0001498161,0.8322479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1681283,0.0002180922,0.000006495724,0.03617467,0.0003540794,0.0006471073,0.0002956282,0.00001620991,0.7941594],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6058671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963465,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}