{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":34,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"8cf335a9af1d","filters":{"venue":"Federal Law Review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3086727983","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955068","title":"A First Nations Voice: Institutionalising Political Listening","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Politics; Democracy; Public administration; Legislature; State (computer science); Political science; Corporate governance; Institution; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Gabrielle Appleby","is_ca":false},{"name":"Eddie Synot","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08724136824589092,"gpt":0.3768457016512369,"spread":0.289604333405346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02182071,0.0002033645,0.0002402351,0.001449553,0.006947896,0.01204595,0.001168664,0.003463906,0.00689612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01915669,0.0002497432,0.0002670575,0.0007264346,0.03772949,0.006289461,0.008648388,0.004664024,0.0004920046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00432719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008379879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005839164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01232253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819279,0.01449549,0.0002810638,0.0006913892,0.001128735,0.001475366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827466,0.01168872,0.001292023,0.001223619,0.001145388,0.001903606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009705,0.00002894069,0.000975235,0.00004350836,0.000003681046,0.0001861706,0.05553506,0.0001629041,0.0003406712,0.9202757,0.004041848,0.01839608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002978491,0.0001161857,0.006605698,0.0008697408,0.00002126948,0.0003425424,0.09553629,0.001159773,0.000904566,0.5951411,0.2992093,0.00006366616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09992759,0.002535266,0.03187707,0.08024366,0.0006555003,0.0001038041,0.00001968762,0.0001269975,0.7845104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856821,0.0004369878,0.002058788,0.002986583,0.0001265298,0.00004439064,0.000004669975,0.00001970349,0.008640213],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1154003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269084978","doi":"10.22145/flr.31.2.2","title":"Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Criminology; Refugee law; Sociology; Publishing; Gender studies; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Dauvergne","is_ca":true},{"name":"Jenni Millbank","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05716202341117506,"gpt":0.3152969747019426,"spread":0.2581349512907675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05179718,0.0003130092,0.0009667791,0.00277598,0.05084212,0.02267472,0.004179008,0.01731027,0.006487058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1126531,0.001081343,0.0006869246,0.002137222,0.02376471,0.00741983,0.0120614,0.01594676,0.0008728202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02344851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04340745,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3908759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5010131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.960261,0.01859938,0.001544718,0.002977024,0.007066374,0.00955148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491938,0.02501049,0.004181867,0.002545639,0.009522088,0.009546105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012448,0.0001942104,0.01912057,0.0003104309,0.00009319121,0.008891296,0.4893833,0.0004627587,0.0008868062,0.3651683,0.06725891,0.0481058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008948488,0.0003082617,0.05904618,0.00104097,0.0001617753,0.00209881,0.3459248,0.00154318,0.001062852,0.05006107,0.5382965,0.0003660969],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5415125,0.007799665,0.001581121,0.3353366,0.001593376,0.0001493556,0.00005541584,0.00005962616,0.1119122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169827,0.001286364,0.0004230292,0.04882523,0.0003168824,0.00006980707,0.00001654616,0.00004389228,0.03203552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3908759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7772014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","authors":[{"name":"Janina Boughey","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2729267636078582,"gpt":0.5032675907602394,"spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04298605,0.0003711119,0.0009787878,0.005293773,0.005560027,0.01161119,0.003746162,0.007488395,0.002509568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07108101,0.0004780047,0.0008203545,0.002673718,0.03145259,0.009840304,0.005799938,0.0114129,0.0004710607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01831295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02121864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0851214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07697459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9647372,0.01621193,0.001368958,0.001372602,0.01302897,0.003280325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042026,0.06563785,0.003282625,0.004598863,0.02044665,0.001831333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417175,0.0000158964,0.0003161005,0.00008421348,0.000008215851,0.0001605495,0.003463069,0.0003320085,0.00008857191,0.9841312,0.003492428,0.007893595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043219,0.0001293896,0.003833896,0.001937985,0.0000709933,0.0003270227,0.006516934,0.0027864,0.000680557,0.7815584,0.2020092,0.0001059722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1322197,0.06959441,0.04206462,0.2721146,0.004818606,0.0002204383,0.0001014216,0.0001091445,0.4787571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615943,0.005721072,0.004621169,0.0156255,0.001406768,0.00005478554,0.00001772381,0.00003044463,0.01092822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0851214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2273347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","authors":[{"name":"Rosalind Dixon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0750247104430044,"gpt":0.3655792180768747,"spread":0.2905545076338703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00483027,0.0005220113,0.0007513715,0.001773662,0.009055332,0.01029637,0.0035659,0.01055851,0.009075448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01521382,0.0004090924,0.000821598,0.002239666,0.01019783,0.009039204,0.002857573,0.01132551,0.0008384379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06327785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1081994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9580024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932053,0.001435699,0.00022093,0.0007227881,0.0024527,0.001962631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941168,0.001303392,0.0002116363,0.0003839874,0.003105495,0.0008787208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001970114,0.00001313884,0.0001796018,0.00007523349,0.000004979765,0.00007703949,0.001177366,0.0002968847,0.00006079732,0.9163582,0.07338595,0.008351126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008040356,0.00003770502,0.002773886,0.0006919339,0.0000287257,0.00007904914,0.003219076,0.002004715,0.0001696735,0.1804825,0.8103048,0.0001275179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01083666,0.01293561,0.003972095,0.6009753,0.00350843,0.0001604399,0.0005005643,0.0001001384,0.3670107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4713397,0.01399676,0.01218324,0.2772639,0.001134189,0.000582274,0.0003428877,0.0001925595,0.2229645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06327785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4591151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319844237","doi":"10.1177/0067205x221146335","title":"Active After Sunset<scp>:</scp> The Politics of Judicial Retirements in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Institution; Government (linguistics); Language change; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Shubhankar Dam","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03922823098085997,"gpt":0.3299607964961456,"spread":0.2907325655152856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002045025,0.00006062197,0.0001271116,0.0009932356,0.00785405,0.004871195,0.0005498129,0.001117067,0.003649881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004138045,0.0001305556,0.0001756833,0.001042649,0.005746747,0.000876549,0.002350545,0.002258497,0.0003920861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006069773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004453504,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05682631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1084187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981217,0.0005793166,0.00004579925,0.0001509931,0.0002712715,0.0008309184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960245,0.001715688,0.0006382277,0.0002715574,0.0005514311,0.0007986468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001641006,0.00009641382,0.05466508,0.0001825877,0.00003163394,0.002064527,0.08320756,0.0007973808,0.001738706,0.7113628,0.09286474,0.05282455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002366991,0.0001489006,0.272007,0.0005668115,0.00006388968,0.0009116256,0.09322014,0.0007647983,0.002919162,0.03775941,0.5914711,0.0001434657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7026497,0.004799953,0.0004831115,0.05722167,0.0003585721,0.00001688836,0.0002000422,0.00005076676,0.2342193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875547,0.0003789302,0.00002969512,0.001725839,0.00008115503,0.000002652005,0.00001155793,0.000006264824,0.01020929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05682631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226395077","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.1.1","title":"The Proscription of Terrorist Organisations in Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Legitimacy; Political science; Commonwealth; Public administration; Law; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Lynch","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nicola McGarrity","is_ca":false},{"name":"George Williams","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04677800223217879,"gpt":0.3750626629625524,"spread":0.3282846607303735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007083461,0.0002024234,0.0004567095,0.002973298,0.003512855,0.004144561,0.0008224408,0.002988566,0.002259196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01376895,0.0005895669,0.0003151351,0.002249374,0.004127861,0.002371711,0.002289543,0.003811161,0.0004951516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007939936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01756647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1360509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1508111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899109,0.004228713,0.0006841606,0.0004585526,0.00397482,0.0007427715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899113,0.003750114,0.001586269,0.0004200863,0.003875512,0.0004568135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483727,0.0002101358,0.005890691,0.003715861,0.00009037653,0.001758662,0.02427114,0.001285411,0.002651785,0.63507,0.09288064,0.232027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003570042,0.0001895036,0.03665645,0.002605009,0.00005966921,0.0006185162,0.003274527,0.0003397916,0.0009619832,0.01267323,0.9425079,0.00007764281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1224896,0.3150788,0.001785144,0.06783191,0.00379391,0.0002467374,0.000140223,0.0000294506,0.4886041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6495845,0.1984533,0.001867755,0.03504379,0.001511469,0.0002236331,0.0001532966,0.00002929532,0.1131329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1360509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2705179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341114917","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.2.4","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Work (physics); Backdoor; Labour economics; Migrant workers; Project commissioning; Business; Gig economy; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Engineering; Publishing; Labour law; Economic growth; Law; Computer security; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Howe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alexander Reilly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07370987631042583,"gpt":0.3649032628772893,"spread":0.2911933865668634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01077982,0.0001643844,0.0004372786,0.0009422326,0.007865082,0.005505328,0.001712729,0.008891637,0.003644231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01236637,0.000418664,0.000585783,0.0005157887,0.007330419,0.004439081,0.006009338,0.009486721,0.0004625935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005859914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03207637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1308404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.182748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932656,0.002495842,0.0003566215,0.0006119573,0.001698824,0.001571113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913401,0.003179619,0.0006948835,0.0006115724,0.002188164,0.001985632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006343248,0.0002146786,0.009828912,0.0007365349,0.00004913228,0.002645751,0.03616088,0.0007802712,0.002367064,0.7491258,0.09744894,0.1005784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005148037,0.0002082853,0.02787123,0.001727163,0.00006527719,0.0008066091,0.01520326,0.00093029,0.0005021718,0.06287502,0.8896727,0.00008650149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1605625,0.01454516,0.003147735,0.6409966,0.002071191,0.0001875376,0.00005305439,0.00006614947,0.1783701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7397662,0.008237394,0.004491892,0.1792727,0.00101543,0.0002775738,0.00003353342,0.00004539037,0.06685991],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1308404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2601576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336534342","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.9","title":"Realising the Public Potential of Corporate Law: Twenty Years of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Fiduciary; Public law; Corporate law; Private law; Commercial law; Corporate governance; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Enforcement; Corporate group; Municipal law; Administrative law; Political science; Comparative law; Business; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Michelle Anne Welsh","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0817171552472051,"gpt":0.3426131843189589,"spread":0.2608960290717538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01847626,0.0002016688,0.0004322092,0.002156993,0.01094874,0.01356969,0.001455897,0.009775241,0.003828548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02469199,0.0007991913,0.0004858085,0.00158736,0.02299229,0.008004524,0.008320593,0.01236762,0.0003293319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02322132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02997897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09023125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.164849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880189,0.004748906,0.0005079096,0.001014815,0.003786474,0.00192302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646376,0.02080776,0.003974529,0.001497986,0.004924643,0.004157592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001094753,0.0005620026,0.01113778,0.0009798667,0.00004879891,0.005034024,0.3690244,0.0009030735,0.00249768,0.4835889,0.01683105,0.1092829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003735523,0.0005370775,0.08940594,0.003591568,0.00005486236,0.001175541,0.1033869,0.002674268,0.0017922,0.05183439,0.7452706,0.000239233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5918462,0.03289025,0.002676198,0.2598158,0.0016354,0.0001638612,0.00003904231,0.0000315847,0.1109015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617339,0.008067375,0.0007603853,0.0141486,0.0004845829,0.000034118,0.000009366153,0.00002015744,0.01474142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09023125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1794121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238265016","doi":"10.22145/flr.36.3.1","title":"The Dangers of Shared Care Legislation: Why Australia Needs (Yet More) Family Law Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law reform; Family law; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing","authors":[{"name":"Helen Rhoades","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07022404376108987,"gpt":0.3400619872985388,"spread":0.2698379435374489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02799746,0.00017838,0.0005453855,0.00129422,0.009350637,0.007540604,0.002274669,0.009833974,0.005326303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05406813,0.0005594096,0.0007351306,0.001329432,0.00827364,0.008163075,0.005573914,0.01137976,0.0006245872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01480271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04627138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1865865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2511615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780986,0.008585189,0.0008275179,0.001466848,0.006918746,0.004103097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636676,0.01403091,0.003143974,0.001650479,0.01125778,0.006249245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000912919,0.0003062134,0.02134653,0.001057617,0.00007610931,0.002072182,0.05144029,0.0004913274,0.001940311,0.6118029,0.1677224,0.1416528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008763491,0.00040432,0.08719522,0.003122968,0.0000907014,0.001133902,0.03004943,0.001726633,0.0009241741,0.08899556,0.7860881,0.0001813955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09122064,0.01467473,0.001533646,0.8523049,0.001343867,0.00008312838,0.00004331426,0.00004225951,0.03875348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6843626,0.008736338,0.004198172,0.2711158,0.001042418,0.0001344688,0.00005318944,0.00005492639,0.03030212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1865865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3710008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","authors":[{"name":"George William","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0715606218552786,"gpt":0.3773252051461163,"spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914065,0.0001871801,0.0006565436,0.005534986,0.008339523,0.005506051,0.001142932,0.002242671,0.004932164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02384445,0.0003616892,0.0003554598,0.005683589,0.007111789,0.002823132,0.003798429,0.003063155,0.0004390998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01911047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01381344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2067765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3148611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890477,0.00566751,0.0002579117,0.000358192,0.002306354,0.002362457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990126,0.005410164,0.001339714,0.0002594062,0.002053733,0.0008109973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002030259,0.0004300556,0.02623616,0.000688862,0.00011451,0.002798012,0.162169,0.000747125,0.0008519592,0.7371319,0.01060499,0.05802441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001007346,0.0007110237,0.5325835,0.002531761,0.0004301493,0.001606727,0.2038475,0.002967482,0.0009196444,0.04970271,0.204448,0.0001507136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7825353,0.01336292,0.0004911181,0.008149682,0.0001023745,0.00009675624,0.00004537387,0.000005817451,0.1952108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859729,0.00359219,0.0001880182,0.001137498,0.00005517329,0.00005140206,0.00002070072,0.000006626907,0.008975523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2067765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4111459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266143053","doi":"10.22145/flr.39.1.6","title":"The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law reform; Law; Politics; Public law; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing","authors":[{"name":"Laura Barnett","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06468398277748962,"gpt":0.3863881121285749,"spread":0.3217041293510853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05485686,0.0004371958,0.0009638297,0.002949284,0.01675236,0.03179977,0.001594007,0.0131144,0.01882196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1158108,0.0005880968,0.0006577355,0.002861358,0.03484772,0.02047653,0.01416325,0.01134316,0.003618708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01110194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04787044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007251304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007432311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9462465,0.0178861,0.001884688,0.003247569,0.01225754,0.01847751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8333126,0.08186635,0.01295164,0.007177877,0.02321668,0.04147484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001641588,0.0007354098,0.01385605,0.0003075374,0.00002427321,0.0006551473,0.01954833,0.0004549035,0.0004913462,0.8881059,0.02788481,0.04777216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302788,0.0004984448,0.0276514,0.001198372,0.00003525306,0.0004743831,0.06121051,0.001621184,0.001061423,0.6433542,0.2623867,0.000177961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1218989,0.007036861,0.01090149,0.4379884,0.0009929107,0.001356456,0.0002105797,0.0002454157,0.419369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682425,0.001659403,0.003701099,0.008793857,0.000679203,0.0006577605,0.00007673771,0.0001160468,0.01607353],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05485686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2901143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358534","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.3.4","title":"Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Statute; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Emma Cunliffe","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1417899818993671,"gpt":0.40267549561988,"spread":0.2608855137205129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03144035,0.0005899044,0.0009988929,0.006978934,0.01125236,0.02148028,0.004384411,0.01059113,0.004235206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02938095,0.0005706977,0.001227244,0.00542445,0.1185242,0.01499591,0.009305651,0.01204936,0.0005605785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01898109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01570883,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01117708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9635691,0.02001638,0.001436727,0.002950038,0.008815254,0.003212461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669371,0.02355798,0.002502523,0.002152343,0.003624925,0.001225139],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[3.376919e-7,0.000001423011,0.00000952037,0.000006207371,5.031009e-7,0.00000594847,0.0003950352,0.00003065716,0.000002726521,0.9988456,0.0002382563,0.0004638117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000281306,0.00000437428,0.00006705656,0.0001179314,0.000002218023,0.00001846915,0.0009158987,0.0002428328,0.00001907937,0.9808358,0.0177687,0.000004885454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01662066,0.0356816,0.1064337,0.07362445,0.001780015,0.0001937372,0.00007107061,0.00008135335,0.7655134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9280857,0.0106653,0.01920045,0.00957034,0.001988817,0.0004234003,0.0000383091,0.00006368681,0.02996401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03144035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1662744,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934301","doi":"10.22145/flr.38.3.5","title":"Judiciaries in Crisis — Some Comparative Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Meaning (existential); Political science; Power (physics); Executive power; Law; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"H P Lee","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0490169392290615,"gpt":0.363439455138616,"spread":0.3144225159095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005447344,0.0004705527,0.0007606372,0.008543805,0.008223453,0.01822175,0.001922914,0.006510244,0.01445232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029823,0.0003251614,0.0003509495,0.009494314,0.02187431,0.01043798,0.005453716,0.006689333,0.001016797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02347225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005154097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01670809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02384333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918016,0.00531598,0.0001842381,0.0002804536,0.0009934661,0.001424332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912566,0.005995106,0.0005226652,0.0002521456,0.001144745,0.0008286599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002255822,0.00003339082,0.0003024206,0.0001181416,0.000006838918,0.0001237149,0.008105211,0.0001041713,0.00002548468,0.9672761,0.01627543,0.00760656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000589718,0.00006318298,0.006453898,0.001939609,0.00001312869,0.0003029637,0.07822907,0.0003829242,0.00009852587,0.2795684,0.6328671,0.00002221261],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01606976,0.2328744,0.000630788,0.1071538,0.001568118,0.00002103686,0.00009370036,0.00001158568,0.6415768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8611888,0.0962661,0.0003928368,0.01557408,0.003971768,0.00009109489,0.0001206208,0.00003749875,0.02235721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02347225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1703039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669535","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231165872","title":"Commonwealth Power to Improve Access, Quality, and Efficiency of Medical Care: Does section 51 (xxiiiA) of the <i>Constitution</i> Limit Politically Feasible Health Policy Options Today?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Health care; Politics; Health policy; High Court; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Fiona McDonald","is_ca":true},{"name":"Stephen Duckett","is_ca":false},{"name":"Emma Campbell","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1025812913578963,"gpt":0.5146856231739784,"spread":0.412104331816082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0303129,0.0002031971,0.000608288,0.001315469,0.004735434,0.01190575,0.001577967,0.01174042,0.004456809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03279104,0.000628465,0.0007010277,0.001003309,0.0189381,0.004308125,0.003351002,0.009214305,0.0007023595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01146468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0274932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07292451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06167994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776654,0.01067459,0.001235624,0.001592457,0.005045035,0.003786811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749762,0.01789673,0.002034986,0.001458882,0.002551306,0.001081882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118429,0.00003016426,0.000809851,0.00008592375,0.00001114547,0.0001114815,0.001940161,0.0003570353,0.0003337193,0.9712715,0.01806038,0.006976634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008232768,0.0002355975,0.02116771,0.003287205,0.00008137738,0.0002343929,0.004058514,0.002823606,0.001439354,0.428218,0.5381714,0.0002005991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06760225,0.01898871,0.004920559,0.5364383,0.002487988,0.0001616657,0.0001596845,0.00006016452,0.3691806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8268486,0.008699009,0.002781914,0.1221575,0.002339346,0.0002250919,0.00006017246,0.00003788947,0.03685044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07292451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1603118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281582","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600411","title":"The Dilemma of Indigenous Self-Government in Canada: Indigenous Rights and Canadian Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Sovereignty; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Constitution; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Dual federalism; Minority rights; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Richard Stacey","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548474332370348,"gpt":0.2615485822070759,"spread":0.2460638388833725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004138112,0.0001708329,0.0004389278,0.00231058,0.01067849,0.00703234,0.001763438,0.002753822,0.003864902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007597606,0.0001796556,0.0002853544,0.004045177,0.01387701,0.002051616,0.001741485,0.002855806,0.0001176692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1235931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2155149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954398,0.0008552602,0.00009713347,0.0003073131,0.001970986,0.001329362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994458,0.001932667,0.0002662774,0.0001811226,0.002526199,0.0006357805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001900338,0.00001227746,0.001481983,0.0002944624,0.00002129203,0.0001703472,0.004951515,0.000547464,0.00008871053,0.9382989,0.03215399,0.02196007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005717874,0.00002850268,0.02432741,0.003195361,0.0001492804,0.0001898412,0.01875063,0.00125356,0.0004288741,0.148591,0.8029165,0.0001118053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07006546,0.2086879,0.00163374,0.2987875,0.001079658,0.00006132064,0.0004909285,0.0000434855,0.4191499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137596,0.04911489,0.0009058876,0.01639748,0.0002791777,0.00002762207,0.0001127703,0.00001656238,0.01938592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1235931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8967351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248404925","doi":"10.1177/0067205x0403200101","title":"Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Publishing; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Leighton McDonald","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02886723879538075,"gpt":0.3194008499368283,"spread":0.2905336111414475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2225142,0.0006572952,0.001758781,0.004743957,0.01730149,0.02746531,0.005449681,0.03853482,0.003942874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3721516,0.00103282,0.001463278,0.003806987,0.1006988,0.02083007,0.01229985,0.0363361,0.0008777856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02070351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02877471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01884933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01836921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.709186,0.1702479,0.01246588,0.02284393,0.0697141,0.01554225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.527182,0.4048795,0.01600196,0.02057645,0.0254812,0.005878806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001368509,0.00001300916,0.0001651528,0.00005093752,0.00001332868,0.00003986873,0.003234322,0.00008035177,0.00003653574,0.9641645,0.02752026,0.004667989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001118809,0.00003067803,0.0006352196,0.0003288,0.00002981145,0.0001229601,0.001911141,0.0003585306,0.0002194415,0.7359081,0.2602803,0.00006315955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005716451,0.01183347,0.005484576,0.9016532,0.00332881,0.00007519438,0.00006222162,0.000064076,0.07178202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4920847,0.006678833,0.006895608,0.4484224,0.02018205,0.0007283619,0.00008918492,0.0001721577,0.02474671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2225142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9587784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601966673","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.3.1","title":"Constitutional Incongruence: Explaining the Failure of the Council of the Australian Federation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Politics; Corporate governance; Project commissioning; Political science; Public administration; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Shipra Chordia","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrew Lynch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1304208890799023,"gpt":0.3405398591506105,"spread":0.2101189700707082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03189438,0.0002087475,0.0005209263,0.002909729,0.02429341,0.008646299,0.003232728,0.009252863,0.00379558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04649914,0.0006332696,0.0003997752,0.002489671,0.04491718,0.006041618,0.007300089,0.01006366,0.0002797622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03861974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02890776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.407428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3534664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9772918,0.01050702,0.0007453134,0.002199686,0.005428751,0.003827367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724392,0.01503961,0.002139531,0.00230485,0.005895006,0.00218189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008084007,0.00001246211,0.00110219,0.00002081632,0.000003927889,0.0003339129,0.03498621,0.0001474976,0.00006074083,0.9555694,0.004911075,0.002843783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004527489,0.00008209269,0.01642948,0.0007184203,0.00005193044,0.0005511724,0.07085438,0.00364973,0.00059586,0.4780039,0.4288499,0.0001677047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3407077,0.003731483,0.009028798,0.2077768,0.0009449417,0.0001448877,0.0001168443,0.00009155531,0.437457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874139,0.0002801555,0.0006873765,0.003894385,0.0000912351,0.00003347921,0.000009612853,0.00001466241,0.007575253],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.407428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.810113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243786276","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1504300204","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Project commissioning; Publishing; Labour economics; Gig economy; Management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Law; Mechanical engineering","authors":[{"name":"Joanna Howe","is_ca":true},{"name":"Alexander Reilly","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0823541066774538,"gpt":0.3663007818266725,"spread":0.2839466751492187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01779959,0.0003951144,0.0009123733,0.001881867,0.008883157,0.009760763,0.002739864,0.02228353,0.005833094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03306587,0.0008099238,0.00114939,0.001115795,0.005585887,0.006223132,0.006093596,0.0183642,0.001081706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00966086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08809204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1883629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3989593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876747,0.002355269,0.0007816058,0.0009817595,0.00484436,0.003362329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745155,0.01053562,0.001291023,0.0008994774,0.007179235,0.005579097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151647,0.0002589043,0.005114454,0.00191148,0.0001358081,0.001651102,0.008707068,0.0004813028,0.003220062,0.2263102,0.5980447,0.1540133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005678333,0.0001371472,0.0131181,0.001400622,0.00009651426,0.0002734447,0.003053149,0.0002424166,0.0003575859,0.01474322,0.9664488,0.00007218539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02343955,0.02354542,0.0009831359,0.8633403,0.007334574,0.0001608999,0.0001145799,0.00007597169,0.08100564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1462706,0.01772184,0.003930828,0.7123042,0.0042643,0.0003390832,0.0001340116,0.0001148125,0.1149203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1883629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.374533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781112312","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.10","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice and the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Duty; Justiciability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gerard Kennedy","is_ca":true},{"name":"Lorne Sossin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07835296890226545,"gpt":0.3644354827945134,"spread":0.2860825138922479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005209897,0.0002098999,0.0004793027,0.002929086,0.01967807,0.01135071,0.001793788,0.002210656,0.01056779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01815567,0.0003169481,0.0002954846,0.003565711,0.01695552,0.002488103,0.003412639,0.004411246,0.0002205742],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1727167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2942849,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922826,0.0009450071,0.0001897978,0.0004791667,0.003323575,0.002779884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860492,0.004469835,0.0007378658,0.0005012083,0.005378031,0.002863869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001507933,0.00002545493,0.004202934,0.00006343957,0.000009260023,0.0002083759,0.006306783,0.0007011892,0.0001475574,0.9609891,0.01168603,0.01564485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007549439,0.00005145468,0.07393897,0.0007326339,0.00006742664,0.0002275385,0.02225784,0.003397194,0.0008555439,0.1970504,0.7011257,0.0002197074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.170687,0.009734509,0.002781246,0.06540955,0.0002843699,0.0001830839,0.000521678,0.00006685206,0.7503317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686763,0.002805745,0.0009959999,0.001946911,0.00003719651,0.00002596811,0.00007778634,0.00001896041,0.02541517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1727167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123103951","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.3.3","title":"The Honour of the Dead – the Moral Right of Integrity Post-Mortem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Prejudice (legal term); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; History","authors":[{"name":"Jani McCutcheon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02856023272696993,"gpt":0.3116974059079512,"spread":0.2831371731809812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01263799,0.0001621217,0.0006304585,0.001671618,0.002604173,0.004983372,0.0009720682,0.004631426,0.003130852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02427795,0.0002119145,0.000342425,0.001111227,0.01587861,0.004204302,0.001737486,0.004829603,0.0006879361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005292553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009039938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02939631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9870763,0.007685246,0.0005335213,0.000654852,0.003179053,0.0008709609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787062,0.01428401,0.001946231,0.001067412,0.003475936,0.0005203073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004658881,0.0000483783,0.001086623,0.001345589,0.00003630815,0.0002473441,0.004659132,0.0002525793,0.000386193,0.856348,0.03804312,0.09750008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002619461,0.0001951502,0.01407362,0.0105902,0.00008879101,0.0005015532,0.004184504,0.0002556184,0.000638357,0.2589602,0.7104223,0.0000636113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02096387,0.5381175,0.002804246,0.1400903,0.002644125,0.00005623187,0.00008645772,0.00002088123,0.2952164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7050866,0.2229051,0.001121215,0.02868128,0.002864783,0.00005496537,0.00005595019,0.00002127384,0.03920878],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02311286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06683689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912109766","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600304","title":"‘Pretaliatory’ Enforcement Action for Chilling Whistleblowing through Corporate Agreements: Lessons from North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Enforcement; Legislation; Business; Misconduct; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Olivia Dixon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4858533238558054,"gpt":0.4817691846553312,"spread":0.004084139200474235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01528455,0.0002439142,0.0003872481,0.001148071,0.01602674,0.007707071,0.002420991,0.007044103,0.006140318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02230844,0.0004585246,0.00070735,0.001138888,0.01097063,0.006297846,0.005080377,0.01020005,0.0006976836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01754827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04027411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.498151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6565229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887455,0.005456107,0.000280521,0.0008880273,0.002222297,0.002407589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967873,0.01833028,0.00154783,0.001757025,0.007917234,0.002574579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001614955,0.001051768,0.03148117,0.0003992412,0.00008386868,0.00403704,0.128958,0.001533918,0.00130668,0.5957427,0.1018098,0.1334343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001905374,0.0003113131,0.0547768,0.002548853,0.0001530471,0.0008490005,0.1235754,0.003057376,0.001754623,0.1033981,0.7091126,0.0002723857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.227567,0.004916355,0.005334784,0.1718044,0.0009018751,0.0001996779,0.00007369898,0.0001172628,0.589085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868302,0.004451087,0.004172297,0.07527779,0.0002611558,0.0002449353,0.00006144887,0.00008504004,0.04714424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.498151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905029,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085997748","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955069","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Institution; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Karen Drake","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06827181375930244,"gpt":0.3446184206711721,"spread":0.2763466069118696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008531829,0.0001401881,0.000317007,0.001531151,0.008778594,0.009681008,0.001532404,0.003777085,0.003889476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109672,0.0002176544,0.0003864311,0.001659079,0.0248406,0.003708367,0.003976217,0.003845611,0.0001846903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02508477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04713602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5382903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6676445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914274,0.003652553,0.0001764453,0.0004976253,0.002403175,0.001842708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899743,0.006653704,0.0004475981,0.0006063563,0.001862591,0.0004553848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004051999,0.000009855185,0.0003031403,0.00004070693,0.000003846896,0.00009438047,0.003949367,0.0001448752,0.00007036975,0.9870297,0.003477641,0.004872078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004659442,0.00004015136,0.006073157,0.0008766372,0.00005961457,0.0002726727,0.01835576,0.001454329,0.0007335489,0.4716785,0.5003546,0.00005454812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06014112,0.03900836,0.007604644,0.2071623,0.0009090567,0.00008432248,0.00006515477,0.00004212585,0.6849829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534099,0.007533547,0.00151556,0.01141023,0.0005998649,0.00004778566,0.00001899432,0.00001461789,0.02544958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125224730","doi":"10.22145/flr.41.1.6","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Political science; Publishing; Racism; Sociology; History","authors":[{"name":"Louise Parrott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625460854472228,"gpt":0.3382586096723159,"spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01978543,0.0004210951,0.0009543616,0.004198415,0.03088247,0.01708246,0.003971266,0.009216913,0.006300676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01930728,0.0004100314,0.0008151077,0.004560062,0.02740423,0.004249399,0.006156953,0.009853582,0.0002370681],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1767028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2657129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795131,0.005280117,0.0005180669,0.001189081,0.005280683,0.008218908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824676,0.007483348,0.0005369065,0.0006247477,0.006383421,0.002503924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003061125,0.0000238287,0.001094818,0.0001748304,0.00002238409,0.0004531633,0.0355632,0.000446666,0.0002876337,0.9296656,0.01772213,0.01451514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150269,0.0001003951,0.01866304,0.001559099,0.0001951033,0.0002871828,0.1282566,0.001017058,0.0007905296,0.1173361,0.7313719,0.0003614266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1101477,0.0312348,0.001704027,0.364412,0.002207353,0.000189253,0.0002494268,0.00005567557,0.4897998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089081,0.00969965,0.002338062,0.03528448,0.0004169795,0.00008982571,0.00007342773,0.0000250186,0.04316456],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1767028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9549081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934112569","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19831805","title":"Finding the Foothold: Freedom of Political Association in the Australian <i>Constitution</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Constitution; Corollary; Politics; Law; Political communication; Supreme court; Political freedom; Jurisprudence; Freedom of the press; Political science; Sociology; Association (psychology); Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Geoffrey Milani","is_ca":false},{"name":"Elizabeth Handsley","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03345941953877991,"gpt":0.3270030402620783,"spread":0.2935436207232984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021024,0.00021734,0.0008266022,0.002741467,0.008708832,0.01223906,0.00170403,0.007354517,0.007991453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02938376,0.0006836115,0.0006800619,0.001798008,0.02602682,0.005746824,0.006694741,0.01022867,0.0009076535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01019944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0145392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07132162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06563167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9780568,0.009030219,0.00127575,0.002244961,0.006411888,0.002980351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799096,0.01279655,0.001182508,0.002221723,0.003143033,0.0007466672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930376,0.00001009656,0.0002906691,0.00003136401,0.000005018964,0.0001109229,0.002208897,0.00009163088,0.0001238688,0.9919215,0.002560383,0.002635711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006363007,0.00009584433,0.01058964,0.000921948,0.00007936066,0.0001886705,0.0032051,0.001082657,0.0008255399,0.7889432,0.1939055,0.00009886318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.106957,0.004562066,0.008231281,0.06498627,0.0009654252,0.0001889498,0.0002692627,0.00003654654,0.8138031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574044,0.0009647618,0.001282182,0.007364753,0.0004154279,0.00012175,0.00008652305,0.00001769612,0.03234247],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07132162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1418129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802150874","doi":"10.22145/flr.46.1.6","title":"The Survival of Reasonableness Review: Confirming the Boundaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Standard of review; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Proportionality (law); Political science; Substantive law; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Swati Jhaveri","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0561105950039175,"gpt":0.3731523777757259,"spread":0.3170417827718083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12086,0.0002308877,0.001120144,0.002944806,0.01009669,0.01654536,0.002788653,0.0104937,0.004364791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3242355,0.0006072703,0.0005819821,0.001381867,0.05070986,0.02005621,0.008846139,0.014657,0.0008861653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01612266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03538585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02121592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01498307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.902535,0.06151546,0.003969845,0.006933124,0.01859932,0.006447242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5759746,0.2851056,0.02329803,0.03233355,0.07436956,0.008918583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004423517,0.00001926383,0.001163739,0.00008833213,0.00001096529,0.0002142047,0.005309112,0.0002944598,0.0001836067,0.9664285,0.006996209,0.01924748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005073968,0.0001392218,0.003149752,0.001267939,0.0000392289,0.0002171542,0.004748062,0.002304088,0.001210427,0.8684575,0.1183168,0.00009907052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1121942,0.01272022,0.08196475,0.5199133,0.005008623,0.0002904487,0.00008630931,0.0002303557,0.2675919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577655,0.001082162,0.01045774,0.02203556,0.0009864473,0.0001101647,0.00002520949,0.00006070035,0.007476515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211104402","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.7","title":"Time to Get Serious about Privacy Policies: The Special Case of Genetic Privacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Business; Consumer privacy; Privacy by Design; Genetic testing; FTC Fair Information Practice; Relation (database); Project commissioning; Privacy law; Privacy rights; Publishing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Dianne Nicol","is_ca":false},{"name":"Meredith Hagger","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nola M. Ries","is_ca":true},{"name":"John Liddicoat","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03012949440883363,"gpt":0.3106534458376723,"spread":0.2805239514288387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06094357,0.0002952694,0.001036493,0.001531877,0.0148789,0.01925839,0.002559349,0.02354165,0.005886262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07751241,0.0006967245,0.001384292,0.002056034,0.04940148,0.02036989,0.009897172,0.02867036,0.0006442711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02079134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01865418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01442094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9324571,0.03807526,0.00248013,0.004394788,0.01281718,0.009775542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8949807,0.08336484,0.005460409,0.007304141,0.005668715,0.003221205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003338351,0.00002517603,0.001627759,0.00005323366,0.00001604348,0.00191231,0.03157077,0.0002815043,0.0003075346,0.9431912,0.01055581,0.01042519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003547199,0.00008216748,0.003037947,0.001044733,0.00004923196,0.003151592,0.05486014,0.001377991,0.001133167,0.6682248,0.2668808,0.0001220862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09459903,0.004030922,0.02628003,0.7085333,0.000977504,0.0001293758,0.00007482546,0.00007759024,0.1652974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965256,0.001605023,0.008034395,0.07984204,0.0006429995,0.0001145305,0.00003007289,0.00006187905,0.01314352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06094357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3223042,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277183366","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.1.3","title":"Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Prerogative; Constitution; Law; Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); House of Commons; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Eliot Olivier","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06500949117634366,"gpt":0.3562204782157535,"spread":0.2912109870394098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01030834,0.0002236544,0.0003871625,0.00133323,0.0096725,0.008231725,0.001070006,0.002573073,0.007904083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0228266,0.0005829553,0.0003633673,0.001025479,0.01065967,0.002621409,0.008141715,0.004981069,0.0009884862],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01250744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01761567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1724175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3177985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795679,0.01124925,0.0006374938,0.0009864529,0.004286806,0.003272229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784724,0.01046316,0.002473427,0.001235033,0.004898572,0.00245753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004059007,0.0001714689,0.03064675,0.0005008368,0.0001245289,0.001917234,0.06445603,0.001378762,0.007203485,0.8071319,0.02114775,0.06491537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001331804,0.0007410664,0.2970846,0.001546194,0.000217642,0.000755261,0.03917107,0.003111858,0.009082173,0.07007155,0.5776566,0.0004287155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4648952,0.003480405,0.002349973,0.04675453,0.0003581261,0.0001051007,0.0001005743,0.00007061045,0.4818854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545314,0.0006231628,0.0004939136,0.004738139,0.0000875052,0.00005178562,0.00001476641,0.00003330286,0.03942606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1724175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989922706","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19890443","title":"Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Collateral; Legislature; Law; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Political science; Law and economics; Entitlement (fair division); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Economics; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Jules O’Donnell","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06463917718911977,"gpt":0.3983113533893212,"spread":0.3336721762002014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06401256,0.0005704158,0.0014922,0.003789637,0.008627946,0.02286379,0.004981728,0.02389788,0.00719121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09568214,0.0008231029,0.001330954,0.001909333,0.04166842,0.02449005,0.009659276,0.02394124,0.002032748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01551742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0173767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009404047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01471171,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9364735,0.03300328,0.002874651,0.004815275,0.0186589,0.004174399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9019282,0.0677193,0.004004196,0.009207746,0.0151605,0.001980052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001135178,0.000009319519,0.0001264855,0.00002573064,0.00000442796,0.0001811345,0.001238895,0.0001682029,0.000108262,0.9917576,0.003829766,0.002538892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003105771,0.00007311818,0.0005711094,0.0006857981,0.00004104007,0.000271752,0.001610914,0.002292227,0.0009645421,0.8596437,0.1337325,0.00008225736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0516658,0.01200277,0.06381159,0.3155118,0.004580575,0.0002366167,0.0001539173,0.0002449854,0.551792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140642,0.003205992,0.01295974,0.02968294,0.004821686,0.000262885,0.00005713388,0.000217828,0.0347277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06401256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3385348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533621","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231205051","title":"Collective Bargaining in Fissured Work Contexts: An Analysis of Core Challenges and Novel Experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Legislation; Shadow (psychology); Statutory law; Competition (biology); Labour law; Economics; Labour economics; Bargaining power; Industrial relations; Business; Market economy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Management; Microeconomics","authors":[{"name":"Anthony Forsyth","is_ca":true},{"name":"Tess Hardy","is_ca":false},{"name":"Shae McCrystal","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.105711063265105,"gpt":0.3567071814664445,"spread":0.2509961182013395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137196,0.0003550935,0.0006623006,0.0007608272,0.01086427,0.00577909,0.002850762,0.002817998,0.01549776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02181989,0.0002907576,0.0005796109,0.0009225181,0.01501471,0.005043612,0.006895056,0.003921752,0.0009534914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004370888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002551423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003286792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004188188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904481,0.007005921,0.0001271913,0.0007335101,0.0009740398,0.0007112757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732589,0.02182597,0.0009094269,0.001990746,0.0008256218,0.001189401],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005058508,0.001789563,0.00589446,0.0003967401,0.00004264616,0.001306922,0.1400455,0.004102317,0.0023708,0.8103293,0.005233016,0.02798285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003896854,0.001171038,0.01360934,0.0005714815,0.00004303696,0.0005075906,0.2648686,0.02907283,0.002066459,0.597976,0.08958276,0.0001411006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7839325,0.0005854932,0.02310148,0.007810452,0.0002644192,0.0008344268,0.000112393,0.00005160399,0.1833073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858798,0.0001607647,0.005797565,0.0003938185,0.00003510793,0.0005205482,0.00003272949,0.00002411711,0.007155415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01549776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07255709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256397086","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1304100106","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Project commissioning; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Publishing; Ethnology; Law; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Louise Parrott","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1625460854472228,"gpt":0.3382586096723159,"spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02655029,0.0007075628,0.001670481,0.009177238,0.047932,0.02843411,0.007723832,0.0185534,0.008540688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03977298,0.0008958913,0.001504939,0.01240157,0.02912385,0.0071896,0.006450376,0.01788798,0.0003822664],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2577679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5328707,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9626386,0.006066817,0.001129888,0.00236792,0.01039437,0.01740243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589502,0.01418376,0.001059404,0.001138905,0.019805,0.004862727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005419405,0.00004512365,0.002011374,0.0003582069,0.00006245649,0.0003854225,0.02363815,0.0004820415,0.0002340157,0.8744822,0.07683612,0.02141083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011786,0.00005794593,0.02392406,0.002501634,0.0003851855,0.0002154189,0.07396714,0.0006785846,0.0006532958,0.09439795,0.8027202,0.000397449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05139401,0.0636121,0.00101901,0.5155899,0.004479932,0.0001760384,0.0006767825,0.00005798867,0.3629943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7489168,0.0354755,0.003156065,0.1404455,0.002015509,0.0002252423,0.0003116822,0.0001042585,0.06934951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2577679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992013934","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19892363","title":"Withdrawn: Knighthoods and the Order of Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Prime minister; Prime (order theory); Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Combinatorics; Politics; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Greg Taylor","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03412100745467204,"gpt":0.3490452409046103,"spread":0.3149242334499383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002931077,0.0002145442,0.0004046016,0.001026235,0.009087944,0.007582158,0.001091289,0.006497174,0.007144866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030994,0.0003879374,0.0003434074,0.001111455,0.0109396,0.004283117,0.003966388,0.008523549,0.001041284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01051153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02362989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2514191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3070917,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953591,0.001041155,0.0003020554,0.0006225893,0.001792566,0.0008824537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961619,0.001424583,0.000442553,0.0002391811,0.001300302,0.0004313485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001422274,0.00001561557,0.001024314,0.0001298944,0.000007254564,0.0003199065,0.01588144,0.00007855504,0.0002132246,0.9299828,0.0405297,0.01180299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144507,0.00004728233,0.008683383,0.0005737721,0.00001990316,0.0002207183,0.006615477,0.000160929,0.0003021182,0.05561491,0.9277043,0.00004274198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06793264,0.02627703,0.001239729,0.2044204,0.003250918,0.0001096811,0.0002105337,0.00003765873,0.6965213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5744519,0.01145495,0.0007528416,0.05933795,0.001316679,0.00007408395,0.00009202732,0.00003896526,0.3524806],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2514191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4999114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256167964","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.11","title":"Lisa Burton Crawford The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution - Janina Boughey Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Robert French","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05260209595554128,"gpt":0.3407976567241885,"spread":0.2881955607686472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01956553,0.000618276,0.001432757,0.002686864,0.02083883,0.01781134,0.002119055,0.0238674,0.01069988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06342148,0.001480197,0.0006143203,0.003030518,0.02413009,0.01255569,0.004490153,0.03029193,0.001863277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02943947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08836129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5936276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7672815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.986729,0.005154959,0.0007028528,0.001915735,0.003997599,0.001499995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444422,0.03656197,0.001680261,0.001389471,0.01002711,0.005898956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002747163,0.00004414556,0.0005443241,0.0001546933,0.00002096915,0.000111234,0.003287227,0.00009839046,0.00008863832,0.2554834,0.726607,0.01353242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003233125,0.0000174396,0.002499502,0.0008479565,0.00002037287,0.00007459053,0.002879745,0.0002093432,0.0001020763,0.05724846,0.9359803,0.00008807195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001610535,0.05712623,0.0002203768,0.9130197,0.007267372,0.00002217546,0.00003999016,0.00001161483,0.02068208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09534253,0.08126201,0.001287518,0.6349206,0.0161854,0.0001354873,0.00005727955,0.0001229602,0.1706861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4063724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8175313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122253256","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.2.4","title":"Investor-State Arbitration: The Roadmap from the Multilateral Agreement on Investment to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investment protection; International trade; Treaty; Investment (military); Business; General partnership; Multinational corporation; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Political science; International investment; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Razeen Sappideen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ling Ling He","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05175145912435978,"gpt":0.2693442461313393,"spread":0.2175927870069795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02555754,0.0002737457,0.0003840789,0.001768207,0.002862757,0.01175131,0.001928098,0.007543078,0.007311158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02338681,0.0003905804,0.0006259537,0.001926581,0.009185761,0.008537123,0.005907554,0.008939729,0.0006580374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00584883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01450935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01009997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861415,0.006415583,0.0007363053,0.0009346701,0.00459014,0.001181774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983045,0.01143784,0.0009604709,0.001171,0.002685932,0.0006997131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003436427,0.00001173156,0.00009842789,0.00003855094,0.000002162872,0.00005815387,0.0004692269,0.0002500951,0.00003403072,0.9855931,0.003527389,0.009913642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002362744,0.0000677846,0.001681298,0.0007108431,0.0000121672,0.0001563336,0.001164265,0.002163508,0.0003403219,0.5867433,0.4069012,0.00003537001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02604564,0.02688979,0.03518663,0.1673975,0.001253489,0.0002314706,0.00009828863,0.00014859,0.7427486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860932,0.01974051,0.01698627,0.0233562,0.00123751,0.0003169749,0.0001154265,0.00006731353,0.05208663],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02555754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1351628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413961078","doi":"10.1017/fed.2025.4","title":"The Place of Federalism in Deliberative Rights Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Publishing; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Scott Stephenson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01543522068326151,"gpt":0.3318731827753933,"spread":0.3164379620921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02959373,0.0003343516,0.0007515925,0.00311615,0.006373018,0.01041149,0.001839572,0.006282589,0.00566639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02611745,0.0004689783,0.0009931414,0.002129829,0.06295539,0.01099007,0.005444855,0.008091464,0.0004994412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01251277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008148225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006989358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004924386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.970477,0.02249786,0.0005714333,0.001895221,0.002768743,0.00178987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471532,0.04389191,0.002089067,0.00357027,0.002416259,0.0008793657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001337399,0.000002281918,0.00003185563,0.000007421735,0.000001356318,0.000005983578,0.0003042579,0.0001177354,0.000006388235,0.9987243,0.0001594464,0.0006376008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005068872,0.000005003081,0.00008969552,0.00007057114,0.000003538508,0.0000104834,0.0002179012,0.00041628,0.00004584962,0.9894457,0.009685749,0.000004146312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03599092,0.01601208,0.1239122,0.1478728,0.0009742247,0.00007722771,0.0000785158,0.00009311586,0.674989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836833,0.001774595,0.005606608,0.003702545,0.0005343626,0.00008791682,0.00001826181,0.00003059859,0.004561802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02959373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1565084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}