{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":11,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"5c7c23a9df7c","filters":{"venue":"Hastings law journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2256007795","doi":"","title":"Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon - the Spirited Debate About Geographical Indications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Intellectual property; TRIPS Agreement; Certification; TRIPS architecture; State (computer science); Monopoly; European union; International trade; Economy; Geographical indication; Business; Political science; Geography; Law; Economics; Regional science; Market economy; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Justin Hughes","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.00658658870422012,"gpt":0.1816470093789882,"spread":0.175060420674768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005764385,0.000374191,0.0004731175,0.001781889,0.009697965,0.01465446,0.001497079,0.0154049,0.00806094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01453602,0.0003812594,0.0004865384,0.001879108,0.023424,0.009266135,0.002486202,0.01161952,0.001570195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01211638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006427049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04599781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0480521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945019,0.002608676,0.0001220997,0.0008456676,0.001391558,0.0005299744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882428,0.008523166,0.000334197,0.0006246469,0.001823195,0.0004520062],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000956469,0.000003325198,0.00009858876,0.00001176274,0.00000157906,0.0000395461,0.001400713,0.00003240356,0.00003352443,0.9657215,0.02989371,0.002753713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000223299,0.00001526466,0.0005273607,0.0003569913,0.00000607171,0.0001569265,0.002574306,0.0001917768,0.0002584103,0.3210035,0.6748573,0.00002979557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008862546,0.02163665,0.004652434,0.4809444,0.002067786,0.00002661211,0.0001132225,0.00009529137,0.4816011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5730117,0.01196469,0.004764703,0.2163461,0.003030844,0.0001828126,0.00009532509,0.0002308983,0.1903729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04599781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09146011,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971682184","doi":"","title":"Algorithmic Discrimination Is an Information Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Information sensitivity; Disparate impact; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer security; Business; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Ignacio Cofone","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0329633058088814,"gpt":0.3314377557106744,"spread":0.2984744499017929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04075278,0.0006495707,0.001928165,0.002011379,0.004653904,0.01000317,0.003752222,0.008722109,0.009552368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1117194,0.0007985435,0.001797869,0.001966073,0.02503156,0.01866896,0.006450223,0.01336577,0.001676866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005187813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006127153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002219695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001285629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9619666,0.01650899,0.002347592,0.007095424,0.0100843,0.001997015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8481094,0.1204078,0.004977833,0.01899296,0.006376645,0.001135264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001404743,0.00002165128,0.0002635083,0.0000411761,0.00001565133,0.00003698987,0.0001752651,0.00177385,0.0000613528,0.9844664,0.002683949,0.0104463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001338935,0.000005516229,0.00007541622,0.00002455561,0.00000433367,0.00002728085,0.00004367804,0.002510559,0.00009222422,0.9923454,0.004850133,0.000007432219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03251009,0.00201669,0.601774,0.1784476,0.001049039,0.0003364344,0.0005722811,0.0003392183,0.1829548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7517976,0.00183363,0.188723,0.02665769,0.002841238,0.0009328423,0.0004952994,0.0003529484,0.02636589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04075278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2155239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255057608","doi":"","title":"Private Rights and Public International Law: Why Competition Among International Economic Law Tribunals is Not Working","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Competition (biology); Plaintiff; Business; Order (exchange); International economic law; State (computer science); International arbitration; Law; International law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Public international law; Finance","authors":[{"name":"Andrea K. Bjorklund","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02324239378390523,"gpt":0.232949590209658,"spread":0.2097071964257528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01460121,0.0002230875,0.0005038833,0.00120012,0.01363648,0.0240161,0.001756972,0.009490835,0.01146222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03543993,0.0004947492,0.0006623843,0.001647201,0.05449197,0.01989489,0.009403919,0.007590857,0.001373986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007949365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008621512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01014552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01052324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862937,0.005774507,0.0003488081,0.001528644,0.003230872,0.00282353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839,0.009639842,0.00161807,0.001813391,0.00169323,0.001335614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008302897,0.00001732018,0.000760068,0.00001910853,0.000002754145,0.0001138189,0.008846282,0.0001090086,0.00004780855,0.9770512,0.006028738,0.006995503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003322009,0.00002074709,0.00166718,0.0001435773,0.000009575191,0.0002282355,0.02075128,0.0006781751,0.000207125,0.9034346,0.0727959,0.00003037562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1748958,0.00431218,0.02697942,0.272226,0.0009683744,0.00007462069,0.00005509094,0.0001378875,0.5203506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801467,0.0005021124,0.001443239,0.006532821,0.0002174455,0.00004238851,0.00001697661,0.00007745616,0.01102091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0240161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07721943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209051954","doi":"","title":"If the Hat Fits, Wear It, If the Turban Fits, Run for Your Life: Reflections on the Indefinite Detention and Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Political science; Law; International human rights law; National security; Fundamental rights; International humanitarian law; Law and economics; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"Vincent-Joël Proulx","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06000476004544464,"gpt":0.3270714866705445,"spread":0.2670667266250998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008718882,0.0006778377,0.0004082744,0.001011702,0.02824268,0.01130812,0.003125544,0.01823936,0.002858575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01091612,0.0005807791,0.000512307,0.0007414815,0.04773838,0.006811224,0.008209391,0.01539476,0.000710959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009336292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00793552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04276515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08849226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902557,0.006617771,0.0001939729,0.000480913,0.0009819079,0.001469834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900339,0.008647871,0.000385596,0.0001576289,0.0003877754,0.0003871713],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005479255,0.00007279298,0.000526604,0.0001969088,0.000006536153,0.002422603,0.6253343,0.0002986328,0.0009747826,0.3153715,0.03967398,0.01506655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001631854,0.00009702003,0.0009858373,0.0007732807,0.000009979843,0.0005108106,0.6318154,0.0001816687,0.001146115,0.02180401,0.3425981,0.00006142293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1843233,0.02044423,0.006362244,0.4732864,0.006079331,0.00008634903,0.00005472502,0.0001033384,0.3092601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8579928,0.009207565,0.00127081,0.07376428,0.001346347,0.0001258495,0.00001683925,0.0001362779,0.05613923],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04276515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08503246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254199577","doi":"","title":"Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Proscription; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Constitutional law; Scrutiny; Proportionality (law); Public law; Dignity; Autonomy; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Markus D. Dubber","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05859160456954537,"gpt":0.332146196155907,"spread":0.2735545915863616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01304237,0.0005294396,0.0007712267,0.001869667,0.004890304,0.009676333,0.001974216,0.006926476,0.003080366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01424155,0.0005280104,0.00070474,0.001313665,0.03628548,0.008616061,0.005743715,0.01175798,0.0006693964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005624686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01204236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008855211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007896477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9909849,0.003159633,0.0004578047,0.001706854,0.002857739,0.0008330735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953074,0.001897602,0.0004337204,0.0008732415,0.001027439,0.0004606695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[2.793519e-7,0.000001674993,0.00001266947,0.000001728293,2.75881e-7,0.000002660263,0.00006104069,0.00005320287,0.00001014124,0.998725,0.0005158958,0.0006155104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005922468,0.000007554578,0.000102872,0.00004550427,0.000002897102,0.00002130414,0.0001249385,0.0002961125,0.00007904655,0.9433391,0.05596811,0.000006619522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01777258,0.009045176,0.257325,0.169082,0.002310566,0.0002117704,0.0003166282,0.0002235564,0.5437128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7537568,0.008618711,0.1463556,0.0305615,0.002841249,0.0005937345,0.0004293582,0.0001598554,0.05668321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01304237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06897545,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219836483","doi":"","title":"Teaching Legal Ethics a Quarter of a Century After Watergate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Ronald D. Rotunda","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03042177896643157,"gpt":0.3588986514044897,"spread":0.3284768724380582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003781793,0.0004590391,0.0004379955,0.001758774,0.006131208,0.008923778,0.0008232787,0.008438175,0.02476514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01229594,0.0004889304,0.0003881351,0.001715965,0.01275802,0.009381101,0.00464146,0.01007529,0.003411307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01720207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01975486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06763855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.162378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972857,0.0008010492,0.00009198962,0.0004075437,0.0008979054,0.0005157408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947296,0.002101557,0.0001745638,0.000301956,0.0009404299,0.001751823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007948581,0.0001128243,0.0005864206,0.0002474853,0.00001170593,0.0004382159,0.007128297,0.0002507697,0.0006465995,0.3227426,0.5501681,0.1175876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009142372,0.00001474955,0.0003764439,0.0001946052,0.00000249282,0.00004779746,0.001370106,0.00006075535,0.0002887368,0.02408755,0.9735353,0.00001227278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009028828,0.04786688,0.002782718,0.7712544,0.03159261,0.00005248644,0.0001014688,0.0001327669,0.1371879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09049261,0.01805187,0.001140742,0.06286239,0.004377935,0.00004637063,0.00004054424,0.0002802357,0.8227073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06763855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1344897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278285628","doi":"","title":"The Public Health Case for the Safe Storage of Firearms: Adolescent Suicides Add One More 'Smoking Gun'","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun violence; Suicide prevention; Accidental; Gun control; Criminology; Occupational safety and health; Poison control; Injury prevention; Medical emergency; Suicide rates; Medicine; Forensic engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental health; Psychology; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Andrew Jay McClurg","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.142580595323169,"gpt":0.3925799293935104,"spread":0.2499993340703414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006346768,0.0003265812,0.0004124022,0.0009792033,0.007604865,0.005782883,0.002038826,0.03470572,0.00591251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02487563,0.0005857858,0.001005486,0.0008274514,0.01713582,0.00643979,0.005083014,0.02459335,0.0006490713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003350105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008651638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01844931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02400084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941021,0.002352056,0.0002845572,0.0004989074,0.001203752,0.001558691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755034,0.01733946,0.002453005,0.000789657,0.001557432,0.002357051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000915758,0.0003134196,0.01410906,0.0003554601,0.00005896979,0.009106407,0.0163808,0.0003276306,0.0004679011,0.6600917,0.2640953,0.03460182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955675,0.0002875292,0.02172435,0.002384923,0.0002107762,0.009734422,0.03083712,0.0007217879,0.00137976,0.1603929,0.7719478,0.0001831108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.01104359,0.003184588,0.0004129063,0.9619492,0.001913109,0.00001524367,0.00002442476,0.00001553978,0.0214413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2036128,0.004877554,0.0006824145,0.7756819,0.007259707,0.00007632031,0.00003005817,0.00001990038,0.007759319],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03470572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03668386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787705115","doi":"","title":"Lifting the “American Exceptionalism” Curtain: Options and Lessons from Abroad","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; American exceptionalism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; International trade; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Earl Johnson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02741226104346817,"gpt":0.3296761565842392,"spread":0.302263895540771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005221277,0.0003244374,0.0004671298,0.001084697,0.01089707,0.01033577,0.00154086,0.00306721,0.01361586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004699467,0.0001609509,0.0004830394,0.001362686,0.01007899,0.00858178,0.006546102,0.007212024,0.00121998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004855565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009825972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01999197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04392583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979379,0.001020246,0.00003398065,0.0001300948,0.0001757918,0.0007018841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994433,0.00151773,0.0001668425,0.0003369167,0.0005791523,0.002966435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001933389,0.0009302422,0.01202209,0.0004227233,0.00002679752,0.002012621,0.09610812,0.0004980104,0.0001906852,0.3542918,0.2506445,0.2826592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035775,0.0001603231,0.009130013,0.002012304,0.00002189068,0.0005344556,0.2538788,0.0002366373,0.0002307521,0.07812192,0.6555746,0.00006249572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.161917,0.01916254,0.0009417824,0.435669,0.003268572,0.00003676581,0.000090879,0.0000725394,0.3788409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853161,0.02352569,0.001181283,0.06611751,0.001601149,0.00006570327,0.0001756896,0.0001311391,0.05404085],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01999197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04554957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794975037","doi":"","title":"Note – “Between” a Rock and a Hard Place: Martin Marietta v. Vulcan and the Rise of the Backdoor Standstill","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backdoor; Geology; Computer science; Computer security","authors":[{"name":"Sasha S. Hahn","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01963233193546786,"gpt":0.2777221952549317,"spread":0.2580898633194638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002201321,0.0003730754,0.0003261462,0.0009219947,0.01629057,0.006051098,0.001921519,0.01149535,0.008108824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005336889,0.0004567992,0.000553532,0.0007161594,0.008241275,0.004778192,0.002639349,0.0110803,0.001270373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008769363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01167345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3995593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6406567,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968954,0.0006700227,0.0001135829,0.0005490669,0.001005419,0.0007665131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975525,0.001545612,0.0001521216,0.00008680218,0.000470101,0.0001929994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005516854,0.00003771047,0.002157241,0.00007947422,0.00001735046,0.0009852268,0.02463756,0.000173475,0.0006739324,0.5960764,0.3661149,0.0089915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003518766,0.00007428498,0.008932716,0.000493461,0.00006146824,0.000860304,0.04007954,0.0004257246,0.002382054,0.06868083,0.8778124,0.0001620087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03891056,0.004595578,0.002693636,0.4927107,0.003574118,0.00009568594,0.0007583264,0.00008562096,0.4565757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5003497,0.003241678,0.002968822,0.3133786,0.001765423,0.0001598595,0.0002849461,0.0001070591,0.1777439],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3995593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7944672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791270191","doi":"","title":"Two Wrongs Don't Make a Patent Right","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","authors":[{"name":"David Catechi","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1003903321998904,"gpt":0.2238198459108035,"spread":0.1234295137109132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01271593,0.0004767637,0.0008585881,0.001378651,0.007508392,0.01078725,0.00158422,0.02001877,0.01609229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04479207,0.000523568,0.001227891,0.0008427584,0.02267839,0.0185457,0.00489373,0.01318646,0.003934189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00321122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005375336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003660897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002997648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9845561,0.003358484,0.000853765,0.003281207,0.005778089,0.002172428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783985,0.01186931,0.001060481,0.004520279,0.003125004,0.00102649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000199028,0.00001765828,0.0002546314,0.00001746614,0.00001034072,0.0001588377,0.0004142302,0.00007594656,0.0001261081,0.9787351,0.01311164,0.007058094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004501554,0.00002991905,0.0003357036,0.00007945522,0.00003042431,0.000385907,0.0005190891,0.0002981584,0.0004903871,0.8684292,0.129328,0.00002875323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02840076,0.004074299,0.02268825,0.3257381,0.00515929,0.00006479615,0.0002441581,0.0002222232,0.6134081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7957566,0.002450973,0.007351309,0.08103416,0.003800544,0.000143948,0.0001553486,0.0001723898,0.1091348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02001877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06724912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808252237","doi":"","title":"Towards and Explicit Balancing Inquiry - R.A.V. and Black through the Lens of Foreign Freedom of Expression Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of expression; Through-the-lens metering; Expression (computer science); Lens (geology); Law; Political science; Computer science; Human rights; Physics; Optics","authors":[{"name":"Matthew S. Melamed","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03702698819068929,"gpt":0.2486247810390282,"spread":0.211597792848339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02909722,0.000588836,0.001030761,0.001966736,0.00729306,0.01274914,0.00254604,0.009390789,0.002054675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02401696,0.0005402878,0.0008907125,0.001385153,0.04100806,0.01460388,0.006695035,0.01394926,0.0004747271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00900837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01341465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01125346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01341014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9784241,0.01338353,0.0005226706,0.002615173,0.003837041,0.001217531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986668,0.009784104,0.0007634299,0.001082021,0.00137089,0.0003314836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001257008,0.000001941123,0.0000167297,0.000004099903,6.155343e-7,0.00001084376,0.0008689973,0.00004515013,0.00002217473,0.9972653,0.0005494443,0.001213496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006625177,0.000007293327,0.00004917893,0.00008767878,0.000003755121,0.00002005121,0.001035516,0.0004434389,0.0001758923,0.9554576,0.04270554,0.000007391287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02879579,0.01067992,0.1560352,0.1806673,0.001632474,0.0002021214,0.00008626,0.0001410655,0.6217598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8420978,0.003131866,0.07058214,0.0359133,0.0009620657,0.0005296087,0.00006352396,0.0001311502,0.04658858],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02909722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1538826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}