{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":64,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":64,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"fdd51a68d7fc","filters":{"venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2556895110","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2074","title":"Extending the Reno Model: Responsible Gambling Evaluation Guidelines for Gambling Operators, Public Policymakers, and Regulators","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; Université Laval","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Public economics; Accounting; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Robert Ladouceur","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alex Blaszczynski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Howard J. Shaffer","is_ca":false},{"name":"Davis Fong","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4033227568449514,"gpt":0.4710230576305505,"spread":0.06770030078559908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002775263,0.000245242,0.000406955,0.0001017193,0.0004273278,0.0001478643,0.0001527801,0.0001093036,0.00004436114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003437338,0.00015475,0.00009888559,0.00009470449,0.0001151156,0.0003137255,0.00007636857,0.00007163115,0.00001089754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008904854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006722504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006639891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982327,0.0001321951,0.0006126798,0.0005373158,0.00007902225,0.0004060993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986804,0.0002321691,0.0002241639,0.0004989543,0.0002366426,0.0001276835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008606648,0.00008589726,0.005956771,0.0004484023,0.0003119191,0.0000018252,0.0005004301,0.00008019281,0.0003406014,0.5063836,0.003984514,0.4818198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01920106,0.0008356674,0.01192558,0.008349409,0.008195043,0.0007472376,0.0009364972,0.03312216,0.00109325,0.06687512,0.8445016,0.00421737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8496941,0.1292884,0.001425664,0.01516459,0.0007025792,0.002192624,0.0001056734,0.0001132814,0.00131299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9339418,0.05672863,0.004445479,0.003061175,0.0002706383,0.0005065245,0.00003501707,0.00008683362,0.0009239299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.631052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025195404","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1797","title":"Assessment Tool to Measure and Evaluate the Risk Potential of Gambling Products, ASTERIG: A Global Validation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Journal of Public Health; Art history; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Health care; Public health policy; Health policy","authors":[{"name":"Carlos Blanco","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alex Blaszczynski","is_ca":false},{"name":"Reiner Clement","is_ca":false},{"name":"Jeffrey L. Derevensky","is_ca":true},{"name":"Anna E. Goudriaan","is_ca":false},{"name":"David C. Hodgins","is_ca":true},{"name":"Ruth J. van Holst","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ángela Ibáñez","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sílvia S. Martins","is_ca":false},{"name":"Chantal Moersen","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sabrina Molinaro","is_ca":false},{"name":"Adrian Parke","is_ca":false},{"name":"Franz W. Peren","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nancy M. Petry","is_ca":false},{"name":"Heather Wardle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08754902457062169,"gpt":0.3714633990753765,"spread":0.2839143745047548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006375568,0.0001328917,0.0002824211,0.00001504812,0.0001073756,0.00007305956,0.00008165194,0.00004093039,0.00008447115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002135518,0.00009510278,0.00004335387,0.00005568558,0.00004301508,0.0001114233,0.00005696899,0.00006663884,0.00004319811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003679157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001872129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004398182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001742331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990498,0.0001171125,0.0003237594,0.0002928029,0.00005384696,0.0001626335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994155,0.00001861246,0.0001359395,0.0003038483,0.00007592708,0.000050242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005857041,0.0004875078,0.1932297,0.001568303,0.0009812311,0.000004917315,0.0008166286,0.0001043481,0.0007278529,0.03869514,0.001041121,0.7622847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001434175,0.0003046786,0.9857907,0.0005036641,0.002048232,0.00009626484,0.0001241064,0.0001180032,0.000120659,0.001375269,0.007679772,0.0004045273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914521,0.005582662,0.0001095212,0.0005516775,0.0002615472,0.000960332,0.00003149585,0.00001195512,0.001038717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958208,0.002664153,0.0010089,0.0002727888,0.00004191912,0.0001149785,0.00001250264,0.000010127,0.00005381179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.792561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3878179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247510543","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15911","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S105520, 2011 BCSC 772 (British Columbia Supreme Court, June 2, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Political science; Electronic signature; Economics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02820992736255812,"gpt":0.227764914538077,"spread":0.1995549871755188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148993,0.0001584355,0.000597487,0.00001188982,0.0007753809,0.001638181,0.0004967451,0.0001322236,0.01557183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001031708,0.0003232138,0.0001790358,0.00004257105,0.0005179639,0.0008216685,0.0001356984,0.0002532153,0.00143401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001023696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3934297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8059787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978831,0.0001862562,0.0006980518,0.0005451599,0.0001431944,0.0005442058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987524,0.00008363577,0.0003302291,0.0002866782,0.000233223,0.0003138771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007267201,0.0001928418,0.01601789,0.0004860619,0.0001345284,0.00008502147,0.0002052795,1.750304e-7,0.000005955664,0.0104394,0.9586728,0.01375282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003361355,0.00004551109,0.008052989,0.0006191235,0.0001058336,0.0000554016,0.00002770906,0.00001295124,9.917453e-7,0.000715432,0.9896156,0.0004123707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2620642,0.04569612,0.00001341181,0.0006130095,0.003416663,0.001327083,0.0005580837,0.0002316625,0.6860797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1747561,0.460081,0.0007959578,0.02249843,0.001378,0.00007653398,0.0001594181,0.0001417579,0.3401128],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4143849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240039888","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18615","title":"Nova Growth Corp. v. Kepinski <i>2014 CarswellOnt 6335, 2014 ONSC 2763 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice [Commercial List], May 12, 2014</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Download; Economic Justice; CITES; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02529310089975424,"gpt":0.2676874636780195,"spread":0.2423943627782653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005449,0.0002706035,0.001005448,0.00003964811,0.0005720572,0.0001490572,0.000386355,0.0001848705,0.0004404585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001748621,0.0002637863,0.0001768053,0.00006710909,0.0004503027,0.0004208523,0.0001059852,0.0002301314,0.0001893767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000182011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003110196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3764692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5031607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979273,0.0001968428,0.0007960383,0.0004452984,0.0001498178,0.0004846926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985996,0.0002321204,0.0004477937,0.0003084903,0.0001611815,0.0002507906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000678302,0.0002613829,0.03852596,0.01060651,0.000238481,0.000006663044,0.007992,0.00001548801,0.00008427729,0.6946017,0.2299959,0.01760386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003017136,0.00007679102,0.001193635,0.000548723,0.0003814044,0.000006146274,0.0001441276,0.00001008643,0.00003867185,0.0006082699,0.9963272,0.0003632275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2587857,0.1072676,0.0004102192,0.01181376,0.005678198,0.002752757,0.0001529081,0.0002131559,0.6129257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331099,0.05952301,0.000277146,0.004278718,0.001085658,0.00002307627,0.00002093322,0.0000383952,0.001643201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229673390","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19413","title":"Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. (Re) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1201; 2015 ONSC 712 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03101750018826518,"gpt":0.3015964477350956,"spread":0.2705789475468304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001675848,0.0002295279,0.0006279913,0.000006361237,0.0004783333,0.000117543,0.0003099819,0.0001749522,0.0003464797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008311732,0.0002090366,0.0001524041,0.0000517583,0.0003883774,0.0004276636,0.00009884738,0.0002278016,0.0001774682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003616213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004022587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01865311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983624,0.0001402921,0.0005720443,0.000345602,0.0001661751,0.0004134766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989217,0.00006770704,0.0002409487,0.0002767447,0.0001768658,0.0003160233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002420011,0.0002473269,0.005961773,0.002421192,0.0002906746,0.000009466859,0.06522046,0.00008068934,0.00006153048,0.04953338,0.8740756,0.002073736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000378045,0.00005937476,0.00005542572,0.0004380229,0.0002522119,0.000004264707,0.004640516,0.00002642608,0.00002187946,0.0001309464,0.9937117,0.0002811639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2650165,0.2640578,0.0000401882,0.01631949,0.00420399,0.003217313,0.0003058328,0.0001635832,0.4466753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3051358,0.5939652,0.008547561,0.04298998,0.002964628,0.0002805036,0.000340123,0.0001616288,0.0456146],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4010607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244012758","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19215","title":"R. v. Miller <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 2121, 2014 BCSC 1561, Docket: X075613 (British Columbia Supreme Court, April 4, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02322293283140335,"gpt":0.2536600518538323,"spread":0.2304371190224289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001979357,0.0001989325,0.0007748758,0.00001702784,0.0007073677,0.0008644941,0.0003611593,0.0001903485,0.0007109827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001975593,0.0002658349,0.0001331783,0.00008235846,0.000364539,0.0006874214,0.0001205523,0.000181339,0.001079512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001483032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002911323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2695343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.297025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979257,0.0001683984,0.0006428711,0.0005160022,0.0001754926,0.0005715215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985587,0.00008442756,0.0003173463,0.0002968356,0.000276921,0.0004657966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000376288,0.00003628974,0.002675213,0.0007158168,0.00004355552,0.000004975186,0.0004631643,0.00000240718,0.000001868983,0.005222404,0.9859044,0.004926141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003194037,0.00003997407,0.0001322589,0.0005017027,0.00008668644,0.00001374936,0.0001836718,0.00001183248,0.000001337664,0.001725626,0.9966089,0.0003748609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05152747,0.4143629,0.0000413848,0.004110893,0.00423663,0.002058416,0.0001955231,0.0002816176,0.5231851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3043417,0.6457562,0.000602376,0.01427082,0.004146527,0.0001598023,0.0000807375,0.0001248831,0.03051699],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4926682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241392334","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.151113","title":"Loveless v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2011] O.J. No. 3783; 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 6128; 2011 ONSC 4744 (August 20, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Lottery; Download; Art; Advertising; Business; Humanities; World Wide Web; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04167835955753108,"gpt":0.2295467539918523,"spread":0.1878683944343212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004443699,0.0004820882,0.001089542,0.00007197627,0.0001986913,0.00006149611,0.0001921727,0.0001517941,0.005493157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008563202,0.0004365982,0.0002077184,0.00002018538,0.0001985735,0.0003830273,0.0002183115,0.0004640715,0.001956927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001974397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001255004,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03078732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009138881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978707,0.00005012226,0.0007380667,0.00069574,0.00009459673,0.0005507807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984389,0.00008514047,0.000306214,0.0006916496,0.00006545343,0.0004126597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001919989,0.002277647,0.1351931,0.01675434,0.002062696,0.0008776664,0.003090007,0.000003739045,0.0005019778,0.03524003,0.685179,0.1168998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001819899,0.0007243258,0.009000395,0.001562615,0.0009460815,0.000601994,0.00005265128,0.00003294966,0.0002044498,0.0001469111,0.9840899,0.0008177902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7771163,0.1175788,0.00003795453,0.002532124,0.001366068,0.001625278,0.0001769905,0.0001260392,0.09944046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3644952,0.4052498,0.005715021,0.1715838,0.001978832,0.0002432088,0.0007101278,0.00050084,0.0495232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4126212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243184977","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20513","title":"R. v. Dey <i>No.: 500-73-004217-143; [2016] Q.J. No. 2333; 2016 QCCQ 1670 (Court of Québec [Criminal and Penal Division] District of Montréal, March 21, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Law; Criminal court; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Arithmetic; International law","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03771702997297455,"gpt":0.3294438888148218,"spread":0.2917268588418472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002213919,0.0003013322,0.001239747,0.00004608903,0.0004424728,0.000007621949,0.0002315717,0.0003219732,0.0004101054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004543999,0.0001926825,0.0001696936,0.00006476128,0.0003570927,0.0002328359,0.0002306739,0.0005019574,0.0002437829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001603128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001012256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01694098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00246337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969098,0.00035337,0.001504253,0.0004692672,0.0001324314,0.0006308906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968041,0.001250049,0.0007483467,0.0005420193,0.0002501606,0.0004053752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000242888,0.0003808287,0.02997941,0.05927852,0.0003522067,0.00001053587,0.003878054,7.471386e-7,0.0008977933,0.01037454,0.6570194,0.2375851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001570442,0.0003427518,0.007270347,0.00961615,0.0002831898,0.000007632061,0.0003452005,0.00004798161,0.00001483682,0.0001613382,0.9800137,0.0003264352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6349828,0.2985077,0.0007541002,0.02138706,0.001779733,0.003854203,0.0008864449,0.0001030709,0.03774497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.171034,0.8135082,0.001264685,0.007465963,0.000541795,0.00009832829,0.00003440675,0.00007123229,0.005981423],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5150005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068762313","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.1635","title":"The UIGEA, Canada and the “New” Fantasy Sports","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Download; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Art; Literature; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business","authors":[{"name":"Jack Tadman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03410074490607685,"gpt":0.3003339783601601,"spread":0.2662332334540833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003714633,0.0001014805,0.0002045567,0.000004253492,0.000227743,0.00003139791,0.00007382308,0.00002657893,0.00005878677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006542565,0.00005540716,0.00003171468,0.0000164444,0.00009500851,0.00004783519,0.00003239704,0.0000707594,0.00001098518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002525682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002850168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1327366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.156351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994012,0.0000346512,0.000187706,0.0001226092,0.00002470532,0.0002291421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994647,0.000101788,0.00008181659,0.000251149,0.000005594898,0.00009494278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004226494,0.00005357497,0.2087117,0.0001549661,0.0002635702,0.000009639451,0.001015601,3.068684e-7,4.420283e-7,0.5352399,0.01538172,0.2391264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006414735,0.000008008694,0.0828822,0.0000539204,0.0003206056,0.0001097294,0.00004898347,6.784633e-7,0.000002758273,0.0004245153,0.9153867,0.0001203696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7309962,0.2435462,0.000002298553,0.002024867,0.001230993,0.0004568259,0.00001586747,0.00001381303,0.02171292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697167,0.02685724,0.00001629102,0.001697284,0.00008650094,0.00002330836,0.000005047608,0.00001077063,0.001586815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.900005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8730385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235003937","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13112","title":"B-Filer, Inc. v. TD Canada Trust, <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1397</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009243825721817865,"gpt":0.1750799401747025,"spread":0.1658361144528847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001881142,0.0001933143,0.000387142,0.00002021169,0.0001665172,0.0001533832,0.0001677206,0.00004144334,0.000207067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002133348,0.0001866791,0.00005075329,0.000088591,0.00003088481,0.0006720371,0.00006348363,0.00009939133,0.0002018941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005723958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000626179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1452568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2111776,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999052,0.000003853107,0.0003405966,0.0002717655,0.00005285406,0.0002788737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993894,0.00001269528,0.0002714631,0.0002417795,0.00005884199,0.00002588941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002084795,0.00006654367,0.002800409,0.002567167,0.00005200185,0.00003258209,0.000008479754,0.00003134647,0.00002321797,0.3881315,0.4957969,0.110469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001890923,0.000006039101,0.001313958,0.0002201327,0.00006854193,0.000004508214,0.000003746986,0.0002394709,0.000002980242,0.0007799109,0.9969186,0.0002530529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3154251,0.1033266,0.00002344948,0.01389099,0.002252043,0.001293597,0.00008316768,0.00023224,0.5634729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5619345,0.08211378,0.0002717254,0.3476867,0.003466408,0.00003210605,0.0002348177,0.00007489985,0.004185016],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5592878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860435,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083064927","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14205","title":"The Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:ke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Morden C. Lazarus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brian Hall","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04639817410377368,"gpt":0.3688322969537854,"spread":0.3224341228500118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000643989,0.0001070303,0.0002947517,0.00001330509,0.0002042653,0.00001725138,0.0002290533,0.00004743624,0.00000556815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005939855,0.00005434347,0.00009388849,0.00006825753,0.0001135897,0.00002578587,0.00002154782,0.0001403503,2.611138e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004102072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001297556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1810732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5478142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991658,0.0000387703,0.0004530205,0.0001420398,0.00003258528,0.0001677634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981375,0.001040931,0.0003127358,0.0004213659,0.00006160965,0.00002584011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001488673,0.0001137118,0.02481876,0.0007662558,0.0002413223,0.000003262287,0.002481739,0.0002380492,0.0001084991,0.9077413,0.0001590195,0.06317923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009354626,0.001159803,0.249227,0.007038023,0.007568384,0.0008774772,0.01329297,0.004400384,0.004834506,0.03119275,0.6691942,0.001859888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913816,0.00452519,0.0004241602,0.001167138,0.0005685901,0.001423558,0.0001089559,0.000002259825,0.0003985388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978585,0.0008081461,0.0008080696,0.0002815549,0.00003678873,0.0001457776,0.000003200849,0.00001299715,0.0000450144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8243801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246921850","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19612","title":"Between Stanley Howard Tomchin, Plaintiff, and Her Majesty the Queen and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Defendants <i>[2015] F.C.J. No. 378; 2015 FC 402 (Federal Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Plaintiff; Law; Queen (butterfly); Preparedness; Political science; Jurisprudence","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02819225285611794,"gpt":0.2796180607108978,"spread":0.2514258078547799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402931,0.0001541405,0.0005940131,0.00001102577,0.00119206,0.0003665875,0.0001674992,0.00009116135,0.000064449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001471764,0.0001289628,0.00007110078,0.00006871024,0.001264375,0.0003497014,0.0002840984,0.0001371934,0.00000297618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005924246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001325186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03645264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3052815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983408,0.0003106254,0.0005353286,0.0003391559,0.0001374703,0.000336559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989145,0.0001812241,0.000273391,0.0002272045,0.0001910864,0.0002125704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748575,0.00008363187,0.1554581,0.001626844,0.0005961199,0.000005844646,0.01169892,0.000002227151,2.824746e-7,0.01156027,0.7891672,0.02971308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008108147,0.00004774082,0.01145463,0.00016373,0.0001759189,0.000008805649,0.001472651,0.00002745817,4.413127e-8,0.001033025,0.984593,0.0002121646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6226513,0.3061329,0.00005191363,0.02923695,0.002063608,0.0036247,0.001451213,0.00006831289,0.03471907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6163995,0.3748068,0.0002551319,0.001026516,0.0004851013,0.00005470957,0.00003522587,0.00003883155,0.006898231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2688289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699637,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037572661","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15406","title":"Betting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Tourism; Colonialism; Download; Law; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Paul Seaman","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brenda Pritchard","is_ca":false},{"name":"David Potter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01866833660455779,"gpt":0.1931828018412585,"spread":0.1745144652367007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002865119,0.00005460965,0.0001466799,0.0000337172,0.0007093851,0.00005869384,0.00006313281,0.00002533989,0.0001300029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001970529,0.00007662437,0.00001227122,0.00002930661,0.00006926389,0.0001675669,0.00001464569,0.00004854312,0.00001437397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002571882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001220584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.00001803626,0.0002101821,0.0001454939,0.00002356581,0.0001336119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999701,0.0000546662,0.00009535298,0.00006121536,0.000008164248,0.00007964863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001054948,0.000007951371,0.003606657,0.0003552291,0.00001618243,0.000002036132,0.003989674,0.000003662079,1.459037e-8,0.9750627,0.001079483,0.01587541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000632568,0.000002696381,0.003923269,0.0001795846,0.000009036922,7.204143e-7,0.00009153916,0.000006310196,6.043556e-7,0.0001113739,0.9955147,0.0000969199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.342469,0.02605671,9.491978e-7,0.002299662,0.0007217721,0.0005336909,0.00004786804,0.00002803945,0.6278423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.822539,0.1712686,0.0007405481,0.004273188,0.0001205345,0.00004894108,0.000007509477,0.00001479166,0.0009868826],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6725381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254099115","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17611","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba, Ltd.Case No. CI 09-01-61504 and CI 09-01-61489, [2013] M.J. No. 81; 2013 MBQB 67; 2013 MB.C.Lexis 81 (Manitoba Court of Queen s Bench, Winnipeg Centre, March 15, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); General partnership; Charter; Library science; Political science; Geography; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Law; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02751448436436627,"gpt":0.2525301976058204,"spread":0.2250157132414541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376083,0.0005235401,0.001441028,0.0001223646,0.0006420434,0.0002834455,0.0004980281,0.0003287597,0.0009103029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002147158,0.0005019998,0.0002077903,0.0002616179,0.0008827969,0.0008705262,0.0002165871,0.0003481121,0.0004418003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001500773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003674814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6830145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7243703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962679,0.0003246109,0.001430939,0.0007475519,0.0002898464,0.0009391424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967134,0.0003425875,0.00103518,0.0005652672,0.0007017388,0.0006418411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001193096,0.0005981784,0.05756487,0.01648078,0.0008779606,0.0001517151,0.003827103,0.00004132804,0.0000735884,0.03238487,0.8611496,0.02673068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006347246,0.0001266881,0.001153069,0.001447848,0.0002990959,0.0000398329,0.001542968,0.0001393735,0.00002007853,0.0007592972,0.9931088,0.0007282019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7494763,0.1739365,0.00001488866,0.01438192,0.002229204,0.005894553,0.001262763,0.000169274,0.05263469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.739571,0.2538891,0.0003606961,0.001765543,0.001511948,0.00013272,0.0001642217,0.0001074696,0.002497301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243222075","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20411","title":"Great Canadian Gaming Corp. v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S152587; [2016] B.C.J. No. 113; 2016 BCSC 101 (British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, January 25, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Media studies","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008839946253133973,"gpt":0.1948477469982002,"spread":0.1860078007450663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008351619,0.000492004,0.002130947,0.00004359252,0.001069385,0.002935247,0.0005426007,0.0003971047,0.008263635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001974905,0.0009566601,0.000537489,0.0001722316,0.0005552221,0.001121025,0.0003422436,0.0005662529,0.0006200173],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008870066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945672,0.0001745803,0.001691754,0.00154767,0.0002924452,0.001726398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959671,0.0002485555,0.0006023701,0.001072308,0.0004679672,0.00164167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001499297,0.0001231385,0.04805533,0.001591305,0.0002197806,0.001070532,0.00001000561,1.179109e-7,0.00002592837,0.000002626823,0.878778,0.07010827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003573998,0.000400491,0.01712582,0.01704456,0.0008035676,0.003714364,0.00002637775,0.00003047099,0.000001816091,0.0001097874,0.9558771,0.001291645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7864851,0.149003,0.00002872391,0.001605595,0.00741485,0.005451762,0.009948136,0.0004369482,0.03962586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1099278,0.5542158,0.000992295,0.06717083,0.002945338,0.0005191019,0.001251989,0.0005109869,0.2624659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206557481","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16714","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>B.C.J. No. 489; 2012 BCCA 120; 2012 BC.C. LEXIS 1071</i> <i>(British Columbia Court of Appeal, March 13, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Lottery; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0191191538648193,"gpt":0.2473496995810753,"spread":0.228230545716256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001575378,0.0001984116,0.0009572194,0.00001784662,0.001610945,0.0008925884,0.000308111,0.0002264394,0.002864436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007250165,0.0003570551,0.0002623764,0.0001803944,0.001037791,0.001575198,0.0002395612,0.000263636,0.0001441673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001395068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001581844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4244774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8448716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973409,0.0001935363,0.0008614287,0.0004568442,0.0001946107,0.000952733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983779,0.0001566578,0.0004437727,0.0003599555,0.0002307611,0.0004309234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003456123,0.0001597861,0.01916813,0.001113459,0.0001215459,0.000005597129,0.0002316539,0.00000132219,0.000003180505,0.001217841,0.9606692,0.01730481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003682585,0.00004026514,0.01146891,0.0008573897,0.0002389053,0.00006036646,0.000160746,0.000006293864,3.410486e-7,0.0001792947,0.9861829,0.0004363529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.184979,0.5839524,0.00005005135,0.003423742,0.004642363,0.003257496,0.001948252,0.0002111078,0.2175356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2593627,0.6174191,0.0008288053,0.005910162,0.002730585,0.0001850378,0.0002067814,0.0001290867,0.1132278],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4203942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231234638","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13111","title":"Bear Hills Charitable Foundation v. Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1431</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Foundation (evidence); Download; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0154266693967477,"gpt":0.2679643827990066,"spread":0.2525377134022589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006722523,0.0001243218,0.0003613466,0.00001861813,0.0007180914,0.0002127541,0.0001102077,0.00008084556,0.00006626145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001591419,0.0001186089,0.00003946765,0.00007146321,0.0001224726,0.0006086908,0.00003095552,0.00008917152,0.00006800893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005051418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006563331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01511995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005105847,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999063,0.00005582277,0.0003184573,0.0002468979,0.00005586074,0.0002599235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994196,0.00008850331,0.0001549492,0.0001198392,0.00005979426,0.000157309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417866,0.0001097797,0.00143503,0.002151705,0.00005597142,0.000002694421,0.003496566,0.000003024409,0.00007918113,0.8263415,0.01076964,0.1555408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001128677,0.00003663474,0.0001745305,0.0005606318,0.00004159221,0.000003199827,0.0000543336,0.00002471852,0.000009363756,0.002220656,0.9965904,0.0001711242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06189106,0.1813098,0.00009171369,0.04091084,0.001188291,0.001924187,0.00002201163,0.0001584544,0.7125037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8039984,0.1770214,0.0004211978,0.009101728,0.0009307443,0.00001846781,0.00002440594,0.00002255293,0.008461133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233329049","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181012","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen and Lorena Lam <i>[2014] A.J. No. 428, 2014 ABPC 90 LEXIS 420 (Alberta Provincial Court, April 17, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Lexis; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Botany; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01851065696521964,"gpt":0.2664289703729082,"spread":0.2479183134076886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154751,0.0002578412,0.0006029658,0.00001841573,0.0008255781,0.000265146,0.0004015618,0.0001449186,0.0001704433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000189086,0.0001974358,0.0001170325,0.0000414237,0.0006505954,0.0004707078,0.000167584,0.0002194827,0.0005192851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006713979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03333439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03441308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.0002282441,0.0004756534,0.0004831216,0.0001183532,0.0004926198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984916,0.0005388499,0.0002640547,0.0003901788,0.00007094436,0.0002443721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711992,0.00006242886,0.03347791,0.002391563,0.0001353638,0.000002460893,0.002748317,0.00000568668,0.000007448257,0.3976529,0.5032927,0.06018613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001360062,0.00005316922,0.00169431,0.000280222,0.0001988064,0.000003216255,0.00005213899,0.00001841036,0.00000471754,0.001519944,0.9957458,0.0002932546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2234537,0.09283423,0.0003136959,0.1245849,0.002461419,0.004663891,0.0001958017,0.0002852635,0.5512071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432143,0.3076397,0.0008611162,0.02068327,0.005914903,0.0001117791,0.0000715573,0.0001186684,0.02138469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5298225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233389050","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16314","title":"<i>Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd.</i> <i>[2011] M.J. No. 305; 2011 MBQB 225, 2011 MB.C. LEXIS 845 (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, September 16, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Lexis; General partnership; Art; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0326076102925209,"gpt":0.2605759400749266,"spread":0.2279683297824057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049211,0.0003266654,0.0008059868,0.00004758733,0.0004205638,0.00006267474,0.0004552045,0.0001799829,0.001703023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003357729,0.0003283547,0.0002262461,0.00007582827,0.0006148298,0.000541041,0.00012917,0.0002235466,0.0008581507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001250757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002604903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06899349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.169322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976413,0.0001560138,0.0009005259,0.0004167436,0.0001563727,0.0007289976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977804,0.0001763844,0.0007380064,0.0005867709,0.0002467626,0.000471608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002991913,0.0005300549,0.1676706,0.002547788,0.0003268869,0.00000244342,0.001915152,0.00001298303,0.00003898988,0.3663166,0.453705,0.006903577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002654859,0.00002395453,0.002560957,0.000215313,0.0002687706,0.000002122048,0.0004530007,0.00000771242,0.0001126328,0.000422563,0.9952837,0.0003837898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.282425,0.1296685,0.00009742846,0.007631585,0.002403683,0.004191999,0.001663701,0.0002591344,0.571659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031119,0.08051498,0.0007395769,0.004482835,0.001332765,0.0001115608,0.0002811176,0.0001273434,0.00929795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6206868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235758395","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.19112","title":"Ross v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 612, 2014 BCSC 320, 2014 BC.C. LEXIS 975 (British Columbia Supreme Court, March 5, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Supreme court; Lottery; Law; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Media studies","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01979959897980959,"gpt":0.2388291168262018,"spread":0.2190295178463922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001180825,0.0003303414,0.001518638,0.00002311493,0.0003738111,0.00147873,0.0003398629,0.0002168353,0.003275417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000651294,0.0005899601,0.0003333681,0.000068637,0.000329475,0.0005358331,0.0003532808,0.0004964321,0.001152669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002781987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002342606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3903679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3405895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967751,0.0001402278,0.001097343,0.0009298944,0.0002201589,0.0008373036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.0001112215,0.0003694428,0.0008216653,0.0002561573,0.0008001675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002971342,0.0001560994,0.02728478,0.001504038,0.000139703,0.0001751943,0.00001530075,0.000001207968,0.00001153655,0.000025264,0.9619226,0.008734532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002611601,0.0004008287,0.006890986,0.002097382,0.0006215592,0.002266898,0.00002598642,0.0000866289,0.000002905956,0.0001711943,0.9841393,0.0006847191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6138797,0.3513587,0.00004230984,0.004244363,0.002791538,0.003296048,0.001552686,0.0002883332,0.02254633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1131916,0.7408133,0.002356465,0.09027421,0.003015863,0.0004032389,0.002520629,0.0004211251,0.0470036],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5006881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229795280","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16315","title":"<i>Pineau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation</i> <i>Case No. CV-10-00399497, [2011] O.J. No. 4360, 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 9344, 2011 ONSC 5822 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 5, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03211866439953598,"gpt":0.2593901434697813,"spread":0.2272714790702454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001656866,0.0004069591,0.001046161,0.00006701385,0.0008141552,0.0001938565,0.0002376704,0.000238219,0.002763271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000729142,0.0003930094,0.0001558917,0.00004671984,0.0004493349,0.001389874,0.0001300278,0.0003208037,0.001554497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003339129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000536271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5703068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6061011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974729,0.0001346131,0.0009928579,0.0005330329,0.0001803172,0.0006862218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980813,0.0001905535,0.0006466724,0.0003852756,0.0002684659,0.0004277644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005335047,0.001814301,0.1941467,0.0202597,0.001176764,0.0002091773,0.0486668,0.00002843803,0.0002902266,0.1993411,0.512868,0.02066524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004434387,0.000137808,0.00124707,0.0005209434,0.0004544909,0.00008100424,0.0002354949,0.000008343822,0.00002304705,0.000120646,0.9961826,0.0005451107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6408961,0.08871476,0.00005763234,0.001433539,0.005028496,0.002467908,0.0001977517,0.0001388223,0.2610649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744993,0.0533587,0.001489571,0.008919718,0.003277333,0.0001529148,0.0001090373,0.0001483415,0.05804506],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4833146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027819035","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14109","title":"Case Comment on <i>Canada v. Fischbacher</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Library science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Stuart Hoegner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02011947005182962,"gpt":0.2597711806890595,"spread":0.2396517106372299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617795,0.00007132611,0.000192863,0.000005146374,0.0004294972,0.00006262895,0.0000788711,0.00003993836,0.00007705939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004692193,0.00006529994,0.00002383037,0.00002945212,0.00007848726,0.00009571569,0.00002055847,0.0001220154,0.00001099434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004155714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7335896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.933226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994671,0.00003022455,0.0001714886,0.0001334938,0.00003822386,0.0001594138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996156,0.00006677477,0.000075697,0.0001074065,0.00001878421,0.0001157412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001631468,0.00002325212,0.0003301479,0.0005403597,0.00001973126,0.00005919305,0.0004843458,9.311581e-7,0.000002920094,0.9465369,0.03316421,0.0188364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004718062,0.000007898605,0.000007826183,0.00007615412,0.00001752376,0.00002961812,0.00008963257,0.00000177641,0.000006877536,0.0003391097,0.9992874,0.00008898696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2911629,0.02104994,0.000004594179,0.07424915,0.002232485,0.0009235704,0.00004865862,0.00006642163,0.6102622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630086,0.006535165,0.00002936119,0.02988476,0.0002886108,0.00001072173,0.000001803957,0.000006762014,0.000234186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3303389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661077792","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.1948","title":"Aboriginal Gaming Challenges in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"Morden C. Lazarus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brian M. Hall","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1129555066946083,"gpt":0.3270983709033963,"spread":0.2141428642087879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008454852,0.00007616235,0.0002342923,0.00001192601,0.00009711469,0.00002891555,0.0001219268,0.00002550495,0.00001789402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395916,0.00007880848,0.00001756608,0.00003725301,0.00006850451,0.0002126622,0.00001456368,0.0000711528,0.00001036875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004022384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007435133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9072872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992858,0.00005487177,0.0001943218,0.0001725782,0.00005707734,0.000235319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995908,0.00006551834,0.00005852459,0.0001009776,0.00002367306,0.0001605785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005484674,0.0000136206,0.004520712,0.0009370383,0.00001024773,0.00002116672,0.004261062,0.00001837016,3.968944e-7,0.8947454,0.00180654,0.09365994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006140389,0.000007122345,0.0004291763,0.0003420454,0.00001688497,0.000004165442,0.001709162,0.0000135452,0.000001014583,0.0008036179,0.9964982,0.0001137036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3231103,0.5081924,0.000003109002,0.02349172,0.000620983,0.0003291809,0.000006371559,0.00002492604,0.1442211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5608117,0.4377159,0.0001064904,0.001146807,0.000101978,0.000008406302,9.872067e-7,0.000005276217,0.0001025062],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3213716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992773862","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13505","title":"Canadian Tax Structuring for Gaming Ventures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Tax law; Advertising; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Value-added tax","authors":[{"name":"Stuart Hoegner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0154800232570498,"gpt":0.2109649916487863,"spread":0.1954849683917365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001728826,0.0001120126,0.0002029331,0.00005442213,0.0002142853,0.0001837245,0.00009189398,0.00002973615,0.00004594214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002688446,0.0001134623,0.00004825344,0.00005200539,0.00001393384,0.0004262322,0.00001701863,0.00004893985,0.00002179284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004264198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001869658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005295316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02719187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993915,0.000002009063,0.0002027998,0.0001816864,0.00001799437,0.0002040045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.00001026958,0.0001806419,0.0001149297,0.00002975486,0.00002569402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005764135,0.000009824306,0.001069598,0.002070784,0.00001992819,0.000002533789,0.00002174577,0.00008689587,0.00004768436,0.821073,0.004932213,0.17066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001726473,0.000004680081,0.002452976,0.0002772213,0.00005544718,0.000002843712,0.0000124117,0.000752591,0.00001567264,0.009261332,0.9867826,0.0002096187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.791994,0.0771905,0.0006568642,0.03041275,0.001795092,0.00305841,0.0000843032,0.0003080866,0.09450003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665372,0.00291813,0.00045335,0.02911117,0.0006012449,0.00001459703,0.00004546971,0.00001598118,0.0003028856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242206263","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19611","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Nicky Fortunato <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1502; 2015 ONSC 1845 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06143848215864963,"gpt":0.3283772116095314,"spread":0.2669387294508818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002468824,0.0001992391,0.0006050877,0.00002192433,0.000377999,0.0001212053,0.000336772,0.0001156413,0.00009233247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001542567,0.0001582584,0.00009081474,0.00006297501,0.0006145488,0.0004311409,0.0001744127,0.0002106066,0.00008129083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000147505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003985177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05612262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1097229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998463,0.0001401011,0.000515937,0.0003344134,0.0001481366,0.0003984367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986942,0.0002704245,0.0002072002,0.0003367853,0.0001696137,0.0003217284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001526976,0.0001941705,0.157918,0.007144648,0.0004054016,0.00001885669,0.01713684,0.00001508177,0.00001473663,0.227527,0.5586264,0.03084614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001914013,0.00006223212,0.001576834,0.0003791364,0.0004486257,0.000006694297,0.0005774376,0.000009866525,0.000003152325,0.0008067022,0.9957193,0.0002186123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5925,0.2281237,0.0000748898,0.08639139,0.001957112,0.003102699,0.0003040123,0.0001103462,0.08743583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7469008,0.2231644,0.00202129,0.007464531,0.001446187,0.00009895621,0.00006458405,0.00009003745,0.01874924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4370929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9501628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254174589","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14712","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2360 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03524059886939603,"gpt":0.2572022426826484,"spread":0.2219616438132523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000555491,0.0001112113,0.0003294104,0.00001031806,0.0005913707,0.00004939169,0.0001389945,0.00008089031,0.0001781648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001833571,0.00009934587,0.00007546321,0.00004178716,0.0002658197,0.0002132796,0.00006331864,0.0001730522,0.00003525149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001116603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004737657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1578356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7404369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992313,0.00002731742,0.0002912971,0.0001848088,0.00006026863,0.0002049413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994363,0.00008857399,0.0001980176,0.000113439,0.00008594696,0.0000777419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001895875,0.0001897648,0.06633183,0.00409783,0.0003881776,0.00000243477,0.06900094,0.00001790795,0.0005913083,0.8008199,0.01163771,0.0469032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001228422,0.00001398594,0.004090039,0.0002048185,0.00006237264,9.16932e-7,0.0001882752,0.000008062381,0.00003282864,0.0003472587,0.99476,0.0001685605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.869606,0.00980747,0.00000286062,0.007613035,0.001764662,0.0007389171,0.00001971742,0.00006165163,0.1103857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399985,0.05212684,0.001925576,0.001876978,0.0004846469,0.00003758734,0.00001540411,0.00001893663,0.003515499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8477725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242221348","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17910","title":"Ontario First Nations Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>Case No. CV-12-461369, [2013] O.J. No. 2800; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 2992; 2013 ONSC 4166 (Ontario Court of Justice, June 17, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; General partnership; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03532596529928986,"gpt":0.2548350094174521,"spread":0.2195090441181622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098174,0.0004855616,0.001145309,0.000133,0.001630016,0.0004353702,0.0003438523,0.0002778934,0.002002088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001591174,0.0004787552,0.0001942318,0.0001583727,0.0005177096,0.001241334,0.0001504711,0.0005078805,0.0005617527],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006997624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007723534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970042,0.0001343614,0.0011678,0.0007210333,0.0002242084,0.0007484597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972643,0.0005729868,0.0007781727,0.0004625288,0.0004439684,0.0004780201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001152172,0.0008488547,0.05584037,0.008835652,0.0008483345,0.00009767382,0.03680374,0.0002136129,0.00001554058,0.0536081,0.8392763,0.003496623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005236435,0.0001253993,0.001825071,0.001601812,0.0004385128,0.00004177571,0.0003285578,0.00005938643,0.000002816653,0.0002481096,0.9942119,0.0005929785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.538157,0.03196847,0.00004447636,0.01329225,0.003690385,0.004577072,0.0001111732,0.0001732618,0.4079859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7895979,0.08097516,0.001012407,0.005759725,0.001398268,0.0003778956,0.0001198559,0.0001179721,0.1206408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.287345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253019488","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20412","title":"MGM Grand Hotel LLC v. Chiu <i>CV-15-527306; [2016] O.J. No. 721; 2016 ONSC 1071 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 10, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Download; Advertising; Business; Computer science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01756886264126859,"gpt":0.2517096826205425,"spread":0.2341408199792739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007750738,0.0002348968,0.0006862697,0.00003688997,0.0008270175,0.00006628493,0.0002205663,0.0001299269,0.000796966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009794193,0.0001638993,0.0002077424,0.00007411458,0.0007017751,0.0004357081,0.0001199149,0.0001082537,0.0002895105],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001626697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003842851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02730259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05608391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984101,0.0000826785,0.0005863244,0.0003740769,0.0001021756,0.0004446268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988768,0.0002040847,0.0002567978,0.0003148919,0.0001429227,0.0002044877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002361984,0.0005777603,0.01070397,0.006899722,0.001181171,0.00002793441,0.01375295,0.00001399261,0.0004860075,0.196356,0.6446603,0.125104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000515929,0.00005845183,0.002431783,0.001091355,0.000382739,0.00000585104,0.0001256935,0.000002807093,0.00001050974,0.0004854416,0.9945845,0.0003049219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2995867,0.2637519,0.0001611833,0.02194192,0.004664266,0.002918559,0.0006511746,0.0001946076,0.4061297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2340004,0.6664602,0.001119987,0.003419482,0.001562444,0.00009158736,0.00003330847,0.00008005089,0.09323262],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4027083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248601765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13210","title":"1397868 Ontario Ltd. v. Nordic Gaming Corp., <i>[2008] O.J. No. 5171</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01967238829424454,"gpt":0.2614517018495865,"spread":0.241779313555342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680736,0.0001456356,0.0003226232,0.00002316929,0.0003659539,0.0001485395,0.0002343907,0.00005503523,0.0003625814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007504557,0.0001489651,0.0001017431,0.00004378784,0.0001281336,0.000407192,0.00003235965,0.0001706452,0.000408202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001838102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001045675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006105143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02670783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989413,0.00005913711,0.0003582106,0.0002671586,0.0000772393,0.0002969809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.00006289761,0.0001622028,0.000167199,0.00007626179,0.0001516321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007783484,0.00004658351,0.0007019594,0.0001002477,0.0000319289,0.000007899259,0.000620747,0.00000360113,0.00002406368,0.9722019,0.003718821,0.02253447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001432371,0.00003909741,0.001115645,0.0002712297,0.00004161143,0.000004226716,0.00001327769,0.00001278471,0.00000595854,0.0006303042,0.9975324,0.0001901864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08589744,0.02241023,0.00002291236,0.002353982,0.0005849031,0.0003448394,0.000009255374,0.00007017779,0.8883063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6979052,0.1676824,0.001104418,0.07425226,0.00130419,0.00001339477,0.00004508572,0.00004524172,0.0576478],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910522,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243198121","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14412","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., <i>[2010] O.J. No. 1223 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Microeconomics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02510372144971111,"gpt":0.2576572364137912,"spread":0.2325535149640801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009598656,0.0001800992,0.0004829632,0.00002437299,0.0006675393,0.0002431716,0.0002516992,0.0001458888,0.0003807448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288542,0.0001771185,0.00009652013,0.00006940767,0.000275936,0.000389783,0.00007683706,0.000315049,0.0003058404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000253066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2377642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8005949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986954,0.00004800391,0.000428395,0.0003415993,0.00008359841,0.0004030391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.00009066315,0.0002306079,0.0002521863,0.00009129458,0.0002150046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003409614,0.0002738099,0.06875778,0.007213497,0.0003246279,0.00002287778,0.02271871,0.000005273786,0.0008891058,0.7739543,0.0480581,0.0777478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001047016,0.00001147602,0.000488475,0.0002927628,0.0000593153,0.000007489784,0.00004400922,0.000001346324,0.000009479826,0.001053068,0.9976797,0.000248199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117949,0.0236076,0.00005351505,0.004635555,0.005510795,0.001104937,0.00003371908,0.0001832299,0.3530757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194669,0.04366906,0.0011452,0.01359259,0.00229533,0.00006396515,0.00002820679,0.0000611568,0.01967757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249754693","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20115","title":"Kalra v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 4153, 2015 ONSC 4983; Court File No.: CV-14-4450-00 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, August 6, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Federal court; Library science; Computer science; Supreme court; Economics; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01960426838119865,"gpt":0.2578478612331971,"spread":0.2382435928519984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279054,0.0003491115,0.001069286,0.00005011718,0.0005636009,0.0001958785,0.0003246203,0.0002222314,0.00259793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002154869,0.0002900057,0.0001388908,0.00007989891,0.0005732435,0.0009105,0.0001608891,0.0002335559,0.0003013983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004697952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000845656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3567295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6315573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976392,0.0001031649,0.0008912306,0.0005719488,0.0001846009,0.0006098114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981546,0.00032127,0.000518415,0.0003404822,0.0003039303,0.0003612767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268519,0.0002572979,0.03060941,0.006903647,0.0003504801,0.00002793067,0.008083155,0.000002439298,0.0002955791,0.01775197,0.9254872,0.01010408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004954457,0.0001024167,0.001584829,0.002109081,0.000279251,0.0000139393,0.0001727636,0.000004320401,0.00001473156,0.0001279035,0.9946581,0.000437196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5031075,0.1490874,0.0001130423,0.01062056,0.007235268,0.004058046,0.001815336,0.0002916304,0.3236713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253011,0.1467717,0.001718531,0.0089288,0.003443243,0.0002298105,0.0001703584,0.000213289,0.1132232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2748279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999552,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239787302","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20212","title":"Babstock v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. <i>[2015] N.J. No. 299, 2015 NLTD(G) 116, Docket: 201201G2257 (Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court Trial Division—General Division, September 3, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Supreme court; Division (mathematics); Law; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01680033058937544,"gpt":0.2714741729619923,"spread":0.2546738423726169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007088978,0.0004489884,0.001144191,0.00005846742,0.0002133013,0.0001405508,0.0001641172,0.0001437826,0.0006571861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005254332,0.000303404,0.0002166451,0.00005335753,0.0001860456,0.0005940361,0.0002730146,0.0002105341,0.0004591298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001153885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006779876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001154586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005924002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977057,0.0001019682,0.0008445363,0.0006634668,0.0001534454,0.0005309092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982861,0.0002143707,0.0002971594,0.0006350882,0.0001008903,0.0004664308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002850021,0.0004841545,0.07391956,0.003319252,0.0005745313,0.0001018194,0.00009388465,0.000002131539,0.0005461813,0.002675467,0.8918071,0.02362585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0170751,0.0006663638,0.0090479,0.001985138,0.0006241298,0.0002450733,0.000005076327,0.00007010756,0.00002092432,0.0001145507,0.9695683,0.0005773531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343542,0.05150012,0.0001179538,0.009952559,0.00117936,0.00151017,0.0001518474,0.00006520752,0.001168614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8094003,0.1430821,0.0009039558,0.03066068,0.002515354,0.0001416071,0.0003904768,0.0001932589,0.01271227],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1249538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248841446","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16611","title":"Between Giuseppe Tarascio and Her Majesty, the Queen[2012] F.C.J. No. 127, 2012 FCA 30, 2012 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 134 (Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto, Ontario; January 26, 2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Botany","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02658409602326493,"gpt":0.2769649511127849,"spread":0.2503808550895199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065146,0.0003111178,0.000898407,0.00001972513,0.0008679233,0.0001946808,0.0003360219,0.0002174668,0.0008966352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043533,0.0002454228,0.0001437029,0.00005636971,0.0004916522,0.002776918,0.0001717217,0.0002416646,0.0001787881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002443688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002356729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3283901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3632202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978208,0.0002022204,0.0007312928,0.0003510444,0.0001686289,0.0007260391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998576,0.0001863532,0.0004732457,0.000313295,0.0001035638,0.0003475359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009082037,0.0004828748,0.250152,0.00689213,0.001034713,0.00000349508,0.02195397,0.000004307527,0.00002186274,0.2217431,0.4470388,0.05058193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002130835,0.00006480075,0.01067682,0.0004309099,0.000191333,0.00000350246,0.000286333,0.000001196614,0.000003488776,0.0004841186,0.9873069,0.0003375014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038089,0.6656404,0.00005777543,0.005719149,0.002056973,0.002013757,0.00008934206,0.0001098426,0.2205038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053827,0.1709252,0.0003959652,0.002922699,0.00366328,0.00008275687,0.00002870111,0.00009015853,0.01650853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7015738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256695152","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18812","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd. <i>[2014] M.J. No. 171, 2014 MBCA 61, 2014 MB.C. Lexis 172 (Manitoba Court of Appeal, June 13, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; General partnership; Political science; Download; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03139974770948781,"gpt":0.2670107917707297,"spread":0.2356110440612419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001897021,0.0004162702,0.001348336,0.00004727096,0.0007314711,0.0001075984,0.0005216322,0.0002108623,0.000267745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002837514,0.000374735,0.0002733936,0.0001081412,0.001159735,0.0003457697,0.0001838138,0.0002478457,0.0003111144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001768774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001352759,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1033997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5861177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971021,0.0003634647,0.001038584,0.0005603298,0.0002336789,0.0007018019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975209,0.0003837534,0.0009255446,0.0004765795,0.000363599,0.0003296759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090076,0.0002051378,0.03518561,0.004267591,0.0004932652,0.000003166281,0.002646709,0.00003733619,0.00007504306,0.04866825,0.8987274,0.009639641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004479632,0.00007362555,0.002112575,0.0005827359,0.0003122473,0.000002120201,0.0008541702,0.0000482878,0.00004238376,0.0002586616,0.9947827,0.0004825407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659667,0.2894437,0.00009541905,0.02155,0.005550888,0.005850295,0.0009851928,0.0004010643,0.2101567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6139288,0.3759992,0.0009204493,0.004285799,0.001494553,0.000109786,0.0001762904,0.00009519318,0.002989931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4827181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246162766","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19113","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Joseph LeClair <i>[2014] O.J. No. 2700, 2014 ON.C. LEXIS 2994 (Ontario Court of Justice, March 19, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Economic Justice; Lexis; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0374808489849111,"gpt":0.2876950274305874,"spread":0.2502141784456763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001908673,0.0001898327,0.0005078541,0.000005217806,0.0005716687,0.0001025631,0.0003014179,0.0001778189,0.0001417043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006661884,0.0001374353,0.0001162633,0.00004622387,0.0006679125,0.000231817,0.0001077911,0.0002796206,0.0001483893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002575281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02172395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02503693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986694,0.00017206,0.0003811954,0.0003165417,0.0001321103,0.0003287033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989275,0.0001963182,0.0002324435,0.0002973001,0.0001071842,0.0002392372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001412935,0.00004304856,0.009498691,0.0009357672,0.0001305628,0.000001063551,0.00734399,0.000009016006,0.000001372295,0.1668091,0.812812,0.00240131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002286631,0.00004861016,0.0007911104,0.0001730011,0.0002707096,0.000001903249,0.0006231944,0.000002226405,0.000002116993,0.002410206,0.995258,0.0001902656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1170549,0.2056104,0.0000646287,0.05597655,0.00229223,0.003113333,0.0003152005,0.00016408,0.6154087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1503789,0.7794501,0.001930333,0.03229039,0.002829218,0.000111152,0.0001164322,0.00009554881,0.03279796],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5826107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240459957","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14311","title":"Seguin v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 170 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web; Thermodynamics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01576875441192486,"gpt":0.2496548811439885,"spread":0.2338861267320636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004009712,0.00008673211,0.0002210771,0.000009649594,0.0006658825,0.00006871454,0.00009427599,0.00006250911,0.0003706773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003908327,0.00007734992,0.00006597081,0.00003476705,0.0002521446,0.0001316834,0.00005094482,0.0001544483,0.0000788165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001027619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06890277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7307811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993829,0.00002058309,0.0001854732,0.0001699803,0.00003446357,0.0002065619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999586,0.00003845318,0.00007103255,0.0001532549,0.00004568299,0.000105507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002161018,0.00003160486,0.003219274,0.0002902454,0.00005374865,0.000002243003,0.003414324,0.000001228345,0.00001990319,0.9549634,0.02529671,0.0127051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006416112,0.000007240738,0.0007924225,0.0000452951,0.00004270664,0.000002663623,0.00003846446,0.000003098305,0.000001894795,0.0006424981,0.9982466,0.0001129647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.171892,0.01442727,0.000006083947,0.01981925,0.003595257,0.000718182,0.00003424245,0.00008861893,0.7894191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7099036,0.1559771,0.004582188,0.02664188,0.003113466,0.0001070086,0.00004879814,0.00006571144,0.09956023],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9372975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247762789","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14615","title":"203102 Ontario Ltd. v. Canada <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2055 (May 14, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01520814125502146,"gpt":0.2346485213647178,"spread":0.2194403801096964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004243344,0.0001218121,0.0002945273,0.000009543599,0.000900364,0.00007240261,0.0001354533,0.00007348023,0.0005361711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005258813,0.000108903,0.00006433845,0.00004143402,0.0002230796,0.0001770013,0.00006271587,0.0002222433,0.0000552176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001626315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006070797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.976364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991468,0.00002638634,0.0002511266,0.0002171008,0.00006229898,0.0002962738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.00005745872,0.0001027871,0.000202304,0.00007530226,0.0001663947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004096011,0.00003831378,0.008389716,0.0004084938,0.0001162901,0.000008637622,0.002151691,0.00000501219,0.00001298914,0.3299224,0.6488574,0.01008494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007629148,0.00000600054,0.002435624,0.00004927091,0.0000522919,0.00000334135,0.00004379942,0.000002932656,0.000001621395,0.0001134599,0.9970587,0.0001566527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.161566,0.0317716,0.00000499542,0.02963685,0.01721997,0.001071889,0.0001010035,0.00007446825,0.7585532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3610561,0.1974154,0.002685279,0.03962285,0.005996339,0.0001398169,0.0001064616,0.0001018478,0.3928759],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3656773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251263544","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14913","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario (Native Affairs), <i>S.C.C.A. No. 91, C.S.C.R. no 91, File No.: 33613 (Supreme Court of Canada, July 8, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01643565876932158,"gpt":0.2192227205486977,"spread":0.2027870617793761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008515379,0.0001743934,0.0006108366,0.00002648387,0.0004343711,0.00004912462,0.0002465088,0.0001239662,0.0008392716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005007968,0.0001732171,0.00008474952,0.00008870127,0.0002408376,0.0003801074,0.00006099767,0.0002364797,0.00004089325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001958572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9338248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985873,0.00004588775,0.0006237365,0.0002750001,0.0001601461,0.0003079394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841,0.0001989308,0.0005962477,0.0001865431,0.0004637493,0.0001445087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268954,0.0004653451,0.01205857,0.01878632,0.0007405639,0.00001050122,0.03059036,0.00009370548,0.0007495512,0.2094821,0.7201751,0.006721043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596455,0.00004226258,0.0005496463,0.0008122545,0.0000563032,0.000001163622,0.0001589519,0.00003506483,0.00009063348,0.0002151808,0.9976583,0.0002205621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07582086,0.008091806,0.000008556136,0.001612752,0.00436824,0.001376084,0.0006947914,0.00004774866,0.9079791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744268,0.009883384,0.0006595184,0.0009622138,0.001130726,0.0000602402,0.00009019781,0.00004291779,0.01274398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8986059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9189436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240456741","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17911","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming CorpCase No. C55923, [2013] O.J. No. 3468; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 3610; 2013 ONCA 501 (Ontario Court of Appeal, July 31, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Download; Advertising; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02428805788161605,"gpt":0.2479881391423822,"spread":0.2237000812607662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105526,0.0004152962,0.001144933,0.00007144591,0.0006924028,0.0003617034,0.0003564691,0.0002479431,0.0005702618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007525318,0.0003913857,0.0001707545,0.00009086134,0.0004894856,0.0009328601,0.0001584604,0.00037297,0.001326718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004110774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000567927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9163206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9030843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973988,0.0001125498,0.0009914382,0.0006433587,0.0001737162,0.0006801655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997992,0.0001958461,0.0006909554,0.000399373,0.0003116655,0.0004101187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001027054,0.0006053802,0.01856167,0.008630099,0.0006287248,0.00003334802,0.01645401,0.00004246968,0.00006613295,0.02111422,0.9062679,0.02749328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004262566,0.0001631277,0.001119034,0.001422915,0.0001400979,0.00001277008,0.0001377699,0.00003162309,0.000007332527,0.0004828893,0.9955523,0.0005038916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7842849,0.07050489,0.00003499536,0.006401114,0.002259282,0.003115492,0.00007422667,0.0001231395,0.133202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5976018,0.340701,0.001896497,0.009856938,0.002100434,0.0003038131,0.00007490333,0.0001616673,0.04730298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2701961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243943677","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19412","title":"Walsh v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. <i>[2015] N.S.J. No. 56; 2015 NSCA 16 (Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, February 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; History; Economics; Archaeology","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02910424056185277,"gpt":0.2752402427656346,"spread":0.2461360022037819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000656872,0.0002937864,0.001039258,0.00004842639,0.00005191115,0.00003581386,0.0001645006,0.00009814606,0.0001850723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003374364,0.0002579358,0.0001816875,0.00006616936,0.0001536084,0.0002479111,0.0001826628,0.0002252058,0.0004962069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001439693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001379959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008628968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009189751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983667,0.00005414949,0.0007430027,0.0003703401,0.0001120364,0.0003537975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985811,0.00005869163,0.0003196446,0.0005447848,0.0001330703,0.0003626816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001685702,0.0002429904,0.02579608,0.005179473,0.0002841447,0.000047411,0.00006708528,0.000005350251,0.00007064635,0.001599615,0.9635361,0.003002511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002809336,0.0006819652,0.002121849,0.003596018,0.001302884,0.0006660306,0.00006475201,0.0001845901,0.00008226309,0.0001994397,0.9876855,0.0006053729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6313472,0.331605,0.00005531804,0.01677274,0.001593811,0.001538802,0.0001741662,0.00009386955,0.01681899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555707,0.09920973,0.0007519869,0.04211984,0.0009310213,0.00001708895,0.0006360185,0.0000981098,0.0006655071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2323953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238753586","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19310","title":"Edgewater Casino v. Chubb-Kennedy <i>[2015] B.C.J. No. 32; 2015 BCCA 9; 2015 BC.C. LEXIS 34 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, January 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.025307861219641,"gpt":0.2801121623371103,"spread":0.2548043011174693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001496965,0.0002150283,0.0008443236,0.00002833253,0.0007124148,0.0003164865,0.0002736634,0.000176141,0.000209828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001070382,0.0002603144,0.0001847742,0.0001385875,0.0007325282,0.0005378928,0.0001940924,0.0001707891,0.0001961301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001887053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002903332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1232733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2364316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979523,0.0001535583,0.000716759,0.0004489602,0.0001746546,0.000553766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984392,0.00007219721,0.0003481804,0.0003599885,0.0003831389,0.0003972852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007094533,0.0000683765,0.001766239,0.0004627565,0.00009042998,0.000008353131,0.000774432,0.000008000162,0.000001851823,0.002980642,0.9916927,0.002139133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004692253,0.00007874744,0.0004870797,0.0004299606,0.0001804566,0.00002503263,0.0004243931,0.00002447143,0.000002070326,0.0006533766,0.9968749,0.0003502492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.123253,0.4442981,0.00003688482,0.02467774,0.005370065,0.003424766,0.0008866961,0.000232206,0.3978206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4337986,0.4892938,0.001984601,0.006950139,0.003669236,0.0002022481,0.0003159271,0.0001596955,0.06362577],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3341948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253012223","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16412","title":"Bell v. Levy <i>[2011] B.C.J. No. 2018, 2011 BCCA 417; 2011 BC.C. LEXIS 5195 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, October 27, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; Download; Political science; Law; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02812046852513575,"gpt":0.2573231408813508,"spread":0.229202672356215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001744418,0.000194121,0.0006350345,0.0000243081,0.0003943052,0.0002248347,0.0004224689,0.000129404,0.009537881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000580516,0.0002633444,0.000201929,0.00002510084,0.0004451696,0.0009224743,0.0001327124,0.0002044498,0.005240992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008490305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009500482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05428145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0312623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980077,0.0001805098,0.0007321202,0.0003589971,0.0001542848,0.0005664618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998589,0.0001229101,0.0004615807,0.0003156906,0.0001922874,0.0003185219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001487624,0.0002636539,0.01459698,0.0007451472,0.0001663765,0.000004210726,0.0003478674,9.478355e-7,0.0000284297,0.1162501,0.8593625,0.008218928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002581963,0.00004338108,0.002367614,0.0002835742,0.0001098603,0.000008411787,0.00002664745,0.000006846473,0.000008518748,0.0002832954,0.9962897,0.0003139572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06837655,0.1705035,0.00002314523,0.001257114,0.00322804,0.001027652,0.0003014492,0.00009236751,0.7551902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1785804,0.6459513,0.0009112313,0.0117307,0.002207085,0.00003770477,0.000107819,0.0001205537,0.1603532],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238408455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19411","title":"Merpaw v. Hyde (c.o.b. City Limits Convenience) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 800; 2015 ONSC 1053 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05733022544795584,"gpt":0.3092049537484531,"spread":0.2518747283004972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001587142,0.0003046294,0.0009716714,0.00002421594,0.00061484,0.00009293392,0.0003715477,0.0001555618,0.0001487328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000383208,0.0002687757,0.0001719587,0.0001048574,0.0009049225,0.0006361733,0.0001415668,0.0002549462,0.0002136426],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004980594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003754876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09998837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1849271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979114,0.0001664833,0.0006978499,0.000455801,0.000211392,0.0005570914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983603,0.000177962,0.000371319,0.0002844403,0.0003674917,0.0004385276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002044656,0.0008005726,0.08301961,0.006394323,0.001156126,0.00003263923,0.08596724,0.00008537379,0.0002839531,0.09939674,0.7108206,0.01183841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004700126,0.0000921615,0.002880279,0.0004103307,0.0004721912,0.000005154619,0.001390246,0.00002495121,0.00003314593,0.000172611,0.9935989,0.0004500636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7447571,0.1521035,0.00001895771,0.01692702,0.003121841,0.002132685,0.0001700086,0.000152124,0.0806168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7290455,0.2432535,0.00384524,0.007884985,0.001346479,0.0001343913,0.00007796432,0.00007752557,0.01433439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2827783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256694958","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181010","title":"Szecsodi v. MGM Resorts International <i>Court File No. CV-11-9457-00CL, [2014) O.J. No. 946, 2014 ONSC 1323, 2014 CarswellOnt 2465 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, March 3, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01533223290551432,"gpt":0.2630077241841347,"spread":0.2476754912786203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002354358,0.0003658673,0.001106323,0.00007347918,0.000709211,0.0002605087,0.0006792033,0.0002566492,0.003663722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003579922,0.0003642235,0.0002483146,0.0000665238,0.0005324706,0.0007003817,0.0002369567,0.0003357822,0.001007547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000296641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004295041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2301352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2890572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.0002515599,0.001091431,0.0006385024,0.0002987361,0.0006235779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977678,0.0003828569,0.0006033427,0.0004608837,0.000462118,0.0003229712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003846524,0.0001106549,0.007067214,0.001773918,0.00009299565,0.000004043311,0.001107515,0.00001147661,0.00001940262,0.01846539,0.9688971,0.002411792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003886514,0.00007922993,0.001351385,0.000690225,0.0002182499,0.000008399697,0.00009316819,0.00008286484,0.00000717449,0.0002500479,0.996407,0.0004236181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1089474,0.06210503,0.0003101963,0.01779585,0.01614396,0.004245342,0.002388029,0.000315377,0.7877488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6303987,0.2766134,0.003386377,0.01849712,0.01562828,0.0004123268,0.001220176,0.0002962449,0.05354743],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247898333","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161113","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 1879, 2012 ON.C. LEXIS 3717; 2012 ONSC 2304 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, April 30, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web; Linguistics","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03858182301488459,"gpt":0.2729170242922233,"spread":0.2343352012773387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003051774,0.0007687408,0.001930735,0.0001237093,0.001297275,0.0003326086,0.0006235776,0.0004666762,0.003096593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002179213,0.0007526666,0.0004361722,0.0002199935,0.0007221911,0.003474503,0.0002724437,0.0007667385,0.003199519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008752225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00102058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2982831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5976616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951406,0.0002791192,0.001723783,0.0008700785,0.0003861788,0.001600269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964254,0.0004265555,0.001052409,0.0008343134,0.0004143492,0.000847006],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006600228,0.003209026,0.04525192,0.03136136,0.002094099,0.0002851196,0.0557633,0.00009906047,0.0008512177,0.15648,0.6623104,0.04163452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063409,0.0001137307,0.0005723732,0.001545718,0.0007846008,0.0001422698,0.0002795318,0.000003237087,0.00002447745,0.000132573,0.994839,0.0009283873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4861555,0.2066876,0.0001890732,0.001402388,0.009749445,0.003232134,0.0003467568,0.0002731367,0.2919639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546938,0.09187115,0.002795151,0.01842861,0.009545951,0.0003678864,0.0002366369,0.0004122118,0.1216486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3325287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253588455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20311","title":"Lalani v. Reeves <i>Case File No. 07-CV-338183CP; [2016] O.J. No. 397; 2016 ONSC 424 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 26, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01707181484242867,"gpt":0.2523056909357985,"spread":0.2352338760933698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082435,0.0002674068,0.0008325754,0.00003708341,0.0005555055,0.0001111886,0.0003015087,0.0001824665,0.00183307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003620911,0.0001992366,0.0001631989,0.00007491515,0.0004523242,0.0007948457,0.000119392,0.0001418266,0.001672884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001721079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006690258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1061066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07280598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980123,0.0001214846,0.0007877603,0.0004548469,0.0001201269,0.0005034725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983469,0.0003699701,0.0004151761,0.0003490405,0.0002553482,0.0002635869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009322743,0.0002098791,0.002639807,0.008256257,0.0002978251,0.0001230846,0.004660602,8.792843e-7,0.0004252893,0.04082143,0.9163024,0.0261693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003053116,0.00007810668,0.0001240158,0.002815434,0.0002178814,0.00003834668,0.0001772313,0.000002712155,0.00002238169,0.000292704,0.9955865,0.0003393833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1283802,0.1723286,0.0001103773,0.007115419,0.00600565,0.003521585,0.002272001,0.0003970949,0.6798691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3434377,0.4895571,0.001676964,0.007099411,0.004810517,0.0002732282,0.00007096657,0.0001977205,0.1528764],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5269927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245174989","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18910","title":"In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Phu Hai Pham[2014) B.C.J. No. 2013, 2014 BCSC 1538, 2014 BC.C. Lexis 1750 (British Columbia Supreme Court (in Bankruptcy &amp; Involvency), July 30, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Lexis; Law; Political science; Philosophy","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01355184581197886,"gpt":0.2025448978866989,"spread":0.18899305207472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960187,0.0002901104,0.0008855554,0.00004758519,0.00016854,0.0003091187,0.0007995281,0.000124863,0.00177353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007872579,0.0002812408,0.0002229481,0.0001531341,0.0002796955,0.001108578,0.0002646401,0.000308238,0.001210938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004329879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004449511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06466921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1232808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976413,0.00009801862,0.001136889,0.0005149196,0.0001678914,0.0004410199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977955,0.0001376821,0.0010873,0.000808491,0.0001473808,0.00002366357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001228567,0.0001518253,0.06073387,0.003539691,0.00003344256,0.00000190926,0.00008582227,0.00003617283,0.00002554384,0.00347559,0.9303039,0.001599941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006155332,0.00001540287,0.03549615,0.001636764,0.000128605,0.000006813985,0.00001617616,0.0002329607,0.000004487806,0.003299039,0.9581893,0.0003587759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8217183,0.08328445,0.00009778634,0.01342315,0.003788165,0.003824901,0.0002800743,0.00007512078,0.07350801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8760353,0.08205669,0.0002562966,0.03464151,0.001433185,0.0001668295,0.00009589787,0.0001269022,0.005187355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06832065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233760448","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20910","title":"Paton Estate v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission (c.o.b. Fallsview Casino Resort)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Estate; Commission; Download; Real estate; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02501758896512817,"gpt":0.2640455497033671,"spread":0.239027960738239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317369,0.0001342526,0.0003945702,0.0000185203,0.0004702039,0.0001144247,0.0001050712,0.00007244944,0.0000698309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005667692,0.00009744251,0.00004375482,0.00003906842,0.0001971028,0.0004140024,0.00006658239,0.00007688194,0.00002149904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001411605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001212378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1162331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2508083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989653,0.00008577961,0.0003508978,0.0002711675,0.00005763015,0.0002692707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993857,0.0001058866,0.0001683207,0.0001365259,0.00003283456,0.0001707501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001713206,0.00004544032,0.03097066,0.003170075,0.00006842529,0.00001815969,0.008266067,3.418801e-7,0.00006011243,0.1603351,0.002237679,0.7948108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014268,0.0000217845,0.001248399,0.002035829,0.0000483091,0.000008209324,0.00008973503,9.662949e-7,0.000009617984,0.0008755059,0.9953366,0.0001823671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112659,0.1174337,0.00006067402,0.007760326,0.0005554603,0.000958287,0.00002005361,0.0001071188,0.1618385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466536,0.249584,0.00007796678,0.001243435,0.0001555209,0.00001279774,0.000001805697,0.00001559634,0.002255291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.889652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980009831","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1769","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal Takes a Spin at Roulette: <i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp.</i> , 2013 ONCA 121, February 26, 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roulette; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Emir Crowne","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kiratjot Tiwana","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02047576640537435,"gpt":0.2381419362012918,"spread":0.2176661697959174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007371359,0.0002574935,0.0008172993,0.00003686632,0.000518183,0.0001893394,0.0002007619,0.0001509656,0.0004803903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002238924,0.0002445956,0.0001051528,0.00006538686,0.0004050886,0.0007599635,0.0001155464,0.0002189232,0.0001150062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004178355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002938071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9447466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.00007912196,0.0006995654,0.0004252713,0.0001238987,0.0004568423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989113,0.00008915885,0.0004575569,0.0002236296,0.00008690911,0.0002314795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009560365,0.0004615571,0.4763683,0.0149978,0.0008687947,0.00004032272,0.06859565,0.00004219653,0.0003599792,0.1041502,0.2584124,0.07560724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003646168,0.0000859057,0.02207925,0.00138233,0.0001583525,0.00002225369,0.0004098233,0.00001945481,0.00001501404,0.0006367306,0.9743299,0.0004963113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9208416,0.04869503,0.00001501733,0.004774069,0.0004051927,0.001055615,0.00001154993,0.00004711084,0.02415476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437946,0.04356116,0.0004808625,0.00610228,0.0004611266,0.00008808155,0.00001763872,0.00004932014,0.005444907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7159176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474419122","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2046","title":"Canada's First Nations and the State of the First Nations' Gaming Sector in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Morden C. Lazarus","is_ca":false},{"name":"Brian T. Hall","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008102830885473972,"gpt":0.1819634505460296,"spread":0.1738606196605556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000315636,0.00004275222,0.0001370792,0.00003552861,0.0010537,0.00004043384,0.0001193702,0.0000114881,0.0000385125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002221117,0.00003061433,0.0000191267,0.00009707426,0.0003099177,0.00008165552,0.00002537632,0.00003682066,4.501863e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001316723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002975593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995307,0.00003868107,0.0001809922,0.00008672123,0.00004813909,0.0001148112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993091,0.0004302001,0.00009925379,0.00009528071,0.00002118576,0.00004502816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007529091,0.00001424285,0.01334551,0.002132717,0.00008421164,0.000003495487,0.007093764,0.00008804822,7.419396e-7,0.9238958,0.02271717,0.03061675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001239438,6.946165e-7,0.004130989,0.0003023289,0.00001378932,6.676354e-7,0.00008746738,0.000007533087,4.232633e-7,0.0001705557,0.9951109,0.00005066813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5658493,0.1399972,0.000008183992,0.1962776,0.002010759,0.002272234,0.001058392,0.00001658993,0.09250977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209255,0.07657811,0.000004239703,0.001336413,0.00002604592,0.00001486703,5.797247e-7,0.000004059775,0.001110207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8104314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}