{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":298,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":298,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"9debe24da6e1","filters":{"venue":"Hume studies"}},"results":[{"id":"W336972056","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385972","title":"A Guide to Parallel Paragraph and Page References in Oxford University Press Editions of Hume's Enquiry concerning Human Understanding","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"David Norton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mary K. Norton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2955415813092725,"gpt":0.3756283501123771,"spread":0.08008676880310456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690129,0.001163397,0.001240277,0.005654302,0.003500508,0.00417638,0.001792147,0.00230641,0.1805513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01679428,0.000879569,0.0005996536,0.004818749,0.001590333,0.004982099,0.001971014,0.006455346,0.129638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001602268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00318797,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009452885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02410332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979671,0.0007805693,0.0002509511,0.0001344694,0.0007537451,0.00011322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895748,0.004432973,0.00036416,0.0007433973,0.004472268,0.0004124128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001628468,0.00002199463,0.00003656447,0.0001425594,0.000001921778,0.0000229182,0.0005420631,0.00002930575,0.0002583449,0.01157004,0.9630546,0.02430341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004105243,0.000009047851,0.0002463619,0.0002419646,0.000002427646,0.00003564135,0.0003940522,0.00005100458,0.0001994067,0.004374646,0.9944293,0.00001212763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001879199,0.02608012,0.0778583,0.0696164,0.1844237,0.001462138,0.02137871,0.003656656,0.6136448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006097908,0.009368539,0.02895034,0.01030324,0.008026854,0.000930046,0.006543507,0.004161596,0.9256179],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1805513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6040041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081277561","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0311","title":"\"All Is Revolution in Us\": Personal Identity in Shaftesbury and Hume","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Law; Self; Aesthetics; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Kenneth P. Winkler","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0984612116391918,"gpt":0.3290845162988819,"spread":0.2306233046596901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003786729,0.0004294039,0.0003903608,0.001252597,0.01769449,0.009373771,0.0008262588,0.003600505,0.005031442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004873158,0.0002846913,0.000173057,0.001901478,0.05106682,0.00817462,0.003834102,0.004200726,0.0005037863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0176331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008288646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1877905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1814759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968047,0.001879091,0.0000479293,0.0002488827,0.0005950551,0.0004243833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980772,0.001056291,0.0002093599,0.0000998294,0.0002430318,0.0003142879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001122101,0.00001513784,0.0003555192,0.00002248461,0.000001923923,0.0001161919,0.1547824,0.0000405698,0.00006136037,0.8084353,0.02903477,0.007123157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000155411,0.00002105205,0.003514466,0.0004253286,0.000006572652,0.0002759757,0.1143353,0.0001477995,0.0002253798,0.2436302,0.6373622,0.00004022775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0800748,0.0627974,0.002362902,0.2342267,0.001770583,0.00005777397,0.00006811113,0.00002896187,0.6186126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250672,0.008109851,0.0004239349,0.009056184,0.0004555572,0.000033147,0.00001451488,0.00001981125,0.05681974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1877905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3733949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969878553","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0015","title":"The Circumstances of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Epistemology; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Simon Hope","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1037403417050015,"gpt":0.3241856297699282,"spread":0.2204452880649267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01665353,0.0004362369,0.001028378,0.001874028,0.01180278,0.01304334,0.001548298,0.006177537,0.004570156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03199967,0.0005580095,0.0008891989,0.001074628,0.04854221,0.01584636,0.01221768,0.007437424,0.0007638464],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004376071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006469911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002438443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001984271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9753224,0.0138245,0.001088694,0.002594622,0.004004826,0.003164987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812458,0.01081054,0.00157076,0.002846878,0.002270605,0.001255535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005384635,0.000004688739,0.0001655709,0.0000149119,0.000003687161,0.00005880315,0.001468585,0.00008922735,0.00002799767,0.9957925,0.0008022406,0.001566454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003726141,0.000007645275,0.0001483374,0.00007420639,0.000004519859,0.00006969044,0.002554466,0.0001223613,0.00009074881,0.9604606,0.03645471,0.000008918538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.04355389,0.006460957,0.0745328,0.06427678,0.0013847,0.0001599578,0.0001557609,0.00008825346,0.8093869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734368,0.001872383,0.006249533,0.004740316,0.0007725236,0.0002145826,0.0000508169,0.00008265184,0.01258049],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01665353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08807337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986328627","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0241","title":"Moral Skepticism and Moral Naturalism in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Morality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Wonder; Relation (database)","authors":[{"name":"Nicholas L. Sturgeon","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1768750336287885,"gpt":0.3203677747415037,"spread":0.1434927411127152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337809,0.0005105549,0.0005502586,0.001969088,0.0139832,0.01034049,0.001013699,0.00819779,0.003748167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009942819,0.0002896807,0.0004073614,0.002076228,0.0419857,0.005883662,0.003399487,0.009740049,0.0006968672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01107196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004585566,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009332844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01033307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873837,0.009938492,0.0001432109,0.0004171746,0.001366766,0.0007506565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926819,0.005732471,0.0004277477,0.000325643,0.0005309565,0.0003011993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006736194,0.00001096282,0.00006639939,0.00002704508,0.000003279382,0.00004748139,0.007285324,0.00009100205,0.00001531557,0.9506524,0.03957656,0.00221753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001437433,0.00001191053,0.0003182262,0.0004974981,0.00000477722,0.00008568727,0.003649478,0.0002195009,0.00008446952,0.610052,0.3850429,0.00001914545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01213488,0.0625649,0.003582515,0.3024763,0.002721354,0.00002666553,0.00004486963,0.00004124732,0.6164071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114537,0.01983987,0.001629813,0.06157391,0.008104212,0.0001607682,0.00004188261,0.0001255899,0.09707022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08033299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967744870","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0000","title":"A Conversation between Annette Baier and Anik Waldow about Hume's Account of Sympathy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Conversation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology","authors":[{"name":"Annette C. Baier","is_ca":false},{"name":"Anik Waldow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1515377144260957,"gpt":0.2918947842477799,"spread":0.1403570698216841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01050953,0.0005000338,0.0009023486,0.0009932721,0.0113809,0.006958822,0.001250634,0.009604302,0.004536099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01538436,0.0004716006,0.0004173446,0.001326987,0.02141784,0.01468152,0.003601672,0.01710054,0.0007656698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004491422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00162503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0150723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930815,0.005374579,0.00008469086,0.0003258947,0.0007284562,0.0004049618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795243,0.01875293,0.0003001895,0.0002185586,0.0005488712,0.0006550129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006594724,0.00002514646,0.000421757,0.00009368498,0.00002069778,0.000882534,0.07823174,0.0001882965,0.0003604224,0.692145,0.2159836,0.01158097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002220367,0.00002960857,0.0009872707,0.0004741272,0.00001602433,0.0008255799,0.04992373,0.0004937054,0.0005663949,0.2759595,0.6706111,0.00009072864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01276208,0.01984314,0.003756645,0.9216544,0.00582057,0.00001243105,0.00003266817,0.00002641687,0.03609171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5249833,0.01783394,0.004955026,0.3853469,0.008160437,0.0001032557,0.00004149582,0.0001842674,0.05839141],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05558032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126031463","doi":"","title":"Hume’s Theory of Causation: A Quasi-Realist Interpretation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"P. J. E. Kail","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1219300513602781,"gpt":0.3036695597998627,"spread":0.1817395084395845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005394252,0.0008411217,0.001220903,0.003626395,0.003473979,0.004274184,0.002056957,0.005949002,0.009550636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007011337,0.0008657182,0.001542079,0.002201087,0.02838635,0.0124827,0.003517029,0.004916614,0.001077134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003689398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001886642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002602175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001872255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960518,0.002224432,0.0001732009,0.0006534226,0.0006214942,0.0002756034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936417,0.00460168,0.0003361252,0.0006886644,0.0005932674,0.0001385283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002115536,0.000001828844,0.00001584153,0.00001279927,0.000003716669,0.00001283922,0.0002251378,0.00007755795,0.00001163496,0.9984335,0.0006502028,0.0005528092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005097926,0.000003023,0.00003015271,0.00001219205,0.000003244744,0.00002506845,0.00006149692,0.0002252824,0.00004739044,0.9928439,0.006739131,0.00000382185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773484,0.006699811,0.4116106,0.06949323,0.00203269,0.0001577111,0.000466769,0.0003083772,0.491496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795277,0.003431156,0.05573968,0.008987524,0.002097515,0.0004511965,0.0001304577,0.0001783856,0.04945639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009550636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03195006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776105220","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403838","title":"Doxastic Virtues in Hume's Epistemology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Causation; Essentialism; Philosophy of science","authors":[{"name":"Rico Vitz","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1433182101882349,"gpt":0.3434410694255357,"spread":0.2001228592373008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007343727,0.0002781603,0.0004984572,0.001461232,0.003532356,0.004423901,0.0007756345,0.002289014,0.002539909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005834982,0.0002103366,0.0003873725,0.0006790798,0.03187769,0.00561669,0.004412698,0.002774936,0.0003679529],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002147383,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001253647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001386984,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970062,0.001877955,0.00009673973,0.00026481,0.0004870444,0.000267257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954122,0.002742838,0.0002777034,0.0006404051,0.0005682799,0.0003586394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002778071,0.000003768328,0.00008474765,0.000009162055,0.000001358648,0.00001102759,0.001052591,0.00007535384,0.00001998471,0.9972506,0.0002961673,0.001192365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004204078,0.000004333482,0.0001104591,0.00001664944,0.000001382715,0.00002415202,0.0003543604,0.0003096646,0.00005625397,0.98874,0.01037425,0.000004144382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09469945,0.006479626,0.2197817,0.05307075,0.0006438045,0.0000769129,0.000110442,0.0002844154,0.6248529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780419,0.0005414248,0.01076898,0.001926785,0.0001841306,0.00006197124,0.00001722566,0.00002666771,0.008430849],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007343727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03883779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076562610","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0136","title":"Conceivability and Modality in Hume: A Lemma in an Argument in Defense of Skeptical Realism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Metaphysics; Certainty","authors":[{"name":"Peter Kail","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1676121852224575,"gpt":0.351752536256458,"spread":0.1841403510340004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006624044,0.0003544792,0.000669376,0.001997051,0.004436144,0.006977537,0.001220506,0.005414467,0.00567845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133386,0.0004095601,0.0009305399,0.001334196,0.04040345,0.01404423,0.005370329,0.007178798,0.0007609062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003327777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001144006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008700901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000608983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995671,0.002973091,0.0001103689,0.0003783325,0.0006236405,0.0002435608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807017,0.01652464,0.0008307432,0.0008358623,0.0008267622,0.0002801908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001112586,0.000004099888,0.0000578518,0.00001929285,0.000002094265,0.00004793439,0.002435547,0.00003923688,0.0000531004,0.9955938,0.001017943,0.0007178543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000192818,0.00001263941,0.000165041,0.00004856232,0.000004894098,0.0001181162,0.001251257,0.0002675218,0.0001656125,0.9787741,0.01916316,0.00000986913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07584712,0.02127712,0.1016519,0.2473879,0.00121577,0.000112415,0.0001553773,0.0002646018,0.5520878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763849,0.001862693,0.005758003,0.005616207,0.000842683,0.0001063044,0.00002379703,0.00005955136,0.009345895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006977537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03503174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379616522","doi":"10.1353/hms.2007.a383364","title":"The First Motive to Justice: Hume's Circle Argument Squared","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Chemistry","authors":[{"name":"Don Garrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06005516266888998,"gpt":0.389051541393064,"spread":0.328996378724174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003948033,0.0003744517,0.0009866322,0.00173852,0.007971673,0.004963189,0.001498102,0.007862429,0.02369877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01800843,0.0003146986,0.0004537797,0.001232905,0.02373438,0.01127506,0.004550842,0.006340802,0.00196219],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003145683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002079663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003981391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004034587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965999,0.001492759,0.00005484433,0.0006068784,0.0006738339,0.0005717816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908544,0.0059429,0.0004523969,0.001033845,0.00102904,0.0006874485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001543611,0.000008552758,0.00008768461,0.000009494562,0.000003312928,0.00001473062,0.0005458949,0.00002590228,0.00001770583,0.9930277,0.003837067,0.002406523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001981033,0.000008766318,0.0002903083,0.0000239863,0.000004051987,0.00005072552,0.0007670169,0.0001435008,0.00009602439,0.9786632,0.01992608,0.000006449026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05049124,0.002755232,0.02407859,0.0936783,0.0009315033,0.00007179876,0.0001146523,0.00006246682,0.8278162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379658,0.0005196367,0.001868915,0.006091646,0.0006942396,0.00008134604,0.00001808922,0.00007236046,0.05268804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02369877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07928032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050377973","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0284","title":"The Idea of Chivalry in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Case of David Hume","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chivalry; Enlightenment; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Ideology; Scottish Enlightenment; Civilization; Novelty; Romance; Age of Enlightenment; Ridiculous; Epistemology; Literature; History; Art; Law; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Ryu Susato","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08939222186533352,"gpt":0.3249291547240085,"spread":0.2355369328586749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005779696,0.0003527008,0.0003676965,0.001043243,0.02231502,0.008058148,0.001226959,0.007463416,0.002373802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005150736,0.0003217336,0.0002649278,0.0008398768,0.07138945,0.005058945,0.005488704,0.006172358,0.0003248871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009038063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00386517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04020045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05319114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941601,0.003845559,0.00005784654,0.0003370347,0.0004211265,0.001178471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968093,0.001985329,0.0002533279,0.0001766879,0.0002614353,0.0005138864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003668555,0.00002216928,0.000533866,0.00003000132,0.00000601215,0.001199047,0.2633771,0.00008450903,0.000159713,0.7219368,0.00835126,0.00426286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005178812,0.00008795237,0.001660662,0.000320048,0.00001647471,0.001377228,0.2259585,0.0003811582,0.0005931366,0.1744839,0.5949771,0.00009194099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3970543,0.01226021,0.00381738,0.120414,0.000983814,0.00004021316,0.00002819493,0.00004694844,0.4653549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982717,0.0005493442,0.0001803734,0.004652264,0.00009700237,0.000005377416,0.000002041315,0.00001120631,0.01178541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04020045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07993293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W231664201","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385973","title":"A Guide to Parallel Paragraph and Page References in Oxford University Press Editions of Hume's Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Hume's philosophy and hair distribution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"David Norton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Mary K. Norton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2286621479661579,"gpt":0.3555040222150221,"spread":0.1268418742488642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002886831,0.001041527,0.001159456,0.004939225,0.00281203,0.003862573,0.001788184,0.002442816,0.1704223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01677358,0.0008448568,0.0006141493,0.004515274,0.001437987,0.004378892,0.001550794,0.006036085,0.1141159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001519058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002539921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008427039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02152961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980676,0.0007396321,0.0002398053,0.0001306381,0.0007256287,0.00009669358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894048,0.004981581,0.0004058317,0.0007496487,0.00405418,0.0004039426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001582057,0.00002257196,0.00003220955,0.0001385733,0.000002184769,0.00002000404,0.0003779267,0.00003109529,0.0002372637,0.01425607,0.9604313,0.0244349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004404632,0.000008151921,0.0002205746,0.0002150673,0.00000208285,0.00003034206,0.0002426061,0.00004680984,0.0001675799,0.00491508,0.9941346,0.00001269532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00160934,0.0329521,0.07485205,0.07384855,0.1942195,0.001326715,0.02227441,0.003442687,0.5954747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005109444,0.01060466,0.0298948,0.0123294,0.008859868,0.0007255777,0.005825513,0.003344656,0.9233062],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1704223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5701194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509904696","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383327","title":"Hume's Recantation Revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Personal identity; Epistemology; Identity (music); Perception; Causation; Reflexive pronoun; Consciousness; Nothing; Psychology; Self; Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Vijay Mascarenhas","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2028833437903789,"gpt":0.3462706873515908,"spread":0.1433873435612119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008604692,0.0008258582,0.001016136,0.002480371,0.01562431,0.01165019,0.002878559,0.01643511,0.007912058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01980477,0.0005423984,0.0005663173,0.002808677,0.05134718,0.01452702,0.005773164,0.02069389,0.002274509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005630073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02030147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01530964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9851046,0.01015391,0.0002451493,0.001325341,0.00228353,0.0008874907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897768,0.007242397,0.0004650416,0.00075868,0.001408078,0.0003490372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001354535,0.000009110445,0.00006294905,0.00004025567,0.000004176367,0.0001026919,0.01057197,0.00004525475,0.00001612811,0.8763391,0.1071424,0.005652458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001330168,0.000009094085,0.0001814043,0.0003071603,0.000003483854,0.0002111739,0.005583557,0.0001057722,0.00008172222,0.2581896,0.735297,0.00001670844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006231037,0.08359376,0.002309959,0.6216387,0.007467802,0.000015922,0.0000638921,0.00007573414,0.2786032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5304852,0.03516562,0.001838359,0.2501928,0.02175503,0.0001704105,0.00008101153,0.0005027701,0.1598089],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02030147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1054789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142782002","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0234","title":"Can Hume Be Read as a Virtue Ethicist?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Subjectivism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Christine Swanton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1655308733859838,"gpt":0.3582634954299187,"spread":0.1927326220439349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005488415,0.0003656526,0.0006106924,0.00106903,0.004095444,0.007356408,0.0009823982,0.005089642,0.005960735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113028,0.0001588827,0.0003004966,0.0007204998,0.02997869,0.01006501,0.002817121,0.005037514,0.001694761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001760383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001904485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001263026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001955739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969562,0.002201086,0.0000559462,0.000207816,0.0003608889,0.0002179052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949149,0.003241954,0.0004296699,0.0004338913,0.0006143756,0.0003651729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001480963,0.0000102064,0.00015117,0.00005161799,0.000003667215,0.00003876183,0.00490344,0.0000504697,0.00004895326,0.978462,0.008514402,0.007750464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008677118,0.0000200992,0.0002779842,0.0001880215,0.000004618189,0.00007020523,0.004971702,0.000264968,0.0002031888,0.8842199,0.1097576,0.00001287467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02837553,0.02059879,0.0318532,0.3981686,0.005814612,0.00003794679,0.00006297505,0.0001430928,0.5149452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8766143,0.006357064,0.007494536,0.04356123,0.003938437,0.00008850327,0.00003989455,0.0001067774,0.0617993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007356408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02902585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042417103","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0294","title":"Relations of Literary Form and Philosophical Purpose in Hume's Four Essays on Happiness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology; Art","authors":[{"name":"Colin Heydt","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1184411344764323,"gpt":0.3138282458599027,"spread":0.1953871113834704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006462847,0.0005935571,0.0004601085,0.003511243,0.006970413,0.007913717,0.0007282655,0.001478062,0.001562183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02409495,0.0003340072,0.0003484222,0.001729617,0.02858637,0.005013539,0.007669844,0.002768961,0.0002808909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002561541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00107047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006733265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001255926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901838,0.007753029,0.0002270189,0.0002876693,0.001110064,0.0004385191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839005,0.01239482,0.00121856,0.0005405691,0.001313919,0.0006316578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001135654,0.00004130606,0.001679567,0.000260549,0.00001978226,0.0004584632,0.4294522,0.0002727356,0.001018531,0.5388688,0.006502,0.0213125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003601646,0.0001431533,0.008076468,0.00146561,0.00004530172,0.0008626523,0.2754441,0.0008773,0.003604876,0.2986492,0.4106695,0.0001258306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4592434,0.01210158,0.03536395,0.03335984,0.003473706,0.0001343798,0.0001041513,0.0002174301,0.4560014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781984,0.001364277,0.002846243,0.001085023,0.0004528136,0.00009055443,0.00002882155,0.0001430763,0.01579075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007913717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03417921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069933221","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0002","title":"Politeness, Paris and the Treatise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Philosophy; Linguistics; Humanities","authors":[{"name":"Mikko Tolonen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.05413084555305341,"gpt":0.3302296053057378,"spread":0.2760987597526844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001694376,0.0006141385,0.0002918836,0.002000233,0.005543962,0.008718494,0.0004103999,0.002496684,0.004861905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00302072,0.0001720862,0.00024599,0.001459008,0.02267298,0.004655831,0.002372263,0.002629022,0.0007495511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00929066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001973156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008323764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006062163,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968678,0.002250177,0.0000424187,0.0001869416,0.000373914,0.0002787749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999019,0.0005867199,0.0001278215,0.00008037897,0.0001123826,0.00007368601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001376854,0.000006933236,0.0001162199,0.00002741034,0.000003052569,0.00007520421,0.008173592,0.0001466503,0.00005955388,0.9805619,0.005645814,0.005169958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002254306,0.00003304455,0.001241539,0.0002328739,0.000008880852,0.0002175803,0.01061622,0.0004506062,0.0003073218,0.2816008,0.7052376,0.00003104313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03018609,0.02330386,0.005306688,0.02705284,0.0008312302,0.00001568129,0.00004267644,0.0001179663,0.913143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466249,0.00484484,0.001015562,0.002106652,0.0006775316,0.0000315947,0.00003237104,0.00005473149,0.04461188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00929066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0674088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480578946","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385726","title":"Explaining General Ideas","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Epistemology; Philosophy; Order (exchange); Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Janet Broughton","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1287022311872871,"gpt":0.3167838316640034,"spread":0.1880816004767163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004827187,0.001106663,0.0005172049,0.002460643,0.003495339,0.006217461,0.001776985,0.004580617,0.01757727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009101046,0.0004012071,0.0008811291,0.001868515,0.02427136,0.013294,0.003836571,0.005424748,0.002994804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005285815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002268708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002713506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00206638,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966197,0.002036186,0.0001072447,0.0004845329,0.0004893753,0.0002629331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955903,0.002780037,0.0002915697,0.0007040441,0.0004931376,0.0001408184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003876642,0.000004607158,0.00007492079,0.00003150683,0.000003907744,0.00002978183,0.001742244,0.0001434519,0.00002388996,0.9895188,0.005653822,0.002769217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005424973,0.000004648641,0.0001070463,0.00007773127,0.000003552732,0.00004983377,0.0007989299,0.000291969,0.00004673571,0.9263395,0.07227036,0.000004366702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0152882,0.02807949,0.1140425,0.1068035,0.002099661,0.0001606421,0.0005811538,0.0004464419,0.7324986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7888346,0.01691617,0.04629919,0.02021918,0.003072139,0.0005320696,0.001140391,0.0004938342,0.1224924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05880177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103179823","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0295","title":"Hume's Impression/Idea Distinction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Impression; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","authors":[{"name":"David Landy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04820698971563302,"gpt":0.3662778109844513,"spread":0.3180708212688183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003231144,0.0004117434,0.0003893662,0.002537082,0.00223722,0.008417294,0.001232942,0.003216633,0.006076163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026133,0.0002582217,0.0005160243,0.001206753,0.02428726,0.00881357,0.00417571,0.002981855,0.0008077541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002766869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001355304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001447464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009890646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943663,0.002203467,0.00021216,0.0005524684,0.002022122,0.000643491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953268,0.002624985,0.0003798389,0.0006968398,0.0006937749,0.0002778099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105199,0.000007883351,0.0002436087,0.00002026782,0.000003559073,0.00005134584,0.003918569,0.00007662994,0.00007811637,0.9913769,0.0008439135,0.003368664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001762498,0.00001964634,0.0008223042,0.000045256,0.000007811728,0.0001869787,0.002160899,0.0003679814,0.0002397117,0.9755602,0.0205565,0.00001511537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06981882,0.001823245,0.05250965,0.01722002,0.0005181854,0.00008135448,0.000194352,0.000152853,0.8576815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827746,0.0004622446,0.004066111,0.0009969014,0.000253794,0.00006198712,0.000046694,0.00003259406,0.01130517],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008417294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02032679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032908795","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0016","title":"Sympathy and the Mechanics of Character Change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Character (mathematics); Relation (database); Epistemology; Moral character; Function (biology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Philosophy; Biology","authors":[{"name":"Anik Waldow","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2277726261961615,"gpt":0.3043627204079108,"spread":0.07659009421174934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001398013,0.0001899634,0.000229489,0.0008445829,0.00201976,0.003481331,0.0007201943,0.001466433,0.009506864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007439671,0.0002425115,0.0003764776,0.0003659202,0.01180399,0.004400679,0.002581435,0.001469109,0.0008595184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001524084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005435282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009329658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005527375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985336,0.0006703098,0.00002888659,0.0002623152,0.0003106967,0.0001941363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976023,0.001242372,0.0003237281,0.0003628862,0.0002006876,0.0002680224],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001817069,0.00001584111,0.001447372,0.00002294142,0.000007248079,0.0001280387,0.002540907,0.001248303,0.0006559901,0.9853381,0.0006616883,0.007915386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001459994,0.00003039832,0.004613779,0.00002281476,0.000004992618,0.0002070256,0.0013322,0.005949761,0.0003950435,0.9779479,0.009461263,0.00002025896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3737653,0.001463925,0.07033268,0.009681031,0.0002865959,0.000105704,0.00007204527,0.0002017429,0.5440909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882039,0.0001404665,0.002646336,0.0001475879,0.00004623673,0.00003566634,0.000009543938,0.00002227224,0.008748031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009506864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03180361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045112857","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0018","title":"Hume, Malebranche, and the Self-Justification of the Passions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Philosophy; Theme (computing); Epistemology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Éléonore Le Jallé","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08869480473911803,"gpt":0.2834883854118251,"spread":0.1947935806727071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002938608,0.0004882384,0.0004468871,0.001783861,0.006261319,0.006235521,0.0008795706,0.005121394,0.004822975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006085927,0.000257139,0.0004009471,0.001402134,0.0415105,0.006654609,0.002657115,0.004855705,0.000808297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003030192,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004207946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006618386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949928,0.003415859,0.00007787593,0.0003172637,0.0008505101,0.0003456971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951288,0.003818024,0.0003300897,0.0002449974,0.0003354578,0.0001425516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003847371,0.000003021162,0.00005041665,0.00002247104,0.000001941404,0.00003330012,0.004208786,0.00005632666,0.00001512163,0.9877346,0.005951054,0.001919069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009321702,0.00001463809,0.0003555529,0.0002255738,0.000004394405,0.0001105284,0.003569251,0.0002098619,0.000240955,0.7907324,0.2045131,0.00001437732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01916401,0.0248759,0.02055714,0.09460411,0.001222253,0.00005381323,0.00006995807,0.00006469891,0.8393881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8424408,0.008255584,0.006336898,0.01258644,0.001846199,0.0002034795,0.00005412614,0.0001223345,0.128154],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006261319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0373314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138030685","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0003","title":"Filling the Gaps in Hume's Vacuums","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Interpreter; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Miren Boehm","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1722157259676711,"gpt":0.3276957438219384,"spread":0.1554800178542673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068354,0.0006386252,0.0008881971,0.003110731,0.0100928,0.008251095,0.001374105,0.005180538,0.00415305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01597483,0.0004719968,0.0007051455,0.002177628,0.05012086,0.01834995,0.007605901,0.008521466,0.000796226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00424338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003097127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002674417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9864463,0.009344411,0.0003275241,0.000894182,0.001970839,0.00101673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900914,0.007360938,0.0005930251,0.0008705855,0.000788792,0.0002953325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002788749,0.000001904231,0.0000162083,0.00001157047,9.004668e-7,0.00001366818,0.002571645,0.00003602563,0.00000788347,0.9952397,0.0009966705,0.001101021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004170552,0.000004664893,0.00003729366,0.00008270299,0.000002227287,0.00002408204,0.001427933,0.000147729,0.00007503605,0.9634646,0.0347231,0.000006424385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04817782,0.02523091,0.116853,0.1701643,0.002333757,0.00005234105,0.0001110704,0.0002737058,0.6368032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562701,0.003910958,0.00902502,0.008176684,0.0009022274,0.0001153739,0.00003221198,0.0001504407,0.02141688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01068354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05650061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081294787","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0319","title":"Hume on Resemblance, Relevance, and Representation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Representation (politics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Political science","authors":[{"name":"Steven Gamboa","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1183292477196541,"gpt":0.4511796007425331,"spread":0.332850353022879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962613,0.0003225844,0.0004701159,0.001724706,0.00250031,0.003536041,0.0009290458,0.00201413,0.004809554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006226283,0.00022291,0.0005582026,0.001366974,0.01994068,0.007255877,0.003322189,0.002157973,0.0004892852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002709965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008357709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001938338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001505229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976748,0.00141998,0.00005553939,0.0003112714,0.0003799887,0.0001584943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978916,0.001345749,0.0001543178,0.0003299591,0.0001770584,0.0001013987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007608456,0.000006202893,0.0001101828,0.00002844465,0.000003653339,0.00003593626,0.001608445,0.0001620614,0.0000566757,0.9938781,0.0007030974,0.003399769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004127238,0.000008256849,0.0001838829,0.0000201506,0.000002916327,0.00004405428,0.0003279231,0.0001866442,0.00006616169,0.9903598,0.008792989,0.000003120693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1219759,0.01953078,0.1469565,0.04224301,0.0007859664,0.00009477812,0.0001735612,0.0002934811,0.667946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761305,0.002103832,0.008841158,0.001516041,0.0003999608,0.00005103738,0.00004770327,0.00004220935,0.01086743],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004809554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01966232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132400585","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0013","title":"Hume’s Conception of Proper Reflection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Philosophy; Affect (linguistics); Key (lock); Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Lisa Ievers","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1599664125548168,"gpt":0.4371757733643993,"spread":0.2772093608095825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004921392,0.0006124262,0.0004559578,0.001584606,0.003572455,0.005679861,0.00126654,0.005061849,0.003561536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008565167,0.0003576657,0.0005797208,0.000934988,0.03291361,0.00752202,0.002932922,0.006228891,0.001178703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003235044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002975651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00196383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001952854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932054,0.00420041,0.0002119175,0.0006568681,0.00118219,0.0005431891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952232,0.002908127,0.0003827872,0.0007141128,0.0005688096,0.0002030367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003121718,0.000003196528,0.0000358905,0.00001262805,0.000001694574,0.00001637012,0.001616877,0.0000729645,0.00001994177,0.9938023,0.00298607,0.001428901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005895689,0.00001093097,0.00009793639,0.00007054867,0.000003506584,0.00008293367,0.0005555765,0.0002656012,0.0001998746,0.9146402,0.08405765,0.000009404076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01067819,0.005884473,0.1079793,0.05769925,0.001306448,0.00008226122,0.000105388,0.0001581229,0.8161065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8300237,0.003760585,0.03258366,0.02447055,0.001793549,0.0003838323,0.00006794577,0.0001569504,0.1067594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005679861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02602714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560177732","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383324","title":"Baconian Probability and Hume's Theory of Testimony","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Premise; Epistemology; Miracle; Skepticism; Credibility; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Dorothy Coleman","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1513993452556712,"gpt":0.2962148804505526,"spread":0.1448155351948814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008426864,0.0007558942,0.0007989766,0.003705409,0.006933528,0.009594067,0.001546749,0.00531208,0.009613864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02813735,0.000828576,0.0006369976,0.003320267,0.03163506,0.01159438,0.003156883,0.006441556,0.001691094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01183333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004410457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01313624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008927043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922059,0.005065314,0.0002669356,0.0005752885,0.001524243,0.0003621942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720212,0.02390956,0.0008624368,0.0008348483,0.001959685,0.000412282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002965896,0.000003042715,0.00004238699,0.00001426019,0.000002384281,0.00001800763,0.0005426846,0.0001454768,0.000007229153,0.9946494,0.002820414,0.001751702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008718335,0.000006238181,0.0001753762,0.00009118183,0.000004011518,0.00005512218,0.0001621698,0.0004055129,0.00002451716,0.9686524,0.03040703,0.00000782088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009601898,0.05191128,0.07622601,0.1042138,0.001151947,0.0001095464,0.000295549,0.00009197783,0.756398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8687056,0.02437047,0.02107166,0.01163173,0.004002978,0.0003531323,0.000150525,0.0001105399,0.06960324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01313624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08585721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000425093","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0316","title":"Hume on Steadfast Objects and Time","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Simple (philosophy); Metaphysics; GRASP; Computer science; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Donald L. M. Baxter","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1158586668048641,"gpt":0.2954910147088902,"spread":0.1796323479040261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376355,0.000531757,0.0003592294,0.001528235,0.007719823,0.005375718,0.0007340736,0.002264192,0.01058722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002470735,0.0002773733,0.000258034,0.001720528,0.02573466,0.008909497,0.002493745,0.003036751,0.001681082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005467216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002005162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01183963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01305225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985852,0.0009146794,0.00002696837,0.0001437801,0.0002033586,0.0001260375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988313,0.000748375,0.00008082211,0.000102239,0.0001311165,0.0001061447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005827113,0.000004572079,0.0000773352,0.00001618328,0.000001294568,0.00001957581,0.007884149,0.00003171876,0.0000171102,0.9707959,0.01816477,0.002981478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001034181,0.00001175955,0.0004943449,0.0001596064,0.000003352689,0.00009882121,0.006412703,0.00006491431,0.0000752826,0.4294502,0.5632114,0.000007244668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01344586,0.07577026,0.003855752,0.06038282,0.0009444143,0.00002173623,0.0001040742,0.00006080295,0.8454143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7091855,0.0296491,0.002474888,0.0127208,0.001906878,0.00009787215,0.0001112858,0.0001533052,0.2437004],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01183963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03966767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076154353","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0658","title":"Hume's \"Early Memoranda\" and the Making of His Political Economy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Composition (language); Economic Thought; Period (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Work (physics); History; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Tatsuya Sakamoto","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09698497969463386,"gpt":0.3494854051710267,"spread":0.2525004254763928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004228327,0.000266741,0.0001708655,0.001942945,0.006340574,0.006909199,0.0007007278,0.001946314,0.002752538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01203318,0.000211167,0.0001339254,0.001121345,0.02947646,0.005640352,0.00222995,0.003423085,0.0003926705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005959549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003589461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004771493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004287608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959842,0.002662768,0.00006566392,0.0002445255,0.0005889555,0.0004540171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947884,0.003738006,0.0004546568,0.0003280459,0.0004743579,0.0002165709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005979712,0.000002362649,0.00007879054,0.00000830386,5.53583e-7,0.00002740895,0.004556939,0.00005938553,0.00002313047,0.9877858,0.00412242,0.003328933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001249306,0.00001265641,0.0008986205,0.0001760316,0.00000290843,0.00008129214,0.005926977,0.0002354672,0.0005211926,0.5479742,0.4441413,0.00001685596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07134494,0.01100897,0.0165114,0.105555,0.001894018,0.00005549924,0.00009726571,0.00008579584,0.7934472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537721,0.00167289,0.001606928,0.002795895,0.0007664479,0.00004156343,0.00001838765,0.00003169952,0.03929405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006909199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04323983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008810109","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0245","title":"Unnatural Religion: Indoctrination and Philo's Reversal in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indoctrination; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Skepticism; Teleological argument; Natural (archaeology); Theism; Agnosticism; Law; Teleology; Political science; Ideology","authors":[{"name":"Rich Foley","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03749868377430476,"gpt":0.3267065421861547,"spread":0.28920785841185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02003417,0.000297965,0.0005828853,0.001397231,0.01537163,0.00947107,0.00134638,0.007879916,0.001969055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02528165,0.0004900175,0.0003436895,0.0008861438,0.06497244,0.006495386,0.006356467,0.01022977,0.0002186197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00704832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002649809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003688668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004344545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9685924,0.02684079,0.0003498167,0.0008606125,0.001977304,0.001378927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760828,0.01939842,0.001232619,0.001357509,0.001090579,0.0008380208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005391644,0.00004606152,0.0007230242,0.00003412721,0.000007084083,0.0003325134,0.2102853,0.0001200376,0.0003499269,0.7798653,0.003468301,0.004714402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001630753,0.0001614548,0.002207864,0.0002747845,0.00002759962,0.0008055985,0.1497928,0.002023773,0.002923716,0.4722223,0.3692714,0.000125577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4565443,0.002783423,0.02173406,0.158303,0.001005953,0.00008874207,0.00004454956,0.000130378,0.3593656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875101,0.0001402412,0.0009811281,0.005139471,0.00009488054,0.00003677173,0.00000484941,0.00002286266,0.006069636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02003417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1059521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1675966506","doi":"10.1353/hms.2004.a383301","title":"Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise , Another Look-A Response to Erin Kelly, Frederick Schmitt, and Michael Williams","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Normative; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Louis E. Loeb","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09897934583329224,"gpt":0.2983841970836164,"spread":0.1994048512503241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101551,0.0005645991,0.0005500784,0.001657725,0.007082442,0.007828938,0.001059318,0.006741103,0.00866977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008528454,0.0003107675,0.0004388798,0.001889279,0.01632674,0.00967187,0.002575454,0.007474066,0.001863668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008992726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004885431,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01125046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01915942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960998,0.002591648,0.00007671305,0.0002873417,0.0006503065,0.0002941278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973417,0.001745652,0.0001507208,0.0001402411,0.0004519953,0.0001696503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001016145,0.00001111373,0.00008013305,0.00004025318,0.000004344297,0.00003906223,0.002178939,0.0000844997,0.00003482509,0.6182533,0.3719142,0.007349178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007413305,0.000008556072,0.0002274406,0.0003206214,0.000003418017,0.00004271994,0.002081071,0.0001040165,0.0000756279,0.3587329,0.6383814,0.00001488724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002273207,0.07280286,0.002481678,0.7888346,0.005009376,0.00001482654,0.0000618858,0.00003232699,0.1284893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3314422,0.0556441,0.004198577,0.2647814,0.02952711,0.0002138883,0.0001565648,0.0003281885,0.313708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W963884259","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0002","title":"Hume on Art Critics, Wise Men, and the Virtues of Taste","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Beauty; Taste; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Exposition (narrative); Epistemic virtue; Clearance; Psychology; Art; Literature","authors":[{"name":"Tina Baceski","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06293815843604779,"gpt":0.2829823822691093,"spread":0.2200442238330615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006115729,0.0003869592,0.0004127767,0.001660388,0.006549734,0.005394383,0.0005464004,0.003560132,0.003170515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006915791,0.000160236,0.0002738062,0.0006525469,0.0432651,0.007577621,0.003762798,0.003405901,0.0004929543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002713487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001612947,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001858262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003289978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954157,0.003253526,0.00005184824,0.0002791382,0.0006096683,0.0003901489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946592,0.003480294,0.0004774395,0.0003577719,0.000611187,0.0004139051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008226248,0.000006380037,0.0002872811,0.00001586752,0.000002259,0.00005030627,0.006602744,0.0000694547,0.00003475463,0.9881357,0.002026295,0.002760764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001268032,0.00002764016,0.0008332158,0.000198124,0.000007002857,0.000150351,0.008526863,0.0003611349,0.0002543349,0.9120154,0.07759234,0.00002093723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1143946,0.008080851,0.01609274,0.06907067,0.0007824268,0.00003054462,0.00002750029,0.00004778358,0.7914729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727798,0.001093255,0.001427467,0.005965855,0.0003312301,0.00002280432,0.00000503757,0.00001970408,0.0183548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006549734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03234351,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053097021","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0218","title":"The Gallant and the Philosopher","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Wife; Philosophy; German; Style (visual arts); Atheism; Literature; Classics; Theology; History; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Lívia Guimarães","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08588222628250035,"gpt":0.2820694580853682,"spread":0.1961872318028678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001714805,0.0005940736,0.0002926962,0.001136233,0.008175179,0.007584326,0.0004962322,0.003429123,0.0240075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004668545,0.0003101397,0.0001749667,0.001147217,0.01183474,0.006461757,0.003084103,0.003648248,0.005171998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004313705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002940937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01963419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984085,0.0009168653,0.00004237699,0.0002175909,0.0002862833,0.0001284063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986748,0.0007328473,0.0001006896,0.0001509972,0.0001542186,0.0001865079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002270027,0.00002179282,0.0003677673,0.00007202577,0.000004535917,0.00009474817,0.01998834,0.00003255661,0.0001495469,0.4641495,0.4925245,0.02257202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003186856,0.000004640865,0.0002474602,0.0001081758,0.000001455677,0.0000566183,0.003144512,0.00001616519,0.0000493664,0.0124381,0.9839271,0.00000322007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005966684,0.0861963,0.001450402,0.346003,0.003918122,0.00002809935,0.0001279821,0.000126092,0.5561832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1753805,0.02203703,0.001310815,0.05910056,0.003088926,0.00005506769,0.00008489141,0.000227014,0.7387152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0240075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08031309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519776254","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403831","title":"Complexities of Character: Hume on Love and Responsibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Moral character; Passions; Epistemology; Feeling; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Action (physics); Moral disengagement; Moral philosophy; Moral responsibility; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Nancy E. Schauber","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1845723699349023,"gpt":0.3426206989202132,"spread":0.1580483289853109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002573595,0.0003190655,0.0003179856,0.0007697062,0.007979996,0.006376848,0.0005528366,0.002579,0.002168169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004210267,0.0002062431,0.0002713038,0.0004146943,0.03605833,0.0083676,0.004848425,0.004230089,0.0004149596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003805839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003193037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002813894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995776,0.003221983,0.00003833255,0.0002063412,0.0004136317,0.0003436641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976247,0.001424586,0.000187925,0.0001483584,0.0002746113,0.0003398102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001706688,0.0000168887,0.0004819493,0.00002266514,0.000004755859,0.0001879832,0.04166934,0.0001371791,0.00008064557,0.944167,0.006021561,0.007193056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001081309,0.00002602071,0.0009013055,0.0001202385,0.000005762978,0.0003462263,0.02021333,0.0003494178,0.0002041261,0.8413396,0.1364606,0.00002254705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1153895,0.02016751,0.01260264,0.1256767,0.001063696,0.00003255176,0.00003705338,0.00005114171,0.7249791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689611,0.002293275,0.0008664228,0.006008961,0.0003334921,0.00001871082,0.000005395674,0.00002659035,0.0214861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007979996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02761346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525568543","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0022","title":"Loeb’s “Standard” Questions about Hume’s Concept of Probable Truth","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Virtue; Beauty; Honor; Reading (process); Causation; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Don Garrett","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07216388733433313,"gpt":0.3045090137049078,"spread":0.2323451263705747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01350351,0.0006438512,0.0008753556,0.002130426,0.004312288,0.009630105,0.001984509,0.01170454,0.007532187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0393568,0.0005632275,0.0007270926,0.001905493,0.04336033,0.02496325,0.003916548,0.01387511,0.002056994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008029636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002846274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003399865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002662556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869751,0.008428359,0.0005176789,0.001297845,0.002311978,0.00046908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828106,0.01269194,0.0008005886,0.001031423,0.002042304,0.0006231733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007887154,0.000006292674,0.00004144319,0.00002117718,0.000003133579,0.00001237097,0.001187619,0.00003031305,0.00001951542,0.9662665,0.03012084,0.002282875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009252749,0.000005970516,0.0001103288,0.0001042363,0.000001942436,0.00003717071,0.0006047768,0.0001093214,0.00004916693,0.9245999,0.07435567,0.00001224727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005163223,0.02325392,0.02393781,0.7458495,0.004508174,0.00004730889,0.000184789,0.00007715209,0.1969781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6170705,0.009140816,0.01334791,0.28402,0.0174557,0.0004451915,0.0002180331,0.0002542687,0.05804758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01350351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07141423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046436944","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0649","title":"The Role of Political Economy in Hume’s Moral Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reading (process); Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Moral philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","authors":[{"name":"Carl Wennerlind","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2028560838194342,"gpt":0.3686473488575962,"spread":0.165791265038162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00596305,0.0003826576,0.0004725019,0.001810093,0.00498092,0.006570067,0.0008348858,0.00411453,0.002040406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004261659,0.0003125687,0.0004484571,0.001009537,0.04941868,0.004683111,0.002185313,0.004109393,0.0004531302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005288358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002762775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002743563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001819979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952137,0.003484381,0.0000767374,0.0003178724,0.0005385556,0.0003687191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619,0.002817809,0.0002257561,0.0002198753,0.0003403969,0.0002062557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001680578,0.00000325214,0.00003408606,0.000006776691,0.000001282412,0.00001468651,0.000937123,0.0001277744,0.00001364335,0.9970926,0.0008809356,0.0008861548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005134195,0.000006086904,0.00008888857,0.00002386733,0.000001383225,0.00001854171,0.0003351687,0.00041945,0.00005540163,0.9708595,0.02818132,0.000005130108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04580107,0.01512529,0.1005126,0.1565149,0.001105398,0.00008636389,0.000102702,0.0001018259,0.6806499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406096,0.003105338,0.01532089,0.012395,0.0009643838,0.0001682211,0.00002172407,0.00004747817,0.02736724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006570067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03836995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494444853","doi":"10.1353/hms.2006.a383389","title":"Hume and Locke on Scientific Methodology: The Newtonian Legacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Causation; Inductive reasoning","authors":[{"name":"Graciela De Pierris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.299506503265611,"gpt":0.3501174813992639,"spread":0.0506109781336529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02787909,0.0008351687,0.001555858,0.00470631,0.005015559,0.007518914,0.001832174,0.00666393,0.002846054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04050558,0.0008335953,0.001030576,0.003267949,0.06566916,0.015845,0.005115479,0.01224332,0.001233869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006921229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005517832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003363285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002914473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9739687,0.01747558,0.0006870736,0.001985121,0.005315563,0.0005679897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401323,0.05176694,0.001253492,0.003158986,0.002945373,0.0007428944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008740886,0.000009717113,0.00008580906,0.00005947749,0.00001072187,0.0000177605,0.0009794162,0.0001524007,0.00002434516,0.9858741,0.0072106,0.005567017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008399456,0.000008428568,0.00007902883,0.0001254056,0.000003453273,0.00002194723,0.0001549595,0.0002109889,0.00005185141,0.9517765,0.04754969,0.000009486531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01092073,0.1790984,0.1399944,0.4672351,0.00870979,0.0001061262,0.00023611,0.0002176716,0.1934816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5817939,0.1045163,0.1082077,0.1063984,0.03288449,0.0007625654,0.0001500107,0.000526475,0.06476019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1474405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154618067","doi":"10.1353/hms.2009.a403835","title":"Sympathy, Understanding, and Hermeneutics in Hume's Treatise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Positivism; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Henrik Bohlin","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2716722552179638,"gpt":0.3343509989565894,"spread":0.06267874373862559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00426774,0.000531516,0.0004679564,0.001740434,0.007725951,0.008185641,0.0007954186,0.004176296,0.003568408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005159484,0.0002071012,0.000360681,0.001529419,0.04140459,0.006766491,0.003142338,0.005461602,0.0005543782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005531373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003032139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004441787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004511101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925244,0.005424324,0.0001103054,0.0005179378,0.0009261358,0.000496868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979665,0.001548629,0.0001223884,0.000129073,0.0001239542,0.0001093738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003428773,0.000003025466,0.00002179798,0.00001067696,0.000001027627,0.00001683207,0.004973497,0.00005021372,0.00001217204,0.9903038,0.003089326,0.001514099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000616193,0.00001199545,0.0001666722,0.0001487097,0.000003469846,0.00005564942,0.003415066,0.0001847825,0.0001095948,0.7974455,0.19844,0.00001240985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01723608,0.02592439,0.01960123,0.05829643,0.001455465,0.0000433997,0.00005104691,0.00007469404,0.8773172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8352429,0.008102615,0.005903596,0.01541978,0.003143631,0.0002918396,0.00005390156,0.000123714,0.131718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008185641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04013312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129947012","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0005","title":"Hume on the Moral Obligation to Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","authors":[{"name":"James A. Harris","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2794015542457803,"gpt":0.4481105192393288,"spread":0.1687089649935485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005118792,0.000374789,0.0005487195,0.001182308,0.006340213,0.005510335,0.0007135182,0.004958119,0.00359208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007776679,0.000248016,0.0003904096,0.0006711301,0.03297726,0.005758974,0.003985772,0.005538662,0.0008810653],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003792012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003450445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003659485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002890367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940894,0.003610589,0.0001293306,0.0005000633,0.001156944,0.0005138001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958699,0.002562165,0.0002665604,0.0003349439,0.0006120068,0.0003544037],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003168347,0.000003569069,0.00004218255,0.000009071239,0.000001399038,0.00002204386,0.001034093,0.0000737534,0.00002092384,0.9939582,0.003412804,0.001418806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004411935,0.000005086031,0.0001251028,0.00004646347,0.000001554459,0.00002810647,0.0003820341,0.0001571936,0.00006116059,0.9425762,0.05660667,0.000006015203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01943089,0.01184141,0.02485394,0.1393851,0.001096089,0.00004440617,0.00008067357,0.00006834093,0.8031992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789974,0.004949349,0.007799822,0.037477,0.001652452,0.0001433447,0.00003833848,0.0000849346,0.06885736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006340213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02751315,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141202510","doi":"10.1353/hms.2014.0000","title":"Hume’s Citation of Strabo and the Dating of the Memoranda","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Citation; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Classics; Linguistics; Computer science; Library science","authors":[{"name":"Jon Charles Miller","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.046261995234328,"gpt":0.3161815119818451,"spread":0.2699195167475171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956518,0.0003341597,0.000216946,0.002882185,0.004181489,0.002423391,0.0006608089,0.001711171,0.00454141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01245163,0.0001548923,0.0001440395,0.001474675,0.008861621,0.002910278,0.0021424,0.002142545,0.0007989461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002301142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001830573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007675079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01779041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983443,0.0008967933,0.00008294104,0.0001638242,0.0003079918,0.0002041643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948008,0.003448161,0.0005312577,0.0003795007,0.0007070636,0.0001331861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000847632,0.00001540636,0.002004939,0.0003386873,0.00001055005,0.0005743296,0.08477502,0.0001533267,0.000845684,0.8407398,0.03715129,0.03330619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000681923,0.00003089333,0.004753721,0.0009195506,0.00001419267,0.0005635883,0.01672507,0.0001420612,0.002484489,0.02778913,0.946534,0.00003651448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1626971,0.03447722,0.02369102,0.06830876,0.0178906,0.0001072803,0.0005184361,0.0003332325,0.6919765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216892,0.003507561,0.002345709,0.003670551,0.002369883,0.00003671768,0.0000966234,0.0001358372,0.06614804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007675079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01669604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622469145","doi":"10.1353/hms.2015.0011","title":"Turnabout is Fair Play: A New Humean Response in the Old Debate with Kant","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical philosophy","authors":[{"name":"Peter Thielke","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1990778657528034,"gpt":0.3199796473626689,"spread":0.1209017816098655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01298632,0.0006959799,0.0008007613,0.00201876,0.00878032,0.0130231,0.002341745,0.01369372,0.005404616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01683363,0.0004520059,0.0006643754,0.001497331,0.07809144,0.01814176,0.006337297,0.01342108,0.0008624796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009383854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003924003,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004894583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005592979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881585,0.007528565,0.0002278468,0.001461629,0.001717764,0.0009057285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896525,0.007489051,0.0004086704,0.001026677,0.0009152564,0.0005078746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007698123,0.000002698193,0.00003204271,0.000008045789,0.000002117844,0.00001832012,0.002628662,0.00004563282,0.00001448154,0.9938177,0.002631961,0.0007905859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004970895,0.000003629702,0.0000414592,0.00004780447,0.000002563678,0.00002770687,0.001609369,0.0001928934,0.00007717218,0.9570005,0.0409824,0.000009454932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02330676,0.01020181,0.05186389,0.5375451,0.00258917,0.00003540708,0.0001019884,0.0001811858,0.3741748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036858,0.001994231,0.007690706,0.05117819,0.002448937,0.00007583403,0.00003309656,0.0001869017,0.03270635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06867903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819644612","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385729","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Scholarship; Section (typography); Reflexive pronoun; Point (geometry); Law; Computer science; Political science","authors":[{"name":"David Owen","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1351547742627148,"gpt":0.328928064686276,"spread":0.1937732904235612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01921844,0.001908567,0.00233977,0.002724958,0.01115362,0.01527629,0.006464393,0.04639877,0.01260366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1168926,0.00103916,0.002160345,0.003831862,0.01366638,0.01370774,0.007758205,0.07050295,0.01192612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01010553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009322653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009224828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009188692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838439,0.004433222,0.001066088,0.002861942,0.005764001,0.002030908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479719,0.02188566,0.003371812,0.002785038,0.01962943,0.004356208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007123277,0.000005955616,0.0000863668,0.00003130538,0.000005038632,0.00008693791,0.0005575526,0.0000212846,0.00002473129,0.006402216,0.9906179,0.002153753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009190545,0.00001043171,0.0003651049,0.0003301114,0.0000149738,0.0001928213,0.002624594,0.0001392964,0.000124653,0.0059352,0.9902107,0.00004304752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001742883,0.001285339,0.0001788686,0.9540698,0.04155729,0.000008389749,0.00003396705,0.00006169084,0.002630419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003228762,0.0007727098,0.0002529728,0.9632326,0.02264913,0.00004199736,0.00002227436,0.0001071798,0.00969241],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04639877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1016381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099869159","doi":"10.1353/hms.2005.a383285","title":"Religion and Moral Prohibition in Hume's \"Of Suicide\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Duty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Theology; Physics","authors":[{"name":"Thomas Holden","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.06462684998896982,"gpt":0.3744488470057035,"spread":0.3098219970167336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005471005,0.0002183028,0.0003099494,0.001205884,0.006573058,0.0044585,0.001010125,0.004533176,0.00312513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00860623,0.0003078842,0.0003827636,0.0005517735,0.04380501,0.004443913,0.003757237,0.005041942,0.0003009788],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003477616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007184728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007989842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961888,0.002607516,0.00008674977,0.0002362085,0.0004705575,0.000410278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995606,0.002972452,0.0004465141,0.000261921,0.0005439316,0.000169207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002736447,0.000003602257,0.0000689213,0.000005821458,9.460435e-7,0.00002538151,0.001751701,0.00004403339,0.00001710955,0.996897,0.0006275234,0.0005552995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001382922,0.000008721431,0.0003503331,0.00005347597,0.000004278842,0.00005165225,0.001998024,0.000250404,0.0002095974,0.9637837,0.03326529,0.00001055074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1411908,0.004203563,0.02903913,0.1247237,0.0007437915,0.00007288432,0.00009208644,0.00005960337,0.6998744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810488,0.0004771554,0.001676078,0.006313573,0.000223689,0.00004375503,0.0000134465,0.00001223134,0.01019117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007184728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02893376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174977507","doi":"10.1353/hms.2003.a383814","title":"A True Account of the Behaviour and Conduct of Archibald Stewart, Esq ; Late Lord Provost of Edinburgh . In a Letter to a Friend.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Classics; Psychology; Art","authors":[{"name":"David Hume","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0776362796522289,"gpt":0.2854733129454864,"spread":0.2078370332932575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001803867,0.0004340506,0.0002540621,0.0005560857,0.00743488,0.004151001,0.001140597,0.004057722,0.01741922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004106176,0.000375006,0.0002040144,0.0007512788,0.007910475,0.003840464,0.001477839,0.00329502,0.001798949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005573404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004085869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2065875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4108501,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989862,0.0003443829,0.00004335523,0.00009822365,0.0002752458,0.0002525999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981154,0.0008200385,0.0001851311,0.0001514743,0.0004881457,0.0002397562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005278179,0.00001231715,0.00168574,0.000100347,0.00001260382,0.001017756,0.06774668,0.0001029112,0.0001451807,0.07707275,0.8305518,0.0214992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001169711,0.00002216051,0.009250761,0.0002218211,0.00001165033,0.0004006726,0.03819096,0.0000756587,0.0001367467,0.01265239,0.9389937,0.00003182497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02772972,0.05924013,0.001814268,0.678175,0.008886743,0.00003313969,0.0009363057,0.000194912,0.2229898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5264876,0.01342598,0.0007695932,0.07413097,0.002144808,0.00003771442,0.0002186365,0.0001401309,0.3826444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2065875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119510605","doi":"10.1353/hms.2002.a385862","title":"The Passions, Character, and the Self in Hume","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Reading (process); Identity (music); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Contradiction; Self; Reflexive pronoun; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Personal identity; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Linguistics","authors":[{"name":"Eugenio Lecaldano","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.104576542066793,"gpt":0.2696456198611193,"spread":0.1650690777943264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001364063,0.0004869184,0.0003366157,0.001080188,0.006020143,0.007718336,0.0004693942,0.001971381,0.004092695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002505147,0.0001547525,0.0001364607,0.001317355,0.02455083,0.004413858,0.002008763,0.002651175,0.0009132148],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005069434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002731172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008694798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01213263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984113,0.001134573,0.00002170173,0.00007524854,0.0002358368,0.0001213833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998701,0.0008799411,0.0001004053,0.00006602596,0.000122958,0.0001297095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001343832,0.00001715473,0.0003170387,0.00006372796,0.000002890758,0.00008716778,0.05192615,0.00005235878,0.00004657055,0.8903244,0.04496932,0.01217971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001061503,0.00001726252,0.001272325,0.000500921,0.000004185684,0.000214078,0.02514102,0.0000792379,0.000109972,0.2610507,0.7115872,0.00001249915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01808485,0.1283306,0.002303131,0.06396499,0.001218805,0.00003067318,0.00005569067,0.000047403,0.785964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7390102,0.04192361,0.001138311,0.01168197,0.002786022,0.00008587821,0.0000443238,0.00008276978,0.2032468],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008694798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03678149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051678757","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0003","title":"Thinking in Time in Hume's Essays","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","authors":[{"name":"Scott Black","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0635058259417763,"gpt":0.2957520162032437,"spread":0.2322461902614674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005804912,0.0005550237,0.0004135892,0.00246288,0.008424625,0.01234938,0.0008419697,0.002602784,0.00446048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01714331,0.0002179231,0.00035564,0.001401102,0.02641792,0.009908808,0.003826057,0.003671309,0.0007792477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004264888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00216918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001394326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002197876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901549,0.007353785,0.0001993071,0.0005478633,0.001160667,0.0005834788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903457,0.006846064,0.0006371486,0.0005428553,0.0008595028,0.0007687758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002651813,0.00001500408,0.000187351,0.00005336831,0.000004939018,0.0001456207,0.05711032,0.0001102829,0.0001052099,0.9007206,0.03394051,0.007580275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001010839,0.00001979451,0.0002744904,0.0002993933,0.000003850801,0.0001947884,0.03208727,0.0001743328,0.0002380597,0.2514423,0.7152356,0.00002004888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0532289,0.0313806,0.02045456,0.1247965,0.01945898,0.00008100939,0.0001376645,0.0002527401,0.7502091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8511244,0.005222907,0.004563419,0.01155572,0.005810172,0.0001051437,0.00006245918,0.0002462176,0.1213095],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01234938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03094411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062407234","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0195","title":"The Bibliothèque raisonnée Review of Volume 3 of the Treatise : Authorship, Text, and Translation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Volume (thermodynamics); Translation (biology); Psychology; Literature; Art; Physics; Chemistry; Thermodynamics","authors":[{"name":"David Norton","is_ca":false},{"name":"Darío Perinetti","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.08061987343246789,"gpt":0.2945061002060492,"spread":0.2138862267735813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008339331,0.0006881232,0.001139407,0.01002753,0.003258478,0.008635691,0.001038841,0.003294036,0.01390378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0475728,0.0003581098,0.0007828425,0.01145668,0.00406148,0.002745283,0.001767233,0.003845982,0.004276275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01281625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01545762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01609026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0164639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9880895,0.005030842,0.0007153478,0.0006487644,0.004810562,0.0007050772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722434,0.0118979,0.002683775,0.001494301,0.01094335,0.0007373466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000329197,0.000008801552,0.0001600934,0.002172974,0.00003627939,0.0001466748,0.001988905,0.0001403851,0.0003174318,0.07510726,0.8725322,0.04735602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005248121,0.000007430763,0.0004652714,0.002483072,0.00001420461,0.00009121617,0.0002952964,0.00002537326,0.0001397795,0.003204356,0.9932548,0.00001398633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00180962,0.6176093,0.003359539,0.1826916,0.07542174,0.00007297286,0.0008041844,0.0001982356,0.1180327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1200053,0.5628113,0.004428874,0.09502943,0.1085754,0.0006004843,0.002246063,0.0009963873,0.1053068],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01609026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09298885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006244423","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0650","title":"Extreme Skepticism and Commitment in the Treatise","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Nothing; Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Karánn Durland","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.4531161379002982,"gpt":0.3123247672187859,"spread":0.1407913706815123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009181162,0.0004412702,0.0004528706,0.001225906,0.009968651,0.01368251,0.001385772,0.007284808,0.005174936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01667647,0.0003440751,0.0005472964,0.001512758,0.02769091,0.007733324,0.005558495,0.01340184,0.001270504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007638001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005113319,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004069488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004174932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981239,0.01252779,0.0003679947,0.001096317,0.003379234,0.001389649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943793,0.003692726,0.0003664835,0.0005978618,0.000618825,0.0003447829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005509813,0.000004615648,0.00002661229,0.0000125955,0.0000023311,0.000043138,0.00252682,0.0001005323,0.00003460007,0.9826733,0.01260169,0.001968447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009360961,0.0000137957,0.0001409611,0.0001896575,0.000004058817,0.00006609695,0.002099498,0.0002937304,0.0001237639,0.7266957,0.2703432,0.00002016768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01562667,0.01099185,0.0120666,0.1270259,0.002881167,0.00003143387,0.00003468728,0.00007060613,0.8312711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854393,0.004210087,0.003472996,0.02731431,0.004030544,0.0002057286,0.00006412359,0.0002131365,0.1750498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01368251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0554179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562014562","doi":"10.1353/hms.2006.a383390","title":"Chastity and the Practice of the World in Hume's Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Virtue; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics","authors":[{"name":"Catherine Villanueva Gardner","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02338066537480741,"gpt":0.3499252793299149,"spread":0.3265446139551074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002790599,0.0003515455,0.0002952894,0.001052353,0.01186791,0.008400071,0.0006512447,0.006210997,0.003779665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004367747,0.0002190217,0.0002736682,0.001338469,0.02632112,0.003475485,0.002817418,0.005770348,0.0005576153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00646867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005361465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0235626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0385538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966432,0.001978923,0.00005325882,0.0001849628,0.0005487991,0.0005908833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983097,0.00125603,0.0001042031,0.00008878674,0.0001336763,0.0001075997],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003516014,0.000003829182,0.0000657436,0.000009069507,8.59296e-7,0.00003514896,0.004643409,0.0000382649,0.00001996332,0.9808671,0.01239887,0.001914088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009451692,0.00001332806,0.0004095726,0.0002227777,0.000003728196,0.00008612058,0.004791125,0.0001259877,0.0001996792,0.301468,0.6926534,0.00001673694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01930173,0.0137985,0.003173801,0.08203128,0.001015251,0.00002771088,0.00006492762,0.00002726563,0.8805594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7609133,0.00682712,0.001583012,0.03666694,0.001647673,0.0001513329,0.00004487778,0.00005388807,0.192112],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0235626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04693371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092350729","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0001","title":"A Cruel but Ancient Subjugation?: Understanding Hume’s Attack on Slavery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reverence; Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Enlightenment; Sensibility; Politics; Compromise; Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science; Art","authors":[{"name":"Margaret Watkins","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2451962849910392,"gpt":0.3945314187315659,"spread":0.1493351337405266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002704935,0.0002364109,0.0003100744,0.001192845,0.007404601,0.005047497,0.0007251246,0.003396435,0.002442048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004391974,0.0001585865,0.0001615937,0.0006129667,0.03773306,0.005771479,0.003164178,0.003466702,0.000280463],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00361046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001603814,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005584298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00876529,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979651,0.001446107,0.00001758884,0.0001237843,0.0001840309,0.0002633418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983005,0.001217314,0.0001176907,0.0001089296,0.0001419927,0.0001136168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007361014,0.000007503907,0.000226105,0.00001473209,0.000002092716,0.0001182421,0.03935402,0.00007303615,0.00008238164,0.9542943,0.002662061,0.003158121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001549972,0.00003148749,0.00110833,0.0002126772,0.000006617495,0.0003116281,0.03835829,0.0006813273,0.0005121633,0.6671284,0.291612,0.00002153774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1878058,0.009974479,0.01295905,0.0805041,0.0008052136,0.00002525221,0.00002887693,0.00004136311,0.7078559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723614,0.001222958,0.0007036672,0.004331203,0.0003041065,0.000009893701,0.0000059252,0.00001955973,0.02104118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007404601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02619588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591496887","doi":"10.1353/hms.2001.a383326","title":"General Rules and the Justification of Probable Belief in Hume's Treatise","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Superstition; Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dilemma; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Theology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Jack Lyons","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09999874871150895,"gpt":0.2984662607870991,"spread":0.1984675120755902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007076992,0.0003893803,0.0005621007,0.002433113,0.002865448,0.005142404,0.001031314,0.003154297,0.002967732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01931688,0.0003890404,0.0006869717,0.001809328,0.01874307,0.006929228,0.002207551,0.00404837,0.0005354403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003834805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001940877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003677223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004053217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994258,0.003289021,0.0002444327,0.0003992723,0.001358492,0.000450759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899831,0.007276785,0.0005648986,0.0008913586,0.001104667,0.0001791578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006777629,0.000004387093,0.00007920779,0.00001855667,0.000006390938,0.00002613945,0.000686519,0.0004427097,0.00002432919,0.9957727,0.001076437,0.001855909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004387781,0.000002923781,0.0001151508,0.00002129635,0.000003090176,0.00001217312,0.000095561,0.0003391777,0.00003288436,0.9946853,0.004683238,0.000004762028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07872824,0.0136786,0.1337749,0.04469169,0.0009633889,0.0001114112,0.0002538867,0.0001545948,0.7276433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691835,0.002732696,0.01196427,0.001609963,0.0009210829,0.0001069778,0.0001051268,0.00006735435,0.01330901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007076992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03742719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988878473","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0185","title":"Hume's Nuanced Defense of Luxury","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Assertion; Philosophy; Acknowledgement; Virtue; Pessimism; Morality; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics","authors":[{"name":"Ryu Susato","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.09446842297566957,"gpt":0.2903228239533097,"spread":0.1958544009776401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004153034,0.0005900793,0.0004458039,0.001165573,0.004223646,0.005646825,0.001471141,0.01023311,0.003042583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008545215,0.0002625333,0.0005003943,0.0009183016,0.02799697,0.005832875,0.003639758,0.00618903,0.0006093285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003072371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001372616,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003862903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004228705,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936476,0.004178356,0.0001309736,0.0005767742,0.0009381669,0.0005280889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949353,0.003591287,0.0002934944,0.0002817414,0.0006807173,0.0002173849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001759637,0.000005880762,0.0001260135,0.00004878116,0.000005205686,0.0001371249,0.005843797,0.00009887276,0.00009051675,0.9708902,0.02021051,0.002525472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001392515,0.00003181949,0.0007013271,0.0003035566,0.000009812235,0.000342017,0.00576677,0.0005705736,0.0006215287,0.541559,0.4500422,0.00003731751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04275952,0.02621068,0.02938796,0.4299389,0.004267168,0.00005333235,0.0001758675,0.000150922,0.4670556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643993,0.003645919,0.002819496,0.07687961,0.003237064,0.00008380161,0.00002775732,0.00007044008,0.04883665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01023311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02229166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965356735","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0001","title":"Hume's Theory of Mental Representation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Perception; A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Mental representation; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognition","authors":[{"name":"David Landy","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.2437873989440629,"gpt":0.3621498582289832,"spread":0.1183624592849202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002663594,0.0007147102,0.0005690953,0.002433817,0.002348247,0.005516644,0.001311638,0.003297896,0.004884747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004211317,0.0003285508,0.0009832756,0.001433752,0.02719499,0.007310131,0.002465048,0.003283105,0.001343805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001824601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002684386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001645143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972989,0.001500972,0.00008964485,0.0003217067,0.00057418,0.0002145401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981299,0.001179133,0.000118032,0.0002712494,0.0002252761,0.00007649731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002582641,0.000002107687,0.0000196805,0.00001642384,0.000003251775,0.00001311314,0.0005414713,0.0001670286,0.00001845552,0.9965093,0.001046846,0.001659704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004789259,0.000005106111,0.0000802205,0.00003119566,0.000003645374,0.00004752522,0.0001381055,0.0003455305,0.00008338415,0.9773265,0.0219291,0.000004946238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01148889,0.008421794,0.1976153,0.02899017,0.0006405417,0.0000996482,0.0002215524,0.000205064,0.752317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.869938,0.006225899,0.051455,0.00551032,0.0012826,0.0004559476,0.0001780185,0.000122284,0.06483198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005516644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03348678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030182908","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0022","title":"Hume on Pride-in-Virtue: A Reliable Motive?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Virtue; Epistemology; Beauty; Form of the Good; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Theology","authors":[{"name":"Lorraine Besser-Jones","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.07962298659059694,"gpt":0.307928970094644,"spread":0.2283059835040471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007630841,0.0003339002,0.0005215132,0.0009456114,0.003181302,0.003530333,0.001532357,0.006368873,0.00750827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02332767,0.0002287726,0.0004210944,0.0007086236,0.0259426,0.00829652,0.00305708,0.005585463,0.001199621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002529297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001112105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00336189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00281147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948025,0.0032632,0.0001276114,0.0006467751,0.0006963008,0.0004635869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793352,0.01482564,0.001330345,0.001695157,0.002319579,0.0004940929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000243276,0.000010604,0.0009830437,0.00007898224,0.0000110212,0.0001209184,0.007986252,0.00008136578,0.00008066918,0.9716985,0.01496869,0.003955476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003520707,0.00004414036,0.006555389,0.0005274048,0.00001531722,0.0002499794,0.01415371,0.0008395343,0.0007818211,0.7466999,0.2300296,0.00006787894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.06553425,0.007372799,0.01389857,0.6095873,0.001550229,0.00004625445,0.0002241566,0.00009176147,0.3016946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292311,0.001990244,0.001224586,0.04961158,0.00173048,0.00005878622,0.00003905835,0.00004778967,0.01606631],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007630841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04035622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}