{"meta":{"page":1,"per_page":50,"max_per_page":100,"total":8,"total_is_capped":false,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"direct_label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline (scores rank; they never assert a category)","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12","author_layer_release":"2026-06-26"},"query_hash":"c6b302a918d6","filters":{"venue":"ICL Journal"}},"results":[{"id":"W2249289710","doi":"10.1515/icl-2014-0104","title":"The New Zealand Food Bill and Global Administrative Law: A Recipe for Democratic Engagement?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false},"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Accountability; Political science; Criticism; Corporate governance; Law; Public administration; Administrative law; Global governance; International law; Commission; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Management","authors":[{"name":"Bryce Adamson","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03798736611554968,"gpt":0.3298010267148228,"spread":0.2918136605992731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001036024,0.00007016329,0.00008453719,0.00001117893,0.001720965,0.0004580132,0.000182641,0.00003718372,0.00004741334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005236453,0.00004322509,0.00003276215,0.000148743,0.0001849675,0.0001768725,0.00001797317,0.0001195778,0.000005161684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005881126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002301272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007906149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005167433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989786,0.0002896936,0.0001721273,0.00009896019,0.0002285381,0.0002321484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991315,0.0003795708,0.000122027,0.00007050423,0.00008906532,0.0002073497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002939801,0.00002156047,0.003753592,0.000002161165,0.00005662797,0.00000131299,0.004062456,0.000002680325,0.00002472892,0.9254602,0.05738774,0.009197546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006156397,0.0002073747,0.003016353,0.00001248286,0.00002593256,0.00001900507,0.0009045703,0.0000151132,0.00006007456,0.149622,0.8454201,0.00008136213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08750691,0.0009023841,0.01351661,0.7967755,0.002880614,0.001555463,0.00003907857,0.0001743349,0.09664915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938647,0.0000658699,0.001561666,0.0005725956,0.0008051554,0.0000026999,6.604374e-7,0.000007235089,0.00311949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249658205","doi":"10.1515/icl-2019-0052","title":"Judicial Review (Departmentalism) vs Supremacy: The Connection to a 17th Century Debate and a Dilemma for Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Separation of powers; Legislature; State (computer science); Unitary state; Sovereignty; Political science; Judicial activism; Power (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Dilemma; Enumerated powers; Judicial interpretation; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Boleslaw Z. Kabala","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0444017283513609,"gpt":0.3234033583116535,"spread":0.2790016299602925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005065805,0.00007459596,0.0001557116,0.00001355879,0.001547507,0.00009802092,0.0001218948,0.00002345187,0.00008898248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004773219,0.00004982873,0.00007987984,0.0001596058,0.0001629886,0.0001186677,0.00004524017,0.0001039116,0.00001711485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005459545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001251617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007660976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991232,0.0001113614,0.0001777715,0.0001170847,0.0002622614,0.0002083792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994934,0.0001031125,0.00007638949,0.00003091431,0.0001156116,0.0001806161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009141897,0.000156561,0.009375807,0.0001879288,0.0005151972,0.00008551895,0.03539377,0.00002044534,0.0006097498,0.4021128,0.4200482,0.1305798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999932,0.0001323817,0.001754762,0.0002020119,0.00008194587,0.00002847349,0.001347426,0.000005767655,0.00001903747,0.007433784,0.9885929,0.0001014648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1910643,0.043704,0.001272753,0.7480407,0.002081041,0.002100222,0.00007891244,0.0000834265,0.01157463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617102,0.01474989,0.00007111323,0.02149207,0.001920039,0.00003221829,0.000001592826,0.00000451409,0.0000183494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7706459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185515804","doi":"10.1515/icl-2021-0008","title":"The Right to Assisted Dying: Constitutional Jurisprudence and Its Impact in Canada, Germany and Austria","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitutional court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislation; Constitutional law; Constitutional review; Constitutional right; German; Constitution; History","authors":[{"name":"Kerstin Braun","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.03208285660061638,"gpt":0.3671231256590786,"spread":0.3350402690584622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004323819,0.00005128715,0.00007746483,0.00002488838,0.0007834635,0.0002018084,0.00008687207,0.000026146,0.0001338512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002611934,0.00003558202,0.00001715191,0.0001359308,0.0001367507,0.0001032983,0.00002813366,0.0001724194,0.000002721087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003107204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004176078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3242007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.895437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991871,0.0001302389,0.0001310846,0.0000755703,0.0002481775,0.0002278139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993226,0.0002631399,0.00004309855,0.00003709011,0.00008292934,0.0002511501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002117168,0.00008624863,0.1769939,0.00002175239,0.0001466919,0.003439885,0.01605999,0.00009458885,0.008023305,0.6967521,0.06153085,0.036639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004306055,0.00002593396,0.5328762,0.00007385831,0.00002026493,0.001105844,0.001772523,0.00003550413,0.0003251358,0.001336433,0.4618256,0.0001721009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788008,0.001106741,0.0000079585,0.01300743,0.00022302,0.00004405977,0.00001084984,0.000002201985,0.006796944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985988,0.0002210943,0.00001928594,0.0003350699,0.0002087153,7.985917e-7,2.539403e-7,0.000001439955,0.0006145323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7408184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185707320","doi":"10.1515/icl-2021-0003","title":"Public Employees Restrictions on Political Activity in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Public service; Public administration; Neutrality; Democracy; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Dignity","authors":[{"name":"Margaret O’Brien","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1421828027916091,"gpt":0.3310146661112187,"spread":0.1888318633196096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004637466,0.00005551366,0.0001022035,0.00007434962,0.0007388021,0.0002443132,0.0001298334,0.00004728632,0.0001875722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003761857,0.00003651953,0.0000335698,0.0004071638,0.001869236,0.0001529454,0.0000195314,0.0003941678,0.000003234083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000457899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001468183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.886964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.0005149601,0.0001258988,0.00009198695,0.0003555513,0.0003657236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991636,0.0003692427,0.00004544235,0.00008416881,0.00009773303,0.0002398388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001219674,0.0000347024,0.03824555,6.481905e-7,0.00001196626,0.00008977854,0.0004383558,0.000004953889,0.000007131658,0.9592412,0.001702775,0.0002108178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004623977,0.00009534656,0.4573741,0.00008941609,0.00006612279,0.0003083893,0.009201569,0.0001346121,0.0002391266,0.1822819,0.3451098,0.0004756117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605476,0.00001512606,0.0001708342,0.03511855,0.0004433659,0.0000426287,0.000004743408,0.000006209328,0.003651004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984538,0.00003442432,0.00001461273,0.0003374057,0.0004066615,0.000001397398,5.479798e-7,0.000003150592,0.0007480084],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7769592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6887277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035318609","doi":"10.1515/journal-2019-0052","title":"Judicial Review (Departmentalism) vs Supremacy: The Connection to a 17th Century Debate and a Dilemma for Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Legislature; State (computer science); Separation of powers; Sovereignty; Unitary state; Political science; Dilemma; Power (physics); Judicial activism; Interpretation (philosophy); Supremacy Clause; Enumerated powers; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Federalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Mathematics","authors":[{"name":"Boleslaw Z. Kabala","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.0444017283513609,"gpt":0.3234033583116535,"spread":0.2790016299602925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005065805,0.00007459596,0.0001557116,0.00001355879,0.001547507,0.00009802092,0.0001218948,0.00002345187,0.00008898248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004773219,0.00004982873,0.00007987984,0.0001596058,0.0001629886,0.0001186677,0.00004524017,0.0001039116,0.00001711485],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005459545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001251617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007660976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991232,0.0001113614,0.0001777715,0.0001170847,0.0002622614,0.0002083792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994934,0.0001031125,0.00007638949,0.00003091431,0.0001156116,0.0001806161],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009141897,0.000156561,0.009375807,0.0001879288,0.0005151972,0.00008551895,0.03539377,0.00002044534,0.0006097498,0.4021128,0.4200482,0.1305798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002999932,0.0001323817,0.001754762,0.0002020119,0.00008194587,0.00002847349,0.001347426,0.000005767655,0.00001903747,0.007433784,0.9885929,0.0001014648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1910643,0.043704,0.001272753,0.7480407,0.002081041,0.002100222,0.00007891244,0.0000834265,0.01157463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617102,0.01474989,0.00007111323,0.02149207,0.001920039,0.00003221829,0.000001592826,0.00000451409,0.0000183494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7706459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997523,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556221961","doi":"10.1515/icl-2015-0104","title":"The Place of the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Witness; Accommodation; Charter; Citizenship; Political science; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Freedom of religion; Psychology; Human rights","authors":[{"name":"Vrinda Narain","is_ca":true}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.04297987057629569,"gpt":0.332259574693555,"spread":0.2892797041172593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002879462,0.00003051758,0.00004070561,0.00001631151,0.0004730585,0.0001198311,0.0004914027,0.00002739348,0.000006534421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004601529,0.00001202978,0.00004347625,0.0001626616,0.0002050447,0.0000796153,0.00001755837,0.0001576821,0.00000511261],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005275261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002556519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001955678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00752202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987649,0.0004241827,0.0001271127,0.00003219522,0.0005230661,0.0001285036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994735,0.0001822581,0.0001113869,0.00009811401,0.0000985938,0.00003620308],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007403998,0.0001079458,0.04635812,0.000002578376,0.00001689298,0.00001115452,0.214667,0.0004053675,0.00008995769,0.2107529,0.5125535,0.01496053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001442881,0.000112116,0.06322397,0.00005976715,0.00003585161,0.00008869737,0.3280555,0.0002377301,0.0001744332,0.3784802,0.2279439,0.000144993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6163225,0.001416497,0.0000943065,0.04653733,0.001318806,0.0001903247,0.00000126878,0.00000626867,0.3341127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986809,0.0001913976,0.00001072455,0.0001949007,0.0002752636,0.000001357232,4.992306e-8,0.000001828187,0.0006435008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3823585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4197464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115008139","doi":"10.1515/icl-2020-0008","title":"<i>Ius puniendi</i> and Constitution: A Comparative (Canadian-German) Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; German; Obligation; Law; Human rights; Criminalization; Political science; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","authors":[{"name":"Кай Амбос","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.1074933690151718,"gpt":0.4086710427120665,"spread":0.3011776736968947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001640799,0.00006437053,0.0001111279,0.00004329782,0.0009508475,0.0001808315,0.0001100378,0.00004025431,0.0003628356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006859777,0.00005984313,0.00003930966,0.0001386891,0.0004513938,0.0002239494,0.0000125928,0.000229403,0.00009484812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001579866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007943992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04690084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999297,0.0001084548,0.00009654829,0.00009551315,0.0001643017,0.0002381708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990536,0.00004425514,0.00004867811,0.00003080053,0.0001266875,0.0006959609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001999457,0.000007798124,0.0006883335,0.000001636842,0.00001939745,0.000100888,0.129425,0.000002635726,0.00003984203,0.8554983,0.0137416,0.0004546081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002738803,0.00007182438,0.0009962696,0.00001126284,0.0000236511,0.0001417115,0.04348446,0.0000217278,0.0000304815,0.004756587,0.9500701,0.0001179912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1649353,0.0008993726,0.00007643763,0.05797496,0.000264505,0.0001113613,0.0000225016,0.00002436672,0.7756912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995488,0.0001086482,0.0001200126,0.003255169,0.000799618,8.118355e-7,4.4736e-7,0.000002082129,0.0002252219],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9363285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.959446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206016767","doi":"10.1515/icl-2010-0103","title":"Learning From Others: The Scalia-Breyer Debate and the Benefits of Foreign Sources of Law to U.S. Constitutional Interpretation of Counter-Terrorism Initiatives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true},"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Terrorism; Torture; Constitutional interpretation; Political science; Constitutional law; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","authors":[{"name":"Cornel Marian","is_ca":false}],"retraction":null,"screen_n_in":null,"score":{"opus":0.02660857607916999,"gpt":0.3010301254287254,"spread":0.2744215493495554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline"},"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411095,0.0000573977,0.0001453642,0.00002824434,0.0003690153,0.00005401177,0.0001943739,0.00007217285,0.0001095191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003664954,0.00003244691,0.00006335496,0.00004910406,0.003120755,0.0002060297,0.00002554848,0.0003756295,7.518843e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007808626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009575891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001180707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002273007,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989697,0.0002769629,0.0002587286,0.00006716338,0.000331118,0.00009636524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863,0.0006974612,0.0003401797,0.00005990066,0.0002271279,0.00004528728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001699298,0.0000212498,0.01784759,0.000006156021,0.00008202817,5.748167e-7,0.2272515,0.0004327805,0.0006333995,0.750789,0.00002572484,0.002740019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006686505,0.0007083119,0.1596947,0.001662542,0.0004564492,0.00009023419,0.3566906,0.002468609,0.01536601,0.4138953,0.04156291,0.0007178613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774054,0.0003521566,0.001400545,0.00145001,0.000274597,0.00009636371,0.00001511451,0.000003959602,0.01900183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992414,0.00005970513,0.0001535373,0.0003001577,0.0002142649,0.000001398856,5.993954e-7,0.000003239299,0.00002573804],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3368938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}