{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":5,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"f6c2a533e6fb","filters":{"venue":"Hofstra law review"}},"results":[{"id":"W176921812","doi":"","title":"Conversations about Families in Canadian Courts and Legislatures: Are there \"Lessons\" for the United States?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Mary Jane Mossman","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05314811017678399,"gpt":0.3436349278381987,"spread":0.2904868176614147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02551288,0.000504179,0.0009706962,0.006536608,0.05830142,0.01956018,0.005102657,0.01297971,0.008687543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06802019,0.0007257697,0.0008185811,0.009135513,0.02212921,0.007980656,0.004667269,0.01167703,0.0003791235],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2017567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4236943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9766231,0.006758704,0.0006128888,0.001281921,0.006946712,0.007776795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9242745,0.03140198,0.002412715,0.0008496154,0.02850436,0.01255684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001353467,0.0001324482,0.02235274,0.001036798,0.0001714344,0.000729805,0.187477,0.0005178624,0.0002829642,0.1794686,0.5010126,0.1066824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005886604,0.00004642431,0.0631889,0.00444877,0.0002761499,0.0001596738,0.3861913,0.0002320037,0.0003974187,0.01656323,0.5281729,0.0002643636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06288919,0.08791492,0.000464421,0.7622812,0.002514662,0.00007510394,0.0007303982,0.00003936004,0.08309068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7376489,0.05538078,0.0006662099,0.1894955,0.0008582198,0.0001212693,0.0002985816,0.00005747302,0.01547304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2017567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624692811","doi":"","title":"Reciprocity and Environmental Obligations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Law and economics; Consequentialism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science","authors":[{"name":"Leslie P. Francis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01687254602272902,"gpt":0.2330125327782671,"spread":0.2161399867555381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120961,0.0005925777,0.0007029444,0.001295098,0.007018432,0.00789718,0.001432258,0.005472377,0.02156316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01962478,0.0004730821,0.0007029136,0.001254581,0.03276064,0.0111706,0.009220153,0.004090874,0.002510513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004682665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006230807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004642469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004327062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9829605,0.009459403,0.0007186044,0.00225138,0.002938844,0.001671263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868276,0.006598876,0.001308088,0.002126949,0.002362509,0.000775855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003105525,0.00000456592,0.0001397907,0.00002562017,0.000004214795,0.00003833622,0.000691905,0.0001441042,0.00002988921,0.9943282,0.001522275,0.003068043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008869742,0.00001499552,0.0002888097,0.0001337967,0.000007674834,0.0001451839,0.0008552144,0.00020915,0.0001077973,0.8508691,0.147343,0.00001643769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01124655,0.004370687,0.03840313,0.02721293,0.0005369455,0.0001036373,0.0001504475,0.00006796213,0.9179077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8827942,0.004702708,0.01150565,0.007620931,0.0007121725,0.0003979458,0.0001698601,0.00013944,0.09195702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02156316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07213593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78552956","doi":"","title":"Forum Non Conveniens and the Warsaw Convention: Leaving the Turbulence Behind?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Convention; Turbulence; Physics; Mechanics","authors":[{"name":"Katherine R. Dieterich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01604030929471405,"gpt":0.3048623765301413,"spread":0.2888220672354272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003834953,0.0003638169,0.00024053,0.0007323484,0.005830179,0.01069239,0.001038551,0.006315558,0.008659347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008016368,0.0002926426,0.0002840409,0.001288551,0.009009464,0.008863573,0.003131184,0.005570773,0.0008079793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01270119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01231045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1357192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.235387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997121,0.0009769367,0.0000720419,0.0003219126,0.0007293698,0.0007786709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989271,0.0004527736,0.0001491784,0.0001175631,0.0001866362,0.0001667625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001332191,0.000009844693,0.0004273429,0.00002416973,0.000002485359,0.0001440887,0.002404754,0.0001006269,0.0001600983,0.938428,0.03807081,0.02021443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001463659,0.00002088221,0.002939082,0.0002156317,0.000005363979,0.0001214499,0.004678164,0.0002915185,0.0003745564,0.102293,0.8890035,0.00004225676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05048719,0.04439804,0.006619278,0.25113,0.003679113,0.00006134075,0.0001438117,0.00007379868,0.6434075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7314054,0.01135855,0.002667745,0.04476248,0.002066679,0.0001012366,0.0001185517,0.00009515863,0.2074242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1357192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2698584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661050030","doi":"","title":"Positivist Legal Ethics Theory and the Law Governing Lawyers: A Few Puzzles Worth Solving","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal ethics; Law; Legal positivism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Legal profession; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Amy Salyzyn","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04481532221732027,"gpt":0.3895861595395608,"spread":0.3447708373222405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01425046,0.0007212163,0.001348965,0.002065425,0.005738865,0.01158586,0.00383104,0.0121338,0.008921615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01812908,0.0006299435,0.0009504398,0.002287314,0.06166571,0.03076717,0.005026811,0.01983021,0.002023322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007130369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006036136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00449632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005166488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934431,0.003683496,0.0001805345,0.0007256067,0.001477615,0.0004896772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781678,0.01575989,0.001109916,0.001594572,0.001849053,0.001518831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008459187,0.00002502016,0.0001315644,0.0000719452,0.000006417556,0.00003015441,0.00116523,0.0001264665,0.0000263463,0.9851204,0.008712654,0.004575309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001050545,0.000005235846,0.00009322738,0.000140175,0.000001514138,0.00002484503,0.0008689216,0.0001634482,0.0000181968,0.9808218,0.01784506,0.000007073596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006186724,0.04154329,0.01371167,0.8951991,0.00155601,0.00001654433,0.0000514091,0.00005372169,0.04168162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.680578,0.06723483,0.02852559,0.169006,0.01771586,0.0003443038,0.000194392,0.0003056815,0.03609525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01425046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07536453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990093633","doi":"","title":"Confronting Chaos: The Fiscal Constitution Faces Federal Shutdowns and (Almost) Debt Defaults","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hofstra law review","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Default; Government (linguistics); Statutory law; Cabinet (room); Revenue; Constitution; Debt restructuring; Debt service coverage ratio","authors":[],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02602608522374035,"gpt":0.2339578879687293,"spread":0.2079318027449889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005899234,0.0001596258,0.0004972507,0.001476608,0.00694643,0.01085465,0.0007967159,0.006397569,0.005000236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02302434,0.0002695113,0.0003573613,0.001564634,0.005252711,0.006822397,0.003804858,0.007995049,0.0006813643],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006417391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006918457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04183954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04578745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99613,0.0009732814,0.0001236405,0.0003003233,0.0007858651,0.001686871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927608,0.003132897,0.001752306,0.0003562489,0.0007859035,0.001211825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000308046,0.00009661011,0.03269221,0.000126316,0.00006634661,0.0017943,0.005454805,0.002801109,0.0003859342,0.7088169,0.1963763,0.05108121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001457641,0.00008727925,0.0705254,0.0006553274,0.00007609192,0.000429554,0.01561892,0.003808322,0.0005112247,0.6398796,0.268126,0.0001366313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3616727,0.009637355,0.002534502,0.4973667,0.001367762,0.00003371245,0.000654019,0.0001123593,0.1266209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747779,0.002558596,0.0002386131,0.01650833,0.0009257407,0.0000150931,0.0001141299,0.00003037101,0.004831085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04183954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08319199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}