{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":12,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"bc3637c1182d","filters":{"venue":"Faculty publications"}},"results":[{"id":"W251065692","doi":"","title":"Beyond Hospital Misbehavior: An Alternative Account of Medical Related Financial Distress","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Health care; Debt; Business; Suspect; Incentive; Actuarial science; Finance; Law; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Melissa B. Jacoby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth Warren","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05364013270014764,"gpt":0.3286993493604173,"spread":0.2750592166602697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005195213,0.0004949409,0.0003935443,0.003087401,0.006126729,0.009230648,0.001949449,0.01239757,0.007616411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03760606,0.0002984025,0.0005007479,0.002963873,0.02904958,0.0163486,0.007732588,0.01090432,0.0005028634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005323717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003584508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007512486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00572963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941048,0.003080719,0.0002475987,0.0005236153,0.000811519,0.001231825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807193,0.008568149,0.00512664,0.002336487,0.001803659,0.001445722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004340429,0.00003300258,0.009763769,0.00004444118,0.00001563522,0.002238638,0.01637282,0.0003211054,0.00004844551,0.9288328,0.0312929,0.01099311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004464379,0.00006189376,0.01115761,0.0008979237,0.00004184731,0.005832789,0.05052024,0.004291718,0.0002148132,0.7256113,0.2012012,0.0001240696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0909161,0.00862896,0.01237817,0.609217,0.001814518,0.00008647717,0.0003283478,0.000105555,0.2765249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592393,0.002229366,0.001277178,0.02682448,0.002173386,0.00004589313,0.0000695181,0.00003907039,0.008101837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01239757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03862649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212354004","doi":"","title":"More Sorry Than Safe: Assessing the Precautionary Principle and the Proposed International Biosafety Protocol","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biosafety; Precautionary principle; Convention on Biological Diversity; Harm; Negotiation; Protocol (science); International regime; Political science; Convention; Conference of the parties; Montreal Protocol; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Biotechnology; Law; Economics; Biodiversity; Biology; Geography; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Jonathan H. Adler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04321387997990989,"gpt":0.3523322020966485,"spread":0.3091183221167386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1137957,0.001686801,0.001515514,0.01077956,0.004968288,0.0201036,0.004730789,0.0181283,0.005731676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2166753,0.0008424465,0.001796114,0.006969525,0.03002227,0.03492742,0.0104998,0.01361554,0.0007153105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01420489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03365741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008030221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007774616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8892112,0.06252175,0.006471888,0.003793403,0.03389738,0.004104334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8242432,0.1417247,0.01028917,0.005114153,0.01697269,0.001656145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002499854,0.00005326734,0.0009228628,0.0003144661,0.00001650896,0.00006877324,0.0008532604,0.001949605,0.00008659726,0.9773476,0.00273111,0.01563102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003839499,0.0002150825,0.001636124,0.002597492,0.00006569244,0.0001521175,0.004579186,0.003474509,0.0006976741,0.9255052,0.06092662,0.0001119193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04418465,0.04142898,0.2117553,0.1881117,0.003889265,0.003548105,0.0006132351,0.0001527566,0.5063161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6310683,0.0295775,0.2634717,0.0484629,0.0020043,0.005468742,0.0005715067,0.0001787379,0.01919625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1137957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6018165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542214041","doi":"","title":"Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Private law; Sociology; Public law; Duty","authors":[{"name":"Evan J. Criddle","is_ca":false},{"name":"Evan Fox-Decent","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09025192314591357,"gpt":0.356500903930992,"spread":0.2662489807850784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01648589,0.001091405,0.002062588,0.002738551,0.01055883,0.01332058,0.004496049,0.04173151,0.007317054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02682308,0.0007873193,0.001299954,0.00307476,0.07141319,0.03550814,0.007503554,0.03604936,0.002070272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01695313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009817875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01499833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01334552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912736,0.004375383,0.0002230586,0.001229743,0.002167512,0.0007307589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793753,0.01714903,0.000468435,0.0009372007,0.001439803,0.0006303205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008301401,0.00000968233,0.00003228816,0.00002406105,0.000002782457,0.00003117103,0.0005269554,0.00006691698,0.000008541782,0.936857,0.06081953,0.001612743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002684047,0.000005413607,0.00007101792,0.0001988532,0.000004099653,0.00003679207,0.0005119218,0.0001786845,0.00003289984,0.8757325,0.1231864,0.00001468621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009871238,0.03091091,0.001301233,0.9416034,0.002673664,0.000005781076,0.00004431551,0.0000222537,0.02245142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2043177,0.04522125,0.002713539,0.6893071,0.02526548,0.0001362782,0.00008805993,0.0002489433,0.03270166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04173151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1230041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246233972","doi":"","title":"Resolving Mass Legal Disputes Through Class Arbitration: The United States and Canada Compared","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Supreme court; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Class (philosophy); Federal Arbitration Act; Arbitration clause; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"S.I. Strong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05417959921893981,"gpt":0.2501517217395624,"spread":0.1959721225206226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002759715,0.0001617446,0.0004031534,0.002333444,0.01451023,0.008851675,0.001361285,0.001981423,0.005366897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009435599,0.0002435849,0.0003064782,0.004085438,0.005872305,0.001988023,0.002812391,0.001929647,0.0001938446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08411369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1127249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949285,0.0006749401,0.0001034777,0.0002648859,0.001930208,0.00209807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968335,0.0008259882,0.0002011037,0.000112429,0.001475107,0.0005519269],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002168271,0.000083067,0.02073974,0.0002729898,0.00007874734,0.0009376979,0.03593938,0.003553329,0.0007328333,0.7862002,0.03087489,0.1203704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001994917,0.0001141661,0.1058456,0.001324405,0.0002847309,0.0005239445,0.1617838,0.007598868,0.002636062,0.0659392,0.6534269,0.0003227488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4018011,0.01178838,0.002636413,0.03364017,0.0003166683,0.0001664966,0.0002662564,0.00004624003,0.5493383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770315,0.003725457,0.001367115,0.001909247,0.00002579545,0.00002039312,0.00007251767,0.00001344086,0.01583463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08411369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6102904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784713775","doi":"","title":"Judges Talking To Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do It So Differently From Just About Everyone Else","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Paul Marcus","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1033544531730529,"gpt":0.3937276031233483,"spread":0.2903731499502953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05273677,0.0005427801,0.0006031455,0.002451611,0.03591505,0.01785619,0.00322943,0.01497091,0.00484363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1700919,0.001283732,0.0005603899,0.002667004,0.02731206,0.01279456,0.006228162,0.01889609,0.002326849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01451407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03171664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1398304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.276433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9185591,0.05653264,0.002858195,0.004079351,0.0116167,0.006353979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9217551,0.04121162,0.006375446,0.00179403,0.01981281,0.009050907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029065,0.0001130931,0.01717203,0.0004969747,0.00007051551,0.001156389,0.3485329,0.0001823018,0.000707561,0.08439373,0.4653397,0.08173186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396435,0.0002073974,0.0396784,0.004589741,0.0001265162,0.0008111562,0.523218,0.0005968436,0.001029695,0.06929591,0.3599084,0.0003983004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07639517,0.023185,0.002758373,0.8372959,0.006967075,0.0001971673,0.00009666615,0.00009861192,0.05300603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7158244,0.01165209,0.00329319,0.2503821,0.004420061,0.000313019,0.0001111744,0.0001567979,0.01384723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1398304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2789021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580136977","doi":"","title":"Privatizing Workplace Privacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expectation of privacy; Pager; Officer; Public sector; Private sector; Concurring opinion; Probable cause; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Information privacy; Business; Certiorari; Engineering; Original jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Paul M. Secunda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08838665354627506,"gpt":0.3010846060106959,"spread":0.2126979524644208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005548615,0.0002753206,0.0002841715,0.0006209748,0.004326551,0.007845568,0.001316278,0.005953019,0.01442022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01069558,0.0004161272,0.000761225,0.0006218861,0.01236659,0.01279535,0.01127935,0.008778051,0.002599606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004296776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006309773,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004514818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004403214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927737,0.002167768,0.0002529313,0.001515576,0.001992919,0.001297142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912602,0.003309915,0.0007456675,0.003201278,0.0007824649,0.0007004752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001398882,0.00002618959,0.0005890135,0.00003324931,0.000005892688,0.0001013556,0.002012565,0.0002561735,0.0005162025,0.9704351,0.009704058,0.01630632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002767744,0.00005716519,0.001303054,0.0002225484,0.00001851888,0.0003204325,0.001730163,0.001330408,0.001524826,0.6166543,0.3767747,0.00003616214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04971167,0.004285539,0.07003099,0.1960658,0.001340397,0.000085691,0.00017841,0.0004814778,0.67782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484834,0.002156668,0.006769274,0.04425197,0.001065582,0.0001430241,0.0001184941,0.0001407258,0.09687071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01442022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04824042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535565003","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage Claims in Insolvency and Under Guarantee Schemes in OECD Countries: Comparative Law Lessons for Detroit and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Pension; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Context (archaeology); Wage; Business; Debt; Government (linguistics); Debtor; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Labour economics","authors":[{"name":"Paul M. Secunda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05945118811615021,"gpt":0.3090316838074769,"spread":0.2495804956913266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003995387,0.000267963,0.0005467487,0.008350446,0.002593637,0.004949582,0.0008359178,0.00110784,0.001778652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008523573,0.0001945347,0.0009231111,0.010291,0.003430841,0.001512427,0.00228303,0.001692943,0.0001268437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004219234,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.215026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3243207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958361,0.001904972,0.0002402049,0.0001924293,0.0009126534,0.0009136854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994912,0.002114717,0.0014617,0.0002309915,0.001022315,0.000258287],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004948095,0.000474302,0.3866958,0.0004966113,0.0005996078,0.00400842,0.03097347,0.008384095,0.001100654,0.4817279,0.01272061,0.07232364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008938615,0.0003352484,0.864915,0.0008724389,0.0004855437,0.0007591087,0.06473237,0.003263116,0.001551232,0.01149344,0.0514029,0.0001002452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8774513,0.007215452,0.00079185,0.002743379,0.00006923439,0.00007695568,0.0005223562,0.00001701276,0.1111124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924406,0.003223797,0.0005021731,0.0005854106,0.00004628482,0.00006932488,0.0002767605,0.000007737315,0.002847923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.215026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275489,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554110004","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Twenty-Five Years of the Gulf of Maine Judgment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maritime boundary; International court; Boundary (topology); Settlement (finance); Continental shelf; Geography; Treaty; Oceanography; Political science; Square (algebra); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; Law; Fishery; Public international law; Geology; Business","authors":[{"name":"Charles H. Norchi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01047675442781114,"gpt":0.251733212247386,"spread":0.2412564578195749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003252292,0.0002875885,0.000185855,0.00196956,0.006219471,0.006537496,0.000901497,0.003569071,0.0099149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01055116,0.0002594079,0.0002316966,0.002505585,0.004735793,0.003903995,0.002705624,0.003413511,0.001740093],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01373232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008247163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1941105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3333708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980332,0.0003931627,0.0001057706,0.0002482379,0.0008874849,0.000332216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956464,0.001543885,0.000224758,0.000205062,0.002108781,0.0002710968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003043705,0.00002159627,0.002394593,0.0002186497,0.00000795966,0.0002781052,0.01837523,0.0001137248,0.0003656546,0.1652997,0.7774791,0.03541535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001196451,0.000006391766,0.003377822,0.0002734164,0.000002415412,0.00003596711,0.002989579,0.00001500007,0.00008401902,0.002009769,0.9911954,0.000008953067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.04111133,0.1213573,0.001455124,0.2800146,0.01721257,0.0001118867,0.002133331,0.0001440609,0.5364597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2799959,0.03399081,0.001027451,0.1063966,0.004947603,0.0001418621,0.001480315,0.0001779122,0.5718415],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1941105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3859614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545203131","doi":"","title":"Judges and Their Editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Craft; Law; Pride; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art; Visual arts","authors":[{"name":"Douglas E. Abrams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05403533965330897,"gpt":0.396584241780534,"spread":0.3425489021272251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01445939,0.0009118319,0.0009267423,0.003058519,0.007195565,0.01803833,0.002186984,0.005989399,0.04264115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1023201,0.0006942476,0.0005105734,0.002009282,0.005752589,0.007270173,0.00418064,0.00971364,0.02612474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005216846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01214633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002365948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004949686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9773833,0.00571761,0.001468416,0.002260454,0.01085496,0.002315322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9409145,0.01518417,0.003459995,0.003941322,0.02711883,0.00938126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001078395,0.00000789853,0.0001203872,0.00006018615,0.000002828088,0.00005279261,0.0005250548,0.00002430683,0.00007089727,0.03047205,0.9468107,0.0218421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003410231,0.00000415359,0.00009587795,0.00007572616,0.000002150163,0.0000301902,0.0002746448,0.00001457289,0.00003087059,0.003798853,0.9956657,0.000003834738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00125691,0.03967225,0.001538992,0.3381988,0.4133959,0.00008994639,0.0001750018,0.0002284423,0.2054438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04138397,0.03114098,0.001979065,0.09693424,0.2579736,0.0001436379,0.0002889972,0.0003246632,0.5698308],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04264115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1426488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767332693","doi":"","title":"California's Climate Diplomacy and Dormant Preemption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Diplomacy; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Government (linguistics); Dormant Commerce Clause; China; Power (physics); Governor; Foreign policy; Treaty; Federalism; Politics; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"David L. Sloss","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05349167589899685,"gpt":0.3903065535542201,"spread":0.3368148776552233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001733309,0.0002448827,0.0002881108,0.0004654983,0.006443326,0.006485415,0.001033528,0.003310004,0.01488592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003185291,0.0004864643,0.0003182079,0.000401078,0.003568562,0.00162544,0.002411865,0.00780272,0.00162693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007021044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01167187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.170232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2583695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984842,0.0001394542,0.00004672923,0.0003392594,0.0004391173,0.0005512373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998563,0.0004353469,0.0001281035,0.0001721095,0.0002608518,0.0004407202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009848634,0.0000939695,0.002384596,0.00009150217,0.00001093991,0.0005849871,0.001682115,0.0004548847,0.0005265707,0.6075246,0.3660046,0.02054281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000756587,0.00004009162,0.004006694,0.0001210491,0.00001401312,0.0000852794,0.0004594926,0.0002720726,0.0005867554,0.01904552,0.9752488,0.00004464034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04012159,0.003165073,0.001519394,0.05555462,0.0023058,0.00005864455,0.0005454959,0.0001806316,0.8965488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221462,0.002535355,0.001485102,0.05245118,0.001363624,0.0001375234,0.0004983858,0.0001420078,0.4192406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.170232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3384823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060875377","doi":"","title":"An Overview of Canadian Privacy Law for Pharmaceutical and Device Manufacturers Operating in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Privacy law; Privacy policy; Parliament; Legislation; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Government (linguistics); Data Protection Act 1998; Enforcement","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1272945902332519,"gpt":0.333884708193535,"spread":0.2065901179602831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004260188,0.0008557461,0.0005845226,0.009690673,0.01952215,0.01275052,0.002705158,0.005028896,0.01487202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01037803,0.0009754363,0.001205446,0.01612706,0.00478727,0.002941675,0.002218981,0.004081116,0.001554169],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2754878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4122927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9829056,0.0008011166,0.000559887,0.0007783004,0.01129788,0.003657247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882116,0.001742229,0.0005296285,0.0002375147,0.007648959,0.001630035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295861,0.00008673975,0.007249119,0.0009021838,0.0000333821,0.001549806,0.004508914,0.001449577,0.0006298903,0.5395032,0.3520316,0.09200261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117438,0.0000127634,0.009489173,0.0005087774,0.00002406576,0.0001915955,0.001370989,0.0004516095,0.0001689231,0.004278792,0.9834187,0.00007284084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0174876,0.086656,0.003984282,0.0739409,0.001677856,0.0006592876,0.004798069,0.00040562,0.8103904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3468803,0.2057947,0.02129698,0.06687799,0.001153067,0.0006607561,0.006883803,0.0003555132,0.3500969],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8403314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980143916","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Women Under the Law: The False Promise of Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"S. I. Strong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05406308912076459,"gpt":0.2805880973273655,"spread":0.2265250082066009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008515551,0.0007874783,0.001045882,0.002365102,0.00144926,0.004240854,0.001217225,0.003310196,0.03040562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004756568,0.0004624389,0.0002674249,0.004894717,0.002623669,0.003533802,0.0008744873,0.00380755,0.0165604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003629768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01389501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03696938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987609,0.000278113,0.000048006,0.0001157874,0.0007257105,0.00007153297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963529,0.00226587,0.0001923656,0.00009422309,0.0009107214,0.0001838255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004798208,0.000003898535,0.00002369558,0.0003237525,0.000002752708,0.0000171015,0.00007188535,0.00003686579,0.00002900368,0.005013401,0.9680496,0.02642322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003041884,0.0000071323,0.0001664559,0.0008363272,0.00000372331,0.00009121311,0.00008972511,0.00002129874,0.00001846872,0.001832816,0.9969254,0.000004373272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002639222,0.7363259,0.0004994238,0.09590402,0.03933344,0.00004293046,0.0001533232,0.00007420987,0.1274029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005022302,0.6968503,0.0006062991,0.04787826,0.02610615,0.00008766839,0.0002482987,0.0001052271,0.2230955],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03040562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1017169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}