{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":10,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"00046fd87a5c","filters":{"venue":"Fordham law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Ran Hirschl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01760112576162902,"gpt":0.292893257251816,"spread":0.2752921314901869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01033963,0.000302635,0.0005840331,0.001729514,0.004778366,0.01552109,0.001394513,0.005187904,0.009167557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01254264,0.0004194793,0.0005035167,0.001332385,0.02208352,0.01129098,0.005839294,0.01044977,0.00122083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007374547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006244256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004156463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004846263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896525,0.003797993,0.0006687327,0.001959934,0.002663854,0.001257081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937179,0.003010446,0.00049703,0.001482514,0.0008949125,0.0003970446],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002481985,0.000003491222,0.00002356962,0.000008089976,0.000001299263,0.00001730569,0.000288369,0.00004540843,0.00005588683,0.9930011,0.003512613,0.00304048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002700574,0.00001812142,0.0003985356,0.0001533966,0.000007425749,0.00006836183,0.0003682539,0.0002950638,0.0002429447,0.5167427,0.4816574,0.00002081673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845717,0.02242402,0.01365239,0.08234651,0.004123433,0.00006591559,0.0001191751,0.0001488017,0.8586626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7260042,0.01225514,0.008172647,0.03112308,0.008721947,0.0002964958,0.0002555064,0.0002394328,0.2129315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01552109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05468184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146107859","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries: Canada's Response to the Peer-to-Peer Crisis and What it Means for the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Political science; Peer-to-peer; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Fara Tabatabai","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02353045452776848,"gpt":0.3322762379614103,"spread":0.3087457834336418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00467788,0.000542998,0.0005937557,0.001882603,0.04308034,0.02739452,0.002789414,0.015315,0.009618241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01648474,0.0004010467,0.0005868454,0.003814331,0.02210539,0.008713806,0.006603774,0.01685077,0.0005805068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08917567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2581218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9914591,0.001428975,0.0001237958,0.0004873151,0.002265004,0.004235828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905087,0.001520187,0.0002972473,0.0002343365,0.003555874,0.003883655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008118409,0.00006127336,0.004734019,0.0001244632,0.00004565973,0.0007267384,0.02165451,0.0006451917,0.0002545054,0.541983,0.3974464,0.03224308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007976862,0.00004025054,0.01186509,0.0007192642,0.00008894666,0.0001538804,0.1112038,0.0007138404,0.0004370878,0.07497749,0.799473,0.0002476284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02817406,0.009696188,0.000829779,0.8450697,0.002652773,0.00003870258,0.0002052381,0.00004605742,0.1132875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6893119,0.009602135,0.001476234,0.2213806,0.0008192036,0.00007677679,0.0001408478,0.0001505541,0.07704176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08917567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6470178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493863039","doi":"","title":"Loving Gender Balance: Reframing Identity-Based Inequality Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Supreme court; Identity (music); Inequality; Gender studies; Scholarship; Nationality; Political science; Law; Immigration; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Darren Rosenblum","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08220999882219028,"gpt":0.2827300487934689,"spread":0.2005200499712786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006157717,0.0005187737,0.0003465262,0.001329326,0.008332172,0.007859041,0.002521083,0.007507533,0.01097391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075425,0.0002956875,0.0006348971,0.0005806825,0.01951392,0.007908234,0.008277091,0.008491825,0.001086878],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004651506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005873079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01030083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02239778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940626,0.00193183,0.0001656757,0.000787019,0.001552353,0.001500505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974597,0.001447328,0.0002052101,0.0002529016,0.0003305449,0.0003043111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001184088,0.000027942,0.0003113001,0.0000260414,0.000003963944,0.0002308667,0.006134389,0.0001905961,0.0003653967,0.9665191,0.009701705,0.01647674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004161568,0.0001113012,0.001592409,0.0006263982,0.00003274524,0.0004339006,0.01914033,0.001078355,0.00157034,0.5687507,0.4065755,0.00004632984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03635062,0.005689612,0.03285211,0.1176531,0.002632575,0.0001484774,0.00007046695,0.000211764,0.8043913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728251,0.001866348,0.0109079,0.04536141,0.001142874,0.0002722449,0.0000459338,0.0001732605,0.0674049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01097391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03671134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512866983","doi":"","title":"Foreign Official Immunity and the 'Baseline' Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Doctrine; Law; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Universal jurisdiction; State (computer science); Common law; State immunity; Customary international law; Qualified immunity; International law; Sovereign immunity; Public international law; Constitution","authors":[{"name":"Chimène I. Keitner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05194192873920622,"gpt":0.304862104085157,"spread":0.2529201753459508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975283,0.0002875907,0.0009217686,0.00171975,0.005888958,0.005367426,0.002081589,0.00456645,0.02050413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03411491,0.0002918983,0.0005964149,0.001669499,0.007353525,0.008203387,0.005173998,0.00737023,0.001552506],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005084242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004799037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01342356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009520525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895285,0.004045824,0.0004919426,0.002072025,0.001938854,0.00192299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916633,0.003612938,0.0007374902,0.001614726,0.001796904,0.0005745574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001774062,0.0000207856,0.0008338406,0.00003439833,0.000004848341,0.0001293656,0.0008215757,0.0001047339,0.00002544745,0.9817585,0.006071459,0.0101773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007036372,0.00009424033,0.00434292,0.0003540414,0.00002617668,0.001030992,0.005194257,0.001048132,0.0002707678,0.803091,0.1844517,0.00002544944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07936367,0.003578512,0.02482327,0.0728157,0.001397259,0.0001016587,0.0004116862,0.0001742058,0.817334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553836,0.0008455865,0.003178404,0.008589763,0.0004587769,0.0001244205,0.0002334206,0.00005407041,0.03113199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06859308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604575688","doi":"","title":"THE PARADOXES OF PRO BONO","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; American exceptionalism; Supreme court; Representation (politics); Legal education; Exceptionalism; Immigration; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Richard Abel","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02542627311214324,"gpt":0.3487777984498652,"spread":0.3233515253377219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01657467,0.0006707257,0.001124898,0.002322698,0.007237963,0.01220726,0.002194517,0.01354161,0.02258922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05344367,0.0006131276,0.0007897019,0.002380747,0.02474077,0.01492012,0.004926634,0.01923477,0.004017455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01031201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005997944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00641948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006547405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892608,0.00419621,0.0002752998,0.00194855,0.002827937,0.001491226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724692,0.01712293,0.002213176,0.001828455,0.003081519,0.003284699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003929162,0.00002365466,0.0003316799,0.00003156385,0.000009066069,0.0000705676,0.0004126513,0.0002524278,0.00002514244,0.9499018,0.04020386,0.008698289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000426193,0.000012423,0.0006155689,0.0001526724,0.000005455935,0.00009139626,0.0003799495,0.0005289721,0.00004855264,0.8855931,0.1125047,0.00002450947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01485412,0.01535059,0.005528145,0.6143195,0.002953422,0.00004337394,0.0002712623,0.0001364542,0.3465432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195897,0.01139476,0.003038104,0.221088,0.01071117,0.0002335498,0.0001338202,0.0004141619,0.03339678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02258922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08765626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341768213","doi":"","title":"Registered Savings Plans and the Making of Middle Class Canada: Toward a Performative Theory of Tax Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Middle class; Performative utterance; Incentive; Salience (neuroscience); Tax reform; Tax policy; Politics; Tax avoidance; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Political economy; Market economy; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Philipps","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05326405690864237,"gpt":0.2976925660136262,"spread":0.2444285091049838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006423497,0.0003046972,0.000349392,0.003739811,0.01677297,0.01328395,0.002101544,0.002907187,0.004213219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008528426,0.0003301719,0.0003435323,0.004519919,0.02064648,0.003291604,0.002226614,0.004187464,0.0002936199],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1579106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.248738,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925206,0.001706576,0.0001206013,0.0004153741,0.002854332,0.00238269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955093,0.001057869,0.0003219494,0.0002213749,0.002176308,0.0007132215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006367158,0.0000111495,0.001087058,0.00006584493,0.00000852932,0.00004637208,0.005013716,0.0003734988,0.00004699375,0.9589872,0.01793432,0.01641891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000248317,0.00001758666,0.0150109,0.0009769185,0.00004764725,0.00005266083,0.01937166,0.0009982769,0.0003813998,0.1571567,0.805888,0.00007337986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05822813,0.06148081,0.004695806,0.2392247,0.0008967447,0.0001214868,0.0003166329,0.00007536716,0.6349604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196552,0.02628218,0.00177408,0.0134361,0.0002510176,0.00004061802,0.00009978554,0.0000523067,0.03840869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1579106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121630146","doi":"","title":"Outsourcing Immigration Compliance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Deportation; Government (linguistics); Outsourcing; Nationality; Political science; Population; Compliance (psychology); Immigration policy; Business; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Eleanor Brown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1354968263526254,"gpt":0.4655588366139104,"spread":0.330062010261285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007607647,0.0004121377,0.0002410449,0.001164805,0.008071156,0.004999415,0.001767335,0.001566996,0.04141602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922855,0.0003755544,0.0005194006,0.001886552,0.002435772,0.002216619,0.01177131,0.002599538,0.004976768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006678924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04205754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02405697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03362873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877358,0.003635716,0.0007058433,0.0008635418,0.002276942,0.004782036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856666,0.002690379,0.002078791,0.00289554,0.002763085,0.003905648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001493883,0.002142741,0.1492929,0.0004785882,0.00004768365,0.002025882,0.03346157,0.002990619,0.002058475,0.1760213,0.08262306,0.5487078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002111727,0.001214121,0.2371186,0.001476075,0.00009519496,0.002414009,0.1166559,0.009425125,0.007481683,0.03735694,0.5864256,0.0001255747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4059892,0.0004503216,0.01092426,0.02649209,0.0004461221,0.0009668994,0.0003607036,0.0005853484,0.553785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357017,0.0005086096,0.005603041,0.003116093,0.0001281753,0.0003329594,0.0002869832,0.00006461406,0.0542578],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04141602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1385504,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867839040","doi":"","title":"The Preservation Obligation: Regulating and Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation in Federal Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Sanctions; Law; Obligation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Summary judgment; Pension; Misconduct; Civil procedure; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"A. Benjamin Spencer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0541456604935297,"gpt":0.3211354572521745,"spread":0.2669897967586448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02950058,0.0003645979,0.0006212519,0.003008888,0.01439929,0.01920536,0.004284024,0.01584211,0.002331704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0520549,0.00103178,0.0008239811,0.002285556,0.01859277,0.01137848,0.007330422,0.009008199,0.0006191066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01461671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0258315,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04710994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06786127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9605086,0.01093001,0.002901116,0.004540417,0.01162595,0.009493861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546468,0.02603339,0.004878351,0.006540605,0.006062938,0.001837868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004185564,0.00008654843,0.005341801,0.00004764926,0.00002407068,0.0006476549,0.006679111,0.001085822,0.001257167,0.9453136,0.01046624,0.02900857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529024,0.0005387631,0.03474587,0.001483213,0.0003595989,0.001501328,0.01164517,0.01428362,0.01329303,0.722559,0.1988851,0.0005523636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.343368,0.005162111,0.08316518,0.08909173,0.0006825147,0.0005546879,0.0001764526,0.0007499814,0.4770493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791326,0.0004525738,0.005294776,0.006787497,0.0003655129,0.0001153998,0.00003542974,0.00004351874,0.00777271],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04710994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1560158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122171275","doi":"","title":"“Natural Born” Disputes in the 2016 Presidential Election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Presidential system; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Presidential election; Judicial review; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Derek T. Muller","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01510593303282512,"gpt":0.3169053765679362,"spread":0.3017994435351111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03100173,0.0003103311,0.0008082653,0.0009000744,0.02751925,0.01431011,0.001880786,0.01478006,0.004402116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03657311,0.0007826978,0.0007833384,0.001077374,0.009983908,0.006256624,0.005826649,0.01628142,0.0009223441],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01185472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01138585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05803461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1359361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9759926,0.01091575,0.001492595,0.002633855,0.003773713,0.005191496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837793,0.01101421,0.001111683,0.000737246,0.002050809,0.001306851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000500003,0.0000638893,0.002120403,0.00007503873,0.00001506733,0.001540574,0.02288727,0.0001888616,0.0004248295,0.9134718,0.04946448,0.009697776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001037826,0.0001274604,0.0096304,0.0004122455,0.0000567799,0.0007137188,0.02527041,0.0007527041,0.001632427,0.08820695,0.8729028,0.0001903252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2258293,0.01268437,0.005513567,0.1930397,0.006374756,0.0002189708,0.000289486,0.0001000033,0.5559499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815802,0.00226194,0.001700929,0.04785701,0.002156395,0.0001563731,0.0000897128,0.00006627845,0.06413109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05803461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1639548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125849290","doi":"","title":"Defining “Accidents” in the Air: Why Tort Law Principles Are Essential to Interpret the Montreal Convention’s “Accident” Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Accident (philosophy); Convention; Political science; Liability; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Alexa West","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817534232558286,"gpt":0.33468242059449,"spread":0.3065070782689071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01124317,0.0005874066,0.0004603557,0.001547137,0.007661893,0.009769912,0.00284844,0.007294997,0.002898437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01475877,0.0005943213,0.0005621773,0.001147101,0.03592191,0.01027247,0.003486082,0.01291773,0.0004842553],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01941966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02839462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4044602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3562423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906376,0.003640767,0.0004220112,0.0009664069,0.00302199,0.001311205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923044,0.004126463,0.0006183774,0.000447602,0.002229598,0.0002734989],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001080752,0.000001998441,0.000087464,0.000009604975,0.000001157006,0.00001612587,0.0009823345,0.0001154795,0.00002843842,0.9929061,0.004629775,0.001220519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001964594,0.00001912013,0.002135003,0.0003197207,0.00001547307,0.00008705856,0.00309801,0.0009310131,0.0003771805,0.6618787,0.3310527,0.00006642486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03114722,0.0341107,0.06911826,0.4129902,0.003169547,0.0001196497,0.0002706007,0.0001581085,0.4489158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86533,0.0124735,0.01494976,0.06349442,0.002492855,0.0001858609,0.0001358156,0.0001487467,0.04078894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4044602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.804212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}