{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":20,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"76f648cd4705","filters":{"venue":"Houston journal of international law"}},"results":[{"id":"W293968321","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Foreign Tax Judgments: An Argument for the Revocation of the Revenue Rule","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Jurisdiction; Statute; Political science; Obligation; Federal common law; Personal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics","authors":[{"name":"William J. Kovatch","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02204820852338325,"gpt":0.2563221487246002,"spread":0.234273940201217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01371271,0.0007814725,0.001162468,0.002176351,0.006462587,0.01022695,0.006328898,0.02245232,0.01312096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03045785,0.0009048065,0.00263255,0.0009327822,0.02217967,0.0117395,0.007006369,0.02534573,0.003986944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005595043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006145421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008544961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005108184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869305,0.003386322,0.000645466,0.00287514,0.003874538,0.00228809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828542,0.009664064,0.001287409,0.002378507,0.003035235,0.0007804512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016726,0.000016764,0.0001384455,0.00001381204,0.000005364324,0.0001880186,0.0002141105,0.0001153892,0.00008711631,0.9933069,0.004386315,0.001510924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001528651,0.00006945474,0.0004016764,0.000232502,0.0000662247,0.0005316022,0.0005457422,0.003704864,0.001185277,0.8589123,0.1341183,0.00007919283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.0329928,0.002039546,0.05639548,0.09922739,0.004046942,0.0003438678,0.0002088281,0.0003132735,0.8044319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8289472,0.00133029,0.01803807,0.04781279,0.005948916,0.0004961016,0.0001380177,0.0002111859,0.09707735],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02245232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07252055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171716517","doi":"","title":"Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11: Past, Present, and Future","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Free trade; Arbitration; Political science; International trade law; Negotiation; Tribunal; Interpretation (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Free trade agreement; Commission; Sovereignty; Law; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"J Marcia","is_ca":false},{"name":"Christine W. Lewis","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01399269410344472,"gpt":0.2278515043472219,"spread":0.2138588102437772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01155461,0.0003025918,0.0003443511,0.001692182,0.004676078,0.01103618,0.001704142,0.00544097,0.009077206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01562642,0.0003687766,0.0005084157,0.00245384,0.006951401,0.004615319,0.002276742,0.003585433,0.001120746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009133445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01176408,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02361095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02941653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9875031,0.004500993,0.0008612731,0.0008082699,0.005217074,0.001109219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918839,0.004189319,0.001006154,0.0003215144,0.0023888,0.0002102898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002869093,0.00002591233,0.001918559,0.0002325064,0.000009339041,0.0003462219,0.005026716,0.0006833009,0.0002557436,0.895389,0.04905592,0.04702804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006997462,0.0000402703,0.001883759,0.001316036,0.00001512364,0.0003243195,0.003005746,0.0006210775,0.0003279866,0.07191719,0.9205016,0.00003974242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03116234,0.06767305,0.009994396,0.07035986,0.004200272,0.0002033724,0.0003036949,0.0001296029,0.8159734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6907679,0.05709018,0.01339086,0.02334556,0.00495617,0.0005257066,0.0007490834,0.00007029867,0.2091043],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02361095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06626809,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308739830","doi":"","title":"TRIPS Compliance: Dealing with the Consequences of Drug Patents in India","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Patent Act; Principle of legality; Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Economics; Medicine; Patent law; Pharmacology","authors":[{"name":"Rishi Gupta","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0851516494275886,"gpt":0.2459004662222322,"spread":0.1607488167946436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005078421,0.0001746722,0.0001843262,0.001934275,0.007067974,0.007849756,0.002499372,0.007026762,0.01035812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01842165,0.0002298687,0.0005353173,0.002792117,0.003920855,0.004350318,0.004911514,0.00705231,0.000846429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007873681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01586087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04095706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05057686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939015,0.001263845,0.0003681086,0.0004064397,0.002713061,0.001347086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981778,0.009189814,0.003293886,0.0009867646,0.002561362,0.002190172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001215754,0.000376455,0.04848115,0.0007942374,0.00006406833,0.01520696,0.03508743,0.002127136,0.001517009,0.3561576,0.3114492,0.2286171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003023798,0.0002911632,0.06516434,0.0008385758,0.00007427709,0.00686005,0.06645645,0.003205932,0.002056724,0.03427947,0.8205816,0.000161243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2177647,0.005535086,0.002038595,0.335783,0.001463805,0.0001703704,0.0004069608,0.0004007576,0.4364369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8690979,0.004870387,0.001157905,0.04727954,0.001080726,0.0000739738,0.0002752098,0.00008640879,0.07607789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04095706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08143735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337972206","doi":"","title":"Bitcoin: The Napster of Currency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Cryptocurrency; Currency; China; Virtual currency; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Business; Public administration; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Stephen Small","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02114331938529612,"gpt":0.2660303835112224,"spread":0.2448870641259263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00287791,0.0005664161,0.000321899,0.001197647,0.003723804,0.01268225,0.0007631258,0.004884115,0.01134846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00621914,0.0002162449,0.0003096832,0.001736619,0.009771886,0.01050068,0.003999368,0.006817924,0.002125061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005231186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003724558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009457641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005334194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974242,0.0009191913,0.000103332,0.0002902602,0.0008430929,0.0004199044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998619,0.0003882465,0.0001362653,0.0002051995,0.0004233419,0.000227997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003763947,0.000006643616,0.0003019003,0.0000624673,0.000004042567,0.0001141583,0.001348917,0.0001211137,0.0002788923,0.9408188,0.04038037,0.01652507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128618,0.00004585601,0.001021377,0.0005128824,0.000005346792,0.0001901256,0.002408755,0.0003735985,0.0006971736,0.1465036,0.8482023,0.00002623746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0176903,0.0352561,0.006443601,0.1698224,0.005664092,0.00006751168,0.000145861,0.0001649674,0.7647451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5688934,0.03495559,0.003089213,0.09039176,0.004988587,0.0002223345,0.0001782747,0.0003355755,0.2969452],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01268225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03796434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41821280","doi":"","title":"Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009: A \"Fit\"-Ing Policy for North America?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Tariff; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Energy policy; Emissions trading; Feed-in tariff; Economy; Business; Environmental protection; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economics; International trade; Renewable energy; Engineering; Environmental science","authors":[{"name":"Michael E. Streich","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02723628145205783,"gpt":0.2800089532955212,"spread":0.2527726718434634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002647932,0.0008819052,0.0006549953,0.0008623658,0.007569612,0.007181678,0.002734504,0.02331818,0.01502192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006120921,0.0005260996,0.0007038604,0.002177786,0.003957144,0.004219241,0.00154326,0.01188986,0.005623947],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0316572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07923669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7972178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9144548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972161,0.0003227521,0.0001552967,0.0003586229,0.001270547,0.0006767358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967265,0.0006837226,0.000213412,0.00009914533,0.001888325,0.0003889067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001304776,0.00002521086,0.0004075304,0.0001056445,0.000002927445,0.0001123237,0.0006330513,0.00004891771,0.0001727527,0.0327433,0.9598052,0.005930169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008559226,0.000006916694,0.002811073,0.0003323696,0.000006179335,0.00001956713,0.001015495,0.0000554654,0.00007024969,0.002885424,0.9927614,0.00002735491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001911822,0.01331929,0.0004621888,0.8453119,0.01646053,0.0001107823,0.002614121,0.0001684881,0.1196409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01869126,0.01362879,0.003115961,0.6933663,0.003358955,0.0003599942,0.001445491,0.000157393,0.2658759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4079528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41070819","doi":"","title":"International Student Athletes in the NCAA: Professionals or Exploited Children?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; Amateur; Athletes; Club; Political science; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; History","authors":[{"name":"Patrick L. Stewart","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02323526045174472,"gpt":0.3853870945880636,"spread":0.3621518341363189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001580011,0.0004152243,0.0003878531,0.001250724,0.005371111,0.005006214,0.0009489078,0.004891332,0.02449528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005879257,0.000280137,0.0002472406,0.001693976,0.003115592,0.007128917,0.002221818,0.00572386,0.00403981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003092398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007433603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04419782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09666946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988165,0.0002701589,0.00008835125,0.0001335725,0.000317006,0.0003744474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777,0.0004326806,0.0002306621,0.00005629641,0.0007340871,0.0007763758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001713329,0.00004051206,0.004484114,0.0002766544,0.000003256678,0.0003803516,0.00997062,0.000009836961,0.00006910966,0.0135657,0.9090198,0.06216296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003526141,0.00002424897,0.008526086,0.001506516,0.000003913831,0.0004832695,0.04170252,0.00001364146,0.0000427747,0.002445717,0.94523,0.00001780929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01007145,0.03905582,0.0002980185,0.7858167,0.04645205,0.00007700173,0.0007784401,0.00009676998,0.1173537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1121578,0.1145657,0.001258377,0.5389276,0.03026736,0.0003883339,0.001824467,0.0001880609,0.2004223],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04419782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08788115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320146868","doi":"","title":"Who Gets the Oil?: Arctic Energy Exploration in Uncertain Waters and the Need for Universal Ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Arctic; Ratification; Law; Political science; Administration (probate law); International law; Oceanography; Politics; Geology","authors":[{"name":"Meagan P. Wilder","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02690097810458089,"gpt":0.2869453539809207,"spread":0.2600443758763398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01416968,0.0005874665,0.0008723538,0.001390285,0.01531406,0.02311021,0.003008688,0.01953179,0.008984219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02038153,0.0005316338,0.0006605671,0.002316791,0.02148264,0.02226311,0.007123283,0.02137906,0.001795823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01394634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02966417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06975765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1239211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936514,0.003212693,0.000286023,0.0005713669,0.00119219,0.001086182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835021,0.01183286,0.0007926584,0.0002315864,0.001876599,0.001764237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004397046,0.00004308497,0.0009060107,0.0003543412,0.000009684836,0.0007887549,0.01756789,0.0003652888,0.0001657307,0.4854404,0.4590997,0.0352151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009633758,0.00002637396,0.001911655,0.00304742,0.00001088453,0.0002242822,0.07736383,0.0005705897,0.0001896752,0.2018073,0.7147445,0.00009386674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002633646,0.02880776,0.0004268179,0.9326818,0.006782877,0.00001113326,0.00003444612,0.00001472203,0.02860694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.298526,0.1318976,0.003985052,0.4792222,0.02242176,0.000174522,0.0002245967,0.0002004881,0.06334785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06975765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1387032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106099222","doi":"","title":"Gene-Patenting and Access to Healthcare: Achieving Precision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Patent Act; TRIPS Agreement; Health care; Business; Law; Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Biotechnology; Patent law; Economics; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Dipika Jain","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09772565969263787,"gpt":0.2752054991477962,"spread":0.1774798394551583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005886404,0.0006042358,0.0006352391,0.001686238,0.001952258,0.009753341,0.001519719,0.008643267,0.01773199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01021909,0.0003538931,0.0006911083,0.001939134,0.01988575,0.01072861,0.005144612,0.005532979,0.003289918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007172636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007532327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004126864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003723348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956209,0.001298172,0.0002372456,0.0005540473,0.001744416,0.0005451671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936985,0.00389743,0.0007041483,0.0005718331,0.0007582735,0.000369911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002873102,0.00002842143,0.000568959,0.0007398514,0.00001157014,0.0001204411,0.0006442433,0.0004480299,0.0004958154,0.8641788,0.04734058,0.08539456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001313928,0.00006661984,0.001616414,0.002246358,0.00002042137,0.0003305325,0.00103166,0.0003451951,0.0009897988,0.5085582,0.4847441,0.00003751833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004431111,0.2433582,0.01456544,0.5075079,0.004074476,0.0000718173,0.0002487669,0.0001995261,0.2255427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.386672,0.3978871,0.01761873,0.1357413,0.01200381,0.0001995392,0.0003301124,0.00009326188,0.04945425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01773199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05931944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343004315","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments in Brazil's Oil & Gas Industry: Brazil Appears to Be Stemming the Tide of Resource Nationalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Petroleum industry; Economy; International trade; Economics; Business; Engineering","authors":[{"name":"Steven P. Otillar","is_ca":false},{"name":"Kristina A. McQuaid","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.015843774201692,"gpt":0.2425327437133686,"spread":0.2266889695116766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006667376,0.0001644633,0.0001214507,0.0007369808,0.001420782,0.002519148,0.0002789627,0.001478395,0.007720444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001868815,0.0001460612,0.0001893686,0.002062294,0.001258842,0.001952551,0.0007557631,0.001458589,0.0006862591],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004184397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00613062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07660115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1457719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996805,0.00004538724,0.00001702718,0.00005912261,0.0001237706,0.00007407366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987229,0.0003297399,0.0003031447,0.00003755267,0.0004195995,0.0001871532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007415306,0.0000556499,0.03159998,0.002431165,0.0000375864,0.002178486,0.01082208,0.0008803749,0.007156322,0.4511702,0.2097047,0.2838892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003132982,0.00001719229,0.02861182,0.0005612557,0.00001175559,0.0003321616,0.003134759,0.0001810534,0.0005495677,0.007827658,0.9587508,0.00001880822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0864124,0.118345,0.00143705,0.5188497,0.001755701,0.00003198482,0.001731708,0.000111703,0.2713248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7916648,0.1293635,0.002208333,0.0266439,0.001858055,0.00002819963,0.0008923913,0.00005132781,0.04728946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07660115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1523106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W10843675","doi":"10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6230","title":"Continental Cap-and-Trade: Canada, the United States, and Climate Change Partnership in North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"International trade; Climate change; Emissions trading; General partnership; Political science; Business; Law","authors":[{"name":"Jessie Childs","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01818422882921701,"gpt":0.272570947006419,"spread":0.254386718177202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002994673,0.0003217315,0.0001728584,0.001530371,0.002815616,0.00314378,0.0003363717,0.0005720325,0.03269113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005575393,0.0001128244,0.0001589398,0.00424753,0.0005693451,0.0006911482,0.001066084,0.0007680883,0.002649011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01097862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02432313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9047855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9628561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997123,0.00001933572,0.000008570057,0.00005401875,0.0001031729,0.0001025531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990362,0.00003388898,0.00006723977,0.00003142012,0.0005481331,0.0002830115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120408,0.00009587195,0.2134848,0.0003256432,0.0001098501,0.001094605,0.001541004,0.0008148968,0.001699731,0.02386656,0.4772731,0.2795734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007962514,0.000007095244,0.2017848,0.0001297274,0.00001862461,0.0001908627,0.002227008,0.0002229675,0.0002209742,0.0007031661,0.7944725,0.0000143211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1058566,0.0207636,0.0009774214,0.03048766,0.002435836,0.0001539386,0.04113244,0.0006667304,0.7975258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5402938,0.01703775,0.004200496,0.008410468,0.0005073535,0.0001574495,0.02649176,0.0002907976,0.4026102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09521455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1915505,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W281238728","doi":"","title":"Pac Rim Cayman V. Republic of El Salvador: Confronting Free Trade's Chilling Effect on Environmental Progress in Latin America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Multinational corporation; Free trade agreement; International trade; Enforcement; Free trade; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Arbitration; Economic history; Environmental protection; Law; Geography; Business; Economics; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Katie Zaunbrecher","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.008744262238543294,"gpt":0.2239076193718812,"spread":0.2151633571333379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258373,0.0004271574,0.000252287,0.0007633214,0.007198022,0.006825506,0.001248178,0.006165917,0.007750372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004574618,0.000196235,0.0003133316,0.0008251148,0.00474985,0.002522409,0.003780476,0.007055382,0.0004089391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009270137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008111961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2044422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2766103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991467,0.0002386992,0.00002837762,0.00009179602,0.0001741519,0.0003203241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.0006271566,0.0001221138,0.00004650667,0.0002631512,0.0002093883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002576016,0.0001208561,0.01142787,0.0006499921,0.0001043408,0.009530236,0.0282256,0.000934828,0.002344051,0.4689929,0.4200607,0.05735099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007163011,0.00005492102,0.009470156,0.0005174368,0.00006837073,0.0003429224,0.01484171,0.0003089893,0.001070891,0.01354916,0.9596521,0.00005172492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1070817,0.02750711,0.0004319841,0.4155823,0.003688816,0.00007660315,0.000162769,0.00009073222,0.445378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6568853,0.0152754,0.0005977245,0.1949446,0.002934858,0.0001484848,0.0001962646,0.0001216162,0.1288957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2044422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4065045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350034773","doi":"","title":"OVER THE RIVER AND (AROUND) THE WOODS TO GRANDMA'S HOUSE WE GO: LONG-TERM FIRM TRANSMISSION RIGHTS, TRANSMISSION MARKET POWER & GAMING STRATEGIES IN A DEREGULATED ENERGY MARKET-AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Electricity market; Competition (biology); Monopoly; Market power; Energy market; Economics; Transmission (telecommunications); European union; Business; Market economy; Telecommunications; Economy; Law; Electricity; International trade; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Richard R Bradley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01789093872281868,"gpt":0.3107303046641693,"spread":0.2928393659413507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142512,0.0001459131,0.0001442651,0.0006149456,0.001036053,0.005780216,0.0005285313,0.0007428193,0.01087745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009176409,0.00007255282,0.0002500914,0.001200505,0.001837511,0.004890337,0.0007252687,0.0007824282,0.0005529149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002552276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001374155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01471652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02010138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996474,0.00008921742,0.000008876334,0.00004304196,0.00008867674,0.0001228345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995489,0.0001623071,0.00008724573,0.00002628363,0.00009963803,0.00007565077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008374419,0.0001244781,0.004436213,0.0000711258,0.00001482911,0.0003077947,0.003620308,0.001787044,0.0003805327,0.9243702,0.007830802,0.05697292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000814126,0.0005721017,0.1172868,0.0007950682,0.00006711114,0.0007035981,0.04988169,0.01384388,0.001805456,0.2786991,0.5361493,0.000114459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195308,0.008235941,0.002740456,0.004631842,0.0001251333,0.00003601181,0.0001976417,0.00002436028,0.5644777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580418,0.002840477,0.0005528817,0.0003864422,0.00004906047,0.00001625532,0.0001030713,0.00001580124,0.03799408],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01471652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03638875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30133502","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0201924","title":"Admirality Judges: Flotsam on the Sea of Maritime Law?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Appeal; Political science; Duty; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Common law","authors":[{"name":"John Russell Brown","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03551756258416505,"gpt":0.2514686183299647,"spread":0.2159510557457996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001629756,0.0002555124,0.0003110915,0.0006136383,0.01179174,0.002790185,0.001175687,0.002965139,0.1298498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009203124,0.0002087955,0.000215566,0.0004095858,0.002467025,0.002608659,0.002650273,0.004789438,0.01653487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004641892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007546034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2488157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5079488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988918,0.000195406,0.00003418895,0.0001104441,0.0002868981,0.0004813298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955336,0.0002774495,0.0003501638,0.0001142526,0.001326503,0.002397997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002708206,0.00006038173,0.01928613,0.00003848718,0.000006478369,0.001048203,0.004111725,0.00001608127,0.0001568576,0.00414172,0.9233654,0.04774148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001791493,0.00004407407,0.03125033,0.0003003099,0.00001153742,0.0009988354,0.03362557,0.0001366421,0.000118757,0.001482784,0.9319766,0.00003671035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07295451,0.00334833,0.0005559569,0.5564134,0.01602705,0.0001490949,0.0006286073,0.0003561549,0.349567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2982287,0.002988886,0.0006483389,0.2487362,0.004130777,0.00007683341,0.0004247589,0.0002705177,0.444495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2488157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4947349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W842500435","doi":"","title":"\"This Does Not Matter in Mexico\": Mexico-U.S. Competition Law - Conflicts and Resolutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Competition (biology); Competition law; Political science; Common law; Economics; Jurisdiction","authors":[{"name":"Harve A. Truskett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01884776225364338,"gpt":0.2731447789627447,"spread":0.2542970167091013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002023099,0.000282595,0.0002513765,0.001128692,0.006696041,0.008288431,0.0008825437,0.004985145,0.01072929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003491876,0.0001995171,0.0002693281,0.001935275,0.005689864,0.003854179,0.002316226,0.004137876,0.0004855932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01024299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007227236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1006409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09908278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986313,0.0004299237,0.00005206466,0.0002574265,0.0003118359,0.0003175023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.0003182088,0.0002123609,0.00004029,0.0001411046,0.0000711936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002163582,0.00001627823,0.00185452,0.00009974206,0.000009152273,0.0002181088,0.004494353,0.00008819708,0.0001094558,0.86927,0.1039538,0.01986472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002195346,0.00002690287,0.01754916,0.0009483711,0.00002575589,0.0002213062,0.009571625,0.0002743957,0.0002756273,0.07131368,0.8997342,0.00003702212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04834198,0.04916396,0.002039478,0.4489666,0.002839551,0.00009117033,0.0007021129,0.00008251011,0.4477727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7629959,0.02318363,0.003146779,0.07053227,0.002924551,0.0002777784,0.0006513697,0.00005667254,0.1362311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1006409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2001102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287418538","doi":"","title":"The Alien Torts Statute and the Search for Energy in Difficult Political Environments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy law; Statute; Politics; Law; Energy (signal processing); Business; Political science; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental law","authors":[{"name":"EDWIN L. GORHAM","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01173812754937469,"gpt":0.2329473484331023,"spread":0.2212092208837276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128012,0.0003379517,0.0002955139,0.001802938,0.005850365,0.006794831,0.0007405592,0.005717638,0.01564387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004478807,0.0003014616,0.0005108051,0.002051533,0.01723206,0.003778663,0.004848209,0.004170749,0.00154226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005036644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004336648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02450007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02699109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969951,0.001019996,0.0001428595,0.0002273954,0.0008713514,0.0007434054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963802,0.002270454,0.0005734033,0.0001763945,0.000322011,0.00027754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006094093,0.000009311891,0.0005524927,0.00001894282,0.000002192926,0.0001647418,0.0009702159,0.0001817556,0.00003190371,0.9660465,0.02730986,0.004705876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001631791,0.0000277148,0.005812186,0.0007117267,0.00001302034,0.0005046999,0.00482122,0.0007959578,0.0001064546,0.2884085,0.698735,0.0000470852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02035928,0.009985664,0.003108965,0.07908145,0.001268202,0.00004780156,0.000278126,0.00008282503,0.8857877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7205163,0.01699891,0.002025766,0.04156209,0.003147603,0.000258487,0.0004054599,0.00008367927,0.2150016],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02450007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05233395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293430674","doi":"","title":"Resale Price Maintenance and Leegin: Opening Kay's Kloset Opened the Lid on Pandora's Box in Global Competition Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Intellectual Property Rights and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Competition law; European union; Politics; Resale price maintenance; Political science; Economics; Sociology; International trade; Market economy; History; Monopoly","authors":[{"name":"Francis J. Devlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01999820580545317,"gpt":0.2950483449484478,"spread":0.2750501391429946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003367417,0.0004537505,0.0005799162,0.0006162772,0.004150975,0.008654584,0.001016218,0.01103497,0.009053485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01125176,0.0003193056,0.0005415177,0.0006482849,0.008220338,0.01231882,0.002839843,0.01313831,0.00177243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003758017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01497989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01508908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970408,0.0009684828,0.0001274447,0.0006719141,0.0008114279,0.0003799174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970413,0.001846302,0.0001890248,0.0002375841,0.0004710758,0.0002148589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002038577,0.00001437624,0.0001105893,0.00003258781,0.000003462111,0.0001529748,0.0004977701,0.0001270504,0.0001001318,0.8427458,0.1470524,0.009142333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001778131,0.0000403733,0.0004265737,0.0003430865,0.00000950564,0.0001287542,0.0008588987,0.0005218459,0.0002006431,0.2320092,0.7653957,0.00004772356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.008361177,0.02630875,0.004222854,0.5201269,0.009686798,0.00004747891,0.00009069432,0.000169988,0.4309854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3059449,0.009912279,0.00249474,0.2662886,0.006884216,0.0001734642,0.00006836165,0.0002168002,0.4080166],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01497989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03082192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934496157","doi":"","title":"The Mexican Trucking Dispute: A Bottleneck to Free Trade. A Tough (Road) Test on the NAFTA Dispute Settlement Mechanism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Treaty; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Business","authors":[{"name":"Carrie Anne Arnett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01390410021061502,"gpt":0.267969947774526,"spread":0.254065847563911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01681274,0.0004148311,0.000667022,0.001641123,0.01320841,0.02521946,0.003425773,0.01458518,0.02069305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02478285,0.0005876542,0.0007851825,0.001996553,0.01070659,0.01270934,0.006283128,0.01089506,0.002156179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01430102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02236542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07837719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990369,0.002326322,0.0003978228,0.0008911687,0.004530522,0.001485105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910789,0.004359597,0.0009954659,0.0005977668,0.001847957,0.001120326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004052267,0.0000465634,0.0008950887,0.0001327065,0.000006535993,0.0003182068,0.00381715,0.0001306524,0.0002616371,0.8542085,0.1114591,0.02868329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006161875,0.00004175143,0.002958957,0.0009155375,0.0000208802,0.0002908149,0.009091862,0.0007359936,0.0003067133,0.188637,0.7968785,0.00006033527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02911494,0.02366319,0.00360541,0.6985478,0.002700482,0.0001223169,0.0002956711,0.0001371786,0.241813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254189,0.01788842,0.009237343,0.1367066,0.006023318,0.000383214,0.0005596001,0.0001562477,0.1036263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07837719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1558419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243121698","doi":"","title":"The Impaired Dual System Framework of United States Drunk-Driving Law: How International Perspectives Yield More Sober Results","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sobriety; Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Criminology; Driving under the influence; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Psychiatry; Environmental health","authors":[{"name":"Daphne D. Newaz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0117335587025176,"gpt":0.2780547868322283,"spread":0.2663212281297107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01213064,0.0005774301,0.0004128467,0.003864615,0.009099584,0.0213962,0.001614546,0.006164892,0.01013975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01550942,0.0003574254,0.0006259027,0.002665723,0.04408726,0.01164616,0.006629339,0.007722764,0.0009838495],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009934515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01046996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01861451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02467945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883566,0.007181684,0.0003227114,0.0009072536,0.001802166,0.001429479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901587,0.004616636,0.0009155789,0.0007926146,0.002558629,0.0009577184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008745212,0.00001403839,0.001293634,0.00003103035,0.000004433143,0.0001334117,0.005994974,0.00009043486,0.00004217174,0.9755865,0.009650724,0.007149884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000167825,0.00006800012,0.005849164,0.001061787,0.00003122023,0.0003843072,0.02941766,0.00099803,0.0003321124,0.742095,0.219684,0.00006182272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04624645,0.02105895,0.01258087,0.3134907,0.003076687,0.00007563984,0.0001560886,0.0001645499,0.6031501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919329,0.007552363,0.008913093,0.03596267,0.001255151,0.0001645415,0.0001021602,0.0001216698,0.02659919],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0213962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07208031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102816895","doi":"","title":"Responsibility to Protect: An Explanation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Genocide; Crimes against humanity; War crime; International community; Law; State responsibility; Charter; Political science; Ethnic Cleansing; International law; Collective responsibility; Human rights; Incitement; Sociology; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Halil Rahman Basaran","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.01552452565963845,"gpt":0.3287178840238012,"spread":0.3131933583641627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007397249,0.001482477,0.000641853,0.001935256,0.005329579,0.007090182,0.00322788,0.01399679,0.0277077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007826542,0.0004959551,0.001436872,0.001306476,0.03131222,0.0171218,0.007026482,0.01348531,0.006918117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008604778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007813357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004997537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933862,0.002563528,0.0002589482,0.00107068,0.001542386,0.001178211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967868,0.001793793,0.0001854563,0.0002742459,0.0006896455,0.0002700348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002928252,0.000007897488,0.00006045621,0.00002333461,8.216494e-7,0.0000487922,0.0007020207,0.00005463451,0.00001211404,0.9700548,0.02621741,0.002814888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001239975,0.0000163052,0.0002734475,0.0003200426,0.000002934349,0.0002478446,0.001216292,0.0002360741,0.00007973341,0.528962,0.4686178,0.00001504584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001479029,0.008487456,0.02268998,0.3087918,0.005221821,0.0002455405,0.0002897767,0.0001214734,0.652673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.297002,0.02169938,0.01808737,0.2881459,0.01119643,0.001683747,0.0005567936,0.0003555848,0.3612728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0277077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09269148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229142946","doi":"","title":"Unrest in the European Commission: The Changing Landscape and Politics of International Mergers for United States Companies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Houston journal of international law","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Competition (biology); Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Business; International trade; Public administration; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Jeffrey M. Peterson","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03298184568820899,"gpt":0.2374930109342138,"spread":0.2045111652460048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01323431,0.0004079385,0.0004686366,0.003069179,0.01446959,0.03104971,0.001258295,0.01675565,0.00906467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0226149,0.0004806579,0.0006224034,0.005550299,0.01567048,0.01107199,0.007870568,0.009059733,0.0007300503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01809088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007987591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03205396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0436612,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9846972,0.007322251,0.0005160962,0.001246669,0.003265586,0.002952173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840323,0.009002557,0.002355968,0.0005365217,0.00215932,0.001913244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005638757,0.00003956415,0.002660235,0.00009897865,0.00001397414,0.0007982326,0.01138227,0.0002803939,0.0001864854,0.784411,0.1624511,0.03762136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001557324,0.00005223135,0.007433068,0.0009099083,0.00001365365,0.0004436122,0.02526839,0.0003268509,0.0002931368,0.05061112,0.9145566,0.00007581837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06144219,0.08291524,0.001128065,0.4252902,0.004628034,0.00003699554,0.00009086848,0.00008257462,0.4243858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7969401,0.01831168,0.000611407,0.1332168,0.003395847,0.00004992843,0.00007560056,0.0000825688,0.04731607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03205396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1312591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}