{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":11,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5c7c23a9df7c","filters":{"venue":"Hastings law journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2256007795","doi":"","title":"Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon - the Spirited Debate About Geographical Indications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Certification; TRIPS architecture; State (computer science); Monopoly; European union; International trade; Economy; Geographical indication; Business; Political science; Geography; Law; Economics; Regional science; Market economy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Justin Hughes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00658658870422012,"gpt":0.1816470093789882,"spread":0.175060420674768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002642914,0.0001240206,0.0001143739,0.00000874847,0.001462513,0.0003325925,0.0002022102,0.00008913352,0.000212542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000284981,0.00003325602,0.00007849509,0.0003240751,0.000169903,0.0001189821,0.00004917233,0.000374194,0.00001099948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003894408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008146436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002987562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990701,0.00005210911,0.0002247408,0.0001586242,0.0002119237,0.0002824658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995314,0.00009869739,0.0001582835,0.00003148484,0.00006797224,0.0001121091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007245259,0.0008252347,0.06361232,0.00002262567,0.0001402956,0.0001010697,0.0005428586,0.00001572458,0.6114345,0.1021882,0.05869001,0.1623547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002051964,0.000160823,0.8133021,0.00004304515,0.00002984862,0.0008979814,0.0002370102,0.00001838793,0.0008309275,0.004142052,0.1799391,0.0001935121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705813,0.001084984,0.000005444785,0.024312,0.00009284524,0.0000856605,0.00001331913,0.00004743032,0.003777049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980901,0.00006226863,0.000060819,0.0005995173,0.001042753,0.000002672477,0.00001225303,9.505411e-7,0.0001287067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7496898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998375,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971682184","doi":"","title":"Algorithmic Discrimination Is an Information Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Information sensitivity; Disparate impact; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer security; Business; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ignacio Cofone","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0329633058088814,"gpt":0.3314377557106744,"spread":0.2984744499017929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001674485,0.00006705288,0.00008870459,0.00005045308,0.00137217,0.0009986499,0.0001855524,0.0001144773,0.0003529573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001847723,0.00006173758,0.00004908213,0.0001141981,0.0001138807,0.004847859,0.00001835945,0.0003710273,0.0001369853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001051131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001597274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003782723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00131621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988146,0.00009400996,0.0002217588,0.00006538602,0.0005421224,0.0002621309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989394,0.00004725666,0.000233549,0.00006014036,0.0005373508,0.000182288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083774,0.00004895713,0.0007793019,0.00002143303,0.00001517307,0.000001663821,0.2159377,0.00002527226,0.0001812782,0.7254447,0.001623804,0.0559099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001479609,0.0006008957,0.003778879,0.0003130132,0.0000509464,0.00004588054,0.1115588,0.001589463,0.0003084881,0.3621394,0.5174388,0.0006958125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2449905,0.00002447842,0.002135734,0.02064194,0.0009687218,0.0003406565,0.000007455295,0.00009009443,0.7308004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943502,0.00003533755,0.002551326,0.002010932,0.0005028963,0.00000123191,0.000004310695,0.000006377997,0.000537372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7493597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255057608","doi":"","title":"Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition Among International Economic Law Tribunals is Not Working","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Competition (biology); Plaintiff; Business; Order (exchange); International economic law; State (computer science); International arbitration; Law; International law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Public international law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Andrea K. Bjorklund","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02324239378390523,"gpt":0.232949590209658,"spread":0.2097071964257528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009861408,0.0002402422,0.0001998827,0.000292254,0.0009073593,0.002558687,0.0004555464,0.00009384413,0.002231174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003899454,0.0002287031,0.0001295468,0.00009165664,0.0002817351,0.003799831,0.0001836077,0.0003772544,0.0001945351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002189401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001300148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004794899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979978,0.00001450403,0.0007251456,0.0003193171,0.0005621117,0.0003810863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986753,0.0000744666,0.0007195101,0.0001036728,0.0003564451,0.0000705675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000631962,0.00006551897,0.002716506,0.00000706782,0.0001023867,0.00002384573,0.00004433077,0.0000184252,0.0003269876,0.9947478,0.001651753,0.0002322006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001385644,0.00001395695,0.001703389,0.0001511443,0.0000271963,0.0001155338,0.00005828461,0.004975025,0.0009481838,0.09381931,0.8964844,0.0003179538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1752886,0.00001956948,0.003772047,0.008387339,0.003321896,0.0001604987,0.00001096028,0.0001087789,0.8089303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438183,0.000006199163,0.0007082379,0.05064414,0.004403391,0.000004457611,0.00008434079,0.00002522006,0.0003057721],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209051954","doi":"","title":"If the Hat Fits, Wear It, If the Turban Fits, Run for Your Life: Reflections on the Indefinite Detention and Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Political science; Law; International human rights law; National security; Fundamental rights; International humanitarian law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Vincent-Joël Proulx","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06000476004544464,"gpt":0.3270714866705445,"spread":0.2670667266250998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307344,0.0001175896,0.0001194465,0.0000508455,0.004801204,0.0003363737,0.0003427501,0.00007372423,0.0001964841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004022219,0.00005857208,0.0001244631,0.0001092866,0.000354332,0.0002095139,0.00002709227,0.0004375086,0.000007769872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008107102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008967791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005598803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005435824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985889,0.0001968444,0.0003361404,0.0001391181,0.000465136,0.0002739209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984956,0.0006022247,0.0003717019,0.000108396,0.0003442493,0.00007782973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006219409,0.00004678325,0.00008881943,0.000003906123,0.00006888437,9.646177e-7,0.01385629,0.0001915158,0.0003131228,0.9828214,0.002122199,0.000423901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001607661,0.0004496868,0.0085457,0.0005491603,0.0002329169,0.0000952537,0.01485641,0.003855144,0.001523915,0.1760053,0.7917703,0.0005084964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908058,0.000344572,0.001890639,0.06337446,0.001295856,0.0007487995,0.00004322607,0.0000708942,0.04142577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994752,0.00004197278,0.0003562589,0.001058659,0.001714757,0.00001129793,0.000003488252,0.00001288825,0.002048609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8068161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254199577","doi":"","title":"Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Proscription; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Constitutional law; Scrutiny; Proportionality (law); Public law; Dignity; Autonomy; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05859160456954537,"gpt":0.332146196155907,"spread":0.2735545915863616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004730103,0.00006413601,0.0001148169,0.00002385261,0.0008687347,0.0001017186,0.0001026247,0.0000452363,0.0001302378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007938327,0.0000579141,0.00005115335,0.00005738839,0.001904031,0.000187503,0.00002635339,0.0001516393,0.000007783698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006893612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002459159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01277274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001664593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991794,0.00003825507,0.0001922322,0.00007746647,0.0002992974,0.0002132986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994919,0.00005288203,0.0001149477,0.00003708417,0.0001203674,0.0001827818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001141865,0.00003147091,0.0000682495,0.0000076988,0.000008869944,0.00001597115,0.004001196,0.000008726022,0.0002169011,0.9951489,0.00009168431,0.0003889229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001634716,0.0002396069,0.0006204822,0.0002944884,0.00008358769,0.0008859645,0.005650512,0.000002194525,0.002552376,0.3212448,0.6665061,0.0002851491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1171853,0.0003232963,0.001192051,0.006317331,0.0003445135,0.00009345868,0.00001200347,0.00002546361,0.8745066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973532,0.00003226802,0.001509315,0.0006137575,0.0004154023,7.569189e-7,5.008956e-7,0.000002767156,0.00007200805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219836483","doi":"","title":"Teaching Legal Ethics a Quarter of a Century After Watergate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Ronald D. Rotunda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03042177896643157,"gpt":0.3588986514044897,"spread":0.3284768724380582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002243792,0.000066206,0.00008939585,0.00005102625,0.0012954,0.0003658978,0.0001441965,0.00008970858,0.006043583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004018539,0.0000576827,0.00005902217,0.0001358334,0.0001756894,0.001104321,0.000007888115,0.001695649,0.00007929801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004764536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003967594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01594358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002664885,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986113,0.00038375,0.0003038912,0.00008528861,0.0003860743,0.0002297431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999221,0.0002127541,0.0001710993,0.0000715561,0.0002127605,0.0001107979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001502745,0.000343529,0.0009954184,0.00002733661,0.00005714297,0.00003429578,0.4970858,0.00002890943,0.0004800983,0.460905,0.005020026,0.03487224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001534415,0.00002143558,0.0002546539,0.00005741274,0.00001141955,0.000053335,0.009525795,0.000009937429,0.00003087947,0.002131861,0.9876657,0.00008416878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2858975,0.00006411104,0.000200215,0.115083,0.0007754718,0.00007922106,0.00000365117,0.00003869515,0.5978581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931741,0.00002811119,0.001235389,0.002401792,0.0006796763,0.000002605791,8.547116e-7,0.000007176486,0.002470273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278285628","doi":"","title":"The Public Health Case for the Safe Storage of Firearms: Adolescent Suicides Add One More 'Smoking Gun'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun violence; Suicide prevention; Accidental; Gun control; Criminology; Occupational safety and health; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medical emergency; Suicide rates; Medicine; Forensic engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental health; Psychology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Jay McClurg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.142580595323169,"gpt":0.3925799293935104,"spread":0.2499993340703414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008354308,0.0001059795,0.0001781381,0.00004053398,0.00676397,0.0004815981,0.0005734794,0.00006066461,0.0006037905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008127626,0.00006048552,0.0001474584,0.0002879504,0.0007987196,0.00025221,0.00003918094,0.0005505272,0.000005287277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002121225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005723154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007420009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01123024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973118,0.0004290384,0.0004007444,0.0001477909,0.0008259165,0.000884764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997808,0.001082956,0.0002795863,0.000179677,0.0003138225,0.000335997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154189,0.0002188026,0.002454701,0.0000693759,0.0000988567,0.00009442231,0.02088478,0.000135199,0.00002892119,0.03298833,0.008020634,0.9348906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001229167,0.0004152705,0.003391919,0.0008089549,0.00004655114,0.0009043319,0.105771,0.001494339,0.0000609755,0.00244772,0.8831066,0.0003231472],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6527202,0.01913968,0.006151124,0.2997719,0.001308451,0.00279908,0.00008462871,0.0001407207,0.01788419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997034,0.001204494,0.0001523696,0.0004853648,0.0006494004,0.00001205711,8.095525e-7,0.00001375352,0.0004477725],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787705115","doi":"","title":"Lifting the “American Exceptionalism” Curtain: Options and Lessons from Abroad","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Earl Johnson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02741226104346817,"gpt":0.3296761565842392,"spread":0.302263895540771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009653477,0.0001040027,0.0001598663,0.00002087589,0.004498682,0.0001992498,0.0002560636,0.00003513991,0.0003718658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003556848,0.00006381838,0.0001105028,0.0001738706,0.002778131,0.0002771775,0.00003983874,0.0002512394,0.00002960298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001417741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000128459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006833735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001886293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986014,0.0002723583,0.0002079249,0.000181589,0.0003954958,0.0003411835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985358,0.0006194924,0.0003910035,0.0001066419,0.0001321583,0.0002149026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004536451,0.0001482423,0.0204775,0.000004925267,0.0002057301,0.00002891882,0.1268312,0.00001904649,0.008542949,0.3340325,0.07281438,0.4368493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003136169,0.00003874457,0.01592245,0.00009431213,0.00003910766,0.00002910548,0.03778318,0.00001360678,0.00001145424,0.007665877,0.9378684,0.0002201852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7829137,0.0015042,0.008883472,0.1089592,0.0009755339,0.0001751867,0.00006504217,0.0001554106,0.09636828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919426,0.0007939289,0.002426741,0.001407198,0.002078699,0.000005031307,6.946561e-7,0.00001400001,0.001331062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.865054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794975037","doi":"","title":"Note – “Between” a Rock and a Hard Place: Martin Marietta v. Vulcan and the Rise of the Backdoor Standstill","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backdoor; Geology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Sasha S. Hahn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01963233193546786,"gpt":0.2777221952549317,"spread":0.2580898633194638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00332665,0.0001040402,0.0002135732,0.00001679172,0.001740581,0.0002698662,0.0002920394,0.0000610404,0.00006342097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001409751,0.00005715182,0.00007067669,0.0001157437,0.0009658742,0.0001910351,0.0001289928,0.0003485287,0.000002982307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000267735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007337996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002550439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.0004360822,0.0002841103,0.0001394339,0.0004436459,0.0002833789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984601,0.0008146181,0.0003095635,0.0001271939,0.0001273279,0.0001612205],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002260871,0.0001198267,0.1719361,0.0003320492,0.0001950804,0.00002285492,0.1130354,0.0001581107,0.001249347,0.5802763,0.03092272,0.09949141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003813005,0.00025596,0.03774075,0.000796451,0.0003922521,0.0001942549,0.00777291,0.00227095,0.0003181777,0.02932037,0.9166782,0.0004467189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265598,0.0007470089,0.001909586,0.04339748,0.0003880333,0.0003184314,0.00001222311,0.00002513142,0.02664233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983891,0.00006468619,0.0002819016,0.0002692007,0.000417442,0.000001668098,7.489764e-8,0.000007620899,0.0005682895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791270191","doi":"","title":"Two Wrongs Don't Make a Patent Right","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Catechi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1003903321998904,"gpt":0.2238198459108035,"spread":0.1234295137109132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005605568,0.0002167563,0.0001986604,0.0001333933,0.0009789026,0.000856427,0.0003253948,0.0000609789,0.005167821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000918627,0.0001577141,0.0001447498,0.0002078419,0.00007544312,0.001048159,0.0001344029,0.000488012,0.002596851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005046771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000142432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009258381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008462963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984661,0.0000142939,0.0004126683,0.0002131541,0.0003843261,0.0005094497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992459,0.00002782859,0.0002861309,0.0001295879,0.0002711622,0.0000393663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001466779,0.001794013,0.0136004,0.0004878295,0.0005898941,0.001319372,0.001815215,0.004414149,0.008321893,0.3160979,0.1979624,0.4521301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001469299,0.00002906513,0.0002679475,0.0001879286,0.00006634396,0.000366064,0.0001355303,0.008864602,0.00051019,0.003022331,0.9847002,0.0003805177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2729228,0.0002829993,0.002178365,0.004440145,0.001590952,0.0002324834,0.00000189408,0.0002174985,0.7181329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829957,0.000008023338,0.0007844286,0.007767715,0.006216367,0.000003684082,0.000005186655,0.00003560667,0.002183245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7867377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808252237","doi":"","title":"Towards and Explicit Balancing Inquiry - R.A.V. and Black through the Lens of Foreign Freedom of Expression Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Through-the-lens metering; Expression (computer science); Lens (geology); Law; Political science; Computer science; Human rights; Physics; Optics","authors":[{"name":"Matthew S. Melamed","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03702698819068929,"gpt":0.2486247810390282,"spread":0.211597792848339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000734504,0.0001399058,0.000230268,0.00006466181,0.0004278185,0.0001649747,0.0001820169,0.00005517006,0.00005776927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003102223,0.00008811116,0.00005093978,0.0001189765,0.0003811791,0.001066567,0.000181584,0.00020948,0.000001797714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008355742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001167022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004067082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000219378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988818,0.000008791183,0.0004356625,0.0001508257,0.0002926735,0.0002302884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989288,0.00008456061,0.0006325784,0.0001297773,0.000207597,0.00001669557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001363673,0.00005868587,0.00666545,0.0003207645,0.00002961116,0.00002690375,0.002790093,0.00005397292,0.02081913,0.9658485,0.001119175,0.002131326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004742324,0.0002579565,0.08803712,0.003747942,0.0003858135,0.0003510454,0.01510837,0.002188004,0.02472605,0.8219705,0.03738024,0.001104583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674571,0.0002511342,0.008409466,0.0001541102,0.0001600671,0.0001031042,8.552099e-7,0.00001635355,0.02344779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975954,0.00003015222,0.001026853,0.0002319937,0.001075261,6.085988e-7,8.742319e-7,0.00001429472,0.00002455059],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.143878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3593068,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}