{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":51,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3b2538682e73","filters":{"venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W4253504090","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019064","title":"Measuring the Gender-Responsiveness of Free Trade Agreements: Using a Self-Evaluation Maturity Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Empowerment; Maturity (psychological); Momentum (technical analysis); Intervention (counseling); International trade; International economics; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Amrita Bahri","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05019680804747467,"gpt":0.2901092020193232,"spread":0.2399123939718485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07429989,0.0007092002,0.0005185261,0.008709992,0.002539619,0.006794117,0.001229447,0.001714887,0.002084063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1026956,0.000359296,0.001346299,0.004363258,0.005308057,0.009377606,0.005304013,0.002266057,0.0003650909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01198559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008731754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004866863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005054322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9414171,0.03827001,0.003284516,0.001738349,0.01336599,0.001924057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9012094,0.04672456,0.01671433,0.004340804,0.02702718,0.003983587],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002660346,0.00135342,0.3213579,0.0008584926,0.0003112301,0.0002448042,0.07187945,0.01364498,0.002629223,0.3341572,0.003129191,0.2501682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007958405,0.00251638,0.3484582,0.002175739,0.0002094646,0.0003724292,0.1365086,0.07286255,0.006729528,0.3770531,0.05251246,0.0005219934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6055655,0.00118333,0.2231126,0.005975827,0.0001405783,0.003193989,0.0004401494,0.0002491966,0.1601388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625379,0.0001841722,0.03480729,0.0001815662,0.0000148397,0.0008832806,0.000185896,0.00001816565,0.001186902],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07429989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246045263","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019010","title":"The Court of Justice of the European Unions Judgment on Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; European union; Mutagenesis; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Parliament; Biology; Biotechnology; Genetics; Law and economics; Business; Mutation; Politics; Sociology; Gene; International trade; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Tobias Dolle","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ignacio Carreño","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03108684530606665,"gpt":0.2744469337447521,"spread":0.2433600884386855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01939823,0.001117548,0.001870243,0.001280768,0.02174062,0.01902139,0.004564833,0.08915645,0.006971496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03796079,0.00146885,0.00291142,0.00225893,0.01089002,0.009360244,0.005872967,0.04463878,0.00202126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01452493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02559783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06334221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08161195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.97641,0.004601746,0.001633252,0.004189348,0.007071401,0.006094282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843392,0.01035383,0.0006652452,0.0005999035,0.002840412,0.0012014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008089803,0.00007062736,0.0006849118,0.0000851979,0.00003115653,0.002591251,0.002955303,0.0002779303,0.0005249218,0.674569,0.3121289,0.0059999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008862811,0.00007087058,0.0008479433,0.0006191327,0.00009404482,0.0007304286,0.001974874,0.0006785727,0.0007929687,0.0791809,0.9147507,0.0001709727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01320329,0.008717244,0.004557074,0.7086642,0.01597763,0.0002173267,0.0003808827,0.0000955795,0.2481868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1021946,0.00285057,0.002489749,0.7886423,0.005617297,0.0002680564,0.0001527092,0.0001203807,0.09766436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08915645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1259471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614194518","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017024","title":"The Obstacles to Concluding the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and Lessons for the Future","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Member states; Convergence (economics); Member state; International trade; Opposition (politics); European union; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Free trade; Economic growth","authors":[{"name":"E. Diane White","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03140491407703751,"gpt":0.2688798035833601,"spread":0.2374748895063225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02626897,0.0004587839,0.0008472755,0.001380965,0.01240636,0.0159467,0.003611287,0.01403271,0.005998618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04173695,0.0004624059,0.001189981,0.001746824,0.009272003,0.006917127,0.006276472,0.01380441,0.0008680752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06267285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2137467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8985618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9035125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9732082,0.003708224,0.001003994,0.001752591,0.01393177,0.006395234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768955,0.005961052,0.0006894393,0.001079121,0.01069533,0.004679635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000387624,0.00003221936,0.0007482009,0.000086286,0.00001403323,0.0003264055,0.002009334,0.00164125,0.0001936465,0.9255956,0.04545135,0.02386293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005899205,0.00003762092,0.003593906,0.000632433,0.00002858865,0.0002301065,0.0069362,0.002552083,0.0005069669,0.1807341,0.8045248,0.0001642492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03381882,0.01465944,0.008588511,0.7358446,0.003611504,0.0001601896,0.0004179194,0.0001870522,0.2027121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636749,0.01251811,0.02621579,0.1969723,0.001160759,0.0002414905,0.0006262323,0.0002253069,0.125291],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1014382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4547254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235589513","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2021050","title":"A Canadian Border Carbon Adjustment? GATT Compliance and Underexplored Exceptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; International trade; Convention; Greenhouse gas; Carbon leakage; Order (exchange); Political science; European union; International economics; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Emissions trading; Economics; Law; Kyoto Protocol; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Annie Arko","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03066435155547819,"gpt":0.3090210329350418,"spread":0.2783566813795636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01137287,0.0004004184,0.0005859092,0.00182424,0.02466241,0.01446484,0.00371169,0.01108414,0.006148812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03304087,0.0004594138,0.0007805951,0.003563859,0.01343233,0.004185168,0.003224861,0.0139454,0.0004659111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.220588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983688,0.001567941,0.0005441646,0.002122651,0.008308812,0.003768531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769236,0.006351914,0.001064102,0.001001816,0.01292818,0.001730326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004967518,0.00002372252,0.00481047,0.000144072,0.00003550765,0.0007046756,0.01013075,0.0005214859,0.0004053633,0.7441188,0.2089614,0.03009414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004405047,0.00002449256,0.01386462,0.0006689964,0.00007228724,0.0002816017,0.0133151,0.001377074,0.0007957928,0.04977791,0.919512,0.0002661419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0520277,0.008183769,0.002807341,0.601751,0.002911818,0.00008219102,0.00070199,0.0001684563,0.3313658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6605742,0.0073054,0.003823468,0.2649979,0.0008500114,0.00006199414,0.000343151,0.000171025,0.06187283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7587267,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816635","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022042","title":"Dispute Settlement in Indian FTAs’: Shaping the Future with Lessons from the Past","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Dispute resolution; Scope (computer science); Arbitration; International trade; Settlement (finance); Dispute mechanism; Political science; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Free trade; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Shailja Singh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01740617014674922,"gpt":0.2317619260444285,"spread":0.2143557558976793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01457294,0.0003354063,0.0004990496,0.002192788,0.02024655,0.03693775,0.003619141,0.008833275,0.005581296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01439377,0.0003928935,0.0008526975,0.004351014,0.03399286,0.01851652,0.007770328,0.01425579,0.0007120588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02485091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01828828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03061284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0435258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884371,0.00490238,0.0005826527,0.0009716993,0.00231801,0.002788163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878793,0.005238957,0.001303533,0.001380668,0.002081607,0.002115906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001265114,0.00003294815,0.000491292,0.00007584079,0.000004051755,0.0002576,0.01402968,0.0002914701,0.00008478801,0.9676045,0.004567866,0.01254733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001143723,0.00003697648,0.002614407,0.0007682283,0.00001863297,0.0006583995,0.07743872,0.001268959,0.0003614606,0.448056,0.4686559,0.0001110009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09644825,0.03423296,0.01221069,0.3312509,0.002301807,0.00008054513,0.0001446883,0.000118719,0.5232114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626627,0.008527598,0.003405751,0.01103553,0.0006386146,0.00004551022,0.00005044613,0.0000353767,0.01359857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03693775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1803068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229647937","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010034","title":"Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Law and Practice: The Mexican Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Dumping; Jurisprudence; International trade; Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Settlement (finance); Free trade agreement; Free trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Ihn H. Uhm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nick Covelli","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gregory W. Bowman","is_ca":false},{"name":"David A. Gantz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01624115784412717,"gpt":0.3238190397737079,"spread":0.3075778819295807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003358581,0.0002005153,0.0002265775,0.0007621344,0.01125174,0.005620351,0.0009492302,0.002695463,0.003385862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004327572,0.000256387,0.0001902353,0.002043761,0.01449126,0.003633716,0.002751078,0.00439472,0.0001574883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01598784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00989532,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2677122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3420306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987698,0.0004413375,0.0000270814,0.0001355056,0.00023504,0.0003913126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988009,0.0005705882,0.0001838607,0.0001075715,0.0002035186,0.0001335824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000535274,0.00008371827,0.003794554,0.0001121798,0.000005763745,0.001050896,0.1964689,0.0001289652,0.0005277421,0.750791,0.01773136,0.0292514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001891657,0.00005121375,0.01526127,0.0005562135,0.00001682335,0.0006891434,0.2039232,0.0002559713,0.0004375744,0.02101252,0.7577223,0.00005490797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4883815,0.01908973,0.001874071,0.1131377,0.0003919101,0.00003565144,0.0001327859,0.00003857792,0.3769181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634759,0.01172708,0.0005955955,0.005375935,0.0001477357,0.00001995851,0.00003748529,0.00002434362,0.01859601],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2677122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606450338","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017018","title":"The Brexit Vote: Its Impact on the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and UKs Obligations Under Comprehensive Trade and Economic Trade Agreement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; European union; International trade; Negotiation; Trade agreement; Investment (military); Member state; Commission; European commission; International economics; Economic impact analysis; Economic integration; Customs union; Free trade agreement; Economics; Business; Member states; Free trade; Political science; Finance; Law","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kevin Massicotte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexandra Logvin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03044590585871328,"gpt":0.2689096511603479,"spread":0.2384637453016346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008528442,0.0003340795,0.0006682799,0.001631874,0.01432279,0.01876659,0.001935821,0.007306491,0.01299676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03302608,0.0004406896,0.0006750848,0.003313178,0.009645493,0.004000614,0.006923235,0.009851591,0.001219884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09294445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1250604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9592553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804754,0.002464114,0.0004151769,0.001069466,0.008874572,0.006701345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881826,0.003895028,0.0005143197,0.0006810368,0.004774049,0.001952881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001046595,0.00003190148,0.003219958,0.00007937336,0.00001828052,0.0004950867,0.00531779,0.0005507204,0.0001572143,0.8626356,0.1119104,0.01547911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007214615,0.00004869633,0.02456782,0.0005878244,0.0000704026,0.0001431643,0.01197612,0.001078641,0.0007280724,0.03599792,0.9245604,0.0001687639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09843703,0.005635729,0.0007586484,0.1127031,0.002127796,0.000100057,0.0009291295,0.00008333271,0.7792252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7455045,0.00275961,0.0006427397,0.04768924,0.0003613635,0.00005725724,0.0003952427,0.0001606006,0.2024294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09294445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198730501","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010016","title":"The EU Ban on Seal Products: Some Customs and WTO Open Questions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Legitimacy; Business; International trade law; Harmony (color); International trade; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Maurizio Gambardella","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01427271030996241,"gpt":0.3044430522675279,"spread":0.2901703419575655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03967868,0.001100175,0.002212844,0.00169757,0.004308362,0.01451324,0.005215616,0.04141025,0.006282557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03622017,0.0008522377,0.002299055,0.00332928,0.0283988,0.02682034,0.006304114,0.02543715,0.001732427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005102831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006223616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01082726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00430699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9811518,0.006009202,0.001691308,0.002944067,0.006412893,0.001790749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791868,0.01504223,0.001446745,0.001733455,0.001837239,0.0007536532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002445251,0.00004194531,0.0002254956,0.0001541138,0.00001360264,0.0002334582,0.0009567516,0.0003558887,0.0001909733,0.9518305,0.02861458,0.01735826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001868464,0.00004417893,0.0008035601,0.001179046,0.00001474951,0.0003241927,0.001620937,0.000559908,0.0002651765,0.602281,0.3928092,0.0000794337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01242517,0.1045441,0.01080372,0.736773,0.009012331,0.00004787122,0.0003268711,0.00009870014,0.1259682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2814271,0.09560255,0.01795449,0.5512395,0.01917882,0.0002693788,0.000495129,0.0003074391,0.03352559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04141025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2098434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521613312","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014028","title":"The Canada-European Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement and the Mining Sector: Key Issues and Opportunities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Capital (architecture); Member states; International trade; Key (lock); Capital investment; Goods and services; Industrial organization; International economics; European union; Economics; Finance; Economy; Political science; Geography; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sean Stephenson","is_ca":false},{"name":"P. Kirby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03700613202404893,"gpt":0.2565995248964648,"spread":0.2195933928724158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004522949,0.0004727271,0.0006149919,0.001747389,0.01305595,0.01759961,0.001963203,0.008884408,0.00850551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758587,0.0003725047,0.0005629931,0.006093356,0.01422626,0.00671902,0.003937561,0.004051425,0.0004159494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.106018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2382119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9615169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993678,0.0008054334,0.0001087784,0.0003344308,0.001859172,0.003214152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956358,0.001541035,0.0002380572,0.0001643571,0.001289441,0.001131282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001862954,0.00001754482,0.0008439946,0.00008917985,0.000007050419,0.0001980161,0.001148882,0.0004528339,0.00004964392,0.9494787,0.03576564,0.0119299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002411961,0.00001505686,0.008724535,0.001029292,0.00002015926,0.0001665533,0.01010322,0.001177874,0.0002183682,0.2253294,0.7530975,0.00009386733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02696477,0.09925109,0.00206202,0.3845795,0.001382305,0.00007026801,0.000505675,0.00005170527,0.4851327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206229,0.06777622,0.003924199,0.06212542,0.0008309332,0.00008866246,0.000359258,0.00004930279,0.1442231],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7692177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1011805438","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014014","title":"How <i>Canada Renewable Energy</i> Supports the Use of the Alternative Commercial Reasonableness Standard in Future Feed-In Tariff Disputes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Settlement (finance); Business; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Energy policy; Finance; Market economy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Eugenia Laurenza","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01137413630447138,"gpt":0.1891871888121834,"spread":0.177813052507712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01440245,0.0005079042,0.0006486023,0.002937103,0.01402363,0.018419,0.003618265,0.00867765,0.008433266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03559504,0.0003655782,0.0009315547,0.003874822,0.01696703,0.006415962,0.003398748,0.008091277,0.001003008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04377743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07384989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8327919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8982316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9769,0.003743506,0.000483472,0.001438014,0.01256175,0.004873251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971705,0.008766006,0.001493229,0.001700984,0.01546437,0.0008703493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002273855,0.00001789917,0.001435926,0.00004984188,0.00001705835,0.0001514825,0.002174374,0.0003636573,0.0001685301,0.9562943,0.03351976,0.005784375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001002088,0.0000937853,0.01421605,0.0007816899,0.0002325443,0.0003687308,0.01114839,0.005212032,0.003274598,0.3693672,0.5948654,0.0003394357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03512261,0.002617223,0.01690071,0.1776404,0.0009275998,0.0002229314,0.0006265862,0.0001543383,0.7657877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8602769,0.001897775,0.01174233,0.07122134,0.0005893166,0.000151685,0.0002627505,0.0001460678,0.05371179],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1672081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3363855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W956576443","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012025","title":"Judicial Review of Trade Remedy Determinations in Ten User Countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Deference; Law; Business; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Edwin Vermulst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01544081132544329,"gpt":0.3102067800768424,"spread":0.2947659687513991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0314704,0.0002284217,0.0006029925,0.006167904,0.004187718,0.007533571,0.001793877,0.002769751,0.0009020336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06155745,0.0008705242,0.0006393364,0.009479564,0.004075275,0.002409926,0.003420059,0.002230152,0.000162494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009342262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009492233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02203278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9594201,0.01935061,0.004757225,0.002265265,0.01048201,0.003724798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8439705,0.1006413,0.02471191,0.006253824,0.02214327,0.002279086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000956686,0.0005504116,0.4416868,0.002564122,0.0006248242,0.009054405,0.07811583,0.0130928,0.009174894,0.1290409,0.01433403,0.3008042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001439403,0.001978358,0.6262333,0.002525296,0.0007720918,0.005418858,0.05259533,0.00736173,0.01966444,0.01196114,0.2707349,0.0006106124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375412,0.01258222,0.003172783,0.002210065,0.0001288447,0.0002804463,0.0002747106,0.00004743625,0.04376231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878017,0.004701708,0.002800808,0.0008084148,0.00005502476,0.00008688849,0.000176799,0.00001625905,0.00355242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0314704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1664334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229959763","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014010","title":"The WTO Seal Products PanelThe Public Morals Defense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Seal (emblem); Argument (complex analysis); Panel data; Technical barriers to trade; International economics; Panel discussion; Business; Trade barrier; Economics; Advertising; Chemistry; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Brendan P. McGivern","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02428847428004631,"gpt":0.2707641488351212,"spread":0.2464756745550749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01347926,0.0008961922,0.0005482694,0.0007537384,0.005067902,0.01116195,0.001684474,0.02377611,0.01675325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02455564,0.0006684557,0.001054497,0.0008709805,0.00705081,0.007255081,0.004586097,0.02183918,0.00734241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004058636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01064435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01163619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008128591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902416,0.002021662,0.0003038119,0.001222516,0.005008584,0.001201819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938936,0.002525025,0.0005026588,0.0009157594,0.001727279,0.0004356526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003823919,0.0000343298,0.0003046879,0.00005337451,0.00001012914,0.0001368141,0.0006296961,0.0001382185,0.000496681,0.5664251,0.4197152,0.01201747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001726661,0.00001684894,0.0003004066,0.0001674247,0.000008402834,0.00005090041,0.0001921958,0.000155445,0.0004052985,0.03814215,0.9605282,0.00001527244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005403556,0.003842512,0.002636896,0.4232664,0.006317095,0.0001009439,0.000629088,0.0001084689,0.557695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1264111,0.003049025,0.002812972,0.3890842,0.00459037,0.0003671301,0.0005559626,0.0002642726,0.4728649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02377611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07128602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233770138","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013020","title":"Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tariff; Market access; International trade law; Dumping; Free trade; Duty; Subsidy; Safeguard; Liberalization; Rules of origin; International economics; Business; World trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Geography; Agriculture","authors":[{"name":"Terence P. Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06513871667867441,"gpt":0.367088721235281,"spread":0.3019500045566066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02492716,0.0006041002,0.0005687865,0.001669176,0.002926547,0.01042567,0.002499294,0.01110937,0.01418697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06567845,0.0003632209,0.0005713497,0.004014731,0.01374343,0.01817761,0.004076659,0.01201629,0.001773747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003540239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003951973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005653289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004379556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9813609,0.006803887,0.001008974,0.002398318,0.00588187,0.002545972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9503947,0.02223161,0.01187102,0.00389047,0.009680264,0.001931908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000153705,0.0001639941,0.02015981,0.0009352134,0.0001198732,0.001851465,0.02680166,0.0005031822,0.001488825,0.4858675,0.305362,0.1565928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003602347,0.0001413948,0.0121006,0.001716385,0.00004809444,0.001625954,0.02482262,0.0008649601,0.00108813,0.1213813,0.8360436,0.0001309114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03309222,0.01782395,0.007394368,0.8547902,0.006773208,0.00007300844,0.0002574585,0.0001576785,0.07963803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6204337,0.0183904,0.004057955,0.3103538,0.01117479,0.0001245051,0.0003290843,0.0003149468,0.03482083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02492716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.131829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483365100","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014007","title":"The Canada EU Free Trade Agreement Demystified: New Opportunities for Trade, Investment and Government Procurement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; European union; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Procurement; Government procurement; Trade barrier; Agricultural economics; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Kiselbach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04232910781126253,"gpt":0.2542014099466428,"spread":0.2118723021353802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004958679,0.000980195,0.000683823,0.001867705,0.01051763,0.01982655,0.002095279,0.01022231,0.02957378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102512,0.0007342524,0.0009410484,0.003689718,0.00552368,0.006447375,0.00509926,0.008638206,0.005240025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08646066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2709993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9504384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896923,0.000556493,0.0002062184,0.0006386847,0.005659749,0.003246538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927291,0.0006426218,0.0001424733,0.00043169,0.003340173,0.002713819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003693921,0.00001965643,0.0005460035,0.0000770414,0.000008582593,0.0001996382,0.0005254052,0.000327306,0.000229532,0.3119656,0.6555477,0.03051651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007738145,0.000003232119,0.0008496263,0.00008263353,0.000002606027,0.00002739395,0.000298709,0.0001116984,0.0001038473,0.006601044,0.9918902,0.00002133929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008277902,0.01953163,0.004955854,0.3274912,0.009676625,0.0001910543,0.004906644,0.0007410921,0.624228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.107451,0.01880769,0.01387265,0.1136872,0.001082608,0.0001633905,0.005043645,0.0006772712,0.7392146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08646066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6273189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423493607","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013040","title":"The Question of the Benefit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Fernando Piérola","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007829631317478027,"gpt":0.2617525603438024,"spread":0.2539229290263244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01958021,0.000741366,0.001646841,0.001692574,0.005437065,0.0139782,0.004173483,0.01848468,0.01548187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04567441,0.0007431853,0.001257518,0.001400925,0.02845187,0.0181367,0.006316456,0.01647974,0.003370227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009768223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01388204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01335758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01094092,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9757084,0.005988037,0.001138471,0.00511652,0.009638168,0.002410344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825042,0.009437375,0.0007091759,0.002177695,0.004428938,0.0007426844],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001144002,0.000009328085,0.0001037017,0.00002241243,0.000006979812,0.00002493094,0.0002332455,0.00005089104,0.00006009763,0.9906263,0.0056717,0.003178948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003700977,0.0000351938,0.0005692,0.0002911455,0.00003108114,0.0001573957,0.0006487722,0.0003356172,0.0002738632,0.8558177,0.1417746,0.00002841448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01066934,0.006725248,0.01629558,0.1805739,0.003118477,0.0001316539,0.0003695618,0.00004953267,0.7820667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7509297,0.004154568,0.009559019,0.0885407,0.008803804,0.0005761808,0.0002926201,0.0003303516,0.1368132],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01958021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1035513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615207609","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017023","title":"Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, ISDS and the Belgian Veto: A Warning of Failure for Future Trade Agreements with the EU?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Veto; Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Settlement (finance); International economics; Investment (military); Trade agreement; Business; Economics; Free trade; Political science; Politics; Law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Flip Petillion","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ian A. Laird","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01413010685661673,"gpt":0.2353800508137781,"spread":0.2212499439571614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007430785,0.0002400036,0.0004201416,0.0009271747,0.005587368,0.01425353,0.0009048881,0.01333401,0.003228962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01695269,0.0003264747,0.000582499,0.001658891,0.00688235,0.004438027,0.002153823,0.00889931,0.0007065659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009872283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01155684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08234569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1154375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924092,0.002018937,0.0003194468,0.0005427299,0.002995359,0.001714294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992595,0.00375991,0.001019186,0.000503328,0.001417532,0.0007050237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009818635,0.00002297087,0.002808117,0.0001095049,0.00002162701,0.001283852,0.006485525,0.0005456127,0.0004132846,0.7536788,0.1956385,0.03889389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001455107,0.00002856808,0.0038725,0.0002799628,0.00001219124,0.0006240267,0.003363745,0.0005750745,0.0003899939,0.02940832,0.9613862,0.00004485406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07711442,0.02964588,0.00572414,0.5705163,0.01186422,0.00004138724,0.0003154424,0.0002829585,0.3044952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8059792,0.004829378,0.002871432,0.1141188,0.002740134,0.00002027939,0.0001989329,0.0002161568,0.0690258],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08234569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1637328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816966","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022044","title":"Application of Dispute Settlement in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’): A Cross Country Analysis of Modern FTAs’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ronjini Ray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rishabha Meena","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009823503543956655,"gpt":0.2896731883168665,"spread":0.2798496847729098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748088,0.0002106598,0.0003145789,0.004556335,0.004508661,0.009542096,0.001282216,0.002650183,0.003905691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02140968,0.0003038936,0.0006542155,0.01016358,0.006421729,0.006437487,0.003682238,0.003146339,0.0003201618],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007814173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003918131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01357078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009823661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883421,0.005104851,0.0008688161,0.0008506851,0.003159141,0.001674465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737066,0.01857423,0.003529825,0.001093441,0.002766191,0.0003297539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002654025,0.00007502107,0.01460568,0.0002333869,0.000030638,0.0007707276,0.03335354,0.001748517,0.0002353332,0.9116766,0.003303045,0.03394099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003201157,0.000226082,0.1338796,0.002666949,0.0001203231,0.002248235,0.1198944,0.01121546,0.002822135,0.212085,0.5146576,0.0001521906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4182084,0.01168255,0.03341277,0.005536823,0.0003088928,0.0004666344,0.0005322184,0.00004743589,0.5298042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795673,0.002967955,0.004471827,0.0008285004,0.0001048305,0.000186814,0.000297281,0.00002929174,0.01154613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01357078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05669606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1426969286","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014035","title":"Administrative Protective Orders: Protection of Confidential Information in Canadian Trade Remedy Proceedings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Business; Balance (ability); Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Trade secret; Public information; Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Law; Intellectual property; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"J Horwitz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Darrel H. Pearson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01811891558399312,"gpt":0.2194980514629739,"spread":0.2013791358789808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01295201,0.0005086614,0.000505202,0.006519876,0.02112775,0.02011925,0.004489976,0.005561084,0.008679427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04570349,0.0009636277,0.0007049785,0.007303797,0.01482277,0.005236628,0.005152527,0.005896455,0.000706416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1319497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3320095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705935,0.00286378,0.001338154,0.001765763,0.01802995,0.005408903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641194,0.01065006,0.002226857,0.002956574,0.01763272,0.002414364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005398975,0.00003887757,0.004722274,0.0002118775,0.00002171557,0.0006283972,0.01052995,0.001162978,0.0008657709,0.8597888,0.05537488,0.0666005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007529552,0.00005377337,0.0238074,0.0009478462,0.0001561189,0.0005138562,0.01114569,0.003437773,0.003501187,0.06439607,0.891637,0.0003280407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07691866,0.008996284,0.01948925,0.105693,0.0007399633,0.00087178,0.001175679,0.0003976281,0.7857178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840885,0.008400201,0.02719952,0.01384438,0.0003423993,0.0002023193,0.0004775003,0.0001405422,0.108508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578906619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013028","title":"Modernization of the EUs Trade Defence Instruments and the Law of Unintended Consequences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Transparency (behavior); Modernization theory; Protectionism; European commission; Duty; International trade; Political science; Unintended consequences; Law; Subsidy; Business; Law and economics; Economics; European union","authors":[{"name":"Edwin Vermulst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01106672533862642,"gpt":0.2406983414378343,"spread":0.2296316160992078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02397295,0.0006702294,0.0008599308,0.001817612,0.003827635,0.01173772,0.002483949,0.01704077,0.003492298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03335492,0.0007257845,0.001157694,0.001290862,0.03505783,0.01210654,0.006264545,0.01901234,0.000474002],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007541903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007568594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004161876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003019264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9778709,0.007248144,0.001778337,0.003634213,0.007945183,0.001523251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798004,0.01114319,0.001794191,0.004264238,0.002697505,0.0003005055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003198457,0.000004695096,0.0000716974,0.00001458805,0.000002497242,0.00003116554,0.0001730941,0.0001328485,0.00005369139,0.9967014,0.0008848581,0.001926253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002042553,0.00003505714,0.0004463566,0.0003268251,0.00001099809,0.0001694437,0.000189237,0.0008000918,0.0003054612,0.9097973,0.08786718,0.0000315851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03672392,0.0213878,0.08932403,0.1243636,0.003043192,0.0002385653,0.0002276654,0.0002043399,0.7244869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8433379,0.007959177,0.03210679,0.06318554,0.002807253,0.0006133575,0.0000926865,0.0001199622,0.04977736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02397295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1267825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784952832","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018005","title":"Unspoken Truths: The Hidden Logic of Decision 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Autonomy; European union; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Business; International economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Rob Howse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03306527082140851,"gpt":0.3234128907596879,"spread":0.2903476199382794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03801929,0.0004211867,0.0007889971,0.001250242,0.009892046,0.01624613,0.003136665,0.01627009,0.006584467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0500378,0.0004753393,0.001090757,0.001037396,0.05255225,0.01522494,0.006066972,0.01450856,0.00128765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009982095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01224488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008170584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9680932,0.0182514,0.001138068,0.003779532,0.005528894,0.003209037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724655,0.01959858,0.001174309,0.001898083,0.003951668,0.000911728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001364232,0.000004275897,0.00009005058,0.00001915316,0.000005768975,0.00008935406,0.004171547,0.00008546039,0.00004615196,0.983376,0.01039164,0.00170704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002245768,0.00001041883,0.0001397814,0.0001495838,0.00001176789,0.00005763966,0.003736981,0.0006121942,0.0002115312,0.9144014,0.08061861,0.00002752115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03300336,0.003252315,0.02373587,0.6215808,0.003189278,0.00007400668,0.0001643752,0.00009965707,0.3149004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9049797,0.0008946175,0.005070568,0.07204771,0.001720417,0.0001033578,0.00006431369,0.0001307602,0.01498855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03801929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2010676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225245840","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022015","title":"The COVID-19 Pandemics’ Impact on Customs Valuation and Import Duties: An Israel Perspective, and a Wider Comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Valuation (finance); Business; Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Value (mathematics); International trade; Finance; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Omer Wagner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06216054854914702,"gpt":0.3394570013454314,"spread":0.2772964527962843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002036166,0.000275006,0.0002319304,0.00253392,0.000888022,0.004797958,0.0004513577,0.0009707161,0.01691793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003206113,0.0001216382,0.0004405269,0.002441583,0.002446137,0.003748979,0.002202415,0.001747348,0.0009321798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006027531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001963847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01650082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0157962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987339,0.0002741547,0.00004489465,0.00008736935,0.0004933641,0.0003662338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984819,0.0004676925,0.000314737,0.00005982033,0.0004983233,0.0001774424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004956009,0.0004415246,0.154201,0.0005022723,0.0002009241,0.002019734,0.01035415,0.003164205,0.001270872,0.6058241,0.05410315,0.1674226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006121734,0.0002888684,0.4144567,0.00235767,0.0001530805,0.001682608,0.05442317,0.004069593,0.00184135,0.0737941,0.4466932,0.0001784071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3402919,0.01486657,0.00148478,0.02592889,0.0004631328,0.00005703613,0.001059637,0.00002002693,0.615828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715363,0.006807033,0.0002921915,0.00314102,0.00028844,0.00002078645,0.0006766319,0.00002655092,0.01721107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01691793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05659616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403432599","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024079","title":"Article: The Contribution of the Canadian-European Partnership to the Integration of Sustainable Development Issues into the Multilateral Trading System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Sustainable development; International trade; Political science; Regional science; Business; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"Antoine Comont","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02010113841887976,"gpt":0.290653126018958,"spread":0.2705519876000783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004875585,0.0003667907,0.0002910058,0.001668044,0.008525604,0.008163361,0.001186833,0.00290654,0.01164743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009617061,0.0001724186,0.0002723991,0.003005004,0.003854415,0.002299697,0.004290959,0.003232649,0.0009101198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04475787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2290473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9317602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9579878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944292,0.0006033484,0.00007986469,0.0002237559,0.003594721,0.001069012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922729,0.0009565754,0.0001796277,0.0002638659,0.003364037,0.002963057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004864052,0.00004453586,0.001844616,0.0002410566,0.0000170389,0.0003849105,0.002738463,0.0007429902,0.0003683938,0.3003433,0.5792856,0.1139405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005246355,0.000004560756,0.001906089,0.0001009756,0.000004533989,0.00007937719,0.001117034,0.000210702,0.00009421458,0.006703791,0.9897599,0.00001366067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01331246,0.03611366,0.004016703,0.4563917,0.01832274,0.0001764535,0.00139551,0.0001700379,0.4701008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4977881,0.04086122,0.0145835,0.04271249,0.002774172,0.0001029706,0.001279316,0.0002434941,0.3996547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06823981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3247426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508726722","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010029","title":"At the Cross-Roads of US and Canadian Trade Controls: The Cuba Conflict","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; International trade; Economic sanctions; Context (archaeology); Surprise; Control (management); Business; International economics; Economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"John W. Boscariol","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02218779368063458,"gpt":0.2439251266484827,"spread":0.2217373329678481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950042,0.0002727406,0.000352757,0.001560176,0.02020791,0.01048994,0.0009580805,0.001943835,0.007554799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00328667,0.0002653545,0.0002872298,0.002672497,0.004527452,0.002178371,0.002857766,0.003272692,0.0002892844],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08044379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06345335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938839,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977319,0.0003007974,0.00004154982,0.0001494538,0.0003756211,0.001400647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983563,0.0002439253,0.0001114901,0.0000776892,0.000657762,0.0005527492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000496042,0.0001208349,0.05378729,0.0003241999,0.0001428592,0.002137338,0.06978183,0.0007884129,0.0007538479,0.5659735,0.1834202,0.1222736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004143776,0.0000252747,0.04760684,0.0008598478,0.0000988083,0.0004756882,0.1446309,0.0005646825,0.0004793061,0.01297756,0.7920852,0.0001545429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3128043,0.01986234,0.0005807556,0.1670445,0.0006634439,0.00006558775,0.0007143856,0.00003814588,0.4982265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271389,0.005160452,0.0006185364,0.01780976,0.00005659265,0.00003859828,0.0002500018,0.0000411811,0.04888598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08044379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5836633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783009311","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018004","title":"Prior Judicial Involvement in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from the Courts Rhetoric in Opinion 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Majority opinion; European union; Concurring opinion; Member state; Court of record; Economics; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; International trade; Member states","authors":[{"name":"Hannes Lenk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02987525067430212,"gpt":0.2714643232561439,"spread":0.2415890725818418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03363509,0.0005651676,0.0009665277,0.00177819,0.01592962,0.02426493,0.005356872,0.03282589,0.009046454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05066336,0.0009284393,0.001323506,0.001940306,0.03724739,0.02364306,0.007321471,0.02612135,0.001586226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01829168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03247473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03050577,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9680439,0.01709586,0.001225187,0.004033264,0.00657037,0.003031352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9443856,0.04655038,0.001323294,0.001962456,0.004935856,0.000842509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005399101,0.000008437601,0.00004526276,0.00001649384,0.000002849011,0.0001041663,0.003510007,0.00006468596,0.00002967213,0.9908668,0.004000574,0.001345759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000754642,0.00003494843,0.0004518706,0.0006291979,0.00004834851,0.0001647552,0.006081434,0.001354512,0.0008159477,0.8049227,0.1853416,0.00007921019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02889029,0.01006218,0.02659743,0.2157665,0.002462344,0.00008870741,0.00009041018,0.00007081956,0.7159713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653839,0.004888192,0.00700433,0.06256574,0.004110459,0.0002355913,0.00007800276,0.0002031118,0.0555306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03363509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1778815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1016589838","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012030","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the EU","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Edwin Vermulst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0253988167565704,"gpt":0.3306699392982921,"spread":0.3052711225417217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04120706,0.0002214419,0.0007811561,0.003545201,0.002999431,0.01026045,0.001772235,0.005462489,0.001066042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06877717,0.0005797155,0.0005727461,0.004722745,0.003401038,0.00294165,0.002949111,0.002804876,0.0002386705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005429847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01466831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01840227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9495168,0.0244433,0.005835076,0.004439204,0.01103688,0.004728641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8852458,0.07405642,0.0111056,0.006971025,0.02079174,0.001829419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005586922,0.0003568741,0.06945859,0.002151129,0.0006083412,0.007040279,0.02854878,0.01535315,0.005197366,0.47558,0.04675345,0.3483934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001719541,0.0007613188,0.1280551,0.00319112,0.0005554939,0.002446895,0.01634741,0.008348265,0.01485407,0.0409467,0.7839277,0.0003939056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712445,0.05769866,0.01384093,0.02358172,0.001277272,0.0004176698,0.000490112,0.0001888329,0.2312603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691242,0.00698501,0.005175081,0.00668453,0.0003285528,0.00008218129,0.0001581769,0.00004490457,0.01141736],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04120706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2179264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503493334","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013053","title":"Demystifying the Trans-Pacific Partnership: An American and Canadian Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Brady","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Kiselbach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alizee Bilbey","is_ca":false},{"name":"William E. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02365661709021259,"gpt":0.2978003832037697,"spread":0.2741437661135571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006947687,0.0006207426,0.0007277775,0.003061549,0.031442,0.02190035,0.00362172,0.01073887,0.01254987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111422,0.0003496152,0.000668323,0.006152526,0.0264478,0.01085852,0.01054518,0.01427692,0.0004242882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08502509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3219452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9714556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911252,0.001208485,0.0001333748,0.0004919891,0.002254622,0.004786416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889753,0.001548178,0.0004375816,0.0005262276,0.003537347,0.00497531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002580243,0.00003865624,0.001489044,0.00008641589,0.0000124538,0.0003354906,0.01778249,0.000570509,0.0001548045,0.9342247,0.02594302,0.01933666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003416626,0.00003551523,0.009503951,0.0006290586,0.00005356823,0.0002871376,0.1102253,0.0009306694,0.0002634036,0.1853813,0.6925452,0.0001106817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04912226,0.01448983,0.002451414,0.3873676,0.001528812,0.00008629453,0.0002386985,0.00007279602,0.5446423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997451,0.0166216,0.003478696,0.04019894,0.0004505745,0.00008360791,0.0001379273,0.00007441108,0.03920915],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08502509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6169031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215259119","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011041","title":"Customs Audits, Verifications and Voluntary Disclosures in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Agency (philosophy); Business; Officer; Accounting; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Government (linguistics); Revenue; Finance; Political science; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Dalton J. Albrecht","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Kiselbach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02202978032222933,"gpt":0.2420849397973127,"spread":0.2200551594750833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007105886,0.0002867707,0.0003730082,0.002565029,0.01351243,0.008024726,0.001652718,0.002105284,0.007253446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03990062,0.0006872748,0.0004115861,0.005968878,0.005915147,0.001789255,0.003968316,0.002970456,0.0003433103],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1659544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3897527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819041,0.001912843,0.0007539314,0.001019554,0.008828875,0.005580654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605083,0.008200609,0.004877195,0.001836439,0.01609248,0.008484898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002690821,0.0002008559,0.112788,0.0003812043,0.00008373037,0.001652681,0.01416975,0.005033015,0.0006453048,0.512801,0.1845128,0.1674626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114329,0.0001220986,0.2869443,0.001039718,0.0001015617,0.0007411962,0.01607465,0.007733303,0.001225064,0.03067153,0.6548212,0.0004111111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.3567136,0.01484034,0.004096014,0.08516252,0.001193761,0.0005908013,0.002739843,0.0004027149,0.5342603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355798,0.0044187,0.002061088,0.004209243,0.0001042419,0.00006236084,0.0005183525,0.00005412014,0.05299199],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1659544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340614765","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016029","title":"Trans-Pacific Partnership: Key Takeaways on Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); General partnership; Business; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie C. Milton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02160176687289279,"gpt":0.2596199635681542,"spread":0.2380181966952614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006786248,0.0007826228,0.0007934221,0.00128403,0.01999827,0.01470444,0.00289933,0.01874689,0.03316375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081261,0.0006192325,0.001219769,0.002685779,0.005336922,0.006819009,0.01136839,0.0131883,0.002005714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06676767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4688723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871471,0.0006815011,0.0001898461,0.0004686911,0.003406778,0.008106192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812856,0.0008665514,0.0002277187,0.0002717422,0.003572514,0.01377588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002731352,0.0001842073,0.004780627,0.0003902521,0.00005414898,0.001081823,0.002447894,0.0004773158,0.0007312246,0.121921,0.8208944,0.04676394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001175177,0.00009818819,0.01399113,0.0005551248,0.00004854345,0.0001727246,0.01273473,0.0004035675,0.0002424595,0.009006738,0.9625006,0.0001286249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02678549,0.01340833,0.0008441104,0.8270888,0.01081958,0.0003189576,0.001914443,0.0001577975,0.1186625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3041269,0.02121316,0.004849474,0.3240992,0.002053927,0.0004257419,0.001596076,0.0002582484,0.3413773],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06676767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4844356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320070132","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022038","title":"Binational Panel Review of Trade Remedies Determinations: Prospects for Exporting the USMCA’s Unique Procedure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Duty; Treaty; International trade; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Panel data; Business; International economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony VanDuzer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03879812744797095,"gpt":0.3274639800484329,"spread":0.288665852600462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1033872,0.000432557,0.0008481106,0.006371864,0.007820657,0.01271279,0.004265745,0.01006377,0.006622777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1703109,0.001056435,0.001012146,0.004684643,0.004440406,0.007070812,0.004845037,0.007672451,0.001553958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01067816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05672479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04684815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07067863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.936944,0.02196754,0.005029123,0.006247338,0.02519904,0.004612826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7585215,0.09727046,0.01525886,0.02425104,0.0981353,0.006562865],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001601775,0.0002175245,0.009483985,0.001054436,0.0001188664,0.001387414,0.005121609,0.001754029,0.004582095,0.4204585,0.2843009,0.2713605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001272249,0.0002185379,0.01561193,0.001574106,0.0001364848,0.0007030512,0.001437287,0.004135466,0.002752531,0.03619597,0.9369067,0.0002007171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1058276,0.03518401,0.1246118,0.3327046,0.01232012,0.004269547,0.001310503,0.001898195,0.3818736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5055734,0.02120526,0.1343721,0.1815874,0.007174145,0.003610003,0.002340865,0.0006005667,0.1435363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1033872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587869027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012033","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Mexico","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Gustavo A. Uruchurtu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02149216541023044,"gpt":0.3243113300247242,"spread":0.3028191646144937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00924257,0.0001236407,0.000315121,0.002431623,0.00314377,0.004585888,0.001034133,0.001703173,0.0008094697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01987038,0.0003443139,0.0002473534,0.003792915,0.001682239,0.001227171,0.001627508,0.001555456,0.00006414032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009633201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007391558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08084247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1256265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945716,0.001844477,0.0004329142,0.0005677023,0.001619602,0.0009637525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785331,0.009814573,0.006554021,0.0007937645,0.0038923,0.000412346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009089147,0.0003407913,0.3509203,0.002990557,0.0005072989,0.01066869,0.05456885,0.008956858,0.007335066,0.1642328,0.0539563,0.3446136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001065484,0.0004538463,0.5411649,0.001610909,0.0004198554,0.00172412,0.01830842,0.003221123,0.007600535,0.005157472,0.420069,0.0001633559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.894444,0.02340054,0.001806036,0.01224695,0.000238697,0.0001993405,0.0004388534,0.00005268579,0.06717291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741991,0.01231832,0.002064944,0.001863738,0.0002698037,0.0001022942,0.0002833017,0.00001341692,0.008885181],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08084247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1607438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256013541","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020022","title":"Proving FTA Preferential Tariff Eligibility: The Evidentiary Burden in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Tariff; Agency (philosophy); Rules of origin; Burden of proof; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; International trade; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jean-Marc Clément","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02507047992846204,"gpt":0.275590819929398,"spread":0.250520340000936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02552185,0.0003253623,0.0007510677,0.005424206,0.01789405,0.01987804,0.003459414,0.007943166,0.004015882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07684246,0.0008460247,0.0008045703,0.005526402,0.01305966,0.005252948,0.003992822,0.008867616,0.0003278564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1118735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2801582,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.977085,0.002654243,0.001379059,0.002144227,0.01285007,0.003887435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9261804,0.03850828,0.002870486,0.002377919,0.02697201,0.003090963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006237745,0.00003125651,0.006297068,0.000436532,0.00006177062,0.001521261,0.00999318,0.0008238518,0.0009878014,0.8818144,0.05323447,0.04473602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001360215,0.00007972954,0.03667389,0.003486605,0.0004219026,0.0009288737,0.01266552,0.004876561,0.003957975,0.2070118,0.7292647,0.0004964118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1434312,0.03509668,0.01399484,0.3364445,0.001728859,0.000459542,0.001467534,0.0001805423,0.4671964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753297,0.01880306,0.01164603,0.03600784,0.0004530161,0.0001224323,0.000393505,0.00008552564,0.057159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1118735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8117025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943319220","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019017","title":"The Effects of CETA on the Continuous Implementation of the Precautionary Principle within the European Union","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; European union; Negotiation; International trade; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criticism; Order (exchange); Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Biotechnology","authors":[{"name":"Martin Wolfgang Zankl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0101494258903735,"gpt":0.2900502765910667,"spread":0.2799008507006932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03439859,0.000403006,0.0005772801,0.001164015,0.006117056,0.01560731,0.001599757,0.0149011,0.003790888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06622573,0.0006552003,0.001392483,0.001483519,0.01711796,0.00524729,0.009906394,0.01382118,0.0006516485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01120626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01773406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02183708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01419916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9684876,0.012973,0.001467685,0.002939178,0.01035654,0.003776025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611129,0.02523735,0.003899178,0.004397042,0.004049406,0.001304114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009531715,0.00007376532,0.001552649,0.00006584919,0.00002121129,0.0002998608,0.003745489,0.001112872,0.0005118927,0.9732105,0.004634581,0.01467594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002317962,0.0005365035,0.0315243,0.00236061,0.00013388,0.0004413929,0.01086788,0.00436482,0.004114806,0.4775237,0.4676543,0.0002459023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2705607,0.00955904,0.008203335,0.08778188,0.001947235,0.0002379346,0.000142179,0.00009333126,0.6214743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456939,0.001830852,0.003422522,0.02335206,0.0005458149,0.0001239424,0.00004599713,0.00005574152,0.02492923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964685619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019028","title":"The New NAFTA: A First Look","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Enforcement; Free trade agreement; International trade; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Control (management); Business; House of Representatives; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Law; Engineering; Management; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gary Horlick","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02444598883753399,"gpt":0.1961351130697427,"spread":0.1716891242322087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00563269,0.0006180645,0.0007579504,0.002450088,0.005380054,0.01291896,0.001692971,0.01002038,0.02477938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271796,0.0003975773,0.0008984014,0.0019717,0.003654948,0.01968377,0.002440207,0.008457607,0.002971913],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01501583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01346674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1301731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1990953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964664,0.0007669792,0.0001470128,0.0004016485,0.001395015,0.0008228996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966286,0.001019599,0.0002255432,0.0001730618,0.001562655,0.0003905284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001387695,0.0001452975,0.002669692,0.0006590937,0.00003819135,0.0008569282,0.003280023,0.0002385551,0.0004654386,0.5454167,0.3648486,0.08124264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001009448,0.00002702948,0.0018374,0.0007399304,0.000009766229,0.0001065673,0.002455127,0.00006074046,0.00006679342,0.01915201,0.975514,0.00002056942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01001369,0.09262472,0.001001364,0.6049815,0.0133134,0.00004830578,0.0009817866,0.00009244979,0.2769427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2853185,0.1158774,0.005270012,0.3228131,0.0115627,0.0003342727,0.002224038,0.0003369019,0.256263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1301731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2588308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212860751","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011059","title":"Troubles along the U.S.-Canada Border","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Protectionism; Prime minister; Political science; Law; Political economy; International trade; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Greg Rushford","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02515425206961983,"gpt":0.2696481748517336,"spread":0.2444939227821138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001822217,0.0003238682,0.0003587751,0.00108784,0.03816491,0.0100656,0.001659364,0.005484713,0.01277117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006018747,0.0003740063,0.0004099591,0.00249159,0.007470561,0.002823139,0.003757182,0.006392202,0.0008691401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07314914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1482668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959201,0.0003412342,0.0000804517,0.0003428876,0.001224595,0.00209066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966381,0.0002888466,0.0001647061,0.0001142337,0.001309568,0.001484595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001042812,0.00006943262,0.02957132,0.0001501711,0.00006058997,0.004745423,0.03174198,0.00105047,0.001000361,0.2785193,0.5912622,0.06172455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435281,0.00002905972,0.03333004,0.0004182555,0.00006045342,0.0008859702,0.1191709,0.0007634064,0.0005775754,0.01807269,0.8265094,0.0001379183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2143392,0.01094356,0.001224226,0.3460579,0.002205789,0.00008608729,0.0009002553,0.0001505287,0.4240925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7899423,0.007782331,0.001369962,0.08150507,0.0002243549,0.00003872712,0.000508839,0.0001201678,0.1185083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07314914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5307366,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1023936531","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012035","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Thomas J. Trendl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723967536101116,"gpt":0.3274331793685566,"spread":0.3001935040075454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01831677,0.0001498008,0.00045605,0.003119663,0.003273544,0.007367053,0.001154566,0.003229373,0.0007249363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04167188,0.0005548068,0.0004006441,0.004456852,0.003147603,0.001733757,0.001891132,0.002323671,0.0001827804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007230115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01176505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06165455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.128434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9752143,0.01044371,0.002145046,0.001608907,0.008085878,0.002502186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9163149,0.04831058,0.01124619,0.003451299,0.01933969,0.00133733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005866093,0.0003598547,0.1611504,0.001764282,0.000568892,0.00713245,0.0459455,0.0132737,0.005974171,0.2872923,0.08339806,0.3925539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010675,0.0007821189,0.2371453,0.002845178,0.0006638523,0.002352349,0.01976883,0.006935639,0.01290604,0.02276068,0.6932902,0.0004430957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7131457,0.05713898,0.007057705,0.02551272,0.001160663,0.0002685868,0.0004971757,0.000124187,0.1950942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681394,0.01114813,0.003696205,0.006747495,0.000293863,0.00006126041,0.0002182424,0.00001893487,0.009676652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06165455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1225914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W859336493","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012024","title":"Promises Are Meant to Be Kept: A Case Comment on <i>Attorney General of Canada v. United States Steel Corporation</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Settlement (finance); Law; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Political science; Business; Finance; History","authors":[{"name":"Brian A. Facey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02915245901821417,"gpt":0.2324291385944362,"spread":0.203276679576222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005498701,0.0006358818,0.0005741247,0.001002224,0.0422285,0.01033764,0.004785981,0.02859453,0.004463419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01188646,0.00101817,0.001046772,0.002063767,0.01013212,0.003296768,0.002602615,0.02521656,0.0005688524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07938042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1249175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885521,0.001205257,0.0003033887,0.0008692436,0.004506849,0.004563256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947272,0.002143482,0.0002866384,0.0001392131,0.001985515,0.0007180411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001059715,0.0000605331,0.005410029,0.0001661071,0.00005786055,0.005570642,0.07230439,0.0009018895,0.001337696,0.3674379,0.5356926,0.01095439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006213025,0.0000528584,0.009234786,0.000640045,0.000162768,0.001010662,0.08776502,0.001083333,0.00175195,0.01339689,0.8844786,0.0003609234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0759011,0.006879602,0.00138847,0.6733613,0.002020592,0.0001349899,0.0005603934,0.000102553,0.239651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4721194,0.005053355,0.001181955,0.4014427,0.0008339348,0.00008290553,0.0001870087,0.0001105075,0.1189883],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07938042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.575948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191445368","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012028","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"James McIlroy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01563390884689148,"gpt":0.2861446365416728,"spread":0.2705107276947813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007071485,0.0002465222,0.000447029,0.004588812,0.0111779,0.008302604,0.002620929,0.002496728,0.001339187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03708676,0.000684096,0.0004008737,0.008796018,0.003541606,0.001239444,0.002161861,0.00241166,0.0001705453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1680353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806436,0.001643156,0.0009431553,0.001209889,0.01108631,0.004473894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942727,0.01576521,0.00505552,0.00124399,0.03193989,0.003268402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005759007,0.0003373208,0.1848301,0.002476905,0.0005609504,0.01342776,0.06200401,0.01352175,0.006499293,0.1901818,0.1630935,0.3624906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001123103,0.0002633669,0.2473994,0.001470667,0.0004230858,0.00201139,0.03609518,0.006294726,0.007788673,0.007505163,0.6900761,0.0005599088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.675589,0.03489578,0.003164016,0.04210041,0.0009442731,0.0006594522,0.001390053,0.0001838288,0.2410731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486888,0.01297409,0.002671603,0.006380128,0.0001701362,0.00006746214,0.0004414305,0.00003659739,0.02856983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.101381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7355741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1229773905","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012029","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; China; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Pu Lingchen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02137559777398961,"gpt":0.305536707373042,"spread":0.2841611095990524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108848,0.0002513142,0.0005181079,0.003555731,0.003346255,0.003852583,0.001595333,0.001663177,0.0006741349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01724508,0.0004033241,0.0004918761,0.005799823,0.002341451,0.001061372,0.001621423,0.00108133,0.00007390767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01495986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02786972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.147548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1809033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9885451,0.002297065,0.001109994,0.001002246,0.005107323,0.001938241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980837,0.007456453,0.003958558,0.00114426,0.005628327,0.0009753665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005384344,0.0002487074,0.3427606,0.002453409,0.0006481529,0.01130894,0.03908629,0.02189426,0.01002326,0.1224591,0.03838974,0.4101891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002027154,0.0008020141,0.6441554,0.001005482,0.0006777554,0.001850628,0.01408192,0.01793505,0.01960101,0.01141557,0.2878502,0.0004222399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271744,0.01738033,0.001975895,0.007076401,0.0003002046,0.0002586815,0.0002361869,0.00005635665,0.04554155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848311,0.004503088,0.0009827255,0.001074013,0.0001310849,0.0000545727,0.0001416769,0.000008467338,0.008273201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.147548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2933784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2856654253","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018027","title":"The Unreliability of Merchandise Trade Statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; International trade; Official statistics; Economics; International economics; World trade; Business; Statistics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Tadashi Yasui","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04090929531177531,"gpt":0.2359491890343322,"spread":0.1950398937225569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03763831,0.000609113,0.0009243636,0.01110569,0.001010398,0.00595644,0.001952133,0.001175058,0.002019608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2227305,0.00086895,0.0004326624,0.01406327,0.004015128,0.008009762,0.002185654,0.003401796,0.001958389],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003132427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002720399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01378294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007458532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.946364,0.02037559,0.006879182,0.00507278,0.02013996,0.001168548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7177991,0.1697978,0.03266697,0.02924618,0.04926417,0.001225855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005723702,0.0001127551,0.2625372,0.001905086,0.0006020361,0.0009829352,0.006965427,0.02671927,0.0008804137,0.2282554,0.1485513,0.3219158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054786,0.0001645306,0.1434274,0.004796655,0.0002230996,0.001627244,0.009662336,0.03523371,0.005833319,0.4115765,0.3869419,0.0004586484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4894139,0.02535124,0.158769,0.08668501,0.005965981,0.0003076094,0.04854488,0.002503695,0.1824587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638786,0.005717747,0.01410216,0.002852411,0.001113361,0.00009809077,0.008288134,0.0004713168,0.00347825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03763831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1990528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924666097","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012027","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Brazil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Carol Monteiro de Carvalho","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrea Weiss Balassiano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03231256595847817,"gpt":0.3668339060110848,"spread":0.3345213400526067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01425778,0.0001843276,0.0003704629,0.003293825,0.003390679,0.004893672,0.001251151,0.00137788,0.0006969685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04465844,0.0005664577,0.0004379972,0.003597221,0.002986737,0.001443288,0.002335898,0.0015014,0.000105669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01353002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01904874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1300511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2148423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9865229,0.004613087,0.001340021,0.001059202,0.004409459,0.00205542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552308,0.02095526,0.009939138,0.002679905,0.01005965,0.001135268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003161675,0.0002383853,0.2231173,0.003036216,0.0004757358,0.01073133,0.1375164,0.007789576,0.01698791,0.2729969,0.0207905,0.3060036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001138512,0.0004969064,0.4074871,0.003160331,0.000667844,0.005086757,0.05721356,0.008023883,0.0190079,0.01836596,0.4799608,0.0004151633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462541,0.02059015,0.003554481,0.01552311,0.0002329722,0.0004221955,0.0004045556,0.00008241206,0.1129361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887269,0.004710467,0.001563259,0.001107735,0.00006624299,0.00005098,0.00006493423,0.00001602423,0.003693395],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1300511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2585882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219368199","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013029","title":"The Landmark Decision in <i>Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency</i>: Lessons for Compliance with Canadian Customs Valuation Requirements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Tribunal; Business; Transfer pricing; Documentation; Database transaction; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Multinational corporation; Finance; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Laura J. Murray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Darrel H. Pearson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03224238979258095,"gpt":0.2677250847679954,"spread":0.2354826949754144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244133,0.0004432875,0.0004572663,0.001316081,0.02076178,0.01279192,0.003350713,0.01071421,0.005181226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03281936,0.0007969463,0.0008080312,0.002088146,0.01004589,0.003334464,0.002286703,0.0140272,0.0005862662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1164852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2477877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921117,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9762499,0.001805586,0.0006210385,0.001736647,0.01427111,0.005315789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750233,0.006020639,0.000651275,0.001034885,0.01502438,0.002245605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006239078,0.00003104233,0.003708882,0.00007671511,0.00002518184,0.0005784057,0.007040516,0.0008274214,0.0009775432,0.7704183,0.1943345,0.02191905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007187527,0.00005616067,0.01286868,0.0003750179,0.00007358535,0.0002286925,0.00720932,0.001715238,0.001771009,0.03187909,0.9433818,0.0003694877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09562434,0.003953801,0.007609286,0.4939459,0.002827368,0.0002929102,0.0006123479,0.0003727798,0.3947613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037159,0.002578681,0.008424182,0.1166934,0.0005986578,0.0001046346,0.0002435074,0.0002387836,0.1674022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1164852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8451634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866314101","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012026","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; Business; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Moulis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alistair Bridges","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07860839744239517,"gpt":0.3779738723010165,"spread":0.2993654748586213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01440522,0.0001205998,0.0003148639,0.002952878,0.003624002,0.004949179,0.001298689,0.001780918,0.0006059905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04426749,0.0005742731,0.0003141168,0.003052388,0.002739548,0.001479701,0.002753905,0.001755503,0.0001181837],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009835919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01828484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08313012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1635373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753222,0.01003124,0.002127344,0.001364604,0.008651177,0.002503378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439642,0.02461459,0.01097338,0.002348886,0.01634771,0.001751209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004430131,0.0005467744,0.2122564,0.002939339,0.0004117572,0.01123202,0.1467326,0.008513792,0.0164212,0.1145311,0.02420859,0.4617635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005815677,0.0007700301,0.608052,0.001341216,0.0002466284,0.003013772,0.04040422,0.006023309,0.01004523,0.006338908,0.323417,0.0002896051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013007,0.01558708,0.002685508,0.009436212,0.0002524075,0.0002863144,0.00009372186,0.00004033272,0.07031762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777363,0.006157804,0.002586047,0.001686993,0.0001151216,0.00006960933,0.00005841982,0.00001307327,0.01157655],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08313012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1652925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548138422","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012032","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Indonesia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Law; Political science; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Erry Bundjamin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02020546805075709,"gpt":0.3186842818616074,"spread":0.2984788138108503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01053306,0.0001723739,0.0004778789,0.002307496,0.002778563,0.007268047,0.001383129,0.00163674,0.0007837588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02236517,0.0004984164,0.0003025427,0.004478569,0.002263652,0.001583931,0.001822556,0.002444563,0.0002059365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007651103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01098251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03073993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05259705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861696,0.004215914,0.001938759,0.001134095,0.005004276,0.001537268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639661,0.01793281,0.009242986,0.001454749,0.006533545,0.0008698012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005968321,0.0004659349,0.2235795,0.003752299,0.0003603712,0.0199998,0.05970753,0.009780167,0.01337437,0.1176442,0.0404601,0.5102789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009661825,0.0005774153,0.36777,0.002866962,0.0004542382,0.007616974,0.03559051,0.007960469,0.02312243,0.01295761,0.5405805,0.0004062534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7904137,0.0374286,0.004856231,0.00977851,0.0007301442,0.000432022,0.000358379,0.0001044395,0.155898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692747,0.01345244,0.003043062,0.002073736,0.0002089113,0.00007880417,0.0001450686,0.00003018648,0.01169303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03073993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299657596","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016015","title":"Canadas Sanctions Regime Regarding Iran: How Much has Changed in a Post-Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regulated Market?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Negotiation; Status quo; Action (physics); Political science; Action plan; Economic sanctions; Business; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Psychology; Management","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064375102142402,"gpt":0.2385340721965104,"spread":0.1320965619822703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003755706,0.0002678986,0.0002594252,0.001310424,0.009957043,0.007179485,0.002009133,0.003624695,0.005273419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01077168,0.0002417905,0.0004567337,0.001815453,0.005473616,0.002119938,0.001344818,0.005955107,0.0005334655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06858474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1530677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9712585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926006,0.0004209708,0.0001349446,0.0004519841,0.004670478,0.001721056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921383,0.0007253845,0.0005260828,0.0002481092,0.005080084,0.001281983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001465087,0.0001720966,0.02820608,0.0003176732,0.00007469679,0.001530483,0.00670905,0.001770147,0.001473089,0.5260918,0.3262198,0.1072887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005285827,0.00008788837,0.07964329,0.0005961685,0.00006731743,0.0003698859,0.01016137,0.002003064,0.001317831,0.01947293,0.8859292,0.0002982435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.159803,0.01221479,0.003070846,0.3931136,0.004305788,0.0002172067,0.001424378,0.0002249208,0.4256254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297949,0.006702716,0.004966045,0.07427336,0.000777644,0.00005598669,0.0007948788,0.00009803702,0.08253647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06858474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4976195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534094088","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010055","title":"An Overview of the Mexico-Brazil Strategic Agreement for Economic Integration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Negotiation; Globalization; International economics; Business; International free trade agreement; Framework agreement; Trade agreement; Economic integration; Market access; Goods and services; Trade in services; Trade barrier; Free trade; Economics; Economy; Political science; Market economy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Turenna Ramirez","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09776617269052837,"gpt":0.2897151945702118,"spread":0.1919490218796834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007673979,0.0007688334,0.0005629199,0.004231555,0.004272113,0.009118712,0.001511588,0.004229655,0.0123313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006979625,0.0006570172,0.0008913297,0.00541448,0.001903709,0.005247417,0.00451179,0.003866114,0.003120759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02095134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05229114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05224467,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955759,0.00118046,0.0004072134,0.0003827176,0.001826991,0.0006267761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987891,0.0003820821,0.0001402773,0.0001185017,0.0004062593,0.0001637651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230592,0.00002935736,0.0004171091,0.0004427827,0.000008203931,0.0002505907,0.001090386,0.0004895676,0.0002674134,0.9120811,0.03433813,0.05057301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003972318,0.00001135145,0.0008373909,0.0006036438,0.000005333601,0.0001188584,0.0003182082,0.0001730261,0.00009439718,0.02002848,0.9777908,0.00001457198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00562212,0.05809644,0.01795832,0.02592631,0.002143776,0.001105045,0.00103708,0.0002579888,0.8878528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.218038,0.1543159,0.110078,0.02234177,0.002771098,0.004829112,0.005429871,0.0007268456,0.4814694],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05229114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1039736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318826069","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022045","title":"Sanctions or No Sanctions: Enforcing Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; International trade; Business; Free trade; Dispute resolution; Economics; International economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Shiny Pradeep","is_ca":false},{"name":"A Achyuth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02475872121222198,"gpt":0.3163132790680172,"spread":0.2915545578557951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01649613,0.0004494011,0.0005651186,0.001709387,0.00634113,0.01425816,0.002356393,0.006556393,0.00426601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03228032,0.0005764194,0.0007304512,0.002160456,0.02295714,0.009381545,0.006763329,0.00760402,0.0007413286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007943531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0180305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02101333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03380657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9749059,0.01034,0.001580569,0.001699009,0.008210704,0.003263905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816878,0.01138044,0.002268779,0.001851115,0.001904361,0.0009074764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001498489,0.00002250034,0.0003569764,0.00006212142,0.000003263514,0.0001054277,0.002628509,0.0007530608,0.0001067679,0.9847376,0.0009826412,0.01022619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002911731,0.00008169533,0.001927943,0.001646356,0.00002509083,0.0001772986,0.00497785,0.001687765,0.0005134372,0.8432481,0.145613,0.0000722914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05358309,0.006503145,0.09551955,0.02536047,0.001074235,0.0004372084,0.0001096922,0.0001489788,0.8172637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159631,0.00382892,0.0326765,0.005279829,0.0005520703,0.0003150565,0.00008375669,0.00008788407,0.04121295],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02101333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08724093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584115084","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011063","title":"Canadian Transfer Pricing: Optimizing Canadian Expansion with a Unified Approach to Tax and Customs Transfer Pricing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transfer pricing; Internal revenue; Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax revenue; Economics; Investment (military); International economics; Foreign direct investment; Public economics; Finance; Economy; Macroeconomics; Service (business); Politics","authors":[{"name":"Darrel H. Pearson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claire M.C. Kennedy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02731606779605138,"gpt":0.2326132024428399,"spread":0.2052971346467885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485582,0.0008777702,0.000684518,0.002656386,0.00475678,0.007895133,0.00218219,0.001589556,0.005000652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009494462,0.000465631,0.0006899645,0.005175447,0.002365242,0.003098823,0.002918625,0.002572003,0.0003140647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08833724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1411262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975771,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940864,0.001080279,0.0001217169,0.0004557623,0.002636929,0.001618944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972421,0.0002737619,0.0001205832,0.0001089564,0.001872153,0.0003825375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005320169,0.00007002768,0.004316019,0.00009599008,0.00005596463,0.0002349313,0.0009500663,0.1904546,0.0008144293,0.6783317,0.03866562,0.0859575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034635,0.00009248751,0.01545906,0.0003892505,0.0001885143,0.000263159,0.005177808,0.4995703,0.002358221,0.2046561,0.2714004,0.0003411798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.09712149,0.003961487,0.2287736,0.02653058,0.0005048508,0.001139631,0.001250135,0.0008409482,0.6398773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543266,0.002396362,0.09896702,0.001384914,0.000120684,0.0002323173,0.000424585,0.0002427428,0.04190481],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08833724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6409345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595621542","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012034","title":"Anti-dumping and Judicial Review in South Africa: An Urgent Need for Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Gustav Brink","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08233373517147559,"gpt":0.332947398984342,"spread":0.2506136638128664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05001758,0.0004794865,0.0011435,0.00286149,0.007439333,0.02089489,0.003407941,0.01072723,0.002342825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08026991,0.0008840818,0.001027439,0.004316723,0.01781281,0.01472164,0.006211724,0.01477503,0.000372984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01409788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06494355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02360977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04284575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9594359,0.01967289,0.003879576,0.002512984,0.008042041,0.006456602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8712901,0.08810039,0.01376363,0.004254358,0.01637214,0.00621941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001664836,0.0002134001,0.01306233,0.006165425,0.0002237386,0.005051708,0.04840379,0.001307415,0.002121169,0.4541312,0.1023495,0.3668037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009992739,0.0001888165,0.01770268,0.007061971,0.00008437889,0.002490067,0.04275599,0.0005833727,0.001149035,0.06733356,0.8603362,0.0002140203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02520457,0.1274921,0.001780766,0.828188,0.003038052,0.00008026046,0.00003315914,0.00003232386,0.01415074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5254153,0.1721427,0.01421168,0.2619772,0.01062749,0.0002549253,0.00006464154,0.000149171,0.01515681],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05001758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2645214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249955464","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020023","title":"The New Paradigms for the Rule of Origin in México","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Rules of origin; Free trade agreement; General partnership; Negotiation; Treaty; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Automotive industry; Free trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Gustavo A. Uruchurtu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07487154724626409,"gpt":0.2409737764715516,"spread":0.1661022292252875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006984471,0.0003967094,0.0006969423,0.002478534,0.004191298,0.01195184,0.001744465,0.003892723,0.005474911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01411247,0.0004217887,0.000972592,0.002236335,0.01491407,0.01003318,0.0039861,0.006652028,0.0004939658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007030472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003665145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009198573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006452567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9935469,0.002783069,0.0003343854,0.001447904,0.001433653,0.0004541725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934899,0.00348501,0.0009822368,0.001178243,0.0006942154,0.0001703377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002454855,0.000002675328,0.00009191258,0.000006185498,0.00000146232,0.00001439158,0.0002219679,0.00009544607,0.00001212302,0.997209,0.0002666258,0.002075673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001540489,0.00001743947,0.0008301348,0.000129543,0.0000108166,0.0001030261,0.0005339226,0.001724112,0.0001575568,0.937237,0.05922323,0.00001785445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07921467,0.0107233,0.3123724,0.03100769,0.0008556942,0.0002696997,0.0004573968,0.0001523331,0.5649468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8258725,0.00518887,0.1194899,0.002870336,0.00100848,0.0008902404,0.0002435655,0.0001311326,0.04430499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01195184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05100989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772339027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017055","title":"Trade from the Trenches: Negotiating in Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Mandate; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); International trade; Curiosity; Globalization; Commission; Trade barrier; Investment (military); General partnership; Multilateral trade negotiations; Commercial policy; Business; Political science; Economics; International economics; Free trade; Law","authors":[{"name":"Eva Valle Lagares","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02496935044431364,"gpt":0.2669622107028202,"spread":0.2419928602585066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05902758,0.0010583,0.001319708,0.002651939,0.02738363,0.03699068,0.005093261,0.01374548,0.01728613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06238458,0.001572717,0.001316498,0.004656135,0.06164855,0.03657454,0.02502712,0.01347183,0.004599464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01535853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02825572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008644759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008937815,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9173829,0.06188596,0.002202873,0.005359787,0.008063232,0.005105201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649904,0.02471743,0.001614608,0.003505515,0.002451562,0.002720472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002089389,0.0000735038,0.0006740526,0.0001321916,0.00002093035,0.0008694878,0.1004748,0.00166638,0.0001999619,0.86511,0.008471807,0.02228588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001732121,0.00003901314,0.0002550552,0.0008531528,0.000009598402,0.0002959991,0.07009138,0.001976869,0.0002001155,0.6775542,0.2486618,0.00004547217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04703644,0.006927556,0.2446946,0.0789792,0.0009764599,0.0006981962,0.00008044812,0.0003863193,0.6202208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519157,0.004043514,0.07612305,0.007254106,0.0003034626,0.0007786967,0.0001509721,0.000583797,0.05884678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05902758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3121714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}