{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":298,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":298,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"query_hash":"9debe24da6e1","filters":{"venue":"Hume studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W336972056","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385972","title":"A Guide to Parallel Paragraph and Page References in Oxford University Press Editions of Hume's Enquiry concerning Human Understanding","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2955415813092725,"gpt":0.3756283501123771,"spread":0.08008676880310456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003209343,0.00009795037,0.0002198575,0.00009891348,0.0009697273,0.00002518676,0.0001305301,0.00005746962,0.00005437156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001116168,0.0001021555,0.0000413146,0.0002485275,0.0007025136,0.0002144106,0.0000857831,0.00009423832,0.000001162588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001683794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001524481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007568431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990153,0.0001505855,0.0001889347,0.0002067954,0.0002027466,0.0002356279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995454,0.0001387692,0.00009065816,0.00008561947,0.00007119526,0.00006838127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001626165,0.00006804148,0.007838751,0.00004383061,0.00008701788,0.00001341057,0.0580086,0.00003710027,0.0000743613,0.9261674,0.007431296,0.0002139688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001938487,0.0004909363,0.01924755,0.0006810352,0.0001637586,0.000001340638,0.5880591,0.00004516754,0.00008774335,0.08278212,0.3056593,0.000843472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5670982,0.00361709,0.00149226,0.00450723,0.00036831,0.0008998998,0.0001541533,0.0001664224,0.4216964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963742,0.002322293,0.000102491,0.00002505819,0.0001073028,0.000006854759,0.000004553673,0.000003151743,0.001054108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7458457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081277561","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0311","title":"\"All Is Revolution in Us\": Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Law; Self; Aesthetics; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0984612116391918,"gpt":0.3290845162988819,"spread":0.2306233046596901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004116729,0.0001118249,0.0002060428,0.00008367238,0.0001683027,0.00005247681,0.00006588882,0.00004474718,0.001039655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005998281,0.0000978483,0.00003880225,0.00004104191,0.0004913735,0.0002663819,0.0000602031,0.0002347201,0.00007461726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004267768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009920057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005553521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00662146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991829,0.00005341375,0.0002172214,0.0002109915,0.0001475468,0.0001879051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997417,0.00008175743,0.00002862269,0.00007870716,0.00004130619,0.00002785274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009574209,0.0001195837,0.002572797,0.0001189409,0.0000706674,0.00002827933,0.1585464,0.000001337212,0.0000115672,0.8357166,0.00116069,0.001557437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005978955,0.00005828937,0.02080442,0.0001492515,0.00001616222,0.000001584266,0.003787786,0.00006982974,0.000002474168,0.9246185,0.04969582,0.0001979854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132614,0.008807317,1.720143e-7,0.005459274,0.0001074979,0.00008988478,0.00003086737,0.0000230552,0.07222052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931726,0.002750918,0.000004673051,0.001617518,0.0002618197,0.00001360471,0.00000295157,0.000007383475,0.002168471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1547586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998735,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969878553","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0015","title":"The Circumstances of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037403417050015,"gpt":0.3241856297699282,"spread":0.2204452880649267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003206965,0.00005755877,0.000104752,0.00001219669,0.0006859277,0.00003193423,0.0001323447,0.00001716334,0.0001149158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003312248,0.0000309748,0.00004142871,0.00001238302,0.001635182,0.00004115218,0.00004948942,0.0001935136,0.00002345336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001941994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001085425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009539023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009292025,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.00001871171,0.0001252718,0.00007023512,0.0001152021,0.0001015579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.0005923979,0.00005595121,0.0001372562,0.0001886234,0.0000150075],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005237947,0.00001022461,0.000004614762,0.0000328865,0.00005353993,4.994055e-7,0.013256,7.868107e-8,0.0001423258,0.9850942,0.0005951551,0.0008052172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004351106,0.00001814658,0.00002789936,0.000008732583,0.00002823129,2.192628e-7,0.007376675,0.000001474858,0.00007350538,0.7529108,0.2394717,0.00003912793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1106299,0.008086024,0.000002173816,0.01063045,0.003981513,0.00009707158,0.00001788651,0.0000490378,0.8665059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969714,0.0005757745,0.000006300845,0.0002130009,0.0007868719,0.000007312248,2.3464e-7,0.000004655358,0.001434453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8863415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986328627","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0241","title":"Moral Skepticism and Moral Naturalism in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Morality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Wonder; Relation (database)","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1768750336287885,"gpt":0.3203677747415037,"spread":0.1434927411127152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001798853,0.0001692654,0.0002960933,0.00009183378,0.0003104234,0.00007661224,0.00008424057,0.00005214177,0.0002449986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007793969,0.0001273964,0.00005056341,0.00003678551,0.0008457373,0.00016191,0.0001055113,0.0002640263,0.00003454092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002395143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008338873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002317067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00191538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991394,0.00005051695,0.0002041055,0.0002141095,0.0001430394,0.0002488619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995683,0.0001361364,0.00004273194,0.0001256292,0.00007824023,0.00004889187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851864,0.0000409735,0.0006706266,0.00002358818,0.00005503846,0.00006862972,0.027586,8.749427e-7,0.000007228763,0.9692799,0.0004593443,0.001789251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005260297,0.00008119799,0.002548185,0.00006434873,0.00002595653,0.000006202879,0.004020064,0.00002821135,0.00000582459,0.9719934,0.02049629,0.0002043256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7475083,0.01234948,3.405584e-7,0.009703053,0.0004779104,0.0001624386,0.00002302162,0.00008148896,0.229694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929287,0.001577568,0.00001333616,0.0008959018,0.0005151146,0.00002030221,0.000004553038,0.00001435101,0.004030192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2454204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5195073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967744870","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0000","title":"A Conversation between Annette Baier and Anik Waldow about Hume's Account of Sympathy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Conversation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1515377144260957,"gpt":0.2918947842477799,"spread":0.1403570698216841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002541725,0.0001383315,0.0003213271,0.00006336228,0.0004181128,0.00002425179,0.00007819795,0.00005043492,0.0001275485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008893187,0.0001096394,0.00005883461,0.00002538092,0.001334428,0.0001530418,0.00009157402,0.0001641319,0.00002209998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001600432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001895753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008417069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006028807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991573,0.00004386402,0.000241193,0.0001781587,0.000217645,0.0001618169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992447,0.0002165339,0.0001075533,0.0001341746,0.0002571159,0.00003986879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002748599,0.00004808143,0.002726717,0.0001746193,0.0004162801,0.00001078539,0.208248,7.80394e-7,0.00005922198,0.7858111,0.001618029,0.0008588921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001386118,0.0004927184,0.04704854,0.000253663,0.000254314,0.000006486723,0.02538104,0.00002614569,0.0004242336,0.849892,0.07418723,0.0006475649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651611,0.004495546,0.000003180075,0.002685683,0.0002401874,0.00014189,0.00007231336,0.00004597711,0.02715409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969785,0.001471072,0.00001026159,0.0004445427,0.0006613718,0.0000104889,0.000007428208,0.00001248385,0.0004038562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.182867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4916754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126031463","doi":"","title":"Hume’s Theory of Causation: A Quasi-Realist Interpretation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1219300513602781,"gpt":0.3036695597998627,"spread":0.1817395084395845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005615826,0.00008004047,0.0001495707,0.00009168988,0.0003984449,0.00001871245,0.0001006232,0.00001399409,0.0002364777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008117017,0.00006606017,0.00005071598,0.0000306261,0.001146263,0.0001988828,0.00003005815,0.00005054574,0.00003181609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003683768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000123666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005008993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00127449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993581,0.00002570647,0.0002158445,0.0001231702,0.0001589288,0.0001182746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994568,0.000137159,0.0001109609,0.0001058756,0.000167042,0.00002217336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567799,0.00003602438,0.00003866943,0.00003453477,0.00003747001,0.000001774182,0.1719341,7.114967e-7,0.00007071407,0.8232709,0.001325355,0.003214026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004690344,0.000645666,0.003152839,0.0002154038,0.0001075786,0.000003617678,0.1448919,0.00002279587,0.0005321776,0.6333561,0.2161797,0.0004231679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07856195,0.006720596,0.001191984,0.0009148352,0.001873877,0.0002019423,0.00002851495,0.000115188,0.9103911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949846,0.00003981369,0.00005836094,0.0002270337,0.0003226861,0.000004866458,0.000002540221,0.000004557101,0.004355544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4223452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776105220","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403838","title":"Doxastic Virtues in Hume's Epistemology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Causation; Essentialism; Philosophy of science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1433182101882349,"gpt":0.3434410694255357,"spread":0.2001228592373008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577848,0.0002109491,0.0005121773,0.000128995,0.0003326978,0.00004276538,0.000162723,0.00007089112,0.0001298186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002050941,0.0001755818,0.0001018116,0.00004473466,0.0009433977,0.0001349602,0.00005354591,0.0002780578,0.0001891537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000430478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002446505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009123366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002469972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987098,0.0001371067,0.0003622422,0.0002913972,0.0001325913,0.0003668541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991857,0.0002974453,0.0001023554,0.0002253466,0.0001511681,0.00003801174],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000262677,0.0001460048,0.0006921709,0.00008473975,0.000120858,0.00005411169,0.07909039,0.00000616826,0.00007637098,0.9101309,0.006020429,0.003551558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001118288,0.0009106543,0.01090036,0.0002063749,0.0001329694,0.00001428151,0.04299077,0.00001253726,0.0001445374,0.6210014,0.3218357,0.0007321657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4950319,0.03215566,0.00005004134,0.01407779,0.005045117,0.0006295018,0.00003188243,0.000408441,0.4525696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982965,0.0005801725,0.00007416366,0.001805367,0.0008284593,0.00001938886,0.000005184565,0.0000132891,0.013709],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.487933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7160017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076562610","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0136","title":"Conceivability and Modality in Hume: A Lemma in an Argument in Defense of Skeptical Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Metaphysics; Certainty","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1676121852224575,"gpt":0.351752536256458,"spread":0.1841403510340004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001246969,0.0001254013,0.0003853524,0.00008386475,0.00006804392,0.00001902575,0.00006218297,0.00005709372,0.00006671511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004213669,0.0001045563,0.00003187,0.000046741,0.001186676,0.0001017852,0.0000609163,0.0002601346,0.00000135122],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005211802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002609417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005559004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01343696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986709,0.0003270641,0.0004073841,0.0002508038,0.0001381141,0.000205702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993608,0.0002974094,0.00004955231,0.0001759149,0.00007526052,0.00004103452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004025688,0.0002373615,0.01062641,0.0000820657,0.00001234431,0.00001159642,0.04679364,0.000004068645,0.000012974,0.942076,0.000004683788,0.00009861313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006628553,0.0001102433,0.01717653,0.0000722994,0.000006107964,5.057126e-7,0.007924633,0.00002099283,0.00002248597,0.9734231,0.0004595368,0.0001207224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693473,0.001166563,4.619916e-7,0.001144669,0.00006155672,0.0001674257,0.00001574322,0.000008786694,0.02808747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995261,0.0001797433,0.0000184748,0.000178358,0.00003348775,0.00002748124,0.000001530031,0.000006314414,0.00002844771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.038869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7498138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379616522","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383364","title":"The First Motive to Justice: Hume's Circle Argument Squared","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Chemistry","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06005516266888998,"gpt":0.389051541393064,"spread":0.328996378724174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001430156,0.0001234724,0.0001670174,0.00003932836,0.004504099,0.0000887842,0.0002602396,0.00005748977,0.00004517321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007603327,0.0001007817,0.00008036361,0.0003285875,0.0005073934,0.0001092946,0.000115913,0.0001164549,0.0002516926],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000313112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004571926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002063345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007283111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984581,0.00006861867,0.00023826,0.0002440377,0.0004527789,0.0005381923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989151,0.0004308907,0.00007636287,0.0001892139,0.0002639108,0.000124459],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172319,0.0002772458,0.00311208,0.00009036983,0.0004716819,0.00003493984,0.2517983,0.00004173249,0.00009082544,0.6372042,0.07574029,0.03096606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003602479,0.0001778942,0.0440097,0.00006723785,0.0001366547,5.296203e-7,0.1469668,0.000001689661,0.0004600751,0.03346388,0.7740213,0.0003338976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3706589,0.01249222,0.002288464,0.1489216,0.006958724,0.003031991,0.0001058884,0.0007468959,0.4547953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970776,0.0004572877,0.00003870171,0.0004792223,0.000912588,0.00004304176,0.000002756994,0.000007594284,0.0009811796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.698281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050377973","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0284","title":"The Idea of Chivalry in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Case of David Hume","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chivalry; Enlightenment; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Ideology; Scottish Enlightenment; Civilization; Novelty; Romance; Age of Enlightenment; Ridiculous; Epistemology; Literature; History; Art; Law; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08939222186533352,"gpt":0.3249291547240085,"spread":0.2355369328586749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103804,0.0001443952,0.0002477253,0.00003252834,0.0006227478,0.0000377142,0.0003315095,0.00002424053,0.00008924583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001607909,0.00005778297,0.0001403511,0.00006938242,0.001551797,0.00005459679,0.000111317,0.0002007186,0.000011994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001533717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007947158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002715095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001407819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986656,0.0001530672,0.0004767934,0.0001371973,0.0002504365,0.0003168683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793,0.001502113,0.000125237,0.0003238549,0.0000911755,0.000027554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003205888,0.0001164391,0.0001402032,0.00005027184,0.0001277116,0.0000841838,0.03733636,3.207972e-7,0.00001021509,0.9580621,0.002104626,0.001935535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006411843,0.0002815191,0.003413082,0.0001872457,0.0001711434,0.0001012014,0.1079104,0.000004984377,0.0006432555,0.4420754,0.4443152,0.0002553451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7203786,0.02745309,0.000002391843,0.01686093,0.00101522,0.0006593032,0.0001066935,0.00002682869,0.2334969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969789,0.0007329354,0.00000489003,0.0006599157,0.0006418726,0.00001663511,0.00000172015,0.000008690748,0.0009544627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5159867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5717661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231664201","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385973","title":"A Guide to Parallel Paragraph and Page References in Oxford University Press Editions of Hume's Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2286621479661579,"gpt":0.3555040222150221,"spread":0.1268418742488642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004033407,0.00007758677,0.000211535,0.00005055763,0.0004405026,0.00001128035,0.0001742831,0.00004093408,0.0000309175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002365974,0.00006145186,0.00004243249,0.0002206465,0.0009875847,0.0001342211,0.0001067253,0.00006971426,6.5342e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003292584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001963206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007699049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002517724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991018,0.0001845681,0.0002073684,0.0001454212,0.00019631,0.0001645053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993777,0.0002238063,0.0001285243,0.0001067334,0.0001256026,0.00003766806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004048777,0.0001309367,0.02302149,0.00008348729,0.0001614513,0.000006952513,0.1030305,0.0002410135,0.0001284946,0.8666024,0.005421496,0.001131262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009921039,0.000317223,0.07942602,0.0004510852,0.0001415566,7.966923e-7,0.22352,0.00007014875,0.0003409011,0.01226921,0.6820458,0.0004251829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8642777,0.004331237,0.0001016871,0.004540098,0.0001511839,0.000633909,0.0001556109,0.00004192714,0.1257666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937447,0.004874782,0.0001263316,0.00002173751,0.00006943884,0.00001005919,0.000002249069,0.000001981399,0.001148713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8543332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3638797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509904696","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383327","title":"Hume's Recantation Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Personal identity; Epistemology; Identity (music); Perception; Causation; Reflexive pronoun; Consciousness; Nothing; Psychology; Self; Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2028833437903789,"gpt":0.3462706873515908,"spread":0.1433873435612119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002424153,0.0001035748,0.0001742609,0.00005282555,0.0004690767,0.00006082716,0.0000781525,0.00002730876,0.0009488919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000149686,0.00007976042,0.00005728189,0.00003696902,0.0003759408,0.0001163521,0.00004837102,0.0001363813,0.0002663949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001821629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008020656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002271957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001449167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999338,0.00004840667,0.0001688606,0.0001521714,0.0001391972,0.0001533238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994563,0.0001330013,0.00005438171,0.0001317128,0.0001937399,0.00003090215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001581076,0.00001638535,0.00004904649,0.00002657379,0.00007684601,0.00001064952,0.01446949,3.800878e-7,0.00002309372,0.9812794,0.002139921,0.001892365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001374979,0.00004420945,0.000127365,0.0000508394,0.00002471349,0.00000173878,0.002530264,0.000004856518,0.00001379711,0.6716572,0.3252975,0.0001100419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07778898,0.007362338,0.00001221523,0.01006527,0.0007216093,0.0001596557,0.00001564646,0.0001957493,0.9036785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887806,0.00230989,0.0000142449,0.001404157,0.001073729,0.00001491936,0.000007997045,0.00001185499,0.006382583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999644,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142782002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0234","title":"Can Hume Be Read as a Virtue Ethicist?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subjectivism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1655308733859838,"gpt":0.3582634954299187,"spread":0.1927326220439349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109961,0.0002072829,0.0003120971,0.00009422571,0.0008620753,0.00008044855,0.000183821,0.00009630965,0.0006996776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004829017,0.0001629457,0.0001140709,0.00004299289,0.001363896,0.00007721336,0.0001561057,0.0005281214,0.0001994496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004698635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003864558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004171057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006200551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986816,0.00005643388,0.000302467,0.0002715357,0.0003328184,0.0003551684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987471,0.0005328177,0.00008583327,0.0002566132,0.000281623,0.00009602497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003108584,0.0000442441,0.000007589326,0.00003894359,0.000150083,0.00004744023,0.04823139,2.186269e-7,0.00004047247,0.9494741,0.001187688,0.0007467574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001674604,0.0001170974,0.00004095359,0.00004836875,0.00003144501,0.000002635697,0.01023324,6.055434e-7,0.00008047836,0.7347952,0.254296,0.0001865387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03834058,0.003429438,0.000006236061,0.03642003,0.001107731,0.0001640263,0.00004275045,0.0001914982,0.9202977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778447,0.0002984962,0.00001403594,0.008771628,0.001386252,0.00001392822,0.000006380931,0.00002609823,0.01163846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7660978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042417103","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0294","title":"Relations of Literary Form and Philosophical Purpose in Hume's Four Essays on Happiness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1184411344764323,"gpt":0.3138282458599027,"spread":0.1953871113834704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006146581,0.0001470808,0.0002968072,0.0001847999,0.0002633713,0.00002737263,0.00008640626,0.00007178298,0.00008738936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002031321,0.000115234,0.00005874136,0.00006010894,0.0007701349,0.0001453331,0.0001018405,0.0003193555,0.00001416078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000212919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001245931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001550831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003425485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.00003594996,0.0003567708,0.000195042,0.0001873227,0.0002009956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990513,0.0005352239,0.00008140389,0.0001459982,0.0001381131,0.00004792588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006320397,0.0001016737,0.0003053549,0.00007148145,0.00005194011,0.00002101969,0.02322657,7.037922e-7,0.00001653236,0.974589,0.00005337421,0.001499092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004018926,0.0001385447,0.002033382,0.0001724313,0.00001667639,0.000001932334,0.001125859,0.000009377765,0.00002044592,0.9898899,0.006056143,0.000133426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.548431,0.004728428,0.00001583223,0.01457877,0.0004080323,0.0003041591,0.00004331391,0.00006268797,0.4314278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981974,0.0002377237,0.00002423782,0.0004887403,0.000457259,0.00001352865,0.000004102586,0.00001356361,0.0005634829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4497664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4699108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069933221","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0002","title":"Politeness, Paris and the Treatise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Philosophy; Linguistics; Humanities","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05413084555305341,"gpt":0.3302296053057378,"spread":0.2760987597526844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001031843,0.0000800571,0.0001687156,0.00002293406,0.0002679372,0.000006619157,0.00004041681,0.00002581901,0.000179734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004008867,0.00004329921,0.00003986964,0.00005968807,0.0004574046,0.000026529,0.00003066455,0.00005075368,0.0001199045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005535564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004047478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003035864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004039662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994766,0.00009741043,0.00009655839,0.0001320559,0.00006459961,0.0001328458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996245,0.0001444579,0.00003299019,0.0001405893,0.00003992455,0.00001753684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007985093,0.0003077042,0.06806315,0.00006908894,0.002757402,0.0003633679,0.4199225,2.303332e-7,0.00005183958,0.2009187,0.2434338,0.0633137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01057836,0.0002389803,0.7380614,0.00004821832,0.0006727746,0.0004491646,0.1102928,0.000004223225,0.0002046845,0.0458377,0.09303267,0.0005790077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7714608,0.09061632,0.00001761576,0.001315426,0.0003809346,0.0001853373,0.000009231974,0.00006234527,0.135952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816579,0.005002812,0.00001880891,0.0005537873,0.0001863374,0.00007519128,0.000002476021,0.000006900225,0.0124958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6699983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2060784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480578946","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385726","title":"Explaining General Ideas","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1287022311872871,"gpt":0.3167838316640034,"spread":0.1880816004767163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001668678,0.0001031961,0.0001614835,0.00002633773,0.0005310759,0.00005437423,0.00008561702,0.00002232419,0.005574386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000371662,0.00007833939,0.00006143851,0.00001428669,0.0004545756,0.00008847263,0.00003575629,0.0001362769,0.0005475733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001054583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007726007,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002653143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008131735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993864,0.00003281001,0.0001382527,0.0001406187,0.0001233139,0.0001785961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996817,0.00008741166,0.00002120657,0.0001137682,0.0000612343,0.00003473216],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009567781,0.00001444986,0.00000552249,0.000009908273,0.00007198357,0.000007492824,0.02811268,0.000003467401,0.000004930805,0.9661658,0.001713741,0.003880391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001092405,0.00003167628,0.00002102275,0.0000189852,0.00001120973,8.707677e-7,0.001987035,0.00001105808,0.00000871747,0.6632125,0.3344892,0.00009854569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2284052,0.003633329,6.349196e-7,0.00274172,0.0003297021,0.00004576559,0.000008217677,0.00009653843,0.7647389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761818,0.0005530607,0.00002242201,0.001654823,0.001576538,0.00001559458,0.000002252972,0.00001176145,0.01998173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103179823","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0295","title":"Hume's Impression/Idea Distinction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Impression; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04820698971563302,"gpt":0.3662778109844513,"spread":0.3180708212688183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000228606,0.00006834604,0.0001248924,0.00002252978,0.0007938219,0.00003059077,0.00007700618,0.00004244685,0.000205848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002502818,0.00005817195,0.00004789782,0.00006291394,0.0004150988,0.000135454,0.00005594801,0.00005853805,0.0001364574],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007159219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002837755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002809215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002511483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999274,0.00005705658,0.000134005,0.0001390445,0.0001121116,0.000283791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996341,0.0001458518,0.00003818406,0.00007738176,0.00005491474,0.00004960451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005389617,0.00004906311,0.003996206,0.00001384182,0.00003102323,0.000004194162,0.002354372,0.000002163861,0.00004848883,0.9358458,0.04854544,0.00910404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001349298,0.0000158308,0.01980115,0.00001502141,0.0000180029,2.92235e-7,0.004049686,0.000002619837,0.0001039054,0.1395956,0.8361348,0.0001281924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1022175,0.001824668,0.0001253934,0.004372104,0.0009528412,0.0001430028,0.000006913388,0.0001860648,0.8901715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811823,0.0001415837,0.00006430775,0.0001940407,0.0008682765,0.00002257749,0.000001888233,0.000004006572,0.01752102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8789648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6105517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032908795","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0016","title":"Sympathy and the Mechanics of Character Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Character (mathematics); Relation (database); Epistemology; Moral character; Function (biology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Philosophy; Biology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2277726261961615,"gpt":0.3043627204079108,"spread":0.07659009421174934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005096093,0.00007217435,0.0001778002,0.00001937787,0.0002144798,0.00001384118,0.00005582852,0.00001992424,0.00008719554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006849281,0.00003737969,0.0000425991,0.000009764039,0.0005928716,0.0001065778,0.0001060626,0.00009642199,0.00001542296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003357469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000194717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001620635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002153434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995685,0.00004845321,0.0001088014,0.00005677514,0.00009140143,0.0001261336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995491,0.000202651,0.00005593329,0.00009702933,0.00007312054,0.00002219236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140345,0.00001638084,0.00001300546,0.00003312905,0.00007132662,1.327597e-7,0.1086397,2.066533e-9,0.000006773721,0.8907524,0.00004143206,0.0004117393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003573703,0.00003214513,0.0001540659,0.00003657529,0.00005830987,8.527671e-7,0.007761374,0.000006398512,0.00003198003,0.9270213,0.06445686,0.00008275858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5542524,0.1595602,0.00001047189,0.05661622,0.005219418,0.001159871,0.0001320337,0.0001500721,0.2228993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955841,0.001696046,0.000002285187,0.001260228,0.001186157,0.00003206999,6.912481e-7,0.000006417386,0.0002320318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4413316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.218446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045112857","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0018","title":"Hume, Malebranche, and the Self-Justification of the Passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Epistemology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08869480473911803,"gpt":0.2834883854118251,"spread":0.1947935806727071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880388,0.00007110651,0.0001309113,0.00001356972,0.001045136,0.00001575654,0.000102251,0.00002246831,0.00007484746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001665606,0.00003016449,0.00005529818,0.0000222558,0.001435704,0.00006884443,0.000172674,0.0001367699,0.000009115429],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005522471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007635028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000429448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994656,0.0001005108,0.0001381868,0.00006678342,0.0001166812,0.0001122743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992759,0.0003690789,0.00007785395,0.0001646676,0.00009310347,0.00001935268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007512418,0.00002852832,0.0001556318,0.00003322252,0.00007427316,2.729814e-8,0.06520681,9.921271e-8,0.00001660966,0.933906,0.000416138,0.000155187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004147989,0.0000161948,0.005334132,0.00005473573,0.000157522,0.000001305572,0.01217074,0.000008892092,0.000138031,0.8605619,0.121039,0.0001027712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523274,0.03404458,0.00000628001,0.06733351,0.00233371,0.0006855396,0.00005017581,0.0001087103,0.3431101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975289,0.0006114971,0.000007055471,0.0004010189,0.0004878472,0.00002729758,4.712419e-7,0.000005611382,0.0009303293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4452015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138030685","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0003","title":"Filling the Gaps in Hume's Vacuums","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Interpreter; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1722157259676711,"gpt":0.3276957438219384,"spread":0.1554800178542673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000636472,0.0001108215,0.0001672659,0.00003872074,0.0004919568,0.00004502997,0.0001296768,0.00002889306,0.0004012196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001321593,0.0000631756,0.00005948072,0.0000285556,0.0005225876,0.000132091,0.0001128293,0.0002673261,0.0001645628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000181402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006641729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004440939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003227346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992443,0.00006790768,0.0001668481,0.0001002347,0.0001374699,0.0002832453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993671,0.0003526213,0.00004070502,0.0001503819,0.00005806152,0.00003114574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004503221,0.00003408516,0.0002138611,0.00001942645,0.00004773385,0.000001227431,0.07110368,0.000001112243,0.00000621423,0.9275041,0.0007136638,0.0003504398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001348629,0.0000215821,0.0005600122,0.00005001331,0.00001855573,7.650456e-7,0.01405038,0.000004960713,0.00002999028,0.7047511,0.2802438,0.000134007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3313197,0.0511595,0.000003302996,0.01840465,0.002466481,0.0002770735,0.00002037435,0.0001176156,0.5962313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950586,0.0006288801,0.00000537503,0.001257719,0.001575636,0.00002798584,0.000001305261,0.00001135136,0.001433176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6637389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4393074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081294787","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0319","title":"Hume on Resemblance, Relevance, and Representation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Representation (politics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1183292477196541,"gpt":0.4511796007425331,"spread":0.332850353022879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004487887,0.00008054399,0.0001291608,0.00005425208,0.0001673185,0.000009292867,0.00008279673,0.000035791,0.00007212451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000333324,0.00006186705,0.00002234549,0.0001991344,0.0004881173,0.00005237864,0.00005362985,0.0001009669,0.0002071746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001369487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001914247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008256301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001504588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991442,0.00004431864,0.0001391796,0.0002837815,0.0001484348,0.0002401112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991488,0.000519301,0.00004093233,0.0001980917,0.00004138714,0.00005141789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001413984,0.00003931456,0.002327358,0.000005328401,0.00003569202,0.00003162013,0.001421007,3.979878e-7,0.0003225405,0.98445,0.004047965,0.007177421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005765337,0.0003666478,0.1796012,0.00004502,0.00001683455,0.00001083387,0.001745955,0.000001900919,0.001209644,0.8023899,0.01383867,0.0001969078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817891,0.00159903,0.00008715377,0.001039081,0.0004916111,0.0001007366,0.000001882844,0.00005163769,0.7148398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963958,0.0002059743,0.00008426545,0.0004596129,0.0002236833,0.00001045405,5.594228e-7,0.00000506175,0.002614564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7146067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2662879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132400585","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0013","title":"Hume’s Conception of Proper Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Philosophy; Affect (linguistics); Key (lock); Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1599664125548168,"gpt":0.4371757733643993,"spread":0.2772093608095825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000236397,0.00004096813,0.00009359993,0.00001856369,0.0003452447,0.000004081194,0.00003662707,0.00002262583,0.00009677745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001657127,0.00003354495,0.00002842262,0.00008435558,0.001140575,0.0001380396,0.00001734523,0.00003406415,0.00003703871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006342188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001179552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005135101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001628118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994674,0.00007110571,0.00009360617,0.00005016519,0.0001514251,0.0001662892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996733,0.00005182783,0.00005281746,0.00004323603,0.0001424431,0.00003633999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003208109,0.00002183769,0.0112934,0.000007804213,0.00002922668,7.786572e-8,0.00986908,8.186801e-7,0.0001791052,0.9741786,0.003729217,0.0006876311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006591173,0.00003289776,0.003848132,0.00001588459,0.00002558974,4.66275e-7,0.01964612,1.693559e-7,0.0002523463,0.0007314844,0.9753033,0.00007772898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1380787,0.00380591,0.0001231459,0.0008735718,0.000908797,0.0001488692,0.000006072715,0.0000549229,0.856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919454,0.0003064623,0.000188731,0.0001124709,0.0006755637,0.000008700495,8.842532e-7,0.000002096403,0.006759644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4202496,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560177732","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383324","title":"Baconian Probability and Hume's Theory of Testimony","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Miracle; Skepticism; Credibility; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1513993452556712,"gpt":0.2962148804505526,"spread":0.1448155351948814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002397676,0.00008818544,0.0001622283,0.00003354739,0.0002759474,0.00002433704,0.00005647387,0.00001613885,0.0003533227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001596642,0.00006817919,0.0000269095,0.00002105764,0.0007200347,0.0001450908,0.0000459958,0.00005201497,0.00001594559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001154652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001222925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002692884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001116451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994785,0.00004710025,0.0001667234,0.0001274066,0.0000703626,0.0001099045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994988,0.0001739694,0.00006497171,0.0001334803,0.0001069199,0.00002187184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851829,0.00007783934,0.002804342,0.0001104842,0.00007988965,8.056621e-7,0.07246989,5.536322e-7,0.00002334515,0.9165053,0.001837779,0.006071243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001430511,0.00008604123,0.009130149,0.00005436599,0.00004259817,0.000002640495,0.01094526,0.000002578295,0.00005220337,0.9545615,0.02486895,0.0001106179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7934741,0.006927925,0.000008494882,0.002055711,0.0004812223,0.0002124923,0.00001321027,0.00006077649,0.196766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970639,0.0003035812,0.000138653,0.0001102051,0.0002795796,0.00002503211,0.000001691645,0.000005673734,0.00207173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2035897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3868636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000425093","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0316","title":"Hume on Steadfast Objects and Time","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Simple (philosophy); Metaphysics; GRASP; Computer science; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1158586668048641,"gpt":0.2954910147088902,"spread":0.1796323479040261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001826096,0.0001357653,0.0002078936,0.00005158091,0.0004929586,0.00006819845,0.00006776078,0.00003181735,0.0006280549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008810448,0.00009963587,0.00004087797,0.00001907734,0.0006258351,0.0000725405,0.00008369047,0.0001671936,0.0005191824],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001215902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007084715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000129992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001108351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993221,0.00003847574,0.0001248417,0.0001859228,0.0001429749,0.0001856459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994991,0.0002088342,0.00003597942,0.0001294522,0.00008050759,0.00004614472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002709342,0.00004279937,0.00001794672,0.00002084533,0.00009522437,0.0000187748,0.01669755,4.364934e-7,0.00002654914,0.9806114,0.001346615,0.001094779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002986341,0.000263801,0.0001441609,0.00008164192,0.00002785428,0.000003885791,0.003432061,0.000009569138,0.00002134345,0.8336443,0.1618693,0.0002034276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1953906,0.002727856,2.963362e-7,0.004275869,0.0003134428,0.0001068682,0.00001460584,0.0001042828,0.7970662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832335,0.0006235968,0.0000029143,0.001488351,0.0007649172,0.00001072792,0.000001997996,0.00001387791,0.01386013],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7878429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6876761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076154353","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0658","title":"Hume's \"Early Memoranda\" and the Making of His Political Economy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Composition (language); Economic Thought; Period (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Work (physics); History; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09698497969463386,"gpt":0.3494854051710267,"spread":0.2525004254763928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002974602,0.00005659086,0.0001745517,0.00001761451,0.0004380736,0.00001160931,0.00009029577,0.00002073429,0.00006629367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001745617,0.00003775598,0.000042671,0.00004307823,0.005813781,0.00006559821,0.00005828229,0.0000481408,0.000006422428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002597427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001438563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001640016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002407333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994009,0.00009195648,0.0001264234,0.000082545,0.00008720774,0.000211032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995309,0.0002232808,0.00005108037,0.00006883321,0.00009672792,0.00002920253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001187809,0.000005953542,0.003619448,0.000006335269,0.00005525474,9.174688e-7,0.0151744,1.651335e-8,2.342751e-7,0.9805681,0.0004463024,0.0001111317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008995955,0.00008047625,0.008639005,0.00005360047,0.0001699518,0.000003822543,0.08012851,0.000001448,0.00003845657,0.2928735,0.6168627,0.000248944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01718608,0.001783201,0.00002914738,0.003552627,0.0001150021,0.00009704025,0.000006518461,0.00001580304,0.9772146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980684,0.00006087135,0.0001783706,0.0007950644,0.0001511414,0.000007610125,1.181638e-7,0.000002400685,0.0007360521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008810109","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0245","title":"Unnatural Religion: Indoctrination and Philo's Reversal in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indoctrination; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Skepticism; Teleological argument; Natural (archaeology); Theism; Agnosticism; Law; Teleology; Political science; Ideology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03749868377430476,"gpt":0.3267065421861547,"spread":0.28920785841185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002624889,0.0001095488,0.0001905392,0.00007719222,0.0005535458,0.0000384126,0.00007451991,0.00005758477,0.000003795155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002395861,0.0001016933,0.00003529318,0.000197135,0.001216609,0.0002145941,0.00005290366,0.0001667257,0.000006687187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000170544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001479868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008054777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005924531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989767,0.0001180954,0.0001979568,0.0001903913,0.0002481858,0.0002686895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994278,0.0002589145,0.00008943766,0.00005705664,0.0001333088,0.0000334897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001285521,0.000009515094,0.01596409,0.000008983414,0.00001373838,0.00001272774,0.002314753,0.000006866879,0.00002453069,0.9760105,0.005221324,0.0004001145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010456,0.00009729704,0.06312244,0.000191549,0.00005286193,0.00001064004,0.007606586,0.00001165203,0.00007811866,0.03843772,0.8887593,0.0005863096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7174838,0.04072081,0.00001982518,0.01015522,0.001371529,0.0003731462,0.00001559239,0.0001758726,0.2296842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946701,0.002447383,0.0001474362,0.0003439561,0.0006613352,0.000009430562,0.00001391748,0.000004424333,0.001702025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1675966506","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383301","title":"Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise , Another Look-A Response to Erin Kelly, Frederick Schmitt, and Michael Williams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Normative; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09897934583329224,"gpt":0.2983841970836164,"spread":0.1994048512503241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005760929,0.0001695751,0.0002622673,0.00008815059,0.0003204216,0.0000786001,0.0000669961,0.00005061088,0.00008289645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002675227,0.000139213,0.00002718142,0.00004757254,0.0008713631,0.0001198906,0.0001084964,0.0001502299,0.00001931058],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005665346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002464943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002560633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002800991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999007,0.0001086694,0.0002338556,0.0003325622,0.0001247398,0.0001931454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993582,0.0002407155,0.00004775608,0.0002004099,0.00009362851,0.00005924135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007984764,0.0002275662,0.001004674,0.0001787017,0.00009099802,0.00001687165,0.1823914,0.000008222378,0.00376663,0.8088638,0.0001154341,0.002537186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001974649,0.0005797967,0.02562133,0.0002866884,0.00006405698,0.000004050715,0.03027267,0.00001066268,0.001118606,0.895139,0.04430354,0.0006249673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817081,0.003768393,0.00001298649,0.009118431,0.0001038544,0.0002765399,0.00003390813,0.00004228876,0.004935466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978668,0.000544236,0.00008302711,0.0006244277,0.0001190632,0.0000455641,0.000001851805,0.00001667089,0.0006983351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1521188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5676941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W963884259","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0002","title":"Hume on Art Critics, Wise Men, and the Virtues of Taste","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Beauty; Taste; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Exposition (narrative); Epistemic virtue; Clearance; Psychology; Art; Literature","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06293815843604779,"gpt":0.2829823822691093,"spread":0.2200442238330615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000570989,0.0001098309,0.0002655921,0.00003001974,0.0003721451,0.0000397707,0.00009084116,0.00002254248,0.00009150214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000373243,0.00006089076,0.00005683477,0.00001027993,0.002696573,0.00004425463,0.0000952669,0.0001438394,0.00004613675],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004252815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004301891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001475857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007014963,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993165,0.0001120304,0.0001757431,0.0001262666,0.0001519694,0.0001174998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988694,0.0007455928,0.00005685955,0.0001665804,0.0001373192,0.00002429764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004813061,0.00002486963,0.000004405015,0.00005318991,0.00009609572,4.882993e-7,0.01543084,5.242082e-7,0.000008846717,0.9817042,0.002245863,0.0003825117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004778605,0.0001351974,0.00002850938,0.000071145,0.00004172787,2.936248e-7,0.003642223,0.00002102212,0.00005359304,0.8987713,0.09667727,0.00007980863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02372241,0.004680895,0.000007448049,0.02090267,0.0004663089,0.0001874378,0.00003074007,0.00004913197,0.949953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943671,0.0006474439,0.000004840105,0.001596216,0.0004908076,0.00001246348,0.000001102243,0.000009433402,0.002870621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053097021","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0218","title":"The Gallant and the Philosopher","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wife; Philosophy; German; Style (visual arts); Atheism; Literature; Classics; Theology; History; Art; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08588222628250035,"gpt":0.2820694580853682,"spread":0.1961872318028678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004594238,0.00008918867,0.0001279543,0.000008307251,0.001584485,0.0001180866,0.0001151045,0.00001566918,0.00003366739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001418835,0.00003443215,0.00004933884,0.00001059244,0.003242849,0.00003518812,0.0001126472,0.0001616454,0.00004567004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008916503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000999196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003083835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004802615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994793,0.00004721238,0.0001159228,0.00009906849,0.0001239855,0.0001344998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992761,0.0004484757,0.00003573163,0.0001431654,0.00007729905,0.00001919888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002980237,0.000007082085,9.881683e-7,0.000006849227,0.0001052432,0.000001775277,0.02653208,7.530177e-7,8.855258e-7,0.972856,0.0001934312,0.0002650961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005027606,0.00002029961,0.00001213521,0.00001580135,0.00001975147,0.000001485986,0.004210887,9.77639e-7,0.000003200853,0.8719085,0.1232512,0.00005302095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.019952,0.04797604,0.000002573261,0.2885195,0.0008738159,0.0002719425,0.000008316197,0.0000767121,0.6423191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927017,0.003156934,0.000002280226,0.002132472,0.0008589005,0.0000256021,2.484362e-7,0.000007391442,0.001114437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519776254","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403831","title":"Complexities of Character: Hume on Love and Responsibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Moral character; Passions; Epistemology; Feeling; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Action (physics); Moral disengagement; Moral philosophy; Moral responsibility; Psychology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1845723699349023,"gpt":0.3426206989202132,"spread":0.1580483289853109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003500299,0.0001236729,0.0002992591,0.00005758829,0.000182806,0.00003711204,0.00007120503,0.00002970361,0.0002334415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001768032,0.00009166125,0.00005611407,0.00001511445,0.001146626,0.00008983781,0.00004787089,0.0001560206,0.00003811406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001172876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009930005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001119498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006057038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992566,0.00007107176,0.0002140421,0.0001721973,0.0001494871,0.0001366652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992318,0.000342864,0.00007521376,0.0001747756,0.0001444467,0.00003085705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001259143,0.00006946705,0.0000150848,0.00004090051,0.0000507555,0.000002225265,0.02341124,9.999953e-8,0.00009402041,0.9753241,0.0002281441,0.0006380733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001947527,0.0004499028,0.004510988,0.00007357027,0.00001647158,5.690974e-7,0.003803146,0.000002200941,0.000150269,0.9745597,0.01612678,0.0001116744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7083918,0.002098121,3.92642e-7,0.01243779,0.0002175309,0.0001284975,0.00005957315,0.00003949083,0.2766268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966646,0.0002022582,0.000008301969,0.001421382,0.0003292169,0.000001479137,0.000002051974,0.000005331065,0.001365346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2882728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4224791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525568543","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0022","title":"Loeb’s “Standard” Questions about Hume’s Concept of Probable Truth","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; Beauty; Honor; Reading (process); Causation; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07216388733433313,"gpt":0.3045090137049078,"spread":0.2323451263705747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004443025,0.0001496414,0.0003733624,0.00005246609,0.0004433174,0.0000470347,0.0001368882,0.00004454406,0.0003275175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005152196,0.0001132758,0.00009954259,0.00002895132,0.001575537,0.00009871634,0.00008899555,0.0002030708,0.00003956246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002242297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003360754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004281539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003635374,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.00009030318,0.0002869157,0.0001901016,0.0002417436,0.000210369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988234,0.0003536265,0.0001161602,0.0002161887,0.0004426557,0.00004797607],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001576894,0.00003690575,0.00001069713,0.00007553263,0.000109315,7.275134e-7,0.02869252,0.000006542673,0.00000639695,0.9689935,0.001082468,0.000969637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002888068,0.0002019175,0.00003849492,0.0001403846,0.000047413,4.899703e-7,0.003869517,0.000006792926,0.0001407667,0.8566678,0.1384501,0.0001474607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03443582,0.008717869,0.000211335,0.007257934,0.002101793,0.0003795178,0.0002237546,0.000250892,0.9464211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970707,0.0001866709,0.00005767278,0.0003282488,0.0007376625,0.00002466332,0.000005937523,0.0000159349,0.001572466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5805132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046436944","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0649","title":"The Role of Political Economy in Hume’s Moral Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reading (process); Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Moral philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2028560838194342,"gpt":0.3686473488575962,"spread":0.165791265038162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005809271,0.00008234978,0.000185749,0.00003556642,0.0004315307,0.00001134175,0.0002348461,0.00007190611,0.00002568604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004852092,0.0000597961,0.00006792305,0.00009803803,0.002380645,0.0001085014,0.00009578349,0.0001820882,0.0000340319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006366592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007896936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001423399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009306491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.000152492,0.0002268186,0.0001273157,0.0001453172,0.000471527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991953,0.0004349622,0.00004105943,0.0001365188,0.00009776436,0.0000943522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009463912,0.00003716609,0.004638729,0.000008106344,0.00002736896,0.000001359473,0.01504411,3.527685e-8,0.000001015635,0.980028,0.00005193557,0.0001527547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000798637,0.00003343971,0.003530136,0.00001468035,0.000008888617,1.236414e-7,0.01624665,0.000001169526,0.000100115,0.9717498,0.008164738,0.00007042397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01416646,0.001751354,4.657561e-7,0.01002513,0.0001354648,0.0001000677,0.000003900618,0.0000222638,0.9737949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988976,0.0001107467,0.00003346317,0.0004775635,0.0003354851,0.00001658628,2.014362e-7,0.000004883477,0.0001235069],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8771585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494444853","doi":"10.1353/hms.2006.a383389","title":"Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Causation; Inductive reasoning","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.299506503265611,"gpt":0.3501174813992639,"spread":0.0506109781336529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009949517,0.0001387024,0.0002056173,0.00006391584,0.001677696,0.0003471158,0.0001408906,0.00003499345,0.0001418702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001692718,0.00007891129,0.00005865522,0.00003681991,0.003050871,0.0001013816,0.0001253491,0.0002402311,0.00009292466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001288035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001513874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001230065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001122514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990194,0.0001748269,0.0001653269,0.0002530834,0.0001697531,0.000217569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988566,0.0007204387,0.00005565641,0.000223851,0.0001179165,0.00002553662],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001076956,0.00002648977,0.00001339917,0.00001680233,0.00005100876,0.000003561652,0.01078841,0.000001318093,0.00005418423,0.9834663,0.004867407,0.0007003429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001036737,0.00004720121,0.0001617341,0.00001813855,0.0000223096,0.00000110784,0.002888765,0.00000461348,0.00005692213,0.6916264,0.3049849,0.00008423989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3573943,0.0213386,0.00002199326,0.07695532,0.003195692,0.0003873719,0.0000399752,0.0001906534,0.5404761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880784,0.00009418881,0.00004429075,0.0011852,0.001023131,0.00001260997,0.000002701463,0.00001193348,0.009547592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6306841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154618067","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403835","title":"Sympathy, Understanding, and Hermeneutics in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Positivism; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2716722552179638,"gpt":0.3343509989565894,"spread":0.06267874373862559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001768699,0.0001254988,0.0002157996,0.00007112469,0.0002938325,0.00006486042,0.00005518529,0.00003704987,0.00007029038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003623216,0.00009903402,0.00003128907,0.00002500064,0.0004916132,0.00008639546,0.00003905029,0.0001535186,0.00001011644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005692679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009559319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001493239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005802459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993548,0.00003511359,0.0001589425,0.000161369,0.0001070609,0.0001827088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996879,0.0001063052,0.00003546774,0.00009858829,0.00003434351,0.00003746785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009937612,0.00004314705,0.00007486419,0.00001765979,0.00002984164,0.00001601011,0.05063862,6.449881e-7,0.00000947851,0.9483612,0.0001678895,0.00063076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000308271,0.0001482502,0.000399726,0.00006438108,0.00001925091,0.000001191554,0.01575211,0.00001160496,0.00000692806,0.9788387,0.004320453,0.0001291764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3234282,0.007486383,0.000003388087,0.01364635,0.0003709212,0.0002197428,0.00002034497,0.0001131333,0.6547116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963301,0.001582886,0.000006134606,0.0009337938,0.0002148391,0.00000458212,0.000001304664,0.000007334641,0.0009189625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.672902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.403849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129947012","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0005","title":"Hume on the Moral Obligation to Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2794015542457803,"gpt":0.4481105192393288,"spread":0.1687089649935485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006932335,0.00006025656,0.00007868424,0.00002040566,0.001186777,0.00003869167,0.0001619779,0.00005484088,0.0000656972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003647591,0.00003924749,0.00003099687,0.0001344281,0.0005876545,0.00006200156,0.00005128113,0.0002713554,0.0004445979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002354511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003464385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001874743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001255756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992238,0.00008312253,0.00008195535,0.0001119145,0.0002715699,0.0002276598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989482,0.0007085819,0.00001937577,0.0001271992,0.0001216093,0.00007508318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003259343,0.00001129311,0.00006295549,0.000004786841,0.00001044901,5.783082e-7,0.01291063,0.000001174005,0.00008218405,0.9784008,0.008315817,0.0001960604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005167697,0.00005218302,0.003446313,0.0000169059,0.00003747717,1.099944e-7,0.01112355,0.000002771566,0.0002112808,0.8837154,0.1012309,0.0001114486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2475175,0.00006552459,0.000005568559,0.2406995,0.001524561,0.0002007502,0.000005297551,0.00007940056,0.5099019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990274,0.00002806117,0.00005267287,0.006734462,0.001234429,0.0000184057,2.808948e-7,0.000003660762,0.001653992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7427565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141202510","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0000","title":"Hume’s Citation of Strabo and the Dating of the Memoranda","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Citation; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Classics; Linguistics; Computer science; Library science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.046261995234328,"gpt":0.3161815119818451,"spread":0.2699195167475171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007152548,0.00004299143,0.000163919,0.00001109979,0.0005987129,0.000005711166,0.00009536133,0.00001259337,0.000009393883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008520042,0.00002024092,0.0000374005,0.0001296492,0.001183174,0.00004912358,0.00006354944,0.0000380023,5.194671e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009305425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009431873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000439777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004588159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993157,0.0002160055,0.0001453442,0.00006601468,0.000182478,0.00007450461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991204,0.0005871831,0.0001078187,0.00007225689,0.0001032015,0.000009098797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003633408,0.00002597252,0.01958277,0.0001137703,0.0001835006,8.105426e-8,0.6189036,0.000004385495,0.0001079064,0.3331403,0.005523916,0.02237742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002206062,0.0001570652,0.08544832,0.0002467375,0.0002350811,2.639571e-7,0.2063169,0.00005081604,0.0003376118,0.07028124,0.6344453,0.0002745806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8069685,0.01053899,0.00003865027,0.004516534,0.000600978,0.000304918,0.000006971805,0.00001934433,0.1770052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979066,0.0004265008,0.00005896928,0.00005816937,0.00009374699,0.00000574907,1.222068e-7,0.000001549864,0.001448621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6289214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4604877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622469145","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0011","title":"Turnabout is Fair Play: A New Humean Response in the Old Debate with Kant","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical philosophy","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1990778657528034,"gpt":0.3199796473626689,"spread":0.1209017816098655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001086621,0.0001643944,0.0002374341,0.00008133848,0.0002945113,0.0001170828,0.0002306214,0.00003608367,0.00005673252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002847973,0.00008496924,0.00004796534,0.00005571207,0.0005662818,0.0001036462,0.00009478085,0.0003009315,0.00004730668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003254921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001137473,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002885542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002013258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989091,0.0002010559,0.0001896312,0.0001944489,0.0002741585,0.0002315733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990543,0.0004222965,0.00005761938,0.0002586438,0.000147377,0.00005983105],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005875023,0.00003560271,0.00004593604,0.0000126034,0.00008624453,0.0000412965,0.2659594,0.000002198855,0.000002275528,0.7232249,0.009898379,0.000103663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007114589,0.0003263399,0.0002853061,0.000123794,0.00003132431,0.000004175962,0.02761623,0.000004676741,0.00001441684,0.7470111,0.2237137,0.0001575742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6022618,0.0108672,0.00002194078,0.1892056,0.0006845355,0.0005966818,0.00005083897,0.0001438588,0.1961675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814321,0.0001129437,0.00001896801,0.007402901,0.0004043471,0.0000225126,0.000001099197,0.00001105987,0.01059406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3791703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3464945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819644612","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385729","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Scholarship; Section (typography); Reflexive pronoun; Point (geometry); Law; Computer science; Political science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1351547742627148,"gpt":0.328928064686276,"spread":0.1937732904235612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001645712,0.00009768937,0.0001604838,0.00003088629,0.0004276885,0.00005955433,0.00009935165,0.00001714889,0.003685315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001233991,0.00007664816,0.00005201222,0.00002054848,0.000378142,0.00005724785,0.00004768539,0.0001218941,0.001232428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001227701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008386273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003759833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007329055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993604,0.00002534284,0.000145074,0.0001584915,0.0001321016,0.0001786225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995157,0.0001204899,0.00001206149,0.0001710379,0.0001255386,0.00005521911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001110321,0.00002523422,0.000001979331,0.00001790778,0.00004971716,0.000007156168,0.03364933,0.00000143907,0.000003095416,0.9492792,0.01413293,0.002820898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004762216,0.00004586716,0.000009883054,0.00001919968,0.000008911198,4.282662e-7,0.001528297,8.392904e-7,0.00001003798,0.4417399,0.556517,0.00007202916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03672482,0.00188371,0.000001364763,0.0396899,0.0004267221,0.00009926863,0.00002263537,0.0001185463,0.921033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496033,0.0003106088,0.00003048336,0.02455859,0.001132568,0.000018847,0.000001222164,0.00001285236,0.02433154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099869159","doi":"10.1353/hms.2005.a383285","title":"Religion and Moral Prohibition in Hume's \"Of Suicide\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Duty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Theology; Physics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06462684998896982,"gpt":0.3744488470057035,"spread":0.3098219970167336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001680867,0.00004150298,0.0001048343,0.00003318617,0.0001560522,0.0000055969,0.00002908916,0.00002035152,0.000009421316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001298272,0.00003812836,0.00001546406,0.00008256958,0.0009144209,0.00008566461,0.00002199903,0.0000362338,0.000004903572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005214847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001158127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001962597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005942216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999535,0.00004145211,0.0001127985,0.00007458617,0.0001126333,0.0001235924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997719,0.0000730309,0.00003850856,0.00003331183,0.00006001704,0.00002326812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003883882,0.00001405774,0.02322296,0.000007753329,0.000006724993,0.000001058288,0.003142132,0.000005769827,0.00002087077,0.9714792,0.001199535,0.0008959961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009583409,0.000222555,0.06408132,0.0003241631,0.00006205832,0.000005033828,0.03267304,0.00001791013,0.000617094,0.04977523,0.8507265,0.0005367926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7702787,0.005727482,0.00001222976,0.004420706,0.00008295022,0.0001505386,0.000006908958,0.0000271643,0.2192933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970741,0.001302203,0.0002970695,0.0002023791,0.000146526,0.00000599741,9.238474e-7,0.000001668313,0.0009690962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9217041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3369222,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174977507","doi":"10.1353/hms.2003.a383814","title":"A True Account of the Behaviour and Conduct of Archibald Stewart, Esq ; Late Lord Provost of Edinburgh . In a Letter to a Friend.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Classics; Psychology; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0776362796522289,"gpt":0.2854733129454864,"spread":0.2078370332932575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002422023,0.00007780733,0.0002315454,0.00009538107,0.00009099109,0.00000801638,0.00007749972,0.00001564798,0.0001694381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001371229,0.00005510676,0.00004685546,0.00005230595,0.0004304657,0.00009729521,0.00005885222,0.00006956574,6.71421e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001718625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002450708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003138084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004434983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993291,0.00004412287,0.0002568143,0.0001105672,0.0001691736,0.00009016176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995323,0.00007185232,0.0001199869,0.0001071822,0.0001557239,0.00001294875],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002375971,0.0008536839,0.1406634,0.0005825194,0.0005335379,0.00001226443,0.5097834,0.00002887397,0.006766024,0.2112301,0.1288981,0.0004104544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005040386,0.001286226,0.238037,0.001637364,0.0005729072,0.000009594669,0.07140055,0.00000794723,0.03503463,0.03115465,0.6146859,0.001132858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926352,0.001057744,2.893958e-7,0.0002541387,0.0002680676,0.0002137634,0.00004021899,0.000003367813,0.005527215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961431,0.00002669724,0.00002136365,0.0001284261,0.0000525012,0.00002094806,5.143883e-7,0.000004242647,0.003602233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4857878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2474824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119510605","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385862","title":"The Passions, Character, and the Self in Hume","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Reading (process); Identity (music); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Contradiction; Self; Reflexive pronoun; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Personal identity; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Linguistics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104576542066793,"gpt":0.2696456198611193,"spread":0.1650690777943264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005407482,0.00009372745,0.0001557651,0.0000204623,0.001135594,0.0001095406,0.0001176725,0.00002262037,0.00012792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001716475,0.00003942246,0.00004071186,0.00001940487,0.001311128,0.0000593051,0.0001231977,0.0002467498,0.00005328863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009015461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001897182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003871741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999334,0.0001221062,0.0001589872,0.0001109039,0.0001147517,0.0001591946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998869,0.0008725153,0.00004362147,0.0001466193,0.00004905882,0.00001916414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009635,0.00002163971,0.00001696107,0.000009562368,0.00005334151,0.0000021589,0.04801526,2.745617e-8,7.411978e-7,0.9493795,0.001179189,0.001311547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004001738,0.00001680071,0.0002538958,0.00002815629,0.00001349293,8.320361e-7,0.004708082,0.00003480444,0.000001062971,0.6202545,0.3742219,0.00006635024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1076402,0.09487804,3.125122e-7,0.3051294,0.001435773,0.0005620104,0.00001793594,0.0001487235,0.4901876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802777,0.01455731,0.000001239414,0.0013738,0.0004591809,0.0000465067,2.876674e-7,0.000006861949,0.003277076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051678757","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0003","title":"Thinking in Time in Hume's Essays","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0635058259417763,"gpt":0.2957520162032437,"spread":0.2322461902614674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007749906,0.0001177696,0.0002317796,0.0001148725,0.0002484327,0.00008329751,0.0002088266,0.00005787639,0.0007172519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001932279,0.00009380025,0.00004239729,0.00003732207,0.000504413,0.0001154295,0.0001699164,0.0005973667,0.0002126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001519307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001346803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008641179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006143848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991695,0.00004292227,0.0002073512,0.0001728028,0.0001932322,0.000214227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995025,0.0002340234,0.00003914898,0.000144473,0.00005605791,0.00002384372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007474641,0.00005335998,0.0003626407,0.00001933879,0.00001839612,0.00002388272,0.0397603,7.669132e-7,0.0001046074,0.9592053,0.0001923932,0.0002515256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002404481,0.00002114128,0.0004303092,0.00006120585,0.000004668805,7.160389e-7,0.001438732,0.00001239927,0.0000197044,0.9758559,0.02178429,0.0001305037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4771678,0.0008918681,2.671359e-7,0.006120661,0.000663901,0.0001185041,0.000006718738,0.0000655266,0.5149647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970219,0.00008281713,0.00001609667,0.0007144783,0.0005111985,0.0000184724,0.000001801147,0.0000125204,0.001620724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.519854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7853404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062407234","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0195","title":"The Bibliothèque raisonnée Review of Volume 3 of the Treatise : Authorship, Text, and Translation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volume (thermodynamics); Translation (biology); Psychology; Literature; Art; Physics; Chemistry; Thermodynamics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08061987343246789,"gpt":0.2945061002060492,"spread":0.2138862267735813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005356802,0.00008216844,0.000210204,0.00004716275,0.0003880442,0.00002318989,0.00009934262,0.00002287113,0.00008818753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001486442,0.00003903248,0.00008599136,0.00009594404,0.001173857,0.00005937719,0.00003546957,0.0001037353,0.000001851578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005050151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001677037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009153032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008072327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.000120556,0.0002711702,0.00008339294,0.0001466104,0.00008580272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999131,0.0004168773,0.000135402,0.000151042,0.0001551676,0.00001051184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007618577,0.00001932688,0.0001192426,0.0009815907,0.00004936854,1.386637e-7,0.005008874,2.334558e-7,0.00002004288,0.9893561,0.001789406,0.002648078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001431649,0.00004664086,0.001582779,0.001484877,0.00009227914,5.124954e-7,0.0004590731,0.00000813765,0.00005301761,0.8362651,0.1597908,0.00007367663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02240885,0.7426122,0.000005912533,0.03305077,0.0002983372,0.0004387517,0.00006161174,0.00002566118,0.2010979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560988,0.04165701,0.000005088647,0.0001523794,0.0001442613,0.00001225534,8.491745e-7,0.000006209891,0.001923141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4325127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006244423","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0650","title":"Extreme Skepticism and Commitment in the Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4531161379002982,"gpt":0.3123247672187859,"spread":0.1407913706815123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002650559,0.00007895257,0.0001199117,0.0000279055,0.0002377509,0.00002515445,0.00007845734,0.00001511387,0.0002064913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003184612,0.00004307573,0.00002339101,0.00001162433,0.0005913826,0.00004447496,0.00005261099,0.0001075305,0.00002217487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006737146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003085934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001276951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001299826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995504,0.00006289722,0.0001065127,0.00009263932,0.00008167343,0.0001058761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996678,0.0001568571,0.00002252529,0.0001097716,0.00002875597,0.00001431413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005899768,0.00004472397,0.000076116,0.000008435303,0.00002807425,0.000008599033,0.195444,1.397991e-8,7.766888e-7,0.8032913,0.0002474777,0.0008446826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001796728,0.00007890919,0.00139704,0.00002667278,0.00001981166,0.00000105692,0.02098334,0.000002323977,0.000003067349,0.9596044,0.01763415,0.00006953283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.177167,0.008737446,0.000001729308,0.005132432,0.0002233148,0.0002182968,0.00001240292,0.00003221745,0.8084752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977208,0.0005704548,0.00001163442,0.0009756308,0.0001387652,0.0000316503,6.028051e-7,0.000004641106,0.0005458517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2260935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562014562","doi":"10.1353/hms.2006.a383390","title":"Chastity and the Practice of the World in Hume's Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Virtue; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02338066537480741,"gpt":0.3499252793299149,"spread":0.3265446139551074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003758564,0.00003991145,0.0001041374,0.00001378133,0.0004240648,0.00000992618,0.00007170228,0.000009495371,0.0000104006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005872218,0.00002095182,0.00002357905,0.0001639057,0.003742765,0.0000605596,0.00004695357,0.00005281052,0.000001425629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002832656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001126741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01336116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04870263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994214,0.000184245,0.00009741076,0.00005722337,0.0001393855,0.0001002967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988153,0.0009772271,0.00006992872,0.00006337184,0.00006498319,0.000009207834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000876097,0.00001396237,0.008175849,0.000002514641,0.00001289935,5.223284e-7,0.002386088,0.000005297267,6.526375e-7,0.9876139,0.001657459,0.0001221398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000444509,0.000008706324,0.03262566,0.00003064156,0.00005636721,0.000001019114,0.01492722,0.000001853052,0.00001034988,0.01468329,0.9371408,0.00006964248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03126036,0.004351579,0.000006260409,0.01931309,0.0001316636,0.000165864,0.00000770385,0.000008222711,0.9447553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891303,0.0002207138,0.0000574968,0.0003155696,0.0001218821,0.000008111422,1.274522e-7,0.000001146944,0.01014465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092350729","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0001","title":"A Cruel but Ancient Subjugation?: Understanding Hume’s Attack on Slavery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reverence; Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Enlightenment; Sensibility; Politics; Compromise; Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science; Art","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2451962849910392,"gpt":0.3945314187315659,"spread":0.1493351337405266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000192738,0.0001030513,0.0001556379,0.0000498338,0.001300275,0.00006660497,0.0001070541,0.000036338,0.0002815936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002871672,0.00008980887,0.00005900288,0.000146471,0.001444831,0.0001643187,0.00004394933,0.00007863745,0.0004769893],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004514697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003108251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001209102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005690233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989046,0.00007718483,0.0001466332,0.000171729,0.0003549817,0.0003448188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992625,0.0003200228,0.00006605333,0.0001037558,0.0001553427,0.00009232754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002214523,0.0000208442,0.001688495,0.000006954278,0.00004565873,0.000002024973,0.003517049,0.00001199379,0.00002502698,0.9642048,0.03039874,0.00007622097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000410314,0.0001698059,0.01022497,0.0001247937,0.00005861087,0.000001995689,0.1727575,0.0000149366,0.00008020945,0.03434392,0.7812309,0.0005820405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2182353,0.0009625769,0.000423064,0.007135285,0.0009304724,0.0003556124,0.00002026572,0.0001294225,0.771808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872158,0.0002374821,0.0001118986,0.001427757,0.0003595116,0.00003048136,0.000002104329,0.000005442095,0.01060959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591496887","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383326","title":"General Rules and the Justification of Probable Belief in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Superstition; Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dilemma; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Theology; Mathematics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09999874871150895,"gpt":0.2984662607870991,"spread":0.1984675120755902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003278393,0.00007726108,0.0001887661,0.00003867328,0.0002332332,0.00002754555,0.00006369341,0.00002134759,0.00005334291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000867891,0.00004474448,0.00002952155,0.00002283057,0.001151777,0.0000617148,0.00004940015,0.00008795662,0.000007036022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008933967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007919491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000132725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001473538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994618,0.00006105089,0.0001792418,0.000108276,0.00008904579,0.000100604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995729,0.0001647356,0.00005864079,0.0001084449,0.00008264439,0.00001260465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004521892,0.00003737126,0.0002106389,0.00003606013,0.00004056,0.000001388266,0.02544479,0.000003154348,0.00001703138,0.9727165,0.0001222099,0.001325127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006457586,0.00003590868,0.001270922,0.00004756245,0.0000327014,0.00000106274,0.002894403,0.0000372668,0.00002329972,0.9809152,0.01402307,0.00007282386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8176054,0.01358492,0.000002783523,0.009392188,0.0001466497,0.0002682697,0.00001304437,0.00002448439,0.1589622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937926,0.003303853,0.00002156191,0.0001691925,0.0002125862,0.00003910367,0.000002822688,0.000005575794,0.002452704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1761872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4243771,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988878473","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0185","title":"Hume's Nuanced Defense of Luxury","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Assertion; Philosophy; Acknowledgement; Virtue; Pessimism; Morality; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09446842297566957,"gpt":0.2903228239533097,"spread":0.1958544009776401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001830364,0.0001170505,0.0002585605,0.00004750437,0.0002711846,0.00002143385,0.0000940404,0.0000326923,0.0003131954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000686966,0.0000899831,0.00009679354,0.0000239736,0.0009216646,0.00006485517,0.00007203372,0.0001238894,0.00005992517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001170876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001212047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001010437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003754955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992688,0.00002737206,0.0002361204,0.0001417112,0.0001610239,0.0001649945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993712,0.0001647723,0.00008407288,0.0001553737,0.0002054586,0.0000190804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001490617,0.00005292878,0.00002389284,0.00005677421,0.00006883594,0.000004013012,0.005981771,0.000002921691,0.0001081308,0.9912309,0.002282763,0.0001721783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001958767,0.00005323677,0.0001247124,0.00004252218,0.00002763025,4.976386e-7,0.001783441,0.000002203497,0.0002509564,0.9020196,0.09538364,0.0001156374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1568343,0.00840087,0.000005932401,0.002719254,0.0006127663,0.0001143771,0.0000430613,0.00009305093,0.8311764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955099,0.0001767718,0.00002682974,0.0002794925,0.000749026,0.00001186991,0.000003606322,0.00001259872,0.003229953],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8386756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3669404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965356735","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0001","title":"Hume's Theory of Mental Representation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Perception; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Mental representation; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognition","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2437873989440629,"gpt":0.3621498582289832,"spread":0.1183624592849202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000438194,0.00008036989,0.0001615694,0.00003764564,0.0002355098,0.00001274928,0.00006620469,0.00002111181,0.0007084018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001199117,0.0000597627,0.00006706825,0.00001724975,0.0006834885,0.0001671274,0.00008165381,0.00008693994,0.00006102044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001143646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004742867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001159705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001588615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993761,0.00008229777,0.0001650924,0.00008361073,0.0001454435,0.0001474946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994753,0.0002123173,0.00007196573,0.0001210993,0.00008940566,0.00002992903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001955231,0.00005803282,0.0001637951,0.0000245338,0.0001278662,2.67562e-7,0.08424372,1.037304e-7,0.0001325472,0.9138671,0.0006212237,0.0007413203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001634691,0.0000417524,0.0004094817,0.00002818663,0.00003727301,6.046927e-7,0.02506219,7.259334e-7,0.0007585657,0.9467124,0.02669202,0.0000932801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3101013,0.01333601,0.00001103793,0.001967322,0.001833218,0.0001961099,0.00004153973,0.00007755601,0.6724359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968156,0.0002581876,0.00001168181,0.0002406832,0.0007529819,0.00001154382,0.000004715575,0.000008642235,0.001896031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6867142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7756503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030182908","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0022","title":"Hume on Pride-in-Virtue: A Reliable Motive?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Virtue; Epistemology; Beauty; Form of the Good; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Theology","retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07962298659059694,"gpt":0.307928970094644,"spread":0.2283059835040471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004204433,0.000168789,0.0002689165,0.00009570199,0.0003928313,0.0000652676,0.0001583094,0.00006286299,0.0005962359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003201941,0.0001274394,0.00007484665,0.00003537428,0.0007133934,0.0001053959,0.0001061768,0.0006598194,0.0004488258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001909557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002062869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006699824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001531774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999043,0.00003069027,0.0002172216,0.0002576989,0.0001979031,0.000253505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992555,0.0002624108,0.00005640235,0.0002491971,0.0001289053,0.00004760465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382902,0.00009593738,0.0000827981,0.00002782966,0.00004745982,0.0000144672,0.007669518,0.000001489649,0.0001015377,0.989654,0.00203701,0.0002440946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002804164,0.000120877,0.0003977584,0.00006527467,0.00001130981,7.03929e-7,0.001290843,0.000007905819,0.0001167583,0.7950045,0.2025305,0.0001731536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2774937,0.0007432219,5.051536e-7,0.00774215,0.001733888,0.0001933884,0.00001835301,0.0001116036,0.7119631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907214,0.0001372522,0.0000129163,0.001205001,0.0008973181,0.00003569269,0.000001850649,0.00001994915,0.006968616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7132276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6528365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}