{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":64,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":64,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"fdd51a68d7fc","filters":{"venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2556895110","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2074","title":"Extending the Reno Model: Responsible Gambling Evaluation Guidelines for Gambling Operators, Public Policymakers, and Regulators","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; Université Laval","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Public economics; Accounting; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Ladouceur","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alex Blaszczynski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Howard J. Shaffer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Davis Fong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4033227568449514,"gpt":0.4710230576305505,"spread":0.06770030078559908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1703841,0.002291934,0.00329306,0.005141235,0.005261526,0.01753394,0.01027608,0.0458232,0.007472666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2861612,0.001875683,0.003387643,0.001781984,0.01921347,0.01782233,0.008253928,0.02964794,0.003292127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009122103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05233109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02759971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04609533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.788725,0.1380445,0.009460466,0.01080179,0.04410162,0.008866571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.734817,0.1973324,0.008189356,0.009050805,0.04593754,0.004672887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001574739,0.0001593393,0.001183166,0.0003052392,0.0001055042,0.0002182278,0.001219076,0.002319484,0.0002730307,0.8449433,0.1127755,0.03634061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000451073,0.00022513,0.00234087,0.002634198,0.0003713233,0.0002773874,0.0006767702,0.009636804,0.0009018451,0.7517749,0.2303624,0.0003473527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006748221,0.009797487,0.1532215,0.6145824,0.004204334,0.001319489,0.000615105,0.0008401677,0.2086713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2683147,0.006183832,0.1367062,0.5353637,0.005698928,0.003025598,0.0004287541,0.0006067845,0.04367152],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1703841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9010881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025195404","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1797","title":"Assessment Tool to Measure and Evaluate the Risk Potential of Gambling Products, ASTERIG: A Global Validation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Journal of Public Health; Art history; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Health care; Public health policy; Health policy","authors":[{"name":"Carlos Blanco","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alex Blaszczynski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Reiner Clement","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey L. Derevensky","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anna E. Goudriaan","is_ca":false},{"name":"David C. Hodgins","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ruth J. van Holst","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ángela Ibáñez","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sílvia S. Martins","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chantal Moersen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sabrina Molinaro","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adrian Parke","is_ca":false},{"name":"Franz W. Peren","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nancy M. Petry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Heather Wardle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08754902457062169,"gpt":0.3714633990753765,"spread":0.2839143745047548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007085413,0.001255989,0.0007549439,0.004477287,0.000555941,0.001271221,0.00139454,0.001428757,0.01604819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177063,0.0003881782,0.002094097,0.001482339,0.0005638653,0.001713234,0.002028536,0.001007802,0.007118008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005191342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00126461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001563367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002722343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957526,0.001174784,0.0004922827,0.0003652454,0.00207875,0.0001363719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836558,0.007426269,0.002122467,0.00126443,0.005137427,0.0003935774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034444,0.002275946,0.4432231,0.00137089,0.0006033458,0.0003215036,0.000642348,0.002677456,0.004898888,0.004512624,0.05465465,0.4813749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009049416,0.006362738,0.8680968,0.001660936,0.001048813,0.003471289,0.001084749,0.01456654,0.01119994,0.008576886,0.08282953,0.0001968469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.646983,0.006321857,0.1121204,0.002630899,0.001448568,0.01117925,0.05238095,0.005294147,0.161641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7868293,0.00274609,0.1215959,0.001347002,0.0002413737,0.008031388,0.02476002,0.0005807771,0.05386816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05368656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247510543","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15911","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S105520, 2011 BCSC 772 (British Columbia Supreme Court, June 2, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Political science; Electronic signature; Economics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02820992736255812,"gpt":0.227764914538077,"spread":0.1995549871755188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001189834,0.0006107012,0.0003852461,0.001718874,0.01438352,0.006159638,0.001906292,0.00673779,0.07322314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003974066,0.0008772889,0.0005350319,0.001843403,0.001643173,0.00153547,0.001207764,0.004173392,0.01490683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02201708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04406289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9139782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997758,0.0001499576,0.00006214806,0.0001516433,0.001136416,0.0007418628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981747,0.0003977674,0.00006110231,0.00007654247,0.001067016,0.0002228311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004180992,0.00002854881,0.001417515,0.00006113457,0.000008486549,0.0001261914,0.0003112906,0.0001090136,0.0002330311,0.03821204,0.9503312,0.009119771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004924964,0.00002514416,0.01203718,0.0002881087,0.0000367258,0.0001084456,0.001094423,0.0005378212,0.0007546201,0.005171429,0.9798275,0.00006930049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006882601,0.002930454,0.000549163,0.02061696,0.0005716887,0.0001571132,0.005005814,0.0002608558,0.9630253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03798614,0.001159384,0.0004828099,0.01939613,0.00006242524,0.0001336505,0.001451792,0.00007521804,0.9392524],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08602178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2449558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240039888","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18615","title":"Nova Growth Corp. v. Kepinski <i>2014 CarswellOnt 6335, 2014 ONSC 2763 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice [Commercial List], May 12, 2014</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Download; Economic Justice; CITES; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02529310089975424,"gpt":0.2676874636780195,"spread":0.2423943627782653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001335415,0.0005639929,0.0002596004,0.001523292,0.01278405,0.005044806,0.001577701,0.004697895,0.04399895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541216,0.0007763651,0.0005347148,0.001276825,0.001740357,0.001824058,0.001403332,0.003764705,0.009158244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02345156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03537131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8642535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9771988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973232,0.000150782,0.0000841509,0.0002318859,0.001435166,0.0007748667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975485,0.0003847295,0.0001034095,0.00007006565,0.001627686,0.0002654604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005017384,0.0000340847,0.003596648,0.00009059397,0.00001057613,0.0002586486,0.0009305322,0.0001276637,0.0005465177,0.09310636,0.8912645,0.009983734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002901741,0.00002281998,0.01690287,0.000179578,0.00002494632,0.0001304457,0.001148253,0.0003553802,0.000819353,0.00442808,0.975904,0.00005524241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01032695,0.001433272,0.0004724384,0.0193141,0.0003685521,0.0001685219,0.003942309,0.00009864145,0.9638751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05724762,0.001187464,0.0006485113,0.02109036,0.0001004001,0.0001346,0.001809215,0.00006104133,0.9177209],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1357465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2730918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229673390","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19413","title":"Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. (Re) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1201; 2015 ONSC 712 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03101750018826518,"gpt":0.3015964477350956,"spread":0.2705789475468304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006680848,0.0005539104,0.0002376108,0.001648346,0.005998805,0.005126552,0.001181533,0.003327753,0.192553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002413276,0.0007022558,0.0004890882,0.00121088,0.001032369,0.001744308,0.001212094,0.003182636,0.0826993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006910976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01060961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5556493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988722,0.00004676933,0.00003855404,0.0001009832,0.0006885949,0.0002528172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998952,0.0001394164,0.00004787989,0.00005617283,0.0006967922,0.0001077246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001536927,0.00001139805,0.0003122712,0.00005394963,0.000002539854,0.00005822241,0.0001360636,0.00003504752,0.0001843855,0.02267383,0.9674091,0.009107865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005340342,0.000004980818,0.001570377,0.0000673219,0.000004712804,0.00002641455,0.0001811335,0.00007181663,0.0002230891,0.0005339222,0.9972998,0.00001095164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001173681,0.001181879,0.0002908706,0.006142257,0.0005827131,0.0000820838,0.002052043,0.0003236467,0.9881709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005631404,0.0005752047,0.0001963634,0.002745293,0.00008158942,0.00004015522,0.0006163308,0.0001114024,0.9900023],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4443507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8939352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244012758","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19215","title":"R. v. Miller <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 2121, 2014 BCSC 1561, Docket: X075613 (British Columbia Supreme Court, April 4, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02322293283140335,"gpt":0.2536600518538323,"spread":0.2304371190224289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001625398,0.0007378701,0.0005584073,0.002007586,0.01198605,0.005640419,0.002187588,0.009252793,0.08305398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007027383,0.0009328418,0.0007551353,0.001915234,0.002033085,0.001919013,0.001436458,0.006918388,0.0271608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01311391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02973045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6184404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8486769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976508,0.0001732359,0.00008184597,0.0002188115,0.001159886,0.0007154316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980004,0.0005829362,0.0001063767,0.00009402761,0.001002101,0.0002141681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002018916,0.00001783662,0.0004756778,0.0000540073,0.000005139584,0.00008816681,0.0001696259,0.00005257546,0.0002193743,0.0485029,0.9426178,0.007776704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003588464,0.00001894719,0.005962268,0.0003667295,0.00002932022,0.00009517887,0.0003479197,0.000289234,0.000468389,0.008846976,0.9834902,0.00004891647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003321991,0.004075615,0.0006159986,0.05671635,0.0006880237,0.0002298456,0.004253156,0.0005063349,0.9295925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0328846,0.002354508,0.00118402,0.08035307,0.0003735635,0.000369462,0.001244523,0.0001518085,0.8810844],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3815596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7676134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241392334","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.151113","title":"Loveless v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2011] O.J. No. 3783; 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 6128; 2011 ONSC 4744 (August 20, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Lottery; Download; Art; Advertising; Business; Humanities; World Wide Web; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04167835955753108,"gpt":0.2295467539918523,"spread":0.1878683944343212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001504279,0.0006090997,0.0003895805,0.0009761122,0.01751264,0.004478737,0.002042613,0.009342271,0.02851448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004686042,0.0009085905,0.0006268707,0.001303789,0.003244552,0.001720018,0.001105869,0.004913648,0.00445576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03077249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04007492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978714,0.0001775838,0.00005830715,0.0001308244,0.001104011,0.0006578116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980785,0.0006538417,0.0001056139,0.00005456431,0.0008115162,0.0002958937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002896687,0.00001449439,0.001447076,0.00009370876,0.000007730354,0.0001920309,0.001565244,0.00005226363,0.0002146767,0.05814064,0.9333134,0.004929828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003450408,0.00002079812,0.008727888,0.0002713335,0.00003127925,0.00009330763,0.001397493,0.0001551402,0.0003646364,0.003042369,0.9858223,0.00003887682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006439497,0.007987839,0.0004211421,0.07423484,0.0008697874,0.0001403491,0.002039604,0.00009876381,0.907768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08353782,0.005308273,0.0004820279,0.1302366,0.0005388898,0.0001996863,0.0006853123,0.00006764405,0.7789438],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0724206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2232711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243184977","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20513","title":"R. v. Dey <i>No.: 500-73-004217-143; [2016] Q.J. No. 2333; 2016 QCCQ 1670 (Court of Québec [Criminal and Penal Division] District of Montréal, March 21, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Law; Criminal court; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Arithmetic; International law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03771702997297455,"gpt":0.3294438888148218,"spread":0.2917268588418472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002618308,0.0009707684,0.0006820864,0.001707267,0.01084998,0.006890705,0.002546212,0.01008079,0.1731112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008221909,0.001045919,0.000718333,0.001560498,0.002254037,0.002159741,0.00163179,0.006115415,0.07253059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01892639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03402071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.853129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9279358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971617,0.0001952888,0.00008407503,0.0003028539,0.001189533,0.0010666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952416,0.001006843,0.0001873982,0.0001829137,0.002880251,0.0005009457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625447,0.00001684967,0.0006286852,0.00004993629,0.000006239391,0.0001014167,0.0001744325,0.00005168714,0.0001706445,0.02254855,0.9718534,0.004371907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000342876,0.00002012479,0.005098235,0.0002213391,0.00002055421,0.0001058987,0.0003394274,0.0002189094,0.0003404638,0.002037017,0.9915187,0.00004501732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002076812,0.00241024,0.0007376769,0.02485985,0.0007908768,0.0002475078,0.007565771,0.0006207367,0.9606906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01770578,0.0008011347,0.0004164665,0.03914085,0.0001621213,0.0001959964,0.001251562,0.000170586,0.9401555],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.853129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5791148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068762313","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.1635","title":"The UIGEA, Canada and the “New” Fantasy Sports","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Download; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Art; Literature; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business","authors":[{"name":"Jack Tadman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03410074490607685,"gpt":0.3003339783601601,"spread":0.2662332334540833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002315867,0.0004940298,0.0006214055,0.002285979,0.006071016,0.007258567,0.002447281,0.007532932,0.01253497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008722443,0.0003533672,0.0006486718,0.002635713,0.009158357,0.002412209,0.002133663,0.009495064,0.0005147888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03528052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1080288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9576072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965987,0.0003034876,0.00009428336,0.0002545962,0.00175971,0.0009891771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953245,0.001068225,0.0002262158,0.000147158,0.001808518,0.001425279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001023262,0.00009145115,0.004852712,0.0003023132,0.00006285166,0.0002313282,0.0008788814,0.0004148163,0.0001957007,0.4634268,0.4226519,0.106789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001005621,0.00004462325,0.02514108,0.001848284,0.000103008,0.0001810138,0.002264788,0.0004872758,0.0001755706,0.03733948,0.9322254,0.00008883436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02327244,0.1768768,0.001096008,0.4335487,0.006024844,0.00008073303,0.001023273,0.00006712443,0.3580101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.377153,0.1247491,0.001607459,0.3190468,0.003219713,0.0001511452,0.0006890542,0.00008988851,0.1732938],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04239285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2559793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235003937","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13112","title":"B-Filer, Inc. v. TD Canada Trust, <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1397</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009243825721817865,"gpt":0.1750799401747025,"spread":0.1658361144528847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001390009,0.0005477418,0.000351552,0.00139945,0.01294497,0.00637692,0.00204564,0.009402911,0.04936508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006916306,0.0008944281,0.0007135618,0.00145899,0.001620548,0.002351096,0.001097245,0.005137744,0.01120742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01825101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04917235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9037622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997209,0.000120368,0.00008628181,0.0001787028,0.00149936,0.0009062518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996214,0.0007733302,0.0001347217,0.00009760111,0.00230399,0.0004763879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003894065,0.00002350643,0.001985488,0.00007229464,0.000008750159,0.0002124011,0.0005474092,0.00007894454,0.0003442429,0.0505395,0.9389304,0.007218026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003538739,0.0000379807,0.01002748,0.0002174304,0.00004170831,0.0001697291,0.001269518,0.0003318048,0.0008436302,0.004270886,0.9826881,0.00006639352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01169509,0.006194891,0.001272149,0.06970688,0.00139436,0.0002235902,0.006586005,0.0004819743,0.9024451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07073885,0.002405274,0.0007241487,0.0563191,0.000191522,0.0001249899,0.001439193,0.0001488355,0.8679081],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9037622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1936091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083064927","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14205","title":"The Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:ke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Morden C. Lazarus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brian Hall","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04639817410377368,"gpt":0.3688322969537854,"spread":0.3224341228500118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007361988,0.000417129,0.0006586096,0.002000342,0.03661766,0.01614478,0.003098512,0.01250899,0.00464707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154677,0.0008381938,0.0006318228,0.002125949,0.02267533,0.004645666,0.00540293,0.0147411,0.0004019889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1308443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.348806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862895,0.001977731,0.0004405015,0.0007870095,0.005639957,0.004865302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860079,0.004656925,0.0006424368,0.0005991617,0.005381351,0.002712158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003474654,0.00004280937,0.003305085,0.0002004541,0.00003601619,0.0008807077,0.01795082,0.0006390439,0.0005063651,0.8139334,0.1470985,0.01537212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006840579,0.00004563409,0.02491498,0.001931028,0.0001758178,0.000768106,0.0582985,0.001735283,0.0009865386,0.1204875,0.7901607,0.000427484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05845478,0.03581785,0.001860476,0.6565881,0.001176899,0.0001644139,0.0005270545,0.0000625807,0.2453478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8544179,0.01342394,0.002471347,0.07912547,0.000253577,0.0001141163,0.0001445024,0.00005357447,0.04999557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1308443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246921850","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19612","title":"Between Stanley Howard Tomchin, Plaintiff, and Her Majesty the Queen and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Defendants <i>[2015] F.C.J. No. 378; 2015 FC 402 (Federal Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Plaintiff; Law; Queen (butterfly); Preparedness; Political science; Jurisprudence","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02819225285611794,"gpt":0.2796180607108978,"spread":0.2514258078547799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002807977,0.0004782829,0.0004561382,0.001041442,0.01970353,0.00708897,0.001727528,0.0128695,0.02095067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01282741,0.0008753205,0.0005549052,0.001263197,0.003472466,0.002506076,0.002475783,0.008882808,0.003738442],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007990753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01813539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3167207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5739781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970373,0.0005241662,0.0001111794,0.000425055,0.001119443,0.0007829634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962642,0.002339573,0.0001486792,0.00009429811,0.0007187926,0.0004345717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003235105,0.00003097114,0.001165133,0.00007675739,0.00001155536,0.0005541996,0.002551522,0.00007710758,0.0002715877,0.2130713,0.7752936,0.006863897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002935177,0.0000274563,0.004496272,0.0003653101,0.00002634511,0.0003752762,0.005503442,0.0002485895,0.0006587668,0.01858744,0.9696286,0.00005319178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01929067,0.01403108,0.001793016,0.3236538,0.005521662,0.0002356399,0.0007165577,0.000122293,0.6346353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1022536,0.003517604,0.0009681958,0.2676464,0.0008816558,0.0001744662,0.0002020014,0.0000713071,0.6242847],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6297543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037572661","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15406","title":"Betting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Tourism; Colonialism; Download; Law; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Seaman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brenda Pritchard","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Potter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01866833660455779,"gpt":0.1931828018412585,"spread":0.1745144652367007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005015648,0.0004077126,0.0007270094,0.004410467,0.01238196,0.01076817,0.00193199,0.003965246,0.007066458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0162289,0.0003589737,0.0004498181,0.008284183,0.009877738,0.003019762,0.002228323,0.00429192,0.0003292217],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1864863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3023516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919926,0.0009313615,0.0001763978,0.0004101287,0.004245053,0.002244306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988193,0.003078901,0.0005162081,0.0003012402,0.006308663,0.001602021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000456536,0.00005575946,0.01143144,0.0005000699,0.00006425885,0.0002312182,0.005772731,0.0009474517,0.000123472,0.5111597,0.3981124,0.07155583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003007965,0.00001869041,0.05393743,0.002893484,0.00009599968,0.00008925602,0.009050109,0.001293249,0.0002948575,0.03357341,0.8985577,0.000165793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04097965,0.3237531,0.0006967922,0.3324884,0.002212314,0.000120381,0.001729379,0.00005859308,0.2979614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6703171,0.1970126,0.00100258,0.04073161,0.0008752295,0.0001138562,0.0007503962,0.0000771586,0.08911967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1864863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9435605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254099115","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17611","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba, Ltd.Case No. CI 09-01-61504 and CI 09-01-61489, [2013] M.J. No. 81; 2013 MBQB 67; 2013 MB.C.Lexis 81 (Manitoba Court of Queen s Bench, Winnipeg Centre, March 15, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); General partnership; Charter; Library science; Political science; Geography; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Law; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02751448436436627,"gpt":0.2525301976058204,"spread":0.2250157132414541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001461161,0.0006668971,0.0002540341,0.001606064,0.01450581,0.005484297,0.001683913,0.004690986,0.03611969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003635318,0.001123238,0.0004224986,0.002060209,0.002008263,0.00191548,0.001286972,0.003599296,0.005849797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02474609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06036525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9266575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984433,0.0001407018,0.00003703959,0.0001490283,0.0006656468,0.0005643084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980775,0.0003714568,0.00009980944,0.00005177902,0.001093594,0.0003058754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009788759,0.00007434079,0.009209489,0.0002075779,0.00003199804,0.0007720058,0.002117919,0.0002218911,0.0009996491,0.1250884,0.8420689,0.01911007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008356672,0.00006042344,0.02291938,0.0004021935,0.00007403897,0.0002573275,0.003636572,0.0006178691,0.00135932,0.004976443,0.9655271,0.00008589998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02417765,0.007923131,0.001155369,0.06300332,0.0008050569,0.0003451865,0.004099237,0.0002629089,0.8982281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09288446,0.002855117,0.0008429078,0.03857146,0.00008970357,0.0002143369,0.0008221091,0.00005289589,0.8636671],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0733425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1795463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243222075","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20411","title":"Great Canadian Gaming Corp. v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S152587; [2016] B.C.J. No. 113; 2016 BCSC 101 (British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, January 25, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Media studies","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008839946253133973,"gpt":0.1948477469982002,"spread":0.1860078007450663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562727,0.0008469486,0.0003814024,0.002193004,0.0155186,0.006471775,0.002271897,0.00842668,0.04506839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005460598,0.0007656212,0.0006660488,0.002634023,0.002683477,0.001587875,0.001093608,0.005778539,0.007321118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03504187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07166385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968256,0.0002090062,0.0000797477,0.0001841347,0.001734788,0.0009667835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974294,0.0006957098,0.0000738896,0.00006430779,0.001442572,0.0002941589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001570767,0.000009323827,0.0005518422,0.00007305195,0.000006046999,0.0001084837,0.0004282762,0.00007967403,0.0001369586,0.03924459,0.9531462,0.006199803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002258216,0.00001277073,0.005563124,0.0003146073,0.00002826674,0.00008381884,0.001008846,0.0002015963,0.0003402199,0.00416563,0.988207,0.00005141752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.003268624,0.007323913,0.0004702498,0.04467942,0.001134233,0.0001338855,0.00344497,0.0001833541,0.9393614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07442186,0.006867117,0.001055655,0.1114088,0.0004320736,0.0002154276,0.001844842,0.0001281486,0.8036261],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04506839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2542477,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206557481","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16714","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>B.C.J. No. 489; 2012 BCCA 120; 2012 BC.C. LEXIS 1071</i> <i>(British Columbia Court of Appeal, March 13, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Lottery; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0191191538648193,"gpt":0.2473496995810753,"spread":0.228230545716256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001341182,0.0006158506,0.0003487301,0.00173542,0.01254249,0.005038157,0.00178035,0.006468961,0.04888311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00428121,0.0008605443,0.0004601359,0.001728986,0.001737606,0.001307452,0.0009885898,0.003554952,0.009321402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01863359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04009118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9098251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979335,0.0001909967,0.00006482618,0.000139538,0.001032494,0.0006386593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980532,0.0006011067,0.00007230826,0.00007480763,0.0009916549,0.0002068552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005134678,0.00003415217,0.001728415,0.00009824825,0.00001007647,0.0001766134,0.0005783221,0.000119321,0.00031314,0.04875807,0.9350825,0.01304983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005786088,0.00003107697,0.01629007,0.000394563,0.00004768261,0.0001395677,0.001314542,0.000538127,0.000897677,0.005276567,0.9749302,0.0000821119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009505996,0.005627147,0.0006019154,0.02634614,0.0005833842,0.0001971211,0.004061138,0.0002378589,0.9528393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06488077,0.002200162,0.0007153371,0.03269574,0.00008729567,0.000224758,0.001330368,0.00006846683,0.8977972],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09017491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1814119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231234638","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13111","title":"Bear Hills Charitable Foundation v. Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1431</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Foundation (evidence); Download; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0154266693967477,"gpt":0.2679643827990066,"spread":0.2525377134022589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001603897,0.0005841216,0.0003504812,0.001520059,0.01393327,0.00779519,0.002240247,0.01043449,0.02549146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00433206,0.000898446,0.0005772587,0.001795723,0.002677723,0.00147477,0.001121262,0.00450111,0.004029038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0212429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04058151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9290683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974537,0.0001545803,0.00006275903,0.0001565066,0.001290192,0.0008821308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982402,0.0004134892,0.00008978306,0.0000525238,0.0009307571,0.000273155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004311503,0.00004951494,0.003833577,0.00008501134,0.00001610088,0.0003147872,0.001379739,0.0001970736,0.0004120803,0.1189974,0.8643339,0.01033769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005135723,0.00004561686,0.02702986,0.0003204483,0.00006838282,0.0001428208,0.002778156,0.0005876273,0.0009870816,0.01165273,0.9562348,0.0001010887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01623617,0.00558897,0.0008444087,0.05582844,0.001100336,0.0001679806,0.003179704,0.0002963961,0.9167576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1148885,0.002956491,0.001030064,0.07812048,0.0003016105,0.0001237547,0.001301331,0.00006944161,0.8012082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07093167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1541288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233329049","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181012","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen and Lorena Lam <i>[2014] A.J. No. 428, 2014 ABPC 90 LEXIS 420 (Alberta Provincial Court, April 17, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Lexis; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Botany; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01851065696521964,"gpt":0.2664289703729082,"spread":0.2479183134076886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001772014,0.0005354601,0.0004859517,0.0009232053,0.01749228,0.007828183,0.001603123,0.007496551,0.07695521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006948949,0.0006875264,0.0004904516,0.0008945747,0.002528755,0.002378817,0.002459608,0.009466548,0.01768349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01114797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01893114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5368219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8164803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981287,0.0001870535,0.00004562354,0.0002931428,0.000725229,0.0006202964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980264,0.0006846648,0.00007139255,0.00007852641,0.0007657327,0.0003731904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000227698,0.00001030629,0.0003811937,0.00003144529,0.000005465013,0.0001631672,0.0007430416,0.00002510504,0.0001344506,0.03790864,0.953806,0.006768297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007094592,0.000008523763,0.001782472,0.000132961,0.000005336283,0.00007806735,0.001426503,0.00004928697,0.0002083939,0.002889541,0.9933888,0.00002301025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005066698,0.01288957,0.001261072,0.1833293,0.008165345,0.0001805414,0.001602671,0.0003384957,0.7871664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01850515,0.001288352,0.0003261062,0.04924622,0.0004642676,0.00004747068,0.0001725974,0.00008813767,0.9298618],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5368219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9318117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233389050","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16314","title":"<i>Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd.</i> <i>[2011] M.J. No. 305; 2011 MBQB 225, 2011 MB.C. LEXIS 845 (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, September 16, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Lexis; General partnership; Art; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0326076102925209,"gpt":0.2605759400749266,"spread":0.2279683297824057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001348901,0.0006987223,0.0002698023,0.001629246,0.01164104,0.005283786,0.001992742,0.005550483,0.03547757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003401605,0.0009910219,0.0005776676,0.002045935,0.001816478,0.00173061,0.001208991,0.003241003,0.008109402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01441661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0354712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.855674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985738,0.0001515371,0.00004677985,0.0001274084,0.0006087372,0.0004917669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998174,0.0004345312,0.0001142434,0.00006211102,0.0009956604,0.0002195477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004422937,0.00003546119,0.002940812,0.0001455486,0.00001808322,0.000320638,0.001479846,0.0001254094,0.0004312537,0.101451,0.8823798,0.01062786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003105992,0.00003151071,0.01250154,0.0003091131,0.00003644825,0.0001359687,0.001797588,0.00029926,0.0007871336,0.003088577,0.9809322,0.00004958602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01000644,0.005275356,0.0008330785,0.04302175,0.0009333018,0.000222423,0.003081293,0.0002231347,0.9364032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06598325,0.002720198,0.0008407531,0.0647957,0.0001622172,0.000259037,0.0009623864,0.00007454617,0.8642019],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.144326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235758395","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.19112","title":"Ross v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 612, 2014 BCSC 320, 2014 BC.C. LEXIS 975 (British Columbia Supreme Court, March 5, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Supreme court; Lottery; Law; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Media studies","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01979959897980959,"gpt":0.2388291168262018,"spread":0.2190295178463922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001522379,0.0007963572,0.000448555,0.001559094,0.01479527,0.005764298,0.002094518,0.01261348,0.03384348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006233122,0.000860041,0.0006446271,0.001575234,0.002708402,0.001422577,0.001105771,0.00745411,0.007833139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02195181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03277655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8631794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9620813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978816,0.0002629127,0.00007086412,0.0001757433,0.0009380882,0.0006706813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979708,0.0008213789,0.00007603268,0.00005333764,0.0008716753,0.0002067819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002221458,0.00001202782,0.0004496339,0.00005966184,0.00000545673,0.0001232872,0.0004042214,0.00006095576,0.0001581772,0.03023267,0.963571,0.004900716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003590572,0.0000194277,0.005684071,0.0004586832,0.00002931713,0.00009813329,0.001133229,0.0002330502,0.0004869776,0.004996083,0.9867612,0.00006391534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005757245,0.009506233,0.000453935,0.1070636,0.001705537,0.0001739267,0.002773626,0.000208137,0.8723578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05914531,0.004191777,0.0007104683,0.2339729,0.0004598754,0.0003027263,0.0009648186,0.00009679702,0.7001553],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1368206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229795280","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16315","title":"<i>Pineau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation</i> <i>Case No. CV-10-00399497, [2011] O.J. No. 4360, 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 9344, 2011 ONSC 5822 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 5, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03211866439953598,"gpt":0.2593901434697813,"spread":0.2272714790702454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001326591,0.0005734923,0.0003512569,0.001571269,0.0136309,0.004936231,0.00205619,0.005996051,0.03951311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004498153,0.0008419044,0.0006478652,0.002228728,0.002401543,0.001664408,0.001179082,0.002903684,0.005990551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03041915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04633986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975626,0.0001398328,0.00007977912,0.0001868089,0.001238678,0.0007922984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979316,0.0004832358,0.0001451932,0.00008210082,0.001098357,0.0002595977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000333628,0.00001875804,0.001885251,0.00008334208,0.000009594942,0.0002587816,0.001042743,0.00005870976,0.0002654166,0.0615261,0.9294105,0.005407467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003055092,0.00001933436,0.01972104,0.0002001545,0.00002926738,0.0001184449,0.001124087,0.0002480544,0.0003892695,0.004079978,0.9739947,0.00004519683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.007996306,0.004574732,0.0005170159,0.03861129,0.000711598,0.0002504343,0.006464339,0.0001649188,0.9407094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102941,0.003787987,0.001009198,0.06448986,0.0003500154,0.0003268797,0.002722981,0.0001087467,0.8242633],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04282695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2207074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027819035","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14109","title":"Case Comment on <i>Canada v. Fischbacher</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Library science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Stuart Hoegner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02011947005182962,"gpt":0.2597711806890595,"spread":0.2396517106372299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003854483,0.0009169928,0.001257728,0.00171229,0.0193421,0.007615042,0.006224784,0.06768042,0.01322132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01463061,0.001145588,0.002076301,0.002574591,0.006853832,0.002757387,0.002002429,0.02945606,0.00340424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02823814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0583746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8515004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9287322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946852,0.0003841186,0.0001842765,0.0006486711,0.002319501,0.001778325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934608,0.003094439,0.0002991303,0.0001903144,0.001968988,0.0009863322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391894,0.0000154652,0.0007705726,0.00003526053,0.00001417799,0.000575597,0.0007336049,0.0001107973,0.0002220265,0.03470493,0.9610263,0.00175748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006586628,0.00003238731,0.004640109,0.0002818767,0.00007744,0.0004490288,0.002632057,0.0006080513,0.0007015293,0.01245259,0.9779108,0.0001483179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.003517465,0.00136941,0.0003890759,0.9176639,0.005334867,0.00009885324,0.0008348355,0.000126293,0.07066534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01316728,0.0004890345,0.0003009735,0.9414525,0.001363382,0.00005658869,0.0001263219,0.00003857188,0.04300527],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1484996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2987483,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661077792","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.1948","title":"Aboriginal Gaming Challenges in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Morden C. Lazarus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brian M. Hall","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1129555066946083,"gpt":0.3270983709033963,"spread":0.2141428642087879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006526527,0.0003421288,0.0009045269,0.004010975,0.02366222,0.01371594,0.003517107,0.004555703,0.009289026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02174073,0.0005513004,0.0006643273,0.006499723,0.00699997,0.002203244,0.003614103,0.007465899,0.0003368059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1239809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3758616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987777,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925604,0.001218439,0.000320045,0.0004026599,0.002619502,0.002878965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741799,0.008345147,0.000925818,0.0004651764,0.01150209,0.004581917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003639245,0.0002545701,0.07077631,0.001619113,0.0003743976,0.003154726,0.04551492,0.002514329,0.0004606373,0.5291884,0.2059541,0.1398246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001725076,0.0001701371,0.1670066,0.005380012,0.0007438659,0.001166005,0.1387145,0.003099967,0.0008189785,0.06229807,0.6200583,0.0003711405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3466322,0.04958971,0.001138906,0.328588,0.00195283,0.0002963455,0.001864131,0.00007283819,0.2698649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8488116,0.03517206,0.001929448,0.04871716,0.0005113318,0.0001761933,0.0004417134,0.00008047437,0.0641601],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1239809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8995486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992773862","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13505","title":"Canadian Tax Structuring for Gaming Ventures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Tax law; Advertising; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Value-added tax","authors":[{"name":"Stuart Hoegner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0154800232570498,"gpt":0.2109649916487863,"spread":0.1954849683917365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002551184,0.0004234358,0.0004271534,0.004843028,0.01071935,0.006254265,0.001449577,0.002904202,0.01565977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213907,0.000511646,0.0004718852,0.006321537,0.002573201,0.001402703,0.001612827,0.002935658,0.001474492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08287048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1563475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992867,0.000281011,0.0001339586,0.0003996976,0.004700787,0.001617542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921418,0.000592343,0.000270658,0.00043945,0.005396478,0.00115934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003660619,0.00003551111,0.006056841,0.00009261891,0.00001620141,0.0001132337,0.001179745,0.0005086921,0.0003361751,0.5029624,0.4446698,0.04399221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000219439,0.00001604713,0.02707471,0.0002136519,0.00003568736,0.00008354124,0.0007942654,0.0006350336,0.000315398,0.01413059,0.9566113,0.00006792205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03857922,0.01067298,0.0009088628,0.04952258,0.001004623,0.0002265451,0.003538699,0.0001526568,0.8953938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5941235,0.01037827,0.001579581,0.01448605,0.0004578084,0.0001161856,0.001794523,0.0001169221,0.3769471],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08287048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6012703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242206263","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19611","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Nicky Fortunato <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1502; 2015 ONSC 1845 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06143848215864963,"gpt":0.3283772116095314,"spread":0.2669387294508818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024254,0.0004902399,0.0004448343,0.0009442191,0.01697766,0.007172782,0.001391245,0.006780038,0.06631565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008593651,0.000612238,0.0004859683,0.000887967,0.003809777,0.002810351,0.002544,0.007453539,0.01106672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01467352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02667231,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6907179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9002483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977009,0.0002732961,0.00007829758,0.0003053351,0.0009494037,0.0006928302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974841,0.0009146764,0.0001399845,0.00007876274,0.0008993217,0.0004831848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003667102,0.00001316829,0.001023568,0.00008887849,0.000008460298,0.0001985269,0.001398802,0.00003179447,0.0001423975,0.05833766,0.9288902,0.009829813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001011835,0.00001151525,0.003340188,0.0003095945,0.00001226157,0.00008858871,0.002098372,0.00005340915,0.0002242536,0.004272693,0.9895529,0.00002620364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006381413,0.02313601,0.001048945,0.2868884,0.005326847,0.0001642257,0.001601277,0.0001541778,0.6752988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03726739,0.0042145,0.0005606969,0.08938087,0.0005553561,0.00007400195,0.0002395396,0.00009149426,0.8676163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.622207,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254174589","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14712","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2360 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03524059886939603,"gpt":0.2572022426826484,"spread":0.2219616438132523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016405,0.0004178765,0.000273251,0.000719473,0.01776553,0.005000726,0.001308512,0.006877766,0.0180141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003463939,0.0005594245,0.000410263,0.0009421949,0.002166153,0.001452823,0.000972185,0.003481306,0.001811758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02740736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0500266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987568,0.0000714347,0.00002942742,0.00009994645,0.0005391424,0.0005033287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987914,0.0002820918,0.00005446557,0.0000387832,0.0005990205,0.0002342864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006795938,0.00003669873,0.008286007,0.0001473769,0.00001993183,0.0007875754,0.004944657,0.0001286921,0.0008331589,0.1048106,0.8695356,0.01040174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002493077,0.00002583069,0.029432,0.0002266048,0.00005890411,0.0001438867,0.004898108,0.0002557495,0.0009681431,0.003830864,0.9600738,0.00006119278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03322591,0.005989319,0.0007100005,0.07765631,0.001171457,0.0002061425,0.002877077,0.0001117303,0.8780521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1532937,0.003749987,0.0006038879,0.05480432,0.0001973483,0.0001422353,0.0007260715,0.00005818132,0.7864243],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04050988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1988553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242221348","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17910","title":"Ontario First Nations Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>Case No. CV-12-461369, [2013] O.J. No. 2800; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 2992; 2013 ONSC 4166 (Ontario Court of Justice, June 17, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; General partnership; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03532596529928986,"gpt":0.2548350094174521,"spread":0.2195090441181622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001272063,0.0005037236,0.000235309,0.001426637,0.01504014,0.004071752,0.001329311,0.003780618,0.03722257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003722775,0.0007182485,0.0004969481,0.001927072,0.002083285,0.00140482,0.001062654,0.002005958,0.004300141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04444409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07402895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964855,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973109,0.0001387966,0.00005979047,0.0001367879,0.001572189,0.0007816213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979462,0.000332675,0.0001051768,0.00005753875,0.001201661,0.0003567292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004292172,0.00002159846,0.004410098,0.0001178539,0.00001089778,0.0002878517,0.00174369,0.0001057671,0.0003835804,0.08025972,0.9032307,0.009385384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561696,0.0000207326,0.02261426,0.0001823388,0.00002956173,0.0001200925,0.001507424,0.0002913182,0.0005380503,0.003986218,0.9706251,0.00004929867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009224055,0.003607666,0.0005427281,0.02366332,0.0003866611,0.0002119344,0.0046972,0.00009894593,0.9575676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1175897,0.003128937,0.001017625,0.02548596,0.0001435549,0.000216223,0.001810724,0.00007394318,0.8505332],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04444409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3224659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253019488","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20412","title":"MGM Grand Hotel LLC v. Chiu <i>CV-15-527306; [2016] O.J. No. 721; 2016 ONSC 1071 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 10, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Download; Advertising; Business; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01756886264126859,"gpt":0.2517096826205425,"spread":0.2341408199792739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001269031,0.0006454164,0.0003119302,0.001512696,0.01186662,0.005328052,0.001786156,0.006889922,0.08019911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004863063,0.0007338889,0.0005546794,0.001628743,0.00187309,0.001782543,0.001469171,0.003890759,0.01887797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01350538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02066722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7245942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9194099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976941,0.000185514,0.00006082922,0.0001832459,0.001140958,0.0007354173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983524,0.000426282,0.00009654534,0.00007518579,0.0007717041,0.0002778943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004174587,0.00002687872,0.001700887,0.00008698321,0.000007572718,0.0002554597,0.0009275356,0.00005179398,0.0003846483,0.08209924,0.9073067,0.007110598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002995139,0.00002660852,0.006810251,0.0001868963,0.0000198312,0.0001174407,0.0008490364,0.0002477845,0.0006253385,0.003023561,0.98803,0.00003320642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006211005,0.001401103,0.0004383959,0.01691362,0.0004245,0.0001829135,0.00272771,0.0002694329,0.9714314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05976358,0.0009888626,0.0006046638,0.0350071,0.0001933913,0.0002794127,0.001060753,0.0001257035,0.9019765],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5540553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248601765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13210","title":"1397868 Ontario Ltd. v. Nordic Gaming Corp., <i>[2008] O.J. No. 5171</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967238829424454,"gpt":0.2614517018495865,"spread":0.241779313555342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001143738,0.0007153193,0.000351856,0.001429967,0.01126274,0.00533802,0.001596401,0.009170588,0.04688402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003497339,0.001083883,0.0006595172,0.00147338,0.001750624,0.001840437,0.001162553,0.003286392,0.01017629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01491396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0268785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8578923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979197,0.000109488,0.00007054774,0.0001855966,0.001117312,0.0005973573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984225,0.0003460042,0.00008172077,0.00005000648,0.0009208004,0.0001790391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007029527,0.00003880985,0.003023759,0.0001602491,0.00001366189,0.0002797285,0.001292523,0.0001575946,0.0006963746,0.1031731,0.8787287,0.01236515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002575743,0.00002404958,0.008568198,0.0002559536,0.00002655365,0.00009623274,0.000810599,0.0001730287,0.0004712555,0.002661839,0.9868495,0.00003701052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.006396022,0.004297814,0.0005222902,0.01031088,0.0006925051,0.000133142,0.002787,0.0001505073,0.9747098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03552146,0.001862364,0.0004125627,0.01555393,0.0001129402,0.0001086197,0.0009462889,0.00005432199,0.9454276],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2858892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243198121","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14412","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., <i>[2010] O.J. No. 1223 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Microeconomics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02510372144971111,"gpt":0.2576572364137912,"spread":0.2325535149640801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008200497,0.0005631292,0.0002772316,0.001287928,0.01284328,0.004940967,0.001370771,0.00578378,0.04046844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002766246,0.0008397424,0.0004958807,0.001494611,0.001781575,0.001366977,0.0008916541,0.002409079,0.006217234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02403284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0353258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9448825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998519,0.00006468699,0.00003739621,0.00009285692,0.0008265757,0.0004594961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988428,0.0002130309,0.00006919626,0.00003137912,0.0006419519,0.0002016352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003783052,0.00002540759,0.003492844,0.00007537516,0.000008288703,0.0001782039,0.0008587546,0.00007172552,0.0003024112,0.04952132,0.9381756,0.00725231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003616945,0.00001723754,0.01819142,0.00016673,0.00002768353,0.00009202236,0.0008224759,0.0002651871,0.0004503483,0.00268983,0.9772022,0.00003865379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009296981,0.00607735,0.0004742823,0.03079753,0.0005649952,0.0001505778,0.004707165,0.0001684248,0.9477627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0683345,0.003378966,0.000560185,0.03132461,0.0001694505,0.0001215271,0.001409777,0.00005817254,0.8946428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05511755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1743712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249754693","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20115","title":"Kalra v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 4153, 2015 ONSC 4983; Court File No.: CV-14-4450-00 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, August 6, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Federal court; Library science; Computer science; Supreme court; Economics; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01960426838119865,"gpt":0.2578478612331971,"spread":0.2382435928519984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315656,0.0004225479,0.0002964688,0.001424473,0.01291036,0.004412496,0.001448791,0.003464057,0.05494036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004152573,0.0007298295,0.0005303083,0.001469379,0.001765974,0.00152686,0.001040845,0.002149311,0.007510233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03080777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04582311,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976535,0.0001245868,0.00006909013,0.000135195,0.001322053,0.0006956163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997485,0.0004383004,0.0001306147,0.00006845088,0.001531912,0.0003457057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005604859,0.00002428855,0.003301849,0.0001507922,0.00001079555,0.0002057933,0.001178633,0.00008418039,0.0003877111,0.07356338,0.9099911,0.01104537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005360302,0.00002837754,0.02954047,0.000272075,0.00004404414,0.0001344512,0.001187761,0.0004098893,0.0005202207,0.003829254,0.9639246,0.00005515308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008905198,0.003970978,0.0006963931,0.02051352,0.0003731829,0.0002400549,0.005220028,0.0001738243,0.959907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1108338,0.003342281,0.0009758135,0.0212028,0.0001717823,0.0002165789,0.001954369,0.00007482703,0.8612278],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05494036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2235271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239787302","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20212","title":"Babstock v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. <i>[2015] N.J. No. 299, 2015 NLTD(G) 116, Docket: 201201G2257 (Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court Trial Division—General Division, September 3, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Supreme court; Division (mathematics); Law; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01680033058937544,"gpt":0.2714741729619923,"spread":0.2546738423726169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003014749,0.0006502306,0.0004695779,0.001286574,0.01120693,0.007863377,0.002579784,0.0135711,0.03803755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009159049,0.000787914,0.0007881825,0.001498123,0.002986412,0.002660957,0.001560701,0.009582411,0.009861321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009716494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01528281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3657571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6609187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974033,0.0004055185,0.0001293824,0.000257274,0.00100371,0.0008007831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961852,0.002251452,0.000190797,0.00009251064,0.0009350233,0.0003449048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002790912,0.00001979306,0.0004514919,0.00007646301,0.000007973337,0.0001449334,0.0004354951,0.00004643748,0.0001545712,0.06892233,0.9243358,0.005376922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006757105,0.00004030993,0.005217543,0.0006942958,0.00004687192,0.000138225,0.00104273,0.000296996,0.0005410849,0.009404789,0.982452,0.00005761541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004761918,0.00774069,0.0007188856,0.1506678,0.002267582,0.0001388873,0.002110464,0.0002089381,0.8313849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06091216,0.004586809,0.0008323134,0.4647704,0.001255402,0.0002348688,0.0008466549,0.00010144,0.4664599],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6342429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7272563,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248841446","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16611","title":"Between Giuseppe Tarascio and Her Majesty, the Queen[2012] F.C.J. No. 127, 2012 FCA 30, 2012 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 134 (Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto, Ontario; January 26, 2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Botany","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02658409602326493,"gpt":0.2769649511127849,"spread":0.2503808550895199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001329846,0.000728334,0.0004398624,0.0007578409,0.007506324,0.004138985,0.0009157307,0.005299549,0.02587189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004472688,0.000528847,0.0003011315,0.0006861276,0.002909019,0.002642497,0.002363,0.007129025,0.007571847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003305365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003104392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07692967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2218066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.0002777905,0.00002512122,0.0002573529,0.0002178281,0.000188158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.0008031531,0.00007810785,0.00004766198,0.0001412818,0.0001949536],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002132031,0.000009671178,0.0002473382,0.00006185101,0.000006855584,0.0001770609,0.001214082,0.00003812144,0.00008718333,0.03948668,0.9498727,0.008777097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009643799,0.000006841641,0.001353612,0.000160755,0.000005150152,0.0001520767,0.0008824293,0.00005930455,0.00007313942,0.005102367,0.992179,0.00001566511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005622648,0.165057,0.001619309,0.5171431,0.01778845,0.0001030992,0.0005045281,0.0001769941,0.2919849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08650934,0.03119543,0.001119596,0.2128155,0.00780667,0.0001639365,0.0001643402,0.0002231538,0.6600021],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1529638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256695152","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18812","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd. <i>[2014] M.J. No. 171, 2014 MBCA 61, 2014 MB.C. Lexis 172 (Manitoba Court of Appeal, June 13, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; General partnership; Political science; Download; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03139974770948781,"gpt":0.2670107917707297,"spread":0.2356110440612419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279547,0.0006645179,0.0002529033,0.001522595,0.01284573,0.005248415,0.001697033,0.004534984,0.04263556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002899323,0.00101251,0.0005063491,0.001893116,0.001598708,0.001921376,0.001153285,0.003264205,0.008476915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01628059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04033973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.855763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987099,0.0001288955,0.000035297,0.0001117585,0.0005748164,0.0004394421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979476,0.0003764056,0.00009124013,0.00005142719,0.00126606,0.000267257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807967,0.00006555941,0.006436632,0.000194455,0.00002587415,0.000468262,0.001642398,0.0001508212,0.0006696665,0.08540078,0.8884752,0.01640225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004962357,0.00004742398,0.01415312,0.0003915133,0.0000541077,0.0001769184,0.002779798,0.0004039124,0.001068099,0.00292341,0.9778934,0.00005868129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01397004,0.005510618,0.0008427727,0.03933007,0.0007354623,0.0002200084,0.002485925,0.0002617319,0.9366434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0599892,0.002614755,0.0006777057,0.03686077,0.00009034511,0.0002032284,0.0007525163,0.00006081354,0.8987507],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.855763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2901729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246162766","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19113","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Joseph LeClair <i>[2014] O.J. No. 2700, 2014 ON.C. LEXIS 2994 (Ontario Court of Justice, March 19, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Economic Justice; Lexis; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0374808489849111,"gpt":0.2876950274305874,"spread":0.2502141784456763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184719,0.0004861052,0.0003461107,0.0008488412,0.01489707,0.007011444,0.001201571,0.005068331,0.08437743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004922291,0.0006237312,0.000437907,0.0008479163,0.002979477,0.002760659,0.002463697,0.005940785,0.01762907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01229753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01569081,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6082944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8243635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998619,0.0001568319,0.00003982852,0.0001812427,0.0005392259,0.0004638027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988995,0.0003380266,0.00006755488,0.00003959789,0.000441076,0.0002142864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000215753,0.00001096661,0.0005811532,0.00004851879,0.000004256637,0.0001401193,0.001121696,0.00002665889,0.0001430971,0.07078587,0.9164824,0.01063373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000524718,0.000006966967,0.001616505,0.0001482208,0.000004379599,0.00006399284,0.001453082,0.00004254841,0.000184912,0.003625053,0.9928323,0.00001683232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004020817,0.01877828,0.0009696602,0.1278843,0.003521651,0.00009378199,0.0008814589,0.0002009937,0.8436491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02231947,0.00237841,0.0002835846,0.03116727,0.000284444,0.00004163869,0.0001183532,0.000075588,0.9433312],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3917056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7880249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240459957","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14311","title":"Seguin v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 170 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web; Thermodynamics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01576875441192486,"gpt":0.2496548811439885,"spread":0.2338861267320636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008766109,0.0005006102,0.0002520115,0.001073459,0.01399385,0.004833105,0.001388769,0.005285737,0.02875023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003111445,0.0006477315,0.0005314522,0.002138493,0.002604355,0.001418062,0.0009870209,0.002221682,0.003539877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03551072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06433842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998436,0.00008502205,0.00004116412,0.0001053093,0.0007925539,0.0005398656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987445,0.0002025261,0.00007828805,0.00004582407,0.0007036435,0.0002250924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005146498,0.00002288657,0.005810205,0.0001670674,0.00001284508,0.0003246828,0.003160499,0.0001223405,0.0005668955,0.1014773,0.8771664,0.0111174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002361423,0.00001989677,0.02434098,0.0001823647,0.00003410559,0.00008264767,0.002017573,0.0001300268,0.000397335,0.004102266,0.9686288,0.00004033845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01740785,0.0075276,0.0005164504,0.03667202,0.0006536357,0.0001591274,0.004783556,0.0001445769,0.9321352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1121537,0.004531072,0.0009206198,0.03780114,0.0001638684,0.0001237619,0.001462323,0.00008302168,0.8427604],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03551072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2576495,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247762789","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14615","title":"203102 Ontario Ltd. v. Canada <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2055 (May 14, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01520814125502146,"gpt":0.2346485213647178,"spread":0.2194403801096964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001080976,0.0006944842,0.0003800474,0.001602232,0.01496163,0.00588434,0.001782727,0.008401779,0.03498831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002901503,0.0008692336,0.0008093138,0.001743491,0.002301164,0.001312378,0.0008936581,0.003365827,0.006815183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03342049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06888415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977478,0.0001042629,0.00005598821,0.0001461416,0.001211921,0.0007338812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979949,0.000284665,0.00007899472,0.0000612369,0.001336247,0.0002439036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004321422,0.00003499837,0.002757828,0.0001146089,0.00001641184,0.0003104904,0.001209075,0.0001486208,0.0006540235,0.0671555,0.9184546,0.009100609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002906684,0.00002699648,0.01269984,0.0001949083,0.00004297301,0.0001219077,0.001344945,0.0002872699,0.0007076843,0.002600538,0.9818813,0.00006263003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00813795,0.003571844,0.0007121217,0.02807395,0.0008620783,0.0002470932,0.005718224,0.0002124958,0.9524642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05358426,0.001789444,0.0008326931,0.04945879,0.0001501166,0.0001423348,0.001465429,0.00006702973,0.8925098],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03498831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2424837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251263544","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14913","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario (Native Affairs), <i>S.C.C.A. No. 91, C.S.C.R. no 91, File No.: 33613 (Supreme Court of Canada, July 8, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01643565876932158,"gpt":0.2192227205486977,"spread":0.2027870617793761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001103074,0.0003664555,0.0003133382,0.0008992121,0.0138888,0.004926939,0.001198243,0.005024548,0.01878523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004417596,0.0004303952,0.0003800209,0.001001476,0.001765001,0.001236724,0.0008270355,0.002959264,0.002070016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02053815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03953454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9208972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.00008486785,0.0000300551,0.000116412,0.0006115003,0.000488506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986589,0.0003779054,0.00004594406,0.00004195528,0.0006839312,0.0001913427],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006645438,0.00003771478,0.006394147,0.0001504918,0.00001889717,0.0008871601,0.003725272,0.0001081981,0.0008421593,0.1313825,0.8438441,0.01254303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002189663,0.00002603919,0.02370403,0.0001841553,0.00005100356,0.0001884326,0.003741607,0.0003307391,0.001372886,0.005215028,0.9651108,0.00005328988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02462996,0.005338595,0.0008334339,0.06218552,0.001231334,0.0001963479,0.003614921,0.0001040484,0.9018659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1718727,0.004244412,0.0009633677,0.03994244,0.0002172386,0.0001234273,0.001233402,0.00005450219,0.7813485],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07910281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1591373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240456741","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17911","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming CorpCase No. C55923, [2013] O.J. No. 3468; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 3610; 2013 ONCA 501 (Ontario Court of Appeal, July 31, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Download; Advertising; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02428805788161605,"gpt":0.2479881391423822,"spread":0.2237000812607662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218771,0.0005604971,0.0002881176,0.001282045,0.01513985,0.003820817,0.001274282,0.004018581,0.0529111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003558361,0.0008686011,0.0004974356,0.001515918,0.001670418,0.001256245,0.0009852283,0.001956676,0.005946673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03174524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05937664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997858,0.00008625993,0.0000512259,0.0001424871,0.001298446,0.0005635126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984288,0.0002447503,0.00006607768,0.00004558445,0.0009688769,0.0002459548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007531568,0.00003309584,0.005465231,0.0001312095,0.00001398265,0.0002793112,0.001186239,0.0001211859,0.0004984925,0.0866248,0.8910212,0.01454991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007198797,0.00002892401,0.03032506,0.0002045687,0.00004415443,0.0001511948,0.000994833,0.0004074614,0.0005679842,0.004411192,0.9627308,0.00006194481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01208153,0.004124055,0.0007492864,0.01711952,0.000377111,0.0002590675,0.006033322,0.0001419175,0.9591141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08739591,0.002465235,0.0009584503,0.01435568,0.0001193634,0.0001982803,0.001579175,0.00005008013,0.8928779],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0529111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2303289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243943677","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19412","title":"Walsh v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. <i>[2015] N.S.J. No. 56; 2015 NSCA 16 (Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, February 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; History; Economics; Archaeology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910424056185277,"gpt":0.2752402427656346,"spread":0.2461360022037819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001642146,0.0006731748,0.0003828444,0.001071068,0.01021398,0.005337598,0.001818855,0.0122795,0.02673744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007614177,0.0007354968,0.0007326416,0.0007057596,0.002108559,0.001814334,0.001569438,0.007916933,0.007913226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006672872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01009984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2648834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5462924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998129,0.0002913327,0.00008585292,0.0002059772,0.0006981448,0.000589768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977146,0.001278973,0.0001106591,0.00006111645,0.0005822706,0.000252308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003537838,0.00002045334,0.0008536542,0.0000947207,0.000008465309,0.0003845683,0.001194888,0.00006846553,0.0003747288,0.08024341,0.910157,0.006564253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004776963,0.00004157738,0.005467501,0.0006200378,0.00003495821,0.0002551579,0.001808366,0.0003138196,0.0006890738,0.008872344,0.9817861,0.00006331829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008908086,0.005458987,0.000600385,0.1388563,0.002136115,0.000143961,0.001111543,0.0001665875,0.842618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1030496,0.003351833,0.0008372529,0.3637449,0.001145693,0.0002747795,0.0004808725,0.00008064981,0.5270343],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7351166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238753586","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19310","title":"Edgewater Casino v. Chubb-Kennedy <i>[2015] B.C.J. No. 32; 2015 BCCA 9; 2015 BC.C. LEXIS 34 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, January 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.025307861219641,"gpt":0.2801121623371103,"spread":0.2548043011174693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233393,0.0005478071,0.0002984383,0.001554565,0.01013414,0.006265893,0.001654345,0.006681528,0.04432137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004932286,0.0005797344,0.0004669847,0.001246313,0.001821123,0.001861507,0.001372272,0.003661537,0.01008934],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008052418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01312606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4445075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7308784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982634,0.000187254,0.00006048712,0.0002034174,0.0007486232,0.0005367788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985811,0.0005251864,0.0000874084,0.00005783081,0.0005847905,0.0001637395],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002859037,0.00002784746,0.000926381,0.00008311829,0.000006709402,0.0001645782,0.0006965346,0.00007176125,0.0002430916,0.1420562,0.8458221,0.009873084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002412728,0.00002240981,0.006976787,0.0003679607,0.00002404717,0.0001216223,0.0009259976,0.0002367475,0.000644627,0.007794385,0.9828204,0.00004083535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004291538,0.002651263,0.0004447078,0.01670619,0.0003949873,0.0001286934,0.001069641,0.0001100732,0.9742029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09570738,0.00282449,0.0009657693,0.0733358,0.000267378,0.0003366302,0.0008964923,0.0001040037,0.825562],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5554925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8838404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253012223","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16412","title":"Bell v. Levy <i>[2011] B.C.J. No. 2018, 2011 BCCA 417; 2011 BC.C. LEXIS 5195 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, October 27, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; Download; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02812046852513575,"gpt":0.2573231408813508,"spread":0.229202672356215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00189242,0.0007504831,0.0004652308,0.001448675,0.0144463,0.006960264,0.002191376,0.01328301,0.04574591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007477703,0.0009067648,0.000742135,0.001952151,0.002219736,0.002680244,0.002011762,0.007185072,0.01562495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0140217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02278811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5704208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7626575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972456,0.0002344777,0.00007773075,0.0002480332,0.001159515,0.00103466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975951,0.0008390871,0.0001136131,0.00007523408,0.0011131,0.0002638569],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000255651,0.00002323478,0.0005667309,0.00004873343,0.000005781531,0.00009914615,0.0004017798,0.00004993904,0.0002098244,0.09502512,0.896634,0.006910074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000328505,0.00002465069,0.004959771,0.0002984152,0.00003137293,0.00009424098,0.0006452805,0.0002874266,0.0004916419,0.009539089,0.9835382,0.00005697723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.005373371,0.005181789,0.0007380804,0.06509864,0.001173584,0.0001115795,0.001766735,0.0003039395,0.9202522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06342579,0.00208766,0.0007144976,0.1351526,0.0003555432,0.0002687031,0.0008160814,0.0001609152,0.7970182],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4295792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238408455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19411","title":"Merpaw v. Hyde (c.o.b. City Limits Convenience) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 800; 2015 ONSC 1053 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05733022544795584,"gpt":0.3092049537484531,"spread":0.2518747283004972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009098107,0.0003530629,0.0002464893,0.0006941421,0.007556111,0.004291693,0.00106854,0.004760196,0.05338685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003563985,0.0007239101,0.0003915292,0.0008030227,0.001415707,0.001891848,0.001425678,0.00329331,0.007871227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006400454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5027984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8127381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989877,0.00009717922,0.00003657427,0.0001171042,0.0004474257,0.0003140288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.0003358299,0.00007347581,0.00005334392,0.0004530142,0.0001792398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003828259,0.00002319079,0.002117283,0.00009684492,0.000008104976,0.0002290703,0.001113692,0.00006841428,0.0003291024,0.1478598,0.8371246,0.01099159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002012382,0.00001900164,0.007194127,0.0001690003,0.00002174568,0.0001182062,0.0007189505,0.0001952002,0.0005648925,0.003490261,0.9874622,0.00002618733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.009743629,0.003401514,0.0009406072,0.02435136,0.000496564,0.0001242566,0.001437812,0.0001507587,0.9593535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08347896,0.002261061,0.0008119779,0.0323066,0.000153175,0.0001224901,0.0005033199,0.00008621968,0.8802762],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4972016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256694958","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181010","title":"Szecsodi v. MGM Resorts International <i>Court File No. CV-11-9457-00CL, [2014) O.J. No. 946, 2014 ONSC 1323, 2014 CarswellOnt 2465 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, March 3, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01533223290551432,"gpt":0.2630077241841347,"spread":0.2476754912786203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131627,0.0004184118,0.0003817615,0.001442031,0.004711817,0.004875649,0.001006217,0.004200935,0.07018003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002738202,0.0003662219,0.0005124633,0.00126256,0.001424275,0.001618421,0.001674062,0.002873423,0.009929342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005558498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007643844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1413186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2664483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985558,0.00008599833,0.00006064927,0.0001112958,0.000516255,0.0006699713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.0001485748,0.00004519934,0.00003064402,0.0002063731,0.00008316762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000148763,0.00003331225,0.001734298,0.0001630255,0.00001711461,0.0007263283,0.0007259991,0.0001408253,0.0004894429,0.3314361,0.6478778,0.01650706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007675487,0.00003218428,0.01102554,0.0002531038,0.00004022502,0.0003975663,0.000954408,0.000458064,0.001216007,0.02192602,0.9635816,0.00003838129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607175,0.004431626,0.0007589967,0.03019819,0.0007388481,0.0000906743,0.003889969,0.0001672547,0.9436527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2534663,0.003994341,0.0009712857,0.03386708,0.0003827734,0.0001558421,0.002700582,0.0001331593,0.7043286],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1413186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.280992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247898333","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161113","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 1879, 2012 ON.C. LEXIS 3717; 2012 ONSC 2304 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, April 30, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web; Linguistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03858182301488459,"gpt":0.2729170242922233,"spread":0.2343352012773387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162456,0.000649458,0.0003732083,0.001600761,0.01192282,0.004830278,0.002255026,0.005953166,0.05423084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00402045,0.0009492981,0.0007467894,0.001976368,0.00193885,0.001662893,0.001240699,0.003237746,0.009622389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02496274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03056334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9214395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974704,0.0001278927,0.00008006403,0.000184303,0.001396378,0.0007410353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979774,0.0004203088,0.0001369192,0.0000873578,0.001130312,0.000247666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002517387,0.0000164175,0.001202946,0.00007161621,0.000007971134,0.0001483676,0.0006517345,0.00004254969,0.0002179014,0.03342067,0.9590331,0.005161513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002230019,0.00001492205,0.01324681,0.0001491211,0.00002116047,0.00008463451,0.0006302596,0.0001722303,0.0003289401,0.002140999,0.9831551,0.00003349696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.004453714,0.003502456,0.0004153361,0.02493724,0.0006013672,0.0002072754,0.005237313,0.0001623935,0.9604829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05855162,0.002762849,0.0008154559,0.04726868,0.0003202038,0.0002530958,0.002427772,0.0001138258,0.8874865],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07856053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1814202,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253588455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20311","title":"Lalani v. Reeves <i>Case File No. 07-CV-338183CP; [2016] O.J. No. 397; 2016 ONSC 424 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 26, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01707181484242867,"gpt":0.2523056909357985,"spread":0.2352338760933698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003313411,0.0006433447,0.0006097715,0.002368717,0.009774059,0.006724801,0.003099676,0.008750908,0.09412134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01074816,0.0008828234,0.0008381975,0.002187771,0.001827927,0.002151227,0.001678671,0.005336689,0.02710282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01383808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02025555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6617998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8377808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959622,0.00037871,0.0001497148,0.0003752414,0.001852002,0.001282125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954514,0.001822524,0.0002310283,0.0002017451,0.001902425,0.000390865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359032,0.00002238659,0.001102617,0.00007516614,0.000009293467,0.0001704584,0.000497609,0.00003964658,0.0001658024,0.06862741,0.9247571,0.004496713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003795349,0.00002054957,0.005955491,0.0002875861,0.00002923174,0.0001464166,0.000534743,0.0002170482,0.0004686615,0.005265468,0.9869986,0.00003826025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798687,0.00174289,0.000455468,0.02355619,0.0004062744,0.0001809931,0.005248215,0.0002356568,0.9653757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06614634,0.002910529,0.001155042,0.07690497,0.0005255514,0.0004659734,0.003861726,0.0002621863,0.8477676],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3382002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6803837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245174989","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18910","title":"In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Phu Hai Pham[2014) B.C.J. No. 2013, 2014 BCSC 1538, 2014 BC.C. Lexis 1750 (British Columbia Supreme Court (in Bankruptcy &amp; Involvency), July 30, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Lexis; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01355184581197886,"gpt":0.2025448978866989,"spread":0.18899305207472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669534,0.0005705383,0.0003279712,0.0005383647,0.009438536,0.006895248,0.0009689227,0.01347515,0.01863612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005868454,0.0006138497,0.0003999679,0.0007950288,0.002174037,0.002445891,0.001550137,0.007297709,0.004007991],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005335274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007437051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1725114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.435737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986178,0.0002544608,0.00009096281,0.0002077932,0.0004233604,0.0004057451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989832,0.0004497285,0.00009496729,0.00005673509,0.0003112109,0.0001042623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003203092,0.00002441869,0.001175068,0.00008265702,0.00001181859,0.0004837732,0.001442746,0.0001026678,0.000261731,0.2319329,0.7505467,0.01390354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001539416,0.00002305313,0.007769303,0.0003652255,0.00002026821,0.0001845965,0.001427262,0.0002634306,0.0004029994,0.01461031,0.9748683,0.00004990453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01546395,0.01945805,0.001345248,0.1340337,0.009214951,0.0002124004,0.00219302,0.0001731311,0.8179055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1630063,0.006791515,0.0007983653,0.1550268,0.003065948,0.00027128,0.0005309926,0.0001003835,0.6704085],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3430145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233760448","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20910","title":"Paton Estate v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission (c.o.b. Fallsview Casino Resort)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Estate; Commission; Download; Real estate; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02501758896512817,"gpt":0.2640455497033671,"spread":0.239027960738239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007228326,0.0002831838,0.0001947253,0.0008295386,0.0120414,0.00372761,0.0008505171,0.003177471,0.03698355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002325524,0.0005066755,0.0003085419,0.001086505,0.001540506,0.0008229896,0.0007980182,0.001710681,0.00315906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02129945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03578882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.955568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933178,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998597,0.00005892272,0.00002818595,0.00008882229,0.0008293321,0.000397721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988575,0.0001979747,0.00005397143,0.00003252854,0.0006206741,0.0002373387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006540093,0.00004260544,0.01139688,0.0001179322,0.00001356716,0.0006777246,0.001693107,0.0001623673,0.0008969666,0.07197611,0.8842387,0.02871868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005909832,0.00003516589,0.05705962,0.0001874276,0.00004703849,0.0002445633,0.001561044,0.0005710414,0.000912089,0.003842861,0.9354314,0.00004862784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03013651,0.00429126,0.0007059324,0.0250784,0.000394205,0.0002028081,0.002763365,0.0001242894,0.9363032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1717778,0.002354505,0.0006941448,0.01292908,0.0001140511,0.00009428986,0.0007042246,0.00003653475,0.8112954],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04443204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.154539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980009831","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1769","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal Takes a Spin at Roulette: <i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp.</i> , 2013 ONCA 121, February 26, 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roulette; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Emir Crowne","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kiratjot Tiwana","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02047576640537435,"gpt":0.2381419362012918,"spread":0.2176661697959174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706166,0.0005408496,0.0004887371,0.001091396,0.01963324,0.004841541,0.001764595,0.008161006,0.03612702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004157379,0.0008564738,0.0008110382,0.00124028,0.002099492,0.001144234,0.001126301,0.005022046,0.004724246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05810192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08093245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977125,0.00009150032,0.00005505972,0.0001654837,0.001264865,0.000710609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974952,0.0002993677,0.00005400989,0.00006651197,0.001681239,0.0004036608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005604176,0.00002697451,0.00310458,0.00005599678,0.00001853795,0.0003891296,0.001080093,0.0000892438,0.0005346245,0.0299278,0.9584532,0.006263745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005556168,0.00002010264,0.02093534,0.0001245328,0.00006545654,0.00008906597,0.001678503,0.0003747079,0.0005257056,0.002440253,0.9736121,0.00007863351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02123723,0.004076573,0.0009178874,0.1316027,0.002283608,0.0004860199,0.008014754,0.0002573662,0.8311239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08521301,0.002071068,0.0009501585,0.05169552,0.0004240712,0.0001814497,0.001409292,0.0000996173,0.857956],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05810192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4215609,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474419122","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2046","title":"Canada's First Nations and the State of the First Nations' Gaming Sector in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Morden C. Lazarus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brian T. Hall","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008102830885473972,"gpt":0.1819634505460296,"spread":0.1738606196605556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002591729,0.0003594473,0.0006526765,0.005203468,0.0141941,0.01564865,0.002180954,0.004620007,0.007232223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01040735,0.0004067815,0.0005583817,0.009352365,0.007647024,0.002629082,0.001862123,0.005123481,0.0002239895],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2210317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3956255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950327,0.0003336833,0.0001200999,0.0002616169,0.001994001,0.002258013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897619,0.002019365,0.0005036261,0.0001696316,0.005581479,0.001964045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006039422,0.00005095005,0.009871942,0.0004237243,0.00005731047,0.0002484999,0.003182892,0.001315524,0.0001319724,0.7959777,0.1497779,0.03890114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005796714,0.00003898193,0.09114195,0.002758822,0.0002173837,0.0001626681,0.01390179,0.002487363,0.0004374995,0.0486612,0.8398982,0.0002360844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1308926,0.1486636,0.0008525366,0.2582071,0.002819334,0.00009711657,0.003323326,0.00007710026,0.4550674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547274,0.05995822,0.0005273159,0.02420232,0.0005340404,0.00004100916,0.0005238256,0.00004518784,0.05944078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2210317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}