{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":10,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"00046fd87a5c","filters":{"venue":"Fordham law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01760112576162902,"gpt":0.292893257251816,"spread":0.2752921314901869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654429,0.0000587238,0.0001678304,0.000006216686,0.001400406,0.0000305024,0.0001089697,0.00002422191,0.00001643213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002729433,0.00003110844,0.00006123274,0.0002007935,0.002391792,0.00006350349,0.00002980461,0.00004492969,0.000006417164],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002411092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001858276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02817572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0240802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991999,0.0001333009,0.00023191,0.00007324533,0.0002214107,0.0001402897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994503,0.0002197535,0.0001166569,0.00007839115,0.0001075352,0.00002737798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002574264,0.00000409264,0.0001200063,0.00002987684,0.000008143571,1.761609e-7,0.00005644809,8.364359e-7,3.666145e-7,0.9899053,0.007431523,0.002440671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009756926,0.000002864462,0.0001349344,0.0002877993,0.00004712815,7.190589e-7,0.00005074725,6.936963e-7,0.000002415905,0.3233731,0.6759724,0.00002962499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002399348,0.4100663,0.0006894033,0.04526621,0.000330801,0.0007901968,0.000007448469,0.00003000094,0.5425797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346155,0.1615079,0.00004547202,0.00242324,0.0006134269,0.00002371126,0.000005595345,0.000002821185,0.0007623523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146107859","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries: Canada's Response to the Peer-to-Peer Crisis and What it Means for the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Political science; Peer-to-peer; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Fara Tabatabai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02353045452776848,"gpt":0.3322762379614103,"spread":0.3087457834336418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311111,0.00009522164,0.0002036832,0.00001868043,0.0004850116,0.0001278207,0.0003472521,0.00002213201,0.0001147715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001226631,0.00005916065,0.00005569639,0.0004283114,0.0001373209,0.0001653903,0.00003175974,0.00005841911,0.000008189121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001641145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005186316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986771,0.0001699128,0.0002227484,0.0001410244,0.0004907697,0.0002984816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981794,0.0009683227,0.00009332968,0.0002735474,0.000314924,0.0001704978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003759457,0.000003660734,0.000004374241,0.0001042121,0.00001622745,6.601614e-7,0.005667974,0.00005377134,2.82236e-7,0.03402944,0.956558,0.003523731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009994823,0.00002792836,0.00004206041,0.000489697,0.00004315028,0.000001078178,0.001999936,0.00001667175,0.00000919478,0.0001723628,0.9970111,0.00008682684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.004416267,0.02722503,0.00006953414,0.9656585,0.0001017374,0.001232939,0.0009228939,0.000007052803,0.0003660419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08383934,0.1097179,0.0002917084,0.7827219,0.0004535412,0.0003907361,0.00002253673,0.00003210639,0.0225302],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1829366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3730366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493863039","doi":"","title":"Loving Gender Balance: Reframing Identity-Based Inequality Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Supreme court; Identity (music); Inequality; Gender studies; Scholarship; Nationality; Political science; Law; Immigration; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Darren Rosenblum","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08220999882219028,"gpt":0.2827300487934689,"spread":0.2005200499712786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007167282,0.0002550983,0.0005097306,0.00007146823,0.0005897024,0.0001516876,0.0003500716,0.0000620666,0.001063053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004896245,0.000208343,0.0001978829,0.0003843421,0.0001312822,0.001660696,0.0001500145,0.0001843465,0.000874026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003959499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003426465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003090171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004328183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982444,0.00002816073,0.0005522804,0.0003721965,0.0004421639,0.0003607699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998844,0.00003510082,0.0003694689,0.0004992825,0.0002287712,0.00002335971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009920483,0.00008203321,0.006087781,0.01187477,0.000029876,0.0001140361,0.0000193605,0.000003893461,0.00003530609,0.9646957,0.01606132,0.0009860209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000301476,0.000006780315,0.002494624,0.002060006,0.0001129865,0.000008350242,0.00000556458,0.0001546002,0.00001760455,0.05067682,0.9437463,0.0004149365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4910232,0.1427841,0.01242047,0.004393941,0.00392411,0.004232049,0.00002851498,0.002390232,0.3388034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640885,0.004221096,0.0008736795,0.02778338,0.002086676,0.0000667863,0.0001749387,0.0000683116,0.0006366382],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.927685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512866983","doi":"","title":"Foreign Official Immunity and the 'Baseline' Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Doctrine; Law; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Universal jurisdiction; State (computer science); Common law; State immunity; Customary international law; Qualified immunity; International law; Sovereign immunity; Public international law; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Chimène I. Keitner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05194192873920622,"gpt":0.304862104085157,"spread":0.2529201753459508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002754953,0.00008008366,0.0002097954,0.000008796736,0.000673057,0.00003084439,0.0001803018,0.00004412706,0.0006059408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001012262,0.00004973304,0.00009851457,0.0001327218,0.0004708428,0.0001248221,0.00004840044,0.0001122236,0.00003239147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001397757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005192735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01187701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003951477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989307,0.0003810925,0.0002278902,0.0001111589,0.0001706542,0.0001785384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994825,0.00009773068,0.00009912554,0.000180091,0.00007941865,0.00006119863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001447263,0.00001966801,0.00003739881,0.000143725,0.000008956205,6.137589e-7,0.001541884,1.227897e-8,3.352815e-7,0.9623436,0.000775694,0.0351136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002284405,0.00002687268,0.0001067293,0.0003912417,0.00006053707,0.000002058001,0.0001522502,0.000004426283,0.000003552161,0.01855156,0.9803972,0.00007514143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001212547,0.05085095,0.0002897955,0.002643849,0.00013476,0.001296944,0.000004947767,0.00008530889,0.9434809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7547436,0.2335009,0.001253492,0.007665318,0.000646531,0.0002204949,0.00001200337,0.00002745412,0.001930269],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604575688","doi":"","title":"THE PARADOXES OF PRO BONO","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; American exceptionalism; Supreme court; Representation (politics); Legal education; Exceptionalism; Immigration; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Richard Abel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02542627311214324,"gpt":0.3487777984498652,"spread":0.3233515253377219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005987072,0.00004713249,0.0001314127,0.000003285977,0.0004527103,0.00001522799,0.0002205898,0.00002637849,0.0001974866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002659717,0.00002908074,0.00007783742,0.000093355,0.001434802,0.0000537719,0.00001858442,0.00009529287,0.0000422125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007065085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004231948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002523686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993547,0.00006658505,0.0001696916,0.00006478802,0.0001784784,0.0001658088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.0002128652,0.00009219041,0.0001676381,0.00008236356,0.00006129958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[4.458677e-7,0.000006586136,0.00007852219,0.00006694275,0.000003854421,2.741813e-7,0.00002253195,1.53216e-8,0.000003682832,0.9923829,0.002913596,0.00452068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001599297,0.000008128369,0.00002795692,0.0001321822,0.00001440656,0.000001386269,0.00002093744,1.416148e-7,0.00001121472,0.006141909,0.9935849,0.00004082382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008669565,0.02404593,0.00002305529,0.008560845,0.0004131953,0.0003844603,0.00001346416,0.00002536651,0.9656667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598342,0.03209898,0.0005600617,0.003016521,0.0003396845,0.00004540047,0.000003258818,0.000005870922,0.004096005],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5286589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341768213","doi":"","title":"Registered Savings Plans and the Making of Middle Class Canada: Toward a Performative Theory of Tax Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Middle class; Performative utterance; Incentive; Salience (neuroscience); Tax reform; Tax policy; Politics; Tax avoidance; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Political economy; Market economy; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Philipps","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05326405690864237,"gpt":0.2976925660136262,"spread":0.2444285091049838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001153953,0.00007655237,0.0003094032,0.00001386466,0.0001601053,0.000007567588,0.0002403952,0.0000312504,0.0000487134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009803743,0.00004204833,0.00007064623,0.0001529491,0.000797553,0.0001076128,0.00003757023,0.00005836037,0.000001050568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001385243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008055987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8740808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9543572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989104,0.0002903626,0.0002840817,0.00009390476,0.0002159155,0.000205298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990019,0.0003274317,0.0003717854,0.0001946338,0.00005809571,0.00004619596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001796939,0.000002401641,0.00004213269,0.0006826411,0.00001569539,6.980051e-7,0.004419934,1.968443e-8,0.000002131634,0.9713855,0.0136842,0.009746689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002695779,0.00001365576,0.0003953234,0.004265592,0.0000270393,0.000003403255,0.0003808083,4.392699e-7,0.00001755612,0.007396082,0.9871598,0.00007075334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02218902,0.1207165,0.0001765381,0.4480267,0.0003122139,0.002965524,0.00427162,0.00003324353,0.4013087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717127,0.01500968,0.00002059159,0.01083748,0.00008020242,0.0000168658,5.204159e-7,0.000005933177,0.002315998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2938617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121630146","doi":"","title":"Outsourcing Immigration Compliance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Deportation; Government (linguistics); Outsourcing; Nationality; Political science; Population; Compliance (psychology); Immigration policy; Business; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Eleanor Brown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1354968263526254,"gpt":0.4655588366139104,"spread":0.330062010261285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003937744,0.0001222032,0.0003373355,0.00001259318,0.0006977157,0.000004108143,0.0001055258,0.00004594431,0.0003448662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000455464,0.00009270455,0.00008517104,0.0001281909,0.00002046625,0.0001049706,0.00003201851,0.0002009228,0.0007998658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000436764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001822382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001126583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001777105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988375,0.0001388379,0.0004222199,0.0001657048,0.0001342067,0.0003015748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993897,0.00006975908,0.0001590607,0.0002330477,0.0000969668,0.00005148026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001600086,0.00008946413,0.01181345,0.008279093,0.00004458322,0.00000741418,0.001026859,9.050315e-7,0.00007468451,0.540112,0.3461114,0.09242422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001588533,0.00005388918,0.007503415,0.009104931,0.00003451135,7.060926e-7,0.00004788693,0.000005887239,0.000003700989,0.002348217,0.9806182,0.0001198414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004414329,0.318686,0.00219566,0.1296682,0.001234596,0.004327508,0.00002136128,0.0006892433,0.5387631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7357366,0.112464,0.0008493904,0.1358328,0.0009269289,0.0003441213,0.000098857,0.00004184326,0.01370538],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7313223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867839040","doi":"","title":"The Preservation Obligation: Regulating and Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation in Federal Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Sanctions; Law; Obligation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Summary judgment; Pension; Misconduct; Civil procedure; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"A. Benjamin Spencer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0541456604935297,"gpt":0.3211354572521745,"spread":0.2669897967586448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001535986,0.00006329158,0.0001242956,0.00001354662,0.00100682,0.0001214615,0.00008118334,0.00004886973,0.00002960849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003657465,0.00004930303,0.00002508269,0.000262599,0.00009890999,0.00088741,0.00001774402,0.00007291661,0.000004161991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006353315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006170689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02235077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02165016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989834,0.0001770336,0.0003230328,0.0001313452,0.0002257155,0.000159498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994622,0.0000798933,0.0002052493,0.0000872582,0.0001274684,0.00003793654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007407794,0.00001122582,0.01792337,0.0005523733,0.000005964164,2.818223e-7,0.004759778,0.000002227981,0.000006396697,0.9568833,0.0004976984,0.01934998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003428711,0.00007034854,0.1035962,0.006188187,0.00002945682,0.000002928249,0.001225833,0.0002836727,0.00008548907,0.1285368,0.7593337,0.0003044616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2752345,0.1161855,0.001610846,0.02042083,0.001515452,0.005661617,0.000005178116,0.0003422792,0.5790238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922109,0.006567208,0.0001794882,0.0003563285,0.0002395228,0.00008104728,0.000005718301,0.000006128136,0.0003536201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122171275","doi":"","title":"“Natural Born” Disputes in the 2016 Presidential Election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Presidential system; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Presidential election; Judicial review; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Derek T. Muller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01510593303282512,"gpt":0.3169053765679362,"spread":0.3017994435351111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131288,0.000078546,0.0001776396,0.00001400379,0.0002944822,0.00006701153,0.000289588,0.00004314887,0.0001694668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003142641,0.00003624051,0.00007927073,0.0002799485,0.0001250812,0.0004338752,0.00002065597,0.00007489434,0.0001330172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004689308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000942229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02011974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03285254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987532,0.0002999006,0.0002351946,0.0001514516,0.0003127438,0.0002474784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.0001454346,0.0000947027,0.00013486,0.00006201965,0.00003516069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001039359,0.00006013163,0.000750286,0.0008564473,0.00001737601,0.000008630008,0.001173424,3.445384e-8,0.0001317876,0.8060776,0.09676319,0.09415068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008406537,0.00001756225,0.000662114,0.00199372,0.0000145878,0.000001810368,0.00003727345,1.29006e-7,0.00002442987,0.005450635,0.9916354,0.00007825861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00959298,0.5416978,0.0003856738,0.08706914,0.003200443,0.003850947,0.00001477894,0.0002513659,0.3539369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544837,0.04112944,0.000009324731,0.00160808,0.0007675614,0.0000740808,0.000001251249,0.000006553442,0.001919998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125849290","doi":"","title":"Defining “Accidents” in the Air: Why Tort Law Principles Are Essential to Interpret the Montreal Convention’s “Accident” Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Accident (philosophy); Convention; Political science; Liability; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alexa West","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817534232558286,"gpt":0.33468242059449,"spread":0.3065070782689071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992668,0.0001276525,0.0002007611,0.00002215519,0.0004436287,0.0001096198,0.0008557266,0.0000448479,0.0003928068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004040353,0.00006515955,0.0001688014,0.0001603391,0.0001113363,0.0003781067,0.0001455766,0.00008412219,0.0002325044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001960755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005168301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01625833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2494765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979164,0.0004253399,0.0004671675,0.0002396897,0.0006733367,0.0002780909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990267,0.0002409884,0.0001816971,0.0003564719,0.0001380487,0.00005612322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007485745,0.00003175822,0.001881955,0.00003606869,0.00001553153,0.000004401476,0.0006736001,0.000001298901,0.000003753272,0.9889042,0.006252697,0.002187253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001747965,0.00002943258,0.00470232,0.003127085,0.0000376459,0.000002791412,0.0002381579,0.000001337409,0.00004041846,0.01169458,0.979826,0.000125475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03686804,0.02365222,0.001945046,0.3696708,0.003315842,0.006430867,0.00008405001,0.0002306207,0.5578026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780721,0.004113414,0.00004844882,0.01612998,0.0002742006,0.0002590944,0.00001279108,0.00001113433,0.001078848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}