{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":51,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"3b2538682e73","filters":{"venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W4253504090","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019064","title":"Measuring the Gender-Responsiveness of Free Trade Agreements: Using a Self-Evaluation Maturity Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Empowerment; Maturity (psychological); Momentum (technical analysis); Intervention (counseling); International trade; International economics; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Law","authors":[{"name":"Amrita Bahri","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05019680804747467,"gpt":0.2901092020193232,"spread":0.2399123939718485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001731467,0.0002512629,0.0003357008,0.00008691032,0.0004901167,0.0004490286,0.0004522085,0.0001755253,0.00006533098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003602468,0.0001881932,0.0002118534,0.0005540904,0.0001155543,0.001028723,0.0001244663,0.000417009,0.000005869533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002987582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001551766,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001909986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001460148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977119,0.0001568703,0.0004527761,0.0002509404,0.0009535747,0.0004739205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989952,0.00006008634,0.0004055895,0.0003071733,0.0001802257,0.00005169747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001674462,0.002088745,0.8343651,0.002866577,0.002027324,0.0001159185,0.01366032,0.006063253,0.001030075,0.08673371,0.003203835,0.04617068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002674315,0.00006673915,0.7869576,0.0003002684,0.001053584,0.0001510239,0.02708724,0.004111778,0.00004486889,0.1727778,0.00420507,0.0005697802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932873,0.001166101,0.0002876412,0.001718244,0.0007784928,0.0005184329,0.00001508749,0.00004076926,0.002187937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981777,0.00004825763,0.0002211634,0.0007221397,0.0008095188,0.00000253529,0.000002538511,0.00001385205,0.000002270916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08604407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7674295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246045263","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019010","title":"The Court of Justice of the European Unions Judgment on Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trade: A Case of GMO, Mutagenesis and International Trad","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; European union; Mutagenesis; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Parliament; Biology; Biotechnology; Genetics; Law and economics; Business; Mutation; Politics; Sociology; Gene; International trade; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Tobias Dolle","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ignacio Carreño","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03108684530606665,"gpt":0.2744469337447521,"spread":0.2433600884386855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825499,0.0002219125,0.000295524,0.00005192703,0.0002595238,0.0001024823,0.0004771563,0.00009971072,0.00009086504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009579027,0.00009890052,0.0001358837,0.0002315501,0.0005263809,0.0001181905,0.0002085906,0.0002288464,4.475571e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004444488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003993888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001508253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001670581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979451,0.0003396647,0.0006344395,0.0003213953,0.0005058352,0.0002535073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989177,0.0003297299,0.0003685408,0.0001134814,0.00006641263,0.0002041381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001163226,0.001457046,0.04359452,0.0002335469,0.001485634,0.001166745,0.002408695,0.0003962902,0.2651119,0.006917003,0.001012011,0.6750534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002946201,0.00126302,0.9359627,0.0002385681,0.0004792491,0.02952732,0.01111706,0.001655232,0.0118312,0.0006570449,0.003864388,0.0004579639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880809,0.0007420219,0.00001540966,0.009352973,0.0003362678,0.0002464214,0.0006013294,0.000006146578,0.0006185908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978732,0.001683727,0.0001248259,0.00009373415,0.0001440222,0.00000283214,0.00000719974,0.000004456012,0.00006598723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4033046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614194518","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017024","title":"The Obstacles to Concluding the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and Lessons for the Future","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Member states; Convergence (economics); Member state; International trade; Opposition (politics); European union; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Free trade; Economic growth","authors":[{"name":"E. Diane White","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03140491407703751,"gpt":0.2688798035833601,"spread":0.2374748895063225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001836428,0.0001115884,0.00009177959,0.000009979584,0.003109257,0.001597285,0.0002582616,0.00002231897,0.000009915643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001642458,0.00005494842,0.00003641193,0.0000160452,0.0001464165,0.0003430075,0.0000787485,0.0001092335,0.000001574577],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004718929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004125583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02954557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994084,0.00000907934,0.0001587169,0.0001158813,0.0001341182,0.0001738039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995852,0.00007577986,0.0001783594,0.0001063609,0.00002498,0.00002938065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006069709,0.000007554653,0.001484217,0.00001330455,0.0001323303,0.000003915431,0.0000824582,0.00003416148,0.00003763902,0.88422,0.08880536,0.02511837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004613204,0.00001055291,0.09762337,0.00001545678,0.00004629342,0.00004118846,0.001771127,0.001460498,0.000007512876,0.003402438,0.8950771,0.00008310754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.207554,0.003304788,0.00007594383,0.7785737,0.001756406,0.0004917073,0.00004325598,0.000009094093,0.008191113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683634,0.000559064,0.00002036485,0.02938006,0.001606901,0.000009543878,0.000001643259,0.000004670388,0.00005436174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8808175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235589513","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2021050","title":"A Canadian Border Carbon Adjustment? GATT Compliance and Underexplored Exceptions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; International trade; Convention; Greenhouse gas; Carbon leakage; Order (exchange); Political science; European union; International economics; Climate change; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Emissions trading; Economics; Law; Kyoto Protocol; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Annie Arko","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03066435155547819,"gpt":0.3090210329350418,"spread":0.2783566813795636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001217873,0.0000985536,0.0001229428,0.00003554664,0.0007971726,0.000234938,0.00009166009,0.00007537651,0.0003634977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004070774,0.000103618,0.00002845904,0.0004525064,0.0002032316,0.0001882712,0.00001615162,0.0001681396,0.000006649624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003112059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007282283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01439074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2286628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989658,0.0001239209,0.0001534868,0.0001698411,0.0002325207,0.0003544126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991719,0.00001612572,0.0000492529,0.00007346641,0.00006483013,0.0006244784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002309894,0.0002390334,0.1815867,0.00004786297,0.0003017678,0.000652983,0.01489346,0.00005158957,0.000361744,0.7195355,0.02170474,0.0606015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000995364,0.00003209364,0.3973682,0.00008538035,0.00008892216,0.0007535878,0.01300043,0.00004544985,0.00001941061,0.00644733,0.5808143,0.0003495844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4770223,0.01308989,0.0001540502,0.3922092,0.0017207,0.0003362167,0.0001100633,0.0001337119,0.1152238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996188,0.001496551,0.0002629022,0.001173322,0.0003228459,0.000001526836,0.000004517322,0.000007523388,0.0005428273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7130882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816635","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022042","title":"Dispute Settlement in Indian FTAs’: Shaping the Future with Lessons from the Past","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Dispute resolution; Scope (computer science); Arbitration; International trade; Settlement (finance); Dispute mechanism; Political science; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Free trade; Law; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Shailja Singh","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01740617014674922,"gpt":0.2317619260444285,"spread":0.2143557558976793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002686653,0.0001039343,0.00007695438,0.00003142043,0.0008303978,0.0004509749,0.0002748285,0.00001642478,0.0003405823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002934211,0.0000549436,0.0000406845,0.0002368439,0.00005115846,0.0003885436,0.00009525044,0.0003475745,0.000009649881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000697719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002543115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000155846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005666311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991356,0.00003075632,0.0001690715,0.0001215842,0.0003654481,0.0001775347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997441,0.00001426087,0.0001342167,0.00007618531,0.00001676882,0.00001446647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001850825,0.0001968134,0.1588194,0.00001264441,0.0001759215,0.0001803519,0.0009850524,0.0006918389,0.00002750188,0.7406455,0.08564357,0.0124364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007800313,0.00001852027,0.2488446,0.00002227403,0.00003215418,0.00009681605,0.005044736,0.0005388173,9.6589e-7,0.007071938,0.7374294,0.0001197173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6145975,0.0008907296,0.00008437628,0.3636553,0.0009963793,0.0002944053,0.0001267899,0.00002891104,0.01932563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454857,0.00003228971,0.00002148792,0.05245711,0.001920427,0.00001420578,0.00003990417,0.000005786099,0.00002305042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7335735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6386832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229647937","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010034","title":"Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Law and Practice: The Mexican Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Dumping; Jurisprudence; International trade; Political science; Law; Subject (documents); Settlement (finance); Free trade agreement; Free trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Ihn H. Uhm","is_ca":false},{"name":"Nick Covelli","is_ca":false},{"name":"Gregory W. Bowman","is_ca":false},{"name":"David A. Gantz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01624115784412717,"gpt":0.3238190397737079,"spread":0.3075778819295807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000811113,0.00009502986,0.0001129044,0.00001306664,0.001722229,0.000661708,0.000149797,0.00007058883,0.00005068597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002678215,0.00006970847,0.000019581,0.0001928394,0.001041165,0.0007396857,0.00003668,0.0003435008,0.000001616551],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002273583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006894305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003132628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008259047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989657,0.0001532253,0.0001694871,0.0001586421,0.0003046521,0.0002482581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.0001395423,0.0001150399,0.00007787839,0.00004746529,0.0002238644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002779017,0.00005865507,0.03742864,0.00001040774,0.00004809647,0.00005733672,0.03166018,0.000002407945,0.00193596,0.9204611,0.0006538295,0.00765557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005680777,0.0000368796,0.07375376,0.00003793321,0.00007019484,0.002115229,0.03419872,0.00004180389,0.000129009,0.001991362,0.8867994,0.0002576519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9064075,0.001002147,0.00006143338,0.07276703,0.0005626355,0.0001157687,0.000005581776,0.00003781117,0.01904007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960974,0.0008256572,0.0003792403,0.00228408,0.0003839738,9.579728e-7,2.374849e-7,0.00000541682,0.00002305778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606450338","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017018","title":"The Brexit Vote: Its Impact on the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and UKs Obligations Under Comprehensive Trade and Economic Trade Agreement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; European union; International trade; Negotiation; Trade agreement; Investment (military); Member state; Commission; European commission; International economics; Economic impact analysis; Economic integration; Customs union; Free trade agreement; Economics; Business; Member states; Free trade; Political science; Finance; Law","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kevin Massicotte","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alexandra Logvin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03044590585871328,"gpt":0.2689096511603479,"spread":0.2384637453016346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001954518,0.0003698147,0.0003486508,0.00005769697,0.002449034,0.002150079,0.0003065606,0.00008859702,0.00004891329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001435376,0.0002368365,0.00009328047,0.00004123758,0.0003650392,0.0007391421,0.0001029095,0.0003645477,0.000007548663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001902314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03496284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05500922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984995,0.00004714985,0.0004279906,0.0003463607,0.0002359145,0.000443059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989035,0.0001118703,0.0005724897,0.0002572522,0.00001595846,0.0001389243],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001462128,0.0004140066,0.07608081,0.0004480124,0.003694836,0.0002522583,0.002461458,0.005957103,0.00101798,0.5781056,0.2262094,0.1038964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018342,0.00006965229,0.8079662,0.00008415303,0.0001503136,0.0001885792,0.002345891,0.002004507,0.00002789223,0.002036187,0.1829529,0.0003395203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8975589,0.002698526,0.000007725789,0.09651926,0.0004718707,0.0004238938,0.00009006376,0.00001612389,0.002213629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931966,0.00106407,0.000008677755,0.005003632,0.0006619109,0.000007532426,0.000008204024,0.00001538281,0.0000339552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7318854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198730501","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010016","title":"The EU Ban on Seal Products: Some Customs and WTO Open Questions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Legitimacy; Business; International trade law; Harmony (color); International trade; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Maurizio Gambardella","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01427271030996241,"gpt":0.3044430522675279,"spread":0.2901703419575655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008891526,0.0001307347,0.0001320888,0.00002800426,0.002737216,0.001283154,0.0004919337,0.00009753777,0.00006842321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002770761,0.00009230518,0.00002741989,0.0003756875,0.0006490956,0.0006596097,0.00007264789,0.0005192683,0.00002512515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006519461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002845065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001923302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001385131,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986176,0.0001930136,0.0002146918,0.0002244825,0.0003793176,0.0003709315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999245,0.00006640478,0.0001108793,0.0001583761,0.00006664007,0.0003526321],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001900593,0.00005518533,0.002186178,0.000002380548,0.00002108591,0.00001135028,0.0007704132,0.000001408316,0.0001090837,0.9707585,0.01434081,0.01172458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004035623,0.00005457509,0.04212638,0.00001739588,0.00002638741,0.0001713471,0.0008971932,0.000003522516,0.00003866056,0.005374168,0.9507418,0.0001450453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2766851,0.0007092264,0.000003869892,0.6902676,0.001942255,0.0004869464,0.00003411512,0.00008395646,0.02978692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995998,0.0006731105,0.0001914881,0.001143884,0.001184783,0.000004025731,0.000001506515,0.00001055876,0.000792605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521613312","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014028","title":"The Canada-European Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement and the Mining Sector: Key Issues and Opportunities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Capital (architecture); Member states; International trade; Key (lock); Capital investment; Goods and services; Industrial organization; International economics; European union; Economics; Finance; Economy; Political science; Geography; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Sean Stephenson","is_ca":false},{"name":"P. Kirby","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03700613202404893,"gpt":0.2565995248964648,"spread":0.2195933928724158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006246972,0.0001044693,0.0001337433,0.00000878581,0.00170294,0.0003549831,0.0002186443,0.00002757776,0.000009675503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008383922,0.00006369259,0.00002918636,0.00004413596,0.0008272291,0.00009668734,0.00003741427,0.0001514966,2.459243e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000731291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002164462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3718226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7982415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986823,0.0004329352,0.000162993,0.0001051304,0.0003105524,0.0003061097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993079,0.0001792714,0.0001129539,0.00009620192,0.00001437823,0.0002892608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000720551,0.000008054123,0.001586066,0.00001316024,0.000105395,0.0000767323,0.01973506,0.000004089273,0.000004028303,0.255692,0.5965022,0.1262011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006452338,0.0000261408,0.04087565,0.00002503938,0.00002398147,0.000134182,0.009500119,0.00002336869,8.806545e-7,0.002450223,0.9462017,0.00009340671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4390932,0.02434993,0.00001147037,0.4899518,0.0005173024,0.0001896976,0.0001770591,0.00001408073,0.04569552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831343,0.008085292,0.00001647535,0.007454762,0.0006724214,0.000001013233,3.643566e-7,0.000004538702,0.000630821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1011805438","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014014","title":"How <i>Canada Renewable Energy</i> Supports the Use of the Alternative Commercial Reasonableness Standard in Future Feed-In Tariff Disputes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Tariff; Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Economics; Settlement (finance); Business; International economics; International trade; Public economics; Energy policy; Finance; Market economy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Eugenia Laurenza","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01137413630447138,"gpt":0.1891871888121834,"spread":0.177813052507712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002532628,0.000129528,0.0001599887,0.00003846831,0.0001825461,0.0003798298,0.0002490783,0.000042239,0.000022339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004523831,0.00007481029,0.00005420506,0.0002477456,0.00007900001,0.0008081816,0.00005906267,0.000173815,1.978813e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009341325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009949402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09960122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4042472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989542,0.00005445478,0.0002427797,0.0001230464,0.0004251366,0.0002003444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995428,0.00003262682,0.0002376031,0.00009935717,0.00006864619,0.00001899931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003005185,0.0001496153,0.1992055,0.00004928583,0.00007601373,0.00004929607,0.0001103231,0.003406193,0.00007879809,0.5998741,0.1859142,0.01078619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007625538,0.00001333426,0.08261932,0.00007882461,0.00001815402,0.00002716745,0.000212233,0.002221398,0.00009840549,0.007361493,0.9064676,0.0001195745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106028,0.0004983345,0.001002882,0.153084,0.003973003,0.0003885141,0.00009586659,0.00002331586,0.03033124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983171,0.00005290227,0.00002722915,0.01572012,0.0008775684,0.000003209098,0.000007405604,0.000005913376,0.0001346513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7205534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W956576443","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012025","title":"Judicial Review of Trade Remedy Determinations in Ten User Countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Deference; Law; Business; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Edwin Vermulst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01544081132544329,"gpt":0.3102067800768424,"spread":0.2947659687513991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008542616,0.00009076132,0.0002106165,0.00005235178,0.00027411,0.00004587871,0.0001601969,0.00006582982,0.0002174443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001901418,0.00008307472,0.00005217444,0.0005528614,0.0002736971,0.0005432206,0.00001314806,0.0001637507,0.000006574719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001312106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000181835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005404376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002995894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985856,0.0002015136,0.0003762151,0.00008498132,0.0004303217,0.0003213354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994819,0.00004367927,0.0001684301,0.00006541503,0.0000346036,0.0002059334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002702552,0.0004182113,0.4470741,0.0005593051,0.00007151388,0.00003407894,0.009483465,0.000002416542,0.00005642753,0.4695209,0.03677931,0.03597334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003652707,0.00002157161,0.3909542,0.0008139807,0.00006822417,0.0001108562,0.0006369407,8.4481e-7,0.00003560148,0.0005759383,0.6062738,0.000142817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2932932,0.1721044,0.0002567472,0.4422239,0.003552098,0.001547764,0.0001746511,0.0001796603,0.08666748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795941,0.0184489,0.0001864542,0.001285022,0.000431256,0.000001839976,0.000001687682,0.000006033164,0.0000446704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6863009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3387688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229959763","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014010","title":"The WTO Seal Products PanelThe Public Morals Defense","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Seal (emblem); Argument (complex analysis); Panel data; Technical barriers to trade; International economics; Panel discussion; Business; Trade barrier; Economics; Advertising; Chemistry; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Brendan P. McGivern","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02428847428004631,"gpt":0.2707641488351212,"spread":0.2464756745550749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001242933,0.0001187697,0.0001295516,0.00002286223,0.002204062,0.0008284586,0.0003471698,0.00007257478,0.00005941727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005141632,0.00007730722,0.00004717399,0.0005045116,0.0005073455,0.0003602225,0.00002933475,0.0002345463,0.00003564734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009446433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001866261,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003103469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003532902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998126,0.0004734496,0.0002286265,0.0001733682,0.0005105264,0.0004880191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992062,0.00008293613,0.0001288451,0.0001460837,0.00009333775,0.0003425921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114617,0.00004206112,0.01087087,0.000004082434,0.00003227689,0.000008543941,0.00108749,0.000004073802,0.00004457264,0.9411314,0.02413666,0.0226269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002733675,0.00003094616,0.02108134,0.000007139646,0.0000206247,0.0001544315,0.001059148,0.000008512931,0.00002912209,0.005103216,0.9721108,0.0001213327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2176023,0.001268463,0.00007155033,0.7401418,0.001298822,0.0002486724,0.000008260736,0.0001312625,0.03922883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968057,0.0004530448,0.00009432143,0.0009153116,0.001191906,0.000001695708,9.508775e-7,0.000009076253,0.0005279427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233770138","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013020","title":"Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tariff; Market access; International trade law; Dumping; Free trade; Duty; Subsidy; Safeguard; Liberalization; Rules of origin; International economics; Business; World trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Geography; Agriculture","authors":[{"name":"Terence P. Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06513871667867441,"gpt":0.367088721235281,"spread":0.3019500045566066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003177024,0.0001360116,0.0002085914,0.00004900865,0.0006492392,0.0003459001,0.0002422789,0.0001364711,0.001126437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001792294,0.0001140507,0.00008220881,0.000558742,0.0002517016,0.001040037,0.00001734772,0.0001773227,0.000002336317],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000236431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000249903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006881105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001540299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986579,0.0001419881,0.0003619266,0.0001925455,0.0002979954,0.000347597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991728,0.00008458715,0.000269305,0.00009342816,0.00008420585,0.0002956426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006433944,0.0006103263,0.00678611,0.000116735,0.0006382526,0.0000128586,0.006555837,0.000009919154,0.01635683,0.02004554,0.9053284,0.04289581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002259331,0.0002755836,0.01096173,0.00006198955,0.0002164583,0.0002055907,0.005199309,0.0002366874,0.0008499802,0.001782136,0.9776012,0.0003500063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4041562,0.002781159,0.008069711,0.4920378,0.005732714,0.006736576,0.0008265901,0.0007046317,0.07895462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966116,0.0005751898,0.000492216,0.0004601868,0.0003766615,0.0000244332,0.000004455783,0.0000148504,0.001440431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5924554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483365100","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014007","title":"The Canada EU Free Trade Agreement Demystified: New Opportunities for Trade, Investment and Government Procurement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; European union; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Procurement; Government procurement; Trade barrier; Agricultural economics; Economics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Kiselbach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04232910781126253,"gpt":0.2542014099466428,"spread":0.2118723021353802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006457468,0.000165761,0.0001694078,0.000008316322,0.001306462,0.0002765533,0.0002912861,0.00006266119,0.00001169265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001076067,0.0001258806,0.00005794966,0.00006523295,0.0002222152,0.0001321168,0.00002586233,0.0001460499,1.691021e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007923828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001531631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2544201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8767126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980679,0.0001066981,0.0002925766,0.000180565,0.0008106916,0.0005416065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987981,0.00009512009,0.0001854434,0.0001239991,0.000008375058,0.0007889932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003952614,0.00001701029,0.0001899382,0.00001346152,0.00005811347,0.000009108125,0.0009337962,0.000004219757,0.000004079862,0.2086228,0.705271,0.08483692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007905935,0.0001101787,0.009876512,0.00003544915,0.00004954207,0.00004270457,0.003510643,0.00002565871,0.00001609433,0.006927232,0.9784499,0.0001655353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02569882,0.007453898,0.0003466804,0.9367033,0.001049334,0.001073014,0.0008921381,0.0000237115,0.02675915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484121,0.00357999,0.0002883863,0.04293077,0.001800014,0.00003594184,0.000002413257,0.00001521319,0.002935227],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2423493607","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013040","title":"The Question of the Benefit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Fernando Piérola","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.007829631317478027,"gpt":0.2617525603438024,"spread":0.2539229290263244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002969413,0.00004493595,0.00005181619,0.000006253779,0.000992614,0.0001707739,0.0002203728,0.00003822225,0.00009619725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007133996,0.00002387352,0.00003733083,0.0002452483,0.0003183262,0.0001770372,0.00001675026,0.0001097397,0.00001032032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004738411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006465024,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002832364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003792765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992726,0.0001084416,0.0001397602,0.00005024384,0.0002785537,0.0001503647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996642,0.00003285057,0.00009984912,0.00006829468,0.00005320783,0.00008154867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002376192,0.00001669381,0.02624021,0.000001482233,0.00001520585,4.388943e-7,0.0008543036,0.00001084334,0.00006417609,0.9390683,0.006605527,0.02712052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002048769,0.00001710533,0.6182401,0.00002457486,0.00002234295,0.00005104202,0.001942978,0.00001241539,0.00008122409,0.03656615,0.3427635,0.00007367189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6267569,0.001753796,0.00006256823,0.3292449,0.001344594,0.000311943,0.000006216498,0.00003793186,0.04048117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987822,0.0003437366,0.0000399106,0.0002266089,0.0001984567,9.317185e-7,9.518398e-8,0.000002429112,0.0004056522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7634485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615207609","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017023","title":"Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, ISDS and the Belgian Veto: A Warning of Failure for Future Trade Agreements with the EU?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Veto; Negotiation; Free trade agreement; Settlement (finance); International economics; Investment (military); Trade agreement; Business; Economics; Free trade; Political science; Politics; Law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Flip Petillion","is_ca":false},{"name":"Ian A. Laird","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01413010685661673,"gpt":0.2353800508137781,"spread":0.2212499439571614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000224,0.000166251,0.0002010425,0.00003075813,0.001105002,0.0007177016,0.0002403996,0.00004742488,0.00002255804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000786205,0.00009049104,0.00006907897,0.0000291175,0.0004020639,0.0007394556,0.00005413778,0.000166978,0.000001165519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002143936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001964678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005723152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001173285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992301,0.00001865279,0.0002270582,0.0001617655,0.0001747428,0.0001876294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993477,0.00002753672,0.0004522918,0.0001201562,0.00002366991,0.00002857493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001353798,0.0001175343,0.02110865,0.0002835414,0.001044757,0.00001887375,0.00171015,0.00007207655,0.0003768656,0.9104432,0.04533735,0.01813324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008762623,0.0001257509,0.1816175,0.0001224989,0.0003289176,0.0002301373,0.005027058,0.003262518,0.00003078941,0.004857775,0.7953451,0.000289319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7747943,0.001148796,0.0001535117,0.211696,0.0004390792,0.0007076381,0.00004514875,0.00001507611,0.01100044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896525,0.0001748076,0.0001003918,0.009045341,0.0009714523,0.000009248677,0.000006880006,0.000007896621,0.00003144682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9055854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8498893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816966","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022044","title":"Application of Dispute Settlement in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’): A Cross Country Analysis of Modern FTAs’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Political science; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ronjini Ray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Rishabha Meena","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.009823503543956655,"gpt":0.2896731883168665,"spread":0.2798496847729098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146907,0.00009911913,0.0002635124,0.000155215,0.0003620782,0.0000518423,0.0003870276,0.00004833517,0.0002215123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002272868,0.0001063468,0.00009308381,0.002073121,0.0002179841,0.0002047961,0.00007032085,0.000184066,3.794118e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002930175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001284855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004792224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001331863,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980174,0.0002015557,0.0005014958,0.0001815459,0.000838043,0.0002599883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993233,0.00002470518,0.0003399413,0.0001615296,0.00002755881,0.0001229442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032325,0.0008081383,0.8467411,0.00003825291,0.0008932968,0.00002179108,0.01020765,0.01493563,0.0003765319,0.1020016,0.002468852,0.02140391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00193574,0.00008875149,0.9146335,0.00001661737,0.0006004517,0.0000227951,0.003408589,0.003012003,0.00005914173,0.00644715,0.06952986,0.0002453836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651303,0.002710814,0.003689193,0.02178534,0.0004419037,0.0005450007,0.002657052,0.0000357379,0.00300468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993544,0.0001613475,0.000166204,0.0001756408,0.00005534294,0.000007745955,0.00004132915,0.000005784925,0.00003222145],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09555441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4336698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1426969286","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2014035","title":"Administrative Protective Orders: Protection of Confidential Information in Canadian Trade Remedy Proceedings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Business; Balance (ability); Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Trade secret; Public information; Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Law; Intellectual property; Economics; Medicine; Computer science; Geography","authors":[{"name":"J Horwitz","is_ca":false},{"name":"Darrel H. Pearson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01811891558399312,"gpt":0.2194980514629739,"spread":0.2013791358789808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000329925,0.0001314051,0.0001716845,0.0002107186,0.0002121483,0.0003501771,0.0001010921,0.00008829662,0.00003594308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002801362,0.0001126372,0.00004205688,0.0002836124,0.00007380438,0.00204305,0.00001170285,0.0002325037,0.000007848022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009974576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02268812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07156391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990758,0.000009535436,0.0003378532,0.0001101531,0.0002057807,0.000260852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999504,0.000002945903,0.0003188004,0.00003804656,0.00008356904,0.00005269437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008851637,0.0002487648,0.03302581,0.0008129019,0.0001382803,0.00003690452,0.002506603,0.00006746499,0.0006636365,0.881327,0.003437584,0.07684989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006323909,0.0005871312,0.4563909,0.0006581505,0.0001789308,0.0005853433,0.004442998,0.006481697,0.0004274551,0.2765157,0.2463598,0.001047997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852291,0.00001429392,0.0002904251,0.002038334,0.0001923247,0.000542615,0.000005064865,0.00002299657,0.01166482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.000002474745,0.00002402108,0.0002535849,0.0003965125,0.00001198733,0.000004462441,0.000004438742,0.000005497533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6048113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578906619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013028","title":"Modernization of the EUs Trade Defence Instruments and the Law of Unintended Consequences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Transparency (behavior); Modernization theory; Protectionism; European commission; Duty; International trade; Political science; Unintended consequences; Law; Subsidy; Business; Law and economics; Economics; European union","authors":[{"name":"Edwin Vermulst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01106672533862642,"gpt":0.2406983414378343,"spread":0.2296316160992078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002861717,0.00007344955,0.0001353246,0.00001303026,0.0004703512,0.00009500739,0.0002475951,0.00005127037,0.00005159884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008091616,0.00004151389,0.00003929528,0.0002982515,0.003999079,0.0002858314,0.00002647782,0.0001180782,7.319917e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002895319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001072458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000793757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002681937,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989077,0.0002675998,0.0002528966,0.00008462832,0.0003410864,0.0001460416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.0000386971,0.0002301577,0.00007473437,0.00005169985,0.00008082273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001266802,0.00002144648,0.01213164,0.000006628518,0.00003002574,4.134203e-7,0.003485129,0.00001985353,0.0002848469,0.981616,0.000174859,0.002216475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007393788,0.0001791567,0.4600537,0.0003936948,0.0003980968,0.0006688943,0.03762227,0.0008906388,0.006957091,0.4638255,0.02101183,0.0006053126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8490205,0.0007415294,0.0001228667,0.1343218,0.000320857,0.0004157532,0.00001788867,0.00001809636,0.01502064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.0003497868,0.00009649179,0.0004122175,0.00003725686,0.000001290567,2.88316e-7,0.00000312986,0.0000275516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784952832","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018005","title":"Unspoken Truths: The Hidden Logic of Decision 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Autonomy; European union; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Business; International economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Rob Howse","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03306527082140851,"gpt":0.3234128907596879,"spread":0.2903476199382794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004886976,0.00005774227,0.00008787259,0.00001448083,0.00060678,0.00007367889,0.0002595833,0.00002946281,0.0001553175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121556,0.00003337747,0.0000575658,0.0001182809,0.0005951061,0.0001079487,0.00002540822,0.00008882073,0.00003085704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003533187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004299722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006551581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001584023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991658,0.0001042662,0.0001661938,0.00007690134,0.0003385233,0.0001482936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996335,0.00006704641,0.00009043735,0.00005472983,0.00008114854,0.00007313624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001342606,0.00008099004,0.01527143,0.000003302813,0.0001105331,0.00003185897,0.00596281,0.000001669281,0.00007642109,0.7627009,0.06276436,0.1528615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004855572,0.0002766521,0.1138169,0.00006761504,0.00003880231,0.0001162696,0.006301374,0.00001226031,0.00004297793,0.06432351,0.8143937,0.0001243383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5181259,0.002800651,0.0003482792,0.008406046,0.001028464,0.00008778228,0.00001861197,0.0000214183,0.4691629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971238,0.001132658,0.0002195978,0.0005291087,0.0007758083,2.794687e-7,1.658041e-7,0.000002148986,0.0002164366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7516294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225245840","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022015","title":"The COVID-19 Pandemics’ Impact on Customs Valuation and Import Duties: An Israel Perspective, and a Wider Comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Valuation (finance); Business; Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Value (mathematics); International trade; Finance; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Medicine","authors":[{"name":"Omer Wagner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06216054854914702,"gpt":0.3394570013454314,"spread":0.2772964527962843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792077,0.000202504,0.0002096896,0.00008471235,0.001546414,0.0008428943,0.0001941932,0.00005242606,0.00006558672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001698152,0.0001408298,0.00007398165,0.000155842,0.0002872967,0.0006890268,0.0001071907,0.0003844339,0.000002941483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003155762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008656403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00109435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001195711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985472,0.00006346258,0.0003263125,0.000271972,0.0005008074,0.0002902734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993392,0.00009165565,0.000278786,0.0001077676,0.00007627079,0.0001063175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006740151,0.0003322622,0.5647792,0.00004374774,0.0002798665,0.0000598239,0.0009826896,0.002022226,0.00003309287,0.3903761,0.02934049,0.01107654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003821929,0.0006085029,0.463983,0.00002762091,0.0002889684,0.001776207,0.03680707,0.04757022,0.00000156903,0.2448576,0.199553,0.0007042623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734673,0.00205417,0.0005268486,0.0174429,0.0006465102,0.0003220997,0.00005383342,0.00006581304,0.005420563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993232,0.000313434,0.00002368598,0.005633964,0.0007136269,0.00001109993,0.00001474268,0.0000119983,0.00004549669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1702126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403432599","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024079","title":"Article: The Contribution of the Canadian-European Partnership to the Integration of Sustainable Development Issues into the Multilateral Trading System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Sustainable development; International trade; Political science; Regional science; Business; Geography; Law","authors":[{"name":"Antoine Comont","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02010113841887976,"gpt":0.290653126018958,"spread":0.2705519876000783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645546,0.00006504291,0.00007441408,0.00001920014,0.001334358,0.0002835475,0.0002949712,0.00003102672,0.000005609875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001421893,0.00002816224,0.0000525336,0.000368146,0.0002065778,0.0001133685,0.00001654688,0.0001743614,0.000002356393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005712821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006504593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2393172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6651316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988357,0.0003495872,0.0002044799,0.00007299323,0.0002668486,0.0002703627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996057,0.0000509672,0.00007476632,0.00008534261,0.00005677578,0.0001265022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002319186,0.00000828558,0.001385044,0.00002584367,0.00006492782,0.00003086645,0.2180008,0.00009497876,0.00008741806,0.7196946,0.03461891,0.02596515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001268431,0.00002279093,0.06311959,0.000236365,0.0000419821,0.00005847536,0.05919087,0.000363515,0.0004743823,0.001335365,0.8749456,0.00008421484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8519995,0.002395075,0.00008184502,0.1403889,0.0003466409,0.0003900905,0.00001700183,0.00001070631,0.004370227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986084,0.00002709064,0.00000762505,0.000603876,0.0002470496,0.000003538498,2.577405e-7,0.000002832714,0.0004993596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8403267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508726722","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010029","title":"At the Cross-Roads of US and Canadian Trade Controls: The Cuba Conflict","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; International trade; Economic sanctions; Context (archaeology); Surprise; Control (management); Business; International economics; Economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"John W. Boscariol","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02218779368063458,"gpt":0.2439251266484827,"spread":0.2217373329678481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003917803,0.00008812967,0.0001582034,0.00005070772,0.0004877258,0.0001684402,0.0001597272,0.00008261344,0.000483733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005778782,0.00006129521,0.00008386544,0.00007000059,0.0002852216,0.0001565491,0.00001761908,0.0002969436,0.00002492075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007739051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005134685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004807298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01593729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992638,0.00001069723,0.0003838399,0.0001288283,0.00003047323,0.0001824228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994364,0.00006067837,0.0002147598,0.0001249248,0.00001371954,0.000149474],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001808046,0.00002133249,0.4745292,0.000002637796,0.0001395401,0.000002824265,0.0002691984,0.00009116133,0.00003740425,0.5149837,0.005512094,0.004392815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004089309,0.00002233163,0.5356385,0.000002704367,0.000008836162,0.0003467617,0.00005216191,0.0006371618,0.00000663495,0.007226513,0.4555887,0.00006079787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403781,0.003860489,0.00003752951,0.01028716,0.0006742455,0.00008892997,0.0003564877,0.000003575666,0.04431347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977971,0.0006817207,0.000021931,0.0008709335,0.0001913531,0.00000401531,0.000002795174,0.000005173618,0.0004249347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5077572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893379,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783009311","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018004","title":"Prior Judicial Involvement in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from the Courts Rhetoric in Opinion 2/15","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Majority opinion; European union; Concurring opinion; Member state; Court of record; Economics; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; International trade; Member states","authors":[{"name":"Hannes Lenk","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02987525067430212,"gpt":0.2714643232561439,"spread":0.2415890725818418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004121229,0.0001584435,0.0001471378,0.00009358423,0.0002596468,0.0003782061,0.0002277938,0.00004755228,0.0001454866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002630208,0.0001171865,0.00004991535,0.0002744628,0.0001204116,0.0008045899,0.00007942463,0.0002269514,0.00005945927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005372184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008243058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002657848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987124,0.00003315093,0.0004013181,0.0002026267,0.0003703175,0.0002802374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999609,0.00001776605,0.0002028386,0.00008873552,0.00005011166,0.00003152654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003445437,0.0005803852,0.218639,0.00003784801,0.0001401835,0.00008193866,0.001489072,0.00008719059,0.0003506201,0.6762766,0.08527485,0.01669772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002381763,0.00005017493,0.4691684,0.0002097291,0.00002456172,0.00001452483,0.0004253324,0.002724905,0.00003903178,0.0702356,0.4544464,0.0002796113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406134,0.0005381154,0.0001670744,0.03594614,0.002494912,0.0003367352,0.00005368785,0.00003216174,0.01981778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727772,0.0001615912,0.00005782981,0.02443021,0.00249525,0.000008214038,0.00003826261,0.00000871962,0.00002267591],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.606041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4778728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1016589838","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012030","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the EU","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Edwin Vermulst","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0253988167565704,"gpt":0.3306699392982921,"spread":0.3052711225417217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00111197,0.0000526628,0.0001184048,0.00002764443,0.0003070862,0.00004108419,0.0001719969,0.00003598029,0.00009603871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001664798,0.0000399707,0.00004002832,0.0005486124,0.0001561635,0.0003107908,0.00000998881,0.0001336441,0.000004368705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004529001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008002174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004365571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007740902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989359,0.0002590958,0.0002301475,0.00005043488,0.0003104015,0.0002140064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996763,0.00004302614,0.0001148245,0.00005194143,0.0000279044,0.00008594788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004972783,0.0003268615,0.1824582,0.0003066573,0.00003504611,0.00002221865,0.01538583,0.000002454707,0.00007615369,0.7499468,0.01425161,0.03718319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002987559,0.00001807121,0.5374192,0.0009572336,0.00007024061,0.0002104379,0.002798155,0.000001803251,0.00002086801,0.0008034454,0.4572695,0.0001322712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4251186,0.07950482,0.0001746596,0.3748463,0.001772258,0.0007888909,0.00003216805,0.00005624447,0.1177061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883107,0.00932641,0.00008378823,0.001883714,0.000384556,9.190544e-7,6.122406e-7,0.000002530483,0.000006800683],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7491434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.236189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503493334","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013053","title":"Demystifying the Trans-Pacific Partnership: An American and Canadian Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","authors":[{"name":"Ryan Brady","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Kiselbach","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alizee Bilbey","is_ca":false},{"name":"William E. Perry","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02365661709021259,"gpt":0.2978003832037697,"spread":0.2741437661135571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002709147,0.00009384208,0.0001089626,0.0000300276,0.001301191,0.0004323425,0.0001637404,0.00004946758,0.00007232435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004880504,0.00007162101,0.00003774219,0.0002305361,0.0007508255,0.0003589971,0.000003959265,0.0002301773,0.000005659432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003221044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000472418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8561489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8853738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989292,0.000159034,0.0001036782,0.0001421812,0.0001873171,0.0004785595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988272,0.00003035548,0.00006215506,0.00006721619,0.00003183463,0.0009812554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002988773,0.00005507092,0.03843006,0.000007683585,0.0001391231,0.00009729306,0.1584576,0.00001104231,0.00002983287,0.4371344,0.1053881,0.2602199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002684691,0.0001088556,0.2837971,0.00001843809,0.00003470375,0.0003076532,0.1403696,0.00003462057,0.000001510647,0.01924714,0.5555657,0.0002461023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6860465,0.001539613,0.00001739926,0.265256,0.0001367356,0.0002122265,0.00007758995,0.00001925711,0.04669468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963653,0.0005545094,0.00002918397,0.002430934,0.0004073375,0.000003567046,2.557349e-7,0.00000430383,0.0002046072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4501776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215259119","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011041","title":"Customs Audits, Verifications and Voluntary Disclosures in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Agency (philosophy); Business; Officer; Accounting; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Government (linguistics); Revenue; Finance; Political science; Law; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Dalton J. Albrecht","is_ca":false},{"name":"Daniel Kiselbach","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02202978032222933,"gpt":0.2420849397973127,"spread":0.2200551594750833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001606611,0.00007781586,0.0001039044,0.00002400004,0.0003557533,0.00004759791,0.0001299213,0.00004605707,0.00008231375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003801215,0.00007443824,0.00002100947,0.0001757802,0.0001745925,0.0001997858,0.000008924058,0.0001704125,0.000001901484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004170708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001328433,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991596,0.00006530417,0.0001556498,0.0001172416,0.0001946084,0.0003075828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.0000168145,0.00007022182,0.00006003329,0.00001106741,0.0003413997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004611044,0.0000517735,0.6764687,0.00001266235,0.00003461008,0.0002706376,0.01079982,0.000003914257,0.00001038889,0.08612419,0.1757756,0.05040159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002009652,0.00001136915,0.7764794,0.00001549748,0.00000964345,0.0000784119,0.002124702,0.000006001353,0.000003304665,0.002015913,0.2189553,0.00009950063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654971,0.002187011,0.00001236031,0.01230113,0.0003156136,0.00008461407,0.0002259731,0.000007372254,0.01936886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973743,0.0009923748,0.00004263064,0.001178613,0.0001831936,0.000001814835,6.675778e-7,0.000003008907,0.00022338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1000107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3035503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340614765","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016029","title":"Trans-Pacific Partnership: Key Takeaways on Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); General partnership; Business; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false},{"name":"Leslie C. Milton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02160176687289279,"gpt":0.2596199635681542,"spread":0.2380181966952614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002280392,0.0001010068,0.0001172214,0.00001651546,0.0005267395,0.00008637751,0.000166067,0.00007154971,0.0001648424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000606968,0.00007184639,0.00005513824,0.0001370864,0.0001905805,0.0001484754,0.000003294804,0.0001304585,0.000007255307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004791386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001143512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4122895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9123735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987485,0.00008967568,0.0001456029,0.0001367043,0.0004123605,0.0004671689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992083,0.0000491863,0.00006973024,0.00007425954,0.00001546452,0.0005830489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005815216,0.00002358782,0.002889229,0.000003941231,0.00002939795,0.0002064184,0.001795901,0.000001806618,0.0000345849,0.1101378,0.8028194,0.08199979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000388932,0.00003666487,0.01369278,0.00004280721,0.000008979505,0.00007261681,0.0006223858,3.96064e-7,0.00001329377,0.002369977,0.982627,0.0001241812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2517202,0.001403095,0.00009262774,0.4313577,0.001205275,0.0001997361,0.0007356206,0.00004742797,0.3132383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992823,0.0006013336,0.000007422823,0.002853762,0.0006316904,0.000001154207,2.383593e-7,0.000004252538,0.003077115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7411028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320070132","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022038","title":"Binational Panel Review of Trade Remedies Determinations: Prospects for Exporting the USMCA’s Unique Procedure","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Duty; Treaty; International trade; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Panel data; Business; International economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"J. Anthony VanDuzer","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03879812744797095,"gpt":0.3274639800484329,"spread":0.288665852600462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001263861,0.0000664315,0.0001106823,0.00002593645,0.001222261,0.00004462422,0.0001855432,0.00002691396,0.00004694807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003804064,0.00005024967,0.00008665623,0.0001833562,0.0001059207,0.0001836845,0.00001963286,0.0001514398,1.965802e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001592059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003203936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002379554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006623271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987424,0.0001311272,0.0003174086,0.00009659757,0.000560523,0.0001519398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993916,0.00008207418,0.00034406,0.00003816459,0.00009557162,0.00004854223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005222373,0.0001839464,0.005735733,0.0005927373,0.00007518211,0.000009795287,0.005046761,0.00003841745,0.0000901901,0.935733,0.02634337,0.0260987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001552304,0.0006455427,0.08277456,0.002263515,0.0002462331,0.0008928365,0.01384907,0.0006653332,0.00020778,0.1259434,0.7704322,0.0005272596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2557043,0.07344681,0.001955866,0.6040364,0.003771946,0.006402863,0.0009626775,0.0002488859,0.05347029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946246,0.003077949,0.0002773075,0.001385084,0.0003188523,0.00007912434,0.00001360607,0.000004221606,0.0002192972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9400764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587869027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012033","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Mexico","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Law; Deference; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Gustavo A. Uruchurtu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02149216541023044,"gpt":0.3243113300247242,"spread":0.3028191646144937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007451903,0.00006427981,0.0001656218,0.00004648554,0.000229362,0.00003007787,0.0001189294,0.00004978533,0.0001636082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001797578,0.00006170291,0.00004309509,0.0005681968,0.0001505354,0.0004161375,0.00001385557,0.0001283359,0.000005577425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008652933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001109312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004229263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009738278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989371,0.0001640171,0.0002884109,0.00006507863,0.0002871467,0.0002582659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995898,0.00002657344,0.0001361733,0.00004700283,0.00003586072,0.0001645691],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005910107,0.000293139,0.6807892,0.0003438984,0.00003664816,0.00001963692,0.005069205,0.000004091048,0.0001213857,0.2704198,0.007660612,0.03523646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005592867,0.00002481116,0.6643311,0.002128912,0.0000808023,0.0001823153,0.00131621,0.000004461062,0.0001267576,0.001143301,0.3298652,0.000236814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6204168,0.1222366,0.0005212068,0.1562057,0.003014871,0.0008680735,0.00006873958,0.0001162109,0.09655184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865255,0.01223812,0.0001890841,0.0007264189,0.000302476,7.723204e-7,0.00000107871,0.000003819106,0.00001278416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3661086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2516172,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256013541","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020022","title":"Proving FTA Preferential Tariff Eligibility: The Evidentiary Burden in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Tariff; Agency (philosophy); Rules of origin; Burden of proof; Order (exchange); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; International trade; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Jean-Marc Clément","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02507047992846204,"gpt":0.275590819929398,"spread":0.250520340000936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002648337,0.00008326319,0.0001200206,0.000008841461,0.0003988941,0.0001756326,0.0002883344,0.00004544999,0.00009927497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001562581,0.00006518662,0.00003795736,0.0002102881,0.0001069431,0.0002081874,0.00003054562,0.0003186505,0.000002919464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005249257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002618313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987634,0.0001506214,0.0002008099,0.0001453366,0.0003867189,0.0003531159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994502,0.00003529706,0.00008641311,0.00006478248,0.00001410798,0.0003491939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001784931,0.00004677947,0.1032643,0.00006451709,0.000118347,0.0004668663,0.02368177,0.0002325684,0.00005801524,0.02088385,0.6776758,0.1733287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000522376,0.00002568906,0.1276559,0.00004509079,0.00002775314,0.0000578599,0.003995432,0.000141213,0.000005352743,0.001945135,0.8654003,0.00017788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7819427,0.002048163,0.00001098068,0.2107254,0.0003469925,0.0001919999,0.0001178079,0.000009964441,0.004605951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937357,0.0003317994,0.000006152481,0.00492788,0.0009033625,0.000001575753,6.242547e-7,0.000003005045,0.00008991931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.211793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4644775,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943319220","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019017","title":"The Effects of CETA on the Continuous Implementation of the Precautionary Principle within the European Union","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; European union; Negotiation; International trade; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criticism; Order (exchange); Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Biotechnology","authors":[{"name":"Martin Wolfgang Zankl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0101494258903735,"gpt":0.2900502765910667,"spread":0.2799008507006932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002237755,0.00005661175,0.00006353181,0.000007622667,0.0007391487,0.00006695742,0.0003121208,0.00001747663,0.00003204966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004085845,0.00002183978,0.00006710563,0.0001235008,0.0002332837,0.00006225811,0.00004834549,0.0001289407,0.000005852224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003957548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004662616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001244849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002614181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979472,0.001321116,0.0001838161,0.00006531803,0.0003632106,0.0001193129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994729,0.0001068015,0.0002314464,0.0001324076,0.00002645774,0.00002997621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006949882,0.0001545951,0.06805585,0.00004482798,0.0002158663,0.000003191961,0.03558704,0.0001726757,0.001222337,0.6264188,0.02220086,0.2458545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004947581,0.0001475784,0.8419209,0.00005562724,0.00004556916,0.000008378838,0.02771077,0.00001459709,0.0001471083,0.002295156,0.1271031,0.00005651949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617829,0.0001584258,0.00002537599,0.01353721,0.000619432,0.0004789057,0.000004068323,0.000006290455,0.0233874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987291,0.0004205536,0.00000404621,0.0002925177,0.00009192107,0.000002164573,3.286756e-7,0.000002537946,0.0004568971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.773865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5685009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964685619","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2019028","title":"The New NAFTA: A First Look","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Enforcement; Free trade agreement; International trade; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Control (management); Business; House of Representatives; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Law; Engineering; Management; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Gary Horlick","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02444598883753399,"gpt":0.1961351130697427,"spread":0.1716891242322087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003520544,0.0001728859,0.0002953974,0.00003505962,0.0003723606,0.0004352977,0.0003370434,0.0001079339,0.0002462506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002419373,0.000144654,0.0001633285,0.0001374924,0.00006531857,0.0003230793,0.00004888898,0.0002747425,0.001364956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004459146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006921254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006027477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986853,0.000008852933,0.0005242676,0.0002682009,0.00004371536,0.0004696541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991876,0.00003183488,0.0002525458,0.0002257509,0.000007627274,0.0002946313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008462788,0.0000645582,0.2085628,0.00001907019,0.0002151013,0.00002394601,0.0002395579,0.0001785148,0.000002757466,0.6740057,0.1035662,0.01303718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009158383,0.00008965882,0.04787075,0.00001341687,0.000006631452,0.000448479,0.0001852187,0.0002443959,0.000002560622,0.07631168,0.8737049,0.0002064586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412943,0.03812923,0.0005210183,0.03751038,0.004194736,0.0003860881,0.0001413493,0.00006900143,0.1777539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918038,0.004577786,0.0001756963,0.001085134,0.0004895809,0.000001861832,0.000001823612,0.00001361633,0.001850761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7701387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212860751","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011059","title":"Troubles along the U.S.-Canada Border","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Protectionism; Prime minister; Political science; Law; Political economy; International trade; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Greg Rushford","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02515425206961983,"gpt":0.2696481748517336,"spread":0.2444939227821138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002379859,0.00006689199,0.00007432521,0.000007104947,0.0007791152,0.00008607871,0.0002149129,0.00004123939,0.0002759799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004368024,0.00004689108,0.00003816422,0.0001334626,0.0002043577,0.0001451432,0.00001001228,0.0001542671,0.000003293385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001475211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009110638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9215655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838576,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991522,0.00006939844,0.0001170612,0.00007741593,0.0002679465,0.0003159062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995787,0.00002005195,0.00006890291,0.000064986,0.0000157064,0.0002516143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003574028,0.00002724727,0.02740828,0.000004142187,0.00006411986,0.0001696893,0.008580514,0.000001731754,0.000002035855,0.2684312,0.6056394,0.08963596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001427179,0.00001078551,0.1389574,0.000007884831,0.00001202524,0.0001119637,0.00173895,0.000001063757,0.000003037532,0.003420472,0.8555226,0.00007113393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5574178,0.006821874,0.00007598776,0.1215501,0.001512259,0.0002125895,0.0002117903,0.00003094224,0.3121666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931827,0.0004876566,0.00003352738,0.005023348,0.0004584266,9.7317e-7,1.413117e-7,0.000002697175,0.0008105883],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4357648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5992403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1023936531","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012035","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Thomas J. Trendl","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723967536101116,"gpt":0.3274331793685566,"spread":0.3001935040075454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103342,0.00005654064,0.0001144181,0.00004954258,0.0003084032,0.00004539677,0.0001622691,0.00003317814,0.00007649874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001528209,0.00004167094,0.00003254447,0.0009264242,0.0001714487,0.0002652326,0.000009645498,0.0001338288,0.000002807621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004658068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001499379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001006209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988948,0.0003105353,0.0002351155,0.00004833907,0.0002943957,0.0002168743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996426,0.00006037566,0.0001195839,0.00004914217,0.0000406014,0.00008773781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001103507,0.0005537322,0.3871419,0.0005305965,0.00007247341,0.00003538727,0.04063341,0.00003157436,0.00006064352,0.5246013,0.02153307,0.02479487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004049963,0.00002683146,0.4485067,0.001206678,0.00009078885,0.0001705683,0.00763071,0.00001272341,0.00002242824,0.001396433,0.540361,0.0001701567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277079,0.02505203,0.0001563916,0.1336454,0.0006429325,0.0004030496,0.00002987483,0.00003446795,0.01232796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802824,0.01746229,0.00006552171,0.001953151,0.0002239164,8.743227e-7,0.000003847635,0.000002737528,0.000005255407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5232049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2372019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W859336493","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012024","title":"Promises Are Meant to Be Kept: A Case Comment on <i>Attorney General of Canada v. United States Steel Corporation</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Settlement (finance); Law; Context (archaeology); Investment (military); Political science; Business; Finance; History","authors":[{"name":"Brian A. Facey","is_ca":false},{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02915245901821417,"gpt":0.2324291385944362,"spread":0.203276679576222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001913882,0.0001361034,0.0001371814,0.00007822299,0.0002287554,0.0001564002,0.00008719734,0.00002729152,0.0000864638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002256836,0.0001087968,0.00003692828,0.0001984909,0.00002940349,0.0004854871,0.00002887734,0.00009939347,0.000004646648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001236952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006038452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02356698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01453113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989901,0.00001753804,0.0003091913,0.00009607108,0.0003539298,0.0002332345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994382,0.0000110735,0.0002803763,0.00006403151,0.0001198944,0.00008640423],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002178772,0.000381823,0.01942917,0.00005980787,0.0001219971,0.0002441343,0.0002097088,0.001017815,0.0001363234,0.4089673,0.5688905,0.0003235476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000911944,0.00006200013,0.007896393,0.00005985887,0.00005181367,0.0004467485,0.001201363,0.001786801,0.0002232965,0.0006246663,0.9865115,0.0002236352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490903,0.00006443173,0.00006691187,0.03163623,0.0006432123,0.0002249982,0.0001043408,0.00001826471,0.0181513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.870396,0.000008542139,0.00008787101,0.1288161,0.0005513793,0.000004840661,0.00004714245,0.000006443252,0.00008170964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.417621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191445368","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012028","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"James McIlroy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01563390884689148,"gpt":0.2861446365416728,"spread":0.2705107276947813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004263299,0.00005501953,0.000144778,0.00002564701,0.0001925206,0.00001784015,0.0001051138,0.00002642629,0.0001463212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000125584,0.00005362838,0.00002400576,0.0004480616,0.0000755095,0.0002660021,0.00001032848,0.00010876,0.000001354158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003268959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008713324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1440961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4754249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990227,0.000121954,0.0002542602,0.00005343282,0.000302885,0.000244815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996168,0.00002484671,0.0001176311,0.00003893135,0.0000318282,0.0001699322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003258416,0.00009380643,0.8736106,0.000284523,0.00002710739,0.00002900568,0.001871426,0.000005510846,0.00004501919,0.08396856,0.009791922,0.03026926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002744676,0.000007580167,0.8174056,0.001081312,0.00004057425,0.0001037946,0.001336651,0.000003042272,0.00003835807,0.0002106283,0.1793532,0.0001447765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8393344,0.05151228,0.0000693503,0.07280155,0.001880805,0.0003649777,0.00004367276,0.000025623,0.03396735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913685,0.007505564,0.00007835139,0.0008058008,0.0002298,5.217469e-7,7.175274e-7,0.000002873721,0.000007832593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3313287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8616034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1229773905","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012029","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; China; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Pu Lingchen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02137559777398961,"gpt":0.305536707373042,"spread":0.2841611095990524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111226,0.00007621427,0.0002060913,0.00003874206,0.0002158743,0.00003295983,0.0001348436,0.00005376282,0.0001732799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001771896,0.00006881436,0.00004966842,0.0004964134,0.0001571144,0.0003626204,0.00001382919,0.000162087,0.000004226457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008068736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001630516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001130692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987208,0.0002135453,0.0002967865,0.00007286579,0.0003956085,0.0003003652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995797,0.00001431606,0.0001399153,0.00005045966,0.00002650475,0.0001891125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001585179,0.0002987407,0.707932,0.000462017,0.00006178853,0.0000217029,0.006226636,0.000005784977,0.0002218926,0.230863,0.009783803,0.04410685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003687634,0.00001594896,0.7735662,0.001501911,0.00004652451,0.00009638591,0.0005302645,7.409663e-7,0.00005678778,0.0006583523,0.2230082,0.0001499298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6054383,0.2096763,0.0002089716,0.09624191,0.002255148,0.0005529422,0.00002321168,0.00008373102,0.08551953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744113,0.02445568,0.00009620962,0.0005353338,0.0004864163,4.625789e-7,5.299614e-7,0.000004332383,0.000009729778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.368973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2806168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2856654253","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2018027","title":"The Unreliability of Merchandise Trade Statistics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; International trade; Official statistics; Economics; International economics; World trade; Business; Statistics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Tadashi Yasui","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04090929531177531,"gpt":0.2359491890343322,"spread":0.1950398937225569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070795,0.0001553411,0.0003304291,0.00003417924,0.0003990752,0.0001313402,0.000288226,0.00009945894,0.0000901508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009210792,0.0001291239,0.0001139349,0.0001523979,0.0004908702,0.0001734959,0.00003760714,0.0002046212,0.00006263767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001001503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003737872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005536626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004862537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.00002663673,0.0007603851,0.0002293648,0.00005360068,0.0003876487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991099,0.00005900385,0.0003797983,0.0002231743,0.00001967908,0.0002084668],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001571456,0.0001606143,0.08607628,0.00003323856,0.0002020736,0.00001026544,0.0004939208,0.00001639864,0.00001754615,0.8662375,0.02353125,0.02306382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001192932,0.0004616809,0.2636288,0.0000204156,0.00003542254,0.0002843647,0.000438962,0.0008386014,0.00007205205,0.4080804,0.3246161,0.0003302799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9270112,0.01259085,0.007401302,0.01047429,0.003209594,0.000350538,0.002573446,0.0000445045,0.03634428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966252,0.001825792,0.0008929645,0.0002831192,0.0003154147,0.000001837875,0.000003154373,0.000008966348,0.00004349732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.458157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5265521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924666097","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012027","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Brazil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Tribunal; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Carol Monteiro de Carvalho","is_ca":false},{"name":"Andrea Weiss Balassiano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03231256595847817,"gpt":0.3668339060110848,"spread":0.3345213400526067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005636052,0.0000673187,0.0001646082,0.00003655202,0.0002434616,0.00003916034,0.00007492789,0.00004739506,0.00008221319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001699525,0.00006404213,0.00002659718,0.0003886564,0.0002414602,0.0004185898,0.00001328913,0.000121022,0.00000157324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005187016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001313201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000349424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001530148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.0001562914,0.0002547204,0.00007265739,0.0002175495,0.0002104201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995883,0.0000376458,0.000132391,0.00003519217,0.00003384384,0.0001726608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001353465,0.0003269109,0.5983022,0.0004934639,0.00005156001,0.00003212276,0.009693949,7.488166e-7,0.0001812633,0.3460072,0.00271013,0.04218691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005162403,0.00004735174,0.9271331,0.001506094,0.0000677143,0.0002338623,0.00221215,0.000002298533,0.00008864101,0.0008968332,0.06710743,0.0001882351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8582511,0.04933485,0.00009997855,0.05761758,0.0006292412,0.0004069927,0.0000374656,0.00003348299,0.03358933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865906,0.01252105,0.000180988,0.0004861925,0.0002044333,8.137931e-7,7.820196e-7,0.00000310482,0.0000120159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3451104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219368199","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2013029","title":"The Landmark Decision in <i>Jockey Canada Company v. President of Canada Border Services Agency</i>: Lessons for Compliance with Canadian Customs Valuation Requirements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Tribunal; Business; Transfer pricing; Documentation; Database transaction; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Multinational corporation; Finance; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Laura J. Murray","is_ca":false},{"name":"Darrel H. Pearson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03224238979258095,"gpt":0.2677250847679954,"spread":0.2354826949754144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002685333,0.000146517,0.0001783712,0.00004480401,0.0004319669,0.0002696192,0.0003132094,0.00003648311,0.00003481011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004435776,0.0001009702,0.00002679028,0.0001572002,0.00006337254,0.000449305,0.00002544957,0.0001124387,0.000001129386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003619732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009291313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985311,0.00001485814,0.0003783014,0.0001606919,0.0005348747,0.0003801743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992486,0.00006334121,0.0002601338,0.0001075528,0.0002457457,0.00007464827],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004896742,0.0002057916,0.6918139,0.000595813,0.0004543791,0.00009571007,0.0002285896,0.007387189,0.00006551108,0.07213268,0.1701929,0.0563379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001282752,0.00002422102,0.8903382,0.0003196379,0.00005465479,0.000023421,0.0006088127,0.01139873,0.000007950724,0.009431342,0.08628673,0.0002235343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663295,0.001009328,0.00066136,0.0217388,0.001273942,0.0008455983,0.0001403765,0.00001124643,0.007989858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978773,0.00006762257,0.0001449703,0.00154478,0.0002508482,0.00001537886,0.00001835409,0.000008468589,0.00007229128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1985243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4117443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866314101","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012026","title":"Administrative and Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Measures in Australia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Judicial review; Dumping; Political science; Law; Deference; Jurisdiction; Business; International trade","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Moulis","is_ca":false},{"name":"Alistair Bridges","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07860839744239517,"gpt":0.3779738723010165,"spread":0.2993654748586213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008314865,0.00008376785,0.0002085329,0.00003154805,0.0001830852,0.00004264972,0.00008583816,0.00005976609,0.0001286854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001442807,0.00007615821,0.00003173135,0.0003341635,0.0002696028,0.0003588419,0.00001183239,0.0001546042,0.00000203826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005538737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001044851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001555473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002631501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988508,0.000207174,0.0002849712,0.00008451617,0.0003070123,0.0002655496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995444,0.00002371335,0.0001408088,0.00003853674,0.00003380554,0.0002186768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002349053,0.0002257615,0.7592181,0.0004454752,0.00007083579,0.00003016593,0.00648051,9.28121e-7,0.000259562,0.2181731,0.004425626,0.01064645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005204519,0.00005160304,0.8994456,0.001766412,0.00007916654,0.0001867058,0.001988666,3.719727e-7,0.0001478493,0.0008754677,0.09472977,0.0002079233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148463,0.0462807,0.00003967007,0.02709826,0.0006273207,0.0003259497,0.00002417351,0.00002527273,0.01073233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887007,0.01063959,0.0001110007,0.0002401941,0.0002849178,6.164935e-7,5.838693e-7,0.000003263282,0.00001909775],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2172976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3105642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548138422","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012032","title":"Judicial Review of Anti-dumping Determinations in Indonesia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Law; Political science; Deference; Jurisdiction; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Erry Bundjamin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02020546805075709,"gpt":0.3186842818616074,"spread":0.2984788138108503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000695738,0.0000644343,0.0001668477,0.00005132674,0.0002232746,0.0000299018,0.0001158057,0.00005270597,0.00009991329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001168048,0.00006218236,0.00003995931,0.0006174382,0.0001464021,0.0004172505,0.00001338233,0.0001321176,0.000004458595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008128791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001163168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004627604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007335471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989482,0.0001677211,0.000288605,0.00006393134,0.0002797001,0.0002518679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995959,0.00002535122,0.0001406569,0.00004552834,0.00003595736,0.0001565524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004443767,0.0001881721,0.8232016,0.0002589726,0.00002196912,0.00001525748,0.003164486,0.000001747809,0.0001007233,0.1465947,0.002071448,0.02437646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003375112,0.0000126039,0.936954,0.001118068,0.00004304607,0.0001163042,0.0006546556,0.000001601482,0.00004095057,0.0003626885,0.06023169,0.000126862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8989298,0.03801613,0.0001413986,0.04144089,0.0009536046,0.0003309388,0.00001467611,0.00003979723,0.0201328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988754,0.01022797,0.0001328199,0.0005476274,0.0003253881,8.481767e-7,8.02672e-7,0.000003806214,0.000006730768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1462321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2535723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299657596","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2016015","title":"Canadas Sanctions Regime Regarding Iran: How Much has Changed in a Post-Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Regulated Market?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Negotiation; Status quo; Action (physics); Political science; Action plan; Economic sanctions; Business; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics; Psychology; Management","authors":[{"name":"Clifford R. Sosnow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1064375102142402,"gpt":0.2385340721965104,"spread":0.1320965619822703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002185714,0.0001236262,0.0003006822,0.0002803046,0.0001834031,0.00007659829,0.00008771946,0.0001064275,0.0003453339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007673226,0.0001125212,0.0001123169,0.000190417,0.00008859146,0.0004293437,0.00001849927,0.0001635086,0.00001300409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004227762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005462366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005564757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009013564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989826,0.00002623504,0.0005110055,0.0002168142,0.00004846145,0.0002148986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992494,0.00004167157,0.0004238292,0.0001217265,0.00005309868,0.0001102724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001166538,0.0007469975,0.3359669,0.0001310815,0.002073577,0.0001269951,0.00225123,0.0004035186,0.007867939,0.4233777,0.1475985,0.07828902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002882656,0.0001795349,0.8588557,0.0002413096,0.00002560538,0.0007878013,0.001462115,0.0007964474,0.0001523761,0.02019842,0.1140868,0.0003312165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592637,0.001657934,0.001048433,0.02580432,0.0008898366,0.0001460106,0.0003454207,0.00001674043,0.01082756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980354,0.0009063084,0.0001453048,0.00013502,0.0001473156,0.000006122897,0.000005196102,0.00000894666,0.0006104418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5228889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4588482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534094088","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2010055","title":"An Overview of the Mexico-Brazil Strategic Agreement for Economic Integration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Negotiation; Globalization; International economics; Business; International free trade agreement; Framework agreement; Trade agreement; Economic integration; Market access; Goods and services; Trade in services; Trade barrier; Free trade; Economics; Economy; Political science; Market economy; Geography","authors":[{"name":"Turenna Ramirez","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09776617269052837,"gpt":0.2897151945702118,"spread":0.1919490218796834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004801088,0.0001580266,0.0003138192,0.00004214386,0.0001871553,0.0001595859,0.000348662,0.0001282882,0.0001815683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001058214,0.000132837,0.000205635,0.00006000445,0.00009355815,0.0003557305,0.00002200134,0.0002391275,0.00003014916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009420794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005463664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005604584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002341951,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988065,0.00001358868,0.0006495116,0.0002382227,0.00003016122,0.0002620579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991188,0.00001348612,0.000455786,0.0002497899,0.00001241758,0.0001497019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002829288,0.00008617272,0.01995601,0.00001945548,0.00005846253,5.568527e-7,0.00008740625,0.0001554102,0.0001734051,0.9749263,0.0008224829,0.003686086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00200635,0.0004022552,0.1019918,0.0000360662,0.00005133184,0.0002568577,0.0005647719,0.006290709,0.0005647683,0.8356527,0.05172661,0.00045576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826344,0.002072653,0.0003224245,0.002327519,0.001728341,0.0002415392,0.0005232649,0.00001024721,0.01013965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997964,0.0007858184,0.0005060695,0.0004360548,0.0002564242,0.000006602555,0.000007285608,0.000008933636,0.00002877636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1392736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5416934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318826069","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022045","title":"Sanctions or No Sanctions: Enforcing Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; International trade; Business; Free trade; Dispute resolution; Economics; International economics; Political science; Law","authors":[{"name":"Shiny Pradeep","is_ca":false},{"name":"A Achyuth","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02475872121222198,"gpt":0.3163132790680172,"spread":0.2915545578557951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005174347,0.0001021357,0.0001219837,0.00008933895,0.001797747,0.0001504681,0.0002854127,0.00004978345,0.002132668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001048789,0.00009273374,0.00007151301,0.0004855389,0.00009716339,0.00042814,0.00006581165,0.000393104,0.00001158395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004916087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002822332,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001682533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003594966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983895,0.0001796033,0.000284828,0.0001593374,0.0006174539,0.000369255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995858,0.00003720573,0.00009316389,0.00008529842,0.00002798689,0.0001705436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004398505,0.00101418,0.03781936,0.00002358991,0.0001938459,0.0003514011,0.008151828,0.001020388,0.000102559,0.7413127,0.171821,0.03774929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001032775,0.0001927592,0.02228557,0.00003067468,0.00002056213,0.0001813152,0.006460381,0.0000439123,0.000002710682,0.007565982,0.962032,0.0001513656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6130505,0.002824114,0.0004696187,0.08515117,0.01224199,0.00105839,0.00130019,0.0002115239,0.2836925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912007,0.0005459407,0.0002689961,0.00154119,0.0006954131,0.00003227478,0.000006918366,0.000007726593,0.005700869],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.790211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584115084","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2011063","title":"Canadian Transfer Pricing: Optimizing Canadian Expansion with a Unified Approach to Tax and Customs Transfer Pricing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transfer pricing; Internal revenue; Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax revenue; Economics; Investment (military); International economics; Foreign direct investment; Public economics; Finance; Economy; Macroeconomics; Service (business); Politics","authors":[{"name":"Darrel H. Pearson","is_ca":false},{"name":"Claire M.C. Kennedy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02731606779605138,"gpt":0.2326132024428399,"spread":0.2052971346467885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004523371,0.0002500865,0.0002798913,0.0002224297,0.00134423,0.000244606,0.0002586963,0.0002004061,0.00004914995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002140199,0.000222756,0.0000618423,0.00060965,0.0002163056,0.0003974362,0.000006210171,0.0003986572,0.000003570764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008868707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002379665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918602,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978009,0.0001129905,0.0002607077,0.0003514225,0.0003588833,0.00111505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965731,0.00001470194,0.00002966092,0.0001268002,0.00004784408,0.003207912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007622786,0.0002750237,0.02492119,0.0001746001,0.0005382085,0.001855197,0.5396581,0.0007594009,0.0002861058,0.2553879,0.02994741,0.1454346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004696104,0.0009245054,0.1400656,0.000728546,0.0004629893,0.003263643,0.05313837,0.0003180208,0.0002083859,0.001576172,0.7918388,0.002778857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8677325,0.0007933583,0.002915268,0.01431833,0.0002597919,0.0007600625,0.0003364367,0.00004345967,0.1128408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947678,0.0002358859,0.000759022,0.003655949,0.0002129764,0.000007467385,0.00000180769,0.00001910932,0.0003399644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7618914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595621542","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2012034","title":"Anti-dumping and Judicial Review in South Africa: An Urgent Need for Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dumping; Judicial review; Political science; Deference; Law; International trade; Business","authors":[{"name":"Gustav Brink","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08233373517147559,"gpt":0.332947398984342,"spread":0.2506136638128664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008458789,0.00009944785,0.0002102868,0.00004273326,0.0004159349,0.0000929715,0.00009834327,0.00006575225,0.00007015738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001481869,0.00009111042,0.00003725741,0.0003757499,0.0001121136,0.0005908339,0.00001591286,0.0001197425,0.000002287891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007199034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007844514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003718113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000775063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988763,0.0001349427,0.0002252876,0.0001201613,0.0002221561,0.0004211915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.00001818421,0.0001060251,0.00004975175,0.00002627346,0.0005497398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008141415,0.0006721835,0.4848998,0.0005020991,0.0001261799,0.00003998799,0.1649842,0.00000222776,0.0001592256,0.248053,0.009741118,0.09073846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001551931,0.0001050675,0.350059,0.0007800373,0.0001873607,0.0001150943,0.01024639,0.00001409644,0.00001381188,0.001036006,0.6353821,0.0005090964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293388,0.1651856,0.0001859955,0.09631648,0.002117869,0.001855129,0.00008597925,0.000127206,0.004786857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928566,0.004318068,0.0001924959,0.001463524,0.00114391,0.000006608177,0.000001950669,0.00000757767,0.000009322254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.625641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3715375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249955464","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2020023","title":"The New Paradigms for the Rule of Origin in México","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Rules of origin; Free trade agreement; General partnership; Negotiation; Treaty; Trade agreement; International economics; Business; Automotive industry; Free trade; Economics; Political science; Law; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Gustavo A. Uruchurtu","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07487154724626409,"gpt":0.2409737764715516,"spread":0.1661022292252875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003357725,0.0001125539,0.0002603035,0.00001845287,0.0001785098,0.0001315463,0.0003273891,0.00006457786,0.00002797813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005947676,0.00007882721,0.0001369678,0.0001578204,0.00007572176,0.0001410475,0.00002381228,0.0001811671,0.00002176363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005303944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004446989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007548711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003568861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989586,0.000008501303,0.0005503994,0.0001638798,0.00002916762,0.0002893971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993947,0.00007814897,0.0002464843,0.000112147,0.00000593705,0.0001625664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000210434,0.00005124454,0.1136933,0.0000240366,0.0001619571,0.000006319318,0.0008353426,0.0007848734,0.000007348658,0.8292112,0.02729203,0.02772198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001276764,0.0001151581,0.05617544,0.000008808457,0.00001309737,0.00005732193,0.0003546745,0.002224625,0.00001239764,0.07351009,0.8661162,0.0001354693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6495467,0.08203986,0.008090328,0.2368836,0.002317038,0.0009765112,0.0007378283,0.00003679772,0.01937132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993971,0.003793659,0.0002645372,0.00150987,0.0003890198,0.000004642809,0.000001573188,0.000008202926,0.00005753365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.321448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772339027","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2017055","title":"Trade from the Trenches: Negotiating in Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Mandate; Negotiation; Transparency (behavior); International trade; Curiosity; Globalization; Commission; Trade barrier; Investment (military); General partnership; Multilateral trade negotiations; Commercial policy; Business; Political science; Economics; International economics; Free trade; Law","authors":[{"name":"Eva Valle Lagares","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02496935044431364,"gpt":0.2669622107028202,"spread":0.2419928602585066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002971772,0.0001045132,0.00009581959,0.00002339653,0.0006724386,0.001911581,0.0003100087,0.00004271341,0.00005898123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002398989,0.00007094641,0.00004677144,0.00005572276,0.00007861913,0.002371479,0.00004757817,0.0002424215,0.00002861437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003509142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002076611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008720271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001451706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992211,0.00001847157,0.0002247071,0.000123783,0.0002438872,0.0001679961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994605,0.00004642009,0.0003343704,0.000119633,0.00002142579,0.00001768023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001129073,0.000205318,0.07528789,0.000009800826,0.0001220655,0.0001362212,0.0004180731,0.0001123213,0.0001057737,0.8747948,0.02939074,0.01930404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001161989,0.00001120341,0.4129636,0.00006602769,0.00006898385,0.00008305114,0.001598544,0.004312399,0.000005788726,0.01322127,0.5663394,0.0001677925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3588235,0.001103917,0.0001616324,0.1384435,0.001760043,0.0002073142,0.00001609156,0.00004240635,0.4994415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720675,0.00008499069,0.0001286629,0.0258614,0.001822098,0.000002225128,0.000005309093,0.000004848202,0.00002299119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8615736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}