{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":7,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"753ccf39cc4a","filters":{"venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly"}},"results":[{"id":"W2136017761","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Parliamentary Sovereignty and Judicial Review: On The Theoretical and Historical Origins of the Israeli Legislative Override Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sovereignty; Legislature; Judicial review; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Political science; Law; Constitutionalism; Popular sovereignty; Constitutional theory; Supreme court; Politics; Charter; Judicial interpretation; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Democracy","authors":[{"name":"Rivka Weill","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04084824629556707,"gpt":0.2549819303808372,"spread":0.2141336840852701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007044526,0.0001438727,0.0002325682,0.00001703085,0.001446566,0.00002177171,0.0001676109,0.00005974789,0.000346898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003782185,0.00008649739,0.00008838638,0.00012591,0.01100192,0.0001412484,0.00004357601,0.0002164948,0.000007570578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002609443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000324517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01025305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009500723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.0001950571,0.00029973,0.000241258,0.000468906,0.0002238124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989312,0.0005672561,0.0001596109,0.0001082563,0.0001535856,0.00008012606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758032,0.00004035842,0.001246546,0.000008022497,0.00003428891,0.000002411806,0.002223297,1.125489e-7,0.000011774,0.9950257,0.000697891,0.0006720115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004343028,0.000367066,0.003513351,0.001212102,0.0001531987,0.00002533878,0.003697135,0.000007027432,0.00004155283,0.7879632,0.2022452,0.0003405828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0701417,0.004404546,0.0002400204,0.0116561,0.0009103121,0.0005318954,0.00008704016,0.00004148245,0.9119869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959248,0.0002565801,0.00008574695,0.003521914,0.0001599594,0.00001789297,9.342475e-7,0.000002939574,0.00002919496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797551927","doi":"","title":"Striking the Right Balance: Hate Speech Laws in Japan, the United States, and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Law; Balance (ability); Doctrine; Legislation; Political science; Constitutional right; Marketplace of ideas; Supreme court; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; First amendment; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Craig Martin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.006979528134496212,"gpt":0.2018759241549634,"spread":0.1948963960204672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004874698,0.0001535533,0.000119189,0.00005581926,0.0009166123,0.0003188906,0.0004898162,0.0000452502,0.00001934868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003236609,0.00009639724,0.00002259919,0.0004339518,0.001154672,0.0002831238,0.00005172736,0.0002583743,0.00001034028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009680566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003670655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3480641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5569016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986157,0.0000996532,0.0002544697,0.000313351,0.0003626968,0.0003541755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991135,0.0002462613,0.0001051579,0.0002946846,0.0001635224,0.00007685014],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001089009,0.00001371734,0.0006506377,0.000005346971,0.00001392858,0.00003753094,0.0005322396,0.00007253715,0.0001902123,0.9912495,0.001247479,0.005975991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001425603,0.0004977107,0.006615797,0.0002585095,0.00002400188,0.001135461,0.0008307088,0.09713291,0.002198539,0.02660427,0.8625573,0.000719205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8897693,0.0001295578,0.08159226,0.01014985,0.001578049,0.0005406904,0.00004467808,0.0001924314,0.01600318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965127,0.000003864416,0.001161412,0.002020264,0.0001578837,0.00001320621,0.0000134336,0.000004059632,0.0001132113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W71613735","doi":"","title":"Thawing a Frozen Treaty: Protecting United States Interests in the Arctic with a Congressional-Executive Agreement on the Law of the Sea","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Treaty; Agreement; Political science; Arctic; The arctic; Executive branch; Oceanography; Geology; Philosophy; Legislature","authors":[{"name":"Andrew D. King","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03037579525811985,"gpt":0.2959714603032663,"spread":0.2655956650451464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001930758,0.0001596706,0.0001609781,0.0000547719,0.002277643,0.00006414663,0.0003490816,0.00004936199,0.00002520698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003032286,0.00006901798,0.00007169526,0.0004459694,0.005723809,0.0001058811,0.00003437046,0.000383804,0.000006329484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001268779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001980824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02575975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03385684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979931,0.0004869664,0.0002957832,0.0002018999,0.000647898,0.0003743523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968925,0.002495749,0.0002356801,0.0001675311,0.0001610189,0.00004750151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008835377,0.00007431884,0.006124918,0.00001008349,0.00005288039,0.000008801991,0.04931901,0.00002954066,0.000008223782,0.943978,0.0001442423,0.0001616924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003744573,0.001943846,0.06253783,0.006884105,0.0002497886,0.000131262,0.7087051,0.0003211716,0.0005964569,0.1284039,0.08541555,0.001066426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5905132,0.00006347967,0.001563019,0.06719034,0.0002561672,0.002197441,0.00007819121,0.00005739794,0.3380807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971031,0.000001162141,0.00009668912,0.002518189,0.0001044367,0.00004929684,0.000004039407,0.000004653316,0.0001184262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.815574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279239915","doi":"","title":"Clearly Canadian--Hill v. Colorado and Free Speech Balancing in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Political science; Gerontology; Audiology; Medicine; Law","authors":[{"name":"Donald L. Beschle","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01100146696211573,"gpt":0.2175072836962858,"spread":0.20650581673417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007539532,0.0001144242,0.0001315238,0.00007897663,0.001171163,0.0002162899,0.0002155494,0.00007426944,0.00005635875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001264974,0.00009244653,0.00001523266,0.0002601298,0.01050897,0.000231193,0.000009462503,0.0001756383,0.000003258938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002101728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001351601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986618,0.0001679746,0.0001992653,0.0002097248,0.0003460622,0.0004151842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990393,0.0004383138,0.00005551617,0.0001104046,0.000110888,0.0002455962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007015074,0.000008594668,0.01189355,0.000003428807,0.000006393416,0.0001439646,0.004382034,0.000008222272,0.000003856888,0.9813399,0.001718868,0.0004841517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018548,0.0001318084,0.007360497,0.00008027528,0.00002337517,0.0002070893,0.01895264,0.0005348122,0.000001770021,0.04764282,0.9236513,0.0003950088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325212,0.0001560976,0.0008091551,0.01253503,0.0003433116,0.0003587111,0.00016143,0.00003904265,0.05307605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971275,0.00002732727,0.0001177382,0.002377007,0.0001450553,0.000006805461,0.0000307595,0.000003889019,0.0001639735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101281661","doi":"","title":"There's an Amendment for That: A Comprehensive Application of Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence to Smart Phones","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Jurisprudence; Law; First amendment; Political science; Supreme court","authors":[{"name":"Daniel Zamani","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03589488471331127,"gpt":0.3193175211676829,"spread":0.2834226364543717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005174035,0.000154372,0.000202019,0.00007094054,0.0008225082,0.0001051241,0.0004345161,0.0001025256,0.0000603656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008889492,0.0001584972,0.00007457597,0.0001536054,0.001197911,0.0004851866,0.00004243344,0.000152307,0.00003498424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007218272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002513379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006690135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008009376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99845,0.00007181489,0.0002933877,0.0003939733,0.000479041,0.0003117246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986963,0.0001786179,0.0002195305,0.0003198773,0.00037873,0.0002069588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008330763,0.0001960324,0.0004310908,0.00002490482,0.00001610416,6.699888e-7,0.003117829,0.000009634943,0.03770956,0.9494746,0.0002122496,0.008724026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002240706,0.001994116,0.002762607,0.0001599432,0.0001097042,0.00002510208,0.01018108,0.001097252,0.01879861,0.14298,0.8185989,0.001052061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4848729,0.00004360741,0.5018881,0.003085942,0.001163026,0.002418794,0.0004512375,0.0001762896,0.005900058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867768,0.000002487942,0.01191038,0.0003552435,0.0003141258,0.0005406386,0.00007217136,0.000007060118,0.00002106335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8183866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219763656","doi":"","title":"Alive Not Dead: The Revival of Redevelopment Post-Matosantos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Liberian dollar; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Business; Law; Archaeology; Sociology; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Helen Luu Chou","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02284685498492168,"gpt":0.2671130235782936,"spread":0.244266168593372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000961989,0.0001389403,0.0002263227,0.00003946463,0.001479008,0.00007279793,0.0002627227,0.00006670554,0.0002009751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004528855,0.000103499,0.00009652355,0.0001681818,0.003332064,0.0001987734,0.00002274218,0.0001147451,0.00007269601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005272941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003948355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001624248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001115838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982425,0.0001917194,0.0004002138,0.0002286394,0.0006495288,0.0002874018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982848,0.0007195513,0.0002306075,0.0001460613,0.0005315554,0.00008748509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001845786,0.00002904561,0.0008766281,0.000008774174,0.00003730386,7.9862e-7,0.01030567,0.000003311298,0.0002922392,0.9839238,0.0009407924,0.003563183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001111308,0.0003699354,0.006546719,0.0003047319,0.0001140784,0.00002811473,0.01721135,0.0001405876,0.0006712865,0.01982821,0.9530312,0.0006424278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05479123,0.0003193647,0.01995549,0.015597,0.001329001,0.0008250764,0.0001147009,0.0002171595,0.906851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965667,0.000007505549,0.001210789,0.001199757,0.0002690432,0.00002573845,0.00001107269,0.000004326552,0.0007050905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267274023","doi":"","title":"\"Bring Your Own Devices\": A Cautionary Tale for Public Employees During Investigatory Searches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Advertising; History; Business","authors":[{"name":"Julie Chi Chow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04775836630640407,"gpt":0.2624044763976631,"spread":0.2146461100912591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007848976,0.0002694848,0.0002541712,0.0002381851,0.00134389,0.0006636377,0.0008487825,0.0001084914,0.00001806493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004495019,0.0002884991,0.0001279725,0.0005804399,0.001391856,0.001982956,0.0001531348,0.0002650401,0.0001189022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001519033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006341087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008004392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006122774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997545,0.00009671882,0.0005233469,0.0006716424,0.0005432062,0.0006200946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978908,0.0005045236,0.0002234841,0.0004987766,0.0006094927,0.0002729053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004269395,0.00006617171,0.003474408,0.00005694103,0.00003118731,0.000005050149,0.0004190251,0.0000974721,0.001359476,0.9925618,0.0002584649,0.001665708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007725122,0.001954753,0.06947358,0.001266694,0.0001274777,0.001933175,0.0009735218,0.060211,0.004712825,0.3168018,0.5300855,0.004734555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1917344,0.00004358518,0.7980401,0.003312337,0.0004101602,0.0004334897,0.00004681559,0.0006915088,0.005287572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092113,1.351494e-7,0.08934361,0.0008254407,0.0002841672,0.0001261329,0.00004219359,0.00001568218,0.0001513505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7174768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}