{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"753ccf39cc4a","filters":{"venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2136017761","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On The Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Legislature; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Popular sovereignty; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Politics; Charter; Judicial interpretation; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Rivka Weill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04084824629556707,"gpt":0.2549819303808372,"spread":0.2141336840852701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032953,0.0001322953,0.0002452034,0.001702096,0.006534419,0.01046103,0.001040043,0.003683978,0.002262581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007314689,0.0002482815,0.0001989889,0.001464378,0.02771448,0.00474282,0.001949698,0.00392029,0.0001984766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01919793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01172308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06762405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1066168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953868,0.002035061,0.0001123016,0.0005003914,0.0009753351,0.0009901273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931782,0.00519582,0.0004063332,0.000282026,0.0007308361,0.0002067581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006314362,0.000005034238,0.000299405,0.000009750232,0.000001605071,0.0000658578,0.005800223,0.00007543329,0.00006409136,0.988001,0.001077904,0.00459334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004762817,0.00007406105,0.007117324,0.0006640991,0.00003505373,0.0004942558,0.01880947,0.002248472,0.001983458,0.5148307,0.4536023,0.00009323196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160718,0.01610739,0.009453831,0.05972827,0.0003315718,0.00003841874,0.00004835763,0.00004895034,0.7981713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776245,0.002888317,0.0009309648,0.003860868,0.0002501754,0.000017016,0.00001204814,0.00001870229,0.01439723],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06762405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797551927","doi":"","title":"Striking the Right Balance: Hate Speech Laws in Japan, the United States, and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Law; Balance (ability); Doctrine; Legislation; Political science; Constitutional right; Marketplace of ideas; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; First amendment; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Craig Martin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006979528134496212,"gpt":0.2018759241549634,"spread":0.1948963960204672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341619,0.0002818196,0.0004991785,0.00598931,0.008404811,0.005624195,0.0009869565,0.001468413,0.001588327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005712956,0.0002418984,0.0005032552,0.01087494,0.005222776,0.002557904,0.001371457,0.002112983,0.00006294458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09806719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1352516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997593,0.0002109967,0.0001148133,0.0001580487,0.001137324,0.0007858447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946992,0.0007982557,0.0005005729,0.00008013827,0.003400275,0.0005215012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003440106,0.0001937941,0.115065,0.005426499,0.0003393891,0.003931597,0.150421,0.002747541,0.001902097,0.4175652,0.03962667,0.2624372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004207661,0.00009856752,0.3517188,0.005891115,0.000564164,0.000511015,0.1825724,0.0009439601,0.0009960978,0.009267242,0.4471671,0.0002276663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.4000607,0.3537822,0.0006839553,0.02640289,0.0006015765,0.00009066808,0.0008749231,0.00002817039,0.2174749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8273269,0.1612355,0.0006035982,0.00396539,0.00007048548,0.00002617544,0.0003246051,0.00001895106,0.006428494],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09806719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7115306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71613735","doi":"","title":"Thawing a Frozen Treaty: Protecting United States Interests in the Arctic with a Congressional-Executive Agreement on the Law of the Sea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Treaty; Agreement; Political science; Arctic; The arctic; Executive branch; Oceanography; Geology; Philosophy; Legislature","authors":[{"name":"Andrew D. King","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03037579525811985,"gpt":0.2959714603032663,"spread":0.2655956650451464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004420434,0.0003578946,0.0002105538,0.0005881114,0.01267715,0.01053301,0.0009009624,0.00540741,0.01035007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007597171,0.0002678163,0.000419267,0.0007139341,0.004721028,0.003610772,0.002949097,0.00952653,0.002315243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004596424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01604404,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04316025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1064255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975377,0.0009920781,0.00009506087,0.0002201169,0.0006403048,0.0005147589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981223,0.0006910263,0.0001270804,0.0001551525,0.0004337532,0.0004707164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000766915,0.00005182634,0.001127015,0.00007214724,0.00001104819,0.000640011,0.004654599,0.0003526497,0.0007777128,0.4659385,0.4942853,0.03201246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001230279,0.00003569778,0.001424451,0.0002719537,0.00001130299,0.00007567758,0.003405722,0.0001454972,0.0003761773,0.01850163,0.9757126,0.00002697618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02598346,0.01008463,0.002779097,0.2125515,0.02041689,0.00008088403,0.0002087946,0.0001017294,0.727793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3079391,0.009983875,0.00502976,0.2011322,0.008598399,0.0002079061,0.0005192132,0.000229626,0.4663599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04316025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08581805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279239915","doi":"","title":"Clearly Canadian--Hill v. Colorado and Free Speech Balancing in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Political science; Gerontology; Audiology; Medicine; Law","authors":[{"name":"Donald L. Beschle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01100146696211573,"gpt":0.2175072836962858,"spread":0.20650581673417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002202841,0.0002321302,0.0003283125,0.001375926,0.01956874,0.007490345,0.001076885,0.005741575,0.009109272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006501399,0.0002906149,0.0003817067,0.001778902,0.009138725,0.002097532,0.001884342,0.003579775,0.0004196131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06234311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09215462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961221,0.0003820401,0.00006497968,0.0003657065,0.001375139,0.001690111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974294,0.0008047376,0.0001378918,0.00006878315,0.001102927,0.0004562043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001789985,0.000009992887,0.00233997,0.00004506345,0.00001096887,0.0002018077,0.004512387,0.0002433523,0.0001877094,0.9450639,0.03987467,0.007492307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008396409,0.00004524105,0.02714884,0.0007840804,0.0001431064,0.0004306571,0.02246915,0.001453168,0.00142755,0.1566337,0.789125,0.0002557008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05864939,0.007116562,0.001764183,0.08034988,0.0005856333,0.00007939128,0.000562521,0.00003955407,0.8508529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.843322,0.003346576,0.001467033,0.02511099,0.0001514055,0.00006244484,0.0002071724,0.00002535804,0.126307],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06234311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.452333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101281661","doi":"","title":"There's an Amendment for That: A Comprehensive Application of Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence to Smart Phones","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Jurisprudence; Law; First amendment; Political science; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Zamani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03589488471331127,"gpt":0.3193175211676829,"spread":0.2834226364543717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04241742,0.0006963123,0.001714132,0.002734269,0.01197175,0.01814758,0.004482149,0.02719462,0.003492812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06211771,0.001363459,0.003026692,0.00258619,0.04766132,0.01531493,0.0107228,0.02071112,0.001100629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009766849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0214133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0309811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02634492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9524186,0.01916465,0.003147814,0.005528712,0.01482856,0.004911639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542403,0.03349461,0.001322177,0.005923723,0.004086841,0.0009323476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005200423,0.00001238186,0.0001291722,0.00001552422,0.000005979055,0.00008635894,0.001500319,0.0001348435,0.0000844246,0.990577,0.005707636,0.001741255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005977341,0.00006991893,0.0009208247,0.0006626996,0.00004675705,0.0002398029,0.00234689,0.001230849,0.0006182718,0.7630104,0.2306655,0.0001283787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03393513,0.007178547,0.06009592,0.3400023,0.002946911,0.0004192058,0.0005438291,0.0002383697,0.5546398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7140653,0.003241947,0.02888927,0.1681495,0.002299242,0.001116069,0.0002724972,0.0001532746,0.08181288],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04241742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2243274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219763656","doi":"","title":"Alive Not Dead: The Revival of Redevelopment Post-Matosantos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Business; Law; Archaeology; Sociology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Helen Luu Chou","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02284685498492168,"gpt":0.2671130235782936,"spread":0.244266168593372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007319261,0.0002803024,0.0004241534,0.001271833,0.01829183,0.01336561,0.00308584,0.008834624,0.004535077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02499558,0.0009871357,0.000702711,0.0009225893,0.009756648,0.004273066,0.005922001,0.01802609,0.0007382499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01240321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01851005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09919951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1830441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991147,0.001022081,0.0004375368,0.00163137,0.003516852,0.002245229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926858,0.003361801,0.0009591723,0.0005988327,0.001193987,0.001200453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002645031,0.0003125854,0.01465259,0.0002755306,0.00007534348,0.008789075,0.07063949,0.0008597676,0.002276128,0.5557622,0.2703272,0.07576565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005456028,0.0001823643,0.02510063,0.0005507664,0.00006874895,0.0008107211,0.02183621,0.0005587982,0.003000502,0.01060615,0.9370614,0.0001691549],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.417433,0.007275333,0.003068219,0.1451688,0.008066316,0.0002550427,0.0004714348,0.0004532309,0.4178086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7590715,0.002851826,0.001060574,0.07380461,0.001610572,0.0001664058,0.0002565311,0.0001748764,0.1610031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09919951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1972442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267274023","doi":"","title":"\"Bring Your Own Devices\": A Cautionary Tale for Public Employees During Investigatory Searches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Advertising; History; Business","authors":[{"name":"Julie Chi Chow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04775836630640407,"gpt":0.2624044763976631,"spread":0.2146461100912591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04373559,0.0007917873,0.001480203,0.001295541,0.02660386,0.02292984,0.006939184,0.05941274,0.004414778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09703147,0.001371373,0.001839112,0.001107484,0.0327851,0.02379188,0.0084503,0.05694945,0.002761932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00721143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02853981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03289323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0581427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9504484,0.02287649,0.002873925,0.005671471,0.0110334,0.00709633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073386,0.06595052,0.004454649,0.007673913,0.01034027,0.004241945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006478169,0.0001107695,0.004505783,0.0002398378,0.00003619183,0.003423851,0.09119777,0.000194783,0.001254914,0.347359,0.5153453,0.03626689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007615671,0.0001118777,0.00282985,0.001722929,0.00007684314,0.002740643,0.05709899,0.0008015041,0.001463251,0.0984736,0.8343331,0.0002712756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009556217,0.003439859,0.005491509,0.9303499,0.002279754,0.00009680586,0.00003775353,0.0002227755,0.0485253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1344126,0.002069647,0.005911492,0.8169231,0.002934623,0.0003122192,0.00003658024,0.0001972367,0.03720267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05941274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2312987,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}