{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":34,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"8cf335a9af1d","filters":{"venue":"Federal Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3086727983","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955068","title":"A First Nations Voice: Institutionalising Political Listening","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Politics; Democracy; Public administration; Legislature; State (computer science); Political science; Corporate governance; Institution; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08724136824589092,"gpt":0.3768457016512369,"spread":0.289604333405346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001502727,0.00008707418,0.0001630387,0.0000140381,0.0005241178,0.00003775219,0.000176384,0.00004371538,0.000770714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001980574,0.00008183684,0.00008410597,0.0001736338,0.00005812017,0.0001092442,0.00006514574,0.0001635901,0.001179877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004426019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003321963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002927583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001162993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991261,0.000121783,0.0002543464,0.0001591626,0.0001209485,0.0002177038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994211,0.0001200033,0.00004617644,0.0002224893,0.00004390731,0.0001463645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002774603,0.00003373131,0.0003355285,0.000365118,0.00001518705,0.000003568443,0.0001427259,0.000001147862,0.000001891331,0.9955282,0.003214072,0.0003560724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001669869,0.00003818721,0.001967673,0.001255758,0.00002606691,0.00002048761,0.00001608912,0.00005044578,0.00000169757,0.0004042641,0.9959433,0.0001090285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001640705,0.02999209,0.001184463,0.1545153,0.0002585937,0.0005824954,0.00001213894,0.0002602907,0.811554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693565,0.0006542247,0.0009232638,0.02840184,0.0002058924,0.0001002149,0.0000416101,0.00001109896,0.000305369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269084978","doi":"10.22145/flr.31.2.2","title":"Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Criminology; Refugee law; Sociology; Publishing; Gender studies; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05716202341117506,"gpt":0.3152969747019426,"spread":0.2581349512907675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001385338,0.0002060761,0.000512262,0.000007686094,0.002534747,0.0002401014,0.0002313986,0.00006869286,0.0003187401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004964177,0.0001330036,0.0001642952,0.000277086,0.001192892,0.0001965761,0.00003906004,0.0001968629,0.00005275337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008225316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002063156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155695,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978269,0.0006729295,0.0003056649,0.000311676,0.0004607379,0.0004220411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999307,0.00008135273,0.000154103,0.0001726185,0.0001256568,0.000159314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003871691,0.00003155769,0.0002531247,0.001259987,0.00007359845,0.000006721595,0.0001048921,3.909837e-8,0.00000631569,0.6385813,0.3516073,0.008071348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001240188,0.00002681239,0.00006988372,0.004444306,0.0001054228,0.000005404171,0.00007388987,4.987493e-8,0.00001096832,0.003091355,0.9918546,0.000193291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001333355,0.6795864,0.0000109427,0.2621001,0.0002047461,0.00142629,0.00002661024,0.00004634514,0.05646522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3384284,0.6287852,0.0001071021,0.02362593,0.0003032647,0.0003648981,0.00002464031,0.00001632823,0.008344184],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6402473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2729267636078582,"gpt":0.5032675907602394,"spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165684,0.00005673263,0.0001664138,0.000002735733,0.00125329,0.0001190625,0.0004733292,0.00002435162,0.0001742072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003172437,0.00003706645,0.00005608014,0.00005311881,0.0003537022,0.0001422163,0.00007360403,0.000106636,0.00002580047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002275669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001025062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01747351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0618725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.0001729811,0.0002294091,0.0001204432,0.0001978682,0.0001358582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991984,0.0001228443,0.0002283886,0.0003455282,0.00006847636,0.00003630721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001147978,0.00001286291,0.0002980433,0.00008254236,0.000002202753,3.658349e-7,0.0002789164,2.240021e-7,0.000006994441,0.9960883,0.0001179233,0.003110536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001509392,0.00005712806,0.003167206,0.001650836,0.00002157207,3.921405e-7,0.0002366281,0.0000127056,0.00009015404,0.02105666,0.9734299,0.0001259462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01058397,0.006448564,0.000007737801,0.02777841,0.00004354424,0.0007383728,0.0000102015,0.00001240914,0.9543768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939114,0.003986213,0.0002220976,0.001157281,0.00005713454,0.00009084601,0.000001451151,0.000002604061,0.0005709781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0750247104430044,"gpt":0.3655792180768747,"spread":0.2905545076338703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781242,0.0001092391,0.0002895789,0.000006502033,0.0007691894,0.00005435095,0.0002827322,0.00003986097,0.001352911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002005019,0.00005591932,0.0001185277,0.00006215662,0.0001326523,0.00007229389,0.000007716899,0.00006546939,0.00001772472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003533866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.476189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9679613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989609,0.00007537199,0.0002653112,0.0001538918,0.0002774606,0.0002670446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.00005434488,0.0001087178,0.0001777023,0.00008798138,0.00009376877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493776,0.00001667093,0.000001609055,0.0001385479,0.000009266869,0.000003583536,0.0003537428,3.323434e-7,0.000001324504,0.8853303,0.1139471,0.0001826133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380453,0.00008927486,0.00003282384,0.0005613354,0.00004199695,0.000001856307,0.00001737842,0.00001237429,0.00002381177,0.04014083,0.9588206,0.0001196685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244567,0.03732121,0.00007000533,0.1443111,0.00141433,0.01182422,0.0003959955,0.0001838611,0.6800226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578673,0.0007104095,0.0001587634,0.008776465,0.000208448,0.00005234914,0.000007437663,0.000004942056,0.0322139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319844237","doi":"10.1177/0067205x221146335","title":"Active After Sunset<scp>:</scp> The Politics of Judicial Retirements in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Institution; Government (linguistics); Language change; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03922823098085997,"gpt":0.3299607964961456,"spread":0.2907325655152856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005406194,0.00008730635,0.0002474735,0.0000225497,0.0005947878,0.00002092263,0.0001746959,0.00004438319,0.00005554433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005018889,0.00006206514,0.00009331292,0.0004829187,0.0005983331,0.00008592188,0.0000837045,0.0001117774,0.0001360234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007002725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001538525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00996665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005859096,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987118,0.0002067554,0.0002525904,0.0001315927,0.0003904467,0.0003068665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994499,0.000252106,0.00008620483,0.00008449837,0.00008147125,0.00004581309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002549361,0.0000246846,0.005692534,0.0001026824,0.00002595574,0.00001065579,0.001522124,1.363822e-7,0.000001282497,0.9830222,0.008459617,0.001135619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001189358,0.00002354801,0.09062914,0.001387542,0.00003463299,4.010884e-7,0.000856962,2.707175e-7,0.00001566325,0.06162366,0.8452478,0.00006145328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1633267,0.06090129,0.000001485452,0.01476131,0.0009095316,0.001634299,0.0001342551,0.00009956094,0.7582316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724835,0.02338543,0.000004820951,0.003278736,0.0002591606,0.0001174243,0.000006477305,0.000004500082,0.0004599554],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966261,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226395077","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.1.1","title":"The Proscription of Terrorist Organisations in Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Legitimacy; Political science; Commonwealth; Public administration; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04677800223217879,"gpt":0.3750626629625524,"spread":0.3282846607303735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006441131,0.00009132916,0.000195489,0.00001319739,0.0003960979,0.00006119156,0.0002536565,0.0000564793,0.0001549048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001270409,0.00006438082,0.00007401333,0.0001875665,0.0002815017,0.0001806611,0.00001110812,0.0001299746,0.00005612754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009412457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007024136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004214242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986845,0.0002375746,0.0003754562,0.0001387912,0.0002612516,0.0003024236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995179,0.00005639812,0.00009885079,0.0001816052,0.00006787914,0.00007742562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001367049,0.0002122923,0.002583559,0.0004506242,0.00001080607,0.000006779021,0.01780886,3.925064e-7,0.0001681943,0.9405397,0.01503452,0.02317066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003213313,0.0002294,0.03208311,0.004492508,0.00005060893,0.000004277548,0.008845353,0.000006034481,0.0001068109,0.02727778,0.9261661,0.0004166588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6200398,0.07244038,0.0004919648,0.196572,0.003837603,0.006467052,0.00008230234,0.0004052148,0.09966371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907696,0.006096106,0.00001488627,0.001863137,0.0001255348,0.00002630417,0.000003319451,0.000003782745,0.00109728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6320871,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341114917","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.2.4","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Work (physics); Backdoor; Labour economics; Migrant workers; Project commissioning; Business; Gig economy; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Engineering; Publishing; Labour law; Economic growth; Law; Computer security; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07370987631042583,"gpt":0.3649032628772893,"spread":0.2911933865668634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001390111,0.0001172112,0.0002162336,0.00001144127,0.000665807,0.0002464542,0.0002221257,0.00006589124,0.000251529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005609316,0.00007856944,0.0001221517,0.0004077223,0.00008371639,0.000145336,0.0000265936,0.00010853,0.0001061723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006982902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001829786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01199244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0456267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988223,0.0002607726,0.0002704329,0.0001406924,0.0002073578,0.000298462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991306,0.0001311694,0.0001260585,0.0001828724,0.0001764715,0.0002528477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006246543,0.00002237571,0.00008380124,0.0002426505,0.00001401417,0.00002156447,0.00547787,0.00000917059,3.553811e-7,0.7890818,0.2001165,0.00492365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539228,0.00001569361,0.000006868356,0.0007322346,0.00002738858,0.00001327396,0.001159344,0.00001678474,8.803507e-7,0.001554732,0.9961965,0.0001223543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2202829,0.2221009,0.002762643,0.3822324,0.005077877,0.01362622,0.000203361,0.0009857129,0.1527279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7907084,0.01366251,0.003756451,0.04679694,0.002911542,0.0003466289,0.00004426008,0.00006009026,0.1417132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7960801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336534342","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.9","title":"Realising the Public Potential of Corporate Law: Twenty Years of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Fiduciary; Public law; Corporate law; Private law; Commercial law; Corporate governance; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Enforcement; Corporate group; Municipal law; Administrative law; Political science; Comparative law; Business; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0817171552472051,"gpt":0.3426131843189589,"spread":0.2608960290717538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386472,0.00006052406,0.0002111484,0.000009871193,0.0001935002,0.00005109325,0.0002681344,0.00003278033,0.000354138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005102976,0.00004548231,0.0000900304,0.000180018,0.0002490383,0.0001179972,0.0000569301,0.00008703427,0.00001708861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003297587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005239051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04036091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03700749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988131,0.0002496179,0.0003657491,0.0001166494,0.0002768729,0.0001780018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992903,0.0000388144,0.0003318269,0.0002098308,0.00007567687,0.00005348338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001118519,0.00002308326,0.0001283963,0.0001561544,0.000004796186,2.650561e-7,0.00009881256,0.000007107876,0.00003245059,0.9975238,0.0007595273,0.00126444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001332926,0.00002050324,0.001605864,0.0005389989,0.00002139751,5.632696e-7,0.00004122087,0.00002341847,0.00003760904,0.01168974,0.9858035,0.00008386561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2187892,0.01078785,0.0009757803,0.0422787,0.0007990116,0.005067581,0.0001426444,0.0001054089,0.7210538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974151,0.001431718,0.00006739132,0.000626847,0.00006099915,0.00002596377,0.00001070799,0.000004088474,0.0003572396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238265016","doi":"10.22145/flr.36.3.1","title":"The Dangers of Shared Care Legislation: Why Australia Needs (Yet More) Family Law Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law reform; Family law; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07022404376108987,"gpt":0.3400619872985388,"spread":0.2698379435374489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003756134,0.0001204797,0.0002598546,0.00001394058,0.001637375,0.00007685218,0.0002616463,0.00007821429,0.0001961865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002345529,0.00008398246,0.000180939,0.0002609043,0.0004770791,0.0002976346,0.00003221479,0.0001191772,0.00003239876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007733883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04919909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01197791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986633,0.0001252066,0.0003522364,0.0001406941,0.0004598883,0.000258652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992286,0.00004274783,0.0001673848,0.0002540064,0.0002157904,0.0000914495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001297416,0.00002006484,0.0003325247,0.0003761862,0.0000344245,0.000005976057,0.01089365,8.977347e-7,0.0000234129,0.9538752,0.02844264,0.005981993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101053,0.00003316982,0.0009581664,0.0005423372,0.00002454816,0.00000220913,0.0007425506,7.390796e-7,0.00001132081,0.0001193573,0.997357,0.0001075553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007963871,0.08538684,0.000007572042,0.01521342,0.0007552954,0.0009923832,0.00004426708,0.0001038807,0.8895324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196423,0.06769514,0.000137996,0.005830293,0.0004581934,0.0000862942,0.00006367231,0.00001937586,0.006066732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0715606218552786,"gpt":0.3773252051461163,"spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209135,0.00005711927,0.000250101,0.000007354751,0.0006646926,0.00004041204,0.0001453879,0.00001703208,0.0002427258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002014807,0.00002788305,0.00009510196,0.0003180554,0.0006842923,0.00004942834,0.00001465729,0.00006588364,0.00001492767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001596948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001765638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05518136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1164034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991091,0.0003132096,0.0001994931,0.00008423672,0.0001798634,0.0001140904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999676,0.000146378,0.00005494143,0.00006513416,0.00004014083,0.00001734298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005447377,0.000023564,0.001601144,0.00002227267,0.0001211337,0.000001369201,0.001004591,0.000002803395,1.845742e-7,0.9928024,0.002357986,0.002057133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009247885,0.00002532631,0.03224479,0.0004229309,0.0002458162,6.931693e-7,0.0005645355,0.000001752522,0.000001174289,0.01391086,0.952406,0.00008364118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3631477,0.2776912,0.000006842191,0.06900137,0.0001639719,0.001314133,0.0000496778,0.00002311785,0.2886021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636698,0.03532501,0.00000724277,0.0006130286,0.00004068093,0.00003101848,0.000001703858,5.476478e-7,0.0003109392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266143053","doi":"10.22145/flr.39.1.6","title":"The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law reform; Law; Politics; Public law; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06468398277748962,"gpt":0.3863881121285749,"spread":0.3217041293510853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007503286,0.00008401118,0.0002252333,0.00000512999,0.001340345,0.00005244224,0.0004925816,0.00004961453,0.0002582741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001558141,0.0000522266,0.0001207241,0.0001284282,0.000706611,0.000252269,0.00003071167,0.00007560063,0.00004134734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004854095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007886647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006467527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005043361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.0001183331,0.0003028456,0.0001345891,0.0002395964,0.000265949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991646,0.0001027206,0.0001705586,0.0002220995,0.0002636051,0.00007636488],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004198406,0.00001950443,0.00002371055,0.0005186837,0.00001066541,3.43255e-7,0.004988341,1.570595e-8,5.355731e-7,0.9934213,0.0007301247,0.0002825852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006992446,0.00003143627,0.00001343543,0.0005430364,0.00003236837,3.247758e-7,0.0002091098,4.44552e-7,0.00009357206,0.03152094,0.967402,0.00008341049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002448775,0.03441468,0.00001528438,0.001814581,0.0002436511,0.00107448,0.00004415818,0.00005235015,0.9620959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923533,0.003712737,0.0002439668,0.001549012,0.0001217995,0.0004342604,0.000007815205,0.00001151173,0.001565629],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358534","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.3.4","title":"Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Statute; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1417899818993671,"gpt":0.40267549561988,"spread":0.2608855137205129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009700669,0.00009156109,0.0002350406,5.646725e-7,0.001306625,0.0002010337,0.0003022438,0.00009259245,0.000672059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008454573,0.00006982962,0.00006354397,0.00009232794,0.0003646315,0.0005521788,0.0001467093,0.0001204244,0.00008960847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000290096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004525365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006421436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003631143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989756,0.0002375581,0.0001422044,0.0001424136,0.0001948439,0.0003074101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995832,0.00004421581,0.00006628213,0.0000997246,0.0000304462,0.0001760984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000119752,0.00002506771,0.0001455651,0.0003659705,0.00001030334,3.051236e-7,0.002824811,1.406513e-8,6.669844e-7,0.9268376,0.06505664,0.004731897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000906376,0.0000074628,0.0001038456,0.0003877781,0.00007992719,0.000001796042,0.001030093,1.960757e-7,0.00000260405,0.001812698,0.9963641,0.0001188506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003507496,0.2632286,0.000003864558,0.007896104,0.0003566079,0.000669557,0.000005338375,0.00003822412,0.727451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6571566,0.2774169,0.001987715,0.04731157,0.003729634,0.0002926418,0.00002753955,0.00002673277,0.01205064],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9313075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934301","doi":"10.22145/flr.38.3.5","title":"Judiciaries in Crisis — Some Comparative Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Meaning (existential); Political science; Power (physics); Executive power; Law; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0490169392290615,"gpt":0.363439455138616,"spread":0.3144225159095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003674227,0.00009267151,0.0003072562,0.00001657518,0.000941224,0.00005644845,0.0001373655,0.00004249009,0.0004238528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001307741,0.00007704382,0.00008106469,0.0001752417,0.0007802729,0.0003255391,0.00003848691,0.000205716,0.0001222425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004469902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001166704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03230913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09637885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990879,0.0001163671,0.0001773414,0.0001745592,0.0002262342,0.000217589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996392,0.00007666473,0.0000511576,0.00007199637,0.0001030146,0.00005800683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002253547,0.00003392597,0.0003453319,0.00002096248,0.00001057975,0.000002608883,0.002526281,9.906541e-8,0.000003898471,0.9922389,0.004591162,0.0002239743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008614856,0.00001334329,0.001831749,0.0003399911,0.00001557373,7.958155e-7,0.004468528,2.863511e-7,0.00000683157,0.1670424,0.826037,0.0001574103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01691336,0.2383533,0.000007317372,0.0601129,0.0006397539,0.0006855088,0.00001269854,0.00009372459,0.6831815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967974,0.02787431,0.00007675476,0.003589265,0.0003291123,0.00006533621,0.000001421618,0.000002421335,0.00008736128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9510607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669535","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231165872","title":"Commonwealth Power to Improve Access, Quality, and Efficiency of Medical Care: Does section 51 (xxiiiA) of the <i>Constitution</i> Limit Politically Feasible Health Policy Options Today?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Health care; Politics; Health policy; High Court; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025812913578963,"gpt":0.5146856231739784,"spread":0.412104331816082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003370161,0.0002181179,0.00079373,0.0001478512,0.001440941,0.00002833533,0.0006546746,0.0001922911,0.0002199064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006512843,0.0001389699,0.0001490791,0.001333556,0.00023407,0.0001800702,0.0009339523,0.0005626729,0.00006960434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002527566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002595923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07620292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0185453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948227,0.001529307,0.001629987,0.0003590315,0.0008152396,0.0008436838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997356,0.0004689782,0.0006349037,0.0006480078,0.0002974301,0.0005946789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001307958,0.00007094672,0.006267607,0.03606187,0.00001802025,4.542788e-7,0.0008285606,0.000001700521,0.000006158648,0.9447147,0.01015574,0.001861188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001137991,0.0003605894,0.08368094,0.01794577,0.00005656082,0.000002907326,0.0007244712,0.00002037158,0.00001227423,0.004192193,0.8915194,0.0003465787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03007741,0.01602975,0.000121888,0.8696393,0.002704413,0.009754058,0.0005923634,0.0002950584,0.07078582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7750433,0.03780349,0.00009970336,0.1850402,0.0006893793,0.0005965268,0.00006095491,0.00003207627,0.0006343764],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9405225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281582","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600411","title":"The Dilemma of Indigenous Self-Government in Canada: Indigenous Rights and Canadian Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Sovereignty; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Constitution; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Dual federalism; Minority rights; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548474332370348,"gpt":0.2615485822070759,"spread":0.2460638388833725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005851408,0.0001590141,0.0003543645,0.000007352355,0.003578068,0.0001030236,0.0002883045,0.0000574804,0.00005898252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007927984,0.00009991859,0.00004737868,0.000156958,0.0003338716,0.0001077619,0.00005927477,0.0001363221,0.000009030706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002656932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001333032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979464,0.000270143,0.0003658907,0.0002047436,0.0005931783,0.000619593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.0001236827,0.0001519212,0.0001429741,0.0001254048,0.0002441692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005315805,0.000262994,0.1631738,0.003015299,0.0009943654,0.0003139525,0.3420945,0.000001554687,0.00001839347,0.3775204,0.04311462,0.06943698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001189167,0.00003544116,0.0306477,0.0004041578,0.00002193438,0.000002319639,0.0006528941,5.545628e-7,0.00001441202,0.0003761209,0.9675405,0.0001850372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8977346,0.06148927,1.194797e-7,0.005509707,0.0004338258,0.001915577,0.00005385907,0.00002506343,0.03283792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852983,0.01267182,0.00004436709,0.001496824,0.0001382559,0.00004769357,0.000002001635,0.000007377167,0.00029335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248404925","doi":"10.1177/0067205x0403200101","title":"Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Publishing; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02886723879538075,"gpt":0.3194008499368283,"spread":0.2905336111414475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004243428,0.0001230454,0.0003798559,0.00001463571,0.002308403,0.00004604748,0.0001147414,0.00003707558,0.0001642407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002367457,0.0000981678,0.00009737125,0.0003110427,0.0003602411,0.0001294304,0.00005103755,0.00009410054,0.0003193907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009605193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001712601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02856536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04456949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988466,0.00012047,0.0002780606,0.0002184549,0.0002775032,0.0002589312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.0000437067,0.00005715237,0.0000927436,0.0001047363,0.0001717406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001092295,0.00002057312,0.00002296597,0.0003968609,0.00001596267,0.000004789781,0.00008400512,2.547231e-7,8.139901e-7,0.980337,0.01692055,0.002195099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007211429,0.00002822884,0.0001617104,0.009048264,0.00007835153,0.000005799903,0.000009986135,1.3431e-8,0.000001294693,0.1167731,0.8736793,0.0001418777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000199367,0.6016706,0.00009024625,0.06936849,0.0004238982,0.001217372,0.00001222086,0.00009341203,0.3269244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1378575,0.7785211,0.0005297045,0.08136034,0.0009320687,0.000326369,0.00001032836,0.000009084827,0.000453476],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.863564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601966673","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.3.1","title":"Constitutional Incongruence: Explaining the Failure of the Council of the Australian Federation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Politics; Corporate governance; Project commissioning; Political science; Public administration; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1304208890799023,"gpt":0.3405398591506105,"spread":0.2101189700707082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002117714,0.0001248924,0.0002627316,0.000004224647,0.001526622,0.0001163394,0.0006255563,0.00008407651,0.0001337022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005918762,0.00006244172,0.0001903314,0.0002151933,0.001932307,0.0001585622,0.0000919825,0.0002436497,0.000008557034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003807815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003470666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01428341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02705145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974471,0.0006035941,0.0004763274,0.0001435239,0.001058123,0.0002712851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998445,0.0001235323,0.0003633637,0.0003655938,0.0005992659,0.0001032662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002102657,0.00001511584,0.0008874821,0.0001394704,0.00001185377,3.069178e-7,0.002105127,0.000009166803,0.000007050691,0.9712177,0.02544701,0.0001576015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000161981,0.00001549231,0.0006086101,0.001083596,0.00003571832,0.000006601221,0.0007676125,0.000003590068,0.00007529101,0.008929051,0.9882163,0.00009620433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03400508,0.01443301,0.000054506,0.4318804,0.003734022,0.004645148,0.0002646959,0.00008054089,0.5109025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934573,0.0003569623,0.00004993792,0.003362928,0.000185601,0.00003170095,0.000002972675,0.000004335991,0.002548215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997733,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243786276","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1504300204","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Project commissioning; Publishing; Labour economics; Gig economy; Management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Law; Mechanical engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0823541066774538,"gpt":0.3663007818266725,"spread":0.2839466751492187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001313278,0.0001245725,0.0002289143,0.00001105865,0.0009701885,0.0002491744,0.0002671611,0.00005501048,0.0002634063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004052667,0.00007802434,0.0001283341,0.0003956609,0.00008934527,0.0001683664,0.00004926016,0.0001029897,0.00003570901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007118726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001652186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04010455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01543506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998757,0.0002163273,0.0002656552,0.0001538708,0.0002243296,0.0003828404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999113,0.0001258368,0.0001186031,0.0002136223,0.0001565606,0.0002724005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003081603,0.00002654953,0.00007959603,0.00008394156,0.00001770855,0.00002129618,0.001222378,0.000001063951,3.981327e-7,0.8447139,0.1486904,0.005139699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002012368,0.00002179693,0.00006069092,0.0009280118,0.00003860335,0.000006693909,0.0005974442,4.700907e-7,0.000002525276,0.002854501,0.9951637,0.0001243372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1921263,0.2437599,0.0005708624,0.3529028,0.006119265,0.01332646,0.0002541656,0.000706963,0.1902333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8354569,0.008574383,0.001847772,0.05887372,0.003121138,0.000354498,0.00002295151,0.00005319088,0.09169544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8464733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781112312","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.10","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice and the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Duty; Justiciability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07835296890226545,"gpt":0.3644354827945134,"spread":0.2860825138922479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000778285,0.00006452114,0.000240736,0.000004294523,0.002519516,0.00008148461,0.0003275789,0.00001450463,0.00004582157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000593083,0.00004315095,0.00002199139,0.00004505876,0.002239984,0.000130335,0.0002151456,0.00005622548,0.000003912587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001678676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001946378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9519714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991007,0.00008973174,0.0002574279,0.0001180235,0.0002846325,0.0001495223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.0001753186,0.00009327572,0.0001018819,0.0001044388,0.00005950668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007080019,0.000006463129,0.002183791,0.0002036035,0.000007987624,0.000001151372,0.0001438029,0.00000129104,1.371137e-7,0.9954118,0.0004237855,0.001609134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003938435,0.000004275034,0.03427646,0.002139188,0.00009592753,0.000001125649,0.000297722,0.000001282794,0.000007992124,0.02406002,0.9385401,0.0001820405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01221597,0.02225288,0.00008782124,0.05453724,0.0007074256,0.001284142,0.00002523118,0.000009212686,0.9088801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992442,0.001926575,0.0001330516,0.005359647,0.00006115832,0.00005775011,7.037473e-7,9.270427e-7,0.00001821585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123103951","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.3.3","title":"The Honour of the Dead – the Moral Right of Integrity Post-Mortem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Prejudice (legal term); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02856023272696993,"gpt":0.3116974059079512,"spread":0.2831371731809812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002146215,0.00006985659,0.0001889271,0.000004015782,0.001014728,0.00004681615,0.0005616607,0.00004420475,0.0001448411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007782143,0.00002560561,0.0001773646,0.0001219144,0.0005041784,0.00008722398,0.00006681286,0.000176855,0.00002249043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000150915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006713388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003866798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005004552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981428,0.0009755205,0.0002955314,0.00008730526,0.0003636172,0.0001352548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988552,0.0003311442,0.0002685193,0.000324957,0.0001847754,0.00003537328],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003920439,0.00001601871,0.0001793935,0.0001128437,0.000006127881,5.919372e-8,0.000266955,3.209038e-7,0.00003748158,0.9754425,0.01603152,0.007902806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008283588,0.00002252295,0.002405645,0.001212631,0.0000220305,9.840646e-7,0.0001609481,0.00002068403,0.0002418238,0.01127834,0.9844918,0.00005974587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824984,0.07406931,0.0001169861,0.1544291,0.001925208,0.002348964,0.00002311783,0.00007093313,0.7387666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912502,0.004616412,0.00007220489,0.00279466,0.0001166794,0.00002018372,0.000001215692,0.000004249157,0.001124242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7804568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912109766","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600304","title":"‘Pretaliatory’ Enforcement Action for Chilling Whistleblowing through Corporate Agreements: Lessons from North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Enforcement; Legislation; Business; Misconduct; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4858533238558054,"gpt":0.4817691846553312,"spread":0.004084139200474235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001137773,0.0001971539,0.000435512,0.0000310069,0.000985473,0.0003567932,0.0004499905,0.0000658178,0.001642435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009215466,0.0001473937,0.000185566,0.0004160131,0.0001762316,0.0006889444,0.00008401995,0.0001422569,0.000562508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009555173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001258664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001015003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001220384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974232,0.0001456365,0.0008026925,0.0005570797,0.0007884403,0.0002829643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972964,0.0004627361,0.0008004896,0.0006000305,0.0007621626,0.00007818248],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001304266,0.0004446531,0.006074787,0.001995578,0.0003486062,0.000003646041,0.004344204,0.0001669388,0.0003251391,0.3708979,0.2152247,0.4000434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016757,0.00006381103,0.0006598567,0.001217277,0.00005391625,7.260802e-7,0.0001309256,0.0002502342,0.0001328697,0.04937833,0.9477211,0.0002233916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244324,0.1016218,0.5644161,0.05997432,0.03153649,0.008458342,0.000928594,0.0005352385,0.1080968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417366,0.01890245,0.01397427,0.02182669,0.001628412,0.0002560838,0.0004120537,0.0000400288,0.001223411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085997748","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955069","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Institution; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06827181375930244,"gpt":0.3446184206711721,"spread":0.2763466069118696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004605424,0.00009664144,0.000182525,0.000002988165,0.002332008,0.000138172,0.000127005,0.0000443993,0.00004146115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003381096,0.00006076389,0.00004942067,0.00009161142,0.0005545052,0.0003354367,0.00004427661,0.000115824,0.000037531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000795029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005503572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006924863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003772651,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987746,0.0003725413,0.000192387,0.0001791856,0.0002918928,0.0001893377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00008991181,0.00009443716,0.00006619789,0.0001034509,0.0001240688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006999815,0.00002137406,0.0006871209,0.0003436393,0.0000385131,0.000004726121,0.0275468,0.000005664361,0.00001563521,0.9512915,0.01368749,0.00635052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009741684,0.00003015408,0.00234694,0.0002604116,0.00004048695,0.000001627194,0.000702719,0.00001351753,0.000001824311,0.001101168,0.9952804,0.0001233139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03970468,0.3778835,0.0002940184,0.5336426,0.000573389,0.004237428,0.00008722402,0.0003769791,0.04320009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8936586,0.05731352,0.0004916069,0.04769119,0.0005519365,0.0001172405,0.00004084677,0.00000802344,0.0001270216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125224730","doi":"10.22145/flr.41.1.6","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Political science; Publishing; Racism; Sociology; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625460854472228,"gpt":0.3382586096723159,"spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893119,0.00007630609,0.0002553274,0.00001228369,0.0003085172,0.0000424523,0.00008667829,0.00003550175,0.0002191523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002385531,0.00004975684,0.00004153553,0.00009137816,0.0006805485,0.0001466685,0.00001165646,0.0000669363,0.00000846738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001852688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8280364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000262056,0.0002564787,0.0001117342,0.0001877072,0.0001671308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994631,0.0002328888,0.00007909945,0.0000500695,0.00009936233,0.00007544716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002976663,0.00002601462,0.01098021,0.0008877672,0.0000286468,7.816512e-7,0.01690309,6.086859e-7,0.00001250064,0.9625339,0.001724172,0.006899332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001091801,0.0001636178,0.2021113,0.009429612,0.0001649542,0.00001471398,0.09588222,0.000008225888,0.0001410718,0.01191235,0.6780894,0.0009907143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8029121,0.0386316,0.0000202389,0.04595618,0.0001778875,0.003671848,0.0002113445,0.00002230582,0.1083966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954643,0.002858806,0.0002393417,0.001290283,0.00003334519,0.00008728766,0.000007041404,0.000001447427,0.00001811742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3442837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934112569","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19831805","title":"Finding the Foothold: Freedom of Political Association in the Australian <i>Constitution</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Constitution; Corollary; Politics; Law; Political communication; Supreme court; Political freedom; Jurisprudence; Freedom of the press; Political science; Sociology; Association (psychology); Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03345941953877991,"gpt":0.3270030402620783,"spread":0.2935436207232984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001923988,0.00006545638,0.0001712619,0.000001311168,0.0004430135,0.00007416311,0.0003026026,0.0000994786,0.0003007061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001932208,0.00003471294,0.0001447476,0.0002101471,0.0002238909,0.0001299975,0.00001852332,0.0002155645,0.00007953103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001291219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007378462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002553262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001879153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985346,0.0004899623,0.0002139935,0.0000991354,0.0003924289,0.0002698467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.0002300687,0.0001110217,0.0001414982,0.00005354637,0.00002981527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.45724e-7,0.00001391893,0.003209145,0.0001132633,0.000006579096,3.131565e-7,0.0009747278,7.276203e-7,0.000003812507,0.974585,0.02103257,0.00005952137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857031,0.000008471394,0.001217033,0.0005668803,0.00002168677,9.269121e-7,0.00130589,3.570825e-7,0.000005898269,0.00476602,0.9919606,0.00006052813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009124127,0.01134505,0.000002111323,0.1347644,0.000596189,0.001360452,0.00002585431,0.00003012525,0.8427516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823545,0.003734188,0.00004511365,0.01019778,0.0002153746,0.00003464697,0.000005739557,0.000002598855,0.003410114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3859785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802150874","doi":"10.22145/flr.46.1.6","title":"The Survival of Reasonableness Review: Confirming the Boundaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Standard of review; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Proportionality (law); Political science; Substantive law; Law; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0561105950039175,"gpt":0.3731523777757259,"spread":0.3170417827718083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004347322,0.0001108246,0.0003354846,0.000003055642,0.004509485,0.0002710891,0.0006229996,0.00003301322,0.000388056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001186106,0.00005617624,0.0001457184,0.0001994993,0.002917138,0.0001730712,0.00008419341,0.0001110543,0.0001000238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002977768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002948609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01004185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02102953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979464,0.0006882004,0.0003776651,0.0001660921,0.0005069221,0.0003147601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984128,0.0005520137,0.0002117361,0.0003854919,0.0003750642,0.00006284769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005747783,0.000006227461,0.00004818635,0.001797063,0.0000107626,9.113687e-7,0.0002552555,4.771886e-9,0.000001901874,0.9195824,0.06194291,0.01634865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000225786,0.00002448719,0.00005584208,0.01021804,0.00006092336,0.000002531556,0.0001380127,2.909877e-7,0.00001497288,0.001788916,0.9875919,0.00008155847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001907568,0.7715436,0.00001420307,0.0828326,0.0007979845,0.0006911357,0.000004235207,0.00002955735,0.1438959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1385601,0.8462811,0.00004200262,0.01068172,0.0006473376,0.00008772739,0.000002192625,0.00001189073,0.003685896],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211104402","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.7","title":"Time to Get Serious about Privacy Policies: The Special Case of Genetic Privacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Business; Consumer privacy; Privacy by Design; Genetic testing; FTC Fair Information Practice; Relation (database); Project commissioning; Privacy law; Privacy rights; Publishing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03012949440883363,"gpt":0.3106534458376723,"spread":0.2805239514288387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003696164,0.0002233646,0.0006664958,0.00003323848,0.0002194298,0.00003271173,0.0003143003,0.00006407622,0.001615448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000546134,0.0001467937,0.000218639,0.0002192884,0.0001255815,0.00006574915,0.0002123931,0.0001885042,0.001419401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004119028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007385233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003215165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002816307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983465,0.0002170162,0.0005771084,0.0002552152,0.0002673627,0.0003367701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984843,0.0001252003,0.0001785961,0.0008612973,0.0001215209,0.000229157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004959973,0.001230306,0.002452284,0.02479494,0.0005536918,0.00112428,0.006479447,0.000021444,0.001027586,0.03420177,0.5553754,0.3722429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004892769,0.0004368945,0.00200184,0.00266888,0.0001600469,0.0009747167,0.000004215655,0.00002227301,0.0001111588,0.0002770526,0.9926792,0.0001744382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7753374,0.03898212,0.0001513584,0.02818571,0.0003436923,0.005653672,0.00008050694,0.0001561843,0.1511093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679271,0.01187058,0.003996745,0.1027255,0.005446635,0.0002573236,0.00008366098,0.0001351893,0.007557275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4373038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993581,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277183366","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.1.3","title":"Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Prerogative; Constitution; Law; Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); House of Commons; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06500949117634366,"gpt":0.3562204782157535,"spread":0.2912109870394098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004412304,0.0001164969,0.0001827347,0.00000263066,0.002411554,0.0001561331,0.000423824,0.00003048906,0.0001916537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001745706,0.00003276371,0.0001655469,0.0001209112,0.001937662,0.00008702742,0.00008754634,0.0002608531,0.00003798026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000245817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002663447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001384575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005958753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975039,0.001625398,0.0002067156,0.0001126761,0.0003026691,0.0002486466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978564,0.001502232,0.0002076911,0.0003526251,0.00004020113,0.00004079362],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004060911,0.00001474066,0.0002110192,0.00004529748,0.00004585172,5.282239e-8,0.002871988,3.285149e-7,0.000004185003,0.9944944,0.001660531,0.0006474899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471194,0.00004272542,0.001598563,0.0007840215,0.0001717594,0.000003422733,0.002570953,0.000003412498,0.0001879516,0.003591057,0.9907041,0.00009489409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1183245,0.0602611,0.00003668224,0.6489383,0.0004623161,0.01615132,0.00007242923,0.00006164558,0.1556917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993452,0.002237821,0.000004673649,0.002813093,0.00008229995,0.0007295869,0.000001041657,0.000005351782,0.0006741679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989922706","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19890443","title":"Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Collateral; Legislature; Law; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Political science; Law and economics; Entitlement (fair division); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Economics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06463917718911977,"gpt":0.3983113533893212,"spread":0.3336721762002014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001798648,0.00005147217,0.0001290552,0.000004266665,0.0002438999,0.00005067102,0.0002765357,0.00002348412,0.0002162613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005207846,0.00002819426,0.00005911241,0.0001350036,0.00007687746,0.0001103621,0.00002901064,0.0001523356,0.00005892888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003471773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007533624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002635487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004974957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988111,0.0004841325,0.0002309099,0.0001012523,0.000251374,0.0001212214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994218,0.0002050767,0.0001161552,0.0001940972,0.00004783089,0.00001502926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005833765,0.00003304637,0.0002924825,0.0003542509,0.000006378887,2.404465e-7,0.0129076,0.00001095123,0.00001112953,0.9561639,0.0006240022,0.02959017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001464254,0.00008958552,0.001557297,0.001576244,0.00001808728,3.026371e-7,0.001945267,0.000279835,0.000002928271,0.004169019,0.9901147,0.0001002364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1498965,0.04040053,0.00002640829,0.0888949,0.0002378615,0.0036095,0.00001250839,0.00003247193,0.7168893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906438,0.005452135,0.00008055309,0.00341512,0.00004869176,0.0001080859,0.00000318706,0.000003606316,0.0002448317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3984086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533621","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231205051","title":"Collective Bargaining in Fissured Work Contexts: An Analysis of Core Challenges and Novel Experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Legislation; Shadow (psychology); Statutory law; Competition (biology); Labour law; Economics; Labour economics; Bargaining power; Industrial relations; Business; Market economy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Management; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.105711063265105,"gpt":0.3567071814664445,"spread":0.2509961182013395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000592377,0.00006715656,0.0003374846,0.0000719472,0.0001465279,0.00003751164,0.00007356989,0.00003961713,0.00004365036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004507515,0.00006445244,0.00006011809,0.0007337345,0.00008007148,0.0003839027,0.00001159697,0.00003886188,0.000004808852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004784053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003412978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004279698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999297,0.00007151667,0.0002458846,0.0001357367,0.0001086527,0.0001412417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996856,0.00008382886,0.00007380946,0.00006768057,0.00003516045,0.00005390897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004164686,0.0001533421,0.005290461,0.0004395542,0.0003851707,0.000003141973,0.05379342,0.00004405854,0.000004406795,0.8406585,0.0001317056,0.09905454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004989861,0.0008558437,0.3533335,0.02505691,0.001572029,0.000001654473,0.04865431,0.001510144,0.0001229784,0.02643161,0.5349839,0.002487238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1580642,0.181681,0.00007021757,0.00291209,0.0001632981,0.001878403,0.00005890496,0.0001679048,0.655004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758661,0.02357119,0.00003153341,0.000273823,0.0000104819,0.00005428163,0.00002511171,0.000003594964,0.0001638511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8178019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2628294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256397086","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1304100106","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Project commissioning; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Publishing; Ethnology; Law; Archaeology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625460854472228,"gpt":0.3382586096723159,"spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893119,0.00007630609,0.0002553274,0.00001228369,0.0003085172,0.0000424523,0.00008667829,0.00003550175,0.0002191523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002385531,0.00004975684,0.00004153553,0.00009137816,0.0006805485,0.0001466685,0.00001165646,0.0000669363,0.00000846738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001852688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8280364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000262056,0.0002564787,0.0001117342,0.0001877072,0.0001671308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994631,0.0002328888,0.00007909945,0.0000500695,0.00009936233,0.00007544716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002976663,0.00002601462,0.01098021,0.0008877672,0.0000286468,7.816512e-7,0.01690309,6.086859e-7,0.00001250064,0.9625339,0.001724172,0.006899332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001091801,0.0001636178,0.2021113,0.009429612,0.0001649542,0.00001471398,0.09588222,0.000008225888,0.0001410718,0.01191235,0.6780894,0.0009907143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8029121,0.0386316,0.0000202389,0.04595618,0.0001778875,0.003671848,0.0002113445,0.00002230582,0.1083966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954643,0.002858806,0.0002393417,0.001290283,0.00003334519,0.00008728766,0.000007041404,0.000001447427,0.00001811742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3442837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992013934","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19892363","title":"Withdrawn: Knighthoods and the Order of Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Prime minister; Prime (order theory); Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Combinatorics; Politics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03412100745467204,"gpt":0.3490452409046103,"spread":0.3149242334499383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001009387,0.000118816,0.000412686,0.00001081629,0.000402182,0.0000982886,0.0002309713,0.00006641065,0.001491623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006352692,0.0000751847,0.0001035973,0.0001463105,0.0005556063,0.0001099372,0.00004755844,0.0001529228,0.0001074296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002094294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008279986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01847451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002563375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985415,0.0003699907,0.0003305821,0.0001710632,0.0002795166,0.0003073301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999238,0.0001292781,0.0001461514,0.0002647011,0.0001059349,0.0001159544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006675408,0.00001117198,0.0005369904,0.000532314,0.00001401947,7.137561e-7,0.0004503861,1.176668e-7,0.000001255102,0.9931098,0.004983154,0.0003534114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005083922,0.00003075588,0.0008148081,0.0007860752,0.00003738496,0.000003629885,0.00008412913,0.000002354145,0.000005936161,0.0155517,0.9820383,0.000136523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06657822,0.06682859,0.00002411952,0.1043138,0.001200045,0.004797622,0.00004810489,0.0001059058,0.7561036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650232,0.01209666,0.0001514285,0.003436655,0.0001285026,0.00002706275,0.000003433418,0.00001024898,0.01912285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256167964","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.11","title":"Lisa Burton Crawford The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution - Janina Boughey Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Sociology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05260209595554128,"gpt":0.3407976567241885,"spread":0.2881955607686472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001297309,0.0001492876,0.0004397991,0.000005298506,0.006253319,0.0001676409,0.0002918975,0.00004607938,0.00006088683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001466064,0.00007205315,0.00005430822,0.0000525856,0.006435928,0.0001887911,0.0001195778,0.0001785548,0.000001665538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005188315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001546525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985995,0.0003251016,0.000352101,0.0001912115,0.0002939056,0.0002381602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992644,0.0001378337,0.0002488115,0.000207935,0.00007540807,0.0000655881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006631516,0.000006424916,0.0009584182,0.0002907178,0.00002025038,0.00000445005,0.000163077,3.82992e-8,8.380809e-7,0.9934645,0.004750278,0.0003343904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003366951,0.00001631238,0.01730299,0.005110322,0.0001531191,0.00001051088,0.00004263129,1.187801e-7,0.000003392656,0.03073924,0.9461546,0.0001300458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09481094,0.4038391,0.000001333155,0.2448288,0.0009024856,0.004644729,0.00009290452,0.00002565309,0.2508541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377183,0.0579211,0.000005691564,0.003709821,0.0001517655,0.00005522835,0.000002672306,0.000002321107,0.0004331498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122253256","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.2.4","title":"Investor-State Arbitration: The Roadmap from the Multilateral Agreement on Investment to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investment protection; International trade; Treaty; Investment (military); Business; General partnership; Multinational corporation; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Political science; International investment; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05175145912435978,"gpt":0.2693442461313393,"spread":0.2175927870069795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001159566,0.00034494,0.0002540778,0.00002671624,0.0009775872,0.0006452517,0.0006281793,0.00003687142,0.001504502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004648302,0.0001592295,0.000222386,0.0002278303,0.0001183458,0.0007228701,0.0001025398,0.0002636527,0.003156765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009949464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002422536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001064886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001059689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976909,0.000156738,0.0005941438,0.0003180275,0.0007815647,0.0004585854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.0001001255,0.000261065,0.0005768815,0.0001181269,0.00005817018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002592457,0.0001290158,0.0004372133,0.0001038234,0.00008475042,0.000001016924,0.0003622171,0.00003569232,0.00002724715,0.7969804,0.2012572,0.0005554431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002677921,0.00002718178,0.002930713,0.0005458544,0.00008051857,0.000001077498,0.00006115602,0.0001953924,0.000100816,0.002286512,0.9932645,0.0002384847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01104965,0.009377601,0.0001152181,0.3321872,0.001955953,0.004802165,0.00002891184,0.0001232454,0.6403601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4185091,0.0003888394,0.00005119053,0.577047,0.001820248,0.0005529936,0.0001181863,0.0000198581,0.001492601],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413961078","doi":"10.1017/fed.2025.4","title":"The Place of Federalism in Deliberative Rights Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Publishing; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01543522068326151,"gpt":0.3318731827753933,"spread":0.3164379620921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247954,0.00007311711,0.0001913176,0.00001496211,0.001213045,0.00009847694,0.0001799723,0.00003583761,0.0001428125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008142566,0.00003921898,0.00006871745,0.0001573167,0.0002437263,0.0001422876,0.00001881705,0.00009389054,0.0000181277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005451892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004484584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09814369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985397,0.0007448317,0.000288246,0.0001162569,0.0001529934,0.0001580011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993974,0.0002926399,0.00008154679,0.0001258403,0.00007888713,0.00002371246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005518057,0.00001251861,0.000009251253,0.00007129847,0.000007314802,5.474383e-7,0.000902284,3.168244e-7,0.000001500978,0.9880115,0.007997622,0.002980347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007894795,0.000009237895,0.0001571956,0.001079594,0.000007753049,8.883667e-8,0.00007912938,0.000002537267,0.00003755488,0.1526601,0.845837,0.00005087896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01153169,0.09542855,0.0001205442,0.02224516,0.0004696446,0.001475436,0.000004627391,0.00004170441,0.8686826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8914679,0.03879955,0.0001283981,0.007037645,0.0001326582,0.0001569388,0.000008677466,0.000008159332,0.06226005],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}