{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":97,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":97,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"27a81af7ef4a","filters":{"venue":"Family Court Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W2165826771","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x","title":"CUSTODY DISPUTES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: TOWARD A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO PARENTING PLANS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Differential (mechanical device); Child abuse; Social psychology; Poison control; Criminology; Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Peter G. Jaffe","is_ca":false},{"name":"Janet R. Johnston","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claire V. Crooks","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07078689713719062,"gpt":0.3432964902111397,"spread":0.2725095930739491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01762596,0.0003230236,0.0008511734,0.004930884,0.00126991,0.003093159,0.002060539,0.00191233,0.0009343988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03364432,0.0004495519,0.0006708407,0.002351771,0.00451981,0.003994306,0.002151778,0.003562171,0.0002214149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003014803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009377575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02963922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873887,0.00847687,0.001417209,0.0003899652,0.002000881,0.0003263484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750996,0.01689582,0.002740881,0.0006024627,0.004095895,0.0005654856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001143528,0.0001229637,0.01817505,0.00967064,0.0001981493,0.003003135,0.01232915,0.002128685,0.0004841062,0.1845487,0.01810821,0.7511168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001184858,0.0007249725,0.05326856,0.05136078,0.0004409329,0.01545157,0.02981852,0.00118411,0.0009902582,0.09829902,0.7481053,0.0002374817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01461339,0.9304845,0.00824479,0.01669569,0.0009165408,0.0001383927,0.00004422243,0.00002233733,0.0288401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1796909,0.80176,0.01188259,0.003499875,0.0006779209,0.0001512431,0.00009841258,0.000009810723,0.002229259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09321606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014229464","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01287.x","title":"CHILDREN RESISTING POSTSEPARATION CONTACT WITH A PARENT: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES, AND CONUNDRUMS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Resistance (ecology); Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Barbara Jo Fidler","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01342374486595975,"gpt":0.3110076863260546,"spread":0.2975839414600948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02555083,0.0004828725,0.001226657,0.004814012,0.004040721,0.008340557,0.003450282,0.007836634,0.001748627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03086708,0.0003869833,0.0006058118,0.004792637,0.03908196,0.01514293,0.004951974,0.009935227,0.0002791936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006920542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00868854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007736252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00972026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845888,0.009595475,0.001228618,0.001113012,0.002792135,0.0006818466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572391,0.03676416,0.002617957,0.0006677528,0.002152775,0.0005583525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005292432,0.00007823556,0.002651006,0.006582729,0.00005853151,0.002339049,0.06771438,0.0003190737,0.0002225188,0.5304833,0.01732813,0.3721701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002787888,0.0001777483,0.005347998,0.02744707,0.00008049662,0.008294607,0.2068632,0.0002755285,0.0004885851,0.2680023,0.4828364,0.0001583715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007725588,0.8407716,0.001222611,0.1381779,0.001091304,0.00001977157,0.00001376546,0.000009091457,0.01096831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1264753,0.8530646,0.001553429,0.01499591,0.00261091,0.00008609777,0.00001952187,0.00001555761,0.001178728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02555083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1351273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784500953","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00632.x","title":"CRITICAL ASPECTS OF PARENTING PLANS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Developmental psychology; Schedule","authors":[{"name":"Marsha Kline Pruett","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel Ebling","is_ca":false},{"name":"Glendessa M. Insabella","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0394686040950965,"gpt":0.3450090663421491,"spread":0.3055404622470526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001188398,0.00007721838,0.0001119381,0.0004599839,0.0004673142,0.0007010571,0.000198273,0.0001772797,0.000828147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008061,0.00009787067,0.0001141737,0.0004378961,0.0005963322,0.0003469171,0.0003643066,0.0003481254,0.00004510056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000682442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001358891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007098048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01868068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992939,0.0004321319,0.00004444636,0.00003052115,0.0001350301,0.00006384839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974754,0.0009807338,0.0009498275,0.00009019864,0.0002514271,0.0002523505],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001608232,0.00005873112,0.6022099,0.000621689,0.00007063196,0.002315627,0.02142094,0.0006793384,0.001468513,0.01617487,0.005445038,0.3493739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008048319,0.000204648,0.934495,0.0005345999,0.00004221685,0.002573671,0.01457743,0.0001364059,0.0002810561,0.004103384,0.04302682,0.00001676557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323016,0.0400429,0.0006750356,0.003638082,0.0001226422,0.00002567974,0.0001229706,0.000007716128,0.02306322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911764,0.007600912,0.0003655849,0.00007886851,0.00004970774,0.000007662894,0.00003546945,0.000001788229,0.0006836142],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007098048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01411349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582480376","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01319.x","title":"TOWARD THE DIFFERENTIATION OF HIGH‐CONFLICT FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND CANADIAN CASE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Alienation; Economic Justice; Identification (biology); Law; Social conflict; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1616197370814857,"gpt":0.4801000534582291,"spread":0.3184803163767433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04710742,0.0007827731,0.001385118,0.05022908,0.02845266,0.01607203,0.00645505,0.003571089,0.002959803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101187,0.0008100913,0.001223814,0.05553898,0.02973394,0.005900901,0.008660943,0.003230892,0.0001262183],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.313216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3231824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9428506,0.01846864,0.003046162,0.002048831,0.02504652,0.00853914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9077788,0.04200558,0.006419437,0.001587101,0.03831327,0.003895749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745081,0.00003096682,0.01429707,0.0006738006,0.00004144091,0.0006120263,0.06838822,0.0005162133,0.00008175782,0.8723593,0.01016251,0.03281929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007877419,0.0000579846,0.1999755,0.007451828,0.0003217369,0.001069575,0.2602376,0.005059169,0.0004192366,0.2244647,0.3005604,0.000303433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2510156,0.1634359,0.008669807,0.1356065,0.0004645471,0.001676633,0.001002441,0.00005829569,0.4380702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470199,0.03276108,0.007507818,0.005054904,0.0001051854,0.0004750699,0.0003540781,0.00003483612,0.006686969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.313216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false},{"name":"Suzanne Hunt","is_ca":false},{"name":"Carolyn McCarney","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04782442497088262,"gpt":0.3398939775480977,"spread":0.2920695525772151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007519583,0.0004991664,0.0005864014,0.007197753,0.01564341,0.003192673,0.003226668,0.004006788,0.004161688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023724,0.0006030293,0.0006215376,0.01497226,0.002496537,0.0008346595,0.002113999,0.002784953,0.0004126461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1707836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905784,0.0004892691,0.0004770982,0.0006269621,0.005151717,0.002676524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815083,0.003530206,0.002584269,0.0004962218,0.01011547,0.001765545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005656177,0.0001347869,0.07351684,0.002211384,0.0003049004,0.006938321,0.02768254,0.0009219184,0.0009638339,0.04571583,0.7165828,0.1244612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001115609,0.00004516805,0.3984092,0.001349867,0.0003052907,0.001012836,0.01088674,0.0002467271,0.0005834244,0.0009636277,0.585948,0.0001376343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4295287,0.1438991,0.0005919214,0.07836659,0.003040276,0.0009047207,0.02824384,0.0001022227,0.3153226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811624,0.04969523,0.001045575,0.03023373,0.0008841965,0.000350046,0.008547888,0.00005562643,0.09756375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.113307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8221036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040194546","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00117.x","title":"DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DOVE, AND DIVORCE MEDIATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dove; Categorical variable; Mediation; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Mental health; Domestic violence; Risk assessment; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health; Psychiatry; Computer science; Computer security; Business; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Desmond Ellis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Noreen Stuckless","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01638917466527218,"gpt":0.3241922748868361,"spread":0.3078031002215639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001595867,0.0002320592,0.0005708277,0.001922887,0.0005072547,0.001473034,0.0004642732,0.0007706555,0.001583388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00541895,0.0001910599,0.0002738827,0.001709805,0.001062637,0.0009264096,0.0007528128,0.0009687016,0.0001936185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001140336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003038983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007901791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01611131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981049,0.00101565,0.0001473062,0.00009215303,0.0005425848,0.00009732613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973559,0.001696761,0.0004223785,0.0000365038,0.0004159947,0.00007238355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001123671,0.0001623111,0.02686944,0.01045203,0.0002110716,0.001834319,0.001927521,0.0006735064,0.0003815746,0.03241968,0.01236051,0.9125957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005073904,0.0009251121,0.1211431,0.0153297,0.000383929,0.01594746,0.007702383,0.0005577047,0.0008425395,0.01813253,0.818906,0.0000787067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006169952,0.9852272,0.0002333364,0.001541817,0.0001946175,0.000009440908,0.000009384919,0.000002110567,0.006612086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05837174,0.9394842,0.0003009579,0.0003697368,0.0002892225,0.0000152609,0.00002697879,0.0000014815,0.001140327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007901791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01571161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1788428164","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00635.x","title":"PARENT EDUCATION AFTER SEPARATION/DIVORCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Separation (statistics); Developmental psychology; Parent education; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","authors":[{"name":"Brenda L. Bacon","is_ca":true},{"name":"Brad McKenzie","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03450573828765361,"gpt":0.3723536530606825,"spread":0.3378479147730288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008668244,0.00008800542,0.0002769793,0.0005951761,0.0005390332,0.0002359654,0.0004576537,0.0003175127,0.001935011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003132916,0.00006238203,0.0001586433,0.0004916705,0.00006936099,0.0001244474,0.0003106384,0.0003328856,0.0001878999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009744592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003430238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05865027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1692234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996331,0.000148954,0.00001939663,0.00002566332,0.00009755484,0.00007527691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991204,0.0001817094,0.000175166,0.00002454958,0.0001963719,0.0003017306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001105378,0.002336831,0.03687718,0.001760118,0.0001025567,0.0007400053,0.00133796,0.0001667299,0.0004768901,0.0003238111,0.00615087,0.9486216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002098409,0.01333185,0.8530149,0.008218256,0.0006926233,0.003395115,0.004432541,0.00028164,0.00197089,0.0005090626,0.1120226,0.00003214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.8262638,0.15153,0.0003431337,0.002631008,0.0003040665,0.0003736042,0.000369612,0.00003554062,0.01814919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977457,0.092696,0.001058272,0.0009062188,0.0001489246,0.0001815842,0.0004735826,0.000005442508,0.006784331],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05865027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1166178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750155760","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12289","title":"Crossover Cases of High‐Conflict Families Involving Child Protection Services: Ontario Research Findings and Suggestions for Good Practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Harm; Economic Justice; Family court; Child protection; Crossover; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Claire Houston","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1788718673494707,"gpt":0.4240792760886152,"spread":0.2452074087391445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02452111,0.0003223667,0.0007059089,0.005185619,0.01028824,0.0044199,0.002810348,0.001020396,0.005147024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05894797,0.0006471602,0.0004979157,0.009761686,0.006570353,0.004161898,0.003852905,0.001225792,0.000264535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04914084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09180313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9029114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9827302,0.007766276,0.001602556,0.001373068,0.004551603,0.001976341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297632,0.03157413,0.01424316,0.003791824,0.01685862,0.003769023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004374075,0.0004115212,0.3569538,0.005115878,0.0001502598,0.00744747,0.3394204,0.000445941,0.001420299,0.02708065,0.02603267,0.2350837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010082,0.0001369134,0.4943524,0.007376088,0.0001522779,0.002471282,0.4107349,0.0003236083,0.000521226,0.003983274,0.07973301,0.0001141814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7908952,0.08788434,0.002164772,0.03761205,0.0004411204,0.001137073,0.00107906,0.00006815113,0.07871825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534149,0.03518483,0.004079733,0.002148345,0.00008939469,0.0003807677,0.0004810179,0.00002455179,0.004196255],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09708858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3565434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karine Poitras","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Francine Cyr","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shawna LeClair","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07694001248423663,"gpt":0.3333489573152807,"spread":0.256408944831044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03596871,0.0005729497,0.002194407,0.01240346,0.0100293,0.01283465,0.0076661,0.004442637,0.004999345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06484228,0.000807324,0.001107423,0.0268648,0.01317316,0.004797463,0.003991988,0.006623696,0.0003324759],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1765982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3759319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9646822,0.004284749,0.002325721,0.003427652,0.02175177,0.003527911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450943,0.04474165,0.008432441,0.003082136,0.09028865,0.008360869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001585957,0.0001059578,0.01876573,0.01149962,0.000378778,0.000537658,0.009279312,0.0006364395,0.0003189682,0.1252003,0.2098326,0.6232861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005729234,0.00008456849,0.05937206,0.02823302,0.0004342933,0.0005324964,0.01556278,0.000431837,0.0003551615,0.008067735,0.8866516,0.0002171746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007973439,0.8488504,0.0002914247,0.1179767,0.001815988,0.00003422115,0.0007267744,0.00002863385,0.02230239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1645976,0.7721039,0.001533651,0.05548089,0.001756833,0.00006084617,0.0006867381,0.00008942,0.003690076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1765982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018036763","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00141.x","title":"ASSESSING THE PARENT–CHILD RELATIONSHIP IN PARENTING CAPACITY EVALUATIONS: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF ATTACHMENT RESEARCH","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Fred Schmidt","is_ca":true},{"name":"L. Jane Cuttress","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jan Lang","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mary Jane Lewandowski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jennine S. Rawana","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4869531592217185,"gpt":0.592706808589885,"spread":0.1057536493681665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04799478,0.0005680456,0.0009176115,0.004949698,0.001160908,0.002254453,0.00120631,0.0009171466,0.001703456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07050411,0.000311556,0.0004176538,0.00336358,0.002363417,0.002924257,0.002614741,0.001961976,0.0003603307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001314778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003378193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002637515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008030696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9792548,0.01626099,0.001647644,0.0002988768,0.002304362,0.0002333656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599915,0.02679126,0.004106492,0.001254462,0.00675303,0.001103325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000149709,0.0004528556,0.1178056,0.00392851,0.0001124053,0.0007246539,0.01510597,0.000533892,0.001144001,0.009075031,0.004341654,0.8466257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001865705,0.00507795,0.7676096,0.02515361,0.0004802549,0.01404478,0.05004517,0.003729952,0.00319597,0.04034964,0.0898142,0.0003122507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3930424,0.4042056,0.07409975,0.0165162,0.001895023,0.004538476,0.0004112921,0.0001904285,0.1051009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882538,0.1438553,0.06144505,0.0007494171,0.0004391495,0.002704897,0.0001522921,0.00002670387,0.002373457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04799478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2538237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Glenda Lux","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sandy Gill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05914237393214094,"gpt":0.3530770726104747,"spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0325805,0.000585471,0.001213813,0.01563331,0.009944608,0.009393229,0.003410247,0.00214875,0.001695707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06715012,0.0006560573,0.0008755061,0.01599067,0.01070246,0.003758166,0.00222409,0.002898161,0.0001425291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2992753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9695976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712514,0.007260484,0.002224013,0.001280609,0.01609612,0.001887338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9280857,0.0321494,0.003001149,0.001548961,0.03433076,0.0008840843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405024,0.00004164563,0.01275831,0.02744935,0.0003518604,0.0009862336,0.03224701,0.001081937,0.0008582195,0.347119,0.05957822,0.5174542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003737046,0.00005840772,0.05916592,0.0816341,0.001037178,0.0008525962,0.02799391,0.0008752753,0.001518492,0.03255168,0.7940475,0.0002276282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01016621,0.9086882,0.001605652,0.03103322,0.0008707933,0.0001869136,0.0003441382,0.00001156335,0.04709321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2503569,0.7292731,0.006918645,0.008180993,0.0003268877,0.0001536647,0.0003335114,0.00002575517,0.004430513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7700306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814157025","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00667.x","title":"THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Seriousness; Legislature; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Criticism; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Karen L. Endres","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06187454347855731,"gpt":0.3574576572154753,"spread":0.295583113736918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002358919,0.0005328054,0.0004304721,0.002452203,0.005251917,0.003174624,0.001445543,0.002332689,0.004581517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006741004,0.0003632829,0.0004234611,0.002620212,0.001595214,0.0005877757,0.001507599,0.002256693,0.00146521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04119325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1521559,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947174,0.000346376,0.00024541,0.000265428,0.002991323,0.001434087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957344,0.0002868837,0.0002201431,0.0001190838,0.002933772,0.0007056824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000753419,0.0000933945,0.01575329,0.0004757751,0.00003452813,0.0006810983,0.004735565,0.0004350467,0.0007876521,0.1870835,0.6780608,0.111784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002091155,0.00003925267,0.0444735,0.0004229021,0.00002810889,0.0001478854,0.001014439,0.0001375457,0.0002373682,0.001195647,0.9522547,0.00002781126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.05244196,0.04028241,0.002723725,0.04249169,0.004245183,0.002824666,0.02408245,0.0005373246,0.8303705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.300262,0.02879199,0.006000489,0.07750316,0.0006007844,0.002359359,0.01591648,0.00008666196,0.5684792],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04119325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2988793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491038314","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00054.x","title":"TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be \"Experts,\" But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Law; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Resolution (logic); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08894869586451364,"gpt":0.3804127153912334,"spread":0.2914640195267197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01880993,0.001067006,0.001269226,0.002267954,0.00844615,0.007198002,0.003060632,0.02646629,0.007082653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06723768,0.0007928012,0.001247991,0.001666336,0.01453399,0.01347594,0.004314205,0.02341957,0.001940403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006039044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007060772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01728966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02188749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913134,0.003480332,0.0009459763,0.001253786,0.002269008,0.0007374908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617972,0.02886841,0.001146475,0.001022302,0.006527078,0.0006384841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008295591,0.00004700787,0.001056941,0.0003266972,0.0000485644,0.0005794659,0.007523456,0.0003195048,0.0004933287,0.6163509,0.3304414,0.04272976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009240438,0.00008076689,0.001990571,0.001141737,0.00009784217,0.0008159563,0.009346991,0.0009433124,0.002258115,0.3410482,0.6419812,0.0002027913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009349885,0.013775,0.008855224,0.9303173,0.009503875,0.0001679112,0.0002531065,0.00009552143,0.02768224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.181864,0.0102271,0.01493374,0.7517663,0.005344575,0.0004621228,0.0001102047,0.0001183068,0.03517367],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02646629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09947759,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894907231","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12081","title":"A Presumption Against Shared Parenting for Family Court Litigants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Coaching; Presumption; Compromise; Psychological intervention; Domestic violence; Adversarial system; SAFER; Social psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Peter G. Jaffe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06379233560967743,"gpt":0.3620999707599172,"spread":0.2983076351502398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08260631,0.0005767321,0.001686524,0.002063795,0.005032989,0.008612913,0.006446609,0.02371919,0.005677063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1515407,0.0008559516,0.001978731,0.001798247,0.0320406,0.0129827,0.006205772,0.04770424,0.00297554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005556716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01832675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01062891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01127376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9266074,0.03561353,0.009707144,0.008672015,0.01631332,0.003086656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7892828,0.169557,0.009883965,0.01144027,0.01620444,0.003631606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627369,0.0001173186,0.001703084,0.006353232,0.0002004935,0.00138216,0.006200438,0.0005006075,0.0007706454,0.7371618,0.1594768,0.08597075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001713846,0.000386811,0.002369292,0.02747528,0.0002777137,0.002272425,0.003804212,0.0003694701,0.001289302,0.171058,0.7904108,0.000115389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004951842,0.118534,0.01262207,0.7883886,0.01993354,0.0002064092,0.0002596763,0.0001020717,0.05500174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1954429,0.1035639,0.01584431,0.6566521,0.01258941,0.001120333,0.0001526115,0.0001037598,0.01453066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08260631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4368691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965852444","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00139.x","title":"ROCK‐PAPER‐SCISSORS: PLAYING THE ODDS WITH THE LAW OF CHILD RELOCATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Settlement (finance); Jurisdiction; Law; Adversarial system; Odds; Duty; Process (computing); Proposition; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"W. Dennis Duggan","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02121358440434306,"gpt":0.3040934368450104,"spread":0.2828798524406673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129883,0.0002682907,0.0004641217,0.001258826,0.007758818,0.01000032,0.002123783,0.007816004,0.006038588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162329,0.0004453995,0.0007312476,0.0009530949,0.02652353,0.008073905,0.004651437,0.008478173,0.000802712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005963562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01040991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03783778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0779049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846008,0.007231555,0.0006281326,0.001225926,0.004559284,0.001754223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888426,0.008102571,0.0009362605,0.000691147,0.0009984955,0.0004288625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001482411,0.00001001489,0.001409539,0.00005709687,0.000007297798,0.0008259657,0.003565387,0.0003698203,0.0001135343,0.9714192,0.009076606,0.0131307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004710635,0.0001501294,0.004087064,0.001181656,0.00005793738,0.001881671,0.01988176,0.001467782,0.001274878,0.4636496,0.5062332,0.00008725595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1172285,0.02745681,0.03321482,0.2245846,0.001580897,0.00016371,0.0000688019,0.0001453711,0.5955564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202998,0.006854121,0.006688867,0.02233523,0.0005661127,0.00009739713,0.00002646785,0.00008529402,0.04304671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03783778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07523507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579304025","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01446.x","title":"MARRIAGE: CIVIL, RELIGIOUS, CONTRACTUAL, AND MORE*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage law; Law; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Religious law; Sociology; Judaism; Political science; State (computer science); Public law; Islam; History","authors":[{"name":"Joel A. Nichols","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03992372588675457,"gpt":0.3467561512948609,"spread":0.3068324254081063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287106,0.0003619027,0.000801017,0.00302383,0.002089431,0.004571715,0.0008679078,0.002541556,0.002992113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004390108,0.000297819,0.0003707464,0.004643638,0.01097023,0.006254451,0.002117153,0.002302175,0.0004940312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003432875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007139087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01630576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02345875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944482,0.003414556,0.0003819379,0.0003161024,0.001163193,0.0002759551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969094,0.001602151,0.0004179729,0.0001769166,0.0006945859,0.0001989445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006983068,0.00007948945,0.001545144,0.00618536,0.00008045774,0.0002448168,0.01142705,0.0002797566,0.0002672432,0.5535479,0.04770615,0.3785668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002025586,0.0001090792,0.004249142,0.006692019,0.00004354299,0.0004719119,0.009123375,0.00005976317,0.00008103201,0.05220414,0.9269235,0.00002215668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009219238,0.9793896,0.0001413462,0.007327416,0.0008618093,0.000003572962,0.000005085463,0.000001405153,0.01134784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06233272,0.9230267,0.0002954716,0.007737334,0.002608784,0.0000256952,0.0000319337,0.000004542035,0.003936809],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03242165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964793103","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00218.x","title":"DIVORCE AND THE FAMILY COURT: WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Desmond Ellis","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03846092976810275,"gpt":0.3273576404843517,"spread":0.288896710716249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005907509,0.000343272,0.001840328,0.001903236,0.001328487,0.003854684,0.001379153,0.004524633,0.005204048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02396786,0.0003567952,0.0007779766,0.002466877,0.002747072,0.005896321,0.001274056,0.003531984,0.0008576497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001894705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008447572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0350987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06239585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971813,0.001648045,0.0002296586,0.0001617799,0.000619868,0.00015936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806855,0.0134444,0.00165282,0.0003311452,0.002858889,0.00102735],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001761828,0.0001828302,0.008099653,0.01475389,0.000331527,0.0007811703,0.001930833,0.0002146803,0.0000681125,0.007775977,0.04268406,0.9230012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002090356,0.0008105861,0.1052526,0.1169436,0.001145091,0.00696962,0.02293685,0.0003022555,0.0002182222,0.0320203,0.7129595,0.0002321908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006862521,0.9754103,0.00004491534,0.02186779,0.000543648,0.000004370205,0.00001387502,0.000002102869,0.001426667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007730333,0.9887983,0.00007117103,0.002231346,0.0009634474,0.00000620556,0.00001312462,0.000001232955,0.0001848402],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0350987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081683432","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00665.x","title":"ASSESSMENTS FOR POSTSEPARATION PARENTING DISPUTES IN CANADA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mental health; Family law; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Best interests; Child custody; Political science; Criminal law; Common law; Order (exchange); Psychiatry; Business","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06501038362968176,"gpt":0.4227965016415071,"spread":0.3577861180118253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008058907,0.0002520694,0.0004326119,0.00412086,0.009511041,0.003413337,0.002786418,0.002184407,0.005072201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04170049,0.0006147956,0.0003813161,0.004483759,0.001877226,0.0009760528,0.002573448,0.002743215,0.000308883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07092767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2166759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937074,0.001031825,0.0005252737,0.0003365421,0.002618148,0.001780888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682109,0.006487403,0.003022006,0.0005174411,0.01637359,0.005388657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003480862,0.0003454041,0.2619247,0.00168649,0.0001329054,0.01706024,0.06160467,0.002785005,0.001883006,0.05775427,0.1836214,0.4108539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490945,0.0002282939,0.6122312,0.002741992,0.0001576194,0.004575675,0.0423696,0.003315852,0.002235519,0.007156226,0.3245355,0.0003033767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624944,0.03870268,0.003903789,0.07683049,0.001085235,0.001877714,0.00296177,0.0002208169,0.2119232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558046,0.01243845,0.005604748,0.006109662,0.0001225123,0.0001422933,0.0006973658,0.00004072821,0.01903964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07092767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5146187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401002424","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12801","title":"Educating for change: A meta‐analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Psychology; Medical education; Meta-analysis; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","authors":[{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":true},{"name":"Samantha Corrente","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.234485532697593,"gpt":0.4575250408737663,"spread":0.2230395081761732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01050561,0.001649504,0.01209764,0.004176007,0.0006497651,0.002750065,0.001426746,0.001705102,0.004760757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02628299,0.0008613048,0.02565114,0.003945664,0.0006355806,0.001538408,0.001135582,0.002160388,0.0002318588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002787844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003433645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007362451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01604286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934019,0.003550059,0.001589223,0.0005512253,0.0007059018,0.0002015661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881656,0.00917909,0.001488848,0.0002930161,0.0006738108,0.0001995993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006606448,0.0002429206,0.001477281,0.524061,0.408251,0.0001254463,0.000236907,0.0005041743,0.0003157072,0.0002632417,0.0007248864,0.05719115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003677884,0.001488171,0.004449641,0.07666235,0.909192,0.00008169381,0.0001464361,0.0001875632,0.0002863081,0.0002826486,0.003516383,0.00002904042],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01044291,0.9870462,0.0005188187,0.0002669287,0.0002279905,0.0006890488,0.0003048433,0.00002894958,0.0004742289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2356434,0.7578168,0.002865672,0.0008843351,0.0002007843,0.001725515,0.0004519749,0.0000317477,0.0003797965],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01209764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05555969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348734","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00661.x","title":"ASSESSING MUTUAL PARTNER‐ABUSE CLAIMS IN CHILD CUSTODY AND ACCESS CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; Power (physics); Domestic violence; Psychology; Child abuse; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Linda C. Neilson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1124218470525008,"gpt":0.427202802703295,"spread":0.3147809556507941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0349385,0.0002736178,0.0007543723,0.01498768,0.005561535,0.003641565,0.001752219,0.001751958,0.001331226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1089803,0.0004487701,0.0004587292,0.01059311,0.003410631,0.004018877,0.005683064,0.001226423,0.0001710966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005377991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04848636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1561047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9617319,0.02066919,0.003833879,0.001154659,0.01022273,0.002387587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172845,0.05253185,0.0147973,0.001474382,0.01289147,0.001020564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004582723,0.0002826182,0.4623182,0.003272881,0.0003918417,0.014263,0.3208976,0.001434861,0.002505562,0.03436726,0.00382476,0.1559832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003905359,0.0005707491,0.5877088,0.002162233,0.0004405932,0.008921341,0.3507204,0.001631428,0.003464051,0.01013011,0.03409783,0.0001134439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642208,0.01117593,0.0007339822,0.001007406,0.00006593762,0.0001992038,0.00009061746,0.000004633797,0.02250145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944826,0.003279579,0.0009893293,0.0001557665,0.00003896195,0.00008645216,0.00009823884,0.000002600543,0.000866332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04848636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1847746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018000587","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00909.x","title":"LESSONS LEARNED FROM A CHILD PROTECTION MEDIATION PROGRAM: If At First You Succeed and Then You Don't…","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Thriving; Political science; Psychology; Family mediation; Child protection; Public relations; Law; Alternative dispute resolution","authors":[{"name":"Kelly Browe Olson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0593212203700322,"gpt":0.3227485933561666,"spread":0.2634273729861344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01016517,0.0002523833,0.0003623352,0.001023146,0.002043746,0.002860065,0.001226896,0.003856054,0.002023384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01947513,0.000182598,0.0004410046,0.001160752,0.005285642,0.005859247,0.001704914,0.008173865,0.0003240717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003429079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01339914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0198909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03336021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992728,0.004818103,0.0002867599,0.0004087332,0.001379508,0.0003788963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984743,0.01218074,0.0005255689,0.0002658314,0.001633812,0.000651063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000372891,0.0001364958,0.001436244,0.006273269,0.00004965836,0.0007880514,0.00546025,0.0003065771,0.0001997666,0.2365053,0.1031997,0.6456075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003214451,0.0001837821,0.005262658,0.01731178,0.00005984518,0.001302405,0.008515252,0.00008786091,0.0002203731,0.02876342,0.9382272,0.000033227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026415,0.7576392,0.0004914801,0.2156695,0.001780727,0.00002861617,0.00001440771,0.000008449023,0.02172614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07063731,0.8800569,0.001737925,0.04137003,0.001725713,0.00007966801,0.0000239038,0.00001164678,0.004356908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0198909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05375922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122448045","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12069","title":"Family Law Proceedings and the Child's Right to be Heard in <scp>A</scp>ustralia, the <scp>U</scp>nited <scp>K</scp>ingdom, <scp>N</scp>ew <scp>Z</scp>ealand, and <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Active listening; Jurisdiction; Law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Kingdom; Political science; Family court; Common law; Child protection; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Fernando","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02739440351717994,"gpt":0.284524748762866,"spread":0.2571303452456861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944267,0.0001491846,0.0002955246,0.002543726,0.007284683,0.006588271,0.0008455797,0.002202799,0.002614533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021065,0.0002162465,0.0002435213,0.003744335,0.01071985,0.002876704,0.002433054,0.002380894,0.0001101814],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03921895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4876373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.634609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898302,0.005145257,0.000565641,0.0005518818,0.002167083,0.001739803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819452,0.01172709,0.002802066,0.0003147442,0.002373277,0.0008375956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005329978,0.00008561624,0.02509395,0.001864618,0.0000997733,0.002011124,0.2923268,0.000518614,0.0007619978,0.5214272,0.02876751,0.1269895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002948127,0.0001321721,0.1164749,0.008329956,0.0001708132,0.0008603295,0.194652,0.000149662,0.0008700699,0.01587147,0.6623545,0.0001046612],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3789032,0.2331501,0.0004500495,0.0657179,0.0004556563,0.0001049943,0.0001873535,0.00001543299,0.3210153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592199,0.02954108,0.000167505,0.002577076,0.00007203048,0.00002878156,0.00003690768,0.000007801231,0.008348867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5123627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045858742","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12505","title":"New <scp>AFCC</scp> Guidelines for Parenting Coordination (2019)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Task (project management); Task force; Statute; Psychology; Multiculturalism; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Law; Public administration; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Task Force","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.126599807028865,"gpt":0.3842570775904826,"spread":0.2576572705616176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03115935,0.001220031,0.001153138,0.006200064,0.003200501,0.005247755,0.004676251,0.01048469,0.01238535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07409587,0.001051379,0.002490824,0.004429133,0.002670508,0.003015453,0.004119242,0.0105326,0.006676283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07637286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2050849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2532232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9728357,0.006013602,0.005652053,0.0007579392,0.01202464,0.002716106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9032175,0.02081322,0.00673882,0.002190206,0.06004359,0.006996637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001232609,0.00002843487,0.0003786671,0.000492874,0.000006339325,0.00008745094,0.0003052827,0.00007966129,0.00008486737,0.004261088,0.9566873,0.03757579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001462022,0.00001834983,0.002469149,0.003489909,0.00001648404,0.0001527448,0.0002715843,0.00003601572,0.00008455552,0.001322244,0.992098,0.00002633005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002461086,0.1105718,0.01273448,0.5637848,0.06719358,0.004139447,0.01580727,0.00167172,0.2216357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03216396,0.1563576,0.1125452,0.3949044,0.02084168,0.01494953,0.0426546,0.00170078,0.2238823],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2050849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4077824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021709107","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12487","title":"An Interdisciplinary Case Management Protocol for Child Resistance or Refusal Dynamics<sup>†</sup>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Focus group; Conflict resolution; Introspection; Protocol (science); Accountability; Conflict management; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Francine Cyr","is_ca":false},{"name":"Karine Poitras","is_ca":false},{"name":"Élisabeth Godbout","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06547832487396374,"gpt":0.409277610102394,"spread":0.3437992852284303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05181912,0.001397326,0.0009800222,0.003102546,0.004155674,0.001876652,0.003499888,0.001593507,0.09242535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05077196,0.001507441,0.0009276391,0.001739373,0.001414051,0.001884053,0.003645095,0.003076617,0.02576822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003230184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02274975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007437263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.972447,0.01871482,0.003873989,0.001083329,0.002696011,0.001184764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470124,0.01793565,0.003067952,0.01076399,0.01791507,0.003305039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005310125,0.0118764,0.005364945,0.003409291,0.00004683843,0.003577254,0.03617464,0.002505338,0.02088014,0.01595908,0.3994346,0.4954614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007091288,0.007833076,0.02483014,0.003407612,0.00005206689,0.002134275,0.01858354,0.008747282,0.01608141,0.008423169,0.9023739,0.0004421925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01208057,0.00009953658,0.04659935,0.001532161,0.0005711168,0.9120519,0.001882679,0.0007432021,0.02443956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01665875,0.0002004836,0.1173547,0.0007756448,0.0001357946,0.8526937,0.0014143,0.0001424037,0.01062427],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09242535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3091936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045968056","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12509","title":"Effective Use of Parenting Coordination: Considerations for Legal and Mental Health Professionals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Intervention (counseling); Referral; Family law; Mental health; Conciliation; Dispute resolution; Psychology; Family court; Conflict resolution; Nursing; Political science; Law; Medicine; Mediation; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Matthew J. Sullivan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Annette Burns","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09951592691784956,"gpt":0.3833228083569018,"spread":0.2838068814390522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048012,0.0004546675,0.001055947,0.004231246,0.006072133,0.008776034,0.00278165,0.008716776,0.003456824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09535391,0.0005154954,0.0008697705,0.002634869,0.005173282,0.008329825,0.005010291,0.009448118,0.0007195367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01034807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06007741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03730605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1153242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9679251,0.02125425,0.002906141,0.000874278,0.00517119,0.001868998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9076064,0.06208781,0.004550831,0.00164433,0.01817326,0.005937306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004346092,0.00009790876,0.003033494,0.00701844,0.00006846328,0.001241087,0.01438697,0.0003027684,0.0003040212,0.07674624,0.2506728,0.6460843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003833549,0.0001273459,0.006539668,0.04265408,0.00009832621,0.002299655,0.0311171,0.0001561534,0.000174503,0.02567953,0.8910313,0.00008403297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001317238,0.5714031,0.0008924772,0.413954,0.003220555,0.00004823761,0.00001871479,0.00002049527,0.009125214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07054909,0.8397407,0.006776486,0.07238039,0.006226167,0.0003203696,0.00005630744,0.00003215757,0.003918333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2539148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046702320","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00910.x","title":"PEDOPHILIA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pedophilia; Recidivism; Psychology; Stigma (botany); Social psychology; Criminology; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Bhagwan A. Bahroo","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04743541708443172,"gpt":0.3513225511738332,"spread":0.3038871340894015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003240701,0.0003360078,0.0005283104,0.0008863604,0.0006923625,0.0009576287,0.0002866116,0.0008671316,0.02458079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001767131,0.000124265,0.0002515444,0.0009260257,0.0003461831,0.0004880441,0.000441619,0.0007598896,0.005617052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003027511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006527755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001020332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001352308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996955,0.00008299028,0.00003142452,0.00003872251,0.00007536897,0.00007595163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995697,0.0001117586,0.0001141869,0.0000252051,0.00009368056,0.00008551663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003827919,0.0001664882,0.02219954,0.004550614,0.000172473,0.08813573,0.0003956695,0.0001177806,0.00201492,0.01207485,0.1347325,0.7350567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005751847,0.0001663126,0.01730876,0.002387173,0.000100353,0.3039736,0.000580754,0.00005882691,0.000848084,0.002011618,0.6724887,0.00001833685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03168242,0.740247,0.002541825,0.007730071,0.002165498,0.0001953675,0.0007898761,0.0001197293,0.2145282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2937176,0.5948502,0.001724976,0.006738074,0.002066696,0.0001168902,0.0008841025,0.00004579245,0.09985562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02458079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604588040","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12050","title":"Family Life, Parental Separation, and Child Custody in Canada: a Focus on Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Child custody; Family law; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"Francine Cyr","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gessica Di Stefano","is_ca":false},{"name":"Bertrand Desjardins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01937330007562651,"gpt":0.2777592548116963,"spread":0.2583859547360698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001650591,0.0003999239,0.0006230866,0.002585209,0.00377295,0.002468985,0.001081565,0.0006542079,0.001932175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003660695,0.000187871,0.0006891996,0.007790857,0.001382419,0.0005705596,0.0007643677,0.0007195032,0.00009553044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0610937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09677828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991133,0.0002018283,0.00004946534,0.0001038186,0.000293838,0.0002378627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964651,0.0006836384,0.0004483226,0.00004815929,0.001781115,0.0005736589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005570701,0.0002920235,0.6518136,0.005777634,0.001002924,0.001121075,0.02064612,0.001559389,0.0006944513,0.01133844,0.02654088,0.2786564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002754588,0.0001379606,0.9332865,0.004206788,0.0006207989,0.0003293788,0.01504399,0.0004674169,0.0001717253,0.0003266135,0.0453077,0.00007349268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3092436,0.6715225,0.0001589218,0.007556792,0.0002530861,0.00006682896,0.001435213,0.00001187446,0.009751176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037507,0.2888902,0.0004110619,0.001654415,0.0001153907,0.00005273161,0.0008669073,0.000008458665,0.004250109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0610937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4432679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964254585","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00044.x","title":"ADOLESCENTS’ VIEWS ON THE FAIRNESS OF PARENTING AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS AFTER SEPARATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Separation (statistics); Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Business; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Patrick Parkinson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judy Cashmore","is_ca":false},{"name":"Judi P. Single","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05105035142021946,"gpt":0.3354691415415401,"spread":0.2844187901213206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009621767,0.00009232432,0.0003214399,0.0008037251,0.002614033,0.00196606,0.0003358308,0.000695142,0.001128255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01529464,0.0002309859,0.0002634924,0.000572402,0.002403804,0.001023351,0.001477793,0.001570145,0.00008145173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002371786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001990369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02396184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03594145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943264,0.003765008,0.0003119754,0.0001334725,0.0008827075,0.000580425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873374,0.005125947,0.004323806,0.0002107129,0.001619293,0.001382802],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001623732,0.00005735955,0.1810241,0.0001295567,0.00003271361,0.001800708,0.7904689,0.0001140298,0.001136931,0.004247667,0.0006194513,0.02020625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002343179,0.0003000534,0.2786541,0.0004089624,0.00004476002,0.001681136,0.7012957,0.0001723377,0.0006294678,0.00100523,0.01574085,0.00004402164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944028,0.0008131952,0.000105021,0.0009872393,0.00001651567,0.000009222696,0.00001186583,9.181638e-7,0.003653219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988286,0.0004399095,0.0000591723,0.0001236536,0.000007586785,0.00000472191,0.000006630913,8.358912e-7,0.000528843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02396184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05088538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105190709","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12060","title":"Controversy about the Role of Children's Lawyers: Advocate or Best Interests Guardian? Comparing Practices in Two Canadian Jurisdictions with Different Policies for Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":false},{"name":"Lorne D. Bertrand","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06301285000555393,"gpt":0.4044794314693569,"spread":0.3414665814638029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006906,0.0002445502,0.0005827109,0.002195181,0.02831389,0.007161009,0.002926934,0.002024062,0.00231927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03034299,0.0007073474,0.0003320305,0.003495899,0.0134024,0.002131891,0.004568407,0.003209729,0.0001571102],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0993657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.126788,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878848,0.002860807,0.0004988643,0.000932712,0.003532807,0.004289947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771294,0.00677001,0.004627055,0.0005366892,0.005200393,0.005736456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006306676,0.00005729909,0.09161499,0.00008797184,0.00001493286,0.0005983129,0.8904229,0.00005167244,0.0007375073,0.002485854,0.001582626,0.01228291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007118438,0.00003213206,0.06734265,0.0001049583,0.000009974972,0.0001130087,0.9257482,0.00003668917,0.0001187483,0.0001260945,0.006335085,0.00002535241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892083,0.0005725559,0.00008393899,0.004759168,0.00001761438,0.00003483459,0.0000421887,0.000005392974,0.005275933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974076,0.0004558282,0.0001861312,0.0009078151,0.000004803516,0.0000159648,0.00002615062,0.000005143586,0.0009906819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.720952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898085152","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01358.x","title":"PARENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN FAMILY COURTS: BALANCING AUTONOMY AND STATE INTERVENTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Autonomy; Intervention (counseling); State (computer science); Psychology; Child custody; Work (physics); Medical education; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Criminology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Shelley M. Kierstead","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0942847539749596,"gpt":0.3295298479360282,"spread":0.2352450939610686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717394,0.0001122315,0.0002258903,0.000716541,0.00174017,0.002100554,0.001143832,0.002401273,0.002321823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01315812,0.000123009,0.0002380212,0.0006312801,0.001390207,0.001389189,0.001977463,0.001877285,0.0001185856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002102738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006940475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005590042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01939656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993604,0.004714452,0.000198863,0.0003226284,0.0006937005,0.0004663574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913639,0.00663209,0.0007198571,0.0002444306,0.000424149,0.0006155526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003027307,0.002162588,0.01092819,0.002462163,0.0001109943,0.0007558453,0.007073442,0.003102795,0.001257651,0.2170829,0.009270027,0.7454906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003279534,0.008646161,0.1669123,0.03059012,0.001082665,0.002792349,0.02698853,0.00613329,0.01292902,0.1397167,0.6007192,0.0002101572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6433277,0.1659674,0.006420545,0.04564583,0.001297745,0.0006704033,0.00006981949,0.00009811229,0.1365024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755144,0.01565326,0.001603858,0.00296532,0.000221974,0.000194143,0.00002217473,0.000005609404,0.003819216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005717394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03023684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045589255","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12508","title":"Emerging Parenting Coordination Practices Around the Globe: What We Have Learned","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Confidentiality; Referral; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Nursing","authors":[{"name":"Connie Capdevila Brophy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dominic A. D’Abate","is_ca":false},{"name":"Silvia Mazzoni","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elena Giudice","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1325745378953243,"gpt":0.3867867823533191,"spread":0.2542122444579948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078715,0.0002961812,0.0007199816,0.001640313,0.006014481,0.01106036,0.001425305,0.002657963,0.003601523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01857485,0.000320312,0.0003258767,0.005485652,0.008853571,0.01157453,0.004947877,0.00507757,0.0002498433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005561382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01884357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08762983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1659724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939818,0.003464642,0.0003842367,0.0006979925,0.000718609,0.0007526405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700514,0.0180486,0.003322844,0.00132227,0.004538632,0.002716237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005665399,0.0001118636,0.03593047,0.003131873,0.00005444175,0.002366887,0.6030765,0.0001410214,0.0002366893,0.02816194,0.01747683,0.3092549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006799589,0.0000595992,0.03670699,0.007658322,0.0000267657,0.001205836,0.7952305,0.00004250322,0.0001086428,0.003920983,0.1549874,0.00004567429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2722029,0.4807868,0.001153427,0.2025598,0.002220232,0.00005951493,0.0002587796,0.00003482902,0.04072381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.611586,0.3676088,0.001521795,0.01482635,0.0006423357,0.00006937066,0.0002172705,0.00003491771,0.003493119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08762983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1742395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576862296","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12267","title":"A Survey of Beliefs and Priorities About Access to Justice of Family Law: The Search for A Multidisciplinary Perspective*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mental health; Family law; Law; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Political science; Popularity; Psychology; Public relations; Psychiatry","authors":[{"name":"Peter Salem","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2878557145310583,"gpt":0.5381772428008942,"spread":0.2503215282698358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008001446,0.0001337373,0.0003174939,0.001652962,0.0008423441,0.001260018,0.0003524677,0.0006028354,0.001229619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01570344,0.0002600138,0.0002218955,0.002072095,0.000736237,0.002008812,0.001403819,0.0009491895,0.0001767424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009253051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001825233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007617543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009467791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.001601562,0.0002849758,0.0001146776,0.0003462677,0.0002272277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899175,0.004558792,0.002892694,0.0002006818,0.001525831,0.0009044832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004663944,0.0001589815,0.8894019,0.0002849469,0.00003103013,0.0002647402,0.0798262,0.00003308525,0.0002384882,0.0006791952,0.002218957,0.02681583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001072082,0.0003199009,0.7204766,0.0004416541,0.00001751095,0.0004184419,0.2685181,0.0002093915,0.00007605155,0.0002591968,0.009235216,0.00001722823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972083,0.0007448464,0.0001171992,0.000691072,0.00001115912,0.00004366904,0.0001219193,0.000001420038,0.001060439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973744,0.001259968,0.0003238394,0.0004440585,0.00001137395,0.0001016477,0.0001574566,0.00000152595,0.0003256045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008001446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0423162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522893009","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12236","title":"Understanding Pathways to Family Dispute Resolution and Justice Reforms: Ontario Court File Analysis &amp; Survey of Professionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family court; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Mediation; Attendance; Dispute resolution; Family mediation; Family law; Psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brenden McLarty","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2350929625081757,"gpt":0.3600738974728618,"spread":0.124980934964686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003042762,0.0001150665,0.0002433328,0.002706601,0.004410923,0.002257573,0.0008786438,0.0006518047,0.002604729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01617319,0.0003506279,0.0002295584,0.004986467,0.001378499,0.001524284,0.002224889,0.0006048048,0.0002114065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02511333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03084912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9479987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968123,0.0005680384,0.0002663903,0.0002852347,0.001273018,0.0007949845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890741,0.002077851,0.004089486,0.0003551819,0.002846814,0.001556587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002753876,0.0000303457,0.9195887,0.00005611846,0.00001123337,0.0002118224,0.06742441,0.0000446458,0.0001344896,0.0005362365,0.001500725,0.01043365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003098071,0.0000164305,0.9338987,0.00004625461,0.000003435324,0.00007348816,0.0618489,0.00006403947,0.00002693897,0.0000628311,0.003947977,0.000007849375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946812,0.0003339558,0.00006013251,0.001218823,0.000002858087,0.00004389142,0.0007284473,0.000001977324,0.002928786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972245,0.0006103766,0.0001118953,0.0001763489,0.000004159343,0.00003733148,0.0005095177,0.000002634413,0.001323381],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0520013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1822108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972185549","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01278.x","title":"WHERE IS THE JUSTICE? PARENTAL EXPERIENCES OF THE CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CASES OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Child sexual abuse; CITES; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Restorative justice; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Political science; Medicine; Law; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Ramona Alaggia","is_ca":true},{"name":"Elizabeth Lambert","is_ca":true},{"name":"Cheryl Regehr","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03433389715955994,"gpt":0.3123407924780015,"spread":0.2780068953184416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690955,0.000219728,0.00032748,0.0009386154,0.01384379,0.003454901,0.0009864038,0.0008824038,0.001830727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01071979,0.0003801484,0.0001786342,0.001922755,0.006186469,0.001389219,0.002311216,0.00157224,0.00007976302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01941074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02470721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8633454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9278622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975131,0.000940847,0.0001088111,0.0001074831,0.0005567252,0.0007731041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958434,0.001389607,0.0008253322,0.0001407087,0.001097189,0.0007038628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004582371,0.00001799771,0.03080577,0.00006889097,0.000008715585,0.002375926,0.9522364,0.00003626725,0.0003486259,0.002974915,0.001477772,0.009602897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001848711,0.00001681819,0.03470508,0.0001125218,0.000007749376,0.0008518593,0.9531575,0.00002109764,0.0001007955,0.0001297849,0.01087482,0.00002009658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834273,0.002885954,0.0001171849,0.00332943,0.00005997562,0.00001955904,0.00006538254,0.00000419687,0.01009103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967005,0.00190759,0.00008029176,0.0001995503,0.000007726928,0.00000497511,0.00001993613,0.000002641676,0.001076658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1366546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2749186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086240373","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00911.x","title":"THE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DEBATE IN CANADA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Parliament; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Martha Bailey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03143154448091205,"gpt":0.2835631375398148,"spread":0.2521315930589027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629507,0.0003709313,0.0008237573,0.003898636,0.01197665,0.009497867,0.002515445,0.007534395,0.005445521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01385761,0.0004732623,0.0005137988,0.008332243,0.007517049,0.001894151,0.001216116,0.004729332,0.0004114404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1250842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2049301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870905,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928445,0.001140754,0.0002620838,0.0005008522,0.003726253,0.001525625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884325,0.003455431,0.0007109169,0.000210126,0.006086701,0.001104466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008813878,0.00005628711,0.002809066,0.001705939,0.000102074,0.0008690247,0.003361246,0.001614752,0.000338542,0.4326758,0.4503416,0.1060377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005876616,0.00003229408,0.01198094,0.002725585,0.0001049827,0.0002230845,0.002316732,0.0003321082,0.0002769218,0.01919923,0.9626716,0.00007779686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01150627,0.6437216,0.000286018,0.2064167,0.002801399,0.00004140741,0.0003238838,0.00002583543,0.1348769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.342532,0.5043116,0.0008892128,0.1063849,0.002523811,0.00006754087,0.000303498,0.00005412465,0.04293333],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1250842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245888572","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200308","title":"Assessments for Postseparation Parenting Disputes in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Psychology; Criminology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06501038362968176,"gpt":0.4227965016415071,"spread":0.3577861180118253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009464692,0.0002697732,0.0004801326,0.005213961,0.01634432,0.004581159,0.004106182,0.003613937,0.005975459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0671074,0.0006980664,0.0005760773,0.005332266,0.001863263,0.00166847,0.003478156,0.004326027,0.0003439106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1034667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2491032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887077,0.001689272,0.0009534103,0.0005202211,0.003969601,0.004159806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9076822,0.01458477,0.006897896,0.0009337829,0.05651825,0.01338305],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004746466,0.0008157542,0.5981463,0.000775963,0.0001689713,0.01128735,0.08198738,0.002773821,0.001025001,0.03908056,0.1342177,0.1292467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001149151,0.0002608762,0.7800134,0.001310166,0.0001703712,0.002188735,0.09120001,0.004123524,0.001504723,0.004322962,0.1145395,0.0002508169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8855022,0.005032891,0.0007991357,0.03156868,0.0004029165,0.0008223298,0.00162332,0.00005832896,0.07419013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769846,0.001790441,0.001388189,0.003099986,0.00005726348,0.000156102,0.0003710346,0.00002356042,0.01612871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1034667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7507073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389569375","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12768","title":"Engaging fathers who commit family violence: Issues and challenges for family courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Domestic violence; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Accountability; Masculinity; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Psychiatry; Law","authors":[{"name":"Robert Nonomura","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dan Zamfir","is_ca":true},{"name":"Katreena Scott","is_ca":true},{"name":"Peter G. Jaffe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Shaz Bukhari","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lisa Heslop","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.109653290136903,"gpt":0.385173745174216,"spread":0.275520455037313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05191141,0.0003398524,0.001228342,0.002006394,0.00255623,0.004782286,0.002089996,0.004033451,0.003023649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08895763,0.0004454812,0.001147247,0.00196256,0.001925426,0.003723185,0.002380382,0.004365057,0.0004866447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004703792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02522483,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02321151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09336522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.96663,0.02474568,0.002994011,0.0006975167,0.003911994,0.001020753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9112132,0.0608883,0.005779145,0.00126439,0.01794192,0.002912943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091822,0.0001525523,0.002630134,0.03236364,0.0002824918,0.0007327155,0.006317902,0.0002668487,0.0002080597,0.01816072,0.07072597,0.8680497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001147181,0.0006057098,0.007874151,0.2346147,0.0005810484,0.001970516,0.02000671,0.0001268129,0.0002573089,0.006448145,0.7273224,0.0000777693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001792144,0.9330736,0.0003074397,0.05897246,0.00216921,0.00006751357,0.00001957567,0.000006441535,0.003591615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03604284,0.9463339,0.001603569,0.0130072,0.001431559,0.0001898064,0.00003226119,0.00001165977,0.001347124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05191141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2745371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127238270","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00180.x","title":"CHOOSE TO HUG, NOT HIT*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of the Child; Convention; Psychology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Hon. Alastair Nicholson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05173435427324811,"gpt":0.3679403005549026,"spread":0.3162059462816544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008813756,0.000185389,0.0002409666,0.0002420361,0.001781561,0.001591699,0.0004327395,0.001346899,0.06103732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004103932,0.0001172599,0.0001775007,0.0002015578,0.001001528,0.001255,0.001255838,0.001689698,0.02036504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000347641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001167612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003207045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01156008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991869,0.0002944668,0.00002580598,0.00005861761,0.0002186115,0.0002155647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999138,0.0002480737,0.00009618452,0.00006292091,0.0001370769,0.0003176574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119782,0.000145008,0.005660553,0.0002969693,0.00002458142,0.001320428,0.00315718,0.00009980807,0.0006943817,0.08671954,0.5790403,0.3227292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001459172,0.0001004853,0.003075801,0.0001815822,0.000009513893,0.001249041,0.003693957,0.00004498078,0.0002518725,0.005142674,0.986222,0.00001362667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0306116,0.01834753,0.002897294,0.06216764,0.007813993,0.000137024,0.0003120307,0.0001701902,0.8775427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2714238,0.01343341,0.001572609,0.05001665,0.001218566,0.0001709786,0.0001988845,0.0001010731,0.6618641],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06103732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2041902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110783394","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00070.x","title":"THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 43 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: WHAT THIS DECISION MEANS TO THE CHILD WELFARE SECTOR*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Business; Advertising","authors":[{"name":"Marvin M. Bernstein","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03114747434942486,"gpt":0.2859998624272431,"spread":0.2548523880778183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009944194,0.0005631834,0.0009905084,0.001980679,0.01988352,0.01157052,0.004272742,0.02229078,0.004919671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0377237,0.001132372,0.00117764,0.003290082,0.006777342,0.002735412,0.002541308,0.01799828,0.0007432625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08431168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2982465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9812617,0.001378811,0.0007325731,0.001406115,0.009109044,0.006111717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753326,0.007490445,0.0007012057,0.0005149399,0.01284746,0.003113404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008197773,0.0000286955,0.003164927,0.0002091408,0.00005971013,0.0006510261,0.004604676,0.0003534388,0.0009476572,0.3257847,0.647221,0.01689299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009819676,0.00004364458,0.0133818,0.0009527187,0.0002593783,0.0002076143,0.003986814,0.0008131304,0.001583863,0.02185083,0.9565439,0.0002781399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03848759,0.02115623,0.002432055,0.6926689,0.01081438,0.0003920409,0.002847722,0.0002112131,0.2309898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.308864,0.01032009,0.004553977,0.5076431,0.002041194,0.0002189243,0.0007225373,0.0002437126,0.1653925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08431168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6117269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075057681","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00660.x","title":"MOVIN' ON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"D. A. Rollie Thompson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05976005348880054,"gpt":0.3591633051035167,"spread":0.2994032516147161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006347331,0.0003054016,0.0002582191,0.001303625,0.006385863,0.003167474,0.001086969,0.001777675,0.191054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001660538,0.0001831778,0.0004128755,0.0009241535,0.001042273,0.0008365207,0.002105756,0.001451096,0.02853774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006356591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008326792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4458634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6755524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989624,0.00008394586,0.00002794842,0.0001328369,0.0004155402,0.0003772867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994563,0.00008035483,0.00002874818,0.00004177103,0.0003002677,0.00009260099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006949763,0.00003226593,0.001981776,0.0002284457,0.00001202482,0.0006326832,0.001706488,0.0001214686,0.0008459679,0.1733819,0.6832784,0.1377091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003351621,0.000007070242,0.001626115,0.00006859771,0.000003568922,0.00004750642,0.0002719519,0.00002343662,0.0001107605,0.000677836,0.9971559,0.000003788382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003275136,0.002573277,0.0002704807,0.003086899,0.0007695276,0.00006451575,0.0005516038,0.00009657097,0.9893119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02244314,0.0011144,0.0002449628,0.004060466,0.0001162418,0.00003977639,0.0002862668,0.00004106259,0.9716537],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4458634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003924243","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12456","title":"Parenting Coordination and Confidentiality: A (Not‐so) Delicate Balance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; CLARITY; Discretion; Psychology; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Social psychology; Public relations; Business; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Debra K. Carter","is_ca":false},{"name":"Douglas N. Frenkel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.106342500271656,"gpt":0.4145917796721093,"spread":0.3082492794004532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0353688,0.0002753686,0.0007518546,0.001492972,0.01795955,0.02239841,0.00322284,0.00700281,0.00260155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04815355,0.0005267208,0.0005143718,0.001515643,0.04703342,0.01299299,0.007170012,0.01052967,0.0002148044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05221289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.126329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5382118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.667195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9493374,0.01925793,0.001928309,0.00368768,0.01761826,0.008170455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553866,0.02312094,0.003835557,0.002956215,0.00945936,0.005241381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001819671,0.00002187234,0.003342473,0.0001741355,0.00002025825,0.0002169192,0.01786525,0.0003478897,0.0002204264,0.9338562,0.0117575,0.03215895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005655633,0.000120401,0.0180596,0.003771517,0.00009460354,0.0009725878,0.1205453,0.001606273,0.001049178,0.4742389,0.379254,0.000231099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.04735818,0.0196326,0.01253116,0.7850593,0.001305619,0.00009308841,0.00006075,0.00005649205,0.1339029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229704,0.008581538,0.006878348,0.05305644,0.0007393623,0.00006052282,0.00002526424,0.0000294511,0.007658736],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9290155,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915731202","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01325.x","title":"NEGLECTED INFANTS IN FAMILY COURT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"South Health Campus; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Intervention (counseling); Child neglect; Psychology; Mental health; Best interests; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Child abuse; Medicine; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Evelyn Wotherspoon","is_ca":true},{"name":"Sonya Vellet","is_ca":true},{"name":"June Pirie","is_ca":true},{"name":"Marlene O'Neill‐Laberge","is_ca":true},{"name":"Hon. Lynn Cook‐Stanhope","is_ca":false},{"name":"Dee Wilson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02813068388632695,"gpt":0.3257772780835265,"spread":0.2976465941971995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006109407,0.0001929337,0.0005225415,0.001033886,0.004045147,0.002614422,0.000811623,0.00312575,0.003726114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02674365,0.0002020402,0.0002150162,0.001006139,0.001804663,0.001738547,0.002123927,0.002392134,0.0003250935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003073844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006523302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008675744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03593059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949463,0.003048576,0.0003574638,0.0002447554,0.0009104627,0.0004925061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902521,0.005511577,0.00154331,0.000190295,0.00148962,0.001012962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002796927,0.0002433275,0.02727284,0.004785469,0.0001389659,0.08727226,0.04430314,0.00105939,0.001213125,0.1320547,0.1563674,0.5450097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004852918,0.0005093389,0.02793681,0.009711221,0.0001364688,0.06549457,0.04192362,0.0001901346,0.001008375,0.0301417,0.8228118,0.00008751546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1729585,0.5838383,0.001550993,0.1353096,0.006580654,0.0001442309,0.00009529664,0.00003087722,0.09949162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7285996,0.2327317,0.001238297,0.02015995,0.002368875,0.00009448427,0.00006920302,0.00001946553,0.01471826],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008675744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03231001,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323849814","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12716","title":"The use of parental alienation constructs by family justice system professionals: A survey of belief systems and practice implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Alienation; Psychological intervention; Phenomenon; Psychology; Family law; Family court; Quality (philosophy); Economic Justice; Criminology; Social psychology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Marsha Kline Pruett","is_ca":false},{"name":"Janet R. Johnston","is_ca":false},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":true},{"name":"Matthew Sullivan","is_ca":false},{"name":"Peter Salem","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1636372762697186,"gpt":0.3962728576592598,"spread":0.2326355813895413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02477757,0.0001290727,0.0004200349,0.002621099,0.001557819,0.002009904,0.0005558319,0.0009109101,0.0008606189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05862944,0.0003776736,0.0002911909,0.001859546,0.001677532,0.001440884,0.001967566,0.0009686347,0.00009990268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001852236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004880491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01619815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9841248,0.01077946,0.001277903,0.000568764,0.002319237,0.0009297963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474162,0.03348491,0.01049924,0.0008387484,0.006187744,0.001573184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004674856,0.0001089317,0.6274291,0.0005719615,0.00006025835,0.0003039773,0.3147211,0.00004060695,0.0003100312,0.0006160976,0.000971479,0.05481971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135019,0.0002660826,0.5131375,0.001540599,0.00004118231,0.0007265852,0.4744123,0.0002066014,0.0001602441,0.0003874023,0.009075073,0.00003294362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920573,0.00418576,0.0002250388,0.001693313,0.00001714683,0.00005498392,0.00003469698,0.000002265453,0.00172954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970421,0.002239622,0.0001863498,0.0002874038,0.000009686207,0.00004922309,0.00001968752,0.00000147703,0.000164556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02477757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1310379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579884250","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01441.x","title":"SAME SEX, DIFFERENT RIGHTS: AMENDING U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW TO RECOGNIZE SAME‐SEX PARTNERS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLEES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Persecution; Legislation; Immigration law; Political science; Law; Immigration reform; Population; Refugee law; Sociology; Politics; Demography","authors":[{"name":"Elise S. Dunton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03907273651068179,"gpt":0.3576191471671015,"spread":0.3185464106564197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03287359,0.0003687446,0.0007597234,0.002932313,0.01221507,0.01087541,0.00284747,0.02147067,0.001680043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04689955,0.0008326807,0.001021948,0.002082028,0.01197876,0.007240849,0.003888529,0.01583226,0.0005090701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01321557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2131039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3351009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9808881,0.007791597,0.002197932,0.001470426,0.005177508,0.002474495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594116,0.02685079,0.001874522,0.001585535,0.008967012,0.001310489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003034471,0.00009634641,0.002606662,0.0004185776,0.00002122929,0.001060623,0.01203547,0.0004263272,0.0006915482,0.8344795,0.1044115,0.04372168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008147649,0.0001412882,0.008007711,0.003591087,0.0001347015,0.0005792762,0.01115753,0.0007443425,0.001278265,0.07621934,0.8979149,0.0001499176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06733543,0.172406,0.005248432,0.4615369,0.01372686,0.0004584249,0.0002418212,0.0001219574,0.2789241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5734134,0.05617356,0.008003541,0.305572,0.003764006,0.0004484806,0.000229905,0.00007028462,0.05232478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2131039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.423727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221077201","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12640","title":"Ontario family justice in “lockdown”: Early pandemic cases and professional experience","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University; The King's University; St. Lawrence College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Pandemic; Criminology; Welfare; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Law; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Claire Houston","is_ca":true},{"name":"Rachel Birnbaum","is_ca":true},{"name":"Nicholas Bala","is_ca":true},{"name":"Kate Deveau","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1236343833310927,"gpt":0.4305607956654292,"spread":0.3069264123343365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003083491,0.0002140008,0.0002475147,0.0006904096,0.03201722,0.00334472,0.001681059,0.002836186,0.005968363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009715576,0.0003761013,0.0002404289,0.001402759,0.008588153,0.001771958,0.004959986,0.002792077,0.0003181339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06010741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06369285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8983933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965001,0.001024601,0.00008769074,0.0001909265,0.0007882471,0.001408322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938677,0.001935769,0.0005273759,0.0001839073,0.00106264,0.002422637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006113639,0.0001131938,0.0185465,0.0001328245,0.00001107493,0.01547607,0.8902779,0.0002092621,0.0006508708,0.01228772,0.04107949,0.02115388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001205319,0.00006983469,0.02892782,0.0002150723,0.000009596608,0.002652416,0.7448087,0.0002168289,0.0002344159,0.0011583,0.2216476,0.00004737624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8776872,0.002780843,0.0004820267,0.04162739,0.0003215331,0.0001506594,0.0001334207,0.00002824439,0.07678881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712326,0.001901121,0.0002978204,0.005111933,0.00006652304,0.00003881295,0.00005578169,0.00002092731,0.02127447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1016067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4361118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322764587","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12715","title":"A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Manitoba; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coparenting; Domestic violence; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Anxiety; Developmental psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry; Medicine; Environmental health; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Beth Archer‐Kuhn","is_ca":true},{"name":"Michael Saini","is_ca":true},{"name":"Dora M. Y. Tam","is_ca":true},{"name":"Diane I. N. Trudgill","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0687003093350203,"gpt":0.3804215828180953,"spread":0.311721273483075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001475444,0.0001204667,0.000216897,0.001112035,0.0007897542,0.0004258947,0.0004950502,0.0001773226,0.001323616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036665,0.0002340041,0.0001307515,0.002391245,0.0002582087,0.0002235717,0.0004905468,0.0002436551,0.0001549855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003547616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5223295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.648006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992616,0.0002543894,0.00006956928,0.00003839537,0.0002580194,0.0001180371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975809,0.0004806262,0.0007025098,0.00005960429,0.0009150531,0.0002612703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004164737,0.00005203102,0.9393674,0.0003089684,0.0000404164,0.0003543735,0.0256071,0.00002648457,0.0002610048,0.0000587508,0.001804283,0.0320775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003204713,0.00006705962,0.9788574,0.0001812185,0.00001311883,0.0001924306,0.01708763,0.00001614909,0.0000612281,0.000006520405,0.003509932,0.000004026601],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929829,0.002923845,0.00006419168,0.000224879,0.00001325787,0.00006734561,0.001336995,0.000004278663,0.00238237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908977,0.006465005,0.0001825075,0.0001397124,0.00001459684,0.00009595118,0.0008864133,0.000001702314,0.001316332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5223295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9609672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982245255","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.00242.x","title":"BUILDING A CHILD PROTECTION MEDIATION PROGRAM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Welfare; Child protection; Process (computing); Welfare system; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography","authors":[{"name":"M. Jerry McHale","is_ca":false},{"name":"Irene Robertson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrea Clarke","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0330844601367085,"gpt":0.3062229980821771,"spread":0.2731385379454686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004475235,0.000192527,0.0002790446,0.001141539,0.005607699,0.002519881,0.002246445,0.001345002,0.003847267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006917091,0.0003556247,0.0001715622,0.001559494,0.0009146912,0.0007313605,0.001706142,0.001566845,0.0003604742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03807947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9165717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9769912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974425,0.0007920843,0.0001229772,0.0001797012,0.000807017,0.0006557298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944929,0.0009651362,0.0002500817,0.0001777229,0.003095951,0.001018211],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001047153,0.001484482,0.05286848,0.00555106,0.0001994513,0.00758439,0.01328667,0.005031343,0.01035105,0.03326982,0.06379317,0.805533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001039623,0.00223011,0.4068224,0.005395447,0.000416954,0.001360244,0.04230158,0.002841677,0.008809779,0.002891025,0.525627,0.0002643609],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901716,0.05563911,0.001664795,0.03591978,0.0008557776,0.003333024,0.0009033831,0.0001559555,0.1113565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169786,0.03125673,0.004721866,0.005860116,0.00006778678,0.0008749022,0.0005766373,0.00003584999,0.03962754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08342832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2762872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045659605","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12507","title":"Parenting Coordination Law in the U.S. and Canada: A Review of the Sources and Scope of the <scp>PC</scp>'s Authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Competence (human resources); Professionalization; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Milfred D. Dale","is_ca":false},{"name":"Hon. Dolores Bomrad","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexander Jones","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07006436415084899,"gpt":0.3662774264330587,"spread":0.2962130622822097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00818333,0.0008267951,0.00165486,0.01816972,0.003285871,0.00516753,0.002114673,0.001727651,0.002990135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01875747,0.0007332534,0.0009882819,0.03088216,0.003723206,0.001697495,0.001457947,0.002608714,0.0003695731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06023737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2561802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9234638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948318,0.0006758058,0.0006407236,0.0003413314,0.003049697,0.0004605172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779738,0.006810198,0.001921167,0.0002917549,0.01214791,0.0008552434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007772593,0.00005750548,0.002570115,0.08383885,0.0002693148,0.0003258257,0.001597784,0.000440869,0.0002878657,0.02603912,0.1370804,0.7474147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002394868,0.00004080775,0.01497347,0.1397599,0.0005290697,0.000260878,0.001226112,0.00009992596,0.0001754814,0.001280557,0.8415807,0.00004923805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001989937,0.9948688,0.00002687261,0.001593513,0.0001535481,0.00002277532,0.0001214268,0.000004293876,0.003009819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003212783,0.9952456,0.0001511291,0.000853933,0.00004725231,0.00001861046,0.0000865562,0.000002512187,0.0003815015],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07653618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159762856","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12574","title":"Taking a Shot: Access to Justice, Judging and eCourt","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"R. James Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08464916832842004,"gpt":0.3367907881952229,"spread":0.2521416198668028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01401664,0.0002089989,0.0003951732,0.001943818,0.009357459,0.01491805,0.001617897,0.004687325,0.03731481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04295892,0.0003727921,0.0002379672,0.0009616562,0.008279613,0.00828539,0.008095461,0.003846755,0.003191724],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007177901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01462923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05262664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981078,0.009090683,0.0006589997,0.001152158,0.004956725,0.003063454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758108,0.01221255,0.001275995,0.001659211,0.004508367,0.004533178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251308,0.0002975285,0.01622494,0.0002251637,0.00002482425,0.003885501,0.03896485,0.0002630564,0.001190246,0.3488826,0.1863034,0.4036127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003169404,0.0001334578,0.01828057,0.0005181771,0.00001918652,0.001132324,0.02050566,0.0006027843,0.0006500736,0.07640896,0.8816463,0.00007095531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04849179,0.0085523,0.0104223,0.1126159,0.0009548659,0.0002131608,0.00009550803,0.0002435436,0.8184107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802775,0.003192716,0.005303667,0.01895761,0.0007877374,0.0001427636,0.0000724284,0.0001393121,0.1911263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05262664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1248304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481274874","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00651.x","title":"UNIFIED FAMILY COURTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Family court; Law; State (computer science); Family law; Locality; Domestic violence; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency","authors":[{"name":"Carolyn D. Schwarz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04907922515147062,"gpt":0.3549844254956223,"spread":0.3059052003441517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01440034,0.0003030641,0.0007409779,0.004329621,0.005367592,0.005967529,0.003562922,0.003702099,0.01017604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04033606,0.0006907985,0.000782543,0.004784102,0.001952596,0.00472957,0.003360331,0.002399932,0.00190778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009209662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02985541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1043762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.218111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9771886,0.006836578,0.002256239,0.002306181,0.008881209,0.002531154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683439,0.005870515,0.002294703,0.00326972,0.0175389,0.002682158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008032265,0.0001505083,0.009509426,0.0008599887,0.00009715352,0.00133422,0.003792657,0.002122616,0.001266347,0.5234038,0.1788812,0.2785019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009657655,0.0003368433,0.03332252,0.001474958,0.0001600447,0.001826961,0.002273053,0.002861967,0.001258023,0.03096027,0.9252978,0.0001310101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09058506,0.1003812,0.07235702,0.03508842,0.004865977,0.002655087,0.002988363,0.001512525,0.6895664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334485,0.02141213,0.05998863,0.01670695,0.001251298,0.001082175,0.001746702,0.0001846743,0.164179],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1043762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2075373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}