{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":73,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":73,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"4f09bd179a34","filters":{"venue":"Games and Economic Behavior"}},"results":[{"id":"W2079729086","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.001","title":"Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Sowing; Workforce; Labour economics; Economics; Tree planting; Agricultural economics; Business; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Agroforestry; Agronomy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1169760867892088,"gpt":0.3320611405103499,"spread":0.2150850537211411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002096487,0.0001777926,0.0002883889,0.00004219713,0.0006433238,0.0001034402,0.000127991,0.00007982706,0.0002980065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002348796,0.0001914218,0.0000504043,0.0000267205,0.0006271241,0.0005747796,0.0002054888,0.0000963162,0.00004518143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002307621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007635086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0178206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003557034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987854,0.00004759465,0.0002415029,0.0005347585,0.00006679889,0.0003238964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999449,0.00008426366,0.0000995717,0.0001971071,0.0000131162,0.0001569072],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001982347,0.00008247991,0.941102,0.000002305852,0.00001955431,0.00001124652,0.03575823,0.000001047082,0.002990905,0.0001525999,0.0005936073,0.01926621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004146446,0.00007606036,0.9708378,0.00005882636,0.00005532996,0.00001388096,0.01358994,0.00001553861,0.003904211,0.00009006364,0.01041148,0.0005321888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920303,0.005853585,0.000003039861,0.0006605995,0.0004009233,0.0003644483,0.0000335148,0.00004866521,0.000604983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944634,0.002442956,0.000864057,0.00004645631,0.0002184677,0.0001874737,0.000001987768,0.00001723631,0.001757898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02973584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001380691","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2012.04.005","title":"Favoritism in asymmetric contests: Head starts and handicaps","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Ex-ante; Head (geology); Microeconomics; Economics; Head start; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Biology; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04002395329903929,"gpt":0.3312649387049365,"spread":0.2912409854058972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003583114,0.0001215236,0.0002422391,0.0001202507,0.0002133264,0.00008910884,0.00007096116,0.0000823431,0.0001023873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001317786,0.0001368952,0.00003052413,0.00004638709,0.0003214692,0.0004646666,0.00008651312,0.00009108459,0.00004384885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002466803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002866724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01024392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990524,0.00003858292,0.0002311424,0.0002203594,0.00003817506,0.0004193439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995908,0.00005308602,0.00006376661,0.00008588955,0.000005678682,0.0002007619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004259663,0.00007302434,0.9557073,0.000002399098,0.000003794617,0.000002137013,0.005282202,6.564819e-8,0.00004785512,0.005299131,0.0001686048,0.03340925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007519005,0.00005723962,0.9638987,0.00001738262,0.00002637886,0.000006930462,0.01203411,0.000003445638,0.0001443867,0.0001592524,0.02260495,0.0002953577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861861,0.00625511,4.815026e-7,0.0002889069,0.0004180926,0.000267422,0.00002483421,0.00002464562,0.006534352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972047,0.0019377,0.0001310394,0.00008349375,0.0001249243,0.00008744257,0.000003110333,0.00001144766,0.0004161639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03311389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060835352","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0847","title":"Player Types and Self-Impression Management in Dictatorship Games: Two Experiments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Dictatorship; Impression management; Impression; Social psychology; Psychology; Observer (physics); Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03520154320108555,"gpt":0.3401651325124612,"spread":0.3049635893113756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002030527,0.0001589039,0.0002176867,0.00009241295,0.0002185718,0.0001093986,0.0001159623,0.00006793097,0.0002236175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001873312,0.0001663227,0.00003242121,0.00003542792,0.000159742,0.0002871456,0.0001632422,0.00007421186,0.00004411424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002506152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000165039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003126368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998953,0.00004239073,0.0002470289,0.0003682794,0.0000534253,0.0003358622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996425,0.00002186396,0.00007102559,0.0001280884,0.000005148434,0.0001313984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003309479,0.0002431697,0.9483258,0.000006828262,0.0000285928,0.00003219897,0.01810012,0.000003120343,0.0002630443,0.003363472,0.0002215463,0.02937902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004569913,0.0002032587,0.8476764,0.0001103375,0.0002006561,0.0000203715,0.07376216,0.0001372632,0.001449736,0.0008417996,0.06972831,0.001299815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848901,0.001342361,4.747204e-7,0.0001390394,0.0002772524,0.0003822524,0.000005662371,0.00005005744,0.01291278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946225,0.003826198,0.0003124489,0.00007130148,0.00006594689,0.0001890282,0.000002591842,0.00001593672,0.0008940187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1006494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6782443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122501643","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.009","title":"Belief updating and the demand for information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Stanford University","keywords":"Certainty; Value of information; Value (mathematics); Explanatory power; Subjective expected utility; Quality (philosophy); Information quality; Yield (engineering); Aptitude; Econometrics; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Information system; Mathematics; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07985142296356297,"gpt":0.3751320584919505,"spread":0.2952806355283876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065348,0.0001117786,0.0002699511,0.00007002683,0.0008737682,0.002276793,0.0004606016,0.00006870666,0.00006482762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004391158,0.00006985663,0.00008196886,0.00001078155,0.0003003883,0.001224376,0.0002432523,0.00006877789,0.00008702371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001951521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002441116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001269168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001113243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989504,0.00002072491,0.0005374094,0.0002463259,0.000079433,0.0001657297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983482,0.0004668882,0.0005009619,0.0005642631,0.00004652394,0.00007317832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004744775,0.000006351392,0.02875064,0.00000141113,0.000003477616,2.356764e-7,0.0003640444,0.000007805599,0.000003280965,0.004236968,0.001237118,0.9653412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00662735,0.0001512561,0.7018485,0.00003496517,0.0001921299,0.0000824637,0.005007404,0.01002366,0.00009035452,0.08372583,0.19162,0.0005960847],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960255,0.00006546203,0.000189339,0.001033083,0.0005170443,0.0003332055,0.0000627376,0.00001095628,0.001762656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986387,0.00006709639,0.0006860004,0.0001780603,0.00008304654,0.00007058401,0.000003905475,0.000005994514,0.0002665345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166717043","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2007.02.002","title":"Iterated strict dominance in general games","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; University of Hong Kong; National Science Council","keywords":"Iterated function; Risk dominance; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Spurious relationship; Best response; Class (philosophy); Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Dominance (genetics); Stochastic game; Correlated equilibrium; Set (abstract data type); Repeated game; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06196810361513819,"gpt":0.3641725447113662,"spread":0.302204441096228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001704473,0.0001050179,0.000208172,0.0001711947,0.00006446635,0.0001387169,0.0002530317,0.00006368183,0.0005280256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004951938,0.00008827922,0.00004709739,0.0001648429,0.00009313449,0.0001991987,0.00005950567,0.00009059228,0.0002941856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003869289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002268986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009640385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002682405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987734,0.00004003663,0.0004981199,0.0003690019,0.00007669471,0.000242727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.0002684193,0.0001209077,0.0003061792,0.00002110866,0.00008981977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009014158,0.0001286856,0.4010433,0.000001605888,0.000004322605,0.00002076136,0.0007642342,0.0001253178,0.003113421,0.01650586,0.001812695,0.5763897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004400969,0.00002565631,0.9684088,0.000004535778,0.000007798556,0.0000183738,0.0004276679,0.0003507286,0.001553215,0.003971171,0.02463388,0.0001580312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997133,0.0001583148,0.0002393361,0.0001523763,0.000151596,0.0001636148,0.00002424497,0.00001599991,0.001961498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952636,0.00003761744,0.0004464372,0.00009971525,0.00007046555,0.00003323889,0.000003462183,0.000006654945,0.004038833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5762316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130074778","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.009","title":"Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Nash equilibrium; Artificial intelligence; Hierarchy; Introspection; Machine learning; Best response; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Psychology; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03816341690090207,"gpt":0.3447611536448273,"spread":0.3065977367439253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003839918,0.0002460827,0.0004066403,0.0001007742,0.001592745,0.0005108203,0.0004717936,0.0001784234,0.0002882083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005542468,0.0002833857,0.0001024639,0.00001888765,0.0007709621,0.0005984919,0.0003104592,0.0002079221,0.00006895125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004522737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006459357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03881331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03585371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998278,0.00004727177,0.0004672504,0.0005634725,0.00008027057,0.0005637495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989843,0.00006635587,0.0003105118,0.0004630848,0.00002149832,0.0001542596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001008823,0.00011243,0.9767314,0.000003236533,0.000008150703,0.00004778454,0.004307934,0.000005841323,0.0007426104,0.00106081,0.00003418706,0.01693554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001099436,0.0001143953,0.978943,0.00004147394,0.0001123889,0.000009234534,0.01474818,0.00008053461,0.0007465472,0.0001575343,0.003327693,0.000619544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862179,0.0003485054,1.888908e-7,0.00021675,0.0005611909,0.0006020546,0.0000540994,0.00007679134,0.01192254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968253,0.0003134509,0.00007484076,0.00003747765,0.0001632133,0.0002883608,0.000008143981,0.00003233294,0.002256845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.016316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068852191","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2008.08.001","title":"Truthful mechanism design for multidimensional scheduling via cycle monotonicity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism design; Context (archaeology); Monotonic function; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Job shop scheduling; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1118839606777365,"gpt":0.3422649103141397,"spread":0.2303809496364032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007480073,0.000107945,0.0001971102,0.00007204289,0.000447134,0.0000352008,0.0001539704,0.00007332306,0.0003955381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005536831,0.00009375701,0.00009602241,0.00004478168,0.0001044057,0.0002030691,0.00005054827,0.00006388482,0.0002484197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003053946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004324801,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002082985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003446524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989247,0.00003986281,0.0003678441,0.0004079526,0.00008516324,0.000174435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990192,0.0004232013,0.0001454523,0.000259803,0.00004275158,0.0001095577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006779263,0.001038271,0.01689719,0.00001118371,0.0001087827,0.00001699157,0.003598027,0.04495595,0.05008186,0.513711,0.005096431,0.3638064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003826947,0.0003658413,0.05684764,0.00001415658,0.0001655612,0.0005090606,0.002086386,0.4480674,0.07905725,0.3796852,0.02807993,0.001294609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6973123,0.00003164948,0.3019772,0.0001379142,0.000155549,0.0002993055,0.00002677572,0.00002395619,0.00003535583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523813,0.00001684556,0.0464239,0.000085115,0.00007353784,0.0002425923,0.000003506465,0.00001014886,0.0007631159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4031115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4330864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992428101","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.06.002","title":"Equilibrium joining probabilities for an M/G/1 queue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Queue; Join (topology); Poisson distribution; Computer science; Service (business); Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Phenomenon; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Combinatorics; Computer network; Physics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02382778392177146,"gpt":0.2538317663166927,"spread":0.2300039823949212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002990221,0.000134219,0.0001939651,0.00009477479,0.0001008185,0.0002518366,0.0001331543,0.00006227897,0.0002685749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000355404,0.0001331421,0.00007296331,0.00002962279,0.00008932195,0.001295662,0.00007996357,0.00009450858,0.00004324126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001334059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001112658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006665694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992353,0.000003283948,0.0002083809,0.0003030532,0.00002441963,0.0002256108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995529,0.00003403998,0.0001230947,0.0002426339,0.00002903816,0.00001831154],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002698686,0.0003625076,0.2018194,0.000442902,0.0001060514,0.000005526997,0.0006620909,0.001327641,0.04080661,0.5533827,0.002340108,0.1984746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004982031,0.0002786612,0.07638751,0.0001069441,0.002031235,0.00004910411,0.006518475,0.1415639,0.003166471,0.2705508,0.4903357,0.004029186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975969,0.00001553455,0.0001060937,0.0001815374,0.0004131028,0.0002516381,0.000009002064,0.0001043777,0.001321856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966732,0.000001289576,0.001235286,0.0002944451,0.0009730907,0.0001539581,0.0000287784,0.00002961941,0.0006102925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4879956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5429379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015123404","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.09.002","title":"A new stable and more responsive cost sharing solution for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost sharing; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Spanning tree; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Steiner tree problem; Point (geometry); Fixed point; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Tree (set theory); Fixed cost; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1011134267664863,"gpt":0.2579126111951641,"spread":0.1567991844286778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451153,0.0001929903,0.000429008,0.0001534767,0.0001670757,0.000123149,0.0001382386,0.0001257502,0.0001700902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002864536,0.0002288505,0.00007575017,0.00003659059,0.00006757738,0.0003212061,0.00008791148,0.00009924088,0.00005998776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009138962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002390099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001187181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002025712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.000009640074,0.0005400589,0.0005456281,0.00001139726,0.0003883801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992039,0.00005007958,0.0003277164,0.0002415635,0.00001379613,0.0001629383],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005091287,0.0001514597,0.7892206,0.0002518579,0.0001498527,0.000007667648,0.01611249,0.00005020901,0.000562947,0.1242051,0.002636502,0.06614218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009652747,0.001060459,0.7989103,0.0004758727,0.0002908937,0.0001981099,0.004910011,0.03203953,0.001014112,0.03431657,0.1144143,0.002717119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913492,0.001259688,0.003235837,0.0001148744,0.0004536766,0.001131465,0.0002092011,0.00004632905,0.002199797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919244,0.0000930333,0.001662839,0.00005295375,0.0001417832,0.0003003777,0.00001913737,0.00003983474,0.005765642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1117778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9332251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564276048","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002","title":"A note on testing guilt aversion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Inequity aversion; Psychology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05590318872847355,"gpt":0.325242575661796,"spread":0.2693393869333225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000167827,0.0001035923,0.0001415913,0.00004133862,0.0003325022,0.00005014102,0.0001633688,0.00006298625,0.0002895808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004703321,0.00008346317,0.00004138052,0.00001851038,0.0002312303,0.0001824146,0.0001325264,0.00004032571,0.0004328423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003296752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004019689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002131698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008302532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992645,0.0000214397,0.0001570041,0.0002636469,0.00003831178,0.0002550955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995325,0.0001024581,0.00007011615,0.0001799173,0.00001091638,0.0001041038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003586448,0.0001173081,0.5925108,0.000003129999,0.0000106828,0.0000104367,0.005052509,0.000001373957,0.01169122,0.009530042,0.003305076,0.3777315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004948576,0.001169593,0.7121682,0.0003490534,0.0002324756,0.00001995272,0.01536935,0.00004954141,0.01853902,0.003901416,0.2407625,0.002490307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778146,0.00004824445,0.000001738092,0.001352189,0.000388795,0.0001650768,0.00002026784,0.00005320951,0.02015587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971881,0.0001408423,0.000471412,0.0001053293,0.0001420561,0.00004179928,6.01275e-7,0.00001131296,0.001898563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3752412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5563456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144085792","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.09.009","title":"Reinterpreting mixed strategy equilibria: a unification of the classical and Bayesian views","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Unification; Bayesian game; Strategy; Interpretation (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Nash equilibrium; Von Neumann architecture; Type (biology); Computer science; Repeated game; Game theory; Statistics; Pure mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.083668316898636,"gpt":0.3487462139057993,"spread":0.2650778970071633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006093879,0.00007352485,0.0001588072,0.00003470838,0.00008666724,0.00009173953,0.0002335223,0.00004915429,0.00008873259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005065787,0.00004827738,0.00005298511,0.00006174597,0.000230077,0.0001232684,0.00009131441,0.00007184022,0.00002146193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000183298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003670737,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002558488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009478649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991348,0.0000602333,0.0003854307,0.0002547926,0.00006436053,0.0001003602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992633,0.0001326531,0.0001877032,0.0003429805,0.00001724565,0.00005607685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005819377,0.0001859422,0.04453237,0.00001339282,0.0000187095,0.000001212648,0.002307906,0.0003914347,0.05839125,0.3758378,0.0005624039,0.5176994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009913925,0.0001411209,0.835775,0.00006368867,0.0001099092,0.00006463681,0.00409045,0.0025648,0.009454582,0.1377137,0.008694706,0.0003359897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968228,0.00008107241,0.0005381858,0.001266032,0.00007196738,0.000175005,0.0000164925,0.000007894843,0.001020546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.00001542148,0.0002050568,0.00002861669,0.00002358217,0.00002582318,9.820358e-7,0.000004605668,0.0005073641],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7912427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1968694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095237287","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.015","title":"Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Set (abstract data type); Status quo; Computer science; Mathematics; Aggregation problem; Relation (database); Economics; Data mining; Statistics; Voting","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04966057064621966,"gpt":0.2229314150855681,"spread":0.1732708444393485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003659462,0.0001269484,0.0002745359,0.00007517902,0.0001162815,0.0001653504,0.00008544786,0.00007784474,0.0002862432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002069589,0.0001424211,0.00003337813,0.00002416896,0.00009892731,0.0002683809,0.00003912034,0.00007208851,0.0001099747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002441291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008676036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001434366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003333185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990487,0.00001867904,0.0004040594,0.0003457221,0.000009000096,0.0001738636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994553,0.00003774303,0.0002057162,0.0002138339,0.000008720472,0.00007868052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009425216,0.00004227493,0.3710658,0.00006122392,0.00001826908,4.419017e-7,0.001027368,0.0000180216,0.00007403577,0.602154,0.00005161592,0.02547751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007979075,0.0002123151,0.9371814,0.00005608563,0.00002705798,0.00003870433,0.0005380425,0.003508924,0.0002456788,0.04734639,0.009465803,0.0005817534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935513,0.0004232264,0.0003125599,0.000110435,0.0002518566,0.0001801626,0.0001176997,0.00003243887,0.005020302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965153,0.00008333873,0.00007889923,0.00004522031,0.0001217687,0.00005548996,0.00001856554,0.00001414809,0.003067315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5661156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5807763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974429698","doi":"10.1006/game.2000.0815","title":"Epsilon Cores of Games with Limited Side Payments: Nonemptiness and Equal Treatment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Parameterized complexity; Mathematical economics; Payment; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04175621839172083,"gpt":0.2387060891417465,"spread":0.1969498707500257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000225663,0.0002107719,0.0005529342,0.0001347365,0.00006842571,0.00006070029,0.00008355601,0.00008299016,0.0001607488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007511177,0.0001903086,0.00005572364,0.00004662294,0.000137936,0.0001649485,0.00003548311,0.00005427577,0.00004637291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006354535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001202481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009224933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001739928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987824,0.00001578253,0.0005335814,0.0004005514,0.00001515174,0.0002525168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00005792826,0.0003593686,0.0002441079,0.00001126079,0.00009750453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384062,0.0001731227,0.9745534,0.0000348215,0.00007503488,0.00001104744,0.0007632931,0.00004121433,0.0000944015,0.01387382,0.00002636312,0.01021505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004863489,0.001706802,0.9719652,0.0001391368,0.0001526789,0.0002276744,0.001453481,0.00096782,0.000718792,0.00179361,0.0151494,0.0008619305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959164,0.001385613,0.00006059593,0.00008102044,0.0001607994,0.0002781704,0.0001334349,0.0000265041,0.001957458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973314,0.0007861956,0.0001791915,0.00002867954,0.00005297064,0.00006779668,0.00001633884,0.00002538459,0.001512021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01512303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153043675","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.03.013","title":"An initial implementation of the Turing tournament to learning in repeated two-person games","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Tournament; Computer science; Turing; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Stability (learning theory); Principal (computer security); Turing test; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02986008024937789,"gpt":0.358724968715094,"spread":0.328864888465716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002539952,0.00009020579,0.0001558066,0.00006230587,0.0002086758,0.0000663706,0.0001160177,0.00003295712,0.0001255015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002756684,0.00008617122,0.00004166672,0.00004131402,0.00009685023,0.0001992687,0.00004951131,0.00007539413,0.000004381242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003258414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004617513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07387139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06369287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.00006529543,0.0002684115,0.0002062562,0.00004890659,0.0002151114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999714,0.0000130673,0.0001208994,0.00009384748,0.00001006273,0.00004808592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008424762,0.0000419728,0.9625661,0.000001474639,0.000003097157,0.000001102494,0.01249068,0.0002621917,0.005624982,0.0005223496,0.00002767647,0.01844992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000575046,0.00009132105,0.9138825,0.00001558382,0.00002298007,0.000001200647,0.07029252,0.00002375484,0.0144458,0.00003530272,0.0004488885,0.0001651203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978186,0.00005759531,7.404901e-7,0.0003109069,0.0001873926,0.0003337796,0.00001003951,0.00001763922,0.001263264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995184,0.00001956496,0.0001198414,0.00003220205,0.00008813699,0.00006930853,0.000003894846,0.000009237072,0.000139398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05780185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992818571","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0890","title":"(Sophisticated) Stable Sets in Exchange Economies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Von Neumann architecture; Set (abstract data type); Rationality; Space (punctuation); Property (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Exchange economy; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05745302908625478,"gpt":0.2258838899126072,"spread":0.1684308608263524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004634084,0.0001899287,0.0004897718,0.0002275489,0.0000745233,0.0001030935,0.0001630262,0.0001231153,0.004480212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015815,0.0002348737,0.00006936587,0.0000504514,0.00008375443,0.0002689034,0.00006242883,0.0001323735,0.002488243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000427471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004713866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001841079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984588,0.00001762515,0.0006470433,0.0004808544,0.000009442308,0.0003862329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00004493336,0.0002224375,0.0002963122,0.000004438207,0.0001045486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002078483,0.0002628123,0.7665179,0.000113645,0.00004164942,0.00002659176,0.002184642,0.00006299884,0.00001946444,0.2107879,0.003955998,0.01600564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004377047,0.0003184379,0.5854716,0.0001205354,0.00005522574,0.0001453227,0.001003693,0.0181978,0.0001259916,0.02986165,0.3580298,0.002292813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707814,0.00428138,0.00001282341,0.0003435134,0.0005562038,0.000245873,0.0001863291,0.00004632798,0.02354611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932173,0.0006404422,0.00008814854,0.00009260809,0.0000981112,0.0001066222,0.00000835058,0.00002910933,0.005719328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3540739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105314806","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.09.001","title":"Almost fully revealing cheap talk with imperfectly informed senders","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; State (computer science); State space; Bounded function; Noise (video); Mathematical economics; Space (punctuation); Interval (graph theory); Principal (computer security); Computer science; Cheap talk; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer security","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04946268594684997,"gpt":0.3297721895888294,"spread":0.2803095036419794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008497401,0.0001312493,0.0002299522,0.00008180724,0.0001710901,0.0002133795,0.0002631195,0.00005999136,0.0005935454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006611124,0.00009528048,0.0000527678,0.00007951781,0.0001552375,0.0002613424,0.00006445979,0.0000942717,0.0002968059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002967248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000494447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007756842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002166969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998919,0.00003628776,0.0003594589,0.0003515701,0.0001060127,0.0002277092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989341,0.0003038589,0.0001593136,0.0004286262,0.00003050796,0.000143591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001909204,0.0001529103,0.157887,0.00002198382,0.00004867004,0.00000729139,0.003353446,0.0005780554,0.00433548,0.03481097,0.00722676,0.7913865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003295153,0.0007244323,0.547123,0.0000682567,0.0002384423,0.0004734407,0.01249183,0.003622416,0.006072871,0.01775474,0.4066159,0.001519533],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932004,0.00002278501,0.0004525371,0.0004399732,0.00008804477,0.0001875069,0.00001763559,0.00003289531,0.005558274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973247,0.00001468553,0.0005330915,0.0002252339,0.00007526681,0.00006427164,0.000005597251,0.00001084006,0.001746292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.789867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6498906,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491181859","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.04.001","title":"Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: Strategy-proofness and comparative statics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Comparative statics; Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Population; Resource allocation; Computer science; Rationality; Class (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07436292279732265,"gpt":0.2695813863179223,"spread":0.1952184635205997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003770946,0.0001807109,0.0004192326,0.00008713284,0.00009926767,0.0001050253,0.0001060619,0.00009054141,0.0002819168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008735395,0.0001624614,0.00004551091,0.00003236625,0.0001396951,0.0003215615,0.00004161746,0.00006742319,0.0002486159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007656604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001479441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001369197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009209205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987829,0.00002335899,0.0005145633,0.0004178767,0.00001383299,0.0002474164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.00006639819,0.0002960935,0.0002192003,0.00001377666,0.00009907708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009207095,0.0001566369,0.582259,0.00010094,0.0001199301,0.000005078351,0.002946474,0.00004684323,0.001117286,0.3199994,0.0004205175,0.09273587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002723797,0.0003971198,0.9500403,0.0001099092,0.00006700215,0.00007792001,0.001954722,0.001768873,0.001067042,0.03178492,0.008819136,0.001189247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938572,0.001024328,0.001568933,0.00008390928,0.0003239333,0.0002843258,0.0001720655,0.00003670279,0.002648578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978348,0.0002057708,0.0001618871,0.00002757527,0.00008282426,0.00007427773,0.000008068838,0.00001635508,0.001588438],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3677813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6624982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613277224","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.05.002","title":"Three little-known and yet still significant contributions of Lloyd Shapley","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Core (optical fiber); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04133412399462716,"gpt":0.2569065869552318,"spread":0.2155724629606046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006288245,0.0001569133,0.0005202041,0.00008318386,0.0002187298,0.0001684304,0.0002290303,0.0001173398,0.0002675503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008512596,0.0001718743,0.00008465635,0.00001266793,0.0002913613,0.0002215441,0.0001197117,0.000104972,0.0001072406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003967157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001620981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001354411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001923238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987832,0.000009276152,0.0005635863,0.0003787453,0.00001274249,0.0002524449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872,0.00006102518,0.0005787604,0.0005037175,0.00001820336,0.0001182312],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002299018,0.00006626629,0.6662151,0.00003935464,0.00004744269,0.00000303375,0.0002897416,0.000003778016,0.0002082566,0.3280147,0.0003094375,0.004779844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176724,0.0001347652,0.9634874,0.00005204898,0.00004992529,0.00001865915,0.0001329672,0.0007798141,0.0003419593,0.02075658,0.01269206,0.0003770897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994297,0.001068309,0.0001889049,0.000249571,0.0005267342,0.0002609659,0.001214268,0.00001975731,0.00217454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989079,0.0002088649,0.00009503646,0.00001816361,0.00009834772,0.00004029269,0.00001053324,0.00001733046,0.0006035913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3072581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7008829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128171555","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.03.009","title":"Equilibrium rejection of a mechanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Interim; Complete information; Order (exchange); Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Repeated game; Path (computing); Computer science; Microeconomics; Bayesian game; Economics; Game theory","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1359341647129735,"gpt":0.3370388032606259,"spread":0.2011046385476524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004424722,0.00004863372,0.0001131064,0.00006969195,0.00003421115,0.00002021753,0.0001313861,0.00003841632,0.001994004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001731768,0.00004058655,0.00004609956,0.00004672835,0.00007045041,0.0001602981,0.00004676292,0.00003204594,0.0002069389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008617537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001250254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006376104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001200897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999392,0.00002155463,0.0002761482,0.0001911154,0.00004741529,0.00007171726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995175,0.00004134032,0.0001429637,0.0002326588,0.00002141381,0.00004414226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008671926,0.0002385862,0.03725991,0.000004750274,0.0000198754,0.000001543743,0.003308808,0.000009300463,0.02259017,0.6835572,0.001839371,0.2510838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004113,0.0002475573,0.2453946,0.000008335147,0.00009133121,0.00008309147,0.005048141,0.0005920826,0.1208735,0.6138006,0.01290105,0.0003592164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930072,0.00001690916,0.001428921,0.00004174919,0.0002049918,0.0000879651,0.00001462622,0.00001497555,0.005182682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969436,0.000007686504,0.000490255,0.00001833666,0.00002819852,0.0000292682,6.736184e-7,0.000003751908,0.002478248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2507246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069506462","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2015.02.003","title":"Extreme value theorems for optimal multidimensional pricing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Microsoft Research; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1879857899124779,"gpt":0.3744438635196962,"spread":0.1864580736072183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001220392,0.00008720264,0.0001553679,0.00006297466,0.0001435476,0.00008432859,0.0001555014,0.00004856244,0.0002199602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001030988,0.00006802561,0.00006735081,0.00003973636,0.0001055689,0.0001930517,0.00006581032,0.00004609652,0.0002210357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003299676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004800845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001810256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004441231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990912,0.00003032927,0.000312309,0.0003271351,0.0000931103,0.0001458928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991531,0.000286949,0.0001221725,0.0002385697,0.00005585317,0.0001433721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002003162,0.0002212232,0.02641513,0.000002995216,0.00002464244,0.000002024422,0.002200347,0.007351708,0.002467191,0.6598032,0.0182677,0.2830435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004717491,0.0004312036,0.07709654,0.0000216846,0.000197376,0.0002137873,0.0152605,0.09268238,0.006243242,0.2210196,0.5809223,0.001193856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808369,0.00007387199,0.01737047,0.0003973753,0.0003368033,0.000271559,0.00004450906,0.00002500328,0.0006435487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872668,0.000004188692,0.009125438,0.00009641361,0.0001497927,0.0001295429,0.000006274954,0.000009161001,0.003212333],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.284104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086723411","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.07.005","title":"Dynamic coordination with individual learning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coordination game; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09279793172436003,"gpt":0.3256794959273052,"spread":0.2328815642029452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005491996,0.00007205435,0.0001134185,0.00007936575,0.0001245716,0.00009759855,0.0001896361,0.00003584421,0.00104299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001820465,0.00005385039,0.00002387265,0.00005634011,0.0001022904,0.0002026833,0.00005048919,0.00008103162,0.0003383413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001349867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001656517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003341122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006860714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993352,0.00003326828,0.0001931104,0.0002498042,0.00007430449,0.0001142958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999555,0.00007548564,0.0001130482,0.0001754916,0.0000212269,0.00005973846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004321451,0.00009901754,0.4759803,0.000001543591,0.00001712872,0.000003648389,0.003753652,0.00006139048,0.0002679527,0.02101036,0.0003115476,0.4984502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994717,0.0001143708,0.984559,0.000003509096,0.00004379628,0.0000303248,0.002568165,0.0005898644,0.0001662431,0.006370599,0.005102979,0.000151671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955706,0.00002264405,0.0005222636,0.0000812858,0.00004545076,0.0001062591,0.00001080751,0.00002607905,0.003614622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961118,0.000005009262,0.000717417,0.00002354818,0.000009370159,0.00004821593,0.000005010766,0.000006465558,0.003073149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5085787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169382366","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2005.05.005","title":"Mechanism design with weaker incentive compatibility constraints","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Adverse selection; Compatibility (geochemistry); Mechanism design; Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Participation constraint; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09139925314207033,"gpt":0.3395735420950307,"spread":0.2481742889529603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007364438,0.00009358431,0.0001666262,0.00004613839,0.000154282,0.000107584,0.000162102,0.00004167303,0.002826302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001641683,0.00006858795,0.00003362224,0.00004804055,0.0003138354,0.0002390704,0.00004034719,0.00006847992,0.0006009842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004072487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003903026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001237393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004640462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999065,0.00006580494,0.0002901532,0.0003613975,0.000085427,0.0001321728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999266,0.0001838535,0.0001346728,0.0002845254,0.00003603034,0.00009497839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001234255,0.0003092056,0.04708631,0.000001694853,0.00002943359,0.000002797179,0.001538015,0.0006510909,0.0007535718,0.1718726,0.002146704,0.7754851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00442253,0.0005719805,0.6575436,0.00003612083,0.0002835544,0.0002902783,0.01546262,0.0135268,0.02728709,0.2099193,0.06896416,0.001691967],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442095,0.00001477174,0.05385928,0.0004110143,0.00006499951,0.0002866708,0.00004004634,0.00002595308,0.001087747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941174,0.000005836345,0.004717894,0.0001130377,0.00004467511,0.00006054804,0.00000188901,0.000005102807,0.0009335729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7737932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924012729","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2019.07.006","title":"Limiting Sender's information in Bayesian persuasion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Corollary; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Persuasion; Signaling game; Complete information; Action (physics); Best response; Bayesian game; Limiting; Bayesian probability; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Theoretical computer science; Economics; Repeated game; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Psychology; Computer network; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04545769875129722,"gpt":0.31888247633845,"spread":0.2734247775871527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006584946,0.0000645615,0.0001246667,0.0001320446,0.00004778,0.000155968,0.000145211,0.00004693437,0.0008636792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002828623,0.00005543463,0.00003366055,0.00006150972,0.00002667801,0.0006367809,0.00005761614,0.0000695598,0.001383656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002956116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001769579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003940651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000330122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992761,0.00002568728,0.0003356064,0.0001700383,0.00006898248,0.0001236021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994868,0.000123089,0.0001066528,0.0002216433,0.00001324246,0.00004859035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745676,0.00003153722,0.5257555,0.000003773994,0.000001958764,6.062941e-7,0.002071168,0.0003453527,0.0003845356,0.01439465,0.0003226614,0.4566708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008304856,0.00005851,0.9323233,0.00001760276,0.000011704,0.00002462682,0.01355391,0.01297438,0.0003403852,0.0100444,0.02953769,0.0002830378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935732,0.00001290682,0.000158628,0.0002989652,0.0001158823,0.0001784812,0.00001004117,0.000013507,0.005638363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991205,0.000009282786,0.000162668,0.0001035818,0.00001929944,0.00002442232,0.0000049166,0.00000303242,0.0005522618],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4563878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152066392","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2009.01.008","title":"Cooperation through imitation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Imitation; Stochastic game; Economics; Cartel; Microeconomics; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Collusion; Market economy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04274892892966939,"gpt":0.3425427190980267,"spread":0.2997937901683574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001058843,0.00007560333,0.0001123987,0.00001957032,0.0003258615,0.0001032192,0.00005827683,0.00005238661,0.0001620239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004914163,0.00008385464,0.0000296182,0.00001789277,0.0001126307,0.000440389,0.00001385832,0.00003989003,0.00008813463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001514911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003133157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001479382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001117925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994666,0.00001938765,0.0001510223,0.0001764292,0.00002543994,0.0001611055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998101,0.00001185514,0.00004856947,0.00007058568,0.00001175775,0.00004714416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004584611,0.000353187,0.1371636,0.000004150253,0.00002323952,0.000007354093,0.07682557,0.00003969632,0.006587883,0.4817192,0.006858275,0.290372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002853218,0.0008908212,0.7282258,0.00004039101,0.0002669888,0.00001373157,0.06194493,0.0001688233,0.008546626,0.01183453,0.1832497,0.001964409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759592,0.0002755057,0.0000108138,0.001321053,0.0002548914,0.0002047892,0.000006745947,0.00004431361,0.02192269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977223,0.0005438333,0.0005323265,0.0002731936,0.0001143708,0.0000317264,0.0000073028,0.000004790421,0.000770208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5910621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092853244","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2020.09.008","title":"Sentiments, strategic uncertainty, and information structures in coordination games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Comparative statics; Pessimism; Global game; Coordination game; Information structure; Affect (linguistics); Complete information; Perception; Computer science; Mathematical economics; SIGNAL (programming language); Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Game theory; A priori and a posteriori; Economics; Psychology; Communication","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03432947246371196,"gpt":0.2991136512817207,"spread":0.2647841788180088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001060499,0.0001012507,0.0001598478,0.00005173439,0.0001427581,0.000172856,0.00006717964,0.00006302544,0.0001337204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005809389,0.0001104944,0.00002138677,0.00003369406,0.0001643831,0.0008407623,0.00006635975,0.0000682823,0.0000190763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003920147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004031844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001467692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993665,0.00002586108,0.0002292289,0.000167566,0.00003901549,0.0001718595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997446,0.00001487974,0.00008717482,0.00004622914,0.000009933265,0.00009717369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006655,0.00006095502,0.7649723,0.00003686987,0.00002971398,0.000004964401,0.05516853,0.0001740181,0.0008127316,0.1134779,0.0007382138,0.06445722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003982846,0.0003599921,0.742981,0.00003826172,0.0001420502,0.000007607996,0.21356,0.002573483,0.000862069,0.005851169,0.0283174,0.001324125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946665,0.0002307015,8.49383e-7,0.00156276,0.0001185927,0.0002769797,0.0000276889,0.00002549436,0.003090454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991565,0.0003930239,0.00008144428,0.0002171587,0.00004530929,0.00003934838,0.00001660964,0.000004826282,0.00004577545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1583915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.609497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083467094","doi":"10.1006/game.1999.0716","title":"An Example of Dynamic (In)Consistency in Symmetric Extensive Form Evolutionary Games","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Consistency (knowledge bases); Extensive-form game; Equilibrium selection; Markov perfect equilibrium; Subgame; Selection (genetic algorithm); Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Sequential game; Mathematical optimization; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06133991525684419,"gpt":0.3326287466656262,"spread":0.271288831408782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006960643,0.0001148122,0.0003118713,0.0004132528,0.00005234945,0.00004082474,0.0002983332,0.00007225594,0.001612372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000312975,0.0001038348,0.00006506885,0.0003128432,0.0001691517,0.0003540888,0.00003405516,0.00008933517,0.0001533595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006830029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005267821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001182369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001043239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985196,0.00006120872,0.0006500115,0.0004594104,0.00009712767,0.0002126663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989725,0.0002829525,0.0001268857,0.0005038189,0.00003247962,0.00008131485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004698042,0.0003183892,0.1646798,0.000003938043,0.000003786077,0.000006370335,0.001126554,0.0002128818,0.0004109745,0.00955695,0.00009888959,0.8235345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003591046,0.00006572543,0.9690014,0.000009474366,0.00001108031,0.00002287246,0.001501199,0.00269461,0.00003214693,0.02503807,0.001133564,0.0001307988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972919,0.0004193203,0.00001022093,0.00008771529,0.00005014461,0.0002394131,0.00004818853,0.00001062451,0.001842434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.00017396,0.0003625461,0.00004058842,0.00001177977,0.00007742087,0.000008275464,0.000007668238,0.0009161662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085667665","doi":"10.1006/game.2000.0836","title":"Cooperation, Secret Handshakes, and Imitation in the Prisoners' Dilemma","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Handshake; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Imitation; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Superrationality; Repeated game; Limit (mathematics); Computer science; Adversary; SIGNAL (programming language); Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Computer security; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Telecommunications","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08203987794972302,"gpt":0.3517487822863533,"spread":0.2697089043366303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009274419,0.00006805141,0.0001071242,0.00005998254,0.0001303249,0.0002821769,0.0001562847,0.00003790289,0.0002261224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000539906,0.00004535502,0.00001831954,0.00008723195,0.00008835475,0.0002333927,0.00002169717,0.00006106225,0.00007508548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001052266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001457911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000640432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004314381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992713,0.00006624508,0.00026493,0.0002318174,0.00006226634,0.0001034887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994135,0.0002496466,0.00006644584,0.0002107738,0.0000213174,0.00003835213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004550295,0.0001210278,0.6245688,0.000002248996,0.000005458223,0.000006388448,0.007448201,0.0001833233,0.0006111491,0.06846792,0.004592675,0.2939473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004876117,0.0000451437,0.9189312,0.000004276793,0.00001811875,0.00006263689,0.004310424,0.001362491,0.00004999282,0.006898734,0.06769202,0.000137343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968814,0.0001061843,0.0002023599,0.001529928,0.00004544195,0.0002073677,0.00001365734,0.000007705298,0.001005928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988837,0.00008215944,0.00007855228,0.0002059666,0.00003808969,0.00009290952,0.000008557661,0.00000352394,0.0006065231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2943624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2721038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031537811","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2020.04.017","title":"A simple proof of strong duality in the linear persuasion problem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duality (order theory); Simple (philosophy); Duality gap; Stochastic dominance; Mathematics; Persuasion; Mathematical economics; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Strong duality; Mathematical optimization; Optimization problem; Discrete mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1471616948982792,"gpt":0.3831455481436001,"spread":0.235983853245321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007537318,0.00005032035,0.0001249811,0.00002433741,0.00005585343,0.00003476207,0.000206513,0.00002776148,0.0003218588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003811795,0.0000324124,0.00004082481,0.00008178943,0.00007686576,0.0001088236,0.00005088453,0.00006693493,0.00003092141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007519272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001970906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000394573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003355223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992564,0.00006492573,0.0003262719,0.0002016628,0.00007477801,0.00007596889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995348,0.0001161387,0.0001219127,0.0001744465,0.00001483386,0.0000378599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001720815,0.0005227349,0.4725963,0.00003302877,0.0000152238,0.000003407868,0.02676588,0.002230864,0.001712041,0.09766622,0.005679615,0.3926027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002318623,0.0006534897,0.6774705,0.00002262902,0.0001130138,0.00003140608,0.08247928,0.0206497,0.006365408,0.06174522,0.1474831,0.0006676114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996763,0.00002413184,0.0005420563,0.001759486,0.00001609741,0.0002568023,0.00003578895,0.000005435214,0.000597194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995543,0.000003644471,0.000150917,0.0001158082,0.00003715557,0.00005033612,0.00000272712,0.000002552211,0.0000825553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.391935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3524128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198288619","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.07.013","title":"Round-robin political tournaments: Abstention, truthful equilibria, and effective power","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Tournament; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Microeconomics; Politics; Power (physics); Economics; Nash equilibrium; Majority rule; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01698197473461663,"gpt":0.2334617871221687,"spread":0.2164798123875521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004253183,0.0001834485,0.000460511,0.0000917702,0.0001067848,0.0002338444,0.00008394695,0.0001270663,0.0007783143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395706,0.0002156636,0.0001086298,0.00003865136,0.0001042372,0.0002728889,0.0001015885,0.0001343311,0.0003125235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001359749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001742094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001623318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001617045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984875,0.0000385842,0.0005440121,0.0005217727,0.00001576204,0.0003923192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992861,0.00007807045,0.0001805776,0.0002493579,0.00001685911,0.0001890944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002226315,0.0001265376,0.2716681,0.00004225568,0.00008883506,0.00002511013,0.0004765793,0.000002257324,0.0003808499,0.7246855,0.0002052281,0.002276479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003315649,0.0003285766,0.9046228,0.0001148725,0.0001095577,0.0005814156,0.002611797,0.0003728286,0.0007283229,0.05878709,0.02734037,0.001086697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893538,0.001333199,0.00009148494,0.0002916839,0.0008305428,0.0002293059,0.0001420439,0.0000317919,0.007696185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964681,0.00005605061,0.00008443916,0.0001447583,0.0001305753,0.00005880936,0.00001404265,0.00002641562,0.003016842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6658984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088358674","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2013.09.008","title":"Strategic learning in teams","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics","keywords":"Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Process management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03294249389327887,"gpt":0.3037745731684385,"spread":0.2708320792751596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001488715,0.00009105734,0.0001559424,0.00005021609,0.000186545,0.0001322791,0.00008798484,0.00006463384,0.001001805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003149871,0.00009958025,0.00003097472,0.00002282187,0.0001844317,0.0003530838,0.00005270053,0.000111955,0.0003779065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002187888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004530544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02698044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007531172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992788,0.00003175197,0.0001841699,0.0002085029,0.00002530819,0.000271444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997725,0.00001952936,0.00005135033,0.0000653738,0.000006329286,0.00008493172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001775643,0.00004244297,0.9633175,0.000001997355,0.000002840548,0.00000198201,0.004800002,0.00001007877,0.0003597934,0.006425518,0.00009772583,0.02493841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001113894,0.0001628455,0.7966322,0.00002669465,0.00003504152,0.000005218333,0.1801434,0.0001868304,0.0003118847,0.00331464,0.01720974,0.0008575765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604562,0.0004611461,1.07014e-7,0.0002712429,0.0001609751,0.000250348,0.000001638394,0.00003748943,0.03836089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971185,0.0006015815,0.00006728242,0.00003536911,0.00005744234,0.0001731191,0.000001844933,0.000009338099,0.001935495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1753434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104290163","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.005","title":"Ratifiability of efficient collusive mechanisms in second-price auctions with participation costs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Common value auction; Microeconomics; Bidding; English auction; Auction theory; Collusion; Economics; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Value (mathematics); Mechanism design; Vickrey auction; Price discovery; Computer science; Financial economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02862872449813261,"gpt":0.3199889456371675,"spread":0.2913602211390349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000649006,0.00007522569,0.0001733282,0.0001035289,0.0001032989,0.00004518696,0.0001027606,0.00004168032,0.0008899707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002600013,0.00006059032,0.00003155053,0.0001661363,0.0001441156,0.0001124069,0.00002964352,0.00005132029,0.00004415969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008135085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004338543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001876836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001144892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989909,0.00005871236,0.0004529839,0.0002913905,0.00008991435,0.0001161092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992369,0.000190688,0.0002144512,0.000258864,0.00005565761,0.00004345655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002889396,0.001944084,0.348597,0.00001797755,0.00002321565,0.000004239158,0.002322217,0.07263801,0.01460894,0.5080855,0.001345642,0.05012427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005840051,0.00008271549,0.9632716,0.000006872612,0.00002721454,0.000009257676,0.001823879,0.003917639,0.008789071,0.02020079,0.001126946,0.0001599941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919991,0.00001100688,0.006359182,0.0001347754,0.00008283027,0.000328588,0.00006415328,0.00001068075,0.001009714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998575,0.000001020932,0.0004960736,0.00001370737,0.00001574577,0.0001755547,0.00000502029,0.00000411666,0.000713754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6146746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071697652","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.004","title":"Threshold strategy-proofness: on manipulability in large voting problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Lipschitz continuity; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05071341917895347,"gpt":0.2480091257612168,"spread":0.1972957065822634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001031884,0.0002112199,0.0004604377,0.0001568867,0.00009442726,0.0001156614,0.0001732339,0.0001406098,0.0002053769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001488444,0.0002387743,0.00008613981,0.00006341955,0.00005522616,0.0002291949,0.00005682049,0.0002244205,0.0004332067],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002166648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001868603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006730456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998196,0.0000138713,0.000738078,0.0006022465,0.00001712615,0.0004326625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.00002226345,0.0002491751,0.0003033928,0.000005913143,0.0000879872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001355943,0.0002073438,0.5668325,0.00005033048,0.000008566271,0.000005844313,0.0004360154,0.002011354,0.00001292188,0.4294338,0.000007515047,0.0009802666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003013894,0.000283116,0.9196818,0.0001370065,0.00001294796,0.0000251195,0.0005913301,0.001510444,0.00009910041,0.07272188,0.001174089,0.000749286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935173,0.0004802103,0.00006675977,0.0001214706,0.0003480287,0.0004491089,0.00008622419,0.00004865819,0.004882206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993363,0.00002941326,0.00003198029,0.00006653288,0.00009263915,0.0001059232,0.0000107934,0.00002857398,0.0002978465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3567119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43072628","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.028","title":"On the optimality of diverse expert panels in persuasion games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Undo; Diversity (politics); Intuition; Parameterized complexity; Heuristics; Action (physics); Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2085810847554068,"gpt":0.4060143525765911,"spread":0.1974332678211843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019836,0.00007683929,0.0001731655,0.00004571347,0.0002194065,0.0001434813,0.0005597283,0.0000420881,0.000939039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001577738,0.00004740219,0.00006344639,0.00001794606,0.0002930319,0.000166902,0.0001633189,0.00006898723,0.0001319008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001675863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001610531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002596668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005440109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992216,0.0000519753,0.0002699145,0.0002593065,0.00008584119,0.0001114129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986157,0.0003426805,0.0002082641,0.0007741284,0.00001618287,0.00004307212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000191573,0.0004461556,0.3307557,0.000004012547,0.00001460703,0.000006883039,0.008694733,0.0001441844,0.004486651,0.1448353,0.00342855,0.5069916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003160205,0.00004678598,0.976288,0.00001295605,0.000008770888,0.000002698154,0.005182296,0.000289467,0.001714747,0.01352948,0.00250144,0.0001073202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962417,0.00002634145,0.00001281541,0.001199858,0.00009966798,0.0001571339,0.00003049924,0.000004492821,0.002227503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990284,0.00004575162,0.00004867648,0.00007018718,0.00002172221,0.00004359494,5.686325e-7,0.000003427711,0.0007376491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6455323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125498752","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2015.11.004","title":"Social groups and social network formation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Royal Economic Society","keywords":"Social network (sociolinguistics); Sociology; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social media","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02689530424112335,"gpt":0.2752261511530008,"spread":0.2483308469118775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009257528,0.0000786459,0.0001282154,0.00001173012,0.0001957182,0.00009347956,0.00003753349,0.00004165971,0.00003163093],"category_scores_gemma":[2.2774e-7,0.00008437299,0.0000346094,0.00001268963,0.00005812291,0.0001938927,0.00004587186,0.00006181977,0.00001393614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002458667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001979926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001692828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001877717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995639,0.00001192136,0.0001355987,0.000112074,0.00002485041,0.0001516596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998274,0.000005664604,0.00006867281,0.00003312313,0.00001227626,0.00005289085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002422449,0.00006547975,0.42331,0.00001265019,0.00003793444,7.675624e-7,0.009052946,0.00004430386,0.00001785301,0.3945995,0.01020075,0.1626336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003928416,0.0001650202,0.8162561,0.00001839447,0.0002152215,0.000007605036,0.01451045,0.008325731,0.00002279963,0.07661014,0.07862678,0.001313333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978638,0.0000316525,0.0001366581,0.0003027096,0.0001680547,0.00008767672,0.00003133102,0.00001207896,0.001366083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988815,0.000004292076,0.00006308097,0.00005059935,0.0008141803,0.00002417229,0.00003481324,0.000007299222,0.0001201034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3929461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.344063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048798070","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2012.03.007","title":"Optimality and the English and second-price auctions with resale","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04716652789948902,"gpt":0.3195630971394318,"spread":0.2723965692399428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001133864,0.00007589775,0.0001398413,0.00003423439,0.0003132219,0.0001701567,0.00009775082,0.00003638414,0.0006454339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004267902,0.00004475151,0.000021915,0.00004964427,0.0004933087,0.0003953199,0.00007560162,0.00008229496,0.00003133623],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009757906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001155588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002914034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003730958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993355,0.00006010091,0.0001993949,0.0002191785,0.00005204394,0.0001338012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991863,0.0003173266,0.0001002358,0.000257939,0.00002778806,0.0001104288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002792964,0.0001758701,0.5625462,0.000009176352,0.00005585594,7.252763e-7,0.01494275,0.00004216741,0.00009711897,0.3172129,0.007389042,0.09724892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001162225,0.00003464681,0.7912917,0.000003393662,0.00008492584,0.0001238108,0.009589425,0.0001479765,0.0001126566,0.005745229,0.1914954,0.0002086514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953457,0.0003557319,0.0002326143,0.0005094172,0.0001350699,0.0001767497,0.00003387437,0.00001764532,0.003193183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996024,0.00006448802,0.0003558324,0.00008777626,0.0001344736,0.00008587848,0.000001126021,0.000004769735,0.003241694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3114676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7067049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968905048","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.016","title":"Ranking asymmetric auctions: Filling the gap between a distributional shift and stretch","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Regular polygon; Stochastic dominance; Distribution (mathematics); Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Geometry; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08481938142026406,"gpt":0.34596850779857,"spread":0.261149126378306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001297144,0.00008896285,0.000154883,0.00008976533,0.0005046083,0.0002587469,0.0001930601,0.00005251799,0.0003074845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001133177,0.00006139999,0.00005330908,0.0001415299,0.0001888434,0.0001812508,0.00006236345,0.0001095093,0.0001077937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002222691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001571439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003333433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001184445,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00007398524,0.0003300094,0.0003091615,0.0001036873,0.0001384502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986343,0.0008750753,0.0001441866,0.0002477638,0.00002257413,0.00007603685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007825832,0.00002821577,0.3027706,0.000002036246,0.00001771365,1.964818e-7,0.0003268167,0.00009004434,0.00002534653,0.09033993,0.001244085,0.6051472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003426608,0.00003095944,0.8456448,0.000006402758,0.00008092813,0.00002121827,0.0007228568,0.001851686,0.0001512757,0.09600057,0.0549478,0.0001988291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985969,0.0001072973,0.01177667,0.001403654,0.0001651158,0.0001342007,0.0001412796,0.00002028482,0.0002824945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992113,0.00002701608,0.0001420914,0.00005102272,0.0002583127,0.00005537079,0.00001264712,0.000004868869,0.0002374087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.388109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560660664","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.06.008","title":"Multilateral limit pricing in price-setting games","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Oligopoly; Limit (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Bertrand competition; Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Strategy; Set (abstract data type); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Cournot competition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06923152673119372,"gpt":0.358794063187502,"spread":0.2895625364563083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009856886,0.0001112398,0.0002002761,0.0001477571,0.0001224514,0.0001936098,0.0002823111,0.00006053671,0.0007847867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007756555,0.00009256308,0.00004738957,0.0001016395,0.0001558563,0.0002575075,0.000126008,0.0000948142,0.0007288838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003745369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002376888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007332562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001537504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987407,0.00004299594,0.0004628738,0.0004217892,0.00007892337,0.0002526707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.0002278204,0.0001443153,0.000333905,0.00002731288,0.00008412637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002752579,0.00008434003,0.5422778,0.000002756156,0.000005036869,0.000004274712,0.003627683,0.00003955466,0.002591721,0.003189294,0.000845838,0.4473042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004298731,0.00005757728,0.9685599,0.00001737553,0.00001333964,0.00002031005,0.001421307,0.002659637,0.001778364,0.004709662,0.0201021,0.0002305182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963055,0.00004329984,0.0001038192,0.0003560144,0.0001752396,0.0001857626,0.00001027464,0.00002535727,0.002794722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968459,0.00001090566,0.0008975312,0.0001380063,0.0001424814,0.00004974428,0.000001398765,0.000009048194,0.001904989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4470737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.936857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996864214","doi":"10.1006/game.1999.0767","title":"Subgame Monotonicity in Extensive Form Evolutionary Games","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Wright; Monotonic function; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Subgame; Replicator equation; Generalization; Mathematics; Computer science; Population; Game theory; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04884692327721313,"gpt":0.3295493213106184,"spread":0.2807023980334052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005502078,0.0001336926,0.0002656831,0.000124372,0.0001061895,0.0001011802,0.0003074632,0.00008161988,0.005151573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003354378,0.0001161322,0.00008363614,0.0001117392,0.0001783654,0.0003508801,0.00006210882,0.0001209525,0.001403894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006988274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004409931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002048207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002027244,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.00004683128,0.0004869051,0.000477975,0.0001036414,0.000258043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911,0.0002229566,0.00009256216,0.0004358589,0.00002874763,0.0001098368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009168359,0.0002072735,0.1922164,0.000002164268,0.000007743182,0.0000120165,0.001259087,0.0003611213,0.0002503628,0.01121743,0.003327081,0.7910476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003879056,0.00003576778,0.9207853,0.000006315168,0.0000140616,0.00004045672,0.0007530345,0.001260813,0.0001201014,0.0386001,0.03779875,0.0001973918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945468,0.0002544988,0.00001550554,0.0005470961,0.0000753973,0.0002692636,0.00005701708,0.00002541773,0.004208999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936892,0.0001817669,0.0002268097,0.0001816453,0.00004728987,0.0001403268,0.000005435841,0.000008589412,0.005518984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7908502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009233380","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.004","title":"Social distance in a virtual world experiment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social distance; Virtual world; Social psychology; Psychology; Dictator game; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02856490730286717,"gpt":0.3349096535026416,"spread":0.3063447461997744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001991267,0.0001231418,0.0002074184,0.00007319479,0.0003167153,0.00009989124,0.0001414131,0.00007201933,0.0004775035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003897301,0.0001420697,0.00005152076,0.00003972125,0.0004399737,0.0002175187,0.00008604673,0.0001647363,0.000058211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002188719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005215803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00400156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08676478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00002199998,0.0002346472,0.0002866357,0.00004397822,0.0003143903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997175,0.00002138982,0.00006693077,0.00009721662,0.00000601211,0.00009099455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004171158,0.0003143271,0.6728756,0.000002644192,0.00001116395,0.00001246979,0.04348474,0.000001343713,0.006592941,0.2345775,0.001657797,0.04042772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002849219,0.0001523246,0.6117294,0.00002304732,0.00006512602,0.000004997767,0.06885215,0.00005081752,0.005635642,0.001366699,0.3075956,0.001674963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848927,0.0001103047,7.082856e-7,0.0006579059,0.0006090826,0.0002323199,0.00001371193,0.0000320346,0.01345119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968782,0.00005025227,0.00009041319,0.00006027834,0.0002240431,0.0002062332,0.000002520898,0.00001276466,0.002475313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3059378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9298994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123518364","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.006","title":"The informativeness principle without the first-order approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; SIGNAL (programming language); Incentive; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06635935117543422,"gpt":0.3608886295150241,"spread":0.2945292783395899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001173995,0.0000739457,0.00009466947,0.00002243894,0.001067462,0.0003190001,0.0004511115,0.0000329844,0.0001986185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004745639,0.00003458432,0.00003652956,0.00008541546,0.0005436484,0.0002181964,0.00013281,0.00006985454,0.0005668958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001512407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002756238,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001612998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005829928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992869,0.00003355435,0.00028383,0.0001773029,0.00008460649,0.0001338401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990788,0.0002149587,0.0001448658,0.0004655292,0.00005529061,0.00004053755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007903573,0.00009749793,0.2003093,0.000003348932,0.00003283286,1.522273e-7,0.007321569,0.0001970835,0.00001580538,0.2620825,0.009573391,0.5202875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001293109,0.00001836437,0.1293358,0.000001113639,0.00001151937,0.00001444699,0.002783601,0.00246956,0.00006249925,0.004319866,0.8607733,0.00008064778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817284,0.00004650665,0.006292286,0.001369745,0.0002643759,0.0003177833,0.00001277943,0.00002156336,0.00994653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942604,0.00001847102,0.0001809896,0.0001888312,0.0001356026,0.0001912671,0.000001093449,0.000004542127,0.005018802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8511999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8210163,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156879907","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.10.011","title":"Identification in first-price and Dutch auctions when the number of potential bidders is unobservable","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Common value auction; Identification (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0414837072043859,"gpt":0.3286337893274106,"spread":0.2871500821230247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006627412,0.00006146087,0.000109268,0.00005586069,0.0001866781,0.0001193948,0.0001939823,0.0000573626,0.001974923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003438761,0.00004599418,0.00003704541,0.00008502809,0.0002039339,0.0002575095,0.00005785455,0.0001035618,0.0001452779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007935641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001778884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002995887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003841855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992132,0.00002289583,0.00035772,0.0002449917,0.00006939095,0.00009176269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993138,0.0001174995,0.0001644139,0.0003304893,0.00003306266,0.00004076041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004355954,0.0002649513,0.8357536,0.00001020131,0.0000265209,9.301621e-7,0.006942388,0.0002643704,0.01067495,0.05441028,0.01455902,0.07704926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000316253,0.000007367854,0.9201338,0.00000311672,0.00003885835,0.00004337393,0.004120878,0.001636445,0.001292851,0.04516551,0.02710904,0.0001324538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996114,0.00001891815,0.0003121118,0.0027698,0.0002778708,0.0001487176,0.00003266871,0.00000716767,0.0003187111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966415,0.00004132211,0.0001884679,0.00005321754,0.0000403464,0.00005943732,0.000001707389,0.000004341284,0.002969615],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08438028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989374,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206190221","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.12.007","title":"Efficiency in asymmetric auctions with endogenous reserve prices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Common value auction; Economics; Microeconomics; Reservation price; Pareto principle; English auction; Pareto efficiency; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Operations management","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09902865566673559,"gpt":0.3279577725972485,"spread":0.2289291169305129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009214816,0.00007812546,0.0001471188,0.0003747903,0.000441813,0.00009475544,0.0003164936,0.00002065992,0.001148116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002550451,0.00006425987,0.00003711547,0.0005776802,0.00009057096,0.0001684498,0.0001087982,0.0001372745,0.00009846063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008321404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005517641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000236666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001706418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998925,0.00006591299,0.000318365,0.0003749514,0.0001491695,0.0001665818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992563,0.0002089031,0.000143961,0.000310635,0.00001744362,0.00006279571],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001993192,0.001473603,0.5694655,0.000006068272,0.00002810945,0.00005048827,0.004866059,0.04015512,0.0008746214,0.06108367,0.003130141,0.3186673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002983161,0.001184843,0.7011901,0.000008557197,0.0001272569,0.001424797,0.04486627,0.005535086,0.001390978,0.02067908,0.2194164,0.001193446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951996,0.0001384522,0.0003057505,0.0002781626,0.0001765516,0.0002397368,0.00005248627,0.00002107033,0.003588157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976099,0.00001555682,0.0001578445,0.00003985932,0.0000307377,0.0003717513,0.000002993036,0.000006511721,0.00176486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3174739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125879886","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.05.004","title":"Belief formation under signal correlation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Kyoto University; Seoul National University","keywords":"Neglect; Correlation; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Variance (accounting); SIGNAL (programming language); Statistics; Social psychology; Positive correlation; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03303881041886576,"gpt":0.3153874025557272,"spread":0.2823485921368615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001780563,0.00008077179,0.00009830354,0.00005478943,0.0002599619,0.0002081232,0.00005342069,0.00006552362,0.0004472771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001387111,0.00008654271,0.00004459719,0.00002465739,0.0001327425,0.0005743784,0.00003560543,0.00006627031,0.0003155974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003041089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004379465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001570887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001453411,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994128,0.00001803338,0.0001919945,0.0001759482,0.00003509601,0.0001661402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998136,0.00002836583,0.00003603448,0.00005428103,0.000006652074,0.00006112155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003428504,0.0001949465,0.1061326,0.00005354903,0.00008200674,0.0000194032,0.06943051,0.0005601615,0.00286484,0.4091829,0.01244808,0.3989967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002286754,0.0006331381,0.3380831,0.0003271952,0.0008836487,0.0000863091,0.144736,0.01669067,0.005033614,0.02033263,0.4676091,0.003297866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846875,0.001171194,0.0001062395,0.0006424801,0.0007211172,0.0002089809,0.00001883849,0.00009784743,0.01234581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974703,0.0004035507,0.0001046317,0.00005436063,0.0001481185,0.00006257132,0.00001206895,0.000009944608,0.001734485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.455161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4897371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157300277","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.11.016","title":"Large random matching markets with localized preference structures can exhibit large cores","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Preference; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics; Microeconomics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03139128214645982,"gpt":0.230402488825294,"spread":0.1990112066788342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009362002,0.0002610114,0.0006226845,0.0001974769,0.0002259621,0.0001812596,0.0002138258,0.0001283016,0.0008491642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001867106,0.000249851,0.00009340524,0.00009518844,0.00006926651,0.0001728116,0.0001115965,0.000176908,0.0003249448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006079947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002255699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003800443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005254586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982071,0.00004030401,0.0005700025,0.0005761284,0.00002776621,0.0005786925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990958,0.00008797774,0.0003146208,0.0003507122,0.0000103129,0.0001405789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004903945,0.0001049872,0.7567179,0.0001745425,0.000155109,0.00004464362,0.004464598,0.0001598242,0.00004819605,0.2338655,0.001731175,0.002043216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01361583,0.0002351315,0.8745877,0.0001826515,0.0001092387,0.0001120336,0.003877574,0.003318775,0.0002059034,0.04045941,0.0616622,0.00163356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954337,0.0004206901,0.0003659709,0.0001106782,0.0004494056,0.0004082295,0.0008850201,0.0001475817,0.001778662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965308,0.0001526524,0.00008805055,0.00009239499,0.000111428,0.0001109067,0.0000725962,0.00004700945,0.002794177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1934061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323659940","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.03.003","title":"Targeting in networks under costly agreements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Aix-Marseille Université","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Payment; Microeconomics; Economics; Unit (ring theory); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1062701022198937,"gpt":0.3750821985778426,"spread":0.2688120963579489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070572,0.00007150979,0.000137284,0.0001136476,0.00008183069,0.0001140846,0.0002060433,0.00004510858,0.0006054699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002664994,0.00006205832,0.00003226638,0.0001661396,0.0000532333,0.0001257031,0.0001082855,0.00007489752,0.001086592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002445792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001156955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004401595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005668425,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990774,0.00003775456,0.0003305628,0.000286468,0.00006661448,0.0002011393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999443,0.0002054278,0.0000765543,0.000204232,0.000009812565,0.00006099508],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002044733,0.00007869092,0.747923,0.000001881359,0.000009454797,0.000009553129,0.0007122577,0.03127994,0.0004406648,0.01347273,0.02452265,0.1815287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003958535,0.00001748943,0.9510756,0.000006435424,0.00001063035,0.00000306562,0.003071104,0.01968349,0.00002582794,0.01547889,0.01005377,0.0001778629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982814,0.00006452059,0.0002542093,0.0003408323,0.0001837524,0.0001430824,0.0000112346,0.00002863497,0.0006923036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974459,0.00006364103,0.00004833933,0.0001122005,0.0000503569,0.00006471316,0.000008896872,0.000006330896,0.00219962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2031526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133413020","doi":"10.1006/game.1999.0797","title":"Cyclic Games: An Introduction and Some Examples","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Repeated game; Oligopoly; Economics; Complete information; Extensive-form game; Global game; Game theory; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Cournot competition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09215908838217957,"gpt":0.3535597753645019,"spread":0.2614006869823223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000671081,0.0001086024,0.0001869565,0.0001046828,0.0001562468,0.0002568321,0.000184003,0.00007647244,0.0008868355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003602819,0.00009074881,0.00003283477,0.00005901284,0.0001771209,0.0006076752,0.00006483246,0.00009496293,0.0002007416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001722977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001263555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006141117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000862054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988973,0.00005069801,0.0003148214,0.000496106,0.00007062189,0.0001705067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992059,0.000105951,0.0001033933,0.0004288254,0.00001745124,0.000138426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003916433,0.0001404763,0.1081657,0.000002232872,0.00001048368,0.00000316004,0.0009918866,0.00003977957,0.005324114,0.06527462,0.00294279,0.8170656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004314991,0.0001138128,0.6401014,0.000002632107,0.00005635913,0.000186285,0.002687225,0.000263231,0.0005141257,0.05726426,0.2980794,0.0002997331],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972618,0.0002070074,0.00007579294,0.001837472,0.0001814732,0.0001409211,0.00001813428,0.00003461747,0.0002428269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967875,0.0002246984,0.0002254261,0.0001289394,0.0004236372,0.00005570984,0.000007636233,0.000008686538,0.002137739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130729492","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.02.001","title":"Optimal and efficient mechanisms with asymmetrically budget constrained buyers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Budget constraint; Microeconomics; Valuation (finance); Revenue; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Mechanism design; Mathematics; Finance","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03081805682392607,"gpt":0.3012937301618799,"spread":0.2704756733379539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004126196,0.00009457642,0.0001806822,0.00008245424,0.0001534197,0.0002030075,0.0001037831,0.00004761069,0.00072032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005645039,0.00007221288,0.00003535233,0.0001332443,0.0001783878,0.0000723306,0.00007233096,0.00006752979,0.00008704621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001717698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006029237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007134535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009530276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990606,0.00003362782,0.0002551681,0.0004108606,0.00009904466,0.0001407083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992583,0.0002319854,0.00009592615,0.0002282528,0.00004933561,0.0001361404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001275656,0.000388454,0.0120502,0.000006703153,0.00006300207,0.0000661898,0.0009249144,0.003400585,0.003335109,0.4654511,0.001401235,0.512785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01396418,0.002000036,0.5644274,0.00009382826,0.001131633,0.006276083,0.07624292,0.04014216,0.04823176,0.1096439,0.1333838,0.004462314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976729,0.00007155108,0.02098799,0.0006773976,0.00009077383,0.0001193581,0.00005057976,0.00001959915,0.001253701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886067,0.00001774184,0.009736855,0.0001260912,0.00002180428,0.00003523225,0.000003272693,0.0000063436,0.001445971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5523772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7886999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122750115","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.03.002","title":"Financially-constrained lawyers: An economic theory of legal disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Welfare; Social Welfare; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Public economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03168822734550531,"gpt":0.2364309770966461,"spread":0.2047427497511408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467038,0.0006106335,0.002124122,0.0003846523,0.0001745358,0.000372667,0.0008420407,0.0007941718,0.001718537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003272025,0.0008811256,0.0005317045,0.00003052113,0.001101714,0.0006032891,0.0006110613,0.0004311611,0.0006427938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004747268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003089195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005802046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001801963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951799,0.00006313738,0.002413724,0.001614134,0.00002919063,0.0006999001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963194,0.00009344605,0.001996313,0.001225339,0.00003262489,0.0003329304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001362257,0.0002754605,0.1075951,0.0002548256,0.0003574848,0.00001080709,0.001204808,0.0002221617,0.00001727758,0.8768328,0.001510748,0.01158235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005225599,0.00139103,0.2112086,0.0005195353,0.0006332217,0.0001203842,0.001584653,0.006304683,0.0005816576,0.6942371,0.07217708,0.006016446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.963168,0.002001893,0.0003055467,0.0001377167,0.005182555,0.0009033054,0.004647932,0.00009216056,0.0235609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949784,0.001038483,0.0005571904,0.0001203178,0.001924566,0.0002182924,0.0002493319,0.0001277626,0.0007855983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1825957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594652624","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.02.017","title":"Information revelation through bunching","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private information retrieval; Herding; Externality; Microeconomics; Economics; Focus (optics); Bayesian game; Rest (music); Information asymmetry; Information cascade; Mathematical economics; Sequential game; Computer science; Game theory; Psychology; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.119077700302876,"gpt":0.3923268641538337,"spread":0.2732491638509578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006469481,0.00005922183,0.0001043027,0.00003405949,0.0005076209,0.0007277271,0.0003054168,0.00004149394,0.0003542453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001267403,0.00004863399,0.00003518847,0.00001249722,0.00008186253,0.0021458,0.00009205072,0.00005258974,0.001005488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001642536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001446163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000995285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002163182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994121,0.00001582509,0.0002938441,0.0001194337,0.00006881085,0.00008996018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990663,0.00007222823,0.0002904913,0.0005105007,0.00002369316,0.00003679668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001015882,0.00001656751,0.1032214,0.000001770342,0.000004175577,2.573072e-7,0.002384932,0.00004102846,0.000149575,0.106821,0.002578602,0.7847705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002314591,0.00001350329,0.8196244,0.000004943185,0.00001543789,0.000009054093,0.0007957887,0.0004862054,0.0001962707,0.06523489,0.1132666,0.0001215033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822885,0.00001324754,0.00216615,0.0007977684,0.000201301,0.000121455,0.0000174374,0.00001504882,0.01437906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979952,0.00001630028,0.0006677424,0.0000903811,0.00005230277,0.00002944579,0.000004929503,0.000002457464,0.001141225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.784649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952997420","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.11.006","title":"Almost envy-free allocations with connected bundles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Balliol College, University of Oxford; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Lemma (botany); Mathematical proof; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Graph; Bundle; Hamiltonian path; Monotonic function; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03410988676932792,"gpt":0.2231898592085411,"spread":0.1890799724392132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004631524,0.0004136045,0.000959179,0.0001956055,0.0001603101,0.0004630587,0.0004903835,0.000374168,0.0009690357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004451242,0.0004698789,0.000172781,0.00005571832,0.0001712867,0.0001720442,0.0005229404,0.0004505976,0.0002208199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001000223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001853222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976428,0.00003750361,0.0008763013,0.001027043,0.00002418998,0.0003922123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978634,0.00007797136,0.0006816381,0.001175693,0.0000357993,0.0001654862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001079621,0.000754272,0.6359009,0.000786023,0.0008668174,0.00009101394,0.006119236,0.001504408,0.00006921064,0.3444107,0.004088909,0.005300487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008136977,0.000685955,0.834819,0.00174578,0.001076199,0.0008080653,0.01002438,0.006355479,0.0006761551,0.04170553,0.08596998,0.007996575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856465,0.003543215,0.0004596964,0.0004206005,0.001091988,0.0005451866,0.00103711,0.0001051603,0.007150485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940901,0.0004033688,0.0007631107,0.00009378124,0.0002580776,0.0003448746,0.0003019487,0.00007412193,0.003670562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3027052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}