{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":85,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":85,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"87ee249f5091","filters":{"venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics"}},"results":[{"id":"W2560622782","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.245","title":"Marginal contrasts and the Contrastivist Hypothesis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Categorical variable; Harmony (color); Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Physics; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02340768133540891,"gpt":0.3017850828069275,"spread":0.2783774014715186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009937283,0.0001282186,0.0003295367,0.0000795069,0.0001159409,0.00003973972,0.0002732762,0.00008954261,0.0002836337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003009215,0.00006178509,0.00009800724,0.00006956713,0.0007520767,0.00001078338,0.00004684992,0.0002556162,0.00003816142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002402792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008076272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003322672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001006787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986326,0.0002794715,0.00041018,0.0001300882,0.0002191478,0.0003285198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975325,0.001348737,0.0002621697,0.0001851785,0.0005202709,0.0001511034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02276323,0.0008606755,0.04399386,0.00005506258,0.003525216,0.002623606,0.006919246,0.00001035631,0.03302057,0.5183045,0.1475768,0.2203469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04572719,0.002291323,0.5138417,0.0002701496,0.0006792716,0.00399168,0.0003249437,0.0002291447,0.002874093,0.1778264,0.251094,0.0008500354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670705,0.004084643,0.003175792,0.003987945,0.00373104,0.0002005093,0.00008671776,0.00001175633,0.01765114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936333,0.0003354014,0.0009690913,0.0002966503,0.002282385,0.000003201013,2.528738e-7,0.00001482572,0.002464942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4698479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3602529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463662299","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.32","title":"Palatalization and glide strengthening as competing repair strategies: Evidence from Kirundi","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Linguistics; Consonant; Generative grammar; Focus (optics); Optimality theory; Phonology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04256086134269249,"gpt":0.3631895451208541,"spread":0.3206286837781616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006483544,0.0001448102,0.0002631759,0.0001147437,0.0001433976,0.00007547176,0.0002407308,0.0001324263,0.0003436453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003787662,0.0001042945,0.00008156973,0.0001075344,0.0001666697,0.00005754227,0.00008766973,0.0002555395,0.00003236594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004403513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001547939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004399826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008285471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.000196999,0.0005700178,0.0002178097,0.00026997,0.0003020462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977063,0.0009146277,0.0003931565,0.0002353754,0.0005782088,0.0001723542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003352161,0.0005939516,0.710486,0.0001795068,0.002404214,0.004023596,0.04502864,0.0009037249,0.09981142,0.09125691,0.01888273,0.02307714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01328627,0.007377608,0.6100383,0.007348514,0.001085095,0.001996418,0.008653078,0.005522916,0.01145694,0.2086715,0.1219074,0.002656017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899114,0.003120135,0.003190826,0.0001939837,0.001552759,0.00005964504,0.00003184255,0.00002381682,0.001915583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900671,0.0007123142,0.006634525,0.00006353495,0.002206977,0.000001350539,0.000003295348,0.00001933334,0.0002915864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1174145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4534459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467019534","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.8","title":"Consonant harmony in Nilotic: contrastive specifications and Stratal OT","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"City University of New York","keywords":"Harmony (color); Consonant; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07270491437609325,"gpt":0.3480863965020718,"spread":0.2753814821259786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004294494,0.0001122163,0.0002498793,0.0001617682,0.00005434546,0.00002536538,0.0001858671,0.0001000054,0.0002817276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001072637,0.00007688417,0.00004643786,0.0001033022,0.0003010207,0.00001563892,0.00003777895,0.0002856956,0.00003821501],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004385635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001369465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000456966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004360559,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987793,0.0001244024,0.0004735214,0.0001566608,0.0001613081,0.000304822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998678,0.0003418581,0.0001977437,0.000148901,0.0004639192,0.000169533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003726016,0.00231163,0.2353274,0.00005040705,0.001139391,0.005356664,0.01078962,0.00002693261,0.1560702,0.4240475,0.102759,0.05839526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007139078,0.00143612,0.8744503,0.0001675727,0.00009149772,0.0009156775,0.0004266064,0.00009182979,0.003484002,0.02912099,0.08224734,0.0004290231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859038,0.00204239,0.001397769,0.001321393,0.001852901,0.0001253469,0.0001832548,0.000006381457,0.007166735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959789,0.0003504056,0.001467003,0.0001066585,0.001072281,0.000002379387,0.0000017771,0.00001210515,0.00100849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6391228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3135245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944128077","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.681","title":"A target-oriented approach to neutrality in vowel harmony: Evidence from Hungarian","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Vowel harmony; Harmony (color); Neutrality; Vowel; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05087878242237353,"gpt":0.3540259186479447,"spread":0.3031471362255712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001088076,0.0001987791,0.0004933733,0.0002675971,0.00005235921,0.00004873241,0.000625375,0.0002117065,0.0004122567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001532023,0.0001819751,0.0001333419,0.0004050038,0.00007231224,0.00003091726,0.0001338939,0.000895264,0.0002257906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001074011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001971659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001607027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006054152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975849,0.0003584537,0.0007548371,0.0003595033,0.0003998896,0.0005423739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980609,0.0002442653,0.0002751288,0.0004764595,0.0006174057,0.0003258052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00702508,0.00315411,0.7511528,0.0001351429,0.001055417,0.001488046,0.07167652,0.006421555,0.05910043,0.01567479,0.08076499,0.002351079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003596887,0.001447763,0.9344752,0.0002597593,0.00008730291,0.0001046182,0.0005718706,0.003195654,0.002438498,0.007392758,0.04578302,0.000646649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985361,0.001214036,0.001888172,0.000383414,0.004261384,0.0002633238,0.00006628137,0.00001011188,0.006552286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767861,0.00004154662,0.01974636,0.0004952457,0.001729956,0.000006147701,0.00001187709,0.00002489748,0.001157901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1833224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7420731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760246646","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.310","title":"Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Vlaamse regering; Universitetet i Oslo; KU Leuven; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; University of Cambridge; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Genitive case; Dative case; Linguistics; Varieties of English; Variation (astronomy); Syntax; British English; Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Noun","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04629494444331173,"gpt":0.3802781662875881,"spread":0.3339832218442764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247896,0.00007973472,0.0002599658,0.0001186927,0.0002672286,0.00008169188,0.0003014747,0.00006591136,0.00001789972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03212366,0.00006266134,0.00003836581,0.00007685123,0.0005585332,0.00005900376,0.00006024937,0.0002483025,4.896142e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001471331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003012203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005182729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005022174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.0002930158,0.0003761391,0.0001012397,0.0002613042,0.0001452865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961994,0.0003234181,0.0007067327,0.0001091133,0.002616915,0.00004436683],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485628,0.00009556975,0.03039023,0.000005632854,0.00005403854,0.00005977256,0.2482326,0.0001222119,0.00004986077,0.7204487,0.0001946195,0.0001981764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006005826,0.0007278768,0.487045,0.0003352143,0.0002297857,0.00002271695,0.2054396,0.002083419,0.001338975,0.2356524,0.06049567,0.0006234416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657098,0.0004843218,0.0004363398,0.0007168596,0.003487706,0.0002786242,0.00004316546,0.000005043832,0.1288382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961904,0.0002186367,0.001369365,0.00006432889,0.00200456,0.000001582876,9.587368e-7,0.000003677071,0.0001465017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4847963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209076702","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5886","title":"Towards a complete Logical Phonology model of intrasegmental changes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Feature (linguistics); Phonology; Voice; Variety (cybernetics); Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Concatenation (mathematics); Reciprocal; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Speech recognition; Arithmetic; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09918001637287548,"gpt":0.3668710476079664,"spread":0.2676910312350909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003934138,0.0001590426,0.0005199141,0.0001505728,0.00006211222,0.00001690258,0.0003589805,0.0002193308,0.000781819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000840195,0.000140149,0.0001562532,0.0001797597,0.0002931316,0.00000751087,0.0001641881,0.0005502457,0.00002120548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000498082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003149583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004245054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004228482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983054,0.0002063384,0.0005853547,0.0002002321,0.0002963801,0.0004063383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997992,0.0001080188,0.0003407675,0.0002651579,0.001113303,0.000180688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002949691,0.003954688,0.006418811,0.0001955003,0.002707911,0.006682206,0.01255209,0.004148349,0.737023,0.1413182,0.055974,0.0260755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03035119,0.01880696,0.07054123,0.0005384726,0.00179012,0.01496683,0.004262175,0.07391028,0.340841,0.2930326,0.1474799,0.003479217],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754307,0.003140678,0.005100762,0.0008446007,0.003398488,0.00008573798,0.0003300185,0.00001078969,0.01165822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792426,0.0003329918,0.01777181,0.0004513309,0.001516199,0.000002471733,0.00002055728,0.00001861325,0.0006434855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.396182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.856037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753230086","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.374","title":"Singular <i>they</i> and the syntactic representation of gender in English","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Gender Studies in Language","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coreference; Linguistics; Representation (politics); Grammar; Psychology; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Resolution (logic)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03185038810847642,"gpt":0.328382165924577,"spread":0.2965317778161006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131867,0.0001257577,0.000385283,0.00009666674,0.0006923843,0.000159957,0.000562694,0.00009708106,0.00001660862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03614601,0.0000955275,0.0001183806,0.0001013392,0.0008352814,0.00008517048,0.0001721278,0.0002431714,8.64129e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009532937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001835434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002940162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001087286,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979973,0.0003766232,0.000575636,0.000150334,0.0006267105,0.0002734058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971308,0.000380169,0.0009588045,0.0003677559,0.001068695,0.0000938481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000466084,0.0002223507,0.04291756,0.000101942,0.0004739477,0.0003872178,0.3125896,0.000480172,0.001958302,0.6337558,0.002827577,0.003819427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0210482,0.0006945406,0.2209737,0.0007794545,0.001936528,0.000169398,0.04841943,0.00194724,0.002620337,0.3883432,0.3111601,0.001907876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8728646,0.005138684,0.0003947231,0.0005523641,0.005226449,0.0003028868,0.00001197942,0.00001494382,0.1154934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921603,0.0009560894,0.00365235,0.00005617332,0.002922721,0.00000176213,6.292952e-7,0.00001206139,0.000237938],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3083325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9719729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804375619","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.536","title":"Quantity judgment and the mass-count distinction across languages: Advances, problems, and future directions for research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Semantics (computer science); Object (grammar); Task (project management); Linguistics; Cognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05445441781427459,"gpt":0.3467171222647719,"spread":0.2922627044504973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002076189,0.0001344025,0.0002456149,0.00007997406,0.001322333,0.0004042074,0.0001299873,0.00005898016,0.0000316194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003689472,0.00009000319,0.00006282763,0.00005606199,0.00079391,0.00006124956,0.00004943367,0.000271338,0.000002506271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007584607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000568273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005234486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003048184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.0001161997,0.0004683569,0.0001695272,0.0003671697,0.0002840149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962209,0.0003519927,0.0003507414,0.0001484272,0.002849646,0.00007824197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004842852,0.00009166991,0.0008852193,0.0002010404,0.0001439131,0.000007146649,0.04612085,0.00001289953,0.00007533755,0.9435747,0.001388511,0.007014479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00157198,0.0004347853,0.0005726424,0.00009321692,0.0001324379,0.00003059585,0.008379291,0.001469227,0.00007374096,0.1145545,0.8725303,0.0001572954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7624604,0.05058421,0.03065624,0.04752405,0.07278094,0.004317035,0.001809675,0.0002216019,0.02964581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305624,0.002041989,0.006913199,0.0001236474,0.05956386,0.0000178209,0.00001523821,0.0000280047,0.0007337821],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8711418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150141661","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1210","title":"How children attend to events before speaking: crosslinguistic evidence from the motion domain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Motion (physics); Psychology; Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Task (project management); Language production; Encoding (memory); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0240973930103329,"gpt":0.3147552563212715,"spread":0.2906578633109386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005250958,0.0002252252,0.0003178946,0.00008183818,0.0002886197,0.0002276038,0.0004444587,0.0001333478,0.0005700364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005583857,0.0001717621,0.0002069119,0.0003409129,0.00007082852,0.00004664971,0.00008237817,0.0003551959,0.00005758795],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001250579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001532335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003965057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005783408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979756,0.0002697135,0.0005854609,0.0003165934,0.0005101899,0.000342442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972032,0.0001590742,0.0004420944,0.0004847792,0.001510605,0.0002002722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004943835,0.0006606934,0.8610305,0.00003892235,0.0009792636,0.001349176,0.06914793,0.001130779,0.00587241,0.01468655,0.03149348,0.01311586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001075156,0.0002590813,0.9611375,0.0002406005,0.0003092215,0.0004851501,0.001750971,0.00004524655,0.0002403127,0.006971499,0.02714109,0.0003441726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668758,0.001931415,0.02323904,0.001043549,0.006042877,0.0001634216,0.0001402769,0.00002104413,0.000542598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725127,0.00005694214,0.006432435,0.0006573752,0.01844439,0.000002787534,0.0001007868,0.00003666335,0.001755963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.100107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7004257,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033642527","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.347","title":"Verum focus is verum, not focus: Cross-linguistic evidence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Connecticut; Jacobs Research Funds; University of Victoria","keywords":"Focus (optics); Linguistics; Stress (linguistics); Proposition; German; Perspective (graphical); Counterexample; Lexicon; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06642045611659168,"gpt":0.2945713908007315,"spread":0.2281509346841398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007458753,0.000460571,0.0007754614,0.000187514,0.0005364449,0.0007978841,0.0008093181,0.0001609578,0.001015756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03818708,0.0004313735,0.0004164892,0.0001381057,0.0003592039,0.0001288364,0.0001760962,0.0006958009,0.0002590179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001824328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000431491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004984679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001269192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960097,0.0001284394,0.001677066,0.0004443403,0.001120731,0.0006197273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928941,0.0005379518,0.001342109,0.0004062822,0.004342123,0.0004774659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001566546,0.0004051824,0.005761528,0.0005777908,0.0009208921,0.001673527,0.1194985,0.0008597,0.001046405,0.8402743,0.02281952,0.004596151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005803315,0.003887323,0.002438759,0.001948335,0.002384973,0.0002210697,0.002391068,0.02227048,0.01548009,0.3365188,0.6037155,0.002940302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.556637,0.01501075,0.03090522,0.1534178,0.1310459,0.002368581,0.002526857,0.0009886645,0.1070992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436726,0.000150473,0.005077566,0.00228895,0.04814199,0.000002526954,0.000005945668,0.0000800026,0.0005799588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.580896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998975,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519893348","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.37","title":"Ellipsis in appositives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Linguistics; Sentence; Ellipsis (linguistics); Prosody; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Direct speech; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02451957700352982,"gpt":0.248911389521155,"spread":0.2243918125176251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004730626,0.0001548376,0.0003044797,0.0002404335,0.0001007917,0.00009769954,0.0002167845,0.00005700056,0.0003054475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711914,0.0001057379,0.0001184955,0.00004417725,0.0001465588,0.00005157074,0.00003359824,0.0001442749,0.00004725162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001089295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001036514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001356741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003045339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984953,0.00007849751,0.0007224515,0.0001317172,0.0003176251,0.0002543615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979541,0.000237022,0.0004681353,0.0001443655,0.001103388,0.00009295416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001151156,0.0001760102,0.004531905,0.00002907539,0.0001028607,0.0001974748,0.01223962,0.00004817842,0.0009292491,0.975428,0.001333424,0.004869021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004652969,0.0009338408,0.006944654,0.001256588,0.0003703793,0.000116896,0.002981438,0.0007706862,0.004686253,0.6840837,0.2921326,0.001069962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8496586,0.0008966352,0.009844382,0.01335357,0.02679895,0.0003369776,0.0002010317,0.00007948332,0.09883033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808066,0.00008351037,0.003638232,0.0001427994,0.01362645,0.000001060181,0.000002049217,0.00002282245,0.001676442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2913444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022849971","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1000","title":"Gender diversity and morphosyntax: An account of singular <i>they</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Gender Studies in Language","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pronoun; Linguistics; sort; Diversity (politics); Transgender; Identity (music); Psychology; Grammatical gender; Sociology; Computer science; Gender studies; Philosophy; Noun","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04310161491276278,"gpt":0.2901693379297158,"spread":0.247067723016953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008889039,0.0001864178,0.0004388208,0.00008317619,0.0009637327,0.00005592902,0.0005598352,0.0001319246,0.0000674827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003793859,0.0001776499,0.0001370184,0.0002057805,0.0004136533,0.00008481555,0.0006235276,0.0002501323,0.000002913855],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001156939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000234949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001746793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002598966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978037,0.0002108111,0.0005092979,0.0002191962,0.0008960736,0.0003609564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997727,0.00009279536,0.0005339727,0.0001762992,0.001083074,0.0003868403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006023138,0.0007069695,0.07918311,0.0003464842,0.001367099,0.00172489,0.6707498,0.001346238,0.0321798,0.1899131,0.01682248,0.00505766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007751891,0.003572056,0.07802328,0.0003096524,0.002909063,0.0002164736,0.04620363,0.002556865,0.004672165,0.05373618,0.7967687,0.003280059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839095,0.003244894,0.001184885,0.0003362647,0.001525961,0.0001277591,0.00004765853,0.00002486329,0.009598239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831163,0.0005082863,0.01252486,0.0004393708,0.003328757,3.320775e-7,0.000002007555,0.00001634381,0.00006374297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.741235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798117238","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.359","title":"Quantity judgment studies in Yudja (Tupi): Acquisition and interpretation of nouns","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Interpretation (philosophy); Object (grammar); Linguistics; Proper noun; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05022592127506255,"gpt":0.3128694281162874,"spread":0.2626435068412248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006778137,0.0001331172,0.0003637892,0.0002319532,0.0001179543,0.00006307044,0.0001075894,0.00004676027,0.00005341155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003195036,0.0001178402,0.00006508716,0.00004951035,0.0003741555,0.00005948564,0.00004616871,0.0001297506,0.000004772337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009213378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000608386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002543349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001112345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985352,0.00008081045,0.0008232958,0.0001210485,0.0002870377,0.0001526722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967165,0.0001434753,0.0006982549,0.0001099765,0.002284219,0.00004760396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006075733,0.0004033329,0.0101616,0.0004303295,0.00046703,0.00007045407,0.1858527,0.0002529719,0.001159903,0.7970808,0.0011021,0.002411232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007040462,0.006874997,0.02021615,0.004331918,0.001515632,0.0001584692,0.04369931,0.05145517,0.009133271,0.8423857,0.0116921,0.001496836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987537,0.0007643796,0.001920768,0.0004721473,0.006740544,0.000114718,0.0000330688,0.00001017491,0.002407159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887083,0.0001770147,0.004598922,0.0001041886,0.006305445,9.303236e-7,0.000005010987,0.00001226744,0.00008792376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1421534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4805384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609464167","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.253","title":"Viewpoint phenomena in constructions and discourse","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; Perspective (graphical); Sentence; Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Deixis; Gesture; Context (archaeology); Pragmatics; Epistemology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02566091341833543,"gpt":0.3407968636596048,"spread":0.3151359502412693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003281011,0.0001045875,0.0002371328,0.0001089926,0.0001838036,0.00008468761,0.0001708176,0.00006543659,0.0001651871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007658502,0.00008647603,0.00006679715,0.00003520439,0.0002157148,0.00003754259,0.00003701755,0.0002565084,0.0000132766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002571092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000477494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008964557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008182692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991177,0.00006538969,0.0003874479,0.0001162273,0.0001302214,0.0001829827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998947,0.00003337559,0.0004413129,0.0002284123,0.0002432053,0.0001066895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007976581,0.001098926,0.06746765,0.0001057144,0.0007519733,0.0034145,0.01467972,0.00004955718,0.001873049,0.6613991,0.009833848,0.2385283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01996814,0.002028533,0.4517978,0.0008547518,0.001520708,0.005705271,0.01698717,0.0005408996,0.00118433,0.3053144,0.1922015,0.001896512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8994535,0.002667881,0.0006598698,0.0004556148,0.005548312,0.00009735737,0.00004300379,0.000007728038,0.09106676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913142,0.0001607929,0.002943902,0.0002270483,0.004461472,0.000002035043,0.000002635491,0.0000117905,0.0008761406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3843301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.352639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589817104","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.229","title":"Predicting prosodic structure by morphosyntactic category: A case study of Blackfoot","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Prosody; Phonology; Noun; Vowel; Phonotactics; Psychology; Morpheme; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03872694266672732,"gpt":0.3725825527730569,"spread":0.3338556101063296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005881749,0.0002055138,0.0004914796,0.000150498,0.0004501827,0.0001026739,0.0007136339,0.0001884766,0.0001829037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002052443,0.0001739109,0.00009846935,0.00008694868,0.0002424608,0.00003209064,0.0001622811,0.0008616659,0.000005046918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004606864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001765809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003912483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005007008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979752,0.0002132324,0.0007562501,0.0002382532,0.0004130985,0.0004039635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966246,0.0001229805,0.001311752,0.0007185458,0.001003597,0.0002184905],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001912315,0.004666203,0.7952031,0.0001948818,0.003029174,0.05714092,0.05534547,0.0003176228,0.03665788,0.0009777222,0.04071908,0.003835608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07832701,0.08049955,0.4432145,0.0008774424,0.007301435,0.1812975,0.08000581,0.009099866,0.04725302,0.03328157,0.03332595,0.005516345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994922,0.0006254355,0.0000291107,0.00005600508,0.002780264,0.0002446915,0.0001196602,0.000006879765,0.001215884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975851,0.00001990491,0.0003407568,0.00002873997,0.001549903,0.000003064527,0.000003234539,0.00002979112,0.0004395411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3519886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.709188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783124930","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.210","title":"Intonation, <i>yes</i> and <i>no</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intonation (linguistics); Polarity (international relations); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Preference; Prosody; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Chemistry; History; Statistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02273358692001928,"gpt":0.3181015431913301,"spread":0.2953679562713108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001928399,0.000546726,0.0008762387,0.0006398313,0.000568661,0.0002068056,0.001016025,0.0006400156,0.001770512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004023811,0.0005103799,0.0002775493,0.0005576195,0.001128475,0.00007500449,0.0003444912,0.0009473839,0.0007267671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005073029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001737117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002007196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951966,0.0005108382,0.001482669,0.000657557,0.000977437,0.001174919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926899,0.0004316633,0.0008624583,0.0008019379,0.004462134,0.0007518976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001696546,0.0011632,0.002548696,0.0001177339,0.00151745,0.001185828,0.006218985,0.00006547835,0.2788647,0.1652455,0.5316706,0.00970525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002847381,0.002058555,0.0216349,0.00009914883,0.0002179053,0.0007147189,0.00001947392,0.0009384554,0.001543533,0.01584607,0.9534322,0.0006476375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8463188,0.01494727,0.001748439,0.001073347,0.01616281,0.0004901934,0.0002735883,0.00008690819,0.1188987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557206,0.001625584,0.008729209,0.0008151578,0.01694948,0.0000145978,0.00004779016,0.0001201734,0.01597742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4217616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997348,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249407223","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.507","title":"Dispositional causation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Stuttgart; University of Toronto","keywords":"Animacy; Causation; Causative; Relation (database); Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Computer science; Verb","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02264340164887907,"gpt":0.3338646649625536,"spread":0.3112212633136746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003655797,0.00007089173,0.0001121633,0.00005727703,0.0001101538,0.00002322956,0.0001909271,0.00005656713,0.0008212769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007850172,0.0000559787,0.000066628,0.0001335865,0.0003186971,0.00002043275,0.00002166235,0.0001400134,0.0001510748],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003051146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004447293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005950557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001398428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991221,0.00006368593,0.0002961957,0.00009305417,0.0002516851,0.000173312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988479,0.0000649179,0.0001833861,0.0001068685,0.0006643385,0.0001325797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001038798,0.00007830526,0.0003706863,0.000001334829,0.00002573499,0.0000568382,0.0002810321,0.000005980412,0.0006554042,0.9945511,0.002857089,0.001012613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070163,0.001086683,0.01544635,0.0000347335,0.0000705028,0.0003101312,0.00003372117,0.0002711472,0.001732398,0.9318547,0.04826982,0.0001881355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3205048,0.0002425859,0.01486997,0.00065322,0.01059387,0.00006086782,0.00003605425,0.0000173177,0.6530213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831427,0.000003116888,0.004008831,0.0004620228,0.01201234,4.498592e-7,0.000002098323,0.00000529521,0.0003631327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6626378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8992406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808015381","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.172","title":"Prosodic focus in English vs. French: A scope account","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Romance languages; Scope (computer science); Phonology; Psychology; Contrast (vision); Prosody; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02889502719158425,"gpt":0.3442829844521869,"spread":0.3153879572606026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009451055,0.0001740122,0.0003770629,0.000337691,0.0000926152,0.00006345876,0.0005422745,0.0002194339,0.000667483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002597057,0.0001519723,0.0001000567,0.0003778514,0.0003152134,0.00002342137,0.0001035679,0.0007428108,0.0001243266],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008611841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003201275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003789897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002591051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980259,0.000167419,0.0006957486,0.0002231778,0.0003346462,0.0005531319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972733,0.0001099606,0.0003091482,0.0003246186,0.001789059,0.0001939425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003961997,0.003454412,0.2632131,0.0001297211,0.001038293,0.006041626,0.07647219,0.0001010873,0.00948074,0.0311281,0.5745237,0.03045496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01158603,0.01038572,0.3948062,0.0004898026,0.0002119059,0.0008200048,0.0005437087,0.0005393475,0.00978413,0.06281317,0.5066733,0.001346622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374947,0.003049201,0.0002064113,0.0001911203,0.009612584,0.0001818983,0.00002870285,0.00001838531,0.04921697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855601,0.0001356196,0.002476569,0.0002235479,0.01038767,0.000005228618,0.000002098201,0.00002466415,0.001184519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1315931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7308471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789924889","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.223","title":"Unergatives are different: Two types of transitivity in Samoan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ergative case; Samoan; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Verb; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Combinatorics; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02817203735120414,"gpt":0.2662798736513843,"spread":0.2381078363001802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003735904,0.0001735762,0.0004646289,0.0002204786,0.0001152371,0.00006044383,0.0001927818,0.00005133689,0.0002223657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002748354,0.0001437134,0.0001230758,0.00006240104,0.0003451978,0.00003702057,0.00002735045,0.0002062696,0.000006355459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005767376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000734752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004284283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00421537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984665,0.0001211376,0.0007440139,0.0001298972,0.000325582,0.0002128489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972565,0.0001601151,0.0007374873,0.0001462484,0.00162634,0.00007333483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003809538,0.000673426,0.01999417,0.0001648721,0.0002864948,0.0001190344,0.07266264,0.0003177718,0.001778031,0.901661,0.0003955736,0.001565985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008289932,0.002959443,0.08658631,0.00227989,0.001046011,0.00007219799,0.01074133,0.01234638,0.03118683,0.8191226,0.02376884,0.00160032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823419,0.000179408,0.001125646,0.0007248602,0.004678131,0.00008858432,0.00009610438,0.00001329195,0.01075201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865598,0.0000227738,0.001766765,0.00006721931,0.01131988,5.691608e-7,0.000005033708,0.00002019655,0.0002377676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08253853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5860461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786413672","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.397","title":"Modifying plurals, classifiers, and co-occurrence: The case of Korean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Morpheme; Linguistics; Feature (linguistics); Head (geology); Relation (database); Noun; Projection (relational algebra); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Philosophy; Algorithm; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04908450171320633,"gpt":0.2938472090552623,"spread":0.244762707342056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000691856,0.0001626346,0.0003070113,0.0001212788,0.0004631849,0.0001634511,0.0002050894,0.00005924353,0.0001097214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003800752,0.0001121864,0.00009391707,0.0000444092,0.0006031495,0.00003856888,0.00004824772,0.0002662762,0.000005276697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000383695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001243665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004250428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000363247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986013,0.00009014132,0.0007102391,0.0001280513,0.000252462,0.0002177998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967666,0.0002026502,0.0007890321,0.0001972303,0.001944535,0.0000999805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001253654,0.0001113591,0.001260238,0.0001154465,0.0002609537,0.0006118721,0.0480289,0.00003555312,0.000232275,0.9356127,0.01070982,0.002895561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005284313,0.003439063,0.0008717451,0.001050409,0.002382772,0.006459753,0.05600528,0.03816934,0.00625333,0.6006428,0.2777033,0.001737921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713906,0.0006192736,0.001473294,0.00243497,0.00984542,0.0002068442,0.0005366955,0.00002541366,0.01346748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842296,0.00005737435,0.002579848,0.0001330168,0.01281491,6.271733e-7,0.000009738879,0.00001365816,0.000161274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3349699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4574827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894518107","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.604","title":"Testing theories of temporal inferences: Evidence from child language","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council; Australian Research Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Ulster University; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Adverbial; Negation; Inference; Implicature; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pragmatics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03333674762600988,"gpt":0.3312136257922054,"spread":0.2978768781661955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000443997,0.0001533147,0.0003076207,0.0001130556,0.00009431482,0.00003602785,0.0003622361,0.0000924938,0.0007498118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006812601,0.000118174,0.00008337068,0.0002410098,0.0002340893,0.00004372027,0.00006206497,0.0002106219,0.00003133132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001950186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001530845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008301944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001113748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985934,0.0001007245,0.0006356806,0.0001456659,0.0002946638,0.0002298986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977678,0.0003447873,0.0006400255,0.0002116984,0.0009431178,0.00009256126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000840913,0.0003647346,0.8594102,0.00006545759,0.000621496,0.0006222371,0.08143181,0.000023509,0.004235892,0.01775151,0.0105842,0.02404801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009640904,0.006976458,0.7651187,0.005731001,0.001303723,0.0005431369,0.04445802,0.0005479643,0.02996785,0.09424108,0.03845184,0.003019288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.953627,0.003635984,0.001216013,0.00005817093,0.002871168,0.00006312679,0.00003492877,0.0000195593,0.038474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968043,0.00001596943,0.02745946,0.0001942133,0.004023823,8.399032e-7,0.000007554601,0.00001448057,0.0002406301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0942915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8209914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033057954","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.799","title":"Vestigial ergativity in Shughni: At the intersection of alignment, clitic doubling, and feature-driven movement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Clitic; Linguistics; Morpheme; Feature (linguistics); Affix; Agreement; Syntax; Object (grammar); Computer science; Subject (documents); Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03272423051575669,"gpt":0.252523523882549,"spread":0.2197992933667923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004687682,0.0001542693,0.0003099101,0.0000765334,0.0001421302,0.00009729373,0.0001588717,0.00005432346,0.00008487565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518249,0.0001170922,0.0000902246,0.00005683676,0.000202341,0.00003800889,0.00009854096,0.0002600123,0.000002810061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001906199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009817497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003684179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001245243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985222,0.0001054647,0.0006230786,0.0001479259,0.0004222999,0.0001790591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982868,0.0001440145,0.0006458951,0.0001125551,0.000712082,0.00009864074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008027321,0.0003199823,0.02221362,0.0003247233,0.0004321756,0.0001246853,0.1118001,0.003151888,0.004642874,0.8482065,0.006869571,0.001111208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01911684,0.007922741,0.03357188,0.00217403,0.002643058,0.0001729465,0.02755263,0.09818392,0.0309277,0.5467955,0.2281935,0.002745257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827016,0.0002686542,0.0009214145,0.007370261,0.004094492,0.000222775,0.00007582224,0.0000134583,0.004331513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917064,0.00003374891,0.001540158,0.000498315,0.006014554,0.000001477819,0.00000687692,0.00001600257,0.0001824348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.301411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4774881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951392685","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.650","title":"Sound change and coarticulatory variability involving English /ɹ/","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sound change; Coarticulation; Variation (astronomy); Phonotactics; Obstruent; Consonant; American English; Covert; Vocal tract; Phonation; Audiology; Psychology; Vowel; Acoustics; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Computer science; Phonology; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04970588550776505,"gpt":0.3295578075410565,"spread":0.2798519220332914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052703,0.0001267346,0.0002985981,0.0001089161,0.00006966026,0.00004589706,0.000202302,0.0001620727,0.000330203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001842062,0.0001140768,0.00007461392,0.0001108641,0.0001412751,0.00002676159,0.00009845703,0.0005010499,0.00003260112],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003396832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006878811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005372471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007375817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.0002255257,0.0004138592,0.0001871229,0.0002268156,0.0003325012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983589,0.0002655384,0.0002221291,0.0002752376,0.0006863342,0.0001918406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006059751,0.0006039719,0.8852515,0.0001662825,0.0005821381,0.0003909458,0.03436347,0.00004619109,0.008179839,0.06142422,0.00574738,0.002638147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005531176,0.002348772,0.8485914,0.0001440715,0.0002810576,0.0004303801,0.001199081,0.001671698,0.000943201,0.06683909,0.07114391,0.0008760917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855875,0.002055573,0.00005230488,0.00004601596,0.005658917,0.0001318648,0.00001688646,0.000009916747,0.006441019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946619,0.0000763274,0.000974636,0.0002578206,0.003777149,0.000002744461,0.000002238916,0.00001675462,0.0002304425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06539652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4651915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480725665","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.129","title":"Velar palatalization in Slovenian: Local and long-distance interactions in a derived environment effect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obstruent; Consonant cluster; Consonant; Linguistics; Mathematics; Suffix; Variation (astronomy); Computer science; Voice; Speech recognition; Physics; Vowel; Astrophysics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01643187513234905,"gpt":0.32119999492894,"spread":0.3047681197965909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004051987,0.0001052922,0.0002202188,0.0001873118,0.00002839819,0.00001348398,0.0001160306,0.00007506368,0.0001506064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004369015,0.00007861642,0.00003778288,0.00009626689,0.0001385782,0.0000204787,0.00004317927,0.000262725,0.0000219819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001288766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003395972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005952887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002653988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988732,0.0002112286,0.0003993154,0.0001479928,0.0001346808,0.000233609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993572,0.0002035463,0.000151741,0.0001316277,0.00006623598,0.00008962114],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002594928,0.0007521319,0.9039209,0.00006817625,0.0002254003,0.003080001,0.004358258,0.001024498,0.0319025,0.004778195,0.001430701,0.04586427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005151803,0.0008987531,0.9734563,0.0002932589,0.00003688048,0.0003342777,0.00006480466,0.001001421,0.002574485,0.002844353,0.01308427,0.0002594014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743022,0.001101528,0.02312174,0.0001744113,0.0008345569,0.00009641713,0.00001688186,0.000002573451,0.0003497275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998665,0.0003054825,0.000449721,0.00003457244,0.000289707,0.000004550744,0.000002551046,0.00001162917,0.0002368046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06953534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3205884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188140164","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5774","title":"Learning Island-insensitivity from the input: A corpus analysis of child- and youth-directed text in Norwegian","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Filler (materials); Grammar; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Engineering","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01646052534428852,"gpt":0.2265914966282405,"spread":0.210130971283952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005420506,0.0001655224,0.0005774536,0.0002322679,0.0002188793,0.0001581573,0.0001300959,0.0000692614,0.0001140182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008636445,0.0001307966,0.0001794261,0.000256099,0.0001477779,0.00002572483,0.00006796824,0.0004240798,0.00000148297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004655768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001142409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002793232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01646742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982527,0.0002965323,0.0007438011,0.0001775293,0.000339362,0.0001900704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971089,0.0004469173,0.000728526,0.0001850719,0.001463215,0.0000673648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005809452,0.0008729181,0.2355373,0.00009738986,0.007340412,0.001049832,0.5857333,0.01405068,0.001045722,0.1469495,0.0005268112,0.006215188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009653567,0.00126675,0.5802991,0.002337191,0.02563926,0.0002825832,0.08732884,0.19157,0.002778058,0.05802276,0.03826721,0.002554704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912026,0.0006401839,0.0003509869,0.001314103,0.001697602,0.00006094394,0.0003407072,0.00001585642,0.004377009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948548,0.0001429415,0.000928304,0.0002212493,0.003619477,2.949431e-7,0.00009307753,0.0000165754,0.0001232523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4984045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959827199","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.752","title":"Classifiers, partitions, and measurements: Exploring the syntax and semantics of sortal classifiers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Numeral system; Noun; Artificial intelligence; Classifier (UML); Natural language processing; Computer science; Denotation (semiotics); Syntax; Mathematics; Measure (data warehouse); Linguistics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Data mining; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07699053832954611,"gpt":0.2525525400710165,"spread":0.1755620017414704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692371,0.0001783454,0.0003536694,0.0001108784,0.0002406958,0.0001552305,0.0001583035,0.000051266,0.000113776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002129828,0.0001339434,0.00008995435,0.00004554976,0.0002960404,0.00008198204,0.00007100143,0.0002532169,0.000006494402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004639806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007820028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001216301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001566124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983562,0.00008796209,0.0007151379,0.0001516343,0.0004679988,0.0002211108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979704,0.0001817471,0.0006487232,0.0001939479,0.0009054742,0.00009968851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002257622,0.0002367671,0.06915726,0.0004541451,0.0009516554,0.0000493565,0.03424029,0.0005182092,0.002012121,0.8860018,0.003753054,0.002399554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0113146,0.003955815,0.06461395,0.003673586,0.006232929,0.0005885977,0.07844034,0.01843031,0.00946437,0.521451,0.2783753,0.003459223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852703,0.0004892076,0.0003621966,0.001956263,0.006186043,0.0001935898,0.00004317498,0.00001423817,0.005485015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942732,0.0002394749,0.002114397,0.0001094291,0.002940858,0.00000220601,0.000003864115,0.00002320662,0.0002933185],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3645508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5462053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943533753","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.363","title":"Second-language processing of English mass-count nouns by native-speakers of Korean","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Linguistics; Noun; Syntax; Grammar; English grammar; Computer science; Proper noun; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01548339178893281,"gpt":0.2499640056197853,"spread":0.2344806138308525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006839166,0.0002258818,0.0005362689,0.0002159582,0.0001735022,0.0001074433,0.0003315465,0.00009027089,0.0006128454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007854795,0.000201734,0.0001635035,0.00008508194,0.000523574,0.00007609675,0.00003775262,0.000253713,0.000004046637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009078319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002471293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000303426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976991,0.00006631312,0.001188982,0.0001717369,0.0005955709,0.0002783363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989091,0.0001289915,0.001743477,0.0002013522,0.008731289,0.0001039152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006155102,0.0008769769,0.002669566,0.001110261,0.000976842,0.0000992954,0.6467277,0.00009622015,0.0213616,0.3035634,0.01837054,0.003532172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01025137,0.007010448,0.00121273,0.003454817,0.002655538,0.00007352413,0.09580502,0.01268069,0.2554172,0.1194165,0.488968,0.00305417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.877254,0.001382138,0.003167251,0.0002296411,0.01433315,0.0002635202,0.0008168363,0.00004690758,0.1025065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733299,0.00001861634,0.007091141,0.00008646971,0.01859776,7.472769e-7,0.00002380002,0.00003761667,0.0008139585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5509226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114358815","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1012","title":"Singular <i>they</i> in context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Linguistic research and analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referent; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Context (archaeology); Deixis; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Philosophy; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03682614712168602,"gpt":0.264994145037252,"spread":0.228167997915566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006198534,0.0002499633,0.0006290944,0.0002612778,0.0002252997,0.0003220678,0.0005001132,0.00007676833,0.0006411428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009121868,0.0002050101,0.0003177715,0.0001364918,0.0002355399,0.00005580895,0.00009481345,0.0004708224,0.00007700967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008848466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002901938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007002059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006636436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973675,0.0001494834,0.001027106,0.0002280754,0.0007409111,0.0004869405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970234,0.0001559112,0.0004471983,0.0001931536,0.001737865,0.000442457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004709861,0.000398307,0.00097721,0.0001742324,0.0005768256,0.002863973,0.04700433,0.0009199987,0.003994316,0.8922957,0.04563075,0.004693381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001182291,0.0004818878,0.00006614579,0.0001141768,0.0001363371,0.00001509936,0.0005044717,0.003748185,0.0002756645,0.01733279,0.9758348,0.0003081896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8509934,0.01073156,0.00113516,0.003202753,0.004365409,0.0003817131,0.0002325595,0.00008712916,0.1288703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799453,0.0002321589,0.001176816,0.001019809,0.01590723,0.000001479141,0.00001319463,0.00003346068,0.001670571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.930204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600820115","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.51","title":"Nominalizations and the structure of progressives in Chuj Mayan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalization; Linguistics; Verb; Ergative case; Predicate (mathematical logic); Computer science; Noun; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02009146091078935,"gpt":0.2668592844712938,"spread":0.2467678235605045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002977806,0.0001064697,0.000286129,0.00009315536,0.0003668805,0.0002558323,0.0002929503,0.00004166926,0.00006182191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006792133,0.00007010675,0.00005996292,0.00001549392,0.0006088117,0.00004127718,0.00006055961,0.0001614893,5.121967e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001867429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006983408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003449159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009959897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990046,0.00005890493,0.0005278732,0.00008068667,0.0002047038,0.0001232238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976006,0.0001076835,0.001099863,0.0002194177,0.0009326372,0.00003984493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001099274,0.00004134077,0.008877849,0.00005135072,0.00007022591,0.00002293705,0.02044406,0.00008741796,0.00007920193,0.9695322,0.00008685476,0.000596655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007090176,0.0003483766,0.03313264,0.0006329112,0.0006492046,0.00009997765,0.004639401,0.008030673,0.001260962,0.9235766,0.02005548,0.0004835909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783049,0.001097743,0.0003592003,0.005118111,0.005748469,0.0002949547,0.0001354187,0.000008341218,0.008932905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923863,0.00005397117,0.002663088,0.000041116,0.00464099,4.264728e-7,0.00000335711,0.00001124368,0.0001995334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04595558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8131308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965894473","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.834","title":"A syntax for semantic incorporation: generating low-scope indefinite objects in Inuktitut","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Locative case; Syntax; Linguistics; Scope (computer science); Noun; Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Range (aeronautics); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02339427309747863,"gpt":0.2482619536173447,"spread":0.2248676805198661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009827036,0.000286618,0.0005960598,0.000409375,0.0002198587,0.0003577857,0.000301967,0.0001284202,0.0002057632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005177177,0.0002716781,0.0001840924,0.0001191391,0.00008850537,0.0001178038,0.00006240481,0.0003639718,0.00005358927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001835104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004397907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002473526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001220035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974214,0.00009784096,0.001346921,0.0002654469,0.0004756848,0.000392686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996222,0.0003104234,0.001152176,0.0002626288,0.001939396,0.0001134105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004421727,0.0005113975,0.009189487,0.0008480324,0.0003183596,0.0002475705,0.03920003,0.01607958,0.003094637,0.9268443,0.001483479,0.001740963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02244654,0.005318779,0.003426058,0.006319861,0.001465661,0.0004249463,0.01228855,0.2783505,0.008857849,0.5526932,0.1035308,0.004877166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616792,0.0005102873,0.004285912,0.0008692023,0.01803711,0.0008224088,0.000108058,0.00004703663,0.01364084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964384,0.00003045298,0.02050147,0.0003772086,0.01387676,0.000008953695,0.00004015586,0.00005138556,0.0007295919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.374151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172611571","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1413","title":"Gradience in prosodic representation: vowel reduction and neoclassical elements in Brazilian Portuguese","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Raising (metalworking); Brazilian Portuguese; Portuguese; Vowel; Psycholinguistics; Phonology; Word (group theory); Grammar; Computer science; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03688025877764333,"gpt":0.3756619949377982,"spread":0.3387817361601549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006059323,0.00009440279,0.0002286679,0.0002063951,0.00003831024,0.00002807037,0.0001334556,0.0001053836,0.00007257611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001608221,0.00009361006,0.00004045255,0.0004019224,0.000141802,0.00003119645,0.00006061086,0.00048924,0.000005782638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006310443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001870993,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001353628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001013763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983841,0.0002391494,0.0006267168,0.0002213286,0.0002460202,0.0002826482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989814,0.00006844236,0.0001875983,0.000171604,0.0004651772,0.0001258212],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002931082,0.004292988,0.6785902,0.0001217567,0.0004250514,0.04013434,0.04294369,0.0006708356,0.06322274,0.02848888,0.02945302,0.1087254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003795104,0.0006953506,0.9556583,0.0001256713,0.00003898428,0.002636217,0.001521781,0.0007717047,0.001855215,0.0237341,0.008890566,0.0002769819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912493,0.002750484,0.0000493348,0.0006474652,0.001837733,0.00008205242,0.000006970499,0.000003068991,0.003373545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935455,0.0006135177,0.003995396,0.0001328665,0.0009480804,0.000004153387,0.000007585694,0.000009451825,0.0007434564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2770681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3817307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186213131","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5780","title":"Long-distance phonological processes as tier-based strictly local functions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phonology; Class (philosophy); Computation; Modulo; Computer science; Function (biology); Characterization (materials science); Linguistics; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Philosophy; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03705028880735352,"gpt":0.3477308094970272,"spread":0.3106805206896737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003276979,0.0002010186,0.0003878288,0.0001543294,0.0001888516,0.00007226098,0.0003749013,0.0002657044,0.001708128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003531651,0.0001756966,0.0001580245,0.0006296337,0.0003126202,0.00001712705,0.00006775072,0.0008346317,0.0002209616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009321476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001367793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004701076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008964934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979613,0.0002082078,0.000622384,0.0002907466,0.000415213,0.0005021791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960226,0.0003111837,0.0003056427,0.000332897,0.002747684,0.000279979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0122147,0.01770809,0.1333702,0.00108823,0.005051525,0.08283598,0.006746737,0.02655766,0.01235972,0.08825638,0.5558356,0.05797514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009800287,0.006620263,0.08136307,0.0003223171,0.0006883856,0.004880853,0.00158671,0.001800854,0.02275121,0.02402333,0.844578,0.001584665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7799203,0.01874722,0.1395816,0.001164631,0.011639,0.0002229782,0.0002494644,0.00007420145,0.04840061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989557,0.0001638954,0.002445342,0.0006463252,0.002240741,0.000005901578,0.00003086386,0.00002502698,0.004884913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2887424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162102619","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1116","title":"Towards a non-arbitrary account of affricates and affrication","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obstruent; Linguistics; Vowel; Phonology; Representation (politics); Element (criminal law); Psychology; Government (linguistics); Theoretical linguistics; Mathematics; Political science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02674874556465335,"gpt":0.3439067600519894,"spread":0.3171580144873361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003839568,0.000104398,0.0002971879,0.0001290689,0.00004961434,0.00002457075,0.0001949419,0.0001245499,0.0001709013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008188196,0.00009311159,0.00008451792,0.0002239001,0.0001294979,0.00001424344,0.00007964104,0.0003149116,0.000008904322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002321202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006062449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000629462,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988526,0.0000930762,0.0004675173,0.0001416714,0.0002304677,0.0002147313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980568,0.0001072626,0.0003079293,0.0002143371,0.001192996,0.0001206219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003180618,0.00588404,0.1816175,0.0008614509,0.00465131,0.006231071,0.0476731,0.0003120682,0.3654451,0.1296787,0.1768233,0.07764175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005645391,0.002604086,0.6998728,0.0002709843,0.0005801503,0.002685942,0.001534187,0.001837592,0.09827933,0.08453692,0.101282,0.0008706491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709126,0.007185514,0.0007482618,0.0004200642,0.001507199,0.00006000226,0.00005288616,0.000004753649,0.01910866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882,0.0006019401,0.009555566,0.0001254656,0.001063351,0.000001722166,0.0000076474,0.00001339737,0.0004309113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5182553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.379698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803745119","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.409","title":"Individuals and non-individuals in cognition and semantics: The mass/count distinction and quantity representation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Cognition; Representation (politics); Sentence; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Noun phrase; Computer science; Natural language processing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03182613605008884,"gpt":0.3257323017146826,"spread":0.2939061656645938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062648,0.0001515612,0.000301321,0.0001142293,0.0001821068,0.000144709,0.0000753538,0.00007432711,0.00001958498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005678187,0.0001065989,0.00003219208,0.000132717,0.0002602757,0.0000795302,0.00009480578,0.0001947359,0.00000298167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002619775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003462687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001645914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005221125,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986492,0.00008725986,0.0005806162,0.0001620955,0.0003451965,0.0001755715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982196,0.0006958942,0.0003895749,0.00008935662,0.0005136027,0.00009194459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005200594,0.001227101,0.7994244,0.001315595,0.0009588208,0.0002921477,0.01645069,0.000004465435,0.008768113,0.1404591,0.008844126,0.02173535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001745507,0.0004286008,0.1958846,0.0005475365,0.0003269039,0.0002411946,0.0009298158,0.0005885137,0.004665991,0.7937694,0.0005773025,0.0002945873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928172,0.0001665937,0.004809905,0.000254006,0.0002408595,0.0002198053,0.0000249451,0.000007468188,0.001459167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701423,0.000218402,0.02872919,0.0001208698,0.0007276894,0.000002674303,0.000004493869,0.00001258243,0.00004180307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6533103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.679773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045694578","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.852","title":"Processing ambiguities in attachment and pronominal reference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Sentence; Sentence processing; Reading (process); Resolution (logic); Ambiguity resolution; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Pronoun; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06676211193804245,"gpt":0.31704682747108,"spread":0.2502847155330376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001791476,0.0001166874,0.0002280282,0.00006469191,0.0000651676,0.00005365316,0.0001867642,0.00005063486,0.000009619734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002414994,0.0000946915,0.00003189005,0.0001027007,0.0001393596,0.0000390372,0.00006748,0.0003093811,0.000002315309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001991827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001105612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005994194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003223623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989721,0.00008455633,0.0004152649,0.0001869402,0.0001482521,0.0001929153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993882,0.00006676742,0.0002558353,0.00005691496,0.0001161933,0.000116052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001074117,0.0003872484,0.01754575,0.0005058167,0.00002412677,0.01522198,0.01463705,0.0005663455,0.9072629,0.00502056,0.001855552,0.03589856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008292398,0.006894439,0.007516074,0.0009496958,0.0002569813,0.007838687,0.002590323,0.008571825,0.7881544,0.006957133,0.1599082,0.002069862],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972211,0.0005527081,0.00006558149,0.0005417495,0.0002565767,0.0000645498,0.000008642261,0.00001041418,0.001278649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940482,0.00009506589,0.002652362,0.001977452,0.001152771,7.484747e-7,6.297172e-7,0.00000843476,0.00006430825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1580527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3861407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181790712","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1421","title":"Obviation in Hungarian: what is its scope, and is it due to competition?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Subject (documents); Competition (biology); Scope (computer science); Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03189176694789085,"gpt":0.2721479140180162,"spread":0.2402561470701254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004310751,0.0001741842,0.0003734724,0.0002117597,0.0001943667,0.0006901225,0.0001347534,0.00007626473,0.0009452435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002794166,0.0001791725,0.00007801795,0.0001017886,0.00004808407,0.0001388937,0.00006767189,0.0002337513,0.00005556799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000975544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001921058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001262746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008682904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983048,0.00008796329,0.000765069,0.0002097772,0.0004005774,0.0002318221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966723,0.0001224337,0.0003699476,0.0001614251,0.002529194,0.0001446457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001152695,0.0003397574,0.001102604,0.0002021908,0.0002022988,0.0009036338,0.09979273,0.0002938858,0.0006067304,0.8828697,0.01090075,0.002670432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005523259,0.001027047,0.007071507,0.003965029,0.0007454403,0.0006453122,0.02789196,0.009607353,0.01368576,0.2381916,0.689841,0.00180468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7380105,0.01110742,0.005352646,0.1480865,0.04472725,0.0009003887,0.0005454388,0.00007143911,0.0511984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729604,0.0008514989,0.007506322,0.005671947,0.01069446,0.000002302428,0.00002479632,0.00003083501,0.002257505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6789403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506245779","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.49","title":"Covert partial <i>wh</i>-movement and the nature of derivations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogative; Covert; Movement (music); Linguistics; Psychology; Interrogative word; Phrase; Specifier; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Noun phrase; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01440718174728786,"gpt":0.2352579634375479,"spread":0.2208507816902601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000742032,0.0001940975,0.0003999324,0.0001168221,0.0003008135,0.0001239569,0.0002643874,0.0001073849,0.0002192914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007191229,0.0001114237,0.0001623867,0.00004608515,0.000493843,0.00004951229,0.00007752853,0.0002124611,0.000006645068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000643238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001536028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004223875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000262376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980739,0.0001120898,0.0008894387,0.0001499068,0.0005322126,0.0002424771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964616,0.0004652971,0.0008928427,0.0002445319,0.001837369,0.00009834157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001707793,0.0000776022,0.0003072263,0.00002602945,0.0001952108,0.00001272967,0.00386952,0.00003373516,0.002927766,0.9885523,0.003360457,0.000466639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00630216,0.0004961721,0.002021945,0.0004548681,0.0008329879,0.00003965919,0.0003835204,0.001407272,0.004688717,0.5398092,0.4430552,0.000508243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462431,0.004779694,0.02128304,0.04366432,0.03518878,0.001088326,0.0008713349,0.00009049252,0.04679092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984725,0.0002507993,0.002613941,0.0004707703,0.01092839,0.000002999756,0.000005993706,0.00002392099,0.0009782088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.448743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8609092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281753153","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5717","title":"Indexed definiteness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Definiteness; Linguistics; Index (typography); Constraint (computer-aided design); Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03303784586883382,"gpt":0.2469674162987836,"spread":0.2139295704299498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007484823,0.0001709141,0.0003322976,0.0002505213,0.0006822566,0.0001658743,0.0003931479,0.0000349486,0.001498235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003336302,0.0001653767,0.0001715948,0.00007961964,0.0001027244,0.00003099701,0.0001389413,0.0004397896,0.00002148411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001563945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002369571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002279793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008272741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979895,0.0001382162,0.0007792257,0.0001434049,0.0006787065,0.0002709726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973632,0.0001546282,0.0007627883,0.0001984324,0.001412219,0.0001087891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001156475,0.0002022675,0.001010259,0.00002648582,0.0001344028,0.000227976,0.01409114,0.001990634,0.00008280243,0.977348,0.00409854,0.0006718973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001522493,0.000682491,0.0004575202,0.00004220557,0.0003256461,0.0002004185,0.005083821,0.002239263,0.0001789443,0.3335734,0.6551934,0.0005003416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7508747,0.001514878,0.003584866,0.007972767,0.0996768,0.0004974468,0.0006956703,0.0001788245,0.1350041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793188,0.00001414183,0.003588927,0.0005032501,0.01494854,0.000003987509,0.00002332289,0.00003553443,0.001563484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342909790","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.7","title":"Propping up predicates: Adjectival predication in Tłıcho Yatıì","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"AKA; Noun; Linguistics; Feature (linguistics); Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02857006854387489,"gpt":0.2550134893806249,"spread":0.22644342083675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008369249,0.0002068911,0.0003584621,0.0003403499,0.0001594404,0.0001271033,0.0003313569,0.00009905178,0.0002563116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01165466,0.0001462078,0.000121098,0.0000785327,0.0001891303,0.0001013815,0.00005420432,0.0002510846,0.00003528471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002349952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003031179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001977535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002282055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977052,0.0001166039,0.00106528,0.000216387,0.0005572694,0.0003392847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969565,0.0002191308,0.0008592991,0.0002296874,0.001595913,0.00013944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005552935,0.0006508128,0.02560351,0.000247934,0.0003899081,0.0002005824,0.04721701,0.0002219317,0.003806673,0.8975833,0.008159724,0.01536333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01152841,0.002123829,0.0254229,0.004637608,0.0008243492,0.0002471224,0.00513466,0.006524955,0.006225065,0.6530026,0.2823454,0.001983127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8501354,0.001087045,0.02649463,0.02360428,0.05236963,0.001203932,0.0003109153,0.000251209,0.04454293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977838,0.00006606356,0.002784077,0.0001086584,0.01749266,0.000005345896,0.000007118489,0.00003456543,0.001663534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2741857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011280477","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.804","title":"Object attraction and the role of structural hierarchy: Evidence from Persian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clitic; Word order; Verb; Attraction; Object (grammar); Linguistics; Agreement; Subject (documents); Hierarchy; Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Natural language processing","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03222002424370587,"gpt":0.283886983056861,"spread":0.2516669588131552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000206904,0.0001126934,0.0002675982,0.00003591353,0.0001149069,0.00003742904,0.0002892694,0.00005450452,0.00002560307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009611259,0.00006969746,0.0001100899,0.000105274,0.0003599064,0.00005057076,0.00006897155,0.000358452,0.000001632791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001098322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007364175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000775773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004533136,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988217,0.0002505317,0.0003890003,0.0001669005,0.0002326617,0.0001392538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985183,0.0006530096,0.0004329031,0.0001105497,0.0001855734,0.00009961439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001081863,0.00001468297,0.00339883,0.00001781482,0.0000332813,0.000472671,0.006919069,0.0001530549,0.9838539,0.001036774,0.0001307333,0.002887328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002861127,0.001111533,0.002886319,0.0001706796,0.0003362726,0.001496236,0.00127067,0.007070413,0.9619544,0.01473705,0.005739475,0.0003657919],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956269,0.00265348,0.00003984677,0.0007227502,0.000596239,0.0000696014,0.0000285313,0.000007612903,0.0002550383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950587,0.0002562192,0.001336809,0.001083096,0.002241354,2.471163e-7,7.767406e-7,0.000007954713,0.00001484008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02189946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904986141","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.632","title":"Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicalization; Compounding; Linguistics; Sign language; Sign (mathematics); Computer science; Focus (optics); Artificial intelligence; Syntactic structure; Syntax; Natural language processing; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02640855219987269,"gpt":0.3705898747479086,"spread":0.3441813225480359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005987865,0.00006967364,0.000174356,0.00007155169,0.00006545812,0.00001675091,0.0002326256,0.00003409142,0.00007086444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005527145,0.00004807272,0.0000345373,0.0001126384,0.0001984083,0.00001358091,0.00004994005,0.0002064944,0.000001128335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001221206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002741192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003372389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001690672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991899,0.000121436,0.0003751301,0.0000605293,0.0001308261,0.0001222114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991324,0.0001075571,0.0002819491,0.0001810659,0.0002632352,0.00003380568],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002401347,0.0006085703,0.4026551,0.00009424344,0.0005566465,0.00009123667,0.07510735,0.0004669269,0.1058814,0.3912657,0.00710376,0.01376782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03015146,0.002328889,0.8694465,0.0008753196,0.0006063305,0.001710969,0.01675374,0.01087188,0.009761026,0.03805114,0.01831894,0.00112381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904675,0.001009559,0.00110689,0.0001179902,0.00106638,0.00006272414,0.000006863266,0.000003366082,0.006158648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922218,0.0000403568,0.00638345,0.00006639231,0.001171079,4.398079e-7,0.000001153277,0.00000658905,0.0001087631],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4667914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1960349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301603763","doi":"10.16995/glossa.8437","title":"Classifiers can be for numerals <em>or</em> nouns: Two strategies for numeral modification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Numeral system; Classifier (UML); Noun; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06334217467914365,"gpt":0.2974163104404324,"spread":0.2340741357612887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001302201,0.0004181986,0.0007014342,0.000343619,0.001474823,0.0008056345,0.0006113625,0.0001008489,0.0004208618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003862055,0.0003897631,0.0004283411,0.0001141258,0.0001524594,0.0001276163,0.00008222397,0.0004037486,0.00000356657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004395781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009868399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002456872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001685969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964108,0.0001620988,0.001517795,0.000396339,0.0008665004,0.0006464285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942203,0.0004709284,0.001547602,0.0003662229,0.00318475,0.0002102612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008204874,0.0002801827,0.00003365241,0.0001461796,0.000387671,0.00003237063,0.03225293,0.008346285,0.0009651015,0.9371133,0.0187835,0.0008382933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004539331,0.001833954,0.00006098059,0.00009502978,0.0008861908,0.00008286483,0.02092369,0.05199413,0.0002892257,0.3618339,0.5565168,0.0009439968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5565066,0.002676764,0.2461273,0.02999496,0.1178895,0.007477233,0.01647898,0.0006148592,0.0222338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492892,0.00004180306,0.0243793,0.0009198903,0.0210293,0.0001239694,0.0003806115,0.0001104433,0.003725452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5752795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200307291","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5800","title":"Bilinguals have a single computational system but two compartmentalized phonological grammars: Evidence from code-switching","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Phonotactics; Computer science; Linguistics; Phonology; Syllabic verse; Code-switching; Phonological rule; Rule-based machine translation; Context (archaeology); Natural language; Syntax; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; History","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07636578113615491,"gpt":0.2992218236116488,"spread":0.2228560424754939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006825678,0.0003224659,0.0007610031,0.0001450625,0.0004375157,0.0006432348,0.000350017,0.00009819083,0.0003073138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008044001,0.0002901642,0.0002912231,0.0000675007,0.0001683919,0.0000865441,0.0001299142,0.0004044262,0.00003816356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003757365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003861804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009618224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008643434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965863,0.0003431726,0.00150955,0.0003626599,0.0008200678,0.0003782911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938831,0.001086341,0.001195693,0.0002707281,0.00336279,0.000201335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001285397,0.002101092,0.009048255,0.000445005,0.002228573,0.006047893,0.06598866,0.03881651,0.01817002,0.8515201,0.002192323,0.002156142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01287914,0.001695712,0.001723365,0.006671217,0.003196044,0.001621287,0.04821763,0.2935383,0.01803776,0.580607,0.02893617,0.002876387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443826,0.001834086,0.03748988,0.001283521,0.01219468,0.0002329586,0.0004257361,0.000118047,0.002038467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9173566,0.00002091259,0.069476,0.0002305822,0.01258635,0.000002524356,0.0001019069,0.00003539632,0.0001897019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2709131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120845757","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.1286","title":"Overt speakers in syntax","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Clitic; Pronoun; Syntax; Computer science; Czech; Anaphora (linguistics); Markedness; Phrase; Feature (linguistics); Variation (astronomy); Expression (computer science); Possessive; Substitution (logic); Head (geology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02522185823422189,"gpt":0.2517752927579236,"spread":0.2265534345237017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004507123,0.0001747575,0.0003836505,0.0001813952,0.0001210967,0.0002034877,0.0001970153,0.00006945853,0.0006903454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007888411,0.0001683626,0.0001587366,0.00008246126,0.00009442893,0.00004440854,0.00005265026,0.0003253328,0.00003701235],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001475632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000317501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003257591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00143711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981712,0.00009164923,0.0008549976,0.0001650202,0.0004302561,0.0002868898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973294,0.0001484934,0.0004593936,0.000201446,0.00174859,0.0001127227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008178756,0.0002947074,0.004106489,0.00007416162,0.0001624123,0.001963712,0.01599213,0.0007598426,0.0003287364,0.9711339,0.004181877,0.000920234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003602069,0.0004452846,0.005310034,0.0008120323,0.0004901536,0.0004847082,0.008680002,0.004992419,0.002958949,0.4081477,0.5629758,0.001100831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002161,0.002437318,0.0024544,0.01087462,0.05477406,0.0002849668,0.0001917543,0.00008048866,0.2286863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738652,0.00008836071,0.007526925,0.0004403132,0.01590003,7.030525e-7,0.00001422494,0.00002964694,0.00213463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5629863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045278324","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.853","title":"Bilingual phonology in dichotic perception: A case study of Malayalam and English voicing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Voice; Malayalam; Dichotic listening; Linguistics; Psychology; Obstruent; Mandarin Chinese; Feature (linguistics); Perception; Speech recognition; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04680788105088255,"gpt":0.3555683958483722,"spread":0.3087605147974896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005378069,0.0001540672,0.0004924916,0.0002396561,0.00005922699,0.00001992852,0.0002107124,0.000153263,0.0001428664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002125049,0.0001422506,0.00006114503,0.0002941898,0.0001587286,0.00001471931,0.0001104225,0.0007400734,0.000004355165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003104855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001203431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005553727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003348967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981389,0.0003216075,0.0007981408,0.0002352904,0.0001991307,0.0003069298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984924,0.0002079329,0.0003069314,0.000175961,0.00061767,0.0001990884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001444413,0.002010866,0.4830849,0.0001120802,0.0004885736,0.04418185,0.4565559,0.0009336601,0.004782051,0.000404815,0.001225757,0.004775181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03403964,0.03980314,0.6138325,0.0002455682,0.000911855,0.02707785,0.267382,0.008205463,0.0006384308,0.001712933,0.004695106,0.001455533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972256,0.0005980509,0.00003526417,0.00006996566,0.001347389,0.0001583486,0.000012021,0.000006898359,0.0005463985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970459,0.00005573245,0.0007714732,0.0001190138,0.001932834,0.000001834298,0.00000107325,0.00001871067,0.00005345589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1891739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624741553","doi":"10.5334/gjgl.162","title":"Gradient phonological relationships: Evidence from vowels in French","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Contrast (vision); Phonology; Vowel; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1620419387502375,"gpt":0.4091332736408592,"spread":0.2470913348906217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001171626,0.0001485104,0.0003501948,0.0001729558,0.0003099703,0.0001113071,0.0009477434,0.0002601577,0.0004478163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01215486,0.0001252294,0.0001145287,0.00008588901,0.0002873797,0.00004249337,0.0001583165,0.00118767,0.0001246571],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008353148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001341338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001565788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004588433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998095,0.000330267,0.0006609043,0.0002372515,0.000287021,0.0003895198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975505,0.0005728884,0.0005729059,0.0006283494,0.0004879651,0.0001873322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004607677,0.0005334378,0.9553085,0.00001007442,0.0002340208,0.00257342,0.008081452,0.0002283718,0.002351784,0.005756178,0.02061178,0.003850226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008449226,0.0003299442,0.9616772,0.0001190803,0.00003362904,0.00006069656,0.00006533776,0.0002535005,0.00023238,0.0312776,0.004959149,0.0001465862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986423,0.003264863,0.0003398165,0.0005378357,0.004325057,0.00008370076,0.00003148699,0.000006705007,0.004987566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917489,0.0003305419,0.004900273,0.00006107594,0.002209648,0.000003697407,0.00000351107,0.00001218629,0.0007301623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02552143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284896578","doi":"10.16995/glossa.6557","title":"The syntactization of kinship in vocative phrases","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Kinship; Relation (database); Speech act; Prosody; Psychology; Anaphora (linguistics); Head (geology); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03898877835991547,"gpt":0.2922761721236087,"spread":0.2532873937636932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005504293,0.00007765021,0.000159781,0.0001044857,0.0004049749,0.00008901282,0.0004033716,0.00001282004,0.0002090488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001093232,0.00005544207,0.00006744891,0.00007875112,0.0001891394,0.00004183727,0.00008561074,0.000273561,0.000001278633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007316317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001862146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000154576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005168426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987913,0.0002351277,0.0004933653,0.00005340725,0.0003113854,0.0001153494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983321,0.0003104313,0.0006083705,0.0001894231,0.0005333098,0.00002629685],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001068387,0.0001660786,0.001063643,0.00001557946,0.0000670576,0.00002301911,0.03667608,0.002312836,0.0001195891,0.9555738,0.002994852,0.0008806048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001621267,0.0008778598,0.002716387,0.0001427181,0.0001922071,0.00006669531,0.2115835,0.001155238,0.001471484,0.08823591,0.6914845,0.0004522318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8251295,0.00769438,0.0001645279,0.001171324,0.004246065,0.0002650425,0.0001942915,0.00002265736,0.1611122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977174,0.0001420596,0.0003039805,0.00007525169,0.0009476434,0.00000415678,0.000008720696,0.000009857002,0.0007908779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8673379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.311478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281290344","doi":"10.16995/glossa.5786","title":"Language is for thought and communication","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Utterance; Linguistics; Argument (complex analysis); Human communication; Psychology; Content (measure theory); Human language; Function (biology); Philosophy; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02797634308761458,"gpt":0.2720355882289898,"spread":0.2440592451413752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005766199,0.00009831628,0.0001957783,0.0000997376,0.000584039,0.000120633,0.0002151983,0.00002218936,0.0003060611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001636325,0.00009471821,0.00008219403,0.00002729829,0.00007423724,0.00002418025,0.00009321469,0.0001919074,0.000001779712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006012728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006301316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001416207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007532023,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990325,0.00007304596,0.0004223709,0.00008948483,0.0002448441,0.000137739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998448,0.0001761885,0.0004539507,0.000172273,0.0006971456,0.00005248699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008963289,0.00009353929,0.0001999778,0.00004400902,0.0001006441,0.00001486767,0.06548915,0.00009699139,0.0001197008,0.920862,0.0115535,0.001336032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00137626,0.0004866248,0.0001338457,0.00004198499,0.0002979893,0.00006847717,0.01336783,0.005036348,0.0003709127,0.1895413,0.7889871,0.0002913639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526086,0.01285232,0.009301066,0.03626287,0.02857606,0.001361878,0.002404139,0.0001545943,0.05647846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720064,0.00005823167,0.01832265,0.0007004893,0.006310296,0.000006902128,0.0000342679,0.0000240132,0.002536719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7774336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4492014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311408218","doi":"10.16995/glossa.8582","title":"Production benefits recall of novel words with frequent, but not infrequent sound patterns","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Recall; Contrast (vision); Speech production; Speech sound; Psychology; Production (economics); Phonology; First language; Cognition; Sound (geography); Linguistics; Speech recognition; Audiology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Acoustics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03897291642974062,"gpt":0.2985767711837248,"spread":0.2596038547539842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007621704,0.0002041127,0.0003785496,0.000254981,0.0001717238,0.00003415648,0.000321885,0.00005967739,0.0002241719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004200771,0.0001736536,0.0001145376,0.0002404086,0.00005845039,0.0000298452,0.0000755452,0.0005344757,0.000003284663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002165493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001871479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001255092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001620255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977275,0.0001155405,0.0009245877,0.0002535708,0.0006635473,0.0003152657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977041,0.00006017687,0.0009935816,0.0003072307,0.0008026774,0.0001322189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01103173,0.01354815,0.5188426,0.000701051,0.005820299,0.002515194,0.07207541,0.1403113,0.02516302,0.1161708,0.04015247,0.05366804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02963027,0.01515469,0.345221,0.002129543,0.002115553,0.01770865,0.009157378,0.001013902,0.02989732,0.005816948,0.5375037,0.004650965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895688,0.0003832656,0.001759194,0.0001742478,0.006094159,0.0001417748,0.0001614876,0.0000143125,0.001702789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813209,0.00003004364,0.01393498,0.0002440127,0.002223382,0.00001302022,0.00002636785,0.00003483423,0.002172448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4973513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7081388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390517454","doi":"10.16995/glossa.10666","title":"Iconicity as the motivation for the signification and locality of deictic grammatical tones in Tal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glossa a journal of general linguistics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tone (literature); Linguistics; Noun; Sound symbolism; Deixis; Perception; Psychology; Communication; Speech recognition; Computer science; Philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05350079456944078,"gpt":0.3901555239275936,"spread":0.3366547293581528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261361,0.00006742331,0.0001426551,0.00006599341,0.00006833383,0.00003905185,0.0001677573,0.00007973455,0.00002760786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002690672,0.0000380988,0.00005938028,0.000142817,0.0002252247,0.00001086943,0.00002737005,0.0003063975,0.000002688638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002587481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009813996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001216411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002599418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990564,0.0001449573,0.0004115164,0.00009247708,0.0001503787,0.0001442432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997929,0.001448606,0.0001195942,0.0001350873,0.000331433,0.00003625053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001782281,0.0007402629,0.0247349,0.0005701951,0.000988323,0.0001271388,0.02213227,0.001665741,0.01593801,0.8868085,0.006472241,0.03804021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002378287,0.002035771,0.4456561,0.0002614779,0.0004727701,0.0004531219,0.001686506,0.0770791,0.006142184,0.4431264,0.02037343,0.000334826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822068,0.00347436,0.01053849,0.001758524,0.001343146,0.0002368907,0.0000210651,0.000003941185,0.000416785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985632,0.0001410161,0.000453518,0.00006458479,0.0006536748,0.000007310511,0.000002241701,0.00000700173,0.0001074571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.443682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.322118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}