{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":8,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"80381e258916","filters":{"venue":"History of Political Thought"}},"results":[{"id":"W2248717767","doi":"","title":"Schiller's aesthetic republicanism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Emancipation; Politics; Reciprocal; Sociology; Aesthetics; Division of labour; Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art; Anthropology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Douglas Moggach","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05553145397013378,"gpt":0.2429609540478872,"spread":0.1874295000777534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070619,0.0003332318,0.0001602999,0.0009800059,0.004247853,0.003008708,0.0003525413,0.001163074,0.005664824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001937441,0.0001092878,0.0001748727,0.0006685991,0.01420423,0.002666508,0.002245079,0.00212599,0.0007852318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004084649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001808655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002498001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004748647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.000516137,0.00002244352,0.0001265555,0.0003204685,0.0001608041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999595,0.0001967695,0.00004186089,0.00003606632,0.00008027237,0.00005010222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005526603,0.000003601439,0.00004528097,0.000008365008,4.864795e-7,0.00002643796,0.002384414,0.00004485324,0.00005418445,0.9871748,0.005593613,0.004658305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008770064,0.00002215138,0.0003591468,0.00007555355,0.00000291872,0.0001890716,0.002062248,0.0003598956,0.0003185641,0.6128115,0.3837787,0.00001154861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02619739,0.003824826,0.004389896,0.02727222,0.0006987522,0.00001973508,0.00002328623,0.00004574702,0.9375283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8936045,0.001720021,0.001920465,0.004603576,0.0005727153,0.00004509203,0.00002312515,0.0000526108,0.09745798],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005664824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02963632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W50066032","doi":"","title":"Bentham’s Religious Radicalism Revisited: A Response to Schofield","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"James E. Crimmins","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03186800354275975,"gpt":0.3398143725746071,"spread":0.3079463690318473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01870283,0.0008516192,0.001721674,0.0028597,0.01664373,0.01637647,0.004263276,0.0433135,0.009631251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04882073,0.0007188832,0.0009200611,0.004096765,0.04698019,0.02313618,0.009968217,0.04690463,0.001680818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01234527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01097576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0372669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06131262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891025,0.005414551,0.000497041,0.001760366,0.002076245,0.001149362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506586,0.038825,0.001419837,0.001247214,0.004688453,0.003160818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005284337,0.00002617144,0.0002897344,0.0001571749,0.00001905141,0.0003009944,0.01446081,0.00008067547,0.00007075589,0.3733507,0.5993333,0.0118577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003920906,0.00001452786,0.0006790996,0.0006465217,0.00001750393,0.0001891532,0.01612622,0.0001806738,0.0001619367,0.1890968,0.7927703,0.00007792871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005554508,0.007346523,0.0001585984,0.982219,0.006196712,0.000001961179,0.00001175001,0.000005580916,0.003504409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05643891,0.00890976,0.0004068881,0.8898004,0.03340964,0.00002310593,0.00001856399,0.0000930196,0.01089967],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0433135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09891123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389509010","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.4.676","title":"Liu Bei, Plato <i>et al</i>. on Kingship: A Microhistory of Seventeenth-Century Globalization and Political Thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Emperor; Microhistory; Monarchy; Politics; Reading (process); Philosophy; Globalization; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Humanities; History; Epistemology; Ancient history; Law; Art; Political science; Linguistics; Economic history","authors":[{"name":"Shoufu Yin","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03210888375735334,"gpt":0.3062970676016378,"spread":0.2741881838442845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000476194,0.0002306151,0.0001285811,0.001042494,0.002955083,0.001805826,0.0001804811,0.0005818495,0.002212796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004145363,0.000104002,0.0001129686,0.001304601,0.007031904,0.002151751,0.001116785,0.001445551,0.0002355092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006088117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001891589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01147584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01760479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998245,0.00006146846,0.000005944189,0.00002403132,0.00003169446,0.00005246061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998884,0.00004414034,0.00002049634,0.00001048081,0.00001568769,0.00002072752],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003704811,0.0000100911,0.002544018,0.0001134618,0.000006089864,0.0002994832,0.0676853,0.0001520678,0.0004647222,0.8785466,0.01477034,0.03537078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002136127,0.00004996184,0.01074408,0.0003022666,0.00001484429,0.0002199711,0.01661613,0.0004429469,0.001015629,0.1506412,0.819907,0.00002463761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1507818,0.07499989,0.003627216,0.06396593,0.001935649,0.00004487334,0.000106565,0.0001368244,0.7044013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924837,0.01124351,0.000577607,0.002612944,0.0003968858,0.00003691053,0.00003881013,0.000027699,0.06022871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01147584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04417264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235682095","doi":"","title":"Guelpshs! factiones, liberty and sovereignty: Inquieries about the Quattrocento","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Ideology; Fifteenth; Context (archaeology); Empire; Politics; Law; Ancient history; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology","authors":[{"name":"Serena Ferente","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04277856758262599,"gpt":0.2481474505404628,"spread":0.2053688829578368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009240523,0.0003029113,0.0002260771,0.001026652,0.004332888,0.003259883,0.0002950893,0.001234146,0.003791002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00133366,0.0001693786,0.0001476743,0.0008552285,0.01531823,0.003300362,0.00172292,0.002114242,0.0003010494],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003263571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008660425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008443463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01029827,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994849,0.0002974554,0.000007537684,0.00006851659,0.00005605296,0.00008556966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995863,0.0002893452,0.00004092961,0.00003262571,0.00002035362,0.00003047309],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002494899,0.000005268542,0.0007425544,0.00008119328,0.000003561673,0.0002176719,0.05140415,0.00005026854,0.0001275228,0.9284548,0.007044293,0.01184371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001687015,0.00003052873,0.00538133,0.0005222967,0.000007893129,0.0004670699,0.01543796,0.0001315212,0.0002580628,0.1947599,0.7829731,0.00001350431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.137676,0.09649004,0.003131765,0.08791922,0.001318603,0.00002063066,0.0001181104,0.00006237537,0.6732633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665735,0.009675467,0.0004864091,0.002945069,0.0008657505,0.00002172679,0.0000339639,0.0000298577,0.01936825],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008443463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02367902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386293548","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.3.577","title":"The Rhetorical Roots of Du Bois's Double Consciousness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Double consciousness; Oppression; Rhetorical question; Consciousness; Sociology; Power (physics); Injustice; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Rob Goodman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04564796679820318,"gpt":0.3124755148046457,"spread":0.2668275480064425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005379835,0.0004141329,0.0003282561,0.002375001,0.009099167,0.009902172,0.0007088539,0.002497228,0.003063696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093443,0.0002617972,0.0002302376,0.001448909,0.04586321,0.008118663,0.004688874,0.006182041,0.0004234443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005471106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003148207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003753969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959583,0.002604377,0.00007085702,0.0003604937,0.0005895566,0.000416396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885395,0.009139705,0.0007964098,0.0004643601,0.0006356567,0.0004244367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006959679,0.000005713074,0.0001607283,0.00002579099,0.000001511485,0.00006707854,0.03348079,0.00002543275,0.00009004987,0.9607671,0.002003939,0.003364806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001608716,0.0000288226,0.0008320014,0.0003843422,0.000009567983,0.0004103201,0.03563131,0.0003978492,0.001120797,0.6925628,0.2685833,0.00002283842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1170351,0.01315176,0.02938596,0.1056911,0.001351489,0.00004320321,0.00004166914,0.0001018087,0.7331977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811374,0.001765368,0.001714141,0.003382856,0.0003055401,0.00003122772,0.000006298172,0.00005585768,0.01160138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009902172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03969586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386293840","doi":"10.53765/20512988.44.3.530","title":"History, Filmerian Patriarchalism and Exclusion Royalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Monarchy; Scholarship; Power (physics); Constitution; Ideology; Law; Sociology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"William Tigner Holmes Little","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06676622540193457,"gpt":0.2365307651850098,"spread":0.1697645397830752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001382494,0.0001364906,0.0001831786,0.001061374,0.004723659,0.005142896,0.0003903029,0.0009109817,0.005830774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003574858,0.000115936,0.00009403464,0.001377035,0.02138151,0.00399405,0.001971633,0.001882275,0.0003369223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006126749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001672593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01322863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01364095,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989711,0.000590809,0.00003042363,0.0001379375,0.0001170758,0.0001527038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998219,0.001084798,0.0002807592,0.0001057973,0.0001167096,0.000192967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001790973,0.000009852076,0.0005800741,0.00002539463,0.000001642746,0.00007459015,0.007517481,0.00004694858,0.000028745,0.9844081,0.003161076,0.004128084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002087621,0.00002732802,0.00650784,0.0002870319,0.000006084247,0.0003079488,0.009816682,0.0002532715,0.0001849547,0.5036499,0.4789232,0.00001497086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1497975,0.02689115,0.002578764,0.0446712,0.0003918665,0.00001390611,0.0001128012,0.00001688365,0.7755259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737014,0.004114165,0.0002110428,0.0009847844,0.0002930536,0.00001093194,0.00002478012,0.0000142646,0.02064551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01322863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411501600","doi":"10.53765/20512988.46.2.233","title":"‘The Man Sterne, Strong, Bould . . . The Woman Weake, Fearfull, Faire’: Sir Thomas Smith’s Account of the Patriarchal Family","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Politics; Character (mathematics); Intervention (counseling); Gender studies; Prism; Law; Political science; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Joanne Boucher","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0390922284019838,"gpt":0.2391332526202849,"spread":0.2000410242183011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069373,0.0002991046,0.0002649712,0.0006957173,0.004280379,0.003551083,0.000617173,0.001641643,0.003669656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002184358,0.0002005076,0.0001420762,0.0009774873,0.01583378,0.003844724,0.00123902,0.002074475,0.0004049552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007186575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002258135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03851002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04649982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983935,0.001166927,0.00001764554,0.00008824588,0.0001584844,0.0001751795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992856,0.0004524543,0.00007322071,0.00002949474,0.00006084056,0.00009830914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002491943,0.000009936277,0.0006231201,0.00005068566,0.000005805194,0.0003711632,0.1637194,0.0001945058,0.00008100488,0.7660363,0.06299417,0.005889029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009187801,0.00002360069,0.002030761,0.0001686605,0.000005739564,0.0004036532,0.06418613,0.0003396337,0.0001292065,0.1085342,0.8241538,0.00001537865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.14905,0.06593735,0.00410621,0.3825902,0.001719613,0.00002578292,0.0001757017,0.0000458055,0.3963494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303129,0.008704632,0.0003929539,0.008109265,0.000888159,0.00002120083,0.00002143851,0.00003191744,0.0515175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03851002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07657176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408138162","doi":"10.53765/20512988.46.1.1","title":"‘To Listen to Both Sides Equally’: Just Judgment in the Athenian Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Thought","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07263613690805638,"gpt":0.3586157912071158,"spread":0.2859796542990595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01131172,0.0002905337,0.0005041857,0.001604353,0.0164947,0.01012423,0.0008960573,0.006278465,0.00249377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008428777,0.00046512,0.0002457661,0.001049267,0.08022901,0.01068115,0.00506141,0.008636613,0.0005470025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006118874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003186589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003352623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00530629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9882748,0.008564852,0.0002372247,0.0009741639,0.001131165,0.0008177859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955018,0.003345123,0.0003100181,0.0003151063,0.000312298,0.0002155871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009162,0.00001639388,0.0001610954,0.00002795124,0.000003360848,0.0001063702,0.04275461,0.0000384981,0.0000882019,0.9505203,0.001696943,0.004576073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003100761,0.00004844967,0.00136306,0.0003769886,0.000008510511,0.000341991,0.03100393,0.0002113476,0.0003449676,0.7845057,0.1817287,0.00003532272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1738997,0.0163937,0.008274196,0.1044776,0.001217697,0.00004040262,0.000022076,0.00002610461,0.6956484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805894,0.001271202,0.001140854,0.00746316,0.000357072,0.00001974501,0.000004670154,0.00001367187,0.009140153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0164947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05982286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}